Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Association between wasting and inadequate breastfeeding practices among infants under six months in SNNPR and Somali regions of Ethiopia: A multilevel cross-sectional study

  • Bethel Getachew ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    bethelgaciph@gmail.com

    Affiliation Nutrition and Behavioral Sciences Department, Addis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Yemane Berhane,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, Addis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Yadeta Dessie,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations School of Public Health, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia, African Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Walelegn W. Yallew,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Global Health and Health Policy Department, Addis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Hanna Y. Berhane,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Nutrition and Behavioral Sciences Department, Addis Continental Institute of Public Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Sunny S. Kim

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Nutrition, Diets, and Health Unit Department, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, United State of America

Abstract

Background

Wasting is a severe threat to children’s survival and development. Attaining optimal breastfeeding practices for infants under six months of age remains a significant challenge in low-income countries. This study assessed the association between wasting and breastfeeding practices among infants under six months of age in the SNNPR and Somali regions of Ethiopia.

Methods

The study used data from a large feasibility study conducted in the SNNPR and Somali regions of Ethiopia, from August-September 2021. This study involved 895 infants under six months of age with their mothers. The Poisson regression model with robust variance estimation was used to produce adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

The prevalence of wasting was 16.5% (95% CI: 14.2, 19.2) among infants under six months of age. Non-exclusive breastfeeding (APR = 1.50; 95% CI:1.02, 2.21), delayed initiation of breastfeeding (APR = 1.52; CI:1.00, 2.30), being male infants (APR = 1.50; 95% CI:1.09, 2.07), and mothers who attained primary level (APR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.95) or secondary level education (APR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.99) were independently associated with wasting in the multivariable analysis.

Conclusion

This study indicates a high prevalence of wasting among infants under six months of age. Non-exclusive breastfeeding and delayed initiation of breastfeeding were the modifiable factors significantly linked to infant wasting. Strengthening breastfeeding promotion and support may help reduce wasting in infants under six months.

Background

Wasting is a significant public health challenge impacting infants below six months of age, particularly in low and middle-income countries [1]. Wasting among infants less than six month has serious consequences for morbidity and mortality [2]. The first six months of life are marked by rapid growth and neurological development, during which optimal nutrition, especially through exclusive breast feeding is essential [3]. This study aims to investigate the relationship between breastfeeding practice and wasting among infants under six months of age in Ethiopia, addressing a critical gap in understanding wasting in this vulnerable age group.

Globally, 48 percent of infants under six months of age are exclusively breastfed [4]. However, suboptimal breastfeeding practices, such as delayed initiation of breastfeeding, discarding colostrum, pre-lacteal feeding, and non-exclusive breastfeeding are recognized as contributors to undernutrition among infants [5]. These poor feeding practices can leave infants predisposed to sub-optimal growth and development [6]. Addressing suboptimal breastfeeding practices and promoting optimal nutrition is crucial in mitigating the risk of wasting among infants under six months of age [7].

Wasting is defined as having a weight-for-length z-score (WLZ) below −2 standard deviations from the median of the World Health Organization (WHO) child growth standards [8]. Wasting is an acute undernutrition that results from inadequate food consumption, usually from an incident of illness [9]. It is characterized by weight loss and a rapid worsening in nutritional status over a short period [10].

Despite the implementation of various strategies and programs, including the National Nutrition Program (NNP) [13], the prevalence of wasting among children under five remains high in Ethiopia [14]. According to the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EMDHS) 2019, 7% of children under five were wasted, with the prevalence of wasting in the Somali region was 21.4% and 6.3% in Southern Nations Nationalities and People’s Region (SNNPR). Additionally, 9.4% of infants under six months of age were identified as wasted at the national level [11].

Previous studies have predominantly focused on children in the older age group, up to five years of age. This may be due to a poor understanding of the malnutrition burden in infants under six months of age [12] and challenges in accurately measuring the length of infants, especially in community settings, since small infants tend to be in knee-bent position which is a natural posture where the infant’s legs are not fully straight but rather flexed at the knees. Moreover, calculating the WLZ using the WHO 2006 growth standards presents a challenge for infants with a length less than 45 cm, particularly for those born preterm or small-for-gestational-age.

Previous studies identified multiple risk factors associated with wasting among children up to five years of age, such as male sex, inadequate child feeding practices such as non-exclusive breastfeeding, late initiation of breastfeeding, pre-lacteal feeding, and early initiation of complementary feeding [1315]. Maternal characteristics, included low level of education, lack of occupation, fewer antenatal care (ANC) visits, and poor maternal health status [16]. Additionally, household conditions such as lack of latrine availability and the use of unprotected drinking water sources contribute to child wasting [17,18].

The aim of this work was to examine the association between breastfeeding practices and wasting in infants under six months of age in the SNNPR and Somali regions of Ethiopia. This analysis was conducted using the end-line household survey data from a maternal nutrition intervention study. We also provide recommendations for future policy and program directions, focusing on improving maternal and child health outcomes.

Methods

Study design and setting

Secondary data analysis was conducted using the end-line household survey data from a large feasibility and impact study of maternal nutrition interventions, which was designed as a cluster-randomized evaluation [19]. The study was conducted in the SNNPR and Somali regions of Ethiopia, with the end-line survey carried out from August 1 to September 30, 2021. The Somali region is located in the eastern part of Ethiopia, predominantly rural, and has a substantial pastoralist population, with livestock serving as the primary foundation of their livelihoods. The SNNPR region is primarily agrarian. The Federal Government of Ethiopia and regional health bureaus and the Alive & Thrive (A&T) selected seven woredas (districts; three in Somali and four in SNNPR regions) as program areas based on having adequate health facility access and infrastructure.

