Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The value of serum cystatin c in predicting acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • PeiQiang Peng ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: PeiQiang Peng, Xiao Chen Fu

    Roles Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Technology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China

  • Xiao Chen Fu ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: PeiQiang Peng, Xiao Chen Fu

    Roles Validation, Visualization

    Affiliation Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Technology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China

  • YueTing Wang,

    Roles Resources, Software

    Affiliation Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Technology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China

  • XuFei Zheng,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Technology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China

  • Linfang Bian,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Technology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China

  • Nuer Zhati,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Technology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China

  • Shuang Zhang ,

    Roles Methodology, Supervision

    zhangs@jlu.edu.cn (SZ); weiw@jlu.edu.cn (WW)

    Affiliation Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Technology, School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China

  • Wei Wei

    Roles Supervision

    zhangs@jlu.edu.cn (SZ); weiw@jlu.edu.cn (WW)

    Affiliation Urology surgery, The first hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to review relevant research and assess the diagnostic value of serum cystatin C (CysC) for post-cardiac surgery acute kidney injury (PCSAKI).

Method

We searched databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, WanFang, CNKI, VIP) for literature published up to January 10, 2024. Quality was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). Extracted data from eligible studies and summarized sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) values.

Results

A total of 24 studies involving 3,427 patients were included. The estimated diagnostic sensitivity of CysC for PCSAKI was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.57–0.76), with a specificity of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81–0.91). The positive likelihood ratio (+LR) was 5.17 (95% CI, 3.45–7.73), and the negative likelihood ratio (-LR) was 0.38 (95% CI, 0.28–0.51). The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 14 (95% CI, 7–26), the diagnostic score (DS) was 2.62 (95% CI, 1.99–3.24), and AUC was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83–0.89). The sub-analysis results indicate that gender distribution, serum storage temperature, CysC detection method, and detection time all have a significant impact on sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusion

CysC has high specificity and good sensitivity in diagnosing PCSAKI during the perioperative period, with better detection results 24 hours before surgery, making it suitable for early detection. However, whether and how CysC is commonly used in clinical diagnosis still requires further research and clinical trials.

Introduction

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a sudden loss of kidney function, characterized by elevated serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels. It commonly occurs after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, with an incidence of 30%-40%. The duration and severity of AKI are closely linked to poor patient outcomes, increasing morbidity and mortality. Even with recovery of kidney function, some patients may develop subclinical or subacute kidney disease (AKD), leading to progressive renal disease [13].

Despite the advances in AKI research, current clinical diagnostic standards remain controversial, primarily relying on elevated serum creatinine or reduced urine output [46]. However, these standards are influenced by non-renal factors such as muscle mass and surgical environment, often leading to delayed and inaccurate diagnoses [7]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for more effective diagnostic markers for acute kidney injury, especially post-cardiac surgery.

Cystatin C (CysC) has been found to be a crucial predictive biomarker for detecting acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery [8]. It is a 13-kDa endogenous cysteine protease inhibitor produced by nucleated cells at a constant rate, freely filtered in the glomerulus, and metabolized without increases due to urinary tract infections or chronic non-renal diseases like malignancies [9]. Thus, its serum concentration provides a highly sensitive estimate of glomerular filtration rate [10].

So far, despite several studies using serum CysC to predict acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery, its effectiveness remains controversial due to differences in detection time, methods, sample sizes, etc. [11]. Therefore, this study aims to systematically evaluate the diagnostic value of serum CysC for PCSAKI through meta-analysis. We opt for a bivariate model as our primary analytical approach to enhance accuracy and minimize heterogeneity effects [12].

Methods

This meta-analysis was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [13].

Data sources and search strategy

Conducted a comprehensive search for literature published on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, CNKI, and VIP databases up to January 10, 2024. We employed a search strategy to identify all trials using the following keywords: serum cystatin C or CysC, post-cardiac surgery, acute kidney injury, or renal failure. (see S1 Table for details). Additionally, we scanned the reference lists of all included studies and relevant reviews. The search was independently conducted by two researchers.

