Figures
Abstract
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a highly contagious virus that poses a significant threat to the global pig farming industry, resulting in substantial economic losses. However, owing to the high variability of PRRSV and unclear mechanisms of infection, there are currently no effective vaccines or drugs available for its prevention and control. Our previous report revealed that highly pathogenic PRRSV (HP-PRRSV) requires the FAK-PI3K-AKT signaling pathway to facilitate its entry into cells. In this study, we further investigated whether the integrin subunit was involved in the entry process of NADC30-like PRRSV. First, the integrin subunits in Marc-145 cells were characterized by RT-PCR, and 11 of these subunits were identified, nearly all of which interacted with the integrin α V and β1 subunits to form heterodimers. Western blot analysis revealed that the integrin α V subunit was highly expressed in Marc-145 cells, and blocking this subunit with a functional antibody or siRNA significantly attenuated NADC30-like PRRSV entry without affecting virus binding. Moreover, in Marc-145 cells, NADC30-like PRRSV could activate the FAK-PI3K-AKT signaling pathway through the integrin α V subunit. Blocking the α V subunit significantly inhibited signal transduction and virus entry, and treatment of cells with the PI3K activator greatly reversed this inhibitory effect. Furthermore, the α V subunit activator manganese could also enhance NADC30-like PRRSV entry and signal transduction. In conclusion, our results revealed that NADC30-like PRRSV could activate the integrin α V subunit and subsequently transduce signals to the FAK-PI3K-AKT signaling pathway to facilitate entry into Marc-145 cells.
Citation: Li C, Cui J, Zheng H, Sha Z, Wei R, Wu R, et al. (2025) The NADC30-like PRRSV activates the integrin αV subunit to facilitate its entry into Marc-145 cells. PLoS ONE 20(3): e0316239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316239
Editor: Li Xing, Shanxi University, CHINA
Received: October 16, 2024; Accepted: December 8, 2024; Published: March 27, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript.
Funding: This research and APC was funded by the Innovation Fund (DW2022001-3), funded by China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is a single-stranded RNA virus that belongs to the family Arteriviridae [1]. PRRSV infection usually causes respiratory symptoms, productive failure and immune depression in pig herds, leading to tremendous losses in the pig raising industry worldwide [2]. It has been estimated to cause losses of more than $600 million annually in the United States [3]. Despite considerable research, the factors influencing the various stages of PRRSV infection, such as virus entry, replication in host cells, and virus assembly and release, are still poorly understood [4]. NADC30-like PRRSV is a variant of PRRSV that may have been introduced into China from North America in 2013 [5] and was widespread in China in 2014 [6]. This strain is now the main circulating strain of PRRSV in China and has high recombination potential and pathogenicity diversity [7]. Marc-145 is a derivative of the African green monkey kidney cell MA-104 and is often used in virology research and vaccine production because of its high sensitivity to viral infections, particularly PRRSV [8]. Marc-145 cells play crucial roles in understanding the biology and pathogenesis of PRRSV [9].
Integrins are a prominent class of cell surface molecules that play crucial roles in cellular adhesion and signaling. Composed of noncovalently linked α and β subunits [10], these transmembrane glycoproteins typically have a single membrane-spanning segment and a short cytoplasmic tail [11]. To date, research has identified 18 integrin α subunits and 8 β subunits, which combine to form over 24 distinct integrin complexes [12]. Predominantly, these heterodimers contain the α V or β1 subunits, indicating their significant roles in cellular processes [13]. Integrins act as essential transmembrane linkers that connect the extracellular matrix (ECM) to the cytoskeleton, facilitating various cellular functions through biochemical signal transduction across the plasma membrane [14]. ECM binding induces clustering and/or conformational changes in integrins [15], which can elicit cellular signaling events that increase ligand affinity/avidity and promote cytoskeletal rearrangement. Moreover, integrins play important roles in the attachment and entry of various kinds of viruses [16,17]. Notably, integrin subunits are reportedly involved in the infection process of PRRSV, suggesting that integrins are potential targets for antiviral strategies [18]. Understanding the diverse roles of integrins in cellular and viral biology enhances our ability to develop targeted therapeutic interventions in virology.
