Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Prevalence of depression, anxiety, stress, and suicide tendency among individual with long-COVID and determinants: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Razieh Bidhendi-Yarandi,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Psychosis Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Social Health, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

  • Akbar Biglarian,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Social Health, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

  • Jannike Lie Karlstad,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway

  • Cathrine Fredriksen Moe,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway

  • Enayatollah Bakhshi,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Social Health, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

  • Mohammad-Reza Khodaei-Ardakani,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Razi Psychiatric Hospital, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

  • Samira Behboudi-Gandevani

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    samira.behboudi-gandevani@nord.no

    Affiliation Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway

Abstract

Background

While mental health alterations during active COVID-19 infection have been documented, the prevalence of long-term mental health consequences remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of mental health symptoms—depression, anxiety, stress, and suicidal tendencies—and to identify their trends and associated risk factors in individuals with long-COVID.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature search of databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PsycINFO up to August 2024, targeting observational studies published in English. Study quality was assessed using structured standard tools. The primary outcome was the pooled prevalence of depression, anxiety, stress, and suicidal tendencies in individuals with long-COVID. Secondary outcomes included trends in these mental health problems over time and identification of associated determinants.

Results

A total of 94 eligible studies were included in the analysis. The pooled prevalence estimates, regardless of follow up times duration, were as follows: depression, 25% (95%CI:22–28%; PI:1–59%); anxiety (adjusted via trim and fill method), 23%(95%CI:21–25%;PI:2–35%); composite outcomes of depression and/or anxiety, 25% (95%CI:23–27%;PI:2–51%); stress, 26%(95%CI:13–39%;PI:1–69%); and suicidality, 19%(95%CI:15–22%;PI:13–25%). The results of meta-regression analyses revealed a statistically significant trend showing a gradual decrease in the prevalence of the composite outcome of anxiety and/or depression over time (RD = -0.004,P = 0.022). Meta-regression results indicated that being female and younger age were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of mental health symptoms. Study design and study setting did not contribute to heterogeneity.

Conclusion

One-fourth of individual with long-COVID experience mental health symptoms, including depression, anxiety, and stress, which remain prevalent even two years post-infection despite a slight decreasing trend. Factors such as female gender and younger age were linked to higher rates of anxiety and depression. These findings indicate the need for ongoing mental health screening and early interventions to mitigate long-term psychological distress in long-COVID patients.

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic is regarded as an unprecedented natural disaster in the current century, with far-reaching and catastrophic consequences for the global population. As reported by the World Health Organization (WHO), more than 750 million people have been infected globally, and the death toll has tragically surpassed 6 million [1, 2]. While most patients recovered in the weeks following acute infection, evidence quickly emerged that some people reported persistence or appearance of a wide variety of symptoms with variable intensity, regardless of the initial disease severity [1, 3]. The term “long-COVID” was introduced in May 2020 [3]. According to the WHO it was defined as the presence of symptoms lasting for at least 2 months in individuals with a history of probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, which usually manifests 3 months from the onset of acute illness, yet cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis [4].

In this respect, emerging evidence reported a high prevalence of prolonged psychiatric symptoms in individuals who had preliminary COVID-19 or have recovered from the acute infection, that could last for weeks, even months, after recovery [57]. For instance, Badenoch et al. (2021) in a meta-analysis reported that among patients experiencing persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms after an initial 2-week infection period (with a median follow-up time of 77 days, ranging from 14 to 182 days), the pooled prevalence of anxiety was 19% [19.1% (13.3–26.8%)] [8].

However, the prevalence of some significant mental health symptoms, such as depression, anxiety, stress, and suicidal tendencies, in individuals with long-COVID, are not fully determined. While some studies have identified specific associated risk factors for mental health problems, a thorough understanding of their prevalence and contributing factors in long COVID patients is still missing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and trend of mental health symptoms, including depression, anxiety, stress, and suicidal tendencies, and to identify their associated risk factors among individuals with long-COVID. By addressing this gap, we hope to provide a clearer picture of the mental health issues in long COVID patients and inform better clinical practices and public health strategies.

Material and methods

Design and registration

This systematic review and meta-analysis adhere to the 2020 preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines [9]. The protocol of this review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022346858).

Data source, search strategy and study selection

We conducted a comprehensive search across seven electronic databases (PubMed including Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PsycINFO) from inception to August 2024. Additionally, we manually searched the reference lists of relevant articles, including backward and forward citation searches. All identified studies were exported into EndNote Software for duplicate removal, screening, full-text review, and data extraction. Three independent reviewers conducted title and abstract screening, full-text review was completed by two other independent reviewers against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Disagreements or conflicts were resolved through discussion and consensus. A detailed information is provided in the S1 File.

Selection criteria

All observational (cross-sectional, case–control, or cohort) Studies were considered for inclusion in this review if they met the following criteria: (i) reported the occurrence or provided adequate data to estimate the prevalence of outcomes among the general adult population, and (ii) utilized validated measurement tools for outcome assessment. Additionally, studies that recruited college students and healthcare providers were also included. We excluded studies that (i) were non-primary research articles (brief communications, commentary, editorials, and reviews); (ii) did not adhere to the defined criteria for long-COVID; (iii) Did not clearly specify the follow-up duration; (iv) studies published in languages other than English. If studies had overlapping participants and survey periods, then the study with the most detailed and relevant information was used. In cases where studies had overlapping participants and survey periods, preference was given to the study providing the most detailed and relevant information.

Data extraction

After identifying eligible studies through full-text review, two reviewer (SB-G and RB-Y) extracted data. The third reviewer double-checked 15% subsample of the extracted information to check the consistency. General information that was extracted for each study included: the first author, year of publication, sample size, country, and study population. Information on event occurrences such as severity of preliminary infection, follow up time, measurement tools, and associated factors were also extracted.

Outcome variables and measures

Long-COVID was defined as conditions that occur in individuals with a history of probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection 3 months from the onset of COVID-19 that last for 2 months and cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis [10, 11].

For the endpoint outcomes of the study, including anxiety, depression, stress, and suicide tendency, we utilized the definitions employed in each original study, due to the heterogeneity of definitions used across different studies, at different time points.

Quality assessment

The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies [12]. The NOS consists of eight items classified into three domains of study population/ group selection, study group comparability of study group, and determination of outcome or exposure. This tool evaluates the methodological quality of studies using a star system, providing a semi-quantitative assessment. Scores range from zero to nine stars for cohort and case-control studies and zero to eight for cross-sectional studies. The studies were categorized into four quality levels based on their scores: high (75–100% scores), moderate (50–74% scores), low (25–49% scores), and very low (0–24% scores). Quality assessment involved two reviewers (CFM and JLK), with a third reviewer (SB-G) double-assessing 15% of the articles to ensure consistency.

Synthesis of results/data analysis

A narrative synthesis was performed for the results of studies to summarize the determinant associated with outcomes. This involved systematically reviewing and integrating findings from the included studies. Initially, we extracted and tabulated key data from each study, then identified and analyzed recurring themes and patterns across the studies, comparing findings to explore consistencies and discrepancies. Finally, to generate a consistent effect measure across studies, meta-analyses was performed.

Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Chi-square test. Publication bias was also assessed by both funnel plot and Egger’s test. The random effect model was used to estimate the pooled proportion in case of significant heterogeneity. In addition, Freeman-Tukey (double arcsine) transformation for proportions was applied to stabilize the variances. Trim and fill method applied in case of significant publication bias. Meta-regression analysis was also run to assess the effect of extracted determinants as the potential sources of heterogeneity. R software metaphor package version 4.3.3 was used to conduct statistical analysis.

Results

Search results and characteristics of the included studies

The initial literature search yielded 3857 studies, 250 of which were further evaluated by retrieving their full text and 156 of these were excluded. Eventually, 97 eligible studies were included in the systematic review and offered extractable data for the meta-analysis [57, 13103], involving 660484 participants. A flow diagram of this process is present in Fig 1. The main characteristics of included studies are summarized in Table 1.

Fifty studies were conducted in Europe including Norway, UK, Switzerland, Italy, Spain, Germany, Hungary, Turkey, Netherlands, France, Ireland, Sweden [5, 6, 13, 1922, 2427, 3234, 39, 43, 44, 4750, 52, 53, 58, 6070, 73, 75, 77, 78, 80, 81, 84, 87, 91, 92, 9699, 102], fifteen in the United States and Canada [16, 29, 3537, 41, 42, 46, 76, 82, 86, 88, 89, 101, 103], nineteen in Asia including Iraq, Thailand, China, Malaysia, Japan, Bangladesh, Republic of Korea, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Vietnam [7, 14, 23, 38, 45, 51, 5456, 59, 66, 71, 72, 90, 9395, 100, 104], four in Africa including Egypt, Morrocco, south Africa [15, 17, 18, 57], and six in South America including Brazil, Mexico [28, 30, 31, 40, 74, 83]. Follow-up time ranged from 2 to 24 months (Table 1).

All included studies reported on the prevalence of depression or anxiety, with only seven studies also addressing stress [5, 58, 64, 71, 82, 100, 104] and two studies examining the prevalence of suicidality [39, 42].

Quality appraisal, publication bias and heterogeneity

The quality appraisal of the included studies is presented in S1-S3 Tables in S1 File. Among them, 32.9% (31/94) of studies were judged as high quality, 56.3% (53/94) were assessed as moderate quality, and 10.6% (10/94) were classified as low quality. None of the studies were considered very low quality, resulting in all studies being included in the final analysis.

Based on the funnel plot (Fig 2) and Egger’s test (Table 2), no statistically significant publication bias was observed among the studies for any of the outcomes. Due to insufficient data, publication bias for the outcome of suicidality was not performed. Heterogeneity tests for all outcomes were statistically significant (P < 0.001); therefore, all estimations were obtained using the random effects method.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Funnel plot for testing asymmetry hypothesis using Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation for proportions.

A: Depression, B: Anxiety, C: Anxiety and/or Depression D: Stress.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312351.g002

thumbnail
Table 2. Results of random effect meta-analysis using Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation for proportions, regardless of the duration of their symptoms.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312351.t002

Results of meta-analysis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis

Table 2 provides a summary of the overall prevalence of depression, anxiety, stress, and suicidality in individuals with long-COVID, regardless of the duration of their symptoms depression, 25% (95% CI: 22–28%; PI:1–59%); anxiety (adjusted via trim and fill method), 23% (95% CI:21–25%; PI: 2–35%); composite outcomes of depression and/or anxiety, 25% (95% CI: 23–27%; PI: 2–51%); stress, 26% (95% CI: 13–39%; PI: 1–69%); and suicidality, 19% (95% CI: 15–22%; PI: 13–25%).

The results of the subgroup and meta-regression analyses, stratified by follow-up duration, age, gender, study design, and study setting, are summarized in Table 3 and Fig 3. Regarding the depression, the pooled prevalence of depression at follow-up intervals of up to 6 months, 6–12 months, and 12–24 months was 27% (95% CI: 23–31%), 23% (95% CI: 20–26%), and 15% (95% CI: 9–21%), respectively, exhibiting a non-significant decreasing trend over time (Beta = -0.04, P = 0.06). Meta-regression analyses revealed studies with a higher proportion of female participants reported a significantly higher prevalence of depression compared to those with a greater proportion of male participants (27% vs. 20%, P = 0.025). Additionally, individuals aged ≤50 years exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of depression compared to those >50 years (27% vs. 22%, P = 0.033). Population-based studies reported a slightly lower prevalence compared to non-population-based studies (21% vs. 28%, P = 0.07), though this difference was not statistically significant. Finally, there were minimal setting-related differences, with a pooled prevalence of 25% for studies conducted in both developing and non-developing countries, showing no significant differences by study setting.

thumbnail
Fig 3.

Subgroup and meta-regression analysis of depression, anxiety, and composite outcomes of depression and/or anxiety results stratified by: (A) gender (Studies with more women participants vs, Studies with more men participants), (B) Study setting (living in developing vs. developed countries), (C) Study design, (population-based vs. non-population-based), (D) Age (< = 50 yr vs. >50 yr), and (E) Follow-up time (up to 6 months, 6–12 months, and 12–24 months) in individuals with long covid. RD: risk difference.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312351.g003

thumbnail
Table 3. The results of the subgroup and meta-regression analyses, stratified by follow-up duration, age, gender, study design, and study setting.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312351.t003

Regarding anxiety, the pooled prevalence at follow-up duration of up to 6 months, 6–12 months, and 12–24 months was 25% (95% CI: 21–29%), 21% (95% CI: 19–23%), and 21% (95% CI: 12–29%), respectively, showing a non-significant decreasing trend over time (Beta = -0.03, P = 0.205). Meta-regression analyses revealed that studies with a higher proportion of female participants reported a significantly higher prevalence of anxiety compared to those with a higher proportion of male participants (27% vs. 20%, P = 0.025). While individuals aged ≤50 years had a non-significantly higher prevalence of anxiety compared to those >50 years (25% vs. 20%, P = 0.159), this difference did not reach statistical significance. Population-based studies reported a slightly lower prevalence compared to non-population-based studies (25% vs. 20%, P = 0.072), although this difference was also not statistically significant. Lastly, studies conducted in developed countries had a higher, but non-significant, pooled prevalence of anxiety compared to those in developing countries (24% vs. 20%, P = 0.254).

The composite outcome of depression and/or anxiety demonstrated a consistent pattern, with pooled prevalence rates at follow-up intervals of up to 6 months, 6–12 months, and 12–24 months being 27% (95% CI: 25–30%), 23% (95% CI: 21–24%), and 20% (95% CI: 16–24%), respectively, indicating a significant decreasing trend over time (Beta = -0.04, P = 0.022). Studies with a higher proportion of female participants reported a significantly higher prevalence of the composite outcome compared to those with a higher proportion of male participants (28% vs. 22%, P = 0.007). Meta-regression analyses revealed that individuals aged ≤50 years exhibited a significantly higher prevalence compared to those >50 years (28% vs. 22%, P = 0.011). Setting-related and study design differences were minimal, with both population-based and non-population-based studies showing a pooled prevalence of 24%, and studies from developing and developed countries showing pooled prevalences of 24% and 25%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference.

