Figures
Abstract
Accurately predicting how the global environment will change under continued CO2 and temperature increases is currently a critical issue. Predictions are dependent on global models that represent this complex system of natural and anthropogenic inputs, responses, and feedback loops. These models must include accurate descriptions of complex biological processes such as photosynthesis, which is currently responsible for the removal of 123 petagrams of atmospheric carbon annually. Here, we develop a simplified approach to model the effect of concurrent changes in temperature and CO2 concentrations on the rate of C3 carbon fixation. The model simplifies the temperature response of the CO2 fixation pathway into a three-parameter curve (as modelled by macromolecular rate theory, MMRT), which incorporates the limitations of RuBisCO kinetics, and CO2 and O2 solubility as simple system constraints. This framework fully accounts for the temperature and CO2 dependence of CO2 fixation rates in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) leaves with just three parameters, in combination with defined biophysical constraints.
Citation: Prentice EJ, Barbour MM, Arcus VL (2025) A minimal biophysical model for the temperature dependence of CO2 fixation rates based on macromolecular rate theory. PLoS ONE 20(4): e0319324. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319324
Editor: Susmita Lahiri (Ganguly),, University of Kalyani, INDIA
Received: March 19, 2024; Accepted: January 31, 2025; Published: April 17, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Prentice et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: EJP and VLA were supported through the Marsden Fund of New Zealand (19-UOW-035) for this work. The funders had no role in study design and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Predictions for the trajectory of our global environment are reliant on our ability to accurately model the climate now and into the future under changing temperature and CO2 regimes. A central component of global modelling is the ability to predict the rate at which photosynthetic species are removing CO2 from the atmosphere, especially extrapolations to changes in CO2 fixing capacity in response to increasing temperature and atmospheric CO2 concentration. For example, models need to capture the changes in CO2 fixing capacity over the predicted future temperature increases of up to four degrees, accompanied by up to a tripling of CO2 concentrations by the year 2100 (RCP 8.5) [1].
Rates of net CO2 exchange display a curved response to temperature, with increasing rates of CO2 fixation up to peak in activity (Topt), above which rates decline [2–5]. This curvature has been accounted for in various ways. Farquhar and colleagues have fit a Gaussian (which is curved and symmetric about an optimum temperature) to the electron transport component of photosynthesis [6]. In accounting for the temperature response of net CO2 assimilation in sweet potato, the limiting processes of carboxylation (Vcmax), electron transport (Jmax) and phosphate regeneration are modelled as curves [7]. Medlyn developed a ‘peaked’ model, which incorporates the negative effect of enzyme damage at high temperatures, which is applied to the temperature dependence of Vcmax and Jmax [4]. Further, the temperature response of net CO2 assimilation rates has recently been described in a three parameter single quadratic [2]. Currently, incorporation of CO2 fixation at the global scale typically models leaf physiology based on the equations developed by Farquhar and colleagues, parametrising the temperature response of Vcmax and Jmax based on the fit of modified Arrhenius functions to a range of data [4,8] and incorporating smoothing functions to transition between limiting factors and allow for co-limitation [9–11].
Macromolecular rate theory (MMRT) has been developed to account for the curved temperature dependence of enzyme catalysed rates [12,13]. The basis of MMRT is the expansion of the Eyring-Polanyi equation [14–16] to account for the unusual properties the arise for enzyme catalysis due to the large size of enzymes – hence macromolecular rate theory. Specifically, enzymatic reactions undergo a narrowing of the conformational space as the reaction progresses from the enzyme-substrate complex to the tight binding enzyme-transition state complex [17]. As the enzyme-transition state complex has a reduced heat capacity, enzymatic reactions are associated with a negative activation heat capacity () [16,17]. The incorporation of a negative
into the Eyring-Polanyi equation quantifies the degree of negative curvature of enzyme catalysed rates with temperature [14,16]. This accounts for the temperature optimum and decreases in rates at high temperature observed in enzyme catalysis, without the need to invoke enzyme denaturation [12,13].
Given that enzyme catalysed reactions are the underlaying driver of biological rates at increasing scales of complexity, MMRT has been applied to the temperature response of multiple biological systems. This has included the temperature response of rates for both in vitro and in vivo metabolic pathways [18], as well as various soil processes [15], leaf respiration rates [19] and net ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration [20]. At these increasing scales of biological organisation, the temperature dependence of rates for these various processes are well described by MMRT. The basis for this scaling from enzymes to metabolic pathways has been investigated, showing that the temperature dependent curvature of a metabolic pathway is dependent on the temperature response of the constituent enzymes [18]. This raises the possibility for the application of MMRT to describe the temperature dependence of the CO2 fixation as an in vivo metabolic pathway. In terms of global scale models of CO2 fixation, utilising a curved function like MMRT to describe the temperature response eliminates the need to incorporate smoothing functions between limiting factors [9–11]. Compared to the curved functions which are also used [2], this would concurrently extract information on the thermodynamics of the enzyme driving the process [13,18].
