Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolated from captive primates: characteristics and horizontal gene transfer ability analysis

  • Wenhao Zhong ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Wenhao Zhong, Yuxin Zhou, Mengjie Che

    Roles Data curation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan, Chengdu, China

  • Yuxin Zhou ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Wenhao Zhong, Yuxin Zhou, Mengjie Che

    Roles Data curation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan, Chengdu, China

  • Mengjie Che ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Wenhao Zhong, Yuxin Zhou, Mengjie Che

    Roles Data curation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan, Chengdu, China

  • Liqin Wang,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation The Chengdu Zoo, Institute of Wild Animals, Chengdu, China

  • Xingyu Tian,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan, Chengdu, China

  • Chengdong Wang,

    Roles Software, Validation

    Affiliation China Conservation and Research Centre for the Giant Panda, Key Laboratory of SFGA on The Giant-Panda, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

  • Yuehong Cheng,

    Roles Software, Validation

    Affiliation Sichuan Wolong National Natural Reserve Administration Bureau, Wenchuan, China

  • Haifeng Liu,

    Roles Software, Validation

    Affiliation College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan, Chengdu, China

  • Ziyao Zhou,

    Roles Software, Validation

    Affiliation College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan, Chengdu, China

  • Guangneng Peng,

    Roles Software, Validation

    Affiliation College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan, Chengdu, China

  • Kun Zhang,

    Roles Software, Validation

    Affiliation College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan, Chengdu, China

  • Yan Luo,

    Roles Software, Validation

    Affiliation College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan, Chengdu, China

  • Keyun Shi ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Software

    zhongzhijun488@126.com (ZZ); staff955@yxph.com (KS)

    Affiliation Jiangsu Yixing People’s Hospital, Yixing, China

  • Zhijun Zhong

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing

    zhongzhijun488@126.com (ZZ); staff955@yxph.com (KS)

    Affiliation College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health of Sichuan, Chengdu, China

Abstract

The rapid spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) around the world has become a significant challenge for humans and animals. In this study, we aimed to examine the characteristics and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) capacity of ESBL-EC derived from captive primates. We screened for ESBL-EC among a total of 444 multidrug-resistant (MDR) E. coli strains isolated from 13 zoos in China using double-disk test. ESBL genes, mobile genetic elements (MGEs), and virulence-associated genes (VAGs) in ESBL-EC were detected through polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Furthermore, conjugation experiments were conducted to examine the HGT capacity of ESBL-EC, and the population structure (phylogenetic groups and MLST) was determined. Our results showed that a total of 69 (15.54%, 69/444) ESBL-EC strains were identified, and 5 variants of blaCTX and 3 variants of blaTEM were detected. The highest detection rate was blaCTX-M-55 (49.28%, 34/69), followed by blaCTX-M-15 (39.13%, 27/69). Ten MGEs were detected and the most prevalent was IS26 (78.26%, 54/69), followed by ISEcp1 (60.87%, 42/69). Eighteen combinations of MGEs were detected, in which ISEcp1 + IS26 was predominant (18.84%, n = 13). A total of 15 VAGs were detected and the most prevalent was fimC (84.06%, 58/69), followed by sitA (78.26%, 54/69). Furthermore, HGT ability analysis results showed that 40.58% (28/69) of ESBL-EC strains exhibited the ability to engage in conjugative transfer. Plasmid typing revealed that IncFIB (78.57%, 22/28) had the highest detection rates. Furthermore, antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) of blaTEM-135, tetA and qnrS; MGEs of IS26, trbC and ISCR3/14 showed high rates of conjugative transfer. The population structure analysis showed that the phylogroup B1 and ST2161 were the most prevalent. ESBL-EC poses a potential threat to captive primates and may spread to other animals, humans, and the environment. It is imperative to implement measures to prevent the transmission of ESBL-EC among captive primates.

1. Introduction

Escherichia coli is a resident microorganism in the gut of humans and animals, as well as in the environment [1,2]. Antimicrobial resistant (AMR) E. coli poses a threat to animal and human health [3,4]. The production of extended`spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) by E. coli represents the primary mechanism responsible for the treatment failure by β-lactam antibiotics [5]. The ESBL-producing E. coli (ESBL-EC) is one of the most important pathogens at the One Health interface [6]. Current ESBLs are mainly encoded by blaCTX-M, blaTEM, blaSHV and blaOXA genes. CTX-Ms are the most predominant types of ESBLs which are encoded by several blaCTX-M type genes [7]. According to amino acid homology, blaCTX-M was divided into five subfamilies (CTX-M-1, CTX-M-2, CTX-M8, CTX-M-9 and CTX-M-25 group). More than 260 CTX-M-β-lactamase variants have now been identified [8]. ESBL genes frequently co-exist with other antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), such as qnrS, tetA and sul, which cause multidrug-resistance (MDR) in E. coli [911]. ESBL-EC has been frequently reported in captive and wild animals, such as giant pandas, ostriches, white storks, herring gull and Fennec fox [1216]. However, there have been only few reports focus on the ESBL-EC from captive primates recently. In 2003, 65 ESBL-EC strains (32%) were detected from primates in six zoos in China, among which blaCTX-M-15 (48%) was the most predominant [17]. In 2012, one ESBL-EC strain was isolated from a wild Barbary macaque (Macaca sylvanus) in Algeria [18]. In 2022, Zeng et al [19] isolated eight ESBL-EC strains from captive primates, all of which carried the blaCTX-M genes. In 2024, Bazalar-Gonzales et al [20] isolated seven ESBL-EC strains from captive and semi-captive primates, three blaCTM-X variants (blaCTX-M-15, blaCTX-M-55 and blaCTX-M-65) were identified. Previous studies have focused on the identification of ESBL-EC and the prevalence of ESBL genes. However, other characteristics, such as the carriage of mobile genetic elements (MGEs), virulence-associated genes (VAGs), horizontal gene transfer (HGT) ability and population structures of ESBL-EC isolated from captive primates remain unknown.

