Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Predictors of antenatal care services utilization by pregnant women in Afghanistan: Evidence from the Afghanistan Health Survey 2018

  • Muhammad Haroon Stanikzai,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Public Health Research Program, School of Public Health, Walailak University, Tha Sala, Thailand, Excellent Center for Dengue and Community Public Health (EC for DACH), Walailak University, Tha Sala, Thailand, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Kandahar University, Kandahar, Afghanistan

  • Essa Tawfiq,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia

  • Charuai Suwanbamrung,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Public Health Research Program, School of Public Health, Walailak University, Tha Sala, Thailand, Excellent Center for Dengue and Community Public Health (EC for DACH), Walailak University, Tha Sala, Thailand

  • Abdul Wahed Wasiq,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kandahar University, Kandahar, Afghanistan

  • Paleeratana Wongrith

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    paleerut@gmail.com

    Affiliations Excellent Center for Dengue and Community Public Health (EC for DACH), Walailak University, Tha Sala, Thailand, School of Public Health, Walailak University, Tha Sala, Thailand

Abstract

Background

Poor utilization of maternal healthcare services remains a public health concern in most low and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Afghanistan. Late, inadequate, or no utilization of antenatal care (ANC) services pose a great concern.

Objectives

This study assessed the predictors of ANC service utilization among Afghan pregnant women, using secondary data from the Afghanistan Health Survey 2018 (AHS2018).

Methods

In this study, we used data from 10,855 ever-married women, aged 13–49 years, who gave birth in the two years prior to the survey or those women who were currently pregnant. The outcome variable was defined as a binary variable on ANC utilization (≥1 ANC visit equals 1, and zero otherwise). We fitted a binary logistic regression model and examined the associations between ANC utilization and explanatory variables, providing findings based on univariate and multivariate analysis. STATA version 17 was employed for the data analysis.

Results

Overall, 63.2%, 22.0%, and 3.1% of women had at least one ANC visit, ≥4 ANC visits, and ≥8 ANC visits during their last pregnancy, respectively. Higher odds of ANC utilization were observed in women who could read and write (AOR = 1.55, 95%CI: 1.36–1.77), whose husbands could read and write (AOR = 1.42, 95%CI: 1.29–1.56), who knew 1 sign (AOR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.74–2.14), 2 signs (AOR = 2.43, 95%CI: 2.17–2.71) and ≥ 3 signs (AOR = 1.55, 95%CI: 1.36–1.77) of complicated pregnancy, and those with almost daily access to radio (AOR = 1.19, 95%CI: 1.08–1.327) and TV (AOR = 1.92, 95%CI: 1.73–2.13). We also found that women with one (AOR = 0.64, 95%CI: 0.49–0.84) and more than one (AOR = 0.60, 95%CI: 0.47–0.76) parity status, those for whom in-laws and others decided for their birthplace [(AOR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.74–0.97) and (AOR = 0.63, 95%CI: 0.55–0.72), respectively], and those that resided in rural areas (AOR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.79–1.00) had reduced odds of ANC utilization.

Conclusion

ANC service utilization is unacceptably low by pregnant women in Afghanistan. The predictors of ANC utilization identified by the study should be considered in the design of future interventions to enhance antenatal care utilization in Afghanistan.

Introduction

Maternal mortality has been steadily decreasing worldwide, from more than 380 deaths to an estimated 211 deaths per 100,000 live births, between the 1900s and 2020 [1]. However, the progress is highly unequal, owing to stark geographic disparities [1, 2]. Reductions in maternal mortality have been comparatively modest in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), where 94% of the global maternal deaths occur [3, 4]. In addition, epidemiologic studies suggest that maternal mortality and morbidity appear to have a measurable impact on newborn health [59], emphasizing the need for comprehensive maternity care during pregnancy in these settings.

Antenatal care (ANC), a core intervention of the safe motherhood initiatives, anticipates improved maternal and neonatal outcomes [1012]. Research indicates that the use of high-quality ANC services, characterized by timely and frequent visits, can potentially reduce pregnancy-related maternal deaths by 20% [8]. Moreover, the benefits of a single ANC visit have been widely documented in the literature [1318]. Aside from the obvious health benefits, most of the contents in ANC services bear minimal costs to both clients and providers [19, 20]. For example, a systematic review across LMICs revealed that ANC utilization tends to lower costs for uncomplicated services during pregnancy [21]. Furthermore, a study conducted in Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa and South-East Asia details the opportunities for cost savings in ANC services [22]. Taken together, these data suggest that antenatal care could be one of the cost-effective strategies to improve maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) in LMICs.

