Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Effect of light on ascorbic acid biosynthesis and bioinformatics analysis of related genes in Chinese chives

  • Yuxuan Qian,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations Beijing Vegetable Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Beijing, China, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing, China

  • Jing Tong ,

    Roles Project administration, Resources, Supervision

    tongjing@nercv.org (JT); wuzhanhui@nercv.org (ZW)

    Affiliations Beijing Vegetable Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Beijing, China, Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (North) of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing, China

  • Ning Liu,

    Roles Project administration, Resources, Supervision

    Affiliations Beijing Vegetable Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Beijing, China, Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (North) of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing, China

  • Baoju Wang,

    Roles Project administration, Resources, Supervision

    Affiliations Beijing Vegetable Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Beijing, China, Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (North) of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing, China

  • Yanhai Ji,

    Roles Project administration, Resources, Supervision

    Affiliations Beijing Vegetable Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Beijing, China, Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (North) of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing, China

  • Zhanhui Wu

    Roles Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision

    tongjing@nercv.org (JT); wuzhanhui@nercv.org (ZW)

    Affiliations Beijing Vegetable Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Beijing, China, Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (North) of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing, China

Abstract

Ascorbic acid (AsA) is an essential nutritional component and powerful antioxidant in vegetables, and in plants, AsA levels are regulated by light. AsA levels in the leaves of Chinese chive (Allium tuberosum Rottler ex Spr), a popular vegetable, are poorly understood. Thus, this study was performed to assess the influence of light on AsA biosynthesis in chive and select related genes (AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1); in addition, bioinformatic analyses and gene expression level assays were performed. The biological information obtained for AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 was analysed with several tools, including NCBI, DNAMAN, and MEGA11. After different light treatments were performed, the Chive AsA content and AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 expression levels were determined. These results suggest that 1) compared with natural light, continuous darkness inhibited AsA synthesis in chives. 2) The amino acid sequences of AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 are very similar to those of other plants. 3) The trends observed for the expression levels of AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 were consistent with the AsA content observed in chives. Hence, we speculated that light controls AsA biosynthesis in chives by regulating AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 expression. This study provided impactful and informative evidence regarding the functions of GGP and GME in chives.

Introduction

Chinese chive (Allium tuberosum Rottler. ex Spr.), a perennial plant of the Allium genus, has been widely cultivated and naturalized worldwide [1]. Due to their high nutritional and medicinal properties, Chinese chives have become increasingly popular in food inventories as multifunctional vegetables; this popularity greatly reflects consumers’ awareness of the medicinal potential of chives to improve health and prevent chronic diseases [25].

Ascorbic acid (AsA), also known as vitamin C (VC), is a potent water-soluble antioxidant in humans and plays important roles in the synthesis of organic components within the extracellular matrix [6]. In plants, AsA acts as a major antioxidant and enzymatic cofactor that participates in several cellular and molecular processes [7, 8]. Several pathways for AsA biosynthesis have been identified, including the D-mannose/L-galactose pathway [9], D-galacturonate pathway [10], myoinositol pathway [11], and L-gulose pathway [12]. The L-galactose pathway has been identified as the primary pathway for AsA biosynthesis in many higher plants [1317]. Gene expression levels in the AsA metabolic pathway are closely related to changes in AsA accumulation [18]. Several key genes involved in AsA accumulation have been identified in various plants. In this complex process, GDP-L-galactose phosphorylase (GGP) is a rate-limiting enzyme that plays a vital role in AsA synthesis and is a major determinant of AsA concentrations [19]. GGP is the first specific enzyme in the L-galactose pathway and catalyses the conversion of GDP-L-galactose into L-galactose-1-phosphate [20]. Additionally, GDP-mannose 3,5-epimerase (GME) synergistically controls AsA biosynthesis [21] and catalyses the epimerization of GDP-D-mannose, generating GDP-L-galactose in the L-galactose pathway and GDP-L-gulose in an alternative L-gulose pathway [22, 23]. The AsA content was increased by 1.5- to 2.5-fold by the overexpression of GME and GGP genes in the D-mannose/L-galactose pathway within Arabidopsis and rice leaves, which was achieved through the genetic manipulation of the AsA biosynthesis process [24, 25]. Previous studies revealed that the AsA content decreased significantly in GME-silenced tomatoes [26]. Among the GGP deletion mutants, the AsA content in tomato fruit was significantly reduced [27].

