Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

High ferritin is associated with liver and bone marrow iron accumulation: Effects of 1-year deferoxamine treatment in hemodialysis-associated iron overload

  • Lucas L. A. Nunes ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    lucaslan@ufpa.br

    Affiliation LIM 16 –Laboratorio de Fisiopatologia Renal, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

  • Luciene M. Dos Reis,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Validation

    Affiliation LIM 16 –Laboratorio de Fisiopatologia Renal, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

  • Rosse Osorio,

    Roles Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Software

    Affiliation Radiology Department, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

  • Hanna K. A. Guapyassú,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation

    Affiliation LIM 16 –Laboratorio de Fisiopatologia Renal, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

  • Rosa M. A. Moysés,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation LIM 16 –Laboratorio de Fisiopatologia Renal, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

  • Hilton Leão Filho,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), Sao Paulo, Brazil

  • Rosilene M. Elias,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Validation

    Affiliations LIM 16 –Laboratorio de Fisiopatologia Renal, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, Radiology, Instituto do Coracao (InCor), Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

  • Carlos E. Rochitte,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Validation

    Affiliation Radiology Department, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

  • Vanda Jorgetti ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Vanda Jorgetti, Melani R. Custodio

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation LIM 16 –Laboratorio de Fisiopatologia Renal, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

  • Melani R. Custodio

    Contributed equally to this work with: Vanda Jorgetti, Melani R. Custodio

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation LIM 16 –Laboratorio de Fisiopatologia Renal, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Abstract

Background

Iron (Fe) supplementation is a critical component of anemia therapy for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, serum Fe, ferritin, and transferrin saturation, used to guide Fe replacement, are far from optimal, as they can be influenced by malnutrition and inflammation. Currently, there is a trend of increasing Fe supplementation to target high ferritin levels, although the long-term risk has been overlooked.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 28 patients with CKD on hemodialysis with high serum ferritin (> 1000 ng/ml) and tested the effects of 1-year deferoxamine treatment, accompanied by withdrawal of Fe administration, on laboratory parameters (Fe status, inflammatory and CKD-MBD markers), heart, liver, and iliac crest Fe deposition (quantitative magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), and bone biopsy (histomorphometry and counting of the number of Fe positive cells in the bone marrow).

Results

MRI parameters showed that none of the patients had heart iron overload, but they all presented iron overload in the liver and bone marrow, which was confirmed by bone histology. After therapy, ferritin levels decreased, although neither hemoglobin levels nor erythropoietin dose was changed. A significant decrease in hepcidin and FGF-23 levels was observed. Fe accumulation was improved in the liver and bone marrow, reaching normal values only in the bone marrow. No significant changes in turnover, mineralization or volume were observed.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that treatment with deferoxamine was safe and could improve Fe accumulation, as measured by MRI and histomorphometry. Whether MRI is considered a standard tool for investigating bone marrow Fe accumulation requires further investigation.

Registry and the registration number of clinical trial: ReBEC (Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clinicos) under the identification RBR-3rnskcj available at: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/pesquisador.

Introduction

Anemia is a major problem among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), mainly in those on maintenance hemodialysis [1] factors such as absolute or functional iron (Fe) deficiency, relative erythropoietin deficiency, and a chronic inflammatory state. Several studies have shown that anemia worsens patients’ quality of life, favors the development of cardiovascular complications, and increases the mortality rate. Over the years, there has been a reduction in blood transfusion dependence associated with an increase in Fe replacement and the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents [2, 3].

Serum Fe, ferritin, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) levels are used in clinical practice to guide Fe supplementation. However, these parameters are far from optimal, as they can be influenced by malnutrition and inflammation, both of which are common in patients with CKD. The KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guidelines suggest Fe supplementation if ferritin levels are <500 ng/dL or TSAT is < 30% [4]. However, Rostoker G et al. [5] using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to document hepatic hemosiderosis in 84% of patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD), and in 30% of patients, the burden was as intense as that observed in patients with genetic hemochromatosis. Notably, the median serum ferritin level was 446 ng/ml, which is below the current threshold that demands discontinuation of intravenous Fe administration.

