https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4908-5012
Figures
Abstract
Although many studies highlighted the potential of COVID-19 to reshape existing models of wildlife management, empirical research on this topic has been scarce, particularly in Europe. We investigated the potential of COVID-19 pandemic to accelerate the ongoing decline in an aging population of recreational hunters in Italy. Namely, we modelled spatiotemporal trends between 2011 and 2021 in the number of recreational hunters in 50 Italian provinces with a varying incidence of COVID-19, and temporally delayed waves of infection. Compared to projections from 2011–2019 data, we detected a lower number of hunters who enrolled for the hunting season, both in 2020 (14 provinces) and in 2021 (15 provinces). The provinces with the highest incidence of COVID-19 in the Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna regions were also those experiencing the most marked decrease in hunting participation. Our findings revealed that a wildlife management system based on recreational hunting can be rapidly destabilized by epidemics and their associated public health measures, particularly when the average age of hunters is high, like in Italy. Considered the high incidence attained by COVID-19 in many European countries, where hunters are pivotal for the management of large ungulates and where they were already declining before the pandemic, our findings call for further large-scale research about the impact of COVID-19 on hunting participation.
Citation: Cerri J, Musto C, Ferretti M, Delogu M, Bertolino S, Martinoli A, et al. (2024) COVID-19 could accelerate the decline in recreational hunting: A natural experiment from Northern Italy. PLoS ONE 19(8): e0309017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309017
Editor: Mattias Gaglio, University of Ferrara, ITALY
Received: May 9, 2024; Accepted: August 3, 2024; Published: August 16, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Cerri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: A reproducible dataset and software code are available at https://osf.io/j25cr/.
Funding: The co-author Carmela Musto was partially supported by a research grant funded by the Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF) [10.47379/ESR20009], the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Between early 2020 and early 2023, Sars-CoV-2 infected over 655 million people globally, leading to more than 6 million official deaths [1] and a much higher excess mortality [2]. Millions of people experienced long-term physical and mental harm and COVID-19 caused temporary global reductions in human mobility [3].
In conservation science, the COVID-19 pandemic was studied from multiple viewpoints [4, 5]. Some studies explored how changes in human mobility affected the ecology (e.g., diet, [6, 7]), demographics [8] and behaviour of wildlife (e.g., movement, [9–11]). Other research quantified changes in human-nature relationships [12] and explored the potential effects of the pandemic on existing management models for wildlife and ecosystems [13].
Some other studies suggested that the sustained impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on outdoor activities [14–16], could potentially result in long-lasting changes in patterns of outdoor recreation [17], including recreational hunting. This consequence is plausible from both demographic and behavioural viewpoints. In facts, COVID-19 resulted into a significant increase in the death rate or health complications among people above 65 years of age [18, 19]. Consequently, the pandemic may have prompted many hunters to prematurely end their hunting career due to health problems, caregiving responsibilities for older relatives, or even higher mortality among older hunters [20, 21]. Moreover, many countries repeatedly enforced restrictions to human mobility, whenever they experienced peaks in SARS-CoV2 incidence and deaths from COVID-19, and some even halted the hunting season (e.g., Portugal [22]). This could have increased the uncertainty of hunters about the upcoming hunting seasons in 2020 and 2021, potentially leading them to not renew their licenses.
While both mechanisms are possible, and despite some research has been conducted about recreational angling [23], empirical research on the impact of COVID-19 on hunting licenses has been limited to two studies, carried out in North America. Namely, Chizinski et al. [24] found a decrease of approximately 90% in permits for non-resident turkey hunters across the US in 2020 compared to the previous three years. Conversely, Danks et al. [25] reported an increase in participation in turkey hunting across the US in 2020, aligning with grey literature that indicated an overall increase in hunting licenses across the US in 2020 and 2021 [26].
Given the critical role that hunters play in the management of wildlife in Europe, the lack of studies in this continent is cause for concern. The monitoring [27, 28], control [29] and epidemiological surveillance [30] of wildlife populations are among the many tasks that hunters are responsible for in many nations.
