Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis (PDKA) among newly diagnosed diabetic patients at Dilla University Hospital, Dilla, Ethiopia: Prevalence and predictors

Correction

11 Aug 2025: Oromo DO, Melaku AM (2025) Correction: Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis (PDKA) among newly diagnosed diabetic patients at Dilla University Hospital, Dilla, Ethiopia: Prevalence and predictors. PLOS ONE 20(8): e0330202. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330202 View correction

Abstract

Background

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a morbid complication of Type 1 diabetes mellitus(T1DM), and its occurrence at diagnosis has rarely been studied in Ethiopia, despite the many cases seen in the pediatric population.

Objective

The aim of this study was to know the prevalence of DKA among patients with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus and identify avoidable risk factors.

Method

This institution-based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from December 1, 2018 to December1, 2022. Newly diagnosed T1DM under 15 years were included in the study. DKA and the new diagnosis of type 1 DM were defined based on the 2022 ISPAD and other international guidelines. A data collection form was used to collect sociodemographic and clinical data. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the risk factors.

Result

Among the 61 newly diagnosed T1DM pediatric patients admitted, DKA was the initial presentation in 37 patients, accounting for 60.7% of the cases. The mean age at diagnosis was 8 (±3.85) years, with females being more affected. Clinical presentation revealed vomiting accompanied by signs of dehydration (32.4%), with polyuria, polydipsia and weight loss (26.2%) being the most common symptoms. The presence of adequate knowledge of signs and symptoms of DM (AOR = 0.07, 95%CI 0.019–0.0897, P value 0.017) and a family history of DM (AOR = 0.129 95%CI 0.019–0.897, P value 0.039) were protective factors against DKA as the initial diagnosis of DM. Moreover, new-onset type 1 DM without DKA was 1.5 times higher in children from families with a high monthly income (AOR = 1.473, 95% CI 0.679–3.195 p value 0.000) compared to those from families with low income. The presence of an infection prior to DKA (AOR = 11.69,95%CI 1.34–10.1,P value 0.026) was associated with the diagnosis of DKA at the initial presentation of DM.

Conclusion

A high number of children present with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at the initial diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM), which is associated with inadequate knowledge of the signs and symptoms of DM as well as the masking effect of concomitant infections in these children. Healthcare professionals should endeavor to suspect and screen children. Continuous awareness creation of DM is encouraged to diagnose diabetes mellitus earlier and to decrease the prevalence of DKA as an initial presentation.

Introduction

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a common complication of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) in both children and adolescents [1, 2]. Worldwide, the reported frequencies of DKA as an initial presentation of type 1DM across countries and continents are diverse ranging from as low as 12% and as high as 80%, indicating wide geographic variations in its incidence [3].

This condition remains a public health concern in sub-Saharan African countries, including Ethiopia [4]. A Small number of reports from Africa have reported that up to 95% of children present with DKA at the time of type 1DM diagnosis [3, 5, 6]; and in Ethiopia, there were reports showing its high prevalence [79].

Earlier diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents will reduce the number of children presenting with DKA. However, several studies have demonstrated and linked an increased incidence to multiple factors. For instance, younger age [1015], uneducated parents, no relative with type1DM, residing in rural areas, and having low economic status were incriminated [10, 13, 14, 16]. Nonetheless, not all the factors were explanatory [3].

Considering the fewer reports in Ethiopia, the current study was conducted to know the prevalence of DKA among newly diagnosed type 1DM children and to uncover potential factors for its occurrence as a first presentation.

Participants and methods

Study area

The study was conducted at Dilla University Hospital, located in Dilla town, southern Ethiopia, 360 km away from the Ethiopian capital city, Addis Ababa. The hospital is organized into different departments, and the pediatric and child health departments have emergency, inpatient, outpatient, and neonatal units. The pediatric ward admits an average of 875 pediatric patients for inpatient treatment services every month.

Study design and patient selection

The study utilized an institution-based retrospective cross-sectional method over a 4-year period, from December 1,2018 to December 1,2022. Data were accessed and collected from individual patient charts, and as well as patients’ parents/guardians from December 5,2022 to December 25,2022. All newly diagnosed T1DM patients under the age of 15 were included, and the percentage of patients with DKA was calculated. Known T1DM patients who were admitted during the study period were excluded.

