Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Salmonella isolated from street foods and environment of an urban park: A whole genome sequencing approach

  • Christian Vinueza-Burgos,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Unidad de Investigación de Enfermedades Transmitidas por Alimentos y Resistencia a los Antimicrobianos (UNIETAR), Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador

  • José Medina-Santana,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Unidad de Investigación de Enfermedades Transmitidas por Alimentos y Resistencia a los Antimicrobianos (UNIETAR), Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador

  • Maria Ishida,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Food Laboratory, New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, Albany, New York, United States of America.

  • Brian Sauders,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Food Laboratory, New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, Albany, New York, United States of America.

  • Gregory Deiulio,

    Roles Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Food Laboratory, New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, Albany, New York, United States of America.

  • Alyssa Dickey,

    Roles Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Food Laboratory, New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, Albany, New York, United States of America.

  • Pablo Endara,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Escuela de Medicina, Colegio de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador

  • Rommy Terán

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    riteran@uce.edu.ec (RT)

    Affiliation Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador

Abstract

Salmonella is one of the most important foodborne pathogens worldwide. Therefore, this study was conducted to understand the importance of this microorganism in street food and the environment of an urban park in Quito, Ecuador. This research included phenotypic characterization and whole genome sequencing (WGS) analysis of isolates from different food matrices and fecal samples of dogs and pigeons. Salmonella was found in 10% (18/180) of the food samples, 3% (3/100) of the dog stool samples, and 5% (5/100) of the pigeon stool samples. These results also showed that meals containing any sauce or eggs were associated with a high probability of Salmonella isolation, regardless of other ingredients. All Salmonella isolates from food were identified as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) while isolates from animal feces belonged to Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis (S. Infantis) and S. Typhimurium. WGS analysis showed that all S. Typhimurium strains belonged to ST19 and S. Infantis to ST32 according to the Multi-Locus Sequence Type (MLST) scheme. These strains were not related to Salmonella genomes of other origins when a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) tree analysis was carried out. Antimicrobial resistance genes, such as blaCTX-M-65, were predominantly linked to the pESI-like plasmid found in S. Infantis. These results show the importance of urban fauna as a reservoir of S. Infantis and the impact these animals could have in terms of public health.

Introduction

Meals served and sometimes cooked in public places are named street food. These foods are widely exposed to potential microbial contamination through soil, dust, and water contact. Besides, preparation methods, holding temperature, and food-handlers’ sanitary practices are factors related to the risk of bacterial contamination [1].

Pathogenic microorganisms like Salmonella have been reported in street food [24], causing food-borne illnesses. This pathogen can cause diseases ranging from diarrhea to septicemia according to the serotype [5]. Besides, the recurrent reports of resistant strains of this pathogen lead to problems related to the disease treatment [68]. Therefore, isolation and characterization of Salmonella in different food matrices are essential in the active surveillance of safety and quality control of food [6].

Millions of low-and-middle-income consumers eat street food regularly in developing countries, mainly due to the low cost and easy access to these foods. Additionally, the growth of street food vendors promoted by socioeconomic conditions (migratory crisis, inflation, etc.) has raised the risks of food poisoning and outbreaks [1]. These small businesses are usually located in urban parks where urban animals are present, especially dogs and pigeons [2,3]. Dogs play many roles such as pets, guarding, lifesaving, and they are important in the physical and psychological human well-being. Nonetheless, dogs may represent a potential risk for human health due to the possibility of the transmission of zoonoses [4]. Thus, dogs can be infected, even asymptomatically, by several zoonotic enteric bacteria (species of Salmonella, Campylobacter, Yersinia, Listeria, etc.) that later are excreted and spread by their feces, representing a risk of infection to the human population [9].

On the other hand, populations of feral pigeons are dense in cities and could act as reservoirs and vectors of diseases to other birds and humans. Pigeons, due to their tendency to forage in garbage and animal remains, play a significant role in the spread and epidemiology of certain bacterial pathogens [5]. Salmonella is among the primary zoonotic bacteria reported to be harbored by pigeons[10] which potentially implicates these birds in the transmission of salmonellosis in urban environments [6].

When dog feces are not regularly removed from public places such as parks, it might represent a risk factor because organic matter can be spread by wind, vehicular and bike traffic, contaminating food and water [7]. Similarly, pigeons can be considered a risk factor when contaminated feces reach food and water after traveling several kilometers [8]. Consequently, microbiological surveillance of street food should be implemented as a strategy to reduce the risk of foodborne diseases. Plasmids play a crucial role in bacterial evolution, conferring antimicrobial resistance and enhancing host adaptation. Initially, plasmids were classified into Incompatibility (Inc) groups based on coexistence capacity within a cell [11], yet this method lacks insight into genetic variants and phylogenetic relationships. With this background, a sequence-based typing scheme named plasmid multilocus sequence typing (pMLST) has been proposed [12]. Moreover, plasmids exhibit genetic plasticity, altering gene order without affecting function, and complicating epidemiological research. Thus, combining Inc groups with pMLST enhances our grasp of plasmid dynamics in bacterial communities. Thus, the present study aims to evaluate the occurrence and genetic profiles of Salmonella in the food cooked and commercialized in the biggest urban park of Quito city. This study also evaluates whether dog’s and pigeon’s feces can be contaminated with this bacterium and be a potential source of infection for humans.

Materials and methods

Study area and design

This cross-sectional study was conducted from July to September 2018 in Carolina Park, situated in Quito-Ecuador. Quito is the capital of the country, and this park is the largest one in the city (61.4 ha; 0º11’019” S -78º29’04.9” W) nestled in a bustling area surrounded by schools, office buildings, and shopping centers (S1 file). More than 100.000 people visit it every week and is particularly known for its dog-friendly environment, numerous pets, and stray dogs living in the park. Besides, this green area is the habitat of many wild and urban birds including pigeons. Contamination from dogs and pigeon stools is commonly seen in several areas. This park is also a place where people prepare and sell street foods, providing visitors with a variety of local snacks and meals. However, there is a lack of clean water and adequate food safety measures.

