Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Analysis of arsenic-modulated expression of hypothalamic estrogen receptor, thyroid receptor, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma mRNA and simultaneous mitochondrial morphology and respiration rates in the mouse

  • Daiana Alymbaeva,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation

    Affiliation Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary

  • Csaba Szabo,

    Roles Resources, Supervision

    Affiliation Department of Animal Physiology and Health, Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Godollo, Hungary

  • Gergely Jocsak ,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    jocsak.gergely@univet.hu

    Affiliation Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary

  • Tibor Bartha,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Resources

    Affiliation Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary

  • Attila Zsarnovszky,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary, Department of Animal Physiology and Health, Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Godollo, Hungary, Agribiotechnology and Precision Breeding for Food Security National Laboratory, Department of Animal Physiology and Health, Institute of Physiology and Nutrition, Hungarian University of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Kaposvar, Hungary

  • Csaba Kovago,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary

  • Silvia Ondrasovicova,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biology and Physiology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, Slovakia

  • David Sandor Kiss

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary

Abstract

Arsenic has been identified as an environmental toxicant acting through various mechanisms, including the disruption of endocrine pathways. The present study assessed the ability of a single intraperitoneal injection of arsenic, to modify the mRNA expression levels of estrogen- and thyroid hormone receptors (ERα,β; TRα,β) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) in hypothalamic tissue homogenates of prepubertal mice in vivo. Mitochondrial respiration (MRR) was also measured, and the corresponding mitochondrial ultrastructure was analyzed. Results show that ERα,β, and TRα expression was significantly increased by arsenic, in all concentrations examined. In contrast, TRβ and PPARγ remained unaffected after arsenic injection. Arsenic-induced dose-dependent changes in state 4 mitochondrial respiration (St4). Mitochondrial morphology was affected by arsenic in that the 5 mg dose increased the size but decreased the number of mitochondria in agouti-related protein- (AgRP), while increasing the size without affecting the number of mitochondria in pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons. Arsenic also increased the size of the mitochondrial matrix per host mitochondrion. Complex analysis of dose-dependent response patterns between receptor mRNA, mitochondrial morphology, and mitochondrial respiration in the neuroendocrine hypothalamus suggests that instant arsenic effects on receptor mRNAs may not be directly reflected in St3-4 values, however, mitochondrial dynamics is affected, which predicts more pronounced effects in hypothalamus-regulated homeostatic processes after long-term arsenic exposure.

1. Introduction

Based on the latest analysis conducted by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), and the Environmental Protection Agency, which accounts for factors such as substance toxicity, potential human exposure, and frequency of occurrence, arsenic (As) has been identified as the most hazardous substance. This recent (2022) ranking is documented in their priority list, accessible at https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/spl/index.html#2019spl. The issue of arsenic poisoning has become increasingly prevalent in many developing nations, often stemming from contamination of drinking water sources due to natural environmental factors, such as seepage into aquifers, mining activities, and industrial operations [1]. Globally, more than 150 million people are impacted by arsenic-contaminated drinking water, posing a substantial public health concern due to the chronic nature of exposure [2]. Both human population studies and animal research have consistently demonstrated that chronic exposure to As leads to cognitive impairment [3, 4].

Many of the environmental toxicants act as agonists or antagonists of certain hormones (mainly estrogens and/or thyroid hormones [511]); interfering with the physiological regulation of the homeostatic system. These chemicals have been termed endocrine disruptors (EDs) [12].

In general, within the frame of ED-modulated intracellular hormone actions, there are two major and fundamentally interrelated types of intracellular mechanisms. №.1.: regulatory pathways that regulate physiological balance, optimizing responses to the environment [1316]; №.2.: adjustment of cellular energy expenditure to homeostatic processes [1719].

Emerging evidence suggests that As exposure disrupts the normal functioning of the endocrine system, influencing some intricate regulatory processes related to hormone synthesis and secretion [20]. Given their integral roles in orchestrating diverse physiological processes, the thorough investigation of the thyroid and estrogen systems is of fundamental importance in the assessment of a substance demonstrating potential endocrine-disrupting properties [2123]. Apart from these “traditional” hormone receptors, some studies highlight that the adipogenesis activators like peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), a crucial regulator of energy metabolism [24, 25], is also sensitive to As exposure [26] that raises the question of whether PPARγ is also a potential target for endocrine disruptors [27].

While the toxicological impact of As is widely acknowledged in various aspects, the mechanisms through which As elicits its endocrine disrupting effects on the above hormonal systems, remain largely unknown. Nevertheless, our earlier studies have already demonstrated some aspects of its disrupting potential in in vitro conditions [2831] however, until now it remained questionable whether these phenomena may also manifest in vivo.

Located in the basal region of the brain, the hypothalamus serves as a key regulator of the above-mentioned hormonal systems, functioning as an intricate network comprising specialized neurosecretory cells [32]. Receiving a myriad of external and internal signals through hypothalamus-pituitary-end-organ axes [33, 34], these cells compose the major regulatory center for homeostatic processes [35]. Among the numerous hypothalamic nuclei that integrate the processes related to energy balance, nutrient intake, and feeding behavior, the arcuate nucleus (ARC) receives special attention in our present research since it is positioned at a region with higher local permeability in the blood-brain barrier, making it readily exposed to circulating factors, such as chemicals expressing endocrine disrupting capability [3639]. ARC neurons, particularly those expressing proopiomelanocortin (POMC; termed as “satiety neurons”), and agouti-related peptide (AgRP; so-called “hunger cells”) not only play a vital role in sensing the overall energy status of the organism as key members of the melanocortin system but also integrate signals from both central and peripheral pathways [4042].

Mitochondria in somatic cells typically serve general cellular metabolic functions, producing ATP, while–quite interestingly–mitochondria located in AgRP and POMC neurons are suggested to play a specific role in regulating the energy balance of the whole organism through dynamic changes in their activity that are believed to directly mimic and modulate their hosting cells’ function; i.e. they act as energy sensors of the hosting neurons [4345]. Regarding the context between hormone receptors and cellular energy management, the influence of ER, TR, and PPAR on mitochondria is unequivocal, manifesting through both direct and indirect pathways across diverse cellular contexts [4649].