Study selection

We included all retrieved articles without restrictions on sample size or language. Initially, studies meeting the following criteria were identified:(1) Included articles with prospective cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional designs exploring serum CysC performance in PCSAKI detection. (2) Encompassed studies allowing the calculation of estimated sensitivity and specificity of serum CysC in diagnosing PCSAKI.

Two reviewers checked titles and abstracts of all citations using EndNote, followed by a full-text retrieval and reevaluation. The reference lists of reviewed articles were examined to ensure no omission of relevant studies. Any discrepancies were resolved by a third researcher.

Data extraction

A reviewer used a standardized form to extract information from each eligible study. The following information was extracted: (1) Study details: first author, publication year, country of origin, study design, sample size, and population characteristics; (2) Characteristics of study subjects: age, gender, baseline serum creatinine; (3) AKI information: AKI criteria and the number of AKI patients; (4) Serum CysC: measurement timing, measurement method, and optimal cutoff value; (5) Outcome information: sensitivity and specificity, true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), false negative (FN), and AUC value. If a study proposed more than one cutoff threshold, we used the threshold with the highest product of sensitivity and specificity.

Quality assessment of evidence

The methodological quality of these studies was independently assessed by two authors. We utilized the QUADAS-2 tool [14] to evaluate the quality of each trial. Risk of bias comprises four domains: patient selection, index test, reference test, and flow and timing. Applicability concerns encompass three domains: patient selection, index test, and reference test. Any discrepancies were resolved by a third researcher.

Data synthesis and analysis

We used a bivariate model for diagnostic test studies, offering stability with minimal additional information. This approach is especially valuable in situations with limited data, where the prior for the covariance matrix of the bivariate structure plays a crucial role, enhancing precision sensitivity and specificity, along with all hyperparameters and covariates, were accurately derived directly from the bivariate model, eliminating the need for Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling [12]. Moreover, univariate estimates of sensitivity and specificity, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), as well as the aggregated summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, can all be directly utilized for interpretation.

Calculate the 95% CI for the AUC of the SROC. Summarized +LR and -LR are derived from the summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity, respectively. We also assessed funnel plot asymmetry to effectively evaluate the degree and impact of publication and selective reporting bias in diagnostic accuracy studies. Subgroup analysis was performed considering study design, age range, gender ratio, sample storage temperature, diagnostic and testing criteria, and testing time.

Results

Search results

The initial search identified 4,277 records. After removing 523 studies due to duplicates, and further excluding 907 studies using automated tools, we screened the titles and abstracts of the remaining 2,811 studies. 44 studies underwent full-text review, with 24 ultimately included in the meta-analysis [1538] (Fig 1).

Study and patient characteristics

This study included 24 studies with a total of 3427 patients. Technical features of individual studies are in Table 1. All these studies, published between 2008 and 2023, come from diverse countries and feature varied research designs, sample sizes (ranging from 40 to 628 individuals), and population settings. It’s worth noting that these articles use different definitions for AKI. The meta-analysis includes 22 prospective cohort studies and 2 retrospective case-control studies. Twenty studies used immunofluorescence to measure serum cystatin C levels, and the other four used commercial ELISA.

thumbnail
Table 1. Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310049.t001

Quality assessment

The methodological quality of the studies according to the QUADAS-2 is summarized in Fig 2 and Table 2. The literature included in this study exhibits an overall low risk of bias and applicability concerns.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Overall level of risk of bias and applicability concerns.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310049.g002

