Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Myroides species, pathogenic spectrum and clinical microbiology sight in Mexican isolates

  • Claudia Adriana Colín-Castro ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Claudia Adriana Colín-Castro, Jossue Mizael Ortiz-Álvarez

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Infectious Diseases Division, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Jossue Mizael Ortiz-Álvarez ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Claudia Adriana Colín-Castro, Jossue Mizael Ortiz-Álvarez

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Programa “Investigadoras e Investigadores por México”, Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías (CONAHCYT), Mexico City, Mexico

  • Cindy Fabiola Hernández-Pérez,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Centro Nacional de Referencia de Inocuidad y Bioseguridad Agroalimentaria, Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria (SENASICA), Tecámac, Mexico State, Mexico

  • Melissa Hernández-Durán,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Infectious Diseases Division, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico

  • María de Lourdes García-Hernández,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Infectious Diseases Division, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico

  • María Guadalupe Martínez-Zavaleta,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Infectious Diseases Division, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Noé Becerra-Lobato,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Infectious Diseases Division, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Mercedes Isabel Cervantes-Hernández,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Infectious Diseases Division, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Graciela Rosas-Alquicira,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Infectious Diseases Division, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Guillermo Cerón-González,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Infectious Diseases Division, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Braulio Josué Méndez-Sotelo,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Infectious Diseases Division, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Rodolfo García-Contreras,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Microbiology and Parasitology Department, Bacteriology Laboratory, Medicine Faculty, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Rafael Franco-Cendejas ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    esaulopezjacome@quimica.unam.mx (LEL-J); raffcend@yahoo.com (RF-C)

    Affiliation Biomedical Research Subdirection, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico

  • Luis Esaú López-Jácome

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    esaulopezjacome@quimica.unam.mx (LEL-J); raffcend@yahoo.com (RF-C)

    Affiliations Infectious Diseases Division, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico, Biology Department, Chemistry Faculty, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico

Abstract

Introduction

Myroides is a bacterial genus of opportunistic bacteria responsible for diverse infections including in the skin and soft tissues, urinary tract, cardiovascular system, and bacteremia, although the incidence of its reported infections is low, it is increasing, likely due the use of better bacterial identification methods, but also perhaps due an increase in its prevalence. In addition, their pathogenic role is limited in terms of reporting their microbial physiology, so the present work provides information in this regard in addition to the information that is available in the international literature.

Objective

To describe the microbiological and genetic characteristics of seven different Myroides spp. clinical strains and comment on their phylum, pathogenic and resistance characteristics.

Methods

Seven Myroides spp., strains associated with infections were included from 1/January/2012 to 1/January/20 and identified by miniaturized biochemistry and MALDI-ToF. Susceptibility tests were performed according to CLSI recommendations by broth microdilution. Whole genome sequencing was performed for each strain and bioinformatics analysis were performed.

Results

Strains were identified at genus level by two methodologies. Our results revealed that likely four strains belong to the species Myroides odoratimimus, while the other two may be undescribed ones. Remarkably, all isolates harbored several genes encoding antibiotic resistance determinants for ß-lactams, aminoglycosides and glycopeptides and in concordance, presented high levels of resistance, against these antibiotics (AK and GN both 100%, ATM, CAZ and FEP 100%, e.g.); moreover, the presences of carbapenemases were evidenced by meropenem (mCIM) and imipenem (CARBA NP) degrading activity in six isolates and two strains possessed plasmids harboring mainly ribosomal RNA genes, tRNAs and genes encoding proteins with unknown functions.

Conclusions

Our study increases the knowledge about the biology of this understudied genus and highlights the potential of Myroides to emerge as a broader cause of recalcitrant opportunistic infections.

Introduction

The genus Myroides, first isolated in 1923 in feces of patients with gastrointestinal infections [1], belongs to phylum Bacteroidota, class Flavobacteriia, order Flavobacteriales and family Flavobacteriaceae. Myroides is comprised of 13 species in NCBI Taxonomy Browser, which comprise Myroides albus, Myroides fluvii, Myroides gitamensis, Myroides guanonis, Myroides indicus, Myroides injenensis, Myroides marinus, Myroides odoratimimus, Myroides odoratus, Myroides oncorhynchi, Myroides pelagicus, Myroides phaeus and Myroides profundi [2, 3]. Myroides was initially included within Flavobacterium genus, specifically Flavobacterium odoratum and described by Stutzer in 1929, however, Vancanneyt and coworkers reclassified it and created a new genus, Myroides [4]. The given name came from Greek noun mýron which means perfume and Latin suffix oides means similar, shape, form or resembling (used in taxonomy), therefore Myroides resembling perfume, this due to the sweet odor, like fruits, characteristics in this genus [5]. It is an aerobic strict, thus is positive for oxidase and catalase activity, Gram-negative rod, 0.5 x 1–2 μm, non-motile, including gliding. Growing conditions characterizes its ability to grow on MacConkey agar and non-hemolysis production, growth at 18–22° C, and 37° C. Myroides produces, in the most of times, yellow or orange colonies [5].

Clinically, only four species of Myroides (M. odoratimimus, followed by M. odoratus. M. injenensis and M. phaeus) have been related with different infections such as endocarditis, pericarditis, urinary tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, ventriculitis, liver abscesses and bacteremia, either in immunocompromised or immunocompetent host, as well [69]. The number of reported infections by Myroides species have been documented in a major frequency due the employment of more sensible and reliable techniques, such as matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and 16S ARN sequencing; Myroides species have been reported specially in hospital outbreaks causing catheter related urinary tract infections [10, 11] associate, probable, to some factors such as prolonged use of antibiotics, immunosuppression, and invasive procedures [12]. Furthermore, it is linked to multiple antimicrobial resistance mechanisms [13]. However, as data expands, there must be more species associated with different infections that might be added, in this sense, information, either microbiological or genetic, is limited and impact of Myroides spp., infections are not well understood, therefore, the role of infections is poorly documented. The aim of this work was to describe the microbiological and genetic characteristics of seven different Myroides spp. clinical strains and comment on their phylum, pathogenic and resistance characteristics.