Light is essential for the activation of AsA biosynthesis [28, 29], and research has shown that light induces many genes in the AsA synthesis pathway (such as GMP, GME, GGP, GPP, GalDH, and GLDH) that contain optical response elements on their promoters [30]. Under dark conditions, the transcription levels of GGP and GME were decreased, and the AsA content in Arabidopsis leaves decreased by 91%; however, after prolonged illumination, the AsA content was 1.71 times greater than that in the control [28]. Shading leads to a decrease in the expression level of most genes that synthesize AsA, of which GME and GGP are the most reduced [31]. Compared with the conventional optical period (12 h/12 h), continuous light (24 h/0 h) significantly increased the content of AsA in lettuce leaves [32]. Continuous light also gradually upregulated the expression of GME and GGP genes [28].

Here, we show that plant GGP and GME expression levels are largely influenced by light, which thus affects AsA biosynthesis. However, studies on how light affects AsA synthesis and GGP and GME expression in chives are scarce. Therefore, this study was performed to determine the physicochemical properties of GGP and GME in chive by bioinformatic analysis, as well as the influence of light on the AsA content and GGP and GME expression levels in chives, to provide more impactful and informative information on the functions of GGP and GME in chive.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

Seeds of the A. tuberosum cultivar ‘791’ were germinated on substrates (peat: vermiculite = 3: 1) in a balcony greenhouse located in the Beijing Vegetable Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (latitude: 39°56′18′′N; longitude: 116°17′03′′E). After the first crop harvest, the chives were treated as follows: 1) the plants were grown under natural light (L) or continuous darkness (D). Fresh leaves of plants were collected after 10 days, 20 days, 30 days and 40 days under treatments (samples were used in three replicates). 2) The plants were grown under the following photoperiods: 0 d (40 d continuous dark), 10 d (30 d continuous dark + 10 d natural light), 20 d (20 d continuous dark + 20 d natural light), 30 d (10 d continuous dark + 30 d natural light), and 40 d (40 d natural light), and fresh leaves were collected (samples were used in three replicates). The plants in each treatment group were irrigated with nutrient solution every 3 days. The composition was as follows: Ca(NO3)2 1.0 mM, KNO3 4.0 mM, NH4NO3 2.0 mM, KH2PO4 2.0 mM, (NH4)2SO4 1.0 mM, MgSO4·7H2O 1.0 mM [33]. All the collected samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C before use.

Total RNA isolation and first-strand cDNA synthesis

Total RNA from the chive leaves was extracted using a Vazyme FastPure Universal Plant Total RNA Isolation Kit (Nanjing Novizan Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA was dissolved in 100 μL of RNase-free water, and the concentrations were measured with a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). cDNA was synthesized using the TRAN EasyScript One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix Kit (Beijing All-style Gold Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). Briefly, total RNA was mixed with dNTPs in a total volume of 20 μL and incubated for 5 min at 65°C, 30 min at 42°C, or 5 s at 85°C in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. First-strand cDNA was stored at -20°C before use.

Cloning the full-length cDNA of AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1

The transcriptome sequencing results revealed one homologous GGP gene sequence and one homologous GME gene sequence, which contained complete open reading frames (ORFs). We named them AtuGGP1 (387 bp) and AtuGME1 (1140 bp). The specific primers AtuGGP1-FP/AtuGGP1-RP and AtuGME1-FP/AtuGME1-RP were designed for these two genes (Table 1) using SnapGene 7.0.2.0 to amplify the cDNA sequences of AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1. First-strand cDNA was used as a template to amplify the cDNA of AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 with 2×A8 PCR Mix (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR products were purified, cloned and inserted into the pEASY®-Blunt E2 vector (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China), and sequenced by Shanghai Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

Bioinformatic analysis

The protein physicochemical properties were analysed by ProtPatham, and the secondary structures were predicted by NovoPro. Both ProtPatham and NovoPro were used to analyse the protein hydrophilicity. The Molecular Bioinformatics Center was used to predict protein subcellular localization. The protein phosphorylation sites were predicted using NetPhos 3.1. Finally, amino acid homologous sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree construction were completed using NCBI BLAST, DNAMAN and MEGA11 (Table 2).