Sample collection

Sample size was defined by convenience because there is no valid information about the dogs and pigeons’ numbers in this location, nor about the numbers of food sellers and prevalence of Salmonella in street foods. Moreover, this study was not intended to measure the prevalence of Salmonella in street foods, but to establish the genomic relationship among Salmonella isolates.

The park of study has six locations (Children’s play area, Lagoon Area, Botanical garden, Running track, Skating area, and sports facilities). Vendors occupied these areas without established regulations. Five different vendors were selected in each area and 3 food samples were acquired from each vendor. So, a total of 15 food samples from each area were collected. This procedure was repeated 7 days later in the same locations but with different vendors reaching 180 food samples for final analyses. Foods were categorized according to their susceptibility to contamination core ingredients. Core ingredients do not necessarily mean the main ingredient, but those that, due to handling or limited cooking processing, imply a greater risk of contamination for the dish. These categorized ingredients were: sauce, fruit, beef, chicken, eggs, sausages, milk, potatoes, and chocho (pearl lupin). However, several foods shared some core components, and many were composed of a mixture of cooked and raw ingredients (S2 file).

A total of 200 stool samples (100 pigeons and 100 dogs) were collected for 6 Sundays in the same locations as the food vendors. Fecal samples were identified as freshly deposited by visual inspection and subsequently collected as individual samples.

All samples were individually packed in sterile plastic containers, labelled (date of sampling, location, number and type of sample) and transported at 4°C in cooler boxes with ice packs to the microbiology laboratory for processing within 48 hours of collection. Sample collection did not involve live animals nor human samples. Therefore, no permits were needed according to local regulations.

Microbial analysis of food

The food samples analysis was carried out according to the NTE INEN 1529-15:2009 Ecuadorian standard [9]. Shortly, 25g of the food sample was homogenized in 225 ml peptone water (Conda, Madrid, Spain), and incubated at 37°C overnight. Following enrichment, 1 ml of diluted sample was inoculated in 10 ml tetrathionate broth with brilliant green (Conda, Madrid, Spain) and in 10 ml selenite cystine broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The incubation temperatures were 42°C and 37°C respectively; both tubes were incubated for 48 hours. Following the second enrichment, a loopful of each broth was inoculated into Salmonella-Shigella agar (SSA) (Conda, Madrid, Spain); Bismuth sulfite agar (Conda, Madrid, Spain); Brilliant green phenol red lactose agar (Neogen, Lansing, USA) in duplicates and incubated at 37°C overnight [9]. After incubation, colonies were isolated for further biochemical analyses and stored at -80 °C until antibiotic resistance testing and molecular analysis. American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strain 14028 was used as a positive control in all processes.

Microbial analysis of stool samples

Stool samples were analyzed using the ISO 6579:2002 standard [10]. Approximately 1 g of the stool sample was homogenized in 9 ml peptone water (Conda, Madrid, Spain) mixed properly and incubated at 37°C overnight. The 1 ml diluted sample was inoculated in 10 ml Rappaport Vassiliadis broth (Conda, Madrid, Spain) at 42°C overnight. Then, a loopful of broth was inoculated into Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate agar (BD, Sparks, USA) in duplicates and incubated at 37°C overnight [11]. After incubation, suspected colonies were isolated for further biochemical analyses and stored at -80 °C until antibiotic resistance testing and molecular analysis.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella isolates was tested by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [12]. Antibiotics were selected to represent the major antibiotic groups commonly used in human and veterinary medicine in Ecuador. Tested antibiotic (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) were Ertapenem (ETP, 10 μg), Cefoxitin (FOX, 30 μg), Cefotaxime (CTX, 30 μg), Trimethoprim +  Sulfamethoxazole (STX, 1.25/23.75 μg), Streptomycin (S, 10 μg), Nitrofurantoin (F, 300 μg), Amoxicillin +  Clavulanic acid (AMC, 20/10 μg), Chloramphenicol, (C, 30 μg), Gentamicin (CN, 10 μg), Azithromycin (AZM, 15 μg), Fosfomycin (FF, 50 μg), Ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 μg), Tetracycline (TE, 30 μg), and Amikacin (AK, 30 μg). Cutoff values from CLSI 2022 were used for Kirby-Bauer interpretation [12].

DNA extraction and whole genome sequencing

Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI) was used to extract the Genomic DNA according to manufacturer instructions. Salmonella isolates were confirmed by PCR according to Akiba, et al. [13]. DNA concentration and quality were measured by Qubit fluorometer system (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and the NanoDrop 2000 UV-Vis (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE). DNA extracts with concentrations greater than 10 ng/mL and an A260/280 ratio of 1.75 to 2.05 were directly sequenced. However, DNA extracts outside this range could be integrated always that data quality based on coverage (>40X) and other quality assessments inherent in the analysis pipelines were satisfactory. MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA) was used to perform whole genome sequencing (WGS) according to the harmonized FDA GenomeTrakr/CDC PulseNet protocol (CDC PulseNet, 2018). Sequences were uploaded to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA). Accession numbers of all genomes studied genes, and their metadata are listed in S3 File.

Bioinformatic analysis

The integrated software environment EnteroBase was used for quality control, trimming, and assembly of raw reads [14,15]. This platform also functions to identify serotypes, Sequence Type (ST) based on MLST and cgMLST schemes, carrying out SNP tree analysis, and supplying assembled sequences for further analysis. Visualization and annotation of SNP tree analysis were performed on iTOL v. 6.0 [16]. The genomes were compared between them and with other Salmonella genomes of different origins (humans, poultry, environment, and wildlife) isolated in Ecuador using sequences available in Enterobase.

Additionally, genes and SNPs that determine resistance to antimicrobials and disinfectants were identified by AMRfinder plus and ResFinder database [17,18]. Virulence genes were identified by the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB)[19] using a mass screening of contigs in ABRicate software [20].

Functional nitrofurantoin resistance-associated mutations were identified as previously described [21]. Briefly, all genomes were mapped to the wild-type sequences of nfsA and nfsB genes (oxygen insensitive nitro reductase enzymes) of S. enterica accession number NC_003197 (Geneious prime v. 2021.0.3). Once sequences were identified, those that possessed mutations were in silico translated and aligned with the wild type proteins sequences to visualize nonsense mutations [22].

