https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4952-1400
Figures
Abstract
Frankincense resin exhibits antibacterial potential against various microorganisms, but little is available on its effectiveness against dental root canal biofilm. This study aimed to assess its efficacy as a root canal irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. A standard E. faecalis strain underwent antibacterial sensitivity testing with frankincense derived from Boswellia sacra Flück and Boswellia frereana Birdw trees. Frankincense, demonstrating inhibition of bacterial growth, was further evaluated as an irrigant. Root canals of 50 single-canalled human teeth were prepared, then contaminated with E. faecalis and placed into three groups: Group A was irrigated with saline (negative control), Group B was irrigated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO), and Group C was irrigated with frankincense. Microbial sampling pre- and post-irrigation was conducted under aseptic conditions. Colony count reduction percentages were calculated, and the data was analyzed using one-way analyses of variance followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test (significance level set at 5%). The antibacterial susceptibility test revealed that only Boswellia sacra Flück frankincense was effective against E. faecalis. Both NaClO and frankincense significantly reduced colony counts compared to saline (p < 0.0001), with no difference between frankincense and NaClO irrigation. Therefore, root canal irrigation with B. sacra frankincense proved as effective against E. faecalis biofilm as NaClO. Further exploration of its potential as a root canal irrigant is recommended.
Citation: Almohareb RA, Barakat RM, Eid EE, Aldaws A, Alhagbani N, Almubayi R, et al. (2025) Assessing the efficacy of frankincense extract as a root canal irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis . PLoS ONE 20(4): e0321458. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321458
Editor: Omer Sheriff Sultan, A T Still University Missouri School of Dentistry & Oral Health, United States of America
Received: November 25, 2024; Accepted: March 5, 2025; Published: April 9, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Almohareb et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: Data are provided in Supplementary File F1.
Funding: This research was funded by the Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2025R162), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Apical periodontitis is a prevalent oral disease that can lead to tooth loss and ultimately affect the quality of life [1]. The primary cause of this disease is the endodontic biofilm [2]. To effectively treat root canal infections and resolve apical periodontitis, it is essential to successfully eliminate this biofilm. [2]. The key to this process is the irrigation protocol, which aims to eradicate the biofilm chemically and/or mechanically [3].
The endodontic biofilm harbors various bacteria. One prominent bacterium species is Enterococcus faecalis, which is associated with root canal treatment failures [4]. These Gram-positive cocci are commonly found in both the intestines and oral cavity. They possess the ability to infect dental pulp tissue and form resilient biofilms capable of enduring the harsh conditions of root canal treatment [5,6].
To date, the root canal irrigant of choice has been sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) [3,7,8]. It has effective antibacterial properties due to its high pH, reaching 11 [9]. Besides its antimicrobial properties, NaClO can dissolve the pulpal tissue and organic dentin components [10,11]. Furthermore, it can partially neutralize any antigenic or microbial substance remaining in the root canal space [12]. Increasing the NaClO concentration and temperature can greatly enhance its effectiveness and tissue-dissolving capacity [13,14]. However, NaClO is highly cytotoxic, and its accidental extrusion into the periapical tissue can result in adverse effects ranging in severity from transient to severe pain and different levels of localized tissue necrosis, hematoma, edema, and neurological damage.
Over the years, plants have been used for medical purposes as part of commercial medication or in herbal treatments. For oral infections, plant-based phytochemicals obtained from extracts such as Carissa bispinosa Desf. have shown promising antibacterial activity against oral pathogens [15]. The use of nanoparticles has been promoted to enhance the antibacterial properties of dental materials. However, a major concern with incorporating nanoparticles into these materials is the potential toxicity to patient tissues when exposed for extended periods [16].
The Burseraceae family consists of plants that produce resin and is particularly famous for two genera: Commiphora, which produces myrrh, and Boswellia, which produces frankincense [17,18]. The latter, a high-quality oleo-gum resin, is a popular material used by the inhabitants of the Arabian Peninsula and North Africa. Frankincense resin is obtained through incisions made in the Boswellia tree trunk. The genus Boswellia contains 25 species, which mainly inhabit Northern Africa: Boswellia carterii Birdw and Boswellia frereana Birdw (B. frereana), Ethiopia (Boswellia papyrifera Hochst and Boswellia rivae Engl), and Eritrea (Boswellia neglecta S. Moore), in addition to Boswellia serrata Roxb. (B.serrata) in India, Boswellia sacra Flück (B.sacra) in the Arabian Peninsula [19]. The word “frankincense” is derived from an old French term meaning “pure incense” or “pure and noble high-quality incense.” Many scientists have sought to identify its medical effects [20]. Consequently, several published studies have reported the anticancer, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, antimicrobial, and antiviral activities of frankincense obtained from several B. species [20,21].
