Figures
Abstract
In the arid landscapes of the Arabian Peninsula, high levels of cryptic diversity among reptiles, and especially in geckos, have recently been revealed. Mountain ranges within the peninsula were shown to contain the highest richness of reptile endemicity, serving as refugia to species less adapted to the hyper-arid conditions of the lowlands. With up to 19 endemic reptile species, the Hajar Mountains of southeastern Arabia are a clear example of this pattern. Owing to its old geological history, complex topography and geographic isolation from the rest of the peninsula, this mountain range rises as a hotspot of reptile biodiversity and endemicity in Arabia, and provides the perfect scenario to study the processes of evolution and diversification of reptiles in arid mountain ranges. In the present study we investigate the systematics of the Pristurus rupestris species complex, a group of geckos exhibiting cryptic morphological traits along with a remarkably deep evolutionary history. Initially considered a single species distributed throughout coastal Arabia, and with some scattered populations at the Horn of Africa, several recent studies have shown that Pristurus rupestris actually comprises a species complex restricted to the Hajar Mountains of southeastern Arabia. Here, we utilize an integrative approach assembling several morphological, genetic, genomic, and ecological datasets to resolve this long-standing systematic challenge. Results support the existence of four new cryptic Pristurus species in the Hajar Mountains with three new Oman endemics. While no unique diagnostic morphological characters were identified, some slight morphological differences occur between species, especially among high-elevation species relative to the rest. Despite the lack of clear morphological differentiation, extreme levels of genetic variation were found between species with genetic distances of up to 24% in the 12S mitochondrial marker, resulting from deep divergence times of up to 10 mya. Moreover, all species have been found in sympatry with at least another representative of the species complex and without any signs of apparent and ongoing gene flow among them. These findings yield profound implications for conservation efforts, as one of these newly described species presents an extremely restricted distribution (only known from a single locality and three individuals), requiring immediate attention for protection. Overall, this study sheds light on the hidden diversity within the P. rupestris species complex, emphasizing the importance of preserving biodiversity in the face of ongoing environmental changes, while highlighting, once again, the Hajar Mountains of southeastern Arabia as a cradle of reptile biodiversity.
Citation: Burriel-Carranza B, Koppetsch T, Tabares J, Talavera A, Mochales-Riaño G, Estarellas M, et al. (2025) Cryptic speciation in arid mountains: An integrative revision of the Pristurus rupestris species complex (Squamata, Sphaerodactylidae) from Arabia based on morphological, genetic and genomic data, with the description of four new species. PLoS ONE 20(2): e0315000. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000
Editor: Ulrich Joger, State Museum of Natural History, GERMANY
Received: April 9, 2024; Accepted: November 6, 2024; Published: February 24, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Burriel-Carranza et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. Molecular sequences are available from GenBank database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) and accession numbers are provided in Table 1.
Funding: This work was funded by grants PGC2018-098290-B-I00 (MCIU/AEI/FEDER, UE); PID2021-128901NB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and by ERDF, A way of making Europe; grant 2021 SGR 00751 from the Departament de Recerca i Universitats de la Generalitat de Catalunya, and the project Field Study for the Conservation of Reptiles in Oman, Ministry of Environment and Climate Affairs, Oman (Ref: 22412027) to SC. BB-C was funded by FPU grant from Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spain (FPU18/04742). AT is supported by “la Caixa” doctoral fellowship programme (LCF/BQ/DR20/11790007). GM-R was funded by an FPI grant from the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spain (PRE2019-088729). J.G.P. was supported by the program “Atracción de Talento Investigador Modalidad I” from the Spanish Comunidad de Madrid (2022-T1/AMB-24171); JŠ was supported by the Czech Science Foundation (GACR, project number 22-12757S), by the Charles University Research Centre program No. 204069, and by the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic (DKRVO 2024–2028/6.I.a, National Museum of the Czech Republic, 00023272). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Over the past two decades, considerable taxonomic efforts have been made to better understand the Arabian reptile fauna. This has led to the discovery and description of dozens of species endemic to the peninsula [1–16], reshaping our understanding of reptile species inhabiting arid environments. What was once considered an impoverished biome filled with homogeneous species with wide distributions has revealed to be a region teeming with hidden diversity. For instance, a recent review on Arabian squamates highlights the significance of mountain ranges in the peninsula as hotspots of reptile diversity and endemicity [17]. These mountains are dominated by local, sometimes ancient, radiations of closely related and narrow-ranging species [17]. In one of such hotspots, the Hajar Mountains of southeastern Arabia, a small but extremely abundant semaphore gecko of the genus Pristurus Rüppell, 1835, exemplifies one of these radiations: The Pristurus rupestris Blanford, 1874 species complex.
The genus Pristurus is distributed across the southern coast of Iran, Arabia, the Socotra Archipelago, and the northeastern African coast, with a single geographically isolated species occurring in Mauritania [18–20] (Fig 1A). With 28 recognized species [21, 22], this genus thrives as the most diverse group of mostly diurnal geckos inhabiting the arid regions of the Old World. Like many sphaerodactylid geckos, all Pristurus have elongated fingers lacking adhesive digital pads, femoral and preanal pores, and cloacal sacs and bones [19, 23–25]. Most of them evolved distinctive adaptations to warm and photopic environments such as round pupils and relatively small eyes, but their most distinct characteristic, which gave rise to their common name ’semaphore geckos’, is their particular visual signaling using their body and tail; the latter often raised or curled during intraspecific signaling [19, 25, 26].
Geographic map showing (A) the Pristurus rupestris species complex distribution (blue). (B) a regional topographic map of the Hajar Mountains of southeastern Arabia with the main topographic features highlighted; (C) map showing the entire distribution of the Pristurus genus (red) with the exception of an isolated species in Mauritania (P. adrarensis).
One particularly intricate group within the genus is the aforementioned Pristurus rupestris species complex, encompassing a variety of deep lineages with cryptic morphological traits [27]. Initially thought to be a single widespread taxon, “P. rupestris” was first recognized as polyphyletic through a taxonomic revision [18]. This led to its division into two clades: the Western Clade (which extends from coastal Southern Oman to Yemen, Western Saudi Arabia, and up to Jordan) temporarily named Pristurus sp 1 [18] and posteriorly assigned to P. guweirensis [22], and the Eastern Clade, which was restricted to the Hajar Mountains of southeastern Arabia and the coast of Iran, and maintained the nomen P. rupestris. Notably, subsequent molecular analyses revealed a cryptic species complex within the Arabian P. rupestris, characterized by up to 14 mitochondrial deep lineages with allopatric or parapatric distributions [27]. These findings were corroborated by a recent study on the endemic reptile fauna of the Hajar Mountains using genome-wide SNP data, with up to 12 nuclear deep lineages identified within the P. rupestris species complex [28].
In Arabia, the members of the P. rupestris species complex are endemic to the largest mountain range of southeastern Arabia, the Hajar Mountains, with scattered (and most probably introduced) populations outside the Hajar Mountains in the southeastern coast of Oman, on the northern United Arab Emirates (UAE) coast, from Sharjah to Abu Dhabi, and also in Qatar, Bahrain, and the eastern coast of Saudi Arabia. The Hajar Mountains have an old and complex geological history that dates back approximately 90 million years ago (mya) [29]. However, the current topography probably originated about 40 mya and was linked to the Arabian-Eurasian plate collision, with two secondary uplifts circa 15 and 6 mya that ended up fine tuning the current topography of this spectacular mountain range [29–32]. Nowadays, the Hajar Mountains are divided into three main mountain blocks: the Western, Central and Eastern Hajars (Fig 1B). The mountains reach up to 3,009 m above sea level (asl) in Jabal Shams, Jabal Akhdar, Central Hajars, but peaks above 2,000 m are found in all three mountain blocks. Therefore, they reach high enough elevations to significantly affect the local climate, representing the most climatically variable region in Oman and the UAE, with rainfall being considerably higher than their surrounding arid lowland regions to the South and West [26, 33, 34].
Due to its heterogeneous topography and geographic isolation from other mountain systems, the Hajar Mountains stand out as a hotspot of endemicity in Arabia, especially for reptiles [17, 26, 35]. With up to 19 described endemic species, the Hajar Mountains are home to a relatively high number of endemic squamates. Among them, we find one species of saw-scaled viper, Echis omanensis Babocsay, 2004; two lacertid species of the endemic genus Omanosaura, O. cyanura (Arnold, 1972) and O. jayakari (Boulenger, 1887); one species of agamid, Pseudotrapelus jensvindumi Melnikov, Ananjeva and Papenfuss, 2013; seven species of geckos of the genus Asaccus, A. montanus Gardner, 1994, A. gardneri Carranza, Simó-Riudalbas, Jayasinghe, Wilms and Els, 2016, A. caudivolvulus Arnold and Gardner, 1994, A. margaritae Carranza, Simó-Riudalbas, Jayasinghe, Wilms and Els, 2016, A. platyrhynchus Arnold and Gardner, 1994, A. arnoldi Simó-Riudalbas, Tarroso, Papenfuss, Al-Sariri and Carranza, 2018, and A. gallagheri Arnold, 1972; two species of geckos of the genus Hemidactylus, H. luqueorum Carranza and Arnold, 2012 and H. hajarensis Carranza and Arnold, 2012; two species of geckos of the genus Pristurus, P. gallagheri Arnold, 1986 and P. celerrimus Arnold, 1977; two species of geckos of the genus Ptyodactylus, P. orlovi Nazarov, Melnikov and Melnikova, 2013 and P. ruusaljibalicus Simó-Riudalbas, Metallinou, de Pous, Els, Jayasinghe, Péntek-Zakar, Wilms, Al-Saadi and Carranza, 2017; one species of gecko of the genus Trachydactylus, T. hajarensis (Arnold, 1980); and several candidate species assigned to the P. rupestris species complex [26–28, 33, 35].
Recent molecular studies have shown that cryptic species are not uncommon in this mountain range, as exemplified by both Ptyodactylus species [13], or by Asaccus gallagheri and A. arnoldi [14]. Moreover, analyses using genome-wide SNP data showed that the endemic reptile diversity is highly structured following the local topography of the mountain range, identifying up to 49 endemic deep lineages, usually found in allopatry or parapatry to other lineages of the same species [28]. The disparity between taxonomically described species diversity and the number of deep lineages identified provides a hint towards the levels of unrecognized, cryptic diversity still hidden within this mountain range. Such disparity was most apparent for P. rupestris geckos, where up to 12 deep lineages were identified [28]. Pristurus rupestris represents the second oldest and the most diverse group originating from a single colonization event in the Hajar Mountains, only comparable to the prolific species radiation of the second Hajar Mountain’s colonization of Asaccus (clade comprised by all Asaccus species mentioned above except for A. montanus; [28]). With respect to the latter, six species are currently recognized, while P. rupestris is still referred to as a single taxon.
However, discerning between the intertwined fine line of the Wallacean and Linnean shortfalls (that of our poor biogeographic and poor taxonomic knowledge respectively) when dealing with cryptic species constitutes a multifaceted endeavor. While the morphological uniformity of this complex conceals high levels of genetic diversity, the challenge still remains on where to set the threshold to discern intra- from interspecific variability. With the increasing availability of genome-wide data, several studies have raised concerns showing that Multispecies Coalescent (MSC) species delimitation methods tend to capture population splits rather than species-level divergence when using hundreds to thousands of SNPs [36–41]. Therefore, in the present work we implement an integrative approach analyzing morphological, genetic, genomic and ecological data to investigate in depth the nuances of cryptic speciation in this intricate species complex, aiming to resolve the systematics and diversification history of the P. rupestris species complex inhabiting the Hajar Mountains of Oman and the UAE. The results of our integrative analyses revealed four new species of Pristurus that are described herein, three of them endemic to Oman. Moreover, the findings on this taxonomic review are of paramount importance for effective conservation efforts since some of the herein described species exhibit restricted distributions (with one particular species restricted to a single locality), warranting immediate attention for protection. This study aims to contribute to a holistic understanding of the true diversity within the Pristurus rupestris species complex, and by extension, highlights the importance of balanced taxonomic assessments in the era of genomics and evolutionary insights.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
No in vivo experiments were performed. Specimens were collected and manipulated with the authorization and under strict control and permission of the governments of Oman (Environment Authority) and the United Arab Emirates (Environment and Protected Areas Authority, Government of Sharjah), who approved the study. Specimens were captured and processed following the guidelines and protocols stated in the collecting permits and agreements obtained from the competent authorities of Oman and the United Arab Emirates (see references below). Members of the government supervised collecting activities. All efforts were made to minimize animal suffering. All the necessary collecting and export permits for this study in Oman were issued by the Nature Conservation Department of the Ministry of Environment and Climate Affairs, Oman (currently Environment Authority) (Refs: 08/2005; 16/2008; 38/2010; 12/2011; 13/ 2013; 21/2013; 37/2014; 601 31/2016; 6210/10/21) and the research in the United Arab Emirates was done under the supervision and permission of the Environment and Protected Areas Authority, Government of Sharjah. This research is not institutional. As a result of the characteristics of this study and the total control and compliance with the laws, regulations and procedures of this kind of biodiversity studies in Oman and the United Arab Emirates, it did not need the approval of an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) or ethics committee.
Data collection
In the present work, we assess the morphological, genetic, genomic, and geographic variability within the Pristurus rupestris species complex, aiming at resolving a more than one-decade old taxonomic challenge. To achieve this, we gathered or generated the following data: i) 11 morphological linear measurements from 150 specimens extracted from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017 [27]; ii) μ-computer-tomography (μ-CT) scans from four specimens representing the holotypes of the new species of Pristurus described herein; iii) one mitochondrial gene from 173 specimens (115 extracted from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017 [27]; 58 sequenced in the present study); iv) Four nuclear genes from up to 75 specimens extracted from Garcia-Porta et al., 2017 [27]; v) genome-wide ddRADseq data from 173 specimens (available from Dryad repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.r7sqv9sj3) [28]; vi) Geographic data from 604 specimens [33, 34]. All specimens used in this study were collected or recorded between 2006 and 2016. Vouchers were preserved in 99% ethanol and stored at -20ºC. Tissues from specimens used in molecular analyses were tail tips stored in ethanol at -20ºC until DNA extraction.
Morphological analyses
We characterized the morphology of each candidate species by analyzing 11 different measurements from 150 adult Pristurus rupestris (data obtained from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017) [27]. Measurements characterized body size by measuring snout-vent length (SVL; measured from the snout to the cloaca); head length by measuring from the snout to the anterior ear border (HL), head width, taken at the anterior ear border (HW) and head height, taken laterally at the anterior ear border (HH in the present study; head depth, HD, in [27]); body proportions by measuring the trunk length as the distance between the internal parts of the fore and hind limb insertion points (TrL in the present study; axilla to groin length, AGL, in [27]); the body width at the level of the scapular and pelvic girdles (ASG and APG respectively); the forelimb proportions by measuring the humerous length from the elbow to the insertion of the forelimb on the anterior part of body (LHu in the present study; brachium length, BL, in [27]), the ulna length, measured from the wrist to the elbow (LUn in the present study; ante-brachium length, AL, in [27]); the hindlimb proportions by measuring the femur length from the knee to the insertion of the hindlimb on the posterior side of body (LFe in the present study; thigh length, TL, in [27]), and the tibia length measured from the ankle to the knee (LTb in the present study; crus length, CL, in [27]).
As morphological differentiation is negligible among sexes in this species complex [27], we pooled all specimens for subsequent analyses without accounting for sex. Then, data were log10 transformed to improve normality and homoscedasticity. Body size effect was removed by extracting the residuals from regressing the data on SVL. We then determined the morphospace with a Principal Component Analysis (PCA; ‘geomorph v.4.0.4’; [42]). Because all linear measurements were in commensurate units and of similar scale, we did not standardize the data prior to computing the PCA (see [43, 44]), in contrast to Garcia-Porta et al. [27]. We quantified the relative amount of shape variation with a Procrustes ANOVA using shape as a response variable and specimen assignment to each species described below as the independent variable (package ‘geomorph v.4.0.4’; [42]). Significance was estimated via distributions generated from a resampling of 1,000 permutations (package ‘geomorph v.4.0.4’; [42]). Then, we generated pairwise statistics for each pair of putative species interrogating differences on shape means between candidate species (package ‘RRPP’; [45, 46]). To account for multiple testing of the data, pairwise comparisons were evaluated at the Bonferroni-adjusted alpha = 0.05 (for 10 pairwise comparisons).
Additionally, we obtained osteological information from each holotype specimen by micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) scanning. We scanned each specimen with a Skyscan 1173 μ-CT (Bruker, Billerica / USA) at the Museum Koenig in Bonn, Germany. The specimens were firmly fixed with foam in 70% EtOH filled tubes that were glued on a stub before scanning. Scans were performed with the following parameters: Voltage: 49 kV; Current: 133 μA; Rotation steps: 0.21º over 360º; Exposure time: 850 ms; Image pixel size: 18.1 μm; Frame averaging: 6; and a random movement: 15. All scans are part of the digital collection of the LIB and can be acquired by contacting T.K. or B.W. Subsequently, the scans were reconstructed with the software NRecon (Bruker, Billerica / USA). They were imported into Amira 6.1.2 (Thermofisher) where the skulls were separated from scales, the remaining skeletons, the filling material, and the tube. Subsequent volume rendering was performed in VG Studio 3.3 (Volume Graphics). Final images and plates were edited and arranged with Adobe CS6 (Adobe, San Jose / USA). Measurements of osteological elements were conducted by using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Terminology of cranial osteological characters follows Lobon-Rovira & Bauer (2021) [47].
Single locus analyses
We sequenced 58 specimens for the 12S rRNA (12S) mitochondrial gene and, together with 115 additional samples downloaded from GenBank, we assembled a dataset of 173 Pristurus specimens (Table 1) with the same specimen composition to the one in Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024) [28]. This way, we were able to compare both mitochondrial and nuclear phylogenetic histories and interrogate if there were any mito-nuclear discordances among taxa. DNA extraction was done following the protocol in MacManes (2013) [48] and PCR amplification conditions and primers used were the same as described in Metallinou et al. (2015) [49]. PCR products were purified and Sanger sequenced by Macrogen Inc. to obtain a fragment of approximately 400 bp of the mitochondrial gene 12S. Sequences were aligned with Geneious 2021.1.1 (Biomatters Ltd.) and a Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogeny was reconstructed in RAxML-ng v.1.0.2 [50] with a GTR+G model, a total of 100 starting trees (50 random and 50 parsimony) and 1,000 bootstrap replicates to estimate branch support. Uncorrected genetic distances (p-distances) were also inferred for the same dataset of the mitochondrial 12S gene, using the package ‘ape v5.0’ [51] within the R environment.