Integrin assembly facilitates the formation of focal adhesions (FAs), which are crucial for cellular communication and structural integrity [19]. These assemblies recruit signaling molecules, including focal adhesion kinase (FAK), steroid receptor coactivator (Src), and p130 Crk-associated substrate (p130Cas), together with cytoskeletal proteins such as talin, paxillin, and vinculin [20]. These complexes not only strengthen cell-ECM connections but also activate signaling pathways that regulate cell migration, proliferation, and even pathogen infection [19]. FAK is a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase that is recruited as a participant in focal adhesion dynamics between cell motility and survival. In many cell types, FAK colocalizes with integrins in focal adhesions [21]. The binding of integrins to their extracellular ligands activates FAK and its subsequent tyrosine, serving as a pivotal step in cellular signaling [22–24]. Activated FAK can colocalize and associate with PI3-kinase in cells such as fibroblasts and platelets, which leads to phosphorylation of the p85 subunit of PI3-kinase, demonstrating that PI3-kinase acts as a downstream effector of FAK [25,26]. Phosphorylation of the p 85 subunit of PI3-kinase is a critical step that activates the p110 subunit of PI3-kinase, catalyzing the production of phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5trisphosphate (PIP3), which initiates the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway [27–29]. Our previous study revealed that activation of the FAK-PI3K-AKT-Rac1 signaling pathway during entry is increased in the HP-PRRSV strain [30].
In this study, we used Marc-145 cells to investigate the role of the integrin α V subunit, which regulates downstream signaling pathways involved in the cellular entry of NADC30-like PRRSV. These findings indicated that NADC30-like PRRSV induced activation of the integrin pathway before or during entry.
Materials and methods
Cells and virus
Marc-145 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Viva Cell, Italy) supplemented with 10% heatinactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; OPCEL BS-1101, China.), penicillin (100U ∕ ml ) and streptomycin ( 100μg ∕ ml). Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus PRRSV (NADC30-like strain) was propagated in Marc-145 cells cultured in DMEM supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum. The virus was purified, titered and then stored at −80∘C until use.
Chemicals, antibodies and other reagents
Antibodies against FAK and AKT were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Antibodies against integrin α V, phosphoAKT (S473), phospho-FAK (Y397), and integrin β1 were purchased from Abcam, and antibodies against integrin β1 were purchased from Abcam and Cell Signaling Technology. A function-blocking antibody against integrin α V was purchased from Sigma. Monoclonal antibodies against the PPRSV N protein were purchased from Gene Tex, and PI3K activators were obtained from Santa Cruz and dissolved in DMSO. All the reagents were stored at −20∘C in single-use aliquots. siRNAs designed specifically to knock down integrin αV expression were purchased from Sangong along with the corresponding control siRNAs.
siRNA transfection
Marc-145 cells were grown to 70% − 80% confluence in cell culture plates and then transiently transfected with small interfering RNA ( siRNA ) − αV using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The silencing efficiency of the siRNAs was detected via western blot analysis. Scrambled siRNAs were used as negative controls.
Virus entry inhibition assay
Serum-starved cells transfected with siRNA or preincubated with function-blocking antibodies against integrins (10μg ∕ ml ) were incubated with NADC 30–like at 4∘C for 1 h to allow virus binding but not internalization. The cells were washed, and internalization was initiated by transferring the cells to 37∘C for 40 min. The medium contained all the inhibitors. The cells were washed with citric acid buffer (40 mM citric acid, 10 mM KCl, and 135 mM NaCl, pH3 . 0 ) 3 times to inactivate any particles that remained on the cell surface. The cells were then washed three times with PBS to remove the acidic buffer. The internalized virus was detected via both western blotting and real-time PCR.
Virus binding inhibition assay
Cells transfected with siRNA or preincubated with functionblocking antibodies against integrin αV were incubated in DMEM at 37∘C for 1 h. Then, the Marc-145 cells were incubated with NADC30-like PRRSV (MOI = 1) at 4∘C for 1 h to allow virus binding but not internalization. The cells were washed three times with cold PBS to remove the unbound virus particles. The internalized virus was detected via both western blotting and real-time PCR.
