Figures
Abstract
Reptiles may act as reservoirs or spreaders of potential pathogenic microorganisms including Candida yeasts. While the epidemiology of yeast species has been thoroughly studied, the virulence profile of isolated species is not well investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the haemolytic, phospholipase, lipase activities and biofilm formation of yeasts isolated from the cloacal swabs of venomous snakes from Marrakech, Morocco (Group I, n = 40) and from non-venomous snakes from Cocullo, Italy (Group II, n = 32). All the isolated yeasts from Group 1 showed low production of lipase (Lz ≥ 0.90) and haemolysin (Hz ≥ 0.90), and only 35% of them were low phospholipase (Pz) producers (Pz > 0.90). In contrast, all the yeasts from Group 2 produced enzymes and more than 62% produced high amounts of enzymes (Pz ≤ 0.64; Lz ≤ 0.69; Hz ≤ 0.69). Data show that yeasts from snakes were able to produce virulence factors, which vary according to the yeast species and the hosts or their origin, thus suggesting the potential role of snakes in harboring and spreading pathogenic yeasts in the environment. Since the virulence profile was lower in venomous snakes than that in non-venomous ones, we discussed that it may be affected by the venom composition. This will pave the way for fungal infection control, alternative to antifungal drugs in order to overcome resistance phenomena.
Citation: Ugochukwu ICI, Mendoza-Roldan JA, Miglianti M, Palazzo N, Odigie AE, Otranto D, et al. (2025) Virulence profile of pathogenic yeasts from snakes: Alternative ways for antifungal strategies. PLoS ONE 20(3): e0318703. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318703
Editor: Vartika Srivastava, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Received: October 2, 2024; Accepted: January 20, 2025; Published: March 12, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Ugochukwu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript.
Funding: This study was supported by EU funding within the NextGeneration EU-MUR PNRR Extended Partnership initiative on Emerging Infectious Diseases (Project no. PE00000007, INF-ACT).
Competing interests: The Authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Introduction
Fungal infections poses an emerging global health threat, prompting the World Health Organization (WHO) to release the first list of health-threatening fungi to pilot research and public health interventions [1]. Importantly, wildlife is a major source of infectious diseases, including mycoses [2,3], many of them of zoonotic concern worldwide [3,4]. In the last decades, reptiles have attracted the interest of the scientific community, for their role as spreaders of bacteria (Salmonella spp., Vibrio spp.), viruses (arboviruses) and fungi (Candida spp.) [5–8]. In addition, many wild animal species (e.g., Cheetahs, Koalas, Lizards, Deer, Dolphins, Elk, Porpoises, Sea Lion, Baleen whales, Wild Boars, Snakes) were considered as sentinels for human/animal pathogenic microorganisms. For example, in our previous study focusing on snakes of different origin we have isolated pathogenetic yeasts including fungal species listed among WHO Critical and High Priority group of fungal pathogens [9]. Since the yeast species community as well as their antifungal profile varied according to animal origin and lifestyle reflecting the epidemiology of human yeast infections in the same geographical areas, we have suggested that these animals including snakes should be considered as sentinels for human/animal pathogenic microorganisms and bio-indicators of environmental quality [6–8,10,11]. As a matter of fact, yeasts belonging to the genera Candida, Cryptococcus, Geotrichum, Rhodotorula, Debaryomyces, Meyerozyma and Trichosporon were frequently isolated from wild animals [6,8,11–13]. All of the above yeasts are considered a public health concern of emerging importance, due to the increased number of their infection in humans and animals [14,15]. In particular, yeasts of both endogenous (e.g., Candida albicans, Pichia kudriavzevii, Candida parapsilosis) or exogenous origin (e.g., Meyerozyma guilliermondii, Candida fermentati, Candida lusitaniae, Cryptococcus spp., Trichosporon spp., Rhodotorula spp.) may induce cutaneous and systemic diseases in humans and animals [16–22]. In addition, their low antifungal drug susceptibility has been considered, the major cause of outbreaks [23]. These yeasts can persist within the host without causing diseases, spread in the environment through the feces, eventually acquiring virulence determinants, such as antifungal resistance [24–26]. Indeed, there is a growing concern that these yeast species might acquire virulence determinants and antimicrobial resistance when they move from one niche or location to another [27,28].