Information regarding specimen assignment to genetic and genomic deep lineages, specimens used as type material, geographic location, elevation, 12S accession numbers, MorphoBank accession codes, as well as information on which individuals were included in each morphological, genetic, genomic and geographic dataset are provided. Genomic dataset1 and dataset2 include all specimens used for genomic analyses (Genomic column) except P. flavipuntatus specimens; Genomic dataset3 includes all specimens used for genomic data; Specimens selected for dataset4 are highlighted in bold in the Genomic column. Holotype (H) and paratype (P) museum codes refer to the following collections: IBE[X]: field series of S. Carranza housed at the Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-UPF); ZFMK[X]: Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany; NHMOK[X]: the Naturhistorisk Museum, Oslo, Norway; MZB [X]: Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona, Spain.
Additionally, we implemented independent network analyses with four nuclear markers including specimens from all candidate species of the P. rupestris species complex. Sequences were downloaded from GenBank (see accession numbers within [27]), and corresponded to genes mc1r (73 sequences; 669 bp), cmos (72 sequences; 411 bp), rag1 (73 sequences; 279 bp), and rag2 (67 sequences; 405 bp). SEQPHASE [52] was used to convert input files and haplotypes were phased with PHASE [53]. Then, genealogical relationships for each gene were assessed with TCS v.1.21 [54] constructing haplotype networks with statistical parsimony and applying a connection limit of 95%.
Genomic data
ddRADseq data analyses of genome-wide SNPs.
Several datasets of genome-wide SNP data inferred from Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024) [28] were used to perform population genomic, phylogenomic and species delimitation analyses. The following datasets were retrieved or assembled: i) dataset1: Dataset composed of 163 specimens from the P. rupestris species complex including all known lineages with 491 unlinked SNPs (retaining one SNP per locus) and a dataset completeness of 77% (dataset retrieved from [28], corresponding to dataset 16 in the former study); ii) dataset2: Dataset composed of the same 163 specimens produced de novo to obtain in addition invariant sites. Raw illumina reads were downloaded from Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024) [28] and processed with iPyRAD [55]. We discarded reads with ≥ 3 missing sites, consensus sequences with low coverage (<10 reads), excessive undetermined or heterozygous sites (>3), or too many haplotypes (>2). Consensus sequences were clustered across samples using the within-sample clustering threshold (89%). The resulting dataset contained 104,277 loci and 346,583 SNPs. When this dataset was used, further filtering options were applied for each analysis; iii) dataset3: Dataset composed of 173 Pristurus specimens including 10 individuals of P. flavipunctatus and 163 specimens from the P. rupestris species complex, with a total length of 137,800 bp including invariant sites (20,845 SNPs), and a dataset completeness of 70.87% (dataset retrieved from [28], corresponding to dataset 31 in the former study); iv) dataset4: Multispecies Coalescent (MSC) species tree reconstructions and species delimitation methods were implemented to a reduced dataset of 31 specimens, containing the specimens with the least missingness and with no signs of admixture from at least two representatives from each deep lineage identified by Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024) [28], and two samples from P. flavipunctatus used as outgroups. The dataset was obtained following the same procedure as in dataset2 but including a hard filtering of missing genotype call rate of 40% (i.e. all loci were present in at least 60% of the samples).
Population genomics.
Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024) [28] performed a set of several hierarchical admixture analyses to discover the most probable number of populations within the Pristurus rupestris species complex. This showed that deep lineages of the P. rupestris species complex are highly structured following the local topography of the mountain range with no signs of current admixture between the deep lineages of the Pristurus rupestris species complex (see S23, S38–S43 Figs from Burriel-Carranza et al 2024) [28]. Here, we further complement this data by implementing two other population genomic analyses. First, we performed a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on dataset1 using Plink v2.00a2.3 [56]. Then, a fineRADstructure [57] analysis was implemented on dataset2 applying a hard filtering of missing genotype call rate of 40%. This analysis unravels different levels of structure within and between populations and its robustness to missing data is optimal for non-model organisms [57].
Genetic divergence.
We assessed the levels of intra- and interspecific genetic divergence across all lineages of the Pristurus rupestris species complex. We used dataset2 with a SNP data assembly allowing a maximum of 40% missing data at each locus, with a total of 2,712 SNPs. We clustered the samples into groups representing the 12 P. rupestris independent lineages identified in Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024) [28]. Then, we used all variant sites to calculate pairwise FST and dxy across all lineage-pairs. Measures were calculated with the package PopGenome [58] implemented in R v.4.2.1 [59].
Phylogenomic reconstructions.
We used dataset3 to generate a ML phylogenomic reconstruction as a means to compare the nuclear evolutionary history of the P. rupestris species complex to the mitochondrial evolutionary history of this group (see above). The phylogenomic reconstruction was inferred through RAxML-ng v.1.0.2 [50], with a GTR+G model, a total of 100 starting trees (50 random and 50 parsimony) and 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Then, we further investigated the phylogenomic relationships within the P. rupestris species complex by generating a time-calibrated species tree inferred with SNAPP v.1.5.2 [60] under the multispecies coalescent model. We used dataset4 excluding invariant sites, keeping one biallelic SNP per locus, applying a minor allele frequency filter of 0.05, and discarding SNPs that were not present in at least 80% of the samples. We converted the resulting vcf file following Stange et al. (2018) [61] script snapp_prep.rb (available at: https://github.com/mmatschiner/snapp_prep), summarizing 2,759 SNPs. The deepest node of the phylogeny (i.e., the split between P. flavipunctatus and all representatives of the P. rupestris species complex) was constrained to be monophyletic and set to a normal distribution with a mean of 20.92 mya and σ = 1.6, following the latest calibration [28]. Samples were then assigned to their corresponding lineage (as inferred in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024) [28] and three independent runs of 3x106 generations were carried out sampling every 50 generations. Convergence between runs and stationarity was checked with Tracer v.1.7 [62]. Posterior distributions were combined with LogCombiner v.2.6.3, discarding 10% of the posterior trees as burnin and a maximum clade credibility tree was obtained calculating median heights in TreeAnnotator v.2.6.3 (both programs implemented in BEAST2 v.2.6.4; [63]).
Species delimitation
Using several mitochondrial and nuclear markers, Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) [27] found evidence of up to 14 putative species within the P. rupestris species complex. Using genome-wide SNP data, Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024) [28] found that 12 of such putative species were still recovered as distinct species when using Bayes Factor Delimitation* (*with genomic data; BFD; [64]). In this study, we further investigate these findings by implementing guided species delimitation methods by means of BPP v.4.4.1 [65, 66]). We followed Huang (2018) [67] pipeline (https://github.com/airbugs/Dynastes_delimitation) to estimate θ and τ priors (a = 3, b = 0.06 and a = 3, b = 0.15 respectively) on dataset4, selecting those loci present in at least one specimen from each putative species. The species tree topology was fixed to match a Multispecies Coalescent (MSC) species tree estimated above. Then, three independent runs of BPP A10 species delimitation [65] were implemented, with 1,000,000 generations, sampling every 10 generations after a burn-in of 100,000.
Then, we calculated the gdi index for each putative species using the equation gdi = 1-e(-2τ/θ) [37]. Posterior distributions for θ and τ were estimated with BPP analysis, A00 [65]. We used dataset3 with the same prior specification and species tree topology as above. Three independent runs of BPP A00 [65] analyses were performed for 100,000 generations, sampling every five generations, and applying a burnin of 10,000. Although the gdi can account for both genetic isolation and gene flow, it was calculated assuming no gene flow, as this procedure has been shown to provide more accurate species delimitations than the original estimation with PHRAPL [68], even in the presence of gene flow [39, 69]. The gdi is a continuous index between 0 (panmixia) and 1 (strong divergence between two sister taxa) and, while there is not a specific “species delimitation threshold”, Jackson et al. (2017) [68] proposed that gdi > 0.7 supports a species status of two sister taxa and gdi < 0.2 supports a single species hypothesis. However, there is a wide range of uncertainty between 0.2–0.7 which is considered as an ambiguous result, lacking the support necessary to be classified as distinct species.
Using the same posterior distributions of θ and τ obtained to estimate the gdi, we calculated another measure of genetic divergence between populations of the P. rupestris species complex. This was obtained by calculating divergence times in coalescent units (2τ/θ) for each species and population using all samples from the combined posterior distributions following a similar approach as in Leaché et al. (2021) [39].
Sympatry analyses
We assessed the geographic overlap of species within the P. rupestris species complex by evaluating the number of sympatric localities between species. We generated a 50 m buffer to 604 localities of P. rupestris species complex specimens (extracted from [33, 34]) and determined the number of samples that were found within each buffer. A buffer of only 50 m was chosen due to the complex topography and dramatic altitudinal shifts of the Hajar Mountains. The analysis was performed within R v.4.2.1 [59] using packages ‘terra’ [70] and ‘sf’ [71].
Morphological description and designation of type specimens of the Pristurus rupestris species complex
We chose and examined a total of 29 alcohol-preserved adult specimens of the P. rupestris species complex from the Hajar Mountains. All specimens were photographed using a Nikon D750 camera with a 60 mm macro-lens. Voucher specimens are deposited at the Institute of Evolutionary Biology (IBE), Barcelona, Spain, the Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK), Bonn, Germany, the Naturhistorisk Museum (NHMO), Oslo, Norway, and the Oman Natural History Museum (ONHM), Muscat, Oman. Variables for the morphological analyses were selected based on previous taxonomic studies of Pristurus [18, 19, 23, 25, 27, 72]. Measurements were taken by the same author (T.K.) using a digital calliper (to the nearest 0.1 mm). We measured the following morphometric characters (see section “Morphological analyses” above for explanation of the different measurements): snout–vent length (SVL); trunk length (TrL); head length (HL); head height (HH); humerus length (LHu); ulna length (LUn); femur length (LFe); and tibia length (LTb). Tail length was not measured because many individuals had a regenerated tail or had lost it. In addition to those morphometric variables, we examined two pholidotic characters, counting from both the right and left sides: the number of upper labial scales (ULS) and the number of lower labial scales (LLS; anterior large scales only; S1 Table).
Nomenclatural Acts
The electronic edition of this article conforms to the requirements of the amended International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, and hence the new names contained herein are available under that Code from the electronic edition of this article. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix “http://zoobank.org/”. The LSID for this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EB6D62A2-E43E-43C5-A8DA-94E52277C067. The electronic edition of this work was published in a journal with an ISSN, and has been archived and is available from the following digital repositories: PubMed Central, LOCKSS.
Results
The combination of morphological (Fig 3A and S1–S4 Tables), genetic (Fig 4 and Tables 1 and S5), genomic (Figs 3B, 3C, 5, 6, S1, S2 and S6 Table) and geographic (S7 Table) analyses support the existence of at least five species within the Pristurus rupestris species complex (Fig 2). The comparisons of the cranial osteology for the single holotype specimens (Figs 10B, 10C, 14B, 14C, 18B, 18C, 22B and 22C) of each species did not recover strong qualitative osteological differences between species of the P. rupestris species complex. Minor qualitative osteological differences and differences in the extent of ossification are described for the holotypes only in the species account section. Although these species share striking morphological similarities and may therefore be considered as phenotypically cryptic (Fig 3A and S2–S4 Tables), each one exhibits unique nuclear haplotypes, is recovered in both mitochondrial and nuclear phylogenetic and phylogenomic reconstructions as monophyletic, is considered a distinct species in all species delimitation analyses, and has an ancient origin of at least three mya. Notably, these species coexist within the same geographical areas (Fig 2), often in sympatry or syntopy with at least one other species of the species complex (S7 Table). However, no signs of gene flow occurring among any of such taxa were detected (Figs 3B, S23 and S38–S43 from Burriel-Carranza et al 2024) [28], hence supporting the existence of pre- or postzygotic barriers and stable species boundaries.
Red: Pristurus rupestris sensu stricto; Green: Pristurus omanensis sp. nov.; Pink: Pristurus ali sp. nov.; Blue Pristurus feulneri sp. nov.; Yellow: Pristurus assareen sp. nov.. Type localities for each species are represented with a star. Further detailed maps for each species can be consulted in Figs 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 in order of appearance above.
(A) Reconstructed morphospace of the Pristurus rupestris species complex represented by the first two Principal Components of the PCA (explaining almost 50% of all shape variance). Morphospace was constructed based on 10 independent measurements of 155 specimens from which the body size effect was removed (Table 1; see see Materials and Methods). The PCA highlights the great shape overlap across these Pristurus species. (B) Population structure analyses with genomic data. (B.1) PCA representing 163 specimens of the Pristurus rupestris species complex inferred with genomic dataset1 (Table 1; see Materials and Methods) summarizing 39.4% of the genomic space. Both first and second principal components split species-level diversity, showing up to four well-defined genomic clusters, and Pristurus assareen sp. nov. (yellow) being only slightly differentiated from Pristurus rupestris sensu stricto (red); (B.2) Co-ancestry matrix generated through fineRADstructure implemented on the same 163 specimens using dataset2 (Table 1; see Materials and Methods). This analysis indicates pairwise genomic similarity across all specimens, unraveling different levels of structure within and between species. Legend to the right shows the number of shared haplotypes between individuals. Darker colors represent higher inter-specimen co-ancestry.
Systematics
- Family Sphaerodactylidae Underwood, 1954
- Genus Pristurus Rüppell, 1835
- Pristurus rupestris Blanford, 1874
(Figs 2–9, S1, S2 and Tables 1 and S1–S7; Alignment of phased haplotypes for the molecular diagnostic characters based on the mc1r, cmos, rag1 and rag2 genes can be found on S1 Appendix).
(A) Maximum Likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction. A RAxML-NG mitochondrial phylogeny of the Pristurus rupestris species complex was inferred using the mitochondrial marker 12S on 163 Pristurus specimens from the P. rupestris species complex, and 10 P. flavipunctatus used as outgroups (Table 1). Numbers in grey circles represent the lineages considered as putative species in Garcia-Porta et al. (2017), including a newly discovered deep lineage (lineage 17). Black dots: bootstrap support (bs) > 0.95; White dots: 0.75 < bs > 0.95. Different background colors represent the newly described species. (B) Statistical parsimony allele networks of cmos, mc1r, rag1 and rag2 nuclear loci, with colors corresponding to species in the phylogenetic tree. Circle sizes are proportional to the number of alleles. White circles represent mutational steps.
Time-calibrated Multispecies Coalescent species tree inferred with 29 specimens from the Pristurus rupestris species complex and two P. flavipunctatus used as outgroups, summarizing 2,759 SNPs (dataset4; Table 1). Three consensus trees were found and are shown in black (53% of all tree topologies), red (31%), and blue (16%) respectively. Mean divergence times are shown at each node with a cloudgram (light grey lines in the background) representing the uncertainty within divergence time estimates. Tip labels encompass genetic lineages described in Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) and genomic lineages identified in Burriel-Carranza et al. (2023b) separated by a slash. At each node, posterior probabilities (pp) for presence of nodes represented, as well as results from two species delimitation methods: Posterior probabilities for presence of nodes in BPP A10 analysis and the mean value for the posterior distribution of the genealogical divergence index (gdi). For specific ranges of gdi posterior distributions see S2 Fig.
Colored dots correspond to interspecific pairwise comparisons between lineages from one species (represented by the coloured line in the phylogeny) and all lineages within its sister clade. Grey dots show intraspecific pairwise comparisons. Numbers at each grey dot correspond to genetic lineages sensu Garcia-Porta et al. (2017).
(A.1-2) Jar where both P. rupestris specimens shown below are stored; (B) Tag (B.1), dorsal view (B.2), and ventral view (B.3) of the Pristurus rupestris syntype from the type locality (Muscat, Oman), described as a lectotype in the present study; (C) Tag (C.1), dorsal view (C.2), and ventral view (C.3) of the Pristurus rupestris syntype from Kharg island, Iran find in the same jar as the lectotype. All pictures taken by JG-P.
(A) Pristurus rupestris sensu stricto male specimen signaling by curling its tail (picture code: DSC7726) (B) Male specimen with paler coloration and less apparent upper and lower crest in tail from lineage 3 sensu Garcia-Porta; (C) Head close-up on a P. rupestris sensu stricto specimen from lineage 3 sensu Garcia-Porta et al., (2017); (D) Picture of Muscat beach, type locality of P. rupestris sensu stricto. All pictures taken by S.C.
Distribution of P. rupestris sensu stricto, including (A) global distribution of the species including regions with introduced populations. Pristurus rupestris sensu lato in Qatar and its uncertain presence in West Pakistan have been highlighted as question marks; (B) Arabian specimens used for morphological multivariate analyses; (C) Arabian specimens used for sympatry analysis identified as P. rupestris by Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) using the 12S mitochondrial genetic marker; (D) Arabian specimens used for genome-wide SNP analyses, colored by the most supported ADMIXTURE configuration in Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024). Type locality for the species is represented with an orange star. Colors refer to the following populations: Yellow: candidate species 1 and 2 from Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) and P. rupestris BFD1 from Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024); Orange and pink: candidate species 3 from Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) and P. rupestris BFD2 from Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024); Dark red: candidate species 4.5 from Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) and P. rupestris BFD3 from Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024).
Pristurus rupestris.
Arnold, 1977: 106 (part.); Arnold, 1986: 421 (part.); Arnold, 2009: 3 (part.); van deer Kooij, 2000: 116 (part.); Sindaco and Jeremčenko, 2008: 122 (part.); Gardner, 2013: 178 (part.); Badiane et al., 2014: 34 (part.); Šmíd et al., 2014:48; Šmíd et al., 2021: 1189; Tejero-Cicuendez et al., 2021: S1 Fig; Tejero-Cicuéndez et al., 2022: S1 Fig; Burriel-Carranza et al., 2022: 9; Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024: S1 Fig; Carranza et al., 2021: 119.
Pristurus rupestris rupestris.
Schmidt 1952: 2 (part.); Badiane et al., 2014: 33 (part.); Saberi-Pirooz et al., 2019:1; Carranza et al., 2018: S2 Appendix, 61.
Pristurus rupestris iranicus.
Schmidt 1952: 1; Wermuth 1965: 151; Badiane et al. 2014: 35.
Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 1,2,3 and 4.5. Garcia-Porta et al., 2017: 5; Saberi-Pirooz et al., 2019: 11.
Pristurus rupestris rupestris Clade 4. Garcia-Porta et al., 2017: 5
Pristurus rupestris BFD1, BFD2 and BFD3. Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024: S24 Fig.
