Figures
In Fig 4, the panels A and B are identical. Please see the correct Fig 4 here.
(A) Examples of CD4+ T cell receptor (TCR) motifs associated with different prognoses. (B) Examples of CD8+ TCR motifs associated with different prognoses. The figures show the logo and phylogenetic tree of the clustered CDR3β peptides for each motif. The phylogenetic tree also includes peptides found as the best hit from McPAS; the complete set of motifs associated with excellent or poor/worst prognosis is shown in S7A Table. (C) Association networks constructed to form the cluster of motifs associated with response to platinum therapy. Nodes in the networks indicate individual patients; the color of the node indicates prognosis. Edges in the networks indicate an association between a pair of samples if they share GLIPH specificity groups associated with prognosis. The networks validated the statistical algorithm used to identify prognosis-associated specificity groups.
Reference
- 1. Yoshida-Court K, Karpinets TV, Mitra A, Solley TN, Dorta-Estremera S, Sims TT, et al. (2023) Immune environment and antigen specificity of the T cell receptor repertoire of malignant ascites in ovarian cancer. PLoS ONE 18(1): e0279590. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279590 pmid:36607962
Citation: Yoshida-Court K, Karpinets TV, Mitra A, Solley TN, Dorta-Estremera S, Sims TT, et al. (2024) Correction: Immune environment and antigen specificity of the T cell receptor repertoire of malignant ascites in ovarian cancer. PLoS ONE 19(11): e0314643. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314643
Published: November 22, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Yoshida-Court et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.