Here, we address this possibility by applying MMRT to describe the temperature response of portions from the CO2 fixation pathway of increasing complexity. We find that the temperature response of isolated RuBisCO enzyme, as a large complex macromolecule, is fully accounted for by MMRT. We also find the temperature response of Vcmax and Jmax, representing portions of the CO2 fixation pathway measured in vivo, are well described by MMRT. We further extend this to apply MMRT to model the temperature response of net CO2 fixation rates in the C3 species sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) leaves across concurrent changes in temperature and CO2 concentration. We find that MMRT, in conjunction with limitations imposed by RuBisCO enzyme kinetics and gas solubility, describes the temperature dependence of net CO2 exchange in sweet potato leaves with just three fitted parameters. By incorporating MMRT into this model, the curved temperature response of the enzymes catalysing the CO2 fixation process is mechanistically accounted for. This describes net CO2 assimilation rates over a 30-degree temperature and 360 ppm(g) CO2 range and models the curved response of rates to temperature and associated changes in curvature with altered CO2 concentration. Overall, this accounts for the changes in CO2 fixation rates due to these two critical environmental factors with a combination of biological and physical parameters in a minimal biophysical model, underpinned by enzyme thermodynamics. For global scale modelling, MMRT presents a promising tool for incorporating a mechanistic understanding to the curvature of the CO2 fixation process, while also simplifying input parameters and maintaining model accuracy.
Model description
We firstly define an artificial state of saturating CO2 (substrate), no O2 (inhibitor) and ideal light and moisture. The rate of this reaction is defined as:
Where c is a constant and kp is the rate constant for the CO2 fixation reaction. At saturating substrate, the reaction rate is not dependent on substrate and in the context of laboratory-based experiments, we assume that the number of CO2 fixing centres, c, is constant (over the course of the experiment). We seek to calculate the value for kp across the temperature range, kp(T). If kp(T) is well defined, then the rates of net CO2 exchange in the lab/field may be calculated directly using this function and can be incorporated into models.
We use an existing dataset to define kp(T) as follows: the CO2 assimilation rate under experimental conditions is a function of ckp, the concentration of substrate available to RuBisCO (dissolved CO2 and its observed binding constant (
), the inhibitor concentration (dissolved O2
) and its observed binding constant (
), and the degree of cooperativity associated with the enzyme catalysed reaction (the hill coefficient, n). This is a Michaelis Menten equation with a competitive inhibitor (as in the Farquhar–von Caemmerer–Berry Vcmax equation [11]) with the addition of a cooperativity term (n). These parameters are defined by Equations 2–4. Both
and
are calculated directly from the partial pressures of these gases at any temperature, simplifying the myriad of complex components related to the bioavailability of CO2 into a simple physical constant applicable to C3 plants which rely on passive CO2 dissolution (Equation 6). Due to this, the model is not applicable to C4/CAM plants, as the CO2 concentrating mechanisms in these species circumvent the physical constraints of CO2 dissolution.
Combining (2) and (3) gives Equation 4
For sweet potato, Equation 4 was parametrised by a fit of intercellular CO2 partial pressure (Ci) vs rate data with high and low O2 concentrations to define the response of RuBisCO to substrate and inhibitor (Fig 3) [7]. These data were fit over three temperatures to define the temperature dependence of the parameters. Final model fitting of Equation 1 was achieved with independent of temperature (0.094 ppm(aq)), whereas
was linearly dependence on temperature, as defined by Equation 5.
(A) The change in solubility constants with temperature for CO2 and O2 (Equation 6). Both gases become less soluble with increasing temperature. (A insert) The ratio of CO2 and O2 solubility. With increasing temperature, CO2 becomes proportionally less soluble compared to O2. (B) The effect of temperature on dissolved gas concentrations of current atmospheric O2 and three CO2 concentrations.
Rates are fit to MMRT (Equation 7), with the exception of RuBisCO from T. thyasirae, which is fit using MMRT with a temperature dependent (see S2 supplementary in S1 File). Fitted values are reported in S1 Table in S1 File. RMSE values for the fitting from A-C are given in the table to the top right of the figure.
The data show positive cooperativity, setting an average hill slope of 2.24 over all temperature and O2 treatments for the final model. For all data, aqueous CO2 and O2 concentrations were calculated using the known solubility constants for the specific gases across the temperature range ( and
respectively) [21,22].