Lectotype.
The taxonomic description of Pristurus rupestris Blanford, 1874 was based on two female syntype specimens collected by W.T. Blanford in 1872 and deposited inside the same jar at the collections of the NHMUK with catalogue numbers 1874.11.23.89–90 (NHMUK:ecatalogue:1885855). The two specimens can be differentiated based on their attached labels that indicate their different origin: Muscat, Oman and Kharg island, near Bushehr, Iran. Schmidt (1952) [73] restricted the type locality of Pristurus rupestris to Muscat, Oman and described the subspecies Pristurus rupestris iranicus Schmidt, 1952 restricted to the southern coast of Iran. This included some offshore islands based on a specimen from Bushehr, Iran collected in March 10, 1937 by E.W. Kaiser and deposited at the Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen with catalogue number NHMD876583. More recently, Saberi-Pirooz et al. (2019) [74] analyzed specimens across the distribution range of P. r. iranicus and showed that the Iranian subspecies branched within the deep lineage composed of specimens from the type locality of P. r. rupestris (Muscat, Oman), making P. r. rupestris paraphyletic. Considering these molecular results and the lack of morphological evidence, P. r. iranicus was synonymized with P. rupestris [74]. In order to avoid any future taxonomic confusion, and based on the terra typica restricta by Schmidt (1952) [73] to Muscat, Oman, we here formally designate the specimen from Muscat, Oman from the type series deposited at the NHMUK 1874.11.23.89 as the lectotype of Pristurus rupestris.
Other material examined.
Additional specimens assigned to Pristurus rupestris sensu stricto used for morphological, genetic, genomic, and geographical analyses can be consulted in Table 1.
Diagnosis.
Pristurus rupestris corresponds to a genetically highly distinct lineage of the P. rupestris species complex. Together with Pristurus assareen sp. nov. (P. r. rupestris candidate species 16 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; P. rupestris BFD12 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; described below) [27, 28], it constitutes the youngest divergence within the species complex with an approximate date of origin of 3.6 mya (95% HPD: 2.9–4.4 mya). Pristurus rupestris is hereafter restricted to candidate species 1,2,3 and 4.5 from Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) [27] corresponding to putative species BFD1–BFD3 from Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024) [28], and by all Iranian P. rupestris, formerly classified as P. r. iranicus but later synonymized with P. rupestris [74]. This small species of Pristurus is characterized by the combination of the following characters: (1) a maximum recorded SVL of 27.4 mm; (2) 6–7 upper labial scales; (3) 3–4 lower labial scales; (4) 3–5 small postmental scales; (5) absence of mid-dorsal enlarged scales (crest) along the body; (6) laterally compressed tail usually with conspicuous dorsal and smaller ventral enlarged scales (crest) in males, and less conspicuous (sometimes absent) in females; (7) one unique mutation in the rag2 alignment: a T instead of a C in position 276 (S1 Appendix).
Morphological, genetic and phylogeographic remarks.
Multivariate morphological analyses show that P. rupestris sensu stricto shows a broad overlap in shape morphospace with every representative of the species complex. Procrustes ANOVA and subsequent pairwise comparisons on the Principal Components of the PCA (explaining almost 50% of all shape variance; Fig 3A and S2–S4 Tables) showed significant differences between P. rupestris sensu stricto and two species described herein that only occur at mid to high elevations (P. ali sp. nov.: corresponding to P. r. rupestris candidate species 6 and 7; P. assareen sp. nov.: corresponding to P. r. rupestris candidate species 16 in Garcia-Porta et al. 2017) [27]. However, no unique diagnostic morphological characters were found between P. rupestris sensu stricto and any other Pristurus species described herein. In addition, Pristurus rupestris sensu stricto is found in sympatry and even syntopy with every species of Pristurus described in this study (S7 Table), thus identification of this species relies on molecular methods.
All mitochondrial (Fig 4A), nuclear loci (Fig 4B), and genome-wide SNP analyses (Figs 3A, 3B, 5, S1 and S2) are fully concordant in the differentiation of P. rupestris sensu stricto as a distinct species from all other species described below. In all phylogenetic reconstructions, P. rupestris sensu stricto forms a clade together with P. assareen sp. nov. (corresponding to P. r. rupestris candidate species 16 sensu Garcia-Porta et al., 2017 [27] and P. rupestris BFD12 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; described below) [28] representing the youngest split within the species complex, originating about 3.6 mya (Fig 5). The results of the nuclear networks for the cmos, mc1r, rag1 and rag2 loci shown in Fig 4B, indicate that P. rupestris sensu stricto bears private alleles for some of these genes (not shared with any other species included in the present analysis). Although occurring in sympatry with all the species described herein in several localities, no signs of admixture were detected between P. rupestris sensu stricto and any other species Pristurus described below. Uncorrected p-distances with the mitochondrial 12S gene as well as FST estimates with genome-wide SNP data show a strong interspecific genetic differentiation (12S estimates ranging from 9–22%; FST values range from 0.52–0.8; S5 and S6 Tables, respectively).
Pristurus rupestris sensu stricto (Fig 8) contains high levels of intraspecific diversity (12S: 4.7%; S5 Table; FST values: 0.37–0.53; Fig 6). Three well-defined populations were identified in both mitochondrial and genome-wide SNP analyses. Across the southern slope of the Central Hajars we find lineage 1.2 (comprised by lineages 1 and 2 sensu Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; P. rupestris BFD1 sensu Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024) [27, 28], representing the first split within the species about 2.1 mya (95% HPD: 1.7–2.6 mya); across the northern slope of the Central Hajars and extending West until almost reaching the border with the UAE it inhabits lineage 4 (comprised by lineage 4.5 sensu Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; P. rupestris BFD3 sensu Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024) [27, 28]; finally, in the Eastern Hajars and extending West through the coastal area of the Batinah Plain lineage 3 occurs. This population is conformed by a single mitochondrial lineage, but genome-wide SNPs support the existence of two populations within this lineage, with a contact zone of admixed specimens in the western region of the Eastern Hajars (Fig 9D).
Lectotype description. As outlined above, Blanford (1874) [75] based his original description of P. rupestris on material originating from Muscat, Oman (Fig 7B.1–7B.3) as well as Kharg Island (northwest off Bushehr) in Iran (Fig 7C.1–7C.3). In his designation of the type material no information on where and which type specimens had been finally deposited was stated by the author. Although Boulenger (1885) [76] provided a thorough description of Blanford’s type material, the description of the lectotype from Muscat, Oman is still needed since he offered a general description for several syntypes only, including material from Muscat, Oman, Kharg island, Iran, and Socotra, Yemen (corresponding to Pristurus sokotranus Parker, 1938), together with measurements from a single specimen that was not identified therein [76]. After examining the available type material, we confirmed that the measurements provided by Boulenger (1885) [76] are from the female lectotype specimen from Muscat, Oman and therefore, we will use these metrics in the following description of the lectotype of Pristurus rupestris sensu stricto based on NHMUK1874.11.23.89–90 (NHMUK:ecatalogue:1885855), an adult female specimen with attached locality tag referring to Muscat, Oman. Specimen ventrally damaged with internal tissue apparent in the abdomen near the pelvic girdle and with dorsal skin partially wrinkled; tail missing. Body length 23 mm, head length 9 mm, and head width 5.5 mm. Moderately built, round body; limbs slender. Head robust and does not rise very steeply in profile, snout slightly blunt. Supranasals are separated into two scales. Scales on snout granular, polygonal and slightly pointed upwards. Scales on snout, anterior to eyes, are larger than those on top of head. Palpebral fold edged anteriorly with large scales and with pointed (ciliate) scales. Ear opening ellipsoidal. Upper labials (right/left) 6/6. Lower labials (right/left) 4/4, the fourth decreasing in size from the three large anterior scales. Four enlarged scales running backwards along the proximal borders of the third lower labials to end at about the level of the angle of the mouth. Mental large, wedge-shaped, truncated posteriorly by three postmental scales. Gulars small, rather pointed posteriorly, becoming slightly imbricate and bigger in size on throat. Dorsal scales on body small, polygonal and homogeneous, slightly pointed posteriorly. Ventrals flat and distinctly imbricate. Limbs slender. Scales on dorsal and anterior surface of the forelimbs slightly larger than dorsal body scales, flat and imbricate, fairly pointed. Scales beneath the upper forelimbs granular and smaller than ventral body scales; those beneath lower forelimbs large, flat, imbricate, and polygonal, larger than ventral body scales. Claws relatively shallow and weakly recurved. Scales on dorsal and anterior surface of hindlimbs large, flat and imbricate, fairly pointed. Scales beneath the upper hindlimbs granular and smaller than ventral body scales, those beneath lower hindlimbs large, flat, imbricate and polygonal, larger than ventral body scales.
Coloration in alcohol is grayish brown dorsally; faint thin dorsal midline pale grayish. Dorsally and both left and right of the midline irregularly-shaped whitish blotches present. Head presents the same color as the body with a broad dark brownish stripe running from the nostril through the eye and then dorsolaterally until above the ear opening. Faint large dark blotches are located from the gular region to the insertion of the hindlimbs ventrally, decreasing in number and brightness posteriorly. Ventral background coloration is grayish-whitish. Limbs banded dorsally with dark gray, light gray bands reaching until toes. Ventral coloration of limbs is grayish, darker than the abdomen and not banded.
Distribution.
In the Arabian Peninsula, P. rupestris sensu stricto is now restricted to the Omani Hajar Mountains, spanning from Ra’s al Hadd to 40 km North of the Wadi Jizzi gap (almost reaching the UAE border; Fig 9). It has been recorded from sea level up to 2,115 m asl in Jabal Shams, Central Hajars, Oman. Some specimens from lineage 3 (candidate species 3 in Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; P. rupestris BFD2 in Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024) [27, 28] and lineage 4 (candidate species 4.5 in Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; P. rupestris BFD3 in Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024) [27, 28] have been recently discovered in Masirah Island and most probably are the result of human introduction (work in progress). The designation of morphologically typical P. rupestris sensu lato introduced populations from Qatar, Bahrain, eastern Saudi Arabia and the northern UAE coast, from Sharjah to Abu Dhabi and offshore islands, will need to be genetically reassessed in the light of the here presented taxonomic revision to corroborate their identity. Since it was shown that the Iranian P. rupestris genetically fall within a clade of specimens close to the type locality in Oman [74], they are here considered as P. rupestris sensu stricto. Therefore, outside the Arabian Peninsula, P. rupestris sensu stricto is found throughout the coast of Iran, reaching North to Bushehr, in Kharg island, and spreading south until almost reaching Pakistan [77, 78]. Pristurus rupestris sensu stricto has been reported marginally from southwestern coastal Pakistan adjacent to the Iranian border [19], but its presence in Pakistan is considered uncertain by Kamali (2020) [78], and it is not included in a recent checklist provided for Pakistani reptiles by Khan (2016) [77].
Habits.
They are usually found on rocks, boulders, tree trunks, and human-made structures. Females lay single hard-shelled eggs throughout the year. They are mainly diurnal (although they can be active after sunset) and perform complex signaling including curling their tail up over the back, push-ups and inflating and laterally compressing their body and throat.
Pristurus omanensis Burriel-Carranza, Koppetsch, Garcia-Porta, Carranza–sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:512E2CD2-6F46-445E-AA3E-D1288709AD74
(Figs 2–6, 10–13, S1, S2, S3 and Tables 1 and S1–S7; Alignment of phased haplotypes for the molecular diagnostic characters based on the mc1r, cmos, rag1 and rag2 genes can be found on S1 Appendix).
English name: Oman Semaphore Gecko
(A) Ventral-lateral and dorsal external view of the specimen; (B) Ventral, lateral and dorsal internal view obtained through μ-CT scanning; (C) close up of head bone structures of the holotype specimen ZFMK104096 (sample code S8000).
(A) Dorsal and (B) ventral view of Pristurus omanensis sp. nov. paratype specimens showing color variation. All specimens correspond to specimens from the type locality or the Eastern Hajars assigned to genomic lineage BFD5. Further variation in specimens of P. omanensis sp. nov. lineage BFD6 is shown in S3 Fig.
(A) P. omanensis sp. nov. male specimen from lineage 8 sensu GarciaPorta et al. (2017) (lineage BFD5 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024) with pale coloration, and a conspicuous dorsal crest in tail (picture code: clade8_SC42471); (B) P. omanensis sp. nov. male specimen from lineage 9 sensu GarciaPorta et al. (2017) (lineage BFD6 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024) from the Central Hajars; (C) Head close-up of the P. omanensis sp. nov. holotype (ZFMK104096; sample code S8000); (D) Habitat of P. omanensis sp. nov. in Tiwi beach, Oman, (type locality of the species). Pictures taken by S.C. (A,B,D) and T.K (C).
Distribution of P. omanensis sp. nov. in Arabia, including (A) all known populations (including an introduction to Masirah island); (B) specimens used for morphological multivariate analyses; (C) specimens used for sympatry analysis identified as P. rupestris candidate species 8 and 9 by Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) using the 12S mitochondrial genetic marker; (D) specimens used for genome-wide SNP analyses colored by the most supported ADMIXTURE configuration in Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024). Type locality for the species is represented with a light green or white star. Colors refer to the following populations: Light green: candidate species 8 from Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) and P. rupestris BFD5 from Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024); Dark green: candidate species 9 from Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) and P. rupestris BFD6 from Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024).
Pristurus rupestris.
Arnold, 1977: 106 (part.); Arnold, 1986: 421 (part.); Arnold, 2009: 3 (part.); van deer Kooij, 2000: 116 (part.); Sindaco and Jeremčenko, 2008: 122 (part.); Gardner, 2013: 178 (part.); Badiane et al., 2014: 34 (part.).
Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 8 and 9. Garcia-Porta et al., 2017: 5.
Pristurus rupestris rupestris Clade 1. Garcia-Porta et al., 2017: 5; Saberi-Pirooz et al., 2019:11.
Pristurus sp5. Šmíd et al., 2021: 1189; Tejero-Cicuendez et al., 2021: S1 Fig; Tejero-Cicuéndez et al., 2022: S1 Fig; Burriel-Carranza et al., 2022: 9; Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024: S1 Fig; Carranza et al., 2018: S2 Appendix, 66; Carranza et al., 2021: 119.
Pristurus rupestris SP8 and SP9. Saberi-Pirooz et al., 2019:11.
Pristurus rupestris BFD5 and BFD6. Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024: S24 Fig.
Holotype.
ZFMK 104096 (sample code S8000), adult male from Tiwi, 12 m asl, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.84441’N, 59.24189’E, WGS84, collected in November 2010 by J. Garcia-Porta (assigned to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 8 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017 and to Pristurus rupestris BFD5 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1).
Paratypes.
NHMOK 2657 (sample code S7541), adult male from Sumayyan road, 1,005 m asl, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.83326’N, 58.98821’E, WGS84, collected in May 2011 by S. Carranza, F. Amat and E. Gómez-Díaz (assigned to P. r. rupestris candidate species 9 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017 and to Pristurus rupestris BFD5 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; MZB 2024–0988 (sample code S9012; MorphoBank M849884–M849886), adult male from Fulayj, 132 m asl, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.42828’N, 59.35618’E, WGS84, collected in May 2011 by S. Carranza, F. Amat and E. Gómez-Díaz (assigned to P. r. rupestris candidate species 9 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017 and to Pristurus rupestris BFD5 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; IBES7508 (sample code S7508; MorphoBank M849878–M849882), adult male from Tiwi, 28 m asl, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.8448’N, 59.24156’E, WGS84, collected in May 2011 by S. Carranza, F. Amat and E. Gómez-Díaz (assigned to P. r. rupestris candidate species 8 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017 and to Pristurus rupestris BFD5 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; IBES7276 (sample code S7276; MorphoBank M849893–M849896), adult male from Fulayj, 212 m asl, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.33769’N, 59.31128’E, WGS84, collected in May 2011 by S. Carranza, F. Amat and E. Gómez-Díaz (assigned to P. r. rupestris candidate species 9 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017 and to Pristurus rupestris BFD5 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; MZB 2024–0987 (sample code S7737; MorphoBank M849864–M849867), adult female from Ashila, 42 m asl, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 21.95181’N, 59.6082’E, WGS84, collected in October 2010 by S. Carranza and F. Amat (assigned to P. r. rupestris candidate species 9 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017 and to Pristurus rupestris BFD5 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; IBES7708 (sample code S7708; MorphoBank M849869–M849871), adult female from Al Ashkharah, 13 m asl, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 21.84242’N, 59.56673’E, WGS84, collected in October 2010 by S. Carranza and F. Amat (assigned P. r. rupestris candidate species 9 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017 and to Pristurus rupestris BFD5 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; IBECN4297 (sample code CN4297; MorphoBank M849873–M849876), adult female near Wadi Naam, 457 m asl, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.70851’N, 58.77569’E, WGS84, collected in May 2013 by S. Carranza, F. Amat, M. Metallinou, M. Simó-Riudalbas and P. de Pous (assigned to P. r. rupestris candidate species 9 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017 and to Pristurus rupestris BFD5 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; IBES9013 (sample code S9013; MorphoBank M849888–M849891), adult female from Wadd, 136 m asl, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.53899’N, 59.36823’E, WGS84, collected in May 2011 by S. Carranza, F. Amat and E. Gómez-Díaz (assigned to P. r. rupestris candidate species 9 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017 and to Pristurus rupestris BFD5 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28].
Other material examined.
Additional Pristurus omanensis sp. nov. specimens formerly assigned to P. r. rupestris candidate species 8 and 9 from Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) [27] and Pristurus rupestris BFD5 and BFD6 from Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024) [28] used for morphological, genetic, genomic, and geographical analyses are found in Table 1.
Etymology.
The species epithet ‘omanensis’ is an adjective that refers to the distribution range of the species, restricted to the Omani side of the Al Hajar Mountain range.
Diagnosis.
Pristurus omanensis sp. nov. corresponds to a genetically highly distinct lineage of the Pristurus rupestris species complex sensu Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) [27] from the Central and Eastern Hajar Mountains (North Oman). It represents the oldest split within the Pristurus rupestris species complex, having diverged from all other species within the group around 10.8 mya (95% HPD: 8.7–12.6 mya; Fig 5). This small species of Pristurus is characterized by the combination of the following characters: (1) a maximum recorded SVL of 25.8 mm; (2) 6–8 upper labial scales; (3) 4–5 lower labial scales; (4) 3–5 small postmental scales; (5) absence of mid-dorsal enlarged scales (crest) on the body; (6) laterally compressed tail usually with conspicuous dorsal and smaller ventral enlarged scales (crest) in males, and less conspicuous (sometimes absent) in females; (7) four unique mutations in the mc1r alignment: A instead of G in position 45; T instead of C in position 438; A instead of G in position 443; T instead of G in position 510; (8) one unique mutation in the cmos alignment: A instead of G in position 260; (9) two unique mutations in the rag1 alignment: T instead of C in position 205; G instead of A in position 242; (10) four unique mutations in the rag2 alignment: A instead of G in position 17; G instead of A in position 61; G instead of A in position 67; A instead of C in position 348 (see S1 Appendix).