Material and methods

Clinical strains

We conducted a retrospective study seeking Myroides spp., isolates from a tertiary care Hospital in Mexico City. We included all strains isolated from invasive samples, including blood cultures, lower respiratory samples, abscesses, and tissue biopsies, over an eleven-year period from 1/January/2012 to 1/January/2023 and were accessed for research on 15/May/2023. Duplicated samples were excluded. The collection and sample processing were conducted at Clinical Microbiology Laboratory at Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra in Mexico City. All isolates were stored at -70°C and subsequently inoculated onto 5% sheep blood agar prior to their use. Identification at the beginning was performed with the Vitek 2 compact (BioMérieux, Marcy ′Étoile, France) and was confirmed with Vitek MS (MALDI-ToF, (BioMérieux, Marcy ′Étoile, France)) following manufacturer’s recommendations. Information from clinical records was obtained. Current work only involves clinical strains obtained by the typical procedures and guidelines, however, the strains used, and the experimental plan was approved by the research committee of the Institute with the assigned number 55/22 AC.

Minimal inhibitory concentrations determination

The antibiotics evaluated were: Amikacin (AK), Gentamicin (GN), Aztreonam (ATM), Ceftazidime (CAZ), Cefepime (FEP), Ciprofloxacin (CIP), Levofloxacin (LVX), Meropenem (MEM), Imipenem (IMP), Colistin (CL), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (TZP), azithromycin (AZT), Erythromycin (E), Doxycycline (DO), Tigecycline (TYG) and Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SXT) (Sigma Aldrich, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA). Broth microdilution assay was performed following the recommendations by the CLSI [14]. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used for quality control. Due breakpoints are not defined for Myroides spp., neither in CLSI or EUCAST MIC was defined as the lowest concentration that inhibits bacterial growth. For AK, GN, ATM, CAZ and FEP concentrations tested were from 256 μg/mL to 0.25 μg/m, while for CIP, LVX, MEM, IMP, AZT, E, DOX, and TYG concentrations were 64 μg/mL to 0.0612 μg/mL. On the other hand, for COL and TZP were 128 μg/mL to 0.125 μg/mL and 128/4 μg/mL to 0.125/4 μg/mL respectively. Finally, SXT starting concentration 8/152 μg/mL to 0.00078/0.1484 μg/mL.

Phenotypic test to determine carbapenemase activity

Carbapenemase test was performed for each sample according to CLSI M100 2023 recommendation [14]. First, modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) was carried oud, briefly, colonies were harvested with a 10 μL loop and deposited into a 2 mL polypropylene tube with 1.5 mL Trypticase soy broth, then a 10 μg MEM disc added into the tube. The tubes were incubated during 4 h at 37° C. After that, E. coli ATCC 25922 pan susceptible at 0.5 McFarland Scale was inoculated onto Mueller-Hinton plates. The same strain of E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as negative control and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1705 as positive control (carbapenemase producer). The interpretation of the test was according to CLSI M100 2023 [14]. Due this method is validated just for Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a second method was performed, CARBA NP, also referred in CLSI M100 2023, briefly, two 600 μL conic tubes were labelled for each strain tested, then 100 μL of protein extraction buffer were added to each tube (a and b) and vortexed for 5 seconds and subsequently 100 μL of solution A (without IMP as substrate) and B (supplemented with IMP as substrate to carbapenemase) were added to the respective tubes labelled and again vortexed and incubated at 35° C/2 hours. Positive tests showed a change in color (yellow as positive and unchanged as negative). E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as negative control and K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1705 as positive control. The interpretation of the test was according to CLSI M100 2023 [14].

Whole genome sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted with DNeasy Blood & Tissue (QIAGEN). Once extracted, DNA quality and concentration were determined with the Qubit 3.0 fluorometer (Invitrogen, USA) and the Nanodrop One/One spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and samples were kept at -20°C, until use. Library preparation was performed using the Illumina DNA Prep (Illumina, USA) for the tagmentation, indexing and cleaning steps, as well as the employment of IDT for Illumina DNA/RNA UD Indexes (Illumina, USA) for the indexing step. Library quality control was performed using the Qubit 3.0 fluorometer (Invitrogen, USA) and the 4200 Tapestation System (Agilent, USA). Sequencing of pooled and normalized libraries was made using the MiSeq Reagent Kit V2 (300 cycles) on the Illumina MiSeq platform in a paired end configuration. Samples were sequenced at Centro Nacional de Referencia de Inocuidad y Bioseguridad Agroalimentaria from Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria [15].

Plasmid extraction and purification

In addition, plasmids were searched in all strains included. Plasmids were isolated and purified with the E.Z.N.A Plasmid DNA Mini Kit I (Omega bio-tek, Norcross, Georgia, USA). Once extracted, 5 μL of DNA were run in 1% agarose gel and visualized through Gel Doc XR+ with Image Lab Software (Bio-Rad; Hercules, California, USA), a 100 bp molecular ladder was used (Invitrogen; Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Plasmid library preparation and sequencing were performed in the same manner as for genomic DNA [15].

Genomic analysis

The Quality of the Sequenced Read Archives (SRA) generated was analyzed by using FastQC [16]. The removal of contaminations and sequences with poor Phred values <30 was conducted with Trimmomatic [17]. The SRA of each strain were assembled with SPAdes [18]. Each assembling quality were determined with QUAST [19]. The contigs of each genome were subject to the removal of sequences with coverage values <200 by using the seqtk_seq included in the sektq package [20]. A general annotation for the contigs was performed with Prokka [21]. The evaluation of the annotation based on completeness determination was conducted by using BUSCO [22].

