Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales in human health: Experience from the tricycle project, Ghana

  • Noah Obeng-Nkrumah,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, School of Biomedical and Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana

  • Appiah Korang-Labi,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana

  • Paul Kwao,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, School of Biomedical and Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana

  • Beverly Egyir,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Bacteriology Department, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana

  • Benjamin D. Nuertey,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Community Health Department, University of Ghana Medical School, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana

  • George Hedidor,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation World Health Organization- Ghana Office, Ghana

  • Gifty Boateng,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation National Public Health and Reference Laboratory, Korle Bu, Ghana

  • Kwaku Asah-Opoku,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ghana Medical School, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana

  • Thomas Dankwah,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Korle Bu, Ghana

  • Esther Okine,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Korle Bu, Ghana

  • Japheth A. Opintan

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    jaopintan@ug.edu.gh

    Affiliation Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana

Abstract

Background

Vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women, are at increased risk of potentially life-threatening infections with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) for both mother and newborn. However, data regarding ESBL-E carriage and associated risk factors in Ghanaian pregnant women remain scarce.

Objective

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of ESBL-E carriage and its associated risk factors among pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital.

Methods

A systematic sample of 700 pregnant women with gestational age ≥ 34 weeks attending the antenatal clinic at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital was included in the study. After administering a structured questionnaire to assess potential risk factors associated with ESBL-E carriage, patients were given a sterile stool container to submit at least 1 g of stool specimen. Recovered isolates from faecal specimens were identified using MALDI-TOF-MS technology. These isolates were then subjected to susceptibility testing and ESBL identification. A random subset of 24 ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates was whole-genome sequenced on the MiSeq Illumina platform. Risk factors associated with ESBL-E carriage were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results

Among the 700 pregnant women, 42% (294) carried ESBL-E. The predominant ESBL-producing Enterobacterales were Escherichia coli (95%). Fifty percent (50%) of ESBL-E were multidrug resistant isolates (MDRs). Whole-genome sequencing of 24 ESBL-producing E. coli isolates revealed that blaCTX-M-15 (96%) was the most prevalent ESBL gene type. Notably, most isolates belonged to commensal phylogenetic groups (A, B1, and C; 88%). Having a primary level of education (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.05–1.96) and consuming legumes as the main source of protein (aOR 0.17, 0.40–0.83) were significantly associated with intestinal carriage of ESBL-E.

Conclusion

This study identified a high prevalence of ESBL-E and MDR-ESBL-E carriage among pregnant women. Our findings underscore the urgent need for public health interventions to control the spread of AMR.

Introduction

Treatment options for community-acquired Gram-negative infections are increasingly becoming limited as the frequency of community-acquired infections caused by Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase producing-Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) increases [1]. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases are enzymes that hydrolyse antibiotics containing a beta-lactam ring, including penicillins, broad-spectrum cephalosporins, and monobactams, except for carbapenems [2, 3]. ESBL-E often exhibit multi-drug resistance, affecting second-line antibiotic therapy for common community-acquired infections like urinary tract infections (UTIs) [4, 5]. The emergence of ESBL-E present a significant concern for vulnerable populations, particularly pregnant women who face a heightened risk of infections alongside their newborns [6, 7]. Some studies have reported reduced susceptibility to bacterial infections, including ESBL-E-associated urinary tract infections (UTIs) in pregnant women compared to their post-partum counterparts, potentially due to compromised immunity during pregnancy [6]. Colonization by ESBL-E in pregnant women is one of the key risk factors for infection with antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) [8]. In addition, colonized pregnant women may also serve as a source of transmission to their newborns [9]. A critical knowledge gap exists in Ghana regarding the prevalence and associated risk factors for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) carriage among pregnant women. This lack of data is particularly concerning given the potential for vertical transmission of these resistant bacteria to newborns, possibly leading to adverse health outcomes. Closing this gap is critical, as improving maternal and child health outcomes is a key deliverable within the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [10]. This study determined the prevalence of ESBL-E carriage and its associated risk factors among pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital.