In this study we investigated the potential of COVID-19 pandemic to accelerate the ongoing decline in recreational hunting, using Italy as a natural experiment. In this country ungulate hunters are responsible of extensive monitoring to gain data necessary to produce management plans and COVID 19 prevented these activities during 2020 and 2021. Northern Italy was the first epicentre of 2020 COVID-19 outbreak in Europe [31] and Italian regions differed in the temporal progression of the pandemic, as well as in the implementation of restrictions on crowding and human mobility [32]. This allowed us to: i) model spatiotemporal trends in the number of recreational hunters (2011–2019) across 50 Italian provinces with varying incidence of SARS-CoV2, and temporally delayed waves of infection, ii) detect discrepancies between the observed and predicted number of hunters in 2020 and 2021 and iii) correlate these discrepancies with spatial differences in the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Materials and methods
The study area encompassed 50 provinces across the regions of Emilia-Romagna, Friuli Venezia-Giulia, Lombardy, Piedmont, Veneto, and Tuscany in Central and Northern Italy (Fig 1). Overall, these regions housed 28.4 million residents in 2020, accounting for 47.7% of the Italian population.
Administrative boundaries were downloaded from the Italian National Institute of Statistics and are subjected to a CCBY 4.0 license (https://www.istat.it/note-legali/).
In Italy, professional hunting does not exist, and hunting is a recreational activity. Wildlife is considered a public property and falls under the ownership of the state. During each hunting season, which typically spans from September to January, hunters are required to pay a tax for hunting license to the Italian government and the region where they reside and then a tax to the hunting area/s (i.e. Ambiti Territoriali di Caccia and Comprensori Alpini) where they hunt. While recreational hunting has focused in the past on small game and migratory passerines [33], there has been a consistent rise in the abundance and exploitation of wild ungulates since the early 2000s [34]. The annual hunting bags for these species are nowadays considerable exceeding 500.000 heads [35].
Over the past four decades, Italy has experienced a considerable long-term decline in recreational hunting. In 1980 there were 1,701,853 hunters, whereas in 2017 the Ministry of the Interior estimated a total of 678,970 hunting licenses. The overall number of hunters in the study area fell by 37.8% in Emilia-Romagna, 29.1% in Friuli Venezia-Giulia, 33.2% in Lombardy, 36.9% in Piedmont, 44.6% in Tuscany, and 29.2% in the Veneto region, between 2004 and 2019. In urbanised areas, this loss was more noticeable [36]. In addition, recreational hunters had been aging. In 2010 the percentage of hunters above 60 years of age was approximately 52% in Tuscany and Emilia-Romagna region [37, 38], and 43% in the Lombardy region [39].
In 2020, the evolution of COVID-19 varied across the five regions in the study area. The initial wave, occurring in spring 2020, predominantly affected Lombardy and parts of the Emilia-Romagna and Piedmont regions, with no significant excess deaths observed in Friuli Venezia-Giulia, Veneto, and Tuscany regions [40–42]. The spread of the virus was mitigated by the nationwide implementation of non-pharmaceutical measures [43], from March to May, possibly influenced by the progressive increase in air temperatures [44]. However, a second wave of COVID-19 emerged in autumn 2020, affecting the entire study area, and excess deaths became widespread throughout 2021 [45]. Despite the imposition of various restrictions on human mobility throughout 2020 and 2021, the hunting season was regularly opened in September during both years.
To assess the impact of COVID-19 on hunting participation, we gathered data on the number of hunting licenses issued by each province from 2011 to 2019. Hunting licenses were employed as a proxy for hunting participation, recognizing that some hunters may have renewed their licenses without actively participating in the season. In Italy the hunting season starts in September; consequently, we quantified the number of licenses for the 2020/2021 season (hereinafter “2020”) and the 2021/2022 season (hereinafter “2021”).