Data collection method and study variables

Newly diagnosed T1DM patients were identified using an inpatient registration book, and their individual patient charts were retrieved from the card room for data collection. A paper based structured data collection form was prepared to gather data from individual patient charts, and parents were also contacted and interviewed for additional details. The data were collected by a health care professional working in the hospital after receiving training. The collected data were double-checked by the investigator daily for completeness and accuracy. The structured data collection form included variables such as socio-demographics (age, sex, family income, parental employment status, parental educational status, and parental marital status), parental knowledge of DM signs and symptoms, family history of DM-specific symptoms (polyuria, polydipsia, polyphagia and weight loss), preceding signs and symptoms of DM/DKA,and the presence of any preceding infections. The information was pretested on 5% of the patient records, and appropriate changes were made to refine the quality of the tool.

Definitions

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) diagnostic Criteria includes the following: hyperglycemia (blood glucose > 200mg/dl), acidosis (venous pH <7.3 or serum bicarbonate <18 mmol/L) and the presence of ketonuria (≥+2) or ketonemia. The degree of acidosis is used for severity assessment [1]. In resource-limited settings, such as ours, a modified diagnostic and treatment protocol was adopted from the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) and other international guidelines [1720]. Under this protocol, DKA was diagnosed using the following criteria: hyperglycemia of >200mg/dl, glycosuria, and ketonuria (≥+2). Clinical severity assessment and treatment are based on the following features: mental status changes (ranging from alertness to coma), levels of dehydration (no dehydration, some dehydration and severe dehydration) and Kussmaul respiration. If DKA is not present, Type 1 DM is diagnosed when a child exhibits classic DM symptoms such as polyuria, polydipsia, polyphagia, and weight loss, along with either plasma random blood glucose level of ≥200mg/dl or fasting plasma glucose level of ≥126mg/dl.

Parental awareness of Diabetes Mellitus was evaluated through interviews focusing on knowledge of DM specific symptoms. Parents who could identify the three classic symptoms (polyuria, polydipsia, and polyphagia), along with weight loss were deemed knowledgeable, while those who could not were classified as not knowledgeable.

A preceding infection was considered if it occurred in the two weeks prior to the diagnosis of DKA. Signs and symptoms indicative of DM/DKA prior to DKA include a child exhibiting polyuria, polydipsia, and weight loss within the same two-week time frame.

A Family history of a first-degree relative with DM refers to the child’s father, mother or any other siblings diagnosed with DM.

Family income in Ethiopia is classified according to the World Bank’s designation as low-income nation. Local household income is categorized based on economic conditions, cost of living, and regional differences (urban and rural) over time. For the study period (2018 to 2022), family income was classified in Ethiopian birr (USD) as follows:

  1. Low-income class: monthly income of less than 1000 (<18.02)
  2. Lower-middle-income class: monthly income of 1001–2200 (18.02–39.64)
  3. Upper-middle-income class: monthly income of 2201–3400 (39.65–61.62)
  4. High-income class: monthly income of greater than 3401–3600 (61.63–64.87)

Parental employment status reflects the source of income and was assessed based on the following classifications: unemployed, employed civil servants, daily labor workers, and multiple sources of income apart from those mentioned.

Parental education status was assessed based on the Ethiopian Ministry of Education’s educational classification as unable to read and write, can only read and write, primary education(grades 1–8),secondary education(grades 9–12) and higher education(above grade 12,including attendance at colleges and universities).

Data analysis

Data were checked for completeness, coded, and entered into Epi Info v7 and SPSS version 21. Outliers were identified, checked accordingly, and transformed into categorical variables for correction. Data are reported as mean, median, and standard deviation for continuous variables, and counts and percentages for categorical variables.

The associations between independent variables (age, sex, family income, family history of DM, infection/acute febrile illness before presentation, Preceding signs and symptoms of DM/DKA, parental employment, parental educational status, and knowledge of signs and symptoms of DM) and the dependent variable (DKA in newly diagnosed type 1 DM) were assessed using binary logistic regression analysis. Variables that showed an association with the outcome variable (p value of <0.25) were selected for multivariate analysis to control for potential confounders.