Despite the overwhelming evidence that antenatal care visits are associated with significant health and economic benefits, millions of pregnant women, predominantly in LMICs, do not attend health facilities for ANC services. More specifically, 10–15% of pregnant women do not receive at least one ANC visit during pregnancy in these settings [2326]. Furthermore, an alarming proportion of pregnant women do not utilize a single ANC visit as reflected in population-based surveys across LMICs [15, 16, 2729]. According to the Afghanistan Demographic Health Survey 2015 (DHS), 58.6% of pregnant women complete only a single ANC visit during pregnancy [30, 31], which is a clear reflection of poor maternal healthcare utilization.

A number of local studies have described the attributes of ANC utilization among Afghan pregnant women in recent years, including determinants of utilization [30, 32], timing and frequency of ANC visits [3335], and contents of these services [36]. However, very few studies focused on pregnant women not utilizing a single ANC visit, thus a complete picture of the ANC utilization is lacking on a national level, given that a single ANC visit is associated with well-documented health benefits and an opportunity to encourage pregnant women to adhere to high-quality ANC services [10]. Moreover, at least one ANC visit is one of the three indicators used to track the progress of ANC services utilization at the population level across different countries [3739].

To address this gap in the literature from Afghanistan, we used data from the Afghanistan Health Survey 2018 (AHS2018) with the objective to determine the prevalence of ANC services utilization and its predictors in Afghanistan. Documenting the attributes of ANC coverage on a national level could inform health policy and planning for maternal health.

Methods

We used data from the Afghanistan Health Survey 2018 (AHS 2018) and we accessed the dataset on 13/12/2023. AHS 2018 employed a stratified two-stage sampling design. Details of the sampling approach are available elsewhere [40]. During the survey, women were interviewed by trained surveyors, using a questionnaire on seeking healthcare for women and children.

In this study, we used data from ever-married women, aged 13–49 years, who gave birth in the two years prior to the survey or those women who were currently pregnant. The latest pregnancy either in the past two years or the current pregnancy was used to minimize recall bias by the respondent women. A total of 10,855 women met our inclusion criteria (above), and their data were analyzed. The survey questionnaire was designed to collect data from ever-married women aged 12–49 years. However, the AHS 2018 data used in our study did not have data from ever-married women aged 12 years.

Study variables

The outcome variable was defined as a binary variable on ANC utilization (≥1 ANC visit equals 1, and zero otherwise).

The decision on which explanatory variables need to be included in the multivariate analysis was made by the relevance and potential effects of the variables on the outcome of interest (ANC utilization), based on the evidence reported in recent studies from Afghanistan [33, 36]. The explanatory variables included in the analysis were: woman’s age (13–29 years, 30–39 years, and 40–49 years), woman’s literacy (whether or not she could read and write), husband’s literacy (whether or not he could read and write), parity (the woman had not given birth [nullipara], the woman had given birth once (primipara), the woman had given birth at least twice [multipara]), knowledge on the number of danger signs in pregnancy (no knowledge, knows 1 sign, knows 2 signs, knows ≥3 signs), residential area (urban vs rural), household size (2–4 people vs ≥5 people), decision made for woman where to give birth (by herself, her husband, in-laws, others), access to the internet (whether or not she used the internet almost daily for consulting for her healthcare), access to the radio (whether or not she listened to the radio almost daily), and access to TV (whether or not she watched TV almost daily).

Statistical analysis

We conducted a descriptive analysis of the baseline characteristics of women (e.g., age, education) and other explanatory variables included in the multivariate analysis. We also examined the distribution of ANC utilization, such as proportions of women with no ANC visit, 1 ANC visit, 2 ANC visits up to ≥ 8 ANC visits, and proportions of women with ANC utilization by urban vs. rural areas, by timeliness (early vs. late) of ANC visits, as well as reasons for not using ANC services in women who did not use services in their latest pregnancy. The reasons for not using ANC services were collected as part of the structured response options in the survey questionnaire.

We fitted a binary logistic regression model and examined the associations between ANC utilization and explanatory variables, providing univariate and multivariate results. Only variables with p value of less than 0.25 in the bivariate analysis were included for multivariate logistic regression analysis. To take the clustering effects of data at the household level into account, we added a random cluster effect in our model estimates, and we adjusted standard errors for the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. STATA version 17 was employed for the data analysis.

Ethical approval

The study was reviewed by the Research and Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kandahar, Afghanistan (Certificate #98; Dated 14/November/2023). The committee approved the study and waived the ethical application because secondary data from the Afghanistan Health Survey 2018 (AHS2018) were used and analysed in this study. For the AHS 2018, ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Ministry of Public Health of Afghanistan in 2017. A written informed consent to proceed with the interviews was obtained from all participants. For pregnant women aged less than 16 years, written informed consent was obtained from their legal guardians (husbands/fathers-in-law/mothers-in-law).

