Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Computation of soliton structure and analysis of chaotic behaviour in quantum deformed Sinh-Gordon model

  • Adil Jhangeer ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Adil Jhangeer, Farheen Ibraheem, Tahira Jamal

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision

    adil.jhangeer@vsb.cz

    Affiliations IT4Innovations, VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, Poruba, Ostrava, Czech Republic, Department of Mathematics, Namal University, Mianwali, Pakistan

  • Farheen Ibraheem ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Adil Jhangeer, Farheen Ibraheem, Tahira Jamal

    Roles Formal analysis, Resources, Software

    Affiliation Department of Mathematics, Forman Christian College-A Chartered University-FCCU, Lahore, Pakistan

  • Tahira Jamal ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Adil Jhangeer, Farheen Ibraheem, Tahira Jamal

    Roles Investigation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Mathematics, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

  • Muhammad Bilal Riaz ,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ MBR and AAK also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliations Department of Mathematics, Namal University, Mianwali, Pakistan, Department of Computer Science and Mathematics, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon

  • Atef Abdel Kader

    Roles Formal analysis, Validation, Visualization

    ‡ MBR and AAK also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation College of Humanities and Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, UAE

Correction

26 Jul 2024: Jhangeer A, Ibraheem F, Jamal T, Riaz MB, Kader AA (2024) Correction: Computation of soliton structure and analysis of chaotic behaviour in quantum deformed Sinh-Gordon model. PLOS ONE 19(7): e0308186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308186 View correction

Abstract

Soliton dynamics and nonlinear phenomena in quantum deformation has been investigated through conformal time differential generalized form of q deformed Sinh-Gordon equation. The underlying equation has recently undergone substantial amount of research. In Phase 1, we employed modified auxiliary and new direct extended algebraic methods. Trigonometric, hyperbolic, exponential and rational solutions are successfully extracted using these techniques, coupled with the best possible constraint requirements implemented on parameters to ensure the existence of solutions. The findings, then, are represented by 2D, 3D and contour plots to highlight the various solitons’ propagation patterns such as kink-bright, bright, dark, bright-dark, kink, and kink-peakon solitons and solitary wave solutions. It is worth emphasizing that kink dark, dark peakon, dark and dark bright solitons have not been found earlier in literature. In phase 2, the underlying model is examined under various chaos detecting tools for example lyapunov exponents, multistability and time series analysis and bifurcation diagram. Chaotic behavior is investigated using various initial condition and novel results are obtained.

Introduction

Nonlinear models have earned considerable amount of attention due to their potential of demonstrating the dynamics of numerous natural and scientific phenomena, such as plasma waves (acoustic), gravitational waves, shallow water dynamics, fluid dynamics, nonlinear optics, and surface ocean waves. [16]. Nonlinear partial differential equations (NLPDE) are essential for simulating exciting phenomenon in these areas and numerous real-world problems. Analytic solution of NLPDE, therefore, have been well researched, ever evolving and challenging field of exploration. Some eminent contributions are [712].

Quantum physics that regulates microscopic systems is a best example of the q deformed Sinh-Gordon equation [13]. Numerous partial differential equations in classical calculus that have important applications in numerous fields have been studied by a number of scholars [1416]. These models play an instrumental role both in applied sciences and Mathematics.

With the advent of fractional calculus, it is now possible to explore mathematical models in a novel manner that incorporates fractional derivatives [1720]. Many scientists and researchers began integrating all the principles and relationships that are seen in fractional and traditional calculus into q calculus [21, 22]. Quantum calculus also referred as calculus without limits, is identical to conventional infinitesimal calculus but does not include the concept of limits. It provides ideas of h-calculus and q calculus where h refers Plank’s constant and q representing quantum [23, 24]. Relativity theory, special functions, mathematical physics along with other areas have witnessed instrumental role of q calculus [2527] and partial differential equations generated in q calculus are termed a q-deformed equations.