Model fitness was tested using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit, and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and 95%confidence interval (CI) were estimated to assess the strength of association. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of <0.05.

Ethical clearance and consent to participate

Before conducting the research, ethical clearance was obtained from the Dilla University College of Health Sciences Institutional Review Board on 3/12/2022, ID number 005/17. Verbal consent was obtained from parents/guardians after explaining the purpose and details of the research and informing them of their full right to participate or withdraw at any time. Permission was also obtained from Dilla University Hospital to collect data from patient charts; consent was not needed for this. Data were collected while ensuring patient confidentiality and removing any identifiers.

Results

During the study period (four years), 61 newly diagnosed type 1DM pediatric patients were admitted for inpatient treatment. Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) was the initial presentation in 37 patients, accounting for 60.7% of newly diagnosed type 1 DM cases. Of the 61 children, more than half (60.7%) of the patients were females, with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.54 (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Sex distribution of newly diagnosed type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) from 2018 to 2022.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314433.g001

It was observed that females (n = 24, 64.8%) presented with DKA more frequently than did men (n = 13, 35.2%). Both sexes had similar age distributions, with a mean age of 8(±3.85) years. Regarding the marital status of the child parents/guardians of the 61 children, 53(86.9%) were married, five (8.2%) were single, one (1.6%) was widowed, and the remaining were divorced. The majority of parents (n = 24, 39.3%) earned above 64.87 USD, where the majority of the parents/guardians were either employed as civil servants or daily laborers (4(6.6%) unemployed, 22(36.1%) civil servants, 17(27.9%) daily laborers and other 12 (19.7) have multiple sources of income). Educational levels of the mothers showed that 19(31.1%) can only read and write, 19(31.1%) were in primary education, 16(26.2%) were in secondary education and only 5 (8.2%) of them were in higher education. Similarly paternal education level showed 11(18.2%) can only read and write, 14(23%) were in primary education, 16(26.2%) were in secondary education, and 20(32.8%) were in higher education (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Socio-demographic characterstics of newly diagnosed type 1DM with DKA and without DKA, 2018 to 2022.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314433.t001

The majority, 41 (67.2%), of the children did not have a family history of diabetes, and 33(54%) parents knew the signs and symptoms of DM. The clinical presentations of the 37 children with DKA were abdominal pain in 10(27.2%), loss of consciousness in 4(10.8%), vomiting accompanied by dehydration in 14(37.8%) and fast breathing in the remaining 9(29.7%). Polyuria, polydipsia accompanied by weight loss were the most common signs and symptoms of type 1 DM prior to the diagnosis of DM. Infection occurred in 26 children, 21 of whom had DKA. Of the 21 infections in DKA, pneumonia was the most commonly diagnosed infection in seven (33.3%) children and diarrheal disease in six (33.3%), followed by urinary tract infection in four (19%), and acute tonsillar pharyngitis in three (14.3%) (Tables 1 and 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Clinical presentations of newly diagnosed type 1DM with DKA, 2018 to 2022.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314433.t002

In the bivariate analysis, family history of DM (p = 0.006, OR = 0.197 CI(0.063–0.623), family income (p = 0.00, OR = 2.26(1.437–3.55), parents’ knowledge of signs and symptoms, p value 0.00, OR = 0.069 CI(0.017–0.276), and preceding infection, OR = 4.987 CI(1.532–16.23) showed significant associations and were candidates for multivariate analysis. The odds of developing DKA in females and age groups of above 9.5 years were higher than males and age groups below 9.5 years respectively, however, the association was not significant. Similarly, parental educational level, marital status, occupation and signs, and symptoms of DM that the child had prior to diagnosis did not have a significant association (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Bivariable analysis of newly diagnosed type 1 DM, 2018 to 2022.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314433.t003

