Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Developing the digital transformation skills framework: A systematic literature review approach

  • Machiel Bouwmans ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Machiel.bouwmans@hu.nl

    Affiliations Research Group Organizations in Digital Transition, HU Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands, Institute for People & Business, HU Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands

  • Xander Lub,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Research Group Organizations in Digital Transition, HU Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands, Research Group Strategy, Organization & Leadership, Nyenrode Business University, Breukelen, The Netherlands

  • Marissa Orlowski,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations MV Hospitality Solutions, LLC, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America, Department of Marketing, Entrepreneurship, Hospitality and Tourism, Bryan School of Business, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, United States of America

  • Thuy-Vy Nguyen

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology

    Affiliation Institute for People & Business, HU Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background

Digital transformation (DT) involves integrating digital technologies into organizations to improve productivity, efficiency, and quality. Investing in the workforce’s skillsets is essential for successful DT. However, it remains unclear which skillsets are essential.

Objectives

This study aims to identify and define the essential skillsets needed for exploiting the full potential of DT, and to consolidate the identified skills into a comprehensive framework of DT skills.

Method

A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA approach for selecting studies. This led to the selection of 36 articles that were examined using thematic analysis for identifying and consolidating skills into a framework.

Results

The Digital Transformation Skills Framework (DTSF) was developed, which contains six overarching skillsets and 44 underlying skills. The framework covers key skillsets in the areas of digital work, entrepreneurship, evidence-based work, collaboration, communication, and adaptation.

Conclusion and discussion

The DTSF offers a comprehensive understanding of essential skills for today’s evolving organizations, addressing a critical gap in existing literature. It is valuable for organizations and HR professionals, serving as a foundation for re- and upskilling initiatives. Ongoing research should expand the framework to include domain-specific DT skills and emerging digital technologies.

Introduction

The rapid advancements of digital technology, including automation, artificial intelligence (AI), big data, cloud computing, robotics, and internet of things (IoT), have profoundly impacted organizations [13]; for instance, by enabling organizations to process, archive, and access information at an unprecedented scale, facilitating real-time data analysis, and improving productivity, efficiency, and quality [2]. These advancements drive digital transformation (DT), which comprises the process of improving organizations “by triggering significant changes to its properties through combinations of information, computing, communication, and connectivity technologies” [4, p. 121]. Organizations across sectors undergo DT as they adopt new digital technologies to redefine value propositions for stakeholders as well as optimize or develop digital strategies, structures, processes, and operations [1, 5]. This makes DT a central aspect of Industry 4.0, given that Industry 4.0 entails high digitalization and use of information technologies by organizations to adapt to rapidly changing environments and to gain competitive advantage [6, 7].

Successful DT of organizations relies heavily upon its workforce. Trenerry et al. [3] identified several people-related factors that determine the success of DT, such as employees’ skillsets, perceptions, and attitudes towards technological change, team adaptability and resilience, and organizational culture. Particularly, employees’ skillsets are often recognized as an important prerequisite to successful DT [8], as advancements of digital technology are shifting the skills needed in the workplace. Employees not only need digital skills, which are the abilities needed to perform and complete job tasks within digitalized work environments [3], but also additional, non-digital, skills to thrive in the context of DT [9]. Skills gaps emerge and grow, as employees increasingly do not have these essential skills required to perform their jobs in rapidly changing work environments. Notably, in 2016 the World Economic Forum [6] predicted that 35% of employees’ skills would be disrupted in the upcoming five years due to digital technology advancements, and that share has risen to 44% in 2023.

Subsequently, the World Economic Forum [6] predicts that 60% of employees will require re- and upskilling training activities in the next five years, but only half have access to adequate training opportunities. There is, therefore, a great responsibility on organizations to prevent skill obsolescence and to invest in re- and upskilling activities for their workforce. To successfully do this, it is crucial to have a comprehensive understanding of essential skills for DT [2].

However, there is no consensus on which specific skillsets are needed in the context of DT. Even though there are many scientific articles and models discussing the skills needed for DT, existing frameworks do not cover all the essential skills. This is largely because extant research and frameworks have specifically focused on digital skills [e.g., 10, 11] and, as a result, overlook other crucial skills necessary for exploiting the full potential of DT [9, 12].

Therefore, we attempt to fill this gap in the current literature by making the following three contributions in this research. First, we seek to discern the skills necessary for both the digital technology component and the transformational component of DT, both of which are fundamental in the context of DT [5]. Second, recognizing that DT transcends specific sectors or professions, we pursuit to pinpoint skills that hold relevance across a wide spectrum of professions spanning various sectors. Third, we aim to consolidate the identified skills into a comprehensive framework of DT skills, accompanied by skill definitions to mitigate conceptual ambiguity.

We pursue these contributions by conducting a systematic literature review, through which the following research questions will be answered:

  1. Which workforce skills are essential for digital transformation?
  2. How can these essential skills be synthesized into a digital transformation skills framework?

Digital transformation skills

Industry 4.0 is characterized by the adoption of different interdependent digital technologies across diverse sectors, to enhance processes, decision-making, and services, changing the ways organizations operate and interact with customers, and fundamentally changing the nature of work [13]. The speed and scale of ongoing advancements of digital technologies lead to a digital disruption regarding work, because jobs or tasks are being displaced by digital innovations, and at the same time new jobs and tasks arise due to the emergence of new digital technologies [3, 14]. This makes skill disruption inevitable. For example, as digital technologies replace employees in performing certain tasks, the skills needed to perform those tasks become obsolete, and new digital technologies will create new tasks for which new skills are needed [5]. This disruption is not unexpected as industrial revolutions have historically displaced jobs and industries, necessitating new and often more complex skillsets [14].