In this research, the following generalized q deformed Sinh-Gordon equation (Eleuch equation) [28] is taken into investigation. (1) where the sinhq function is defined by (2)

For q = 1, Eq (2) gives typical sinh functions. The tanhq(y), coshq(y) and their reciprocal are thoroughly explained along with their key properties in [28, 29]. Some significant contribution to the underlying problem are [3032].

Presently, theory of chaos and bifurcation is extensively used in examining differential equations. These are typically useful tools for understanding any intricate system that differential equations may control. A bifurcation is a qualitative shift driven by parameter change in the behaviour of a dynamical system. A variety of bifurcation schemes exist, including the saddle node bifurcation, Hopf bifurcations, period doubling bifurcation and pitchfork bifurcation. Examining the complex behaviour of nonlinear waves and investigating chaos theory are integral components of studying differential equation. The investigation of Chaos, a measure of stability when an external force is introduced to a nonlinear system, is essential in this contemporary era. Autonomous dynamic system’s asymptotic behaviour is exclusively dictated by their introductory conditions. There are the four types of equilibrium behaviour: an equilibrium point, a limit cycle, a torus and chaos.

Recently, Jamal et al. [33] have studied the Novikov Veselov equation through bifurcation and chaos discovery tools and they also achieved the soliton solutions. Rafiq et al. [34] have investigated the shallow water waves through bifurcation and chaos analysis and also acquired the multi solitons. The conformable Fokas Lenells model has been examined by Lie and Huang [35], employing chaos theory and bifurcation analysis. Zhang et al. [36] carried out a investigation of bifurcation on the modified FitzHugh Nagumo neuron model and find out the novel results. Jamal et al. [37] have explored the nerve impulse model by practicing the phase portraits, quasi periodic, multistability, time series and sensitivity analysis, also obtained soliton solutions.

Liu and Li [38] examined the fractional perturbed Gerdjikov–Ivanov equation. Their research delved into the chaotic behavior of the model by introducing disturbance factors into the planar dynamical system. They analyzed various aspects of the model, including two-dimensional and three-dimensional phase portraits, Poincaré sections, and sensitivity analysis. Gu et al. [39] explored the (3+1)-dimensional negative-order Korteweg-de Vries-alogeroBogoyavlenskii-Schiff (KdV-CBS) equation, which extends the classical Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation and broadens the scope of nonlinear partial differential equations.

The aim of this article is to employ the new extended direct algebraic approach and modified auxiliary equation method to derive analytical solutions for the given model. As far as we are aware, this methods have not been used to evaluate Eq (1) in earlier research. The proposed approaches provides findings in several general and explicit form, covering trigonometric, exponential, rational and hyperbolic functions. This gives them various advantages over previously investigated techniques. Travelling wave transformation is used to convert nonlinear partial differential equation into nonlinear ordinary differential equation. The results are represented graphically as 3D and 2D charts for particular values of pertinent parameters. There are various methods for determining chaos [40]. In this study, the most beneficial ones are emphasised. Here are Lyapunov exponents, multistability, time series and bifurcation diagram are discussed to review the chaotic behavior of the considered model. The study, in the opinion of the authors, is intriguing and has never been presented before the system in question.

The paper has been organised according to the format provided below. The mathematical framework and computation of soliton solution of the examined model have been described in Segment material and methods. Graphical illustrations and the chaotic behavior is investigated in Segment results and discussions. The research findings are highlighted in conclusion section.

Materials and methods

The mathematical framework of the model

The subsequent transformation is proposed for the anatomization of the traveling wave solution of Eq (1): (3) where the symbol α represents the speed of the travelling wave. Consequently, plugging Eq (3) into Eq (1), below mentioned ordinary differential equation has been derived. (4)

In this article, Eq (4) will be examined for δ = 0, p = 1, and γ = 1 and (5) use Eq (5) to transform Eq (4) as: (6)

Computation of soliton solutions for Eq (6)

Solutions by employing the extended direct algebraic method

In this segment, the generalized q deformed Sinh-Gordon equation is analyzed employing extended direct algebraic strategy. The method can be realized by considering the nonlinear partial differential equation stated below: (7) where P is a polynomial involving higher order partial derivatives and nonlinear components in p(x, y, t). The travelling wave is transformed by a process known as: (8) here, α represents a nonzero constant. Eq (7) is transformed into a nonlinear ordinary differential equation of the following form: (9)

In Eq (9), the prime denotes the derivative with respect to η. Assume that Eq (9) has a solution of the following form: (10) where (11) while ζ, ν and μ are real constants, the value of Q can be determined by balancing the nonlinear terms and the highest order derivative appearing in Eq (9).