A preliminary identification of the strains was performed with the generation of a phylogenetic tree based on the analysis of partial 16S rRNA. The sequences belonging to the 16S rRNA gene of each sequenced genome for this study were extracted by using barrnap [23]. The sequences of type strains were obtained from the non-redundant GenBank database [24]. A multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of 16S sequences was obtained with MUSCLE [25]. The Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogeny was constructed in IQTREE employing the TVM + F + I + G4 evolutionary model with Ultrafast-Bootstrap determination of 10,000 replicates [26]. The 16S-based phylogenetic trees were edited and visualized with iTOL v5 [27]. As complementary, pairwise gene identity scores were determined with Protologger [28].

The annotation of Antimicrobial Resistance Elements (ARE) was conducted with Abricate [29], by using the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) [30]. The annotation of the virulence factors (VF) was performed by using Markov Hidden Models with HMMER package [31] and custom scripts, based on the VF identified for M. odoratimimus [32]. The plasmids were extracted and typed with MOB Suite [33]; annotated and visualized with Proksee web server [34].

Results

Strains included

During the study period, a total of seven strains previously identified such as Myroides spp., which were confirmed with Vitek 2 compact and with Vitek MS, such as Myroides spp. Four isolates affected males, five cases were associated with skin and deep tissue infections as showed in Table 1.

thumbnail
Table 1. Clinical characteristics, treatment given, and outcomes of clinical strains included.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310262.t001

Treatment chosen was different for each strain including fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides and carbapenems, meanwhile for osteomyelitis the antimicrobial selected was meropenem, with different time periods depending on the type of infection.

Susceptibility patterns

The greatest resistance rates were observed for aminoglycosides (AK and GN) with MICs ≥ 256 μg/mL, followed by ß-lactams (ATM, cephalosporins and TZP). On the other hand, azithromycin had lower MICs (around 2 μg/mL the most) in comparison with erythromycin which had the higher concentration with 4 μg/mL and the lowest with 0.5 μ/mL; however, tetracyclines showed similar MICs between members assessed. The lowest MICs observed in antibiotics evaluated were in SXT as reported in Tables 2 and 3.

thumbnail
Table 2. Myroides spp. minimum inhibitory concentrations of clinical strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310262.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. Myroides spp. minimum inhibitory concentrations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310262.t003

Phenotypic test to determine carbapenemase activity

Due to high MICs values for ß-lactam antibiotics, including carbapenem, we performed phenotypic assay looking for carbapenemases presence according to CLSI guidelines M100, however, this procedure is not yet validated and standardized for microorganisms different to Enterobacterales or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We identified hydrolytic activity against MEM in EB1487, C1519, C4411 with halos < 15 mm, on the other hand, C1996 and C4256 had halos with 16 mm, according CLSI M100 definitions, for Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa this measure corresponds with the definition of inconclusive. However, with CARBA NP strain C1996 was interpreted as positive as well as C4256. Previously C4067 was defined to be negative with mCIM however, once repeated with CARBA NP was defined as positive (S1 Fig). While the rest of the strains had halos > 19 mm (negative); however, as mentioned above, this is not a validated strategy for this microorganism, so the negative result could be due to a limitation of the strategy.

Molecular identification

The phylogenetic tree reconstructed exhibited the following: four strains (C4366, EB1487, C4411 and C1996) were clustered with M. odoratimimus type strain, with an identity percentage > 99% (Fig 1), in Table 4 are included all those non-repeated sequences downloaded to build the phylogeny. Hence, the results indicate that these four strains may be identified as M. odoratimimus. By the other hand, the strain C4067 evidenced a phylogenetic relationship with Myroides marinus, however, they shared a 95.67% of identity. Likewise, the strains C2723 and C1519 were clustered in the same clade with Myroides phaeus, showing a 96.3% of identity among them; consequently, we suspect the strains of Myroides C4067, C2723 and C1519 may be cataloged as new species.

thumbnail
Fig 1. ML phylogenetic tree of the 16S rRNA sequences.

The strains evaluated in this study are marked in bold blue color into the tree. Numbers on the nodes and branches represent the Ultrafast Bootstrap values of 10,000 replicates. Scale bar represents the number of nucleotide differences between branches.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310262.g001

thumbnail
Table 4. Sequences of study for ML phylogenetic tree reconstruction.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310262.t004

Virulence Factors (VF) and Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) genes detection

A total of 15 elements associated with VF and classified in seven categories were recognized and annotated. The summary of this result is displayed in Fig 2. All elements were identified in all strains, nevertheless sodB (encoding for Superoxide dismutase) was not identified in the isolates C1519 and C2723, whereas wecC, encoding for UDP-N-acetyl-D-mannosaminuronic acid dehydrogenase was not detected in the isolate EB1487. The VF recognized maybe associated with production of capsular polysaccharide, cell wall peptidoglycan, heme biosynthesis (oxidative respiration), intracellular survival factors (ISF), chaperones, streptococcal enolase and type 4 secretion system effectors (T4SS effectors).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Virulence factors found in clinical strains of Myroides spp.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310262.g002