Morphological, genetic and phylogeographic remarks.
Multivariate morphological analyses show that P. omanensis sp. nov. presents some degree of morphospace overlap with every representative from the species complex (Fig 3A). However, while it is not significantly distinct from P. rupestris sensu stricto and a Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. (corresponding to Clade 3 in Garcia-Porta et al., 2017 and described below) [27], it is significantly distinct from the other two species that only occur at mid to high elevations (P. ali sp. nov. and P. assareen sp. nov. which correspond to Clade 2 and candidate species 16 in Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; S2–S4 Tables, respectively; species described below) [27]. Pristurus omanensis sp. nov. is monophyletic in both mitochondrial and nuclear phylogenies (Figs 4A, 5 and S1). According to the analysis of divergence time estimation inferred with dataset4, this species diverged from all other relatives within the Pristurus rupestris species complex about 10.3 mya (95% HPD: 8.7–12.41 mya; Fig 5). The results of the nuclear networks shown in Fig 4B indicate that all alleles of P. omanensis sp. nov. for all independent loci analyzed (mc1r, cmos, rag1 and rag2) are private (not shared with any other species included in the present study). Pristurus omanensis sp. nov. is the species with the greatest genetic differentiation within the Pristurus rupestris species complex, with 21–24.5% interspecific distance in the mitochondrial 12S gene (S5 Table) and a genome-wide fixation index above 0.8 with all other Pristurus species (Fig 6). Moreover, while Pristurus rupestris sensu stricto and the other species described herein are usually found throughout the entire elevation gradient (or from mid to high elevations), P. omanensis sp. nov. seems to be restricted to low elevations, rarely exceeding 1,000 m asl (only one record from a total of 102 records; Table 1). Even though Pristurus omanensis sp. nov. is found in sympatry at less than 100 m with Pristurus rupestris sensu stricto and with another Pristurus species described below (S7 Table), no evidence of gene flow has been found between these species (Fig 3B and 3C; Burriel-Carranza et al. 2023: S38 Fig) [28].
Pristurus omanensis sp. nov. (Fig 12) presents some intraspecific diversity with 2.9% of genetic distance in the mitochondrial gene 12S (S5 Table) and an FST value of 0.25 between the populations that comprise this species (Fig 6). Phylogenetic (Fig 4A), phylogenomic (Figs 5 and S1) and population genomic analyses (Fig 3B and 3C) support the presence of two independent parapatric lineages within P. omanenis sp. nov.. However, mitochondrial and genome-wide nuclear SNPs disagree in the topology and composition of such lineages. Mitochondrial data recover an isolated clade, restricted to the northeasternmost distribution of P. omanensis sp. nov. (referred to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 8 in Garcia-Porta et al. 2017) [27], while the other lineage is comprised by specimens from both the Eastern and Central Hajars (referred to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 9 in Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Figs 4A and 13C) [27]. On the other hand, genome-wide nuclear data recover all specimens from the Eastern Hajars as a unique evolutionary unit, sister to the specimens inhabiting the Central Hajars, with a hybrid contact zone with admixed specimens where both populations overlap in distribution (referred to P. rupestris putative species BFD5 and BFD6 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024, Figs 3C, 13D and S1) [28]. Such mito-nuclear discordance between specimens inhabiting the Central and Eastern Hajars is not uncommon in geckos (see Burriel-Carranza et al. 2023c for a similar example in Trachydactylus hajarensis) [40], and since the mitochondrial genome is maternally inherited, it could be representative of dispersal differences between males and females. Given that gene flow exists, that admixed specimens are observed in nature and, together with the lack of support for species status in the MSC species delimitation approach implemented by means of BPP and gdi (Figs 5 and S1), we believe that the two lineages within P. omanensis sp. nov. reflect intraspecific diversity and should be considered as distinct populations of the same species.
Description of the holotype.
ZFMK 104096 (sample code S8000) (Fig 10). Adult male. Complete specimen, with the tail detached. Data on nine morphometric and two pholidotic variables (see Materials and Methods) are provided in S1 Table. SVL 22.2 mm, head length 28.8% of SVL, and head width 59% of head length. Moderately built, round body, habitus comparable to P. rupestris sensu stricto; limbs and tail not especially slender. Head robust and does not rise very steeply in profile, snout slightly blunt. Nostril separated from the rostral and situated between three scales: a wide supranasal extending to the midline margin, a small upper postnasal and a large lower postnasal extending laterally along the lower edge. Supranasals are separated into two scales. Scales on snout granular, polygonal and slightly pointed upwards. About nine scales in a straight line from the lower postnasal to the anterior edge of the orbit. Scales on snout, anterior to eyes, are larger than those on top of head. Around 24 scales across mid-orbital region. Palpebral fold edged anteriorly with large scales and not edged with pointed (ciliate) scales. Ear opening ellipsoidal. Upper labials (right/left) 7/7. Lower labials (right/left) 4/4, the fourth decreasing in size from the three large anterior scales. Four enlarged scales running backwards along the proximal border of the third lower labial to end at about the level of the angle of the mouth. Mental large, wedge-shaped, truncated posteriorly by five gular scales. Gulars small, rather pointed posteriorly, becoming slightly imbricate on throat. Dorsal scales on body small, polygonal and homogeneous, slightly pointed posteriorly. Ventrals flat and distinctly imbricate. Scales on dorsal and anterior surface of the forelimbs slightly larger than dorsal body scales, flat and imbricate, fairly pointed. Scales beneath the upper forelimbs granular and smaller than ventral body scales; those beneath lower forelimbs large, flat, imbricate and polygonal, larger than ventral body scales. Claws relatively shallow and weakly recurved. Scales on dorsal and anterior surface of hindlimbs large, flat and imbricate, fairly pointed. Scales beneath the upper hindlimbs granular and smaller than ventral body scales, those beneath lower hindlimbs large, flat, imbricate and polygonal, larger than ventral body scales. Regenerated tail relatively short and robust, anteriorly more or less cylindrical, posteriorly slightly compressed. Ridges of strongly elongated scales present, low crest on midline and on lower midline of tail is made up of a longitudinal row of enlarged scales, more enlarged dorsally. Tail scales large, flat and imbricate, pointed posteriorly; dorsals and ventrals considerably larger than those on the body.
Coloration in alcohol is grayish brown dorsally; broad dorsal midline pale grayish. Dorsally and both left and right of the midline irregularly shaped reddish blotches present. Dorsolaterally thin discontinuous pale reddish lines that dissolve into irregularly distributed spots on the flanks. Whitish spots are distributed in transversal rows laterally, and double the diameter of the reddish lines. Head is the same color as the body with a broad dark brownish stripe running from the nostril through the eye and then dorsolaterally until above the ear opening. Single large dark blotches are located from beneath the eye to the entire gular region reaching posteriorly to the insertion of the forelimbs. Larger and more prominent blotches are distributed laterally on the throat decreasing in brightness ventrally. Ventral background coloration is creamish-whitish. Limbs pale beige dorsally, toes not banded. Tail similarly colored like dorsals, with pale reddish spots scattered.
The figured μ-CT-scanned specimen (Fig 10B) has a maximal skull length of 6.7 mm, maximal height of 3.2 mm and maximal width of 4.0 mm. 25 presacral vertebrae. Noteworthy minor qualitative cranial osteological differences (Fig 10C) to the other holotype specimens of the Pristurus rupestris species complex are: Vomer posteriorly rounded and bordered by a heart-shaped opening; osseous naris edge sharp and almost right angled; premaxilla and nasal steep to frontal region.
Variation.
Data on nine morphometric and two pholidotic variables (see Materials and Methods) for all eight paratypes (see above) are provided in S1 Table. Largest male 25.4 mm SVL; largest female 22.6 mm SVL. All paratypes have broken or incomplete tails; four of eight have the throat sliced, three of eight individuals show damaged skin. Paratype NHMOK 2657 (sample code S7541) has a regenerated tail. Dorsal coloration ranges from pale beige to dark gray, with thin or absent pale grayish dorsal midlines. Dorsal pattern consisting of incomplete thin reddish lines to reddish blotches, bordered by similar-sized pale whitish spots. Laterally small reddish spots present in all paratypes, in some individuals also present ventrolaterally. Few to multiple large gular blotches present in all paratypes (Fig 11).
Distribution.
Pristurus omanensis sp. nov. is endemic to Oman. It is only found at low elevations surrounding the southern areas of the Central Hajars, and surrounding the southeastern region of the Eastern Hajars up until Ras al Hadd and then entering North until Qurayyat, Oman. Despite several extensive surveys, it has never been found in the Western Hajars or in the northern slopes of the Central Hajars. It has been recorded from 0 m asl up to 1,005 m asl, although it is rarely found above 700 m asl (only one record out of 102).
Habits.
P. omanensis sp. nov. is a diurnal species, although it can also be seen active after sunset. It is abundant on rocks, boulders, tree trunks, and human-made structures such as walls, houses, and gardens. It performs complex signaling including push-ups, inflating and laterally compressing the body and throat, and curling and waving the tail up over the back. It preys on ants and other arthropods using a sit-and-wait strategy. Females lay single hard-shelled eggs throughout the year.
Conservation.
This species is endemic to the Hajar Mountain range in Oman. Whilst the area of occupancy (AOO) is restricted, the species should be assessed as Least Concern in view of its presumed large and stable population, occurrence in more than ten locations, and absence of continuing decline in AOO, extent of occurrence (EOO), or in habitat area or quality and extent.
Pristurus ali Burriel-Carranza, Koppetsch, Garcia-Porta, Carranza–sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C3D2FA38-8C9A-48E5-9A5E-668AAFD1A830
(Figs 2–6, 14–17, S1, S2 and S4 and Tables 1 and S1–S7; Alignment of phased haplotypes for the molecular diagnostic characters based on the mc1r, cmos, rag1 and rag2 genes can be found on S1 Appendix).
English name: Ali’s Semaphore Gecko
(A) Ventral, lateral and dorsal external view of the specimen; (B) Ventral, lateral and dorsal internal view obtained through μ-CT scanning; (C) close up of head bone structures of the holotype specimen ZFMK104093 (sample code S7547).
(A) Dorsal and (B) ventral view of Pristurus ali sp. nov. paratype specimens showing color variation. All specimens correspond to specimens from the type genetic lineage 7 sensu Garcia-Porta et al. (2017). Further variation in specimens of P. ali sp.nov. lineage 6 sensu Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) can be consulted in S4 Fig.
(A) Live male specimen of Pristurus ali sp. nov. lineage 6 sensu Garcia-Porta et al. (2017); (B) Male specimen from lineage 7 sensu Garcia-Porta et al. (2017); (C) Head close-up of P. ali sp. nov. specimen from lineage 6 sensu Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) (picture code: BPP6_SC42502); (D) Habitat of P. ali sp. nov. near Sayma road, type locality. All pictures taken by S.C.
Distribution of P. ali sp.nov. in Arabia, including (A) Distribution of the species throughout the Hajar Mountains; (B) specimens used for morphological multivariate analyses; (C) specimens used for sympatry analysis identified as P. r. rupestris candidate species 6 and 7 by Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) using the 12S mitochondrial genetic marker; (D) specimens used for genome-wide SNP analyses. Type locality for the species is represented with a pink or white star. Colors refer to the following populations: Pink: P. r. rupestris candidate species 7 from Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) and P. rupestris BFD4 from Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024); red: Candidate species 6 from Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) and P. rupestris BFD4 from Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024).
Pristurus rupestris.
Arnold, 1977: 106 (part.); Arnold, 1986: 421 (part.); Arnold, 2009: 3 (part.); van deer Kooij, 2000: 116 (part.); Sindaco and Jeremčenko, 2008: 122 (part.); Gardner, 2013: 178 (part.).
Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 6 and 7. Garcia-Porta et al., 2017: 5.
Pristurus r. rupestris Clade 2. Garcia-Porta et al., 2017: 5; Saberi-Pirooz et al., 2019:11.
Pristurus sp2. Šmíd et al., 2021: 1189; Tejero-Cicuendez et al., 2021: S1 Fig; Tejero-Cicuéndez et al., 2022: S1 Fig; Burriel-Carranza et al., 2022: 9; Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024: S1 Fig; Carranza et al., 2018: S2 Appendix, 63; Carranza et al., 2021: 119.
Pristurus rupestris SP6 and SP7. Saberi-Pirooz et al., 2019: 11.
Pristurus rupestris BFD4. Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024: S24 Fig
Holotype.
ZFMK 104093 (sample code S7547), adult male from Sayma road, 1,327 m asl, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.76619’N, 59.03366’E, WGS84, collected in May 2011 by S. Carranza, F. Amat and E. Gómez-Díaz (assigned to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 7 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD4 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28].
Paratypes.
IBES7509 (sample code S7509; MorphoBank M849691–M849693), adult male from Tiwi road, 1,717 m, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.82554’N, 59.08568’E, WGS84, collected in May 2011 by S. Carranza, F. Amat and E. Gómez-Díaz (assigned to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 7 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD4 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; IBECN4240 (sample code CN4240; MorphoBank M849687–M849689), adult male from Al Salil, 1,691 m, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.83206’N, 59.02031’E WGS84, collected in May 2013 by S. Carranza, F. Amat, M. Metallinou, P. de Pous and Marc Simó-Riudalbas (assigned to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 7 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD4 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; IBES7193 (sample code S7193; MorphoBank M849682–M849685), adult male from Tiwi road, 1,533 m, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.82532’N, 59.11173’E, WGS84, collected in December 2010 by J. Garcia-Porta (assigned to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 7 by Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD4 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; NHMOK 2653 (sample code S7226), adult male from Jabal Bani Jabir, 1,956 m, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.71105’N, 59.14123’E, WGS84, collected in December 2010 by J. Garcia-Porta (assigned to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 7 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD4 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; IBES7539 (sample code S7539; MorphoBank M849700–M849703), adult female from Jabal Bani Jabir, 2,045 m, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.70583’N, 59.1421’E, WGS84, collected in May 2011 by S. Carranza, F. Amat and E. Gómez-Díaz (assigned to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 7 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD4 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; MZB 2024–0983 (sample code S7225; MorphoBank M849705–M849708), adult female from Tiwi road, 1,533 m, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.82532’N, 59.11173’E, WGS84, collected in December 2010 by J. Garcia-Porta (assigned to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 7 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD4 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; MZB 2024–0984 (sample code S7563; MorphoBank M849695–M849698), adult female from Tiwi road, 1,559 m, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.84148’N, 59.09768’E, WGS84, collected in May 2011 by S. Carranza, F. Amat and E. Gómez-Díaz (assigned to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 7 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD4 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; IBECN8286 (sample code CN8286; MorphoBank M849715–M849719), adult female from Tiwi road, 2,046 m, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.71016’N, 59.14027’E, WGS84, collected in November 2014 by S. Carranza (assigned to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 7 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD4 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; IBES7211 (sample code S7211; MorphoBank M849710–M849713), adult female from Jabal Bani Jabir, 1,956 m, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.71105’N, 59.14123’E, WGS84, collected in December 2010 by J. Garcia-Porta (assigned to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 7 by Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD4 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28].
Other material examined.
Additional Pristurus ali sp. nov. specimens previously assigned to P. r. rupestris candidate species 7 (same as type specimens) and 6 from Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) [27], and to P. rupestris BFD4 from Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024) [28] that were used for morphological, genetic, genomic, and geographical analyses can be consulted in Table 1.
Etymology.
The species epithet ‘ali’ is dedicated to Ali Alghafri from the Environment Authority, Oman in recognition for his companionship, guidance and help during several field expeditions across the Hajar Mountains of Oman dedicated to the study of the geckos of the Pristurus rupestris species complex, among other reptiles. The species epithet name is defined as a noun in apposition (not a noun in the genitive case) to avoid ending with a non-euphonious double-i.
Diagnosis.
Pristurus ali sp. nov. corresponds to a genetically highly distinct lineage from the Pristurus rupestris species complex sensu Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) [27] inhabiting the Eastern Hajar Mountains (North Oman). It represents the second oldest split within the Pristurus rupestris species complex, having diverged from all the other species within the group (except Pristurus omanensis sp. nov. which represents the oldest split) around 6.9 mya (95% HPD: 5.6–8.2 mya; Fig 5), and is restricted to a somewhat small geographic range (Fig 17). This small species of Pristurus is characterized by a combination of the following characters: (1) a maximum recorded SVL of 25.8 mm; (2) 6–7 upper labial scales; (3) 4 lower labial scales; (4) 3–6 small postmental scales; (5) absence of mid-dorsal enlarged scales (crest) on the body; (6) laterally compressed tail usually with conspicuous dorsal and smaller ventral enlarged scales (crest) in males, and less conspicuous (sometimes absent) in females; (7) five unique mutations in the mc1r alignment: C instead of T in position 147; G instead of A in position 286; C instead of T in position 399; G instead of A in position 531; C instead of T in position 648; (8) five unique mutations in the cmos alignment: C instead of T in position. 6; G instead of A in position 98; A instead of C in position 147; C instead of T in position 153; A instead of G in position 225; (9) 1 unique mutation in the rag1 alignment: A instead of G in position 206; (10) 1 unique mutation in the rag2 alignment: G instead of T in position 405 (see S1 Appendix).
Morphological, genetic and phylogeographic remarks.
