Figures
Abstract
Introduction
Short stature is a frequent complication of DMD, and its pathomechanisms and influencing factors are specific to this disease and the idiosyncratic treatment for DMD.
Purpose
To establish the height growth curve of early DMD, and evaluate the potential influencing markers on height growth, provide further evidence for pathological mechanism, height growth management and bone health in DMD.
Methods
A retrospective, cross-sectional study of 348 participants with DMD aged 2–12 years was conducted at West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2023 to October 2023.
Results
The growth curve for 2–12 years old boys with DMD indicates a slower growth rate compared to the average population. At age two, children with DMD have a similar height to their peers, but gradually falls behind afterwards. Short stature was observed in children with DMD before and after GC exposure, and prolonged GC use exacerbated the retardation. BMI (β = -0.47, p = 0.007), BMD (β = -0.005, p = 0.014), β-CTX (β = 0.001, p = 0.002), delayed BA (β = 0.417, p < .001), GC duration (β = -0.006, p = 0.047) were independent influencing factors of height. Relevant bone health markers showed different sequential changing patterns.
Conclusion
The high proportion and progression of short stature are associated with the broad bone health status. Different bone indicators have different sensitivities and specificities and need to be considered together for clinical monitoring of bone health. This study provides evidence for the early monitoring of height development and relevant factors as part of bone health management in DMD, to minimize the occurrence of bone-related complications later in life.
Citation: Wang B, Zhou L, Li S, Xu H, Guo Y, Hu Q, et al. (2025) Height development and multiple bone health indicators in children aged 2–12 years with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). PLoS ONE 20(1): e0316938. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316938
Editor: Claudia Brogna, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS, ITALY
Received: July 18, 2024; Accepted: December 18, 2024; Published: January 10, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: Data cannot be shared publicly because of the clinical ethical approval. Data are available from corresponding author(contact via E-mail: cxt_1999@126.com) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. Data are also available from the ethics committee of West China Second University Hospital (contact via Email:hx2llwyh@163.com).
Funding: This study was supported by grants from the Sichuan Science and Technology Support Program (2023YFG0284, 2023ZYD0121), Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (24NSFC1085), Chengdu Municipal Science and Technology (2024-YF05-00493-SN) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (82271981). There were no any sponsors or funders that played any role in this study, and no additional external funding was received for this study.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Abbreviations: DMD, Duchenne muscular dystrophy; GC, Glucocorticoid; MDT, Multidisciplinary Team; BMI, Body mass index; BMD, Bone mineral density; BA, Bone age; CA, Chronological age; QCT, Quantitative computed tomography; β-CTX, β-isomerized C-terminal telopeptides; P1NP, Procollagen type 1 aminoterminal propeptide; N-MID, N-terminal mid-fragment of osteocalcin
1 Introduction
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is a genetic disorder characterized by progressive muscle weakness and degeneration, with an estimated incidence of 1 in 3500 male live births [1]. As the disease progresses, muscles become less functional, and lose independent ambulation by a median age of 12 years old [2]. It is a well-established fact that boys with DMD often experience stunted growth and short stature compared to their healthy peers [3,4], which seems to increase emotional distress and contribute to a reduced quality of life. Glucocorticoids (GC) is the only pharmacy treatment proven to be an effective intervention for DMD patients, which can maintain muscle strength, stabilize cardio and respiratory function, and prolong ambulation by 2–5 years [5]. However, GC often leads to further deterioration of growth rate and bone health status.
To date, the etiology of short stature in DMD patients remains uncertain. Previous researchers have studied the growth patterns of DMD patients in multiple aspects. Several studies explored how genetic types influenced the growth of DMD patients, Sarrazin found more distal mutations suggest short stature, especially ones altering Dp71 expression [6]. Another research indicated that genotype and dystrophin isoform expression influenced height trajectories, DMD participants with mutations affecting expression of Dp71 were shorter than participants with more proximal pathogenic variants [7]. Lamb et al. researched the relationship between height and GC treatment, the earlier initiation of GC use, daily dose, longer duration of GC treatment, and higher dosage were confirmed as associated factors of shorter height [3]. The primary detrimental effect of glucocorticoid exposure on growth appears to be growth plate toxicity. GC is suspected to impair the activity of growth plates by inhibiting the differentiation of chondrocytes and osteoblasts [8], induce chondrocyte and osteoblast apoptosis [9], and disrupt the local production of paracine hormones, including insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and C-type natriuretic peptide [10,11].