Liver MRI is considered the gold standard noninvasive method for estimating and monitoring iron stores in secondary and genetic hemosiderosis, but MRI is not often performed in patients with CKD. Iron overload can lead to heart failure, a complication frequently seen in patients with thalassemia and in those with hereditary hemochromatosis [5, 6] In patients with CKD, heart failure is frequent, although the contribution of iron overload is little appreciated. Another site for Fe accumulation that has been evaluated over the last decade is the bone marrow. Bone biopsies performed for different indications have shown Fe deposits in the mineralization front and bone marrow of these patients [79].

Deferoxamine (DFO), an iron binder often used by thalassemia patients, is capable of increasing the levels of hemoglobin and decreasing the levels of ferritin and tissue Fe [10, 11]. In CKD, DFO has been widely used as a binder in patients with aluminum (Al) intoxication [12]. However, few studies have reported the use of DFO to treat iron overload in patients with CKD, mostly in the pre-ESA era [1315].

Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal ferritin range, how to evaluate Fe deposition, or whether DFO can be used to treat iron overload in patients with CKD. In the present study, we prospectively enrolled patients with CKD undergoing hemodialysis with serum ferritin > 1000 ng/ml, and, we tested the effects of 1-year DFO use, on laboratory parameters, bone biopsy, myocardial, liver, and bone Fe accumulation, assessed by MRI by T2* values, R2* relaxometry and the use of the R2* Water parameter, which improves the diagnostic accuracy of iron overload.

Patients and methods

With the informed written patients’ consent and local ethics committee (Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP) approval (CAPpesq # 1.906.167), 28 patients from São Paulo/SP, Brazil, undergoing chronic intermittent HD were enrolled in this prospective study during a 12-month period from February 3st,2017, after approval by the Ethics Committee, to February 28th, 2019, for participant recruitment (February 2017 to February 2018) and follow-up (1 year). The sample size was obtained by convenience. The main outcome was organ iron deposition measured by magnetic resonance imaging as R2*Water.

The inclusion criteria were ferritin levels >1,000 ng/ml, age > 18 years, on an HD schedule of 3 times/week for at least six months. The exclusion criteria were refusal to participate in the study, ethanol or drug abuse, claustrophobia, hepatic cirrhosis, active malignancy, HIV infection, hepatitis B and C, current use of steroids, presence of cardiac pacemakers or metallic cardiac valves, previous kidney transplant, and previous DFO treatment.

This study was registered at the REBEC (Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clinicos) at the website https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/welcome under the identification number #RBR-3rnskcj (Recruitment—Feb 2017 to Feb 2019 and Follow-up—1 year).

The clinical and demographic parameters included age, sex, race, primary cause of CKD, HD duration, and vascular access. Fasting blood samples were obtained on the same day as the MRI examination. The samples were centrifuged, aliquoted in cryovials, and stored at -80°C. Serum levels of hemoglobin (Hb) Fe, transferrin saturation ferritin, total calcium (tCa), ionized calcium (iCa), phosphate, total alkaline phosphatase (AP), and C-reactive protein (CRP) (immunoturbidimetric method), were analyzed using standard laboratory techniques. Intact PTH (Immulite; DPC-Biermann, Bad Nauheim, Germany,), 25(OH) vitamin D (immunoassay), intact FGF 23 (ELISA FGF 23 Human intact-Quidel San Diego, CA, USA), C-terminal FGF-23 (Human FGF-23 C-Term, ELISA, Quidel San Diego, CA, USA,), and Human Hepcidin (Quantikine ELISA, kit R&D Systems Inc, Minneapolis, MN, USA,) were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Patients underwent liver, heart, and bone (iliac and lumbar spine) MRI and iliac crest bone biopsy at the beginning and after 12 months of DFO administration (5 mg/kg once a week during the last hour of the second HD session of the week). The patients did not receive blood transfusions or iron infusions during the study period (S1 File).

Bone biopsy and histomorphometry, magnetic resonance imaging and statistical analysis

Details of the bone biopsy, histomorphometry, MRI protocol and Statistical analysis are given in S2 File.

Results

Baseline

Of the 70 patients selected, 28 were included in this study (Fig 1) The baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory features and histomorphometry data are shown in S1 and S2 Tables. Most patients were non-white men, relatively young, and on dialysis for a median time of 36 months. Diabetes and hypertension account for > 60% of the etiology of CKD. The median weekly EPO and monthly iron sucrose doses in the previous year were 160 UI/kg and 258 mg, respectively. C-reactive protein levels increased in 50% of the patients.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Patient flow diagram.

