Figures
Abstract
In order to study the optimal use of Lactobacillus plantarum in sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicus), 49 days feeding trial was conducted to determine the influence of immersion bathing in different concentrations of Lactobacillus plantarum CLY-05 on body weight gain rate and non-specific immune activities. The potential effect of CLY-05 on gut microbiota was also analyzed during the immersion bathing at the optimum concentration. The results showed that the body weight growth rate of all bathing groups was higher than that of control. The highest specific growth rate (4.58%) and weight gain rate (25.35%) was achieved at the bacterial concentration of 1×103 CFU/mL. The activities of non-specific immune enzymes (ACP, AKP, SOD and LZM) of all bathing groups increased after immersion bathing, and the enzyme activities of groups bathed with the bacterium at 1×103 and 1×104 CFU/mL reached the highest. Therefore, 1×103 CFU/mL was considered as the optimum concentration of L. plantarum CLY-05 for A. japonicus pond culture. The results of gut microbiota analysis showed that the gut microbiota changed with the addition of L. plantarum CLY-05, and the richness and diversity of the gut microbiota peaked on day 14 and day 21, respectively. The correlation analysis revealed that the non-specific immune enzyme activities were significantly correlated to some gut bacteria (in the phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes) after immersion bathing in L. plantarum CLY-05. These findings provide the theoretical foundation for probiotic application in sea cucumber farming.
Citation: Li B, Wang J, Ge J, Liao M, Rong X, Wang J, et al. (2024) Effects of immersion bathing in Lactobacillus plantarum CLY-05 on the growth performance, non-specific immune enzyme activities and gut microbiota of Apostichopus japonicus. PLoS ONE 19(12): e0315780. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315780
Editor: Mohammed Fouad El Basuini, Tanta University Faculty of Agriculture, EGYPT
Received: September 7, 2024; Accepted: December 1, 2024; Published: December 27, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.
Funding: This research was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFD2401705), Key R&D Program of Shandong Province, China (2023CXGC010410) and Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, CAFS (2023TD29).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
1. Introduction
The sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus is naturally distributed in the Western North Pacific Ocean and is one of the most valuable sea foods worldwide. Sea cucumber is rather prevalent among the customers because it’s superior nutrition, health care and anti-cancer effects, which is a kind of marine organism with a homology of medicine and food [1]. The aquaculture sector is exploding due to the rapid demand for sea cucumbers, and production is rising every year. According to official statistical data from China, the aquaculture area for sea cucumbers has increased to 2.89×105 hm2, with an annual production of up to 2.92×105 t in 2023 However, the rapid development of the A. japonicus industry has led to emerging issues such as germplasm degradation and a decline in seedling survival rates. At the same time, the aquaculture industry of sea cucumbers is plagued by severe illnesses brought on by numerous pathogens, including Vibrio splendidus, Vibrio alginolyticus, and others [2–4]. Antibiotics and chemicals were once widely used to treat illnesses, but their extensive usage is now becoming progressively limited because of potential environmental risks include the growth of pathogens that are resistant to antibiotics, environmental contamination, and residue buildup in seafood [5]. Therefore, Probiotics have gained increasing interest in aquaculture as efficient and environmentally acceptable alternatives to antibiotics and pesticides.