Methods

Study design and setting

This was a cross-sectional surveillance study conducted between December 2021 and November 2022 at the antenatal clinic of the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department of the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH). The KBTH is a 2000-bed tertiary referral healthcare facility in Ghana, with approximately 200 daily admissions. This Obstetrics and Gynaecology department houses 240 beds dedicated to obstetric care and 114 beds for gynaecological care. The department serves the antenatal clinics, labour wards, post-natal clinics, and the gynaecology unit. The antenatal clinic records an average daily attendance of 80 pregnant women, with about 70% (n = 56/80) of them having a gestational period ≥ 34 weeks, and the clinic operates five days a week. The study was well explained to the participants in their native language, allowing them to accept or decline the opportunity to be involved in this study.

Study participants, sampling size and sampling procedure

Consenting pregnant women with gestational age ≥ 34 weeks attending the antenatal clinic at the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department were included in the study. Pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic on account of obstetric and medical emergencies or exhibiting obvious signs of acute illness were excluded from the study. Using the guidelines from the ESBL-Ec tricycle project, 100 pregnant were recruited in 2021 and an additional 600 participants were recruited in 2022 [11, 12]. A systematic sampling technique was employed to recruit study participants. The sampling was done by selecting one sampling day each week. A starting day was selected from this day, and the next sampling day was shifted forward to the following day in the subsequent weeks. For example, if the starting point was Monday, the next sampling day was Tuesday the following week, Wednesday the next week, and so on. This sampling was iterated until the sample size was attained throughout the year. Selected participants provided informed written consent. Faecal specimens were collected, and a questionnaire was administered to evaluate risk factors for intestinal carriage of ESBL-E. A chronological overview of the study methods is provided in S1 Fig.

Data collection tool

A standardized questionnaire was administered to collect participant demographics, lifestyle and hygienic practises and relevant clinical data towards the analysis of risk factors of ESBL-E carriage [1, 13, 14]. Data collected included socio-demographic data (e.g., age, gender, place of residence, marital status), patient lifestyle and hygienic practises (toilet facility at home, type of toilet facility, hand washing with soap after defecation, hand washing with soap before eating, frequency of bathing, use of treated drinking water), hospitalization history in the past year, antibiotic use within the past three and current months, gestational age and household size.

Sample collection and laboratory investigation

Patients were given a sterile stool container and instructed to self-collect and submit at least 1 g of stool sample. Following sampling, the stool samples were transported to the laboratory within 2 hours after collection. Faecal samples were then inoculated on MacConkey agar (Sigma, UK) supplemented with 4 μg/mL cefotaxime (Sigma, UK) and incubated aerobically at 35–37 °C for 16–18 hours for the initial selection of 3rd generation cephalosporin-resistant isolates [15]. Discrete colonies of presumptive Enterobacterales isolates were tested for their reactions to routine biochemical reactions (indole test, urease test, citrate test, triple sugar iron test and motility test). Definitive identification of Enterobacterales was confirmed using the Bruker MALDI-TOF Biotyper (Bruker, USA). Phenotypic determination of ESBL production was performed using the combination disk diffusion method as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) (2023) on Mueller Hinton agar [16]. This test was performed using ceftazidime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg) and with and without clavulanate (10 μg), on Mueller Hinton Agar. Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 was used as a positive control for ESBL production. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a negative control. All ESBL-positive and negative Enterobacterales from faecal specimens were tested for their antibiotic susceptibility using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method according to guidelines by the CLSI (2023). The antibiotics were tested against the ESBL-E and Non-ESBL-E included: amoxiclav (30 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), meropenem (10 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), meropenem (10 μg), and sulfamethoxazole trimethoprim (25 μg). E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as the control strain.