Abbreviations: MRI = Magnetic Resonance imaging.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306255.g001

MRI parameters (S3 Table) showed that none of the patients had iron overload in the heart, but all of them had iron overload in the liver. Using the T2* parameter [1618], mild and moderate Fe depositions were found in 22 (78.6%) and six (22.4%) patients, respectively. All patients showed liver Fe accumulation using the R2*Water parameter. Ferritin correlated with Liver R2*Water (Fig 2A) and LIC (r = 0.735, p < 0.0001). No correlation was found with any other laboratory parameter. Regarding the lumbar spine, we found that 23 of 28 patients (82.1%) had MRI signs of iron overload. There was a positive correlation between the lumbar spine R2*Water and monthly doses of intravenous iron (r = 0.440; p = 0.019), but there was no correlation between Spine R2*water with Liver R2* water (r = -0.158, p = 0.422) and no correlation between serum ferritin and spine R2*water (r = -0.023, p = 0.907) at baseline. In addition, 18 (64.3%) and 17 (60.7%) patients showed Fe accumulation in the iliac crest using R2* Water and R2*, respectively.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Univariate correlations between serum ferritin, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and bone biopsy parameters.

A. Serum ferritin and Liver R2*Water. B. Serum ferritin and right iliac crest R2*Water. C. Right iliac crest R2*Water and number of Fe+ bone marrow cells adjusted by bone marrow area. D. Right iliac crest R2*Water and liver R2*Water.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306255.g002

Right iliac crest R2*Water correlated with serum ferritin and the number of Fe+ bone marrow cells adjusted by bone marrow area (Cells Fe+/Ma.Ar), as shown in Fig 2B and 2C, respectively. Similar results were obtained in the left iliac crest. R2*Water in the liver correlated with R2*Water at the right iliac crest (Fig 2D), but not at the lumbar spine (r = 0.015; p = 0.938).

According to the TMV classification, (Turnover, Mineralization, Volume) aimed to designate the quantity (volume) and the quality (turnover and mineralization) of the bone, patients were distributed between low (33.3%) and high (66.7%) turnover. Bone mineralization was normal in 33.3% of patients and abnormal in 66.7%. The volume was normal in 66.7%, low in 27.7%, and high in the remaining 5.6% of the patients. Of note, patients with low bone turnover had a higher monthly Fe dose in the previous year than those with high turnover (416.5 ± 147.4 vs. 240.1 ± 161.8 mg/month, respectively: p = 0.04). However, Fe was not detected at the mineralization front in any of the patients.

Follow-up

From the original cohort of 28 patients, 2 underwent a kidney transplant, 3 died (2 due to cardiovascular events and 1 due to respiratory infection), and 3 withdrew their consent. Therefore, we analyzed a final sample of 20 patients (13 men, 56 ± 12 years). None of the patients required blood transfusion or experienced adverse effects related to DFO administration. Table 1 shows the changes in laboratory parameters during the follow-up. There was a decrease in serum Fe, transferrin saturation, and ferritin, although 9 patients (45%) remained with a ferritin level higher than that prescribed by the KDIGO guidelines [4] (> 500 ng/ml) at the end of follow-up. These patients did not have significant differences in baseline ferritin (1,871.7 ± 677.6 vs. 1,410.9 ± 529.4; p = 0.105). However, liver R2*Water was higher in these patients at baseline (207.2 ± 74.2 vs. 125.6 ± 38.0; p = 0.005), as well as at the end of the follow-up (175.6 ± 56.2 vs. 71.9 ± 25.1; p < 0.001), indicating that they had more accumulation of Fe. For the entire group, we found a significant decrease in C-terminal FGF-23 and in Hepcidin levels. No significant changes were found in the erythropoietin doses. A decrease in the serum calcium level was not accompanied by a significant increase in PTH. There were no significant changes in calcitriol, cinacalcet, or sevelamer dose. Dialysis prescription was not modified during the study.

thumbnail
Table 1. Laboratory parameters and bone mineral density before and after 12 months after DFO.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306255.t001

There was a significant reduction in Fe deposition in the liver, lumbar spine, and iliac crest (Table 2 and Fig 3). All but 2 patients showed improved liver R2*Water.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Illustrative MRI of a given patient at baseline and at the end of follow-up.