A type of common gram-positive bacteria called lactic acid bacteria can produce phenyl lactic acid, cyclic dipeptides, H2O2, antibacterial peptides, and other substances during the metabolic process to prevent pathogens and spoilage bacteria from growing and reproducing in aquaculture products [6, 7]. Now the use value of lactic acid bacteria is attracting increasing attention that it may help an animal’s digestion and increase its ability to resist disease [8, 9]. It was discovered that Lactobacillus plantarum supplementation diet significantly improved the growth rates and α-amylase and trypsin activities of the liver in zebrafish [10]. Tseng et al. [11] found non-specific immunity, immune-related gene expression, and disease resistance of white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) were significantly increased by feeding the fodder containing 105 CFU/pre shrimp of L. plantarum. for 14~2l days. However, the use of lactic acid bacteria in sea cucumber production is restricted, and there is not much understanding about how it affects the gut microbiota. Our team’s previous research found that a local probiotic strain (L. plantarum CLY-05) isolated from the sediment of A. japonicus farming ponds had a strong inhibitory effect on the growth of Pseudoalteromonas nigrifaciens and V. splendidus. However, the ideal application dosage of L. plantarum CLY-05 and its potential impact on sea cucumbers remain unknown. Therefore, the effects of different concentrations of L. plantarum CLY-05 on sea cucumber growth, non-specific immune enzyme activities, and intestinal microbiota were studied in this research in order to determine the best dosage of lactic acid bacteria to add to the A. japonicus culture and how that would affect the organism’s daily activities. Our findings would serve as a basis for the sensible application of the probiotic L. plantarum CLY-05 in the breeding of A. japonicus.
2. Materials and methods
2.1 Experimental design
Sea cucumber juveniles in good health, weighing 8.7 ± 0.6 g on average, were purchased from a culture company in Qingdao, China. In four plastic containers (83 cm × 64 cm × 60 cm) filled with clean seawater, the sea cucumbers were acclimated for three days. The CLY-05 strain, which was defined in our prior investigation, was screened out of A. japonicus farming ponds for use in the experiment. By analyzing the 16S rDNA sequence, the CLY-05 strain was identified as L. plantarum, and the safety test confirmed that it did not cause viscera ejection, disease symptoms, or mortality of sea cucumber. L. plantarum CLY-05 bathing concentrations of 1×102, 1×103, 1×104, 1×105, 1×106 and 1×107 CFU/mL were used in the experimental groups. Each group consists of three duplicates, each with 60 sea cucumbers chosen at random. Three tanks were utilized as the control group simultaneously, but none of them contained L. plantarum CLY-05. The experiment was done in 35 L of seawater in plastic tanks. The temperature was kept at 16 ± 2°C, pH at 7.6–8.2, dissolved oxygen at 7±1mg/L for the duration of the experiment, which lasted 49 days, and 1/5 of the seawater’s volume was replaced daily. After replacing the sea water, L. plantarum CLY-05 bacteria were added. The feed was given to the sea cucumbers at 1% of their overall weight with sea mud and seaweed powder [12].
Every seven days, three individuals from each group were randomly selected, intestinal contents used for microbiota analysis and coelom fluids used for for non-specific immune enzyme activities analysis. Using a disposable syringe, the coelom fluids were removed, then centrifuged for 10 min at 5,000 rpm and 4°C. After that, the supernatants were put into sterile centrifuge tubes so that the activity of non-specific immune enzymes could be measured. The sea cucumber’s intestines were put in cryopreserved tubes and kept in a refrigerator at -80°C to facilitate a later study of the microbiota [12].
2.2 Growth determination of A. japonicus
Every A. japonicus was weighed on days 0 and 49, and the average weight for each group was determined. The Specific growth rate (SGR) and body weight gain rate (WGR)were calculated as follows:
W0, the initial body weight,
Wt, the final body weight.
2.3 Measurement of non-specific immune enzyme activities
We chosen the superoxide dismutase (SOD), enzymes acid phosphatase (ACP), lysozyme (LZM) and alkaline phosphatase (AKP) to depict the non-specific immune enzymes. The enzyme activities of coelom fluids were assessed spectrophotometrically using enzyme activity test kits (A001-3, A060-2, A050-1, A059-2, Nanjing Jiancheng, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
2.4 Analysis of gut microbiota structure
The E.Z.N.A. soil DNA Kit (Omega Biotek, U.S.) was utilized to extract total genomic DNA from intestinal tissues. By denaturing at 95°C for 2 min, using 25 cycles of denaturing at 98°C for 10 s, annealing at 60°C for 30 s, extending at 72°C for 30 s, and extending again at 72°C for 10 min, the hypervariable region V3–V4 of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR. Primers 341F (5’-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3’) and 806R (5’-GGACTACHVGGGTATCTAAT-3’) were used for amplification. The amplified products were purified and sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq 2500 platform by PE250 [12].