Due to a lack of data, we could not perform those analysis for stress and suicidality.

Determinants of outcomes

Moste of the studies presented factors associated with persistent psychological symptoms in patients with long-COVID which categories as 4 factors, including:

(i) Demographic and socioeconomic factors.

It was included: male gender [14, 96], female gender [17, 28, 36, 44, 55, 61, 62, 71, 93, 94], Older patients [18, 28, 36, 55, 90], younger patients [41, 66, 94, 96], lower educational level [28, 75], life stressors including death of a close contact and new disability, negative experiences with medical professionals, family, friends, partners and employers [36, 96], patients living alone [7, 72], Specific demographic groups (people of color such as African American/ Black individuals and sexual and gender minorities such as non-binary gender) [16, 83, 96];

(ii) Lifestyle and health status factors.

It was included: lower income and financial insecurity [16, 71, 96], unemployment [96], inactivity [72, 96], low quality of life [81], Suffering from one or multi co-morbidities [71] such as type 2 diabetes [17, 18], kidney diseases [18], Respiratory complaints [39], arterial hypertension, obesity [44, 94, 99], previous psychiatric diagnosis or pre-existing depression or anxiety [62, 67, 83, 96, 97] and negative attitude towards the pandemic [72], perceiving to have poorer health [94, 96];

(iii) Acute COVID-19 infection characteristics.

It was included: oxygen support or mechanically ventilated [17, 99], admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) [18, 80], hospitalization or stayed a long duration in the hospital [18, 80, 102], severe and longer duration of symptoms in acute phase [18, 36, 55, 62, 91, 96, 103], used Chloroquine [18], neurological complications during index hospitalization [36], Favipiravir prescription [7], Outpatient care [78];

(iv) Disease progression factors.

It was included: numbers of persistent symptoms [39, 75, 90], presence of psychopathology such as depressive symptoms, fatigue and cognitive impairment after acute phase [44, 62, 81, 99], Hypoechogenic brainstem raphe alterations in transcranial sonography (TCS) [73], affective affectation [75].

Discussion

This systematic review and meta-analysis estimated the prevalence of significant mental health symptoms in individuals with long-COVID. Additionally, it provided evidence on the trends of these problems over time and identified key determinants. The results of our study showed that one-fourth of patients suffering from long-COVID experienced mental health symptoms, including depression, anxiety, and stress. Additionally, although the results were inconclusive due to a lack of data, one-fifth of these patients exhibited suicidality. Furthermore, longer follow-up, up to 24 months, indicated that the trend of these symptoms slightly decreased over time. Being a woman and younger age were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of mental health issues.

After a while since the first cases emerged, the direct effects of COVID-19 on mental health were starting to become apparent [105]. Uncertainty, social distancing, economic disruptions, stringent infection control, and national lockdowns and disruption to mental health services induced by the COVID-19 pandemic, led to heightened levels psychological challenges [106, 107]. In one of the preliminary reports, Nochaiwong et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 107 observational studies spanning 32 countries. Their findings revealed prevalence estimates of 28.0% for depression, 26.9% for anxiety, and 36.5% for stress among individuals who had experienced preliminary COVID- 19 infection. These results highlighted a notable increase in the prevalence of common mental health problems during the pandemic compared to the pre-COVID-19 era [108].

Nevertheless, emerging evidence has demonstrated that a spectrum of sequelae and complications can persist long after the acute infection, irrespective of the severity of the initial illness, collectively referred to as long- COVID [109]. Similar to acute COVID-19, long- COVID can affect multiple organs and systems, resulting in a wide range of symptoms, including mental health symptoms.

While accurately reporting long-COVID symptoms is challenging due to accuracy of diagnosis, reporting systems, population assessed, accuracy of self-reporting and length of follow-up period, our meta-analysis revealed that approximately 25% of patients with persistent symptoms experience mental health problems including anxiety and/or depression and stress. This condition may pose a significant public health concern, affecting millions of individuals worldwide. In a recent published study, Zheng et al. (2023), in a meta-analysis and systematic review of 40 studies with 12,424 individuals, reported that the pooled prevalence of any long COVID and psychiatric symptoms in children and adolescents with long covid were 23.36% (95% CI: 15.27–32.53) and (12.30%, 95% CI: 5.38–21.37), respectively [110].

Although the underlying mechanisms of mental problems in individual with COVID remain unclear, some evidence suggests that the virus can infect the central nervous system (CNS) via hematogenous or neuronal retrograde neuro-invasive routes. This infection can also induce septic encephalopathy and may affect the permeability of the blood-brain barrier, allowing peripheral cytokines and other blood-derived substances to enter the CNS and contribute to neuroinflammation [111113].

Additionally, the pandemic itself has had a negative impact on mental health. Living through a global health crisis, experiencing hospitalization, quarantine, isolation, social distancing, loneliness, reduced physical activity, and financial insecurity all potentially increase the risk of anxiety and depression [107, 111]. These processes may collectively contribute to the development of long-term mental health issues following COVID-19.

Despite inconclusive results due to data limitations, our study found a concerning prevalence of suicidality among individuals with long-COVID, affecting one-fifth of the patient population. Suicidality is a complex outcome influenced by multiple factors, including the interplay of physical health sequelae, psychological distress, and social determinants [114, 115]. Future longitudinal studies with robust methodologies are warranted to confirm this finding and to elucidate the causal pathways and identify effective strategies for suicide prevention in this vulnerable population.

Furthermore, although we observed a gradual decrease in the prevalence of mental health problems over time, the prevalence remained high even after 24 months of follow-up. This persistent prevalence underscores the long-term impact of COVID-19 on mental health and highlights the need for sustained mental health support for these individuals. However, the slight yet significant decrease in mental health symptoms may reflect natural recovery processes or the positive effects of ongoing medical and psychological interventions. However, the high prevalence of these issues after two years suggests that many individuals continue to experience substantial psychological distress long after their initial COVID-19 infection.

In addition, our systematic review identified several key factors associated with persistent psychological symptoms in individuals with Long COVID. These factors can be broadly categorized into four main domains of demographic and socioeconomic factors, lifestyle and health status factors, acute COVID-19 infection characteristics, and disease progression factors. These findings highlight the multifaceted nature of psychological sequelae in Long COVID, influenced by a complex interplay of demographic, socioeconomic, health-related, and disease-specific factors, which is crucial for informing clinical practice and public health strategies. Specifically, being female and residing in developed countries were significantly linked to increased rates of depression among individuals with long-COVID. This gender disparity may reflect broader trends observed in mental health, where females are generally more susceptible to depression due to a combination of biological, hormonal, and psychosocial factors. The higher prevalence of depression in developed countries could be attributed to various factors. These include greater awareness and reporting of mental health issues, better diagnostic capabilities, and possibly higher levels of stress and lifestyle changes associated with the pandemic in these regions.

