Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

MICT ameliorates hypertensive nephropathy by inhibiting TLR4/NF-κB pathway and down-regulating NLRC4 inflammasome

  • Wenyu Dong,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation The Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P. R. China

  • Minghao Luo,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P. R. China

  • Yun Li,

    Roles Writing – original draft

    Affiliation The Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P. R. China

  • Xinhua Chen,

    Roles Writing – original draft

    Affiliation The Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P. R. China

  • Lingang Li,

    Roles Writing – original draft

    Affiliation The Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P. R. China

  • Qing Chang

    Roles Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision

    651733149@qq.com

    Affiliation The College of Exercise Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P. R. China

Abstract

Background

Hypertensive nephropathy (HN) is one of the main causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), leading to serious morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients. However, existing treatment for hypertensive nephropathy are still very limited. It has been demonstrated that aerobic exercise has beneficial effects on the treatment of hypertension. However, the underlying mechanisms of exercise in HN remain unclear.

Methods

The spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were trained for 8 weeks on a treadmill with different exercise prescriptions. We detected the effects of moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) and high intensity interval training (HIIT) on inflammatory response, renal function, and renal fibrosis in SHR. We further investigated the relationship between TLR4 and the NLRC4 inflammasome in vitro HN model.

Results

MICT improved renal fibrosis and renal injury, attenuating the inflammatory response by inhibiting TLR4/NF-κB pathway and the activation of NLRC4 inflammasome. However, these changes were not observed in the HIIT group. Additionally, repression of TLR4/NF-κB pathway by TAK-242 inhibited activation of NLRC4 inflammasome and alleviated the fibrosis in Ang II-induced HK-2 cells.

Conclusion

MICT ameliorated renal damage, inflammatory response, and renal fibrosis via repressing TLR4/NF-κB pathway and the activation of NLRC4 inflammasome. This study might provide new references for exercise prescriptions of hypertension.

1 Introduction

Hypertension is one of the major risk factors for vascular and cerebrovascular disease, its incidence is continuously increasing worldwide [1]. Persistently elevated blood pressure can damage renal blood vessels, leading to chronic hypertensive kidney damage, which is also the main cause of end-stage renal disease [2]. Hypertensive nephropathy (HN) refers to renal arteriosclerosis, thickening of the renal artery wall, and narrowing of the lumen caused by high blood pressure, inducing substantial ischemic damage of kidney and leading to renal function failure ultimately [3]. However, the current treatment methods for HN are still very limited, mainly to control blood pressure and delay progressive damage to renal parenchyma [4].

Substantial studies have demonstrated that chronic inflammation is involved in the pathogenesis of HN [57]. During chronic inflammation, both tissue remodeling and repair processes appear simultaneously [8]. Release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and infiltration of inflammatory cells trigger for the fibrosis process, leading to renal fibrosis and failure [9]. The body’s first line of defensing against the invasive microorganisms is the innate immune system [10]. The innate immune system contains several pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including membrane-bound Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs) [11]. These receptors recognize pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and danger associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in both extracellular and intracellular [12]. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is one of the core members of the TLRs family, plays an important role in innate immune response [13]. Activated NLRs and apoptotic associated speckle-like protein (ASC) interact each other to activate Caspase-1 to generate inflammasomes [14]. Inflammasomes are large molecular complexes activated during cell infection, which can induce the maturation of pro-inflammatory cytokines including interleukin-1β to participate in fibrosis development [1517]. There are four main members of the inflammasomes, including NOD-like receptor protein 1 (NLRP1), NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3), NOD-like receptor C4 (NLRC4), and absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) [18]. NLRP3 inflammasome has been shown to participate in the pathogenesis of hypertensive nephropathy [1921]. However, there is currently limited research on NLRC4 inflammasome, and the role of NLRC4 in fibrosis remain to be studied [22].

Increasing evidence indicate that exercise is an effective treatment for chronic cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension [2325]. Exercise can delay renal failure by inhibiting renal fibrosis, its underlying mechanism still needs to be elucidated [26]. Moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) has always been used to prevent hypertension due to its effectiveness and safety [27]. High intensity interval training (HIIT) is a type of physical exercise that alternates relatively intense activity (85–100% of VO2 peak) and brief rest or low-intensity activity to allow physical recovery [28]. In recent years, HIIT has been proposed as a time-efficient and superior treatment to MICT in reducing blood pressure (BP) in individuals with hypertension [29]. The objectives in this work were to determine the role of NLRC4 in hypertensive nephropathy and compare the effects of MICT and HIIT on NLRC4.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Animals and experimental protocols

Specific-pathogen-free, eight-week-old male SHRs (n = 18) and Wistar Kyoto Rats (WKYs, n = 6) were obtained from Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China). All of the rats were randomly divided into four groups: The WKY sedentary group (WKY, n = 6), the SHR sedentary group (SHR-S, n = 6), the moderate-intensity continuous exercise group (SHR-M, n = 6), and the high-intensity interval exercise group (SHR-H, n = 6). All rats were maintained under a controlled temperature room (22 ± 2°C) on a 12h/12h light/dark cycle, and were available to chow and tap water ad libitum. To alleviate the suffering of rats, we anesthetized them before taking blood and kidney samples. After anesthetized rats with 3% pentobarbital (60 mg/kg) via intraperitoneal injection, rat blood and bilateral kidneys were collected. All rats were sacrificed with CO2 suffocation. The animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Chongqing Medical University (Approval no. 2022136) and performed in accordance with the Chinese Animal Protection Laws and Institutional Guidelines.