In order to identify plasmids, Platon v.1.6 [2326] was used for plasmid contigs prediction. Additionally, Geneious Prime 2022.1.1. (https://www.geneious.com) and NCBI–BLAST [27] were used to profile the plasmids’ identity. For that, tentative plasmids were mapped in all genomes using the map to reference tool in the Geneious Prime software.

Statistical analysis

Examined variables were analyzed as qualitative exposures (presence or absence) for meals and nominal for collection place. The relative frequency of each category was expressed in percentage. Multicomponent food was treated according to the main core ingredient in food as stated earlier. Fischer exact test was used to explore the association of each core-ingredient meal and the presence of Salmonella. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the association (odds ratio) between each meal ingredient and the possibility of Salmonella isolation in univariate and multivariate analysis. All analyses were made in STATA software V.15 [28]. Significant results were considered when p-values were equal or under 0.05.

Results

Association between specific type of food and Salmonella Isolation

From the 380 samples analyzed, twenty-six isolates of Salmonella were recovered. Among these isolates, Salmonella was found in 10% (18/180) of food samples, 3% (3/100) of dog stool samples, and 5% (5/100) of pigeon stool samples (S3 file). Meals containing sauces, chicken, potatoes, and eggs were associated with higher frequency of Salmonella isolation in univariable analysis. After considering the effect of the other ingredients, the only main ingredient associated with higher probability of Salmonella isolation were meals containing some sauce or eggs. The presence of sauce or eggs increases 7.9 and 15 times the probability of Salmonella isolation respectively (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Uni and multivariate analysis of association between ingredients of street food and Salmonella isolation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320735.t001

Salmonella serotypes

All Salmonella isolates that originated in food were identified as S. Typhimurium while Salmonella isolates that originated in animal feces belonged to the serotypes S. Infantis and S. Typhimurium (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Number of Salmonella isolates originated in each sample type.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320735.t002

Phenotypic and genetic antimicrobial resistance and plasmids identification

All S. Typhimurium isolates showed phenotypic resistance to streptomycin and harbored the chromosomal aac(6’)-Iaa gene linked to aminoglycoside resistance. These isolates were sensitive to all other tested antibiotics including other aminoglycosides (S3 file).

S. Typhimurium strains harbored three different plasmids: pPNCS007087.2 (accession: CP044969), pPNCS014854_S1 (accession: CP037873), and pSe32 (accession: CP067340). Besides, all S. Typhimurium strains presented the Incompatibility Group F (IncF) (Sequences IncFIB(S) & IncFII(S)). These strains showed the plasmid Multi Locus Sequence Type (pMLST): [S1:A-:B17].

On the other hand, all S. Infantis harbored the plasmids p1864-3 (CP084495) which did not present any resistance genes, and pCFSAN059940 (accession: CP074342) with several resistance genes. The replicon IncFIB(pN55391) was identified in pCFSAN059940-like plasmid that could be integrated into the Incompatibility Group I1 (IncI1). However, the p1864-3 plasmids found in this study were not detected by the PlasmidFinder.

All S. Infantis strains showed the same phenotypic resistance pattern (Table 3). Most of the phenotypic resistance of S. Infantis strains was linked to antimicrobial resistance genes harbored in the pCFSAN059940-like plasmid (PESI-like). However, resistance to fosfomycin, sulfamethoxazole +  trimethoprim, and some Beta-lactams did not express phenotypically even though related genes were present (silenced genes) (Table 3). This plasmid was the only one related to antimicrobial-resistance, biocide-resistance, and metal-resistance genes found in the studied strains (Fig 1). The lack of repI1 locus in pCFSAN059940 plasmids did not allow us to assign them to any known pMLST. However, the nearest sequence was pST 71.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Alignment of pCFSAN059940-like plasmids presents in S. Infantis strains with the reference plasmid.

The alignment with the reference plasmid, showed a mean coverage of 58.4% and a pairwise identity of 98.1% with entire blocks reorganized or absent in the strains. Inner ring represents the reference plasmid pCFSAN059940.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320735.g001

Clonal analysis

All S. Typhimurium strains from food belonged to ST19 and S. Infantis from feces to ST32 according to the Multi Locus Sequence Type (MLST) scheme. However, the Hierarchical clustering of cgMLST (HierCC)[29] allowed to differentiate 5 different cgST in S. Typhimurium and 5 cgST in S. Infantis at HC0 (cgMLST V2 +  HierCC V1) which are practically indistinguishable. Furthermore, from the HC2 level (cgMLST V2 +  HierCC V1), no difference between strains of each serotype could be identified (S3 file). These results show that strains of each serotype were highly clonal. These strains were not related to Salmonella genomes of other origins (Figs 2 and 3).

thumbnail
Fig 2. SNP tree analysis of S. Infantis isolates.

Green circles show the strains of this study. All strains belonged to ST32.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320735.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. SNP tree analysis of S. Typhimurium isolates.

Red circles show the strains of this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320735.g003

Discussion

The present work is the first report of Salmonella in ready-to-eat street food in Ecuador. The presence of Salmonella isolated in this study reached 10%, which agrees with regional reports of Salmonella-contaminated street food in Colombia [30,31], Brazil [32], and other developing countries in Asia and Africa [3335]. Although the diversity of food matrices and local behaviors make it difficult to perform comparisons between countries, it is important to highlight that this type of food is a potential source of foodborne disease-causing bacteria.

Given that most food samples had some thermal treatment, positive results could be related to cross-contamination events in the storage or distribution of foods. These kinds of events have been widely documented, mainly associating cookware with contaminated raw meat [3638]. The presence of pathogens in street food might also be related to the hygienic status of vendors, serving practices, and the unavailability of running water [39,40]. Therefore, in situ, manipulation of raw ingredients and the usage of undercooked ingredients in final dishes (e.g.,: homemade salad and homemade mayonnaise) are risk factors for the presence of Salmonella in street foods [4143]. This fact can be demonstrated in this study, where the presence of sauce or eggs increases up to 15 times the probability of Salmonella isolation independently of other ingredients or dressings.