Morphological differentiation of Pristurus ali sp. nov. from other species of the Pristurus rupestris species complex is convoluted, and even though there are no unique diagnostic characters to distinguish these species, P. ali sp. nov. specimens tentatively have a more robust body, specifically shorter brachia and wider scapular girdles, than Pristurus rupestris sensu stricto, P. omanensis sp. nov. and P. feulneri sp. nov. (which is described below and corresponds to P. r. rupestris candidate species 10.11,12–15 in Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD7–BFD11 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024) [27, 28] as evidenced by the morphological multivariate analyses (Fig 3A and S2–S4 Tables). The reconstructed morphospace of the P. rupestris species complex represented by the first two Principal Components of the PCA (explaining almost 50% of all shape variance; Fig 3A), revealed some differentiation of Pristurus ali sp. nov., yet the range of variation of this species still overlapped with the other taxa. Procrustes ANOVA and subsequent pairwise comparisons generally corroborated these findings, where differences among candidate species were found between P. ali sp. nov. and all other taxa with the exception of the below described P. assareen sp. nov. (P. r. rupestris candidate species 16 in Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD12 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024) [27, 28]. Specifically, differences between these candidate species were due to distinct head dimensions, shorter brachium length and wider scapular and pelvic girdles in P. ali sp. nov., as evidenced by PC loadings and procrustes ANOVAs on the individual variables (S2–S4 Tables). These findings are in agreement with Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) [27] and would correspond to the robust morphotype described therein. Comparisons of within species variance found no differences among putative taxa, which was likewise observed in the overlapping distributions in the PCA. Taken together, although our morphological analyses found some evidence that while Pristurus ali sp. nov. was somewhat distinct morphologically, there were no diagnostic morphological traits that distinguished the species unambiguously and could be used as a morphological taxonomic character for this group. Pristurus ali sp. nov. is also geographically separated from P. omanensis sp. nov. by its elevational occurrence across its distribution range. While both species can be found in the Eastern Hajars, the former has been only found above 900 m asl while the latter is mostly found below 700 m asl.
Molecular analyses show a strong differentiation between P. ali sp. nov. and all other species of the P. rupestris species complex. The results of the nuclear networks for the cmos, mc1r and rag2 loci shown in Fig 4B, indicate that P. ali sp. nov. has private alleles for each of these genes (not shared with any other species included in the present analysis). Pristurus ali sp. nov. is monophyletic in both mitochondrial (Fig 4A) and nuclear (Figs 5 and S1) phylogenetic analyses. This species diverged from its sister group (all other species in the Pristurus rupestris species complex except for P. omanensis sp. nov.) about 6.8 mya, representing the second oldest divergence event within the species complex (Fig 5). Uncorrected p-distances for the mitochondrial 12S gene (9.4–21.1%; S5 Table) as well as population genomic fixation indexes (FST > 0.65 in all pairwise comparisons; S6 Table) support a great deal of differentiation between P. ali sp. nov. and the other Pristurus species. Furthermore, no signs of gene flow are apparent between P. ali sp. nov. even though it has been recorded in sympatry with P. rupestris sensu stricto and the below described P. feulneri sp. nov. (P. r. rupestris candidate species 15 in Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; P. rupestris BFD11 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; S7 Table) [27, 28]. Similar to P. omanensis sp. nov., mitochondrial and nuclear phylogenies yielded contrasting results when interrogating the intraspecific diversity within P. ali sp. nov. The mitochondrial phylogenetic reconstruction recovered two distinct allopatric lineages within P. ali sp. nov. (corresponding to P. r. rupestris candidate species 6 and 7 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017) [27]. However, when using genome-wide nuclear SNP data, this segregation disappeared in the phylogenomic reconstructions as well as in population structure analyses, and P. ali sp. nov. was recovered as a single, homogeneous population (corresponding to Pristurus rupestris BFD4 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024) [28]. When the mitochondrial separation is enforced, the genome-wide FST value inferred with dataset2 is as low as 0.06 (Fig 6).
Description of the holotype.
ZFMK 104093 (sample code S7547) (Fig 14). Adult male. Complete specimen with the tip of the tongue missing (used for DNA extraction), throat damaged and tail detached in two separate parts. Data on nine morphometric and two pholidotic variables (see Materials and Methods) are provided in S1 Table. SVL 23.8 mm, head length 30.4% of SVL, and head width 63% of head length, tail tip regenerated. Moderately built, round body, habitus comparable to P. rupestris sensu stricto; limbs and tail not especially slender. Head robust and does not rise very steeply in profile, snout slightly blunt. Nostril separated from the rostral and situated between three scales: a wide supranasal extending to the midline margin, a small upper postnasal and a large lower postnasal extending laterally along the lower edge. Supranasals separated in two scales. Scales on snout granular, polygonal and slightly pointed upwards. About nine scales in a straight line from the lower postnasal to the anterior edge of the orbit. Scales on snout, anterior to eyes, larger than those on top of head. Around 21 scales across mid-orbital region. Palpebral fold edged anteriorly with large scales and not edged with pointed (ciliate) scales. Ear opening round. Upper labials (right/left) 7/7. Lower labials (right/left) 4/4, the fourth decreasing in size from the three large anterior scales. Four enlarged scales running backwards along the proximal borders of the third lower labials to end at about the level of the angle of the mouth. Mental large, wedge-shaped, truncated posteriorly by four gular scales. Gulars small, rather pointed posteriorly, becoming slightly imbricate on throat. Dorsal scales on body small, polygonal and homogeneous, slightly pointed posteriorly and granular. Ventrals flat and distinctly imbricate. Scales on dorsal and anterior surface of the forelimbs large, flat and imbricate, fairly pointed. Scales beneath the upper forelimbs granular and smaller than ventral body scales; those beneath lower forelimbs large, flat, imbricate and polygonal, larger than ventral body scales. Claws relatively shallow and weakly recurved. Scales on dorsal and anterior surface of hindlimbs large, flat and imbricate, fairly pointed. Scales beneath the upper hindlimbs granular and smaller than ventral body scales, those beneath lower hindlimbs large, flat, imbricate and polygonal, larger than ventral body scales. Tail relatively short and robust, anteriorly more or less cylindrical, posteriorly slightly compressed, with a slight groove along each side. Ridges of strongly elongated scales present, low crest on midline and on lower mid-line of tail is made up of a longitudinal row of enlarged scales, more enlarged dorsally. Tail scales large, flat and imbricate, pointed posteriorly; dorsals and ventrals considerably larger than those on body.
Coloration in alcohol is light brown above; broad but blurred dorsal midline pale and slightly grayish. Dorsolaterally discontinuous thin pale reddish lines that dissolve into rows of small spots ventrolaterally to the flanks. Pale whitish spots distributed in an irregular pattern dorsolaterally, and roughly double the diameter of the reddish spots. Head light brown with a broad dark brownish stripe running from close to the nostril through the eye and then dorsolaterally until above the ear opening. Single large dark spots located right beneath the angle of the mouth until the third lower labial scale. Same-colored but roughly half the diameter sized spots conformed by two to three gular scales present on the ventral side of the throat, distributed from the level of the anterior eye opening to the insertion of the forelimbs. Ventral coloration whitish. Limbs light brown with irregular dark brown markings above, ventrally pale, toes not banded. Tail similarly colored like dorsals, pale gray-brown above with blurred, light, narrow cross-bars in the non-regenerated part.
The figured μ-CT-scanned specimen (Fig 14B) has a maximal skull length of 7.8 mm, maximal height of 3.4 mm and maximal width of 4.5 mm. 26 presacral vertebrae. Noteworthy minor qualitative cranial osteological differences (Fig 14C) to the other holotype specimens of the Pristurus rupestris species complex are: Quadratum well-developed and slightly laterally protruding; ossified cranium; sclerotic rings strongly ossified; vomer posteriorly rounded and bordered by a heart-shaped opening; osseous naris edge smooth and slightly rounded; premaxilla and nasal rising moderately steep to frontal region.
Variation.
Data on nine morphometric and two pholidotic variables (see Materials and methods) for all nine paratypes (see above) are provided in S1 Table. Largest male 25.7 mm SVL; largest female 24.3 mm. Eight of nine paratypes have completely or partially broken tails; three of nine have the throat sliced. Paratype IBECN4240 (sample CN4240) has a partially regenerated tail. Dorsal coloration ranging from pale beige to grayish, with only blurred and thin pale to orangish dorsal midlines present in some individuals usually in females. Multiple small dark brownish gular spots present in all paratypes, ranging from a blend to prominent appearance. Ventrally inconspicuous dark brownish to reddish small spots present in some paratypes, but ventrolaterally only and not reaching to midventral region (Fig 15).
Distribution.
Pristurus ali sp. nov. is endemic to Oman, where it has only been found in the Eastern Hajars (Fig 17). Despite intensive surveys across the Hajar Mountain range, it has never been found to the West of the Eastern Hajars. It is only found in mid to high elevations as it has only been recorded from 919 m asl up to 2,046 m asl.
Habits.
Pristurus ali sp. nov. is a diurnal species, although it can also be seen active after sunset. It has been found on rocks, boulders and tree trunks but most probably it is also present inside the mountain villages on human-made structures such as walls, houses, and gardens (Fig 16). It performs complex signaling including push-ups, inflating and laterally compressing the body and throat, and curling and waving the tail up over the back. It preys on ants and other arthropods using a sit-and-wait strategy. Females lay single hard-shelled eggs throughout the year.
Conservation.
This species is endemic to a restricted area of the Eastern Hajar Mountains in Oman. It has an area of occupancy (AOO) of 76 km2 and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of 307 km2. Despite the restricted EOO and AOO, there are no known threats and no continuing decline in habitat area or quality, and the species should be assessed as Least Concern in view of its distribution, abundance, and presumed large and stable population.
Pristurus feulneri Burriel-Carranza, Koppetsch, Garcia-Porta, Els, Carranza–sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:11000749-4B61-446D-B734-042F6EF7C9E4
(Figs 2–6, 18–21, S5–S8 Tables 1 and S1, S2, S1–S7; Alignment of phased haplotypes for the molecular diagnostic characters based on the mc1r, cmos, rag1 and rag2 genes can be found on S1 Appendix).
English name: Feulner’s Semaphore Gecko
(A) Ventral, lateral and dorsal external view of the specimen; (B) Ventral, lateral and dorsal internal view obtained through μ-CT scanning; (C) close up of head bone structures of the holotype specimen ZFMK104094 (sample code S6102).
Dorsal (A) and ventral (B) view of Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. paratype specimens. To be taxonomically coherent, all paratype specimens were chosen from the same genetic lineage (genetic lineage 13 sensu Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; genomic lineage BFD9 sensu Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024). Further variation in P. feulneri sp. nov. specimens lineages 10.11, 12, 14, and 15 sensu Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) (lineages BFD7,8,10, and BFD11 sensu Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024) can be consulted in S5–S8 Figs.
(A) P. feulneri sp. nov. female specimen from lineage 12 sensu Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) with pale coloration, and a conspicuous dorsal line; (B) Dorsal view of the same specimen; (C) P. feulneri sp. nov. male specimen with dark coloration and a conspicuous dorsal crest in tail. The specimen corresponds to P. feulneri sp. nov. lineage 12 sensu Garcia-Porta et al. (2017); (D) Head close-up of a P. feulneri sp. nov. lineage 15 sensu Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) specimen from the Eastern Hajars; (E) Habitat of P. feulneri sp. nov. near Mizbar, locality of some paratype specimens. All pictures taken by S.C.
Distribution of P. feulneri sp.nov. in Arabia, including: (A) all known introduced populations throughout the coast of UAE and surrounding islands; (B) specimens used for morphological multivariate analyses; (C) specimens used for sympatry analysis identified as P. rupestris candidate species 10.11–15 by Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) using the 12S mitochondrial genetic marker, including specimens from lineage 17 discovered in the present study; (D) specimens used for genome-wide SNP analyses colored by the most supported ADMIXTURE configuration in Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024). Type locality for the species is represented with a blue or white star. Legend in caption (C) refer to P. feulneri sp. nov. candidate species within Garcia-Porta et al. (2017). Legend in caption (D) correspond to P. feulneri sp. nov. lineages within Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024).
Pristurus rupestris.
Arnold, 1977: 106 (part.); Arnold, 1986: 421 (part.); Arnold, 2009: 3 (part.); van deer Kooij, 2000: 116 (part.); Sindaco and Jeremčenko, 2008: 122 (part.); Gardner, 2013: 178 (part.).
Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 10.11, 12, 13, 14 and 15. Garcia-Porta et al., 2017: 5.
Pristurus r. rupestris Clade 3. Garcia-Porta et al., 2017: 5; Saberi-Pirooz et al., 2019:11.
Pristurus sp3. Šmíd et al., 2021: 1189; Tejero-Cicuendez et al., 2021: S1 Fig; Tejero-Cicuéndez et al., 2022: S1 Fig; Burriel-Carranza et al., 2019: S1 Appendix: 35; Burriel-Carranza et al., 2022: 9; Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024: S1 Fig; Carranza et al., 2018: S2 Appendix, 64; Carranza et al., 2021: 119).
Pristurus rupestris SP10/11, SP12, SP13, SP14 and SP15. Saberi-Pirooz et al., 2019: 11.
Pristurus rupestris BFD7, BFD8, BFD9, BFD10 and BFD11. Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024: S24 Fig.
Holotype.
ZFMK 104094 (sample code S6102), adult male from Lizq, 482 m, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.71765’N, 58.15035’E, WGS84, collected in November 2010 by J. Garcia-Porta (assigned genetically to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 13 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017 and to Pristurus rupestris BFD9 from Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28].
Paratypes.
IBECN3699 (sample code CN3699; adult male; MorphoBank M849798–M849800), MZB 2024–0986 (sample code CN7939; adult male; MorphoBank M849785–M849787), IBECN7239 (sample code CN7239; adult male; MorphoBank M849778–M849783), MZB 2024–0985 (sample code CN7213; adult female; MorphoBank M849789–M849791) four specimens from Mizbar, 549 m, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 23.14319’N, 58.42435’E, WGS84, collected in November 2014 by S. Carranza (assigned to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 13 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD9 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; IBES7533 (sample code S7533; MorphoBank M849793–M849796), adult male; NHMOK 2655 (sample code S7551), adult female; two specimens from Mizbar, 555 m, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 23.14307’N, 58.4244’E, WGS84, collected in May 2011 by S. Carranza, F. Amat and E. Gómez-Díaz (assigned to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 13 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD9 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28].
Other material examined.
Additional Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. specimens formerly assigned to P. r. rupestris candidate species 10.11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 from Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) [27] and to Pristurus rupestris BFD7–BFD11 in Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024) [28] that were used for morphological, genetic, genomic, and geographical analyses can be consulted in Table 1.
Etymology.
The species epithet “feulneri” is a genitive Latin noun in honor of American Naturalist Gary R. Feulner, Chairman of the Dubai Natural History Group since 1995, in recognition for his 39 years of dedication and contributions to advancing our understanding of the biodiversity and biogeography of the fauna and flora of the Hajar Mountains.
Diagnosis.
Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. corresponds to a genetically highly distinct lineage from the diverse Pristurus rupestris species complex inhabiting the Hajar Mountains (North Oman and Eastern UAE). This species represents the most abundant Pristurus species of the Hajar Mountains and is distributed across the whole mountain range (Fig 21). Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. is characterized by a combination of the following characters: (1) a maximum recorded SVL of 27.3 mm; (2) 6–7 upper labial scales; (3) 4–5 lower labial scales; (4) 3–6 small postmental scales; (5) absence of mid-dorsal enlarged scales (crest) on the body; (6) laterally compressed tail usually with conspicuous dorsal and smaller ventral enlarged scales (crest) in males, and less conspicuous (sometimes absent) in females; (7) one unique mutation in alignment cmos: an A instead of a G in position 241; (8) two unique mutations in alignment rag1: T instead of C in position 94; A instead of G in position 206 (see S1 Appendix).
Morphological, genetic and phylogeographic remarks.
Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. is morphologically cryptic from the other species of the Pristurus rupestris species complex.
The reconstructed morphospace of the P. rupestris species complex (Fig 3A) revealed that P. feulneri’s sp. nov. morphospace completely overlaps with P. rupestris sensu stricto and P. omanensis sp. nov., and presents a great deal of overlap with P. ali sp. nov. and P. assareen sp. nov. (Pristurus rupestris candidate species 16 in Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD12 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; described below) [27, 28]. Procrustes ANOVA and subsequent pairwise comparisons (S3 and S4 Tables) corroborated that there were no significant differences between P. feulneri sp. nov. and the first two species while there were significant differences with the last two. Specifically, differences between these candidate species were due to distinct head dimensions, longer brachium length, and narrower scapular and pelvic girdles in P. feulneri sp. nov.. These findings are in agreement with Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) [27] and could correspond to the slender morphotype described therein. Tentatively, P. feulneri sp. nov. seems to present a more apparent dorsal midline in both males and females (especially in specimens from the Western and Central Hajars; Figs 19 and S5–S8), than P. rupestris sensu stricto (Fig 7), P. omanensis sp. nov. (Figs 11, 12 and S3), P. ali sp. nov. (Figs 14, 15 and S4), and P. assareen sp. nov. (Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 16. Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD12. Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024; Figs 21 and 22; described below) [27, 28]. Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. occurs syntopically with P. rupestris sensu stricto, P. omanensis sp. nov. and P. ali sp. nov. (S7 Table).
(A) Ventral, lateral and dorsal external view of the specimen; (B) Ventral, lateral and dorsal internal view obtained through μ-CT scanning; (C) close up of head bone structures of the P. assareen sp. nov. holotype specimen.
Molecular analyses on mitochondrial (Fig 4A), nuclear loci (Fig 4B), and genome-wide SNP data (Figs 3B, 3C, 5, 6, S1 and S2) are fully concordant with the differentiation of P. feulneri as a distinct species from the other representatives of the Pristurus rupestris species complex. Pristurus feulneri is monophyletic in both mitochondrial (Fig 3A) and nuclear phylogenetic analyses (Figs 5 and S1). In all phylogenetic reconstructions, it forms a clade together with P. rupestris sensu stricto and the fourth species of Pristurus described below (Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 16. Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD12. Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024) [27, 28], which split apart about 4.5 mya (95% HPD: 3.6–5.3 mya; Fig 5). The results of the nuclear networks for the mc1r, cmos, rag1 and rag2 loci shown in Fig 4B, indicate that P. feulneri sp. nov. has some private alleles for each of these genes (not shared with any other species included in the present analysis), especially in cmos where all haplotypes are private. Uncorrected p-distances with the mitochondrial 12S marker (13.5–24.5%; S5 Table) as well as FST estimates (0.61–0.83; S6 Table) with genome-wide SNP data show a strong interspecific genetic differentiation.
Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. is the species of the Pristurus rupestris species complex with the highest intraspecific diversity (uncorrected p-distance of the mitochondrial 12S gene = 8.4%; S5 Table). Phylogenetic reconstructions with the mitochondrial marker 12S recovered similar results to the ones observed in Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) [27]. However, with the inclusion of new specimens not present in the former study, we were able to identify another deep lineage within Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. from the Central Hajars, to which we assigned the lineage number 17 (Fig 4A). Intraspecific genome-wide FST values inferred with dataset2 ranged from 0.38–0.69 between populations, showing a great deal of differentiation within this species (Fig 6). Moreover, species delimitation analysis inferred through BPP A10 support the existence of up to four species within P. feulneri sp. nov. (Fig 5) but the gdi approach suggest that this diversity is not fully supported as interspecific diversity with the exception of candidate species 15 in Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) (P. rupestris BFD 11 in Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024; Figs 5 and S2) [27, 28]. However, topological discordances in the internal nodes of P. feulneri sp. nov. were found between mitochondrial phylogenetic reconstructions (Fig 3A), phylogenomic reconstructions (S1 Fig), and MSC species tree reconstructions (Fig 5), which could suggest incomplete lineage sorting. Also, although levels of genetic divergence between candidate species 15 in Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) (P. rupestris BFD 12 in Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024) [27, 28] and the other populations within P. feulneri sp. nov. are high, the former seems to fall within the cluster of intraspecific divergence rather than interspecific estimates (Fig 6). Therefore, we refrain from further splitting any allopatric populations of P. feulneri sp. nov. until more data are available. In the Eastern Hajars we find the deepest lineage within the species, which diverged from all other P. feulneri sp. nov. about 2.9 mya (95% HPD: 2.3–3.4 mya; formerly assigned to P. rupestris candidate species 15 in Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; P. rupestris BFD11 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; Fig 5) [27, 28]. This clade is sister to all other deep lineages of P. feulneri sp. nov. in the genome-wide SNP analyses (Figs 5 and S1) but conforms a monophyletic clade with lineage 17 in the mitochondrial phylogenetic reconstruction (Fig 4A). Also in the Eastern Hajars but further west, we find the population assigned to P. rupestris rupestris candidate species 13 in Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) [27] and to P. rupestris BFD9 in Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024) [28]. The greatest diversity of P. feulneri sp. nov. populations is found in the Central Hajars with one population inhabiting the Semail gap (P. rupestris rupestris candidate species 12 in Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; P. rupestris BFD8 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024) [27, 28], another population inhabiting the southern slope of the Jabal Akhdar (conformed by lineage 17 and P. rupestris rupestris candidate species 14 in Garcia-Porta et al 2017; Pristurus rupestris BFD10 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024) [27, 28], and a third population in the northern slope of the Jabal Akhdar (P. rupestris rupestris candidate species 10.11 in Garcia-Porta et al. 2017; P. rupestris BFD7 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; Fig 21C and 21D) [27, 28], which extends to the West until the Musandam Peninsula and to all the coastal and island localities across the western UAE (see Distribution below). Therefore, Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. is the only species of the Pristurus rupestris species complex present in the UAE.
Description of the holotype.
ZFMK 104094 (sample code S6102) (Fig 18). Adult male. Specimen ventrally sliced from gular fold to insertion of hindlimbs (internal tissue used for DNA extraction), right lower forelimb with ventral incision and tail missing (only the first 2 mm of the anterior part present). Data on nine morphometric and two pholidotic variables (see Materials and Methods) are provided in S1 Table. SVL 24.6 mm, head length 27.5% of SVL, and head width 63% of head length. Moderately built, round body, habitus comparable to P. rupestris; limbs and tail not especially slender. Head robust and does not rise very steeply in profile, snout slightly blunt. Nostril separated from the rostral and situated between three scales: a wide supranasal extending to the midline margin, a small upper postnasal and a large lower postnasal extending laterally along the lower edge. Supranasals are separated in two scales. Scales on snout granular, polygonal and slightly pointed upwards. About nine scales in a straight line from the lower postnasal to the anterior edge of the orbit. Scales on snout, anterior to eyes, are larger than those on top of head. Around 26 scales across mid-orbital region. Palpebral fold edged anteriorly with large scales and not edged with pointed (ciliate) scales. Ear opening droplet-shaped. Upper labials (right/left) 7/7. Lower labials (right/left) 4/4, the fourth decreasing in size from the three large anterior scales. Five enlarged scales running backwards along the proximal borders of the third lower labials to end at about the level of the angle of the mouth. Mental large, wedge-shaped, truncated posteriorly by four small postmental scales. Gulars small, rather pointed posteriorly, becoming slightly imbricate on throat. Dorsal scales on body small, polygonal and homogeneous, slightly pointed posteriorly. Ventrals flat and distinctly imbricate. Scales on dorsal and anterior surface of the forelimbs slightly larger than dorsal body scales, flat and imbricate, fairly pointed. Scales beneath the upper forelimbs granular and smaller than ventral body scales; those beneath lower forelimbs large, flat, imbricate and polygonal, larger than ventral body scales. Claws relatively shallow and weakly recurved. Scales on dorsal and anterior surface of hindlimbs large, flat and imbricate, fairly pointed. Scales beneath the upper hindlimbs granular and smaller than ventral body scales, those beneath lower hindlimbs large, flat, imbricate and polygonal, larger than ventral body scales. Tail rudiment cylindrical, bearing the first anterior scales of the caudal crest on midline made up of a longitudinal row of enlarged scales.
Coloration in alcohol grayish brown dorsally; broad dorsal midline pale grayish. Dorsolaterally thin pale reddish lines that dissolve into discontinuous lines posteriorly, and also ventrolaterally to the flanks. Bright whitish spots distributed in transversal rows dorsolaterally, and more than double the diameter of the reddish lines. Head same color as the body with irregularly distributed bright whitish spots. A broad dark brownish stripe running from the nostril through the eye and then dorsolaterally until above the ear opening, bordered both dorsally and ventrally by blurred pale grayish bands. Single large dark blotches located from beneath the angle of the mouth to the entire gular and ventral region reaching posteriorly to the insertion of the hindlimbs. Most of them being conformed by more than four gular scales, with larger and more prominent blotches on the throat decreasing in size posteriorly. Ventral background coloration is creamish-whitish. Limbs dark pale ventrally and brownish with bright whitish spots dorsally, forming regular bright whitish bands dorsally on the toes. Tail rudiment similarly colored like dorsals.
The figured μ-CT-scanned specimen (Fig 18B) has a maximal skull length of 7.1 mm, maximal height of 2.8 mm and maximal width of 4.1 mm. 25 presacral vertebrae. Noteworthy minor qualitative cranial osteological differences (Fig 18C) to the other holotype specimens of the Pristurus rupestris species complex are: Quadratum not laterally protruding; parabasisphenoid damaged; vomer posteriorly only slightly rounded and bordered by a hoof-shaped opening; osseous naris edge smooth and slightly rounded; parietal incompletely ossified; premaxilla and nasal moderately steep to frontal region.
Variation.
Data on nine morphometric and two pholidotic variables (see Materials and Methods) for all six paratypes (see above) are provided in S1 Table. Largest male 25.3 mm SVL; largest female 24.4 mm. All paratypes have broken or incomplete tails; two of six have the throat sliced. Paratype IBECN7239 (sample CN7239) has a regenerated tail. Dorsal coloration similar for all paratypes, with conspicuous broad dorsal midline colored pale grayish to bright orange-beige. Dorsal bright spots present in all paratypes, colored pale-beige to yellowish. Multiple large gular blotches present in all paratypes. Ventral pattern variable, but dark brownish to reddish spots present in all paratypes, being distributed from ventrolaterally only to covering the entire ventral region (Fig 19).
Distribution.
This species of Pristurus is the most ubiquitous of its genus in the Hajar Mountains and the only species of the Pristurus rupestris species complex present in the UAE. It has been recorded throughout the whole mountain range, from the Musandam Peninsula in the Western Hajars to Ras al Hadd in the Eastern Hajars. It is distributed throughout the UAE and Oman and it has been recorded from sea level up to 2,317 m asl in the Jabal Kawr (Central Hajars, Oman). There are records of introduced populations along the western UAE coast and surrounding islands (Fig 21A), most likely due to the transport of rocks and sediments from the Hajar Mountains for the development of coastline infrastructures.
Habits.
Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. is a diurnal species, although it can also be seen active after sunset. It is abundant on rocks, boulders, tree trunks, and human-made structures such as walls, houses, and gardens (Fig 20). It performs complex signaling including push-ups, inflating and laterally compressing the body and throat, and curling and waving the tail up over the back. It preys on ants and other arthropods using a sit-and-wait strategy. Females lay single hard-shelled eggs throughout the year.
Pristurus assareen Burriel-Carranza, Koppetsch, Garcia-Porta, Carranza–sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:1D989386-9EDA-44C9-9256-B9E01EECD12E
(Figs 2–6, 21–24, S1 and S2 and Tables 1 and S1–S7; Alignment of phased haplotypes for the molecular diagnostic characters based on the mc1r, cmos, rag1 and rag2 genes can be found on S1 Appendix).
English name: As Sareen Semaphore Gecko
(A) Dorsal and (B) ventral view of Pristurus assareen sp. nov. paratype specimens.
(A) P. assareen sp. nov. holotype male specimen (ZFMK104095; sample code CN3704); (B) Habitat of P. assareen sp. nov. in wadi As Sareen; (C) Landscape of wadi As Sareen in Eastern Hajars, North Oman. All pictures taken by S.C.
Pristurus rupestris.
Arnold, 1977: 106 (part.); Arnold, 1986: 421 (part.); Arnold, 2009: 3 (part.); van deer Kooij, 2000: 116 (part.); Sindaco and Jeremčenko, 2008: 122 (part.); Gardner, 2013: 178 (part.).
Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 16. Garcia-Porta et al., 2017: 5.
Pristurus sp4. Šmíd et al., 2021: 1189; Tejero-Cicuendez et al., 2021: S1 Fig; Tejero-Cicuéndez et al., 2022: S1 Fig; Burriel-Carranza et al., 2022: 9; Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024: S1 Fig; Carranza et al., 2018: S2 Appendix, 65; Carranza et al., 2021: 119.
Pristurus rupestris SP16. Saberi-Pirooz et al., 2019: 11.
Pristurus rupestris BFD12. Burriel-Carranza et al., 2024: S24 Fig.
Holotype.
ZFMK 104095 (sample code CN3704), adult male from Wadi As Sareen Nature Reserve, 1,682 m asl, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.13182’N, 58.61912’E, WGS84, collected in November 2014 by S. Carranza (assigned to Pristurus rupestris rupestris candidate species 16 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017 and to Pristurus rupestris BFD12 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28].
Paratypes.
IBES7257 (sample code S7257; MorphoBank M849924–M849928), adult female from Wadi As Sareen Nature Reserve, 1,683 m asl, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.13167’N, 58.61889’E, WGS84, collected in May 2011 by S. Carranza, F. Amat and E. Gómez-Díaz (assigned to P. r. rupestris candidate species 16 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017 and to Pristurus rupestris BFD12 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28]; MZB 2024–0989 (sample code CN192; MorphoBank M849930–M849932), juvenile from Wadi As Sareen Nature Reserve, 1,682 m asl, Eastern Hajars (North Oman), 22.13182’N, 58.61912’E, WGS84, collected in May 2014 by S. Carranza (assigned to P. r. rupestris candidate species 16 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017 and to Pristurus rupestris BFD12 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; see Table 1) [27, 28].
Other material examined.
So far, this new species is only known from three specimens (holotype ZFMK 104095 (sample code CN3704); paratypes: MZB 2024–0989 (sample code CN192) and IBES7257 (sample code S7257).
Diagnosis.
Pristurus assareen sp. nov. corresponds to a genetically highly distinct lineage from the Pristurus rupestris species complex sensu Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) [27] inhabiting a secluded and small region of the Eastern Hajar Mountains, North Oman. It is sister taxon to P. rupestris sensu stricto and constitutes the youngest divergence within the species complex about 3.7 mya (95% HPD: 3.0–4.5 mya; Fig 5). This small species of Pristurus is only known from a single locality and is characterized by a combination of the following characters: (1) a maximum recorded SVL of 23.96 mm; (2) 6–7 upper labial scales; (3) 3–4 lower labial scales; (4) 3–5 small postmental scales; (5) absence of mid-dorsal enlarged scales (crest) on the body; (6) laterally compressed tail usually with conspicuous dorsal and smaller ventral enlarged scales (crest) in males, and less conspicuous (sometimes absent) in females; (7) one unique mutation in alignment rag1: A instead of C in position 200; (8) one unique mutation in alignment rag2: A instead og G in position 325 (see S1 Appendix).
Etymology.
The species epithet ‘assareen’ is a noun in apposition that refers to the geographic distribution range of the species, so far only known from a single locality in Wadi As Sareen Nature Reserve, Eastern Hajar Mountains, Oman.
Morphological, genetic and phylogeographic remarks.
Pristurus assareen sp. nov. is morphologically cryptic from the other species of the Pristurus rupestris species complex. Although no diagnostic characters have been found, P. assareen sp. nov. tends to have a more robust body, similar to P. ali sp. nov., with relatively shorter brachia and wider scapular girdles than P. rupestris sensu stricto, P. omanensis sp. nov. and P. feulneri sp. nov.. This new species can be geographically separated from P. omanensis sp. nov., P. ali sp. nov. and P. feulneri sp. nov. by its distribution: P. assareen sp. nov. is restricted to a single locality in Wadi As Sareen Nature Reserve (Eastern Hajars), at an elevation of 1,680 m asl, where none of the aforementioned species co-occur. However, P. assareen sp. nov. is found syntopically with P. rupestris sensu stricto, thus the differentiation between these two species relies on molecular methods. Although there are only morphological data from two adult specimens in the multivariate analyses, it seems that P. assareen sp. nov. is morphologically more similar to P. ali sp. nov. than to any other Pristurus species within the species complex, sharing the ‘robust’ morphotype described in Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) [27] with the latter (Fig 3A and S2–S4 Tables).
All mitochondrial (Fig 4A), nuclear loci (Fig 4B), and genome-wide SNP analyses (Figs 3A, 3B, 5, S1 and S2) are fully concordant in the differentiation of P. assareen sp. nov. as a distinct species of its sister clade, P. rupestris sensu stricto. Pristurus assareen sp. nov. is monophyletic in both mitochondrial (Fig 4A) and nuclear phylogenetic analyses (Figs 5 and S1). In all phylogenetic reconstructions, it forms a clade together with P. rupestris sensu stricto representing the youngest split within the species complex, originating about 3.7 mya (Fig 5). The results of the nuclear networks for the cmos, mc1r, rag1 and rag2 loci shown in Fig 4B, indicate that P. assareen sp. nov. has some private alleles for each of these genes (not shared with any other species included in the present analysis). Although occurring in syntopy, no signs of admixture were detected between P. assareen sp. nov. and P. rupestris sensu stricto lineage 3 from Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) (P. rupestris BFD2 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024) [27, 28], and genetic and population genomic analyses show a great level of genetic differentiation between P. assareen sp. nov. and all other species described herein, including P. rupestris sensu stricto (uncorrected p-distance for 12S gene ranges from 10–23.7%; FST values range from 0.52–0.87; S5 and S6 Tables respectively). Additionally, although some intraspecific pairwise FST values within P. feulneri sp. nov. are similar to FST values between P. assareen sp. nov. and P. rupestris sensu stricto lineage 3 from Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) [27], when incorporating data on genetic distance (dxy), P. assareen sp. nov. vs P. rupestris sensu stricto seems to be placed within the interspecific diversity cluster (colored dots in Fig 6). In addition, it is important to bear in mind that P. assareen sp. nov. and P. rupestris sensu stricto coexist syntopically at the only known locality for P. assareen sp. nov. in Wadi As Sareen Nature Reserve. In fact, P. rupestris sensu stricto seems much more abundant at this locality (S.C. pers. observ.).
Description of the holotype.
ZFMK 104095 (sample code CN3704) (Fig 22). Adult male. Incomplete specimen lacking the entire right hindlimb, parts of the cloacal fissure, and tail. Data on nine morphometric and two pholidotic variables (see Materials and Methods) are provided in S1 Table. SVL 22.3 mm (incomplete due to parts of the cloaca damaged), head length 30.3% of SVL, and head width 59% of head length. Moderately built, round body, habitus comparable to P. rupestris sensu stricto; limbs and tail not especially slender. Head robust and does not rise very steeply in profile, snout slightly blunt. Nostril separated from the rostral and situated between three scales: a wide supranasal extending to the midline margin, a small upper postnasal and a large lower postnasal extending laterally along the lower edge. Supranasals are separated in two scales. Scales on snout granular, polygonal and slightly pointed upwards. About eight scales in a straight line from the lower postnasal to the anterior edge of the orbit. Scales on snout, anterior to eyes, are larger than those on top of head. Around 20 scales across mid-orbital region. Palpebral fold edged anteriorly with large scales and not edged with pointed (ciliate) scales. Ear opening rounded. Upper labials (right/left) 7/7. Lower labials (right/left) 4/4, the fourth decreasing in size from the three large anterior scales. Four enlarged scales running backwards along the proximal borders of the third lower labials to end at about the level of the angle of the mouth. Mental large, rounded, truncated posteriorly by six gular scales. Gulars small, rather pointed posteriorly, becoming slightly imbricate on throat. Dorsal scales on body small, polygonal and homogeneous, slightly pointed posteriorly. Ventrals flat and distinctly imbricate. Scales on dorsal and anterior surface of the forelimbs slightly larger than dorsal body scales, flat and imbricate, fairly pointed. Scales beneath the upper forelimbs granular and smaller than ventral body scales; those beneath lower forelimbs large, flat, imbricate and polygonal, larger than ventral body scales. Claws relatively shallow and weakly recurved. Scales on dorsal and anterior surface of hindlimbs large, flat and imbricate, fairly pointed. Scales beneath the upper hindlimbs granular and smaller than ventral body scales, those beneath lower hindlimbs large, flat, imbricate and polygonal, larger than ventral body scales. Tail absent.
Coloration in alcohol grayish dorsally; blurred dorsal midline dark grayish. Dorsally and both left and right of the midline irregularly shaped reddish blotches present, surrounded by local grayish patterns slightly darker than the background coloration. Dorsolaterally thin pale reddish lines that dissolve into discontinuous lines posteriorly, and also ventrolaterally to the flanks up to spots comprised by individually colored scales. Blurred whitish spots distributed along the flanks. Head is the same color as the body with a broad dark brownish stripe running from the nostril through the eye and then dorsolaterally until above the ear opening. Single large dark blotches are located from beneath the angle of the mouth to the entire gular region reaching posteriorly to the insertion of the forelimbs. Most of them being large and prominent blotches on the throat becoming more blurred posteriorly. Ventral background coloration creamish-whitish. Limbs dark pale ventrally and brownish with blurred whitish spots dorsally, toes not banded.
The figured μ-CT-scanned specimen (Fig 22B) has a maximal skull length of 7.3 mm, maximal height of 3.0 mm and maximal width of 4.7 mm. 23 presacral vertebrae (vertebral column incomplete). Noteworthy minor qualitative cranial osteological differences (Fig 22C) to the other holotype specimens of the Pristurus rupestris species complex are: Vomer posteriorly only slightly rounded and bordered by a hoof-shaped opening; osseous naris edge smooth and slightly rounded; both dentaries fractured; premaxilla and nasal moderately steep to frontal region.
