Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

RETRACTED: Regional integration and export performance of Pakistan: Empirical evidence from the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)

  • Muhammad Waseem Shahzad,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation School of Economics and Trade, Hunan University, Changsha, China

  • Muhammad Asif Khan ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    khanasif82@uokajk.edu.pk

    Affiliation Department of Commerce, Faculty of Management Sciences, University of Kotli, AJK Kotli, Pakistan

  • Mohammed Arshad Khan,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Accountancy, College of Administrative and Financial Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • Ahsanuddin Haider

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Finance, College of Administrative and Financial Sciences, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Retraction

The PLOS One Editors retract this article [1] because it was identified as one of a series of submissions for which we have concerns about potential manipulation of the publication process, peer review integrity, and authorship. These concerns call into question the validity and provenance of the reported results. We regret that the issues were not identified prior to the article’s publication.

MWS, MArshadK, and AH did not agree with the retraction. MAsifK either did not respond directly or could not be reached.

1 Dec 2025: The PLOS One Editors (2025) Retraction: Regional integration and export performance of Pakistan: Empirical evidence from the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). PLOS ONE 20(12): e0337747. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337747 View retraction

Abstract

The study examines export impact of Pakistan’s integration into Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) on its export’s performance. We apply Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood (PPML) on augmented gravity model to estimate trade data from the period before and after permanent membership with Shanghai Cooperation Organization in 2017. The study aims to explore changes in exports volume and analyze the key mechanism through which Shanghai Cooperation Organization promotes exports. The study assesses that after integration which key exports sector such as agriculture or manufacturing sectors are affected more significantly. The initial findings suggest that SCO integration positively affect and provide access to Central Asian markets, leading to modest but noticeable promotion in exports promotion. In heterogeneity analysis we find that exports of Pakistan are more significant with low and middle-income level countries compared to higher-income level countries. Additionally, exports in the manufacturing sector benefited more than in the agriculture sector. The significant and positive findings of mechanism analysis indicate that the belt and road (B&R) initiative and bilateral trade agreements are the key factors to enhanced exports. The overall impact remains moderated by structural changes in Pakistan economy, such as poor infrastructure, deficiency in energy sector and limited trade relations with its neighbors India and Iran. The study concludes that although the SCO integration has positively promoted exports of Pakistan however, it requires to address domestic economic constraints and capitalize more effectively the benefits of SCO membership through regional cooperation mechanism. For more potential benefits in the region SCO needs to expand B&R connectivity, encourage more trade agreements, and adopt favorable environment to attract high income countries in the organization. The study provides the base for future research in depth analysis of long-term impact of SCO integration on Pakistan exports.

1. Introduction

Regional security collaboration cannot be separated from the significance of a region itself, especially nations that are linked geographically and have common benefits. There are many studies have done which shows that with the integration of nations resulted creation of new regional trading hub which are beneficial to best utilization of resources, generating economies of scale, efficiency in the production and enhancement in investment and employment opportunities [14]. Pakistan’s integration with regional organizations holds strategic importance for distinct reasons, as these organizations collectively involve countries from South Asia, Central Asia, and parts of Western Asia, making them regional entities with a focus on Asian countries. These organizations vary in their objectives, structures, and levels of integration, but they all share the common goal of fostering cooperation and strengthened trade relations in the region. Pakistan’s integration with these regional organizations is essential for economic growth, security, diplomatic relations, and addressing common challenges [58].

Table 1 compared the Pakistan intra-trade value (exports/imports) by percentage aggregated with its integrated region Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO), South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARK) and Shanghai Cooperation Organization. The 5- year average have been calculated for 2018–2022 and compared Pakistan trade flow with its integrated region. The values show that the after becoming the permanent member of Shanghai Cooperation Organization Pakistan trade flow significantly increase with SCO as compared to other two regions. The exports flow of Pakistan with SCO for last five-year average is 10.25 percent and imports flow are 28.61 percent both are higher than the other regions.

thumbnail
Table 1. Trade value by percentage for Pakistan compared with ECO, SAARK & SCO (2018–2022).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311984.t001

Pakistan is a growing economy with unique geographical existence and rich resources which are favorable to attract international trade. Pakistan always seeks to make its better relationships bilaterally and multilaterally as well as welcome the regional trade agreements to strengthen its economic and political cooperation. As a growing economy with rich resources and impactful geographical location make Pakistan a very important nation to interact with rest of the word [9]. Pakistan looking for the better relationship especially in the context of international trade and mutual understandings in economic cooperation. Therefore, it always welcomes the regional and international organizations as well as the free trade agreements [10, 11]. The Shanghai Cooperation organization (SCO) is one of emerging regional platform working on regional security, independence and regional developments especially in Central Asia which is enable member country to strengthened their trade relations [12, 13]. SCO was formed in 1996 along Russia, China and three Central Asian countries, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan. In June 2017 Pakistan approved as the permanent membership in SCO in the sixteen Heads of state meeting at Astana, Kazakhstan. After Permanent membership, Pakistan has opportunity to strengthen its bilateral relations and enhance its trade cooperation with Central Asian countries within SCO. Furthermore, Pakistan can Resolve its political and border disputes and address its economic and social challenges with its neighbors under SCO platform [1416]. The SCO has the most distinctive thing that it contains a big geographic area which is around 27,406,927 square kilometers that is consist of almost quarter of planet’s populace. SCO is emerging organization with geographical importance and mostly its members are growing economies with lot of diversity and potential for trade integration [17].