Western blot analysis
Briefly, the cells were washed with PBS three times, freed by scraping, and incubated on ice with Sangong cell lysis buffer (China). The cell lysates were sonicated and then centrifuged at 14 , 000 × g for 20 min at 4∘C. The protein concentration was determined using the BCA assay. Equal amounts of protein samples were diluted in 5 × SDS-PAGE loading buffer and separated on SDS-PAGE gels. The proteins in the gel were transferred to PVDF membranes, which were then blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in PBST at 4∘C overnight and incubated for 2 h with different primary antibodies. Next, the membrane was incubated for 1 h with the appropriate secondary antibodies. The immunoreactive bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Vazyme, China).
Quantitative real-time PCR
Total mRNA was extracted from Marc-145 cells using TRIzol RNA extraction reagent (Takara Bio, Inc., Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using an Evo M-MLV One Step RT-qPCR Kit II (Accurate Biology, China) with the following procedures: reverse transcription at 42∘C for 6 min, predenaturation at 95∘C for 10 min, denaturation at 95∘C for 10 s, and annealing and extension at 60∘C for 20 s for a total of 45 cycles. Each sample was run in triplicate. The relative amount of mRNA for the target gene was normalized to that of actin mRNA in the same sample. The primer and probe sequences used are shown in Table 1.
Integrin characterization by RT-PCR
Integrin characterization via RT-PCR was performed as reported previously [31]. In brief, total mRNA was extracted from Marc-145 cells using TRIzol RNA extraction reagent (Takara Bio Inc., Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription reactions were performed using a HiScriptIV 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit II (+gDNA wiper) (Vazyme, China). RT-PCR amplification was performed using 2 × Phanta Flash Master Mix(Dye Plus) (Vazyme, China) with the following procedure: denaturation at 95∘C for 15 min, followed by 35 to 45 cycles of 95∘C for 45 s, 55∘C for 45 s, and 72∘C for 10 s. The sequences of the primers used are listed in Table 2.
Results
Integrin subunit characterization
It is well known that 18 integrin α subunits and 8 integrin β subunits can assemble into more than 24 different integrin complexes in cells. First, we characterized the integrin subunits expressed in the Marc-145 cell line. The mRNA levels of the integrin subunits were tested via RT-PCR with 26 pairs of integrin subunit-specific primers. Amplicons of the integrin αV , α3 , α5 , α6, α7 , β1 , β2 , β3 , β4 , β6, and β8 subunits were detected (Fig 1a). Since nearly all of these subunits interacted with the integrin αV and β1 subunits to form heterodimers, we further verified whether the αV and β1 subunits were expressed in Marc-145 cells. Western blotting was performed, and the α V subunit was strongly detected; however, the β1 subunit was not detected despite the use of two kinds of commercial antibodies (Fig 1b).
(a) Integrin subunit characterization by RT-PCR. Lane 1: α1; Lane 2: α2; Lane 3: α3; Lane 4: α4; Lane 5: α5; Lane 6: α6; Lane 7: α7; Lane 8: α8; Lane 9: α9; Lane 10: α10; Lane 11: β1; Lane 12: β2; Lane 13: β3; Lane 14: β4; Lane 15: β5; Lane 16: β6; Lane 17 : β7; Lane 18 : β8; Lane 19: α11; Lane 20: α V; M: marker. (b) -3 western blot analysis of integrin αV and the β1 subunit in Marc- 145 cells.