On the other hand, urban animals such as dogs and pigeons could play a role in the epidemiology of Salmonella in highly populated cities, either due to their potential role as reservoirs or carriers of this pathogen [44,45]. Some studies have reported S. Infantis, S. Typhimurium, and other serotypes in urban fauna in North America, South America, Europe, and Asia [4553]. In this study, Salmonella isolates of street food clustered with one isolate of dog feces origin. This fact shows the possible implication of contaminated street food with the presence of domestic animals in the environments where food is prepared. However, zooanthroponosis events (like the consumption of leftovers by dogs) could also explain this observation. These potential interactions highlight the necessity of addressing the epidemiology of Salmonella as a whole, to better control its transmission to humans [54]. In this context, emphasis should be placed on contributing factors of food cross-contamination including the hygienic practices implemented during the preparation of street foods and avoiding feral and domestic animals on the vicinities of food street vendors.

S Typhimurium and S. Infantis are the predominant serotypes in this study. These findings are of special relevance considering that these pathogens are among the main causal agents of gastroenteritis associated with contaminated food [55]. The analysis of clonality showed that isolates of both serotypes belonged to specific sequence types. S. Typhimurium isolates belonged to the ST19 which has been reported as a food contaminant in several studies [5660]. In the case of S. Infantis, isolates of pigeon and dog origin clustered together showing the close relation that animals living in the same environment could have in terms of Salmonella colonization. These isolates belonged to the sequence type ST32 which has been extensively reported in Ecuador in the poultry production chain [21,61,62]. Although these strains did not cluster with other ST32 strains isolated on multiple origins in Ecuador, these results highlight the importance of urban fauna as reservoirs of S. Infantis and the implications that these animals could have in terms of public health [63]. S. Typhimurium did not show clonality with other sources; however, a cluster was found that includes a strain from dog feces, supporting the hypothesis of cross-contamination. This is important due to its role in the epidemiology of Salmonella, which includes the transmission of genetic determinants of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Since this evidence does not show a relation of these strains as contaminants of sampled food, a larger sampling should be conducted to confirm this assumption.

Except for streptomycin, all S. Typhimurium were susceptible to tested antibiotics. These results differ from other regional reports in food and humans where this serotype usually presents multidrug-resistant patterns [6468]. This finding is supported by clonality analysis, which demonstrated that the strains in this study are not closely related to strains of S. Typhimurium with higher resistance profiles from other origins. This suggests that the clones isolated in this study may be circulating specifically within this niche. However, more extensive sampling is required to confirm this hypothesis.

Multi-drug resistant S. Infantis in the region has been previously reported in animals, food, and the environment [62,6971]. Furthermore, this serotype has been documented in broilers exhibiting extreme drug resistance, resistance to disinfectants, enhanced virulence, and improved ability to form biofilms. These characteristics have been linked to pESI-like plasmids [21,54,62]. Except for cefoxitin, amoxicillin +  clavulanic acid, sulfamethoxazole +  trimethoprim, and fosfomycin; the resistant phenotypes could be related to the genetic determinants of resistance present in the strains.

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) deactivate a broad array of beta-lactams, ranging from penicillin to third-generation cephalosporins. However, these enzymes typically do not affect beta-lactamase inhibitors and cephamycins [72]. Historically, resistance to these antibiotics has been primarily linked to AmpC beta-lactamases (class C or group 1) [73]. In the strains examined, blaCTX-M-65 was the only beta-lactamase gene detected, suggesting that the spectrum of activity for this particular allele does not extend to cefoxitin and amoxicillin +  clavulanic acid. This outcome aligns with previous findings in genetically similar strains, supporting this hypothesis [74,75]. Nevertheless, additional experimental verification is required to confirm these results.

Fosfomycin has emerged as a primary treatment option for urinary tract infections and a last-resort therapy for severe infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria [76,77]. Although the present study does not integrate a transcriptional analysis, it was notable that all fosfomycin-susceptible isolates in this study exhibited a lack of fosA3 gene expression. Although such observations are scarce, similar findings have been reported in other bacteria [78,79]. It should be noted that most research concentrates on identifying genetic markers in resistant phenotypes [80,81], which may lead to an underestimation of the presence of fosA3 in susceptible isolates. We considered the possibility of a non-functional product arising from an incomplete or modified gene. However, fosA3 genes showed 100% coverage and identity in all cases (data not shown). Therefore, this event might be attributed to the genetic context of the strains and the absence of promoter regions necessary for fosA3 gene expression (not functional gene or subexpression)[82]. A comparable situation occurs with the folate pathway inhibitors, where despite the presence of resistance genes to trimethoprim (dfrA14) and sulfamethoxazole (sul1), no phenotypic resistance to the combined action of these antibiotics was observed. It is noteworthy that even though laboratory conditions have been proposed as a source of bias when analyzing antimicrobial resistance, the phenomenon of silent genes has been observed to be a common event [83]. Given these facts, further research is essential to fully understand these dynamics in future research.

The study of plasmids structure, epidemiology, and expression is vital for pathogen surveillance. Historically, plasmids were categorized by Incompatibility groups (Inc groups), which describe their coexistence in cells but do not reflect genetic variants or phylogenetic relationships [84]. The introduction of plasmid multilocus sequence typing (pMLST) in 2014 provides a more precise analysis of plasmid diversity and evolution by examining specific loci [24]. Combining Inc groups with pMLST enhances our understanding of plasmid dynamics in bacterial populations. In our study, no resistance genes could be found in plasmids of S. Typhimurium. These plasmids have the replicons IncFIB(S) and IncFII(S) which belong to the Incompatibility Group F (IncF). Additionally, these plasmids belonged to the pMLST [S1:A-:B17]. Comparable results were reported in isolates of this serotype with similar features from pigs in Denmark [85]. However, this pMLST was also reported in S. Typhimurium from humans with the blaTEM-1B gene harbored in plasmids with different replicons (FIB(S), FII(S))[86]. It must be noted that the pMLST [S1:A-:B17] has not been reported in other bacteria than S. Typhimurium which could indicate that these plasmids are highly conserved in this Salmonella serotype.

