In Table 3, there are errors in column “Code”. The “State of Available Facilities (40 Studies)” should have been “State of Available Facilities (57 Studies)”, the “Knowledge (11 Studies)” should be Knowledge (14 Studies) and the “Menstrual Taboos and Social Stigma (36 studies)” should be “Menstrual Taboos and Social Stigma (55 studies). Please see the correct Table 3 here.

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Table 3. Codebook definitions and coding frequency.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316495.t001

In the Reasoning behind behaviour subsection of the Results, references 19, 46 and 47 are omitted from the first sentence of the fourth paragraph. The correct sentence is: In 14 of the studies menstruators explicitly stated that they had been given no, or limited, advice regarding how to dispose of menstrual materials [19,21,24,28,30,37,45,46,47,64,74,78,81,83].

The references are:

19. Ahmmed F, Chowdhury MS, Helal SM. Sexual and reproductive health experiences of adolescent girls and women in marginalised communities in Bangladesh.Cult Health Sex 2021:1–16. pmid:33941046

46. Habtegiorgis Y, Sisay T, Kloos H, Malede A, Yalew M, Arefaynie M, et al. Menstrual hygiene practices among high school girls in urban areas in Northeastern Ethiopia: A neglected issue in water, sanitation, and hygiene research.PLoS One 2021;16(6):e0248825. pmid:34106948

47. Hawkins A, Sharpe R, Spence K, Holmes N. Inappropriate flushing of menstrual sanitary products.Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management 2019;172(4):163–9. WOS:000475712900001.