Variation.
Data on nine morphometric and two pholidotic variables (see Materials and Methods) for the two paratypes (see above) are provided in S1 Table. As of today, only three specimens of P. assareen sp. nov. have been found: one male, one female and one juvenile specimen. Therefore, knowledge on the variation of this species is limited to the material available. Both paratypes have broken or missing tails. Paratype IBES7257 (sample code S7257) has the throat sliced. Dorsal coloration similar for both paratypes, with conspicuous dorsal midline (especially in the female specimen), colored pale-beige. Background coloration is grayish-brownish with reddish spots distributed in longitudinal lines separated by dorsal bright spots. Multiple gular blotches present in both specimens. Ventral pattern uniform pale beige-whitish, with reddish spots distributed ventrolaterally only (Fig 23).
Distribution.
Pristurus assareen sp. nov. is only known from a single locality in the Wadi As Sareen Nature Reserve, Eastern Hajars, North Oman (Figs 24 and 25). Despite extensive surveys across surrounding wadis and the whole Hajar Mountain range, this secluded taxon has never been found anywhere else (Fig 25). It occurs at 1,680 m asl and is completely sympatric and syntopic with P. rupestris sensu stricto and more specifically with lineage 3 sensu Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) [27]. Therefore, this new species is endemic to Oman and, so far, constitutes the species of vertebrate with the smallest distribution range in Arabia.
Distribution of P. assareen sp. nov. in Arabia including (A) the single locality this species is known from within the Hajar Mountains range context; (B) a close-up of the Wadi As Sareen where the species is endemic to.
Habits.
Very little data exists on this very secretive species of the Pristurus rupestris species complex. The only three known specimens were found during the day and at sunset in a rocky plateau in complete syntopy with Pristurus rupestris sensu stricto (Fig 24). During one of the expeditions to the Hajar Mountains carried out to study the Pristurus rupestris species complex, only two specimens out of a total of 25 specimens collected at the only known locality of Pristurus assareen sp. nov. at Wadi As Sareen Nature Reserve belonged to this species, while the remaining 23 specimens belonged to Pristurus rupestris sensu stricto (lineage 3 sensu Garcia-Porta et al. 2017) [27].
Conservation.
This species is currently considered to be endemic to Wadi As Sareen Nature Reserve in the Eastern Hajar Mountains, Oman. It occurs in a single locality with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 4 km2, and is considered to occur in one location based on the inferred threat from competition with a lowland lineage of Pristurus rupestris sensu stricto (lineage 3 from Garcia-Porta et al. 2017) [27]. The species should be assessed as Critically Endangered (CR B2ab(ii,v)) on the basis of restricted AOO, and continuing decline in the AOO and in the number of mature individuals.
Discussion
In the present study, we examined a species radiation that dates back more than 10 mya, encompassing the smallest and most widespread gecko species inhabiting the Hajar Mountains of southeastern Arabia. Results support the existence of four previously unrecognized cryptic species of the genus Pristurus, with one species (together with P. rupestris sensu stricto) being widely distributed across the Hajar Mountains and spanning throughout the entire elevation gradient of the mountain range (P. feulneri sp. nov.; Table 1 and Fig 21), two species displaying restricted ranges endemic to the Eastern Hajars and only occurring from mid to high elevations (P. ali sp. nov. and P. assareen sp. nov.; Table 1 and Figs 17 and 25 respectively), and one lowland dwelling Pristurus endemic to Oman, distributed around the Central and Eastern Hajars (P. omanensis sp. nov.; Table 1 and Fig 13).
Despite the lack of morphological diagnostic characters, significant quantitative morphological differences were found between the range-restricted, high elevation Pristurus species and all other relatives, the former broadly fitting to a more robust morphotype with shorter limbs and wider heads (Fig 3A and S2–S4 Tables; [27]). However, it is important to note that while these differences exist between some specimens, there is a substantial degree of overlap in shape among species, resulting in considerable variation in morphological traits that effectively render visual species differentiation impossible in the field. In fact, rather than displaying a wide spectrum of shape variation, the species within this complex appear to be morphologically constrained when compared to other Pristurus species, comprising less variation than what could be anticipated by their deep evolutionary history [79, 80]. A similar situation also occurred between the Pristurus rupestris species complex and the only recently resurrected Pristurus guweirensis [18, 22], two non-related and molecularly highly divergent species recognized for more than 140 years as the same species due to their morphological similarity. The conserved morphology seen in the Pristurus rupestris species complex is not uncommon in Arabian geckos. A similar case of morphological stasis can be found in the geckos of the genus Hemidactylus from southwest Arabia [81], geckos of the genus Ptyodactylus [13, 49, 82], and agamids of the genus Pseudotrapelus [83]. In those cases, morphologically cryptic species complexes have been found, mostly speciating in allopatry in mountain ranges and with only a few areas where two species coexist in sympatry.
Such conserved morphology in the P. rupestris species complex might have been driven by the effects of stabilising selection acting through different factors. All Pristurus species described in this study (including P. rupestris sensu stricto) occupy a similar microhabitat, predominantly rocky substrates such as rocks or boulders, tree trunks, or human-made structures [26], hence stabilising selection on adaptive traits related to the exploitation of this particular structural niche might be occurring. Such factor is concordant with a scenario of allopatric speciation, in which a lack of resource partitioning could have driven each species to maintain a similar microhabitat (i.e. presenting extensive overlap in their body size and shape) [13, 84]. Although some species are currently widely distributed throughout the mountain range overlapping in distribution range with other species in the complex, not more than two species coexist at the same locality (S7 Table), and biogeographic reconstructions suggest that speciation between these five species could have occurred in allopatry (Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024: S18 Fig) [28] with subsequent dispersal. Additionally, strong environmental conditions can also favour a constrained morphological spectrum. The extreme environmental conditions of the Hajar Mountains (considered a desert mountain range; [31]), might have also impelled a morphological stasis similar to the case of several cryptic species in the Arctic tundra or deep-sea environments [85].
However, although no apparent phenotypic traits were detected, some pre- or postzygotic reproductive isolation mechanisms must exist between these species since no signs of gene flow were detected among them despite the extensive sampling including several syntopic localities (Figs 3B, 3C and S38–S43 in Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024) [28]. As diurnal species with complex visual signaling [19, 23, 25, 26], these Pristurus species might rely on species-specific behaviour to recognise their conspecific relatives. However, other isolation mechanisms such as postzygotic reproductive isolation cannot be ruled out, and future studies should be conducted to better understand the evolution of reproductive isolation in this species complex.
Molecular analyses unequivocally support the existence of at least four new cryptic species of Pristurus geckos in the Hajar Mountains, with divergence time estimates ranging from 10.8 to almost four mya (Fig 5). These results highlight the importance of the Hajar Mountains as biodiversity reservoirs, showcasing the oldest case of cryptic speciation in this Arabian hotspot of reptile diversity. The deep mitochondrial and nuclear divergences observed between these species are not only remarkable when compared to other sibling species in the mountain range [13, 14], but are also greater than between several sister species of the genus Pristurus [72, 86]. For instance, genetic distances on the mitochondrial 12S marker are higher across all species of the Pristurus rupestris species complex (9.4–24.6%; S5 Table) than between the recently described P. masirahensis and its continental sister taxon P. minimus (7.1%) [72].
Intraspecific diversity within the recognized species fluctuates from almost null in P. assareen sp. nov., to relatively shallow in P. ali sp. nov. and P. omanensis sp. nov., and to remarkably diverse in P. rupestris sensu stricto and P. feulneri sp. nov. (Figs 3C, 4A, 5, S1 and S2 and Tables S5 and S6). Multispecies Coalescent (MSC) species delimitation methods, with both Sanger sequencing [27] and next generation sequencing (Figs 5 and S1; [28]) data, generally supported a greater number of species than the ones formally described herein, especially within the latter two species. We proceeded with caution and refrained from further splitting more taxa as intraspecific mito-nuclear discordances (Figs 4A and S1), as well as incomplete lineage sorting (Fig 5) were observed within the recognized species. Moreover, incongruent results were obtained when evaluating species status with an heuristic criterion (the gdi) since most of the undescribed diversity fell within the ambiguous zone between 0.2 and 0.7 (Figs 5 and S2). The only exception was the exceptionally diverse population of P. feulneri sp. nov. population 15 sensu Garcia-Porta et al. (2017) [27]. Isolated in the Eastern Hajars, this population diverged from the rest of its conspecific relatives circa 3 mya (Fig 5). We decided not to recognize it as distinct at species level because its reproductive isolation from the other P. feulneri sp. nov. could not be definitively determined (i.e. in contrast to all other described species; S7 Table). This was supported by the lack of reciprocal monophyly between P. feulneri sp. nov. population 15 and its other conspecific populations in the mitochondrial phylogenetic reconstruction (Fig 4A), and by the results of pairwise FST vs dxy comparisons across the Pristurus rupestris species complex populations (following a recent species delimitation approach; [39]). In the latter analysis, P. feulneri sp. nov. population 15 clustered closer to what could be identified as an intraspecific variability cluster, showing a clear gap with the pairwise comparisons between P. assareen sp. nov. and P. rupestris sensu stricto populations (Fig 6).
Pristurus rupestris sensu lato (i.e. including the four new species described herein) is currently considered as Least Concerned by the IUCN Red List of threatened species, and indeed, morphologically typical specimens can be found in great numbers across the Hajar Mountains. However, here we found that two narrow-ranged Eastern Hajars’ endemics (P. ali sp. nov. and P. assareen sp. nov.) were being concealed by the most abundant species in the species complex (P. feulneri sp. nov., P. omanensis sp. nov. and P. rupestris sensu stricto). Moreover, P. assareen sp. nov. is a microendemic species only known from a single locality in Wadi as Sareen Nature Reserve, Eastern Hajars, representing one of the smallest-ranged extant Arabian reptiles [87]. Not only P. assareen sp. nov. is more prone to extinction by the intrinsic threats of being a microendemic species [87], but it also occurs in syntopy with its sister species, P. rupestris sensu stricto, which is quite abundant at P. assareen sp. nov.’s type locality and might pose an additional threat through resource competition. Therefore, P. assareen sp. nov. is in urgent need of protection and conservation assessment. Together with the description of the cryptic species Ptyodactylus ruusaljibalicus [13] and the taxonomic reevaluation of the Critically Endangered Leaf-toed Gecko, Asaccus caudivolvulus [11], this study exemplifies what potential impacts of the lack of taxonomic knowledge (the Linnean shortfall; [88]) may have on conservation planning and the preservation of biodiversity.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Maximum likelihood phylogenomic reconstruction of the Pristurus rupestris species complex species.
This analysis was inferred with 163 Pristurus specimens from the P. rupestris species complex, 10 P. flavipunctatus used as an outgroup to root the tree, and a concatenated dataset of 137,800 bp and 20,845 SNPs (dataset3; Table 1). Numbers in gray circles correspond to genetic lineages recovered as putative species in Garcia-Porta et al. (2017). Black dots at nodes: bootstrap support (bs) > 0.95; White at nodes dots: 0.75 < bs > 0.95. To the right, vertical colored bars indicate the number of lineages recovered as distinct species with different species delimitation methods from Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024; BFD) and the present study (BPP and GDI). BFD: Bayes Factor Delimitation* (*with genomic data); BPP: BPP A10 species delimitation analysis; GDI: Genealogical divergence index (gdi).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000.s001
(PDF)
S2 Fig. Comparisons of Pristurus rupestris species complex populations and species using two measures of genetic divergence.
(A) Guide tree used for the multispecies coalescent estimation of population sizes (theta) and divergence times (tau) in BPP. The tree was obtained in the present study (see Fig 4). Boxplots for gdi (B) and coalescent units (C) calculated using the posterior probability distributions for theta and tau estimated in BPP.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000.s002
(PDF)
S3 Fig. Pristurus omanensis sp. nov. variation.
(A) Dorsal and (B) ventral view of Pristurus omanensis sp. nov. specimens showing color variation. All specimens correspond to specimens from the Central Hajars assigned to lineage BFD6 (Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024) and lineage 9 sensu Garcia-Porta et al. (2017; see Table 1). Further variation in specimens of P. omanensis sp. nov. lineage BFD5 sensu Burriel-Carranza et al. (2024) is shown in Fig 10.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000.s003
(PDF)
S4 Fig. Pristurus ali sp. nov. variation.
(A) Dorsal and (B) ventral view of Pristurus ali sp. nov. specimens showing color variation. All specimens correspond to specimens from the Eastern Hajars assigned to genetic lineage BFD4 (Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; P. r. rupestris candidate species 6 in Garcia-Porta et al., 2017; see Table 1). Further variation in specimens of P. ali sp. nov. assigned to lineage 7 (P. r. rupestris candidate species 7 in Garcia-Porta et al., 2017) is shown in Fig 14.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000.s004
(PDF)
S5 Fig. Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. variation 1.
(A) Dorsal and (B) ventral view of Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. specimens showing color variation. All specimens correspond to specimens assigned to lineage BFD7 (Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; P. r. rupestris candidate species 10.11 in Garcia-Porta et al., 2017; see Table 1). Further variation in specimens of P. feulneri sp. nov. genomic lineages BFD8–11 (Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; P. r. rupestris candidate species 12–15 in Garcia-Porta et al., 2017) are shown in Fig 18 and supplementary figures below.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000.s005
(PDF)
S6 Fig. Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. variation 2.
(A) Dorsal and (B) ventral view of Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. specimens showing color variation. All specimens correspond to specimens assigned to lineage BFD8 (Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; P. r. rupestris candidate species 12 in Garcia-Porta et al., 2017; see Table 1) from the Semail gap, in the Central Hajars. Further variation in specimens of P. feulneri sp. nov. lineages BFD7,9–11 (Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; P. r. rupestris candidate species 10.11,13–15 in Garcia-Porta et al., 2017), and genetic are shown in Figs 18, S5, S7 and S8.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000.s006
(PDF)
S7 Fig. Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. variation 3.
(A) Dorsal and (B) ventral view of Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. specimens showing color variation. All specimens correspond to specimens assigned to lineage BFD10 (Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024) and genetic lineages 14 (Garcia-Porta et al., 2017; three specimens to the left) and 17 (present study; three specimens to the right) (see Table 1) from the Jabal Akhdar, in the Central Hajars. Further variation in specimens of P. feulneri sp. nov. lineages BFD7–9,1 (Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; P. r. rupestris candidate species 10.11–15 in Garcia-Porta et al., 2017; see Table 1), are shown in Figs 18 and S5, S6 and S8.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000.s007
(PDF)
S8 Fig. Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. variation 4.
(A) Dorsal and (B) ventral view of Pristurus feulneri sp. nov. specimens showing color variation. All specimens correspond to specimens assigned to lineage BFD11 (Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; P. r. rupestris candidate species 15 in Garcia-Porta et al., 2017; see Table 1) from the Eastern Hajars. Further variation in specimens of P. feulneri sp. nov. genomic lineages BFD7–10 (Burriel-Carranza et al. 2024; P. r. rupestris candidate species 10.11–14 in Garcia-Porta et al., 2017; see Table 1), are shown in Figs 18, S5, S6 and S7.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000.s008
(PDF)
S1 Table. Table on nine morphometric and two pholidotic variables for all holotypes and paratypes of the four new species of Pristurus described herein.
Holotypes are highlighted in bold.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000.s009
(XLSX)
S2 Table. Loadings and variance explained by each of the first ten components retained from the PCA performed on shape residuals of Pristurus rupestris species complex specimens.
Abbreviations are as follows: (HL) Head length; (HW) Head width; (HH) Head hight; (ASG) Body width at the scapular girdle; (APG) Body width at the pelvic girdle; (TrL) Trunk length; (LHu) Humerus length; (LUn) Ulna length; (LFe) Femur length; (LTb) Tibia length.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000.s010
(XLSX)
S3 Table. Pairwise procrustes ANOVA on Pristurus shape residuals inferred from 10 independent morphological measurements.
Significant values (p < 0.05) are shown in bold.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000.s011
(XLSX)
S4 Table. Pairwise procrustes ANOVA’s p-values on the individual morphological variables.
Significant values (p < 0.05) are shown in bold. Abbreviations of each variable as in S1 Table.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000.s012
(XLSX)
S5 Table. Uncorrected p-distances for the 12S mitochondrial gene fragment among all five species conforming the Pristurus rupestris species complex.
Values in the diagonal show intraspecific diversity in the 12S mitochondrial gene fragment.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000.s013
(XLSX)
S6 Table. Standardized FST values (upper corner) and p-values (bottom corner) across all species within the Pristurus rupestris species complex.
P. = Pristurus.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000.s014
(XLSX)
S7 Table. Sympatry analysis of all Pristurus species in the Pristurus rupestris species complex.
Each row represents a contact locality where two species have been found at less than 50 m from each other. Species1 and Species2 columns refer to the first and second species mentioned at column Species in sympatry respectively.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000.s015
(XLSX)
S1 Appendix. Alignment of phased haplotypes for the molecular diagnostic characters based on the mc1r, cmos, rag1 and rag2.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315000.s016
(ZIP)
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all the past and present members of the Ministry of Environment and Climate Affairs, MECA, Oman, now the Environment Authority Oman, and especially to Ali Al Kiyumi, Suleiman Nasser Al Akhzami, Thuraya Al Sariri, Ahmed Said Al Shukaili, Ali Alghafri, Sultan Khalifa, Hamed Al Farqani, Salim Bait Bilal, Iman Sulaiman Alzari, Aziza Saud Al Adhoobi, Mohammed Al Shariani, Zeyana, Salim Al Omairi and Abdullah bin Ali Al Amri, Chairman of the Environment Authority. We are also very grateful to past members and collaborators including Edwin Nicholas Arnold, Michael D. Robinson, Andrew Gardner, Josep Roca, Fèlix Amat, Philip de Pous, Margarita Metallinou, Raquel Vasconcelos, Roberto Sindaco, for their help and support. In the UAE, we wish to thank His Highness Sheikh Dr. Sultan bin Mohammed Al Qasimi, Supreme Council Member and Ruler of Sharjah, H. E. Ms. Hana Saif al Suwaidi (Chairperson of the Environment and Protected Areas Authority, Sharjah), Paul Vercammen and Kevin Budd (Breeding Centre for Endangered Arabian Wildlife), and Gary Feulner (Dubai Natural History Group) for their continuous support. For technical assistance and advice with μ-CT scanning we are indebted to Juliane Vehof, and for supporting conditions to examine specimens we are grateful to Wolfgang Böhme and Ursula Bott, all ZFMK.