Data synthesis

Data from 24 eligible studies, detailed in Table 3, include TP, FN, FP, and TN. The information covers Cysc measurement methods, timing, optimal cutoff values, as well as sensitivity (95% CI), specificity (95% CI), and AUC-ROC (95% CI). Serum CysC showed a sensitivity of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.57–0.76) and specificity of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81–0.91) in diagnosing PCSAKI (Fig 3). The +LR was 5.17 (95% CI, 3.45–7.73), and the -LR was 0.38 (95% CI, 0.28–0.51) (Fig 4). The diagnostic score was 2.62 (95% CI, 1.99–3.24), with an odds ratio of 13.7 (95% CI, 7.35–25.58) (Fig 5).The cross-axis plot displays sensitivity, false positive rate values, and confidence intervals for each included study. The SROC curve indicates that serum CysC1 exhibits high efficiency in the diagnosis of PCSAKI, with an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83–0.89) (Fig 6). The Fagan plot demonstrates a significant improvement in post-test probability compared to pre-test probability when using CysC as a biomarker (Fig 7). Furthermore, a good consistency of results is indicated by the proximity of the peak to the coordinates (1, 1) in the posterior density distribution plot and a funnel plot p-value above 0.05 indicates no bias risk (Fig 8).

thumbnail
Fig 3.

Forest plots illustrating overall sensitivity (left) and specificity (right) of serum cystatin C in diagnosing PCSAKI.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310049.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4.

Forest plots illustrating overall +LR (left) and -LR (right) of serum cystatin C in diagnosing.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310049.g004

thumbnail
Fig 5.

Forest plots illustrating dagnostic score (left) and odds ratio (right) of serum cystatin C in diagnosing PCSAKI.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310049.g005

thumbnail
Fig 6.

Crosshair plots of the pooled sensitivity (left) and SROC curve (right) of serum cystatin C in diagnosing PCSAKI.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310049.g006

thumbnail
Fig 7. Fagan plot: A significant improvement in post-test probability compared to pre-test probability.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310049.g007

thumbnail
Fig 8.

Posterior Density Distribution Plot (Left) and Funnel Plot (Right): Assessing Potential Bias in the Diagnosis of PCSAKI Using Serum CysC.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310049.g008

This study found significant heterogeneity in combining sensitivity and specificity. Threshold analysis with a Spearman correlation coefficient of -0.077 and a p-value of 0.680 indicated that heterogeneity was not due to threshold effects. Subgroup analyses based on various criteria were then performed, and the results are presented in Table 4.

The findings reveal that gender distribution, serum storage temperature, CysC detection method, and testing time have a substantial impact on sensitivity, specificity, and AUC area. In diagnostics, accuracy is higher in the female sample group, -80°C storage, and immunofluorescence testing. Testing more than 24 hours after surgery is superior to less than 24 hours before surgery, which, in turn, is better than less than 24 hours after surgery.

Discussion

This article reviews relevant studies and systematically evaluates the diagnostic value of serum CysC for PCSAKI. By including 24 studies with a total of 3427 patients, it was found that CysC has high specificity (0.87, 95% CI, 0.81–0.91) and moderate sensitivity (0.67, 95% CI, 0.57–0.76) in diagnosing PCSAKI during the perioperative period. The comprehensive analysis showed that the area under the SROC curve was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83–0.89), indicating that serum CysC has a high predictive value for diagnosing PCSAKI during the perioperative period.

Early diagnosis of AKI is crucial for treatment and prognosis. Currently, PCSAKI is typically diagnosed by observing elevated serum creatinine levels or reduced urine output [39]. However, existing diagnostic standards fail to meet clinical needs, as the damage may already be irreversible by the time AKI is detected [40]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for more effective methods to diagnose AKI at an earlier stage.

To achieve the goal of early prediction of PCSAKI, we divided the detection times into three subgroups: 0–24 hours preoperatively, 0–24 hours postoperatively, and 24–72 hours postoperatively. We assessed the diagnostic performance at these different time points. The results showed that the detection at 24–72 hours postoperatively had the best performance: sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.58–0.95) and specificity of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.59–0.99). The next best was 0–24 hours preoperatively: sensitivity of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.63–0.90) and specificity of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87–1.00). The worst performance was 0–24 hours postoperatively: sensitivity of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.51–0.73) and specificity of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81–0.91). Comprehensive analysis indicates that 0–24 hours postoperatively has the poorest diagnostic performance, which is not in line with the goal of early prediction. The diagnostic specificity of 0–24 hours preoperatively is similar to that of 24–72 hours postoperatively, with a narrower 95% confidence interval, indicating a more precise diagnosis, and the sensitivity is also similar. More importantly, the 0–24 hours preoperative detection allows for earlier identification of patients who may develop PCSAKI, enabling preparations for potential kidney injury. This allows medical staff to better manage potential AKI situations and save medical resources by focusing on patients who are predicted to develop PCSAKI.