We used Bayesian Generalized Linear Models to capture spatiotemporal variations in the number of hunters in the study area. Specifically, we used a negative binomial distribution to model the annual number of hunters in each province. Model selection was based on leave-one-out cross validation, and diagnostic assessment followed the approach outlined by Zuur et al. [46]. Overall, we tried multiple spatio-temporal structures to account for different potential spatiotemporal patterns, as suggested by Blangiardo & Cameletti [47]. Model selection retained a best candidate model where the number of hunters was modelled according to a non-linear random walk term, with a random intercept assigned to each region, to account for differences in the total number of residents across provinces. We also accounted for temporal trends between 2011 and 2019 through a linear term.
Finally, we compared the total number of hunters in each province, during 2020 and 2021, against predicted values from the posterior distribution of our model, trained on 2011–2019 data. We considered anomalies those values that exceeded the boundaries of the 95% credibility interval. Additionally, we compared the number of hunters in 2020 and 2021 against the median value of the posterior distribution, which in Bayesian models represent the most likely predicted value [48]. Regarding the Veneto region, we could only test for anomalies for the 2020/2021 season, because the number of hunting licenses for 2021 was not available at the time of the study.
Statistical models were implemented using INLA [49] and the “inlabru” package in R [50]. A reproducible dataset and software code are available at https://osf.io/j25cr/
Results
Our findings indicate that the number of hunters who enrolled for the hunting season was lower than expected based on the 2011–2019 trend in 14 Italian provinces during 2020 and in 15 provinces in 2021. Anomalous decreases were observed specifically in provinces within the Lombardy, Emilia-Romagna, and Tuscany regions (Fig 2).
Anomalies are expressed as the difference between the median value of the posterior distribution, which in Bayesian models represent the most probable value, and observed values. Provinces in grey did not have any anomalous variation. Administrative boundaries were downloaded from the Italian National Institute of Statistics and are subjected to a CCBY 4.0 license (https://www.istat.it/note-legali/).
Lombardy exhibited the most pronounced decrease in both 2020 and 2021. By comparing the observed number of hunters in Lombardy with the median value of the posterior distribution, it was found that there were 3,904 (2,936–4,911, compared to the upper and lower bound of 95% Credibility Interval) fewer hunters in 2021 and 2,720 (1,790–3,688) fewer in 2020. There were 808 fewer hunters in the Emilia-Romagna region in 2020 (255–1,382) and 682 in 2021 (138–1,249). There were 538 fewer hunters in the Tuscany region in 2020 (259–828) and 741 fewer in 2021 (213–1,291), however only two out of ten regions in 2020 and three provinces in 2021 were affected by these anomalies. A complete overview of the decrease in hunters for each province is shown in Table 1.
Only provinces with an anomalous decrease are included in the table. Excess mortality was obtained from the Italian National Institute of Statistics [45] and it was represented as the percentage increase from the mean mortality in 2015–2019.
The province of Milan exhibited the most significant decrease overall (396–756 fewer hunters in 2020 and 284–638 in 2021), followed by Cremona (399–619 fewer hunters in 2020 and 286–503 in 2021), Lodi (402–570 fewer hunters in 2020 and 377–541 in 2021) and Bergamo (175–774 fewer hunters in 2020 and 101–691 in 2021).
According to the Italian National Institute of Statistics, the Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna regions exhibited the highest excess mortality in 2020, compared to the 2015–2019 average [45] and provinces with negative anomalies in hunting licenses concentrated in these areas (Table 1, Fig 3).
Anomalies are expressed as the difference between the median value of the posterior distribution, which in Bayesian models represent the most probable value, and observed values. Provinces with anomalous values were highlighted and marked with an asterisk. Excess mortality is represented as the percentage increase from the mean mortality in 2015–2019: for the 2020–2021 hunting season 2020 excess mortality was used, while 2021 excess mortality was used for the 2021/2022 season. Administrative boundaries were downloaded from the Italian National Institute of Statistics and are subjected to a CCBY 4.0 license (https://www.istat.it/note-legali/).
In 2020 the decrease in licences correlated positively with excess mortality (Spearman’s rho = 0.52, panel a of Fig 4); this relationship was negative in 2021 (Spearman’s rho = -0.62, panel a of Fig 4), and the decrease in licences during 2021 correlated positively with 2020 excess mortality (Spearman’s rho = 0.43, panel c of Fig 4).