Overall, previous studies have tended to focus on genotype, GC, and other symptomatic treatments for short stature at puberty. There has been limited research on growth and development at younger ages before puberty, and there is a lack of large sample data to support this. The exact independent factors and the extent of their influence are also not clear. This study aims to establish the curve of stature development in children with early DMD in a larger sample cross-section design, and evaluate the potential influencing markers on height growth patterns, providing further evidence for pathological mechanism and clinical management of stature growth and bone health in DMD.
2 Methods
2.1 Setting and participants
This study is a retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional study. Participants who visited the pediatric rehabilitation department of West China Second University Hospital between January 2023 and October 2023 were included, which was accessed on 25th October 2023 for research purpose, and all data were fully anonymized during and after the reseach. This study was approved by the ethics committee of West China Second University Hospital (registration number: 21PJ048), which waived the requirement for informed consent.
Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients were genetically diagnosed or had muscle biopsies that confirmed DMD; (2) male; (3) aged from 2 to 12 years.
Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with other neuromuscular diseases or neurodevelopmental disorders; (2) combining other pathologic causes of short stature; (3) parents with short stature.
2.2 Data collection and measurements
The medical records of eligible patients were reviewed to extract data. The participants were followed up in our center every 6 to 12 months, regular monitoring was conducted at least once a year, which was customized for each participant depending on their bone health condition, growth pattern, and symptoms. This included medical prescriptions, consultation notes, investigation results, scans, anthropometric data, blood biochemical indicators, and Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) correspondence between clinicians. The initial dose of GC was usually given in the form of prednisone at 0.5–0.75 mg/kg/d. At the same time as taking GC, the children were given oral vitamin D3 (800–1200 IU/d) and elemental calcium (400 mg/d) as supplements. The results of laboratory examinations were recorded, including serum levels of 25(OH)-vitamin D, calcium, phosphorus, and plasma level of procollagen type 1 aminoterminal propeptide (P1NP), β-isomerized C-terminal telopeptides (β-CTX), N-terminal mid-fragment of osteocalcin (N-MID).
A calibrated device was used to measure height and weight, each participant was measured three times, and the average value was recorded for accuracy. For participants with scoliosis, contractures, or inability to stand independently, the ulna conversion formula was used to calculate height [12], as represented in the followinig equation: Height(cm) = (4.605* Ulna Length)+(1.308*Age in years)+28.003. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight(kg)/height(m2). We converted the data of height to standard deviation score (Ht SDS) and z-score based on age and sex [13–15]. The vertebral bone (lumbar spine L1-L3) mineral density (BMD) was measured by a Neusoft 128-slice helical CT scanner (NeuViz128, China) (120 kV, 70 mAs, 3-mm slice thickness) [16]. The BMD data converted to Z-values based on age and sex were provided by the manufacturer of the QCT software (Mindways Software) [17,18]. The bone age (BA) was evaluated using the Greulich & Pyle method (TW2) [19] and scanned with the Digital Medical X-Ray Radiography System uDR 780i (Shanghai United Imaging Medical Technology Co.). Motor function was evaluated using the North Star scale. North Star Ambulatory Assessment score was based on a structured physiotherapy assessment at a pediatric rehabilitation outpatient clinic. The North Star Ambulatory Assessment score reflects their functional motor abilities, scaled from 0 (unable) to 34 [20].
2.3 Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS version 26.0 software. Descriptive data were expressed in mean with standard deviation (SD) and/or median values with IQR according to data types. The normality of data was determined by Shapiro-Wilk tests and the Q-Q plot. Continuous variables were analyzed using linear regression and multiple linear regression. T-test was used to measure the differences between subgroups.
3 Results
3.1 Demography and characteristics
From January 2023 to October 2023, 348 participants with DMD aged 2–12 were included. The average age was 7.97±2.51 years. 276 participants were on GC treatment, accounting for 79.3% of all participants. The mean age of GC initiation was 5.57±1.80 years and the average duration of GC use was 34.44±22.43 months. Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of the studied population. 291 patients had at least one bone mineral density (BMD) measurement, with a mean BMD of 133.70±30.91 mg/cm3. The rate of low BMD (BMD Z-score<-2) in this cohort was 31.3%.