Analyses of AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 expression by real-time quantitative PCR

Real-time quantitative PCR cDNA amplification was carried out on a Bio-Rad CFX Opus 96 real-time PCR system (CFX Opus 96, USA). SYBR Green Mix (2×) (Toyobo (Shanghai) Biotech Co., Ltd.) was used in all reactions according to the protocol described by the manufacturer. Gene-specific primers were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 software (Table 3). The volume of each reaction was 20 μL (10.0 μL of SYBR Green Mix (2×), 0.5 μL of forwards and reverse primer each, 2.0 μL of cDNA, and 7.0 μL of RNase-free ddH2O). AtuSKP1/DN253_c0_g1 was selected as the housekeeping gene, and the relative expression levels were calculated using the 2-△△Ct method. Three biological replicates were performed.

thumbnail
Table 3. Primer sequences and reaction program for qRT‒PCR analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307527.t003

Extraction and determination of AsA

Ascorbic acid oxidase (AAO) catalyses the oxidation of AsA to produce dehydroascorbic acid (DHA) [34]. Thus, the AsA content can be calculated by measuring the percentage of AAO that oxidizes AsA [35]. Briefly, plant leaves (0.1 g) were mixed with trichloroacetic acid (TCA) solution (1 mL) for homogenization and centrifuged at 8000 × g for 20 min. Afterwards, the supernatants were mixed with AAO. Then, the absorbances were measured after 10 s and 130 s by a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 265 nm, and three biological and technical replicates were conducted.

Data analysis

The significance of the differences in the data were assessed by PASW Statistics 18 by making multiple comparisons, and the charts were drawn with Excel 2016 software.

Results

Full-length cDNA cloning

With the cDNA of the leaf as the template, the ORFs of AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 were amplified via PCR to obtain two specific fragments. Agarose electrophoresis of the PCR products revealed that AtuGGP1 had a single band at approximately 300 bp, AtuGME1 had a single band at approximately 1000 bp, and there were no nonspecific amplification bands (Fig 1). These fragments were linked with the pEASY®-Blunt E2 vectors, and the positive clones were selected. After sequencing and comparison were performed, the sequences of AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 were confirmed. According to the amino acid sequence inferred from SnapGene 7.0.2.0, the ORF of AtuGGP1 is 387 bp, encoding a total of 128 amino acids, and that of AtuGME1 is 1140 bp, encoding a total of 379 amino acids (Fig 2).(Data shown in S1 File)

Bioinformatic analysis

The protein physicochemical properties of AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 were analysed using ProtPatham, and the results showed that the relative molecular weight of the AtuGGP1 protein was 14676.84 D, the molecular formula was C650H1024N170O198S9, the aliphatic index was 86.09, the theoretical isoelectric point was 5.09 (<7), and the instability coefficient was 43.77 (>40), indicating that AtuGGP1 is an unstable acidic protein. The relative molecular weight of the AtuGME1 protein was 42804.56 D, the molecular formula was C1903H2936N516O570S20, the aliphatic index was 72.59, the theoretical isoelectric point was 5.83 (<7), and the instability coefficient was 39.00 (<40), indicating that AtuGME1 is a stable acidic protein (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 4. Physical and chemical properties of AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307527.t004

The protein secondary structures of AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 were predicted by NovoPro. The results showed that the α-helix, extended chain, and irregular curl of the AtuGGP1 protein accounted for 56.25%, 10.94% and 32.81% of the structure, respectively. The α-helix, extended chain, and irregular curl of the AtuGME1 protein accounted for 31.66%, 17.41% and 50.92% of the structure, respectively (Fig 3). The protein hydrophilicities of AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 were analysed via ProtPatham and NovoPro, and the results indicated that the maximum hydrophobicity of AtuGGP1 was 1.8 (at positions 10 and 123), the minimum hydrophobicity was -2.9 (at position 62), and the average hydrophilicity was -0.291, suggesting that AtuGGP1 is a hydrophilic protein. The maximum hydrophobicity of AtuGME1 is 1.5 (at positions 37 and 143), the minimum hydrophobicity is -2.7 (at position 65), and the average hydrophilicity is -0.445, suggesting that AtuGME1 is a hydrophilic protein (Table 4; Fig 4). Molecular Bioinformatics Center online software predicted that the AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 proteins are most likely located in the cytoplasm.

Phosphorylation affects protein activity and is closely related to signal transmission. NetPhos 3.1 predicted that the AtuGGP1 protein contains 10 highly reliable phosphorylation sites, including 4 serine, 3 threonine, and 3 tyrosine residues. The AtuGME1 protein contains 35 highly reliable phosphorylation sites, including 16 serine, 13 threonine, and 6 tyrosine residues (Fig 5). It is speculated that AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 are mainly composed of serine and other amino acids that act as auxiliaries, completing phosphorylation and regulating biological functions.