Table 2 shows the rank of each country of SCO in the region and overall, in the world for exports and imports. China is the largest exporter and second largest importer in the world and rank first exporter and importer among SCO countries. Similarly, India and Russia rank second and third largest importer and fifth and second largest exporter in the region respectively. Kazakhstan ranks fifth and fourth in term of importer and exporter in the region. Pakistan sixth and 69th rank in the region in term of importer/exporter. While Kyrgyz Republic and Tajikistan is the lowest rank trader in the region.

The expansion of exports is the key factor for economic growth as well as for sustainable economic Growth in short and long run. Globalization and international competition disturbed the trade pattern and growth in under developing countries. Improving exports for any nation is considered a main part of the development as well as for economic growth. Increased Export competitiveness leads to competition globally, and country can compete with the world with their comparative advantage. Therefore, a nation who have greater value added and greater competitiveness in the innovative exports goods are considered as a biggest worldwide contender [18, 19]. Pakistan is a small open economy because of the minor contribution in the international trade. The total goods exports of Pakistan are mostly agricultural and manufactural which have low value added and most important these are concentrated nature. Only agriculture and textile industry consist of 80% of Pakistan’s total exports, and these exports only with few countries. 35.4 percent of Pakistan’s total goods exports with only five major countries, in which United States of America consists almost 16 percent. Due to concentrate in few goods and markets for exports Pakistan’s economy convert as a dependence economy [20, 21].

Pakistan is the 27th largest economy located in South Asia with 7th largest population in the world. In 2022 Pakistan exported 39.6$ billion which was a 25.27 percent increase from 2021, this makes Pakistan a 69th exporter in the world. Pakistan’s net trade was -$37.48 billion in 2022, which is the result of offsetting imports against exports. The country’s trade deficit was around $41.14 billion in 2022. From last decade Pakistan has faced persistent trade deficit, which leads to excess in foreign debts, ultimately foreign influence involves in the policy issue. Pakistan has integrated with many regional organizations, although the trade potential is very high with these regions but yet to be exploited [22, 23].

Due to below the potential trade performance of Pakistan with regional organizations and persistent deficit in trade balance the integration with SCO of Pakistan got more importance due to several reasons. The main agenda of SCO is resolving security disputes and building mutual interest through trade cooperation among the members. China plays a leading role in the organization by developing infrastructure connectivity through belt and road (B&R) initiative and facilitation in trade agreements which ultimately boost trade in the region. Pakistan has historic relations with China and strengthened over time through trade agreement, which is signed in 2006, the construction of game changing project “China Pakistan Economic Corridor” (CPEC) and the existence of B&R. Since above discussion, we can say SCO can play a crucial role in boosting exports of Pakistan with its members.

A reasonable time has been passed after the permanent membership of Pakistan in SCO on June 2017; therefore, it is fair time to evaluate the effect of SCO on exports of Pakistan. Previously in many studies researchers have discussed the new prospects of Pakistan, regional security, new perspectives and trade opportunities with SCO [12, 2426]. These studies based on qualitative approach and hardly any study have done which have evaluated empirically the significance of pre and post integration effect of SCO on Pakistan exports. This study empirically analyzes the integration effect on exports performance of Pakistan after the permanent membership into SCO.

Exports are the main components of trade patterns as well as for economic growth. Every country aims to enhance its exports in International trade under any regional cooperation to make its balance of trade favorable [27]. The impact of SCO on Pakistan’s exports remains an empirical question which is the main objective of this paper. To address this objective, we develop the following research questions based on the above discussion. Does SCO significantly and positively affect exports volume of Pakistan? 2. Through which mechanism does SCO promote exports in the region? 3. Which exports sector of Pakistan seen more significantly effect after membership in SCO?

To evaluate these questions, we apply Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood (PPML) technique on Augmented Gravity model to estimate exports performance of Pakistan with SCO pre (2003–2016) and post (2017–2022) permanent membership in SCO. The study contributes to the literature by providing empirical analysis and finds that the SCO effect positively exports performance of Pakistan. This includes the moderate increase in exports volume and expanded access to Central Asian markets within the region and identify the exports in Manufacture sector more pronounced as compared to agriculture sector. Developing infrastructure (B&R) connectivity and bilateral trade agreements finds the key mechanism through which SCO promotes exports among its members.

This paper consists of five sections. In section two presents the brief review, theoretically and empirically, of related literature. In section three highlights the descriptive analysis of pre and post Pakistan exports scenario with SCO methodology and data source. In section Four gives the results of the study. In section five discusses conclusion and discussion together and in section six discuss policy recommendation of this study.

2. Literature review

There are lot of economic theories and studies indicates about the specialization and expansion of exports in competitive markets. Economic Integration Theory (Bela Balassa 1960) provides the base to assess how integration promote exports, such as Pakistan’s membership in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Theory postulates that decreasing trade barriers and harmonious regulations within a region, such as customs unions or shared market, can considerably enhance trade flows amongst members. For Pakistan, joining the SCO should improve market access and lower trade barriers, which is expected to enhance export performance [28]. In Comparative Advantage theory (Recardo 1817) a nation has the advantage to produce a certain good comparatively at lower opportunity cost than the other nation. After getting access to the SCO market, Pakistan can focus on those goods in which it is most efficient, therefore, potentially enhance its exports [29]. New Trade Theory (Paul Krugman 1970) stresses the benefits of bigger markets and economies of scale. According to this theory, regional integration into the SCO can allow Pakistan access to a broader market, improve its competitiveness, achieve economies of scale by reducing costs, and improve their export efficiency, leading to overall enhance export performance [30]. Trade Facilitation Theory highlights that improved infrastructure, and logistics are key to reducing trade costs and boosting efficiency. In the SCO context, better regional infrastructure can lower trade costs and enhance Pakistan’s export performance. Political Economy Theory (Adam Smith, David Hume and Francois Quesnay) explores how political and economic factors shape trade policies and regional integration. For Pakistan, SCO’s stability and cooperation are crucial for the success of integration efforts and improving export performance [22].