To obtain high quality clean readings, raw data that contained adapters or low quality reads was filtered. Using FLSAH (v.1.2.11) [13], paired end clean reads were combined as raw tags with a minimal overlap of 10 bp and 2% mismatch error rates. The high-quality clean tags were then obtained from the raw tags using the QIIME software program (v.1.9.1) [14]. In order to obtained a set of effective tags, identify and eliminate chimeric sequences, the tags were compared to the reference database (http://drive5.com/uchime/uchime_download.html) using the UCHIME method (http://www.drive5.com/usearch/manual/uchime_algo.html) [15]. the effective tags were sorted into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using the UPARSE pipeline (v.9.2.64). A naive Bayesian model based on Greengenes Database (https://www.arb-silva.de/) [16] and RDP classifier (Version 2.2) [17] was used to classify the representative sequences into species. Using the QIIME (v.1.9.1), the Chao1, Ace, Shannon and Simpson index were determined.
2.5 Correlation analysis between enzyme activity and OUT abudance
We used the Cloud platform (https://international.biocloud.net) to analyse the relationship between OTU abundance of gut and enzyme activity of coelom fluids. Greengenes database (https://www.arb-silva.de/) were used to assign OTUs chosen and phyla analysis.
2.6 Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviations (SD). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine the significance of difference among groups. Duncan’s multiple range test was used to compare the significance of difference among treatments. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0.
3. Results
3.1 Growth performance
For all groups, there was no mortality seen. In Table 1, the A. japonicus body specific growth rate and weight gain rate for each experimental group is listed. The results demonstrated that the SGR and WGR of each experimental group was higher than the control group’s. In comparison to other groups, the SGR and WGR of the 1 × 102 CFU/mL, 1 × 103 CFU/mL and 1 × 104 CFU/mL groups was substantially greater (p <0.05). The 1 × 103 CFU/mL group’s growth rate had the highest SGR(4.58%) and WGR (25.35%).
3.2 Non-specific immune enzyme activities
In order to study the effects of immersion bathing concentrations of L. plantarum CLY-05 on A. japonicus, we analyzed the enzyme activity of A. japonicus in different groups (Fig 1). All immune enzyme activity had no discernible variation between groups at experiment’s initial day. All non-specific immune enzyme activities of experiment groups typically increased at the beginning and reduced at the end of the L. plantarum CLY-05 treatment, but they were consistently greater than the control throughout. ACP activity increased in the 1 × 103 and 1 × 104 CFU/mL groups on day 21, peaking at a level that was significantly higher than that of the other groups (Fig 1a; P < 0.05). The AKP activity was consistently higher, with the highest activity occurring on day 28 in the 1×103 CFU/mL and 1 × 104 CFU/mL groups (Fig 1b). From day 14 to day 28, the LZM activity of the 1 × 103 CFU/mL group peaked, and on day 28, it was notably higher than that of the other groups (Fig 1c; P < 0.05). On day 28, the SOD activity in the 1×103 CFU/mL group peaked and was considerably higher than that in the other groups (Fig 1d; P < 0.05). These findings demonstrated that the addition of L. plantarum CLY-05 increased the non-specific immune enzyme activities of A. japonicus, with the strongest effects being seen in the 1×103 and 1×104 CFU/mL groups.
(a)activity of ACP, (b) activity of AKP, (c)activity of LZM, (d)activity of SOD.