2.2 Exercise training

A treadmill specifically designed for animal exercise was used throughout the study. Rat exercise protocol was based on guidelines for animal exercise training protocols for cardiovascular studies and our previous research [3032]. During the first week, adaptive training was conducted with the SHR-M and SHR-H groups, which were trained to run at 10 m/min (0° slope) for 60 minutes. The SHR-M group ran at a speed of 18m/min and approximately 50% of maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) then gradually accelerated at a speed of 1 m/min in every 3 weeks up to 20 m/min (0° slope). Similarly, the SHR-H group ran at a speed of 45m/min and approximately 90% of VO2max then gradually accelerated at a speed of 1 m/min in every 3 weeks up to 47 m/min (0° slope). In each exercise training, the rats underwent a two-minute break every 30 seconds of running. The SHR-M and SHR-H groups were performed a 60 min exercise training every day for 5 days a week for 8 weeks in total. Whereas, WKY group and SHR-S group as control groups were raised quietly for 8 weeks. After the exercise training of 8 weeks, the rats were maintained in the metabolic cages for 24 h to collect 24-hour urine for quantitative urinary protein testing. Serum and kidney were kept at -80°C for future research.

2.3 Measurements of weight, heart rate and blood pressure

The weight of rats was measured using an animal scale every week. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were measured in conscious rats by applying the indirect tail cuff method (BP98A, Softron, Tokyo, Japan).

2.4 Renal histopathological analysis

The kidney tissue was fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 24 hours, embedded in paraffin and cut into 5-μm-thick sections for pathological analysis. After being dewaxed and hydrated, Hematoxylin—eosin staining was conducted to observe pathological injury in renal tissue following the manufacturer’s instructions (Solarbio, Beijing, China). Masson trichrome staining was performed to evaluate the degree of renal tissue fibrosis following the manufacturer’s instructions (Solarbio, Beijing, China).

2.5 Cell culture

Human renal proximal tubule epithelial cells (HK-2) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, USA). Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Australia) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) at 37°C with 5% CO2.

2.6 Cell viability assay

Cell viability was assessed by the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay (CCK-8, Beyotime, Shanghai, China). The HK-2 cells (5 × 103 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates and serum starvation for 24 h, then treated with angiotensin II (Ang-II; MedChemExpress) of 1, 5, 10, 20, 40 μM for 24 h to determine the optimal concentration of Ang-II for inducing cell injury. After discarding the medium, 10% CCK-8 solution was then added to each well and the cells were cultured in dark for 1 h. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm on an automatic microplate reader (Thermo Scientific, USA).

2.7 Western blotting

The kidney tissues and HK-2 cells were lysed with a RIPA lysis buffer (Epizyme, Shanghai, China) containing 1% protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Beyotime, Shanghai, China), followed by sonication of 15 seconds. The homogenates were centrifuged at 12, 000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C, and then, the supernatants were collected and mixed with 5x loading buffer in a ratio of 4:1 to prepare protein samples. Total proteins (30 μg) were separated by 10% and 12.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels (Epizyme, Shanghai, China) and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat milk at room temperature for 2 h and then were incubated in primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. The primary antibodies used were anti-Collagen I (1:1000; Zenbio), anti-Collagen Ш (1:1000; Huabio), TGF-β1 (1:1000; Zenbio), α-SMA (1:1000; Zenbio), anti-TLR4 (1:1000; Proteintech), anti-NF-κB P65 (1:1000; Zenbio), anti-P-P65 (1:500; Zenbio), anti-IкBα (1:1000; Zenbio), and anti-p-IкBα (1:500; Zenbio), anti-NLRC4 (1:1000; AiFang), anti-Caspase-1 (1:1000; Zenbio), anti-ASC (1:1000; Zenbio), anti-IL-1β (1:500; Huabio), anti-GAPDH (1:50000; Proteintech). Membranes were washed in TBST (0.01% Tween) 3 times for 30 minutes then incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Using chemiluminescence substrate kit, the signals were visualized with ChemiDoc Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, United States). Band gray values were analyzed by ImageJ software, GAPDH were used as the internal control.

2.8 Biochemical analysis

To evaluate renal function of rats, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine and urine protein were detected using the corresponding kits obtained from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). All procedures followed the manufacturer’s instructions respectively.

2.9 Immunohistochemical staining

The kidney sections were kept in a 60°C oven for 2 h. Paraffin sections were dewaxed in xylene for 20 minutes, then rehydrated in gradient ethanol (100%, 95%, 85%, and 75%) for 20 minutes, and washed in distilled water for 10 minutes before staining procedures. Following sections were placed in the antigen repair solution and boiled in the microwave oven for antigen repair, the sections were treated with 3% H2O2 at room temperature for 30 minutes, blocked with 5% goat serum for 30 min, and incubated with the anti-TLR4 at 4°C overnight. Afterwards, sections were incubated with matched secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. After being stained with 3, 3-diaminobenzidine (DAB), the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Followed by dehydrating and drying, the sections were fixed with neutral gum. Slices were visualized and photographed using a microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

2.10 Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

The serum of rats was tested for interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (MULTISCIENCES, Hangzhou, China), according to the corresponding manufacturer’s instructions. Then, the spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used to measure absorbance at a wavelength of 450nm. Finally, the expression levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines were calculated using a standard curve.

2.11 Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as means ± standard error of mean (SEM). Data between two groups were analyzed with an unpaired Student’s t-test. Data among different groups were analyzed with one-way ANOVA. All analyses were performed by the GraphPad Prism 9.0 software. The difference was considered statistically significant if p < 0.05.