The following are generic solutions to Eq (11) for the parameters ζ, ν and μ, where Φ = (ν2 − 4μζ). For further information, see [41, 42].

The value of Q is firstly obtained using homogeneous balance principle method. The value of Q = 2 is achieved by balancing the nonlinear terms with the highest order derivatives in Eq (6), which ultimately implies the solution in the known form: (12) where P(η) satisfies Eq (11). Comparing the different powers of coefficients P(η), after plugging Eq (12) with Eq (11) into Eq (6) and have a system of suitable algebraic equations:

The set of solutions below is produced by utilising a computational program to solve the aforementioned algebraic equations for the parameters a0, a1, a2, μ, ν, q and ζ: (13)

Case 1. If ζ ≠ 0 and Φ < 0, then

when the values of a2, μ and ν are entered via Eq (13) into Eq (12), the following results for Eq (6) are produced:

Case 2. If ζ ≠ 0 and Φ > 0, then

Case 3. If ν = 0 and μζ > 0, then

Case 4. If ν = 0 and μζ < 0, then

Case 5. If μ = ζ and ν = 0, then

Case 6. If ζ = −μ and ν = 0, then

Case 7. If ν ≠ 0 and μ = 0, then

Case 8. If ν = p, ζ = pq, (μ = 0 and q ≠ 0), then

Case 9. If ν2 = 4μζ, then

Case 10. If μ = ν = 0, then

Solutions by employing the modified auxiliary equation method

In this section, the generalized q deformed Sinh-Gordon equation will be solved by using the modified auxiliary equation method. Consider Eq (9), which takes the following as its solution: (14) where g(η) fits the auxiliary equation below and ai and bi are constants that must be computed. While (15) where σ, β, θ and k are undefined constants with k > 0, k ≠ 1. By balancing the nonlinear highest terms with highest derivatives into Eq (6), the value of n = 2 is obtained. The Eq (14) is convert in the following form as by using the above information: (16)

After employing Eq (15) with Eq (16) into Eq (6), set of algebraic equations turns up as follows and setting all the factors of the distinct powers of kg equal to zero, we have

The set of solutions below is produced by utilising a computational program to solve the aforementioned algebraic equations for the parameters a0, a1, a2, b1, b2, β and σ: (17)

Plugging the values a0, a1, a2, b1,b2, σ, and β via Eq (17) into Eq (16), it will turns up the examining solutions for the Eq (6):

For β2 − 4σθ < 0 and σ ≠ 0 shows, (18) or (19)

For β2 − 4σθ > 0 and σ ≠ 0 shows, (20) or (21)

For β2 − 4σθ = 0 and σ ≠ 0 shows, (22)

Results and discussions

The chosen outcomes to the wave equation are displayed graphically in this section in 2D and 3D forms. The wave solution has been used to construct the many types of graphs. The structure of the travelling wave varies along with the unexplained variables of the outcomes. The composition of the solution has been examined. Now, the graphs are shown illustrating how the generalized q deformed Sinh-Gordon equation has changed over time. There are several different solution of the generalized q deformed Sinh-Gordon equation that contain unspecified parameters. These unknown factors have been effect on the nature of the solutions. In other words, if different specific values are assigned to the variables, several types of solutions can be produced from the general solution. The following diagram illustrates how the solution U6 is affected by the parameters:

The variables ρ, ζ, μ, ν, y, and α are all included in the inclusive finding U6. For the following values: ρ = 2, ζ = 1.5, μ = −0.5, ν = −1, y = 2.5, and α = 0.2 from solution U6, we acquire the kink-bright soliton structure. A 2D graph for oscillating with temporal components t = 0, 1 and 2 and components of velocity α = 0.2, 0.5, 0.8 within the limit −10 ≤ x ≤ 10 is shown in (Fig 1). Additionally, at intervals −5 ≤ x ≤ 5 and −5 ≤ t ≤ 5 and 3D graphs are displayed. Additionally, at intervals −5 ≤ x ≤ 5 and −5 ≤ t ≤ 5 and 3D graphs are displayed.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Graphical depiction of kink-bright soliton shapes for U6 in 2D (the red line corresponds to t = 0, the green line to t = 1 and the magenta line to t = 2) and 3D sketches.

