Figures
Abstract
Background
The complex effects of Long-COVID, a syndrome marked by enduring symptoms after COVID-19 infection, with an emphasis on patients’ differing degrees of fibro fatigue (FF). Electrolyte disturbances may affect the severity of FF and may be used as a predictive tool for severe FF in Long-COVID patients.
Objective
The aim is to use the electrolyte levels for prediction of the Long-COVID patients with high FF levels.
Methods
The electrolyte levels, calcium, and magnesium, as well as albumin and C-reactive protein levels were measured in 120 Long-COVID patients and 60 controls. FF scale was used for scoring the fatigue severity in all subjects. Patients were divided into high-FF (FF score>25) and moderate-FF group (FF score<25).
Results
FF is the major effector on the serum biomarker levels. High-FF group had older people, longer disease durations, lower SpO2, higher CRP, and higher peak temperatures than the control group. High-FF group has a significant decrease in serum total and ionized calcium compared with the controls and low-FF group. After controlling the cofounders, the major factor controlling the levels of the measured biomarkers is the FF value (Partial η2 = 0.468). The ROC-AUC analysis showed that the peak body temperature, Low-SpO2, high-CRP, and low electrolytes can predict the high-FF in a patient with Long-COVID with a moderate sensitivity and specificities (61.6–70%).
Citation: Al Masoodi WTM, Radhi SW, Al-Hakeim HK, Abdalsada HK (2024) Electrolytes as predictors of fibro fatigue scores in Long-COVID patients. PLoS ONE 19(8): e0309348. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309348
Editor: Diana Laila Ramatillah, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 - Jakarta, INDONESIA
Received: March 18, 2024; Accepted: August 9, 2024; Published: August 28, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Al Masoodi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The data used in this paper is available in a public repository figshare.com with the DOI https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26654623.v1 at the link https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Wasin-Al-Masoodi--Raw_data_xlsx/26654623?file=48486631.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Long-COVID, which refers to the presence of persistent symptoms after an initial SARS-COV-2 infection, has become a complicated and difficult issue that impacts millions of people globally and lasts for a duration exceeding 12 weeks after the initial acute infection [1]. This can have long-term health and economic effects on the persons impacted and society [2]. Chronic sequelae in severe COVID-19 may be accompanied by tissue pathology (e.g., lung scarring, vascular thrombosis, post-intensive care psychological stress) that can be understood [3]. Anosmia and ageusia, which were frequent in pre-Omicron strains, are now rare for Long-COVID [4]. People with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 experience a wide range of mostly unexplained symptoms, including fatigue (sometimes with post-exertional malaise), neurocognitive dysfunction, "brain fog," sleep disturbances, and pain (myalgia, arthralgia, headache, chest pain) [3,5]. In COVID-19 survivors, fibromyalgia is common, and the risk is higher in women and those with dyspnea [6]. The primary symptom of fibromyalgia, known as myalgia, was observed in approximately 30% of individuals with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PACS) [7]. Based on 41 publications, the worldwide incidence of COVID-19 is 43% [8]. However, certain studies have indicated a higher rate of 80% [9]. Many variables have been suggested as causes of fibromyalgia, including autoimmune illnesses, infections (especially viruses), and immunization [10–12]. There have been reports that COVID-19 infection makes fibromyalgia symptoms worse [13]. The fundamental symptoms of fibromyalgia, namely fatigue and myalgia, have been widely documented in patients after their COVID-19 infection [14]. Recent results reveal Omicron variations may reduce Long- COVID’s prevalence [15]. Long-COVID can be found in people of all ages and levels of acute illness, but it is most common in Mild Acute Illness patients aged 36 to 50 who are not hospitalized [16]. Moreover, Long-COVID can significantly impact one’s quality of life, functional capacity, and workability [17]. Long-COVID alters blood cell size and stiffness, reducing oxygen transport [18]. A significant worldwide health concern is the prevalence and consequences of Long-COVID, a chronic illness that develops after SARS-CoV-2 infection [19]. Irrespective of the severity of the original sickness, persons with Long-COVID suffer from persistent symptoms, with risk being influenced by characteristics such as age, sex, and immunization status [20–22]. Several studies link Long-COVID with symptoms like fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome, underscoring the importance of customized preventative and treatment approaches [23–25]. Furthermore, the fact that some symptoms, such as neurocognitive problems, are persistent, points to a complicated course that vaccinations may not be able to entirely treat [26]. The most frequently reported symptoms associated with Long-COVID are chronic fatigue, dyspnea, affective symptoms (anxiety and depression), and cognitive impairments [1,27–33]. The studies analyzed Long-COVID patients with varying levels of fibro fatigue (FF), revealing significant differences in age, illness duration, temperature, SpO2 levels, FF-Total scores, and CRP levels, with severe FF patients exhibiting advanced age, extended disease duration, elevated body temperature, and decreased oxygen saturation [34–38]. The present study used the electrolytes as predictors for differentiation between patients with severe and moderate fibro fatigue scores. This analysis helps us understand the detailed impact of this condition. This research provides useful insights into the various features of Long-COVID, which can improve therapeutic decisions and specific interventions. In the next parts, the serum electrolytes in Long-COVID patients with moderate to high FF scores were examined and statistically analyzed for the prediction of the severity of FF in Long-COVID patients.