The amino acid sequences encoded by AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 were used to select homologous sequences from other plants. These results suggest that the amino acid sequences of AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 are highly similar to those of other plants (Figs 6 and 7). The amino acid sequence of AtuGGP1 is highly homologous to that of 8 other plant species, including blue leek, pineapple, coconut, plantain, and oil palm, at over 50%. The amino acid sequence of AtuGME1 is highly homologous to that of 16 plant species, including asparagus, Calamus, Iris pallida, and millet, which are more than 90% homologous. Based on the AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 protein sequences, phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA11 software. Based on the phylogenetic tree analyses, AtuGGP1 was not closely related to plants such as oil palm, coconut, and plantain, and blue leek contained the most closely related gene to AtuGGP1. The plant with the most closely related gene to AtuGME1 was asparagus, followed by calamus and Iris pallida; in contrast, plants such as Magnolia sinica, papaya and pistachio had relatively distant relationships with AtuGME1 (Fig 8).

AsA content and gene expression level

As shown in Fig 9A, the AsA content gradually decreased as the chives grew in natural light but gradually increased after 30 d. When the chives grew in the dark, the AsA content gradually decreased. On the 30th and 40th days, the chive AsA content was significantly lower than that on the 10th and 20th days. During the 40-day growth period, the AsA content was greater in the chives that grew in natural light that in the chives that grew in continuous darkness.

The results in Fig 9B show that different proportions of lighting time influenced the chive AsA content during the 40-day growth period. The content of AsA gradually increased with increasing natural lighting time. After 10 d, 20 d, 30 d and 40 d of natural lighting, the chive AsA content significantly increased to 370.6%, 415.4%, 530.4% and 550.2% greater than that after 0 d of natural lighting, respectively (Data shown in S1 Table).

These results indicate that light affects AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 expression levels. When chives were grown in natural light, AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 expression levels gradually decreased, but after 30 d, the levels gradually increased (Fig 10A). As the chives grew in the dark, AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 expression levels gradually decreased (Fig 10A). Thus, the change in AsA content in chives was consistent with the changes in AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 expression levels. Additionally, compared with those in chives growing in natural light, AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 expression levels in chives growing in continuous darkness were lower during the 40-day growth period (Fig 10B and 10C). Moreover, different proportions of lighting time influenced AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 expression levels, which gradually increased with increasing lighting time; this result showed that the tendency of the AsA content in chives with different durations of lighting was consistent with that of the AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 expression levels (Fig 10D). Thus, we can infer that AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 affect AsA biosynthesis in chives (Data shown in S2 Table).

Discussion

AsA is among the essential components of fruit and vegetable nutritional quality [30]. Many horticultural plants contain high levels of AsA; for example, the AsA content in mature fruits of prickly pear, hawthorn, rosehip, and cherokee rose-hip can reach 800 mg per 100 g. The AsA content is usually higher in wild fruits than in cultivated fruits [36]. AsA is a powerful antioxidant that may decrease the incidence of several illnesses, such as cancer and cardiovascular diseases [37]; however, the human body cannot synthesize AsA because of a lack of the L-guluronic acid-1,4-lactone oxidase enzyme [38]. Thus, plant-derived foods are the main source of AsA for humans. Furthermore, AsA is an essential antioxidant in plants that scavenges reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during exposure to biotic or abiotic stresses and those produced during normal growth and development [7, 39, 40].

Chinese chives are cultivated in China and other Asian countries as well as many European countries because this popular vegetable is rich in vitamins, fibre, and sulfur compounds and exhibits antibiotic properties [41, 42]. Although these nutritional qualities are well known, knowledge regarding AsA compounds in the leaves of Chinese chives is lacking. Light is an important signal for the activation of plant AsA biosynthesis, and researching the effects of light on AsA biosynthesis is convenient and inexpensive. Hence, we assessed the influence of light on AsA biosynthesis and selected related genes in chives; performed bioinformatic analyses; and performed assays to investigate the levels of gene expression in chive.

There are four possible AsA biosynthetic pathways in plants: the L-galactose, L-gulose, myo-inositol, and D-galacturonic acid pathways. The L-galactose pathway seems to prevail in many species [43]. First, 6-phosphate-D-glucose undergoes a series of isomerization and translocation reactions to produce 1-phosphate-D-mannose, after which GDP-D-mannose pyrophosphatase (GMP/VTC1) catalyses the transformation of 1-phosphate-D-mannose to GDP-D-mannose [44]. Second, GDP-D-mannose is catalysed by GME to produce GDP-L-galactose or GDP-L-gulose, and then the GGP catalyses GDP-L-galactose to form 1-phosphate-L-galactose [45]. Third, L-galactose-1-phosphatase (GPP) and L-galactose dehydrogenase (GalDH) catalyse the formation of L-galactose from 1-phosphate-L-galactose and L-galactono-1,4-lactone, respectively [46].