NADC30-like PRRSV entry requires the integrin α V subunit
Since we detected the expression of αV in Marc-145 cells, we further verified whether the integrin α V subunit participated in the NADC30-like PRRSV entry process. First, we incubated the cells with a function-blocking antibody against αV integrin to determine whether the αV-specific antibody could block NADC30-like PRRSV entry. The internal virus concentration was measured via qRT-PCR and western blot analysis. qRT-PCR revealed that the integrin α V neutralizing antibody inhibited NADC30-like PRRSV entry in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 2a), which was also confirmed by western blot analysis (Fig 2b and 2c). To avoid the nonspecific effect of neutralization antibodies, siRNAs targeting integrin α V were used. The siRNA construct specifically reduced the total amount of integrin α V protein (Fig 2d and 2e), and the amount of PRRSV structural protein inside the cell was also reduced, suggesting that virus entry was inhibited. These results were further verified via qRT-PCR and revealed that siRNA targeting the integrin αV subunit could inhibit NADC30-like PRRSV entry in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 2f).
An integrin αV neutralization antibody blocks virus entry. (a) qRT-PCR or (b) western blotting. siRNA-mediated knockdown of the integrin αV subunit significantly reduces virus entry, as shown by (d) qRT-PCR and (e) western blotting. (c)(f) Ratios of N or integrin protein to actin corresponding to (b) and (e) are shown.
The integrin αVsubunit is not involved in the binding of NADC30-like PRRSV
The possibility that the integrin αV subunit regulated PRRSV entry by affecting the binding step was ruled out. We further tested the possible role of integrin α V in the binding of NADC30-like PRRSV to target cells. Neither the neutralizing antibody nor the siRNA influenced virus binding (Fig 3a and 3b).
Blocking the integrin α V subunit with (a) a neutralizing antibody or (b) siRNA–αV does not influence virus binding.
NADC30-like PRRSV entry activates the FAK-PI3K-AKT pathway through the integrin αV subunit
To verify whether NADC30-like PRRSV initiated the activation of the FAK-PI3K-AKT signaling cascade through the integrin αn subunit during the entry process, Marc-145 cells pretreated with integrin α V blocking antibody or siRNA were infected with NADC30-like PRRSV, and the cells were harvested 15 min p.i. Since AKT is a key downstream intermediate in PI3K-dependent signaling, we selected FAK and AKT as detection targets to verify whether the signaling pathway was activated. The results indicated that FAK and AKT phosphorylation were significantly elevated in infected cells, indicating that, similar to HP-PRRSV, NADC30-like PRRSV could activate the FAK signaling pathway. Blocking the function of integrin α V with a neutralizing antibody (Fig 4a and 4b) and siRNA reduced the activation of FAK and AKT in NADC30-like PRRSV-infected cells (Fig 4c and 4d). These results showed that NADC30-like PRRSV required the integrin α V subunit to activate FAK-PI3K-AKT during entry.
NADC30-like PRRSV entry can activate the FAK-PI3K-AKT pathway, and blocking the integrin αV subunit with (a) neutralizing antibodies or (c) siRNA–αV decreases the phosphorylation of FAK and AKT. (b)(d) The ratios of p-FAK and p -AKT to total protein in (a) and (c) are shown.
Integrin αV subunit regulates NADC30-like PRRSV entry through the FAK-PI3K-AKT pathway
To confirm that integrin α V regulated NADC30-like PRRSV entry through the FAK-PI3K-AKT pathway, we first knocked down the integrin α V subunit with siRNA to block signaling and virus entry. In the next step, we treated α V subunit knockdown cells with a PI3K activator to determine whether the activation of downstream effectors could reverse the inhibitory effect on virus entry caused by the loss of upstream signals. Western blot and qRT-PCR results revealed that integrin α V knockdown reduced NADC30-like PRRSV entry, and the PI3K activator strongly reversed this inhibitory effect in Marc-145 cells (Fig 5a, 5b, and 5c). These results showed that when integrin α V acted upstream, NADC30-like PRRSV stimulated the FAK-PI3K-AKT pathway through the integrin α V subunit during entry.
(a) The PI3K activator significantly increases virus entry in integrin α V knockdown MARC-145 cells, as shown by both western blotting and (c) real-time RT-PCR. (b) The ratio of N protein to actin in (a) is shown.