The transformative shift of Industry 4.0 is generally viewed as a DT, which, in turn, is regarded as a socio-technical process of exploiting the potentials of digital technologies for strategic organizational purposes, often as a response to (possible) marginalization or displacement of an organization due to the digital advancements of other organizations in its sector [15]. Compared to digitization (converting from analogue to digital processes), and digitalization (using the potentials of digital technologies for mainly operational purposes), DT involves development towards direct integration of digital technologies in digital business strategies [15].

For digital strategies to be successfully implemented, organizations must undergo significant changes in structures and processes. It is often argued that an agile approach [16], or adoption of a malleable organizational design [17], is needed to respond to and leverage emerging digital technologies, as these increase the likelihood of maintaining competitiveness, exploiting new opportunities, and adeptly navigating unpredictable situations [17]. This need for agile approaches and malleable organizational designs underscores how DT differs from other organizational change processes which are often episodic and infrequent, whereas DT is ongoing, evolving, and cumulative [17]. Gong and Ribiere [1] therefore describe DT as a transformative shift, driven by innovative use of digital technology and strategic resource optimization, aiming to radically enhance and redefine value propositions for stakeholders within organizations, or even business networks, industries, or society.

Employees are regarded as one of the strategic pillars for DT [9], as their ability to adapt to DT is a critical determinant of its success [1]. When some tasks become obsolete and other tasks emerge, it is crucial that employees adopt essential skillsets for DT [18]. This will be challenging for employees for several reasons. First, digital technologies are advancing at a rapid and exponential rate, whereas employees can currently only adapt at a much slower rate, and this growing skills gap will overpower some employees if they are not acutely aware of their potential skills obsolescence [12]. Second, employees in DT contexts not only need job-specific and ever-changing technological skills, but also relevant soft skills such as collaboration skills [12], problem solving skills, and project management skills [2]. This is affirmed by the World Economic Forum [6] which, alongside technological skills, identifies soft skills related to collaboration, communication, entrepreneurship, and self-efficacy as increasingly vital. Foerster-Paster and Golowko [19] and Ivaldi et al. [2] even argue that soft skills are more valuable for employees than digital technological skills, as they contribute to one’s adaptability and flexibility, which are essential to adaptive learning in the dynamic context of DT.

Organizations bear responsibility for preparing employees for DT, by developing upskilling activities through which employees can learn new skills needed to perform new tasks, and reskilling activities through which employees learn new skills needed to perform new jobs [2, 20]. Responsibility for re- and upskilling for DT typically lies with human resource management (HRM) [7, 2028]. However, although there is consensus that expectations towards employees are changing and that organizations need to implement re- and upskilling activities, there is hardly agreement on which specific characteristics of employees are missing specific to DT [29]. In other words, there is no consensus on which specific skills are increasingly important. Therefore, identifying these essential skills is key for re- and upskilling activities to be successful [2].

Despite the increasing number of scientific articles on the subject, there is no unequivocal answer as to which DT skills are essential. The primary reason for this is the conceptual ambiguity surrounding essential skills in increasingly digitalized workplaces. This ambiguity is the result of ongoing advancements in digital technology, which require concepts of digital technology-related skills to rapidly evolve as well [30]. Consequently, various and often overlapping skills frameworks, such as digital literacy, information literacy, and digital competence, have emerged to describe essential digital technology-related skills. Apart from this conceptual ambiguity, most of these existing skills frameworks do not fully capture the complex and multifaceted nature of DT. For instance, many skills frameworks focus exclusively on technological or digital skills, failing to explain the essential soft skills necessary to exploit the full potential of DT [9]. As DT is a fundamental organizational change process [1], a comprehensive framework of essential skills for DT should go beyond digital technology-oriented skills and include soft, transformation-oriented skills as well.

Therefore, we consider essential DT skills to be a combination of digital technology-oriented skills (hard skills) that enable the optimal use of new digital technologies in work, and transformation-oriented skills (soft skills) that enable adaptability and flexibility in the wake of changing work conditions. This is the starting point for developing a new comprehensive framework of essential skills for DT.

Materials and methods

We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) to identify and synthesize essential DT skills in a transparent and reliable way. SLRs are used to advance knowledge based on prior existing academic work. As with all scientific research methods, it is important that SLRs are executed in a valid, reliable, and repeatable manner [31]. Therefore, in this paper we used the PRISMA 2020 approach [32], which includes the process of identifying, screening, and including academic papers. Moreover, we used the PRISMA 27-item checklist for reporting the SLR results in a transparent and complete manner, along with information regarding the advanced Boolean search action, eligibility criteria for including academic papers, quality assessment, and the process of achieving inter-rater agreement. The process of this SLR is visualized in the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram (Fig 1) and the PRISMA Checklist adopted for this study is included as S1 Table.

thumbnail
Fig 1. PRISMA flow chart for the identification of included studies.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304127.g001

Search strategy and selection process

Our search strategy consisted of two steps: an advanced search action in Web of Science, followed by a forward citation search in Google Scholar for the selection of articles found in Web of Science. Searches were conducted in November–December 2021 and in November-December 2023.

Step one: Selection of articles via web of science.

For the search action in Web of Science, we combined multiple search terms into one Boolean search operator. Fig 2 presents the search terms by abstract and keywords (see S1 Fig for the detailed Boolean search operator). This resulted in the identification of 240 articles. After identification, we screened the articles in two stages. In stage one, we screened the titles and abstracts of all 240 articles for the following eligibility criteria:

  • Includes conceptualizations, definitions and/or measurements of DT skills or a related term.
  • Includes DT skills or related terms that are not too domain-specific for one profession or sector.
  • Published in a peer-reviewed journal.
  • Written in English.