E. coli is a reservoir of ARGs and VAGs [21]. The transmission of ESBL genes and ARGs is related to MGEs, including plasmids, transposons and insertion sequences (ISs) [22,23]. ESBL genes are often co-located in plasmids with other ARGs, which cause MDR in the same or different species of bacteria by the horizontal transmission through conjugation transfer [24,25]. Furthermore, transposons can jump from one part of a gene sequence to another with co-transferring of ARGs [26]. Insertion sequences (ISs) have been frequently reported to be associated with the transfer of ESBL genes, for example, ISEcp1 and IS26 have been widely reported to be associated with blaCTX-M gene transmission. Therefore, blaCTX-M has rapidly become the most common ESBL genes transferred by MGEs [27,28]. Additionally, plasmids were also reported to carry various VAGs and to be associated with the transfer of VAGs, for example, IncF plasmid was the most reported virulence plasmid [29,30]. Previous studies showed that ESBL-EC also harbored a range of VAGs, which may help to the enhanced fitness of these emerging CTX-M-harboring strains [31,32]. The strains that carry various VAGs may not be harmful to animals, but there is a possibility for them to become pathogens if host immunity weakens or in response to other adverse environmental factors [21]. The ESBL-EC strains which carried VAGs also cause treatment difficulties [33]. Both the ESBL genes and the VAGs can be transferred horizontally through plasmids together, which will pose a more serious threat to the survival of captive animals [33].

In our previous study, we analyzed the AMR of E. coli isolated from primates in 13 zoos, and the results demonstrated that the strains exhibited high resistance to β-lactam antibiotics [34]. In this study, we proceeded to identify ESBL-EC in MDR isolates from captive primates and conducted a more detailed analysis of the HGT ability of ESBL-EC for ESBL genes, ARG, VAGs and MGEs.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Bacterial strains

Four hundred and forty-four MDR E. coli strains from captive primates, which were isolated from 13 zoos and had previously been stored in our laboratory, were used in this study [34].

2.2 Screening of ESBL-EC isolates

The third generation cephalosporins (cefotaxime, ceftazidime) alone and combined with clavulanic acid were used to confirm the ESBL phenotype by combined disk method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2023) guidelines. ESBL-EC strains were screened using cefotaxime (CTX, 30 μg), cefotaxime +  clavulanic acid (CTL, 30/10 μg), ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 μg) and ceftazidime +  clavulanic acid (CAL, 30/10 μg) antibiotic disk (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom). An antibacterial zone ≥ 5 mm in diameter with the combination of two antimicrobials compared with clavulanate alone is considered to be ESBL-producing.

2.3 Screening of ESBL genes, VAGs and MGEs from ESBL-EC isolates

Total genomic DNA was extracted using the TIANamp Bacteria DNA kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). The DNA samples were stored at − 20 °C. We screened for 8 ESBL genes: blaOXA, blaTEM, blaSHV and blaCTX-M (group1, 2, 8, 9 and 25). Additionally, 20 VAGs in 5 categories were analyzed, including antiserum survival factor (cvaC, ompT, iss), adhesion-related genes (tsh, eaeA, papA, fimC), hemolysin-related genes (hlyA, hlyF), invasion and toxin-related genes (elt, estA, estB, vat, ipaH, astA), and iron transport-related genes (fyuA, iroN, Irp2, iucD, sitA). The occurrence of the following MGEs were investigated: ISEcp1, IS26, IS903, ISCR1, ISCR3/14, traA, trbC, traF, tnpU, tnpA/Tn21, tnsA, merA, tnp513, IS1133, ISpa7, ISaba1, ISkpn6 and ISkpn7. The sequences and conditions for the PCR primers were presented in S1 Table. PCR products were separated by gel electrophoresis in a 1.0% agarose gel stained with GoldView™ (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China), visualized under ultraviolet light and photographed using a gel documentation system (BioRad, Hercules, USA). The positive products were sequenced using Sanger sequencing by Tsingke Biotech (Beijing, China), and the sequences were analyzed online using the BLAST function of NCBI (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).

2.4 Conjugation experiment and plasmid incompatibility groups

In this study, the sodium azide-resistant E. coli J53 was used as the recipient strain to evaluate the conjugation and transfer ability of ESBL-EC. Those colonies capable of growing on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar supplemented with CTX (4 mg/L) and sodium aside (100 mg/L) were considered transconjugants. All transconjugants were tested for ESBLs phenotype, and the presence of ESBL genes in transconjugants was verified by PCR and DNA sequencing. Select the culture plates at appropriate dilution gradients for colony counting (where the number of colonies ranges from 30 to 300). Transfer frequency was determined by calculating the ratio of the number of transconjugants to the number of recipient cells involved in the experiment [35]. In our previously published research, we had already detected the ARGs carried by the donor bacteria, including those for tetracyclines (tetA, tetG), sulfonamides (sul1, sul2, sul3), quinolones/fluoroquinolones (qnrS, oqxAB), chloramphenicol/phenicol (flor, cmlA, cat1), and aminoglycosides (aacC2, aphA3) [34]. We then examined whether the transconjugants carry these same genes. In addition, VAGs, and MGEs were detected in transconjugants. Plasmid incompatibility groups were detected in bacteria (donor) and their transconjugants as described previously [36]. In brief, eighteen pairs of primers were designed to recognize K, B/O, FrepB, FIB, W, I1, FIA, FIIA, N, T, HI2, X, Y, FIC, A/C, L/M, P and HI1. Primers and reaction conditions were listed in S1 Table.

2.5 Phylogenetic grouping and MLST

ESBL-EC strains with conjugative transfer ability were selected for this experiment. Phylogenetic analysis (A, B1, B2, D) was conducted by detecting yjaA, chuA, and TSPE4.C2, according to Clermont et al [37]. MLST was performed according to pubMLST recommended methods (https://pubmlst.org/organisms/escherichia-spp). Briefly, seven housekeeping genes (purA, recA gyrB, icd, mdh, adk and fumC) were investigated by PCR, the obtained DNA fragments were sequenced and uploaded to the website (https://pubmlst.org) to obtain the allele number, and the sequence type (ST) was obtained through the 7 allele numbers [38,39]. Primers and reaction conditions are shown in S1 Table. Clustered analysis of STs was analyzed through online website (https://www.phyloviz.net/).

2.6 Association analysis between MGEs and ESBL genes or VAGs

Correlation coefficient (r) analysis between MGEs and ESBL genes or VAGs were performed using R-software (version 4.2.2) [40]; P-value <  0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

2.7 Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University under permit number DYY-2018203039.