Study sample

Study clusters were defined based on the health center catchment areas. In the Somali region, 10 health center clusters were included within the three study woredas, and 20 clusters were included within the four study woredas in the SNNPR region. Using stratified randomization of the total 30 clusters across both regions, 15 were allocated to the intervention group and 15 were allocated to the control group. The analysis for this paper used the sample in the control group only. The end-line household survey included 944 women with infants under six months of age in the control areas. Forty-two infants were not present at the time of the survey, and seven infants did not have a complete anthropometric measurement, so they were excluded. Consequently, for the current analysis, 895 infants under six months of age, residing with their mothers and having complete anthropometric measurements, were included in the study.

Data collection procedures

Household and socio-demographic characteristics, as well as maternal and infant-related variables, were collected using structured questionnaires administered through computer-assisted personal interviews. Anthropometric measurements were conducted following standardized procedures outlined in the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance (FANTA) Anthropometric Indicators Measurement Guide [20]. The weight of infants was measured using a portable Seca digital balance with a precision of 0.1 kg. The mother’s weight was measured alone; then the mother held her infant, whose weight was obtained by subtracting the mother’s weight using the tare function. The instrument was calibrated before each weighing. Mothers’ height was measured upright using a portable wooden stadiometer, and infants’ length measurements were taken in a recumbent position using a standard wooden measuring board, recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm, and measured twice for precision.

For the original study, missing or ambiguous data on birth dates were managed by verifying records, using parental recall based on significant events, and consulting healthcare workers to estimate infants’ ages. When exact birth dates remained uncertain, ages were approximated to the nearest month to maintain consistency in the analysis. These methods minimized the impact of missing or ambiguous data.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval for the original study was obtained from the Ethical Review Board of the Addis Continental Institute of Public Health (Ref No. ACIPH/IRB/008/2021). Prior to data extraction, permission to use the data was sought and secured from the principal investigator at Addis Continental Institute of Public Health. The original study obtained written informed consent from all participants. For children under six months of age, additional consent was provided by their parents or guardians. To ensure participant confidentiality, all personally identifiable information was excluded from the dataset before analysis.

Study variables and measurements

Outcome variables.

The primary study outcome variable was wasting among infants under six months of age, defined as an infant having a weight-for-length (WLZ) z-score below −2 standard deviations from the median of WLZ, based on the WHO 2006 Child Growth Standards [21]. The outcome was constructed by using the zscore06 Stata command [22]. We marked anthropometric indices as outliers using the 2006 WHO recommendations if they were, > 5 or < −5, for WLZ [23].

Explanatory variables.

Maternal variables included age, education level (no schooling, any primary school, and any secondary school or above); the number of antenatal care (ANC) visits (1–3 visits and four visits or above); place of delivery (home or health facility); and maternal height (short, medium, or tall).

The index child was the specific child selected for the study during data collection, chosen from among the children available in the household. Infant-level variables were categorized as follows: sex was coded as “male” and “female”; the age of the infant was recorded in completed months; and perceived birth size was coded as very small, average, or very big.

Infant feeding indicators were the proportion of infants aged 0–5 months who are fed exclusively on breast milk, with no other food or drink, including water, except for oral rehydration solutions (ORS) and drops or syrups containing vitamins, minerals, and medicine [24]. The following indicators were calculated based on the maternal report of infant feeding practices for the index child and list-based questions of all foods and liquids given to the infant in the previous 24h: infant ever breastfeeds; timing of breastfeeding initiation; colostrum feeding; pre-lacteal feeding; bottle feeding; started cow/goat/camel milk; started solid, semi-solid, and soft food were coded as “no” and “yes.”

Exclusive breastfeeding was assessed based on the infant’s feeding practices during the 24 hours preceding the survey. Infants who consumed no foods or liquids other than breast milk were coded as “exclusively breastfed,” while others were coded as “not exclusively breastfed.” Two key indicators (early initiation of breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding) were used for further analysis of associated factors.

Household characteristics were categorized as follows: sources of drinking water were coded as improved source (piped into dwelling, plot, yard), another improved source (protected well, spring, rainwater), or non-improved source (pond, lake, dam, river, open well, spring). Treatment of drinking water were coded as “no” and “yes”. Toilet facilities were coded as follows; non-improved facility (pit latrine/traditional pit toilet), and improved facility (ventilated improved pit latrine (VIP) or no facility/bush/field).

The household wealth index was formulated by employing twenty-one variables related to the household’s ownership of a selected set of assets [25]. Principal component analysis (PCA) was utilized to calculate the wealth index. These components were then categorized into five quintiles.

Data analysis

Data analysis was performed using STATA version 17 statistical software. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the sample characteristics.

The prevalence of wasting was determined using proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), to indicate the precision of the estimates. The association of independent variables with infant wasting was analyzed through Poisson regression with robust variance estimation, controlled for region (dummy variable) and geographical clustering.