3 Results

3.1 Basic data

To examine the effects of exercise training on the weight of rats, we measured the weight of rats after weekly exercise training. The weight of SHR-S, SHR-M and SHR-H groups was statistically decreased compared with the WKY group. The SHR-M group had significantly lower weight than that in the SHR-S group. The weight of SHR-H group was similar to SHR-S group. After 8-week exercise training, the final HR, SBP, DBP, and MAP of SHR-M group were lower than those in the SHR-S group. However, a decrease in DBP was observed in the SHR-H group than that in SHR-S group (Fig 1A–1E).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Effects of MICT and HIIT on body weight, blood pressure, heart rate and renal function.

SHR-M group and SHR-H group performed exercise training with different exercise prescriptions for 8 weeks. (A) The weight of rats was measured every week. (B) Systolic blood pressure, (C) Diastolic blood pressure, (D) Mean arterial pressure and (E) Heart rate, were measured after 8-week exercise training. (F) Serum creatinine (Scr), (G) Blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and (H) Urine protein were measured to evaluate the renal function. *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306137.g001

We measured the levels of BUN, Scr and urine protein to evaluate the severity of kidney injury. The results suggested that SHR-S group had higher levels of Scr, BUN, and urine protein than the WKY group. SHR-M group, compared to SHR-S group, showed significant decreased in BUN, Scr and urine protein. However, HIIT had no significant effects on the levels of Scr, BUN, and urine protein (Fig 1F–1H).

3.2 Effects of exercise training on renal pathological damage

We performed hematoxylin-eosin staining (H&E staining) to evaluate the effects of exercise training on renal pathological damage in SHR. H&E staining showed that SHR-S group exhibited abnormal pathological manifestations including abnormal glomerular morphology, tubular vacuoles, and renal capsule dilation, which was alleviated in the SHR-M group. But HIIT did not improve the abnormal renal pathological manifestations (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Effects of MICT and HIIT on renal pathological changes.

H&E staining was used to observe changes of pathology of kidney tissue (magnification, 200×). WKY group: there was a normal kidney tissue with normal morphology of renal glomeruli and tubules. SHR-S group: there was an abnormal kidney tissue with abnormal glomerular morphology, tubular vacuoles, and renal capsule dilation. SHR-M group showed no obvious pathological manifestations. In addition to pathological manifestations of abnormal glomeruli and tubules, the SHR-H group also showed infiltration of inflammatory cells.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306137.g002

3.3 Effects of exercise training on renal fibrosis

We performed Masson trichrome staining and Western blot to investigate the effects of exercise training on renal fibrosis in SHR. The Masson trichrome staining results suggested that the fibrotic area of renal cortices in the SHR-S group was much larger than the WKY group. Furthermore, a significant decrease was observed in the SHR-M compared with the SHR-S group, whereas there was no significant difference was observed between SHR-S group and the SHR-H group (Fig 3A).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Effects of MICT and HIIT on renal fibrosis in SHR.

(A) Masson trichrome staining was performed to evaluate the degree of renal fibrosis. Blue staining represents renal fibrosis. (B) Western blot was used to measure the levels of (C) collagen I, (D) collagen III, (E) TGF-β1 and (F) α-SMA in WKY group, SHR-S group, SHR-M group, SHR-H group. Data are presented as means ± SEM. N = 3 in each group. *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306137.g003

Collagen I and collagen III are the main elements of extracellular matrix (ECM), and their expression levels can reflect the deposition of extracellular matrix [33]. TGF-β1-mediated signaling has long been identified as a driver of collagen accumulation and tissue fibrosis [34]. α-SMA is regarded as an indicator of mature myofibroblast and reflects the severity of kidney fibrosis [35]. The results suggested that the expression levels of collagen I, collagen III, TGF-β1 and α-SMA increased markedly in SHR-S group in comparison to WKY group. Moreover, the expression levels of fibrosis-related proteins were significantly decreased in SHR-M group compared with the SHR-S group. We found no distinct differences between SHR-S group and SHR-H group in the expression of fibrosis-related proteins (Fig 3B–3F).

3.4 Effects of exercise training on inflammatory response in SHR

We detected the expression of NLRC4, Caspase-1, ASC and IL-1β in the kidney to explore whether exercise training affected the activation of NLRC4 inflammasome. We observed the expression levels of NLRC4, Caspase-1, ASC, and IL-1β elevated in the SHR-S group, which were decreased in the SHR-M group. Whereas HIIT did not decrease the expression levels of NLRC4, Caspase-1, ASC, and IL-1β (Fig 4A–4E).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Effects of MICT and HIIT on inflammatory response in SHR.

(A) Western blot was used to detect the protein expressions of (B) NLRC4, (C) Caspase-1, (D) ASC and (E) IL-1β in WKY group, SHR-S group, SHR-M group, SHR-H group. ELISA detection of (F) IL-6 and (G) TNF-α (H) IL-1β for evaluating the concentration of pro-inflammatory factors in serum. Data are presented as means ± SEM. N = 3 in each group. *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306137.g004

To investigate whether exercise training could alleviate inflammation levels, we used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits to measure the concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α in serum. Compared with WKY group, the expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α were significantly higher in the SHR-S group. Moreover, SHR-M group had significantly lower IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α levels than the SHR-S group. However, HIIT did not decrease the expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α (Fig 4F–4H).