L-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase (GalLDH) is involved in the final step of the L-galactose pathway and catalyses the formation of AsA from L-galactono-1,4-lactone. Previous studies revealed that the overexpression of GME in tomato plants increased the AsA content and plant tolerance to salt, drought, and low temperatures [47, 48]. In contrast, after two GME genes in tomatoes were deleted, the AsA content decreased, the stems became brittle, and the fruit hardness decreased [26]. Tomato GGP1 is a homologous gene of Arabidopsis VTC2 and VTC5, and inhibiting GGP1 expression can reduce fruit cold resistance and yield [27]. The simultaneous overexpression of GME and GGP significantly increased the AsA content in cherry fruits [49]. There was a significant correlation between the expression level of the GGP gene and the AsA content in kiwifruit leaves and fruits during the growth period [14]. GGP and GME play vital roles in plant AsA synthesis and significantly influence AsA content. Our results showed that the change in AsA content in chives was consistent with the changes in the expression levels of AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 (Figs 9 and 10), which corresponds with previous studies on tomato [47] and kiwifruit [14]. AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 might strongly influence AsA biosynthesis in chives.

Light exerts a regulatory effect on AsA levels in plants by stimulating the L-galactose pathway, inducing gene expression, and increasing plant AsA content via a series of important light signal transcription factors and proteins [50]. GGP and GME contain many optical response elements in their promoters [30]. For example, the Rosa roxburghii GGP promoter contains photoinduction elements such as ACE, AE-box, Box4, CAG-motif, G-Box, GA-motify, GAG-motif, GTI-motif and GATA-motif. Under continuous light treatment, most rosa roxburghii GGP promoter mutants showed a significant increase in activity, but their activity decreased to varying degrees under continuous dark treatment [51].

Early studies revealed that the AsA content in Arabidopsis leaves decreased by 40% after 24 h of dark treatment [52], while under high light conditions, the AsA content in kiwifruit fruits [53], tomato leaves and fruits [54], apple fruits [55], and cowpea seedlings [56] significantly increased. Under shading, the AsA content of tomato fruits decreased by 30%, and the GME and GGP expression levels decreased concurrently [31]. Our research revealed that the AsA content of chives grown in natural light was greater than that of chives grown in continuous darkness during the 40-day growth period (Fig 9A). In addition, as the lighting duration increased, the chive AsA content gradually improved (Fig 9B). The trends in the expression levels of AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 were consistent with the abovementioned trends in AsA content (Figs 9 and 10). Therefore, we speculate that AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 control chive AsA biosynthesis via optical response elements in their promoters.

The GGP protein plays a role in AsA synthesis and may function as a growth regulation factor. Research on Arabidopsis vtc2 mutants revealed that the VTC2:GUS fusion protein is located simultaneously in the cytoplasm and nucleus; these results suggest that GGP plays an enzymatic role in the cytoplasm and performs specific functions to regulate gene expression in the nucleus [57]. Similarly, the tomato SlGGP-GFP fusion protein is localized in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of onion cells [58]. Additionally, previous research has shown that plants might experience slower cell division and growth due to the inactivation of GME [59], suggesting that GME controls plant growth. In addition to AsA synthesis, the functions of GGP and GME should be further studied.

In conclusion, light exerts a regulatory effect on AsA biosynthesis in chives. GGP and GME play vital roles in AsA synthesis, as they are light-induced and control plant AsA synthesis. The amino acid sequences of AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 are very similar to those of other plants. AsA synthesis was inhibited in chives grown in continuous darkness compared to chives grown in natural light. Moreover, the trends in AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 expression were generally consistent with the changes in AsA content in chives. These results suggest that light controls AsA biosynthesis in chives by regulating AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 expression.

Supporting information

S1 File. AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 CDS and amino acid sequences.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307527.s001

(DOCX)

S1 Table. AsA content of Chinese chive.

There are three biological replicates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307527.s002

(XLSX)

S2 Table. AtuGGP1 and AtuGME1 expression levels.

There are three biological replicates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307527.s003

(XLSX)