3.2 Growth pattern of DMD
Fig 1A showed the proportion of different height standard deviation scores (Ht SDS) values changed by chronological age (CA). Normal stature was defined as a height above -2 standard deviation (SD), while short stature was a height below -2SD [21]. A tendency for proportion of normal height to decrease with age can be observed.
(A. proportion of normal and short stature changed with age (normal stature: (normal stature: Ht SDS >-2, short stature: Ht SDS <-2)), B. height growth curve of healthy males and DMD group, C. age and height scatterplot of GC naive and on GC therapy participants with DMD, D. height growth rate of healthy population and DMD group).
As shown in Fig 1B, the 3rd, 50th, and 97th percentile of the height growth curve for DMD individuals showed a retarded growth compared with the healthy male population aged 2–12 years. Children with DMD were around the same height as average normal children at the age of two, but the height began to gradually fall behind after that. Totally 38.5% of participants in our cohort matched the diagnostic criteria for short stature (Ht SDS<-2), 23.9% of participants without taking GC, and 42.5% of participants receiving GC therapy were short stature. Scatters in Fig 1C show the age and height scatterplot of GC naive and on GC therapy participants with DMD, and linear regression equations of the two groups of participants. Fig 1D shows the height growth rate of the healthy male population and DMD participants in our cohort. During 3 to 11 years old, the height growth rate of DMD participants was always slower than healthy male population. The growth velocity of DMD children showed a slow climbing tendency before the age 7.
We also corrected Ht SDS by BA (instead of CA), where the incidence rates of short stature dropped from 38.5% to 20.4%, and 36.5% of individuals with short stature were still short after the Ht SDS was corrected by BA.
3.3 Factors affecting height and short stature
305 of 342 participants (89.2%) had normal serum levels of phosphorus (1.45–2.1nmol/L), 324 of 343 participants (94.5%) had normal serum levels of calcium (2.25–2.67nmol/L), 121 of 342 participants (35.4%) below normal serum level of 25(OH)-D (20ng/mL or 50nmol/L). Individuals in our study were under standard treatment, 25(OH)-D, calcium treatment, and regular follow-up monitoring have been carried out, therefore, the results show calcium, phosphorus, and 25(OH)-D were not associated with height of DMD participants. Candidate variables with a p-value <0.2 on univariate analysis were included in multivariable analysis. The linear regression analysis results show that BMI (β = -0.47, p = 0.007), BMD (β = -0.005, p = 0.014), β-CTX (β = 0.001, p = 0.002), duration of GC use (β = -0.006, p = 0.047), the difference between CA and BA (β = 0.417, p<0.001) were independent factors of height z-score (r = 0.648, p < .001) (Table 2).
3.4 Data changes over time of GC exposure
The bar graph (Fig 2) demonstrates the changing prevalence of short height (Ht SDS <-2) and low BMD (Z-score <-2), delayed BA (<25th percentile) by the duration of GC use. The trend plots indicate different sequential changing patterns in relevant bone health markers. Within one year of GC initiation, β-CTX levels decreased significantly, while the proportion of delayed BA continued to increase. In contrast, the proportion of low BMD increased only after three years of prolonged GC use. These changes in bone health markers were associated with an increasing severity in short stature. We examined the effect of GC exposure duration on proportion of short stature (OR = 0.462, 95%CI [1.056, 1.309], p<0.001), delayed BA (OR = 0.369, 95%CI [1.105, 1.375], p<0.001) and low BMD (OR = 0.127, 95%CI [1.340, 1.793], p<0.001) by binary logistic regression, and on level of β-CTX (R = 0.417, p<0.001) by linear regression.
Chi-square analyses were applied to further study the changes in GC duration. Generally, the percentage of short stature significantly grew from 24.7% to 41.3% within the first year of taking GC (p = 0.004). Also, the percentage of delayed BA (<25th percentile) was 26.6% of the GC naïve group, which significantly increased to 44.1% after GC exposure duration longer than 5 years (p = 0.002). On the contrary, the percentage of low BMD (Z score <-2) kept declining during the first two years of GC use but started to increase after two years of taking GC, from 10.3% to 44.9% (p<0.001), where a delayed deterioration was identified.