3.5 Effects of exercise training on TLR4, p-p65 and p-IκBα expression

We investigated whether the improvement effects of exercise training on renal fibrosis was related to the TLR4 signaling pathway considering the crucial role of the TLR4/NF-κB pathway in inflammatory response. The immunohistochemistry staining was performed to determine the expression of TLR4. The results showed that MICT significantly decreased the expression of TLR4 in SHR (Fig 5A). The expression levels of TLR4, NF-κB p65 and IκBα in renal tissues were detected by western blot. The expression level of TLR4, p-p65/p65 ratio and p-IκBα/IκBα ratio were significantly increased in SHR-S group compared to WKY group. In addition, MICT markedly inhibited the activation of the TLR4/NF-κB pathway by down-regulating the expression level of TLR4, p-p65/p65 ratio and p-IκBα/IκBα ratio. However, we found no significant differences between SHR-S group and SHR-H group.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Effects of MICT and HIIT on TLR4/NF-κB pathway in SHR.

(A) Immunohistochemical staining result of TLR4 in the kidney tissue. The brown area is positive for expression of TLR4. (B) Western blot was used to detect the expression levels of (C)TLR4, (D)p-p65 and p65, (E) p-IκBα and IκBα in WKY group, SHR-S group, SHR-M group, SHR-H group. Data are presented as means ± SEM. N = 3 in each group. *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306137.g005

3.6 TAK-242 blocked the activation of TLR4/NF-κB pathway in Ang II-induced HK-2 cells

To further explore whether there is a relationship between TLR4 and NLRC4 in HN in vitro, we selected the Ang II at a dose of 10 μΜ based on the CCK-8 results (Fig 6B). Firstly, HK-2 cells were pre-treated with different concentrations of TAK-242 (a TLR4 inhibitor) for 2 hours, and then incubated with 10 μΜ Ang II for 24 hours. The expression level of TLR4, p-IκBα/IκBα ratio and p-p65/p65 ratio were observed to be elevated in Ang II-treated HK-2 cells in western blot results (Fig 6A), while these effects were distinctly alleviated in TAK-242 treatment group (3 and 5 μM), suggesting that TAK-242 inactivated the TLR4/NF-κB pathway in Ang II -induced HK-2 cells (Fig 6C–6E).

thumbnail
Fig 6. TAK-242 inhibited TLR4/NF-κB pathway in Ang II-induced HK-2 cells.

(B) CCK-8 assay was used to determine the cell viability. We found that 10 μM Ang II significantly reduced the cell viability of HK-2 cells. We selected 10 μM Ang II for inducing HN model in vitro based on the results of CCK-8. HK-2 cells were treated with 1, 3, 5 μM TAK-242 for 2 hours prior to 10 μM Ang II for 24 hours. (A) Western blot was used to detect the protein levels of (C) TLR4, (D) p-p65 and p65, (E) p-IκBα and IκBα. Data are presented as means ± SEM. N = 3 in each group. *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306137.g006

3.7 TLR4 inhibition protected HK-2 cells from Ang II-induced fibrosis and suppressed the activation of NLRC4 inflammasome

To further investigate the effects of TLR4/NF-κB pathway on fibrosis in HN in vitro, the protein levels of collagen I, collagen III, TGF-β1 and α-SMA were detected in the Ang II-induced HK-2 cells by Western blot (Fig 7A). When compared with the control group, the key fibrotic protein levels were significantly increased in the Ang II-induced group. However, TAK-242 treatment at 3 and 5 μM remarkably lowered the expression of fibrosis-related proteins, indicating that TLR4 inhibition could attenuate Ang II-induced fibrosis in HN in vitro (Fig 7C–7F). In addition, we performed Western blot to explore whether there is a relationship between TLR4 and NLRC4 (Fig 7B). Western blot results showed that TAK-242 treatment at 3 and 5 μM significantly reduced the expression levels of NLRC4, Caspase-1, ASC, and IL-1β in Ang II-induced HK-2 cells, indicating that inhibiting TLR4 to some extent reduced the activation of NLRC4 inflammasome (Fig 7G–7J).

thumbnail
Fig 7. Effects of TAK-242 on fibrosis and activation of NLRC4 inflammasome in Ang II-induced HK-2 cells.

HK-2 cells were treated with 1, 3, 5 μM TAK-242 for 2 hours prior to 10 μM Ang II for 24 hours. (A, B) Western blot was used to detect the protein levels of (C-F) fibrosis-related molecules and (G-J) NLRC4 inflammasome. Data are presented as means ± SEM. N = 3 in each group. *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306137.g007

4 Discussion

In the present study, we investigated the renoprotective effects and underlying molecular mechanism of MICT and HIIT on the pathogenesis of HN in SHR. Our research indicated that MICT reduced blood pressure, improved renal function, and alleviated renal pathological damage in SHR. We also found that MICT alleviated renal fibrosis and inflammatory response as well as inhibited TLR4/NF-κB pathway and the activation of NLRC4 inflammasome in SHR. In addition, in vitro experiments showed that inhibiting TLR4 could improve Ang II-induced fibrosis in HK-2 cells and down-regulate the activation of NLRC4 inflammasome. Therefore, we identified a relationship between TLR4/NF-κB pathway and the activation of NLRC4 inflammasome.

Hypertensive nephropathy is the second main cause of ESRD after diabetic nephropathy, which seriously do harm to public health [36]. Renal fibrosis is a prevalent pathological process in chronic kidney disease, ultimately leading to renal dysfunction and failure [37, 38]. We found that the expression levels of collagen I, collagen Ш, TGF-β1, α-SMA were decreased in SHR-M group, indicating that MICT alleviated renal fibrosis. TGF-β1 can activate downstream Smad3 signaling, playing a crucial role in fibrosis. Smad3 can interact with other signaling pathways, including the ERK/p38 MAPK and NF-κB pathways to regulate inflammation and fibrosis [39].

