Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Facilitating effects of plant extracts on soil health and replanted Panax ginseng growth in recession soil

  • Ergang Wang,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Jilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China

  • Yi Zhou,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China

  • Xinyue Miao,

    Roles Conceptualization

    Affiliation Jilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China

  • Guixiang He,

    Roles Validation

    Affiliation Jilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China

  • Pengyuan Lv,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliation Jilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China

  • Lixiang Wang,

    Roles Software

    Affiliation School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China

  • Yu Zhan,

    Roles Supervision

    Affiliation Jilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China

  • Changbao Chen ,

    Roles Funding acquisition

    wode17k@163.com (QL); ccb2021@126.com (CC)

    Affiliation Jilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China

  • Qiong Li

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    wode17k@163.com (QL); ccb2021@126.com (CC)

    Affiliation Jilin Ginseng Academy, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China

Abstract

Background

Plant extracts have been shown to be effective agricultural strategies for improving soil fertility and quality, and promoting plant growth in soil degradation remediation. The application of plant extracts improves the material cycle of soil microecology, such as the decomposition of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, while increasing plant resistance. However, there is currently no experiment to demonstrate whether plant extracts have a promoting effect on the growth of ginseng and the mechanism of action.

Objectives and methods

Pot experiments were carried out to investigate the effects of extracts, namely Rubia cordifolia (RC), Schisandra chinensis (SC), and Euphorbia humifusa (EH) on soil properties, enzyme activities, and plant physiological characteristics were evaluated.

Results

Results showed that compared with CK, plant extract-related treatments increased soil Organic carbon (OC), Available nitrogen (AN), Available phosphorus (AP) contents, and Soil urease activity. (S-UE), Soil sucrase activity (Soil sucrase), Soil acid phosphatase activity. (S-ACP). Meanwhile, plant extract-related treatments significantly increased plant physiological properties and TP (Total protein) content, and decreased the content of MDA (malondialdehyde) by 15.70% -36.59% and PRO (proline) by 30.13% -148.44%. Furthermore, plant extract-related treatments also significantly promote plant growth and reduce plant incidence, the fresh weight of ginseng increased by 27.80% -52.08%, ginseng root activity increased by 45.13% -90.07%, and ginseng incidence rate decreased by 20.00% -46.67%. Through correlation analysis between fresh weight of ginseng and root parameters and soil index, fresh weight is significantly positively correlated with root diameter, fiber root number, root activity, total protein (TP), catalytic activity (CAT) and superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), H, soil urea activity (S-UE), soil sucrose activity (S-SC), soil acid phosphate activity (S-ACP), and soil laccase activity (SL); The fresh weight was significantly negatively correlated with incidence rate, disease severity index, and malondialdehyde content (MDA).

Conclusion

In summary, plant extract-related treatments improve soil quality and promote ginseng growth, further enhancing soil health and plant disease resistance. These findings provide new insights into ginseng cultivation and soil health management and highlight a new approach that can be applied to a wider range of agricultural practices and environmental sustainability.

Introduction

Ginseng (Panax ginseng C. A. Mey.) is a perennial herb with broad application prospects in ensuring people’s health and life safety [1]. Due to increased demand and inadequate wild resources, it has been intensively cultivated in China, Russia, North Korea, South Korea, and other places [2]. Unfortunately, continuous monoculture and over-fertilization have resulted in soil degradation and accumulation of soil-borne pathogens [35], which jeopardizes ginseng production [6]. Therefore, effective improvement measures are crucial for maintaining the productivity of ginseng under intensive cultivation.

Soil chemical fumigation technology is currently the most widely used method in production to suppress soil-borne pathogens. Chloropicrin is one of the most commonly used soil fumigants. Studies have shown that chloropicrin fumigants can kill more than 85% of bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes in soil [7], and also control weeds and nematodes [8]. However, it has no selectivity and can kill pathogenic bacteria in the soil, but also beneficial bacteria, which can easily endanger human health [9]. With increasing attention to sustainable agricultural development and human health, traditional chemical fumigants have been gradually phased out. Therefore, we urgently need a healthy soil management measure to replace reliance on chemical fumigants. Plant extracts are often considered a promising soil health management practice that extracts active ingredients from plant roots, stems, leaves, flowers, and other parts to kill soil-borne pathogenic microorganisms, improve soil physicochemical properties, and promote plant growth [1013]. For example, plant extracts improved the biochemical index of corn, reduced the impact of abiotic stress, and promoted the establishment and growth of corn seedlings [14]. After the application of plant extracts, the enhanced nutritional growth, chlorophyll concentration, aboveground biomass, and yield properties of potatoes can also be attributed to their biological stimulating effects, which improves the physiological resistance of plants and the physicochemical properties of soil [15]. Seaweed extract application improved the activities of antioxidant enzymes, including SOD, CAT, and POD, in roots and alleviated the oxidative damage of roots caused by drought stress, seaweed extract application can improve soil physical structure, promote enzyme activities, and increase the available N, P, and K of the soil, promote the growth of sugarcane [16].

Soil is the foundation for the growth of perennial plants such as ginseng and an important source of plant nutrition [17]. Studies has shown that a deteriorating soil environment can lead to inhibition of plant photosynthesis [18], imbalance of reactive oxygen species metabolism [19], damage to antioxidant enzyme systems [20], and imbalance of hormone levels [21]. Meanwhile, plants continuously absorb soil nutrients during the continuous monoculture process, causing a continuous decrease in soil nutrients in the root zone [22], leading to soil nutrient imbalance and element proportion imbalance [23]. Soil enzymes are closely related to soil nutrients, which together constitute the soil microecological environment and affect plant root activity [24, 25]. Additionally, with the application of a large number of pesticides and fertilizers, soil salt continuously accumulates towards the surface of the soil [26], accelerating soil acidification [27], leading to severe soil salinization and hardening [28], ultimately leading to poor crop development. Thus, it is particularly imperative to explore the effects of different plant extracts on soil enzyme activity, soil nutrients, and ginseng growth and development.