3. Results

3.1 Identification of ESBL-EC and distribution of ESBL genes

A total of 69 ESBL-EC (25 strains from Guiyang, 23 strains from Hangzhou, 12 strains from Chongqing, 8 strains from Dalian, 1 strain from Changsha) were isolated from 444 MDR E. coli. As shown in Fig 1 and S2 Table, the detection rates of blaCTX-M and blaTEM among the 69 ESBL-EC isolates were 97.10% (67/69) and 52.17% (36/69), respectively. No blaOXA and blaSHV was detected. Moreover, we found 34 ESBL-EC (49.28%, 34/69) carried both blaCTX-M and blaTEM. Furthermore, all the ESBL genes were sequenced to identify the variant types of blaCTX-M and blaTEM. Six variants of blaCTX-M were identified, including blaCTX-M-55 (49.28%, 34/69), blaCTX-M-15 (39.13%, 27/69), blaCTX-M-65 (4.35%, 3/69), blaCTX-M-14 (4.35%, 3/69) and blaCTX-M-3 (1.45%,1/69). Three variants of blaTEM were identified, with blaTEM-1 (encoding penicillinase) being the most prevalent (28.99%, 20/69), followed by blaTEM-135 (encoding penicillinase) (10.14%, 7/69), and blaTEM-198 (encoding ESBL) (15.94%, 11/69). Among the five zoos, the most prevalent gene combination pattern in Guiyang Zoo was blaCTX-M-15 (32.00%, 8/25), in Hangzhou Zoo, it was blaCTX-M-55 & blaTEM-198 (34.78%, 8/23), in Chongqing Zoo, it was blaCTX-M-15 (25.00%, 3/12), in Dalian Zoo, it was blaCTX-M-15 (37.50%, 3/8), and in Changsha Zoo, it was blaCTX-M-55 (100.00%, 1/1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Distribution of ESBL genes in 69 ESBL-EC strains from captive primates.

(A) Subtypes of ESBL genes carried by 69 ESBL-EC strains; (B) Combination patterns of ESBL genes identified from 69 ESBL-EC strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321514.g001

3.2 Distribution of VAGs in ESBL-EC isolates

A total of 15 VAGs in 5 categories were detected (estA, estB, ipaH, elt and hlyF were not detected). As shown in Fig 2 and Table 1, the most prevalent VAGs was fimC (84.06%, 58/69), followed by sitA (78.26%, 54/69), papA (68.12%, 58/69) and iss (56.52%, 39/69). The remaining VAGs exhibited detection rates that ranged from 1.45% (tsh) to 47.83% (ompT). Furthermore, all strains carried at least one VAG. In addition, 91.30% of ESBL-EC isolates carried three or more VAGs. The proportion of strains carrying three VAGs was the most prevalent (20.29%, 14/69), followed by strains carrying six (6/69 18.84%) and five (5/69 13.04%) VAGs. Interestingly, 3 strains (4.35%) harbored ten VAGs (Fig 2B).

thumbnail
Table 1. VAGs detected from ESBL-EC isolates derived from captive primates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321514.t001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Distribution of VAGs in 69 ESBL-EC strains from captive primates.

(A) Detection rate of VAGs, and the different colors in each bar represent five zoos; (B) The radar map shows the percentages of 69 ESBL-EC strains carrying one to ten types of VAGs. The highest percentage is 20.29% (carrying three types), followed by 18.84% (carrying six types) and the lowest percentage is 2.9% (carrying two or nine types).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321514.g002

3.3 Distribution of MGEs in ESBL-EC isolates

A total of ten MGEs were detected in our present study: IS26 (78.26%, 54/69), ISEcp1 (60.87%, 42/69), trbC (36.23%, 25/69), tnpA/Tn21 (14.49%, 10/69), tnsA (15.94%, 11/69), merA (14.49%, 10/69), ISCR3/14 (10.14%, 7/69), ISaba1 (7.25%, 5/69), IS1133 (5.80%, 4/69), and IS903 (2.90%, 2/69)(S2 Table). The remaining eight MGEs (traA, traF, tnpU, tnp513, ISkpn7, ISpa7, ISkpn6, and ISCR1) were not detected. Further analysis of the MGEs combinations pattern revealed the presence of 18 distinct patterns (Fig 3), with IS26 + ISEcp1 being the most prevalent (13/69, 18.84%). A total of 97.10% (67/69) ESBL-EC isolates exhibited the presence of at least one MGE, except for ESBLs-E. coli 55 and ESBLs-E. coli 56.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Combination patterns of MGEs in 69 ESBL-EC isolates from captive primates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321514.g003

3.4 Association between MGEs and ESBL genes or VAGs

As shown in Fig 4A, eleven pairs of positive correlations between MGEs and ESBL genes were detected (blaCTX-M-15/ISEcp1, blaCTX-M-15/tnsA, blaCTX-M-65/tnpA/Tn21, blaCTX-M-65/IS1133, blaCTX-M-55/trbC, blaCTX-M-55/merA, blaCTX-M-55/IS26, blaCTX-M-55/ISCR3/14, blaTEM-1/trbC, blaTEM-1/IS26, blaTEM-135/ISCR3/4). Seven pairs of negative correlations were detected (blaCTX-M-15/trbC, blaCTX-M-15/merA, blaCTX-M-15/tnpA/Tn21, blaCTX-M-15/IS26, blaTEM-135/ISEcp1, blaCTX-M-55/ISEcp1, blaCTX-M-55/tnsA). For the association between MGEs and VAGs, a total of 8 pairs correlations were observed and all the 8 pairs showed positive association (trbC/iss, trbC/iroN, trbC/ompT, IS26/ompT, IS1133/cvaC, merA/vat, ISCR3/14/vat, ISaba1/astA) (Fig 4B).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Heatmap of the association between MGEs and ESBL genes or VAGs in 69 ESBL-EC strains.

Blue represents positive association (r >  0, P <  0.05) and red represents negative association (r <  0, P <  0.05). The saturation of red and blue represents the r-value. (A) Heatmap of the association between ESBL genes and MGEs; (B) Heatmap of the association between VAGs and MGEs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321514.g004

3.5 Conjugative transfer and plasmid incompatibility groups

Our results showed that 28 of 69 ESBL-EC isolates were successfully transferred to the recipient strain J53, and all transconjugants exhibited the ESBL phenotype and were positive for ESBL genes (blaCTX-M). The conjugational transfer frequency of the 28 ESBL-EC strains ranging from 1.18 × 10-8 to 2.14 × 10-4 transconjugants/recipient strain. Twenty-eight transconjugants were found to carry the blaCTX − M gene. ARGs of blaCTX − M, blaTEM, cmlA, floR, qnrS, sul2 and tetA, VAGs of papA, fimC, fyuA, iroN, Irp2, sitA, cvaC, ompT and iss, MGEs of ISEcp1, IS26, trbC, merA, and ISCR3/14 were detected in the transconjugants showed in Fig 5.

thumbnail
Fig 5. A heatmap comparing ARGs, VAGs, MGEs, and plasmid replicon types among 28 E. coli donor strains and their corresponding transconjugants.