A recent study highlighted the effects of different frankincense compounds on oral infection and inflammation [22]. The resin extracted from B. sacra exhibited antimicrobial activity against various microorganisms, including Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris, and the fungal pathogen Candida albicans [23]. Furthermore, El-Nagerabi et al. found that oil extracted from the B. sacra showed remarkable activity against Aspergillus parasiticus and Aspergillus flavus growth [24]. This effect is related to the essential oils found in frankincense, which contain terpenoids such as α- and β-pinene, limonene, and linalool, which are known for their antibacterial properties [25,26]. The essential oils and antibacterial efficacy have been reported to differ among frankincense harvested from different locations [26,27].
Boswellic acids, a class of pentacyclic triterpenic acids, are identified as the active compounds in frankincense. Research has highlighted their significant role in mitigating chronic inflammatory diseases [28,29]. These compounds were found to endow frankincense with notable anti-cancer properties [30,31], while having no adverse effect differentiated and stem cell viability [32,33]. Further studies have indicated that different Boswellia species vary in their boswellic acid content, which influences their pharmacological activities [34].
A novel therapeutic strategy involving mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles loaded with B. sacra extract showed promising antibacterial activity and improved tissue healing [35]. A recent study reported that B.serrata extracts inhibited Porphyromonas gingivalis biofilm formation and significantly decreased biofilm biomass [36].
Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy of frankincense from Boswellia tree species as a root canal irrigant against E. faecalis biofilm to NaClO. Its null hypothesis was that the antibacterial effects would not differ between NaClO and frankincense.
Materials and methods
This ex vivo study was granted ethical approval by the Internal Review Board of Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (IRB no. 23-0690).
Preparation of the frankincense and bacterial species
A standard E. faecalis strain (American Type Culture Collection: 29212) [37], was cultured on bile esculin agar in a 37°C incubator for 24 hours. After 24 hours, a sterile swab was used to collect a single E. faecalis colony and suspend it in 3.0 mL of sterile brain heart infusion (BHI) broth, which was mixed using a vortex until homogenous. Then, the optical density of the suspension was measured in McFarland units using a DensiCHEK Plus density meter (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC, USA).
Frankincense gum resin was obtained from two Boswellia species: B. frereana (collected in Somalia) and B. sacra (collected in Oman). They were crystalline, with colors ranging from white (B. sacra) to yellow (B. frereana); (Fig 1).
Frerena.
Frankincense was prepared by grinding the resin using a pestle and mortar, then soaking the resulting powder in 95% ethanol at a ratio of 625 mg per 1 mL for 72 hours at room temperature to preserve all ingredients. The mixture was filtered with Whatman No. 1 filter paper, then placed in a rotary evaporator. The concentrate was further incubated at 37 °C for two days to allow the solvent to evaporate. The final extract was stored in an aseptic, airtight container. An irrigation solution was prepared using the extract at a concentration of 6.25 mg/mL.
Antibacterial susceptibility test
The antimicrobial activity of the two frankincense extracts was examined using the agar-well diffusion method. Two bile esculin agar plates were prepared, one for the B. frereana extract and the other for the B. sacra extract. Each plate had two 4 mm wells cut into it using sterile tips, which were filled with 50 µL of the respective frankincense solution using a sterile pipette. Then, these plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Following incubation, the inhibition zones around the wells were observed to assess antimicrobial effectiveness. The frankincense extract showing effective inhibition zones was selected for performing the root canal irrigation test.
Ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)
Liquid chromatography provides an efficient approach for the precise quantification and analysis of the characteristic acidic compounds found in the B. sacra, enhancing accuracy, selectivity, and sustainability in natural product research. To characterize boswellic acid, standard solutions of α-Boswellic acid (CAS No.: 471-66-9) and β-Boswellic acid (CAS No.: 631-69-6) with purities of 98.40% and 99.89%, respectively, purchased from (MedChemExpress, NJ, USA) were injected into the UPLC system. Liquid chromatography was performed using ACQUITY™ UPLC system (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) with an autosampler set at 15 °C. Separation was conducted on a BEH Amide column (1.7 µm, 2.1 x 100 mm, Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) at 40 °C. The mobile phase consisted of 85% acetonitrile and 15% 0.1 M potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (pH 2.5, adjusted with orthophosphoric acid), delivered at a flow rate of 0.40 mL/min.
Accurately weighed 1 mg of α- and β-boswellic acids was dissolved in 1 mL chloroform, vortexed for 3 minutes, and diluted to 100 µg/mL. A 0.2 µL volume of each standard was injected into the UPLC system to determine the exact elution profile of boswellic acid under established conditions. A standard curve was generated at concentrations of 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 µg/mL.
A 174 mg sample of the crude ethanolic frankincense extract that showed effective inhibition zones, was accurately weighed, dissolved in 1 mL chloroform, vortexed for 3 minutes, and diluted 10-fold. A 0.2 µL volume of the prepared extract was injected into the UPLC system
The total run time of less than one minute demonstrated the method’s sensitivity and selectivity, as each isomer displayed a distinct peak without interference. The standard curve for boswellic acid was linear over the range of 10–50 µg/mL (R² = 0.9981), and no interfering peaks were observed, underscoring the method’s selectivity (Fig 2).