We observed a lower prevalence of these mental health symptoms in population-based studies compared to clinical or hospital-based studies. This difference likely reflects the broader inclusion of asymptomatic and mild cases in population-based research, whereas clinical studies tend to focus on more severe COVID-19 cases prone to persistent mental health issues.

In the current meta-analysis, we assessed publication bias across the included studies. Except for anxiety, where some evidence of publication bias was detected, no significant publication bias was found for depression, stress, or suicidality. For anxiety, the bias was adjusted using the trim and fill method, ensuring that the overall findings remain robust and reliable.

It should be noted that the included studies exhibited heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis suggested that variations in populations, particularly younger age, follow-up duration and female gender, may contribute to this heterogeneity. However, other potential factors, such as ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and lifestyle, could also play a role but were not fully explored. Additionally, the use of different questionnaires and assessment tools to gather data likely contributed to the observed heterogenicity. Variations in study design, sample size, and regional healthcare practices might also have played a role in increasing heterogeneity among the studies.

Our study had some limitations. Despite conducting an extensive literature search, certain unpublished studies that and those written in languages other than English were not included. Additionally, the number of studies that assessed stress and suicidality prevalence was limited, restricting our ability to perform additional analyses. Furthermore, different tools have been used to assess mental health symptoms across studies, leading to potential inconsistencies and variations in reported prevalence rates. Additionally, data on individuals who had severe forms of COVID-19 and subsequently died are lacking. This absence potentially underrepresents the most severe cases in existing research. Furthermore, there were limitations in the data collected, as most of the papers did not present data related to determinants and associated factors specifically for mental health in individuals with long-COVID. Finally, the findings do not generalize to patients who have had COVID-19 but were not diagnosed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we found that one-fourth of individuals with long-COVID suffer from mental health symptoms, including depression, anxiety, and stress. Although these symptoms showed a slight decreasing trend over time, their prevalence remained high even two years after the initial infection. While various factors contribute to mental health symptoms in these patients, our analysis highlighted that women and being younger are particularly vulnerable to higher rates of anxiety and depression. These findings emphasize the need for screening and providing adequate support or early intervention for individuals with long COVID to address and reduce long-term psychological distress.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their gratitude to the Nord University Library for their assistance in gathering the articles.