Three co-authors independently conducted this round of screening and discussed differences in judgment to reach absolute interrater agreement. After the stage one screening, we excluded 175 articles based on the eligibility criteria, and two articles could not be retrieved. The main reasons for exclusion were (a) the articles had no specific focus on skills for DT, (b) the articles contained only domain-specific skills for DT (e.g., for healthcare or educational professionals only), or (c) the articles focused on skills for organizations instead of employees. We followed the same process for stage two, this time reviewing the full texts of the remaining 63 articles. Reasons for exclusion of articles in this stage are included in Fig 1. This procedure resulted in the final inclusion of 33 articles from the Web of Science database.

Step two: Selection of articles via Google Scholar.

To be included in the forward citation search in Google Scholar, the 33 selected papers from Step One needed to:

  • Include rich definitions of skills or rich descriptions of indicators of skills.
  • Have a minimum average of two citations per year. We deemed this minimum acceptable given that the majority of articles on this topic are recent (published since 2020) and thus have not had time to collect more citations.

Furthermore, if papers had the same authors, papers were only included in the forward citation search if they contained different frameworks or models in multiple articles.

Based on these criteria, nine articles from Step One were selected for inclusion in the forward citation search. In total these nine articles were forward-cited by 415 papers, which were screened and assessed in the same two stages as described in Step One. In stage one, one co-author screened the titles and abstracts of all 415 articles for the eligibility criteria. Since Step One had proven to produce high interrater agreement among co-authors, other co-authors were not involved in this stage for Step Two. The title-and-abstract screening resulted in the exclusion of 397 articles. The main reasons for exclusion were (a) the articles had no specific focus on skills for DT, likely due to this broader forward-citation search, (b) articles were not published in peer-reviewed journals (e.g., conference papers), or (c) articles appeared as forward-citation search result for more than one of nine articles from Step One (e.g., double hits). In Stage Two, the full-text check on the remaining 18 articles was performed by three co-authors in the same manner as Step One. Reasons for exclusion of articles are included in Fig 1. This resulted in the inclusion of 4 articles from the Google Scholar database, for a total of 37 articles.

Step three: Quality assessment.

In this step, we performed a methodological quality assessment of the 37 articles deemed suitable for inclusion using the JBI critical appraisal checklists for qualitative research, text and opinion papers, systematic reviews and research syntheses, and analytical cross-sectional studies [33]. One co-author conducted the assessment and then the results were discussed by all members of the research team to ensure consensus. As the critical appraisal checklists varied based on study design and methodological approach (e.g., the qualitative research checklist included 10 criteria while the cross-sectional studies checklist included 8 criteria), we converted checklist/scale scores to percentages. Quality scores ranged from 64%–100%, with an average of 94%. Using a benchmark of 80% to indicate high quality [34], only one article was excluded based on the quality assessment, resulting in a final sample of 36 articles included in our review (see S2 Table).

Analysis and framework development

We applied template analysis to analyze the concepts used in the articles and to develop a framework of DT skills. Template analysis is a particular style of thematic analysis, in which an initial coding template is developed based on a subset of the data, which is then applied to further data and is revised and refined based on additional data, leading to a final template [35]. The concepts of the most cited article included in this SLR [9] provided our starting point for our initial coding template. We then revised and refined this initial template by comparing and adding concepts from the other included articles. To increase the reliability of our analysis, three co-authors discussed the framework and differences in judgements to reach absolute interrater agreement. This resulted in a framework containing six skillsets, of which three skillsets are further delineated into subgroups of skills, and a total of 44 different skills.

In the next step, we developed definitions for each skillset, subgroup, and skill, based on definitions, descriptions, and indicators provided in the 36 articles. Again, to increase reliability and the clarity of definitions, the three co-authors discussed the definitions to reach absolute interrater agreement.

Results

Our analysis led to the development of the Digital Transformation Skills Framework (DTSF) (Fig 3). The results leading up to the DTSF are based on the three tables presented and discussed below, with each table serving a distinct purpose.

thumbnail
Fig 3. The Digital Transformation Skills Framework (DTSF).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304127.g003

Table 1 presents an overview of the characteristics of the 36 included articles. Notably, it highlights the diverse terminology employed in these articles to describe essential skills for DT. Some articles primarily focused on digital technology-related hard skills, such as digital or data literacy, while others described transformation-oriented soft skills like entrepreneurial and open innovation competences. Additionally, certain articles focused on a combination of digital technology-oriented and transformation-oriented skills, employing terms like 21st century skills, transprofessional competencies, and skills pertinent to future developments such as near-future key skills, future skills, and current and foreseen skills. Despite variations in focus, all articles shared a common emphasis on essential skills for working within an increasingly digitalized work environment. Table 1 also indicates whether the articles had a broad focus on multiple professions/sectors or focused on specific professions/sectors. While the primary objective of our study was to develop a DT skills framework relevant to a wide range of professions, studies focusing on specific jobs or sectors were included if the skills discussed in those papers were not only domain-specific and (partially) relevant to a wider range of professions.

Table 2 presents the skillsets, subgroups, and skills that make up the DTSF. This table shows which articles, along with the terminology and concepts used in those articles, underlie the framework. In cases where different terminology was used, but similar descriptions or overlapping definitions existed, we consolidated skills and identified appropriate labels for integration into the DTSF. Table 2 also reveals instances where certain terminology used in the articles was associated with multiple skills within the DTSF. In such cases, the descriptions or definitions provided in those articles encompassed components that spanned multiple skills within the DTSF. By disaggregating these descriptions or definitions into distinct skills, our study contributes to clarifying and disentangling the conceptual ambiguity surrounding essential DT skills.

thumbnail
Table 2. Development of the digital transformation skills framework.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304127.t002

Table 3 encompasses the definitions of all skillsets, subgroups, and individual skills within the DTSF. As not all articles within the sample provided clear definitions for the skills they deemed essential, only those articles with accompanying definitions or explicit descriptions are highlighted in this table. Table 3 further aids in reducing conceptual ambiguity surrounding essential digital transformation skills and serves as a starting point for future research on DT skills and on re- and upskilling activities.

thumbnail
Table 3. Digital transformation skills framework with definitions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304127.t003

Digital working skills

The first skillset, digital working skills, refers to all digital technology-oriented skills needed to utilize both established and emerging digital technologies and media platforms to achieve optimal productivity and effectiveness within an increasingly digitalized work environment. The skills derived from literature are divided into two subgroups: fundamental digital working skills and advanced digital working skills.