These effects encompass interactions with nuclear and extranuclear receptors, as well as non-genomic interactions with other organelles and intracellular events. Given the heightened presence of ER and TR within the hypothalamus, coupled with their capacity to traverse the blood-brain barrier and undergo local synthesis within the brain, it is crucial to comprehend the individual and collective impact of ER and TR on mitochondrial function [50, 51]. Considering the distinctive roles played by AgRP- and POMC-associated mitochondria and their profound impact on the overall organism, it becomes apparent that EDs acting upon these hormone receptor pathways possess the capacity to modulate an extensive array of systemic mechanisms. This modulation may result in altered physiological functions or even contribute to the onset of different diseases.

We hypothesize that As can act as an endocrine disruptor in low doses and can also in vivo modulate the expression of different hormone receptors (ERα,β, TRα,β and PPARγ) within the hypothalamus. Coupled with that, different intracellular pathways are suggested to be affected leading to altered function of organelles, most prominently those including mitochondria, which–in the case of AgRP and POMC cells–are remarkably sensitive to circulating factors, like hormone-mimicking chemicals. Therefore, beyond the above we investigated the mitochondrial respiration rates (MRR), a generally accepted parameter for the assessment of the intensity of mitochondrial metabolism, moreover, we examined the mitochondrial morphology in AgRP and POMC cells to offer insights into the broader mechanisms governing metabolic regulation.

In determining our arsenic dosage, we referenced several key studies. The selection of the quantities of hormones and EDs, specifically 40 μg, 5 mg, and 10 mg, was based on several factors. Firstly, these dosages were chosen according to the sensitivity of the applied neuronal cell culture system and our previous experiments where the most effective dosage in proving ED effects was determined [52, 53]. These quantities represent varying levels of arsenic exposure, reflecting different degrees of environmentally relevant concentrations of 40 μg, 5 mg, and 10 mg were chosen to represent varying exposure levels, with 40 μg falling within WHO limits (permissible limit of 10–50 μg) [54]. Chang et al. (2007) [55] noted reproductive effects in mice at 20–40 mg/l sodium arsenite exposure. Jana et al. (2006) [56] found neuroendocrine effects in rats at 5 mg/kg/day sodium arsenite. Moreover, Stump et al. (1999) [57] administered intraperitoneal doses (0, 5, 10, 20, 35 mg/kg) during in-utero development, observing the effects of As exposure during critical developmental periods. On the other hand, the concentrations of 5 mg and 10 mg, as cited in studies by Smedley and Kinniburgh, (2012) [58] and Shankar, (2014) [59], respectively, demonstrate higher exposure levels that exceed permissible limits. Our approach to determining intervention time in our animal model was based on insights from our previous comprehensive pilot study [28]. Initially, we conducted in vitro experiments assessing TR and ER receptor expressions with their ligands using cerebellar granule cells. We maintained a consistent intervention time of 6 hours for PCR analysis to ensure reliable results, aligning with the peak expression period observed, we also noted a secondary peak for Western blot analysis around 18 hours. Subsequently, we refined these time windows through further in vitro experiments examining hormone receptor expressions post-exposure to endocrine disruptors [30, 31, 60]. By systematically progressing through these stages and aligning intervention times across in vitro and in vivo experiments, we aimed to ensure consistency and reliability in our findings while effectively investigating the effects of arsenic exposure on hormone receptor expression in the hypothalamus.

We believe that exposure to elevated levels of As may exert modulatory effects on homeostatic functions by disrupting the integrity of the hypothalamic melanocortin system. This perturbation has the potential to induce enduring physiological consequences, including but not limited to conditions such as diabetes, accelerated aging, and cognitive impairments (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. The hypothesized mechanisms underlying arsenic-induced endocrine disruption, emphasizing its potential impact on the primary endocrine center.

The melanocortin system within the hypothalamus emerges as a key target of arsenic, with adverse effects anticipated across diverse cellular processes, including mitochondrial respiration and morphology, as well as hormonal signaling pathways. Persistent dysfunction of the melanocortin system is implicated in the etiology of various systemic disorders, such as metabolic syndromes, reproductive dysfunction, mood disorders, and neurodegenerative diseases.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303528.g001

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Animals and treatments

18-day-old C57BL/6 mice were used for this study, (purchased from HAS Biological Research Centre, Szeged, Hungary). Since pilot studies showed no differences between the examined parameters in the two sexes, and we found no indication in the relevant literature for hypothalamic gender differences in this respect, pups of both sexes were used (weighing 9–10 g, n = 6 per treatment group, separately for PCR, MRR and electron microscopic stereological measurements). The age chosen represents a pre-pubertal state when the hypothalamus is not yet sexually active, however, being just before the onset of reproductive life, it is responsive to sexual steroids. This period marks a crucial transitional phase, highlighted by Sengupta P. et al., (2017 a,b) [61, 62] and Sengupta T. et al., (2021) [63], and Brydges N. (2016) [64]. Rebuli and Patisaul, (2016) [65] also emphasized the significant impacts of EDs on the hypothalamus during this developmental stage. While behavioral effects of EDs have been extensively studied, neural changes in pre-pubertal animals have received comparatively less attention.

Animals were kept under a 12/12-h light/dark cycle illumination program. Animals were fed with regular chow (vendor: FarmerMix Kft., Zsambek, Hungary) and ad libitum tap water. All experimental procedures were conducted at the University of Veterinary Medicine (Budapest, Hungary) in accordance to ARRIVE guidelines and EU Directive 2010/63/EU, and was reviewed and approved by the Animal Health and Animal Welfare Directorate of the National Food Chain Safety Office (permit no.: XIV-I-001/2202-4/2012, PEI/001/665-8/2015 and PE/EA/1252-6/2016), as well conformed to ARRIVE guidelines and EU Directive 2010/63/EU.

Animals were sorted into experimental groups according to doses administered as mentioned below, plus a control group injected with the vehicle only (non-treated control, ntC). Hypothalamic samples were measured for the following parameters: mRNA expression level of ERα, ERβ, TRα TRβ, PPARγ.

Six hours before sampling, animals received a single intraperitoneal injection of sodium (meta)arsenite (arsenic, As; purity: ≥90%; CAS: 7784-46-5), purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Injections were given in three different doses: 40 μg, 5 mg and 10 mg As per 1000 g body weight, dissolved in 0.9% NaCl + dimethyl sulfoxide (0.1%) and DMSO solution. Non-treated controls (ntC) were injected with the solvent as vehicle only.