Activation of NF-κB pathway triggers a series of inflammatory response, leading to the release of various pro-inflammatory cytokines [40]. Substantial studies have demonstrated that inflammation is involved in the pathogenesis of HN [4143]. Inflammation and fibrosis interact with each other, contributing to the progressive deterioration of renal function [44]. Mesangial cells (MCs) of kidney stimulated with AngII produce ROS and release IL-1β, TNF-α, the macrophage chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) and TGF-β1 [45, 46]. These inflammatory mediators contribute to fibrosis, reducing renal blood flow and permeability, ultimately leading to decrease in glomerular filtration function [47]. In our study, MICT inhibited the activation of TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway, and decreased serum concentration of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α. However, these effects were not found in the SHR-H group. We believe that the improvement of renal fibrosis in the SHR-M group is related to the inhibition of the TLR4/NF-κB pathway and the reduction of inflammatory cytokine levels.

NLRP3 inflammasome has been demonstrated to be involved in the pathogenesis of chronic cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension [21, 48, 49]. It is well known that endothelial dysfunction mediated by NLRP3-dependent pyroptosis is one of the main factors in the pathophysiology of hypertension [50]. A study has shown that NLRP3 inhibitor MCC950 reduced inflammation levels and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) by inhibiting the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome in 1K/DOCA/salt-induced hypertension, which is related to MCC950-sensitive accumulation of M2-like macrophages in the kidney [51]. The NLRP3 inflammasome mediates maturation of caspase-1 and IL-1β to form inflammatory cascade, leading to extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition and fibrosis [52, 53]. Another study has shown that NLRP3 and NLRC4 inflammasomes are activated in macrophages exposed to hypertonic conditions, inducing activation of caspase-1 and IL-1β [54]. However, there is limited research on NLRC4 inflammasome and its effects in fibrosis are not very clear [22]. A previous study has demonstrated that NLRC4 mediated IL-1R antagonist (IL-1Ra) through NF-κB to bind IL-1β, alleviating cystic fibrosis [55]. In addition, it has also been reported that constitutive activation of the NLRC4 inflammasome to facilitate regeneration of liver cells and mitigate liver fibrosis after partial hepatectomy [56]. Whereas we found that the expression levels of NLRC4 inflammasome and fibrosis related proteins were decreased in SHR-M group, indicating MICT reduced renal fibrosis in SHR by inhibiting the activation of NLRC4 inflammasome. In vitro HN model of HK-2 cells induced by Ang II, we further observed a decrease in the expression level of NLRC4 inflammasome when TLR4 was inhibited, which seems to be related to the inhibition of TLR4/NF-κB pathway.

Current research indicates that drug therapy combined with aerobic exercise is superior to single drug therapy in cardiovascular disease [57]. Aerobic exercise has been proven to improve endothelial function [58], alleviate inflammation [59] and fibrosis [60]. Furthermore, Exercise has been demonstrated to regulate various signaling pathways in inflammatory diseases, including Sirt1/AMPK/Nrf2 pathway [61], PI3K/Akt/NF-κB pathway [62]. MICT has always been considered as the cornerstone of non-pharmacological therapies for improving cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension [63]. Our previous research has shown that MICT inhibited activation of the TLR4/NF-κB/NLRP3 pathway to improve inflammatory response and oxidative stress in SHR [64]. In recent years, HIIT has been suggested as an alternate treatment to MICT due to its advantage of time efficiency [65]. A systematic review and meta-analysis showed that HIIT is more effective than MICT in improving brachial artery vascular function, which is related to the improvement of inflammation, oxidative stress and insulin sensitivity [66]. In addition, a study showed that HIIT is more effective than MICT in terms of enhancing cardiorespiratory health [67]. But according to another study, HIIT and MICT had comparable effects in lowering resting blood pressure in adults with pre-to established hypertension [68]. Our research indicated that MICT was more effective at improving blood pressure and renal fibrosis than HIIT in SHR, so we recommend that hypertensive patients exercise with 50%-60% VO2max.

However, our research still has limitations, we only intervened in TLR4 to observe changes in expression of NLRC4, and did not explore the downstream molecular mechanism of NLRC4 inflammasome induced fibrosis. Future research may focus on the exact molecular mechanism of NLRC4 affecting fibrosis. In addition, further clinical trials are needed to verify whether our exercise prescription is applicable to humans.

5 Conclusion

In summary, our present findings suggest that MICT reduced renal damage, inflammatory response, and renal fibrosis to ameliorate HN. TLR4 inhibition has been demonstrated in vitro to repress the activation of NLRC4 and alleviate fibrosis in Ang II-induced HK-2 cells. We also found that NLRC4 has the potential to become a new therapeutic target for hypertensive nephropathy. The present study adds more information to better understand the mechanism behind aerobic exercise involved in HN and provides reference for the study of exercise prescriptions for hypertension to some extent. In the future, the research may aim to the downstream molecular mechanism of NLRC4 inflammasome induced fibrosis.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Body weight, blood pressure, heart rate and renal function of rats.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306137.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. HE staining results of rats.

We selected the magnification of 200x to capture images from 6 different fields of view under the microscope.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306137.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Masson trichrome staining results of rats.

We selected the magnification of 200x to capture images from 6 different fields of view under the microscope.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306137.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Concentration of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α (pg/mL) in serum of rats.

ELISA was used to detect the concentration of IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α (pg/mL) of rats.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306137.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Immunohistochemical staining results of rats.

We selected the magnification of 200x to capture images from 6 different fields of view under the microscope.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306137.s005

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We sincerely appreciate Qiaoyun Yang’s help and suggestions for this research.