Anomalies are expressed as the difference between the median value of the posterior distribution, which in Bayesian models represent the most probable value, and observed values. To assist the interpretation of the plots the decrease in hunting licences was expressed as an absolute value. Administrative boundaries were downloaded from the Italian National Institute of Statistics and are subjected to a CCBY 4.0 license (https://www.istat.it/note-legali/).
Discussion
Although many studies highlighted the potential of the COVID-19 pandemic to reshape socio-ecological systems [51], the amount of empirical research quantifying its implications on wildlife management models has been relatively limited. Through an examination of regional differences in COVID-19 progression in Northern Italy, we found that areas of the country experiencing the most immediate and pronounced impacts from COVID-19 also exhibited an anomalous decline in the number of hunting licenses in 2020 and 2021. We believe our study holds important implications to understand how wildlife management in Italy and Europe can be impacted by large scale epidemic events, and it calls for further large-scale collaborative research on trends in recreational hunting across Europe.
Our findings revealed that a wildlife management system where recreational hunters are aging, can be rapidly destabilized by epidemics and the associated public health measures. Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna regions exhibited high excess mortality in 2020 compared to the 2015–2019 average [45]. Interestingly, most provinces with negative anomalies in hunting licenses are concentrated in these regions (Fig 3), suggesting a potential decrease in hunting activity related to COVID-19 diffusion, particularly during 2020. We believe this pattern to have resulted from at least four different mechanisms.
On the one hand, since COVID-19 predominantly affected people above 60 years of age [52], older hunters could have died from COVID-19, or from consequence of the lack of health care deriving from it (e.g., from missed diagnoses [53]). The Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna regions were characterized by an impressive number of excess deaths and recoveries in intensive care units, particularly during spring 2020. Consequently, a higher-than-usual number of hunters may have perished from COVID-19 as they were in the most affected demographic segment.
Despite the current estimates of COVID-19 incidence are subject to debate, these areas likely experienced a higher total burden of COVID-19 in terms of incidence [45]. Hunters may have refrained from the hunting season to provide assistance to their relatives [20, 21] or because affected by long-COVID symptoms that could persists for months after the infection [54]. In turn, these two dynamics may have been mutually reinforcing, leading to the rapid dissolution of established social networks within the hunting community: as some hunters died, and others quit hunting, more hunters could have simply not renewed their licenses as their social circle was destroyed. The impact of social circle disruption, and the prohibition of gathering in groups from local health authorities, could have significantly affected forms of hunting, like wild boar drives with hounds [34], where teams must attain a minimum number of participants in order for hunting to take place. Finally, hunters might have ceased hunting due to uncertain about the opening of the hunting season, especially during 2020, as sanitary restrictions caused a confused situation where no firm decision were anticipated. Our data also suggest that these mechanisms were concentrated in time. Those provinces of the Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna regions, with the highest excess mortality in 2020 also had the highest anomalous decrease in hunting licences during the 2021/2022 season (Fig 3). This point is confirmed by considering the association between the reduction of hunting licences and excess mortality. As shown in the results, in 2020 the decrease in licences correlated positively with excess mortality, but this relationship was negative in 2021 and indeed the decrease in licences during 2021 correlated positively with 2020 excess mortality. Therefore, most impacts on hunters, their relatives and social circles, probably occurred during the first wave of COVID-19 in 2020, which made withdrawn people in 2020 and 2021. This dynamic can be considered analogous to the “harvesting effect” of pandemics, which is the compensatory reduction in mortality, which follows a temporary increase in the number of deaths among the most at-risk individuals.