On the other hand, the plasmid in S. Infantis strains of this study (pCFSAN059940-like) belongs to the Incompatibility Group I1 (IncI1) with the replicon IncFIB(pN55391). This plasmid does not have an assigned pMLST, however, it is highly similar to the pMLST 71. It should be noted that plasmids of similar characteristics (the same replicon and pMLST) have been previously reported in South America [21,62,69,87]. On the other hand, other plasmids with this replicon and also lack a known repI1 sequence could be identified in Europe but show a close genetic structure to the pMLST 209 [88,89]. These plasmids, generically called pESI or pESI-like, are related to poultry worldwide and associated with MDR genes. Additionally, this Inc group contains several plasmids reported in Salmonella and E. coli of human and animal origin [90].

These findings indicate the potential presence of plasmids, identified by unique genetic markers, that could have increased affinity to particular bacteria or serotypes. Furthermore, the observation that Salmonella strains of the same serotype carried plasmids with identical pMLST supports the conclusions drawn from the previous clonality analysis. Such insights could be valuable for integration into surveillance and control strategies. Besides, the combination of replicon identities and pMLST typing gives an interesting way to overcome the challenges that the genomic plasticity of plasmids represents when understanding the epidemiological dynamics of Salmonella.

The study acknowledges certain factors that may influence the findings, such as the absence of a single protocol, which limited direct comparison between food and animal feces, and the limited sample size included in the analysis. Nevertheless, this study marks the initial scientific documentation of Salmonella in Ecuadorian street food, underscoring the interconnected roles of urban environments and fauna. It raises critical questions regarding the direction of transmission: Are the street foods contaminated due to the presence of dogs, or are dogs contracting Salmonella from contaminated street food? This highlights the need for a One Health approach to fully understand and address the transmission dynamics in urban settings. Additionally, the study emphasizes the importance of plasmid analysis for understanding bacterial evolution and underscores the need for comprehensive food safety and animal management strategies.

Supporting information

S1 File. Sampling site coordinates.

Photographs and coordinates of exact location of Quito and the Carolina Park are presented in the S1 file.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320735.s001

(PDF)

S2 File. Food and animal samples description and location.

Core components of food, animal source of samples and location are listed in S2 file.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320735.s002

(XLSX)

S3 File. Genotypic and phenotypic data of the Salmonella isolates.

Accession numbers of all genomes studied genes, and their metadata as well as the phenotypic antimicrobial responses are listed in the S3 file.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320735.s003

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Juan Carlos Muriel, Sandra Cangui Panchi and Karol Delgado Juca for sample collection in the park and Salmonella isolation.