Results

Table 1 presents baseline characteristics of 10,855 ever-married women by status of ANC services utilization during their latest pregnancies. Nearly two-thirds (62.7%) of women were 13–29 years old. The proportion of women and proportion of husbands with primary and secondary/higher education were higher for women who utilized ANC services than those who did not, and the differences were statistically significant. In terms of parity, the differences between the two groups of women were not statistically significant. Overall, 43.2% of women did not know any sign of risk during pregnancy; however, there were significant differences between the two groups of women, with women who utilized ANC services knowing more signs of complicated pregnancy. In terms of household size, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of women. Overall, most women (77.5%) lived in rural areas, and there were significant differences between the two groups of women, with higher ANC utilization in urban areas and lower ANC utilization in rural areas. There were significant differences between women who utilized ANC services and those who did not in women who themselves decided (29.9% vs. 26.7%), and whose husbands decided (38.1% vs. 36.1%) for birth-place choice. The proportions of women with almost daily access to the internet, radio, and TV were significantly different between the two groups of women, with higher ANC utilization by women with access to the media than women with no daily access to the media.

thumbnail
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of pregnant women by status of ANC services utilization.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309300.t001

Fig 1 presents ANC utilization by pregnant women during their latest pregnancies. It shows that 1 out of 3 pregnant women did not have any ANC visits, and nearly two-thirds of women attended at least one ANC visit, although only 3.1% attended ≥8 ANC visits. Additionally, it shows that a higher proportion of pregnant women did not attend ANC visits in rural areas compared to urban areas.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Utilization of ANC services by pregnant women (n = 10,855).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309300.g001

Fig 2 depicts ANC utilization by timeliness of ANC commencement—timely vs. late ANC. It shows that a higher proportion of women with 1 ANC visit commenced their ANC visit during the first trimester. However, the opposite was observed in women with ≥3 ANC visits, with an increasing gap between women with timely and late commencement of ANC visits by the number of ANC visits.

thumbnail
Fig 2. ANC service utilization by timeliness of ANC commencement—Timely vs. Late ANC.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309300.g002

Fig 3 presents the reasons pregnant women provided for not using ANC services. Of 7,306 responses, provided by the 3,992 women who did not use ANC services, 30% of reasons was “it was not necessary to use ANC services”. Other reasons were—health facilities too far or no transport to health facilities (18%), too expensive transportation cost (14%), security concerns (11%), too expensive services (9%), unfriendly staff (5%), religious reasons (5%), inconvenient service hours (4%), not having an accompanying man—mahram (2%), no female staff (2%), and other reasons (0.1%).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Reasons provided by 3,992 women who did not use ANC services (n = 7,306 responses).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309300.g003

Table 2 presents odds ratios (ORs) on the likelihood of ANC utilization by ever-married women during their latest pregnancies. Results from the multivariable analysis show that it was more likely that women who could read and write attend ANC visits than women who could not [AOR 1.55 (95% CI: 1.36–1.77)]. Husband’s literacy was associated with ANC utilization, with AOR 1.42 (95% CI: 1.29–1.56) for husbands who could read and write, compared to husbands who could not. In terms of parity, women of primiparous and women of multiparous were less likely to utilize ANC, compared to women of nulliparous but currently pregnant [AOR 0.64 (95% CI: 0.49–0.84), and 0.60 (0.47–0.76), respectively]. Women with knowledge of danger sign(s) during pregnancy were more likely to utilize ANC services [AOR 1.93 (95% CI: 1.74–2.14) for those who knew one sign, 2.43 (2.17–2.71) for those who knew 2 signs, and 3.17 (2.66–3.77) for those who knew ≥3 signs, compared to women who knew no signs]. Geographic location was a strong predictor of ANC utilization, with AOR (95% CI) of 0.89 (0.79–0.93) for women who lived in rural areas, compared to women who lived in urban areas. Decisions made for women where to give birth was a strong predictor of ANC utilization [AOR 0.85 (95% CI: 0.74–0.97) for the decision made by in-laws, and 0.63 (0.55–0.72) for the decision made by others for the women, compared to the decision made by women themselves]. Access to mass media was another significant predictor of ANC utilization [AOR 1.19 (95% CI: 1.08–1.32) for women with almost daily access to radio, and 1.92 (1.73–2.13) for women with almost daily access to TV, compared to women with no daily access to radio, and TV, respectively].

thumbnail
Table 2. Likelihood of ANC services utilization by pregnant women.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309300.t002

Discussion

Our analysis of the ANC services utilization among pregnant women in Afghanistan showed concerning results. There were 63.2% of pregnant women that received at least one ANC visit, with 22% of pregnant women receiving ≥ 4 ANC visits and only 3.1% ≥ 8 ANC visits. Many factors were found to be potentially related to ANC service utilization, including woman and husband education, parity, knowledge of pregnancy danger signs, residential location, influence of decision-makers on place of delivery, and media access.