Regional integration has significant effects on trade which increased competition in the international market. To get advantage in international market competitive economies needs little efforts to improve production [31]. Pakistan always ready to integrate with regional organizations as well as to make Regional Agreements of Trade (RATs) for its sustainable growth and development. Previously lot of studies have done on the importance of integration of regional trade and its significance effects [10, 16]. According to them integration with SCO has comparatively great integration effects which improves trading agreements as well as economic and social integration and resolving border territory and internal security disputes. It is argued that in many studies that integration stimulates growth rate and convergence of income between the members through intra-regional trade directly and indirectly, sharing knowledge and technology and structural connectivity [32]. The researchers analyzed the impact of regional trade integration on African economic growth and income convergence and finds the significant impact. They justified integration in terms of trade diversification which offers significant gains in economic growth from intra-regional trade [33]. Empirical evidence specifies that regional integration positively impacts export growth. This hypothesis assesses whether SCO integration leads to such enhancements for Pakistan.

Some studies analyzed bilateral trade with SCOs member nation using augmented Gravity model that the annual growth rate, trade openness and some dummies with SCO effects significantly however GDP per capita and distance impacts negatively but they have significant effect. Additionally, it is shows that the integration of SCOs member nation has significant economic impact which means that the integration with SCO is beneficial and impactful [16, 34, 35]. Moreover, they analyzed that how some of the macroeconomics factor affect the exports competitiveness of SCOs member nations and finds that except real effective exchange rate, unemployment, foreign direct investment, gross domestic product, public debt only the current per capita income has insignificant impact on the export competitiveness from the leading manufacturing products along with current account deficit has insignificant impact on crude materials whereas, SCOs nations have competitiveness in Raw material products and labor-intensive goods. Pakistan’s exports trade with the Central Asian region and SAARK economies. it shows that the Pakistan has a significant trade diversification with central Asian nations in trade openness, growth, border and distance, language, exchange, and tariffs rate are the curtail contributing factor of exports of Pakistan to the region. The supply capacity and partner demand along with the market capability has significant effect on Pakistan’s exports. The free trade agreements have ineffectiveness impacts because of Pakistan’s low level of specialization while bilateral level trade agreements creates reasonable trade [18, 36]. The SCO has delicate the demand for bilateral trade fostered integration cooperation, and enhanced exports flow by strengthening and facilitating bilateral trade agreements within the region. Therefore, it will analyze whether bilateral agreements enhance exports flow for Pakistan within the region.

In June 2017 SCO members grew to nine and all seek to enhance their economic cooperation. Pakistan is the dynamic member of B&R as well; China and Pakistan cooperation promotes the game changing project China Pakistan economic corridor. The SCO can play its vital role in regional trade especially in Central Asian region by developing infrastructure and strategic economic cooperation. Regional trade agreements creates significant promotion in communications, finance and distribution of resources [2, 14]. The formation of B&R countries’ strong infrastructure connectivity helps as an essential factor in overwhelming natural geographical obstacles and significantly decreasing spatial distances between regions. It not only promotes trade facilitation for SCO countries but also significantly lowers transportation and transaction costs [28, 37, 38]. By stimulating infrastructure connectivity in SCO countries, the SCO has enhanced trade facilitation, expanded the bilateral cooperation, and promoted trade flow. This hypothesis tests whether developing infrastructure connectivity promotes exports flow for Pakistan significantly or not.

Pakistan trade with South Asian countries is significantly affect by the simple average tariff imposition and growth rate of partner country. Study also reveals that the Common Language and border are positively impact the Pakistan’s trade pattern. Whereas free trade agreement with China is more effective for Pakistan’s exports than others. The impact of these agreements on agricultural goods is seems to be more effective than the manufacturing goods [10, 22, 37]. Another export factor is services sector which has the major share in Pakistan growth rate as well as in trade balance. services sector contribution in growth relatively higher than the industrial and agricultural sector. [39] analyze that the exports of services sector are not significant as exports of goods sector with Association of Southeast Asian Nations due to Pakistan’s agreement with ASEAN related to service sector is quite unsatisfactory.

Pakistan’s trade potential is higher in Association of Southeast Asian Nations, European Union, Middle east, Latin and North America while it is very disappointing with SAARK and ECO because political and social barriers of Pakistan with India and Afghanistan. Border security and resolve disputes one of the SCO, s objective under which these nations can enhance their trade [4042]. Pakistan’s exports volume with SCO member countries Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan is higher than the its imports volume, which means that Pakistan has a comparatively more advantage and specialized than these nations especially in cereals, oil and pharmaceutical goods which have more demand in these nations [43]. Studies suggest that regional integration has significant effects on trade promotion. This hypothesis tests whether these effects are more pronounced for exports of Pakistan with SCO membership.

3. Research design and data

3.1 Model construction

In past studies shows countries starts liberalizing their local industries by decreasing restrictions to trade openness and business transformation which brings sharp change in the world trade especially in merchandise and services trade through regional integration. Such advancement got the importance of international integration as well as regional integration [44, 45]. SCO is a regional integration platform which encourages bilateral trade as well as multilateral trade in the region. To address our main research question, we applied PPML on augmented gravity model to estimate effect of Pakistan integration in SCO on exports performance of Pakistan. PPML regression is frequently used in econometrics and other grounds for establishing count data or non-negative integer-valued results. To minimize the zero-trade value and heteroscedasticity problem studies have recommended PPML technique. This technique has some advantages on other estimation, and it address the common issue especially zero trade value in the data [4649].