α-boswellic acid and β-boswellic acid, while image (C) shows the peaks for the experimental B.sacra extract. The peak at 0.546 retention time in all images indicates the B.sacra extract content of the boswellic acids.
Using the standard curve equation: Υ = 17976X − 1531.9, extraction recovery was calculated. Quantification was performed in triplicate, based on the mean peak height. The 174 mg crude extract contained 0.102 mg of pure boswellic acid, equating to 0.586 mg per gram of crude extract. Thus, from 25 g of Boswellia, a recovery of 58.62% pure boswellic acid is expected.
Antibacterial susceptibility test
The antimicrobial activity of the two frankincense extracts was examined using the agar-well diffusion method. Two bile esculin agar plates were prepared, one for the B. frereana extract and the other for the B. sacra extract. Each plate had two 4 mm wells cut into it using sterile tips, which were filled with 50 µL of the respective frankincense solution using a sterile pipette. Then, these plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Following incubation, the inhibition zones around the wells were observed to assess antimicrobial effectiveness. The frankincense extract showing effective inhibition zones was selected for performing the root canal irrigation test.
Tooth preparation
The sample size required for this study was estimated using the G * Power 3.1 software (Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany), considering a power of 90%, a type 1 error probability (α) of 0.05, and effect size (f) = 0.5. The estimated sample size was 54 teeth.
A total of 56 teeth, extracted for reasons unrelated to this study, were used after obtaining written patient consent. Teeth were stored in saline until used. The exclusion criteria included teeth with curved canals, external and internal resorption, double canals, and calcified canals. The crowns were removed, and root lengths were standardized at 16 mm. Rotary nickel-titanium instruments (ProTaper Universal, Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA) were used following the manufacturer’s instructions. The instruments were used with a 6:1 reduction contra-angle connected to a rotary electric Endo motor (X-smart, Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA). Canals were irrigated with 5 mL of 5.25% NaClO (Pharma Vitality, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) between each file. A final rinse alternated between 5 mL of 5.25% NaClO with 3 mL of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for one minute and 5 mL of saline [3]. The teeth were autoclaved at 126°C for 20 minutes.
A standard E. faecalis strain (American Type Culture Collection: 29212) was cultured in BHI broth at 37°C for 24 hours. Each tooth was immersed in 900 µ L of BHI broth and 300 µ L of BHI broth containing bacteria and incubated at 37°C in a shaking incubator at 180 rpm for two weeks. The BHI broth was renewed every two days by discarding 300 µ L and replacing it with 300 µ L of fresh BHI broth under sterile conditions.
Next, two teeth were randomly selected and sectioned using a Needle Diamond Bur 0.10 mm (Strauss Diamond, Palm Coast, FL, USA). Then, they were coated with platinum via an auto-fine coater (JEC-3000FC; Jeol, Tokyo, Japan) and examined under an SEM (JSM-IT500HR; Jeol, Tokyo, Japan) with high vacuum conditions at 5 kV with a probe current of 35 A to confirm the existence of E. faecalis biofilms (Fig 3).
Root canal microbial sampling
Strict aseptic conditions were maintained during microbial sampling, which was performed before and after irrigation by a single operator. The first sampling was performed for all teeth by filling the canal with sterile 0.9% normal saline (NS) and then circumferentially filing it with a size 40 H-file (MANI, Inc., Tochigi, Japan) inserted 1 mm short of the working length. The canal contents were absorbed into ProTaper Universal F3 paper points left in the canals for 60 seconds before being transferred into test tubes containing 1.0 mL of NS. The contents of each canal were serially diluted and plated on BHI agar plates. For the second microbial sampling, the teeth were randomly divided into three groups. Teeth in Group 1 served as negative control and were irrigated with 10 mL of saline (n = 18). Teeth in Group 2 were irrigated with 10 mL of 5.25% NaClO (n = 18). Group 3 represented the experimental group, and teeth were irrigated with 10 mL of the B. sacra frankincense solution (n = 18). The irrigant was inserted into the canal using a 30-gauge side-vented irrigation needle placed 1 mm short of the working length. The irrigant was injected at a flow rate of approximately 10 mL per minute, simulating the clinical situation, and the irrigant was left in the canal for one minute.
An operator blinded to the groups performed the serial dilution and plating on BHI agar plates in steps identical to those used for the first sampling. Following incubation for 24 hours, the colonies formed on the agar plates were counted on magnified images of the plates. The percentage reduction in colony forming units (CFU) from before to after irrigation was calculated using the following formula:
Five random teeth from Group 3 were selected for SEM analysis (JSM-IT500HR; Jeol, Tokyo, Japan). Following sectioning, the teeth underwent a dehydration process at room temperature using an increasing ethanol gradient (70%, 80%, 90%, and 100%), immersing them in the water-ethanol mixture for 24 hours at each step. Following dehydration, the specimens were further dried in a desiccator for two hours. Finally, they were coated with platinum using an auto-fine coater before examination under the SEM.