Activation of integrin by Mn2+ can increase signal transduction and NADC30-like PRRSV entry
Mn2+ can induce the extension of integrins in the absence of ligands and partially activate integrins [32–34]. We investigated whether Mn2+ treatment could enhance NADC30-like PRRSV entry and related signal transduction. Marc-145 cells were incubated with NADC30-like PRRSV for 1 h in the presence or absence of Mn2+ before being transferred to 37∘C. Marc- 145 cells were harvested at 15 min and 30 min postinfection for western blot analysis. As expected, Mn2+ increased FAK and AKT phosphorylation (Fig 6a–6h). Mn2+ treatment also increased virus entry (Fig 6i and 6j). These results further verified the above findings that NADC30-like PRRSV utilized integrins to control the FAK-PI3K-AKT signaling pathway to facilitate its entry.
Mn2+ increases FAK phosphorylation at 15 min p.i. (a) and 30 min p.i. (e). Mn2+ increases the phosphorylation of AKT at 15minp . i. (c) and 30minp . i. (g). The ratios of p-FAK and p-AKT to total protein in (a), (c), (e), and (g) are shown in (b), (d), (f), and (h), respectively. (i) Mn2+ enhances NADC30-like PRRSV entry. (j) The ratio of N protein to actin in (i) is shown.
Discussion
PRRSV is a major pathogen in the swine industry that causes significant economic losses worldwide. It can cause symptoms in affected pigs, such as respiratory difficulties, weight loss, poor growth performance, and high fever [34]. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, causing substantial economic losses to the pig farming industry worldwide. The development of effective vaccines and drugs against PRRSV has been challenging because of the high genetic variability and complex infection mechanisms of this virus. As an RNA virus, PRRSV has a high mutation rate due to the lack of proofreading activity in its RNAdependent RNA polymerase. This intrinsic characteristic facilitates rapid genetic diversification within and between viral genotypes over time [24]. Epidemiological investigations have shown that multiple PRRSV strains are now prevalent in China, including HPPRRSV, CH-1a PRRSV, NADC30-like PRRSV, and NADC34-like PRRSV. Among them, NADC30-like PRRSV is the main circulating PRRSV strain [35]. Thus, in this study, we used NADC30-like PRRSV for our research.
The entry mechanism of PRRSV into host cells is a critical aspect of its infection process. Initially, the virus attaches to the cell surface through interactions with heparan sulfate, which provides a low-affinity binding site, facilitating preliminary anchoring of the virus to the cell membrane [36]. Subsequently, the viral GP5/M protein complex exhibits increased specificity for binding to the N-terminal domain of CD169 (sialoadhesin) on susceptible cells. This binding event is crucial, as it stimulates receptor-mediated, clathrin-dependent endocytosis, resulting in internalization of the virus into the host cell via clathrin-coated vesicles. The viral particles are then transported to early endosomes, where the acidic environment, along with interactions with CD163, promotes uncoating of the viral genome, facilitating its release into the cytoplasm [37]. The CD163 receptor plays a pivotal role in the infection process in vivo, acting as a critical facilitator of successful PRRSV infection. Moreover, additional receptors might be involved in this complex entry process, particularly in the context of Marc-145 cells, where simian vimentin and CD151 have been implicated as potential contributors to PRRSV entry and infection [38]. Our previous study revealed that HP-PRRSV can stimulate phosphorylation of the FAK-PI3K-AKT pathway to precisely regulate the cytoskeleton to promote its endocytosis. However, the upstream signaling molecules are still unknown. Integrins are ubiquitously expressed in virtually all cells. Integrin clusters recruit signaling molecules such as talin, FAK, Src and PI3K to form focal contacts that regulate outside-in signaling to manipulate important cellular activities [39]. Therefore, we hypothesized that integrins might be upstream signaling molecules that activate the FAK-PI3K-AKT signaling pathway to facilitate PRRSV entry.
Since there are 26 kinds of integrin subunits in different cell types, we first characterized the integrin subunits in Marc-145 cells via RT-PCR, and 11 subunits, namely, αV , α3 , α5 , α6 , α7 , β1, β2 , β3 , β4 , β6, and β8, were identified. Nearly all of these proteins, except for β2, which is expressed mainly in leukocytes, can interact with the α V and β1 subunits to form a complex [40]. Western blot results revealed that the α V subunit was highly expressed in Marc-145 cells, and the β1 subunit was not detected using antibodies from two reputable companies, Abcam and Cell Signaling. Therefore, we focused our research on the α V subunit, and further studies were performed to investigate whether integrin α V was involved in NADC30-like PRRSV entry.