Virulence factors are key determinants of pathogenicity in yeast, enabling them to cause infections in humans and animals [24–26,29–34]. In particular, one group of virulence factors causes colonization to take place, or the initiation of an infection, whilst the other group helps to spread the infection [34]. The most studied virulence traits of yeast are adhesion to host tissues and surface of medical devices, biofilm formation, extracellular hydrolases production, phenotypic switching and thigmotropism and for Cryptococcus spp., capsule formation and melanin production. Adhesion to the tissue is the primary and most important stage in the process of yeast colonization and infection helping yeast cells to penetrate, disseminate and persist in host tissues. Biofilms are surface associated microbial communities firmly fixed within an extracellular matrix, which limits the penetration of an antifungal agent and protects the yeast cells from host defense mechanism [32,33]. The ability to form biofilm as well as its structure is yeast species dependent thus contributing in the enhancement of the virulence of the specific yeast species [32,33]. Extracellular hydrolytic enzymes facilitate the invasion of host tissue by damaging host cell membrane thus playing an important role in the pathogenesis of yeast infections. Phospholipases, aspartyl proteinases, lipases and hemolysins are the secreted hydrolases most commonly implicated in the yeast pathogenicity [24–26,29,30]. Finally the production of hyphae or thigmotropism, described mainly in C. albicans, C. dubliniensis and C. tropicalis are considered mechanisms of virulence facilitating tissue invasion and resistance by phagocytosis. Polysaccharide capsule formation and melanin production, as seen in Cryptococcus species, protects the yeast against host immune responses [35]. These virulence factors working in combination allow yeast to inhabit host tissues, avoid immune responses, and withstand treatment, thus complicating both diagnosis and therapy [36]. However proteinases, lipases, phospholipases as well as biofilm formation were the most studied virulence factors, and they well evaluated from many yeast species that cause human and animal infections [24–26,29,30,34].
Although the epidemiology of Candida or non-Candida species has been thoroughly studied [37], the virulence profile of yeasts isolated from wild animals has not been fully elucidated. In particular in our previous study we observed that the fungal community as well the occurrence of pathogenic yeasts in the cloaca of snakes varied according to venomousity of the animals suggesting a role of the venom in selecting pathogenic yeast populations. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the production of i) hydrolytic enzymes such as phospholipase, lipase and hemolysin and ii) the biofilm formation of different yeast species isolated from the cloacal swabs of venomous and non-venomous snake species from Marrakech, Morocco and Cocullo, Italy.
Materials and methods
Yeast strains
A total of 72 yeast strains previously isolated and molecularly identified from the cloacal swabs of venomous snakes from Marrakech, Morocco as indicated in Fig 1 (Group I, n = 40) and from non-venomous snakes from Cocullo, Italy as indicated in Fig 1 (Group II, n = 32) were employed in the study (Table 1). Animals were apparently healthy and collected under the frame of previous studies assessing the human-reptile-pathogens interface [8,38,39]. Briefly, Group 1 is composed by species of snakes that properly represent the typical Moroccan herpetofauna (22 species of snakes, being eight considered dangerous), associated to the traditional practices and snake charming. Given that snakes are pivotal for this ancestral custom, the species involved are represented by the more eye-catching ones such as the Egyptian cobras, given their unique display of warning behavior. In addition, species of highly venomous snakes such as puff adders, as well as mildly venomous ones, as in the case of Montpellier snakes, are also frequently used, with even the latter species handed to tourists. In Morocco, snakebites are of important concern mainly in children from rural areas of the northern-central regions, with an average of 218 cases per year, being chiefly caused by vipers. Conversely, snakebite envenomation in charmers is underreported, most likely due to the possibility of risking their livelihood if they report snakebites [38]. On the other hand, Group 2 is characterized by non-venomous species with the four-lined snake being the most captured given its essential role within the “festa dei serpari”, once these large snakes are placed on top of the statue of San Domenico. Overall, in Italy five species of venomous vipers are present, with Vipera aspis and Vipera ursini also occurring in the Abruzzo region, where the snake ritual takes place. However, snakebites are underreported and sporadic, with three deaths reported in a four-year period (1980–1984). Indeed, given their shy and fossorial nature, as well as their distinctive morphological features, vipers have been never captured for the snake ritual and there are no reports of snake catchers from the region being bitten by venomous snakes [39].
Map prepared using QGIS software—Buenos Aires version (link of the XYZ tile: https://tile.openstreetmap.org).
The strains were stored at − 80 °C at the Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari (Italy). To ensure purity and viability, each strain was sub-cultured at least twice onto Sabouraud dextrose Agar (SDA, Liofilchem, Italy) incubated at 35 °C for 24–48 h, prior testing the virulence profiles.
Ethics statement
This research followed relevant international, national, and institutional guidelines regarding the handling of animals. In particular, the procedures for collecting samples from Morocco were approved by the Office National de Sècurité Sanitaire des Produits Alimentaires in the Kingdom of Morocco, under the authorization number 23355ONSSA/DIL/DPIV/2022. Whereas, the protocols of snake sampling, handling, and capture by Serpari, in Italy, was allowed by the National authorizations (National law DPR 357/97) and approved by the Italian Ministry of Environment (n. 16271/2023 PNM and 79052/2023 PNM) as previously reported [8].
Enzymatic activity assays
Preparation of the yeast suspensions.
A loop of the pure stock culture of each yeast strain was cultured onto SDA and incubated at 32°C for 72h (Cryptococcus neoformans) or 37°C for 48h (other yeasts). Pure colonies were transferred into sterile distilled water and adjusted to an optical density of 1.3 using a turbidimeter (DEN-1McFarland Densitometer, Biosan) that was equivalent to 1.5 × 107 colony forming units (CFU)/ml as validated by quantitative plate count CFU in SDA using standard procedures [28,40].
Haemolytic activity.