In multivariate analysis, significant associations were confirmed. Those children whose parents/guardians knew the signs and symptoms of DKA/DM were 93% less likely to develop DKA at the time of the initial diagnosis of DM (p = 0.017; AOR = 0.070(0.008–0.618)). The presence of a first-degree relative with DM was found to be protective against DKA as an initial presentation of DM (p-value of 0.039, AOR = 0.129, 95% CI (0.019–0.897)) compared to having no first-degree relatives with DM. New-onset DM without DKA is 1.5 times higher in children from families with a high monthly income (p value 0.000, AOR = 1.473, 95% CI (0.679–3.195)) compared to those from families with low income (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 4. Bivariable and multivariable analysis of newly diagnosed type 1DM, 2018 to 2022.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314433.t004

Discussion

The frequency of childhood and adolescent Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) as an initial presentation of diabetes mellitus varies worldwide. This retrospective study aimed to review the number of children presenting with DKA at diagnosis and to reveal the background risks for its occurrence in rural and resource-limited settings in Ethiopia. In this study, 60.7% of the children had DKA at diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, a figure notably higher than the 35.8% reported in Addis Ababa 15 years ago [7, 21], but lower than the 78.7% observed in the northern part of Ethiopia, Tigray [8]. The high level of literacy in the community and the availability of a wide range of awareness creation methods (such as screening, posters, flyers, and awareness campaigns) in the capital might explain the sharp decline in the incidence. The model was demonstrated in Germany, where the incidence was reduced from 28% to 16% through the Stuttgart ketoacidosis campaign, which focused on the symptoms of type 1 DM [11]. Moreover, the current study coincided with the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia, a time when similar studies from Egypt [22], Turkey [23] and a systematic review and meta-analysis across Europe, Asia, and North America [24], observed an increasing trend of newly diagnosed type 1 DM. The rise in the incidence could be due to viral factor-induced new onset Type 1 DM, in which the virus induces pancreatic islet cell and glucose metabolism dysfunction, compounded by reduced health seeking and utilization behavior due to pandemic related fears [24, 25].

In the broader African context, the current prevalence is higher than in Egypt (46%) [16], Sudan (17.6%) [26], and Tanzania (43%) [27], but lower than that in two studies in Nigeria (100%) [10] and (77%) [28]. Outside of Africa, the reported prevalence varies widely: the UK (25%) [29], Germany (20%) [30], Finland (19.4%) [31], Sweden (16%), USA (30%), Canada (18.6%) [3], Kuwait (35.9%), and China (50.1%) [32]. Various factors have been identified for a wide range of variations, including an inverse relationship between DKA and type 1 diabetes mellitus prevalence [33, 34].

The diagnosis of type 1 DM at an average age of 8 years and the frequent occurrence of DKA at a younger age in the current study align with several previous studies conducted in different settings. A combination of genetic predisposition, environmental triggers, hormonal changes, growth and development factors, and delayed recognition of symptoms may contribute to the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus around this age [1214, 27, 33]. In contrast to earlier studies in Ethiopia [7, 8, 21], Nigeria [7], Saudi Arabia [13] and Wales [35], the current study observed a higher number of female children presenting with DKA as an initial presentation of type 1 DM than males. This observation is in line with other studies [36]; however, none of the previous studies could explain the increased occurrence in the females. A recent study from England, Germany, Wales, Austria, and the United States was unable to explain female predominance in terms of clinical, biological, and physiological factors [37].

The finding of vomiting accompanied by signs of dehydration, polyuria, polydipsia, and weight loss, and abdominal pain in the present study is consistent with research in northern and central Ethiopia [7, 8, 21, 38] and other studies where they were dominant presentations [3, 16, 27, 32, 3941]. Additionally, the identification of infectious triggers, particularly pneumonia, diarrheal diseases, and urinary tract infections, as predictors of DKA supports the fact that infections can lead to acute metabolic decompensation and insulin resistance and subsequent development of diabetic ketoacidosis [36]. The 33%comorbidity rate of pneumonia and diarrheal diseases may reflect the underlying immune dysfunction associated with Diabetes. This highlights the critical importance of screening in these cases, as well as the necessity for enhanced preventive measures, such as vaccinations.