All the variables with a p-value of less than 0.25 were used during initial screening in the bivariable analysis to capture variables that may not show strong individual associations with the outcome but could be influential when considered together with other predictors [26]. Variables with a p-value below 0.25 were included in the bivariable analysis to identify potential predictors that might have an influence when combined with others. For the multivariable analysis statistical significance was declared at a p-value < 0.05. Adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) with 95% CI were utilized to present the results.

Four regression models were developed to assess the association of independent variables with infant wasting. Model I was adjusted for socio-demographic variables only, Model II was adjusted for maternal-related variables only, Model III was adjusted for infant-related variables only, and Model IV (combined model) was adjusted for socio-demographic, maternal-related, and infant-related variables; Table 5 shows which variables were included in each of the Models I-IV. To address multicollinearity, the variance inflation factor (VIF) was employed. The number of births was omitted from the final model due to multicollinearity with the number of pregnancies. The mean VIF for the combined model (Model IV) was 1.43, indicating the absence of multicollinearity among independent variables. Model fitness was assessed using the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the log-likelihood ratio test were used to estimate the goodness of fitness of the models. Based on the highest value of the Log-likelihood test and with the lowest values of AIC, the combined model (Model IV) was selected.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

The study included 895 infants under the age of six months and their mothers. The mean age of the mothers was 28.1 years. Twenty-eight percent of the mothers were aged between 25 and 29 years, and only 7.5% were aged between 15 and 19 years. More than half of the mothers (68.0%) were housewives, and 52.3% had no formal education. The majority of the study participants(67.2%) were from the SNNPR region, while the remainder (32.8%) were from the Somali region. Most of the respondents(63.1%) used improved sources of drinking water, while the rest (36.9%) used unimproved sources such as ponds, lakes, dams, rivers, open wells, and springs (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants among infants under six months of age in SNNPR and Somali Regions of Ethiopia, 2024 (n = 895).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318323.t001

Maternal characteristics

Regarding maternal height, 38.7% of the mothers were categorized as short, 29.6% as medium, and 31.7% as tall. More than half of the respondents made four or more antenatal care (ANC) visits, while 42.1% had one to three ANC visits during their recent pregnancy. Regarding the number of living children, 33.9% had more than five children living with them, while 33.5% had one to two living children and 38.6% of the mothers had more than five pregnancies. The majority of the respondents, 93.5%, gave birth to their most recent baby through a vaginal delivery. Sixty-eight percent of the index children were delivered at the health facility. Approximately 65.6% of the mothers received counseling on breastfeeding after delivery of the recent baby, while the remaining 34.4% did not receive counseling on breastfeeding (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Maternal characteristics among mothers of infants under six months of age in SNNPR and Somali Regions of Ethiopia, 2024 (n = 895).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318323.t002

Infant characteristics

Of the total infants included in the study, 49.3% were female, and 50.7% were male. The mean age of the infants was 2.8 ± 1.68 months. Only 12 infants (1.3%) were not breastfed. Among the breastfed infants, 88.5% initiated breastfeeding within the first hour of birth, and the majority, 90.8%, received colostrum. Pre-lacteal feeding was initiated for only 8.9% of the infants, and 72.2% were exclusively breastfed. (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Infant under six months of age characteristics and related factors in SNNPR and Somali Regions of Ethiopia, 2024 (n = 895).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318323.t003

Wasting among infants under six months of age

The overall prevalence of wasting among infants was 16.5% (95% CI: 14.1, 19.2). Within this group, male infants had a higher prevalence, accounting for 58.2% of wasted cases, while female infants accounted for 41.8%.

The age distribution of children in the wasted group was 11.4% aged zero months, 8.5% aged one month, 20.6% aged two months, and 59.5% aged three to five months. The age distribution of children in the non-wasted group was 9.3% aged zero months, 15.6% aged one month, 20.0% aged two months, and 55.1% aged three to five months. A high proportion of wasted children(66.7%) were from mothers with no formal education, indicating an association between lower maternal education and higher rates of child wasting. Among mothers with primary education, 31.2% of children were wasted, which is lower than those with no formal education. Only 2.1% of wasted children were from mothers with secondary or higher education.

Regarding antenatal care visits, 59.3% of infants whose mothers had four or more ANC visits were not wasted. For infants who were exclusively breastfed, 73.9% were not wasted. Additionally, 89.7% of infants who began breastfeeding within the first hour of birth were not wasted. 97.3% of infants were not wasted, among infants who did not start solid, semi-solid, and soft food before six months of age (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 4. Prevalence of different contributing factors for wasting among infants under six months of age in SNNPR and Somali Regions of Ethiopia, 2024.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318323.t004

thumbnail
Table 5. Factors associated with wasting among infants under six months of age in SNNPR and Somali Regions of Ethiopia, 2024.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318323.t005

Factors associated with infant wasting

Infants born to mothers with primary education had a 38% lower prevalence of wasting compared to those born to mothers with no formal education (APR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.95). Infants born to mothers with secondary education had a 70% lower prevalence of wasting compared to those born to mothers with no formal education (APR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.99). Male infants had a 1.50 times higher prevalence of wasting than female infants (APR = 1.50; 95% CI:1.09, 2.07). Infants who were not exclusively breastfed were 1.50 times more likely to experience wasting compared to those who were exclusively breastfed (APR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.02–2.21). Wasting among infants who initiated breastfeeding more than one hour after birth were 1.52 times more likely compared to infants who started breastfeeding less than one hour after birth (APR = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.30). (Table 5).