Changes in bone marker levels were studied. The median serum level of β-CTX dropped from 1306 pg/mL to 880.1 pg/mL within the first year (p<0.001). T-test analyses showed no significant difference in β-CTX between short-stature individuals and normal-stature individuals before the use of GC (p = 0.494). However, after receiving GC therapy, the β-CTX of short-stature participants was significantly lower than that of normal-stature participants (p = 0.023).
4 Discussion
Short stature is a frequent complication of DMD, and its pathomechanisms are specific to this disease, which is not identical to other common pathogenetic causes to short stature. Previous studies have shown that the dosage, types, and exposure duration of GC use [3], as well as mutations in the distal part of the dystrophin gene [4,6], are all associated with short stature. Meanwhile, long-term use of GC has been shown to exacerbate the short stature in DMD in multiple dimensions. However, the correlation between bone health and height at different ages and their associated influencing factors remained unclear. To obtain more information about growth patterns and potential impact factors of bone health, we explored the height development in DMD participants and investigated the correlation between height and various clinical indices.
Our study showed that children aged 2–12 years with DMD tend to have similar height to healthy males at early stages of the disease. However, as the disease progressed, the height growth curve gradually deviated from the normal growth curve even before GC initiation, and prolonged exposure of GC exacerbate height growth retardation, which indicates a natural stature progression oriented from disease itself. This is consistent with the conclusion of the previous study of 34 DMD patients that height/length was normal at birth, but a gradual slowdown of height growth was observed during their early years [22]. In our cohort, 23.9% of participants who had never taken GC were short, which is higher than the third percentile of healthy males, while 42.5% of boys with DMD on GC use were short. Even when we compared bone height percentiles corrected for age by BA, there were still 20.4% of participants with short stature. It was consistent with 25% of boys with DMD being short prior to initiation of GC [23] and 45% of DMD boys on GC were short stature [6]. The results suggested that the disease leads to short stature at an earlier age, as early as around 2–5 years of age, boys with DMD are already showing deviations from the growth curve, and GC exposure exacerbates the growth lag. The height growth velocity of the aged 3–7 DMD group was retarded to healthy males of the same age, although showed a slow climbing tendency which is opposite to healthy males.
Furthermore, to explore potential factors impacting the growth and development of boys with DMD, we analyzed the duration of GC use, BMD, BA, electrolytes (Calcium, Phosphorus, 25(OH)-D), motor ability scores (NSAA), and bone turnover markers (PINP, β-CTX, N-MID). The results are quite valuable, showing that BMI, β-CTX, duration of GC use, BMD, and BA were independent impact factors of height growth. The relationship between obesity and the side effects of GC has been studied and formally monitored in the management of DMD. In DMD, this risk of obesity vulnerability is increased by GC, reduced mobility, and limited opportunities for physical activity resulting in reduced energy expenditure [24]. Glucocorticoids have multiple side effects such as obesity, growth suppression, and impaired bone health, and to some extent, these adverse effects are reflected in height development. The interaction between these factors is complex, and long-term GC exposure usually exacerbates endocrine dysfunction in the organism.
Our research proposes, for the first time, the potential value of altered trends in bone markers for growth and development in DMD. β-CTX is a marker of bone resorption, which reflects the degree of bone matrix degradation [25]. Bone resorption gains with age in healthy populations suggest a promotion of new bone formation, as bone resorption is a source of bone formation-stimulating factors [26,27]. Regarding children’s development, the β-CTX expression profile differs from other bone turnover markers such as PINP, as it does not show a peak in early infancy. Existing studies have found that, throughout childhood, β-CTX expression remains relatively stable from birth to 12 years old, with a slight increase leading up to early puberty, followed by a decrease [28]. In our investigation of DMD boys, β-CTX is positively related to height, which is quite congruent with the positive correlations between height and β-CTX in healthy children from 2 months to 18 years [29]. Moreover, prior exploration had shown, a gain in bone resorption with age and reached the peak during Tanner stage 4 (A level of classification in the 5-stage categorical sexual development level evaluation method by Tanner) in healthy males [29,30]. However, the plasma level of β-CTX experienced a downward trend after the onset of GC therapy in our DMD cohort. The use of GC may have exacerbated the effect of β-CTX on height, the duration of which has been shown in our model to be directly proportional to the rate of decrease in β-CTX levels. The decrease in β-CTX levels during the first year of GC initiation suggests that GC may indirectly affect height through bone metabolism. Thus, regular monitoring of bone turnover markers can be effective in managing bone health in DMD.