Subjects and methods
Subjects
This study employed case-control and retrospective cohort methodologies to compare individuals without Long-COVID to those with Long-COVID, and to evaluate the impact of acute-phase biomarkers on Long-COVID symptoms over the final three months of 2021. The study involved 120 people who had at least two symptoms of Long-COVID and had already been diagnosed with and treated for acute COVID-19 infection. The following are the criteria established by the World Health Organization (WHO) for post-COVID, which is also referred to as Long-COVID: (a) a verified infection with SARS-CoV-2; (b) symptoms that have continued beyond the initial phase of illness or emerged during the process of recovering from acute COVID-19 infection; (c) symptoms that have endured for a minimum of two months and are still present three to four months after the beginning of COVID-19; and (d) at least two symptoms that hinder daily functioning, such as fatigue, memory issues, and other symptoms [39]. During the initial stage of the infection, all patients were admitted to the Specific Quarantine Centers in Kerbala City including Al-Kafeel Super Specialty Hospital, Imam Al-Hassan Al-Mujtaba Teaching Hospital, Imam Al-Hussein Medical City of Kerbala, and Karbala Teaching Hospital for Children. SARS-CoV-2 and acute COVID-19 were diagnosed by senior physicians and virologists based on the following criteria: the occurrence of an acute respiratory syndrome accompanied by typical symptoms such as fever, coughing, and loss of taste and smell; a positive result from the rRT-PCR test; and a positive result from the SARS-CoV-2 IgM test. All patients have successfully recovered from the acute period, as indicated by negative rRT-PCR results. The control group consisted of 36 apparently healthy controls from the same geographical area and they have no significant difference with patients in age, BMI, and smoking ratio. These controls consisted of either staff members or individuals who were acquainted with them, such as family or friends. Additionally, we included individuals who tested negative for rRT-PCR and did not exhibit any symptoms of acute infection, such as a dry cough, sore throat, difficulty breathing, loss of appetite, flu-like symptoms, elevated body temperature, night sweats, or shivering. A senior psychiatrist reviewed clinical anamnesis and patient records to determine a person’s career neuropsychiatric illness history. COVID-19 patients and controls excluded anyone with a history of psychiatric axis-1 disorders such as major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, dysthymia, panic disorder, schizo-affective disorder, schizophrenia, psycho-organic syndrome, generalized anxiety disorder, or substance use disorders (other than tobacco use disorder). All participants were required to provide signed informed consent before taking part in the research. Approval for the research was granted by the University of Kufa’s institutional ethics board (1657/2023) and the Kerbala Health Directorate: Training and Human Development Centre (Document No.0030/2023). Ethical and privacy standards set out by Iraqi and international bodies, such as the CIOMS Guideline, the Belmont Report, the International Conference on Harmonization of Good Clinical Practice, and the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki, were adhered to throughout the research. The International Guidelines for the Safety of Human Research (ICH-GCP) are what our institutional review board follows.
Clinical assessments
Senior psychiatrists conducted semi-structured interviews with both control subjects and Long-COVID patients 3–4 months after infection to gather socio-demographic and clinical information. The senior psychiatrist utilized the 12-item FF scale to examine the severity of chronic tiredness and fibromyalgia symptoms in individuals who had previously had acute COVID-19. The patient group was classified according to the FF score into two groups; severe fatigue group (FF>25) and moderate fatigue group (FF<25). The evaluation took place three to four months after the initial infection [40]. It would be unclear to use the total scores of all three scales to evaluate affective symptoms because they take into account both physical and mental (affective) problems. The diagnosis of TUD was made using the DSM-5 criteria. The BMI was determined by dividing the weight of the body in kilograms by the height in meters squared.