Discussion

This research aimed to assess the socio-demographic, maternal, and infant factors associated with wasting among infants under six months of age in the SNNPR and Somali regions of Ethiopia. The study identified significant associations between infant wasting and exclusive breastfeeding practice, initiation of breastfeeding within one hour of birth, male infants, and the mother’s education level.

The prevalence of wasting in the current study was 16.5% (95% CI: 14.2, 19.2), indicating that wasting is a significant public health concern in the study area. The prevalence of wasting was consistent with previous research using data from the Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey of 2011 and 2016, which reported a prevalence of 14.2% [14]. Similarly, the finding was consistent with studies conducted in Bangladesh’s Barisal district (18.8%) [27], Nairobi county (14.2%) [28], and Northern Tanzania (16.0%) [29]. However, research conducted in India using the National Family Health Survey-3 data reported a higher prevalence of wasting, 31.0% [30]. This higher prevalence of wasting may be due to low exclusive breastfeeding rates during the first six months of life, with only 18.6% exclusively breastfeeding between 4 and 6 months, compared to this study, where 72.2% of infants were found to be exclusively breastfed. Likewise, a study conducted in urban areas of Indonesia showed a high prevalence of wasting, 25.6% [31]. This may be due to the study’s findings indicating a high prevalence of early initiation of complementary feeding before six months of age, which could contribute to various infectious diseases and undernutrition. The prevalence of wasting in the current study (16.5%) is higher than a study conducted in Deder Woreda, East Hararge Zone, and Jimma Zone, Ethiopia, where the prevalence was 13.3% [12]. The lower prevalence of wasting may be due to the difference in the sample size and the geographical area. The findings of the study collectively emphasize the challenge of wasting across different geographical regions, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to address the issue of wasting.

Educated mothers were less likely to have wasted infants than mothers without formal education. This result aligns with studies conducted in Debre Berhan town, Ethiopia [16], Bangladesh Barisal district [27], and a study carried out in Pakistan among children under two years of age [32]. The mother’s educational level can significantly impact various aspects of infant health, including the risk of infant wasting [33]. Educated mothers are more likely to understand the importance of proper nutrition during pregnancy and infancy [34]. Moreover, they may also have a better understanding of breastfeeding practices, infants’ nutrition, the importance of clean water, proper sanitation, and hygiene in preventing diseases that can contribute to undernutrition [35].

Infants under six months who were not exclusively breastfed had a 50% higher prevalence of wasting. This finding is consistent with a study by Nigatu et al., which analyzed data from the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Surveys (2011–2016) and reported a 45% increase in the odds of wasting among infants who were not exclusively breastfed [14]. Similarly, a study conducted in Bangladesh found that the lack of exclusive breastfeeding increased the odds of wasting by 79% [36]. A study conducted in Nigeria also reported a significant positive association between the absence of exclusive breastfeeding and wasting [37]. According to the 2019 Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey, the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding for infants under six months in the SNNPR was 58%. In contrast, the rate in the Somali Region was lower, 25% [11]. Breastfeeding is a widely recognized option for child feeding that provides immediate and long-term protection against infections. This protection is attributed to its abundant supply of immune factors, anti-microbial, and anti-inflammatory agents [38]. Moreover, introducing any drink or food other than breast milk, particularly before the age of four months, is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal diseases. This increased risk may lead to growth retardation, micronutrient deficiencies, and heightened vulnerability to various infectious diseases and undernutrition [39].

Our study’s findings underscore that exclusive breastfeeding is far more than a feeding choice; it is a crucial, evidence-based intervention. These results add to the growing body of evidence affirming the essential role of exclusive breastfeeding in promoting healthy growth and reducing the risk of wasting in infants during their early months. Strengthening efforts to support exclusive breastfeeding is therefore vital in combating infant malnutrition. This reinforces the importance of breastfeeding as a powerful intervention for infant health, and mothers should be encouraged and well-supported to exclusively breastfeed as a core strategy for improving child health outcomes and reducing malnutrition.

This study found that infants who did not initiate breastfeeding within one hour of birth had 52% higher odds of wasting compared to those who started breastfeeding within the first hour. This finding aligns with research conducted across 20 developing countries using demographic health survey data, which reported a 31% increase in the odds of wasting among infants who delayed breastfeeding initiation [40]. Similarly, a study from South Asia showed that early breastfeeding initiation reduced the odds of wasting by 8% [41]. These findings highlight the importance of timely breastfeeding initiation in reducing the risk of wasting across various populations.