2.2. Sampling

2.2.1. Sampling for tissue homogenates.

Sampling was performed through quick guillotine decapitation under deep isoflurane narcosis 6 hours after the treatments, as described earlier [28, 29, 53]. Removal of the hypothalamic tissue followed the anatomical protocol previously described [66]. Briefly, hypothalami were dissected from the removed brains as follows: in anterio-posterior direction: between the caudal margin of the optic chiasm and the rostral margin of the mamillary body and in dorsoventral direction: below the upper margin of the fornix. Both sides of the hypothalami were used for preparing the tissue homogenates (although we have taken measures to develop a suitable method for the measurement of mitochondrial respiration rates, in relatively small samples [67], still, using only half of the mouse hypothalamus provided a sample size too small to reliably obtain MRR data). Samples were then used for the determination of the level of receptor mRNAs and mitochondrial respiration rates, as detailed below.

2.2.2. Sampling for electron microscopy.

Anesthetized animals (details above) were perfused through the left cardiac ventricle, first with 50 ml of 0.9% NaCl, followed by 250 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB), pH 7.4. After perfusion, the isolated brains were placed in 4°C glutaraldehyde-free fixative (4% paraformaldehyde) for an additional 3 h. Samples were prepared for immunohistochemistry (IHC) by cutting the isolated brain blocks into 50-μm-thick sections (this thickness ensures optimal tissue morphology preservation and staining efficiency. Specifically, when employing 4% paraformaldehyde fixation, sections within the 20–50 μm range facilitate efficient antibody penetration and antigen retrieval).

2.3. Quantitative-RT-PCR

Total RNAs were isolated from mouse hypothalami using TRI reagent following the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA, #AM9738) and purified from samples with the Direct-zol RNA miniprep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA, #R2051). RNA levels were determined spectrophotometrically (NanoDrop™ ND-1000, Wilmington, NC, USA) at 260–280 nm absorption. 3 μg/μL of total RNA was reverse transcribed by RT-PCR (Amplitron II., Barnstead/Thermolyne, Dubuque, IA, USA) using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega Corporation, Wisconsin, USA, #M1701), oligo (dt) primers and dNTPmix.

Subsequently, 2 μL of the resulting cDNA samples were analyzed by qRT-PCR (Master SYBRGreen, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland) in triplicates, in a LightCycler 2.0 device (F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland). To evaluate qPCR reactions, constitutively expressed genes β-actin (ACTB), beta-glucuronidase (GUSB), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), β-2-microglobulin (B2M) and transferrin receptor protein 1 (TFRC) were evaluated for stability. Transcription levels of the genes under investigation were normalized using the expression values of GAPDH, which was identified as the most consistently expressed gene across the experimental conditions, as determined by the GeNorm and NormFinder algorithms. These algorithms were accessed through the online platform RefFinder [68]. Primer pairs were designed using NCBI’s primer designer Primer-BLAST, or were taken from literature, and used at 2 μM concentration. The primer sequences used for GAPDH, ERα, ERβ, TRα, TRβ and PPARγ are given in Jocsak et al., 2019 [29], (please see Table 1). qPCR cycles and controls were planned according to the manufacturer’s instructions and were optimized for the primer pair as described by Jocsak et al., 2016 [31]. Real-time PCR threshold cycle (Ct) data were analyzed using the REST-XL software version 2.0 (GenEx-BioMcc, TUM, München, Germany) [69]. Cycle threshold values were normalized to those of GAPDH. The relative expression ratios of mRNA (fold changes) were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method.

2.4. Mitochondria metabolism

2.4.1. Isolation of mitochondria.

Hypothalamic samples were prepared for measurement of oxygen consumption as described by Kiss et al., 2016 [69]. Briefly, unit amounts of hypothalamic tissue homogenates (in isolation buffer) were used for mitochondrial purification by a Percoll gradient fractionation. Mitochondrial oxygen-consumption was measured by a Clark-type oxygen electrode (Oxytherm, Hansatech Instruments, Norfolk, UK) at 37°C. Measured values represent the mitochondrial respiration rate (MRR, given in consumed nmol O2 per ml of final volume in one minute). Mitochondrial sample homogenates included both the left and right sides of the hypothalami (i.e., the left and right sides were not separately processed and measured).

2.4.2. Definition of mitochondrial respiration states.

As the name and numeral marking of different mitochondrial respiration states varies in the relevant literature, subsequently we explain our nomenclature as used in the present study. Explanation of mitochondrial respiration states as sequentially measured (60 seconds for each respiration state (please also see: [66]).

First step: the mitochondrial oxygen consumption was measured in respiration buffer only, without the addition of any substrates that may affect mitochondrial respiration. Under such conditions, oxygen consumption per unit time depends on the actual metabolic state of the hypothalamic sample and the sample’s original oxygen supply. We termed this experimental setup as state 1 mitochondrial respiration (St1).

Second step: to fuel the Krebs cycle, 5 μL pyruvate (P; comprising the following mixture: 275 mg pyruvate/5 mL distilled water + 100 μL 1 mol/L HEPES) and 2.5 μL malate (M; comprised the following mixture: 335.25 mg malate/5 mL distilled water +100 μL 1 mol/L HEPES) were added to the sample. Under such conditions, the Krebs cycle intensifies, and oxygen consumption increases due to consequential facilitation of the terminal oxidation and oxidative phosphorylation, if the prior (in vivo) blood/oxygen supply of the hypothalamic tissue was sufficient and downregulating mechanisms were not active. We termed this experimental setup as state 2 mitochondrial respiration (St2).

Third step: adenosine diphosphate (ADP; comprising of the following mixture: 64.1 mg ADP/5 mL distilled water + 100 μL 1 mol/L HEPES) of 2.5 μL was added to the sample. Since ADP is a major upregulator of mitochondrial respiration, under such conditions MRR increases if the prior (in vivo) blood/fuel supply of the hypothalamic tissue was sufficient. We termed this experimental setup as (ADP-dependent) state 3 mitochondrial respiration (St3).