References

  1. 1. Higgins V, Sohaei D, Diamandis EP, Prassas I. COVID-19: from an acute to chronic disease? Potential long-term health consequences. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2021;58(5):297–310. Epub 20201221. pmid:33347790.
  2. 2. Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic analysis of COVID-19-related mortality, 2020–21. Lancet. 2022;399(10334):1513–36. Epub 20220310. pmid:35279232; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8912932.
  3. 3. Castanares-Zapatero D, Chalon P, Kohn L, Dauvrin M, Detollenaere J, Maertens de Noordhout C, et al. Pathophysiology and mechanism of long COVID: a comprehensive review. Ann Med. 2022;54(1):1473–87. pmid:35594336; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9132392.
  4. 4. WHO. A clinical CAS definition of post COVID condition by a Delphy consensus. World health Organization (WHO); 2021. A clinical CAS definition of post COVID condition by a Delphy consensus Available from: https://ww.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Post_COVID-19_condition-Clinical_case_definition-2021.1.
  5. 5. Becker C, Beck K, Zumbrunn S, Memma V, Herzog N, Bissmann B, et al. Long COVID 1 year after hospitalisation for COVID-19: a prospective bicentric cohort study. Swiss Med Wkly. 2021;151:w30091. Epub 20211022. pmid:34694106.
  6. 6. Bellan M, Apostolo D, Albè A, Crevola M, Errica N, Ratano G, et al. Determinants of long COVID among adults hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection: A prospective cohort study. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1038227. Epub 20221219. pmid:36601115; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9807078.
  7. 7. Herman B, Bruni A, Zain E, Dzulhadj A, Oo AC. Post-COVID depression and its multiple factors, does Favipiravir have a protective effect? A longitudinal study of indonesia COVID-19 patients. PLoS One. 2022;17(12):e0279184. Epub 20221230. pmid:36584099; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9803217.
  8. 8. Badenoch JB, Rengasamy ER, Watson C, Jansen K, Chakraborty S, Sundaram RD, et al. Persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms after COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Commun. 2022;4(1):fcab297. Epub 20211217. pmid:35169700; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8833580.
  9. 9. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj. 2021;372:n71. Epub 20210329. pmid:33782057; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8005924.
  10. 10. Soriano JB, Murthy S, Marshall JC, Relan P, Diaz JV. A clinical case definition of post-COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(4):e102–e7. Epub 20211221. pmid:34951953; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8691845.
  11. 11. Lippi G, Sanchis-Gomar F, Henry BM. COVID-19 and its long-term sequelae: what do we know in 2023? Pol Arch Intern Med. 2023;133(4). Epub 20230109. pmid:36626183.
  12. 12. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in metaanalyses.[Online]. Available from: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp, Accessed in March- April 2024.
  13. 13. Group P-CC. Clinical characteristics with inflammation profiling of long COVID and association with 1-year recovery following hospitalisation in the UK: a prospective observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2022;10(8):761–75. Epub 20220423. pmid:35472304; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9034855.
  14. 14. Jawad MJ, Abbas MM, Jawad MJ, Hassan SM, Hadi NR. MENTAL HEALTH AND PSYCHOSOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS POST COVID-19 OUTBREAK. Wiad Lek. 2021;74(12):3156–9. pmid:35058382.
  15. 15. Abdelrahman MM, Abd-Elrahman NM, Bakheet TM. Persistence of symptoms after improvement of acute COVID19 infection, a longitudinal study. J Med Virol. 2021;93(10):5942–6. Epub 20210702. pmid:34171139; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8426945.
  16. 16. Abramoff BA, Dillingham TR, Brown LA, Caldera F, Caldwell KM, McLarney M, et al. Psychological and Cognitive Functioning Among Patients Receiving Outpatient Rehabilitation for Post-COVID Sequelae: An Observational Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023;104(1):11–7. Epub 20221004. pmid:36202227; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9529350.
  17. 17. Ahmed GK, Khedr EM, Hamad DA, Meshref TS, Hashem MM, Aly MM. Long term impact of Covid-19 infection on sleep and mental health: A cross-sectional study. Psychiatry Res. 2021;305:114243. Epub 20211012. pmid:34673325; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8507572.
  18. 18. Azizi A, Achak D, Saad E, Hilali A, Youlyouz-Marfak I, Marfak A. Post-COVID-19 mental health and its associated factors at 3-months after discharge: A case-control study. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2022;17:101141. Epub 20220912. pmid:36119409; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9465475.
  19. 19. Brito-Zerón P, Acar-Denizli N, Romão VC, Armagan B, Seror R, Carubbi F, et al. Post-COVID-19 syndrome in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome after acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2021;39 Suppl 133(6):57–65. Epub 20211122. pmid:34874821.
  20. 20. Buonsenso D, Gualano MR, Rossi MF, Valz Gris A, Sisti LG, Borrelli I, et al. Post-Acute COVID-19 Sequelae in a Working Population at One Year Follow-Up: A Wide Range of Impacts from an Italian Sample. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(17). Epub 20220905. pmid:36078808; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9518581.
  21. 21. Buttery S, Philip KEJ, Williams P, Fallas A, West B, Cumella A, et al. Patient symptoms and experience following COVID-19: results from a UK-wide survey. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2021;8(1). pmid:34732518; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8572361.
  22. 22. Cacciatore M, Raggi A, Pilotto A, Cristillo V, Guastafierro E, Toppo C, et al. Neurological and Mental Health Symptoms Associated with Post-COVID-19 Disability in a Sample of Patients Discharged from a COVID-19 Ward: A Secondary Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7). Epub 20220402. pmid:35409924; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8998950.
  23. 23. Cai J, Lin K, Zhang H, Xue Q, Zhu K, Yuan G, et al. A one-year follow-up study of systematic impact of long COVID symptoms among patients post SARS-CoV-2 omicron variants infection in Shanghai, China. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2023;12(2):2220578. pmid:37272336; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10281439.
  24. 24. Calabria M, García-Sánchez C, Grunden N, Pons C, Arroyo JA, Gómez-Anson B, et al. Post-COVID-19 fatigue: the contribution of cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms. J Neurol. 2022;269(8):3990–9. Epub 20220430. pmid:35488918; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9055007.
  25. 25. Caspersen IH, Magnus P, Trogstad L. Excess risk and clusters of symptoms after COVID-19 in a large Norwegian cohort. Eur J Epidemiol. 2022;37(5):539–48. Epub 20220225. pmid:35211871; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8872922.
  26. 26. Catalán IP, Martí CR, Sota DP, Álvarez AC, Gimeno MJE, Juana SF, et al. Corticosteroids for COVID-19 symptoms and quality of life at 1 year from admission. J Med Virol. 2022;94(1):205–10. Epub 20210904. pmid:34436783; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8662039.
  27. 27. Clemente I, Sinatti G, Cirella A, Santini SJ, Balsano C. Alteration of Inflammatory Parameters and Psychological Post-Traumatic Syndrome in Long-COVID Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(12). Epub 20220609. pmid:35742355; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9222533.
  28. 28. Damiano RF, Rocca CCA, Serafim AP, Loftis JM, Talib LL, Pan PM, et al. Cognitive impairment in long-COVID and its association with persistent dysregulation in inflammatory markers. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1174020. Epub 20230523. pmid:37287969; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10242059.
  29. 29. Danesh V, Arroliga AC, Bourgeois JA, Boehm LM, McNeal MJ, Widmer AJ, et al. Symptom Clusters Seen in Adult COVID-19 Recovery Clinic Care Seekers. J Gen Intern Med. 2023;38(2):442–9. Epub 20221114. pmid:36376627; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9663188.
  30. 30. de Miranda DAP, Gomes SVC, Filgueiras PS, Corsini CA, Almeida NBF, Silva RA, et al. Long COVID-19 syndrome: a 14-months longitudinal study during the two first epidemic peaks in Southeast Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2022;116(11):1007–14. pmid:35514142.
  31. 31. de Oliveira JF, de Ávila RE, de Oliveira NR, da Cunha Severino Sampaio N, Botelho M, Gonçalves FA, et al. Persistent symptoms, quality of life, and risk factors in long COVID: a cross-sectional study of hospitalized patients in Brazil. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;122:1044–51. Epub 20220728. pmid:35908724; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9330427.