To facilitate its clinical application, we analyzed the cut-off values used in the studies. The results showed that most of the studies had cut-off values concentrated around 1.2 mg/L, which could provide a reference for the establishment of future detection standards. However, the cut-off values in the included studies varied widely (ranging from 0.47 to 1.57 mg/L). Therefore, more research is needed to further standardize these values to achieve consistent diagnostic results in clinical practice.

In addition, we conducted a series of subgroup analyses to explore factors potentially influencing the CysC. We found that the sensitivity and specificity of CysC were influenced by gender, sample storage temperature, detection method, detection time, and the presence of diabetes. Firstly, our subgroup analysis revealed that CysC exhibited higher sensitivity and specificity in samples where males accounted for less than 50%. Literature reports also indicate gender differences in CysC, especially in children, which is consistent with our findings [41]. Secondly, sample storage temperature significantly affected CysC detection results. Samples stored at -70°C showed lower sensitivity and specificity compared to those stored at -80°C. This suggests that sample storage conditions should be strictly controlled in standardized detection processes. Additionally, we found that immunofluorescence detection methods have higher sensitivity and specificity relative to ELISA assay kits. Therefore, selecting appropriate detection methods is crucial for improving the diagnostic accuracy of CysC. It is noteworthy that we found a higher incidence of diabetes among PCSAKI patients, indicating that these patients are more prone to AKI, consistent with existing research findings [42, 43]. Additionally, in high-risk diabetic patients, there is a significant increase in the sensitivity and specificity of CysC detection, further supporting the close association between diabetes and PCSAKI. Therefore, we recommend considering the use of new antidiabetic medications during the perioperative period, especially those that do not harm kidney function and do not interfere with testing. This approach may have significant benefits in reducing the risk of kidney injury after cardiac surgery [44].

This study also assessed the consistency of included studies through density plot analysis, with results showing a peak close to (1, 1), indicating good consistency among the study outcomes. Funnel plot analysis revealed no publication bias, and overall quality assessment indicated high study quality. Considering potential threshold effects and the correlation between sensitivity and specificity, threshold effect analysis was conducted, which indicated no threshold effect. This suggests that the results of this study are reliable.

Strengths and limitations

This study integrated multiple research results, increased sample size, and improved the accuracy of CysC in diagnosing PCSAKI. It found that CysC can predict PCSAKI before surgery, enabling early intervention, and proposed diagnostic cutoff values for clinical use. The study also identified factors affecting CysC’s diagnosis of PCSAKI, offering guidance for precise diagnostics and ensuring result reliability through various quality control assessments.

However, studies included in this research have shown extreme variability in the diagnostic cutoff values of CysC, necessitating further clinical studies for validation and supplementation. Moreover, blind controls in some included studies were flawed, potentially affecting the objectivity of the results. Lastly, the conclusions are only applicable to patients after cardiac surgery; further research is needed to assess applicability to other patient populations.

Conclusion

Serum CysC demonstrates high specificity in the diagnosis of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery, with high sensitivity when detected within 0–24 hours preoperatively, enabling early prediction. However, further research is needed to determine its practical application in clinical settings.

Registration number

This study has been registered with PROSPERO and the registration number is CRD42024521067.