Also 8 kinds of elements associated with Antibiotic Resistance (ARE) were detected (Fig 3). The strains showed an average of about 15 AMR genes, exhibiting an evident multidrug resistance and harboring high diversity of AREs. The isolate Myroides spp. C4067 presented the highest diversity and content of AREs, with a total of 22 genes. On the other hand, the strain Myroides spp. C2723 exhibited the lowest content of AMR genes. In general, the drug class assigned for the AMR genes identified was congruent with the MIC profiles obtained in experimental assays. Even though the tet(X2) gene was identified in two strains, these displayed susceptibility to tetracyclines. Also, the iri and rphA, linked with rifampicin resistance were detected. The strains exhibited a significant abundance of AREs associated with ß-lactam, aminoglycosides, and glycopeptides resistance, matching with the resistance profiles to this antibiotic observed. Interestingly, all strains showed the presence of ereB, an erythromycin esterase-like associated with resistance to macrolides, despite the strains being susceptible to azithromycin. Interestingly, strains with GOB-16, a metallo ß-lactamase, were C4256, EB1487, C4067, C4411, these same strains shared another metallo ß-lactamase belonging to the IMP family (IMP-27), strain C1996 carried IMP-27 but not GOB-16. On the other hand, strains C4411 and C4256 co-carried two IMPs (IMP-27 and IMP-35) in addition to GOB-16. MUS-1 is a metallo ß-lactamase identified in Myroides present in almost all isolates except C2723 and C1519. Of the members of the oxacillinase (OXA) family with carbapenemase activity we found OXA-229 (C4411, C4067 and C4256), OXA-351 (C4067) and OXA-97 (C4256). Of the AmpC group, PDC-85 was found in C2723 and C1519. Genes associated with colistin resistance were found in mcr3.10, mcr3.6 and mcr3.7. Strains C1996, C4256, C4067 shared the presence of mcr3.6 and mcr3.7 genes. EB1487 co-carried mcr3.10 and mcr3.6 while C4411 carried only mcr3.7. Phenotypically, EB1487, C1519 and C4411 showed carbapenemase activity against meropenem.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Antimicrobial resistance elements presents in Myroides species strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310262.g003

Plasmid identification and annotation

Two plasmids were detected (S2 Fig) in the strains Myroides spp. C2723 (Plasmid ID C2723_C6) (Fig 4) and M. orodatimimus EB1487 (Plasmid ID EB1487_S7) (Fig 5). The C2723_C6 showed an approximate size of 19 Kb, whereas EB1487_S7 exhibited a size of 150 Kb. Therefore, we consider EB1487_S7 as a megaplasmid. The annotation of the plasmid showed that C2723_C6 harbors ribosomal RNA genes, as well as tRNA sequences. A total of 11 proteins were predicted, however, the annotation assigned them as hypothetical proteins.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Genomic map of the identified plasmid pM2723.

The inner circle represents the genome size per region. The outer circle marks all open reading frames and proteins predicted. Forms and letters in purple show the location of ribosomal RNA genes. Forms and letters in orange indicate the location of tRNA genes. Forms and letters in blue indicate the location of annotated and unannotated proteins.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310262.g004

thumbnail
Fig 5. Genomic map of the identified plasmid EB1487_S7.

The inner circle represents the genome size per region. The outer circle marks all open reading frames and proteins predicted. Forms and letters in purple show the location of ribosomal RNA genes. Forms and letters in orange indicate the location of tRNA genes. Forms and letters in blue indicate the location of annotated and unannotated proteins.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310262.g005

By the other hand, the EB1487_S7 also harbored ribosomal RNA and tRNA genes, and 101 proteins were predicted, of which 75 were cataloged as hypothetical proteins. Twenty-six genes were properly annotated for EB1487_S7 whose functional classification may be associated with mobile elements, DNA processing, amino acid metabolism, aerobic respiration, cell wall peptidoglycan biosynthesis, carbon metabolism, ROS defense, and membrane transport.

Discussion

Since the reclassification of Flavobacterium odoratum and the creation of the new genus Myroides by Dr. Vancanneyt M et al. in 1996 [4], very little evidence has been generated on the role of Myroides associated with infections in patients, only 43 articles were found in PubMed since 2000 using the search terms "Myroides" and "infection". Of these, bacteremia and urinary tract infection were the most frequent. The most common species were M. odoratimimus and M. odoratus [68, 10, 11, 3571]

Myroides species are typically found in immunocompromised hosts, although there have been a few cases reported in immune competent individuals [6, 68, 69]. In our series, skin, and soft tissue infections, as well as deep infections, were the most common. This is likely since we are a tertiary care hospital specializing in orthopedics, rehabilitation, and burns. Except for one patient, all were successfully treated despite having various comorbidities. The deceased patient had burn injuries and was infected with Myroides, along with other Gram-negative bacteria. Burn patients are severely immunosuppressed, making them more susceptible to infections due to the loss of their skin barrier. No previous cases of Myroides infection have been reported in burned patients.

The identification of rutinary cultures within a clinical microbiology lab is performed with miniaturized biochemistry systems such as Vitek 2 [72] (BioMérieux, Marcy ′Étoile, France) and Phoenix (Becton-Dickinson, New Jersey, USA) [43]. The introduction of instruments with larger databases and better precision and sensitivity, such as MALDI-ToF, has increased detection capacity, but even these types of systems, have methodological limitations for a suitable discrimination among species [73, 74]. Therefore, we recurred to a presumptive molecular identification of pathogens based on phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA. The phylogenetic reconstruction has been useful for other studies for resolving properly the identity of isolates belonging to Stenotrophomonas genus [15]. The use of 16S analysis as a robust tool for identification in the clinical routine is not common [75], but has been widely explored in clinical research studies for a presumptive assignment of identity to bacteria species [7679]. According to the criteria for assignment of bacterial species established by Roselló Mora [80], based on 16S-rRNA identity percentage (>97%). We proposed that four isolated species were designated as M. odoratimimus, while the strains C2723, C1519 and C4067 may be cataloged as new species of Myroides. The phylogenetic evidence as a robust tool for identification supports our predictions. Nonetheless, further studies based on a more rigorous genome-based phylogenetic analysis are needed to validate our hypothesis.