The haemolytic activity of yeast species were assessed by the blood plate assay using SDA supplemented with 7% sheep blood and 3% glucose and adjusted to a pH of 5.6 [41]. A total of 10 μl yeast suspension was inoculated in duplicates onto the media and incubated at 37°C for 5 days. After incubation, a distinct translucent halo around the inoculation site indicated positive haemolytic activity [42]. The ratio of the diameter of the colony (a) by that of the translucent zone and that of the diameter of the colony (b) was used as value of the haemolytic index (Hz value). Each strain was tested in duplicates (Fig 2), and the experiments were repeated three times in different days. The Hz values were reported as average of the values registered. According to the Hz index, the following activity ranges were established: high, Hz ≤ 0.69; moderate, Hz = 0.70– 0.89; weak, Hz = 0.90–0.99; none, Hz = 1 [43].
Phospholipase activity.
The production of phospholipase was assessed using the egg-yolk plate method as previously described [24,44]. A total of 10 μl yeast suspension was inoculated in duplicates onto egg-yolk agar media plates and incubated at 32°C for 5 days. The formation of a precipitation zone (i.e., opaque halo) around the yeast colony was considered as an indicator for enzyme production. Phospholipase activity was expressed as Pz, which represents the ratio between colony diameter and total diameter plus zone of precipitation [45]. Each strain was tested in duplicates (Fig 3), and the experiments were repeated three times in different days. The results were expressed as the average of the values obtained. According to the Pz index, the following activity ranges have been established: strong enzymatic production: Pz ≤ 0.64, moderate: Pz = 0.64–0.89; weak: Pz = 0.90–0.99; none, Pz = 1
Lipase activity.
The lipase activity (Lz) was assessed, following standard procedures as previously described [46]. Briefly, 10 µ L of each strain suspension was cultured in a sterile petri disk containing a lipid medium (i.e., peptone 1%, sodium chloride 5%, calcium chloride 0.01%, and agar 2%, plus 1% tween 80) and incubated at 32°C for 5 days. A zone of precipitation around the colony indicated lipase production. The production of lipase (Lz) is expressed as a ratio of diameter of a colony to the total diameter plus zone of precipitation. Each strain was tested in duplicates (Fig 4), and the experiments were repeated three time in different days. The results were expressed as the average of the values obtained. The ranges of activity according to the Lz index were established as follows: high: Lz ≤ 0.69; moderate, Lz = 0.70– 0.89; weak, Lz = 0.90–0.99; none, Lz = 1 [46].
In vitro biofilm formation
The biofilm production was tested using a modified standard method [47–49]. Briefly, yeast cells were suspended in RPMI 1640 broth (Sigma, USA) and the suspension was adjusted to the concentration of 1 × 106 cells/mL. Subsequently, 100 μL of the inoculum were transferred to 96-well flat-bottomed polystyrene plates containing 100 μL of RPMI 1640 broth. The plates were incubated at 35°C for 24 hours for Candida spp. and other isolated yeast species and at 37°C for 72 for C. neoformans. Wells containing only RPMI 1640 broth without inoculum were used as negative control. After incubation, the supernatant was carefully aspirated, and non-adherent cells were removed by gently washing twice using sterile phosphate buffer saline solution (PBS). Subsequently, biofilms were measured using the 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium5-carboxanilide (XTT) reduction assay. In particular, the washed biofilm cells were incubated for 3 hours at 37°C with a solution of 1 mg/ml of XTT and 1μM of menadione in PBS. The volume was then transferred into a new 96-well plate, which was read soon after using a Spectrophotometer at 490 nm. Each test was performed in duplicates and the experiments were repeated three time in different days. The results were expressed as the average of the obtained values (i.e., mean values of optical density-OD) [50].
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed in Python (version 3.9.18). We utilized several core libraries and their respective dependencies in the Python programming environment, which included Pandas for high-performance data analysis, Numerical Python (NumPy) for array operations, Matplotlib and Seaborn for interactive and statistical data visualizations, as well as Scikit-learn and SciPy for data preprocessing, and evaluation [51,52]. The repeated measures ANOVA (rm-ANOVA) and pairwise post hoc comparisons where a statistical significance was performed using pingouin and statsmodels. A critical p-value threshold of p ≤ 0.05 was applied to determine statistical significance. The rm- ANOVA was most appropriate as it accounted for the dependence between repeated measures at different time points within the dataset while the Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test, a commonly used post-hoc test that adjusts for the family-wise error rate, was used to identify specific group comparisons where such significant difference was found.
Results
All the isolated yeasts from Group 1 produced haemolysin and lipase whereas only 35% produced phospholipase (Table 2; Figs 2,3,4). However, the amount of produced enzymes were classified as very low, varying according to the isolated yeast species (Table 2). In Group 1, Exophiala dermatitidis showed the highest haemolytic (Hz = 0.52), phospholipase (Pz = 0.5) and lipase (Lz = 0.5) activities. Whereas Diutina catelunata showed the high lipolytic (Lz = 0.46) and haemolytic activities (Hz = 0.53). Only some strains of Candida tropicalis and E. dermatitidis were phospholipase producers. Conversely, all yeasts from Group 2 produced enzymes, and many of them (e.g., 62%) in high quantity (Table 2). In particular, C. neoformans produced the highest haemolytic and lipase activities (Hz = 0.61; Lz = 0.53), and Meyerozyma guilliermondii the highest phospholipase (Pz = 0.60) activities. All the yeast species produced biofilm varying according to the isolated yeast species (Table 2). The yeast enzymatic activities recorded varied according to snake species (Fig 5), with the lipase and phospholipase activities of Metahyphopichia silvanorum being highest in strains isolated from Zamenis longissimus compared to those isolated from Hierophis viridiflavus. The biofilm formation and phospholipase activity of Rhodotorula mucillaginosa and Debaryomyces hansenii were greater in strains isolated from Elaphe quatuorlineata and Z. longissimus, respectively, than from Malpolon monspessulanus. In addition, the haemolysin activity of Trichosporon asahii was greater in strains isolated from Malpolon monspessulanus than that from Bitis arietans. No statistical differences in virulence factors of C. tropicalis were registered among the strains isolated from B. arietans and Naja haje legionis.