The figure shows R2*Water maps (R2*Water) overlap in the axial images of the upper abdomen and pelvis before (A and B) and after (C and D) treatment. The liver R2*Water showed a median value of 207 s-1 in A and 81 s-1 in C after treatment, which correlated with the reduction in serum ferritin levels. The same can be observed in the spleen, from 373 s-1 in A to 258 s-1 in C. The bones also demonstrated a reduction in the R2*Water values, ranging from 148 s-1 to 94 s-1 for the L3 vertebra (A and C) and from 151 s-1 to 95 s-1 (B and D) in the left iliac crest. Republished from Body Digital Pte Ltd under a CC BY license, with permission from Wanida Chua-anusorn, original copyright 2024.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306255.g003

thumbnail
Table 2. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of liver, heart, lumbar spine, and iliac crest at baseline and at the end of follow-up.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306255.t002

However, none of them reached normal R2*Water values during follow-up (Fig 4A). Regarding the iliac crest, all patients showed improvement and had normal R2*Water values (Fig 4B).

thumbnail
Fig 4.

Liver R2*Water (A) and right iliac crest R2*Water (B) MRI parameter pre- and post-treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306255.g004

A significant decrease in the number of Fe+ bone marrow cells was observed. Bone histomorphometry revealed an increase in trabecular separation and a decrease in the osteoblastic surface (Table 3). There were no significant changes in turnover (p = 0.093), mineralization (p = 1), or volume (p = 1) after 1 year (Table 4 and Fig 5).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Turnover, Mineralization, and Volume (TMV) classification at the different timepoints.

TMV distribution and individual evolution at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306255.g005

thumbnail
Table 3. Bone histomorphometry at baseline and at the end of follow-up.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306255.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Turnover, Mineralization, and Volume (TMV) classification at baseline and 12 months after treatment with DFO.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306255.t004

Discussion

The present study reports three main findings. First, patients on maintenance HD with high serum ferritin present iron overload in the liver and bone marrow, but not in the heart. Second, the results were obtained using the MRI R2*Water parameter, which excludes fat measurement, particularly in the bone marrow, which showed a high-fat fraction in the analysis. Third, Fe overload improved after stopping Fe supplementation and the use of DFO, leading to a reduction in serum ferritin, transferrin saturation index, serum Fe, FGF23c and Hepcidin levels, and an improvement in liver and bone marrow MRI findings. These results were detected despite no changes in serum hemoglobin or erythropoietin doses.

Iron overload was described in patients with CKD before the introduction of erythropoietin due to frequent blood transfusions to correct anemia [19]. However, after the EPO era, blood transfusions were reduced. Therefore, the administration of intravenous iron in association with erythropoietin has become a common clinical practice to correct anemia in patients on dialysis. Hereafter, it is expected that supplemental Fe is harmless. However, this concept was challenged by the study by Rostoker et al. [5], which evaluated patients on HD treated with EPO and regular Fe supplementation. Severe Fe overload was found in more than one-third of patients, indicating the need for more accurate monitoring of Fe supplementation in this population. Serial hepatic MRI showed a clear relationship between iron therapy and increased hepatic iron stocks, confirming the deleterious role of intravenous iron therapy [5]. Another study from the same group showed that intravenous Fe administration should not exceed 250 mg/month, a cutoff above which represents a 3.9 times higher chance of Fe liver accumulation, evaluated through MRI [20].

Before the introduction of EPO, Ali et al described that there was a discrepancy regarding iron overload in patients with CKD, i.e., there was iron overload in the liver tissue, but not in the bone marrow [21]. Contradictorily, these results were not the same as observed in the studies by Rostoker et al. [22], Carrilho et al. [23], and in our study. It seems that iron in the bone marrow of HD patients follows similar kinetics to that traditionally observed in secondary hemosiderosis.

However, even in light of this evidence, the KDIGO guidelines continue to propose serum ferritin levels of 500 ng/L and transferrin saturation up to 30% [4], in agreement with the European Renal Best Practice [24]. In contrast, the Canadian Society of Nephrology [25] suggests lower TSAT and ferritin thresholds. The Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy [26] establishes that iron supplementation is indicated only if the serum ferritin level is <100 ng/mL and the transferrin saturation rate (TSAT) is < 20%. Recently, a new piece of evidence has been added to the literature in favor of Fe supplementation. In the PIVOTAL study [27], patients on HD who received a median monthly dose of 264 mg had fewer cardiovascular events than those who received 145 mg. However, it should be noted that the PIVOTAL study included patients with < 12 months of therapy, without pronounced inflammation status, and from a single country. Therefore, the results may not be generalizable. In summary, while some studies advocate higher iron supplementation, others strongly recommend against it, fearing intoxication [28].