Fourth step: oligomycin (comprised of the following mixture: 1 mg oligomycin/1 mL ethanol) of 1 μL was added to the sample. Oligomycin is an ATP-synthase blocker, therefore, it inhibits the oxidative phosphorylation (ATP synthesis), while terminal oxidation continues. Under such conditions, oxygen consumption depends on the actual uncoupled stage and alternative oxidation in mitochondria. Uncoupling and alternative oxidation play important roles in transient downregulation of ATP biosynthesis when cellular energy needs drop. Therefore, increased oxygen consumption in this case refers to the decline of a process (that was previously upregulated) or the attempt by the mitochondrion to downregulate ATP synthesis. We termed this experimental setup as state 4 mitochondrial respiration (St4).

Fifth step: carbonylcyanide-4-(trifluoromethoxy)-phenyl-hydrazone (FCCP; comprised the following mixture: 1.271 mg FCCP/5 mL dimethyl sulfoxide) of 2.5 μL was added to the sample. The FCCP is a cyanide derivative; therefore, by binding to, and blocking cytochrome C oxidase, it depletes all remaining oxygen from the sample. A decrease in oxygen level under such conditions depends on the actual/initial (in vivo) metabolic state of the sampled tissue and the amount of oxygen consumed during St1-4. Thus, the total amount of oxygen consumed in St1-4 plus the amount of remaining oxygen depleted by FCCP gives good reference to the blood/oxygen supply of the tissue at the time of the animal’s sacrifice. Therefore, this experimental setup is also known as total mitochondrial respiratory capacity, hereby referred to as state 5 mitochondrial respiration (St5).

Although all 5 mitochondrial respiration states (as explained above) were sequentially measured and evaluated, only MRR from state 3 (St3) and state 4 (St4) mitochondrial respiration values are presented in this study, since these MRR parameters are most appropriate to characterize the intensity of mitochondrial/tissue metabolism. St3 gives a plausible insight into mitochondrial metabolism, since the ADP/ATP ratio potently regulates mitochondrial activity, while St4 indicates the degree of uncoupling and the activity of alternative oxidases, two factors that play an important role in transient down-regulation of ATP biosynthesis when cellular energy needs drop.

2.5. Immunocytochemistry & electron microscopy

50 μm thick tissue slices [70] were rinsed in 1% sodium borohydride in PB for 15 min to eliminate unbound aldehydes. The primary antibodies used for labelling included a polyclonal primary POMC (Invitrogen PA5-18368, 1:1500, incubated overnight) and AgRP antibodies (Invitrogen PA5-78739, 1:200, incubated overnight). As a secondary antibody a biotinylated polyclonal goat anti-rabbit antibody was applied (Invitrogen 65–6140, 1:200, incubated for 1 hr.). Finally, ABC kits (avidin-biotin complex kits, # Pk.4001) and DAB (diaminobenzidine, CAS: 91-95-2) were used for development.

For electron microscopic analysis, sections were osmicated (1% OsO4 in PB) for 30 min, dehydrated through increasing ethanol concentrations, and embedded into Durcupan ACM resin (Sigma-Aldrich, 44610). Following embedding, ultrathin sections with a thickness of 50 nm were cut for precise examination, (see above the localization of the area in question).

The prepared sections were examined with a JEOL-1011 TEM (JEOL USA, Peabody, MA, USA). The calibrated electron micrographs were analyzed using the NIH Image J (ver. 1.52n) software. The measured parameters included the occurrence (number per area) and size of mitochondria, matrix/entire mitochondrion ratio [71].

2.6. Data analysis

In this study, statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism version 9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and carried out according to the guidance of the Department of Biomathematics, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.

Prior to analysis, the normality of the data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. As data followed a normal distribution in the data sets, one-way ANOVA was performed followed by Bonferroni or Dunnett’s test for post hoc comparisons, for PCR, and MRR and for structure measurements, respectively. Additionally, the homogeneity of variances was examined using Levene’s test.

Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). All statistical tests were two-tailed, and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

In the present study, we examined the modulatory effects of three environmentally relevant doses of As on mRNA expression levels of ERα,β, TRα,β, and PPARγ, respectively; simultaneous MRR in mouse hypothalamic tissue homogenates and mitochondrial morphology (number and size of mitochondria, and the proportional mitochondrial matrix area to the area of the entire mitochondrial crossection) were also determined. Concerning the MRR, although measurements have been carried out according to our description in the Materials and Methods section (i.e., all St1-5 were recorded), here we only present the results of St3 and St4 measurements, since these two parameters are directly relevant to demonstrate the intensity of mitochondrial metabolism (and №.2 reactions).

3.1. Receptor mRNA levels

In general, As treatment evoked elevated receptor expression in ERs and TRs, and even reached significance depending on the receptor subtypes. In the case of both ERα and TRα (Fig 2A and 2C.), As caused a remarkable dose-dependent increase in the receptor expressions (i.e., higher dose led to higher expression), where the treatment groups showed significant difference compared to the non-treated control and to each other, too. In contrast to TRα (Fig 2A), expression of TRβ (Fig 2B) was not affected by the As injection, since treated groups remained in the expression range observed in the case of the control. Also, the ERβ expression levels (Fig 2C) were drastically changed in a dose-dependent manner as a result of As-treatment, however, the pattern of the different doses was also different from that of ERα (Fig 2D): the expression in all treatment groups increased significantly compared to the control and each other. However, the highest peak was observed in the intermediate dose. Similarly to the TRβ groups, As only negligibly altered the PPARγ expression, without regard to the treatment doses (Fig 2E).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Effects of 3 different doses of a single intraperitoneal injection of sodium (meta)arsenite (arsenic, As) on the expression of hypothalamic nuclear hormone receptors (ERα,β; TRα,β, PPARγ), and hypothalamic mitochondrial state 3–4 respiration.

(A-E): Relative expression level of receptor genes was analyzed by qRT-PCR and normalized to the average of the control gene GAPDH. (F): ADP-dependent (St3) and oligomycin-induced (St4) mitochondrial respiration rates were given in consumed nmol O2 per ml of final volume in one minute. The data shown here are the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compared to the non-treated control (ntC). P-values are represented by asterisk (*) where p < 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303528.g002

3.2. Mitochondrial respiration St3-4

Arsenic induced dose-dependent changes in MRR in both St3 and St4 values, their pattern showing a broad similarity to each other; however, that of the St4 was stronger (Fig 2F). Administration of the highest As dose (10 mg) decreased the mitochondrial activity (significantly in the case of St4), while the further two doses showed roughly the same activity as observed in the control. It is also important to note that St4 MRR values demonstrate a clear (and significant) inverse concentration dependence, i.e. as the As dose was reduced, the MRR increased to near the control mean (please see 40 μg group).