References

  1. 1. Martínez L, Short JR. The informal city: exploring the variety of the street vending economy. Sustainability. 2022;14(12):7213.
  2. 2. Torres-Mejía AM, Blanco-Peña K, Rodríguez C, Duarte F, Jiménez-Soto M, Esperón F. Zoonotic agents in feral pigeons (Columba livia) from costa rica: possible improvements to diminish contagion risks. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2018;18(1):49–54. pmid:29243991
  3. 3. Cortez-Aguirre GR, Jiménez-Coello M, Gutiérrez-Blanco E, Ortega-Pacheco A. Stray dog population in a city of southern mexico and its impact on the contamination of public areas. Vet Med Int. 2018;2018:2381583. pmid:30356356
  4. 4. Almeida KC, Pinto-Ferreira F, Navarro IT, Souza KL, Balbino LS, Bernardes JC, et al. Occurrence of zoonotic enteric parasites in fecal samples from dogs in shelters, parks, squares and public roads, and the dog guardians’ perception of zoonoses as for the risk to public health in the city of Guarapuava, Paraná, Brazil. Top Companion Anim Med. 2024;58:100826. pmid:37884174
  5. 5. Blechman AD. Flying Rats. In: Trash Animals: How We Live with Nature’s Filthy, Feral, Invasive, and Unwanted Species. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2013. p. 221–42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816680542.003.0014
  6. 6. Karim SJI, Islam M, Sikder T, Rubaya R, Halder J, Alam J. Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. isolated from pigeons. Vet World. 2020;13(10):2156–65. pmid:33281350
  7. 7. Mori K, Rock M, McCormack G, Liccioli S, Giunchi D, Marceau D, et al. Fecal contamination of urban parks by domestic dogs and tragedy of the commons. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):3462. pmid:36859468
  8. 8. Chidamba L, Korsten L. Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from roof-harvested rainwater tanks and urban pigeon faeces as the likely source of contamination. Environ Monitor Assess. 2015;187(7):405. Available from:
  9. 9. INEN (Instituto Ecuatoriano de Normalización). Control microbiológico de los alimentos. Salmonella. Método de detección. Ecuador: NORMA TÉCNICA ECUATORIANA; 2009.
  10. 10. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs — Horizontal method for the detection of Salmonella spp. [internet]. International Standard: ISO/TR 6579-1:2002; 2002.
  11. 11. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). Horizontal method for the detection, enumeration and serotyping of Salmonella - Part 1: Horizontal method for the detection of Salmonella spp. ISO/TR 6579-1:2017; 2022.
  12. 12. CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-nine Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S32 [internet]. 32nd ed. Weinstein MP, editor. 32nd ed. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2022.
  13. 13. Akiba M, Kusumoto M, Iwata T. Rapid identification of Salmonella enterica serovars, typhimurium, choleraesuis, infantis, hadar, enteritidis, dublin and gallinarum, by multiplex PCR. J Microbiol Methods. 2011;85(1):9–15. pmid:21329737
  14. 14. Achtman M, Zhou Z, Alikhan N-F, Tyne W, Parkhill J, Cormican M, et al. Genomic diversity of Salmonella enterica -The UoWUCC 10K genomes project. Wellcome Open Res. 2021;5:223. pmid:33614977
  15. 15. Alikhan N-F, Zhou Z, Sergeant MJ, Achtman M. A genomic overview of the population structure of Salmonella. PLoS Genet. 2018;14(4):e1007261. pmid:29621240
  16. 16. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W293–6. pmid:33885785
  17. 17. Feldgarden M, Brover V, Gonzalez-Escalona N, Frye JG, Haendiges J, Haft DH, et al. AMRFinderPlus and the Reference Gene Catalog facilitate examination of the genomic links among antimicrobial resistance, stress response, and virulence. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):12728. pmid:34135355
  18. 18. Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, Vestergaard M, Rasmussen S, Lund O, et al. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(11):2640–4. pmid:22782487
  19. 19. Chen L, Zheng D, Liu B, Yang J, Jin Q. VFDB 2016: hierarchical and refined dataset for big data analysis--10 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D694-7. pmid:26578559
  20. 20. Seemann T. ABRicate. 2020.
  21. 21. Mejía L, Medina JL, Bayas R, Salazar CS, Villavicencio F, Zapata S, et al. Genomic epidemiology of Salmonella infantis in ecuador: from poultry farms to human infections. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:547891. pmid:33134346
  22. 22. Pibiri I. Molecular approaches fighting nonsense. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(21):11933. pmid:34769359
  23. 23. Schwengers O, Barth P, Falgenhauer L, Hain T, Chakraborty T, Goesmann A. Platon: identification and characterization of bacterial plasmid contigs in short-read draft assemblies exploiting protein sequence-based replicon distribution scores. Microb Genom. 2020;6(10):1–12. pmid:32579097
  24. 24. Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, et al. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(7):3895–903. pmid:24777092
  25. 25. Garcillán-Barcia MP, Redondo-Salvo S, Vielva L, de la Cruz F. MOBscan: Automated annotation of MOB relaxases. Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2075:295–308. pmid:31584171
  26. 26. Robertson J, Nash JHE. MOB-suite: software tools for clustering, reconstruction and typing of plasmids from draft assemblies. Microb Genom. 2018;4(8):e000206. pmid:30052170
  27. 27. NCBI Resource Coordinators. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D7–19. pmid:26615191
  28. 28. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software. Texas: College Station, StataCorp LLC.; 2017.
  29. 29. Zhou Z, Charlesworth J, Achtman M. HierCC: a multi-level clustering scheme for population assignments based on core genome MLST. Bioinformatics. 2021;37(20):3645–6. pmid:33823553
  30. 30. Bayona M. Prevalencia de Salmonella y enteroparásitos en alimentos y manipuladores de alimentos de ventas ambulantes y restaurantes en un sector del norte de Bogotá, Colombia. Rev UDCA Act & Div Cient. 2012;15(2).
  31. 31. Méndez I, Badillo C, Parra G, Faccini Á. Caracterización microbiológica de Salmonella en alimentos de venta callejera en un sector universitario de Bogotá, Colombia. Revista de los estudiantes de medicina de la universidad industrial de Santander. 2011;24(1):24.
  32. 32. FERRARI AM, OLIVEIRA J de SC, SÃO JOSÉ JFB de. Street food in Espírito Santo, Brazil: a study about good handling practices and food microbial quality. Food Sci Technol. 2021;41(suppl 2):549–56.
  33. 33. Eromo T, Tassew H, Daka D, Kibru G. Bacteriological quality of street foods and antimicrobial resistance of isolates in Hawassa, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2016;26(6):533–42. pmid:28450768
  34. 34. Bereda TW, Emerie YM, Reta MA, Asfaw HS. Microbiological safety of street vended foods in Jigjiga City, Eastern Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2016;26(2):161–70. pmid:27222629
  35. 35. Sabuj AAM, Haque ZF, Barua N, Islam MdA, Saha S. Assessment of bacteriological quality of street vended fast foods and their antimicrobial resistance. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2018;7(11):3049–59.