Due to the broad AMR spectrum observed in the isolates of study, we decided to identify the ARE presumptively involved in pan-drug resistance. For instance, previous reports describe that M. odoratimimus may harbor up to 32 AMR genes [32, 81, 82] of which ß-lactamases and efflux pumps are the most abundant AREs observed. From 2014 until now, the main AREs identified for Myroides spp., has been the following: ß-lactamases: blaVIM, blaIMP, blaNMD, blaOXA-78, blaOXA-209, blaOXA-347, blaKPC, blaTUS, blaEBR-1, blaMOC and blaMUS-1; tetracycline resistance: tet(X6); efflux pumps: abeS, msrB, qacH, rosA; macrolides: erm(F), ere(D) [12, 32, 55, 8385]. Here, we were able to detect the AREs aforementioned; however, it is important to highlight that the isolates analyzed in this work also displayed AREs and a phenotype associated with resistance to colistin, glycopeptides and rifampicin, a resistance trait not observed previously. These results suggest that the resistome of Myroides spp. is expanding remarkably, and probably soon the species of this genus might convert into an important health threat.

Other important trait is that multidrug resistance genotype was observed in the presumptive new species, although only M. orodatimimus, M. odoratus, M. phaeus and M. injerensis have been cataloged as relevant AMR pathogens [45, 57, 82, 83], our results indicate that the multidrug resistance phenotype possibly is highly expanded and extended in several species of Myroides. In the case of M. orodatimimus a chromosomic metallo ß-lactamase has been describe, the MUS-1 [86]. Two strains had an undetermined phenotype, however carrier, this due the phenotypic assay is not validated for bacteria different to Enterobacterales or Pseudomonas spp,

Pathogen Myroides species have been shown to possess a number of VF that are associated with a range of processes, including cell adherence, intracellular survival, and capsule production [32, 82]. Nevertheless, a more comprehensive investigation into the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenicity of Myroides spp. has yet to be conducted. Therefore, the current state of knowledge regarding the infection process and disease-causing mechanisms of Myroides is limited. Based on the identified VF, the results suggest that the isolates under study possess the ability to survive and replicate within host cells, evade phagocytic cells of the immune system, and are able to cause disease. This is a virulence trait observed in other opportunistic pathogens, including Mycobacterium spp., Pseudomonas spp., Serratia spp., and others [8789].

Certainly, our work has limitations, design nature without doubts since is centered only the background of clinical strains of Myroides spp., the number of strains included, in this sense information about prevalence around the world is limited beside we included all references published. The correlation with a in vivo model could evaluate the impact of virulence factors and the need of phenotypic methods to explore the activity of carbapenemases in this genus.

Conclusions

The Myroides genus is a rare microorganism that can cause infections in both immunosuppressed and immune competent hosts. The outcome of infection varies depending on the antimicrobial profile of the bacteria. Molecular techniques are essential for accurately identifying these bacteria, characterizing potential species, and exploring therapeutic options for achieving clearance of infections. More studies are needed to prove that strains C2723, C1519 and C4067 are new species within the Myroides genus. Finally, the species analyzed in the present work showed reduced susceptibility patterns for aminoglycosides, ß-lactams, cyclic lipopeptides, this was corroborated with the genes found in the genome, therefore, susceptibility tests should be performed in the clinical microbiology laboratory and the Infectious diseases specialists staff should consider these susceptibility patterns for the treatment scheme of patients suffering infections by microorganisms of this genus.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. CARBA NP in Myroides spp. clinical strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310262.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Plasmids extracted from Myroides spp. clinical strains.

MWM: Molecular weight marker.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310262.s002

(DOCX)

S1 Raw image. Plasmids extracted from Myroides spp. clinical strains.

MWM: Molecular weight marker. (Raw data, letters were added with the transilluminator software).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310262.s003

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

To SENASICA and WHO Collaborating Centre on Antimicrobial Resistance in Foodborne and Environmental Bacteria (MEX-33), especially Mayrén Zamora Nava and all the sequencing and bioinformatics staff for helping us to sequence our samples.