3.3 Gut microbiota analyses
The optimal concentration of L. plantarum CLY-05 for A. japonicus pond culture was determined to be 1 × 103 CFU/mL based on growth performance and enzyme activities. After the immersion bathing experiment, 16S rRNA sequencing analysis was used to assess the impact of L. plantarum CLY-05 in different immersion bathing time. Through the analysis of intestinal flora structure characteristics of 8 time nodes, it was found that the bacteria detected in 24 samples belonged to 18 phyla, 36 classes, 68 orders, 131 families and 211 genera. The top 10 microflora in each group at phylum level were selected to construct the intestinal flora abundance map of A. japonicus (Fig 2). The results showed that the three phyla with the highest relative abundance in each group were Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicrobia, and the relative abundance on 0d, 7d, 14d, 21d, 28d, 35d, 42d and 49d were 47.02%, 36.95%, 9.04%; 36.96%, 51.08%, 6.07%; 52.43%, 31.95%, 11.47%; 37.52%, 37.02%, 14.59%; 44.74%, 31.57%, 18.11%; 55.28%, 16.61%, 14.64%; 62.81%, 28.18%, 4.60%; 37.50%, 27.08%, 31.90 respectively.
The intestine of A. japonicus had the highest bacterial richness on day 14 (Table 2), was indicated through the Ace and Chao1 peaks occurring on day 14. The Shannon index peaked on day 21, indicating that following immersion bathing in L. plantarum CLY-05, the intestine’s biodiversity had reached its highest level.
3.4 Correlation analysis between enzyme activities and the abundance of OTUs
In order to study the correlation between enzyme activities and the abundance of OTUs, specific OTUs were screened and a line chart of enzyme activities and OTUs was constructed (Fig 3), then, the specific OTUs are annotated (Table 3). A total of four OUTs were chosen (OTU772, OTU150, OTU485 and OTU028) that had a strong association with enzyme activity. With a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.80, OTU772 showed a positive connection with ACP activity (P < 0.05). The Pearson correlation coefficient for OTU150 and AKP activity was -0.86, and the connection was negatively associated (P < 0.01). OTU485 and LZM activity were positively associated (P < 0.05), and the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.81. The correlation between OTU28 and SOD activity is negative (P <0.01), with Pearson correlation coefficient value was -0.88. OTU772 was annotated to Proteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria, Bdellovibrionales, Bacteriovoracaceae. OTU150 was annotated to Firmicutes, Bacilli, Bacillales, Bacillaceae. OTU485 was annotated to Proteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Alteromonadales, Idiomarinaceae. OTU028 was annotated to Proteobacteria, Epsilonproteobacteria, Campylobacterales, Campylobacteraceae.
4. Discussion
Lactic acid bacteria are the most commonly used probiotics, which can improve the nutritional value of feed, enhance host resistance to disease, or improve the quality of the ambient environment to modify the host associated or ambient microbial community [18, 19]. L. plantarum is a type of classical anaerobic lactobacillus bacteria in intestine [20], which has been reported of good probiotic properties [21, 22]. In this study, different concentrations of L. plantarum CLY-05 were added to the sea cucumber aquaculture water, and it turned out that the WGR of the experimental groups was higher than the control group, and the probiotic effect was related to the dosage. Those results were consistent with many previous studies [23–25]. L. plantarum is known to produce proteolytic and glycoside hydrolase enzymes that aid protein and carbohydrate digestion, therefore, improve the digestibility and nutritional value of feed [26–28]. This may be one of the reasons why L. plantarum promotes the growth of sea cucumbers.
It was reported that L. plantarum could accelerate the production of IgA and enhance the immunity level of the hosts [22, 29]. Chiu et al. [30] reported that administration of L. plantarum induced immune modulation, enhanced the immune ability, and increased resistance to Vibrio alginolyticus of Litopenaeus vannamei. Valipour et al. [22] reported that the phenoloxidase (PO), lysozyme (LYZ), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activity of narrow clawed crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus) were increased after dietary feeding of L. plantarum in 107 or 108 CFU/g. In this study, we also found that L. plantarum CLY-05 could improve the non-specific immunity of the sea cucumbers, so it is worthy studying the application of L. plantarum CLY-05 in the control of sea cucumber diseases.