We speculate that: (1) Different plant extracts have different effects on soil properties and the growth of ginseng; (2) Plant extracts can improve soil health; (3) Plant extracts enhance ginseng root activity, promote the growth of ginseng, and reduce the incidence rate of ginseng. To test these hypotheses, we conducted field investigations and selected three companion plants(Rubia cordifolia, Schisandra chinensis, and Euphorbia humifusa) of ginseng for experiments and we selected a soil where ginseng seedlings had a survival rate of less than 30% after six years of continuous cultivation and studied the effects of extracts on soil physicochemical properties, enzyme activity, and seedling growth after replanting.

Materials and methods

The experiments involved in this study were carried out at the Jilin Ginseng Academy of Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, and the work permits of relevant institutions were not involved. It is hereby declared that the situation is true.

Experimental design

The dark brown forest soil used in this study was collected from Baixi Forest Farm (44˚05ʹN, 127˚67ʹE) in Fusong County, Baishan City, Jilin Province, China. The area belongs to a temperate continental monsoon climate. The annual average temperature is 5°C, the highest temperature is 34°C, the lowest temperature is -36°C, the annual average precipitation is 712 mm, the frost-free period is 79–150 days, and the soil parent material type is dark brown soil. The soil has been continuously planted with ginseng for six years and suffered severe disease, and soil samples have been collected after harvest. Soil’s properties were as follows: pH 4.8; electrical conductivity (EC), 157.8 μS/cm; organic carbon (OC), 12.30 g/kg; and available phosphorus (AP), 2.73 mg/kg.

Prior to the pot experiment, the Rubia cordifolia, Schisandra chinensis, and Euphorbia humifusa were crushed (particle size < 2 mm). Plant powder was separated accurately weighed 10.0 g and placed in a beaker, and then 100 mL of water was added to extract in a 60°C constant temperature water bath for 2 hours. After filtering, the residue was extracted twice with 100 mL of water, combined with three filters, concentrated to 100 mL, obtained 0.1g/mL of extractions, stored at 4°C for later use.

The pot experiment was conducted in the artificial climate chamber of Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine on December 26, 2022. Pots (17 cm × 17 cm × 14 cm, without drainage holes) were filled with 1.8 kg soil, and two-year-old healthy ginseng seedlings of similar size were transplanted, with 3 plants per pot. Four treatments: (1) CK, untreated soil; (2) RC, soil with 30 mL Rubia cordifolia extract, (3) SC, soil with 30 mL Schisandra chinensis extract, (4) EH, soil with 30 mL Euphorbia humifusa extract. There were three replications of these treatments, which were established randomly. The Rubia cordifolia, Schisandra chinensis, and Euphorbia humifusa were purchased from Beijing Tong Ren Tang Traditional Chinese Medicine Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). Dilute 10 mL of the three plant extracts with water every 30 days to 1L, and then add them to the potted soil until the ginseng is harvested. The total amount of each extract is 30 ml.

Sample collection and processing

Soil samples and plants from four treatments were collected during the harvesting period (March 26, 2023), and three replicates of each treatment were mixed as composite samples. Sample the soil around the roots of ginseng using a five-point method. The sampling depth was 5–8 cm. Collect 3 times for each treatment and homogenize the collected soil to obtain a composite sample. Uniformly collected samples are naturally dried and sieved through a 2 mm sieve to measure soil physicochemical properties and enzyme activity. Meanwhile, separate the aboveground and underground parts of the plant, wash gently, and dry the roots with absorbent paper. Subsamples were stored at -80°C for physiological and biochemical analysis.

Soil physicochemical properties analysis

Soil pH and electric conductivity (EC) were measured by a pH meter (PHSJ-3F, Shanghai, China) and conductivity meter (DDS-307A, Shanghai, China) at a soil-water ratio of 1:5 (weight/volume), respectively. Soil organic carbon (OC) was determined by the potassium dichromate external heating method [29]. Soil available nitrogen (AN) was determined by the alkaline diffusion method [30]. Soil available phosphorus (AP) was determined by the NaHCO3 extraction molybdenum antimony colorimetry method [31].

Soil enzyme activity analysis

Soil urease activity (S-UE) was determined by indophenol blue colorimetry, and the activity was defined as 1μg NH3-N produced per gram of soil per day [32]. Soil sucrase activity (S-SC) was determined by 3,5-dinitro salicylic acid colorimetry, and the activity was defined as 1 mg of reducing sugar produced per gram of soil per day at 37°C [33]. Soil acid phosphatase activity (S-ACP) was measured by disodium phenyl phosphate colorimetry, and the activity was defined as 1 nmol phenol release per gram of soil per day at 37°C as one enzyme activity [34]. Soil laccase activity (SL) was measured by activity spectrophotometry, and defined as the amount of enzyme required to oxidize 1 nmol of substrate ABTS per minute per gram of soil [35].

Plant growth and incidence survey

During the harvesting period, ginseng growth conditions below ground were recorded. The measurement and recording methods are as follows: On the day of sampling, the main root length of ginseng was measured with a straightedge, the diameter of the root was measured with a vernier caliper, and weighed the fresh weight of a single ginseng using a balance, while the number of fibrous roots was measured. Meanwhile, five ginseng plants were randomly selected from each treatment to investigate the incidence of root disease in the underground part of ginseng, and the incidence area of each root was graded. A indicates no visible root lesions, B indicates root lesions 0.9 mm in diameter (brown), C indicates root lesions 1–4.0 mm (dark brown), D indicates root lesions 4–7.0 mm (black), E indicates interfusion of root lesions, and F indicates root complete decay [36]. The calculation equation is as follows:

Where Xa, Xb, Xc, Xd, Xe, and Xf represent the numbers of plants with rotting severity of a, b, c, d, e, and f, respectively.