In this study, the proportion (63.2%) of pregnant women with at least one ANC visit revealed a slight increase from the findings reported in the national health surveys undertaken in 2012 (54%) and 2015 (58.6%) [30, 31]. However, this proportion is lower than those reported from other LMICs, including 85% in Somalia [41], 93.8% in India [37], 74.3% in Ethiopia [42], 92.1% in Nepal [43], and 92.5% in Pakistan [38]. Moreover, the increase reported over time of ≥ 4 ANC visits and ≥ 8 ANC visits in Afghanistan is much slower than those achieved in other LMICs [37, 38, 42, 43]. Therefore, increased efforts are needed to reach pregnant women who do not utilize ANC services and move forward toward achieving the WHO-recommended ANC services [10].

The most common reasons for not utilizing ANC services were low perceived needs for ANC services, transportation barriers, security concerns, financial constraints, and unfriendly behavior of healthcare workers. Similar reasons were reported by Stanikzai and colleagues in a study on the determinants of antenatal care utilization in Kandahar, Afghanistan [32]. Immediate policy efforts and tailored interventions are needed to tackle the mentioned barriers to ANC services utilization.

The present study identified a strong association between women’s educational status and ANC service utilization. As meta-analyses have highlighted, a woman’s educational attainment is a strong predictor of ANC service utilization [39, 44]. These findings merit greater emphasis in women’s education on healthcare utilization during pregnancy [38, 45, 46]. Unfortunately, the recent restrictions on female education in Afghanistan are concerning [47, 48]. Therefore, our findings warrant an urgent focus on female education and suitable public health policies to increase awareness among uneducated pregnant women about the consequences of not using ANC services.

Consistent with previous studies from Afghanistan [33, 36, 49], we found that women whose husbands could read and write were more likely to receive ANC services than those whose husbands could not. This finding is echoed in previous observations regarding the influence of husbands’ education on ANC service utilization across LMICs [39, 50]. Given the current sociopolitical challenges in the country, engaging husbands in reproductive health interventions, may also be a key intervention [51].

The lower likelihood of ANC service utilization was reported in primipara and multipara pregnant women in our study. This is in line with studies done in other LMICs [52, 53]. Additionally, higher parity is reported as a barrier to receiving timely [5456] and frequent ANC visits across different studies [56, 57]. Based on the findings of these studies, women who had a previous pregnancy are less motivated to receive ANC services, assuming that they may have already possessed sufficient knowledge and experience from prior pregnancies and childbirths. Nevertheless, in a systematic review, the association between parity and ANC utilization was not ascertained [39]. Interventions for sensitizing primipara and multipara pregnant women may be useful to improve the utilization of ANC services for these groups of pregnant women.

We found statistically significant associations between women’s knowledge of complicated pregnancy and higher odds of ANC service utilization. The effects of women’s knowledge of obstetric danger signs on their health-seeking behaviors are encouraging, as documented in this study and earlier literature [33, 58, 59]. A considerable proportion of pregnant women is likely to have poor knowledge of complicated pregnancy in LMICs [60, 61]. Likewise, nearly half (43.2%) of the pregnant women in this study were not aware of the signs associated with complicated pregnancy. Efforts should focus on developing interventions to increase awareness of complicated pregnancy in pregnant women.

Given the higher socioeconomic adversities in rural Afghanistan [62], the lower utilization of ANC services in these settings is not far-fetched. A growing body of literature has documented geographical disparities in ANC service utilization [26, 53, 57]. The difference in ANC service utilization between rural and urban areas in Afghanistan reflects broader healthcare gaps [63, 64], heightened insecurity [63, 65], and various socioeconomic challenges [66, 67]. Such conditions in Afghanistan’s rural settings magnify the challenges of ANC utilization, underscoring the urgent need for targeted, multi-sectoral interventions to bridge these gaps and support the well-being of pregnant women in rural areas.

This study also adds to the existing literature that women’s and husbands’ decisions on birth place choice were strong predictors of ANC service utilization. Studies elsewhere reported that increasing women’s autonomy and husbands’ involvement in maternal healthcare enhances ANC service utilization [6870]. However, the deeply ingrained sociocultural values in Afghanistan frequently restrict women and young couples from individual preference [71]. It is imperative to empower women with decision-making autonomy, ensuring they have the right and dignity to choose and access quality health services.

We found that access to media (radio and TV) was associated with higher ANC service utilization, and this is true across studies in Afghanistan [33, 36], and elsewhere [39, 72]. This suggests that mass media could influence pregnant women to utilize maternal healthcare by broadcasting maternal health service utilization educational programs in low-resource settings [73]. Our finding has important implications and calls on the Afghan government, international partners, and other health stakeholders to continue allocating resources for mass media-centric educational programs to promote maternal health service utilization in Afghanistan.

Additionally, this study identified that a significant proportion (39%) of pregnant women commenced their ANC lately. In this study, pregnant women with late ANC visits reported a higher frequency of ANC visits than those with early ANC visits. This finding is inconsistent with most studies in LMICs [23, 26, 55], and requires further work, especially given the high prevalence of late ANC initiation in the study population. The details of ANC initiation and ANC contents are described elsewhere [34, 36].