Whole-genome sequencing

Twenty-four ESBL-E. coli were randomly selected by picking two isolates per month and whole genome-sequenced. Genomic DNA of the 24 ESBL-E. coli was obtained following the manufacturer’s protocol for genomic DNA extraction (QIAamp DNA Mini and Blood Mini Handbook 3rd edition, 2010). Whole-genome sequencing was performed on a MiSeq Illumina sequencer (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) using the NextEra DNA Flex Library Prep kit for library preparation (Illumina). Trimming of sequenced reads was performed using Trimmomatic v.3.0 [17]. De-novo assemblies of contigs were performed with Unicycler v0.5.0 [18]. Determination of acquired resistance genes and virulence genes was performed using ResFinder v4.2 [19], and VirulenceFinder v2.0 [20, 21]. Serotype and sequence type were determined using SerotypeFinder v2.0 [22] and pubMLST [23]. A maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed using the CSIPhylogeny v1.4 [24] and tree annotation was performed using the Interactive Tree Of Life (ITOL) v6.8.1 [25]. Determination of phylogenetic groups of sequenced isolates was performed using ClermonTyping v23.06 [26, 27].

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using STATA IC-16. Comparisons between categorical data were conducted with χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests. Point estimates of statistical significance were indicated with two-tailed p < 0.05. Univariate analyses were computed with an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI); variables with p < 0.05 were analysed in multivariate logistic regression models to determine independent associated predictor variables(s). The predictive accuracy of the models was evaluated by Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test with p < 0.05 suggesting that the model predicts accurately on average. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve > 0.7 was used to analyse the discriminatory capability of ESBL faecal carriage versus their respective controls.

Ethical approval

The study received ethical approval from the Institutional and Review Board of the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, before its commencement (KBTH-STC/IRB/000168/2021).

Results

Overall, 761 pregnant women (110 in 2021 and 651 in 2022) who met the inclusion criteria were invited to participate in the study. Of these, 61 either did not consent, provide faecal samples, or could not participate in interviews and were consequently excluded. The remaining 700 women (100 in 2021 and 600 in 2022) consented, provided faecal samples, and participated in interviews for personnel data collection, resulting in a response rate of 91.8%. The mean age of pregnant women was 32 ± 5.50 years (range, 16–42 years) (S1 Table). Among the 700 participants, 40% (n = 280) had completed primary-level education, 29% (n = 206) had completed secondary-level education, 24% (n = 169) had completed tertiary-level education, and 7% (n = 45) had no formal education. Approximately 81% (n = 567) of the participants had a toilet facility at home, 78% (n = 551) had no history of hospitalization in the past year, while 92% (n = 647) had taken no antibiotics during the same period.

Epidemiological metrics for indicators of antimicrobial resistance in faecal cultures

Overall, 364 third-generation cephalosporins-resistant Enterobacterales (3G-CrE) were recovered from the 700 faecal specimens cultured over two years. This included 349 (96%) Escherichia coli, 12 (3%) Klebsiella pneumoniae and 3 (1%) Enterobacter cloacae. Table 1 shows sample- and isolate-based metrics for ESBL-producing isolates. In 2021, the prevalence of third-generation cephalosporin Enterobacterales with growth of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales was 83.3% (n = 57/68) compared to 80.1% (n = 237/296) in 2022. Again in 2021, the prevalence of patient faecal specimens with growth of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli was 57.0% (n = 57/100) compared to 37.0% (n = 222/600) in 2022.

thumbnail
Table 1. Epidemiological metrics for indicators of antimicrobial resistance in faecal culture.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310058.t001

Antimicrobial resistance patterns for third-generation cephalosporin resistance ESBL-positive and negative Enterobacterales

Generally, the proportion of isolates resistant to individual beta-lactam antibiotics was similar to the resistance level observed for non-beta-lactam antibiotics (Fig 1). For example, the mean percentage resistance of Enterobacterales to beta-lactams antibiotics was 54.8 ± 39.1% (range, 7–100%), compared to 52.2 ± 27.1% (range, 15–91%) for non-beta-lactam antibiotics (p = 0.167). When the susceptibility data was compared between ESBL-positive and ESBL negative Enterobacterales, the percentage resistance to each tested antibiotic did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). Approximately 46% (n = 169/364) of the Enterobacterales were MDR. The prevalence of MDR was relatively higher among ESBL-producing strains (50%, n = 147/294) compared to non-ESBL-producing strains (31%, n = 22/70). Overall, meropenem was the most effective antibiotic against both ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative MDR Enterobacterales. Among the non-beta-lactams, chloramphenicol recorded the lowest percentage of resistance to the isolates.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Antimicrobial resistance patterns for ESBL-positive, ESBL negative, and MDR- isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310058.g001