“T” represents that the strain is a transconjugant. Green squares represent donor bacteria or transconjugants carrying the gene or plasmid.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321514.g005

The analysis of plasmid incompatibility groups revealed the presence of seven distinct replicons in 28 ESBL-EC isolates, with the most prevalent being IncFIB (78.57%, 22/28), followed by IncFrepB (53.57%, 15/28), IncI1 (14.29%, 4/28), IncFIA (7.14%, 2/28), IncFIC (3.57%, 1/28), IncHI1 (3.57%, 1/12) and IncP (3.57%, 1/28). PBRT confirmed that all 7 replicons were detected in transconjugants (Fig 5).

3.6 MLST and Phylogenetic Grouping of 28 ESBL-EC isolates with conjugative transfer ability

The results of phylogenetic grouping showed that among the 28 ESBL-EC isolates with conjugative transfer ability, group B1 (46.43%, 13/28) was the most prevalent phylogroup, followed by group D (25%, 7/28), A (14.28%, 4/28) and B2 (14.28%, 4/28) (Fig 6). MLST analysis showed a high diversity of STs (sequence type), and 11 different STs were observed: ST2161 (10/28, 35.71%), followed by ST442 (7/28, 25.00%), ST2854 (2/28, 7.14%) and ST683 (2/28, 7.14%). The remaining 6 STs (ST69, ST469, ST553, ST155, ST4358 and ST4040) were represented by a single strain each (Fig 6 and S3 Table). Moreover, one ST (strain ESBLs-21) not match the existed STs in the MLST database and was suspected to be new ST, designated as nST1 (S3 Table).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Minimum spanning tree of MLST types in 28 capable of conjugation ESBL-EC strains (The new ST that did not match in the MLST database was not shown).

The size of the circle is proportional to the number of this ST type. The colors in the circles represent the proportion of the number of phylogroups. The yellow outline of the circle represents the adjacent ST types belonging to the same clonal complex.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321514.g006

4. Discussion

β-lactams are the most prescribed antibiotics worldwide. However, β-lactams antibiotics are ineffective against ESBLs-producing Enterobacteriaceae [41]. ESBL-EC strains were widely detected in captive and wild animals [1216]. In our results, we successful identified 69 ESBL-EC isolates (15.54%, 69/444), the prevalence was lower than that from captive primates (32.00%) [17] and captive wild animals (24.73%) [19], but higher than reported in another study of primates (7.07%) [20]. Subsequently, the variants of ESBL genes were analyzed in the 69 ESBL-EC strains. Only two categories of ESBL genes (blaCTX-M and blaTEM) were detected, with a high diversity observed among blaCTX-M variants. The most prevalent variant was blaCTX-M-55 (49.28%, 34/69), followed by blaCTX-M-15 (37.68%, 26/69). In our study, the prevalence of blaCTX-M-55 was also higher than that of other detected blaCTX-M variants, including blaCTX-M-65, blaCTX-M-14, and blaCTX-M-3. blaCTX-M-55 is a variant of blaCTX-M-15, which has conferred greater ability to hydrolyze ceftazidime [42,43]. Currently, CTX-M-55 is the most relevant CTX-M enzyme in China. It is the most frequently reported enzyme in animals, and is reported to have an increasing trend in human clinical isolates [44]. blaCTX-M-55 is being increasingly detected in a variety of animals, including waterfowl (48%) [35] and poultry (46%) [45]. In addition, blaCTX-M-55 has been detected in ESBL-EC from captive primates (37.5%) [19] and has been widely detected in ESBL-EC from other captive wild animals, such as giant pandas (75.00%) [46] and swans (35.71%) [19].

MGEs play an important role in the transmission of ESBL-producing capability, which is mediate by the ESBL genes [22,23]. In our present study, a total of 10 MEGs was detected, with the most prevalent being IS26 (76.81%, 53/69), followed by ISEcp1 (60.87%, 42/69). These findings are comparable to those reported in waterfowl [47]. A total of 18 combinations between MGEs was detected, with ISEcp1 + IS26 combination being the most prevalent (18.84%, n =  13). Our results showed that the ESBL-EC derived from captive primates served as a reservoir for MGEs [48]. IS26 and ISEcp1 have been widely reported to be adjacent to blaCTX-M gene and associated with the spread of blaCTX-M [27,28]. IS903, which is frequently located the downstream of the ESBL genes, has been reported to be associated with the transmission of the ESBL gene also been detected in our present study [49].

To further evaluate the potential pathogenic risk of ESBL-EC isolates from captive primates, we detected 20 VAGs in 69 ESBL-EC isolates. A total of 15 VAGs were detected and the detection rates ranged from 1.45% to 84.06%. Another study showed 20 out of 24 VAGs were identified in the E. coli isolates from clinical healthy captive primates at Como Zoo, with a detection rate ranged from 0.62% to 19.8% [50]. In our study, the most prevalent VAGs was adhesion-related gene fimC (84.06%, 58/69), which was not consistent with the report from Como Zoo (sitA 19.8%) [50], but similar high prevalence of fimC was also detected from giant pandas (91.67%) [51] and dogs (100.00%) [52]. Adhesion-related VAGs are associated with adhesion proteins and bacterial fimbriae, which are responsible for histopathological damage, including adhesion and shedding (attaching-effacing) on the intestinal epithelium, which may result in diarrhea [53,54]. Furthermore, other four categories of VAGs were also detected (including antiserum survival related genes cvaC, ompT and iss; hemolysin related genes hlyA; invasion and toxin related genes vat and astA; iron transport related genes fyuA, iroN, Irp2 iucD and sitA). All strains carried at least one VAG and 91.30% of isolates carried three or more VAGs. Previous reports showed that ESBL-EC strains carrying a variety of VAGs have a high intrinsic virulence potential [31], while another report has demonstrated that community outbreaks of ESBL-EC (CTX-M type) strains have a high rate of VAGs, which contribute to enhancing the fitness of the bacteria [33]. The combination of ESBL-production and the carriage of VAGs in E. coli will undoubtedly limit therapeutic options, increase treatment complexity, and enhance pathogenicity [33]. Additionally, strains that carry various VAGs may not be harmful to animals, but there is a potential for them to become pathogenic if host immunity weakens or in response to other adverse environmental factors [21]. The high prevalence of VAGs observed in ESBL-EC isolates from captive primates in our study pose a potential threat to the survival of captive primates in future. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to explore the VAGs in ESBL-EC isolates from captive primates.