The relative weight of these mechanisms is open to debate. In Italy restrictions, such as the lockdown in spring 2020, were implemented at the national level and therefore, if uncertainty had really played a major role, we should have observed an anomalous decrease across the entire study area. Future studies, carried out through structured questionnaires administered to a representative sample of hunters [55], will be crucial for delving into the ways in which COVID-19 affected the quality of the hunting experience. These investigations will help elucidate how each one of these four mechanisms could have affected the behaviour of hunters. Moreover, future studies should also replicate our analyses with long-term data, whenever these are available from regional offices: it is possible that the observed trends in 2020 and 2021 could have reversed in 2022, with some hunters renewing their hunting licenses.
However, we believe that the anomalies we observed in 2020 and 2021 should raise an alarm regarding the potential long-term consequences of COVID-19 for wildlife management in Italy. In this country, wildlife management relies almost entirely on the voluntary work of hunters, and professional hunting is forbidden by the legal framework (Legislative decree n. 157/1992). Voluntary cooperation from hunters will almost certainly collapse as they withdraw from hunting, a dynamic which COVID-19 will be further accelerated. We believe that updating existing laws to allow for the professionalization of hunting could partially counteract this collapse, by creating a corps of gamekeepers to assist local governments in wildlife management actions. Moreover, it will be necessary to reconsider management praxis to cope with a more aged and limited hunters population that could not afford physically demanding tasks.
Our findings also raise an alarm for those parts of Europe where COVID-19 had a high incidence and mortality since late 2020 [56]. In these areas, where hunters are already declining [57], a further decrease in recreational hunting could undermine the management of wild ungulates, whose populations have expanded [34] and nowadays require intensive culling [58, 59], as well as the integrated management of African Swine Fever [60]. To better understand the severity of this risk it is urgent to create a pan-European dataset about hunting licenses in Europe, to model large-scale trends in recreational hunting. This initiative will be fundamental to navigate potentially rapid changes in existing models of wildlife management and to design policies aimed at minimizing social conflicts related to wildlife.
Acknowledgments
We express our gratitude to the people and the institutions that provided us with access to data on hunters: Alessandra Berto and the Piedmont Region “Settore Conservazione e Gestione Fauna Selvatica e Acquicoltura”, CSI Piemonte, Dario Colombi (Friuli Venezia-Giulia Region), Guido Lavazza and Stefano Omizzolo of the Veneto Region and the staff of the “Territorial Services for Agriculture, Hunting and Fishing” (STACP is the Italian acronym) of the Emilia-Romagna Region.
References
- 1.
WHO—World Health Organization. COVID-19 Epidemiological Update—29 September 2023. 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/covid-19-epidemiological-update—29-september-2023
- 2. Wang H, Paulson KR, Pease SA, Watson S, Comfort H, Zheng P. Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic analysis of COVID-19-related mortality, 2020–21. The Lancet. 2022;399(10334):1513–1536. pmid:35279232
- 3. Bates AE, Primack RB, Moraga P, Duarte CM. COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdown as a “Global Human Confinement Experiment” to investigate biodiversity conservation. Biological conservation. 2020; 248:108665. pmid:32549587
- 4. Bates AE, Primack RB, Biggar BS, Bird TJ, Clinton ME, Command RJ, et al. Global COVID-19 lockdown highlights humans as both threats and custodians of the environment. Biological conservation. 2021; 263, 109175. pmid:34035536
- 5. Gibbons DW, Sandbrook C, Sutherland W J, Akter R, Bradbury R, Broad S,et al. The relative importance of COVID‐19 pandemic impacts on biodiversity conservation globally. Conservation Biology. 2021; 36(1): e13781. pmid:34057250
- 6. Gilby BL, Henderson C J, Olds AD, Ballantyne JA, Bingham EL, Elliott BB, et al. Potentially negative ecological consequences of animal redistribution on beaches during COVID-19 lockdown. Biological Conservation. 2021; 253:108926.