References

  1. 1. Liu N, Tong J, Hu MM, Ji YH, Wang BJ, Liang H, et al. Transcriptome landscapes of multiple tissues highlight the genes involved in the flavor metabolic pathway in Chinese chive (Allium tuberosum). Genomics. 2021;113: 2145–2157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.05.005
  2. 2. Zheng HC, Liu ZR, Li YL, Wang YA, Kong JW, Ge DY, et al. Allium tuberosum alleviates pulmonary inflammation by inhibiting activation of innate lymphoid cells and modulating intestinal microbiota in asthmatic mice. J Integr Med. 2021;19: 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joim.2020.11.003
  3. 3. Zeng YW, Li YP, Yang JZ, Pu XY, Du J, Yang XM, et al. Therapeutic role of functional components in alliums for preventive chronic disease in human being. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;2017: 1–13. pmid:28261311
  4. 4. Ni ZY, Guo LH, Liu F, Olatunji OJ, Yin M. Allium tuberosum alleviates diabetic nephropathy by supressing hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress and inflammation in high fat diet/streptozotocin treated rats. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;112: 108678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108678
  5. 5. Hur HJ, Lee AS. Protective effect of Allium tuberosum extract on vascular inflammation in tumor necrosis factor-α-induced human vascular endothelial cells. J Cancer Prev. 2017;22: 228–233. https://doi.org/10.15430/jcp.2017.22.4.228
  6. 6. Padayatty SJ, Katz A, Wang YH, Eck P, Kwon O, Lee JH, et al. Vitamin C as an antioxidant: evaluation of its role in disease prevention. J Am Coll Nutr. 2003;22: 18–35. pmid:12569111
  7. 7. Smirnoff N, Wheeler GL. Ascorbic acid: metabolism and functions of a multi-facetted molecule. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2000;3: 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(00)80070-9 pmid:10837263
  8. 8. Smirnoff N. Ascorbic acid metabolism and functions: a comparison of plants and mammals. Free Radic Biol Med. 2018;122: 116–129. pmid:29567393
  9. 9. Wheeler GL, Jones MA, Smirnoff N. The biosynthetic pathway of vitamin C in higher plants. Nature. 1998;393: 365–369. pmid:9620799
  10. 10. Agius F, Rocío GL, Ruiz A, Muñoz-Blanco J, Botella MA, Valpuesta V. Engineering increased vitamin C levels in plants by overexpression of a D-galacturonic acid reductase. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21: 177–181. pmid:12524550
  11. 11. Lorence A, Chevone BI, Mendes P, Nessler CL. Myo-inositol oxygenase offers a possible entry point into plant ascorbate biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2004;134: 1200–1205. pmid:14976233
  12. 12. Wolucka BA, Montagu MV. GDP-mannose 3’,5’-epimerase forms GDP-L-gulose, a putative intermediate for the de novo biosynthesis of vitamin C in plants. J Biol Chem. 2003;278: 47483–47490. pmid:12954627
  13. 13. Li MJ, Chen XS, Wang PP, Ma FW. Ascorbic acid accumulation and expression of genes involved in its biosynthesis and recycling in developing apple fruit. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2011;136: 231–238. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.136.4.231
  14. 14. Bulley SM, Rassam M, Hoser D, Otto W, Schünemann N, Wright M, et al. Gene expression studies in kiwifruit and gene over-expression in Arabidopsis indicates that GDP-L-galactose guanyltransferase is a major control point of vitamin C biosynthesis. J Exp Bot. 2009;60: 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern327
  15. 15. Liu W, An HM, Yang M. Overexpression of Rosa roxburghii L-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase in tobacco plant enhances ascorbate accumulation and abiotic stress tolerance. Acta Physiol Plant. 2013;35: 1617–1624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-012-1204-7
  16. 16. Liu FH, Wang L, Gu L, Zhao W, Su HY, Cheng XH. Higher transcription levels in ascorbic acid biosynthetic and recycling genes were associated with higher ascorbic acid accumulation in blueberry. Food Chem. 2015;188: 399–405. pmid:26041210
  17. 17. Mellidou I, Kanellis AK. Genetic control of ascorbic acid biosynthesis and recycling in horticultural crops. Front Chem. 2017;5: 278–283. pmid:28744455
  18. 18. Tabata K, Takaoka T, Esaka M. Gene expression of ascorbic acid-related enzymes in tobacco. Phytochemistry. 2002;61: 631–635. pmid:12423883
  19. 19. Liang D, Zhu TT, Ni ZY, Lin LJ, Tang Y, Wang ZH, et al. Ascorbic acid metabolism during sweet cherry (Prunus avium) fruit development. PloS one. 2017;12: e0172818–e0172818. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172818