Root activity analysis

The fresh plant root sample was used to assess root activity by the 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) method [37]. TTC’s oxidation state is colorless by itself. We soaked the roots in TTC aqueous solution, and TTC entered the root cells. This test is based on dehydrogenase in live roots reducing colourless TTC to red triphenyl formazan. Afterward, the compound is extracted by a spectrophotometer at 485 nm after a fixed incubation period.

Plant physiological properties analysis

Total protein content (TP), catalase activity (CAT), superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), peroxidase activity (POD), malondialdehyde content (MDA), and proline (PRO) were used to indicate the physiological properties of the plant. The activities of plant SOD, POD, CAT, and the content of TP, MDA, and PRO were measured using a kit produced by the company Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). TP is defined as the protein content per g of tissue. POD activity units are defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzes 1 μg of substrate per minute per g of tissue at 37°C. CAT activity units are defined as the breakdown of 1 μmol of H2O2 per second per g of tissue. SOD activity units are defined as the corresponding amount of SOD per g of tissue when the SOD inhibition rate reaches 50% in 1 mL of reaction solution. MDA is defined as the content of malondialdehyde per g of tissue. PRO is defined as the proline content per g of tissue.

Data analysis

Using IBM SPSS 21.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc, USA), we measured differences in soil physicochemical properties, soil enzyme activity, and ginseng physiological characteristics between different treatments using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (P < 0.05). GraphPad Prism (Version 8.01) is used to create all graphics. Correlation heatmap created using Majorbio platform.

Results

Physicochemical properties of the rhizosphere soils

Analysis of the collected soil samples showed a clear difference in physicochemical properties changes after plant extract-related treatments of ginseng planted soil (P < 0.05, Table 1). Soil pH was significantly higher in the RC treatment than in the CK treatment (P < 0.05), but the difference in soil pH among the SC, EH treatment, and CK treatment was not significant (Table 1). Soil EC was significantly lower in the RC and EH treatment than in the CK treatment (P < 0.05), but the difference between the SC and CK treatment was not significant, with the RC treatment having the lowest soil EC (Table 1). Soil OC content was significantly increased in all treatments compared to the CK treatment (P < 0.05), and the EH treatment had the highest soil OC value (Table 1). Soil AN content increased significantly (P < 0.05) in all treatments compared to the CK treatment, and the EH treatment had the highest soil AN content (Table 1). Compared with the CK treatment, soil AP content was significantly increased in the RC, SC, and EH treatment (P < 0.05), and the highest AP content was found in the SC treatment (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of rhizosphere soils under different treatments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311679.t001

Enzyme activity of the rhizosphere soils

Analysis of the collected soil samples showed a clear difference in enzyme activity changes after plant extract-related treatments of ginseng planted soil (P < 0.05, Fig 1). S-UE activity was significantly increased in RC, SC, and EH treatment compared to the CK treatment (P < 0.05), with the highest soil S-UE activity in the SC treatment (Fig 1A). S-SC activity increased significantly (P < 0.05) in all treatments compared to the CK treatment, with the highest S-SC activity in the RC treatment and the lowest S-SC activity in the SC treatment (Fig 1B). S-ACP activity was significantly increased in all treatments compared to the CK treatment (P < 0.05) (Fig 1C). Compared to the CK treatment, SL activity was significantly increased in the RC treatment (P < 0.05), and slightly increased in SC and EH treatment, but the difference was not significant (Fig 1D).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Enzyme activity of rhizosphere soils under different treatments.

The error bars indicate the standard errors of the means of three replicates. The one-way ANOVA indicates that the letters denote a significant difference at P < 0.05. S-UE, soil urease; S-SC, soil sucrase; S-ACP, soil acid phosphatase; SL, soil laccase. CK, untreated soil; RC, Rubia cordifolia extract; SC, Schisandra chinensis extract; EH, Euphorbia humifusa extract.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311679.g001

Growth and incidence rate of ginseng

Observing the root morphology of ginseng during the harvesting period, it was found that the plant extract-related treatment was significantly better than the CK treatment, which showed that the ginseng tuber expansion was normal and disease spots were reduced (Fig 2). Meanwhile, compared to the CK treatment, ginseng fresh weight and root diameter were significantly (P < 0.05) increased in plant extract-related treatments, and the fresh weight and root diameter of RC treatment was the highest, increasing by 52.20% and 51.88%, respectively (Fig 3A and 3B). Compared to the CK treatment, both RC and SC treatments significantly (P < 0.05) increased the number of ginseng fibrous roots, while there was no significant difference between the EH treatment and CK treatment (Fig 3C). The taproot length of ginseng in all plant extract-related treatments was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that in the CK treatment, and the taproot length of SC treatment was the highest, increasing by 54.86%, but there was no significant difference between RC and EH treatments (Fig 3D).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Growth of ginseng under different treatments during harvest.

The error bars indicate the standard errors of the means of three replicates. The one-way ANOVA indicates that the letters denote a significant difference at P < 0.05. CK, untreated soil; RC, Rubia cordifolia extract; SC, Schisandra chinensis extract; EH, Euphorbia humifusa extract.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311679.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. Root morphology of ginseng under different treatments.

The error bars indicate the standard errors of the means of three replicates. The one-way ANOVA indicates that the letters denote a significant difference at P < 0.05. CK, untreated soil; RC, Rubia cordifolia extract; SC, Schisandra chinensis extract; EH, Euphorbia humifusa extract.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311679.g003

Investigation of the incidence rate and disease severity of ginseng root showed that plant extract-related treatment could reduce the incidence rate and disease severity of ginseng root (Table 2). In particular, the incidence rate and disease severity of ginseng root treated by RC were the lowest, and compared with CK treatment, the incidence rate of ginseng root treated by RC decreased by 38.89%, and the disease severity index of ginseng root decreased by 1.8.

thumbnail
Table 2. Incidence rate and disease severity of ginseng under different treatments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311679.t002

Root activity of ginseng

Analysis of the collected ginseng samples showed a clear difference in the root activity of ginseng treated with plant extract-related (P < 0.05, Fig 4). Compared with CK treatment, the ginseng root activity was significantly (P < 0.05) increased in RC, SC, EH treatments, and the root activity of RC treatment was the highest, whereas there were no significant differences between the RC, and EH treatments (Fig 4).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Root activity of the ginseng under different treatments.