- 7. Vez-Garzón M, Giménez J, Sánchez-Márquez A, Montalvo T, Navarro J. Changes in the feeding ecology of an opportunistic predator inhabiting urban environments in response to COVID-19 lockdown. Royal Society Open Science. 2023;10(4):221639. pmid:37063991
- 8. Costa L Lopes, Machado PM, de Moura Barboza CA, Soares-Gomes A, Zalmon IR. Recovery of ghost crabs metapopulations on urban beaches during the Covid-19 “anthropause”. Marine Environmental Research. 2022;180,105733. pmid:36049433
- 9. Corradini A, Peters W, Pedrotti L, Hebblewhite M, Bragalanti N. Tattoni C, et al. Animal movements occurring during COVID-19 lockdown were predicted by connectivity models. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2021:32, e01895. pmid:34729384
- 10. Schrimpf MB, Des Brisay PG, Johnston A, Smith AC, Sánchez-Jasso J, Robinson BG. Reduced human activity during COVID-19 alters avian land use across North America. Science Advances. 2021;7(39): eabf5073. pmid:34550735
- 11. Tucker MA, Schipper AM, Adams TS, Attias N, Avgar T, Babic NL. Behavioral responses of terrestrial mammals to COVID-19 lockdowns. Science. 2023;380(6649):1059–1064. pmid:37289888
- 12. Soga M, Evans MJ, Cox DT, Gaston KJ. Impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic on human–nature interactions: Pathways, evidence and implications. People and Nature. 2021;3(3):518–527. pmid:34230912
- 13. Lindsey P, Allan J, Brehony P, Dickman A, Robson A, Begg C, et al. Conserving Africa’s wildlife and wildlands through the COVID-19 crisis and beyond. Nature ecology & evolution. 2020;4(10):1300–1310. pmid:32728187
- 14. Schweizer A M, Leiderer A, Mitterwallner V, Walentowitz A, Mathes GH, Steinbauer MJ. Outdoor cycling activity affected by COVID-19 related epidemic-control-decisions. Plos one. 2021;16(5):e0249268. pmid:33956810
- 15. Venter ZS, Barton DN, Gundersen V, Figari H, Nowell MS. Back to nature: Norwegians sustain increased recreational use of urban green space months after the COVID-19 outbreak. Landscape and urban planning. 2021;214:104175.
- 16. Hansen AS, Beery T, Fredman P, Wolf-Watz D. Outdoor recreation in Sweden during and after the Covid-19 pandemic–management and policy implications. Journal of environmental planning and management. 2023: 66(7):1472–1493.
- 17. Pröbstl-Haider U, Gugerell K, Maruthaveeran S. Covid-19 and outdoor recreation–Lessons learned? Introduction to the special issue on “Outdoor recreation and Covid-19: Its effects on people, parks and landscapes”. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism. 2023;41:100583. pmid:37521268
- 18. Yanez ND, Weiss NS, Romand JA, Treggiari MM. COVID-19 mortality risk for older men and women. BMC public health. 2020; 20(1):1–7. pmid:33213391
- 19. Sorensen RJD, Barber RM, Pigott DM, Carter A, Spencer CN, Ostroff SM. Variation in the COVID-19 infection-fatality ratio by age, time, and geography during the pre-vaccine era: A systematic analysis. The Lancet. 2022; 399(10334): 1469–1488. pmid:35219376
- 20. Fusar‐Poli L, Surace T, Meo V, Patania F, Avanzato C, Pulvirenti A, et al. Psychological well‐being and family distress of Italian caregivers during the COVID‐19 outbreak. Journal of Community Psychology. 2021; 50(5):2243–2259. pmid:34897728
- 21. Messina A, Lattanzi M, Albanese E, Fiordelli M. Caregivers of people with dementia and mental health during COVID-19: findings from a cross-sectional study. BMC geriatrics. 2022;22(1):56. pmid:35034607
- 22. Garcia F, da Silva A A, Freitas H, Sousa JP, Alves J. The effect of COVID-19 confinement on the activity behaviour of red deer. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2023; 45:e02525. pmid:37265595
- 23. Britton JR, Pinder AC, Alós J, Arlinghaus R, Danylchuk AJ, Edwards W, et al. Global responses to the COVID-19 pandemic by recreational anglers: considerations for developing more resilient and sustainable fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 2023; 33:1095–1111. pmid:37360579
- 24. Chizinski CJ, Gruntorad MP, Lusk JJ, Meduna LR, Inselman WM, Fontaine J J. The influence of the COVID‐19 pandemic on spring turkey hunting. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 2022; 86(3), e22202.