We find that the portion of short stature was significantly raised during the first year of GC use, and relevant bone health markers showed different sequential changing patterns. As GC use is prolonged, the level of β-CTX initially decreases, which is a sensitive indicator of affected bone health, after which the proportion of delayed BA gradually increases. Then, the bone mineral density shows a decreasing trend only after the third year of GC use, which reflects the long-term effect of GC exposure on bone health. Specifically, the rate of low BMD fell during the first two years of GC use, but then rose sharply in the third year, far exceeding the previous portion. It has long been shown that in healthy individuals, peak bone mass is almost completely reached by late adolescence or early adulthood [31]. However, our result revealed that BMD kept accumulating during the first two years of prolonged GC exposure (aged around 5.5 to 7.5), yet after which it greatly slumped, probably influenced by both progressive myopathy and cumulative osteo-toxicity of steroids [32]. This was in agreement with the previous findings of our team, where we have reported that children with DMD no longer maintain their BMD leave at least age 8 years [33]. Additionally, the growth of bone mineral content lags behind the growth of height [34], and the dissociation between bone expansion and bone mineralization during the growing period may result in relative skeletal fragility [35], which may provide a further explanation for the heterogeneity in the development of stature and BMD in the DMD population.
In addition, we found an almost consistent trend for a decrease in delayed BA and short stature after GC use. Bone age is a quantitative measurement of skeletal maturation [36], when researchers corrected the height SDS by BA, the number of participants with short stature was reduced from 52.5% to 22.0%, which suggested that the stunted growth was reflected in delayed skeletal maturation [37]. As an apparent influence factor on stature and puberty, the interaction between BA, BMD, bone markers, and other potential factors related to bone health needs to be further investigated. We suggest shedding light on the height growth and focus on those sensitive biomarkers that tend to aggravate in the first year of GC exposure to predict possible changes in bone health conditions.
Our study innovated to present the effect of GC, bone turnover marker, BMD, and BA on the stature of DMD and figure out the key point time of variations. Bone turnover markers have predictive value in height for patients with DMD, especially β-CTX. However, the prediction of a single biomarker may not be precise enough, and further in-depth studies are needed to support their use as a reliable basis for clinical prediction and decision.
This study provides evidence for the early management of height development to manage future bone health of DMD. The occurrence and progression of short stature are unequivocally associated with patients’ broad bone health status, with bone turnover markers, BMD, and BA as independent indicators. We recommend a comprehensive option containing these monitoring items to guide clinical follow-up management and treatment. Different bone indicators have different sensitivities and specificities and need to be considered together for clinical monitoring of bone health. Also, it is essential to monitor height during the early stages of the disease while focusing on bone health to minimize the occurrence of bone-related complications later in life. Monitoring of height and relative impactors should become a routine of DMD early care to help optimize treatments to reduce delay in skeletal maturation, contribute to optimal catch-up growth, and maintain bone health.
Still, this study has some limitations. Firstly, it only includes patients aged 2–12, excluding adolescent and adult patients. To gain a better understanding of the global growth pattern of DMD, particularly during puberty and the non-ambulatory stage, a wider age range of participants needs to be involved. Secondly, the children who were followed up by our team were examined for spinal health (including scoliosis and spina bifida/fracture) every six months to one year. The participants in this cohort were all under age 12, most of them have healthy spine and only few of them have very mild curve that is lower than 10° (which did not meet the diagnostic criteria of scoliosis that cobb > 10°), so scoliosis, increased lumbar lordosis and contractures were not assessing. A mild curvature of spine can also affect the accuracy of height measurement, although height measurement for scoliosis is difficult, more comprehensive approaches should be tried to improve the accuracy of height measurement, including the use of X-ray assisted measurement. Additionally, a longitudinal, multi-center study should be conducted to minimize bias.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Sophelia Chan, Professor of the Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine at the School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, for her assistance in interpreting the results of this study.