  32. 32. Delgado-Alonso C, Valles-Salgado M, Delgado-Álvarez A, Yus M, Gómez-Ruiz N, Jorquera M, et al. Cognitive dysfunction associated with COVID-19: A comprehensive neuropsychological study. J Psychiatr Res. 2022;150:40–6. Epub 20220324. pmid:35349797; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8943429.
  33. 33. Fancourt D, Steptoe A, Bu F. Psychological consequences of long COVID: comparing trajectories of depressive and anxiety symptoms before and after contracting SARS-CoV-2 between matched long- and short-COVID groups. Br J Psychiatry. 2023;222(2):74–81. pmid:36458509; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7614126.
  34. 34. Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Rodríguez-Jiménez J, Palacios-Ceña M, de-la-Llave-Rincón AI, Fuensalida-Novo S, Florencio LL, et al. Psychometric Properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in Previously Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(15). Epub 20220729. pmid:35954630; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9367824.
  35. 35. Ferrando SJ, Lynch S, Ferrando N, Dornbush R, Shahar S, Klepacz L. Anxiety and posttraumatic stress in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19: prevalence, characteristics, comorbidity, and clinical correlates. Front Psychiatry. 2023;14:1160852. Epub 20230602. pmid:37333906; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10272460.
  36. 36. Frontera JA, Sabadia S, Yang D, de Havenon A, Yaghi S, Lewis A, et al. Life stressors significantly impact long-term outcomes and post-acute symptoms 12-months after COVID-19 hospitalization. J Neurol Sci. 2022;443:120487. Epub 20221105. pmid:36379135; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9637014.
  37. 37. Frontera JA, Yang D, Lewis A, Patel P, Medicherla C, Arena V, et al. A prospective study of long-term outcomes among hospitalized COVID-19 patients with and without neurological complications. J Neurol Sci. 2021;426:117486. Epub 20210512. pmid:34000678; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8113108.
  38. 38. Garout MA, Saleh SAK, Adly HM, Abdulkhaliq AA, Khafagy AA, Abdeltawab MR, et al. Post-COVID-19 syndrome: assessment of short- and long-term post-recovery symptoms in recovered cases in Saudi Arabia. Infection. 2022;50(6):1431–9. Epub 20220316. pmid:35294728; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8924350.
  39. 39. Gasnier M, Choucha W, Radiguer F, Faulet T, Chappell K, Bougarel A, et al. Comorbidity of long COVID and psychiatric disorders after a hospitalisation for COVID-19: a cross-sectional study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022. Epub 20220811. pmid:35953265.
  40. 40. Gil S, Gualano B, de Araújo AL, de Oliveira Júnior GN, Damiano RF, Pinna F, et al. Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 associates with physical inactivity in a cohort of COVID-19 survivors. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):215. Epub 20230105. pmid:36604523; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9813883.
  41. 41. Goldhaber NH, Kohn JN, Ogan WS, Sitapati A, Longhurst CA, Wang A, et al. Deep Dive into the Long Haul: Analysis of Symptom Clusters and Risk Factors for Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 to Inform Clinical Care. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(24). Epub 20221215. pmid:36554723; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9778884.
  42. 42. Goodman ML, Molldrem S, Elliott A, Robertson D, Keiser P. Long COVID and mental health correlates: a new chronic condition fits existing patterns. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2023;11(1):2164498. Epub 20230108. pmid:36643576; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9833408.
  43. 43. Gorecka M, Jex N, Thirunavukarasu S, Chowdhary A, Corrado J, Davison J, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy in clinical long-COVID-19 syndrome: a prospective case-control study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022;24(1):50. Epub 20220912. pmid:36089591; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9464490.
  44. 44. Gramaglia C, Gattoni E, Gambaro E, Bellan M, Balbo PE, Baricich A, et al. Anxiety, Stress and Depression in COVID-19 Survivors From an Italian Cohort of Hospitalized Patients: Results From a 1-Year Follow-Up. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:862651. Epub 20220617. pmid:35782424; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9247238.
  45. 45. Guo Y, Wang H, Xiao M, Guan X, Lei Y, Diao T, et al. Long-term outcomes of COVID-19 convalescents: An 18.5-month longitudinal study in Wuhan. Int J Infect Dis. 2023;127:85–92. Epub 20221209. pmid:36509334; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9733963.
  46. 46. Han JH, Womack KN, Tenforde MW, Files DC, Gibbs KW, Shapiro NI, et al. Associations between persistent symptoms after mild COVID-19 and long-term health status, quality of life, and psychological distress. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2022;16(4):680–9. Epub 20220328. pmid:35347854; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9111447.
  47. 47. Hastie CE, Lowe DJ, McAuley A, Winter AJ, Mills NL, Black C, et al. Outcomes among confirmed cases and a matched comparison group in the Long-COVID in Scotland study. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):5663. Epub 20221012. pmid:36224173; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9556711.
  48. 48. Hellemons ME, Huijts S, Bek LM, Berentschot JC, Nakshbandi G, Schurink CAM, et al. Persistent Health Problems beyond Pulmonary Recovery up to 6 Months after Hospitalization for COVID-19: A Longitudinal Study of Respiratory, Physical, and Psychological Outcomes. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022;19(4):551–61. pmid:34582728; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8996273.
  49. 49. Holdsworth DA, Chamley R, Barker-Davies R, O’Sullivan O, Ladlow P, Mitchell JL, et al. Comprehensive clinical assessment identifies specific neurocognitive deficits in working-age patients with long-COVID. PLoS One. 2022;17(6):e0267392. Epub 20220610. pmid:35687603; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9187094.
  50. 50. Houben-Wilke S, Goërtz YM, Delbressine JM, Vaes AW, Meys R, Machado FV, et al. The Impact of Long COVID-19 on Mental Health: Observational 6-Month Follow-Up Study. JMIR Ment Health. 2022;9(2):e33704. Epub 20220224. pmid:35200155; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8914795.
  51. 51. Huang L, Li X, Gu X, Zhang H, Ren L, Guo L, et al. Health outcomes in people 2 years after surviving hospitalisation with COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2022;10(9):863–76. Epub 20220511. pmid:35568052; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9094732.
  52. 52. Jiménez-Rodríguez BM, Gutiérrez-Fernández J, Ramos-Urbina EM, Romero-Ortiz AD, García-Flores PI, Santiago-Puertas MI, et al. On the single and multiple associations of COVID-19 post-acute sequelae: 6-month prospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):3402. Epub 20220301. pmid:35233062; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8888754.
  53. 53. Kayaaslan B, Eser F, Kalem AK, Kaya G, Kaplan B, Kacar D, et al. Post-COVID syndrome: A single-center questionnaire study on 1007 participants recovered from COVID-19. J Med Virol. 2021;93(12):6566–74. Epub 20210728. pmid:34255355; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8426910.
  54. 54. Kim Y, Bae S, Chang HH, Kim SW. Long COVID prevalence and impact on quality of life 2 years after acute COVID-19. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):11207. Epub 20230711. pmid:37433819; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10336045.
  55. 55. Kim Y, Bitna H, Kim SW, Chang HH, Kwon KT, Bae S, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome in patients after 12 months from COVID-19 infection in Korea. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):93. Epub 20220127. pmid:35086489; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8793328.
  56. 56. Kim Y, Kim SW, Chang HH, Kwon KT, Hwang S, Bae S. One Year Follow-Up of COVID-19 Related Symptoms and Patient Quality of Life: A Prospective Cohort Study. Yonsei Med J. 2022;63(6):499–510. pmid:35619573; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9171672.
  57. 57. Kruger A, Vlok M, Turner S, Venter C, Laubscher GJ, Kell DB, et al. Proteomics of fibrin amyloid microclots in long COVID/post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) shows many entrapped pro-inflammatory molecules that may also contribute to a failed fibrinolytic system. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):190. Epub 20220921. pmid:36131342; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9491257.