Patient characteristics as risk factors for intestinal carriage of ESBL-E

In univariate analysis, adolescents, compared to adult pregnant women, were twice as likely to harbour ESBL-E in their intestines. Additionally, married women had slightly higher odds of ESBL-E carriage (OR 1.06) compared to single women (OR 0.94), but this difference was not statistically significant (Table 2). Pregnant women who reported consuming legumes as their primary protein source were significantly more likely to harbour ESBL-E in their intestines (p < 0.05). Additionally, pregnant women who did not wash their hands with soap after defecation had a higher risk of intestinal ESBL-E colonization (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00–1.17) compared to those who reported practising handwashing with soap after using the toilet. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that two variables were independently associated as risk factors for intestinal carriage with ESBL-E (Table 2). Primary level of education increased the risk of intestinal ESBL-E carriage by 45% (aOR, 1.45; 95% CI: 1.05–1.96). In contrast, the consumption of legumes as a main source of protein was protective against ESBL-carriage (aOR, 0.17; 95% CI: 04–0.83).

thumbnail
Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analysis of patient characteristics as possible risk factors for intestinal carriage of ESBL-E.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310058.t002

Distribution of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes

Genomic analysis of the 24 Escherichia coli isolates revealed a heterogeneous gene distribution, leading to the identification of 21 acquired antimicrobial resistance genes using the ResFinder. Genes encoding resistance to beta-lactams (CTX- M-15, CTX-M-27, TEM-1B, TEM-35, OXA-1) and aminoglycosides (aph (6)-1d, aph (3”)-1b, aadA1, aac (3)-IIb, aadA2) antibiotics were the most diverse, followed by folate inhibitors (Sul1, Sul2, dfrA12, dfrA14) and quinolones (aac (6’)-Ib-cr, qnrS1, qepA4). The most common and predominant resistance genes harboured by these isolates include CTX-M-15 (n = 23/24), qnrS1 (n = 17/24), tetA (n = 15/24) and Sul2 (n = 14/24). Furthermore, all 24(100%) ESBL-positive isolates that harboured a particular ESBL gene; CTX-M-15 (n = 23/24) and CTX-M-27 (n = 1/24) demonstrated phenotypic resistance to ceftriaxone, cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam. Also, 83% (n = 20/24) of the isolates that demonstrated phenotypic resistance to ciprofloxacin harboured a corresponding resistance gene(qnrS1), that encodes resistance to quinolones and 58% of the isolates that demonstrated phenotypic resistance to tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim harboured a resistance gene that encodes resistance to tetracyclines (tetA) and folates inhibitors (Sul2) respectively (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Distribution of acquired antibiotic resistance genes and antibiotic susceptibility patterns.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310058.g002

Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic tree was constructed using the CSIPhylogeny tool from the Centre for Genomic Epidemiology and Interactive Tree of Life (ITOL) tool to predict and annotate the evolutionary relatedness among the 24 ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and the frequently studied reference genome ASM584v2 (Escherichia coli str. K-12 substr. MG1655), based on core genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis. All 24 isolates were not closely related based on SNP difference of ≤ 10. Two (2) major clades were identified in this tree; Clade 1 and Clade 2, with Clade 2 giving rise to two major subclades 2A and 2B. Clade 1 comprises 3 taxa with 2 taxa having the same sequence type and serotype (ST38 & O153:H9). Clade 2A comprises 9 taxa with 2 sibling taxa of the same sequence type and serotype; ST167 & O101:H10. Also, Clade 2B comprises 12 taxa with 2 sibling taxa of the same sequence type and serotype; ST3580 & O8: H12 (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Phylogenetic tree showing antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes according to sequence type and serotype.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310058.g003