  36. 36. Lee W, Kim E, Zin H, Sung S, Woo J, Lee MJ, et al. Genomic characteristics and comparative genomics analysis of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Thompson isolated from an outbreak in South Korea. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):20553. pmid:36446807
  37. 37. Kusumaningrum HD, Riboldi G, Hazeleger WC, Beumer RR. Survival of foodborne pathogens on stainless steel surfaces and cross-contamination to foods. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;85(3):227–36. pmid:12878381
  38. 38. Dang-Xuan S, Nguyen-Viet H, Pham-Duc P, Grace D, Unger F, Nguyen-Hai N, et al. Simulating cross-contamination of cooked pork with Salmonella enterica from raw pork through home kitchen preparation in Vietnam. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(10):2324. pmid:30360454
  39. 39. Campos J, Gil J, Mourão J, Peixe L, Antunes P. Ready-to-eat street-vended food as a potential vehicle of bacterial pathogens and antimicrobial resistance: An exploratory study in Porto region, Portugal. Int J Food Microbiol. 2015;206:1–6. pmid:25910073
  40. 40. Ajayi OA, Oladele DO. Microbial assessment of foods and currencies from street food vendors and antibiotic resistance profile of isolates. JAMB. 2019;14(2):1–11.
  41. 41. Ruiz JC, Morales MF. Determinación de Salmonella spp. en mayonesa preparada en pollerías ubicadas en el centro histórico de Cuenca [internet]. Universidad del Azuay; 2014.
  42. 42. Quiroz-Santiago C, Rodas-Suárez OR, Carlos R V, Fernández FJ, Quiñones-Ramírez EI, Vázquez-Salinas C. Prevalence of Salmonella in vegetables from Mexico. J Food Prot. 2009;72(6):1279–82. pmid:19610340
  43. 43. Kilonzo-Nthenge A, Mukuna W. Salmonella and Antimicrobial Resistance in Fresh Produce. In: Salmonella - A Re-emerging Pathogen. InTech; 2018. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72894
  44. 44. Askari N, Mashhad Rafiee S, Amini K. A case control study of Salmonella SPP. infection in stray dogs in Tehran shelters and the correlation between paraclinical tests results and clinical findings. Arch Razi Inst. 2020;75(1):93–9. pmid:32292007
  45. 45. Hoelzer K, Moreno Switt AI, Wiedmann M. Animal contact as a source of human non-typhoidal salmonellosis. Vet Res. 2011;42(1):34. pmid:21324103
  46. 46. Núñez Castro KM, Trasviña Muñoz E, García GF, Herrera Ramírez JC, López Valencia G, Medina Basulto GE, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and identification of Salmonella spp. in stray dogs of northwest Mexico. Austral j vet sci. 2019;51(1):0–0.
  47. 47. Rakib TMd, Islam MdS, Nur-E-Azam Md, Islam S, Faruq AA, Das T, et al. Multidrug resistance pattern of Salmonella typhimurium isolated from rectal swabs of stray dogs at Chittagong Metropolitan Area (CMA), Bangladesh. MRJI. 2018;25(4):1–11.
  48. 48. González Lozano DF, Camacho Ramos CA, Méndez Rodríguez IA. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of potentially pathogenic bacteria and fungi isolated from public parks of bogotá, Colombia. RC. 2018;21(2):85.
  49. 49. Joachim A, Auersperg V, Drüe J, Wiedermann S, Hinney B, Spergser J. Parasites and zoonotic bacteria in the feces of cats and dogs from animal shelters in Carinthia, Austria. Res Vet Sci. 2023;164:105022. pmid:37741041
  50. 50. Leahy AM, Cummings KJ, Rodriguez-Rivera LD, Rankin SC, Hamer SA. Evaluation of faecal Salmonella shedding among dogs at seven animal shelters across Texas. Zoonoses Public Health. 2016;63(7):515–21. pmid:26826098
  51. 51. Ebani VV, Nardoni S, Ciapetti S, Guardone L, Loretti E, Mancianti F. Survey on the presence of bacterial, fungal and helminthic agents in off-leash dog parks located in urban areas in Central-Italy. Animals (Basel). 2021;11(6):1685. pmid:34198875
  52. 52. Gargiulo A, Russo TP, Schettini R, Mallardo K, Calabria M, Menna LF, et al. Occurrence of enteropathogenic bacteria in urban pigeons (Columba livia) in Italy. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2014;14(4):251–5. pmid:24661012
  53. 53. Rahmani M, Peighamari SM, Yazdani A, Hojjati P. Salmonella infection in birds kept in parks and pet shops in Tehran, Iran. Int J Veter Res. 2011:145–8.
  54. 54. Montoro-Dasi L, Lorenzo-Rebenaque L, Marco-Fuertes A, Vega S, Marin C. Holistic strategies to control Salmonella infantis: an emerging challenge in the european broiler sector. Microorganisms. 2023;11(7):1765. pmid:37512937
  55. 55. WHO (World Health Organization). Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Foodborne Bacteria: Application of a One Health Approach [internet]. AGISAR (Advisory Group on Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance), editor. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. 87 p.
  56. 56. Gao Y, Chen K, Lin R, Xu X, Xu F, Lin Q, et al. High levels of antibiotic resistance in MDR-strong biofilm-forming Salmonella typhimurium ST34 in Southern China. Microorganisms. 2023;11(8):2005. pmid:37630565
  57. 57. Yan S, Jiang Z, Zhang W, Liu Z, Dong X, Li D, et al. Genomes-based MLST, cgMLST, wgMLST and SNP analysis of Salmonella Typhimurium from animals and humans. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023;96:101973. pmid:36989679
  58. 58. Carhuaricra Huaman DE, Luna Espinoza LR, Rodríguez Cueva CL, Duran Gonzales CG, Rosadio Alcántara RH, Setubal JC, et al. Genomic characterization of Salmonella typhimurium isolated from guinea pigs with Salmonellosis in Lima, Peru. Microorganisms. 2022;10(9):1726. pmid:36144328
  59. 59. Seribelli AA, da Silva P, da Cruz MF, de Almeida F, Frazão MR, Medeiros MIC, et al. Insights about the epidemiology of Salmonella Typhimurium isolates from different sources in Brazil using comparative genomics. Gut Pathog. 2021;13(1):27. pmid:33910644
  60. 60. Gymoese P, Sørensen G, Litrup E, Olsen JE, Nielsen EM, Torpdahl M. Investigation of outbreaks of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium and its monophasic variants using whole-genome sequencing, Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(10):1631–9. pmid:28930002
  61. 61. Mejia L, Vela G, Zapata S. High occurrence of multiresistant Salmonella infantis in retail meat in ecuador. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2021;18(1):41–8. pmid:32808817
  62. 62. Medina-Santana JL, Ortega-Paredes D, de Janon S, Burnett E, Ishida M, Sauders B, et al. Investigating the dynamics of Salmonella contamination in integrated poultry companies using a whole genome sequencing approach. Poult Sci. 2022;101(2):101611. pmid:34953378
  63. 63. Ortega-Paredes D, Haro M, Leoro-Garzón P, Barba P, Loaiza K, Mora F, et al. Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from canine faeces in a public park in Quito, Ecuador. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019;18:263–8. pmid:30980959
  64. 64. Hurtado R, Barh D, Weimer BC, Viana MVC, Profeta R, Sousa TJ, et al. WGS-Based lineage and antimicrobial resistance pattern of Salmonella typhimurium isolated during 2000-2017 in Peru. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022;11(9):1170. pmid:36139949