The Gravity model explains the strong relationship among the bigger economies as compared to the small economies, and closer economies attracted than those whose distance far away. The distance factor has broader meanings like geographical distance, distance cost, and other barriers in form tariffs and duties. In 1962 Timbergen integrate the trade pattern of two countries to the growth rate of a country and finds that how much a country can export and import alongside tariffs, transportation cost and distance among the bilateral nations [10, 19, 46].

The Simplest form of the Gravity model is given by Timbergen is as below.

(1)

In Eq 1 Eij shows the exports, i and j shows exports and imports respectively, while Y shows the GNP and D indicates the distance. After That he modified the equation by introducing some important dummies which reflects the common border, membership of regional organizations and language, the augmented gravity model presented below.

(2)

The specification for pre and post analysis we created two dummies, which is country dummy and time dummy. To generate country dummy we given 1 to SCO countries otherwise zero similarly, we generate time dummy as we know Pakistan become the SCO permanent member on 2017, so we separate time before and after integration with SCO which is (post 2017–2022 = 1 & pre-2003-2016 = 0). Considering the above research question and since basic augmented gravity model we specify our empirical model is presented in Eq (3).

(3)

In Eq 3 SCO is the key explanatory variable which estimate the integration effect of SCO on exports of Pakistan. The subscripts i, j and t represent countries and time, respectively. A significant and positive coefficient (β1) indicates that the SCO has a substantial impact on promoting exports of Pakistan with SCO countries. α denotes the intercept term and μ represents the random disturbance term in the model.

In addition to key explanatory variable our model Gross domestic product (GDPij) of partner and reporter country. According to economic theory higher GDP of partners reflects higher demand for exports of Pakistan with higher purchasing power, and higher GDP of reporter indicates favorable situation for exporting. Similarly, the population size (POPij) both for reporter and partner countries allow us to analyze the impact of market potential on exports of Pakistan. Geographical distance (DIST) is the key factor when analyzing trade potential. Including distance to account trade patterns that higher the distance between the member nations may curtail the potential benefits of international trade. Furthermore, we also include some important dummies language (LNG), and border (BDR) and colony (COL) between Pakistan and the partner countries. It is believed that integration with the organizations in the presence of common dummies the trade between the partners is significantly increase.

3.2 Data sources and description

The data applied through 2003–2022 obtained from the world indicator trade solution (WITS), international trade center (ICT), World development indicator (WDI) and CEPII database. To account for market size, consumption and demand potential between Pakistan and partners the data for GDP, population, and labor force extract from World development indicator (WDI) and similarly the data for linguistic, border commonalities and geographical distances is obtained from the CEPII database. For further details on the selected variables, including their sources and descriptions, refer to Table 3.

4. Empirical analysis

In this section we start with the baseline results for the SCO effect on exports of Pakistan followed by average and marginal tests. We also test heterogeneity analysis for more effective policies and intervention strategies through different subgroups. Finally, we evaluate the key mechanism that how the SCO potentially effect exports of Pakistan with its members. We test a series of robustness analysis for the consistency and stability of the baseline findings. The descriptive statistics of the main variables are in Table 4.

4.1 Empirical results

The model (Eq 3) is estimated by the Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood (PPML). The calculated results as shown in Table 5, our main variable of interest SCO which is interaction term to capture the integration effect is positive and significant. The coefficient of interaction term shows that Pakistan integrating with SCO has significant and positive effect on its exports while other traditional gravity variables also show significant impact. GDP for both partner and reporter shows a positive and significant impact which supports the higher potential demand of importing countries and higher potential for production of reporter country. Positive and significant population indicates that higher population leads to higher demand for imports of importing country which ultimately positive impact on exports of reporter country. In our results population impact is positive and significant on exports of Pakistan. While analyzing Gravity model geographical factors play crucial role especially in determining trade effect. The most important geographical variable is distance which is considered as trade cost among partners and traditionally it has negative impact on trade flow. The coefficients of distance show negative and significant relationship which depicts that the Pakistan has more exports flow which has shorter distance and more exports with longer distance. The common language and common border shown significant which may indicate Pakistan do not have significant trade relations with its neighboring countries. The positive and significant coefficient of common colony shows that the Pakistan had more exports with its more colonial relationships. The value of R- squared indicates that the model is best fitted and how well the independent variables explain the variation in the dependent variable.

4.2 Tests of average and marginal effect of SCO

This study also assesses the SCO’s average effect on exports of Pakistan by analyzing comparative estimation results with and without control variables, as shown in column (1) and (2) of Table 6. It is evident in both columns that the estimated coefficients of interaction terms are consistently positive and significant, regardless of the addition of the control variables.

Additionally, it’s important to note that the integration effects undergo various stages, including policy and projects implementation between member countries [50]. Therefore, assessing the SCO’s marginal policy effects becomes crucial. To evaluate this, we introduce interaction term in Eq (3) between time dummy variables and country dummy variables at every year post integration of Pakistan with SCO. This leads to the construction of a marginal policy effect model, as shown in Eq (4).