A significant finding of the current study was that children whose parents who were unaware of the signs and symptoms of DM were more prone to develop DKA as an initial presentation. Furthermore, the study found that having no family history of diabetes and low monthly family incomes were associated with a diagnosis of DKA at presentation. This finding is in line with studies that have suggested that creating awareness of the signs and symptoms of classic symptoms of DM reduces the incidence of DKA at diagnosis [3, 39, 4247]. Different strategies have been used to create awareness, such as awareness campaigns on classic symptoms of DM at the local (such as schools, parents/care givers, and health care workers) or nationwide levels. Such methods are effective across countries [11, 45, 4850] however, some are not [51, 52]. Conversely, the study revealed a notable 32.8% prevalence of family history among newly diagnosed type 1 DM cases, indicating the familial clustering of type 1 DM within this population and providing valuable insight for screening strategies, ultimately reducing DKA at the initial diagnosis.

Results from various studies indicate that high family income is linked to a decreased risk of DKA at diagnosis, although some studies reported no significant effect [36]. When families have a higher income, they are better positioned to seek medical advice without financial constraints-provided they are adequately aware of the signs and symptoms of DM, as shown in the current study.

In agreement with earlier studies [7] and research conducted in Germany [53], the current study shows that despite most parents/guardians having primary and secondary education levels, the education levels of parents do not affect the prevalence of DKA at presentation. However, several studies have shown a protective effect [36, 5457]. The lack of awareness and information provided on pediatric diabetes or DKA contributed to the insignificant effect of educational level on the occurrence of DKA. Similarly, in line with other studies [54, 58, 59], the current study found no association between parental employment, marital status, and DKA as an initial presentation. The study population, mainly of similar socioeconomic status, and the presence of unmeasured factors such as healthcare utilization, diet, physical activity, and stress levels, may explain the lack of association between parental employment, marital status, and DKA as an initial presentation.

Study limitations

The study identifies important factors related to DKA development, though its retrospective nature and being a single center might not reflect the condition in the whole population. Short of resources leads to non-identification of biochemical DKA to comply with ISPAD guideline is another limitation.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the current study indicates that the number of children presenting with DKA at the time of type 1 DM diagnosis was high compared to both national and global studies. The unpredictable course in younger children, masking effect of infectious comorbidities, and low awareness of type 1 DM at the individual level were the main factors. Effective awareness creation methods must be implemented to reduce the burden.

Acknowledgments

The acknowledgment goes to all parents and guardians who were willing to provide their consent to participate in the research, and all healthcare workers at the Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, who provided unreserved care for these children.