The error bars indicate the standard errors of the means of three replicates. The one-way ANOVA indicates that the letters denote a significant difference at P < 0.05. CK, untreated soil; RC, Rubia cordifolia extract; SC, Schisandra chinensis extract; EH, Euphorbia humifusa extract.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311679.g004

Physiological properties of ginseng

Analysis of the collected ginseng samples showed a clear difference in the physiological properties of ginseng treated with plant extract-related treatments (P < 0.05, Fig 5). Ginseng TP content in all plant extract-related treatments was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that in the CK treatment, and the ginseng TP content in the RC treatment was the highest (Fig 5A). Compared to the CK treatment, the POD activity was significantly (P < 0.05) increased in the SC treatment, while it was increased slightly in the RC and EH treatments, with no significant differences compared to the CK treatment (Fig 5B). Compared to the CK treatment, the CAT activity was significantly (P < 0.05) increased in the RC treatment, while it was increased slightly in the SC and EH treatments, with no significant differences compared to the CK treatment (Fig 5C). Ginseng SOD activity in RC and EH treatment was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that in the CK treatment, while it was increased slightly in the SC treatment, with no significant differences compared to the CK treatment (Fig 5D). Ginseng MDA content was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced in SC treatment, while it was reduced slightly in the RC, and EH treatments, with no significant differences as compared to the CK treatment (Fig 5E). Compared to the CK treatment, the PRO content was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced in RC, SC, and EH treatments, and the PRO content of the EH treatment was the lowest (Fig 5F).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Ginseng’s physiological properties under different treatments.

The error bars indicate the standard errors of the means of three replicates. The one-way ANOVA indicates that the letters denote a significant difference at P < 0.05. TP, Total protein; POD, peroxidase; CAT, catalase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; PRO, proline. CK, untreated soil; RC, Rubia cordifolia extract; SC, Schisandra chinensis extract; EH, Euphorbia humifusa extract.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311679.g005

Correlation analysis between fresh weight of ginseng and root system parameters

Analyzed the correlation between fresh weight of ginseng and root system indicators, and drew a heatmap. As shown in Fig 6, fresh weight is significantly positively correlated with root diameter, fibrous root number, root activity, total protein (TP), catalase activity (CAT) and superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), indicating that the application of plant extracts can reduce the incidence rate of ginseng, improve the antioxidant activity of ginseng roots, and promote root growth. The fresh weight was significantly negatively correlated with incidence rate, disease severity index and malondialdehyde content (MDA), indicating that the application of plant extracts could alleviate ginseng’s environmental stress and reduce its incidence rate.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Correlation heatmap between fresh weight of ginseng and root system parameters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311679.g006

Correlation analysis between fresh weight of ginseng and soil parameters

Correlation analysis was conducted between fresh weight of ginseng and soil parameters. The result is shown in Fig 7. Fresh weight is significantly positively correlated with pH, Soil urease activity (S-UE), Soil sucrase activity (S-SC), Soil acid phosphatase activity (S-ACP), and Soil laccase activity (SL), indicating that the application of plant extracts can improve the growth of ginseng, which is related to the increase of S-UE, S-SC, S-ACP, SL, and pH.

thumbnail
Fig 7. Correlation heatmap between fresh weight of ginseng and soil index.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311679.g007

Discussion

The negative effects of continuous cropping are the main factor impeding the sustainable and healthy development of ginseng [38]. Developing an effective and environmentally friendly approach to overcoming these effects should therefore have high priority in sustainable cultivation of ginseng. The joint effects of different plant extracts on soil properties and enzyme activities in the rhizosphere of ginseng, as well as the growth and development of ginseng were investigated in this study. Soil acidification and salinization are the two main characteristics of soil degradation, which occurs easily, particularly in long-term single-cropping production systems due to the extensive use of fertilizers [3941]. In the present study, except for SC treatment, the EC value, a common indicator of soil salinity, was considerably declined either in all plant extract-related treatments, with the lowest value observed in the RC treatment, which is consistent with previous reports [42]. Likewise, pH values of acidified soils were generally increased after plant extract treatment, but the degree of increase was slightly different, which was consistent with our results [16]. These changes are likely driven by specific microbial taxa, with particular functional genes, that may flourish considerably during the soil because of the plant extracts’ addition [43]. Soil organic matter is one of the important indicators for evaluating soil fertility and soil quality, which can promote plant growth and development, decompose nutrients, and improve soil properties [44]. In the present study, the OC content was significantly increased in all plant extract-related treatments, with the highest content observed in the EH treatment, which is consistent with previous reports [45]. This may be due to the small molecule of organic matter produced by plant extracts applied in the soil becoming a part of the soil organic matter. Additionally, the effects of different treatments on the large amounts of elements and their transformation in soil are not consistent in different studies [46, 47]. In the correlation heatmap (Fig 7), pH is positively correlated with fresh weight of ginseng, EC plants are negatively correlated with fresh weight of ginseng, while the correlation between OC, AN, AP and fresh weight of ginseng is not significant. We found that the contents of AP, and AN were increased in plant extract-related treatments, which may be directly due to the degradation of plant extracts, or indirectly due to the enhancement of nutrient cycling.