- 25. Danks ZD, Schiavone MV, Butler AB, Fricke K, Davis A, Cobb DT. Effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic on 2020 spring turkey hunting across the United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 2022; 46(2):e1294.
- 26.
CAHSS—Council to Advance Hunting and the Shooting Sports. Hunting licence sales 2020–2021. 2021. https://fishwildlife.org/mscgp/application/files/2016/8691/8549/MicroSite_F22AP00350_2021_CAHSS_LIC_Report_Digital.pdf
- 27. Cretois B, Linnell JD, Grainger M, Nilsen EB, Rød JK. Hunters as citizen scientists: Contributions to biodiversity monitoring in Europe. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2020; 23, e01077.
- 28. Pokorny B, Cerri J, Bužan E. Wildlife roadkill and COVID‐19: A biologically significant, but heterogeneous, reduction. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2022;59(5): 1291–1301.
- 29. Gortázar C, Fernandez-de-Simon J. One tool in the box: the role of hunters in mitigating the damages associated to abundant wildlife. European Journal of Wildlife Research. 2022; 68(3):28.
- 30. Cardoso B, García-Bocanegra I, Acevedo P, Cáceres G, Alves PC, Gortázar C. Stepping up from wildlife disease surveillance to integrated wildlife monitoring in Europe. Research in Veterinary Science. 2022; 144:149–156. pmid:34815105
- 31. Remuzzi A, Remuzzi G. COVID-19 and Italy: what next?. The lancet. 2020;395(10231):1225–1228. pmid:32178769
- 32. Pelagatti M, Maranzano P. Assessing the effectiveness of the Italian risk-zones policy during the second wave of COVID-19. Health Policy. 2021;125(9):1188–1199. pmid:34373109
- 33. Sharp R, Wollscheid KU. An overview of recreational hunting in North America, Europe and Australia. In: Dickson B., Hutton J., & Adams W. A. eds. Recreational hunting, conservation and rural livelihoods: science and practice. 2009; p. 25–38.
- 34.
Apollonio M, Andersen R, Putman R, editors. European ungulates and their management in the 21st century. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
- 35. ENETWILD‐consortium, Illanas S, Croft S, Smith GC, López‐Padilla S, Vicente J, et al. New models for wild ungulates occurrence and hunting yield abundance at European scale. EFSA Supporting Publications. 2022; 19(10): 7631E.
- 36. Cerri J, Ferretti M, Coli L. Where the wild things are: urbanization and income affect hunting participation in Tuscany, at the landscape scale. European journal of wildlife research. 2018; 64, 1–9.
- 37.
Regione Toscana. Piano Regionale Agricolo Forestale 2012–2015. 2012. https://www.regione.toscana.it/documents/10180/71336/PRAF/63dd2550-00e3-4002-b98e-b7bf126e5d4c
- 38.
Regione Emilia-Romagna. Piano Faunistico Venatorio Regionale 2018–2023. 2018. https://agricoltura.regione.emilia-romagna.it/caccia/temi/normativa/indirizzi-pianificazione/piano-faunistico-2018/piano-faunistico-venatorio-regionale-2018-2023
- 39.
Regione Lombardia. Piano Faunistico Venatorio Regionale. 2022. https://www.regione.lombardia.it/wps/portal/istituzionale/HP/DettaglioRedazionale/servizi-e-informazioni/cittadini/agricoltura/fauna-selvatica-e-caccia/piano-faunistico-venatorio-regionale/piano-faunistico-venatorio-regionale
- 40. Blangiardo M, Cameletti M, Pirani M, Corsetti G, Battaglini M, Baio G. Estimating weekly excess mortality at sub-national level in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS one. 2020;15(10), e0240286. pmid:33035253
- 41. Henry NJ, Elagali A, Nguyen M, Chipeta MG, Moore CE. Variation in excess all-cause mortality by age, sex, and province during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Scientific reports. 2022;12(1): 1077. pmid:35058508
- 42. Konstantinoudis G, Cameletti M, Gómez-Rubio V, Gómez IL, Pirani M, Baio G, et al. Regional excess mortality during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic in five European countries. Nature communications. 2022;13(1): 482. pmid:35079022
- 43.