3.3. Mitochondrial ultrastructure

In both the AgRP (Fig 3A, 3C, 3E, 3G) and the POMC (Fig 3B, 3D, 3F, 3H) neurons, the size of mitochondria increased exclusively in animals treated with 5 mg of As (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively), while in the 40 μg and 10 mg group no significant change could been observed compared to the control (Fig 3A and 3B.).

thumbnail
Fig 3. The effects of 3 different doses of a single intraperitoneal injection of sodium (meta)arsenite (As) on the mitochondrial microstructure in AgRP and POMC neurons.

(A-B) the size of mitochondria, (C-D) the number of mitochondria is measured per unit section area. (E-F) the proportional mitochondrial matrix (matrix-to-total mitochondrial ratio) area is expressed as a percentage. (G-H) the images of electron micrographs of AgRP and POMC neurons, where arrows indicate examples of POMC-IR and AgRP-IR neurons. The micrographs showcase the effectiveness of the staining technique employed in this study, providing high-quality visualization of the cellular structures of interest. The data presented above (A-F) are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compared to the non-treated control (ntC) group. P-values are represented by asterisks (*,**) where p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303528.g003

The number (per 10 μm2 section area) of mitochondria has changed only in the 5 mg group, demonstrating a slight decrease (p < 0.1) in AgRP neurons (Fig 3C).

Proportional mitochondrial matrix area (matrix area per entire mitochondrion area in electron microscopic section) showed a drastic increase (p < 0.001) in a dose-dependent manner (higher As concentration caused higher density) (Fig 3E and 3F).

We also examined the juxtaposition of mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum in both the AgRP-IR (Fig 3G) and POMC-IR neurons (Fig 3H), however, neither the average distance between the two organelles, nor the number of mitochondrion-endoplasmic reticulum contacts were changed in any of the experimental groups.

3.4. Behavior of experimental animals

Mice that received the highest dose (10 mg) showed loss of physical activity, depression-like behavior, ataxia, loss of interest for feed and mild trembling 1.5–3 hours after receiving the intraperitoneal injection of As (similar administration of other EDs did not evoke such behavioral responses [unpublished observation]). Autopsy of these animals revealed no macroscopic pathological symptoms.

4. Discussion

4.1. Receptor mRNA levels

The literature abundantly reports how As exposure is associated with different endocrine disorders; however, a mechanistic investigation is still lacking [72, 73]. Arsenics’s impact on the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis is already unquestionable. Nevertheless, the impact of As on the estrogen signalization remains, at least in some senses, inconsistent, since As can either trigger or inhibit ER expression and ER-related pathways, with or without regard to its doses, tissues and species drawn into investigation [7479]. In our case, As treatment generally resulted in an elevated expression in both ER receptors. For example, ERβ expression levels (Fig 2D) were drastically changed in a dose-dependent manner, however, this change was different from that observed regarding ERα expression (Fig 2C). It is to note here, that ERα is recognized as the primary mediator of estrogenic effects on energy balance and an essential factor in the regulation of energy homeostasis, is mainly found in brain regions associated with the control of energy balance more precisely in the melanocortin system [80]. Our present findings are in accord with some previous literature data, however, our assessment of acute As exposure adds new findings to the existing knowledge from long-term exposure studies. Non-cytotoxic doses of As have already proved to strongly suppress ER-dependent gene transcription in in vivo poultry and in vitro human models [81]. This suggests that As may bind to ERs rendering them inaccessible for their natural ligands, a mechanism that can lead to an upregulation of ER expression in trying to regain the native functions. Regardless of whether As increases or decreases receptor expression levels, it is evident that ER-mediated №.1 intracellular processes are affected. Since ERs are not only present in the host cell but also in the mitochondria, it is likely that №.2 reactions are also promptly affected by AS exposure. This idea could be paralleled with our finding that As likewise seemed to depress dose-dependently St4: considering the interpretation of St values described in the Materials and Methods section, a decrease in St4 is a sign of an attempt of the mitochondria to produce more ATP. In contrast to this, Chen et al. [82] detected significant inhibition of ERα expression after long-term exposure to low doses of As2O3, but no effects have been detected with regard to ERβ. Another long-term study also reported the downregulation of ERα along with the decrease of the estrogen-responsive gene activities after a 4 μg/ml exposure to As [79]. Thus, our present results suggest that the immediate effects of As on ERs expression might differ from the long-term effects.

Studies on the relation of thyroid receptors and exposure to As are scarcer than those on estrogen-driven mechanisms. The majority of the reported studies examined thyroid markers other than the relevant receptors (in human patients), however, only a single article discussed the receptor expression (in amphibians). They reported that even very low As level can profoundly affect TR-dependent developmental processes in vertebrates [83]. According to some other studies, sub-chronic As exposure can significantly reduce TRβ expression in the rodent cerebellum both on mRNA and protein levels [84]. In humans, As treatment resulted in an elevated expression of TR mRNA, and also TSH was positively associated with the plasma As [85], however, the data on thyroid hormones (T3, T4) are again controversial [86, 87]. Compared to these, in our experiments, TRα mRNA was, significantly increased, regardless of the doses that we applied (Fig 2A); meanwhile, however, TRβ (Fig 2B) was not affected by the As-injection. The observed differences between As effects on TRs may lie on the grounds of several reasons: besides interspecies differences, direct hormonal and As environment of cells in question may significantly differ; and it is highly likely that significant differences between immediate and chronic effects of exposure also exist.