References
- 1. Emery AE. Population frequencies of inherited neuromuscular diseases—a world survey. Neuromuscular disorders: NMD. 1991;1(1):19–29. MEDLINE:1822774. pmid:1822774
- 2. Ryder S, Leadley RM, Armstrong N, Westwood M, de Kock S, Butt T, et al. The burden, epidemiology, costs and treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an evidence review. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2017;12:21. WOS:000400133900002. pmid:28446219
- 3. Lamb MM, West NA, Ouyang L, Yang M, Weitzenkamp D, James K, et al. Corticosteroid Treatment and Growth Patterns in Ambulatory Males with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2016;173:207–13.e3. pmid:27039228
- 4. Ward LM, Weber DR. Growth, pubertal development, and skeletal health in boys with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes & Obesity. 2019;26(1):39–48. pmid:30507696
- 5. Moxley RT, Pandya S, Ciafaloni E, Fox DJ, Campbell K. Change in Natural History of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy With Long-term Corticosteroid Treatment: Implications for Management. J Child Neurol. 2010;25(9):1116–29. WOS:000281680000006. pmid:20581335
- 6. Sarrazin E, Hagen Mvd, Schara U, von Au K, Kaindl AM. Growth and psychomotor development of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology. 2014;18(1):38–44. pmid:24100172
- 7. Stimpson G, Raquq S, Chesshyre M, Fewtrell M, Ridout D, Sarkozy A, et al. Growth pattern trajectories in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2022;17(1). pmid:35073949
- 8. Fujita T, Fukuyama R, Enomoto H, Komori T. Dexamethasone inhibits insulin-induced chondrogenesis of ATDC5 cells by preventing PI3K-Akt signaling and DNA binding of Runx2. J Cell Biochem. 2004;93(2):374–83. WOS:000223964800015. pmid:15368363
- 9. Chrysis D, Ritzen EM, Sävendahl L. Growth retardation induced by dexamethasone is associated with increased apoptosis of the growth plate chondrocytes. J Endocrinol. 2003;176(3):331–7. WOS:000181860800005. pmid:12630918
- 10. Delany AM, Durant D, Canalis E. Glucocorticoid suppression of IGF I transcription in osteoblasts. Mol Endocrinol. 2001;15(10):1781–9. WOS:000171267800012. pmid:11579210
- 11. Prickett TCR, Lynn AM, Barrell GK, Darlow BA, Cameron VA, Espiner EA, et al. Amino-terminal proCNP: A putative marker of cartilage activity in postnatal growth. Pediatr Res. 2005;58(2):334–40. WOS:000230995500027. pmid:16006435
- 12. Gauld LM, Kappers J, Carlin JB, Robertson CF. Height prediction from ulna length. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46(7):475–80. WOS:000222487000008. pmid:15230461
- 13. Li H, Ji C-Y, Zong X-N, Zhang Y-Q. Height and weight standardized growth charts for Chinese children and adolescents aged 0 to 18 years. Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of pediatrics. 2009;47(7):487–92. MEDLINE:19951507.
- 14.
China NHCotPsRo. Standard for height level classification among children and adolescents aged 7~18 years 2018. Chinese. Available from: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/wjw/pqt/201807/a5269d062966455ea55d90a02c690311.shtml.
- 15. China NHCotPsRo. Growth standard for children under 7 years of age 2022. Chinese. Available from: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/wjw/fyjk/202211/16d8b049fdf547978a910911c19bf389.shtml.
- 16. Liu C, Yang D-D, Zhang L, Lei X-G, Jia F-L, Liao Y, et al. Bone Mineral Density Assessment by Quantitative Computed Tomography in Glucocorticoid-Treated Boys With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Linear Mixed-Effects Modeling Approach. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2022;13. pmid:35399923
- 17. Lee JS, Kim K, Jeon YK, Kim J, Jung H, Kim SH, et al. Effects of Traction on Interpretation of Lumbar Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A New Measurement Method and Diagnostic Criteria Based on Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Quantitative Computed Tomography. J Clin Densitom. 2020;23(1):53–62. WOS:000510115000006. pmid:30143440
- 18. Gilsanz V, Gibbens DT, Roe TF, Carlson M, Senac MO, Boechat MI, et al. VERTEBRAL BONE-DENSITY IN CHILDREN—EFFECT OF PUBERTY. Radiology. 1988;166(3):847–50. WOS:A1988M043800044. pmid:3340782
- 19. Bull RK, Edwards PD, Kemp PM, Fry S, Hughes IA. Bone age assessment: a large scale comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW2) methods. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1999;81(2):172–3. WOS:000081767300020. pmid:10490531