(4)

In Eq (4), the variable T denotes the time dummy variable spanning from 2017 to 2022, while the ∑ij Control shows the set of control variables which are explained in Eq 3. The calculated coefficient β1 shown SCO effect on exports of Pakistan. The marginal effect valuation outcomes of the SCO integration are shown in columns (3) and (4) of Table 6. The calculated results for the marginal effects of the SCO integration stay comparatively stable, regardless of whether control variables are included. The results shown in column (4) demonstrate that in 2017, the value of SCO’s effect on exports flow of Pakistan and SCO countries was 1.544. However, in subsequent years 2018 and 2019, this value diminished to 1.118 and 1.429, respectively. These observations suggest that the SCO’s marginal effect varies during the initial phases of its execution. As time passed and the SCO’s integration extended, more SCO countries started to actively involve with the initiative. Therefore, the SCO’s impact on promoting trade progressively strengthened. During 2020, 2021 and 2022 the calculated value is 3.277, 3.858 and 3.451 respectively signifying a notable increase compared to 2017, with the marginal effect attaining a statistical significance level. These findings suggest that the SCO’s integration policy influence on improving exports flow strengthen bilateral cooperation among member countries. Moreover, the investigation of control variables in columns (2) and (4) of Table 6 shows significant insights.

4.3 Heterogeneity analysis

We add heterogeneity in regression analysis which provides valuable insights into the differential effects of treatments across various subgroups, improves the robustness of the analysis, and informs more effective policy and intervention strategies. It assesses whether the coefficient of interest varies across different subgroups.

4.3.1 Heterogeneity by income differences.

Considering the different income levels between countries, this study analyze the heterogeneity in the SCO’s effects on exports of Pakistan adopting the research framework suggested by [50, 51]. We categories the exporters of Pakistan into three distinct economic groups, containing lower-middle, higher-middle and high-income countries, as per the World Bank’s economic classification standards for the year 2021. To analyze the exports of Pakistan with its trading partners having different income levels, we estimate these effects based on lower-middle, higher-middle and high Income separately. The results in Table 7 show that the exports of Pakistan towards different income level countries are significantly increase by integration with SCO. The variable of interest SCO shows significant heterogeneity in the SCO’s impact on exports across income levels, in particular more robust for Pakistan and low-income level and middle-income level as compared high-income level countries.

4.3.2 Heterogeneity by industry level.

Later, we add another test in heterogeneity analysis which provides valuable understandings into the differential effects of treatments for more effective policy and intervention strategies. For this we analyze integration effect of SCO separately on agriculture exports and manufacture exports. The significant and positive findings of SCO indicate heterogeneity in the SCO’s effect of the agriculture and manufacture exports shown in column (1) and (2) of Table 8. The coefficient for manufacture is higher than agriculture which signifies that after integration with SCO exports of manufacturing products are more significantly increase as compared to agriculture exports.

thumbnail
Table 8. The heterogeneity tests (Agriculture and manufacture exports).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311984.t008

4.4 Mechanism analysis

The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) working on mutual cooperation, trade and investment, cross border flow of goods, address security concerns to enhance regional trade [16, 52]. It also strengthened economic integration among its members through cooperation in bilateral trade agreements and developing infrastructure connectivity (B&R) initiative which is the key mechanism in this study through which SCO promote exports. In the past many researchers supported this argument that trade agreements promote regional trade by eliminating barriers on trade and simplifies customs process. It facilitates trade integration, minimizes cost and uncertainties for investors with in the SCO region [53, 54]. To promote economic integration and development across the region SCO enhanced transportation links reduce transit times and costs, making trade more efficient and competitive [51, 5557]. Subsequently the opening of the B&R initiative, China has commanded the drive to develop infrastructure connectivity in the region. These activities have efficiently aligned the development plans of these countries, thereby forming a combined network with China as the central hub of SCO. This linkage has played a critical role in progressing interregional cooperation [56, 58, 59]. As we know Pakistan located along the B&R route and already signed trade agreement between China and Pakistan. Therefore, to check mechanism which the SCO promote exports among SCO members, this study generates interaction terms between the main explanatory variable (SCO) and mechanism variables bilateral trade agreement and B&R initiative into Eq (1) indicating by Eq 5 and Eq 6, respectively. Those countries who have trade agreements with Pakistan value “1” otherwise zero, similarly the countries along the B&R value 1 otherwise zero. The main coefficient concerned in this analysis is β1.

(5)(6)

Table 9 shows positive and statistically significant coefficients for interaction terms between main explanatory and mechanism variables. To be precise, the calculated coefficients for variables SCO × FTA and SCO × B&R are 0.923, 2.227 respectively (column 1,2). This sustains the significant effect of bilateral trade agreements and B&R initiative on exports of Pakistan.

4.5 Robustness check

To strengthen the estimation reliability and internal validity of the model, this study applies some robustness tests. These tests are crucial in confirming the robustness of our results and offering additional validation for the conclusions drawn from our investigation. These tests encompass the change the model as log linear, the implementation of two-sided truncation tests and alternative estimation methods [51]. By analyzing these robustness tests, the study confirms the consistency and credibility of the outcomes calculated from the regression analysis.

4.5.1 Changes to estimation method.

Acknowledging the perspective endogenous correlation between SCO and exports of Pakistan, which has the possible to lead in bias estimation results, this study alleviates this concern by applying another estimation technique. the results obtained from different methods to reach reliable and robust outcomes. Regardless of our confidence in PPML estimate, both the Ordinary Least Square (OLS) and fixed effect (FE) support and justified the robustness of our results. The calculated results, as shown Table 10, consistently establish that the interaction term positive and statistically significant, regardless of the change in the estimation technique. We find that overall, the outcomes of each model are in line with the trade theory of Gravity, the coefficients of the GDP and distance variables have the desired signs.