References
- 1. Babocsay G. A new species of saw‐scaled viper of the Echis coloratus complex (Ophidia: Viperidae) from Oman, Eastern Arabia. Syst Biodivers. 2004;1(4):503–514.
- 2. Wilms T, Schmitz A. A new polytypic species of the genus Uromastyx Merrem 1820 (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae: Leiolepidinae) from Southwestern Arabia. Zootaxa. 2007;1394:1–23.
- 3. Wilms TM, Shobrak M, Wagner P. A new species of the genus Tropiocolotes from Central Saudi Arabia (Reptilia: Sauria: Gekkonidae). Bonn Zool Bull. 2010;57(2):275–80.
- 4. Carranza S, Arnold EN. A review of the geckos of the genus Hemidactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Oman based on morphology, mitochondrial and nuclear data, with descriptions of eight new species. Zootaxa. 2012;95:1–95.
- 5. Melnikov DA, Melnikova E. Taxonomic diversity of the genus Pseudotrapelus (Agamidae; Sauria) and biogeography of Afro-Arabia. Proc Zool Inst Russ Acad Sci. 2013;317(4):438–51.
- 6. Melnikov DA, Ananjeva NB, Papenfuss TJ. A new species of Pseudotrapelus (Agamidae, Sauria) from Nizwa, Oman. Russ J Herpetol. 2013;20(1):79–84.
- 7. Melnikov DA, Melnikova E, Nazarov R, Al-Johany A, Ananjeva NB. A new species of Phrynocephalus (Agamidae, Sauria) from Al Sharqiyah Sands, northeastern Oman, dedicated to the memory of Sako Tuniyev (1983–2015). Russ J Herpetol. 2015;22(4):301–9.
- 8. Metallinou M, Carranza S. New species of Stenodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from the Sharqiyah Sands in northeastern Oman. Zootaxa. 2013;3745(4):449–68.
- 9. Nazarov R, Melnikov D, Melnikova E. Three new species of Ptyodactylus (Reptilia; Squamata; Phyllodactylidae) from the Middle East. Russ J Herpetol. 2013;20(2):147–62.
- 10. Vasconcelos R, Carranza S. Systematics and biogeography of Hemidactylus homoeolepis Blanford, 1881 (Squamata: Gekkonidae), with the description of a new species from Arabia. Zootaxa. 2014;3835:501–27.
- 11. Carranza S, Simó-Riudalbas M, Jayasinghe S, Wilms T, Els J. Microendemicity in the northern Hajar Mountains of Oman and the United Arab Emirates with the description of two new species of geckos of the genus Asaccus (Squamata: Phyllodactylidae). PeerJ. 2016;4:e2371. pmid:27602305
- 12. Tamar K, Carranza S, Sindaco R, Moravec J, Trape JF, Meiri S. Out of Africa: Phylogeny and biogeography of the widespread genus Acanthodactylus (Reptilia: Lacertidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016;103:6–18.
- 13. Simó-Riudalbas M, de Pous P, Els J, Jayasinghe S, Péntek-Zakar E, Wilms T, et al. Cryptic diversity in Ptyodactylus (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) from the Northern Hajar Mountains of Oman and the United Arab Emirates uncovered by an integrative taxonomic approach. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(8):1–25.
- 14. Simó-Riudalbas M, Tarroso P, Papenfuss T, Al-Sariri T, Carranza S. Systematics, biogeography and evolution of Asaccus gallagheri (Squamata, Phyllodactylidae) with the description of a new endemic species from Oman. Syst Biodivers. 2018;16(4):323–39.
- 15. Sindaco R, Simó-Riudalbas M, Sacchi R, Carranza S. Systematics of the Mesalina guttulata species complex (Squamata: Lacertidae) from Arabia with the description of two new species. Zootaxa. 2018;4429(3).
- 16. Machado L, Šmíd J, Mazuch T, Sindaco R, Al Shukaili AS, Carranza S. Systematics of the Saharo-Arabian clade of the Palearctic naked-toed geckos with the description of a new species of Tropiocolotes endemic to Oman. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 2019;57(1):159–78.
- 17. Šmíd J., Sindaco R., Shobrak M., Busais S., Tamar K., Aghová T., et al. Diversity patterns and evolutionary history of Arabian squamates. J. Biogeogr. 2021;48(5):1183–1199.
- 18. Badiane A, Garcia-Porta J, Červenka J, Kratochvíl L, Sindaco R, Robinson MD, et al. Phylogenetic relationships of Semaphore geckos (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae: Pristurus) with an assessment of the taxonomy of Pristurus rupestris. Zootaxa. 2014;3835(1):33–58.
- 19. Arnold EN. Relationships, evolution and biogeography of Semaphore geckos, Pristurus (Squamata, Sphaerodactylidae) based on morphology. Zootaxa. 2009;(2060):1–21.
- 20. Sindaco R, Jeremčenko VK, Venchi A, Grieco C. The Reptiles of the Western Palearctic: Annotated checklist and distributional atlas of the turtles, crocodiles, amphisbaenians and lizards of Europe, North Africa, Middle East and Central Asia. Belvedere. Vol. 1. 2008.
- 21. Uetz P., Freed P, Aguilar R., Reyes F., Kudera J. & Hošek J. (eds.). The Reptile Database. 2023. http://www.reptile-database.org, accessed November 2023.
- 22. Burriel-Carranza B, Mazuch T, Estarellas M, Talavera A, Riaño G, Koppetsch T, et al. Pristurus guweirensis Haas, 1943 (Gekkota: Sphaerodactylidae): the most abundant and widely distributed species of Pristurus previously referred to as Pristurus sp. 1. Zootaxa. 2023;5297(4):594–9.
- 23. Arnold EN. The scientific results of the Oman flora and fauna survey 1975. Little-known geckoes (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) from Arabia with descriptions of two new species from the Sultanate of Oman. J Oman Stud Spec Rep. 1977;(1):81–110.
- 24. Arnold EN. A key and annotated check list to the lizards and amphisbaenians of Arabia. Fauna Saudi Arab. 1986;8:385–435.
- 25. Arnold EN. Historical changes in the ecology and behaviour of semaphore geckos (Pristurus, Gekkonidae) and their relatives and their relatives. J Zool. 1993;(229):353–84.
- 26.
Carranza S, Els J, Burriel-Carranza B. A field guide to the reptiles of Oman. Madrid: Digital CSIC; 2021. ISBN: 978-84-00-10876-2. http://libros.csic.es/product_info.php?products_id=1605.
- 27. Garcia-Porta J, Simó-Riudalbas M, Robinson M, Carranza S. Diversification in arid mountains: biogeography and cryptic diversity of Pristurus rupestris rupestris in Arabia. J Biogeogr. 2017;44(8):1694–704.
- 28. Burriel-Carranza B, Tejero-Cicuéndez H, Carné A, Riaño G, Talavera A, Saadi SA, et al. Integrating genomics and biogeography to unravel the origin of a mountain biota: The case of a reptile endemicity hotspot in Arabia. Syst. Biol. 2024. syae032. pmid:38953551
- 29. Hansman RJ, Ring U, Thomson SN, den Brok B, Stübner K. Late Eocene Uplift of the Al Hajar Mountains, Oman, Supported by Stratigraphy and Low-Temperature Thermochronology. Tectonics. 2017;36(12):3081–109.
- 30. Bosworth W, Huchon P, McClay K. The Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Basins. J Afr Earth Sci. 2005;43(1–3):334–78.
- 31. Glennie KW. Oman’s geological heritage. Stacey international; 2006.
- 32. Jacobs J, Thomas RJ, Ksienzyk AK, Dunkl I. Tracking the Oman Ophiolite to the surface—New fission track and (U-Th)/He data from the Aswad and Khor Fakkan Blocks, United Arab Emirates. Tectonophysics. 2015;644:68–80.
- 33. Carranza S, Xipell M, Tarroso P, Gardner A, Arnold EN, Robinson MD, et al. Diversity, distribution and conservation of the terrestrial reptiles of Oman (Sauropsida, Squamata). Vol. 13, PLoS ONE. 2018;13(2): e0190389. pmid:29414999
- 34. Burriel-Carranza B, Tarroso P, Els J, Gardner A, Soorae P, Mohammed AA, et al. An integrative assessment of the diversity, phylogeny, distribution, and conservation of the terrestrial reptiles (Sauropsida, Squamata) of the United Arab Emirates. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0216273. pmid:31048886
- 35.
Burriel-Carranza B, Els J, Carranza S. Reptiles & Amphibians of the Hajar Mountains. Madrid: Editorial CSIC; 2022. ISBN: 978-84-00-10988-2. http://libros.csic.es/product_info.php?products_id=1605&language=en.
- 36. Sukumaran J, Knowles LL. Multispecies coalescent delimits structure, not species. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(7):1607–12. pmid:28137871
- 37. Esquerré D, Ramírez-Álvarez D, Pavón-Vázquez CJ, Troncoso-Palacios J, Garín CF, Keogh JS, et al. Speciation across mountains: Phylogenomics, species delimitation and taxonomy of the Liolaemus leopardinus clade (Squamata, Liolaemidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2019;139:106524.
- 38. Chambers EA, Hillis DM. The Multispecies Coalescent Over-Splits Species in the Case of Geographically Widespread Taxa. Syst Biol. 2020;69(1):184–93. pmid:31180508
- 39. Leaché AD, Davis HR, Singhal S, Fujita MK, Lahti ME, Zamudio KR. Phylogenomic Assessment of Biodiversity Using a Reference-Based Taxonomy: An Example With Horned Lizards (Phrynosoma). Front Ecol Evol. 2021;9.
- 40. Burriel-Carranza B, Estarellas M, Riaño G, Talavera A, Tejero-Cicuéndez H, Els J, et al. Species boundaries to the limit: Integrating species delimitation methods is critical to avoid taxonomic inflation in the case of the Hajar Banded Ground Gecko (Trachydactylus hajarensis). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2023;186:107834.
- 41. Chambers EA, Marshall TL, Hillis DM. The Importance of Contact Zones for Distinguishing Interspecific from Intraspecific Geographic Variation. Syst Biol. 2023;72(2):357–71. pmid:35993885
- 42. Adams D, Collyer M, Kaliontzopoulou A, Baken E. geomorph: Geometric Morphometric Analyses of 2D and 3D Landmark Data. 2023. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/geomorph/index.html.
- 43. Legendre P, Legendre L. Numerical Ecology. Elsevier; 2012. 1007 p.
- 44. Adams DC, Collyer ML. Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and the Evolution of Multivariate Phenotypes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2019;50(1):405–25.
- 45. Collyer M, Adams D. RRPP: Linear Model Evaluation with Randomized Residuals in a Permutation Procedure. 2023. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RRPP/index.html.
- 46. Collyer M, Adams D. RRPP: An r package for fitting linear models to high‐dimensional data using residual randomization. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2018;9(7):1772–1779.
- 47. Lobon-Rovira J, Bauer A. Bone-by-bone: A detailed skull description of the White-headed dwarf gecko Lygodactylus picturatus (Peters, 1870). Afr J Herpetol. 2021;70(2):75–94.
- 48. MacManes M. MacManes Salt Extraction Protocol. 2013; https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/MacManes_Salt_Extraction_Protocol/658946/1.
- 49. Metallinou M, Červenka J, Crochet PA, Kratochvíl L, Wilms T, Geniez P, et al. Species on the rocks: Systematics and biogeography of the rock-dwelling Ptyodactylus geckos (Squamata: Phyllodactylidae) in North Africa and Arabia. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015;85:208–20. pmid:25724867
- 50. Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(21):4453–5. pmid:31070718
- 51. Paradis E, Schliep K. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(3):526–8. pmid:30016406
- 52. Flot JF. seqphase: a web tool for interconverting phase input/output files and fasta sequence alignments. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010;10(1):162–6. pmid:21565002
- 53. Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donelly P. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. J Hum Genet. 2001;(68):978–89. pmid:11254454
- 54. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol. 2001;9(10):1657–9.
- 55. Eaton DAR, Overcast I. ipyrad: Interactive assembly and analysis of RADseq datasets. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(8):2592–4. pmid:31904816
- 56. Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LCAM, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. Second-generation PLINK: Rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. GigaScience. 2015;4(1):7.
- 57. Malinsky M, Trucchi E, Lawson DJ, Falush D. RADpainter and fineRADstructure: Population Inference from RADseq Data. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(5):1284–90. pmid:29474601
- 58. Pfeifer B, Wittelsbürger U, Ramos-Onsins SE, Lercher MJ. PopGenome: An Efficient Swiss Army Knife for Population Genomic Analyses in R. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31(7):1929–36. pmid:24739305
- 59.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Found Stat Comput Vienna Austria. 2022. https://www.R-project.org/.
- 60. Bryant D, Bouckaert R, Felsenstein J, Rosenberg NA, Roychoudhury A. Inferring Species Trees Directly from Biallelic Genetic Markers: Bypassing Gene Trees in a Full Coalescent Analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29(8):1917–32. pmid:22422763
- 61. Stange M, Sánchez-Villagra MR, Salzburger W, Matschiner M. Bayesian Divergence-Time Estimation with Genome-Wide Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Data of Sea Catfishes (Ariidae) Supports Miocene Closure of the Panamanian Isthmus. Syst Biol. 2018;67(4):681–99. pmid:29385552
- 62. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA. Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7. Syst Biol. 2018;67(5):901–4. pmid:29718447
- 63. Bouckaert R, Vaughan TG, Barido-Sottani J, Duchêne S, Fourment M, Gavryushkina A, et al. BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLOS Comput Biol. 2019;15(4):e1006650. pmid:30958812
- 64. Leaché AD, Fujita MK, Minin VN, Bouckaert RR. Species Delimitation using Genome-Wide SNP Data. Syst Biol. 2014;63(4):534–42. pmid:24627183
- 65. Yang Z, Rannala B. Bayesian species delimitation using multilocus sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(20):9264–9. pmid:20439743
- 66. Rannala B, Yang Z. Improved Reversible Jump Algorithms for Bayesian Species Delimitation. Genetics. 2013;194(1):245–53. pmid:23502678
- 67. Huang JP. What Have Been and What Can Be Delimited as Species Using Molecular Data Under the Multi-Species Coalescent Model? A Case Study Using Hercules beetles (Dynastes; Dynastidae). Insect Syst Divers. 2018;2(2):3.
- 68. Jackson ND, Morales AE, Carstens BC, O’Meara BC. PHRAPL: Phylogeographic Inference Using Approximate Likelihoods. Syst Biol. 2017;66(6):1045–53. pmid:28204782
- 69. Leaché AD, Zhu T, Rannala B, Yang Z. The Spectre of Too Many Species. Syst Biol. 2019;68(1):168–81. pmid:29982825
- 70. Hijmans R. terra: Spatial Data Analysis. R Package Version 15–34. 2022. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=terra.
- 71. Pebesma E. Simple Features for R: Standardized Support for Spatial Vector Data. R J. 2018;10(1):439–46.
- 72. Tamar K, Mitsi P, Simó-Riudalbas M, Tejero-Cicuéndez H, Al-Sariri T, Carranza S. Systematics, biogeography, and evolution of Pristurus minimus (Squamata, Sphaerodactylidae) with the discovery of the smallest Arabian vertebrate. Syst Biodivers. 2019;17(4):349–66.
- 73. Schmidt KP. Diagnoses of new amphibians and reptiles from Iran. Nat Hist Misc. 1952;(93):1–2.
- 74. Saberi-Pirooz R, Shahriari A, Ahmadzadeh F, Javidkar M, Oladi M, Asadi Aghbolaghi M. Dispersal beyond geographic barriers: a contribution to the phylogeny and demographic history of Pristurus rupestris Blanford, 1874 (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae) from southern Iran. Zoology. 2019;134:8–15.
- 75. Blanford WT. Descriptions of new lizards from Persia and Baluchistàn. Ann Mag Nat Hist. 1874;4(13):453–5.
- 76.
Boulenger GA. Catalogue of the Lizards in the British Museuum (Natural History). Geckonidae, Eublepharidae, Uroplatidae, Pygopodidae, Agamidae. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. 1985. 450 p.
- 77. Khan MS. An up to date Checklist of Reptiles of Pakistan. Pak J Wildl. 2016;7(2):21–7.
- 78. Kamali K. A guide to the reptiles and amphibians of Iran. Edition Chimaira; 2020. 574 p.
- 79. Tejero-Cicuéndez H, Simó-Riudalbas M, Menéndez I, Carranza S. Ecological specialization, rather than the island effect, explains morphological diversification in an ancient radiation of geckos. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2021;288(1965):20211821.
- 80. Tejero-Cicuéndez H, Menéndez I, Talavera A, Riaño G, Burriel-Carranza B, Simó-Riudalbas M, et al. Evolution along allometric lines of least resistance: Morphological differentiation in Pristurus geckos. bioRxiv. 2022;2022.11.28.518148.
- 81. Šmíd J, Shobrak M, Wilms T, Joger U, Carranza S. Endemic diversification in the mountains: genetic, morphological, and geographical differentiation of the Hemidactylus geckos in southwestern Arabia. Org Divers Evol. 2017;17(1):267–85.
- 82. Werner YL, Sivan N.Systematics and zoogeography of Ptyodactylus (Reptilia: Sauria: Gekkonidae) in the Levant: 3, experimental and natural hybrids of P. guttatus and P. puiseuxi. J Zool. 2013;42(2):185–202.
- 83. Tamar K, Uvizl M, Shobrak M, Almutairi M, Busais S, Salim AFA, et al. A new species of Pseudotrapelus (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) from Central Arabia. Vertebr Zool. 2023;73:1033–45.
- 84. Schluter D. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. OUP Oxford; 2000. 302 p.
- 85. Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, Winker K, et al. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22(3):148–55. pmid:17129636
- 86. Garcia-Porta J, Morales HE, Gómez-Díaz E, Sindaco R, Carranza S. Patterns of diversification in islands: A comparative study across three gecko genera in the Socotra Archipelago. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016;98:288–99. pmid:26911521
- 87. Meiri S, Bauer AM, Allison A, Castro-Herrera F, Chirio L, Colli G, et al. Extinct, obscure or imaginary: The lizard species with the smallest ranges. Divers Distrib. 2018;24(2):262–73.
- 88. Brito D. Overcoming the Linnean shortfall: Data deficiency and biological survey priorities. Basic Appl Ecol. 2010;11(8):709–13.