This could be due to early initiation of breastfeeding having a protective effect against infections and reducing newborn mortality. Evidence shows that the risk of morbidity due to diarrhea and other infections is significantly higher among newborns who experience late initiation of breastfeeding either partially or not breastfed at all [42]. Additionally, early breastfeeding initiation creates a positive foundation for exclusive breastfeeding by establishing an adequate milk supply, ensuring effective latching, providing nutrient-rich colostrum, and enhancing maternal-infant bonding [43]. This “critical window” within the first hour after birth is a crucial period when infants are most alert and ready to begin breastfeeding. Natural behaviors such as rooting (the reflex to turn toward the breast) and suckling (the ability to latch and draw milk) are activated at birth, fostering a strong mother-infant bond and supporting successful early feeding [44]. However, an infant’s readiness to breastfeed can be influenced by prenatal factors. Preterm infants or those with complications often have underdeveloped reflexes and slower physiological responses, which can hinder effective latching and feeding. Additionally, conditions like low birth weight or birth asphyxia can reduce alertness and weaken reflexes, leading to delays in breastfeeding initiation [45]. Furthermore, cultural beliefs and health misinformation create additional barriers, particularly in regions where traditional practices influence infant care. In some cultures, colostrum is viewed as “dirty” or “unhealthy,” and caregivers may discard it, delaying the initiation of breastfeeding until what they perceive as the “clean milk” appears, typically a few days post-birth [46]. Moreover, some mothers are advised to delay feeding to let the infant “rest” or because of concerns about pain or discomfort associated with breastfeeding. These cultural barriers are often compounded by healthcare misinformation and inadequate counseling during prenatal care. Without proper guidance on the benefits of early breastfeeding, mothers may delay initiation or avoid it altogether [44]. Thus, promoting early breastfeeding initiation requires both infant readiness and robust education and awareness to counteract these cultural beliefs and misinformation.

This study found that males were 50% more likely to be wasted than females. This finding aligns with data from the 2019 Ethiopian Mini Demographic and Health Survey, which reported that being female was associated with 30% lower odds of wasting [15]. Similarly, a study conducted in three disadvantaged East African Districts, Rwanda, Uganda, and Tanzania among children under five years of age found that being female reduced the odds of wasting by 14% [47]. Furthermore, several studies have found that male children are more likely to experience wasting compared to female children[29,4850]. Different literature emphasizes the importance of approaching the issue of undernutrition comprehensively, considering a variety of factors that can impact the nutritional status of infants [49,51]. Several factors potentially contribute to the nutritional disparities between boys and girls, including biological and hormonal differences [52,53], which have a significant impact on energy consumption, nutritional requirements, and vulnerability to diseases [54,55]. Additionally, an infant’s nutritional well-being is collectively influenced by various factors such as poor maternal health [56,57], poor household conditions [58], and suboptimal breastfeeding practices [59]. Moreover, the higher vulnerability of male infants to wasting is explained by the gender allocation of resources in many societies, particularly in feeding practices, caregiving, and healthcare access. In some cultural contexts, boys and girls receive different levels of care based on societal preferences for one gender over the other. For instance, some cultures prioritize feeding male infants larger portions or more frequent feedings, which are thought to support their growth and future roles as providers or leaders [60]. In contrast, in cultures where girls are seen as more valuable for future reproductive roles or caregiving responsibilities, they may receive better nutrition during early childhood, which could shield them from wasting. In contrast, boys may face neglect or less attention, which can leave them more vulnerable to malnutrition and wasting [55].

Understanding these culturally rooted disparities is critical, as they suggest the need for research on how early caregiving practices and societal gender roles uniquely affect the growth and health of male and female infants. Such research would allow for targeted interventions addressing sex-specific vulnerabilities, ensuring that both boys and girls receive adequate care and nutritional support during the formative first six months of life [54]. Strengthening evidence-based policies to bridge these gender disparities in infant nutrition and health access is vital for reducing early-life malnutrition and promoting equal health opportunities for all infants.

While the wealth index showed a significant association with infant wasting in the bivariate analysis, this association did not hold in the multivariable analysis when other factors such as breastfeeding practices and maternal education, were considered. One possible explanation is that wealth may indirectly influence wasting by affecting more proximal factors, such as the mother’s education level and access to health information, which in turn influence infant feeding practices [61]. When these factors are controlled for in the multivariable model, the direct association between wealth and wasting diminishes. Additionally, wealth may capture general household resources but may not fully reflect specific nutritional or healthcare practices that are crucial for preventing infant wasting. Thus, while wealthier households might have better resources, the actual practices around infant feeding and care are key determinants of infant nutrition are more directly relevant to wasting outcomes [62].

This analysis also explored whether the number of pregnancies and births (parity) was associated with infant wasting. Although higher parity is often thought to affect child health outcomes due to resource allocation or maternal experience, our findings did not show a significant association between the number of pregnancies, parity, and wasting in the multivariable analysis. One possible reason for this non-significance is that factors more directly tied to the immediate care and feeding of the infant, such as exclusive breastfeeding and early initiation of breastfeeding, may be stronger determinants of wasting. The mother’s experience with multiple births may increase her general caregiving knowledge but does not necessarily ensure the specific practices that prevent wasting [63].

Strengths of the study

The study used a comprehensive approach and robust dataset, which include a large sample of infants, enhancing the reliability and generalizability of its findings on infant wasting. By examining a variety of socio-demographic, maternal, and infant-related factors, such as maternal education, breastfeeding practices, and socio-economic status. Additionally, the study provides valuable insights into modifiable determinants of malnutrition and potential intervention points. Focusing on early-life factors, particularly feeding practices like exclusive breastfeeding, emphasizes a crucial developmental period during which timely interventions can significantly impact infant health outcomes, contributing to the prevention of wasting and other forms of malnutrition.

Limitations of the study

A limitation of this study could be the cross-sectional nature of the design, which poses difficulty in examining the causal relationship between wasting status and independent variables. Additionally, there is potential recall bias that may arise when reporting on the infant’s feeding practices. To minimize this recall bias, we included only the mothers of the infants and used a short recall period of 24 hours for certain feeding-related questions. Furthermore, while infant morbidity could be a potential determinant of wasting, no data on infant illness were collected. Similarly, information about whether the infants were singletons or part of multiple births was not collected.