  20. 20. Fenech M, Vítor AS, Alicia EV, Arnaud D, Noemi RL, Castillo AG, et al. The role of GDP-L-galactose phosphorylase in the control of ascorbate biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2021;185: 1574–1594. pmid:33793952
  21. 21. Bulley S, Laing W. The regulation of ascorbate biosynthesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2016;33: 15–22. pmid:27179323
  22. 22. Major LL, Wolucka BA, Naismith JH. Structure and function of GDP-mannose-3’,5’-epimerase: an enzyme which performs three chemical reactions at the same active site. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127: 18309–18320. pmid:16366586
  23. 23. Beerens K, Gevaert O, Desmet T. GDP-mannose 3,5-epimerase: a view on structure, mechanism, and industrial potential. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;8: 101–109. pmid:35087867
  24. 24. Zhang GY, Liu RR, Zhang CQ, Tang KX, Sun MF, Yan GH, et al. Manipulation of the rice L-galactose pathway: evaluation of the effects of transgene overexpression on ascorbate accumulation and abiotic stress tolerance. PloS one. 2015;10: e0125870. pmid:25938231
  25. 25. Ma LC, Wang YR, Liu WX, Liu ZP. Overexpression of an alfalfa GDP-mannose 3, 5-epimerase gene enhances acid, drought and salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis by increasing ascorbate accumulation. Biotechnol Lett. 2014;36: 2331–2341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-014-1598-y
  26. 26. Gilbert L, Alhagdow M, Adriano NN, Quemener B, Guillon F, Bouchet B, et al. GDP-D-mannose 3,5-epimerase (GME) plays a key role at the intersection of ascorbate and non-cellulosic cell-wall biosynthesis in tomato. The Plant J. 2009;60: 499–508. pmid:19619161
  27. 27. Alegre ML, Steelheart C, Baldet P, Rothan C, Just D, Okabe Y, et al. Deficiency of GDP-L-galactose phosphorylase, an enzyme required for ascorbic acid synthesis, reduces tomato fruit yield. Planta. 2020;251: 54. pmid:31970534
  28. 28. Yabuta Y, Mieda T, Rapolu M, Nakamura A, Motoki T, Maruta T, et al. Light regulation of ascorbate biosynthesis is dependent on the photosynthetic electron transport chain but independent of sugars in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2007;58: 2661–2671. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm124
  29. 29. Badejo AA, Fujikawa Y, Esaka M. Gene expression of ascorbic acid biosynthesis related enzymes of the Smirnoff-Wheeler pathway in acerola (Malpighia glabra). J Plant Physiol. 2009;166: 652–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2008.09.004
  30. 30. Jiang M, Liu Y, Ren L, She X, Chen H. Light regulates ascorbic acid accumulation and ascorbic acid-related genes expression in the peel of eggplant. S Afr J Bot. 2018;114: 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.10.012
  31. 31. Safir AT, Li FM, Wang Y, Shang LL, Zhang XY, Tao JB, et al. Effect of shading on ascorbic acid accumulation and biosynthetic gene expression during tomato fruit development and ripening. Vegetable Res. 2022;2: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.48130/vr-2022-0001
  32. 32. Zha LY, Zhang YB, Liu WK. Dynamic responses of ascorbate pool and metabolism in lettuce to long-term continuous light provided by red and blue LEDs. Environ Exp Bot. 2019;163: 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.04.003
  33. 33. Wu ZH, Maruo T, Shinohara Y. Effect of total nitrogen concentration of nutrient solution in DFT system on the initial growth and nutrient uptake of Chinese chive (Allium tuberosum Rottler ex Spreng.). J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci. 2008;77: 173–179. https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs1.77.173
  34. 34. Tan ZM, Xuan ZY, Wu CY, Cheng YX, Xu CZ, Ma XC, et al. Effects of selenium on the AsA-GSH system and photosynthesis of pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.) under lead stress. J Soil Sci Plant Nut. 2022;22: 5111–5122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00987-6
  35. 35. Ji YW, Zhang PP, Xing YX, Jia LL, Zhang YP, Jia TT, et al. Effect of 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells and the underlying regulatory mechanism. Int J Mol Med. 2018;43: 167–176. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2018.3947
  36. 36. He YZ, Pang Y, Sun HQ, Li XY. Recent advances in the biosynthesis, recycling and regulation of ascorbic acid in fruit. Acta Hortic Sin. 2023;50: 1899–1915. https://doi.org/10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2022-0490.
  37. 37. Bei R. Effects of Vitamin C on health: a review of evidence. Front Biosci. 2013;18: 1017. https://doi.org/10.2741/4160
  38. 38. Dun WW, Wei X, Wang L, Liu JJ, Zhao J, Sun PP, et al. Over-expression of FaGalLDH increases ascorbic acid concentrations and enhances salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant Biol. 2022;66: 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-022-09376-z