Soil enzymes are catalysts for soil ecosystems, playing an important role in soil material cycling, energy flow, and other aspects, that are important driving forces for soil ecological functions and system metabolism, and can be used as one of the indicators for soil quality evaluation [48, 49]. Soil urease plays a crucial role in the nitrogen cycle by catalyzing the hydrolysis of urea in the soil to produce ammonia [50]. Soil acid phosphatase plays an important role in the mineralization of soil organic phosphorus and affects the content of phosphorus compounds in the soil [51, 52]. The increase in acid phosphatase content after extract treatment facilitated the decomposition of phosphorus in ginseng-cultivated soils and significantly increased the amount of fast-acting phosphorus in the soil. Previous studies have shown that laccase promotes the formation of soil humus and organic matter [53]. In the present study, the significant increase in soil organic matter content after the treatment with Rubia extract may be related to the increase in laccase content. As shown in Fig 7, the fresh weight of ginseng is significantly positively correlated with S-UE, S-S, S-ACP, and SL, indicating that the extract may enrich beneficial microorganisms for ginseng by increasing soil enzyme activity, thereby promoting ginseng growth [54]. This may be because most of the enzymes in the soil are mainly secreted by soil microorganisms, however, microorganisms that act as activators of some enzymes may act as inhibitors of others [55].

Maintaining soil health is recognized as an important prerequisite for the successful alleviation of replant failure; however, the growth of multiple cropping seedlings is a key indicator for evaluating soil health [56, 57]. Our results indicated that CK treated ginseng root had more disease spots and lower fresh weight, taproot length, root diameter, fibrous root numbers, and root activity. The fresh weight of ginseng is significantly positively correlated with root diameter, fibrous root number and root activity, while the incidence rate and disease severity index of ginseng are significantly negatively correlated with fresh weight, root diameter, fibrous root number, main root length and root activity (Fig 6), indicating that the application of plant extracts can enhance the root activity and nutrient uptake rate of ginseng, thus promoting the growth of ginseng and reducing the incidence rate of ginseng. However, applying plant extract treatment, can facilitate the growth of ginseng and improve root performance, which is consistent with previous studies [58], but there are significant differences in the effects between different plant extract treatments. This was probably due to the positive effects of plant extract on chemical properties and enzymatic activity in the soil, for example, mechanisms that increase nutrient supply and inhibit soil-borne pathogens, thus reversing some of the negative effects of previous cropping systems on plant growth.

The metabolic system for scavenging reactive oxygen in the plant is unbalanced during the continuous single-planting process which leads to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species, causing damage to the plant membrane system [59, 60]. Adversity stress can affect the antioxidant enzyme system of plants, leading to the accumulation of oxygen free radicals and membrane lipid peroxidation. The product of membrane lipid peroxidation, MDA, can cause serious damage to the cell membrane system and affect plant growth [57]. Therefore, the level of MDA content is also one of the indicators reflecting the degree of stress damage to plants. MDA gradually increased, indicating that these plants were suffering from oxidative damage during this process, and SOD, POD, CAT, and PRO were all shown to respond similarly [6163]. In our study, the MDA content of CK treatment was higher, while the MDA content of plant extract related treatment was lower, indicating that the extract can reduce membrane lipid peroxidation and reduce the degree of cell membrane damage. This may be because the increase in MDA content in untreated soil inhibits the activity of protective enzymes and exacerbates cell membrane damage [57]. Meanwhile, SOD can catalyze the disproportionation reaction in the body, converting superoxide radicals into O2 and H2O2, while CAT and POD clear the H2O2 produced by SOD decomposition, causing it to decompose into non-toxic H2O and O2 [64, 65]. Plant extract-related treatments all increased the CAT, SOD, and POD activities of ginseng, with RC treatment having the highest CAT and SOD activities and SC treatment having the highest POD activity. This may be because plants mainly rely on CAT and POD to jointly convert toxic H2O2 into H2O, resulting in a dynamic equilibrium of SOD dominated disproportionation reactions [6669]. In addition, during the degradation process of PRO, toxic substances are produced, leading to a decrease or complete loss of enzyme activity in plants [70], which is consistent with our research results. Our study found that plant extract related treatments significantly reduced PRO content, indicating that plant extract can maintain a balance of reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism, maintain a balance of enzyme activity in the plant body, and protect the healthy growth of ginseng. As shown in Fig 6, the fresh weight of ginseng is significantly positively correlated with CAT and SOD, and significantly negatively correlated with MDA; The incidence rate and severity index of ginseng were negatively correlated with CAT and SOD. It may be because plant extracts enhance the physiological resistance of ginseng, reduce physiological stress, promote ginseng growth, and improve ginseng disease problems. Obviously, plant extracts have great potential in improving soil health and crop growth. Due to the diverse biological activities of many plants in the plant kingdom [71], applying their extracts to soil may affect the abundance and structure of soil microorganisms, thereby altering the physiological and biochemical indicators of the soil and affecting crops.

Conclusion

Soil is necessary for plant growth, and soil properties and enzyme activity are critical indicators for evaluating soil. In particular, plant extract-related treatments increased soil OM, AN, AP contents, and S-UE, S-SC, and S-ACP activities. Plant extract-related treatments significantly increased plant root activity and TP content, and decreased MDA and PRO content. Furthermore, plant extract-related treatments also significantly promote fresh weight, the root length, root diameter, and fibrous root number of ginseng, and reduce the incidence rate of ginseng. However, the feedback of soil and ginseng on different extraction solutions is not the same, possibly due to the different types of bioactive compounds in different extracts, which cause different biological irritants to the soil and ginseng. More detailed research is needed to further understand the mechanism by which plant extracts improve soil health, and it is particularly important to examine the practical application of plant extracts under field conditions. In summary, suitable plant extracts have the sustainable potential to improve the quality of degraded soil and increase crop yield in soil management and crop production. This research result is beneficial for us to explore the long-term effects of extracts on soil and a wider range of crops, and promote the development of sustainable agriculture.

  1. Highlights: 1. Plant extracts improve degraded soil quality;
  2. 2. Plant extracts promote ginseng growth;
  3. 3. Provide an agricultural measure with sustainable potential.