Discussion

The results of this study showed that 42% of pregnant women were intestinally colonized with ESBL-E. This is similar to findings from Indonesia, Malawi, Chad and Madagascar which reported an estimated ESBL-E faecal carriage prevalence of 40%, 42% 45% and 56% respectively among pregnant women [12, 2830]. This finding positions Ghana among the countries with the highest reported prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) colonization, aligning with the global trend of increasing ESBL-E carriage among community persons [28, 31]. Increasing prevalence of ESBL-E raises substantial concerns as it increases the risk of difficult-to-treat infections. Treatment of these infections may necessitate the use of last-resort antibiotics, such as carbapenems, which in turn can contribute to the development and spread of carbapenemase-resistant strains [28, 29]. Relatively high prevalence of ESBL-E among pregnant women suggests that neonates born to these women stand a high risk of developing infections with ESBL-E.

Logistic regression analysis showed that a low level of education (primary education) was a significant risk factor for ESBL-E faecal carriage in most pregnant women, consistent with studies conducted by Djuikoue et al. (2016) and Watt et al. (200) [32, 33]. The observed association between low educational levels and increased ESBL-E carriage may be attributed to lack of awareness regarding hygiene and sanitation practices, both of which have been linked to the carriage of ESBL-E [34, 35]. This study revealed that 50% of ESBL-E were multi-drug resistant isolates, which is in line with a study conducted by Antony & colleagues which reported an overall 47% multi-drug resistance isolates among ESBL-E [36]. The occurrence of non-beta-lactam antibiotic resistance among ESBL-producing Enterobacterales could be explained by a multifaceted phenomenon involving plasmid-mediated resistance gene transfer, where plasmids carrying ESBL genes often harboured additional resistance determinants, cross-resistance mechanism, efflux pump systems, and selective pressures [8, 3638]. This study further investigated the presence of acquired antibiotic resistance genes associated with ESBL production and other resistance determinants to non-beta-lactam antibiotics. The most common ESBL genes harboured by these isolates were blaCTX-M-15 (96%, n = 23/24) and blaCTX-M-27 (4%, n = 1/24). The most predominant non-beta-lactam resistance genes harboured by these isolates were blaqnrS1 (70%, n = 17/24) conferring resistance to quinolones (ciprofloxacin), blatetA (63%, n = 15/24) conferring resistance to tetracyclines (tetracycline), blaSul2 (58%, n = 14/24) conferring resistance to folate inhibitors and blaaph(6)-1d, blaaph(3”)-1b (50%, n = 12/14) conferring resistance to aminoglycosides (gentamicin, amikacin). These results are similar to the findings of the study conducted by Milenkov et al. (2021) in Madagascar [29]. The presence of ESBL and non-beta-lactam resistance genes in these organisms poses a significant challenge in managing maternal and neonatal infections, potentially leading to limited therapeutic options and resulting in increased costs of patient management, morbidity and mortality rate [7, 39, 40].

Molecular analysis revealed that the 24 ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-E) isolates belonged to a diverse set of phylogenetic groups. Multi-locus sequence typing identified 19 distinct sequence types (STs) clustered within 12 clonal complexes. Notably, 95% (n = 18/19) of the STs belonged to the commensal phylogenetic groups A, B1, and C, while the remaining 5% (n = 1/19) belonged to the pathogenic phylogenetic group D. These findings are similar to those from Madagascar and Chad, which reported a high prevalence of commensal phylogenetic groups A, B1, and C among ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from pregnant women with intestinal colonization [29, 30]. This finding could be explained by the fact that these isolates were isolated from one common source; the human intestinal tract where they are considered normal flora [41]. Consistent with the commensal nature of the isolated E. coli strains, our analysis revealed a limited number of virulence genes, primarily within the adhesin group, and a relatively low number of toxins detected. While most isolates belonged to the commensal phylogenetic group, which generally presents a lower risk of invasive disease, it is important to note that infections with commensal isolates are not uncommon [42, 43]. Also, considering their adept adaptation within the host’s gut microbiota, ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-E. coli) strains are likely to persist for extended periods, acting as significant reservoirs of resistance genes and posing a potential threat for human-to-human transmission [44]. To better understand ESBL- E. coli dissemination, we concentrated on isolates with a difference of less than 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms (n>10), which is the cut-off for closely related isolates in the literature according to Schürch et al. (2017) [45]. The core-genome-based SNP analysis showed that there were no closely related isolates present in the sampling site. However, carriers of E. coli_041 (ST3580) and E. coli_095 (ST3580) with SNPs difference of 13 shared similar antenatal appointment dates, were previously admitted in the same hospital in the past three months and had the same number of antenatal visits (n = 8) suggesting a high likelihood of a common acquisition. Our study is not without limitations. First, the study was limited to only one tertiary hospital in Ghana, and the data is less likely to be a representation of what is happening in the entire country. Second, only a limited number of ESBL-positive Enterobacterales were whole-genome sequenced and analyzed, limiting the comprehensive representation of genetic diversity and evolutionary patterns present in the larger cohort of ESBL-E.