The type, abundance and structure of intestinal flora play a decisive role in intestinal function. There were mounts of bacteria in the digestive tract, which develop an interdependence and mutual control relationship with host. Lactic acid bacteria could inhibit the growth and reproduction of the pathogen, and interact with gastrointestinal mucosa immunity system to maintain the microbiology balance in the gut [31]. Ramos et al. [32] found that fed Oncorhynchus mykiss with probiotics could improve the gut microbiota diversity. Purwandari et al. [33] found that the Bacillus subtilis could promote the body weight and improve the gut microbiota diversity of the Epinephelus. coioides. In this study, the usage of 1×103 CFU/mL L. plantarum CLY-05 put the gut microbiota of sea cucumber into dynamic process. The richness and diversity of the gut microbiota peaked at the day 14 and day 21 after immersion bathing in L. plantarum. Therefore, L. plantarum affected the composition of the sea cucumber gut micrbiota in the relative abundance, which maybe the reason for growth and immunity improvement.
Studies in vitro cell, animal models and clinical trials had demonstrated that intestinal bacteria could maintain the integrity of intestinal barrier and affected the intestinal barrier function [34]. In this study, correlation analysis revealed that after immersion bathing in L. Plantarum, the change of non-specific immune enzyme activities of sea cucumbers had significantly correlation, and mainly focused on the phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. Relevant studies have shown that some of the microorganisms in Firmicutes can promote the fermentation of carbohydrates and the decomposition of proteins, thus contributing to the healthy growth of organisms [35]. In this study, the association between gut microbiota and enzyme activity of A. japonicus after bathing in L. plantarum CLY-05 was analyzed, and 4 OTUs were screened to have a strong correlation with enzyme activity. The main pathogenic bacteria of ‘skin ulcer syndrome’ for A. japonicus which were P. nigrifaciens, V. splendidus, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. alginolyticus, were belong to the phyla of Proteobacteria. Lactic acid bacteria can inhibit the growth of pathogen by fostering healthy intestine [36, 37], this maybe be reason that the gut microbiota changed since the L. plantarum CLY-05 was added.
5. Conclusion
The results suggested that the ideal addition concentration of L. plantarum CLY-05 was 1×103 CFU/mL, and that its addition could improve the specific growth rate, increase the non-specific immune enzyme activity, optimize the structure of the intestinal flora, and increase the diversity of the intestinal flora of A. japonicus. The results of this study provide scientific data support for the industrial application of L. plantarum in sea cucumber culture, and contribute to the industrial application of probiotics, so as to promote the development of sea cucumber culture industry.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute for support of this study.
References
- 1. Santoso S, Nusraningrum D, Hadibrata B, Widyanty W, Isa SM, Henny YA. Policy Recommendation for Food Security in Indonesia: Fish and Sea Cucumber Protein Hydrolysates Innovation Based. European Journal of Business and Management. 2021; 13(7): 71–73.
- 2. Fahm NM, Hamed ESAE. Isolation and characterization of Vibrio alginolyticus strain HAT3 causing skin ulceration disease in cultured sea cucumber Holothuria atra (Jaeger, 1833). Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research. 2022; 48(1): 75–81.
- 3. Zhang Z, Liu Y, Wang ZY, Wang ZH, Zhou J, Han JJ, et al. Investigating of the microbial communities in a red circle disease of sea cucumber based on metagenomic sequencing. Aquaculture Reports. 2023; 28: 101445.
- 4. Kudo K, Yamano R, Yu JW, Hatakeyama S, Jiang CQ, Mino S, et al. The Description of Pseudoalteromonas apostichopi sp. nov., Vibrio apostichopi sp. nov., and Marinobacter apostichopi sp. nov. from the Fertilized Eggs and Larvae of Apostichopus japonicus. Current Microbiology. 2024; 81(8): 246. pmid:38940874
- 5. Samreen , Ahmad I, Malak HA, Abulreesh HH. Environmental antimicrobial resistance and its drivers: a potential threat to public health. Environmental antimicrobial resistance and its drivers: a potential threat to public health. 2021; 27: 101–111. pmid:34454098
- 6. Harper AR, Dobson RCJ, Morris VK, Moggré GJ. Fermentation of plant-based dairy alternatives by lactic acid bacteria. Microbial Biotechnology. 2022; 15(5): 1404–1421. pmid:35393728
- 7. Čanak I, Kostelac D, Jakopović Ž, Markov K, Frece J. Lactic Acid Bacteria of Marine Origin as a Tool for Successful Shellfish Farming and Adaptation to Climate Change Conditions. Foods. 2024; 13(7):1042. pmid:38611348
- 8. Mohamad N, Manan H, Sallehhuddin M, Musa N, Ikhwanuddin M. Screening of Lactic Acid Bacteria isolated from giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) as potential probiotics. Aquaculture Reports. 2020; 18(22): 100523.