(a) 2D portrait for U6. (b) 3D portrait for U6.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304424.g001

The specific solution U8 is made up of the parameters ρ, ζ, μ, ν, y and α. For the following values: ρ = 2, ζ = −1.8, μ = −0.5, ν = −2.4, y = −2 and α = 0.2 from solution U8, we are able to obtain the bright soliton structure. (Fig 2) shows a 2D graph for oscillating with temporal components t = 0, 1 and 2 and components of velocity α = 0.2, 0.5, 0.8 within the limit −10 ≤ x ≤ 10. In addition, at intervals −5 ≤ x ≤ 5 and −5 ≤ t ≤ 5 and 3D graphs are exhibited.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Graphical depiction of bright soliton shapes for U8 in 2D (the red line corresponds to t = 0, the green line to t = 1 and the magenta line to t = 2) and 3D sketches.

(a) 2D portrait for U8. (b) 3D portrait for U8.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304424.g002

The specific solution U16 is made up of the parameters ρ, ζ, μ, y and α. For the following values: ρ = 2, ζ = 0.2, μ = −1, y = 1 and α = 0.3 from solution U16, we achieve dark bright soliton structure. (Fig 3) depicts a 2D graph for oscillating with temporal components t = 0, 1 and 2 and components of velocity α = 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 within the limit −10 ≤ x ≤ 10. Moreover, at intervals −5 ≤ x ≤ 5 and −5 ≤ t ≤ 5 and 3D graphs are presented.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Graphical depiction of bright soliton shapes for U16 in 2D (the red line corresponds to t = 0, the green line to t = 1 and the magenta line to t = 2) and 3D sketches.

(a) 2D portrait for U16. (b) 3D portrait for U16.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304424.g003

The distinct solution U19 is made up of the parameters ρ, ζ, μ, y, and α. For the following values: ρ = 4, ζ = 0.2, μ = −0.5, y = 1, and α = 0.2 from solution U19, we get bright-dark soliton structure. (Fig 4) portrays a 2D graph for oscillating with temporal components t = 0, 1 and 2 and components of velocity α = 0.3, 0.4, 0.6 within the limit −10 ≤ x ≤ 10. Furthermore, at intervals −5 ≤ x ≤ 5 and −5 ≤ t ≤ 5 and 3D graphs are demonstrated.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Graphical depiction of bright-dark soliton shapes for U19 in 2D (the red line corresponds to t = 0, the green line to t = 1 and the magenta line to t = 2) and 3D sketches.

(a) 2D portrait for U19. (b) 3D portrait for U19.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304424.g004

The particular solution m3 is formed up of the parameters q, θ, σ, y, β and α. For the following values: q = 0.5, θ = 2, σ = 1, y = 0.5, β = −3 and α = −0.2 from solution m3, we derive kink soliton structure. (Fig 5) represents a 2D graph for oscillating with temporal components t = 0, 1 and 2 and components of velocity α = −0.2, −0.5, −0.8 within the limit −10 ≤ x ≤ 10. Further, at intervals −5 ≤ x ≤ 5 and −5 ≤ t ≤ 5 and 3D graphs are revealed.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Graphical depiction of kink soliton shapes for m3 in 2D (the red line corresponds to t = 0, the green line to t = 1 and the magenta line to t = 2) and 3D sketches.