The first subgroup contains skills needed for everyday tasks common in many professions, such as handling hardware, handling software such as mail and text software, and handling social media channels and the internet for a given task. This subgroup also includes sharing information and data with others in the cloud or shared drives for synchronous online work, and a basic level of digital problem solving when devices or systems do not work as intended.

The second subgroup, advanced digital working skills, includes skills that are relevant for a broad array of professions, although the level of required skill mastery may very per profession. For instance, programming is a very relevant skill for IT professionals but is also increasingly relevant for other employees working with big data and AI technologies in data-driven decision-making processes. Similarly, dealing with law, copyrights, and licenses, which requires employees not only to understand them but also to be able to act in compliance with them, becomes increasingly important for a broad array of professions, yet it belongs more to core tasks of certain professions such as digital ethics officers. The same applies to the other two skills of this subgroup: digital content creation such as creating or editing videos, images or audio, and digital safety skills, which entails adequately protecting one’s devices, systems, and data from disclosure.

Entrepreneurial skills

The second skillset, entrepreneurial skills, includes transformation-oriented skills needed to fully leverage the potential of DT. The present study identifies three interconnected subgroups of entrepreneurial skills: fundamental entrepreneurial skills, openness to novelty, and value creation skills. Most articles included in this SLR include one or more skills that are part of the larger entrepreneurial skillset, such as creativity and problem solving. However, these articles often do not explicitly link these skills to entrepreneurship and neglect to describe links between these individual skills in the context of DT.

The first subgroup, fundamental entrepreneurial skills, contains skills that are essential throughout the whole value creation process. This group consists of creativity and innovation, needed for generating new ideas or treating familiar ideas in new ways, and problem solving, which not only entails recognizing and defining problems and generation solutions, but also developing, testing, and refining prototypes that generate value.

The second subgroup, openness to novelty, contains skills needed to interpret developments and events in an organizational environment, and to identify new opportunities that arise from these developments. Spotting opportunities to generate value by establishing new ways of connecting and combining digital technology developments and events, and sensemaking, or the ability to determine the deeper meaning of digital transformation and create unique insights, make up this subgroup.

The third subgroup, value creation skills, consists of seven skills needed for turning opportunities and unique insights into value: (1) taking initiative by immediately applying ideas until a better solution is found; (2) strategic planning by developing, adapting, and evaluating action plans for achieving goals; (3) informed decision making to determine the best strategy for problem solving and value creation; (4) anticipation of the short- and long-term consequences and potential impact of actions; (5) risk taking by making mistakes and defending unconventional or unpopular opinions to tackle problems in the value creation process; (6) risk management via minimizing and overcoming harmful effects and adversities while searching for solutions; and (7) the leadership skills to guide teams in creating original and valuable solutions.

Evidence-based working skills

The third skillset contains evidence-based working skills that are needed in a digitalized work environment with increased information and data flows. Evidence-based working skills are a combination of digital technology-oriented and transformation-oriented skills. This skillset, which consists of three subgroups, enables employees to extract beneficial insights for their organization.

The first subgroup, fundamental evidence-based working skills, is a crucial basis for the other subgroups within this skillset. The first fundamental skill is formulating research questions, which is the ability to identify key areas of inquiry, understand the organization’s goals and objectives, and formulate research questions that align with these strategic priorities. The other fundamental skill is critical thinking, which is the proficiency to evaluate information and ideas critically, resisting premature conclusions, exploring multiple solutions, and supporting claims with sufficient evidence.

The second subgroup, information processing skills, is widely emphasized in the reviewed literature. This subgroup encompasses searching and selecting information from vast digital sources, which involves articulating information needs, developing search strategies, and filtering results. Another skill is interpreting and evaluating information based on relevance and quality in a discerning and critical manner; for instance, through rigorous fact-checking and other verification techniques to ensure accuracy, and through evaluation of the quality, appropriateness, reliability, and credibility of information sources. The last skill of this subgroup is information management, which involves organizing, storing, and retrieving digital information in a structured and meaningful manner; for example, using data editing methods or adding metadata.

The third subgroup, data fluency skills, involves the ability to comprehend large quantitative datasets and convert them into relevant insights, such as actionable reports for decision-making. The first skill in this subgroup, data collection, involves identifying the appropriate sources and methods to gather data, ensuring its relevance and applicability to the desired objectives. The second skill, data analysis, involves the application of basic descriptive, explorative, and inferential statistical methods, coupled with the ability to employ suitable presentation or visualization methods. The skill data interpretation builds upon previous skills, as it involves being able to make sense of data by identifying patterns and trends, recognizing relationships and dependencies, and also understanding the inherent properties of the data, such as measurement errors and discrepancies. The next skill, data application, involves the ability to construct clear, concise, and coherent reports or presentations on key findings, insights, and recommendations derived from the data. The skill of data management is very similar to information management and involves the systematic handling of quantitative data throughout its lifecycle, including organization, storage, retrieval, and maintenance. Lastly, data ethics and security involves conscientious consideration and responsible decision-making regarding the handling, storage, and analysis of data, with a focus on protecting individual privacy, ensuring ethical data collection practices, and minimizing potential harm.