Discussion
The results of this study suggest that yeasts isolated from snakes are able to produce virulence factors, which varied according to their species, host and/or geographical origin, overall suggesting the potential role of snakes in harbouring and spreading pathogenic yeasts in the environment. It is well known that wild animals may act as reservoirs of yeasts which varied according animal life style and origin [6,8,11,14,25,53]. In addition, the cloaca yeast population is usually retrieved in the faeces of animals, thus suggesting that these animals might act both as reservoirs and spreaders of pathogenic yeasts in the environment through their faeces [6,11,12,14,28,54]. In our previously published study we have demonstrated that mycobiota composition of cloaca of different snake species varied according to animal species and origin and were positively correlated with the etiology and epidemiology of human and animal infection in the same geographical area [8]. The presence of yeasts species in the cloaca of these animals seems to be due to the fact that these microorganisms were acquired from the environment thus acting as a colonizer of the skin and/or of the gastrointestinal tract [8,53]. This evidence was well demonstrated by the isolation of Candida auris from cloaca swab of Egyptian cobra [7]. Since most species of yeasts isolated from snakes have already been established as causative agents of life-threatening infections characterized by high mortality in immune-compromised human patients [2,51–54], snakes might be considered both as spreader or as sentinels for the emergence of zoonotic micro-organisms. Indeed most species of yeasts isolated from snakes have already been established as causative agents of life-threatening infections characterized by high mortality in immune-compromised human patients [2,51–54]. In particular, the World Health Organization classified C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis and C. neoformans as critical priority pathogens [9]. Whereas, the others (i.e., Clavispora lusitaniae, D. catelunata, E. dermatitidis, M. caribbica, R. mucilaginosa, T. asahii, W. pararugosa, D. hansenii, M. silvanorum and M. guilliermondii) are etiological agents of emerging and re-emerging mycoses [2,55–61]. In this study, every yeast species demonstrated distinct virulence traits, been that some were more pathogenic than others, such as C. gattii/neoformans species complex, which remain, together with C. albicans, one of the main pathogen responsible for invasive yeast infections worldwide [62,63]. Meanwhile, other species herein isolated (i.e., C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis) are considered to be emergent, also because of their capacity in acquiring virulent traits according to habitats or hosts in which thrive [62–64].
The production of lipase and hemolysin by all yeasts isolated suggested that these enzymes are part of the metabolic pathway for colonizing the cloaca of healthy snakes, being their production related to the survival of the yeasts in host tissues [64,65]. Conversely, the presence of phospholipase activity in few yeast species herein isolated might be due to a differential yeast pathogenicity, as these enzymes are usually involved in cell membranes damage or disruption of their functions [62–65]. Indeed, mutants lacking these genes are less virulent in murine or in Galleria mellonella model [53,66]. However, apart from W. pararugosa which is not a phospholipase producer [67], the absence of phospholipase activity in C. parapsilopsis, C. lusitaniae, D. catelunata, R. mucilaginosa and T. asahii differs from previous results [28, 44,66,68]. This discrepancy may be due to the low number of yeast strains for each species tested or their inability to produce enzymes in snake cloaca, where these yeasts reside [28,69]. The latter hypothesis is supported by the fact that the amount of produced enzymes or biofilm vary according to the host species and environmental conditions [70]. Hence, the higher amount of enzymes or biofilm production in non-venomous snakes that in venomous ones, might suggest that snake venom affects the virulence profiles of yeasts, as in the case of R. mucillaginosa isolated from an aglyph snake (i.e., Z. longissimus) with a more virulent profile compared to the same species isolated from a mildly venomous opisthoglyphous species (i.e., M. monspessulanus). The same differential virulence pattern was recorded comparing T. asahii strains isolated from highly venomous solenoglyphous snakes (i.e., B. arietans) and mildly venomous species (i.e., M. monspessulanus). However, M. silvanorum showed a different virulence profile even though it was isolated from two non-venomous species of Italian snakes. This may be due to the fact that the Western whip snake (H. viridiflavus) is potentially classified as an opisthoglyphous mildly venomous snake [71], with human cases of envenomation recorded after prolonged bites [71,72]. Overall, data herein presented may suggests that this snake species has salivary compounds analogous to those of snakes that possess Duvernoy’s gland [73]. The absence of any statistically significant differences in virulence profile of C. tropicalis isolated from two highly venomous snakes (i.e., B. arietans, N. haje legionis), further suggest the role of snake venom in rendering less virulent a pathogenic yeast. Indeed, snake venoms are considered as “mini-drug libraries” in which each compound may have potential pharmacological and therapeutical activity [74,75]. Recent data also showed that cobra snakes’ venoms decrease the viability of different Candida spp. (i.e., C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata) reducing their ability in biofilm production [76]. However, some snake venoms are able to promote the secretion of extracellular phospholipases that may facilitate Candida pathogenicity and limit their usefulness as anti-candidal agents [76]. For this reason, the role of snake venom in reducing yeast viability and/or the virulence profile of yeast species, should be better addressed in future studies.