(a) 2D portrait for m3. (b) 3D portrait for m3.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304424.g005

The particular result m4 is formed up of the parameters q, θ, σ, y, β and α. For the following values: q = 1, θ = 0.3, σ = −2, y = 3, β = −1.5 and α = 0.2 from solution m4, we derive kink-peakon soliton structure. (Fig 6) demonstrates a 2D graph for oscillating with temporal components t = 0, 1 and 2 and components of velocity α = 0.2, 0.5, 0.8 within the limit −10 ≤ x ≤ 10. Further, at intervals −5 ≤ x ≤ 5 and −5 ≤ t ≤ 5 and 3D graphs are showed.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Graphical depiction of kink-peakon soliton shapes for m4 in 2D (the red line corresponds to t = 0, the green line to t = 1 and the magenta line to t = 2) and 3D sketches.

(a) 3D portrait for m4. (b) 3D portrait for m4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304424.g006

Investigation of chaotic behavior in perturbed dynamical system

This segment delves at the analysis of Eq (6), which describes quasi-periodic and chaotic behaviour. Employing a Galilean transformation, the studied equation is transformed into a planar dynamical system. To examine the chaotic behaviour of the planar dynamical system, a perturbation phrase Ω cos(θη) is introduced. Consequently, the dynamical planar system and the perturbation phrase have the following structure: (23) with W = θη, is an independent system. The aforementioned system creates a disturbance phrase which represent the force and its frequency using the parameters Ω and θ. Behaviour of a system may change and looks chaotic whenever it is impacted by outside forces. In our research, we discover this behaviour in a chaotically behaving system (23) which demonstrate unpredictable time dependent trajectories that diverge from predictable trends. For determining chaos, we applied Lyapunov exponents method, multistability and time series analysis and bifurcation diagram. In order to comprehend the perturbed dynamical system, we then displayed the behaviour of the aforementioned exponents over time. We can figure out the chaotic behaviour of perturbed dynamical system at K1 = 3, K2 = −3.5, K3 = 5.2, Ω = 3.7, θ = 1.8 and the starting conditions (0.6,0.6,0.6), (0.4,0.4,0.4) and (0.1,0.1,0.1) correspondingly by displaying the resulting Lyapunov exponents versus change in time in Figs (79).

thumbnail
Fig 7. The study of chaotic behaviour for system (23) through Lyapunov exponents is conducted with parameters K1 = 3, K2 = −3.5, K3 = 5.2, Ω = 3.7, θ = 1.8 and the starting conditions (0.6,0.6,0.6).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304424.g007

thumbnail
Fig 8. The study of chaotic behaviour for system (23) through Lyapunov exponents is conducted with parameters K1 = 3, K2 = −3.5, K3 = 5.2, Ω = 3.7, θ = 1.8 and the starting conditions (0.4,0.4,0.4).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304424.g008

thumbnail
Fig 9. The study of chaotic behaviour for system (23) through Lyapunov exponents is conducted with parameters K1 = 3, K2 = −3.5, K3 = 5.2, Ω = 3.7, θ = 1.8 and the starting conditions (0.1,0.1,0.1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304424.g009

In (Fig 7), we have observed that the system (23) is chaotic at λ1 = 0.0113, which is the largest positive Lyapunov exponent. This clearly shows that the orbits are diverging. In the same way, the largest positive Lyapunov exponent, λ1 = 0.0313 for the perturbed dynamical system (23) is represents the presence of chaos. Moreover, the largest positive Lyapunov exponent, λ1 = 0.0513 for the perturbed dynamical system (23) is represents the presence of chaos.

A characteristic of perturbed dynamical systems known as multistability and time series analysis denotes the presence of multiple alternative dynamic behaviors with an identical parameters set but diverse primary conditions. Among these behaviors are chaos, multistability, time series analysis periodicity and quasi periodicity which can manifest in the system in various situations. In Figs (10)–(12), we have explored the multistability and time series examination of the perturbed system (23) under various beginning constraints. System (23) appears to be especially vulnerable to chaotic initial conditions based on observations. Comprehending the characteristics of multistability and time series analysis, which is an essential constituent of intricate dynamic systems, helps facilitate the explanation and prediction of these system’s behaviours under diverse conditions.

thumbnail
Fig 10. The study of chaotic behavior for system (23) through multistability and time series analysis under diverse beginning conditions: Blue (0.2,0.05,0), green (0.5,0.1,0) and red (-0.1,0.02,0).