Assays
Between 7:30 and 9:00 a.m., before participants ate breakfast, researchers took a 5 mL venous blood sample and deposited it into sterile containers to use in the study. The investigation excluded hemolyzed materials following the centrifugation of clotted blood samples at a speed of 1006 Xg for 5 minutes. The resulting serum was then separated and transferred into three new Eppendorf tubes for further testing. Estimation of serum CRP, Albumin, T.Ca, I.Ca, T.Mg, I. Mg, T.Ca/Mg, I.Ca/Mg were conducted using kits provided by Agappe® Diagnostics Ltd., (Cham, Switzerland). Laboratory workers were unaware of clinical data. The study examined patient records to determine the lowest levels of SpO2 and PBT readings during the acute phase. The study kept track of which vaccines were given to each subject, which were made by AstraZeneca®, Pfizer®, or Sinopharm®.
Biostatistical analysis
Analyzing variance and contingency tables test determined scale variable differences and nominal variable associations across groups. The correlations between SpO2, PBT, clinical evaluations, and biomarkers were examined using Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficients. A univariate general linear model (GLM) analysis was employed to examine the correlations between categorization and biomarkers, while taking into account the effects of TUD, sex, age, BMI, and education. The between-subjects effects analysis was utilized for Long-COVID patients with high FF significant biomarker changes. The primary study examined biomarker-clinical data relationships in a research sample of patients and controls without constraints. Within the subset of Long-COVID patients, we sought for correlations as part of the secondary analysis. The threshold for statistical significance was established as a p-value of 0.05 for two-tailed tests. An analysis of variance with three groups and up to five variables should yield 151 participants (calculated using GPower 3.1.9.7). Consequently, we registered a total of 156 people, with 36 being controls and 120 being Long-COVID patients.
Results
Sociodemographic, clinical, and biochemical data in the study groups
Table 1 shows the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of Long-COVID patients and control group with varying FF levels.
Three groups of 30 people were studied: a control group (Group A), Long-COVID patients with FF scores below 25 (Group B), and those with FF scores over 25 (Group C). Patients with FF scores above 25 were older than those in the other groups. The groups did not differ in BMI or education. Patients’ groups had longer disease durations and lower oxygen saturation (SpO2) than the control group. Significant differences in the peak body temperatures were seen among the groups, with Group C having higher temperatures. There are no significant variations in albumin levels across groups. Severe FF patients had the lowest SpO2 and higher FF-TOTAL score and CRP than other groups. Group C patients have significant decrease in serum total and ionized calcium compared with Groups A and B. While there is no significant difference in the serum total and ionized magnesium, as well as the calcium to magnesium ratios.
Results of the multivariate generalized linear model (GLM)
The multivariate generalized linear model (GLM) analysis in Table 2 examined the biomarker effects of Long-COVID with high FF score (>25) between patients.
The study found significant differences in all parameters for Long-COVID patients with high FF (Partial η2 = 0.468). Period of cure, disease duration, sex, age, BMI, smoking, occupation, and marital status had no significant influence. The between-subjects effects analysis showed substantial biomarker changes in Long-COVID patients with high FF. Specifically, SpO2 (Partial η2 = 0.238) showed a significant effect, suggesting that the high FF group had a reduced oxygen saturation. Furthermore, different levels of impact were shown by CRP (Partial η2 = 0.103), followed by the highest temperature during the acute phase of infection (Partial η2 = 0.089). Other biomarkers are not affected by the FF score (p>0.05) after controlling the cofounders.
Analysis of receiver operating characteristic-area under curve (ROC-AUC)
1. ROC-AUC analysis for prediction of high FF in patients using clinical data
The ROC-AUC analysis to identify fatigue in Long-COVID patients based on clinical data collected during the acute phase of the SARS-CoV-2 infection is shown in Table 3 and Fig 1.
Remarkably, the maximum temperature observed during the infection, using a threshold of 39.2°C, showed the patients would have a higher FF score with a sensitivity of 70% and sensitivity of 69%. Additionally, the decline of the SpO2 was lower than the cut-off level of 82.5% indicating a good ability to predict the high FF in a patient with a sensitivity of 65.5% and specificity of 61.6%. However, disease duration and cure time did not predict the severity of FF scores.