Collaboration skills

The collaboration skillset is regarded as a crucial transformation-oriented skillset in the context of DT by many authors (see Table 2). Employees must master skills that enable them to (digitally) collaborate with different types of employees in agile or cross-functional teams to create value or solve problems, or to collaborate in networks to achieve common goals regarding digital transformation. In the specific context of DT, five collaboration skills are considered important. The first is negotiation with the aim of reaching agreements and making decisions that align with a common goal while maintaining mutual respect for all parties involved. The second skill, multidisciplinary teamwork, involves the proficiency to collaborate with individuals from diverse disciplines to collectively contribute to the development of a common, integrated, and shared mental model by actively engaging in collaborative discussions, exchanging ideas, and leveraging the diverse perspectives and expertise of team members. The third and fourth skills, social intelligence and cultural awareness, both entail adapting oneself to a socially and/or culturally diverse team while considering differences in the team on emotional and cultural levels; for instance, by actively challenging and addressing issues of prejudice and stereotypes, or by effectively interpreting and responding to social signals. Networking is the last skill that makes up the collaboration skillset, and involves employees’ ability to establish networks, form alliances, and engage relevant stakeholders inside and outside one’s organization to achieve shared objectives.

Adaptation skills

Mastering the fifth skillset, adaptation skills, is essential for employees’ flexibility and agility, which is key in response to rapidly changing work conditions due to DT. Adaptation skills necessitate continuously modifying one’s thinking, attitudes, and behaviors to effectively navigate current and future (digital) environments, unpredictable technology consequences, and disruptive changes. As such, it is a transformation-oriented skillset in which four distinct skills are identified. Firstly, self-directed learning involves taking charge of one’s professional development, ands proactive re- and upskilling to meet evolving organizational and environmental demands. Self-directed learners manage their own progression towards self-defined learning goals, take appropriate actions to re- and upskill, reflect upon these actions, and as such prevent skill obsolescence. Secondly, experiential learning encompasses the proficiency to acquire knowledge and skills through hands-on experience in the workplace. This skill is crucial for successfully engaging in more agile project work and adapting to dynamic environments, and involves experimenting with different approaches and methods, engaging in self-reflection as well as collective reflection, and extracting valuable lessons and identifying areas for improvement. The third skill, training others, involves transferring knowledge and expertise to others, empowering them to enhance their DT skills. The last skill, resilience, is the proficiency to successfully adapt and bounce back from disturbances and challenges that threaten an employee’s ability to function. This skill involves not only the capacity to prevent or minimize the harmful effects of adversity but also the ability to overcome obstacles and remain mentally, emotionally, and physically healthy amid adverse conditions.

Communication skills

The sixth and final skillset addresses communication skills. Communication skills are deemed important transformation-oriented skills in the context of DT, as noted by most articles included in this SLR (see Table 2). In an increasingly digitalized workplace, it is important that employees master communication skills that enable them to transmit information and interact with others via appropriate and innovative communication channels. Proficiency in communication skills involves not only the ability to convey information accurately but also to ensure that the intended meaning is effectively understood by the intended recipients. Within this skillset, four skills are distinguished. The first, using appropriate ways to communicate, articulates that employees can effectively convey messages through various digital platforms, and develop communication strategies and formats for specific audiences. The second skill, storytelling, denotes that employees are proficient in crafting compelling narratives that captivate audiences and provide a coherent narrative thread using digital tools, attractive visualizations, models, or simulations, with the goal to persuade or inspire others. The remaining two skills focus on appropriate behavior in the digital environment: netiquette, which emphasizes socially responsible online behavior, respecting privacy, using appropriate language, and preventing misinterpretation, and digital identity management, which involves effectively managing multiple digital identities and communicating in alignment with each identity.

Discussion

Our study answers the following research questions ‘Which workforce skills are essential for digital transformation? and ‘How can these essential skills be synthesized into a digital transformation skills framework?, by developing the Digital Transformation Skills Framework (DTSF). The DTSF offers new insights on essential DT skills for employees in a broad array of professions and organizations. This insight is crucial as active engagement of employees determines the success of DT [1], but employees’ required skills are rapidly changing. The skills gap that emerges is recognized as a central hinderance in this success [8]. Although many studies stress the importance of both essential digital technology-oriented (hard) and transformation-oriented (soft) skills, contemporary skills frameworks tend to focus on the former and therefore neglect the full complexity of DT [9]. The importance of transformation-oriented skills is emphasized by the World Economic Forum [6] and multiple scientific papers [e.g., 2, 19]. However, a framework that synthesizes both types of skills specifically for the DT context was missing. The added value of the DTSF therefore lies in the inclusion of both digital technology-oriented and transformation-oriented skills.

The DTSF represents the multifaceted and dynamic nature of DT through six interconnected skillsets: digital working skills, entrepreneurial skills, evidence-based working skills, collaboration skills, adaptation skills, and communication skills. The current study contributes to reducing conceptual ambiguity in contemporary literature through careful examination of terminology, descriptions and definitions used in the included articles, followed by synthesis of this information into skills, subgroups, and skillsets. For instance, the skill data analysis, was identified in 15 papers that all used different terminology, such as ‘data analysis and mathematical skills’, ‘statistical knowledge’, and ‘quantitative and statistical skills’, and the skill creativity and innovation was identified in 19 articles that used 12 different terms, such as ‘curiosity and imagination’, ‘innovative and adaptive thinking’, and ‘out-of-the-box thinking’ (see Table 2 for a complete overview).

Moreover, our study also contributes to reducing conceptual ambiguity on essential DT skills by formulating definitions for all skills, subgroups, and skillsets in the DTSF, based on the articles included in our sample (see Table 3). It was notable that not all included articles contained complete sets of definitions for the skills included in those articles. These definitions can serve a foundation to build upon in future studies on essential DT skills.