Limitations

There were some limitations in our study. First, there is a risk of recall bias as women recalled events from several months ago; women may have under-reported the events and related attributes. Second, data on antenatal care utilization relied on self-report, which may not be free from bias (social desirability bias). Third, we measured the outcome variable in terms of attending ≥1 ANC visit while the WHO ANC guideline recommends attending ≥8 ANC visits [10]. Considering a similar approach in previous studies [29, 39, 41] and low ANC coverage in Afghanistan [30], at least a single ANC visit used as the outcome variable in this study was methodologically appropriate. Fourth, the collected information in AHS2018 confined our evaluation of diverse predictors for ANC utilization. Therefore, we urge future studies to consider other influencing factors, such as access to healthcare facilities, social support systems, and health service factors in their analyses. Fifth, AHS was conducted in 2018, and as a consequence of the current sociopolitical situation, decreased donor funding, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a possibility that healthcare services in the country may have experienced a substantial decline [74, 75]. As such, the present analysis should be interpreted with caution, acknowledging that the findings may not fully reflect the current realities faced by the Afghan health system. Finally, the cross-sectional nature of our study precludes causal relationships between the predictors and ANC service utilization.

Despite the above limitations, this study enriches the literature by spotlighting the intersection of ANC utilization with the sociodemographic adversities faced by pregnant women in Afghanistan, advocating for policy reforms and the establishment of urgent tailored interventions for maternal health services.

Conclusion

This study indicates that ANC service utilization is unacceptably low by pregnant women in Afghanistan. Improvement in ANC service utilization should be a public health priority for the Afghan government, UN agencies, and healthcare stakeholders to reduce the burden of pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality in Afghanistan. The predictors identified in this study should be considered in the design of future interventions for enhancing ANC services utilization in Afghanistan.

Acknowledgments

We extend our gratitude to the Ministry of Public Health of Afghanistan for providing access to the data from the Afghanistan Health Survey 2018.