Conclusion

A high prevalence of wasting (16.5%) among infants under six months of age was observed in our study areas in the SNNPR and Somali regions of Ethiopia. Not breastfeeding exclusively, late initiation of breastfeeding, and low maternal education were significantly associated with infant wasting. The study’s findings highlight the need to strengthen the national strategy for infant and young child feeding programs by promoting and creating awareness about exclusive breastfeeding practices and early initiation of breastfeeding. Additionally, the study’s findings emphasize the need to strengthen policies aimed at improving women’s education to reduce the illiteracy rate among mothers.

Supporting information

S1 Dataset. The data set used to produce the study’s findings.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318323.s001

(XLS)

S1 Table. Explanatory variables categorization and coding.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318323.s002

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Variables used for constructing the wealth index.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318323.s003

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. WHZ Z-score with Standard Normal Distribution.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318323.s004

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to the Haramaya University School of Public Health for academic support to the first author. We acknowledge the Addis Continental Institute of Public Health for permitting us to utilize the data.

References

  1. 1. United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund. Fed to Fail? The crisis of children’s diets in early life. Child Nutrition Report. UNICEF; 2021. Available form: https://data.unicef.org/resources/fed-to-fail-2021-child-nutrition-report/.
  2. 2. Mertens A, Benjamin-Chung J, Colford JM Jr, Hubbard AE, van der Laan MJ, Coyle J, et al. Child wasting and concurrent stunting in low- and middle-income countries. Nature. 2023;621(7979):558–67. pmid:37704720
  3. 3. World Health Organization. Guideline: protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding in facilities providing maternity and newborn services. 2017. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/259386/9789241550086-eng.pdf?sequence=1.pdf
  4. 4. United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund. Global breastfeeding scorecard 2023. Rates of breastfeeding increase around the world through improved protection and support. 2023. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/media/150586/file
  5. 5. Estifanose MB, Dagne GT, Woldemariam AY, Reda HH, Feleke FW. Optimal breastfeeding practice and associated factors among mothers having infants aged 0−6 months in Southern Ethiopia. EC Nutrition. 2022;17(4):01−12. Available form: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359843649_Optimal_Breastfeeding_Practice_and_Associated_Factors_among_Mothers_having_Infants_Aged_0_-_6_Months_in_Southern_Ethiopia
  6. 6. Chowdhury R, , Choudhary TS, Taneja S, Martines J, Bhandari N, et al. Diagnostic measures for severe acute malnutrition in Indian infants under 6 months of age: a secondary data analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21(1):158. pmid:33794826
  7. 7. Titaley CR, Wijayanti RU, Mu’asyaroh A, Ariawan I. The multiple factors of suboptimal early feeding practices among infants aged 0−5 months in Indonesia. Front Nutr. 2023;10:1080727. pmid:37057070
  8. 8. World Health Organization. WHO guideline on the prevention and management of wasting and nutritional Oedema (acute malnutrition) in infants and children under 5 years. 2023. Available form: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240082830
  9. 9. Girma A, Woldie H, Mekonnen FA, Gonete KA, Sisay M. Undernutrition and associated factors among urban children aged 24-59 months in Northwest Ethiopia: a community based cross sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):214. pmid:31255179
  10. 10. Yeshaneh A, Mulu T, Gasheneit A, Adane D. Prevalence of wasting and associated factors among children aged 6-59 months in Wolkite town of the Gurage zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2020. A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0259722. pmid:34762586
  11. 11. Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) [Ethiopia] and ICF. Ethiopia mini demographic and health survey 2019: final report. Rockville (MD); 2021. Available form: https://www.unicef.org/ethiopia/media/1721/file/The%202019%20Ethiopia%20Mini%20Demographic%20and%20Health%20Survey%20.pdf
  12. 12. Grijalva-Eternod CS, Beaumont E, Rana R, Abate N, Barthorp H, McGrath M, et al. Malnutrition in infants aged under 6 months attending community health centres: a cross sectional survey. Nutrients. 2021;13(8):2489. pmid:34444646
  13. 13. Ghosh S. Factors responsible for childhood malnutrition: a review of the literature. Curr Res Nutr Food Sci. 2020360–70.
  14. 14. Nigatu D, Azage M, Motbainor A. Effect of exclusive breastfeeding cessation time on childhood morbidity and adverse nutritional outcomes in Ethiopia: analysis of the demographic and health surveys. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223379. pmid:31577821
  15. 15. Sahiledengle B, Mwanri L, Petrucka P, Kumie A, Beressa G, Atlaw D, et al. Determinants of undernutrition among young children in Ethiopia. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):20945. pmid:36470914