Conclusion

This study identified a high prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) carriage among pregnant women. The study revealed a high rate of multi-drug resistance among the identified ESBL-E isolates, significantly limiting available antibiotic treatment options. These findings suggest a significant threat to both maternal and child health outcomes from ESBL-E, emphasizing the need for strict adherence to infection prevention and control strategies. This underscores the urgent need for public health interventions to control and combat the growing threat of antibiotic resistance in the country.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Visualization of the data collection process and a concise summary of the study’s results.

KBTH-Korle Bu Teaching Hospital; n-number; gest-gestation; obs&gynae dept-Obstetrics & Gynaecology department; gen-generation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310058.s001

(TIF)

S1 Table. Distribution of participants social demographics and clinical characteristics.

SD-Standard deviation; n-number, min- minimum, max- maximum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310058.s002

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staff of the Antenatal clinic, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital for their help in recruiting patients and collecting samples.

References

  1. 1. Rodríguez-Baño J, López-Cerero L, Navarro MD, de Alba PD, Pascual A. Faecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli: prevalence, risk factors and molecular epidemiology. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2008;62: 1142–1149. pmid:18641033
  2. 2. Bradford PA. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14: 933–951, table of contents.
  3. 3. Ghafourian S, Sadeghifard N, Soheili S, Sekawi Z. Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamases: Definition, Classification and Epidemiology. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2015;17: 11–22. pmid:24821872
  4. 4. Gupta K, Hooton TM, Naber KG, Wullt B, Colgan R, Miller LG, et al. International Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis and Pyelonephritis in Women: A 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2011;52: e103–e120. pmid:21292654
  5. 5. Woerther P-L, Burdet C, Chachaty E, Andremont A. Trends in Human Fecal Carriage of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases in the Community: Toward the Globalization of CTX-M. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26: 744–758. pmid:24092853
  6. 6. Bulabula ANH, Dramowski A, Mehtar S. Maternal colonization or infection with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2017;64: 58–66. pmid:28890179
  7. 7. Viet NT, Van Du V, Thuan ND, Van Tong H, Toan NL, Van Mao C, et al. Maternal Vaginal Colonization and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Bacteria in Vietnamese Pregnant Women. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10: 572. pmid:34067975
  8. 8. Thenmozhi S, Moorthy K, Sureshkumar BT, Suresh M. Antibiotic Resistance Mechanism of ESBL Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Clinical Field: A Review. 2014.
  9. 9. Kayange N, Kamugisha E, Mwizamholya DL, Jeremiah S, Mshana SE. Predictors of positive blood culture and deaths among neonates with suspected neonatal sepsis in a tertiary hospital, Mwanza- Tanzania. BMC Pediatrics. 2010;10: 39. pmid:20525358
  10. 10. Callister LC, Edwards JE. Sustainable Development Goals and the Ongoing Process of Reducing Maternal Mortality. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 2017;46: e56–e64. pmid:28286075
  11. 11. Veerappa SK. The Tricycle Project: WHO Integrated Global Surveillance on ESBL Producing.: 13.
  12. 12. Puspandari N, Sunarno S, Febrianti T, Febriyana D, Saraswati RD, Rooslamiati I, et al. Extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli surveillance in the human, food chain, and environment sectors: Tricycle project (pilot) in Indonesia. One Health. 2021;13: 100331. pmid:34632041
  13. 13. Mwandigha AM, Kamori D, Kibwana UO, Masoud S, Manyahi J, Majigo M. Fecal carriage and factors associated with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae among pregnant women at the tertiary referral hospital, Tanzania. Trop Med Health. 2020;48: 84. pmid:33061787