We found no adverse effects when withdrawing Fe supplementation and administering DFO. Since 2013, there have been studies describing the use of the iron chelator Deferasirox, (used orally) in both patients treated with HD or PD [29]. These studies evaluated a small number of patients and many of them were case reports. However, it is worth highlighting that this drug represents a promising option for the treatment of patients with CKD and iron overload [3032]. However, larger studies are needed to demonstrate its safety and efficacy, especially in HD patients.

Hemoglobin levels remained virtually the same, and there was no need to increase the erythropoietin dose. Although it is well known that inflammation leads to increased serum ferritin [33] one cannot rule out Fe overload diagnosis in this scenario. Indeed, 50% of our patients had high CRP levels, but all had liver and bone marrow iron accumulation. The subgroup of patients with high serum ferritin levels had persistent Fe overload at the end of the follow-up. Therefore, Fe tissue overload should not be imputed to inflammation, at least for patients with extremely high serum ferritin levels. Sensitive inflammatory markers such as FGF-23 and hepcidin decreased during follow-up, indicating that excess Fe might have contributed to the inflammatory status [34], which improved after treatment, suggesting lower resistance to erythropoietin.

Liver MRI is the best noninvasive method for quantifying hepatic Fe levels. This technique has good sensitivity and specificity in both diagnosis and follow-up treatment of assorted pathologies [35, 36]. In the current study, the use of the R2*Water MRI parameter reduced the chance of bias due to fat deposits, thereby ameliorating the diagnostic accuracy of Fe overload. It is already known that liver Fe accumulation correlated with serum ferritin [2, 37, 38]. We showed this correlation even in individuals with serum ferritin levels as high as > 1000ng/ml, in the bone marrow and liver. Fe overload has been described to be associated with hepatic steatosis [39, 40].

In thalassemic patients, cardiac complications are responsible for about 50% of deaths, and the use of MRI for diagnosis led to an intensification of Fe chelation regimens with significant improvement in survival [41]. No evidence of cardiac iron overload was found. It seems that Fe deposition kinetics in the heart is slower than that in the liver, probably requiring a much longer time of Fe exposure to impregnate the cardiac tissue [41, 42].

Patients with CKD may have other heart MRI changes that are not associated with iron supplementation. However, it is noteworthy that excess Fe increases hepcidin levels, which in turn activates macrophages in atheromatous plaques, favoring their rupture. Thus, long-term excess Fe without correction would contribute to the cardiovascular complications of these patients [43, 44] A recent review stated that intravenous Fe therapy has been associated with an increased risk of atherothrombosis, vascular calcification, oxidative stress, and infection [45].

In the bone biopsy evaluation, we found that all patients had iron overload in the bone marrow. Rocha et al. [8] described a quantitative method for the counting of iron-stained cells in the bone marrow of an HD patient and observed an increase in cells in patients with ferritin levels above 500 ng/ml. To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to evaluate Fe deposits in the iliac crests using MRI. Despite the lack of reference values for this region, the significant correlations between the amount of liver Fe values and the lumbar spine and iliac crest suggest that the iliac crest could also reflect the excess of Fe in the body. Another interesting result is that serum ferritin levels are a marker of Fe tissue accumulation because they correlate with T2*, R2* and R2*Water values in the liver and with R2*Water in the iliac crests. Although this method has already been validated in patients with Fe overload [4146] this is the first time it has been used in patients with CKD.

Fe is involved in bone formation, iron deficiency and iron-deficiency anemia are linked to phosphate metabolism, and FGF-23 transcription is elevated in iron deficiency. Cell line studies of immortalized human fetal osteoblasts (hFOB1.19) have shown that Fe increases reactive oxygen species, decreases alkaline phosphatase activity, and impairs bone mineralization. Other studies have demonstrated that Fe decreases the expression of osteocalcin and RUNX2 (runt-related transcription factor 2) which affect bone formation [4750]. Therefore, one could expect that withdrawal of Fe supplementation and DFO administration would change BMD biomarkers and bone histomorphometry. However, our results did not meet these expectations. The lack of studies on patients with advanced CKD precluded a comparison of the results.