2. ROC-AUC analysis for prediction of high FF in patients using serum biomarkers
Long-COVID patients with severe and moderate FF scores are distinguished by several serum biomarkers as seen in Fig 2 and Table 4.
Footnote: CRP: C-reactive protein, T.Ca, and T.Mg: total calcium and magnesium, I.Ca and I.Mg: ionized calcium and magnesium.
The decrease in total magnesium at a cut-off value <0.98 mM, and ionized magnesium at a cut-off value<0.68 mM can predict the severity of FF with a sensitivity = 66%, and specificity = 66%. Also, the decrease in albumin at a cut-off value <46.4 g/l can predict the severity of FF with a sensitivity = 62%, and specificity = 66%. The increase in total calcium at a cut-off value <2.19 mM can predict the severity of FF with a sensitivity = 64%, and specificity = 66%. Ionized calcium at a cut-off value<1.26 mM can predict the severity of FF with a sensitivity = 66%, and specificity = 64%. Serum CRP higher than the cut-off value of 5.31 mg/l can predict the high FF with a sensitivity = 58%, and specificity = 55%. Also, the increase in I.Ca/Mg ratio higher than the cut-off value of 1.87 can predict a high FF with a sensitivity and specificity of 65%. According to the results, T.Ca/Mg is not a good predictor of FF scores (p>0.05).
Discussion
The results in Table 1 revealed that the Long-COVID symptoms are related to the clinical state of patients (SPO2, body temperature, and duration of illness) during the acute phase of the infection with SARS-COV-2. These higher body temperatures for a longer time with severe hypoxia may cause damage to the microvessels in multiple organs including the brain and lung [41]. There is also a risk of persistent microcoagulation caused by the illness [42]. These factors can explain the symptoms of fibrofatigue scores in our patient groups. Age, disease duration, temperature, SpO2, FF-TOTAL scores, and CRP had significant differences across groups [36,43,44]. More severe FF patients were older and had longer disease durations, higher temperatures, poorer oxygen saturation, and higher FF-Total and CRP scores. These findings shed light on how FF may affect Long-COVID patients’ clinical and biochemical profiles, helping to comprehend their health state [45]. The study’s results contribute to the ongoing discussion on the relationship between Long-COVID and fibromyalgia, offering potential insights into shared symptoms and underlying mechanisms. There is previous evidence that viral infections are related to the development of fatigue, severe depression, and anxiety [46–48]. The increase in FF score in Long-COVID patients has been reported recently [49,50]. Within six months following the onset of the first COVID-19 symptom, about one-third of COVID-19 survivors experience neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as sleeplessness, anxiety, or depression [51].
The multivariate GLM study, in Table 2, showed that the presence of high FF in Long-COVID patients is the main significant factor affecting the variations in the sera level of the measured biomarkers. Other cofounders (period of cure, duration of disease, sex, age, BMI, smoking, employment, and marital status) have no significant effect size (p<0.05) on the level of the measured biomarkers. These results are important as they indicate a variation in the blood component that affects the overall state of energy of the Long-COVID patients. Previous studies support our explanation by showing that Long-COVID and fibromyalgia may have some of the same symptoms [43,52,53]. The findings add to the Long-COVID fibromyalgia debate by shedding light on overlapping symptoms and processes. The strong influence of FF on Long-COVID patients’ clinical and biochemical profiles highlights the need for more research to distinguish the two illnesses and provide appropriate care [36,54]. Long-COVID patients with high FF had significant biomarker changes in the between-subjects effects analysis, indicating altered clinical and biochemical profiles. Long-COVID patients with high FF had lower SpO2 and variable effects on inflammatory markers, temperature, and metabolic measures. These data suggest that changed biomarkers, particularly oxygen saturation and inflammatory markers, may affect Long-COVID patients’ health outcomes [43,53–55]. By providing possible insights into common symptoms and underlying mechanisms, the study’s findings add to the continuing conversation about the connection between Long-COVID and fibromyalgia [52].