  58. 58. Kucukkarapinar M, Yay-Pence A, Yildiz Y, Buyukkoruk M, Yaz-Aydin G, Deveci-Bulut TS, et al. Psychological outcomes of COVID-19 survivors at sixth months after diagnose: the role of kynurenine pathway metabolites in depression, anxiety, and stress. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2022;129(8):1077–89. Epub 20220707. pmid:35796878; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9261222.
  59. 59. Li D, Liao X, Liu Z, Ma Z, Dong J, Zheng G, et al. Healthy outcomes of patients with COVID-19 two years after the infection: a prospective cohort study. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2022;11(1):2680–8. pmid:36215047; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9639507.
  60. 60. Martino GP, Benfaremo D, Bitti G, Valeri G, Postacchini L, Marchetti A, et al. 6 and 12 month outcomes in patients following COVID-19-related hospitalization: a prospective monocentric study. Intern Emerg Med. 2022;17(6):1641–9. Epub 20220409. pmid:35397762; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8994524.
  61. 61. Mazza MG, Palladini M, De Lorenzo R, Bravi B, Poletti S, Furlan R, et al. One-year mental health outcomes in a cohort of COVID-19 survivors. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;145:118–24. Epub 20211122. pmid:34894521; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8607816.
  62. 62. Mazza MG, Palladini M, De Lorenzo R, Magnaghi C, Poletti S, Furlan R, et al. Persistent psychopathology and neurocognitive impairment in COVID-19 survivors: Effect of inflammatory biomarkers at three-month follow-up. Brain Behav Immun. 2021;94:138–47. Epub 20210224. pmid:33639239; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7903920.
  63. 63. Mendola M, Leoni M, Cozzi Y, Manzari A, Tonelli F, Metruccio F, et al. Long-term COVID symptoms, work ability and fitness to work in healthcare workers hospitalized for Sars-CoV-2 infection. Med Lav. 2022;113(5):e2022040. Epub 20221024. pmid:36282031; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9632671.
  64. 64. Menges D, Ballouz T, Anagnostopoulos A, Aschmann HE, Domenghino A, Fehr JS, et al. Burden of post-COVID-19 syndrome and implications for healthcare service planning: A population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0254523. Epub 20210712. pmid:34252157; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8274847.
  65. 65. Morawa E, Krehbiel J, Borho A, Herold R, Lieb M, Schug C, et al. Cognitive impairments and mental health of patients with post-COVID-19: A cross-sectional study. J Psychosom Res. 2023;173:111441. Epub 20230731. pmid:37544160.
  66. 66. Morioka S, Tsuzuki S, Maruki T, Terada M, Miyazato Y, Kutsuna S, et al. Epidemiology of post-COVID conditions beyond 1 year: a cross-sectional study. Public Health. 2023;216:39–44. Epub 20230213. pmid:36791649.
  67. 67. Ocsovszky Z, Otohal J, Berényi B, Juhász V, Skoda R, Bokor L, et al. The associations of long-COVID symptoms, clinical characteristics and affective psychological constructs in a non-hospitalized cohort. Physiol Int. 2022. Epub 20220516. pmid:35575989.
  68. 68. O’Kelly B, Vidal L, Avramovic G, Broughan J, Connolly SP, Cotter AG, et al. Assessing the impact of COVID-19 at 1-year using the SF-12 questionnaire: Data from the Anticipate longitudinal cohort study. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;118:236–43. Epub 20220314. pmid:35301101; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8920113.
  69. 69. Orrù G, Bertelloni D, Diolaiuti F, Mucci F, Di Giuseppe M, Biella M, et al. Long-COVID Syndrome? A Study on the Persistence of Neurological, Psychological and Physiological Symptoms. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(5). Epub 20210513. pmid:34068009; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8152255.
  70. 70. Peter RS, Nieters A, Kräusslich HG, Brockmann SO, Göpel S, Kindle G, et al. Post-acute sequelae of covid-19 six to 12 months after infection: population based study. Bmj. 2022;379:e071050. Epub 20221013. pmid:36229057; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9557001.
  71. 71. Phu DH, Maneerattanasak S, Shohaimi S, Trang LTT, Nam TT, Kuning M, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with long COVID and mental health status among recovered COVID-19 patients in southern Thailand. PLoS One. 2023;18(7):e0289382. Epub 20230731. pmid:37523396; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10389739.
  72. 72. Qi T, Hu T, Ge QQ, Zhou XN, Li JM, Jiang CL, et al. COVID-19 pandemic related long-term chronic stress on the prevalence of depression and anxiety in the general population. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21(1):380. Epub 20210728. pmid:34320924; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8316891.
  73. 73. Richter D, Schulze H, James JC, Siems N, Trampe N, Gold R, et al. Hypoechogenicity of brainstem raphe in long-COVID syndrome-less common but independently associated with depressive symptoms: a cross-sectional study. J Neurol. 2022;269(9):4604–10. Epub 20220512. pmid:35552501; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9098142.
  74. 74. Román-Montes CM, Flores-Soto Y, Guaracha-Basañez GA, Tamez-Torres KM, Sifuentes-Osornio J, González-Lara MF, et al. Post-COVID-19 syndrome and quality of life impairment in severe COVID-19 Mexican patients. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1155951. Epub 20230515. pmid:37255755; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10225709.
  75. 75. Samper-Pardo M, León-Herrera S, Oliván-Blázquez B, Gascón-Santos S, Sánchez-Recio R. Clinical characterization and factors associated with quality of life in Long COVID patients: Secondary data analysis from a randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2023;18(5):e0278728. Epub 20230516. pmid:37192203; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10187923.
  76. 76. Sayde GE, Stefanescu A, Hammer R. Interdisciplinary Treatment for Survivors of Critical Illness due to COVID-19: Expanding the Post-Intensive Care Recovery Model and Impact on Psychiatric Outcomes. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2023;64(3):226–35. Epub 20230130. pmid:36720311; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9884613.
  77. 77. Schandl A, Hedman A, Lyngå P, Fathi Tachinabad S, Svefors J, Roël M, et al. Long-term consequences in critically ill COVID-19 patients: A prospective cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021;65(9):1285–92. Epub 20210625. pmid:34097753; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8212104.
  78. 78. Spada MS, Biffi AM, Belotti L, Cremaschi L, Palumbo C, Locatelli C, et al. Psychological impact of COVID-19 after hospital discharge: A follow-up study on Italian recovered patients. J Affect Disord. 2022;317:84–90. Epub 20220824. pmid:36029882; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9400369.
  79. 79. Simonetti A, Bernardi E, Margoni S, Catinari A, Restaino A, Ieritano V, et al. Mixed Depression in the Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: Correlation between Excitatory Symptoms in Depression and Physical Burden after COVID-19. Brain Sci. 2023;13(4). Epub 20230420. pmid:37190653; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10137109.
  80. 80. Stallmach A, Kesselmeier M, Bauer M, Gramlich J, Finke K, Fischer A, et al. Comparison of fatigue, cognitive dysfunction and psychological disorders in post-COVID patients and patients after sepsis: is there a specific constellation? Infection. 2022;50(3):661–9. Epub 20220107. pmid:34997542; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8741139.
  81. 81. Staudt A, Jörres RA, Hinterberger T, Lehnen N, Loew T, Budweiser S. Associations of Post-Acute COVID syndrome with physiological and clinical measures 10 months after hospitalization in patients of the first wave. Eur J Intern Med. 2022;95:50–60. Epub 20211125. pmid:34838369; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8612867.
  82. 82. Tabacof L, Tosto-Mancuso J, Wood J, Cortes M, Kontorovich A, McCarthy D, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 Syndrome Negatively Impacts Physical Function, Cognitive Function, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Participation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;101(1):48–52. pmid:34686631; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8667685.
  83. 83. Talhari C, Criado PR, Castro CCS, Ianhez M, Ramos PM, Miot HA. Prevalence of and risk factors for post-COVID: Results from a survey of 6,958 patients from Brazil. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2023;95(1):e20220143. Epub 20230324. pmid:36995792.
  84. 84. Taquet M, Dercon Q, Luciano S, Geddes JR, Husain M, Harrison PJ. Incidence, co-occurrence, and evolution of long-COVID features: A 6-month retrospective cohort study of 273,618 survivors of COVID-19. PLoS Med. 2021;18(9):e1003773. Epub 20210928. pmid:34582441; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8478214.
  85. 85. Titze-de-Almeida R, da Cunha TR, Dos Santos Silva LD, Ferreira CS, Silva CP, Ribeiro AP, et al. Persistent, new-onset symptoms and mental health complaints in Long COVID in a Brazilian cohort of non-hospitalized patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):133. Epub 20220208. pmid:35135496; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8821794.