Practical relevance and implications

The DTSF serves as a solid basis for raising awareness on skillsets that are vital across various professions and sectors and provides a starting point for sector-wide re- and upskilling initiatives. The present study therefore calls upon organizations, particularly HRM professionals, to adapt their strategic talent management practices to the digital era and assume responsibility for re- and upskilling the workforce in essential DT skills. In the development of re- and upskilling strategies informed by the DTSF, several considerations should be taken into account.

First, prior to designing or procuring interventions such as training programs focused on specific skillsets, organizations should enrich the DTSF by providing context-specific examples of the relevance of these skills and articulating desired learning outcomes for their workforce. This will enable tailored training offerings. Second, organizations need to establish desired maturity levels for all DT skills of the DTSF. While the DTSF holds relevance for diverse professions, the study emphasizes that desired skill maturity levels may vary across specific professions or organizations. For instance, entrepreneurial skills or evidence-based working skills may not require the same level of maturity in all professions. By establishing these desired maturity levels, organizations can effectively monitor skill development and implement targeted interventions. Third, in the development of re- and upskilling strategies, organizations should consider both horizontal alignment (interconnectedness between different trainings, and connection with other interventions) and vertical alignment (alignment with the overall business strategy) to maximize potential outcomes. Lastly, organizations should periodically reassess their re- and upskilling strategies to ensure that the skills essential to their specific organizational context are given emphasis and are addressed accordingly.

Limitations and directions for future research

The DTSF raises several follow-up research questions, partly based on the limitations of this study. The first limitation prompting future research is the potential incomplete coverage of relevant research due to our search strategy. Although we utilized Web of Science, the most widely used database of scientific publications, in combination with a forward-citation search in Google Scholar, our search methodology may have resulted in key publications being overlooked. Striving for complete coverage, future research could therefore expand the search action by including other scientific databases as well.

The second limitation prompting follow-up research is related to time sensitivity. This SLR reflects the state of knowledge up to a certain point in time, and therefore does not include skills related to very recent developments, such as generative AI. As highlighted in the Introduction, the lack of timely updated frameworks may lead to conceptual ambiguity regarding essential DT skillsets or outdated frameworks. To address this, and to provide ongoing valuable insights for organizations, this study calls upon researchers to continually provide updates to the DTSF.

Furthermore, we have intentionally used the term ‘skills’ over ‘competence’ in this study. This decision is in line with the practical objective of our research, which is to address the re- and up-skilling challenge by pinpointing essential DT skills. We acknowledge that ‘competence’ is a broader concept, encompassing knowledge and attitudes as well as skills. Indeed, certain knowledge and attitudes are intrinsically linked to the essential skills outlined in the DTSF. However, our SLR indicated a degree of interchangeability between these terms, sometimes leading to conceptual ambiguity. By focusing on ‘skills’, we aimed to reduce potential ambiguity in this paper. Nonetheless, we recognize that re- up-skilling initiatives and programs, which aim to develop essential DT skills, inherently involve the acquisition of relevant knowledge and the shaping of appropriate attitudes. Essential DT skills are not standalone entities but are part of a larger competency framework. Consequently, future research should strive to develop this broader framework by incorporating essential DT knowledge and attitudes.

Moreover, the DTSF enables various follow-up studies that are linked to the new insights the framework provides. For instance, follow-up research on the measurement and monitoring of workforce development in DT skillsets is an important next step. The DTSF presents an opportunity to develop instruments for assessing and measuring DT skills in the workplace, and the next research step therefore involves operationalizing the DT skills outlined in this framework and creating validated and reliable measurement instruments.

Additionally, future research should focus on expanding the DTSF to address specific professions. While the strength of the current framework is that it encompasses skills applicable to a wide range of professions, it lacks domain-specific DT skills. Given the complexity of DT, the importance of employees with π-shaped skillsets is becoming increasingly apparent [67], as these skills contribute to better collaboration between people with different expertise and to innovative output [68]. The term ‘π-shaped skillsets’ is a metaphor to describe employees who are generalists and specialists at the same time. The two vertical bars of the π symbol reflect deep expertise, such as domain-specific skills and the evidence-based working skills of the DTSF, and the horizontal bar of the π symbol reflects the generalist skills [67, 68], such as the transformation-oriented skillsets of the DTSF. Developing expansions of the DTSF for specific professions, such as by adding a digital pedagogical skillset for teachers or a digital health skillset for healthcare professionals, therefore further enhances the understanding of profession- or sector-specific essential DT skills.

Lastly, future research should examine the development of effective re- and upskilling strategies, based on the DTSF. This research should also address strategies that consider employees’ digital mindset and self-efficacy in re- and upskilling, as these factors impact their engagement and willingness to participate in such activities [69].

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Digital Transformation Skills Framework (DTSF) offers a valuable and comprehensive insight into the essential DT skills required by employees in today’s rapidly changing organizations. This framework addresses a crucial gap in existing literature by synthesizing both digital technology-oriented and transformation-oriented skills, providing a holistic understanding of essential skills related to the multifaceted nature of DT. The DTSF has practical relevance for organizations and HR professionals, serving as a foundation for re- and upskilling initiatives. Ongoing research is needed to continually update and expand the DTSF, by addressing domain-specific DT skills and including skills related to emerging digital technologies.