References

  1. 1. Zhou B, Carrillo-Larco RM, Danaei G, Riley LM, Paciorek CJ, Stevens GA, et al. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants [J]. The Lancet, 2021, 398(10304): 957–80. pmid:34450083
  2. 2. Udani S, Lazich I, Bakris GL. Epidemiology of hypertensive kidney disease [J]. Nature Reviews Nephrology, 2010, 7(1): 11–21. pmid:21079654
  3. 3. Seccia TM, Caroccia B, Calò LA. Hypertensive nephropathy. Moving from classic to emerging pathogenetic mechanisms [J]. J Hypertens, 2017, 35(2): 205–12. pmid:27782909
  4. 4. Tsai W-C, Wu H-Y, Peng Y-S, Yang J-Y, Chen H-Y, Chiu Y-L, et al. Association of Intensive Blood Pressure Control and Kidney Disease Progression in Nondiabetic Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease [J]. JAMA Internal Medicine, 2017, 177(6) pmid:28288249
  5. 5. Zhang Z, Zhao L, Zhou X, Meng X, Zhou X. Role of inflammation, immunity, and oxidative stress in hypertension: New insights and potential therapeutic targets [J]. Frontiers in immunology, 2023, 13 pmid:36703963
  6. 6. Gonzalez AL, Dungan MM, Smart CD, Madhur MS, Doran AC. Inflammation Resolution in the Cardiovascular System: Arterial Hypertension, Atherosclerosis, and Ischemic Heart Disease [J]. Antioxid Redox Signal, 2024, 40(4–6): 292–316. pmid:37125445
  7. 7. Mouton AJ, Li X, Hall ME, Hall JE. Obesity, Hypertension, and Cardiac Dysfunction: Novel Roles of Immunometabolism in Macrophage Activation and Inflammation [J]. Circ Res, 2020, 126(6): 789–806. pmid:32163341
  8. 8. Panizo S, Martínez-Arias L, Alonso-Montes C, Cannata P, Martín-Carro B, Fernández-Martín JL, et al. Fibrosis in Chronic Kidney Disease: Pathogenesis and Consequences [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(1) pmid:33401711
  9. 9. Mack M. Inflammation and fibrosis [J]. Matrix biology: journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology, 2018, 68–69: 106–21. pmid:29196207
  10. 10. Netea MG, Joosten LA, Latz E, Mills KH, Natoli G, Stunnenberg HG, et al. Trained immunity: A program of innate immune memory in health and disease [J]. Science (New York, NY), 2016, 352(6284): aaf1098. pmid:27102489
  11. 11. Li D, Wu M. Pattern recognition receptors in health and diseases [J]. Signal transduction and targeted therapy, 2021, 6(1): 291. pmid:34344870
  12. 12. De Oliveira Mann CC, Hornung V. Molecular mechanisms of nonself nucleic acid recognition by the innate immune system [J]. European journal of immunology, 2021, 51(8): 1897–910. pmid:34138462
  13. 13. Akira S, Takeda K. Toll-like receptor signalling [J]. Nature reviews Immunology, 2004, 4(7): 499–511. pmid:15229469
  14. 14. Wada J, Makino H. Innate immunity in diabetes and diabetic nephropathy [J]. Nature reviews Nephrology, 2016, 12(1): 13–26. pmid:26568190
  15. 15. Schroder K, Tschopp J. The Inflammasomes [J]. Cell, 2010, 140(6): 821–32. pmid:20303873
  16. 16. Gaul S, Leszczynska A, Alegre F, Kaufmann B, Johnson CD, Adams LA, et al. Hepatocyte pyroptosis and release of inflammasome particles induce stellate cell activation and liver fibrosis [J]. Journal of hepatology, 2021, 74(1): 156–67. pmid:32763266
  17. 17. Melton E, Qiu H. Interleukin-1β in Multifactorial Hypertension: Inflammation, Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell and Extracellular Matrix Remodeling, and Non-Coding RNA Regulation [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(16) pmid:34445357
  18. 18. Rathinam VA, Fitzgerald KA. Inflammasome Complexes: Emerging Mechanisms and Effector Functions [J]. Cell, 2016, 165(4): 792–800. pmid:27153493
  19. 19. Pitzer A, Elijovich F, Laffer CL, Ertuglu LA, Sahinoz M, Saleem M, et al. DC ENaC-Dependent Inflammasome Activation Contributes to Salt-Sensitive Hypertension [J]. Circ Res, 2022, 131(4): 328–44. pmid:35862128
  20. 20. Wu Q, Meng W, Zhu B, Chen X, Fu J, Zhao C, et al. VEGFC ameliorates salt-sensitive hypertension and hypertensive nephropathy by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome via activating VEGFR3-AMPK dependent autophagy pathway [J]. Cellular and molecular life sciences: CMLS, 2023, 80(11): 327. pmid:37837447
  21. 21. De Miguel C, Pelegrín P, Baroja-Mazo A, Cuevas S. Emerging Role of the Inflammasome and Pyroptosis in Hypertension [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(3) pmid:33494430
  22. 22. Zhang WJ, Chen SJ, Zhou SC, Wu SZ, Wang H. Inflammasomes and Fibrosis [J]. Frontiers in immunology, 2021, 12: 643149. pmid:34177893
  23. 23. Ozemek C, Tiwari S, Sabbahi A, Carbone S, Lavie CJ. Impact of therapeutic lifestyle changes in resistant hypertension [J]. Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 2020, 63(1): 4–9. pmid:31756356
  24. 24. Pescatello LS, Buchner DM, Jakicic JM, Powell KE, Kraus WE, Bloodgood B, et al. Physical Activity to Prevent and Treat Hypertension: A Systematic Review [J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2019, 51(6): 1314–23. pmid:31095088
  25. 25. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr., Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2018, 71(19): e127–e248. pmid:29146535