References

  1. 1. Stutzer MJ. Zur Frage Über die Fäulnisbakterien im Darm. Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infekt Hyg. 1923;91: 87–90.
  2. 2. Schoch CL, Ciufo S, Domrachev M, Hotton CL, Kannan S, Khovanskaya R, et al. NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database. 2020;2020. pmid:32761142
  3. 3. NCBI. Taxonomy browser (Myroides). In: Myroides. 2023.
  4. 4. Vancanneyt M, Segers P, Torck U, Hoste B, Bernardet J-F, Vandamme P, et al. Reclassification of Flavobacterium odoratum (Stutzer 1929) Strains to a New Genus, Myroides, as Myroides odoratus comb. nov. and Myroides odoratimimus sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996;46: 926–932.
  5. 5. Bergey’s Manual® of Systematic Bacteriology. Bergey’s Manual® of Systematic Bacteriology. Springer New York; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68572-4
  6. 6. Benedetti P, Rassu M, Pavan G, Sefton A, Pellizzer G. Septic shock, pneumonia, and soft tissue infection due to Myroides odoratimimus: report of a case and review of Myroides infections. Infection. 2011;39: 161–165. pmid:21246247
  7. 7. Lu Y, Xia W, Zhang X, Ni F, Mei Y. A Confirmed Catheter-Related Blood Stream Infection (CRBSI) in an Immunocompetent Patient Due to Myroides odoratimimus: Case Report and Literature Review. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;Volume 13: 139–144. pmid:32021328
  8. 8. Prateek S. Fatal Case of Pericardial Effusion Due to Myroides Odoratus: A Rare Case Report. J Clin DIAGNOSTIC Res. 2015. pmid:26672889
  9. 9. Bachman KH, Sewell DL, Strausbaugh LJ. Recurrent Cellulitis and Bacteremia Caused by Flavobacterium odoratum. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22: 1112–1113. pmid:8783727
  10. 10. Ktari S, Mnif B, Koubaa M, Mahjoubi F, Ben Jemaa M, Mhiri MN, et al. Nosocomial outbreak of Myroides odoratimimus urinary tract infection in a Tunisian hospital. J Hosp Infect. 2012;80: 77–81. pmid:22099498
  11. 11. Yağcı A, ÇerikÇioğlu N, Kaufmann ME, Malnick H, Söyletir G, Babacan F, et al. Molecular Typing of Myroides odoratimimus (Flavobacterium odoratum) Urinary Tract Infections in a Turkish Hospital. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;19: 731–732. pmid:11057514
  12. 12. Aygar IS, Aydogan CN, Ozcan H, Unat I, Fatsa T, Tekin K, et al. Myroides odoratimimus: a New Threat with Persistent Infections, Multidrug Resistance, and the Potential for Hospital Outbreaks. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2023;76: JJID.2023.005. pmid:37394461
  13. 13. Gunzer F, Rudolph WW, Bunk B, Schober I, Peters S, Müller T, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of a large collection of Myroides odoratimimus and Myroides odoratus isolates and antimicrobial susceptibility studies. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7: 1–8. pmid:29618738
  14. 14. Institute C and LS. CLSI. M100. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Second Informational Supplement. 33rd ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standars Institute; 2023.
  15. 15. Méndez-Sotelo BJ, Delgado-Beltrán M, Hernández-Durán M, Colín-Castro CA, Esquivel-Bautista J, Ortega-Oliva SA, et al. In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, cefiderocol, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical strains of the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex. Osman M, editor. PLoS One. 2024;19: e0298577. pmid:38635685
  16. 16. Andrews Simon. Babraham Bioinformatics—FastQC A Quality Control tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Soil. 2020. pp. 47–81.
  17. 17. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 2114–2120. pmid:24695404
  18. 18. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: A New Genome Assembly Algorithm and Its Applications to Single-Cell Sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19: 455–477. pmid:22506599
  19. 19. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29: 1072–1075. pmid:23422339
  20. 20. Seatk: Toolkit for processing sequences in FASTA/Q formats. [https://github.com/lh3/seqtk].
  21. 21. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 2068–2069. pmid:24642063
  22. 22. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva E V., Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31: 3210–3212. pmid:26059717
  23. 23. Seemann Torsten. tseemann/barrnap::microscope: Bacterial ribosomal RNA predictor. In: GitHub. 2018.
  24. 24. Sayers EW, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Ostell J, Pruitt KD, Karsch-Mizrachi I. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019. pmid:30365038
  25. 25. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32: 1792–1797. pmid:15034147
  26. 26. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: A Fast and Effective Stochastic Algorithm for Estimating Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32: 268–274. pmid:25371430
  27. 27. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49: W293–W296. pmid:33885785
  28. 28. Hitch TCA, Riedel T, Oren A, Overmann J, Lawley TD, Clavel T. Automated analysis of genomic sequences facilitates high-throughput and comprehensive description of bacteria. ISME Commun. 2021;1. pmid:36732617
  29. 29. Seeman T. GitHub—tseemann/abricate::mag_right: Mass screening of contigs for antimicrobial and virulence genes. In: GitHub. 2020.
  30. 30. Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M, Edalatmand A, et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019. pmid:31665441
  31. 31. Eddy SR. Accelerated Profile HMM Searches. Pearson WR, editor. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7: e1002195. pmid:22039361
  32. 32. Hu S, Cao L, Wu Y, Zhou Y, Jiang T, Wang L, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of Myroides odoratimimus isolates. Microbiologyopen. 2019;8. pmid:29797432
  33. 33. Robertson J, Nash JHE. MOB-suite: software tools for clustering, reconstruction and typing of plasmids from draft assemblies. Microb Genomics. 2018;4. pmid:30052170
  34. 34. Grant JR, Enns E, Marinier E, Mandal A, Herman EK, Chen C, et al. Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51: W484–W492. pmid:37140037