  65. 65. Rodríguez E, Bautista A, Barrero L. First report of a Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium isolate with carbapenemase (KPC-2) in Colombia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(2):1263–4. pmid:24295970
  66. 66. Díaz Osorio MÁ, Díaz Guevara PL, Rodríguez Cárdenas EC, Montaño Valencia LA, Medina Alfonso MI, Realpe ME, et al. Caracterización fenotípica y genotípica de Salmonella Typhimurium variante 5- asociada a un brote de enfermedad transmitida por alimentos en el municipio de Paz de Río, Boyacá, 2010. Iatreia. 2013;27(1).
  67. 67. Almeida F, Seribelli AA, Medeiros MIC, Rodrigues DDP, de MelloVarani A, Luo Y, et al. Phylogenetic and antimicrobial resistance gene analysis of Salmonella Typhimurium strains isolated in Brazil by whole genome sequencing. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0201882. pmid:30102733
  68. 68. Quesada A, Reginatto GA, Ruiz Español A, Colantonio LD, Burrone MS. Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella spp isolated animal food for human consumption. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2016;33(1):32–44. pmid:27384620
  69. 69. Burnett E, Ishida M, de Janon S, Naushad S, Duceppe MO, Gao R, et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals the presence of the blaCTX-M-65 Gene in extended-spectrum β-Lactamase-producing and multi-drug-resistant clones of Salmonella serovar infantis isolated from broiler chicken environments in the Galapagos Islands. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland). 2021;10(3):1–13. pmid:33807748
  70. 70. Molina A, Thye T, Muñoz-Vargas L, Zamora-Sanabria R, Chercos DH, Hernández-Rojas R, et al. Molecular characterization of antibiotic resistant Salmonella enterica across the poultry production chain in Costa Rica: A cross-sectional study. Int J Food Microbiol. 2024;416:110663. pmid:38503221
  71. 71. Piña-Iturbe A, Díaz-Gavidia C, Álvarez FP, Barron-Montenegro R, Álvarez-Espejo DM, García P, et al. Genomic characterisation of the population structure and antibiotic resistance of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis in Chile, 2009-2022. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024;32:100711. pmid:38495315
  72. 72. Babic M, Hujer AM, Bonomo RA. What’s new in antibiotic resistance? Focus on beta-lactamases. Drug Resist Updat. 2006;9(3):142–56. pmid:16899402
  73. 73. Bush K, Jacoby GA. Updated functional classification of beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(3):969–76. pmid:19995920
  74. 74. Tate H, Folster JP, Hsu C-H, Chen J, Hoffmann M, Li C, et al. Comparative analysis of extended-spectrum-β-Lactamase CTX-M-65-producing Salmonella enterica serovar infantis isolates from humans, food animals, and retail chickens in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(7):e00488–17. pmid:28483962
  75. 75. Leão C, Clemente L, Moura L, Seyfarth AM, Hansen IM, Hendriksen RS, et al. Emergence and clonal spread of CTX-M-65-producing escherichia coli from retail meat in Portugal. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:653595. pmid:34354678
  76. 76. Hashemian SMR, Farhadi Z, Farhadi T. Fosfomycin: the characteristics, activity, and use in critical care. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019;15:525–30. pmid:30988619
  77. 77. Mattioni Marchetti V, Hrabak J, Bitar I. Fosfomycin resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales: an increasing threat. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1178547. pmid:37469601
  78. 78. Singkham-In U, Muhummudaree N, Chatsuwan T. fosA3 overexpression with transporter mutations mediates high-level of fosfomycin resistance and silence of fosA3 in fosfomycin-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae producing carbapenemase clinical isolates. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237474. pmid:32857767
  79. 79. Wang D, Fang L-X, Jiang Y-W, Wu D-S, Jiang Q, Sun R-Y, et al. Comparison of the prevalence and molecular characteristics of fosA3 and fosA7 among Salmonella isolates from food animals in China. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022;77(5):1286–95. pmid:35296898
  80. 80. Cao X-L, Shen H, Xu Y-Y, Xu X-J, Zhang Z-F, Cheng L, et al. High prevalence of fosfomycin resistance gene fosA3 in bla CTX-M-harbouring Escherichia coli from urine in a Chinese tertiary hospital during 2010-2014. Epidemiol Infect. 2017;145(4):818–24. pmid:27938421
  81. 81. Galindo-Méndez M, Navarrete-Salazar H, Baltazar-Jiménez F, Muñoz-de la Paz E, Sánchez-Mawcinitt MF, Gómez-Pardo A, et al. Emergence of fosfomycin resistance by plasmid-mediated fos genes in uropathogenic esbl-producing E. coli isolates in Mexico. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022;11(10):1383. pmid:36290041
  82. 82. Ito R, Pacey MP, Mettus RT, Sluis-Cremer N, Doi Y. Origin of the plasmid-mediated fosfomycin resistance gene fosA3. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(2):373–6. pmid:29106538
  83. 83. Stasiak M, Maćkiw E, Kowalska J, Kucharek K, Postupolski J. Silent genes: Antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic production. Pol J Microbiol. 2021;70(4):421–9. pmid:35003274
  84. 84. Thomas CM. Plasmid Incompatibility. In: Bell E, editor. Molecular Life Sciences. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2014. p. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6436-5_565-2
  85. 85. Thomsen MCF, Ahrenfeldt J, Cisneros JLB, Jurtz V, Larsen MV, Hasman H, et al. A bacterial analysis platform: An integrated system for analysing bacterial whole genome sequencing data for clinical diagnostics and surveillance. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157718. pmid:27327771
  86. 86. Sumbana JJ. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of extraintestinal pathogenicEscherichia coliand other Gram-negative invasive bacteria in Mozambique [internet]. Università degli studi di Sassari; 2020.
  87. 87. Vallejos-Sánchez K, Tataje-Lavanda L, Villanueva-Pérez D, Bendezú J, Montalván Á, Zimic-Peralta M, et al. Whole-Genome Sequencing of a Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar infantis strain isolated from broiler chicken in Peru. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2019;8(43):e00826–19. pmid:31649094
  88. 88. García-Soto S, Abdel-Glil MY, Tomaso H, Linde J, Methner U. Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Subspecies enterica Serovar Infantis of Multilocus Sequence Type 2283 in German Broiler Farms. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1741. pmid:32765483
  89. 89. Aviv G, Tsyba K, Steck N, Salmon-Divon M, Cornelius A, Rahav G, et al. A unique megaplasmid contributes to stress tolerance and pathogenicity of an emergent Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis strain. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16(4):977–94. pmid:24320043
  90. 90. García-Fernández A, Chiaretto G, Bertini A, Villa L, Fortini D, Ricci A, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of IncI1 plasmids carrying extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli and Salmonella of human and animal origin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008;61(6):1229–33. pmid:18367460