Results
Antibacterial susceptibility test
The antibacterial susceptibility test showed that only frankincense from B. sacra had effective antibacterial activity against E. faecalis, as evidenced by clear zones of growth inhibition measuring 1.5–2 mm wide (Fig 4). Consequently, this specific type of frankincense was selected as the root canal irrigant for the experimental group.
Root canal microbial sampling
A significant 100% reduction in bacterial count was observed with both NaClO and frankincense from B. sacra. This reduction was statistically significant when compared to the control saline group (p < 0.0001), where the average reduction in bacterial count was 68.5% (Fig 5). The log10 reduction in CFU/mL counts showed significant differences among the irrigant groups (Table 1). Saline demonstrated the lowest antibacterial activity with a mean reduction of 0.571 ± 0.247. Both NaClO and B. sacra frankincense exhibited significantly higher reductions (2.993 ± 0.329 and 3.029 ± 0.130 respectively), indicating superior antibacterial efficacy compared to saline. The effect size (𝜂2 = 0.95) demonstrated that the irrigant accounts for a substantial proportion of the variance, indicating a large effect. The reduction in E. faecalis bacterial count did not differ significantly between B. sacra frankincense and NaClO irrigation (p = 1.000; Fig 6). These results highlight the antibacterial efficacy of both NaClO and frankincense from B. sacra against E. faecalis.
No bacterial biofilm was evident on the canal walls of the teeth irrigated with B. sacra frankincense in the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, with a smear layer observed in some locations, probably due to the filing of the canal walls (Fig 7).
Other areas exhibited the presence of a smear layer and debris, as indicated by the white arrows.
Discussion
Irrigation is a crucial part of successful endodontic treatment. Irrigating solutions facilitate the removal of microorganisms, necrotic and inflamed tissue, and dentine debris [38]. They also reduce friction between the instrument and dentine and improve the file-cutting effectiveness [3]. An optimal root canal irrigation procedure should eliminate bacterial biofilm and the smear layer, ensuring thorough disinfection of all aspects of the root canal.
NaOCI is a very effective disinfectant with desirable characteristics such as dissolving tissues, proteolytic activity, and bactericidal effects on endodontic biofilms [39], making it the preferred irrigation solution. Because of its high pH (between 11 and 12), NaClO is especially harmful to vital tissues and cytotoxic. NaClO accidents during root canal treatment may be rare, but if they do occur, they can result in serious patient morbidity and suffering. The presence of certain pathological and iatrogenic conditions, such as root canal perforation and external root resorption, can exacerbate this issue [40]. The often-seen clinical consequences of a NaClO accident include discomfort, ecchymosis, ulceration, edema, neurologic damage (anesthesia and paraesthesia), chemical burns and necrosis, and, at times, respiratory compromise [41].
The antibiofilm efficacy of NaClO is influenced by two key factors: the duration of contact between the solution and biofilm and its concentration. A 1% NaClO solution failed to completely eradicate all E. faecalis biofilm, indicating that higher concentrations should be used (2.5% and 5.25%), which are associated with increased cytotoxicity [42].
E. faecalis has been associated with failed root canal treatment due to its ability to endure challenging conditions [43]. Multiple studies have demonstrated that E. faecalis exhibits a high capacity to form biofilms on human dentin after 72 hours. Furthermore, the bacteria present in mature biofilms are significantly more resistant to NaClO. Irrigation with 2.5% or 5.25% NaClO within 10 minutes is necessary to effectively eradicate such biofilm [44].
The present study investigated the efficacy of frankincense derived from different Boswellia tree species as a root canal irrigant against E. faecalis biofilm. One of the major advantages of frankincense is its biocompatibility with oral tissues [35,45,46]. It has been traditionally used as an oral rinse and in the management of cough and asthma [22]. Additionally, previous studies have demonstrated that frankincense does not adversely affect the viability of heart cells or dental pulp stem cells [32,33]. The current findings demonstrated that frankincense from B. sacra was as effective as 5.25% NaClO against E. faecalis biofilm. Therefore, the null hypothesis was accepted. This finding aligns with a recent study examining the effectiveness of B. sacra extract as an intracanal medicament compared to calcium hydroxide against E. faecalis biofilm. In that study, confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed that B. sacra penetrated deeper into the dentinal tubules and exhibited superior effectiveness within a three-day application period. Even after seven days, calcium hydroxide did not surpass the performance of B. sacra [47]. Other studies also found that frankincense from B. serrata extracts notably reduced the amount of P. gingivalis biofilm compared to conventional antibiotics such as penicillin and streptomycin [36]. Therefore, it is recommended for treating periodontitis [46]. However, this effect did not extend to Fusobacterium nucleatum biofilms, highlighting that frankincense’s ability to inhibit bacterial growth depends on the type of bacteria [20]. Future studies, incorporating quantitative methods such as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination or microdilution assays would provide more precise and standardized insights into the antimicrobial effectiveness of the extract. Further studies could also investigate the effect of varying irrigation volume to better understand its impact on the antimicrobial efficacy.