In this study, As altered only negligibly the PPARγ expression, with no regard to the injected doses (Fig 2E). In contrast, the literature reports variegated outcomes. Arsenic (3.80 ppm) increased PPARγ expression levels, followed by apoptosis, in in vitro cultured rat astrocytes [88]. PPARγ has also been reported to mediate the impact of As on increasing the incidence of type 2 diabetes through the PPARγ-mTORC2 signaling pathway [89, 90]. In preadipocytes, arsenic trioxide inhibited cell differentiation into fat cells by suppressing the PPARγ expression [9193]. In our present study, we detected no immediate effect of As exposure on PPARγ expression. However, this finding does not mean that PPARγ is insensitive to all EDs: our simultaneous experiments show that some other EDs like bisphenol A and zearalenone, in low concentrations, are able to increase PPARγ expression under similar experimental conditions that we applied in the present study (unpublished observations).

4.2. Mitochondrial respiration St3-4

Arsenic neurotoxicity and the adverse (usually drastic inhibitory) effects of As on brain mitochondria are already well-established. Toxic As doses, as a result of chronic exposure, induce super-oxide anion and ROS formation [83, 94, 95], decrease the activity of mitochondrial complexes I, II and IV [96], inhibition of ATPase activity [9698], dissipated mitochondrial transmembrane potentials [99102], as well as affect the mitochondrial proton motive force [95, 97, 103], moreover, leads to malformation of mitochondria [83, 104]. However, it is important to note that our current understanding does not include an examination of low (or non-toxic) doses of As in relation to mitochondrial function. Despite this, our results align with existing literature as we observed a significant inhibition of mitochondrial uncoupling activity at the highest dose of As used. In contrast, the lower two doses showed minimal deviation from the control group, demonstrating an inverse concentration-dependence. This pattern resembles the effects of certain E2 agonists [105107] (see Fig 2C and 2D). Interestingly, the effects of long-term exposure (days to weeks [102, 104]) to As, i.e., inhibition of ATP synthesis by mitochondria is preceded by an increase in ATP production as indicated by the observed low levels of St4 in the 10 mg group. With this regard, an additional important finding demonstrates that alterations in the uncoupling potency of the mitochondria in the melanocortin system are implicated in the intracellular processes that determine the output signals of the AgRP and POMC cells [108].

If this is the case, it suggests that 10 mg of As instantly propels mitochondrial ATP production, followed by the exhaustion of the mitochondria. This observation adds important information to our knowledge of As effects when discussing these effects in the context of №.1 and №.2 reactions. As mentioned in the case of the nuclear receptor expression, the finding that As only affected MRR in its St4 and only in 10 mg dose does not mean that mitochondrial metabolism is not sensitive to other EDs: various doses of bisphenol A and zearalenone had profound effects on St3-4 under experimental conditions that we applied for As exposure (unpublished observations). Those studies will further broaden our view of the temporal relationship of №.1 and №.2 reactions in response to various ED toxicants.

4.3. Mitochondrial ultrastructure

When discussing the ultrastructural features of mitochondria, we took into consideration the generally accepted interpretation of their morphological parameters. Accordingly, increased size, as well as decreased overall numbers of mitochondria (in AgRP and POMC cells) suggest organelle fusion. Increased fusion and/or decreased fission helps overcome low levels of stress (e.g., starvation [109, 110] or toxic effects [111]). Decreased fusion and/or increased fission occurs with high levels of stress (e.g., during apoptosis [112, 113] Increase in the size of the mitochondrial matrix per the entire mitochondrial crossection area is commonly associated with mitochondrial swelling, specifically in the context of oncotic or apoptotic mitochondria. This event is accompanied by a concomitant suppression of oxidative phosphorylation and a consequent decrease in ATP production [114]. More precisely, dynamic changes of mitochondria located in the melanocortin system are suggested to mimic the energy status of the organism (i.e. acting as energy sensors) and are actively participating in the modulation of the cellular activity (neurotransmission and release of cell-specific peptides) of their hosts, the AgRP and POMC neurons. Originating from their mitochondrial responses, these neurons are subsequently engaged in orchestrating distinctive processes governing energy expenditure across the organism and conveying pertinent information to higher brain centers [108].

In our present study As caused the increase of mitochondrial size at 5 mg dose only. With the interpretation described above in mind, this finding suggests that the aforementioned dose of As imposed a mild stress on mitochondria; however, definitions like those above, as taken from the literature, do not count with the versatility in the multitude of parameters of the cellular environment and the length of exposure. Thus, if we want to hold to generally accepted ways of interpretation, we have to emphasize the likely temporal changes in ED effects as cells try to acclimate to the various concentrations of EDs in the short- and long run. This means that, in our case, 5 mg of As may instantly cause a compensating adaptive response in mitochondria, but we cannot rule out that later the same dose could result in the exhaustion of mitochondria with inversed intensity in its metabolic activity [26, 115, 116]. At the same time, doses other than 5 mg may also be considered effective when examined after long-term exposure, although the present study does not answer this question.

The number (per section area) of mitochondria has changed only in the 5 mg group, demonstrating a slight decrease (p < 0.1) in AgRP neurons. It is not easy to interpret the meaning of this observation, considering that the number of mitochondria may increase as a physiological need for more ATP production (e.g., mitochondrial division in hypothalamic neurons after the mid-cycle estrogen surge [43, 108]) but it may also increase as a result of fission, latter which is the result of various stress effects and carries morphological signs such as mitochondrial swelling. With this in mind, our finding that the proportional size of the mitochondrial matrix (indicative of the level of mitochondrial swelling) increased linearly with the injected doses of As, suggests that the increase in the size of mitochondria with a simultaneous decrease in their numbers clearly shows immediate stressful and deleterious effect of As on AgRP neurons. The latter phenomenon may be an adaptive process aimed at mitigating the deleterious effects that pose a threat to the survival of the cell by compromising its metabolic and structural integrity. Beyond this, a decreased number of mitochondria paralleled with higher size of them, is characteristic of AgRP cells in the case of high-fat diet conditions [108]. This further supports the idea, that As may modulate the regulation of the energy homeostasis through affecting melanocortin neurons.

Arsenic’s immediate effect on POMC cells, at the same time, did not affect the number of mitochondria; this, however, does not exclude the possibility of effects on morphology after longer As exposure. The latter, seemingly speculative statement is supported by our findings that mitochondrial swelling occurred in a dose-linked manner (Fig 3A). It seems to be evident that As can alter the ultrastructure of mitochondria in hypothalamic neurons; however, here we only examined two distinct types of versatile neuron populations of the hypothalamus. Therefore, results from our studies do not mean that similar results occur in hypothalamic neurons other than AgRP and POMC cells; on the other hand, considering the rich neuronal interconnectivity between the hypothalamic neurons, it is highly likely that functional alterations in neuronal functions in response to As exposure may also play a role in the appearance of mitochondrial ultrastructure be it in the cell types examined in the present study or other cells of the hypothalamus.