The temperature dependence of values are defined by Henry’s law and physical constants for CO2 and O2 (Equation 6 and Fig 1).
The maximum rate at a given temperature (kp) is defined by MMRT (Equation 7), where is the Boltzmann constant, h is Planck’s constant, R is the ideal gas constant, T is temperature in Kelvin,
and
are the activation enthalpy and entropy at the reference temperature (T0), and
is the change in heat capacity associated with the reaction. For the analysis here, T0 was set to 4 °C below the temperature at which the fastest rates were measured (303 K; 30 °C). While the exact value of T0 does not influence the fitting, this approach of selecting T0 is consistent with standard MMRT fitting practise.
Just three parameters are fitted in this equation: ,
and
. Furthermore,
and
are linked and define the magnitude of rates.
then defines the curvature of the temperature response.
The above model was fit using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, www.graphpad.com; S1 Supplementary in S1 File). Sensitivity analysis of this model was performed by assessing the model fit (R2) through stepwise alteration of the , slope of
(Equation 5) and n parameters about the typical error range of these values (as given in S4–S9 Tables in S1 File).
Results
The temperature response of RuBisCO, Jmax and Vcmax
To test the application of MMRT to CO2 fixation, data were fitted for isolated RuBisCO from a bacterial [23] and an archaeal [24] species, as well as Vcmax and Jmax from a selection of temperate tree species [25] (Fig 2; additional data is in S4 Supplementary section in S1 File). Data for isolated RuBisCO from both species is well described by MMRT (Equation 7) across a wide temperature range (Fig 2A). For the archaeal type III RuBisCO (Pyrococcus kodakaraensis), data from 25 to 100 °C is accounted for by the MMRT model (Equation 7). For the bacterial type II RuBisCO (Thiomicrospira thyasirae), the fitting requires the inclusion of temperature dependent , consistent with other high quality, wide temperature range enzyme data (see S2 Supplementary in S1 File for fitting details) [16] . Further, data across a 30 °C range for both Vcmax and Jmax is well described by MMRT, accounting for the range of curvature in responses observed across the species for both processes.
The temperature dependence of RuBisCO binding constants in sweet potato
Data for the CO2 and O2 response of net CO2 fixation is available for sweet potato leaves at three temperatures [7]. From this, the binding affinities for the two molecules to RuBisCO can be determined by treating O2 as a competitive inhibitor (Equation 4). This reduces the full Farquhar–von Caemmerer–Berry model down to the RuBisCO (Vcmax) portion alone to simplify the analysis for this specific application, while maintaining a full account of the range of Ci data. The aqueous CO2 and O2 concentrations are calculated from Ci based on the equilibrium constant for each gas at the experimental temperature (Equation 6).
For RuBisCO from sweet potato, affinity for CO2 is independent of temperature. The binding constant (), representing where the RuBisCO pool is half saturated, remains constant at about 0.094 ppm(aq) over a temperature range from 10 to 31 °C (Fig 3). The data also displays positive cooperativity, characterised by an average hill slope of 2.24. In comparison, RuBisCO from sweet potato has two orders of magnitude lower affinity for O2 compared to CO2, consistent with the biological function of the enzyme. However, the affinity for O2 increases with increased temperature (Fig 3D). This increases the relative affinity for O2 compared to CO2 as temperature is increased.
The temperature and CO2 response of net CO2 exchange
Given the parametrised temperature dependence of gas solubilities and RuBisCO binding constants, along with the curved response of enzymatic pathways [18], accounting for the full temperature and CO2 dependence of net CO2 fixation rates is possible. Temperature data under different Ci concentrations have previously been collected in sweet potato [7]. These data at three CO2 concentrations are simultaneously fit with Equation 1.
Here we find these data can be simply modelled in terms of an intrinsic temperature dependent rate constant kp(T) based on MMRT, the exponential decreases in gas solubility with increases in temperature, and the effects this has on CO2 fixation versus photorespiration rates due to and
values respectively (Fig 4). The complete dataset, representing an in vivo metabolic pathway over a 10–40 °C temperature span, three CO2 concentrations and rates varying up to nine fold, can be simultaneously fit with just three parameters (Equation 7), these being the magnitude (
and
) and the curvature (
) of rates.
(A-C) Rate versus aqueous CO2 concentration curves for high (200 mbar O2(g); red) and low (30 mbar O2(g); green) O2 concentrations at 10, 25 and 31 °C respectively. Aqueous O2 concentrations are given as ppm(aq) within individual graphs. Each temperature is fit with Equation 4, to fit both O2 treatments simultaneously to gain binding constants for CO2 () and O2 (
). All CO2 and O2 concentrations are corrected from Ci values to account for gas solubility at the given temperature. (D) The temperature dependence of binding constants for sweet potato, as determined in fits A-C.