The ROC analysis, in Table 3, shows that acute SARS-CoV-2 clinical data especially the peak body temperature and SpO2 can predict fatigue in Long-COVID patients. Importantly, the highest temperature recorded during the infection and the level of SpO2 demonstrated a moderate to high level of accuracy in predicting fatigue in patients with Long-COVID. More precisely, a maximum temperature limit of 39.2°C demonstrated a modest degree of predictive precision, whereas a SpO2 threshold of 82.5% suggested a strong capability to predict fatigue in Long-COVID patients. These findings suggest that specific clinical parameters during the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection, such as temperature and SpO2, may serve as early predictors of fatigue in Long-COVID patients, enabling focused treatment and management strategies [43,56,57].
According to the second ROC analysis in Table 4 and Fig 2, using electrolyte levels as predictive tools, the serum level of T.Mg, I.Mg, T.Ca, I.Ca, and albumin moderately predicted the severity of FF scores in Long-COVID patients. While CRP and T.Ca/Mg and T.Ca/Mg ratios have no significant predictability of FFscores in the patients (p<0.005). These findings indicated the importance of electrolytes in the immunity and muscle functions that in turn affect the severity of the fatigue symptoms. Previous research has addressed the connection between Long-COVID and fibromyalgia [36,43,58]. In this study, the electrolytes are other factors that may be useful in predicting FF severity in Long-COVID patients. The study’s findings align with prior research that has established symptom severity scores as a prognostic indicator for Long-COVID [57]. The findings reveal probable underlying processes between Long-COVID and fibromyalgia, given common symptoms and mechanistic roles [36,43,58]. The results emphasize the importance of these findings in clinical treatment decision-making [25,43,52,56,57]. The study’s findings may shed light on Long-COVID and fibromyalgia’s common symptoms and causes. Correction of the alteration in the magnesium and calcium in Long-COVID patients may be necessary to monitor their effects on the FF score in those patients. These results require confirmation, further future work is necessary to investigate the possibility of the effect of other measurable parameters on the FF state in Long-COVID patients.
Limitations
Due to its case-control design, the study cannot establish causality. Self-reported data may create recollection biases, and double stratification may reduce statistical power. Although the study had a large sample size, the limited number of measured biomarkers may limit its application. Prospective studies are needed to validate clinical parameter prediction since retrospective analysis creates biases. Research on FF in Long-COVID patients must address these constraints.
Conclusions
This study shows that age, disease duration, temperature, oxygen saturation, and important biochemical indicators affect FF in Long-COVID patients. The observed differences in biochemical and clinical profiles highlight the widespread impact of FF on Long-COVID people’s health outcomes. The high predictability of T.Mg, I.Mg, T.Ca, I.Ca, and Albumin in severe FF patients underscores their potential utility in distinguishing fatigue severity. A lot of important information was learned in this study that can help doctors treat FF in Long-COVID patients.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the senior pulmonologists Ammar Abbas Neamh and Maytham Abdulameer Al Maamory.
The authors express gratitude to various hospitals in Iraq for their assistance in gathering sample material, senior pulmonologists Maytham Abdulameer Al Maamory and Ammar Abbas Neamh, and internal lab staff for estimating biomarker levels.
References
- 1. Shah W, Hillman T, Playford ED, Hishmeh L. Managing the long term effects of covid-19: summary of NICE, SIGN, and RCGP rapid guideline. BMJ. 2021;372.
- 2. Katz GM, Bach K, Bobos P, Cheung A, Décary S, Goulding S, et al. Understanding How Post–COVID-19 Condition Affects Adults and Health Care Systems. JAMA Health Forum. 2023;4(7):e231933–e. pmid:37418268
- 3. Davis HE, McCorkell L, Vogel JM, Topol EJ. Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2023;21(3):133–46. pmid:36639608
- 4. Choutka J, Jansari V, Hornig M, Iwasaki A. Unexplained post-acute infection syndromes. Nature medicine. 2022;28(5):911–23. pmid:35585196
- 5. Calabrese C, Kirchner E, Calabrese LH. Long COVID and rheumatology: Clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic implications. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology. 2022:101794. pmid:36369208
- 6. Akel A, Almanasyeh B, Abo Kobaa A, Aljabali A, Al-Abadleh A, Alkhalaileh A, et al. A Cross-Sectional Study of Fibromyalgia and Post-acute COVID-19 Syndrome (PACS): Could There Be a Relationship? Cureus. 2023;15(7):e42663. Epub 2023/08/30. pmid:37644924; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10462402.