Finally, the effects of arsenic, as observed and described so far, raise the question of how mitochondrial functions and related cellular metabolism in the hypothalamus could be affected after such changes. Firstly, animals showed signs of anxiety -/depression-like behavior. Numerous reports describe such effects of arsenic [117119], although those effects were observed after a longer time of exposure. These findings indicate the complexity of As’s effects, in that the aforementioned behavioral symptoms are regulated by a wide variety of brain regions, among them the loss of interest in feed-uptake involves the hypothalamus and its “hunger cells” (AgRP neurons) and “satiety cells” (POMC neurons). At the same time, however, among the ultrastructural results, the changes in size and number of mitochondria were observed, nevertheless, these morphological alterations were found in the 5 mg group instead of the 10 mg group. In the 10 mg group, as shown by the dose-dependent values of matrix-entire mitochondrion ratio (Fig 3E and 3F), the most severe changes appeared in the form of alterations of the behavior, as described above (3.4. of the Results section). Thus, it seems that initial changes in the number and size of mitochondria can be interpreted as compensational reactions to less toxic doses of As, whereas mitochondrial swelling (also known as the initial sign towards mitochondrial apoptosis) occurs at higher doses of As and such a toxic dose also manifests in the form of altered behavior. The finding that no changes occurred in the juxtaposition of mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum suggests that immediate effects of As do not include mass growth in the volume of interaction between these organelles, namely, toxically affected mitochondria are likely to enter apoptosis [120123] instead of a generalized mitochondrial compensatory action in cellular metabolism.

4. Conclusion

The study confirms our hypothesis that even low doses of arsenic prompt immediate biological effects within hours of exposure. These effects involve rapid alterations in major hormone systems, particularly estrogen receptor (ER) and thyroid receptor (TR) expression, suggesting arsenic’s role as an endocrine disruptor targeting the neuroendocrine center. Considering these, arsenic influences energy expenditure by modulating cellular metabolism, appetite, and thermogenesis through hypothalamic estrogen and thyroid signaling pathways. Arsenic also affects mitochondrial dynamics in the hypothalamic melanocortin system, resembling the effects of a chronic high-fat diet.

Altogether, arsenic’s significant influence extends to the delicate and bidirectional interaction between the periphery and the central nervous system governed by the hypothalamus, potentially leading to endocrine dysfunction and the onset of metabolic diseases over time. These effects involve №.1 (intracellular regulatory pathways) and №.2 (adjustments of cellular energy expenditure) mechanisms, highlighting the complexity of arsenic’s impact on cellular and systemic processes.

The findings underscore the importance of further exploring the dose- and time-dependent effects of arsenic alone and in combination with other endocrine disruptors in the environment, to better understand their implications for human health and well-being.

Supporting information

S1 Raw data. It was obtained from electron microscopy (JEOL USA, Peabody, MA, USA).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303528.s001

(XLSX)

S2 Raw data. It was measured by a Clark-type oxygen electrode (Oxytherm, Hansatech Instruments, Norfolk, UK).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303528.s002

(XLSX)