(A) Global fit of Equation 1 to temperature curves at varying CO2 concentrations. The Topt under each condition are labelled. R2 for the global fit = 0.9724. Fitting parameters and further statistics are provided in S3 Table in S1 File. (B) Intrinsic curvature (Equation 7) extrapolated from the fitted data, representing maximum rates of CO2 fixation in unlimited conditions (saturating CO2, low O2, optimal light and moisture). (C) Realised proportion of maximum rates (kp) given the CO2 and O2 concentration in solution and binding constants to RuBisCO with temperature. Colouration is the same as panel A for the three CO2 concentrations. The deviations away from 100% capacity quantify the physical and biophysical restrictions placed on the CO2 fixation system.
Sensitivity analysis indicates the model parameters are well defined by the data and are essential for the full fitting of the CO2 and temperature response. The ability of the global fit to accurately model the 140 ppm(g) CO2 curve is highly sensitive to the input of the , slope of
and n. For example, increasing
by 10% alters the R2 for fitting of the 140 ppm(g) CO2 curve from 0.76 to 0.41, reducing the predictive power of the model at these low CO2 concentrations. Further data for the sensitivity analysis is given in S4–S9 Tables in S1 File.
Discussion
CO2 fixation displays a curved response to changes in temperature, with roughly symmetric decreases in rates either side of an optimum [26]. This curvature is characteristic of a range of biological processes, from enzymes to metabolic pathways, organism growth rates and various ecosystem processes [12,15,18,20]. Across these scales, curvature is well described by MMRT (Equation 7). At the enzyme level, the temperature dependent curvature of rates is a consequence of the large decrease in heat capacity () upon progression from the enzyme-substrate complex to the enzyme-transition state. This decrease in heat capacity occurs for the enzyme bound reaction system as the enzyme tightly binds to the transition state species, resulting in a narrowing of the conformational space. A large negative
defines the temperature dependence of the free energy barrier for a reaction (
), expanding the Eyring-Polanyi equation to account for curvature in enzyme rates that is independent of enzyme denaturation [12,13]. Recently, MMRT has been extended to show that the temperature dependent curvature of an in vitro metabolic pathway is a function of the curvature of the enzymes contributing to the catalytic cascade [18]. The temperature dependence of leaf [19] and soil [15] respiration, representing in vivo metabolic pathways, has also been described by MMRT. Further, analysis of a the global FLUXNET dataset has shown that MMRT can simultaneously describe the temperature dependence of ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration [20]. Considering CO2 fixation as an in vivo metabolic pathway raises the possibility the process may be described by MMRT, where the temperature response of the pathway is a function of the thermodynamics of the individual enzymes in the cascade. This would then define the inherent temperature response of CO2 fixation based on the enzymes catalysing the process, upon which other temperature limitations would layer. Defining the curvature of the photosynthetic pathway with MMRT gives a theoretical basis to the curvature of the temperature response (based on the curvature of individual enzymes), allowing access to information about the thermodynamics of the enzymes underpinning the process. This fitting is mathematically equivalent to the three-parameter single quadratic fit that has previously been used for net CO2 assimilation rates [19,27].
To test the applicability of the MMRT equation to the CO2 fixation pathway, we fit the temperature response of isolated RuBisCO, as well as Vcmax and Jmax from a range of sapling species (Fig 2, S1 Fig in S1 File). Across the range of these data representing isolated RuBisCO enzyme and portions of the in vivo pathway, MMRT fully accounts for the temperature response of the rates. Further, enzyme data from bacterial type II RuBisCO from Thiomicrospira thyasirae requires the extension to include the temperature dependence of , a parameter previously applied to high quality enzyme data over wide temperature ranges [16].
We further extended this analysis to develop a minimal model to fully account for net CO2 exchange in sweet potato leaves. For this, the response of RuBisCO to changing concentrations of dissolved CO2 and O2 was defined from existing data (Fig 3). The binding constants of CO2 and O2 were parametrised with temperature based on an enzymatic competitive inhibition model. The binding constant for CO2 (), is relatively independent of temperature at 0.094 ppm(aq) across this temperature range (Fig 3D), although this binding constant could be expected to increase sharply at higher temperatures [28]. Given a typical CO2 concentration and temperature (Ci of 250 ppm(g) and 18 °C), CO2 dissolves to a concentration of 0.19 ppm(aq). Thus, CO2 fixation rates are not substrate saturated under typical conditions and are highly sensitive to changes in CO2 concentration about current atmospheric levels. The binding constant for O2 is two orders of magnitude lower compared to CO2, consistent with the biological function of the enzyme. However, the affinity for O2 increases with increasing temperature. Due to this, the rate of photorespiration will increase with temperature as the relative binding affinities change.