In recent years, the discovery of Fe-based P binders has been proposed as a promising alternative to both offer Fe and chelate P [51]. However, there are no long-term evaluation studies on whether the supply of Fe would lead to overload and its effect on mineral metabolism disorders. Regarding the histomorphometry analysis of bone biopsy, we found that remodelling and mineralization were compromised in most patients, and bone volume decreased in 35% of patients. These findings were observed in cohorts of patients with CKD who underwent bone biopsy and were apparently not influenced by Fe overload [52, 53]. Prospective studies including patients with CKD and Fe overload treated with Fe binders and bone biopsy before and after treatment might shed light on the role of Fe in the observed bone changes.

Our study has some limitations. First, the sample size is small. Second, we assessed a specific study population characterized by a serum ferritin level > 1000 ng/ml and demonstrated a direct relationship between ferritin and Fe tissue accumulation. Our results may not be generalizable to all patients on dialysis because of the inclusion of a specific group of patients. These limitations are balanced against several strengths, including the prospective design and use of MRI, which is a sensitive method for assessing Fe overload. In addition, it includes multiple techniques to test the relationship and agreement among them. Finally, it highlights the novelty of applying iliac crest MRI for the assessment of Fe accumulation.

In conclusion, this study showed a direct association between high ferritin levels and liver and bone marrow Fe overload in patients with CKD undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. The withdrawal of Fe supplementation and DFO administration was safe and ameliorated the Fe overload.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Rosimeire A. B. Costa and Wagner V. Dominguez for technical support.