  86. 86. Veldhuis CB, Nesoff ED, McKowen ALW, Rice DR, Ghoneima H, Wootton AR, et al. Addressing the critical need for long-term mental health data during the COVID-19 pandemic: Changes in mental health from April to September 2020. Prev Med. 2021;146:106465. Epub 20210227. pmid:33647353; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8136863.
  87. 87. Walker S, Goodfellow H, Pookarnjanamorakot P, Murray E, Bindman J, Blandford A, et al. Impact of fatigue as the primary determinant of functional limitations among patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome: a cross-sectional observational study. BMJ Open. 2023;13(6):e069217. Epub 20230607. pmid:37286327; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10335413.
  88. 88. Whiteside DM, Naini SM, Basso MR, Waldron EJ, Holker E, Porter J, et al. Outcomes in post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) at 6 months post-infection part 2: Psychological functioning. Clin Neuropsychol. 2022;36(4):829–47. Epub 20220131. pmid:35098861.
  89. 89. Wong AW, Tran KC, Binka M, Janjua NZ, Sbihi H, Russell JA, et al. Use of latent class analysis and patient reported outcome measures to identify distinct long COVID phenotypes: A longitudinal cohort study. PLoS One. 2023;18(6):e0286588. Epub 20230602. pmid:37267379; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10237387.
  90. 90. Zhang L, Lei J, Zhang J, Yin L, Chen Y, Xi Y, et al. Undiagnosed Long COVID-19 in China Among Non-vaccinated Individuals: Identifying Persistent Symptoms and Impacts on Patients’ Health-Related Quality of Life. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2022;12(4):560–71. Epub 20221124. pmid:36434150; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9702954.
  91. 91. Taquet M, Geddes JR, Husain M, Luciano S, Harrison PJ. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(5):416–27. Epub 20210406. pmid:33836148; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8023694.
  92. 92. d’Ettorre G, Vassalini P, Coppolelli V, Gentilini Cacciola E, Sanitinelli L, Maddaloni L, et al. Health-related quality of life in survivors of severe COVID-19 infection. Pharmacol Rep. 2022;74(6):1286–95. Epub 20221114. pmid:36376776; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9662770.
  93. 93. Huang L, Yao Q, Gu X, Wang Q, Ren L, Wang Y, et al. 1-year outcomes in hospital survivors with COVID-19: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet. 2021;398(10302):747–58. pmid:34454673; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8389999.
  94. 94. Moy FM, Hairi NN, Lim ERJ, Bulgiba A. Long COVID and its associated factors among COVID survivors in the community from a middle-income country-An online cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2022;17(8):e0273364. Epub 20220830. pmid:36040960; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9426885.
  95. 95. Zhao Y, Yang C, An X, Xiong Y, Shang Y, He J, et al. Follow-up study on COVID-19 survivors one year after discharge from hospital. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;112:173–82. Epub 20210912. pmid:34520845; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8434916.
  96. 96. Martínez-Cao C, de la Fuente-Tomás L, Menéndez-Miranda I, Velasco Á, Zurrón-Madera P, García-Álvarez L, et al. Factors associated with alcohol and tobacco consumption as a coping strategy to deal with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and lockdown in Spain. Addict Behav. 2021;121:107003. Epub 20210603. pmid:34111653; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8172276.
  97. 97. Tebeka S, Carcaillon-Bentata L, Decio V, Alleaume C, Beltzer N, Gallay A, et al. Complex association between post-COVID-19 condition and anxiety and depression symptoms. Eur Psychiatry. 2023;67(1):e1. Epub 20231213. pmid:38088068; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10964277.
  98. 98. Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Arias-Navalón JA, Martín-Guerrero JD, Pellicer-Valero OJ, Cigarán-Méndez M. Trajectory of anxiety/depressive symptoms and sleep quality in individuals who had been hospitalized by COVID-19: The LONG-COVID-EXP multicenter study. J Psychosom Res. 2024;179:111635. Epub 20240301. pmid:38432061.
  99. 99. Egger M, Wimmer C, Stummer S, Reitelbach J, Bergmann J, Müller F, et al. Reduced health-related quality of life, fatigue, anxiety and depression affect COVID-19 patients in the long-term after chronic critical illness. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):3016. Epub 20240206. pmid:38321074; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10847136.
  100. 100. Thanh HN, Minh DC, Thu HH, Quang DN. Symptoms, Mental Health, and Quality of Life Among Patients After COVID-19 Infection: A Cross-sectional Study in Vietnam. J Prev Med Public Health. 2024;57(2):128–37. Epub 20240227. pmid:38419549; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10999303.
  101. 101. Naik H, Tran KC, Staples JA, Perlis RH, Levin A. Psychiatric Symptoms, Treatment Uptake, and Barriers to Mental Health Care Among US Adults With Post-COVID-19 Condition. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(4):e248481. Epub 20240401. pmid:38662370; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC11046346.
  102. 102. Wang Y, Su B, Xie J, Garcia-Rizo C, Prieto-Alhambra D. Long-term risk of psychiatric disorder and psychotropic prescription after SARS-CoV-2 infection among UK general population. Nat Hum Behav. 2024;8(6):1076–87. Epub 20240321. pmid:38514769; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC11199144.
  103. 103. Tsai J, Grace A, Kurian A. Incidence and psychiatric predictors of Long COVID beyond 3 months in a city-wide community sample in Texas. J Public Health (Oxf). 2024;46(1):e51–e9. pmid:38141051.
  104. 104. Koliadenko NV, Zhyvago KS, Bursa AI. Provision of Medical-psychological and Psychiatric Care to Patients with Post-covid Syndrome in Telemedicine Conditions. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science 2022;2(4):719–30.
  105. 105. Boldrini M, Canoll PD, Klein RS. How COVID-19 Affects the Brain. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(6):682–3. pmid:33769431; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9894299.
  106. 106. Kelly JR, Crockett MT, Alexander L, Haran M, Baker A, Burke L, et al. Psychedelic science in post-COVID-19 psychiatry. Ir J Psychol Med. 2021;38(2):93–8. Epub 20200819. pmid:32811575; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7487743.
  107. 107. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):912–20. Epub 20200226. pmid:32112714; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7158942.
  108. 108. Nochaiwong S, Ruengorn C, Thavorn K, Hutton B, Awiphan R, Phosuya C, et al. Global prevalence of mental health issues among the general population during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):10173. Epub 20210513. pmid:33986414; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8119461.
  109. 109. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines. COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing the long-term effects of COVID-19. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Copyright © NICE 2020.; 2020.
  110. 110. Zheng YB, Zeng N, Yuan K, Tian SS, Yang YB, Gao N, et al. Prevalence and risk factor for long COVID in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis and systematic review. J Infect Public Health. 2023;16(5):660–72. Epub 20230307. pmid:36931142; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9990879.
  111. 111. Crook H, Raza S, Nowell J, Young M, Edison P. Long covid-mechanisms, risk factors, and management. Bmj. 2021;374:n1648. Epub 20210726. pmid:34312178.
  112. 112. Aghagoli G, Gallo Marin B, Katchur NJ, Chaves-Sell F, Asaad WF, Murphy SA. Neurological Involvement in COVID-19 and Potential Mechanisms: A Review. Neurocrit Care. 2021;34(3):1062–71. pmid:32661794; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7358290.
  113. 113. Needham EJ, Chou SH, Coles AJ, Menon DK. Neurological Implications of COVID-19 Infections. Neurocrit Care. 2020;32(3):667–71. pmid:32346843; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7188454.
  114. 114. Efstathiou V, Stefanou MI, Siafakas N, Makris M, Tsivgoulis G, Zoumpourlis V, et al. Suicidality and COVID-19: Suicidal ideation, suicidal behaviors and completed suicides amidst the COVID-19 pandemic (Review). Exp Ther Med. 2022;23(1):107. Epub 20211202. pmid:34976149; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8674972.
  115. 115. Reinke M, Falke C, Cohen K, Anderson D, Cullen KR, Nielson JL. Increased suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in COVID-19 patients in the United States: Statistics from a large national insurance billing database. Psychiatry Res. 2023;323:115164. Epub 20230312. pmid:36948017; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10008142.