  35. 35. Paek J, Shin JH, Shin Y, Park I-S, Jin T-E, Kook J-K, et al. Myroides injenensis sp. nov., a new member isolated from human urine. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015;107: 201–207. pmid:25515411
  36. 36. Endicott-Yazdani TR, Dhiman N, Benavides R, Spak CW. Myroides Odoratimimus Bacteremia in a Diabetic Patient. Baylor Univ Med Cent Proc. 2015;28: 342–343. pmid:26130883
  37. 37. Lahmer T, Beitz A, Ehmer U, Schmid RM, Huber W. Septic shock due to Myroides odoratus in a medical intensive care unit patient with severe necrotising pancreatitis. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2016;44: 298–9. pmid:27029668
  38. 38. Jover-Sáenz A, Pérez-Villar F, Barcenilla-Gaite F. Sepsis grave por infección de prótesis articular por Myroides odoratimimus. Med Clin (Barc). 2016;147: 276–277. pmid:27207242
  39. 39. Ali MJ, Joseph J, Sharma S, Naik MN. Canaliculitis With Isolation of Myroides Species. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;33: S24–S25. pmid:26669295
  40. 40. Willems P, Muller J, Verhaegen J, Saegeman V, Desmet S. How to treat a fulminant erysipelas and sepsis caused by Myroides odoratimimus: case report and literature review. Acta Clin Belg. 2017;72: 331–335. pmid:27765000
  41. 41. Pompilio A, Galardi G, Gherardi G, Verginelli F, Geminiani C, Pilloni AP, et al. Infection of recurrent calcaneal ulcer caused by a biofilm-producer Myroides odoratimimus strain. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2018;63: 203–207. pmid:28956275
  42. 42. Licker M, Sorescu T, Rus M, Cirlea N, Horhat F, Jurescu C, et al. Extensively drug-resistant Myroides odoratimimus–a case series of urinary tract infections in immunocompromised patients. Infect Drug Resist. 2018;Volume 11: 743–749. pmid:29849466
  43. 43. Lorenzin G, Piccinelli G, Carlassara L, Scolari F, Caccuri F, Caruso A, et al. Myroides odoratimimus urinary tract infection in an immunocompromised patient: an emerging multidrug-resistant micro-organism. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018;7: 96. pmid:30094005
  44. 44. Ahamed I, Annapandian V, Muralidhara K. Myroides odoratimimus urinary tract infection. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant. 2018;29: 1220. pmid:30381524
  45. 45. LaVergne S, Gaufin T, Richman D. Myroides injenensis Bacteremia and Severe Cellulitis. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6. pmid:31334299
  46. 46. Meyer A, Dang H, Roland W. Myroides spp. cellulitis and bacteremia: A case report. IDCases. 2019;18: e00638. pmid:31538047
  47. 47. Choudhary M, Choudhary BK, Bera BC, Chaudhari SP, Giri DK, Ghosh RC, et al. Association of Myroides odoratimimus in immunocompromized piglets with post weaning multisystemic wasting syndrome. J Appl Microbiol. 2019;127: 1635–1645. pmid:31517421
  48. 48. Yang S, Liu Q, Shen Z, Wang H, He L. Molecular Epidemiology of Myroides odoratimimus in Nosocomial Catheter-Related Infection at a General Hospital in China. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;Volume 13: 1981–1993. pmid:32612373
  49. 49. Kutlu HH, Avcı M, Dal T, Arı O, Durmaz R. A healthcare-associated outbreak of urinary tract infections due to Myroides odoratimimus. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2020;73: 421–426. pmid:33208588
  50. 50. Foo RM, Nanavati SM, Samuel A, Lamm R, Upadhyay S. Gardener’s Nightmare: A Rare Case of Myroides-Induced Septic Shock. Cureus. 2020. pmid:33500858
  51. 51. Beathard WA, Pickering A, Jacobs M. Myroides cellulitis and bacteremia: A case report. IDCases. 2021;24: e01061. pmid:33850715
  52. 52. Cruz-Choappa R, López E, Ocara M, Leiva Y. Myroides odoratimimus, una causa infrecuente de infección de tejidos blandos y osteomielitis. Rev Chil infectología. 2021;38: 297–299. pmid:34184722
  53. 53. Pérez-Lazo G, Morales-Moreno A, Soto-Febres F, Jove-Químper H, Morales-Castillo L, Palomares-Reyes C, et al. First report of Myroides phaeus bacteraemia identified by Polymerase chain reaction and genetic sequencing. IDCases. 2020;19: e00695. pmid:32021799
  54. 54. Vempuluru V, Mitra S, Tripathy D, Mohapatra S, Rath S. Isolation of unusual bacteria in canaliculitis: A series of four cases. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2021;35: 66. pmid:34667936
  55. 55. Kurt AF, Mete B, Houssein FM, Tok Y, Kuskucu MA, Yucebag E, et al. A pan-resistant Myroides odoratimimus catheter-related bacteremia in a COVID-19 patient and review of the literature. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2022. pmid:35312630
  56. 56. Faraz A, Fathima K, Kazmi SY, Al Motery AS, Bin Ghaffar U, Farhan MA. Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in a Renal Transplant Patient by Pan-resistant Myroides Spp. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2022;32: S34–S36. pmid:35633005
  57. 57. O’Neal M, Labay CE, Harris JE, Musick WL, Cernoch PL, Grimes KA, et al. Extensively Drug-Resistant Myroides odoratus in Critically Ill Patients: A Case Series and Literature Review. Cui D, editor. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2022;2022: 1–7. pmid:35873406
  58. 58. Alberola Romano A, Gómez-Camarasa C, Pérez Rodríguez L, Vázquez Blanquiño A, Chueca Porcuna N. Myroides odoratus as an unusual urinary tract infection pathogen in immunosuppressed patient. Rev Española Quimioter. 2022. pmid:36183239
  59. 59. Jiang L-Z, Shen Y, Liang F, Ye X-M, Chen J, Yu Y-M. Intracranial Myroides odoratimimus Infection After EVD Successfully Treated with Intravenous Plus Intraventricular Tigecycline: A Case Report. Infect Drug Resist. 2023;Volume 16: 1955–1963. pmid:37034395
  60. 60. Khan U, Pandey E, Gandham N, Das N, Mukhida S, Kannuri S, et al. A case series and literature review of infections due to Myroides spp.: identification of contributing factors and emerging antibiotic susceptibility trends. Access Microbiol. 2023;5. pmid:37323940
  61. 61. Echevarría-Castro N, Matayoshi-Pérez A, Silva-Parra KA, Rojo-García D, Cucho Espinoza C. Cutaneous Infection Associated With Myroides odoratimimus Bacteremia in a Diabetic Patient. Cureus. 2023. pmid:37539412
  62. 62. Do S, Rebentish A, Ravichandran Kumar P. Case Report of Myroides odoratimimus Cellulitis in Chronic Venous Stasis Dermatitis With Literature Review. Cureus. 2023. pmid:37846255