  26. 26. Duan YC, Shi L, Jin Z, Hu M, Huang H, Yan T, et al. Swimming Exercise Ameliorates Hypertension-Induced Kidney Dysfunction via Alleviating Renal Interstitial Fibrosis and Apoptosis [J]. Kidney & blood pressure research, 2021, 46(2): 219–28. pmid:33849006
  27. 27. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise [J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2011, 43(7): 1334–59. pmid:21694556
  28. 28. Buchheit M, Laursen PB. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle: Part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis [J]. Sports Med, 2013, 43(5): 313–38. pmid:23539308
  29. 29. Andreato LV. High-Intensity Interval Training: Methodological Considerations for Interpreting Results and Conducting Research [J]. Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM, 2020, 31(11): 812–7. pmid:32967776
  30. 30. Xia WJ, Xu ML, Yu XJ, Du MM, Li XH, Yang T, et al. Antihypertensive effects of exercise involve reshaping of gut microbiota and improvement of gut-brain axis in spontaneously hypertensive rat [J]. Gut Microbes, 2021, 13(1): 1–24. pmid:33382364
  31. 31. Poole DC, Copp SW, Colburn TD, Craig JC, Allen DL, Sturek M, et al. Guidelines for animal exercise and training protocols for cardiovascular studies [J]. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2020, 318(5): H1100–H38. pmid:32196357
  32. 32. Luo M, Luo S, Xue Y, Chang Q, Yang H, Dong W, et al. Aerobic exercise inhibits renal EMT by promoting irisin expression in SHR [J]. iScience, 2023, 26(2): 105990. pmid:36798442
  33. 33. Karsdal MA, Nielsen SH, Leeming DJ, Langholm LL, Nielsen MJ, Manon-Jensen T, et al. The good and the bad collagens of fibrosis—Their role in signaling and organ function [J]. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2017, 121: 43–56. pmid:28736303
  34. 34. Peng D, Fu M, Wang M, Wei Y, Wei X. Targeting TGF-β signal transduction for fibrosis and cancer therapy [J]. Molecular cancer, 2022, 21(1): 104. pmid:35461253
  35. 35. Shinde AV, Humeres C, Frangogiannis NG. The role of α-smooth muscle actin in fibroblast-mediated matrix contraction and remodeling [J]. Biochimica et biophysica acta Molecular basis of disease, 2017, 1863(1): 298–309. pmid:27825850
  36. 36. Carriazo S, Vanessa Perez-Gomez M, Ortiz A. Hypertensive nephropathy: a major roadblock hindering the advance of precision nephrology [J]. Clinical kidney journal, 2020, 13(4): 504–9. pmid:32897275
  37. 37. Humphreys BD. Mechanisms of Renal Fibrosis [J]. Annual review of physiology, 2018, 80: 309–26. pmid:29068765
  38. 38. Nastase MV, Zeng-Brouwers J, Wygrecka M, Schaefer L. Targeting renal fibrosis: Mechanisms and drug delivery systems [J]. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 2018, 129: 295–307. pmid:29288033
  39. 39. Wu W, Wang X, Yu X, Lan HY. Smad3 Signatures in Renal Inflammation and Fibrosis [J]. International journal of biological sciences, 2022, 18(7): 2795–806. pmid:35541902
  40. 40. Yu H, Lin L, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Hu H. Targeting NF-κB pathway for the therapy of diseases: mechanism and clinical study [J]. Signal transduction and targeted therapy, 2020, 5(1): 209. pmid:32958760
  41. 41. Liao TD, Yang XP, Liu YH, Shesely EG, Cavasin MA, Kuziel WA, et al. Role of inflammation in the development of renal damage and dysfunction in angiotensin II-induced hypertension [J]. Hypertension, 2008, 52(2): 256–63. pmid:18541733
  42. 42. Aboukhater D, Morad B, Nasrallah N, Nasser SA, Sahebkar A, Kobeissy F, et al. Inflammation and hypertension: Underlying mechanisms and emerging understandings [J]. Journal of cellular physiology, 2023, 238(6): 1148–59. pmid:37039489
  43. 43. Xiao L, Harrison DG. Inflammation in Hypertension [J]. The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2020, 36(5): 635–47. pmid:32389337
  44. 44. Lv W, Booz GW, Wang Y, Fan F, Roman RJ. Inflammation and renal fibrosis: Recent developments on key signaling molecules as potential therapeutic targets [J]. European journal of pharmacology, 2018, 820: 65–76. pmid:29229532
  45. 45. Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, Kausz AT, Levin A, Steffes MW, et al. National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification [J]. Annals of internal medicine, 2003, 139(2): 137–47. pmid:12859163
  46. 46. Yue L, Wang W, Wang Y, Du T, Shen W, Tang H, et al. Bletilla striata polysaccharide inhibits angiotensin II-induced ROS and inflammation via NOX4 and TLR2 pathways [J]. International journal of biological macromolecules, 2016, 89: 376–88. pmid:27151672
  47. 47. Lucero CM, Prieto-Villalobos J, Marambio-Ruiz L, Balmazabal J, Alvear TF, Vega M, et al. Hypertensive Nephropathy: Unveiling the Possible Involvement of Hemichannels and Pannexons [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(24) pmid:36555574
  48. 48. Bai B, Yang Y, Wang Q, Li M, Tian C, Liu Y, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome in endothelial dysfunction [J]. Cell death & disease, 2020, 11(9): 776. pmid:32948742