(a) Multistability analysis. (b) Time series analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304424.g010

thumbnail
Fig 11. The study of chaotic behavior for system (23) through multistability and time series analysis under diverse beginning conditions: Blue (-0.02,0.01,0), green (0.3,-0.01,0) and red (-0.2,-0.01,0).

(a) Multistability analysis. (b) Time series analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304424.g011

thumbnail
Fig 12. The study of chaotic behavior for system (23) through multistability and time series analysis under diverse beginning conditions: Blue (0.9,0.5,0), green (0.05,0.02,0) and red (0.6,0.04,0).

(a) Multistability analysis. (b) Time series analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304424.g012

A visual representation that shows how a dynamical system behaves when a parameter is changed is known as bifurcation diagram. The magnitude or strength of the perturbation is the parameter of interest in the scenario of a dynamical system that is perturbed. One can learn more about the possible behaviours of the system, such as fixed points, chaos, or limit cycles, by looking at the bifurcation diagram. Bifurcation diagrams, especially, can be used to determine the key parameter values, such as the beginning of chaos or the shift from stable to unstable dynamics, at which the system experiences a qualitative change in behaviour. In (Fig 13) we explore the bifurcation diagram of the perturbed dynamical system (23) versus m vs K2 with beginning condition (0.4,0.4,0.4) and physical parameters such as K1 = 3, K3 = 5.2, Ω = 3.7, θ = 1.8.

thumbnail
Fig 13. The study of chaotic behavior for system (23) through bifurcation diagram: Bifurcation m vs K2 at K1 = 3, K3 = 5.2, Ω = 3.7, θ = 1.8, and initial condition condition (0.4,0.4,0.4).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304424.g013

Conclusion

The q deformed Sinh-Gordon equation has been investigated by soliton structure and chaotic behaviour. The underlying equation is converted into an ordinary differential equation using the wave transformation technique. The new extended direct algebraic and modified auxiliary equation techniques have been effectively applied to obtain novel analytical traveling wave solutions. It is crucial to note that Sinh-Gordon equation solutions are achieved by utilizing hyperbolic, trigonometric, exponential, and rational functions. A variety of soliton structures have been produced for the resulting ordinary differential equation, taking into account different parameter values. Visual representations in both 2D and 3D forms are subsequently produced.

(Fig 1) depicts the kink-bright soliton structures for U6 by setting distinct temporal component values as t = 0, t = 1, and t = 2 and α = 0.2, α = 0.5, α = 0.8, respectively. (Fig 2) exemplifies the bright soliton structures for U8 using the same temporal parameter values. Dark soliton structures for U16 are portrayed in (Fig 3) for different temporal component values as t = 0, t = 1, and t = 2 and α = 0.3, α = 0.5, and α = 0.7, respectively. In (Fig 4), bright-dark soliton structures are displayed for U19 by choosing different temporal parameter values as t = 0, t = 1, and t = 2, α = 0.2, α = 0.4, and α = 0.6, respectively. (Fig 5) represents kink soliton structures for m3 by selecting different temporal parameter values as t = 0, t = 1, and t = 2, α = −0.2, α = −0.5, and α = −0.8, respectively. Kink-peakon soliton structures for m4 are shown in (Fig 6) by picking different temporal parameter values as t = 0, t = 1, and t = 2, α = 0.2, α = 0.5, and α = 0.8, respectively.

Numerous chaos detecting tools, such as Lyapunov exponents, multistability and time series analysis and bifurcation diagram have been implemented. Lyapunov exponents in Figs (7)–(9) portrays the chaotic behavior of the model at various initial conditions. Moreover multistabiltiy analysis depicts Figs (10)–(12) the chaotic behavior of the model under consideration at distinct beginning constraints. Furthermore bifurcation diagram (Fig 13) illustrates the chaotic behavior of the investigated model. The findings illustrate the effectiveness of the suggested methods in exploring novel solutions for numerous NLPDE found across a variety of disciplines of applied nonlinear sciences.