First, we investigated whether NADC30-like PRRSV entry required the integrin α V subunit. After blocking integrin activity with blocking antibodies and siRNAs (control IgG and siRNA-NC were used to avoid nonspecific effects), the amount of internalized virus protein and virus mRNA significantly decreased in a dosedependent manner. These results showed that NADC30-like PRRSV required the integrin αV subunit for entry. Moreover, similar to HP-PRRSV, NADC30-like PRRSV was able to activate the FAK-PI3K-AKT signaling pathway during entry. When Marc145 cells were incubated with NADC30-like PRRSV, FAK and AKT phosphorylation significantly increased. In contrast, blocking the α V subunit with neutralizing antibodies and siRNAs significantly inhibited signal transduction and virus entry. These results suggested that NADC30-like PRRSV activated the FAK-PI3K-AKT signaling pathway through the integrin α V subunit. However, we could not completely inhibit signal transduction by blocking the activity of integrins, which we hypothesized might indicate that the integrin α V subunit was not the only molecule involved in signal transduction. To confirm that integrin α V regulated NADC30-like PRRSV entry through the FAK-PI3K-AKT pathway, we treated siRNA- α V-transfected Marc-145 cells with a PI3K activator to determine whether downstream signaling molecule activators compensated for the loss of upstream signaling. As expected, the PI3K activator strongly reversed this inhibitory effect. Moreover, the α V subunit activator manganese was able to enhance NADC30-like PRRSV entry and signal transduction. PRRSV exhibits strong tropism for cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage, which are critical components of the host immune defense system [41], and the data obtained using Marc-145 cells may not fully reflect the situation in vivo. However, since Marc-145 is a well-established cellular model of PRRSV infection [42], our results may provide insights and scientific data for studying the molecular mechanisms of NADC30-like PRRSV entry.
Conclusions
Our results revealed that NADC30-like PRRSV could activate the integrin αV subunit and subsequently transduce signals to the FAK-PI3K-AKT signaling pathway to facilitate entry into Marc-145 cells.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Qiaoya Zhang for providing the Marc-145 cell line and other members of our group for their assistance with the sample collection and testing.
References
- 1. Meulenberg JJ. PRRSV, the virus. Vet Res 2000;31(1):11–21. :2000103 pmid:10726635
- 2. Ruedas-Torres I, Rodríguez-Gómez IM, Sánchez-Carvajal JM, Larenas-Muñoz F, Pallarés FJ, Carrasco L, et al. The jigsaw of PRRSV virulence. Vet Microbiol. 2021;260:109168. pmid:34246042
- 3. Du T, Nan Y, Xiao S, Zhao Q, Zhou E-M. Antiviral strategies against PRRSV infection. Trends Microbiol 2017;25(12):968–79. pmid:28652073
- 4. An T-Q, Li J-N, Su C-M, Yoo D. Molecular and cellular mechanisms for PRRSV pathogenesis and host response to infection. Virus Res. 2020;286:197980. pmid:32311386
- 5. Zhou L, Wang Z, Ding Y, Ge X, Guo X, Yang H. NADC30-like strain of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, China. Emerg Infect Dis 2015;21(12):2256–7. pmid:26584305
- 6. Zhao K, Ye C, Chang X-B, Jiang C-G, Wang S-J, Cai X-H, et al. Importation and recombination are responsible for the latest emergence of highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in China. J Virol 2015;89(20):10712–6. pmid:26246582
- 7. Guo Z, Chen X-X, Li R, Qiao S, Zhang G. The prevalent status and genetic diversity of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in China: a molecular epidemiological perspective. Virol J 2018;15(1):2. pmid:29301547