4.5.2 Two-sided truncation test.

The twenty-two sample countries in our study have fluctuations in their economic and social indicators, which can result in oversensitivity or under sensitivity to the integration of SCO. Furthermore, when analyzing exports of Pakistan with SCO there may be chances of the presence of outlier. To ensure a more robust analysis we apply two sided truncations to eliminate the potential influence of outlier. By eliminating the impact of outliers, we confirm a more robust analysis. For this we truncate the data within the 1st and 99th quartiles, thus fixing on the main distribution. After truncation of the variables the outcome of calculation is shown in column (4) of Table 10. It is worth mentioning that the interaction term is consistently positive and statistically significant. The results justify the robustness of our earlier findings.

4.5.3 Log linear model.

The log-linear model plays a vital role in robustness checks by capturing nonlinear relationships and interactions between variables through its flexible and robust framework. The confounded variables may affect both dependent and independent variables. These variables effect can be controlled in log linear model and obtain more robust relationship between the variable of interest. Additionally, the Log-linear model is less sensitive to outliers as compared to linear model. Outliers can be affecting the results of linear model and leading to biased estimates. Log-linear models minimize the influence of extreme values and make them more robust to outliers. Through log linear model the obtained results in Table 10, especially our main variable of interest is still positive and significant which support the validity and robustness of our findings.

5. Conclusion and discussion

To analyze the integration effect of SCO on exports of Pakistan this study applied PPML on augmented gravity model to conducts an empirical analysis using panel data from 2003 to 2022. In this study our focus to estimate the integration effect of Pakistan in SCO on exports of Pakistan. We estimate our model first using PPML technique followed by the tests of average and marginal to check the strength over time. The study also tests heterogeneity analysis for more effective policies and intervention strategies through different subgroups. Furthermore, we test the mechanism through which SCO promotes exports among its members. To ensure the validity and reliability of our findings, the study conducts sensitive analysis with alternate methods, two-sided truncation tests and by long linear model. The findings of our main model estimated by PPML shows that the SCO affect exports of Pakistan positively which clearly confirms the benchmark studies regarding the regional integration promotes the exports flow of trading partners [4, 5] in contrast with [44]. The findings of average and marginal test indicate that the SCO, s effect on exports of Pakistan progressively strengthened over time, similarly the mechanism tests result show that the developing infrastructure connectivity (B&R) initiatives and bilateral trade agreements are the key factor through which SCO enhanced exports of Pakistan and support the related studies finding [50, 53, 58]. While analyzing heterogeneity tests results show that exports of Pakistan are more pronounced with lower-middle and higher-middle income as analyzed previously by [51] and it also finds that the manufacturing exports are more significant than agriculture exports. The robustness test result justifies and strengthened our main findings.

The study contributes to theory development by augmenting integration theory concluded empirical evidence from the SCO, proposing context-specific insights into how regional economic treaties impact export performance. Furthermore, the study illuminates causal relationships between exports performance and regional integration, enlightening both theoretically and practically. Overall, it links theoretical aspects with empirical data, providing a depth impact of regional integrations on export performance within the SCO context.

6. Policy implications

Although the results indicate the positive and significant impact of SCOs on exports of Pakistan, but this study also recommends some policy implication measures and potential future research.

The overall findings of the study suggest that needs to address domestic economic constraints to effectively capitalize the regional cooperation mechanism and Pakistan should have strengthened its trade relation with all the SCO members especially with India and Iran. For more potential benefits in the region SCO should expands routs of B&R initiative with more nations especially bring India and Iran in the connectivity and encourage more trade agreements. Pakistan needs to strength its trade relation with all the SCO members especially with India and Iran. As an Agriculture nation Pakistan need to take some measures to promote exports in this sector which will be significant in minimizing trade deficit. For more potential benefits in the region SCO should expands routs of B&R initiative with more nations especially bring India and Iran in the connectivity and encourage more trade agreements. As a growing organization and flexibility in its structure SCO can adopt favorable environment to attract more members in the organization especially high-income countries.

Pakistan’s relationship with China, demonstrated by the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), promotes strategic and economic ties but it may risk over-reliance on a single partner, restraining economic diversification and creating vulnerability to shift in Chinese policy. The economical South Asian landscape influenced by India’s rising power and strategic coalitions with major economies like the United States (US) and European Union (EU), complicates Pakistan’s strategic options. Learning from India’s successful divergence of world relations and sensible foreign policy, Pakistan should be broadening its economic relationships and integrating with various regional organizations to moderate dependency on China and increase strategic independence which could boost Pakistan’s economic stability and geopolitical issues. Latest worldwide shifts and China’s growing Belt and Road (B&R) Initiative existent both prospects and risks, demanding a careful assessment of these dynamics in Pakistan’s strategic policies.

This study suggests the future research could focus on the depth analysis of long-term effect of SCO integration on exports as well as bilateral and multilateral trade performance of Pakistan. Additionally, the future studies could also analyze the sector wise exports performance of Pakistan after inclusion in SCO. The study also has several limitations such as political instability, global economic conditions, and change in international trade policies might affect export performance and may not be completely addressed in the study. The diverse political and economic backgrounds of SCO member countries might affect the applications of the findings crosswise the region. Furthermore, the study could overlook sector-specific effects on export performance and its policy recommendations might be inhibited by the specific context of Pakistan and the SCO, limiting broader applicability.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Raw data is uploaded as supplementary material.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311984.s001

(ZIP)