To be available for fixation, CO2 must dissolve from the gas phase in the intercellular space into the aqueous environment of the leaf mesophyll. The movement of CO2 from the gas phase to the chloroplast is complex and involves both membrane and cytosolic conductances, many of which are also temperature dependent, variable between species and poorly understood [29–32]. Whilst cognisant of these complexities, for the purposes of this minimal model, these are simplified into a single solubility parameter which captures the broad effects of reduced aqueous CO2 with temperature in a well defined physical constant. At all temperatures, the solubility of CO2 provides a significant limitation on the substrate available to C3 plants for fixation as the equilibrium strongly favours the gas phase (by a factor of 1400 at 20 °C). This equilibrium under a given set of conditions is a physical constant, defined by an equilibrium constant (Keq). With increasing temperature, CO2 solubility decreases exponentially, placing further limits on substrate availability (Fig 1; Equation 6). Incorporating the limitations on CO2 supply with temperature via well-defined fundamental restrictions of CO2 solubility greatly simplifies the temperature considerations for C3 plants, removing reliance on the nuances of membrane and cytosolic conductances.
The rate of net CO2 assimilation is complicated by the competing reaction of O2 with RuBisCO (photorespiration). Photorespiration temporarily takes a portion of the RuBisCO pool out of CO2 fixing capacity, and also requires the release (as CO2) of a fixed carbon to recycle the products of two photorespiratory O2 turn overs [33]. Net CO2 assimilation rates are thus the rate of CO2 fixation offset by the rate of CO2 release by photorespiration and respiration. The proportion of carboxylation to oxygenation is partially dependent on the aqueous concentrations of CO2 and O2 (along with the relative binding constants of the two molecules). O2 is less soluble than CO2, however due to the larger proportion of O2 in air, is more prominent in the aqueous phase. For example, under current atmospheric conditions of 210,000 ppm(g) O2 (21%) and 400 ppm(g) CO2, at 25 °C the gases dissolve to 4.7 and 0.25 ppm(aq) respectively. O2 solubility also decreases with increasing temperature, however due to a more gradual decrease in solubility, relative concentrations of dissolved O2 compared to CO2 increase with temperature (Fig 1A insert). Thus, the physical limitation of gas solubility places further constraints on CO2 fixation at elevated temperatures due to the relatively greater solubility of O2 compared to CO2 and the effects this has on photorespiration rates [26,34–36].
By taking these effects into account, the full response of sweet potato across three different CO2 concentrations and a 30°C temperature range is accounted for (Fig 4). Rate decreases from a maximum rate curve (‘intrinsic pathway curvature’, Fig 4B) and shifts in the Topt of CO2 fixing capacity are captured by the changes in gas solubility (physical constraints), and the effect these have of RuBisCO CO2 saturation and photorespiration rates (biological constraints). This maximum rate curve represents the temperature profile of CO2 fixation rates in an unconstrained system of saturating CO2, vanishingly low O2, as well as optimal light and moisture. As CO2 concentration is lowered, rates over the whole temperature range drop as RuBisCO becomes less saturated, and photorespiration is higher as the CO2:O2 ratio is decreased. As CO2 is reduced, CO2 fixing capacity peaks at a lower temperature due to the lower temperature at which inhibitory ratios of CO2:O2 are reached when CO2 is decreased and O2 held constant (Fig 4C). This shifts the Topt of CO2 fixation from 38 °C to 25 °C between a CO2 saturated system (Fig 4B) and 140 ppm(g) CO2. The expansion of this analysis to other species is currently limited as this full data set is only available in sweet potato, however the general scale and magnitude of these responses is evident in the literature. A Topt shift of similar scale has been reported previously under both high CO2 and low O2 conditions in Agropyron smithii (Western wheat grass) [34], as well as drought stressed Triticum aestivum (winter wheat) operating under reduced stomatal conductance and Ci [37]. Such shifts in the temperature optimum of CO2 fixation are critical to accurately capture in models of a climate likely to experience more regular and sever temperatures spikes and increased atmospheric CO2 [1].