References

  1. 1. Glaser N, Fritsch M, Priyambada L, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022:Diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022;23(7):835–856. pmid:36250645
  2. 2. Jefferies C, Cutfield SW, Derraik JG, et al. 15- year incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis at onset of type 1 diabetes in children from a regional setting (Auckland, New Zealand). Sci. Rep. 2015; 5:1–7. pmid:25989414
  3. 3. Usher Smith JA, Thompson MJ, Ercole A, Walter FM. Variation between countries in the frequency of diabetic ketoacidosis at first presentation of type 1 diabetes in children: a systematic review. Diabetologia. 2012; 55:2878–2894. pmid:22933123
  4. 4. Non-Communicable O. National strategic action plan (nsap) for prevention & control (of non-communicable diseases in Ethiopia. (2016), Google Scholar. Ministry of Health.
  5. 5. Murunga AN, Owira PM. Diabetic ketoacidosis an overlooked child killer in sub-Saharan Africa. Tropical Med Int Health. 2013;18:1357–1364. pmid:24112393
  6. 6. Smith CP. Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Current Pediatrics.2006; 16,111–116.
  7. 7. Fantahun B, Gedlu E. Prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis in newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus pediatric patients in TikurAnbessa Specialized Hospital. Off Organ Ethiopian Pediatr Soc. 2008;4:1.
  8. 8. Hadgu FB, Sibhat GG, Gebretsadik LG. Diabetic ketoacidosis in children and adolescents with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes in Tigray, Ethiopia: retrospective observational study. Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2019; 10:49–55. Published 2019 May 23. pmid:31191086
  9. 9. Assefa B, Zeleke H, Murugan R, et al. Incidence and predictors of diabetic ketoacidosis among children with diabetes in west and east Gojjam zone referral hospitals, northern Ethiopia, 2019. Ital J Pediatr. 2020;46:164. pmid:33143741
  10. 10. Umar UI, Muhammed IL, Aliyu I. Retrospective review of presentation of newly diagnosed children with diabetes mellitus in a Nigerian rural setting. Med J DY Patil Vidyapeeth.2019; 12:490–4.
  11. 11. Holder M, Ehehalt S. Significant reduction of ketoacidosis at diabetes onset in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes–The Stuttgart Diabetes Awareness Campaign, Germany. Pediatr Diabetes.2020; 21:1227–31. pmid:32579294
  12. 12. Al Rashed A. Pattern of presentation in type 1 diabetic patients at the diabetes center of a university hospital. Ann Saudi Med. 2011; 31: 243. pmid:21623052
  13. 13. Abdullah MA. Epidemiology of type I diabetes mellitus among Arab children. Saudi Med J. 2019;26: 911–917.
  14. 14. Chowdhury S.Puberty and type 1 diabetes. Indian J Endocrinol Metab.2015;19(Suppl 1): S51–S54. pmid:25941652
  15. 15. Todorović S, Milenković T, Mitrović K, Plavšić L, Panić Zarić S, Vuković R. High prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes in Belgrade, Serbia: 10-year tertiary centre experience. Zdravstvena zaštita. 2019; 48(4):7–14.
  16. 16. Arafa Noha, Hassan mona Mamdouh, atef Shimaa, fathallah Asmaa salah eldin, Ibrahim amany. Clinical characterstics and precipitating factor(s) associated with diabetic ketoacidosis presentation in children with newly diagnosed diabetes. Clinical diabetology.2020; 9(5):286–292.
  17. 17. Virmani A, Brink SJ, Middlehurst A,et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022:Management of the child, adolescent, and young adult with diabetes in limited resource settings. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022;23(8):1529–1551. pmid:36537524
  18. 18. Bacha T, Shiferaw Y, Abebaw E. Outcome of diabetic ketoacidosis among paediatric patients managed with modified DKA protocol at Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital and Yekatit 12 hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Endocrinol Diab Metab. 2022;5:e363. pmid:36102127
  19. 19. Glaser NS, Wootton-Gorges SL, Buonocore MH, et al. Subclinical cerebral edema in children with diabetic ketoacidosis randomized to 2 different rehydration protocols. J Pediatr. 2013;131:e73–e80. pmid:23230065
  20. 20. Shahshahani MN, Fisher JN, Kitabchi AE. Diabetic ketoacidosis: low-dose insulin therapy by various routes. N Engl J Med.1977;297:238–241. pmid:406561
  21. 21. Atkilt HS, Turago MG, Tegegne BS. Clinical characteristics of diabetic ketoacidosis in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes in Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2017; 12(1). pmid:28135278