References

  1. 1. Afesorgbor SK. Revisiting the effect of regional integration on African trade: evidence from meta-analysis and gravity model. J Int Trade Econ Dev 2017;26:133–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2016.1219381.
  2. 2. Na-Xi L, Meng-Fang H, Shan-Bing L. How the Belt and Road Initiative Can Help Strengthen the Role of the SCO and Deepen China’s Cooperation with Russia and the Countries of Central Asia. India Q J Int Aff 2019;75:56–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928418821484.
  3. 3. Sada S, Ikeda Y. Regional economic integration via detection of circular flow in international value-added network. PLOS ONE 2021;16:e0255698. pmid:34415930
  4. 4. Ullah A, Pinglu C, Ullah S, Hashmi SH. Nexus of regional integration, socioeconomic determinants and sustainable development in belt and road initiative countries. PLOS ONE 2021;16:e0254298. pmid:34242342
  5. 5. Bhowmik R, Zhu Y, Gao K. An analysis of trade cooperation: Central region in China and ASEAN. PLOS ONE 2021;16:e0261270. pmid:34936662
  6. 6. Chaudhary MA, ABE K. Pakistan, Japan and Asean Trade Relations And Economic Development (A Comparative Analysis). Pak Econ Soc Rev 2000:193–214.
  7. 7. Khalid MW, Kayani AS, Alotaibi JM, Muddassir M, Alotaibi BA, Kassem H. Regional trade and food security challenges: The case of SAARC countries. Agric Econ 2020;66:335–44.
  8. 8. Khan MA. Regional trade and economic development: Options for Pakistan 2017.
  9. 9. Kumar J, Xi C, Imran M, Kumari J. Cross border project in China-Pakistan economic corridor and its influence on women empowerment perspectives. PLOS ONE 2022;17:e0269025. pmid:35749526
  10. 10. Masood S, Khurshid N, Haider M, Khurshid J, Khokhar AM. Trade potential of Pakistan with the South Asian Countries: A gravity model approach. Asia Pac Manag Rev 2023;28:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.02.001.
  11. 11. Zahra S, Khan D, Gupta R, Popp J, Oláh J. Assessing the asymmetric impact of physical infrastructure and trade openness on ecological footprint: An empirical evidence from Pakistan. PLOS ONE 2022;17:e0262782. pmid:35580086
  12. 12. Ayusi R, Nurhasanah S. Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in Eurasia Regionalism: New India-Pakistan Membership and Regional Security. J Sentris 2020;1:165–80. https://doi.org/10.26593/sentris.v1i1.4175.165-180.
  13. 13. Hasnat SF, Awan Z. Shanghai Cooperation Organization as a Platform for Regional Understanding: Its Economic, Political and Security Potential n.d.
  14. 14. Enayatollah Yazdani, Yanzhe Ma. China’s Regional and Global Policy Through the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Int Relat Dipl 2023;11. https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2134/2023.04.003.
  15. 15. Nizamani U. The China Pakistan Economic Corridor and Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Implications for South Asia’s Strategic Stability 2018;2.
  16. 16. Xu X, Rogers RA. China’s changing expectations of the SCO between 2001 and 2019. PLOS ONE 2023;18:e0275625. pmid:36893159
  17. 17. Norling N, Swanström N. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization, trade, and the roles of Iran, India and Pakistan. Cent Asian Surv 2007;26:429–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634930701702779.
  18. 18. Kamal MA, Khan S, Gohar N. Pakistan’s export performance and trade potential in central Asian region: Analysis based on constant market share (CMS) and stochastic frontier gravity model. J Public Aff 2021;21:e2254. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2254.
  19. 19. Yao X, Zhang Y, Yasmeen R, Cai Z. The impact of preferential trade agreements on bilateral trade: A structural gravity model analysis. PLOS ONE 2021;16:e0249118. pmid:33784357
  20. 20. Abdullahi NM, Zhang Q, Shahriar S, Irshad MS, Ado AB, Huo X. Examining the determinants and efficiency of China’s agricultural exports using a stochastic frontier gravity model. PLOS ONE 2022;17:e0274187. pmid:36083873
  21. 21. Handoyo RD, Ibrahim KH, Rahmawati Y, Faadhillah F, Ogawa K, Kusumawardani D, et al. Determinants of exports performance: Evidence from Indonesian low-, medium-, and high-technology manufacturing industries. PLOS ONE 2024;19:e0296431. pmid:38165859
  22. 22. Hanif M. An Analysis of International Trade of Pakistan: With a Focus on Exports. Open Science Framework; 2024. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/g8fuh.
  23. 23. Khan S, Ali S, Urooge S. THE ANALYSIS OF REGIONAL BILATERAL TRADE BETWEEN PAKISTAN AND CENTRAL ASIAN REPUBLICS n.d.
  24. 24. Gul U, Zainab S, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad Pakistan, Mansoor M, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad Pakistan. PAKISTAN’S INTER-GOVERNMENTALIST APPROACH TOWARDS SCO IN CONTEMPORARY REGIONAL SCENARIO AND CHALLENGES IN PAK-SCO COOPERATION. Pak J Soc Res 2022;04:865–76. https://doi.org/10.52567/pjsr.v4i1.953.
  25. 25. Mir Sherbaz Khetran. SCO Membership and Pakistan: Prospects of Relations with Central Asia. Strateg Stud 2019;39:83–95. https://doi.org/10.53532/ss.039.02.00113.
  26. 26. Rab A, Zhilong H. SCO, India and Pakistan: New Perspectives and New Hopes 2018.
  27. 27. Mahmood F, Jongwanich J. Export-enhancing Effects of Free Trade Agreements in South Asia: Evidence from Pakistan. J South Asian Dev 2018;13:24–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973174118764925.
  28. 28. Irshad MS, Xin Q, Hui Z, Arshad H. An empirical analysis of Pakistan’s bilateral trade and trade potential with China: A gravity model approach. Cogent Econ Finance 2018;6:1504409. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1504409.