Although this study presents limitations in relation to the number of analyzed strains/per species, the type of samples is quite unique and very rarely investigated, thus representing a novelty for the scientific community. In addition, the state-of-art knowledge enables the researchers to generate new research ideas, contributing to the academia and public health domains. Indeed, data of this study suggests that yeast species isolated from snakes are able to produce hydrolytic enzymes and biofilms, further confirming the role of snakes in spreading pathogenic and virulent organisms [8]. However, the role of these yeast species in producing other virulence factors like secreted aspartic proteinase (SAP) need to be better explored in future studies being that these enzymes are able to cause both mechanical damages (i.e., deteriorate epithelial and mucosal barrier proteins such as collagen, keratin and mucin) and immunological escape (complement, cytokines and immunoglobulins degradation) during the infection process [34]. In Candida, SAP is encoded by ten genes SAP1-10 but they were well characterized only for some Candida spp. (e.g., C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis and C. dubliniensis) and very low characterized for other yeasts (e.g., C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. kefyr [34]. Future comparative studies in the virulence profile as well as in the gene expression between yeasts from venomous/not venomous snakes and yeasts isolated from human/animal clinical cases and environment will be useful to verify the role of venomous in affecting the pathogenic role of yeasts. Nevertheless, studies on usefulness of snake venom to control the growth, biofilm formation, and enzymes production of specific yeast species are warranted, towards the selection of new compounds which could serve as alternatives to available drugs, in order to control fungal infections. Collaborative and integrative efforts are encouraged to better understand the associated virulence factors of yeasts, the physiological or biochemical differential patterns of production in different snake species, in order to develop control and/or prevention measures to mitigate the spread of these virulent yeasts from these reptiles, substantiating the One Health approach.
Acknowledgments
The authors regret the loss of Claudia Cafarchia and dedicate this article to her memory. This study was supported by EU funding within the NextGeneration EU-MUR PNRR Extended Partnership initiative on Emerging Infectious Diseases (Project no. PE00000007, INF-ACT). The technical assistance of Rossella Samarelli and Giada Annoscia from University of Bari Aldo Moro, Department of Veterinary Medicine Bari, Italy is greatly acknowledged.
References
- 1. Loh JT, Lam K-P. Fungal infections: immune defense, immunotherapies and vaccines. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;196:114775. pmid:36924530
- 2. Ugochukwu ICI, Aneke CI, Sani NA, Omeke JN, Anyanwu MU, Odigie AE, et al. Important mycoses of wildlife: emphasis on etiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and pathology-a review: PART 1. Animals (Basel). 2022;12(15):1874. pmid:35892524
- 3. González-Barrio D. Zoonoses and wildlife: one health approach. Animals (Basel). 2022;12(4):480. pmid:35203188
- 4. Allen T, Murray KA, Zambrana-Torrelio C, Morse SS, Rondinini C, Di Marco M, et al. Global hotspots and correlates of emerging zoonotic diseases. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1124. pmid:29066781
- 5. Zancolli G, Mahsberg D, Sickel W, Keller A. Reptiles as reservoirs of bacterial infections: Real threat or methodological bias? Microb Ecol. 2015;70(3):579–84. pmid:25921519
- 6. Rhimi W, Mendoza-Roldan J, Aneke CI, Mosca A, Otranto D, Alastruey-Izquierdo A, et al. Role of lizards as reservoirs of pathogenic yeasts of zoonotic concern. Acta Trop. 2022;231:106472. pmid:35443196
- 7. Cafarchia C, Mendoza-Roldan JA, Rhimi W, C I Ugochukwu I, Miglianti M, Beugnet F, et al. Candida auris from the Egyptian cobra: role of snakes as potential reservoirs. Med Mycol. 2024;62(7):myae056. pmid:38816207
- 8. Ugochukwu ICI, Mendoza-Roldan JA, Rhimi W, Miglianti M, Odigie AE, Mosca A, et al. Snakes as sentinel of zoonotic yeasts and bio-indicators of environmental quality. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):22491. pmid:39341972
- 9.
World Health Organization. WHO fungal priority pathogens list to guide research, development and public health action. 2024.