  22. 22. Ismail K, Amin M, et al. Diabetic ketoacidosis among Egyptian children and adolescents in the coronavirus disease 2019 era: a single-center retrospective study. Alexandria J Pediatr. 2022;35:99–105.
  23. 23. Kiral E, Kirel B, Havan M, Keskin M, Karaoglan M, Yildirim A, et al. Increased severe cases and new-onset type 1 diabetes among children presenting with diabetic ketoacidosis during first year of COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:926013. pmid:35844756
  24. 24. Elgenidy A, Awad AK, Saad K, et al. Incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis during COVID-19 pandemic: a meta-analysis of 124,597 children with diabetes. Pediatr Res. 2023;93:1149–1160. pmid:35953513
  25. 25. Wu Z, Wang J, Ullah R, et al. Covid 19 and diabetes in children: advances and strategies. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024;16:28. pmid:38287388
  26. 26. Ahmed AM, Khabour OF, Ahmed SM, Alebaid IA, Ibrahim AM. Frequency and severity of ketoacidosis at diagnosis among childhood type 1 diabetes in Khartoum state, Sudan. Afri Health Sci. 2020; 20(2): 841–848. pmid:33163051
  27. 27. Kipasika H, Majaliwa E, Kamala B, Mungai L. Clinical Presentation and Factors Associated with Diabetic Ketoacidosis at the Onset of Type-1 Diabetes Mellitus in Children and Adolescent at Muhimbili National Hospital, Tanzania:A cross sectional study. int J Diabetes Clin Res.2020;7:126.
  28. 28. Onyiriuka N. and Ifebi E. Ketoacidosis at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents: frequency and clinical characteristics. Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders. 2013; 12(1):47. pmid:24355514
  29. 29. Lokulo-Sodipe K., Moon R. J., Edge J. A., and Davies J. H.Identifying targets to reduce the incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in the UK. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2014; 99(5):438–442. pmid:24395643
  30. 30. Segerer H, Wurm W, Grimsmann JM, et al. Diabetic ketoacidosis at manifestation of type 1 diabetes in childhood and adolescence—incidence and risk factors. Dtsch Arztebl Int.2021; 118: 367–72. pmid:34250891
  31. 31. Hekkala A, Reunanen A, Koski M, Knip M, Veijola R; Finnish Pediatric Diabetes Register. Age related differences in the frequency of ketoacidosis at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33:1500–1502.
  32. 32. Peng W, Yuan J, Chiavaroli V, et al. 10-Year Incidence of Diabetic Ketoacidosis at Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosis in Children Aged Less Than 16 Years From a Large Regional Center (Hangzhou, China). Front. Endocrinol. 2021; 12:653519. pmid:33986725
  33. 33. Cherubini V, Grimsmann JM, Åkesson K, et al. Temporal trends in diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis of paediatric type 1 diabetes between 2006 and 2016: results from 13 countries in three continents. Diabetologia. 2020; 63(8):1530–1541. pmid:32382815
  34. 34. Große J, Hornstein H, Manuwald U, Kugler J, Glauche I, Rothe U. Incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis of new-onset type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents in different countries correlates with Human Development Index (HDI): an updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Horm Metab Res. 2018; 50: 209–22 pmid:29523007
  35. 35. Patterson CC, Harjutsalo V, Rosenbauer J et al. Trends and cyclical variation in the incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes in 26 European centres in the 25 year period 1989–2013: a multicenter prospective registration study. Diabetologia. 2019; 62(3):408–417. pmid:30483858
  36. 36. Usher-Smith JA, Thompson MJ, Sharp SJ, and Walter FM. Factors associated with the presence of diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis of diabetes in children and young adults: a systematic review. BMJ. 2011; 343:d4092. pmid:21737470
  37. 37. Maahs DM, Hermann JM, Holman N et al. Rates of diabetic ketoacidosis: international comparison with 49,859 pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes from England, Wales, the US, Austria, and Germany. Diabetes Care.2015; 38:1876–1882.
  38. 38. Teshome D. Diabetic Ketoacidosis in an Addis Abeba Children’s Hospital. Ethiop Med J. 1992; 30:7–11. pmid:1622509
  39. 39. Lévy-Marchal C, Patterson CC, Green A; EURODIAB ACE Study Group. Europe and Diabetes. Geographical variation of presentation at diagnosis of type I diabetes in children: the EURODIAB study. European and Dibetes. Diabetologia. 2001; 44 Suppl 3:B75–B80.