Furthermore, we analyzed the association of MGEs with ESBL genes or VAGs. We detected 11 positive and 7 negative association pairs between ESBL genes and MEGs, of which the strongest positive correlation was the pair of blaTEM-135 and ISCR3/14. A previous study reported that the ISCR element can move any adjacent DNA sequence without specific recognition [55]. The strong positive correlation observed between ISCR3/14 and blaTEM-135 in our experiments may be related to the trapping of blaTEM-135 by ISCR3/14 [55]. Our study also observed two pairs of positive association (IS26 and blaCTX-M-55; ISEcp1 and blaCTX-M-15) and previous studies showed ISEcp1 and IS26 have been widely reported to be situated upstream of blaCTX-M [56,57]. Negative correlations between ESBL genes and MGEs were also detected. These correlations may be attributed to the presence of specific combinations of ESBL genes with MGEs, but the specific mechanism for these correlations need to be further studied [58,59]. We further analyze the associations between MGEs and VAGs, only positive associations were observed. The TrbC protein plays an important role in conjugative transfer of IncF plasmid [60], and the positive association between trbC and VAGs (iroN, iss or ompT) may be related to the location of VAGs on conjugable plasmids. However, the true relationship between VAGs and ISs is not yet clear [30,61].

Conjugation transfer represents a significant mechanism of HGT [62]. Our results showed that ESBL genes (including blaCTX-M and blaTEM) can be transferred horizontally. The plasmid incompatibility groups detected in our study included IncFIB, IncFrepB, IncI1, IncFIA, IncHI1 and IncP. Among them, IncFIB (75%, 21/28) and IncFrepB (53.57%, 15/28) had the higher detection rates. Previous reports showed the IncF plasmids are the epidemic plasmids carrying blaCTX-M-55 for transmission, which was also confirmed in our results that blaCTX-55 (79.41%, 27/34) had a high conjugation transfer rate [63,64]. Among the 28 ESBL-EC strains with conjugative transfer ability, 96.43% (27/28) were blaCTX-M-55-carring isolates, and of these 88.89% (24/27) strains carrying both IS26 and blaCTX-M-55 could be horizontally transferred together. Interestingly, when combined with the results of the associations that revealed a positive association between IS26 and blaCTX-M-55, we speculated that IS26 is adjacent to blaCTX-M-55 in gene structure and can be easily transferred [44,64,65]. Above all, our results showed that MGEs play a significant role in the transmission of ESBL genes. Previous reports showed that the ESBL genes and other ARGs are usually located on the same plasmid that causes MDR and can be horizontally transferred by conjugation [9,10,66]. Our present study showed that qnrS (quinolone/fluoroquinolone resistance gene), tetA (tetracycline resistance gene), sul2 (sulfonamides resistance gene), cmlA and floR (chloramphenicol/phenicol resistance genes) were all detected co-transferred with the plasmid into the recipient strain J53. Moreover, plasmids, particularly IncF plasmids, have been reported as the most common vehicles for the transmission of VAGs, our study also demonstrated that VAGs can be transferred into the recipient strain J53 through conjugation with plasmid [29,30]. Plasmid-mediated HGT can facilitate the transfer of VAGs and provide a pathway for the transmission of pathogenicity between bacteria [67]. Moreover, co-transfer of VAGs with the ESBL genes by plasmid increase the difficulty of controlling the transmission of the ESBL gene and VAGs. ESBL-EC isolates may pose a serious threat not only to captive primates but also to other animals, humans, and the environment through cloning and direct contact.

Among 28 ESBL-EC strains capable of conjugation transfer, groups A and B1 together accounted for 64.28% (A: 14.28%, B1: 50%). Groups A and B1 are considered to be commensal groups [37] and previous studies on ESBL-EC strains isolated from pigs and dogs also showed that the major ESBL-EC strains belong to commensal groups [6870]. We also detected groups B2 (14.28%) and D (21.41%), which are classified as potentially pathogenic (37), suggesting that ESBL-EC strains which containing more VAGs may pose a health threat to captive primates. In addition, our result showed that 28 conjugative ESBL-EC isolates exhibited a high population diversity of STs (including 10 known STs and a novel STs.). Of the 10 known STs, ST155 and ST69 are the high-risk clones that have been reported [71], and ST69 has been reported as an important ExPEC carrier and is associated with most extraintestinal diseases [72]. Moreover, ST533 was previously detected in canine ESBL-EC isolates (harboring the blaCTX-M-15 gene) [73], ST4358 was identified in E. coli isolated from goose feces from China and carried blaCTX-M-55 gene [74], ST683 isolate was previously reported in human carbapenem-resistant E. coli, which was resistant to both cefotaxime and ceftazidime [75]. ST442 has been reported to be associated with Shiga toxin-producing E. coli [76], and ST2161 has been reported in fosfomycin-resistant E. coli from humans [77]. As far as we know, ST469, ST2854, and ST4040 have not been reported in ESBL-EC. Our results indicated that ESBL-EC isolates from captive primates exhibited diverse clonal lineages, which may be attributed to cross-infections among different animal species, as well as between humans and captive primates.

5. Conclusion and limitations

Our results showed that ESBL-EC strains isolated from captive primates, primarily mediated by blaCTX-M-55, were the reservoir of VAGs and MGEs, which pose a potential threat to captive primates, other animals, the environment and humans. Conjugative transfer experiments demonstrated that ESBL genes, ARGs, VAGs and MGEs could be transferred horizontally, which was facilitated by plasmids in highly diverse STs E. coli. Based on the One Health concept and the protection of captive primates, we recommend long-term monitoring of the HGT of ESBL-EC isolates from captive primates. Moreover, the use of High-throughput Sequencing or Whole Genome Sequencing could provide more insights into the mechanism of HGT on ESBL-EC strains from captive primates.