- 7. Ciaffi J, Meliconi R, Ruscitti P, Berardicurti O, Giacomelli R, Ursini F. Rheumatic manifestations of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC rheumatology. 2020;4(1):1–15. pmid:33123675
- 8. Chen C, Haupert SR, Zimmermann L, Shi X, Fritsche LG, Mukherjee B. Global prevalence of post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) condition or long COVID: a meta-analysis and systematic review. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2022;226(9):1593–607. pmid:35429399
- 9. Lopez-Leon S, Wegman-Ostrosky T, Perelman C, Sepulveda R, Rebolledo PA, Cuapio A, et al. More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific reports. 2021;11(1):16144. pmid:34373540
- 10. Buskila D. Genetics of chronic pain states. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology. 2007;21(3):535–47. pmid:17602998
- 11. Ablin JN, Shoenfeld Y, Buskila D. Fibromyalgia, infection and vaccination: Two more parts in the etiological puzzle. Journal of Autoimmunity. 2006;27(3):145–52. pmid:17071055
- 12. Allen AD. Is RA273 rubella immunization a cause of chronic fatigue? Medical Hypotheses. 1988;27(3):217–20. pmid:3211019
- 13. Fialho MFP, Brum ES, Oliveira SM. Could the fibromyalgia syndrome be triggered or enhanced by COVID-19? Inflammopharmacology. 2023;31(2):633–51. pmid:36849853
- 14.
Lombardo MDM, Foppiani A, Peretti GM, Mangiavini L, Battezzati A, Bertoli S, et al., editors. Long-term coronavirus disease 2019 complications in inpatients and outpatients: a one-year follow-up cohort study. Open Forum Infectious Diseases; 2021: Oxford University Press US.
- 15. Antonelli M, Pujol JC, Spector TD, Ourselin S, Steves CJ. Risk of long COVID associated with delta versus omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2. The Lancet. 2022;399(10343):2263–4. pmid:35717982
- 16. O’Hare AM, Vig EK, Iwashyna TJ, Fox A, Taylor JS, Viglianti EM, et al. Complexity and Challenges of the Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Long COVID. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5(11):e2240332–e. pmid:36326761
- 17. Walker S, Goodfellow H, Pookarnjanamorakot P, Murray E, Bindman J, Blandford A, et al. Impact of fatigue as the primary determinant of functional limitations among patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome: a cross-sectional observational study. BMJ Open. 2023;13(6):e069217. Epub 2023/06/08. pmid:37286327; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10335413.
- 18. Kubánková M, Hohberger B, Hoffmanns J, Fürst J, Herrmann M, Guck J, et al. Physical phenotype of blood cells is altered in COVID-19. Biophysical journal. 2021;120(14):2838–47. pmid:34087216
- 19.
Maxwell E. A dynamic review of the evidence around ongoing Covid19 symptoms (often called Long Covid). NIHR Centre for Engagement and Dissemination. 2020.
- 20. Perli VAS, Sordi AF, Lemos MM, Fernandes JSA, Capucho VBN, Silva BF, et al. Body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness of overweight COVID-19 survivors in different severity degrees: a cohort study. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):17615. pmid:37848529
- 21. Perlis RH, Santillana M, Ognyanova K, Safarpour A, Lunz Trujillo K, Simonson MD, et al. Prevalence and Correlates of Long COVID Symptoms Among US Adults. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5(10):e2238804-e. pmid:36301542
- 22. Tsampasian V, Elghazaly H, Chattopadhyay R, Debski M, Naing TKP, Garg P, et al. Risk Factors Associated With Post−COVID-19 Condition: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2023;183(6):566–80. pmid:36951832
- 23. Choutka J, Jansari V, Hornig M, Iwasaki A. Unexplained post-acute infection syndromes. Nat Med. 2022;28(5):911–23. Epub 2022/05/19. pmid:35585196.
- 24. Sandler CX, Wyller VBB, Moss-Morris R, Buchwald D, Crawley E, Hautvast J, et al. Long COVID and Post-infective Fatigue Syndrome: A Review. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021;8(10):ofab440. Epub 2021/10/12. pmid:34631916; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8496765.
- 25. Haider S, Janowski AJ, Lesnak JB, Hayashi K, Dailey DL, Chimenti R, et al. A comparison of pain, fatigue, and function between post-COVID-19 condition, fibromyalgia, and chronic fatigue syndrome: a survey study. Pain. 2023;164(2):385–401. Epub 2022/08/26. pmid:36006296; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9797623.