References

  1. 1. Stauffer ME, Fan T. Prevalence of anemia in chronic kidney disease in the United States. PLoS One 2014; 9: e84943. pmid:24392162
  2. 2. Gaweda AE, Ginzburg YZ, Chait Y, et al. Iron dosing in kidney disease: inconsistency of evidence and clinical practice. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2015; 30: 187–196. pmid:24821751
  3. 3. Del Vecchio L, Minutolo R. ESA, Iron Therapy and New Drugs: Are There New Perspectives in the Treatment of Anaemia? J Clin Med 2021; 10. pmid:33670704
  4. 4. Babitt JL, Eisenga MF, Haase VH, et al. Controversies in optimal anemia management: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Conference. Kidney Int 2021; 99: 1280–1295. pmid:33839163
  5. 5. Rostoker G, Griuncelli M, Loridon C, et al. Hemodialysis-associated hemosiderosis in the era of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: a MRI study. Am J Med 2012; 125: 991–999 e991. pmid:22998881
  6. 6. Wood JC, Enriquez C, Ghugre N, et al. Physiology and pathophysiology of iron cardiomyopathy in thalassemia. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005; 1054: 386–395. pmid:16339687
  7. 7. Custodio MR, Elias RM, Velasquez WD, et al. The unexpected presence of iron in bone biopsies of hemodialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol 2018; 50: 1907–1912. pmid:30136087
  8. 8. Rocha LA, Barreto DV, Barreto FC, et al. Serum ferritin level remains a reliable marker of bone marrow iron stores evaluated by histomorphometry in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4: 105–109. pmid:18842949
  9. 9. Velasquez Forero F, Altamirano E, Ramos PT. High frequency of iron bone deposits in a Mexican population with renal osteodystrophy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13 Suppl 3: 46–50.
  10. 10. Saliba AN, Harb AR, Taher AT. Iron chelation therapy in transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients: current strategies and future directions. J Blood Med 2015; 6: 197–209. pmid:26124688
  11. 11. Brittenham GM. Iron-chelating therapy for transfusional iron overload. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 146–156. pmid:21226580
  12. 12. Andress DL, Nebeker HG, Ott SM, et al. Bone histologic response to deferoxamine in aluminum-related bone disease. Kidney Int 1987; 31: 1344–1350. pmid:2441107
  13. 13. Lee CT, Liao SC, Hsu KT, et al. Low dose desferrioxamine can improve erythropoiesis in iron-overload hemodialysis patients without side effects. Ren Fail 1999; 21: 665–673. pmid:10586429
  14. 14. Stivelman J, Schulman G, Fosburg M, et al. Kinetics and efficacy of deferoxamine in iron-overloaded hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 1989; 36: 1125–1132. pmid:2601259
  15. 15. Kovarik J, Irschik H, Graf H, et al. Iron removal by desferrioxamine in patients on chronic hemodialysis—kinetic study and long-term results. Contrib Nephrol 1985; 49: 44–55. pmid:3830570
  16. 16. Wood JC, Enriquez C, Ghugre N, et al. MRI R2 and R2* mapping accurately estimates hepatic iron concentration in transfusion-dependent thalassemia and sickle cell disease patients. Blood 2005; 106: 1460–1465. pmid:15860670
  17. 17. Garbowski MW, Carpenter JP, Smith G, et al. Biopsy-based calibration of T2* magnetic resonance for estimation of liver iron concentration and comparison with R2 Ferriscan. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014; 16: 40. pmid:24915987
  18. 18. Carpenter JP, He T, Kirk P, et al. On T2* magnetic resonance and cardiac iron. Circulation 2011; 123: 1519–1528. pmid:21444881
  19. 19. Crowley JP, Nealey TA, Metzger J, et al. Transfusion and long-term hemodialysis. Arch Intern Med 1987; 147: 1925–1928. pmid:3675094
  20. 20. Rostoker G, Griuncelli M, Loridon C, et al. Maximal standard dose of parenteral iron for hemodialysis patients: an MRI-based decision tree learning analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9: e115096. pmid:25506921
  21. 21. Ali M, Rigolosi R, Fayemi AO,et al. Failure of serum ferritin levels to predict bone-marrow iron content after intravenous iron-dextran therapy. Lancet. 1982;1(8273):652–655 pmid:6121967
  22. 22. Rostoker G, Dekeyser M, Francisco S, et al. Relationship between bone marrow iron load and liver iron concentration in dialysis-associated haemosiderosis. EBioMedicine. 2024 Jan;99:104929. pmid:38128412
  23. 23. Carrilho P, Fidalgo P, Lima A, et al. Post-mortem liver and bone marrow iron quantification in haemodialysis patients: a prospective cohort study. EBioMedicine. 2022;77:103921. pmid:35272260
  24. 24. Mikhail A, Shrivastava R, Richardson D. Renal Association Clinical Practice Guideline on anaemia of chronic kidney disease. Nephron Clin Pract 2011; 118 Suppl 1: c101–124. pmid:21555890
  25. 25. Moist LM, Troyanov S, White CT, et al. Canadian Society of Nephrology commentary on the 2012 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Anemia in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2013; 62: 860–873. pmid:24054466
  26. 26. Tsubakihara Y, Nishi S, Akiba T, et al. 2008 Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy: guidelines for renal anemia in chronic kidney disease. Ther Apher Dial 2010; 14: 240–275. pmid:20609178
  27. 27. Macdougall IC, White C, Anker SD, et al. Intravenous Iron in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 447–458. pmid:30365356