  14. 14. Chereau F, Herindrainy P, Garin B, Huynh B-T, Randrianirina F, Padget M, et al. Colonization of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase- and NDM-1-producing Enterobacteriaceae among pregnant women in the community in a low-income country: a potential reservoir for transmission of multiresistant Enterobacteriaceae to neonates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59: 3652–3655. pmid:25845871
  15. 15. Jacob ME, Keelara S, Aidara-Kane A, Matheu Alvarez JR, Fedorka-Cray PJ. Optimizing a Screening Protocol for Potential Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Escherichia coli on MacConkey Agar for Use in a Global Surveillance Program. Fenwick B, editor. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58: e01039–19. pmid:32434784
  16. 16. Poulou A, Grivakou E, Vrioni G, Koumaki V, Pittaras T, Pournaras S, et al. Modified CLSI Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) Confirmatory Test for Phenotypic Detection of ESBLs among Enterobacteriaceae Producing Various β-Lactamases. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2020;52: 1483–1489. pmid:24574283
  17. 17. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 2114–2120. pmid:24695404
  18. 18. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13: e1005595. pmid:28594827
  19. 19. Florensa AF, Kaas RS, Clausen PTLC, Aytan-Aktug D, Aarestrup FM. ResFinder–an open online resource for identification of antimicrobial resistance genes in next-generation sequencing data and prediction of phenotypes from genotypes. Microbial Genomics. 2022;8: 000748. pmid:35072601
  20. 20. Joensen KG, Scheutz F, Lund O, Hasman H, Kaas RS, Nielsen EM, et al. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52: 1501–1510. pmid:24574290
  21. 21. Malberg Tetzschner AM, Johnson JR, Johnston BD, Lund O, Scheutz F. In Silico Genotyping of Escherichia coli Isolates for Extraintestinal Virulence Genes by Use of Whole-Genome Sequencing Data. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2020;58: pmid:32669379
  22. 22. Joensen KG, Tetzschner AMM, Iguchi A, Aarestrup FM, Scheutz F. Rapid and Easy In Silico Serotyping of Escherichia coli Isolates by Use of Whole-Genome Sequencing Data. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53: 2410–2426. pmid:25972421
  23. 23. Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3: 124. pmid:30345391
  24. 24. Kaas RS, Leekitcharoenphon P, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. Solving the Problem of Comparing Whole Bacterial Genomes across Different Sequencing Platforms. PLOS ONE. 2014;9: e104984. pmid:25110940
  25. 25. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics. 2007;23: 127–128. pmid:17050570
  26. 26. Beghain J, Bridier-Nahmias A, Le Nagard H, Denamur E, Clermont O. ClermonTyping: an easy-to-use and accurate in silico method for Escherichia genus strain phylotyping. Microb Genom. 2018;4: e000192. pmid:29916797
  27. 27. Clermont O, Dixit OVA, Vangchhia B, Condamine B, Dion S, Bridier-Nahmias A, et al. Characterization and rapid identification of phylogroup G in Escherichia coli, a lineage with high virulence and antibiotic resistance potential. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21: 3107–3117. pmid:31188527
  28. 28. Cocker D, Chidziwisano K, Mphasa M, Mwapasa T, Lewis JM, Rowlingson B, et al. Investigating One Health risks for human colonisation with extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Malawian households: a longitudinal cohort study. The Lancet Microbe. 2023;4: e534–e543. pmid:37207684
  29. 29. Milenkov M, Rasoanandrasana S, Rahajamanana LV, Rakotomalala RS, Razafindrakoto CA, Rafalimanana C, et al. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Genetic Characterization of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Escherichia coli Isolated From Healthy Pregnant Women in Madagascar. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.786146 pmid:35003019
  30. 30. Ouchar Mahamat O, Tidjani A, Lounnas M, Hide M, Benavides J, Somasse C, et al. Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in hospital and community settings in Chad. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8: 169. pmid:31695911