  63. 63. Chapman C, Meeks B, Ung L, Nichols J. A Case of Myroides odoratimimus Bacteremia due to a Tunneled Dialysis Catheter-Associated Infection in a Paraplegic Patient. Adnan M, editor. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2023;2023: 1–3. pmid:38020519
  64. 64. Sahu C, Patel SS, Chaudhary R, Bhartiya C, Bhatnagar N. A Retrospective Study on UTI by Myroides Species: An Emerging Drug Resistant Nosocomial Pathogen. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024;28: 399–403. pmid:38585315
  65. 65. Belloir L, Billy PA, Hentgen C, Fille A, Barrans A. Bactériémie à Myroides odoratimimus. Médecine Mal Infect. 2016;46: 396–397. pmid:27292170
  66. 66. Beharrysingh R. Myroides bacteremia: A case report and concise review. IDCases. 2017;8: 34–36. pmid:28331806
  67. 67. Green Bryan T., Kevin Green P. Myroides odoratus Cellulitis and Bacteremia: Case Report and Review. Scand J Infect Dis. 2001;33: 932–934. pmid:11868770
  68. 68. Bachmeyer C, Entressengle H, Khosrotehrani K, Goldman G, Delisle F, Arlet G, et al. Cellulitis due to Myroides odoratimimus in a patient with alcoholic cirrhosis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007; 071202194819001-??? pmid:18039344
  69. 69. Maraki S, Sarchianaki E, Barbagadakis S. Myroides odoratimimus soft tissue infection in an immunocompetent child following a pig bite: case report and literature review. Brazilian J Infect Dis. 2012;16: 390–392. pmid:22846131
  70. 70. Deepa R, Venkatesh K, Parveen JD, Banu ST, Jayalakshmi G. Myroides odoratus and Chryseobacterium indologenes: Two rare isolates in the immunocompromised. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2014;32: 327–330. pmid:25008832
  71. 71. Crum-Cianflone NF, Matson RW, Ballon-Landa G. Fatal case of necrotizing fasciitis due to Myroides odoratus. Infection. 2014;42: 931–935. pmid:24806817
  72. 72. Schröttner P, Rudolph WW, Eing BR, Bertram S, Gunzer F. Comparison of VITEK2, MALDI-TOF MS, and 16S rDNA sequencing for identification of Myroides odoratus and Myroides odoratimimus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;79: 155–159. pmid:24666701
  73. 73. McElvania TeKippe E, Burnham C-AD. Evaluation of the Bruker Biotyper and VITEK MS MALDI-TOF MS systems for the identification of unusual and/or difficult-to-identify microorganisms isolated from clinical specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33: 2163–2171. pmid:24962194
  74. 74. Angeletti S, Dicuonzo G, Avola A, Crea F, Dedej E, Vailati F, et al. Viridans Group Streptococci Clinical Isolates: MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry versus Gene Sequence-Based Identification. Chen JH-K, editor. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0120502. pmid:25781023
  75. 75. Patel J. 16S rRNA gene sequencing for bacterial pathogen identification in the clinical laboratory. Mol Diagnosis. 2001;6: 313–321. pmid:11774196
  76. 76. Drancourt M, Bollet C, Carlioz A, Martelin R, Gayral J-P, Raoult D. 16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence Analysis of a Large Collection of Environmental and Clinical Unidentifiable Bacterial Isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38: 3623–3630. pmid:11015374
  77. 77. Sturt AS, Yang L, Sandhu K, Pei Z, Cassai N, Blaser MJ. Streptococcus gallolyticus Subspecies pasteurianus (Biotype II/2), a Newly Reported Cause of Adult Meningitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48: 2247–2249. pmid:20357211
  78. 78. Church DL, Cerutti L, Gürtler A, Griener T, Zelazny A, Emler S. Performance and Application of 16S rRNA Gene Cycle Sequencing for Routine Identification of Bacteria in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020;33. pmid:32907806
  79. 79. Vashisht V, Vashisht A, Mondal AK, Farmaha J, Alptekin A, Singh H, et al. Genomics for Emerging Pathogen Identification and Monitoring: Prospects and Obstacles. BioMedInformatics. 2023;3: 1145–1177.
  80. 80. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106: 19126–19131. pmid:19855009
  81. 81. Ming D, Chen Q, Chen X. Analysis of resistance genes in pan-resistant Myroides odoratimimus clinical strain PR63039 using whole genome sequencing. Microb Pathog. 2017;112: 164–170. pmid:28916321
  82. 82. Yartasi E, Durmaz R, Ari O, Mumcuoglu I, Dinc B. Molecular characterization of the multi-drug resistant Myroides odoratimimus isolates: a whole genome sequence-based study to confirm carbapenem resistance. Int Microbiol. 2023. pmid:38127105
  83. 83. Liu D, Zhai W, Song H, Fu Y, Schwarz S, He T, et al. Identification of the novel tigecycline resistance gene tet(X6) and its variants in Myroides, Acinetobacter and Proteus of food animal origin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75: 1428–1431. pmid:32068864
  84. 84. Pompilio A, Galardi G, Verginelli F, Muzzi M, Di Giulio A, Di Bonaventura G. Myroides odoratimimus Forms Structurally Complex and Inherently Antibiotic-Resistant Biofilm in a Wound-Like in vitro Model. Front Microbiol. 2017;8. pmid:29312264
  85. 85. Xu S, Chen Y, Fu Z, Li Y, Shi G, Xu X, et al. New Subclass B1 Metallo-β-Lactamase Gene from a Clinical Pathogenic Myroides odoratus Strain. Microb Drug Resist. 2018;24: 909–914. pmid:29227741
  86. 86. Mammeri H, Bellais S, Nordmann P. Chromosome-Encoded β-Lactamases TUS-1 and MUS-1 from Myroides odoratus and Myroides odoratimimus (Formerly Flavobacterium odoratum), New Members of the Lineage of Molecular Subclass B1 Metalloenzymes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46: 3561–3567.
  87. 87. Qin S, Xiao W, Zhou C, Pu Q, Deng X, Lan L, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pathogenesis, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, interaction with host, technology advances and emerging therapeutics. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7: 199. pmid:35752612
  88. 88. Kurz CL. Virulence factors of the human opportunistic pathogen Serratia marcescens identified by in vivo screening. EMBO J. 2003;22: 1451–1460. pmid:12660152
  89. 89. Gonzalez-Perez MN, Murcia MI, Parra-Lopez C, Blom J, Tauch A. Deciphering the virulence factors of the opportunistic pathogen Mycobacterium colombiense. New Microbes New Infect. 2016;14: 98–105. pmid:27818776