  28. 28. Nashwan AJ, Yassin MA, Mohamed Ibrahim MI, et al. Iron Overload in Chronic Kidney Disease: Less Ferritin, More T2(*)MRI. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9: 865669. pmid:35386917
  29. 29. Nashwan AJ, Yassin MA. Deferasirox in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Assessing the Potential Benefits and Challenges. J Blood Med. 2023 Nov 28;14:589–594 pmid:38047247
  30. 30. Bekhechi W, Chiali H, Khelil L, Sari-Hamidou R, Benmansour M. Hemosiderosis in chronic dialysis patients: Monitoring the response to deferasirox by quantitative hepatic magnetic resonance imaging. Hemodial Int. 2023 Jul;27(3):270–277 pmid:36994679
  31. 31. Yii E, Doery JC, Kaplan Z, Kerr PG. Use of deferasirox (Exjade) for iron overload in peritoneal dialysis patients.Nephrology (Carlton). 2018 Sep;23(9):887–889. pmid:29663590
  32. 32. Chen CH, Shu KH, Yang Y Long-term effects of an oral iron chelator, deferasirox, in hemodialysis patients with iron overload. Hematology. 2015 Jun;20(5):304–10. Epub 2014 Sep 9 pmid:25200910
  33. 33. Ferrari P, Kulkarni H, Dheda S, et al. Serum iron markers are inadequate for guiding iron repletion in chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 6: 77–83. pmid:20876673
  34. 34. Camaschella C, Nai A, Silvestri L. Iron metabolism and iron disorders revisited in the hepcidin era. Haematologica 2020; 105: 260–272. pmid:31949017
  35. 35. Ghoti H, Rachmilewitz EA, Simon-Lopez R, et al. Evidence for tissue iron overload in long-term hemodialysis patients and the impact of withdrawing parenteral iron. Eur J Haematol 2012; 89: 87–93. pmid:22435497
  36. 36. Tolouian R, Mulla ZD, Diaz J, et al. Liver and Cardiac Iron Deposition in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis by Magnetic Resonance Imaging T2. Iran J Kidney Dis 2016; 10: 68–74. pmid:26921747
  37. 37. Rostoker G, Griuncelli M, Loridon C, et al. Reassessment of Iron Biomarkers for Prediction of Dialysis Iron Overload: An MRI Study. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0132006. pmid:26182077
  38. 38. Wahidiyat PA, Liauw F, Sekarsari D, et al. Evaluation of cardiac and hepatic iron overload in thalassemia major patients with T2* magnetic resonance imaging. Hematology 2017; 22: 501–507. pmid:28218005
  39. 39. Da Silva Martins J, Castro JH, Sainz Rueda NA, et al. Renal osteodystrophy in the obesity era: Is metabolic syndrome relevant? PLoS One 2017; 12: e0180387. pmid:28719612
  40. 40. De Marchi S, Cecchin E. Hepatic computed tomography for monitoring the iron status of haemodialysis patients with haemosiderosis treated with recombinant human erythropoietin. Clin Sci (Lond) 1991; 81: 113–121. pmid:1649718
  41. 41. Wood JC. History and current impact of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging on the management of iron overload. Circulation 2009; 120: 1937–1939. pmid:19884464
  42. 42. Dimitriadou M, Christoforidis A, Economou M, et al. Elevated serum parathormone levels are associated with myocardial iron overload in patients with beta-thalassaemia major. Eur J Haematol 2010; 84: 64–71. pmid:19744128
  43. 43. Stadler N, Lindner RA, Davies MJ. Direct detection and quantification of transition metal ions in human atherosclerotic plaques: evidence for the presence of elevated levels of iron and copper. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004; 24: 949–954. pmid:15001454
  44. 44. Bailie GR, Larkina M, Goodkin DA, et al. Data from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study validate an association between high intravenous iron doses and mortality. Kidney Int 2015; 87: 162–168. pmid:25075769
  45. 45. Del Vecchio L, Ekart R, Ferro CJ, et al. Intravenous iron therapy and the cardiovascular system: risks and benefits. Clin Kidney J 2021; 14: 1067–1076. pmid:34188903
  46. 46. Karampinos DC, Ruschke S, Dieckmeyer M, et al. Modeling of T2* decay in vertebral bone marrow fat quantification. NMR Biomed 2015; 28: 1535–1542. pmid:26423583
  47. 47. Mandalunis P, Ubios A. Experimental renal failure and iron overload: a histomorphometric study in rat tibia. Toxicol Pathol 2005; 33: 398–403. pmid:15805079
  48. 48. Mahachoklertwattana P, Sirikulchayanonta V, Chuansumrit A, et al. Bone histomorphometry in children and adolescents with beta-thalassemia disease: iron-associated focal osteomalacia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88: 3966–3972. pmid:12915694
  49. 49. Balogh E, Tolnai E, Nagy B Jr, et al. Iron overload inhibits osteogenic commitment and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells via the induction of ferritin. Biochim Biophys Acta 2016; 1862: 1640–1649. pmid:27287253
  50. 50. Yang Q, Jian J, Abramson SB, et al. Inhibitory effects of iron on bone morphogenetic protein 2-induced osteoblastogenesis. J Bone Miner Res 2011; 26: 1188–1196. pmid:21308772
  51. 51. Nakanishi T, Hasuike Y, Nanami M, et al. Novel iron-containing phosphate binders and anemia treatment in CKD: oral iron intake revisited. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016; 31: 1588–1594. pmid:26142396
  52. 52. Malluche HH, Monier-Faugere MC, Blomquist G, et al. Two-year cortical and trabecular bone loss in CKD-5D: biochemical and clinical predictors. Osteoporos Int 2018; 29: 125–134. pmid:28993865
  53. 53. Aguiar F, Meng C, Pereira L, et al. Bone biopsy: an ally in the management of fragility fractures in chronic kidney disease. Acta Reumatol Port 2018; 43: 201–209. pmid:30414368