- 10. Danesi P, Falcaro C, Schmertmann LJ, de Miranda LHM, Krockenberger M, Malik R. Cryptococcus in wildlife and free-living mammals. J Fungi (Basel). 2021;7(1):29. pmid:33419125
- 11. Rhimi W, Sgroi G, Aneke CI, Annoscia G, Latrofa MS, Mosca A, et al. Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) as Reservoir of zoonotic yeasts: bioindicator of environmental quality. Mycopathologia. 2022;187(2–3):235–48. pmid:35072853
- 12. Trama B, Fernandes J, Labuto G. The evaluation of bioremediation potential of a yeast collection isolated from composting. Adv Microbiol. 2014;4796–807.
- 13. Cafarchia C, Iatta R, Danesi P, Camarda A, Capelli G, Otranto D. Yeasts isolated from cloacal swabs, feces, and eggs of laying hens. Med Mycol. 2019;57(3):340–5. pmid:29762763
- 14. Hui ST, Gifford H, Rhodes J. Emerging antifungal resistance in fungal pathogens. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep. 2024;11(2):43–50. pmid:38725545
- 15. Seyedmousavi S, Bosco S de MG, de Hoog S, Ebel F, Elad D, Gomes RR, et al. Fungal infections in animals: a patchwork of different situations. Med Mycol. 2018;56(suppl_1):165–87. pmid:29538732
- 16. Wirth F, Goldani LZ. Epidemiology of Rhodotorula: an emerging pathogen. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2012;2012465717. pmid:23091485
- 17. Merseguel KB, Nishikaku AS, Rodrigues AM, Padovan AC, e Ferreira RC, de Azevedo Melo AS, et al. Genetic diversity of medically important and emerging Candida species causing invasive infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;1557. pmid:25887032
- 18. Neville BA, d’Enfert C, Bougnoux M-E. Candida albicans commensalism in the gastrointestinal tract. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015;15(7):fov081. pmid:26347504
- 19. Maziarz EK, Perfect JR. Cryptococcosis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2016;30(1):179–206. pmid:26897067
- 20. Talapko J, Juzbašić M, Matijević T, Pustijanac E, Bekić S, Kotris I, et al. Candida albicans-The Virulence Factors and Clinical Manifestations of Infection. J Fungi (Basel). 2021;7(2):79. pmid:33499276
- 21. Ghasemi R, Lotfali E, Rezaei K, Madinehzad SA, Tafti MF, Aliabadi N, et al. Meyerozyma guilliermondii species complex: review of current epidemiology, antifungal resistance, and mechanisms. Braz J Microbiol. 2022;53(4):1761–79. pmid:36306113
- 22. Rosa CA, Lachance M-A, Limtong S, Santos ARO, Landell MF, Gombert AK, et al. Yeasts from tropical forests: biodiversity, ecological interactions, and as sources of bioinnovation. Yeast. 2023;40(11):511–39. pmid:37921426
- 23. Schelenz S, Hagen F, Rhodes JL, Abdolrasouli A, Chowdhary A, Hall A, et al. First hospital outbreak of the globally emerging Candida auris in a European hospital. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016;535. pmid:27777756
- 24. Sidrim JJC, Maia DCB de SC, Brilhante RSN, Soares GDP, Cordeiro RA, Monteiro AJ, et al. Candida species isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus): In vitro antifungal susceptibility profile and phospholipase activity. Vet Microbiol. 2010;145(3–4):324–8. pmid:20493645
- 25. Rocha MFG, Bandeira SP, de Alencar LP, Melo LM, Sales JA, Paiva M de AN, et al. Azole resistance in Candida albicans from animals: Highlights on efflux pump activity and gene overexpression. Mycoses. 2017;60(7):462–8. pmid:28295690
- 26. Castelo-Branco D de SCM, Graça-Filho RV da, Oliveira JS de, Rocha MG da, Araújo G dos S, Araújo Neto MP de, et al. Yeast microbiota of free-ranging amphibians and reptiles from Caatinga biome in Ceará State, Northeast Brazil: high pathogenic potential of Candida famata. Cienc Rural. 2021;51(7):.
- 27. Tsiodras S, Kelesidis T, Kelesidis I, Bauchinger U, Falagas ME. Human infections associated with wild birds. J Infect. 2008;56(2):83–98. pmid:18096237
- 28. Rhimi W, Aneke CI, Annoscia G, Camarda A, Mosca A, Cantacessi C, et al. Virulence and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of Candida albicans and Candida catenulata from laying hens. Int Microbiol. 2021;24(1):57–63. pmid:32772220
- 29. Kurokawa CS, Sugizaki MF, Peraçoli MT. Virulence factors in fungi of systemic mycoses. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1998;40(3):125–35. pmid:9830725
- 30. Kadry AA, El-Ganiny AM, El-Baz AM. Relationship between Sap prevalence and biofilm formation among resistant clinical isolates of Candida albicans. Afr Health Sci. 2018;18(4):1166–74. pmid:30766582
- 31. Ahmad Khan MS, Alshehrei F, Al-Ghamdi SB, Bamaga MA, Al-Thubiani AS, Alam MZ. Virulence and biofilms as promising targets in developing antipathogenic drugs against candidiasis. Future Sci OA. 2020;6(2):FSO440. pmid:32025329
- 32. Cavalheiro M, Teixeira MC. Candida biofilms: threats, challenges, and promising strategies. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018;528. pmid:29487851
- 33. Tavares ER, Gionco B, Morguette AEB, Andriani GM, Morey AT, do Carmo AO, et al. Phenotypic characteristics and transcriptome profile of Cryptococcus gattii biofilm. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):6438. pmid:31015652
- 34. Deorukhkar S, Roushani S. Virulence traits contributing to pathogenicity of Candida species. J Microbiol Exp. 2017;5(1):00140.