References

  1. 1. Souza JP, Day LT, Rezende-Gomes AC, Zhang J, Mori R, Baguiya A, et al. A global analysis of the determinants of maternal health and transitions in maternal mortality. The Lancet Global Health. 2024;12(2):e306–e16. pmid:38070536
  2. 2. Girum T, Wasie A. Correlates of maternal mortality in developing countries: an ecological study in 82 countries. Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology. 2017;3(1):19. pmid:29142757
  3. 3. Bauserman M, Thorsten VR, Nolen TL, Patterson J, Lokangaka A, Tshefu A, et al. Maternal mortality in six low and lower-middle income countries from 2010 to 2018: risk factors and trends. Reproductive Health. 2020;17(3):173. pmid:33334343
  4. 4. Kassebaum NJ, Barber RM, Bhutta ZA, Dandona L, Gething PW, Hay SI, et al. Global, regional, and national levels of maternal mortality, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1775–812. pmid:27733286
  5. 5. Boerma T, Campbell OMR, Amouzou A, Blumenberg C, Blencowe H, Moran A, et al. Maternal mortality, stillbirths, and neonatal mortality: a transition model based on analyses of 151 countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2023;11(7):e1024–e31. pmid:37349032
  6. 6. Moucheraud C, Worku A, Molla M, Finlay JE, Leaning J, Yamin AE. Consequences of maternal mortality on infant and child survival: a 25-year longitudinal analysis in Butajira Ethiopia (1987–2011). Reproductive Health. 2015;12(1):S4. pmid:26001059
  7. 7. De Souza S, Duim E, Nampo FK. Determinants of neonatal mortality in the largest international border of Brazil: a case-control study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1304. pmid:31619198
  8. 8. Islam MA, Tabassum T. Does antenatal and post-natal program reduce infant mortality? A meta-analytical review on 24 developing countries based on Demographic and Health Survey data. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. 2021;28:100616. pmid:33799165
  9. 9. Doku DT, Neupane S. Survival analysis of the association between antenatal care attendance and neonatal mortality in 57 low- and middle-income countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(5):1668–77. pmid:29040531
  10. 10. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. WHO Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience. Geneva: World Health Organization. Copyright © World Health Organization 2016.; 2016.
  11. 11. Toolan M, Barnard K, Lynch M, Maharjan N, Thapa M, Rai N, et al. A systematic review and narrative synthesis of antenatal interventions to improve maternal and neonatal health in Nepal. AJOG Global Reports. 2022;2(1):100019. pmid:35252905
  12. 12. Zelka MA, Yalew AW, Debelew GT. Effectiveness of a continuum of care in maternal health services on the reduction of maternal and neonatal mortality: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2023;9(6):e17559. pmid:37408879
  13. 13. Kuhnt J, Vollmer S. Antenatal care services and its implications for vital and health outcomes of children: evidence from 193 surveys in 69 low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e017122. Epub pmid:29146636.
  14. 14. Ghosh A, Ghosh R. Maternal health care in India: A reflection of 10 years of National Health Mission on the Indian maternal health scenario. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. 2020;25:100530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100530.
  15. 15. Tarekegn SM, Lieberman LS, Giedraitis V. Determinants of maternal health service utilization in Ethiopia: analysis of the 2011 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14(1):161. pmid:24886529
  16. 16. Belay DG, Alemu MB, Pereira G, Lassi ZS, Tessema GA. Determinants and geographic distribution of early newborn care in Ethiopia: evidence from the 2019 Ethiopian Mini Demographic Health Survey. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):22690. pmid:38114571
  17. 17. Arunda M, Emmelin A, Asamoah BO. Effectiveness of antenatal care services in reducing neonatal mortality in Kenya: analysis of national survey data. Global health action. 2017;10(1):1328796. pmid:28621201
  18. 18. Tekelab T, Chojenta C, Smith R, Loxton D. The impact of antenatal care on neonatal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(9):e0222566. pmid:31518365
  19. 19. Martin E, Ayoub B, Miller YD. A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of maternity models of care. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):859. Epub pmid:38093244.
  20. 20. Mangham-Jefferies L, Pitt C, Cousens S, Mills A, Schellenberg J. Cost-effectiveness of strategies to improve the utilization and provision of maternal and newborn health care in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14(1):243. pmid:25052536
  21. 21. Banke-Thomas A, Abejirinde IO, Ayomoh FI, Banke-Thomas O, Eboreime EA, Ameh CA. e-income countries from a provider’s perspective: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(6). pmid:32565428
  22. 22. Stenberg K, Watts R, Bertram MY, Engesveen K, Maliqi B, Say L, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Outcomes: A WHO-CHOICE Analysis for Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa and South-East Asia. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021;10(11):706–23. Epub pmid:33904699.
  23. 23. Moller AB, Petzold M, Chou D, Say L. Early antenatal care visit: a systematic analysis of regional and global levels and trends of coverage from 1990 to 2013. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(10):e977–e83. pmid:28911763
  24. 24. Simkhada B, Teijlingen ERv, Porter M, Simkhada P. Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008;61(3):244–60. pmid:18197860
  25. 25. Wegene MA, Gejo NG, Bedecha DY, Kerbo AA, Hagisso SN, Damtew SA. Utilization of preconception care and associated factors in Hosanna Town, Southern Ethiopia. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(1):e0261895. pmid:34995291