Supporting information

S2 Table. All studies identified in the literature search.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310049.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Data extracted from the primary research sources for the systematic review and meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310049.s003

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Screening summary and details of 2811 records for analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310049.s005

(DOCX)

References

  1. 1. Kashani K., Cheungpasitporn W., and Ronco C., Biomarkers of acute kidney injury: the pathway from discovery to clinical adoption. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2017. 55(8): p. 1074–1089. pmid:28076311
  2. 2. Farrar A., Acute Kidney Injury. Nurs Clin North Am, 2018. 53(4): p. 499–510. pmid:30388976
  3. 3. Mizuguchi K.A., et al., Predicting kidney disease progression in patients with acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2018. 155(6): p. 2455–2463.e5. pmid:29548590
  4. 4. Bellomo R., et al., Acute renal failure—definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care, 2004. 8(4): p. R204–12. pmid:15312219
  5. 5. Mehta R.L., et al., Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care, 2007. 11(2): p. R31. pmid:17331245
  6. 6. Ricci Z. and Romagnoli S., Acute Kidney Injury: Diagnosis and Classification in Adults and Children. Contrib Nephrol, 2018. 193: p. 1–12. pmid:29393148
  7. 7. Koyner J.L., et al., Biomarkers predict progression of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2012. 23(5): p. 905–14. pmid:22383693
  8. 8. Kiessling A.H., et al., Early postoperative serum cystatin C predicts severe acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2014. 9: p. 10. pmid:24397879
  9. 9. Wang Y. and Bellomo R., Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: risk factors, pathophysiology and treatment. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2017. 13(11): p. 697–711. pmid:28869251
  10. 10. Palevsky P.M., et al., KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Am J Kidney Dis, 2013. 61(5): p. 649–72. pmid:23499048
  11. 11. Yong Z., et al., Predictive value of serum cystatin C for acute kidney injury in adults: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort trials. Sci Rep, 2017. 7: p. 41012. pmid:28112204
  12. 12. Guo J., Riebler A., and Rue H., Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies with interpretable priors. Stat Med, 2017. 36(19): p. 3039–3058. pmid:28474394
  13. 13. Page M.J., et al., The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj, 2021. 372: p. n71. pmid:33782057
  14. 14. Whiting P.F., et al., QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med, 2011. 155(8): p. 529–36. pmid:22007046
  15. 15. Abadeer M., et al., Using Serum Cystatin C to Predict Acute Kidney Injury Following Infant Cardiac Surgery. Pediatr Cardiol, 2023. 44(4): p. 855–866. pmid:36637459
  16. 16. Che M., et al., Clinical usefulness of novel biomarkers for the detection of acute kidney injury following elective cardiac surgery. Nephron Clin Pract, 2010. 115(1): p. c66–72. pmid:20173352
  17. 17. Haase M., et al., Novel biomarkers early predict the severity of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery in adults. Ann Thorac Surg, 2009. 88(1): p. 124–30. pmid:19559209
  18. 18. Haase-Fielitz A., et al., Novel and conventional serum biomarkers predicting acute kidney injury in adult cardiac surgery—a prospective cohort study. Crit Care Med, 2009. 37(2): p. 553–60. pmid:19114878
  19. 19. Kalisnik J.M., et al., Enhanced Detection of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury by a Composite Biomarker Panel in Patients with Normal Preoperative Kidney Function. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis, 2022. 9(7). pmid:35877572
  20. 20. Kararmaz A., et al., Evaluation of acute kidney injury with oxidative stress biomarkers and Renal Resistive Index after cardiac surgery. Acta Chir Belg, 2021. 121(3): p. 189–197. pmid:31823690
  21. 21. Koyner J.L., et al., Urinary cystatin C as an early biomarker of acute kidney injury following adult cardiothoracic surgery. Kidney Int, 2008. 74(8): p. 1059–69. pmid:18650797
  22. 22. Krawczeski C.D., et al., Serum cystatin C is an early predictive biomarker of acute kidney injury after pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2010. 5(9): p. 1552–7. pmid:20538834