- 26. Jason LA, Islam M, Conroy K, Cotler J, Torres C, Johnson M, et al. COVID-19 Symptoms Over Time: Comparing Long-Haulers to ME/CFS. Fatigue. 2021;9(2):59–68. Epub 2021/09/07. pmid:34484973; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8411893.
- 27. Arnold DT, Hamilton FW, Milne A, Morley AJ, Viner J, Attwood M, et al. Patient outcomes after hospitalisation with COVID-19 and implications for follow-up: results from a prospective UK cohort. Thorax. 2021;76(4):399–401. pmid:33273026
- 28. Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, Wei H, Low RJ, Re’em Y, et al. Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;38:101019. pmid:34308300
- 29. Yong SJ. Long COVID or post-COVID-19 syndrome: putative pathophysiology, risk factors, and treatments. Infectious diseases. 2021;53(10):737–54. pmid:34024217
- 30. Bliddal S, Banasik K, Pedersen OB, Nissen J, Cantwell L, Schwinn M, et al. Acute and persistent symptoms in non-hospitalized PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):13153. pmid:34162913
- 31. Guo P, Benito Ballesteros A, Yeung SP, Liu R, Saha A, Curtis L, et al. COVCOG 2: Cognitive and memory deficits in long COVID: A second publication from the COVID and cognition study. Frontiers in aging neuroscience. 2022;14. pmid:35370620
- 32. Van den Borst B, Peters JB, Brink M, Schoon Y, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Schers H, et al. Comprehensive health assessment 3 months after recovery from acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2021;73(5):e1089–e98. pmid:33220049
- 33. Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Gu X, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. The Lancet. 2021;397(10270):220–32. pmid:33428867
- 34. Aziz R, Siles N, Kelley M, Wylie D, Melamed E, Brode WM. Clinical characteristics of Long COVID patients presenting to a dedicated academic post-COVID-19 clinic in Central Texas. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):21971. Epub 2023/12/12. pmid:38081885; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10713530.
- 35. Vimercati L, De Maria L, Quarato M, Caputi A, Gesualdo L, Migliore G, et al. Association between Long COVID and Overweight/Obesity. J Clin Med. 2021;10(18). Epub 2021/09/29. pmid:34575251; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8469321.
- 36. Plaut S. "Long COVID-19" and viral "fibromyalgia-ness": Suggesting a mechanistic role for fascial myofibroblasts (Nineveh, the shadow is in the fascia). Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:952278. Epub 2023/04/24. pmid:37089610; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10117846.
- 37. Ohno M, Dzurova D, Smejkal P. Health inequalities in post-COVID-19 outcomes among adults aged 50+ in Europe: has COVID-19 exposed divide between postcommunist countries and Western Europe? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023;77(9):601–8. Epub 2023/07/10. pmid:37423747; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10423549.
- 38. Hawke LD, Nguyen ATP, Sheikhan NY, Strudwick G, Rossell SL, Soklaridis S, et al. Swept under the carpet: a qualitative study of patient perspectives on Long COVID, treatments, services, and mental health. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):1088. Epub 2023/10/12. pmid:37821939; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10568931.
- 39. Dashboard WHE. A clinical case definition of post COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus, 6 October 2021 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Post_COVID-19_condition-Clinical_case_definition-2021.1. pmid:34951953
- 40. Zachrisson O, Regland B, Jahreskog M, Kron M, Gottfries CG. A rating scale for fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome (the FibroFatigue scale). Journal of psychosomatic research. 2002;52(6):501–9. pmid:12069875
- 41. Wang P, Jin L, Zhang M, Wu Y, Duan Z, Guo Y, et al. Blood–brain barrier injury and neuroinflammation induced by SARS-CoV-2 in a lung–brain microphysiological system. 2023:1–16.
- 42. Pretorius E, Venter C, Laubscher GJ, Kotze MJ, Moremi K, Oladejo S, et al. Combined triple treatment of fibrin amyloid microclots and platelet pathology in individuals with long COVID/post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) can resolve their persistent symptoms. 2021.
- 43. Maamar M, Artime A, Pariente E, Fierro P, Ruiz Y, Gutiérrez S, et al. Post-COVID-19 syndrome, low-grade inflammation and inflammatory markers: a cross-sectional study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2022;38(6):901–9. Epub 2022/02/16. pmid:35166141; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8935459.