Bezzini D, Schiavetti I, Manacorda T, Franzone G, Battaglia MA. First wave of COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: data and evidence. In: Asea A.A.A., Kaur P. (eds) Coronavirus Therapeutics–Volume II. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1353. Springer, Cham; 2021. p. 91–113.
- 44. Balboni E, Filippini T, Rothman K J, Costanzini S, Bellino S, Pezzotti P, et al. The influence of meteorological factors on COVID-19 spread in Italy during the first and second wave. Environmental Research. 2023; 228:115796. pmid:37019296
- 45.
ISTAT Istituto Nazionale di Statistica. Impatto dell’epidemia COVID-19 sulla mortalità totale della popolazione residente. Anni 2020–2021 e gennaio 2022. https://www.istat.it/it/files//2022/03/Report_ISS_ISTAT_2022_tab3.pdf
- 46.
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Saveliev AA. Spatial, temporal and spatial-temporal ecological data analysis with R-INLA. Newburgh: Highland Statistics Ltd; 2017.
- 47.
Blangiardo M, Cameletti M. Spatial and spatio-temporal Bayesian models with R-INLA. John Wiley & Sons. 2015.
- 48. Kruschke JK, Liddell TM. The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective. Psychonomic bulletin & review. 2018;25:178–206. pmid:28176294
- 49. Lindgren F, Rue H. Bayesian spatial modelling with R-INLA. Journal of statistical software. 2015; 63(19): 1–25.
- 50. Bachl FE, Lindgren F, Borchers DL, Illian JB. inlabru: an R package for Bayesian spatial modelling from ecological survey data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2019; 10(6):760–766.
- 51. Kadykalo AN, Beaudoin C, Hackenburg DM, Young N, Cooke SJ. Social–ecological systems approaches are essential for understanding and responding to the complex impacts of COVID-19 on people and the environment. PLOS Sustainability and Transformation.2022;1(4):e0000006.
- 52. Mannucci PM, Galbussera AA, D’Avanzo B, Tettamanti M, Remuzzi G, Fortino I. Two years of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and COVID-19 in Lombardy, Italy. Internal and Emergency Medicine. 2023;18(5):1445–1451. pmid:37314640
- 53. Angelini M, Teglia F, Astolfi L, Casolari G, Boffetta P. Decrease of cancer diagnosis during COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2023; 38:31–38. pmid:36593334
- 54. Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, Wei H, Low RJ, Re’em Y, et al. Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact. EClinicalMedicine. 2021; 38:101019. pmid:34308300
- 55.
Vaske JJ. Survey research and analysis. 2nd ed. Urbana, IL: Sagamore-Venture; 2019.
- 56.
Dijkstra L. The regional impact of COVID.19. From the 8th Cohesion Report. 2022. https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/stories/s/The-regional-impact-of-COVID-19/24gj-n8r2/
- 57. Massei G, Kindberg J, Licoppe A, Gačić D, Šprem N, Kamler J. et al. Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. Pest management science. 2015;71(4): 492–500. pmid:25512181
- 58. Valente AM, Acevedo P, Figueiredo AM, Fonseca C, Torres RT. Overabundant wild ungulate populations in Europe: management with consideration of socio‐ecological consequences. Mammal Review. 2020;50(4):353–366
- 59. Carpio AJ, Apollonio M, Acevedo P. Wild ungulate overabundance in Europe: contexts, causes, monitoring and management recommendations. Mammal Review. 2021; 51(1), 95–108.
- 60. EFSA—Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), More S, Miranda MA, Bicout D, Bøtner A, Butterworth A, et al. African swine fever in wild boar. EFSA Journal. 2018; 16(7):e05344. pmid:32625980