- 20. Audhya I, Rogula B, Szabo SM, Feeny D, Bolatova T, Gooch K. Exploring the relationship between North Star Ambulatory Assessment and Health Utilities Index scores in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2023;21(1). pmid:37468890
- 21. Grunauer M, Jorge AAL. Genetic short stature. Growth Hormone & Igf Research. 2018;38:29–33. WOS:000428097700008. pmid:29249624
- 22. Nagel BHP, Mortier W, Elmlinger M, Wollmann HA, Schmitt K, Ranke MB. Short stature in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a study of 34 patients. Acta Paediatrica. 1999;88(1):62–5. pmid:10090550
- 23. Kao K-T, Joseph S, Capaldi N, Brown S, Di Marco M, Dunne J, et al. Skeletal disproportion in glucocorticoid-treated boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. European Journal of Pediatrics. 2019;178(5):633–40. pmid:30762116
- 24. Weber DR, Hadjiyannakis S, McMillan HJ, Noritz G, Ward LM. Obesity and Endocrine Management of the Patient With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Pediatrics. 2018;142:S43–S52. WOS:000511642900005. pmid:30275248
- 25. Escudier B, Powles T, Motzer RJ, Olencki T, Frontera OA, Oudard S, et al. Cabozantinib, a New Standard of Care for Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma and Bone Metastases? Subgroup Analysis of the METEOR Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(8):765–+. WOS:000427171900007. pmid:29309249
- 26. Xing W, Liang L, Dong N, Chen L, Liu Z. Abnormal changes of bone metabolism markers with age in children with cerebral palsy. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2023;11. pmid:37593441
- 27. Weivoda MM, Chew CK, Monroe DG, Farr JN, Atkinson EJ, Geske JR, et al. Identification of osteoclast-osteoblast coupling factors in humans reveals links between bone and energy metabolism. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):13. WOS:000511966600001. pmid:31911667
- 28. Ladang A, Rauch F, Delvin E, Cavalier E. Bone Turnover Markers in Children: From Laboratory Challenges to Clinical Interpretation. Calcif Tissue Int. 2023;112(2):218–32. WOS:000763825400001. pmid:35243530
- 29. Rauchenzauner M, Schmid A, Heinz-Erian P, Kapelari K, Falkensammer G, Griesmacher A, et al. Sex- and age-specific reference curves for serum markers of bone turnover in healthy children from 2 months to 18 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(2):443–9. WOS:000244064900015. pmid:17105843
- 30. Chubb SAP, Vasikaran SD, Gillett MJ. Reference intervals for plasma β-CTX and P1NP in children: A systematic review and pooled estimates. Clinical Biochemistry. 2023;118. pmid:37187224
- 31. Heaney RP, Abrams S, Dawson-Hughes B, Looker A, Marcus R, Matkovic V, et al. Peak bone mass. Osteoporosis International. 2000;11(12):985–1009. WOS:000167086200001. pmid:11256898
- 32. Wang H, Su Z, Luo C, Li Y, Feng H, Fang W, et al. The effect of steroid treatment and thymectomy on bone age and height development in juvenile myasthenia gravis. Neurological Sciences. 2013;34(12):2173–80. pmid:23619530
- 33. Zhou L, Zhou H, Xu H, Sun X, Chen X, Fan P, et al. Different bone health progression patterns and early-stage risk marker in glucocorticoid-treated ambulatory Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Osteoporosis International. 2024. pmid:38277031
- 34. Bailey DA, McKay HA, Mirwald RL, Crocker PRE, Faulkner RA. A Six-Year Longitudinal Study of the Relationship of Physical Activity to Bone Mineral Accrual in Growing Children: The University of Saskatchewan Bone Mineral Accrual Study. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 1999;14(10):1672–9. pmid:10491214
- 35. Faulkner RA, Davison KS, Bailey DA, Mirwald RL, Baxter-Jones ADG. Size-corrected BMD decreases during peak linear growth: Implications for fracture incidence during adolescence. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2006;21(12):1864–70. WOS:000242278900007. pmid:17002589
- 36. Khadilkar V, Oza C, Khadilkar A. Relationship between height age, bone age and chronological age in normal children in the context of nutritional and pubertal status. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2022;35(6):767–75. WOS:000788733000001. pmid:35487031
- 37. Annexstad EJ, Bollerslev J, Westvik J, Myhre AG, Godang K, Holm I, et al. The role of delayed bone age in the evaluation of stature and bone health in glucocorticoid treated patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology. 2019;2019(1). pmid:31889957