Supporting information

S1 Table. PCR primer and conditions used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321514.s001

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Details of ESBL genes, VAGs and MGEs in 69 ESBL-EC strains from captive primates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321514.s002

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Distribution of sequence types (STs) and phylogenetic grouping in28 ESBL-EC strains isolates with conjugative transfer ability.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321514.s003

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Junai Gan and Lei Deng for the English language revision.

References

  1. 1. Foster-Nyarko E, Pallen MJ. The microbial ecology of Escherichia coli in the vertebrate gut. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2022;46(3):fuac008. pmid:35134909
  2. 2. Solà-Ginés M, González-López J, Cameron-Veas K, Piedra-Carrasco N, Cerdà-Cuéllar M, Migura-Garcia L. Houseflies Musca domestica as vectors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli on Spanish Broiler farms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(11):3604–11.
  3. 3. Pomba C, Rantala M, Greko C, Baptiste K, Catry B, van Duijkeren E. Public health risk of antimicrobial resistance transfer from companion animals. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(4):957–68.
  4. 4. Ferri M, Ranucci E, Romagnoli P, Giaccone V. Antimicrobial resistance: a global emerging threat to public health systems. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017;57(13):2857–76. pmid:26464037
  5. 5. Halabi M, Lahlou F, Diawara I, El Adouzi Y, Marnaoui R, Benmessaoud R. Antibiotic resistance pattern of extended spectrum beta lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from patients with urinary tract infection in Morocco. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11(7):7.
  6. 6. Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Harbarth S, Mendelson M, Monnet DL, et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(3):318–27. pmid:29276051
  7. 7. Peirano G, Pitout JDD. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae: update on molecular epidemiology and treatment options. Drugs. 2019;79(14):1529–41. pmid:31407238
  8. 8. Negeri A, Mamo H, Gurung J, Firoj Mahmud A, Fällman M, Seyoum E. Antimicrobial resistance profiling and molecular epidemiological analysis of extended spectrum β-lactamases produced by extraintestinal invasive Escherichia coli isolates from Ethiopia: the presence of international high-risk clones ST131 and ST410 revealed. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:706846.
  9. 9. Shi H, Sun F, Chen J, Ou Q, Feng W, Yong X. Epidemiology of CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing nosocomial-Escherichia coli infection in China. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicro. 2015;14(1):4.
  10. 10. Moglad E, Altayb HN. Genomic characterization of extended spectrum beta lactamases producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli clinically isolated harboring chromosomally mediated CTX-M-15 from Alkharj, KSA. Infect Genet Evol. 2023;116:105526. pmid:37977421
  11. 11. Yang Q-E, Sun J, Li L, Deng H, Liu B-T, Fang L-X, et al. IncF plasmid diversity in multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli strains from animals in China. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:964. pmid:26441898
  12. 12. Shu G, Gan T, Lin Z, Liu Y, Chen J, Wang C, et al. The resistance patterns and molecular characteristics of ESBL/AmpC-producing Escherichia coli from captive panda ecosystem in China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024;278:116395. pmid:38728939
  13. 13. Dobiasova H, Dolejska M, Jamborova I, Brhelova E, Blazkova L, Papousek I, et al. Extended spectrum beta-lactamase and fluoroquinolone resistance genes and plasmids among Escherichia coli isolates from zoo animals, Czech Republic. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013;85(3):604–11. pmid:23679004
  14. 14. Carneiro C, Araújo C, Gonçalves A, Vinué L, Somalo S, Ruiz E, et al. Detection of CTX-M-14 and TEM-52 extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in fecal Escherichia coli isolates of captive ostrich in Portugal. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010;7(8):991–4. pmid:20367084
  15. 15. Bouaziz A, Loucif L, Ayachi A, Guehaz K, Bendjama E, Rolain J-M. Migratory white stork (Ciconia ciconia): a potential vector of the OXA-48-producing Escherichia coli ST38 clone in Algeria. Microb Drug Resist. 2018;24(4):461–8. pmid:29022829
  16. 16. Abbassi MS, Badi S, Lengliz S, Mansouri R, Salah H, Hynds P. Hiding in plain sight-wildlife as a neglected reservoir and pathway for the spread of antimicrobial resistance: a narrative review. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2022;98(6):fiac045. pmid:35425978
  17. 17. Wang Y, He T, Han J, Wang J, Foley S, Yang G. Prevalence of ESBLs and PMQR genes in fecal Escherichia coli isolated from the non-human primates in six zoos in China. Vet Microbiol. 2012;159(1–2):53–9.
  18. 18. Bachiri T, Lalaoui R, Bakour S, Allouache M, Belkebla N, Rolain JM, et al. First report of the plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-1 in Escherichia coli ST405 isolated from wildlife in Bejaia, Algeria. Microb Drug Resist. 2018;24(7):890–5. pmid:29227182
  19. 19. Zeng Z, Yang J, Gu J, Liu Z, Hu J, Li X, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of CTX-M-type-producing Escherichia coli from a wildlife zoo in China. Vet Med Sci. 2022;8(3):1294–9. pmid:35182454
  20. 20. Bazalar-Gonzales J, Silvestre-Espejo T, Rodríguez Cueva C, Carhuaricra Huamán D, Ignación León Y, Luna Espinoza L, et al. Genomic insights into ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolated from non-human primates in the Peruvian Amazon. Front Vet Sci. 2024;10:1340428. pmid:38292135
  21. 21. Zhang S, Chen S, Rehman M, Yang H, Yang Z, Wang M. Distribution and association of antimicrobial resistance and virulence traits in Escherichia coli isolates from healthy waterfowls in Hainan, China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;220:112317.
  22. 22. He YZ, Yan JR, He B, Ren H, Kuang X, Long TF, et al. A transposon-associated CRISPR/Cas9 system specifically eliminates both chromosomal and plasmid-borne mcr-1 in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65(10):e0105421. pmid:34339270
  23. 23. Hounmanou YMG, Bortolaia V, Dang STT, Truong D, Olsen JE, Dalsgaard A. ESBL and AmpC β-lactamase encoding genes in E. coli from pig and pig farm workers in vietnam and their association with mobile genetic elements. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:629139. pmid:33776959