Frankincense was reported to show superior efficacy against Gram-positive bacteria than Gram-negative bacteria [35], consistent with our current observation, as E. faecalis is Gram-positive. A separate study evaluated the antibacterial potential of extracts and essential oils from B. sacra and Boswellia papyrifera Hochst trees against various bacteria. Its results also revealed that the essential oil from B. sacra created the most significant zone of inhibition against E. faecalis, surpassing the effectiveness of ticarcycline [48].
Multiple studies have explored the therapeutic potential of frankincense derived from different Boswellia species, highlighting its antibacterial, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral abilities [49]. Frankincense from the B. serrata species found in India effectively prevented the formation of Streptococcus mutans biofilm [50]. It proved effective in treating gingivitis, leading to a significant decrease in inflammatory indices. Notably, no significant difference was observed between using the powder or extract form of frankincense [45].
Two varieties of frankincense: B. sacra and B. frereana were explored in this study. However, only the former created an inhibition zone in the E. faecalis susceptibility test. This inhibition zone may appear smaller than what has been reported for other plant-based antibacterial agents, such as Matricaria chamomilla, which are proposed for root canal treatment [51]. However, the thickness of the agar media used in the bacterial susceptibility test can influence the size of the inhibition zone; thinner media tend to produce larger zones [52].
Hasson et al. compared the antibacterial properties of B. sacra and B. frereana extracts against various bacteria (S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Streptococcus pneumoniae) and concluded that methanol extracts of B. sacra from Oman had superior antibacterial activity to those of B. frereana from Somalia. They concluded that the antibacterial effect depends on the tree from which the frankincense is obtained and the solvent used for extraction [20]. In addition to water extracts, they used methanol extracts, like in other studies [48]. Samani et al. used a different extraction technique, which involved soaking finely ground frankincense oleo-gum in 95% ethanol for 48 hours, followed by filtration [45], which is similar to the technique used in our study.
Another explanation could be the difference in the Boswellia resin content of boswellic, lupeolic, and pentacyclic triterpenic acids (PTAs). One study found that B. sacra resins are particularly rich in PTAs, whereas these acids were not found in B. frereana resins [53].
Anti-bacterial efficacy of frankincense was found to be related to the boswellic acids found in its gum resin. Acetyl-11-keto-b boswellic acid in particular is effective against Gram positive bacteria. It disrupts the bacterial cell membrane’s permeability causing the leaking of its cytosolic components [54–56]. However, the susceptibility of bacterial species to boswellic acids varies, for example, Gram negative bacteria showed resistance due to their outer membrane providing protection against hydrophobic compounds [55].
In the present study, a rotary evaporator, which is well-known for its effectiveness in eliminating volatile solvents such as ethanol was used to prepare the Frankincense extracts [57]. However, 20% ethanol was used to prepare the final irrigation solution with no additional purification processes. This residual ethanol may have influenced the anti-bacterial activity observed.
The quest for herbal alternatives to the gold standard, NaClO, in root canal irrigation has been scrutinized. Systematic studies have shown that many alternatives not only exhibit lower antibacterial efficacy than NaClO but also cannot dissolve organic tissue [58,59] or effectively remove the organic and inorganic components of the smear layer [60]. Whether to remove the smear layer remains contentious. Some argue for its preservation to impede further microbial infiltration [61], while others argue that its impact on clinical treatment outcomes is insignificant. However, there is a notable scarcity of clinical studies examining its role [62].
Recently, activated irrigation devices have been proposed to improve antibacterial efficacy while using lower NaClO concentrations [63]. However, these devices are costly, and their adjunct use can be time-consuming. Therefore, there is a keen interest in thoroughly exploring the potential of herbal agents to develop more efficient irrigation solutions. That said, there may be other practical challenges associated with using frankincense as a root canal irrigant. For one, potential costs and material availability and variability. The chemical composition of frankincense varies according to multiple factors, one of which is harvest conditions, leading to inconsistent extract quality. Not to mention the depletion of the Boswellia species ecosystem and their overharvesting. Better standardized extraction processes would be necessary to ensure that the sufficient amount of boswellic acids is yielded and that certain regulatory requirements such as residual solvent limits and purity standards are met. This may prove to be complex, challenging the scaling up of the process to an industrial level. For this reason, further research is required to determine the clinical applicability of this material.
Although frankincense has demonstrated potent antibacterial efficacy against a major endodontic pathogen, it is crucial to further investigate its additional properties related to irrigation. Key areas of focus should include its wetting ability, effectiveness in smear layer removal, interactions with other materials, and its impact on dentin strength. While the methodology used in our study replicated the clinical setting regarding irrigation protocol and contact with canal walls, it only targeted a single-bacteria biofilm, while the endodontic microbiota is multi-species. Therefore, further investigation of the efficacy of frankincense against the multi-species endodontic biofilm using methodologies that allow the visualization of the biofilm structure, such as confocal microscopy, is recommended.