  40. 40. Souza LCVF, Kraemer GC, Koliski A, et al. DIABETIC KETOACIDOSIS AS THE INITIAL PRESENTATION OF TYPE 1 DIABETES IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2019; 38:e2018204. Published 2019 Nov 25. pmid:31778415
  41. 41. Roche EF, Menon A, Gill D, Hoey H. Clinical presentation of type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2005; 6(2):75–78. pmid:15963033
  42. 42. Bui H, To T, Stein R, Fung K, Daneman D. Is diabetic ketoacidosis at disease onset a result of missed diagnosis? J Pediatr.2010; 156:472–7. pmid:19962155
  43. 43. Barker JM, Goehrig SH, Barriga K, et al, DAISY study. Clinical characteristics of children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes through intensive screening and follow-up. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27(6): 1399–1404. pmid:15161795
  44. 44. Vanelli M, Chiari G, Ghizzoni L, Costi G, Giacalone T, Chiarelli F. Effectiveness of a prevention program for diabetic ketoacidosis in children. Diabetes Care. 1999; 22:7–9. pmid:10333896
  45. 45. Vanelli M, Chiari G, Lacava S, Iovane B. Campaign for diabetic ketoacidosis prevention still effective 8 years later. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30:e12. pmid:17392527
  46. 46. Triolo TM, Chase HP, Barker JM, the DPT-1 Study Group. Diabetic subjects diagnosed through the diabetes prevention trial type 1 (DPT-1) are often asymptomatic with normal A1C at diabetes onset. Diabetes Care.2009; 32(5):769–773. pmid:19407074
  47. 47. Elding Larsson H, Vehik K, Bell R, et al, TEDDY Study Group., SEARCH Study Group., Swediabkids Study Group., DPV Study Group., Finnish Diabetes Registry Study Group. Reduced prevalence of diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in young children participating in longitudinal follow-up. Diabetes Care.2011; 34(11):2347–2352. pmid:21972409
  48. 48. Rabbone I, Maltoni G, Tinti D, et al. Diabetic ketoacidosis at the onset of disease during a national awareness campaign: a 2-year observational study in children aged 0–18 years. Arch Dis Child.2020; 105:363–6. pmid:31597646
  49. 49. King BR, Howard NJ, Verge CF, et al. A diabetes awareness campaign prevents diabetic ketoacidosis in children at their initial presentation with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012; 13:647–51. pmid:22816992
  50. 50. Lansdown AJ, Barton J, Warner J, et al. Prevalence of ketoacidosis at diagnosis of childhood onset Type 1 diabetes in Wales from 1991 to 2009 and effect of publicity campaign. Diabetes Med. 2012; 29:1506–9. pmid:22413738
  51. 51. Derraik JGB, Cutfield WS, Maessen SE et al. A brief campaign to prevent diabetic ketoacidosis in children newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus: the NO-DKA study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018; 19(7):1257–1262. pmid:30014558
  52. 52. Fritsch M, Schober E, Rami-Merhar B, Hofer S, Fröhlich-Reiterer E, Waldhoer T. Diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis in Austrian children: a population-based analysis, 1989–2011. J Pediatr. 2013; 163:1484.e1–8.e1. pmid:23953724
  53. 53. Rosenbauer J, Icks A, Giani G. Clinical characteristics and predictors of severe ketoacidosis at onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus in children in a North Rhine-Westphalian region, Germany. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab.2002;15:1137–45. pmid:12387511
  54. 54. Sadauskaite-Kuehne V, Samuelsson U, Jasinskiene E, et al. Severity at onset of childhood type 1 diabetes in countries with high and low incidence of the condition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract.2002; 55:247–54. pmid:11850101
  55. 55. Komulainen J, Lounamaa R, Knip M, Kaprio EA, Akerblom HK. Ketoacidosis at the diagnosis of type 1 (insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus is related to poor residual beta cell function. Arch Dis Childhood.1996; 75:410–5.
  56. 56. Rewers A, Klingensmith G, Davis C, et al. Presence of diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in youth: The search for diabetes in youth study. Pediatrics.2008; 121: e1258–e1266. pmid:18450868
  57. 57. Komulainen J, Kulmala P, Savola K, et al. Clinical, autoimmune, and genetic characteristics of very young children with type 1 diabetes. Childhood Diabetes in Finland (DiMe) Study Group. Diabetes Care.1999; 22: 1950–1955. pmid:10587824
  58. 58. Smith CP, Firth D, Bennett S, Howard C, Chisholm P. Ketoacidosis occurring in newly diagnosed and established diabetic children. Acta Paediatrica.1998;87:537–4. pmid:9641735
  59. 59. Hamilton DV, Mundia SS, Lister J. Mode of presentation of juvenile diabetes. BMJ.1976; 2:211–2. pmid:974495