Acknowledgments

Thank you to each author for their contributions to this article.

References

  1. 1. Wang B, Liu Y, Sun J, Zhang N, Zheng X, Liu Q, et al. Exploring the Potential Mechanism of Xiaokui Jiedu Decoction for Ulcerative Colitis Based on Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2021;2021:1–11. pmid:34733451
  2. 2. Jayapal PK, Park E, Faqeerzada MA, Kim YS, Kim H, Baek I, et al. Analysis of RGB Plant Images to Identify Root Rot Disease in Korean Ginseng Plants Using Deep Learning. Appl Sci-Basel. 2022;12(5):16.
  3. 3. Chen P, Wang YZ, Liu QZ, Zhang YT, Li XY, Li HQ, et al. Phase changes of continuous cropping obstacles in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) production. Appl Soil Ecol. 2020;155:9.
  4. 4. Zheng YP, Xiang JW, Liu YM, Zhang KM, Liu G, Zhang ZL. Effects of continuous cropping on Panax notoginseng growth, yield and saponins content. Allelopathy Journal. 2021;54(1):95–+.
  5. 5. Yin W, Du J, Li J, Zhang Z. Effects of continuous cropping obstacle on growth of Rehmannia glutinosa. Zhongguo Zhong yao za zhi = Zhongguo zhongyao zazhi = China journal of Chinese materia medica. 2009;34(1):18–21. pmid:19382442
  6. 6. Ding S, Zhou D, Wei H, Wu S, Xie B. Alleviating soil degradation caused by watermelon continuous cropping obstacle: Application of urban waste compost. Chemosphere. 2021;262:128387. pmid:33182114
  7. 7. Gullino M, Minuto A, Gilardi G, Garibaldi A, Ajwa H, Duafala T. Efficacy of preplant soil fumigation with chloropicrin for tomato production in Italy. Crop Protection. 2002;21:741–9.
  8. 8. Haar M, Fennimore S, Ajwa H, Winterbottom CQ. Chloropicrin effect on weed seed viability. Crop Protection. 2003;22:109–15.
  9. 9. Nagami H, Suenaga T. Health Effects Caused by Soil Fumigant Chloropicrin, Reduction of Exposure to Chloropicrin, and Alternative Technology of Soil Fumigants. Journal of UOEH. 2022;44(4):395–404. pmid:36464315
  10. 10. Bobo G, Arroqui C, Virseda P. Natural plant extracts as inhibitors of potato polyphenol oxidase: The green tea case study. Lwt-Food Science and Technology. 2022;153:10.
  11. 11. Nanda S, Kumar G, Hussain S. Utilization of seaweed-based biostimulants in improving plant and soil health: current updates and future prospective. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2022;19(12):12839–52.
  12. 12. Li YQ, Wang YJ, Khan MA, Luo WX, Xiang ZC, Xu WJ, et al. Effect of plant extracts and citric acid on phytoremediation of metal-contaminated soil. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2021;211:7. pmid:33493717
  13. 13. Ni GY, Song LY, Zhang JL, Peng SL. Effects of root extracts of Mikania micrantha HBK on soil microbial community. Allelopathy Journal. 2006;17(2):247–54.
  14. 14. Bhowmick S, Rai G, Mishra SK, Bisht N, Chauhan PS. Bio-stimulants from medicinally and nutritionally significant plant extracts mitigate drought adversities in Zea mays through enhanced physiological, biochemical, and antioxidant activities. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2024;207:11. pmid:38310727
  15. 15. Mbuyisa S, Bertling I, Ngcobo BL. Impact of Foliar-Applied Plant Extracts on Growth, Physiological and Yield Attributes of the Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Agronomy-Basel. 2024;14(1):12.
  16. 16. Chen DW, Li ZM, Yang J, Zhou WL, Wu QH, Shen H, et al. Seaweed extract enhances drought resistance in sugarcane via modulating root configuration and soil physicochemical properties. Ind Crop Prod. 2023;194:13.
  17. 17. Noman M, Ahmed T, Wang J, White JC. Micronutrient-microbiome interplay: a critical regulator of soil-plant health. Trends in microbiology. 2024. pmid:38395702
  18. 18. Gao S, Su PX, Yan QD, Ding SS. Canopy and leaf gas exchange of Haloxylon ammodendron under different soil moisture regimes. Science China-Life Sciences. 2010;53(6):718–28. pmid:20602275
  19. 19. Dong XN, Yang XX, Hua S, Wang ZQ, Cai TM, Jiang CL. Unraveling the mechanisms for persulfate-based remediation of triphenyl phosphate-contaminated soils: Complicated soil constituent effects on the formation and propagation of reactive oxygen species. Chem Eng J. 2021;426:12.
  20. 20. Jayakumar K, Vijayarengan P, Changxing Z, Gomathinayagam M, Jaleel CA. Soil applied cobalt alters the nodulation, leg-haemoglobin content and antioxidant status of Glycine max (L.) Merr. Colloid Surf B-Biointerfaces. 2008;67(2):272–5. pmid:18838253
  21. 21. Dodd IC, Zinovkina NY, Safronova VI, Belimov AA. Rhizobacterial mediation of plant hormone status. Ann Appl Biol. 2010;157(3):361–79.
  22. 22. Hu QL, Tan L, Yang XX, Deng Y, Gu SS, Chen JR, et al. The Divergence of Bacterial Communities among Continuous Cropping, Rotational Cropping and New Planting Potato Soils. Int J Agric Biol. 2020;23(4):721–9.
  23. 23. Yang Y, Wang L, Guo L-P, Cui X-M, Jin H, Zhu X-Y, et al. [Study on dynamic change of middle and micro element in Panax notoginseng plant soils with different interval year]. Zhongguo Zhong yao za zhi = Zhongguo zhongyao zazhi = China journal of Chinese materia medica. 2014;39:580–7. pmid:25204126
  24. 24. Yang Y-W, Jiang Y-T. Study on relationship between effective components and soil enzyme activity in different growth patterns of Panax ginseng. Zhongguo Zhong yao za zhi = Zhongguo zhongyao zazhi = China journal of Chinese materia medica. 2016;41(16):2987–92. pmid:28920336