Conclusions
This study provides initial evidence of the effectiveness of frankincense from B. sacra as a root canal irrigant. It showed similar effectiveness to NaClO in eliminating E. faecalis biofilm. However, to fully understand its potential for clinical use, more research is needed. Further investigations are necessary to clarify its complete therapeutic benefits for application in dental practice including its clinical efficacy and long-term stability.
References
- 1. Tibúrcio-Machado CS, Michelon C, Zanatta FB, Gomes MS, Marin JA, Bier CA. The global prevalence of apical periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2021;54(5):712–35. pmid:33378579
- 2. Jhajharia K, Parolia A, Shetty KV, Mehta LK. Biofilm in endodontics: A review. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5(1):1–12. pmid:25767760
- 3. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Wang Z, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Br Dent J. 2014;216(6):299–303. pmid:24651335
- 4. Alghamdi F, Shakir M. The Influence of Enterococcus faecalis as a Dental Root Canal Pathogen on Endodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2020;12(3):e7257. pmid:32292671
- 5. Hamed SA, Shabayek S, Hassan HY. Biofilm elimination from infected root canals using four different single files. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):660. pmid:36585632
- 6. Narayanan LL, Vaishnavi C. Endodontic microbiology. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13(4):233–9. pmid:21217951
- 7. Radcliffe CE, Potouridou L, Qureshi R, Habahbeh N, Qualtrough A, Worthington H, et al. Antimicrobial activity of varying concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on the endodontic microorganisms Actinomyces israelii, A. naeslundii, Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J. 2004;37(7):438–46. pmid:15189432
- 8. Siqueira JF, Machado AG, Silveira RM, Lopes HP, de Uzeda M. Evaluation of the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite used with three irrigation methods in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal, in vitro. Int Endod J. 1997;30(4):279–82. pmid:9477814
- 9. Hidalgo E, Bartolome R, Dominguez C. Cytotoxicity mechanisms of sodium hypochlorite in cultured human dermal fibroblasts and its bactericidal effectiveness. Chem Biol Interact. 2002;139(3):265–82. pmid:11879816
- 10. Só MVR, Vier-Pelisser FV, Darcie MS, Smaniotto DGR, Montagner F, Kuga MC. Pulp tissue dissolution when the use of sodium hypochlorite and EDTA alone or associated. Rev Odonto Ciênc (Online). 2011;26(2):156–60.
- 11. Taneja S, Mishra N, Malik S. Comparative evaluation of human pulp tissue dissolution by different concentrations of chlorine dioxide, calcium hypochlorite and sodium hypochlorite: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(6):541–5. pmid:25506141
- 12. Andersen M, Lund A, Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. In vitro solubility of human pulp tissue in calcium hydroxide and sodium hypochlorite. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1992;8(3):104–8. pmid:1289067
- 13. Abou-Rass M, Oglesby SW. The effects of temperature, concentration, and tissue type on the solvent ability of sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 1981;7(8):376–7. pmid:6943272
- 14. Cunningham WT, Balekjian AY. Effect of temperature on collagen-dissolving ability of sodium hypochlorite endodontic irrigant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1980;49(2):175–7. pmid:6928291
- 15. Shekwa W, Maliehe TS, Masoko P. Antimicrobial, antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of the leaf and stem extracts of Carissa bispinosa used for dental health care. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2023;23(1):462. pmid:38102607
- 16. Yudaev P, Chuev V, Klyukin B, Kuskov A, Mezhuev Y, Chistyakov E. Polymeric Dental Nanomaterials: Antimicrobial Action. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(5):864. pmid:35267686
- 17. Khan AL, Al-Harrasi A, Wang J-P, Asaf S, Riethoven J-JM, Shehzad T, et al. Genome structure and evolutionary history of frankincense producing Boswellia sacra. iScience. 2022;25(7):104574. pmid:35789857
- 18. Al-Yasiry ARM, Kiczorowska B. Frankincense--therapeutic properties. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2016;70:380–91. pmid:27117114
- 19. Assefa M, Dekebo A, Habtemariam K, Habtu A, Fitwi G, Redi M. Biophysical and Chemical Investigations of Frankincense of Boswellia Papyrifera from North and Northwestern Ethiopia. J Chem Pharm Res. 2012;4:1074–1089.
- 20. Hasson SS, Al-Balushi MS, Sallam TA, Idris MA, Habbal O, Al-Jabri AA. In vitro antibacterial activity of three medicinal plants-Boswellia (Luban) species. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2011;1(2):S178–82.