- 9. Guo GX, Li C, Xia B, Jiang SH. The efficacy of lactic acid bacteria usage in turbot Scophthalmus maximus on intestinal microbiota and expression of the immune related genes. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2020; 100: 90–97. pmid:32145449
- 10. Liu RZ, Huang YL, Chen Y, Huang DL, Zhao ZX, He TL, et al. Lactobacillus plantarum E2 regulates intestinal microbiota and alleviates Pseudomonas plecoglossicida induced inflammation and apoptosis in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Fish & Shellfish Immunollogy. 2023; 142: 109170. pmid:37852511
- 11. Tseng KC, Huang HT, Huang SN, Yang FY, Li WH, Nan FH, et al. Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from kefir enhances immune responses and survival of white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) challenged with Vibrio alginolyticus. Fish & Shellfish Immunollogy. 2023; 135: 108661. pmid:36906049
- 12. Wang JY, Li B, Wang YG, Liao MJ, Rong XJ, Zhang Z. Influences of Immersion Bathing in Bacillus Velezensis DY-6 On Growth Performance, Non-Specific Immune Enzyme Activities and Gut Microbiota of Apostichopus Japonicus. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2019; 37 (4): 1449–1459.
- 13. Magoc T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27(21): 2957–2963. pmid:21903629
- 14. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature Methods. 2010; 7 (5): 335–336. pmid:20383131
- 15. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27(16): 2194–2200. pmid:21700674
- 16. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2006; 72(7): 5069–5072. pmid:16820507
- 17. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007; 73(16): 5261–5267. pmid:17586664
- 18. Zhang WW, Li CH, Guo M. Use of ecofriendly alternatives for the control of bacterial infection in aquaculture of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Aquaculture. 2021; 545(4): 737185.
- 19. Liu LZ, Liu Y, Qin GC, Wei C, Li YM, Cui L, et al. Evaluation of regulatory capacity of three lactic acid bacteria on the growth performance, non-specific immunity, and intestinal microbiota of the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Aquaculture. 2024; 579: 740156.
- 20. Wang QD, Wang RX, Wang CY, Dong WZ, Zhang ZX, Zhao LP, et al. Effects of Cellulase and Lactobacillus plantarum on Fermentation Quality, Chemical Composition, and Microbial Community of Mixed Silage of Whole-Plant Corn and Peanut Vines. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2022; 194: 2465–2480. pmid:35132520
- 21. Jiang ML, Zhang F, Wan CX, Xiong YH, Shah NP, Wei H, et al. Evaluation of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus plantarum WLPL04 isolated from human breast milk. Journal of Dairy Science. 2016; 99(3): 1736–1746. pmid:26805974
- 22. Valipour A, Nedaei S, Noori A, Khanipour AA, Hoseinifar SH. Dietary lactobacillus plantarum affected on some immune parameters, air-exposure stress response, intestinal microbiota, digestive enzyme activity and performance of narrow clawed crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus, Eschscholtz). Aquaculture. 2019; 504: 121–130.