References

  1. 1. Gong C, Ribiere V. Developing a unified definition of digital transformation. Technovation. 2021;102:102217.
  2. 2. Ivaldi S, Scaratti G, Fregnan E. Dwelling within the fourth industrial revolution: organizational learning for new competences, processes and work cultures. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2022;34(1):1–26.
  3. 3. Trenerry B, Chng S, Wang Y, Suhaila ZS, Lim SS, Lu HY, et al. Preparing workplaces for digital transformation: an integrative review and framework of multi-level factors. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:822. pmid:33833714
  4. 4. Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Managing Digital Transformation. 2019; 28(2):118–114.
  5. 5. Kretschmer T, Khashabi P. Digital transformation and organization design: an integrated approach. California Management Review. 2020;62(4):86–104.
  6. 6. World Economic Forum. Future of jobs report 2023. “Internet]. Cologny/Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum, 2023. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/
  7. 7. Ada N, Ilic D, Sagnak M. A framework for new workforce skills in the era of industry 4.0. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences. 2021;6(3):771–786.
  8. 8. Vuksanović Herceg I, Kuč V, Mijušković VM, Herceg T. Challenges and driving forces for industry 4.0 implementation. Sustainability. 2020;12(10):4208.
  9. 9. Van Laar E, Van Deursen AJ, Van Dijk JA, De Haan J. The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: a systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017;72:577–588.
  10. 10. Chetty K, Qigui L, Gcora N, Josie J, Wenwei L, Fang C. Bridging the digital divide: measuring digital literacy. Economics. 2018;12(1):20180023.
  11. 11. Martínez-Bravo MC, Chalezquer CS, Serrano-Puche J. Meta-framework of digital literacy: a comparative analysis of 21st-century skills frameworks. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social. 2021;79:76–109.
  12. 12. Sivaraman A. Soft side of digital transformation: the connected employee. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management. 2020;7(1):121–128.
  13. 13. Culot G, Nassimbeni G, Orzes G, Sartor M. Behind the definition of Industry 4.0: Analysis and open questions. International Journal of Production Economics. 2020;226:107617.
  14. 14. Frey CB, Osborne MA. The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017;114:254–280
  15. 15. Strohmeier S. Digital human resource management: a conceptual clarification. German Journal of Human Resource Management. 2020;34(3):345–365.
  16. 16. Palfreyman J, Morton J. The benefits of agile digital transformation to innovation processes. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation. 2022;6(1):26–36.
  17. 17. Hanelt A, Bohnsack R, Marz D, Antunes Marante C. A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies. 2021;58(5):1159–1197.
  18. 18. Mukesh HV. Digital transformation taking centre stage: how is digital transformation reshaping entrepreneurial innovation?. The Journal of Entrepreneurship. 2022;31(2):364–401.
  19. 19. Foerster-Metz US, Golowko N. The need for digital and soft skills in the Romanian business service industry. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society. 2018;13(1):831–847.
  20. 20. Vereycken Y, Ramioul M, Desiere S, Bal M. Human resource practices accompanying industry 4.0 in European manufacturing industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 2021;32(5):1016–1036.
  21. 21. Bamel U, Kumar S, Lim WM, Bamel N, Meyer N. Managing the dark side of digitalization in the future of work: a fuzzy TISM approach. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2022;7(4):100275.
  22. 22. Fenech R, Baguant P, Ivanov D. The changing role of human resource management in an era of digital transformation. Journal of Management Information & Decision Sciences. 2019 Jul 1;22(2).
  23. 23. Gjika I, Pano N. Human resource development AS a contributor to industry 4.0 implementation IN Albania. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries. 2023;89(2):e12250.
  24. 24. James AT, Kumar G, Tayal P, Chauhan A, Wadhawa C, Panchal J. Analysis of human resource management challenges in implementation of industry 4.0 in Indian automobile industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022;176:121483.
  25. 25. Kuchciak I, Warwas I. Designing a roadmap for human resource management in the banking 4.0. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2021;14(12):615
  26. 26. Ozkan-Ozen YD, Kazancoglu Y. Analysing workforce development challenges in the Industry 4.0. International Journal of Manpower. 2022;43(2):310–333.
  27. 27. Piwowar-Sulej K. Human resources development as an element of sustainable HRM–with the focus on production engineers. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;278:124008. pmid:32901179
  28. 28. Santoso W, Sitorus PM, Batunanggar S, Krisanti FT, Anggadwita G, Alamsyah A. Talent mapping: a strategic approach toward digitalization initiatives in the banking and financial technology (FinTech) industry in Indonesia. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. 2021;12(3):399–420.
  29. 29. Muehlburger M, Krumay B, Koch S, Currle S. Individual digital transformation readiness: Conceptualisation and scale development. International Journal of Innovation Management. 2022;26(03):2240013.
  30. 30. Ilomäki L, Paavola S, Lakkala M, Kantosalo A. Digital competence–an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and information technologies. 2016;21:655–679.
  31. 31. Xiao Y, Watson M. Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2019;39(1):93–112.
  32. 32. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal. 2021;372:n160. pmid:33781993
  33. 33. Aromataris E, Munn Z. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. 2020. https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/4687404/About+this+Manual
  34. 34. Desye B, Tesfaye AM, Daba C, Berihun G. Food safety knowledge, attitude, and practice of street food vendors and associated factors in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2023;18(7):e0287996. pmid:37440560
  35. 35. Brooks J, McCluskey S, Turley E, King N. The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qualitative research in psychology. 2015 Apr 3;12(2):202–22. pmid:27499705
  36. 36. Akyazi T, Goti A, Oyarbide A, Alberdi E, Bayon F. A guide for the food industry to meet the future skills requirements emerging with industry 4.0. Foods. 2020;9(4):492. pmid:32295238