- 21. Farahani MK, Bitaraf FS, Atashi A, Jabbarpour Z. Evaluation of anticancer effects of frankincense on breast cancer stem-like cells. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023;6(2):e1693. pmid:36806721
- 22. Almeida-da-Silva CLC, Sivakumar N, Asadi H, Chang-Chien A, Qoronfleh MW, Ojcius DM, et al. Effects of Frankincense Compounds on Infection, Inflammation, and Oral Health. Molecules. 2022;27(13):4174. pmid:35807419
- 23. Ljaljević Grbić M, Unković N, Dimkić I, Janaćković P, Gavrilović M, Stanojević O, et al. Frankincense and myrrh essential oils and burn incense fume against micro-inhabitants of sacral ambients. Wisdom of the ancients?. J Ethnopharmacol. 2018;219:1–14. pmid:29530608
- 24. El-Nagerabi SAF, Elshafie AE, AlKhanjari SS, Al-Bahry SN, Elamin MR. Biological activities of Boswellia sacra extracts on the growth and aflatoxins secretion of two aflatoxigenic species of Aspergillus species. Food Control. 2013;34(2):763–9.
- 25. Al-Harrasi A, Ali L, Rehman NU, Hussain H, Hussain J, Al-Rawahi A, et al. Nine triterpenes from Boswellia sacra Flückiger and their chemotaxonomic importance. Biochem Syst Ecol. 2013;51:113–6.
- 26. Di Stefano V, Schillaci D, Cusimano MG, Rishan M, Rashan L. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Frankincense Oils from Boswellia sacra Grown in Different Locations of the Dhofar Region (Oman). Antibiotics (Basel). 2020;9(4):195. pmid:32325952
- 27. Al-Saidi S, Rameshkumar KB, Hisham A, Sivakumar N, Al-Kindy S. Composition and antibacterial activity of the essential oils of four commercial grades of Omani luban, the oleo-gum resin of Boswellia sacra FLUECK. Chem Biodivers. 2012;9(3):615–24. pmid:22422529
- 28. Karlapudi V, Sunkara KB, Konda PR, Sarma KV, Rokkam MP. Efficacy and Safety of Aflapin®, a Novel Boswellia Serrata Extract, in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Short-Term 30-Day Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study. J Am Nutr Assoc. 2023;42(2):159–68. pmid:35512759
- 29. Ammon H. Boswellic acids in chronic inflammatory diseases. Planta Med. 2006;72(12):1100–16. pmid:17024588
- 30. Jamshidi-Adegani F, Ghaemi S, Al-Hashmi S, Vakilian S, Al-Kindi J, Rehman NU, et al. Comparative study of the cytotoxicity, apoptotic, and epigenetic effects of Boswellic acid derivatives on breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):19979. pmid:36411309
- 31. Roy NK, Deka A, Bordoloi D, Mishra S, Kumar AP, Sethi G, et al. The potential role of boswellic acids in cancer prevention and treatment. Cancer Lett. 2016;377(1):74–86. pmid:27091399
- 32. Taherzadeh D, Baradaran Rahimi V, Amiri H, Ehtiati S, Yahyazadeh R, Hashemy SI, et al. Acetyl-11-Keto-β-Boswellic Acid (AKBA) Prevents Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammation and Cytotoxicity on H9C2 Cells. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2022;2022:2620710. pmid:35399644
- 33. Amer NA, Badawi MF, Elbeltagi MG, Badr AE. Effect of Boswellic Acid on Viability of Dental Pulp Stem Cells Compared to the Commonly Used Intracanal Medications: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023;24(12):957–66. pmid:38317393
- 34. Börner F, Werner M, Ertelt J, Meins J, Abdel-Tawab M, Werz O. Analysis of Boswellic Acid Contents and Related Pharmacological Activities of Frankincense-Based Remedies That Modulate Inflammation. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021;14(7):660. pmid:34358086
- 35. Ilyas K, Singer L, Akhtar MA, Bourauel CP, Boccaccini AR. Boswellia sacra Extract-Loaded Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nano Particles: Synthesis and Biological Effects. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(1):126. pmid:35057022
- 36. Vang D, Moreira-Souza ACA, Zusman N, Moncada G, Matshik Dakafay H, Asadi H, et al. Frankincense (Boswellia serrata) Extract Effects on Growth and Biofilm Formation of Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Its Intracellular Infection in Human Gingival Epithelial Cells. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024;46(4):2991–3004. pmid:38666917
- 37. ATCC ATCC: The Global Bioresource Center. Bacterial Products Available online: https://www.atcc.org/%0A http://www.atcc.org/.
- 38. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54(2):291–312. pmid:20433979
- 39. Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV. Antimicrobial substantivity of root canal irrigants and medicaments: a review. Aust Endod J. 2009;35(3):131–9. pmid:19961451
- 40. Hatton J, Walsh S, Wilson A. Management of the sodium hypochlorite accident: a rare but significant complication of root canal treatment. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015:bcr2014207480. pmid:25809429
- 41. Patel E, Gangadin M. Managing sodium hypochlorite accidents: the reality of toxicity. South African Dent J. 2017;72(6).
- 42. Forough Reyhani M, Rezagholizadeh Y, Narimani MR, Rezagholizadeh L, Mazani M, Barhaghi MHS, et al. Antibacterial effect of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite on Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in root canals. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2017;11(4):215–21. pmid:29354247
- 43. Colaco A. Extreme resistance of Enterococcus faecalis and its role in endodontic treatment failure. Prog Med Sci. 2018;2(2):9.