  39. 39. Broad RC, Bonneau JP, Hellens RP, Johnson AAT. Manipulation of ascorbate biosynthetic, recycling, and regulatory pathways for improved abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21: 1790. pmid:32150968
  40. 40. Gallie DR. The role of L-ascorbic acid recycling in responding to environmental stress and in promoting plant growth. J Exp Bot. 2012;64: 433–443. pmid:23162122
  41. 41. Imahori Y, Suzuki Y, Uemura K, Kishioka I, Fujiwara H, Ueda Y, et al. Physiological and quality responses of Chinese chive leaves to low oxygen atmosphere. Postharvest Biol Tec. 2004;31: 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2003.09.004
  42. 42. Hu GH, Lu YH, Wei DZ. Chemical characterization of Chinese chive seed (Allium tuberosum Rottl.). Food Chem. 2006;99: 693–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.08.045
  43. 43. Fenech M, Amaya I, Valpuesta V, Botella MA. Vitamin C content in fruits: biosynthesis and regulation. Front Plant Sci. 2019;9. pmid:30733729
  44. 44. Hancock RD, Viola R. Biosynthesis and catabolism of L-ascorbic acid in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2005;24: 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680591002165
  45. 45. Dowdle J, Ishikawa T, Gatzek S, Rolinski S, Smirnoff N. Two genes in Arabidopsis thaliana encoding GDP-L-galactose phosphorylase are required for ascorbate biosynthesis and seedling viability. The Plant J. 2007;52: 673–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03266.x
  46. 46. Conklin PL, Gatzek S, Wheeler GL, Dowdle J, Raymond MJ, Rolinski S, et al. Arabidopsis thaliana VTC4 encodes L-galactose-1-P phosphatase, a plant ascorbic acid biosynthetic enzyme. J Biol Chem. 2006;281: 15662–15670. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m601409200
  47. 47. Zhang CJ, Liu JX, Zhang YY, Cai XF, Gong PJ, Zhang JH, et al. Overexpression of SlGMEs leads to ascorbate accumulation with enhanced oxidative stress, cold, and salt tolerance in tomato. Plant Cell Rep. 2010;30: 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-010-0939-0
  48. 48. Louise MG, Dumont M, Ferrand C, Céline B, Monier A, Jorly J, et al. Two tomato GDP-D-mannose epimerase isoforms involved in ascorbate biosynthesis play specific roles in cell wall biosynthesis and development. J Exp Bot. 2016;67: 4767–4777. pmid:27382114
  49. 49. Suekawa M, Fujikawa Y, Inoue A, Kondo T, Uchida E, Koizumi T, et al. High levels of expression of multiple enzymes in the Smirnoff-Wheeler pathway are important for high accumulation of ascorbic acid in acerola fruits. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2019;83: 1713–1716. pmid:31023155
  50. 50. Ntagkas N, Woltering EJ, Marcelis LFM. Light regulates ascorbate in plants: an integrated view on physiology and biochemistry. Environ Exp Bot. 2018;147: 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.10.009
  51. 51. Zhang SX. Cloning, analysis and functional verification of GGP promoter of Rosa Roxburghii Tratt. 2018.
  52. 52. Conklin PL, Pallanca JE, Last RL, Smirnoff N. L-ascorbic acid metabolism in the ascorbate-deficient Arabidopsis mutant vtc1. Plant Physiol. 1997;115: 1277–1285. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.115.3.1277
  53. 53. Li MJ, Ma FW, Liu J, Li J. Shading the whole vines during young fruit development decreases ascorbate accumulation in kiwi. Physiol Plantarum. 2010;140: 225–237. pmid:20618762
  54. 54. Massot C, Stevens R, Génard M, Longuenesse JJ, Gautier H. Light affects ascorbate content and ascorbate-related gene expression in tomato leaves more than in fruits. Planta. 2011;235: 153–163. pmid:21861113
  55. 55. Li MJ, Ma FW, Shang PF, Zhang M, Hou CM, Liang D. Influence of light on ascorbate formation and metabolism in apple fruits. Planta. 2009;230: 39–51. pmid:19337748
  56. 56. Reid ME. The effect of light on the accumulation of ascorbic acid in young cowpea plants. Am J Bot. 1938;25: 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1938.tb12839.x
  57. 57. Patricia MM. An expression analysis of the ascorbate biosynthesis enzyme VTC2. Plant Mol Biol. 2008;68: 31–41. pmid:18516687
  58. 58. Wang LY, Li D, Deng YS, Lv W, Meng QW. Antisense-mediated depletion of tomato GDP-L-galactose phosphorylase increases susceptibility to chilling stress. J Plant Physiol. 2013;170: 303–314. pmid:23267461
  59. 59. Voxeur A, Gilbert L, Rihouey C, Driouich A, Rothan C, Baldet P, et al. Silencing of the GDP-D-mannose 3,5-epimerase affects the structure and cross-linking of the pectic polysaccharide rhamnogalacturonan II and plant growth in tomato. J Biol Chem. 2011;286: 8014–8020. pmid:21224383