- 35. Zaragoza O. Basic principles of the virulence of Cryptococcus. Virulence. 2019;10(1):490–501. pmid:31119976
- 36. d’Enfert C, Kaune A-K, Alaban L-R, Chakraborty S, Cole N, Delavy M, et al. The impact of the Fungus-Host-Microbiota interplay upon Candida albicans infections: current knowledge and new perspectives. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2021;45(3):fuaa060. pmid:33232448
- 37. Wan L, Luo G, Lu H, Xuan D, Cao H, Zhang J. Changes in the hemolytic activity of Candida species by common electrolytes. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15171. pmid:26296996
- 38. Mendoza-Roldan JA, Noll Louzada-Flores V, Lekouch N, Khouchfi I, Annoscia G, Zatelli A, et al. Snakes and Souks: Zoonotic pathogens associated to reptiles in the Marrakech markets, Morocco. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023;17(7):e0011431. pmid:37467211
- 39. Mendoza-Roldan JA, Perles L, Filippi E, Szafranski N, Montinaro G, Carbonara M, et al. Parasites and microorganisms associated with the snakes collected for the “festa Dei serpari” in Cocullo, Italy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024;18(2):e0011973. pmid:38381797
- 40. Santangelo R, Chen S, Sorrell T, Wright L. Detection of antibodies to phospholipase B in patients infected with Cryptococcus neoformans by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Medical Mycology. 2005;43(4):335–41.
- 41. Luo G, Samaranayake LP, Yau JY. Candida species exhibit differential in vitro hemolytic activities. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(8):2971–4. pmid:11474025
- 42. Elfeky DS, Gohar NM. Evaluation of virulence factors of Candida species isolated from superficial versus systemic candidiasis. Egypt J Med Microbiol. 2016;38(87):1–10.
- 43. Rhimi W, Aneke CI, Annoscia G, Otranto D, Boekhout T, Cafarchia C. Effect of chlorogenic and gallic acids combined with azoles on antifungal susceptibility and virulence of multidrug-resistant Candida spp. and Malassezia furfur isolates. Med Mycol. 2020;58(8):1091–101. pmid:32236482
- 44. Cafarchia C, Romito D, Coccioli C, Camarda A, Otranto D. Phospholipase activity of yeasts from wild birds and possible implications for human disease. Med Mycol. 2008;46(5):429–34. pmid:18608940
- 45. Price MF, Wilkinson ID, Gentry LO. Plate method for detection of phospholipase activity in Candida albicans. Sabouraudia. 1982;20(1):7–14. pmid:7038928
- 46. Angiolella L, Rojas F, Giammarino A, Bellucci N, Giusiano G. Identification of virulence factors in isolates of Candida haemulonii, Candida albicans and Clavispora lusitaniae with low susceptibility and resistance to fluconazole and amphotericin B. Microorganisms. 2024;12(1):212. pmid:38276197
- 47. Nett JE, Cain MT, Crawford K, Andes DR. Optimizing a Candida biofilm microtiter plate model for measurement of antifungal susceptibility by tetrazolium salt assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(4):1426–33. pmid:21227984
- 48. Benaducci T, Sardi J de CO, Lourencetti NMS, Scorzoni L, Gullo FP, Rossi SA, et al. Virulence of Cryptococcus sp. biofilms in vitro and in vivo using Galleria mellonella as an ALTERNATIVE Model. Front Microbiol. 2016;7290. pmid:27014214
- 49. Srivastava V, Singla RK, Dubey AK. Inhibition of biofilm and virulence factors of Candida albicans by partially purified secondary metabolites of Streptomyces chrestomyceticus Strain ADP4. Curr Top Med Chem. 2018;18(11):925–45. pmid:29992882
- 50. Rhimi W, Chebil W, Ugochukwu ICI, Babba H, Otranto D, Cafarchia C. Comparison of virulence factors and susceptibility profiles of Malassezia furfur from pityriasis versicolor patients and bloodstream infections of preterm infants. Med Mycol. 2022;61(1):myad003. pmid:36626926
- 51. Jones E, Oliphant T, Peterson P. SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python. 2001.
- 52. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res. 2011;12(85):2825–30.
- 53. Glushakova A, Kachalkin A. Wild and partially synanthropic bird yeast diversity, in vitro virulence, and antifungal susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis strains isolated from feces. Int Microbiol. 2024;27(3):883–97. pmid:37874524
- 54. Brilhante RSN, Castelo-Branco DSCM, Soares GDP, Astete-Medrano DJ, Monteiro AJ, Cordeiro RA, et al. Characterization of the gastrointestinal yeast microbiota of cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus): a potential hazard to human health. J Med Microbiol. 2010;59(Pt 6):718–23. pmid:20150318
- 55. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(1):133–63. pmid:17223626
- 56. Jarros I, Veiga F, Corrêa J, Barros I, Gadelha M, Voidaleski M. Microbiological and virulence aspects of Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. EXCLI J. 2020;19687–704.