  25. 25. Tan X, Xie B, Wang J, He W, Wang X, Wei G. County-scale spatial distribution of soil enzyme activities and enzyme activity indices in agricultural land: implications for soil quality assessment. TheScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:535768. pmid:25610908
  26. 26. Tam N, Wong Y. Variations of Soil Nutrient and Organic Matter Content in a Subtropical Mangrove Ecosystem. Water Air and Soil Pollution. 1998;103:245–61.
  27. 27. Rousk J, Brookes PC, Baath E. Investigating the mechanisms for the opposing pH relationships of fungal and bacterial growth in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 2010;42(6):926–34.
  28. 28. Heydari N, Das Gupta A, Loof R. Salinity and sodicity influences on infiltration during surge flow irrigation. Irrigation Science. 2001;20:165–73.
  29. 29. Fan DQ, Zhang YQ, Qin SG, Wu B. Relationships between Artemisia ordosica communities and environmental factors following sand-dune stabilization in the Mu Us desert, northwest China. Journal of Forestry Research. 2017;28(1):115–24.
  30. 30. Zhou YJ, Li JH, Friedman CR, Wang HF. Variation of Soil Bacterial Communities in a Chronosequence of Rubber Tree (Hevea brasiliensis) Plantations. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8:12.
  31. 31. Tan XY, Liao HK, Shu LZ, Yao HY. Effect of Different Substrates on Soil Microbial Community Structure and the Mechanisms of Reductive Soil Disinfestation. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;10:12.
  32. 32. Qin S, Cao L, Zhang J-L, Wang D, Wang D. Soil nutrient availability and microbial properties of a potato field under ridge-furrow and plastic mulch. Arid Land Research and Management. 2016;30:181–92.
  33. 33. Zhao S, Chen X, Deng S, Dong X, Song A, Yao J, et al. The Effects of Fungicide, Soil Fumigant, Bio-Organic Fertilizer and Their Combined Application on Chrysanthemum Fusarium Wilt Controlling, Soil Enzyme Activities and Microbial Properties. Molecules. 2016;21:526. pmid:27110753
  34. 34. Tabatabai M, Bremner J. Use of p-Nitrophenol Phosphate in Assay of Soil Phosphatase Activity. Soil Biology & Biochemistry—SOIL BIOL BIOCHEM. 1969;1:301–7.
  35. 35. Luis P, Kellner H, Schlitt B, Langer U, Martin F, Buscot F. Patchiness and Spatial Distribution of Laccase Genes of Ectomycorrhizal, Saprotrophic, and Unknown Basidiomycetes in the Upper Horizons of a Mixed Forest Cambisol. Microbial ecology. 2005;50:570–9. pmid:16341831
  36. 36. Rahman M, Punja ZK. Factors influencing development of root rot on ginseng caused by Cylindrocarpon destructans. Phytopathology. 2005;95(12):1381–90. pmid:18943548
  37. 37. Liu JJ, Wei Z, Li JH. Effects of copper on leaf membrane structure and root activity of maize seedling. Botanical Studies. 2014;55:6.
  38. 38. Wang R, Dong L-L, Xu J, Chen J-W, Li X-W, Chen S-L. Progress in improvement of continuous monoculture cropping problem in Panax ginseng by controlling soil-borne disease management. Zhongguo Zhong yao za zhi = Zhongguo zhongyao zazhi = China journal of Chinese materia medica. 2016;41(21):3890–6. pmid:28929671
  39. 39. You JF, Liu X, Zhang B, Xie ZK, Hou ZG, Yang ZM. Seasonal changes in soil acidity and related properties in ginseng artificial bed soils under a plastic shade. Journal of Ginseng Research. 2015;39(1):81–8. pmid:25535481
  40. 40. Matsumoto S, Doi H, Kasuga J. Changes over the Years in Soil Chemical Properties Associated with the Cultivation of Ginseng (Panax ginseng Meyer) on Andosol Soil. Agriculture-Basel. 2022;12(8):13.
  41. 41. Jian ZY, Wang WQ, Meng L, Wang D, You PJ, Zhang ZL. Analysis of element contents in soil for continuous cropping ginseng. Chinese Journal of Soil Science. 2011;42:369–71.
  42. 42. Ahmad N, Ullah F, Hussain I, Ahmad K, Raza G, Sajjadc Y, et al. Soybean (Glycine max) Extracts Impact on Plant and Soil Biology. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2016;47(15):1751–63.
  43. 43. Knowles R, Laishley E. Factors in forest-tree litter extracts affecting the growth of soil micro-organisms. Nature. 1959;184(Suppl 15):1169. pmid:14410218
  44. 44. Lavallee JM, Cotrufo F. Formation, persistence, and function of soil organic matter: how recent scientific advances apply in agroecosystems. J Anim Sci. 2020;98:51–.
  45. 45. Han C, Shao F, Guo J-W, Hu YX, Zhang C, Shao H. Indirect allelopathic effects of Xanthium italicum Morretti on soil properties and microbial communities. Allelopathy Journal. 2017;41:211–22.
  46. 46. Yi U, Zaharah SS, Ismail SI, Musa MH. Effect of Aqueous Neem Leaf Extracts in Controlling Fusarium Wilt, Soil Physicochemical Properties and Growth Performance of Banana (Musa spp.). Sustainability. 2021;13(22):16.
  47. 47. Qu TB, Du X, Peng YL, Guo WQ, Zhao CL, Losapio G. Invasive species allelopathy decreases plant growth and soil microbial activity. Plos One. 2021;16(2):12. pmid:33561161
  48. 48. Rawald W. Activity of soil enzymes as a component of the soil biological activity, specially with regard to the judgement about soil fertility, and aspects of the soil enzymatic research. Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene Zweite naturwissenschaftliche Abt: Allgemeine, landwirtschaftliche und technische Mikrobiologie. 1970;125(4):363–84.