  24. 24. Park J, Shin E, Park AK, Kim S, Jeong HJ, Kim JS, et al. Co-infection With chromosomally-located blaCTX-M-14 and plasmid-encoding blaCTX-M-15 in pathogenic Escherichia coli in the Republic of Korea. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:545591. pmid:33262742
  25. 25. Tello M, Ocejo M, Oporto B, Lavín JL, Hurtado A. Within-farm dynamics of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in dairy cattle: resistance profiles and molecular characterization by long-read whole-genome sequencing. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:936843. pmid:35966684
  26. 26. Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Wang T, Xu N, Lu T, Hong W, et al. Assessment of global health risk of antibiotic resistance genes. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):1553. pmid:35322038
  27. 27. Liu J, Du SX, Zhang JN, Liu SH, Zhou YY, Wang XR. Spreading of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli ST131 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ST11 in patients with pneumonia: a molecular epidemiological study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2019;132(16):1894–902. pmid:31408445
  28. 28. Eckert C, Gautier V, Arlet G. DNA sequence analysis of the genetic environment of various blaCTX-M genes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57(1):14–23. pmid:16291869
  29. 29. Johnson TJ, Nolan LK. Pathogenomics of the virulence plasmids of Escherichia coli. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2009;73(4):750–74. pmid:19946140
  30. 30. Chen K, Liang J, Wang Y, Tao Y, Lu Y, Wang A. A global perspective on microbial risk factors in effluents of wastewater treatment plants. J Environ Sci (China). 2024;138:227–35. pmid:38135391
  31. 31. Padmavathy K, Padma K, Rajasekaran S. Multidrug resistant CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli: a growing threat among HIV patients in India. J Pathog. 2016;2016:4152704. pmid:27123344
  32. 32. Pitout JDD, Laupland KB, Church DL, Menard ML, Johnson JR. Virulence factors of Escherichia coli isolates that produce CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(11):4667–70. pmid:16251310
  33. 33. Moniruzzaman M, Hussain MT, Ali S, Hossain M, Hossain MS, Alam MAU, et al. Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from patients and surrounding hospital environments in Bangladesh: A molecular approach for the determination of pathogenicity and resistance. Heliyon. 2023;9(11):e22109. pmid:38027708
  34. 34. Zhu Z, Jiang S, Qi M, Liu H, Zhang S, Liu H, et al. Prevalence and characterization of antibiotic resistance genes and integrons in Escherichia coli isolates from captive non-human primates of 13 zoos in China. Sci Total Environ. 2021;798:149268. pmid:34333432
  35. 35. Zhang S, Guo X, Wang Y, Zhong Z, Wang M, Jia R, et al. Implications of different waterfowl farming on cephalosporin resistance: investigating the role of blaCTX-M-55. Poult Sci. 2023;102(10):102929. pmid:37562134
  36. 36. Carattoli A, Bertini A, Villa L, Falbo V, Hopkins KL, Threlfall EJ. Identification of plasmids by PCR-based replicon typing. J Microbiol Methods. 2005;63(3):219-28.
  37. 37. Clermont O, Bonacorsi S, Bingen E. Rapid and simple determination of the Escherichia coli phylogenetic group. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66(10):4555–8. pmid:11010916
  38. 38. Francisco AP, Bugalho M, Ramirez M, Carriço JA. Global optimal eBURST analysis of multilocus typing data using a graphic matroid approach. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:152. pmid:19450271
  39. 39. Tang F, Wang J, Li D, Gao S, Ren J, Ma L, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of 127 Escherichia coli strains isolated from domestic animals with diarrhea in China. BMC Genomics. 2019;20(1):212. pmid:30866824
  40. 40. Algammal AM, Hashem HR, Alfifi KJ, Hetta HF, Sheraba NS, Ramadan H, et al. atpD gene sequencing, multidrug resistance traits, virulence-determinants, and antimicrobial resistance genes of emerging XDR and MDR-Proteus mirabilis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):9476. pmid:33947875
  41. 41. Liu H, Wang Y, Wang G, Xing Q, Shao L, Dong X, et al. The prevalence of Escherichia coli strains with extended spectrum beta-lactamases isolated in China. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:335. pmid:25954262
  42. 42. Zeng S, Luo J, Li X, Zhuo C, Wu A, Chen X. Molecular epidemiology and characteristics of CTX-M-55 extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli from Guangzhou, China. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12:730012.
  43. 43. Hu X, Gou J, Guo X, Cao Z, Li Y, Jiao H. Genetic contexts related to the diffusion of plasmid-mediated CTX-M-55 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase isolated from Enterobacteriaceae in China. Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials. 2018;17(1):12.
  44. 44. Yang J-T, Zhang L-J, Lu Y, Zhang R-M, Jiang H-X. Genomic insights into global blaCTX-M-55-positive Escherichia coli epidemiology and transmission characteristics. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(4):e0108923. pmid:37358409
  45. 45. Shafiq M, Huang J, Shah JM, Ali I, Rahman SU, Wang L. Characterization and resistant determinants linked to mobile elements of ESBL-producing and mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli recovered from the chicken origin. Microb Pathog. 2021;150:104722. pmid:33421607
  46. 46. Ji X, Liu J, Liang B, Sun S, Zhu L, Zhou W, et al. Molecular characteristics of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from diseased captive giant pandas (ailuropoda melanoleuca) in China. Microb Drug Resist. 2022;28(6):750–7. pmid:35639420
  47. 47. Zhang S, Shu Y, Wang Y, Zhong Z, Wang M, Jia R, et al. High rate of multidrug resistance and integrons in Escherichia coli isolates from diseased ducks in select regions of China. Poult Sci. 2023;102(10):102956. pmid:37586192
  48. 48. Zhu Z, Pan S, Wei B, Liu H, Zhou Z, Huang X, et al. High prevalence of multi-drug resistances and diversity of mobile genetic elements in Escherichia coli isolates from captive giant pandas. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;198:110681. pmid:32361498
  49. 49. Xie M, Lin D, Chen K, Chan EWC, Yao W, Chen S. Molecular characterization of Escherichia coli strains isolated from retail meat that harbor blaCTX-M and fosA3 genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(4):2450–5. pmid:26856843
  50. 50. Clayton JB, Danzeisen JL, Trent AM, Murphy T, Johnson TJ. Longitudinal characterization of Escherichia coli in healthy captive non-human primates. Front Vet Sci. 2014;1:24. pmid:26664923
  51. 51. Fan S, Jiang S, Luo L, Zhou Z, Wang L, Huang X, et al. Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli strains isolated from captive giant pandas: a reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes and virulence-associated genes. Vet Sci. 2022;9(12):705. pmid:36548866