The capacity of this simple model to incorporate the recent advances in our understanding of the temperature responses of enzymes and metabolic pathways, as well as accounting for the curvature and changes in Topt under different CO2 regimes has value for global scale modelling. Given the intertwined effects of changing temperature and CO2, encompassing the extensive finer details of CO2 transport through the mesophyll into a simple solubility term offers great benefit for incorporation into global models, along with other major limiting factors (light, water, nutrient availability). Given the exponential decreases of gas solubility with temperature, this presents a critical component for capturing the subtleties of CO2 transport in C3 plants into a defined physical constant for understanding large scale CO2 fixation over short time scales (in the absence of adaptation mechanisms). To fully realise the potential of this, further data is needed to define the range and variability of the biological parameters of the model (the binding and inhibition constants) across multiple C3 species, collet data across a wider temperature range, and assess if biome specific average of these parameters are a possibility.
Currently, terrestrial biosphere models employ a range of approaches to model carboxylation, electron transport and phosphate regeneration rates in response to incident radiation, CO2 and temperature (compositions of the major models are summarised in [38]). These models simulate rates based primarily off the equations by Farquhar [11] or Collatz [39]. In addition, these models incorporate a rate-limiting selection between the three processes, and often a smoothing function to even out transitions between the limiting processes and allow for co-limitation [38]. By comparison, the approach presented here fits these limiting processes in one function (Equation 4), simply capturing the net effect of CO2 assimilation rates of these three rate-limiting processes and transitions, along with the effects of O2. This effectively halves input parameters and removes the need for smoothing functions, reducing model complexity while maintaining output accuracy.
CO2 fertilisation has been presented as a mitigating process to rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations [40]. The CO2 fertilisation effect proposes that elevated CO2 concentrations stimulate higher rates of carbon fixation, increasing atmospheric carbon removal to reverse some of the impact of increased anthropogenic inputs. However, when coupled to rising temperatures, this effect will be reduced due to the decreased solubility and bioavailability of the CO2 at higher temperatures. For example, from 1991–2015 atmospheric CO2 has increased by 40 ppm(g), however the concurrent global average temperature rise of 0.5 °C mitigates the effect of this rise in terms of dissolved CO2 bioavailable to plants (per the temperature dependence of CO2 solubility; Equation 6). Over this period, no evidence of CO2 fertilisation is measurable at a global scale [20]. Future predictions up to the year 2100 indicate that CO2 rises (to 700 ppm) are significantly steep compared to projected temperature rises of three degrees to increase dissolved CO2 overall from 0.34 to 0.53 ppm(aq) (based on the RCP 6.0 scenario) [41]. This suggests that, in the absence of other major limiting factors [42], increased CO2 concentrations will stimulate increased CO2 removal. A full understanding of the extent to which CO2 fertilisation will mitigate atmospheric CO2 increases involves consideration of CO2 solubility with temperature, and species-specific data such as RuBisCO binding and inhibition constants to predict wide scale responses to these changes. The analysis presented here provides a simple framework for this modelling, allowing the characterisation of CO2 fixation rates of C3 plants to concurrent changes in temperature and CO2 concentration.
Conclusions
Here, we show that MMRT can successfully account for the intrinsic curvature of the CO2 fixation pathway with temperature. This curvature is well described at the enzyme (RuBisCO), process (Vcmax and Jmax), and full biochemical pathway level. This presents MMRT as a valuable tool for the incorporation into global scale models to account for the temperature response of the enzymes driving the CO2 fixation pathway by incorporating fundamental enzyme kinetics. Here, the ‘real world’ limitations of substrate solubility and photorespiration have been successfully incorporated to account for reductions in carbon fixation potential under limited CO2 in the C3 species sweet potato. Further work is required to assess the range and variability of the parameter set determined here in a wider variety of C3 plant species, and how other factors such as light, water and nutrient limitations layer on top of the underlaying enzymatic responses defined here. The model presented here incorporating MMRT along with the limitations imposed by substrate availability and the effects this has on enzyme rates illustrates the potential of this approach in capturing the nuance of temperature-based curvature in a complex metabolic system with a simple model based on fundamental enzyme behaviour. This provides a framework, based on the thermodynamics of enzyme activity, for building other limiting processes of the photosynthetic process onto, as a basis for incorporation into global scale models.
Supporting information
S1 File. Additional information on the methods for model fitting, extended MMRT equation used for enzyme data, fitting parameters for RuBisCO, Vcmax and Jmax curves, additional fitted thermal curves and fitting parameters, fitting details for net CO2 fixation rates, details of the sensitivity analysis, and tables of all data used in this publication.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319324.s001
(DOCX)
References
- 1.
Ciais P, Sabine C, Bala G, Bopp L, Brovkin V, Canadell J, et al. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
- 2. Kruse J, Adams MA, Kadinov G, Arab L, Kreuzwieser J, Alfarraj S, et al. Characterization of photosynthetic acclimation in Phoenix dactylifera by a modified Arrhenius equation originally developed for leaf respiration. Trees. 2017;31(2):623–44.