  49. 49. Xu HW, Qu Q, Chen YH, Liu GB, Xue S. Responses of soil enzyme activity and soil organic carbon stability over time after cropland abandonment in different vegetation zones of the Loess Plateau of China. Catena. 2021;196:13.
  50. 50. He W, Ma A, Wu Y, Zhu M. Effect of arsenic on soil urease activity. Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology. 2004;15(5):895–8. pmid:15320419
  51. 51. He ZQ, Honeycutt CW. A modified molybdenum blue method for orthophosphate determination suitable for investigating enzymatic hydrolysis of organic phosphates. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2005;36(9–10):1373–83.
  52. 52. Del Vecchio HA, Ying S, Park J, Knowles VL, Kanno S, Tanoi K, et al. The cell wall-targeted purple acid phosphatase AtPAP25 is critical for acclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana to nutritional phosphorus deprivation. Plant J. 2014;80(4):569–81. pmid:25270985
  53. 53. Park HJ, Lee YM, Do H, Lee JH, Kim E, Lee H, et al. Involvement of laccase-like enzymes in humic substance degradation by diverse polar soil bacteria. Folia Microbiol. 2021;66(3):331–40. pmid:33471293
  54. 54. Calabrese S, Mohanty BP, Malik AA. Soil microorganisms regulate extracellular enzyme production to maximize their growth rate. Biogeochemistry. 2022;158(3):303–12.
  55. 55. Bai XJ, Dippold MA, An SS, Wang BR, Zhang HX, Loeppmann S. Extracellular enzyme activity and stoichiometry: The effect of soil microbial element limitation during leaf litter decomposition. Ecol Indic. 2021;121:13.
  56. 56. Fang S, Tao Y, Zhang YZ, Kong FY, Wang YB. Effects of metalaxyl enantiomers stress on root activity and leaf antioxidant enzyme activities in tobacco seedlings. Chirality. 2018;30(4):469–74. pmid:29334408
  57. 57. Ashraf MA, Ashraf M, Ali Q. Response of Two Genetically Diverse Wheat Cultivars to Salt Stress at Different Growth Stages: Leaf Lipid Peroxidation and Phenolic Contents. Pak J Bot. 2010;42(1):559–65.
  58. 58. Hussain HI, Kasinadhuni N, Arioli T. The effect of seaweed extract on tomato plant growth, productivity and soil. Journal of Applied Phycology. 2021;33(2):1305–14.
  59. 59. Chen JG, Zhang YQ, Wang CP, Lu WT, Jin JB, Hua XJ. Proline induces calcium-mediated oxidative burst and salicylic acid signaling. Amino Acids. 2011;40(5):1473–84. pmid:20890619
  60. 60. Sahu PK, Jayalakshmi K, Tilgam J, Gupta A, Nagaraju Y, Kumar A, et al. ROS generated from biotic stress: Effects on plants and alleviation by endophytic microbes. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2022;13:19. pmid:36352882
  61. 61. Bandeoglu E, Eyidogan F, Yucel M, Oktem HA. Antioxidant responses of shoots and roots of lentil to NaCl-salinity stress. Plant Growth Regulation. 2004;42(1):69–77.
  62. 62. Yu J, Ye S, Zhang M-F, Hu W. Effects of root exudates and aqueous root extracts of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) and allelochemicals, on photosynthesis and antioxidant enzymes in cucumber. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 2003;31:129–39.
  63. 63. Eyidogan F, Oktem H, Yücel M. Superoxide Dismutase Activity of Hexaploid and Tetraploid Wheat Cultivars Subjected to Heat and Chilling Stress. Cereal Research Communications. 2003;31:387–94.
  64. 64. Liao M, Ma ZM, Kang YR, Zhang BM, Gao XL, Yu F, et al. ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY 1 promotes hydrogen peroxide scavenging to enhance rice thermotolerance. Plant Physiol. 2023;192(4):3106–19. pmid:37099454
  65. 65. Wang GY, Ahmad S, Wang Y, Wang BW, Huang JH, Jahan MS, et al. Multivariate analysis compares and evaluates drought and flooding tolerances of maize germplasm. Plant Physiol. 2023:17.
  66. 66. Motamedi M, Karimmojeni H, Sini FG, Majidi MM. Changes in activities of antioxidant enzymes in radish (Raphanus sativus) seedlings in response to allelopathic effect of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius). Braz J Pharm Sci. 2022;58:9.
  67. 67. Zhu Y, Guo B, Liu C, Lin YC, Fu QL, Li NY, et al. Soil fertility, enzyme activity, and microbial community structure diversity among different soil textures under different land use types in coastal saline soil. J Soils Sediments. 2021;21(6):2240–52.
  68. 68. Lin CC, Kao CH. Abscisic acid induced changes in cell wall peroxidase activity and hydrogen peroxide level in roots of rice seedlings. Plant science: an international journal of experimental plant biology. 2001;160(2):323–9. pmid:11164604
  69. 69. Kanazawa S, Sano S, Koshiba T, Ushimaru T. Changes in antioxidative enzymes in cucumber cotyledons during natural senescence: Comparison with those during dark-induced senescence. Physiologia Plantarum. 2001;109:211–6.
  70. 70. Hellmann H, Funck D, Rentsch D, Frommer WB. Hypersensitivity of an Arabidopsis sugar signaling mutant toward exogenous proline application. Plant physiology. 2000;123(2):779–89. pmid:10859207
  71. 71. Gu X, Hao D, Xiao P. Research progress of Chinese herbal medicine compounds and their bioactivities: Fruitful 2020. Chinese herbal medicines. 2022;14(2):171–86. pmid:36117669