  49. 49. Liu D, Zeng X, Li X, Mehta JL, Wang X. Role of NLRP3 inflammasome in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases [J]. Basic Res Cardiol, 2018, 113(1): 5. pmid:29224086
  50. 50. Xi H, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Yang WY, Jiang X, Sha X, et al. Caspase-1 Inflammasome Activation Mediates Homocysteine-Induced Pyrop-Apoptosis in Endothelial Cells [J]. Circ Res, 2016, 118(10): 1525–39. pmid:27006445
  51. 51. Krishnan SM, Ling YH, Huuskes BM, Ferens DM, Saini N, Chan CT, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome reduces blood pressure, renal damage, and dysfunction in salt-sensitive hypertension [J]. Cardiovascular research, 2019, 115(4): 776–87. pmid:30357309
  52. 52. Liu Y, Xu X, Lei W, Hou Y, Zhang Y, Tang R, et al. The NLRP3 inflammasome in fibrosis and aging: The known unknowns [J]. Ageing research reviews, 2022, 79: 101638. pmid:35525426
  53. 53. Xiao H, Li H, Wang JJ, Zhang JS, Shen J, An XB, et al. IL-18 cleavage triggers cardiac inflammation and fibrosis upon β-adrenergic insult [J]. European heart journal, 2018, 39(1): 60–9. pmid:28549109
  54. 54. Ip WK, Medzhitov R. Macrophages monitor tissue osmolarity and induce inflammatory response through NLRP3 and NLRC4 inflammasome activation [J]. Nature communications, 2015, 6: 6931. pmid:25959047
  55. 55. Iannitti RG, Napolioni V, Oikonomou V, De Luca A, Galosi C, Pariano M, et al. IL-1 receptor antagonist ameliorates inflammasome-dependent inflammation in murine and human cystic fibrosis [J]. Nature communications, 2016, 7: 10791. pmid:26972847
  56. 56. Desantis DA, Ko CW, Wang L, Lee P, Croniger CM. Constitutive Activation of the Nlrc4 Inflammasome Prevents Hepatic Fibrosis and Promotes Hepatic Regeneration after Partial Hepatectomy [J]. Mediators of inflammation, 2015, 2015: 909827. pmid:26635450
  57. 57. Izquierdo M, Merchant RA, Morley JE, Anker SD, Aprahamian I, Arai H, et al. International Exercise Recommendations in Older Adults (ICFSR): Expert Consensus Guidelines [J]. The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2021, 25(7): 824–53. pmid:34409961
  58. 58. Qiu S, Cai X, Yin H, Sun Z, Zügel M, Steinacker JM, et al. Exercise training and endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis [J]. Cardiovascular diabetology, 2018, 17(1): 64. pmid:29720185
  59. 59. Quiroga R, Nistal E, Estébanez B, Porras D, Juárez-Fernández M, Martínez-Flórez S, et al. Exercise training modulates the gut microbiota profile and impairs inflammatory signaling pathways in obese children [J]. Experimental & molecular medicine, 2020, 52(7): 1048–61. pmid:32624568
  60. 60. Huang C, Lin YY, Yang AL, Kuo TW, Kuo CH, Lee SD. Anti-Renal Fibrotic Effect of Exercise Training in Hypertension [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2018, 19(2) pmid:29461477
  61. 61. Zou Y, Chen Z, Sun C, Yang D, Zhou Z, Peng X, et al. Exercise Intervention Mitigates Pathological Liver Changes in NAFLD Zebrafish by Activating SIRT1/AMPK/NRF2 Signaling [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(20) pmid:34681600
  62. 62. Liu J, Jia S, Yang Y, Piao L, Wang Z, Jin Z, et al. Exercise induced meteorin-like protects chondrocytes against inflammation and pyroptosis in osteoarthritis by inhibiting PI3K/Akt/NF-κB and NLRP3/caspase-1/GSDMD signaling [J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2023, 158: 114118. pmid:36527845
  63. 63. Vina J, Sanchis-Gomar F, Martinez-Bello V, Gomez-Cabrera MC. Exercise acts as a drug; the pharmacological benefits of exercise [J]. British journal of pharmacology, 2012, 167(1): 1–12. pmid:22486393
  64. 64. Luo M, Cao C, Niebauer J, Yan J, Ma X, Chang Q, et al. Effects of different intensities of continuous training on vascular inflammation and oxidative stress in spontaneously hypertensive rats [J]. Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2021, 25(17): 8522–36. pmid:34331512
  65. 65. Taylor JL, Holland DJ, Keating SE, Leveritt MD, Gomersall SR, Rowlands AV, et al. Short-term and Long-term Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of High-Intensity Interval Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation: The FITR Heart Study Randomized Clinical Trial [J]. JAMA Cardiol, 2020, 5(12): 1382–9. pmid:32876655
  66. 66. Ramos JS, Dalleck LC, Tjonna AE, Beetham KS, Coombes JS. The impact of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on vascular function: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Sports Med, 2015, 45(5): 679–92. pmid:25771785
  67. 67. Weston KS, Wisløff U, Coombes JS. High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Br J Sports Med, 2014, 48(16): 1227–34. pmid:24144531
  68. 68. Costa EC, Hay JL, Kehler DS, Boreskie KF, Arora RC, Umpierre D, et al. Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training On Blood Pressure in Adults with Pre- to Established Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials [J]. Sports Med, 2018, 48(9): 2127–42. pmid:29949110