  52. 52. Yuan Y, Hu Y, Zhang X, Zhong W, Pan S, Wang L, et al. Characteristics of MDR E. coli strains isolated from pet dogs with clinic diarrhea: a pool of antibiotic resistance genes and virulence-associated genes. PLoS One. 2024;19(2):e0298053. pmid:38416699
  53. 53. Vieira MAM, Salvador FA, Silva RM, Irino K, Vaz TMI, Rockstroh AC, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of the O122 pathogenicity island in typical and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(4):1452–5. pmid:20181917
  54. 54. Paixão AC, Ferreira AC, Fontes M, Themudo P, Albuquerque T, Soares MC, et al. Detection of virulence-associated genes in pathogenic and commensal avian Escherichia coli isolates. Poult Sci. 2016;95(7):1646–52. pmid:26976911
  55. 55. Toleman MA, Bennett PM, Walsh TR. ISCR elements: novel gene-capturing systems of the 21st century?. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006;70(2):296–316. pmid:16760305
  56. 56. Castanheira M, Simner PJ, Bradford PA. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: an update on their characteristics, epidemiology and detection. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021;3(3):dlab092. pmid:34286272
  57. 57. Valizadeh S, Yousefi B, Abdolshahi A, Emadi A, Eslami M. Determination of genetic relationship between environmental Escherichia coli with PFGE and investigation of IS element in blaCTX-M gene of these isolates. Microb Pathog. 2021;159:105154. pmid:34419612
  58. 58. Zong Z, Ginn AN, Dobiasova H, Iredell JR, Partridge SR. Different IncI1 plasmids from Escherichia coli carry ISEcp1-blaCTX-M-15 associated with different Tn2-derived elements. Plasmid. 2015;80:118–26. pmid:25929173
  59. 59. Partridge SR, Kwong SM, Firth N, Jensen SO. Mobile genetic elements associated with antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;31(4):e00088-17. pmid:30068738
  60. 60. Shala-Lawrence A, Bragagnolo N, Nowroozi-Dayeni R, Kheyson S, Audette GF. The interaction of TraW and TrbC is required to facilitate conjugation in F-like plasmids. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;503(4):2386–92. pmid:29966652
  61. 61. Morales G, Abelson B, Reasoner S, Miller J, Earl AM, Hadjifrangiskou M, et al. The role of mobile genetic elements in virulence factor carriage from symptomatic and asymptomatic cases of Escherichia coli bacteriuria. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(3):e0471022. pmid:37195213
  62. 62. Lu Y, Zeng J, Wu B, E S, Wang L, Cai R, et al. Quorum sensing N-acyl homoserine lactones-SdiA suppresses Escherichia coli-Pseudomonas aeruginosa conjugation through inhibiting trai expression. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:7. pmid:28164039
  63. 63. Wang J, Zeng Z, Huang X, Ma Z, Guo Z, Lv L. Evolution and comparative genomics of F33:A-:B- plasmids carrying bla(CTX-M-55) or bla(CTX-M-65) in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from animals, food products, and humans in China. mSphere. 2018;3(4):e00500-18.
  64. 64. Leão C, Clemente L, Moura L, Seyfarth AM, Hansen IM, Hendriksen RS, et al. Emergence and clonal spread of CTX-M-65-producing Escherichia coli from retail meat in Portugal. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:653595. pmid:34354678
  65. 65. Wang W, Wei X, Arbab S, Wu L, Lu N, Zhu Q, et al. Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolate of Chinese bovine origin carrying the blaCTX-M-55 gene located in IS26-mediated composite translocatable units. Microorganisms. 2023;11(11):2795. pmid:38004806
  66. 66. Gao L, Hu J, Zhang X, Wei L, Li S, Miao Z, et al. Application of swine manure on agricultural fields contributes to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli spread in Tai’an, China. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:313. pmid:25926828
  67. 67. Pérez-Etayo L, González D, Vitas AI. The aquatic ecosystem, a good environment for the horizontal transfer of antimicrobial resistance and virulence-associated factors among extended spectrum β-lactamases producing E. coli. Microorganisms. 2020;8(4):568. pmid:32326434
  68. 68. Song HJ, Moon DC, Kim SJ, Mechesso AF, Choi JH, Boby N, et al. Antimicrobial resistance profiles and molecular characteristics of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolated from healthy cattle and pigs in Korea. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2023;20(1):7–16. pmid:36577050
  69. 69. Shnaiderman-Torban A, Navon-Venezia S, Baron H, Abu-Ahmad W, Arielly H, Zizelski Valenci G, et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales in healthy community dogs in Israel. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland). 2022;11(8).
  70. 70. Zhang YL, Huang FY, Gan LL, Yu X, Cai DJ, Fang J, et al. High prevalence of blaCTX-M and blaSHV among ESBL producing E. coli isolates from beef cattle in China’s Sichuan-Chongqing Circle. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):13725. pmid:34215807
  71. 71. Shimizu T, Kido N, Miyashita N, Tanaka S, Omiya T, Morikaku K. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from Japanese raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes viverrinus) in Kanagawa prefecture, Japan: emergence of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant human-related clones. J Med Microbiol. 2022;71(12).
  72. 72. Manges AR, Geum HM, Guo A, Edens TJ, Fibke CD, Pitout JDD. Global extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) lineages. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32(3):e00135-18. pmid:31189557
  73. 73. Li S, Liu J, Zhou Y, Miao Z. Characterization of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli recovered from companion dogs in Tai’an, China. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2017;11(3):282–6. pmid:28368864
  74. 74. Cen D, Sun R, Mai J, Jiang Y, Wang D, Guo W. Occurrence and transmission of bla(NDM)-carrying Enterobacteriaceae from geese and the surrounding environment on a commercial goose farm. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2021;87(10):e00245-21.
  75. 75. Tsilipounidaki K, Florou Z, Skoulakis A, Fthenakis GC, Miriagou V, Petinaki E. Diversity of bacterial clones and plasmids of NDM-1 producing Escherichia coli clinical isolates in central Greece. Microorganisms. 2023;11(2):516. pmid:36838481
  76. 76. Fierz L, Cernela N, Hauser E, Nüesch-Inderbinen M, Stephan R. Characteristics of Shigatoxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated during 2010-2014 from human infections in Switzerland. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1471. pmid:28824596
  77. 77. Grilo T, Freire S, Miguel B, Martins LN, Menezes MF, Nordmann P, et al. Occurrence of plasmid-mediated fosfomycin resistance (fos genes) among Escherichia coli isolates, Portugal. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2023;35:342–6. pmid:37553021