  29. 29. Hanif M. An Analysis of International Trade of Pakistan: With a Focus on Exports 2024. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/g8fuh.
  30. 30. Sun H, Zhong Q, Yang L. Analysis of Influencing Factors of China’s Agricultural Products Exports to SCO Based on CMS Model. E3S Web Conf 2021;253:01044. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125301044.
  31. 31. Bond EW, Syropoulos C, Winters LA. Deepening of regional integration and multilateral trade agreements. J Int Econ 2001;53:335–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00064-7.
  32. 32. Amponsah WA. ANALYTICAL AND EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE OF TRADE POLICY EFFECTS n.d.
  33. 33. Niazi ZA. An Overview of SCO Multi-lateral Trade and Cooperation. J Peace Dipl 2020;1:01–6.
  34. 34. Ambrosio T. Catching the ‘Shanghai Spirit’: How the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Promotes Authoritarian Norms in Central Asia. Eur-Asia Stud 2008;60:1321–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130802292143.
  35. 35. ERKAN B, Oğuz K, BOZDUMAN ET. Impact of Macroeconomic Indicators on Export Competitiveness in Shanghai Cooperation Organization Countries. İzmir İktisat Derg 2020;35:443–55.
  36. 36. Abbas S, Waheed A. Pakistan’s Global Trade Potential: A Gravity Model Approach. Glob Bus Rev 2019;20:1361–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919848936.
  37. 37. Ali I, Mahmood Z. Foreign outsourcing collaboration within a developing economy’s perspective: A case of the Pakistani textile industry. PLOS ONE 2024;19:e0299454. pmid:38625894
  38. 38. Lateef M, Tong G-J, Riaz M-U. Exploring the Gravity of Agricultural Trade in China–Pakistan Free Trade Agreement. Chin Econ 2018;51:522–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2018.1481008.
  39. 39. Javed A. GAINS FOR PAKISTAN BY PROMOTING SERVICES TRADE WITH ASEAN REGION. Pak Econ Soc Rev 2023;61:113.
  40. 40. Iqbal J. An analysis of Pakistan’s exports using gravity model. Abasyn J Soc Sci 2016;9:271.
  41. 41. Lakhan AB, Khuwaja FM. Trade Development in Pakistan: An Evidence by Gravity Model Approach. Glob Econ Rev VII 2022:90–102.
  42. 42. Sultan M, Munir K. Export, import and total trade potential of Pakistan: A gravity model approach 2015.
  43. 43. Khan S, Ali S, Urooge S. The analysis of regional bilateral trade between Pakistan and Central Asian Republics. Pak J Appl Econ 2019;29:93–106.
  44. 44. Bano Z, Mujahid H. Pakistan’s Trade Flows with Shanghai Cooperation Organization: A Gravity Approach 2021.
  45. 45. Zhang Y, Cui J, Lu C. Does environmental regulation affect firm exports? Evidence from wastewater discharge standard in China. China Econ Rev 2020;61:101451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101451.
  46. 46. Brodzicki T, Uminski S. A gravity panel data analysis of foreign trade by regions: the role of metropolises and history. Reg Stud 2018;52:261–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1296123.
  47. 47. Correia S, Guimarães P, Zylkin T. Fast Poisson estimation with high-dimensional fixed effects. Stata J Promot Commun Stat Stata 2020;20:95–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X20909691.
  48. 48. Santos Silva JMC, Tenreyro S. The Log of Gravity at 15. Port Econ J 2022;21:423–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-021-00203-w.
  49. 49. Yusuf HA, Afolabi LO, Shittu WO, Gold KL, Muhammad M. Institutional Quality and Trade Flow: Empirical Evidence from Malaysia and Other OIC Member Countries in Africa. Insight Afr 2021;13:177–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0975087820987174.
  50. 50. Wang S, Chang Z, Zhang X. The Belt and Road Initiatives and the growth of total factor productivity: based on the perspective of the regional import of intermediate goods. Empir Econ 2022;63:1915–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02197-y.
  51. 51. Yu L, Zhao D, Niu H, Lu F. Does the belt and road initiative expand China’s export potential to countries along the belt and road? China Econ Rev 2020;60:101419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101419.
  52. 52. Alimov R. The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation: Its role and place in the development of Eurasia. J Eurasian Stud 2018;9:114–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2018.08.001.
  53. 53. Ghossein T, Hoekman B, Shingal A. Public Procurement, Regional Integration, and the Belt and Road Initiative. World Bank Res Obs 2021;36:131–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkab004.
  54. 54. Khan H, Chen Y, Lv L. Does the China–Pakistan free trade agreement benefit the vegetable exports of Pakistan? A gravity estimation. Front Sustain Food Syst 2024;8:1362910. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1362910.
  55. 55. Chen W, Zhang H, Tang Z, Yu Z. Assessing the structural connectivity of international trade networks along the “Belt and Road.” PLOS ONE 2023;18:e0282596. pmid:36888597
  56. 56. Chen Z, Li X. Economic impact of transportation infrastructure investment under the Belt and Road Initiative. Asia Eur J 2021;19:131–59. pmid:34305499
  57. 57. Mahmood S, Ali G, Menhas R, Sabir M. Belt and road initiative as a catalyst of infrastructure development: Assessment of resident’s perception and attitude towards China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. PLOS ONE 2022;17:e0271243. pmid:35857781
  58. 58. Brancaccio G, Kalouptsidi M, Papageorgiou T. Geography, Transportation, and Endogenous Trade Costs. Econometrica 2020;88:657–91. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA15455.
  59. 59. Wang J, Tian X. Impacts of the belt and road initiative on China’s bilateral trade. J Asia Pac Econ 2022;27:400–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2022.2042110.