- 3. Sage RF, Kubien DS. The temperature response of C3 and C4 photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30(9):1086–106. pmid:17661749
- 4. Medlyn BE, Dreyer E, Ellsworth D, Forstreuter M, Harley PC, Kirschbaum MUF, et al. Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. II. A review of experimental data. Plant Cell Environ. 2002;25(9):1167–79.
- 5. Scafaro AP, Posch BC, Evans JR, Farquhar GD, Atkin OK. Rubisco deactivation and chloroplast electron transport rates co-limit photosynthesis above optimal leaf temperature in terrestrial plants. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):2820. pmid:37198175
- 6. June T, Evans JR, Farquhar GD. A simple new equation for the reversible temperature dependence of photosynthetic electron transport: a study on soybean leaf. Funct Plant Biol. 2004;31(3):275–83. pmid:32688899
- 7. Cen Y-P, Sage RF. The regulation of Rubisco activity in response to variation in temperature and atmospheric CO2 partial pressure in sweet potato. Plant Physiol. 2005;139(2):979–90. pmid:16183840
- 8. Ali AA, Xu C, Rogers A, Fisher RA, Wullschleger SD, Massoud EC, et al. A global scale mechanistic model of photosynthetic capacity (LUNA V1.0). Geosci Model Dev. 2016;9(2):587–606.
- 9. Sitch S, Huntingford C, Gedney N, Levy PE, Lomas M, Piao SL, et al. Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate‐carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs). Global Change Biol. 2008;14(9):2015–39.
- 10. Rogers A, Medlyn BE, Dukes JS, Bonan G, von Caemmerer S, Dietze MC, et al. A roadmap for improving the representation of photosynthesis in Earth system models. New Phytol. 2017;213(1):22–42. pmid:27891647
- 11. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta. 1980;149(1):78–90. pmid:24306196
- 12. Hobbs JK, Jiao W, Easter AD, Parker EJ, Schipper LA, Arcus VL. Change in heat capacity for enzyme catalysis determines temperature dependence of enzyme catalyzed rates. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8(11):2388–93. pmid:24015933
- 13. Arcus VL, Prentice EJ, Hobbs JK, Mulholland AJ, Van der Kamp MW, Pudney CR, et al. On the temperature dependence of enzyme-catalyzed rates. Biochemistry. 2016;55(12):1681–8. pmid:26881922
- 14. van der Kamp MW, Prentice EJ, Kraakman KL, Connolly M, Mulholland AJ, Arcus VL. Dynamical origins of heat capacity changes in enzyme-catalysed reactions. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1177. pmid:29563521
- 15. Schipper LA, Hobbs JK, Rutledge S, Arcus VL. Thermodynamic theory explains the temperature optima of soil microbial processes and high Q10 values at low temperatures. Glob Chang Biol. 2014;20(11):3578–86. pmid:24706438
- 16. Walker EJ, Hamill CJ, Crean R, Connolly MS, Warrender AK, Kraakman KL, et al. Cooperative conformational transitions underpin the activation heat capacity in the temperature dependence of enzyme catalysis. ACS Catal. 2024;14(7):4379–94. pmid:38633402
- 17. Firestone RS, Cameron SA, Karp JM, Arcus VL, Schramm VL. Heat capacity changes for transition-state analogue binding and catalysis with human 5’-methylthioadenosine phosphorylase. ACS Chem Biol. 2017;12(2):464–73. pmid:28026167
- 18. Prentice EJ, Hicks J, Ballerstedt H, Blank LM, Liáng LNL, Schipper LA, et al. The inflection point hypothesis: the relationship between the temperature dependence of enzyme-catalyzed reaction rates and microbial growth rates. Biochemistry. 2020;59(38):3562–9. pmid:32902250
- 19. Liang LL, Arcus VL, Heskel MA, O’Sullivan OS, Weerasinghe LK, Creek D, et al. Macromolecular rate theory (MMRT) provides a thermodynamics rationale to underpin the convergent temperature response in plant leaf respiration. Glob Chang Biol. 2018;24(4):1538–47. pmid:29030907
- 20. Duffy KA, Schwalm CR, Arcus VL, Koch GW, Liang LL, Schipper LA. How close are we to the temperature tipping point of the terrestrial biosphere? Sci Adv. 2021;7(3):eaay1052. pmid:33523891
- 21. Dodds WS, Stutzman LF, Sollami BJ. Carbon dioxide solubility in water. Ind Eng Chem Chem Eng Data Series. 1956;1(1):92–5.
- 22. GENG M, DUAN Z. Prediction of oxygen solubility in pure water and brines up to high temperatures and pressures. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2010;74(19):5631–40.