- 23. Bahrami Z, Roomiani L, Javadzadeh N, Sary AA, Baboli MJ. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus plantarum in the alginate/chitosan improves immunity, disease resistance, and growth of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 2023; 49: 815–828. pmid:37500968
- 24. Doan HV, Hoseinifar SH, Tapingkae W, Seel-Audom M, Jaturasitha S, Dawood MAO, et al. Boosted Growth Performance, Mucosal and Serum Immunity, and Disease Resistance Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Fingerlings Using Corncob-Derived Xylooligosaccharide and Lactobacillus plantarum CR1T5. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins. 2020; 12: 400–411. pmid:31119583
- 25. Wang C, Hu XD, Tang HJ, Ge W, Di LJ, Zou JX, et al. Multiple effects of dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus reuteri and Bacillus subtilis on the growth, immunity, and metabolism of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Developmental and Comparative Immunology. 2024; 160: 105241. pmid:39121939
- 26. Cebeci A, Gurakan C. Properties of potential probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum trains. Food Microbiology. 2003; 20(5): 511–518.
- 27. Macedo AC, Tavares TG, Malcata FX. Purification and characterization of an intracellular aminopeptidase from a wild strain of lactobacillus plantarum isolated from traditional Serra da Estrela cheese. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2003; 32(1): 41–48.
- 28. Marathe MY, Ghosh JS. Study of proteinase activity of lactobacillus plantarum NCIM 2083. International Journal of Genetics and Molecular Biology. 2009; 1(1): 1–5. http://www.academicjournals.org/IJGMB.
- 29. Wu YQ, Jha R, Li A, Liu HW, Zhang Z, Zhang CC, et al. Probiotics (Lactobacillus plantarum HNU082) Supplementation Relieves Ulcerative Colitis by Affecting Intestinal Barrier Functions, Immunity-Related Gene Expression, Gut Microbiota, and Metabolic Pathways in Mice. Microbiology Spectrum. 2022; 10: e0165122. pmid:36321893
- 30. Chiu CH, Guu YK, Liu CH, Pan TM, Cheng W. Immune responses and gene expression in white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, induced by Lactobacillus plantarum. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2007; 23(2): 364–377. pmid:17337209
- 31. Zhang YP, Liang XF, He S, Feng HX, Li L. Dietary supplementation of exogenous probiotics affects growth performance and gut health by regulating gut microbiota in Chinese perch (Siniperca chuatsi). Aquaculture. 2022; 547: 737405.
- 32. Ramos MA, Weber B, Gonçalves JF, Santos GA, Rema P, Ozório ROA. Dietary probiotic supplementation modulated gut microbiota and improved growth of juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology. 2013; 166(2): 302–307. pmid:23811044
- 33. Purwandari AR, Chen HY. Effects of probiotic Bacillus subtilis on intestinal microbial diversity and immunity of orange spotted grouper Epinephelus coioides. Journal of Applied Biotechnology. 2013; 1(1): 25–36.
- 34. Li CZ, Liu ZQ, Yang SQ, Li WR, Liang B, Chen HY, et al. Causal relationship between gut microbiota, plasma metabolites, inflammatory cytokines and abdominal aortic aneurysm: a Mendelian randomization study. Clinical and Experimental Hypertension. 2024; 46(01): 2390419. pmid:39133866
- 35. Kong YD, Li M, Li RM, Shan XF, Wang GQ. Evaluation of Cholesterol Lowering Property and Antibacterial Activity of Two Potential Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated From the Intestine of Snakehead Fish (Channa Argus). Aquaculture Reports. 2020; 17: 100342.
- 36. Foysal MJ, Fotedar R, Siddik MAB, Chaklader MR, Tay A. Lactobacillus plantarum in black soldier fly (Hermetica illucens) meal modulates gut health and immunity of freshwater crayfish (Cherax cainii). Fish & Shellfish Immunollogy. 2021; 108: 42–52. pmid:33232807
- 37. Sagada G, Wang L, Xu BY, Sun YX, Shao QJ. Interactive Effect of Dietary Heat-Killed Lactobacillus Plantarum L-137 and Berberine Supplementation on Intestinal Mucosa and Microbiota of Juvenile Black Sea Bream (Acanthopagrus Schlegelii). Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2023. pmid:37740880