  16. 16. Menalu MM, Bayleyegn AD, Tizazu MA, Amare NS. Assessment of prevalence and factors associated with malnutrition among under-five children in Debre Berhan Town, Ethiopia. Int J Gen Med. 2021;141683–97. pmid:33976568
  17. 17. Begashaw WB. Determinants of stunting and wasting among under-five children of Ethiopia: analysis of mini demographic and health survey 2019 of Ethiopia. Eur J Prev Med. 2022;10(3):76–83.
  18. 18. Kasaye HK, Bobo FT, Yilma MT, Woldie M. Poor nutrition for under-five children from poor households in Ethiopia: evidence from 2016 Demographic and Health Survey. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0225996. pmid:31860689
  19. 19. Kim SS, Sununtnasuk C, Zagre R, Berhane HY, Menon P. A feasibility study of integrating maternal nutrition interventions into antenatal care services in Ethiopia: a cluster-randomized evaluation. Alive & Thrive Ethiopia 3.0 Endline Survey Report. Washington, D.C. Alive & Thrive. 2022. Available form: https://www.aliveandthrive.org/sites/default/files/maternal_nutrition_webinar_july142022_finalforsharing.pdf
  20. 20. Cogill B. Anthropometric Indicators Measurement Guide. Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Academy for Educational Development, Washington, D.C. 2003 March. Available form: https://www.fsnnetwork.org/sites/default/files/anthro_2003guide.pdf
  21. 21. World Health Organization. WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/height‐for‐age, weight‐for‐age, weight‐for‐ length, weight‐for‐height and body mass index‐for‐age: Methods and development. Geneva: WHO; 2006. Available form: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/924154693X.pdf
  22. 22. Leroy J. zscore06: Stata command for the calculation of anthropometric z-scores using the 2006 WHO child growth standards. 2011. Available form: http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/bocode/z/zscore06.html
  23. 23. Crowe S, Seal A, Grijalva-Eternod C, Kerac M. Effect of nutrition survey “cleaning criteria” on estimates of malnutrition prevalence and disease burden: secondary data analysis. PeerJ. 2014;2:e380. pmid:24883244
  24. 24. World Health Organization. Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices: definitions and measurement methods. Geneva: WHO; 2021. Available form: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240018389
  25. 25. Rutstein SO, Johnson K. The DHS Wealth Index. DHS Comparative Reports No. 6. Calverton (MD): ORC Macro. 2004.
  26. 26. Bursac Z, Gauss CH, Williams DK, Hosmer DW. Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med. 2008;3:17. pmid:19087314
  27. 27. Munirul IM, Arafat Y, Connell N, Mothabbir G, McGrath M, Berkley JA, et al. Severe malnutrition in infants aged <6 months-outcomes and risk factors in Bangladesh: a prospective cohort study. Matern Child Nutr. 2019; 15(1):e12642. pmid:29971955.
  28. 28. Lydia Achieng A, Chege P, Nyamota W. Breastfeeding practices and infant nutrition (6-23 weeks) of post-partum depressed mothers in Nairobi City Hospitals. Int J Health Sci Res. 2023;13(12):272–86.
  29. 29. Mgongo M, Chotta NAS, Hashim TH, Uriyo JG, Damian DJ, Stray-Pedersen B, et al. Underweight, stunting and wasting among children in Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania; a population-based cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(5):509. pmid:28489043
  30. 30. Patwari AK, Kumar S, Beard J. Undernutrition among infants less than 6 months of age: an underestimated public health problem in India. Matern Child Nutr. 2015;11(1):119–26. pmid:23551459
  31. 31. Hadju V, Yunus R, Arundhana AI, Salmah AU, Wahyu A. Nutritional status of infants 0–23 months of age and its relationship with socioeconomic factors in Pangkep. Asian J Clin Nutr. 2017;9(2):71–6.
  32. 32. Haq IU, Wasila H, Nawsherwan KA, Chawla RK, Imtiaz M, Amad I. Maternal formal education in association with nutritional status of children (less-than two years). Indian J Nutr. 2017;4(2):162.
  33. 33. Khattak UK, Iqbal SP, Ghazanfar H. The role of parents’ literacy in malnutrition of children under the age of five years in a semi-urban community of Pakistan: a case-control study. Cureus. 2017;9(6):e1316. pmid:28690950
  34. 34. Muhammad UF, Nadeem AM, Ali F. The impact of parents’ education on child health from the perspective of demographic and health survey. Eur Online J Nat Soc Sci. 2019;8:158–74.
  35. 35. Iftikhar A, Bari A, Bano I, Masood Q. Impact of maternal education, employment and family size on nutritional status of children. Pak J Med Sci. 2017;33(6):1401–5. pmid:29492067
  36. 36. Choudhury N, Raihan MJ, Sultana S, Mahmud Z, Farzana FD, Haque MA, et al. Determinants of age-specific undernutrition in children aged less than 2 years-the Bangladesh context. Matern Child Nutr. 2017; 13(3):e12362. pmid:27731545.
  37. 37. Anoshirike CO, Okere TO, Ogbonna PC, Ogbu CC, Asinobi CO, Ofoezie EI. Exclusive breastfeeding practice and nutritional status of infants attending University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Enugu, Nigeria. Int J Innov Stud Sci Eng Technol. 2017;3(2):2455–4863.
  38. 38. Nolan LS, Parks OB, Good M. A review of the immunomodulating components of maternal breast milk and protection against necrotizing enterocolitis. Nutrients. 2019;12(1):14. pmid:31861718
  39. 39. Abiyu C, Belachew T. Effect of complementary feeding behavior change communication delivered through community-level actors on the time of initiation of complementary foods in rural communities of West Gojjam zone, Northwest Ethiopia: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20(1):509. pmid:33153434