  37. 37. Akyazi T, Goti A, Oyarbide-Zubillaga A, Alberdi E, Carballedo R, Ibeas R, et al. Skills requirements for the European machine tool sector emerging from its digitalization. Metals. 2020;10(12):1665
  38. 38. Bastidas V, Oti‐Sarpong K, Nochta T, Wan L, Tang J, Schooling J. Leadership of urban digital innovation for public value: A competency framework. IET Smart Cities. 2023:1–16.
  39. 39. Blanka C, Krumay B, Rueckel D. The interplay of digital transformation and employee competency: a design science approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022;178:121575.
  40. 40. Busulwa R, Pickering M, Mao I. Digital transformation and hospitality management competencies: toward an integrative framework. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2022;102:103132.
  41. 41. Cetindamar Kozanoglu D, Abedin B. Understanding the role of employees in digital transformation: conceptualization of digital literacy of employees as a multi-dimensional organizational affordance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2021;34(6):1649–1672.
  42. 42. De Souza ASC, Debs L. Identifying emerging technologies and skills required for construction 4.0. Buildings. 2023;13(10):2535.
  43. 43. Di Gregorio A, Maggioni I, Mauri C, Mazzucchelli A. Employability skills for future marketing professionals. European Management Journal. 2019;37(3):251–258.
  44. 44. Fan C, Wang J. Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure digital skills of Chinese undergraduates. Sustainability. 2022;14(6):3539.
  45. 45. García-Pérez L, García-Garnica M, Olmedo-Moreno EM. Skills for a working future: how to bring about professional success from the educational setting. Education Sciences. 2021;11(1):27.
  46. 46. Henderikx M, Stoffers J. An exploratory literature study into digital transformation and leadership: toward future-proof middle managers. Sustainability. 2022;14(2):687.
  47. 47. Jardim J. Entrepreneurial skills to be successful in the global and digital world: proposal for a frame of reference for entrepreneurial education. Education Sciences. 2021 Jul;11(7):356.
  48. 48. Karcioğlu R, Binici F. Developing a maturity model to identify digital skills and abilities of accounting professionals: evidence from Turkey. Access, 2023;4(2):221–247.
  49. 49. Kuntadi I, Ana A, Rohendi D, Suryadi D, Ab Halim F, Sari AR, et al. Towards Digital TVET: a comparative study on students’ readiness in the industry digital demands in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Technical Education and Training. 2022;14(3):79–93.
  50. 50. Le QTT, Doan THD, Nguyen QLHTT, Nguyen DTP. Competency gap in the labor market: evidence from Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business (JAFEB). 2020;7(9):697–706.
  51. 51. Lee JJ, Meng J. Digital competencies in communication management: a conceptual framework of Readiness for Industry 4.0 for communication professionals in the workplace. Journal of Communication Management. 2021;25(4):417–436.
  52. 52. Martin J, Dang QH, Gremyr I. The influence of digitalisation on the role of quality professionals and their practices. Cogent Business & Management. 2023;10(1):2164162.
  53. 53. McCartney S, Murphy C, Mccarthy J. 21st century HR: a competency model for the emerging role of HR Analysts. Personnel Review. 2021;50(6):1495–1513.
  54. 54. McPhillips M, Licznerska M. Open innovation competence for a future-proof workforce: a comparative study from four European universities. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2021;16(6):2442–2457.
  55. 55. Morris TH, König PD. Self-directed experiential learning to meet ever-changing entrepreneurship demands. Education + Training. 2020;63(1):23–49.
  56. 56. Oberländer M, Beinicke A, Bipp T. Digital competencies: a review of the literature and applications in the workplace. Computers & Education. 2020;146:103752.
  57. 57. Papamitsiou Z, Filippakis ME, Poulou M, Sampson D, Ifenthaler D, Giannakos M. Towards an educational data literacy framework: enhancing the profiles of instructional designers and e-tutors of online and blended courses with new competences. Smart Learning Environments. 2021;8(1):1–26.
  58. 58. Perdana R, Riwayani R, Jumadi J, Rosana D. Development, reliability, and validity of open-ended test to measure student’s digital literacy skill. International Journal of Educational Research Review. 2019;4(4):504–516.
  59. 59. Rayna T, Striukova L. Fostering skills for the 21st century: the role of Fab labs and makerspaces. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2021;164:120391.
  60. 60. Schauffel N, Schmidt I, Peiffer H, Ellwart T. Self-concept related to information and communication technology: scale development and validation. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. 2021;4:100149.
  61. 61. Schmidt DH, van Dierendonck D, Weber U. The data-driven leader: developing a big data analytics leadership competency framework. Journal of Management Development. 2023;42(4):297–326.
  62. 62. Sousa MJ, Wilks D. Sustainable skills for the world of work in the digital age. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 2018;35(4):399–405.
  63. 63. Van Laar E, van Deursen AJ, van Dijk JA, de Haan J. 21st-century digital skills instrument aimed at working professionals: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Telematics and Informatics. 2018;35(8):2184–200.
  64. 64. Vladi B, Kokthi E, Guri G, Kelemen-Erdos A. Mapping stakeholders perceptions on innovation skills, through the Borich Needs Assessment Model: empirical evidence from a developing country. Acta Polytech. Hungarica. 2022;19(8):49–68.
  65. 65. Wang MH, Chen CC, Chen KY, Lo HW. Leadership competencies in the financial Industry during digital transformation: an evaluation framework using the Z-DEMATEL Technique. Axioms. 2023;12(9):855.
  66. 66. Yurinova EA, Byrdina OG, Dolzhenko SG. Transprofessional competences of school teachers in the digital environment: education employers’ perspective. Education and Information Technologies. 2022;27(2):1841–63. pmid:34377078
  67. 67. Hayajneh JA, Elayan MB, Abdellatif MA, Abubakar AM. Impact of business analytics and π-shaped skills on innovative performance: findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Technology in Society. 2022 Feb;68:101914.
  68. 68. Elayan MB, Hayajneh JA, Abdellatif MA, Abubakar AM. Knowledge-based HR practices, π-shaped skills and innovative performance in the contemporary organizations. Kybernetes. 2023;52(9):3102–3118.
  69. 69. Solberg E, Traavik LE, Wong SI. Digital mindsets: recognizing and leveraging individual beliefs for digital transformation. California Management Review. 2020;62(4):105–124.