- 57. Yu H-Y, Qu T-T, Yang Q, Hu J-H, Sheng J-F. A fatal case of Exophiala dermatitidis meningoencephalitis in an immunocompetent host: a case report and literature review. J Infect Chemother. 2021;27(10):1520–4. pmid:34215497
- 58. Kimura M, Asano-Mori Y, Sakoh T, Abe M, Ueno K, Hoshino Y, et al. Factors Associated with Breakthrough Fungemia Caused by Candida, Trichosporon, or Fusarium Species in Patients with Hematological Disorders. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66(3):e0208121. pmid:35041512
- 59. Desnos-Ollivier M, Ragon M, Robert V, Raoux D, Gantier J, Dromer F. Debaryomyces hansenii (Candida famata), a rare human fungal pathogen often misidentified as Pichia guilliermondii (Candida guilliermondii). J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(10).
- 60. Sav H, Ozakkas F, Altınbas R, Kiraz N, Tümgör A, Gümral R, et al. Virulence markers of opportunistic black yeast in Exophiala. Mycoses. 2016;59(6):343–50. pmid:26857806
- 61. Gugnani HC, Hagen F, Meis JF, Chakrabarti A. Occurrence of Cryptococcus neoformans and other yeast-like fungi in environmental sources in Bonaire (Dutch Caribbean). Germs. 2020;10(4):195–200. pmid:33134197
- 62. Staniszewska M. Virulence Factors in Candida species. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2020;21(3):313–23. pmid:31544690
- 63. Oliveira LS de S, Pinto LM, de Medeiros MAP, Toffaletti DL, Tenor JL, Barros TF, et al. Comparison of Cryptococcus gattii/neoformans species complex to related genera (Papiliotrema and Naganishia) reveal variances in virulence associated factors and antifungal susceptibility. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:642658. pmid:34277464
- 64. de Jong AW, Hagen F. Attack, defend and persist: how the fungal pathogen Candida auris was able to emerge globally in healthcare environments. Mycopathologia. 2019;184(3):353–65. pmid:31209693
- 65. Ugochukwu ICI, Rhimi W, Chebil W, Rizzo A, Tempesta M, Giusiano G, et al. Part 2: Understanding the role of Malassezia spp. in skin disorders: pathogenesis of Malassezia associated skin infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2023;21(11):1245–57. pmid:37883035
- 66. Czechowicz P, Nowicka J, Gościniak G. Virulence factors of Candida spp. and host immune response important in the pathogenesis of vulvovaginal candidiasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(11):5895. pmid:35682581
- 67. Peremalo T, Madhavan P, Hamzah S, Than L, Wong E, Nasir M. Antifungal susceptibilities, biofilms, phospholipase and proteinase activities in the Candida rugosa complex and Candida pararugosa isolated from tertiary teaching hospitals. J Med Microbiol. 2019;68(3):346–54.
- 68. Bentubo HDL, Gompertz OF. Effects of temperature and incubation time on the in vitro expression of proteases, phospholipases, lipases and DNases by different species of Trichosporon. Springerplus. 2014;3377. pmid:25161862
- 69. Gil-Bona A, Amador-García A, Gil C, Monteoliva L. The external face of Candida albicans: a proteomic view of the cell surface and the extracellular environment. J Proteomics. 2018;18070–9. pmid:29223801
- 70. Ramos-Pardo A, Castro-Álvarez R, Quindós G, Eraso E, Sevillano E, Kaberdin VR. Assessing pH-dependent activities of virulence factors secreted by Candida albicans. Microbiologyopen. 2023;12(1):e1342. pmid:36825882
- 71. Paterna A. The role of modified teeth in the function of prolonged bites in Hierophis viridiflavus (Serpentes: Colubridae). Phyllomedusa. 2023;22(2):121–30.
- 72. Avella I, Savini F, Di Nicola M. First report of a prolonged bite by a Western Whip Snake, <i>Hierophis viridiflavus carbonarius</i> (Bonaparte 1833) (Serpentes, Colubridae), resulting in pronounced local oedema. RandA. 2024;31(1):e21448.
- 73. Badari JC, Díaz-Roa A, Teixeira Rocha MM, Mendonça RZ, da Silva Junior PI. Patagonin-CRISP: antimicrobial activity and source of antimicrobial molecules in Duvernoy’s Gland secretion (Philodryas patagoniensis Snake). Front Pharmacol. 2021;11586705. pmid:33603660
- 74. Koh DCI, Armugam A, Jeyaseelan K. Snake venom components and their applications in biomedicine. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63(24):3030–41. pmid:17103111
- 75. Mohamed Abd El-Aziz T, Garcia Soares A, Stockand JD. Snake venoms in drug discovery: valuable therapeutic tools for life saving. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11(10):564. pmid:31557973
- 76. Kuna E, Bocian A, Hus KK, Petrilla V, Petrillova M, Legath J, et al. Evaluation of antifungal activity of Naja pallida and Naja mossambica venoms against three Candida species. Toxins (Basel). 2020;12(8):500. pmid:32759763