- 8. Zhang Q, Jiang P, Song Z, Lv L, Li L, Bai J. Pathogenicity and antigenicity of a novel NADC30-like strain of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus emerged in China. Vet Microbiol. 2016;197:93–101. pmid:27938690
- 9. Kim HS, Kwang J, Yoon IJ, Joo HS, Frey ML. Enhanced replication of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus in a homogeneous subpopulation of MA-104 cell line. Arch Virol. 1993;133(3–4):477–83. pmid:8257302
- 10. Takada Y, Ye X, Simon S. The integrins. Genome Biol 2007;8(5):215. pmid:17543136
- 11. Berman AE, Kozlova NI, Morozevich GE. Integrins: structure and signaling. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2003;68(12):1284–99. pmid:14756624
- 12. Sun L, Guo S, Xie Y, Yao Y. The characteristics and the multiple functions of integrin β1 in human cancers. J Transl Med. 2023;21(1):787. pmid:37932738
- 13. Pang X, He X, Qiu Z, Zhang H, Xie R, Liu Z, et al. Targeting integrin pathways: mechanisms and advances in therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023;8(1):1. pmid:36588107
- 14. Isomursu A, Lerche M, Taskinen ME, Ivaska J, Peuhu E. Integrin signaling and mechanotransduction in regulation of somatic stem cells. Exp Cell Res 2019;378(2):217–25. pmid:30817927
- 15. Schwartz AD, Hall CL, Barney LE, Babbitt CC, Peyton SR. Integrin α6 and EGFR signaling converge at mechanosensitive calpain 2. Biomaterials. 2018;178:73–82. pmid:29909039
- 16. Stasiak AC, Stehle T. Human adenovirus binding to host cell receptors: a structural view. Med Microbiol Immunol 2020;209(3):325–33. pmid:31784892
- 17. Izmailyan R, Hsao J-C, Chung C-S, Chen C-H, Hsu PW-C, Liao C-L, et al. Integrin β1 mediates vaccinia virus entry through activation of PI3K/Akt signaling. J Virol. 2012;86(12):6677–87. pmid:22496232
- 18. Yang C, Zuo Q, Liu X, Zhao Q, Pu H, Gao L, et al. Small molecule screening identified cepharanthine as an inhibitor of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection in vitro by suppressing integrins/ILK/RACK1/PKCα/NF-κB signalling axis. Vet Microbiol. 2021;255109016. pmid:33677370
- 19. Zeller KS, Idevall-Hagren O, Stefansson A, Velling T, Jackson SP, Downward J, et al. PI3-kinase p110α mediates β1 integrin-induced Akt activation and membrane protrusion during cell attachment and initial spreading. Cell Signal. 2010;22(12):1838–48. pmid:20667469
- 20. Chen S, He T, Zhong Y, Chen M, Yao Q, Chen D, et al. Roles of focal adhesion proteins in skeleton and diseases. Acta Pharm Sin B 2023;13(3):998–1013. pmid:36970189
- 21. Nader GPF, Ezratty EJ, Gundersen GG. FAK, talin and PIPKIγ regulate endocytosed integrin activation to polarize focal adhesion assembly. Nat Cell Biol. 2016;18(5):491–503. pmid:27043085
- 22. Guidetti GF, Torti M, Canobbio I. Focal adhesion kinases in platelet function and thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2019;39(5):857–68. pmid:30894012
- 23. Te Molder L, Kreft M, Heemskerk N, Schuring J, de Pereda JM, Wilhelmsen K, et al. EGFR-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of integrin β4 is not required for downstream signaling events in cancer cell lines. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8675. pmid:33883672
- 24. Qu H, Tu Y, Guan J-L, Xiao G, Wu C. Kindlin-2 tyrosine phosphorylation and interaction with SRC serve as a regulatable switch in the integrin outside-in signaling circuit. J Biol Chem 2014;289(45):31001–13. pmid:25237194
- 25. Huang Y, Zhao H, Zhang Y, Tang Y, Shi X, Jiang S, et al. Enhancement of Zyxin promotes skin fibrosis by regulating FAK/PI3K/AKT and TGF-β signaling pathways via integrins. Int J Biol Sci. 2023;19(8):2394–408. pmid:37215989