  26. 26. Jiwani SS, Amouzou-Aguirre A, Carvajal L, Chou D, Keita Y, Moran AC, et al. Timing and number of antenatal care contacts in low and middle-income countries: Analysis in the Countdown to 2030 priority countries. J Glob Health. 2020;10(1):010502. pmid:32257157
  27. 27. Arsenault C, Jordan K, Lee D, Dinsa G, Manzi F, Marchant T, et al. Equity in antenatal care quality: an analysis of 91 national household surveys. The Lancet Global Health. 2018;6(11):e1186–e95. pmid:30322649
  28. 28. Tripathy A, Mishra PS. Inequality in time to first antenatal care visits and its predictors among pregnant women in India: an evidence from national family health survey. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):4706. pmid:36949163
  29. 29. Tsegaye B, Ayalew M. Prevalence and factors associated with antenatal care utilization in Ethiopia: an evidence from demographic health survey 2016. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2020;20(1):528. pmid:32917156
  30. 30. Azimi MW, Yamamoto E, Saw YM, Kariya T, Arab AS, Sadaat SI, et al. Factors associated with antenatal care visits in Afghanistan: secondary analysis of Afghanistan Demographic and Health Survey 2015. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2019;81(1):121–31. pmid:30962661
  31. 31. Mumtaz S, Bahk J, Khang Y-H. Current status and determinants of maternal healthcare utilization in Afghanistan: Analysis from Afghanistan Demographic and Health Survey 2015. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(6):e0217827. pmid:31185028
  32. 32. Stanikzai MH, Wafa MH, Wasiq AW, Sayam H. Magnitude and Determinants of Antenatal Care Utilization in Kandahar City, Afghanistan. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2021;2021:5201682. Epub pmid:34306092.
  33. 33. Tawfiq E, Azimi MD, Feroz A, Hadad AS, Soroush MS, Jafari M, et al. Predicting maternal healthcare seeking behaviour in Afghanistan: exploring sociodemographic factors and women’s knowledge of severity of illness. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2023;23(1):561. pmid:37533023
  34. 34. Tawfiq E, Fazli MR, Wasiq AW, Stanikzai MH, Mansouri A, Saeedzai SA. Sociodemographic Predictors of Initiating Antenatal Care Visits by Pregnant Women During First Trimester of Pregnancy: Findings from the Afghanistan Health Survey 2018. Int J Womens Health. 2023;15:475–85. Epub pmid:37033119.
  35. 35. Samiah S, Stanikzai MH, Wasiq AW, Sayam H. Factors associated with late antenatal care initiation among pregnant women attending a comprehensive healthcare facility in Kandahar Province, Afghanistan. Indian J Public Health. 2021;65(3):298–301. pmid:34558495
  36. 36. Stanikzai MH, Tawfiq E, Jafari M, Wasiq AW, Seddiq MK, Currie S, et al. Contents of antenatal care services in Afghanistan: findings from the national health survey 2018. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):2469. pmid:38082286
  37. 37. Girotra S, Malik M, Roy S, Basu S. Utilization and determinants of adequate quality antenatal care services in India: evidence from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) (2019–21). BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2023;23(1):800. pmid:37978458
  38. 38. Midhet F, Hanif M, Khalid SN, Khan RS, Ahmad I, Khan SA. Factors associated with maternal health services utilization in Pakistan: Evidence from Pakistan maternal mortality survey, 2019. PLoS One. 2023;18(11):e0294225. Epub pmid:37972097.
  39. 39. Tekelab T, Chojenta C, Smith R, Loxton D. Factors affecting utilization of antenatal care in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(4):e0214848. pmid:30973889
  40. 40. Afghanistan Health Survey 2018; 2019. Available from: https://www.kit.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/AHS-2018-report-FINAL-15-4-2019.pdf.
  41. 41. Miikkulainen A, Abdirahman Mohamud I, Aqazouz M, Abdullahi Suleiman B, Sheikh Mohamud O, Ahmed Mohamed A, et al. Antenatal care utilization and its associated factors in Somalia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2023;23(1):581. pmid:37573367
  42. 42. Arefaynie M, Kefale B, Yalew M, Adane B, Dewau R, Damtie Y. Number of antenatal care utilization and associated factors among pregnant women in Ethiopia: zero-inflated Poisson regression of 2019 intermediate Ethiopian Demography Health Survey. Reproductive Health. 2022;19(1):36. pmid:35123503
  43. 43. Khanal V, Bista S, Mishra SR, Lee AH. Dissecting antenatal care inequalities in western Nepal: insights from a community-based cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2023;23(1):521. pmid:37460948
  44. 44. Banke-Thomas OE, Banke-Thomas AO, Ameh CA. Factors influencing utilisation of maternal health services by adolescent mothers in Low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):65. Epub pmid:28209120.
  45. 45. Akter E, Hossain AT, Rahman AE, Ahmed A, Tahsina T, Tanwi TS, et al. Levels and determinants of quality antenatal care in Bangladesh: Evidence from the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(5):e0269767. pmid:37134074
  46. 46. Thakkar N, Alam P, Saxena D. Factors associated with underutilization of antenatal care in India: Results from 2019–2021 National Family Health Survey. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(5):e0285454. pmid:37155665
  47. 47. Stanikzai MH, Wafa MH, Akbari K, Anwary Z, Baray AH, Sayam H, et al. Afghan medical students’ perceptions, and experiences of their medical education and their professional intentions: a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education. 2023;23(1):569. pmid:37563712
  48. 48. Stanikzai MH. Need for rapid scaling-up of medical education in Afghanistan: Challenges and recommendations. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics. 2023;8(4):342–3. pmid:37310010
  49. 49. Khan A, Stanikzai MH, Wyar WM, Wasiq AW, Sayam H. Factors Associated with Health Facility Delivery in the 12(th) District of Kandahar City, Kandahar, Afghanistan: A community-Based Cross-Sectional Study. Indian J Community Med. 2022;47(2):172–6. Epub pmid:36034262.