  31. 31. Joo E-J, Kim SJ, Baek M, Choi Y, Seo J, Yeom J-S, et al. Fecal Carriage of Antimicrobial-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Healthy Korean Adults. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;28: 1178–1184. pmid:29913545
  32. 32. Djuikoue IC, Woerther P-L, Toukam M, Burdet C, Ruppé E, Gonsu KH, et al. Intestinal carriage of Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase producing E. coli in women with urinary tract infections, Cameroon. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2016;10: 1135–1139. pmid:27801378
  33. 33. Watt S, Lanotte P, Mereghetti L, Moulin-Schouleur M, Picard B, Quentin R. Escherichia coli Strains from Pregnant Women and Neonates: Intraspecies Genetic Distribution and Prevalence of Virulence Factors. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2003;41: 1929–1935. pmid:12734229
  34. 34. Modi D, Patel D, Patel S, Jain M, Bhatt S, VM M. Comparison of various methods for the detection of extended spectrum beta lactamase in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from neonatal intensive care unit, Ahmedabad. National Journal of Medical Research. 2012;2: 348–353.
  35. 35. Sáez-López E, Guiral E, Fernández-Orth D, Villanueva S, Goncé A, López M, et al. Vaginal versus Obstetric Infection Escherichia coli Isolates among Pregnant Women: Antimicrobial Resistance and Genetic Virulence Profile. PLOS ONE. 2016;11: e0146531. pmid:26784330
  36. 36. Antony S, Ravichandran K, Kanungo R. Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae colonising the gut of adult rural population in South India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2018;36: 488–493. pmid:30880694
  37. 37. Oktaviani Sulikah SR, Hasanah M, Setyarini W, Parathon H, Kitagawa K, Nakanishi N, et al. Occurrence of Carriage of Multidrug Resistant Enterobacteriaceae among Pregnant Women in the Primary Health Center and Hospital Setting in Surabaya, Indonesia. Microb Drug Resist. 2022;28: 48–55. pmid:34348048
  38. 38. Padmavathy K, Krishnan P, Rajasekaran S. Fluoroquinolone resistance among CTX-M producing uropathogenic Escherichia coli from HIV and non-HIV patients in South India. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2014;14: 1–1.
  39. 39. Danino D, Melamed R, Sterer B, Porat N, Gushanski A, Shany E, et al. Mother to Child Transmission of Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase Producing Enterobacteriaceae. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4: S679.
  40. 40. Herindrainy P, Rabenandrasana MAN, Andrianirina ZZ, Rakotoarimanana FMJ, Padget M, de Lauzanne A, et al. Acquisition of extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae in neonates: A community based cohort in Madagascar. PLOS ONE. 2018;13: e0193325. pmid:29494706
  41. 41. Janda JM, Lopez DL. The family enterobacteriaceae. Practical handbook of microbiology. CRC Press; 2021. pp. 353–362.
  42. 42. Dadi BR, Abebe T, Zhang L, Mihret A, Abebe W, Amogne W. Distribution of virulence genes and phylogenetics of uropathogenic Escherichia coli among urinary tract infection patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20: 108. pmid:32033541
  43. 43. Leverstein-van Hall MA, Dierikx CM, Cohen Stuart J, Voets GM, van den Munckhof MP, van Essen-Zandbergen A, et al. Dutch patients, retail chicken meat and poultry share the same ESBL genes, plasmids and strains. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2011;17: 873–880. pmid:21463397
  44. 44. Tandé D, Boisramé-Gastrin S, Münck MR, Héry-Arnaud G, Gouriou S, Jallot N, et al. Intrafamilial transmission of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica Babelsberg among the families of internationally adopted children. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2010;65: 859–865. pmid:20233775
  45. 45. Schürch AC, Arredondo-Alonso S, Willems RJL, Goering RV. Whole genome sequencing options for bacterial strain typing and epidemiologic analysis based on single nucleotide polymorphism versus gene-by-gene–based approaches. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2018;24: 350–354. pmid:29309930