  23. 23. Lakhal K., et al., Early recognition of cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: lack of added value of TIMP2 IGFBP7 over short-term changes in creatinine (an observational pilot study). BMC Anesthesiol, 2021. 21(1): p. 244. pmid:34641779
  24. 24. Magro M.C. and Vattimo Mde F., Impact of cystatin C and RIFLE on renal function assessment after cardiac surgery. Biol Res Nurs, 2013. 15(4): p. 451–8. pmid:22626587
  25. 25. Prowle J.R., et al., Combination of biomarkers for diagnosis of acute kidney injury after cardiopulmonary bypass. Ren Fail, 2015. 37(3): p. 408–16. pmid:25585949
  26. 26. Ristikankare A., et al., Serum cystatin C in elderly cardiac surgery patients. Ann Thorac Surg, 2010. 89(3): p. 689–94. pmid:20172110
  27. 27. Seitz S., et al., Cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin: biomarkers for acute kidney injury after congenital heart surgery. Swiss Med Wkly, 2013. 143: p. w13744. pmid:23348800
  28. 28. Szymanowicz W., et al., Brain and Muscle Oxygen Saturation Combined with Kidney Injury Biomarkers Predict Cardiac Surgery Related Acute Kidney Injury. Diagnostics (Basel), 2021. 11(9). pmid:34573933
  29. 29. Wald R., et al., Plasma cystatin C and acute kidney injury after cardiopulmonary bypass. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2010. 5(8): p. 1373–9. pmid:20522534
  30. 30. Wang X., et al., Early serum cystatin C-enhanced risk prediction for acute kidney injury post cardiac surgery: a prospective, observational, cohort study. Biomarkers, 2020. 25(1): p. 20–26. pmid:31686541
  31. 31. Zheng J.Y., et al., Is serum cystatin C an early predictor for acute kidney injury following cardiopulmonary bypass surgery in infants and young children? Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2013. 29(9): p. 494–9. pmid:24018153
  32. 32. Liebetrau C., et al., Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) for the early detection of cardiac surgery associated acute kidney injury. Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 2013. 73(5): p. 392–9. pmid:23668886
  33. 33. Peco-Antić A., et al., Biomarkers of acute kidney injury in pediatric cardiac surgery. Clin Biochem, 2013. 46(13–14): p. 1244–51. pmid:23876402
  34. 34. Zakaria M., et al., Role of serum cystatin C in the prediction of acute kidney injury following pediatric cardiac surgeries: A single center experience. Medicine (Baltimore), 2022. 101(49): p. e31938. pmid:36626503
  35. 35. Hu XH, Niu Zl, Wang J, et al., Diagnostic value of kidney injury molecular 1, cystatin C and urinary creatinine in acute kidney injury induced by cardiopulmonary bypass of congenital heart disease. Hainan Medicine, 2015. 26(13): p. 1934–1937.
  36. 36. Yong ZZ, Application of serum cystatin C in acute kidney injury [D]. Nanjing Medical University, 2017.
  37. 37. Yu CJ. Changes in Blood Cys-C and Urine Kim-1 Concentrations After Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery and Their Diagnostic Value for AKI[D]. Southern Medical University.2013.
  38. 38. Zheng XF, Study and Validation of Cystatin C in Predicting Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury and Outcomes in Surgical Patients.Shantou University[D]. 2021.
  39. 39. Ronco C., Bellomo R., and Kellum J.A., Acute kidney injury. Lancet, 2019. 394(10212): p. 1949–1964. pmid:31777389
  40. 40. Wen Y. and Parikh C.R., Current concepts and advances in biomarkers of acute kidney injury. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci, 2021. 58(5): p. 354–368. pmid:33556265
  41. 41. Liu C., et al., Age- and sex-specific reference intervals for the serum cystatin C/creatinine ratio in healthy children (0–18 years old). J Int Med Res, 2019. 47(7): p. 3151–3159. pmid:31187682
  42. 42. Hapca S., et al., The Relationship between AKI and CKD in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: An Observational Cohort Study. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2021. 32(1): p. 138–150. pmid:32948670
  43. 43. Gui Y., et al., Acute kidney injury in diabetes mellitus: Epidemiology, diagnostic, and therapeutic concepts. Faseb j, 2023. 37(4): p. e22884. pmid:36943403
  44. 44. Karakasis P., et al., Effect of tirzepatide on albuminuria levels and renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2024. 26(3): p. 1090–1104. pmid:38116693