  50. 50. Pervin J, Venkateswaran M, Nu UT, Rahman M, O’Donnell BF, Friberg IK, et al. Determinants of utilization of antenatal and delivery care at the community level in rural Bangladesh. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(9):e0257782. pmid:34582490
  51. 51. Tokhi M, Comrie-Thomson L, Davis J, Portela A, Chersich M, Luchters S. Involving men to improve maternal and newborn health: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0191620. pmid:29370258
  52. 52. Abel Ntambue ML, Françoise Malonga K, Dramaix-Wilmet M, Donnen P. Determinants of maternal health services utilization in urban settings of the Democratic Republic of Congo—a case study of Lubumbashi City. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:66. Epub pmid:22780957.
  53. 53. Alibhai KM, Ziegler BR, Meddings L, Batung E, Luginaah I. Factors impacting antenatal care utilization: a systematic review of 37 fragile and conflict-affected situations. Conflict and Health. 2022;16(1):33. pmid:35690840
  54. 54. Appiah F. Individual and community-level factors associated with early initiation of antenatal care: Multilevel modelling of 2018 Cameroon Demographic and Health Survey. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(4):e0266594. pmid:35385559
  55. 55. Abdo R, Demelash M, Seid AM, Mussema A. First trimester antenatal care contact in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and contributing factors. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2023;23(1):742. pmid:37858033
  56. 56. Habte A, Tamene A, Melis T. Compliance towards WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience: Timeliness and adequacy of antenatal care visit in Sub-Saharan African countries: Evidence from the most recent standard Demographic Health Survey data. PLOS ONE. 2024;19(1):e0294981. pmid:38271342
  57. 57. Islam MM, Masud MS. Determinants of frequency and contents of antenatal care visits in Bangladesh: Assessing the extent of compliance with the WHO recommendations. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(9):e0204752. pmid:30261046
  58. 58. Gesese SS, Mersha EA, Balcha WF. Knowledge of danger signs of pregnancy and health-seeking action among pregnant women: a health facility-based cross-sectional study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023;85(5):1722–30. Epub pmid:37228959.
  59. 59. Geleto A, Chojenta C, Musa A, Loxton D. WOMEN’s Knowledge of Obstetric Danger signs in Ethiopia (WOMEN’s KODE):a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews. 2019;8(1):63. pmid:30803443
  60. 60. Yunitasari E, Matos F, Zulkarnain H, Kumalasari DI, Kusumaningrum T, Putri TE, et al. Pregnant woman awareness of obstetric danger signs in developing country: systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2023;23(1):357. pmid:37194036
  61. 61. Wulandari RD, Laksono AD. Determinants of knowledge of pregnancy danger signs in Indonesia. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(5):e0232550. pmid:32433645
  62. 62. Noh J-W, Im Y-M, Kim K-B, Kim MH, Kwon YD, Cha J. Digital and Economic Determinants of Healthcare in the Crisis-Affected Population in Afghanistan: Access to Mobile Phone and Socioeconomic Barriers. Healthcare. 2021;9(5):506. pmid:33925698
  63. 63. Farewar F, Saeed KMA, Foshanji AI, Alawi SMK, Zawoli MY, Irit S, et al. Efficiency analysis of primary healthcare facilities in Afghanistan. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022;20(1):24. Epub pmid:35659679.
  64. 64. Anwary Z, Stanikzai MH, Wyar WM, Wasiq AW, Farooqi K. Anemia among Women Who Visit Bost Hospital for Delivery in Helmand Province, Afghanistan. Anemia. 2021;2021:9358464. pmid:33520311
  65. 65. Chrétien JP, Yingst SL, Thompson D. Building public health capacity in Afghanistan to implement the International Health Regulations: a role for security forces. Biosecur Bioterror. 2010;8(3):277–85. pmid:20825338
  66. 66. Stanikzai MH, Wafa MH, Rahimi BA, Sayam H. Conducting Health Research in the Current Afghan Society: Challenges, Opportunities, and Recommendations. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023;16:2479–83. Epub pmid:38024503.
  67. 67. Stanikzai MH. Group Antenatal Care (G-ANC): A way forward to improve Afghanistan’s utilisation of maternity care. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics. 2024 Jun 4;
  68. 68. Gorain A, Barik A, Chowdhury A, Rai RK. Preference in place of delivery among rural Indian women. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(12):e0190117. pmid:29287096
  69. 69. Wai KM, Shibanuma A, Oo NN, Fillman TJ, Saw YM, Jimba M. Are Husbands Involving in Their Spouses’ Utilization of Maternal Care Services?: A Cross-Sectional Study in Yangon, Myanmar. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(12):e0144135. pmid:26641891
  70. 70. Idris IB, Hamis AA, Bukhori ABM, Hoong DCC, Yusop H, Shaharuddin MA-A, et al. Women’s autonomy in healthcare decision making: a systematic review. BMC Women’s Health. 2023;23(1):643. pmid:38042837
  71. 71. Ezadi Z, Mohammadi N, Sarwari R, Jafari SM. Afghan women and access to health care in the past 25 years. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;43:101235. Epub 20211213. pmid:34917910
  72. 72. Aboagye RG, Seidu A-A, Ahinkorah BO, Cadri A, Frimpong JB, Hagan JE, et al. Association between frequency of mass media exposure and maternal health care service utilization among women in sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for tailored health communication and education. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(9):e0275202. pmid:36174071
  73. 73. Fatema K, Lariscy JT. Mass media exposure and maternal healthcare utilization in South Asia. SSM—Population Health. 2020;11:100614. pmid:32596437
  74. 74. Stanikzai MH. Antenatal Care Utilization in Afghanistan during COVID-19: Challenges and Recommendations. Indian J Community Med. 2022;47(4):624–5. Epub pmid:36742960.
  75. 75. Essar MY, Wahdati S, O’Sullivan B, Nemat A, Blanchet K. Cycles of disasters in Afghanistan: The urgent call for global solidarity. PLOS Global Public Health. 2024;4(1):e0002751. pmid:38190415