  40. 40. Kerac M, Frison S, Connell N, Page B, McGrath M. Informing the management of acute malnutrition in infants aged under 6 months (MAMI): risk factor analysis using nationally-representative demographic & health survey secondary data. PeerJ. 2019;6:e5848. pmid:31024756
  41. 41. Harding KL, Aguayo VM, Webb P. Birthweight and feeding practices are associated with child growth outcomes in South Asia. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;14(Suppl 4):e12650. pmid:30499248
  42. 42. Lyellu HY, Hussein TH, Wandel M, Stray-Pedersen B, Mgongo M, Msuya SE. Prevalence and factors associated with early initiation of breastfeeding among women in Moshi municipal, northern Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childb. 2020;20(1):285. pmid:32393191
  43. 43. Sakib MS, Ripon Rouf ASM, Tanny TF. Determinants of early initiation of breastfeeding practices of newborns in Bangladesh: evidence from Bangladesh demographic and health survey. Nutr Metab Insights. 2021;14:11786388211054677. pmid:34720590
  44. 44. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Barriers to breastfeeding: supporting initiation and continuation of breastfeeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(2):396.
  45. 45. Sharma IK, Byrne A. Early initiation of breastfeeding: a systematic literature review of factors and barriers in South Asia. Int Breastfeed J. 2016;11:17. pmid:27330542
  46. 46. Gael B, Andre I. Beliefs, attitudes and practices of mothers towards breastfeeding colostrum and factors associated: case of the Yaounde Gynaeco-obstetric and pediatric Hospital. Food Sci Nutr. 2022; 8:130.
  47. 47. Agho KE, Akombi BJ, Ferdous AJ, Mbugua I, Kamara JK. Childhood undernutrition in three disadvantaged East African Districts: a multinomial analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):118. pmid:31014298
  48. 48. Adedokun ST, Yaya S. Factors associated with adverse nutritional status of children in sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from the Demographic and Health Surveys from 31 countries. Matern Child Nutr. 2021;17(3):e13198. pmid:33960678
  49. 49. Addo IY, Boadu EF, Osei Bonsu E, Boadi C, Dadzie FA. Prevalence and factors associated with undernutrition among children under the age of five years in Benin. PLoS One. 2023;18(8):e0289933. pmid:37561793
  50. 50. Chowdhury TR, Chakrabarty S, Rakib M, Afrin S, Saltmarsh S, Winn S. Factors associated with stunting and wasting in children under 2 years in Bangladesh. Heliyon. 2020;6(9):e04849. pmid:32984587
  51. 51. Zelalem H, Demilew YM, Dagne S, Dessie AM. Prevalence of under-nutrition and its associated factors among 6–23 months old children of employed and unemployed mothers in town Kebeles of Dera district, northwest Ethiopia: a comparative cross-sectional study. BMC Nutr. 2023;9(1):59. pmid:36978152
  52. 52. Garenne M. Demographic evidence of sex differences in vulnerability to infectious diseases. J Infect Dis. 2015;211(2):331–2. pmid:25114159
  53. 53. Taneja V. Sex hormones determine immune response. Front Immunol. 2018;91931. pmid:30210492
  54. 54. Thurstans S, Opondo C, Seal A, Wells JC, Khara T, Dolan C, et al. Understanding sex differences in childhood undernutrition: a narrative review. Nutrients. 2022; 14(5):948. pmid:35207085
  55. 55. Thurstans S, Opondo C, Seal A, Wells J, Khara T, Dolan C, et al. Boys are more likely to be undernourished than girls: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in undernutrition. BMJ Glob Health. 2020; 5(12):e004030. pmid:33472823
  56. 56. Kuse KA, Debeko DD. Spatial distribution and determinants of stunting, wasting and underweight in children under-five in Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):641. pmid:37016328
  57. 57. Sumon IH, Hossain M, Ar Salan S, Kabir MA, Majumder AK. Determinants of coexisting forms of undernutrition among under-five children: evidence from the Bangladesh demographic and health surveys. Food Sci Nutr. 2023;11(9):5258–69. pmid:37701232
  58. 58. Khaliq A, Wraith D, Miller Y, Nambiar-Mann S. Prevalence, trends, and socioeconomic determinants of coexisting forms of malnutrition amongst children under five years of age in Pakistan. Nutrients. 2021;13(12):4566. pmid:34960118
  59. 59. Galante L, Milan AM, Reynolds CM, Cameron-Smith D, Vickers MH, Pundir S. Sex-specific human milk composition: the role of infant sex in determining early life nutrition. Nutrients. 2018;10(9):1194. pmid:30200404
  60. 60. Samuel A, Osendarp SJM, Feskens EJM, Lelisa A, Adish A, Kebede A, Brouwer ID. Gender differences in nutritional status and determinants among infants (6–11 m): a cross-sectional study in two regions in Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):401. pmid:35219315
  61. 61. Hammond YA, Mohammed S, Taminu Y, Ambrose A, Rafatu T, Fusta A. Low birth weight, household socio-economic status, water and sanitation are associated with stunting and wasting among children aged 6–23 months: results from a national survey in Ghana. PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0297698. pmid:38547113
  62. 62. Lijalem MT, Haile MF. Multivariate logistic regression analysis on the association between anthropometric indicators of under-five children in Nigeria: NDHS 2018. BMC Pediatr. 2021; 21:193. pmid:33888079
  63. 63. Renata ON, Juliana RB, Clécio HS, Marcelo ZG, Vera LB. Can parity influence infant feeding in the first six months of life? Cien Saude Colet. 2020; 25(11):4593–600. pmid:33175065