References

  1. 1. Vilasi Gravitational waves as exact solutions of Einstein Field Euations, J. Phys. Conf. 2007; 87:012017.
  2. 2. Odintsov SD, Oikonomou VK, Myrzakulov R. Spectrum of Primordial Gravitational Waves in Modified Gravities: A Short Overview, Symmetry 2022;14:729.
  3. 3. Goswami A, Singh J, Kumar D, Gupta S, Sushila . An efficient analytical technique for fractional partial differential equations occurring in ion acoustic waves in plasma, J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 2019;4(2):85–99.
  4. 4. El-Shiekh R.M, Gaballah M. Solitary wave solutions for the variable-coefficient coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations and Davey–Stewartson system using modified sine-Gordon equation method, J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 2020;5(2):180–185.
  5. 5. Islam T, Akbar A, Rezazadeh H, Bekir A. New-fashioned solitons of coupled nonlinear Maccari systems describing the motion of solitary waves in fluid flow, J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 2022.
  6. 6. Cai M, Li D. An integro-differential equation for surface ocean waves with finite depth, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Nonlinear Anal. 2011; 74(13): 4581–4588.
  7. 7. Jamal T, Jhangeer A, Hussain M.Z. Propagation of velocity profile of unsteady magnetohydrodynamics flow between two orthogonal moving porous discs, Eur. Phys. J. Plus. 2023;138(403):1–10.
  8. 8. Nguyen LTK. Wronskian formulation and ansatz method for bad Boussinesq equation, Vietnam J. Math. 2016;44:449–462.
  9. 9. Hirota R. Direct methods in soliton theory, Soli. 1980;44:157–176.
  10. 10. Raza N, Seadawy AR, Kaplan M, Butt AR. Symbolic computation and sensitivity analysis of nonlinear Kudryashov’s dynamical equation with applications, Phys. Scr. 2021;96:105216.
  11. 11. Zainab I, Akram G. Effect of derivative on time fractional Jaulent-Miodek system under modified auxiliary equation method and exp(−g(Ω))-expansion method, Chaos Solit. Fract. 2023;168:113147.
  12. 12. Hashemi MS, Mirzazadeh M. Optical solitons of the perturbed nonlinear Schrödinger equation using Lie symmetry method, Optik. 2023;281:170816.
  13. 13. Kilbas AA, Srivastava HM, Trujillo JJ. Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, elsevier. 2006;204.
  14. 14. Durur H, IIhan E, Bulut H. Novel complex wave solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional hyperbolic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Fractal. Fract. 2020;4(3).
  15. 15. Almusawa H, Ali KK, Wazwaz AM, Mehanna MS, Baleanu D, Osman MS. Protracted study on a real physical phenomenon generated by media inhomogeneities, Resu. Phys. 2021;313:
  16. 16. Ali KK, Mehanna MS. Traveling wave solutions and numerical solutions of Gilson-Pickering equation, Resu. Phys. 2021;28:104596.
  17. 17. Zafar A, Ali KK, Raheel M, Jafar N, Nisar KS. Soliton solutions to the DNA Peyrard–Bishop equation with beta-derivative via three distinctive approaches. Eur. Phys. J. Plus. 2020;135(9):726.
  18. 18. Osman MS, Ali KK. Optical soliton solutions of perturbing time-fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Optik. 2020;209:164589.
  19. 19. Osman MS, Zafar A, Ali KK, Razzaq W. Novel optical solitons to the perturbed Gerdjikov–Ivanov equation with truncated M-fractional conformable derivative. Optik. 2020;222:165418.
  20. 20. Raslan KR, EL-Danaf TS, Ali KK. Exact solution of space-time fractional coupled EW and coupled MEW equations using modified Kudryashov method, Commun. Theor. Phys. 2017;68(1):49–56.