- 44. Rivera J, Rodríguez T, Pallarés M, Castrejón I, González T, Vallejo-Slocker L, et al. Prevalence of post-COVID-19 in patients with fibromyalgia: a comparative study with other inflammatory and autoimmune rheumatic diseases. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2022;23(1):471. pmid:35590317
- 45. Daniel JC, Leonard C. Rheumatology and Long COVID: lessons from the study of fibromyalgia. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2024;83(2):136. pmid:37230736
- 46. Maes M, Twisk FN. Treatment of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), a multisystem disease, should target the pathophysiological aberrations (inflammatory and oxidative and nitrosative stress pathways), not the psychosocial “barriers” for a new equilibrium. Patient Education and Counseling. 2010;80(1):148–9. pmid:20303231
- 47. Karimi Z, Davoodi Z, Rabiei L, Jafari M, Kiani Dehkordi M, Marzo RR, et al. The potential association of COVID-19 and Psychological Distress and Anxiety in Iran. International Journal of Epidemiology and Health Sciences. 2022;3(12):-.
- 48. Bornand D, Toovey S, Jick SS, Meier CR. The risk of new onset depression in association with influenza–A population-based observational study. Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2016;53:131–7. pmid:26681501
- 49. Van Herck M, Goërtz YM, Houben-Wilke S, Machado FV, Meys R, Delbressine JM, et al. Severe fatigue in long COVID: web-based quantitative follow-up study in members of online long COVID support groups. Journal of medical Internet research. 2021;23(9):e30274. pmid:34494964
- 50. Al-Hakeim HK, Khairi Abed A, Rouf Moustafa S, Almulla AF, Maes M. Tryptophan catabolites, inflammation, and insulin resistance as determinants of chronic fatigue syndrome and affective symptoms in long COVID. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience. 2023;16:1194769. pmid:37333619
- 51. Taquet M, Geddes JR, Husain M, Luciano S, Harrison PJ. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(5):416–27.
- 52.
Healio. Disentangling Long COVID from Fibromyalgia: Patients Often Feel Disrespected, Ignored. 2023. Available from: https://www.healio.com/news/rheumatology/20230824/disentangling-long-covid-from-fibromyalgia-patients-often-feel-disrespected-ignored.
- 53. Al-Hakeim HK, Al-Rubaye HT, Al-Hadrawi DS, Almulla AF, Maes M. Long-COVID post-viral chronic fatigue and affective symptoms are associated with oxidative damage, lowered antioxidant defenses and inflammation: a proof of concept and mechanism study. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28(2):564–78. Epub 2022/10/26. pmid:36280755; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9589528.
- 54. Maes M, Al-Rubaye HT, Almulla AF, Al-Hadrawi DS, Stoyanova K, Kubera M, et al. Lowered quality of life in Long COVID is strongly predicted by affective symptoms and chronic fatigue syndrome which are associated with inflammatory processes during the acute infectious phase and consequent neuroimmunotoxic pathways. medRxiv. 2022:2022.07. 25.22277980.
- 55. Stufano A, Isgrò C, Palese LL, Caretta P, De Maria L, Lovreglio P, et al. Oxidative Damage and Post-COVID Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Cohort of Italian Workers. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(8). Epub 2023/04/28. pmid:37108606; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10139201.
- 56. Klein J, Wood J, Jaycox JR, Dhodapkar RM, Lu P, Gehlhausen JR, et al. Distinguishing features of long COVID identified through immune profiling. Nature. 2023;623(7985):139–48. pmid:37748514
- 57. Guzman-Esquivel J, Mendoza-Hernandez MA, Guzman-Solorzano HP, Sarmiento-Hernandez KA, Rodriguez-Sanchez IP, Martinez-Fierro ML, et al. Clinical Characteristics in the Acute Phase of COVID-19 That Predict Long COVID: Tachycardia, Myalgias, Severity, and Use of Antibiotics as Main Risk Factors, While Education and Blood Group B Are Protective. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(2). Epub 2023/01/22. pmid:36673565; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9858709.
- 58. Galal I, Hussein AARM, Amin MT, Saad MM, Zayan HEE, Abdelsayed MZ, et al. Determinants of persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms: value of a novel COVID-19 symptom score. The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology. 2021;15(1):10.