- 23. Cook CM, Lanaras T, Wood AP, Codd GA, Kelly DP. Kinetic properties of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase from Thiobacillus thyasiris, the putative symbiont of Thyasira flexuosa (Montagu), a bivalve mussel. J General Microbiol. 1991;137(7):1491–6.
- 24. Ezaki S, Maeda N, Kishimoto T, Atomi H, Imanaka T. Presence of a structurally novel type ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase in the hyperthermophilic archaeon, Pyrococcus kodakaraensis KOD1. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(8):5078–82. pmid:9988755
- 25. Dreyer E, Le Roux X, Montpied P, Daudet FA, Masson F. Temperature response of leaf photosynthetic capacity in seedlings from seven temperate tree species. Tree Physiol. 2001;21(4):223–32. pmid:11276416
- 26. Kruse J, Alfarraj S, Rennenberg H, Adams M. A novel mechanistic interpretation of instantaneous temperature responses of leaf net photosynthesis. Photosynth Res. 2016;129(1):43–58. pmid:27220614
- 27. Kruse J, Rennenberg H, Adams MA. Three physiological parameters capture variation in leaf respiration of Eucalyptus grandis, as elicited by short-term changes in ambient temperature, and differing nitrogen supply. Plant Cell Environ. 2018;41(6):1369–82. pmid:29424929
- 28. Thomas TM, Scopes RK. The effects of temperature on the kinetics and stability of mesophilic and thermophilic 3-phosphoglycerate kinases. Biochem J. 1998;330(Pt 3):1087–95. pmid:9494072
- 29. Flexas J, Barbour MM, Brendel O, Cabrera HM, Carriquí M, Díaz-Espejo A, et al. Mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2: an unappreciated central player in photosynthesis. Plant Sci. 2012;193–194:70–84. pmid:22794920
- 30. Bernacchi CJ, Portis AR, Nakano H, von Caemmerer S, Long SP. Temperature response of mesophyll conductance. Implications for the determination of Rubisco enzyme kinetics and for limitations to photosynthesis in vivo. Plant Physiol. 2002;130(4):1992–8. pmid:12481082
- 31. von Caemmerer S, Evans JR. Temperature responses of mesophyll conductance differ greatly between species. Plant Cell Environ. 2015;38(4):629–37. pmid:25224884
- 32. Xue W, Luo H, Carriquí M, Nadal M, Huang J, Zhang J. Quantitative expression of mesophyll conductance temperature response in the FvCB model and impacts on plant gas exchange estimations. Agric For Meteorol. 2022;325:109153.
- 33. Busch FA. Photorespiration in the context of Rubisco biochemistry, CO2 diffusion and metabolism. Plant J. 2020;101(4):919–39. pmid:31910295
- 34. Monson RK, Stidham MA, Williams GJ, Edwards GE, Uribe EG. Temperature Dependence of Photosynthesis in Agropyron smithii Rydb. : I. Factors affecting net CO2 uptake in intact leaves and contribution from ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase measured in vivo and in vitro. Plant Physiol. 1982;69(4):921–8. pmid:16662320
- 35. Servaites JC. Rapid isolation of mesophyll cells from leaves of soybean for photosynthetic studies. Plant Physiol. 1977;59(4):587–90. pmid:16659898
- 36. Servaites JC. Oxygen inhibition of photosynthesis and stimulation of photorespiration in soybean leaf cells. Plant Physiol. 1978;61(1):62–7. pmid:16660238
- 37. Fang L, Martre P, Jin K, Du X, van der Putten PEL, Yin X, et al. Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat. Glob Chang Biol. 2023;29(2):505–21. pmid:36300859
- 38. Walker AP, Johnson AL, Rogers A, Anderson J, Bridges RA, Fisher RA, et al. Multi-hypothesis comparison of Farquhar and Collatz photosynthesis models reveals the unexpected influence of empirical assumptions at leaf and global scales. Glob Chang Biol. 2021;27(4):804–22. pmid:33037690
- 39. Collatz GJ, Ball JT, Grivet C, Berry JA. Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agric For Meteorol. 1991;54(2–4):107–36.
- 40. Ueyama M, Ichii K, Kobayashi H, Kumagai T, Beringer J, Merbold L, et al. Inferring CO2 fertilization effect based on global monitoring land-atmosphere exchange with a theoretical model. Environ Res Lett. 2020;15(8):084009.
- 41.
Stocker T, Qin D, Plattner G, Tignor M, Allen S, Boschung J, et al. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2013:1535.
- 42. Boretti A, Florentine S. Atmospheric CO₂ Concentration and other limiting factors in the growth of C₃ and C₄ plants. Plants (Basel). 2019;8(4):92. pmid:30987384