  21. 21. Kac VG, Pokman C. Quantum calculus. In: Universitext. Springer-Verlag; 2002.
  22. 22. Agarwal RP. Certain fractional q-integrals and q-derivatives. In: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Cambri. Uni. Press. 1969;66.
  23. 23. SI Brochure: The International System of Units (SI) (PDF). (9th ed.). International Bureau of Weights and Measures 2019;131.
  24. 24. Victor K, Pokman CQ. calculus, Universitext, Springer-Verlag 2002; ISBN 0-387-95341-8.
  25. 25. Butt R. I, Abdeljawad T, Alqudah MA, Rehman M. Ulam stability of caputo q-fractional delay difference equation: q-fractional gronwall inequality approach, J. Inequal. Appl. 2019;2019(1):1–13.
  26. 26. Jleli M, Mursaleen M, Samet B. Q-integral equations of fractional orders, Elect. J. Differ. Equ. 2016;2016(17):1–14.
  27. 27. Abdeljawad T, Baleanu D. Caputo q-fractional initial value problems and a q-analogue mittag–leffler function, Commun. Nonlinear. Sci. Numer. Simul. 2011;16(12):4682–4688.
  28. 28. Eleuch H. Some analytical wave solutions for the generalized q-deformed Sinh-Gordon equation:, Hindawi Adv. Math. Phys. 2018;2018:1–7.
  29. 29. Arshed S, Biswas A, Mallawi F, Belic MR. Optical solitons with complex Ginzburg-Landau equation having three nonlinear forms, Phys. Lette. A. 2019;383(36):126026.
  30. 30. Bagheri M, Khani A. Analytical method for solving the fractional order generalized KdV equation by a beta fractional derivative, Adv. Math. Phys. 2020; 2022:1–18.
  31. 31. Abdalla MS, Eleuch H, Barakat T. Exact analytical solutions of the wave function for some q-deformed potentials, Rep. Math. Phys. 2013;71:217–229.
  32. 32. Ali KK, Abdel-Aty AH, An extensive analytical and numerical study of the generalized q-deformed Sinh-Gordon equation, J. Ocean. Eng. Sci. 2022;
  33. 33. Jamal T, Jhangeer A, Hussain MZ. Analysis of nonlinear dynamics of Novikov–Veselov equation using solitonic solutions, bifurcation, periodic and quasi-periodic solutions, and poincaré section, Eur. Phys. J. Plus. 2023;138(12):1087.
  34. 34. Rafiq MH, Raza N, Jhangeer A. Dynamic study of bifurcation, chaotic behavior and multi-soliton profiles for the system of shallow water wave equations with their stability, Chaos. Soli. Fract. 2023;171:113436.
  35. 35. Li Z, Huang C. Bifurcation, phase portrait, chaotic pattern and optical soliton solutions of the conformable Fokas–Lenells model in optical fibers, Chaos. Soli. Fract. 2023;169:113237.
  36. 36. Zhang X, Min F, Dou Y, Xu Y. Bifurcation analysis of a modified FitzHugh-Nagumo neuron with electric field, Chaos. Soli. Fract. 2023;170: 113415.
  37. 37. Jamal T, Jhangeer A, Hussain MZ. An anatomization of pulse solitons of nerve impulse model via phase portraits, chaos and sensitivity analysis, Chine. J. Phys. 2024; 87:496–509.
  38. 38. Liu C, Li Z. The dynamical behavior analysis of the fractional perturbed Gerdjikov–Ivanov equation, Resu. Phys. 2024;59:107537.
  39. 39. Gu M, Peng C, Li Z. Traveling wave solution of (3+1)-dimensional negative-order KdV-Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff equation, AIMS. Math. 2024;9(3): 6699–6708.
  40. 40. Özer AB, Akin E. Tools for detecting chaos, SA. Fen. Bilimleri. Enstits. Dergisi. 2005;9:60–64.
  41. 41. Rezazadeh H. New solitons solutions of the complex Ginzburg-landau equation with Kerr law nonlinearity, Optik. Inter. J. Light. Elect. Opt. 2018;167:218–227.
  42. 42. Jhangeer A, Seadawy AR, Ali F, Ahmed A. New complex waves of perturbed Schrödinger equation with Kerr law nonlinearity and Kundu-Mukherjee-Naskar equation, Resu. Phys. 2020;16:102816.