- 26. Engelman JA, Luo J, Cantley LC. The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat Rev Genet 2006;7(8):606–19. pmid:16847462
- 27. Planas-Rigol E, Terrades-Garcia N, Corbera-Bellalta M, Lozano E, Alba MA, Segarra M, et al. Endothelin-1 promotes vascular smooth muscle cell migration across the artery wall: a mechanism contributing to vascular remodelling and intimal hyperplasia in giant-cell arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76(9):1624–34. pmid:28606962
- 28. Dong W, Li J, Zhuang Z. Deciphering the prognostic significance of anoikis-related lncRNAs in invasive breast cancer: from comprehensive bioinformatics analysis to functional experimental validation. Aging (Albany NY) 2024;16(1):402–30. pmid:38189818
- 29. Paik J-Y, Ko B-H, Jung K-H, Lee K-H. Fibronectin stimulates endothelial cell 18F-FDG uptake through focal adhesion kinase-mediated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling. J Nucl Med 2009;50(4):618–24. pmid:19289426
- 30. Ni B, Wen L-B, Wang R, Hao H-P, Huan C-C, Wang X, et al. The involvement of FAK-PI3K-AKT-Rac1 pathway in porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus entry. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2015;458(2):392–8. pmid:25660453
- 31. Metlapally R, Jobling AI, Gentle A, McBrien NA. Characterization of the integrin receptor subunit profile in the mammalian sclera. Mol Vis. 2006;12:725–34. pmid:16862067
- 32. Luo B-H, Carman CV, Springer TA. Structural basis of integrin regulation and signaling. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25619–47. pmid:17201681
- 33. Xiong J-P, Stehle T, Zhang R, Joachimiak A, Frech M, Goodman SL, et al. Crystal structure of the extracellular segment of integrin alpha Vbeta3 in complex with an Arg-Gly-Asp ligand. Science. 2002;296:151–5.
- 34. Zhang Z-W, Ansari AR, Dong L, Niu X-Y, Yang W-J, Li H-Z, et al. Alterations in the expression level of visfatin in the lungs of piglets infected with PRRSV and its effect on PRRSV replication. Microb Pathog. 2022;164:105443. pmid:35150869
- 35. Li C, Zhao J, Li W, Xu H, Gong B, Sun Q, et al. Prevalence and genetic evolution of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in commercial fattening pig farms in China. Porcine Health Manag 2024;10(1):5. pmid:38254191
- 36. Tong T, Tang W, Xiao S, Liang J. Antiviral effects of heparan sulfate analogue-modified two-dimensional MXene nanocomposites on PRRSV and SARS-CoV-2. Adv Nanobiomed Res 2022;2(10):2200067. pmid:36249178
- 37. Su C-M, Rowland RRR, Yoo D. Recent advances in PRRS virus receptors and the targeting of receptor-ligand for control. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9:354.
- 38. Jiang Y, Khan FA, Pandupuspitasari NS, Kadariya I, Cheng Z, Ren Y, et al. Analysis of the binding sites of porcine sialoadhesin receptor with PRRSV. Int J Mol Sci 2013;14(12):23955–79. pmid:24351868
- 39. Downward J. PI 3-kinase, Akt and cell survival. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2004;15(2):177–82. pmid:15209377
- 40. Pawelek JM, Chakraborty AK. The cancer cell–leukocyte fusion theory of metastasis. Adv Cancer Res. 2008;101:397–444. pmid:19055949
- 41. You X, Liu M, Liu Q, Li H, Qu Y, Gao X, et al. miRNA let-7 family regulated by NEAT1 and ARID3A/NF-κB inhibits PRRSV-2 replication in vitro and in vivo. PLoS Pathog. 2022;18(10):e1010820. pmid:36215225
- 42. Delrue I, Van Gorp H, Van Doorsselaere J, Delputte PL, Nauwynck HJ. Susceptible cell lines for the production of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by stable transfection of sialoadhesin and CD163. BMC Biotechnol. 2010;10:48. pmid:20587060