- 44. Zand V, Lotfi M, Soroush MH, Abdollahi AA, Sadeghi M, Mojadadi A. Antibacterial Efficacy of Different Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite Gel and Solution on Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm. Iran Endod J. 2016;11(4):315–9. pmid:27790262
- 45. Khosravi Samani M, Mahmoodian H, Moghadamnia A, Poorsattar Bejeh Mir A, Chitsazan M. The effect of Frankincense in the treatment of moderate plaque-induced gingivitis: a double blinded randomized clinical trial. Daru. 2011;19(4):288–94. pmid:22615671
- 46. Attallah NGM, Negm WA, Elekhnawy E, Altwaijry N, Elmongy EI, El-Masry TA, et al. Antibacterial Activity of Boswellia sacra Flueck. Oleoresin Extract against Porphyromonas gingivalis Periodontal Pathogen. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(7):859. pmid:34356781
- 47. El-Essawy RH, Al-Ashry S, Sabet NE, Ghobashy AM. Assessment of depth of penetration and antibiofilm properties of Boswellia sacra compared with calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament (in vitro study). Aust Endod J. 2023;49(2):295–301. pmid:36004503
- 48. Abdou-Latif MF, Obame LC, Dicko MH. Antimicrobial activities of essential oil and methanol extract of Boswellia sacra Flueck. and Boswellia papyrifera (Del.) Hochst from Djibouti. Int J Manag. 2012;1(1):1–12.
- 49. Roy NK, Parama D, Banik K, Bordoloi D, Devi AK, Thakur KK, et al. An Update on Pharmacological Potential of Boswellic Acids against Chronic Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(17):4101. pmid:31443458
- 50. Raja AF, Ali F, Khan IA, Shawl AS, Arora DS. Acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid (AKBA); targeting oral cavity pathogens. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:406. pmid:21992439
- 51. Kameri A, Haziri A, Hashani Z, Dragidella A, Kurteshi K, Kurti A. Antibacterial Effect of Matricaria chamomilla L. Extract Against Enterococcus faecalis. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2023;15:13–20. pmid:36820402
- 52. Gajic I, Kabic J, Kekic D, Jovicevic M, Milenkovic M, Mitic Culafic D, et al. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: A Comprehensive Review of Currently Used Methods. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022;11(4):427. pmid:35453179
- 53. Schmiech M, Lang SJ, Werner K, Rashan LJ, Syrovets T, Simmet T. Comparative analysis of pentacyclic triterpenic acid compositions in oleogum resins of different boswellia species and their in vitro cytotoxicity against treatment-resistant human breast cancer cells. Molecules. 2019;24(11):2153. pmid:31181656
- 54. Iram F, Khan SA, Husain A. Phytochemistry and potential therapeutic actions of Boswellic acids: A mini-review. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2017;7(6):513–23.
- 55. Raja AF, Ali F, Khan IA, Shawl AS, Arora DS, Shah BA, et al. Antistaphylococcal and biofilm inhibitory activities of acetyl-11-keto-β-boswellic acid from Boswellia serrata. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11:54. pmid:21406118
- 56. Jaroš P, Timkina E, Michailidu J, Maršík D, Kulišová M, Kolouchová I, et al. Boswellic acids as effective antibacterial antibiofilm agents. Molecules. 2022;27(12):3795. pmid:35744925
- 57. Bnyan R, Cesarini L, Khan I, Roberts M, Ehtezazi T. The effect of ethanol evaporation on the properties of inkjet produced liposomes. DARU J Pharm Sci. 2020;28(1):271–80.
- 58. Janani K, Teja K, Jose J, Liin GS. An evidence-based discussion on herbal-based root canal disinfection: A letter to editor unrevealing the current scope and future perspective. Saudi Endod J. 2022;12(3):340.
- 59. Teja KV, Janani K, Srivastava KC, Shrivastava D, Jose J, Marya A, et al. Comparison of herbal agents with sodium hypochlorite as root canal irrigant: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2021;2021:8967219. pmid:34868334
- 60. Teja KV, Janani K, Alqahtani AA, Robaian A, Alhalabi F, Merdad KA, et al. Herbal agents versus ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid on removal of the smear layer-a systematic review of in vitro studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(11):6870. pmid:35682452
- 61. Shahravan A, Haghdoost A-A, Adl A, Rahimi H, Shadifar F. Effect of smear layer on sealing ability of canal obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2007;33(2):96–105. pmid:17258623
- 62. Alamoudi RA. The smear layer in endodontic: to keep or remove – an updated overview. Saudi Endod J. 2019;9(2):71.
- 63. Alves-Silva EG, Arruda-Vasconcelos R, Louzada LM, de-Jesus-Soares A, Ferraz CCR, Almeida JFA, et al. Effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on the reduction of bacteria and virulence factors in teeth with primary endodontic infection. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2023;41:103292. pmid:36681260