References

  1. 1. Ali W.; Rasool A.; Junaid M.; Zhang H. A Comprehensive Review on Current Status, Mechanism, and Possible Sources of Arsenic Contamination in Groundwater: A Global Perspective with Prominence of Pakistan Scenario. Environ. Geochem. Health 2019, 41, 737–760. pmid:30101397
  2. 2. Mukherjee A.; Sarkar S.; Coomar P.; Bhattacharya P. Towards Clean Water: Managing Risk of Arsenic-Contaminated Groundwater for Human Consumption. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Heal. 2023, 36, 100509,
  3. 3. Wasserman G.A.; Liu X.; Parvez F.; Chen Y.; Factor-Litvak P.; LoIacono N.J.; et al. A Cross-Sectional Study of Water Arsenic Exposure and Intellectual Function in Adolescence in Araihazar, Bangladesh. Environ. Int. 2018, 118, 304–313. pmid:29933234
  4. 4. Wang X.; Huang X.; Zhou L.; Chen J.; Zhang X.; Xu K.; et al. Association of Arsenic Exposure and Cognitive Impairment: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study in China. Neurotoxicology 2021, 82, 100–107. pmid:33249123
  5. 5. Benvenga S.; Elia G.; Ragusa F.; Paparo S.R.; Sturniolo M.M.; Ferrari S.M.; et al. Endocrine Disruptors and Thyroid Autoimmunity. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 34, 101377, pmid:32081544
  6. 6. Alsen M.; Sinclair C.; Cooke P.; Ziadkhanpour K.; Genden E.; van Gerwen M. Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Thyroid Cancer: An Overview. Toxics 2021, 9, 1–26, pmid:33477829
  7. 7. Jugan M.L.; Levi Y.; Blondeau J.P. Endocrine Disruptors and Thyroid Hormone Physiology. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2010, 79, 939–947, pmid:19913515
  8. 8. Boas M.; Feldt-Rasmussen U.; Main K.M. Thyroid Effects of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2012, 355, 240–248, pmid:21939731
  9. 9. Lee H.R.; Jeung E.B.; Cho M.H.; Kim T.H.; Leung P.C.K.; Choi K.C. Molecular Mechanism(s) of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Their Potent Oestrogenicity in Diverse Cells and Tissues That Express Oestrogen Receptors. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2013, 17, 1–11, pmid:23279634
  10. 10. Watson C.S.; Jeng Y.J.; Guptarak J. Endocrine Disruption via Estrogen Receptors That Participate in Nongenomic Signaling Pathways. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011, 127, 44–50, pmid:21300151
  11. 11. Shanle E.K.; Xu W. Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Targeting Estrogen Receptor Signaling: Identification and Mechanisms of Action. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2011, 24, 6–19, pmid:21053929
  12. 12. Kabir E.R.; Rahman M.S.; Rahman I. A Review on Endocrine Disruptors and Their Possible Impacts on Human Health. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015, 40, 241–258, pmid:26164742
  13. 13. Brix K. V; Baken S.; Poland C.A.; Blust R.; Pope L.J.; Tyler C.R. Challenges and Recommendations in Assessing Potential Endocrine‐Disrupting Properties of Metals in Aquatic Organisms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2023, 42, 2564–2579. pmid:37671843
  14. 14. Britto T.I. Endocrine Equilibrium: Navigating the Hormonal Seas: Navigating the Whispers of Hormones: A Delicate Dance of Balance; BookRix, 2023; ISBN 3755446073.
  15. 15. Pisapia L.; Del Pozzo G.; Barba P.; Caputo L.; Mita L.; Viggiano E.; et al U. Effects of Some Endocrine Disruptors on Cell Cycle Progression and Murine Dendritic Cell Differentiation. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2012, 178, 54–63. pmid:22531466
  16. 16. Rutkowska A.Z.; Olsson A.; Rutkowski J.; Milewicz A. The Role of the Environment in Neuroendocrine Tumors. In Environmental Endocrinology and Endocrine Disruptors: Endocrine and Endocrine-targeted Actions and Related Human Diseases; Springer, 2023; pp. 1–30.
  17. 17. Chen J.-Q.; Brown T.R.; Russo J. Regulation of Energy Metabolism Pathways by Estrogens and Estrogenic Chemicals and Potential Implications in Obesity Associated with Increased Exposure to Endocrine Disruptors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Molecular Cell Res. 2009, 1793, 1128–1143. pmid:19348861
  18. 18. Marroqui L.; Tudurí E.; Alonso-Magdalena P.; Quesada I.; Nadal Á.; Dos Santos R.S. Mitochondria as Target of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Implications for Type 2 Diabetes. J. Endocrinol. 2018, 239, R27–R45. pmid:30072426
  19. 19. Mukherjee U.; Maitra S. Impact of Metabolic Disrupting Chemicals on Redox Homeostasis, Energy Sensors, Receptor Modulation, and Hormone Metabolism: A Comparative Account in Teleost and Mammalian Model Organisms. Aquac. Fish. 2023.
  20. 20. Mohammed Abdul K.S.; Jayasinghe S.S.; Chandana E.P.S.; Jayasumana C.; De Silva P.M.C.S. Arsenic and Human Health Effects: A Review. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015, 40, 828–846, pmid:26476885
  21. 21. Kucheryavenko O.; Vogl S.; Marx-Stoelting P. Endocrine Disruptor Effects on Estrogen, Androgen and Thyroid Pathways: Recent Advances on Screening and Assessment. 2020.
  22. 22. Köhrle J.; Frädrich C. Thyroid Hormone System Disrupting Chemicals. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 35, 101562. pmid:34274233
  23. 23. Oliveira K.J.; Chiamolera M.I.; Giannocco G.; Pazos-Moura C.C.; Ortiga-Carvalho T.M. Thyroid Function Disruptors: From Nature to Chemicals. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2019, 62, R1–R19.
  24. 24. Tontonoz P.; Hu E.; Spiegelman B.M. Stimulation of Adipogenesis in Fibroblasts by PPARγ2, a Lipid-Activated Transcription Factor. Cell 1994, 79, 1147–1156, pmid:8001151
  25. 25. Yousefnia S.; Momenzadeh S.; Seyed Forootan F.; Ghaedi K.; Nasr Esfahani M.H. The Influence of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ (PPARγ) Ligands on Cancer Cell Tumorigenicity. Gene 2018, 649, 14–22, pmid:29369787
  26. 26. Ambrosio F.; Brown E.; Stolz D.; Ferrari R.; Goodpaster B.; Deasy B.; et al. Arsenic Induces Sustained Impairment of Skeletal Muscle and Muscle Progenitor Cell Ultrastructure and Bioenergetics. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014, 74, 64–73. pmid:24960579
  27. 27. Janesick A.; Blumberg B. Minireview: PPARγ as the Target of Obesogens. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2011, 127, 4–8, pmid:21251979
  28. 28. Scalise T.; Györffy A.; Tóth I.; Kiss D.; Somogyi V.; Goszleth G.; et al. Ligand-Induced Changes in Oestrogen and Thyroid Hormone Receptor Expression in the Developing Rat Cerebellum: A Comparative Quantitative PCR and Western Blot Study. Acta Vet. Hung. 2012, 60, 263–284, pmid:22609997
  29. 29. Jocsak G.; Ioja E.; Kiss D.S.; Toth I.; Barany Z.; Bartha T.; et al. Endocrine Disruptors Induced Distinct Expression of Thyroid and Estrogen Receptors in Rat versus Mouse Primary Cerebellar Cell Cultures. Brain Sci. 2019, 9, pmid:31817561
  30. 30. Somogyi V.; Horváth T.L.; Tóth I.; Bartha T.; Frenyó L.V.; Kiss D.S.; et al. Bisphenol a Influences Oestrogen- and Thyroid Hormone-Regulated Thyroid Hormone Receptor Expression in Rat Cerebellar Cell Culture. Acta Vet. Hung. 2016, 64, 497–513, pmid:27993100
  31. 31. Jocsak G.; Kiss D.S.; Toth I.; Goszleth G.; Bartha T.; Frenyo L. V.; et al. Comparison of Individual and Combined Effects of Four Endocrine Disruptors on Estrogen Receptor Beta Transcription in Cerebellar Cell Culture: The Modulatory Role of Estradiol and Triiodo-Thyronine. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 1–14, pmid:27338438
  32. 32. Palkovits M. Hypothalamic Regulation of Food Intake. Ideggyogy. Sz. 2003, 56, 288–302. pmid:14608950
  33. 33. Toni R. The Neuroendocrine System: Organization and Homeostatic Role. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2004, 27, 35–47. pmid:15481802
  34. 34. Patisaul H.B.; Belcher S.M. 73 The Neuroendocrine System and General Mechanisms of Endocrine Disruption. In Endocrine Disruptors, Brain, and Behavior; Oxford University Press, 2017 ISBN 9780199935734.
  35. 35. Chen T.T.; Maevsky E.I.; Uchitel M.L. Maintenance of Homeostasis in the Aging Hypothalamus: The Central and Peripheral Roles of Succinate. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 2015, 6, 7, pmid:25699017
  36. 36. Hall K.D.; Heymsfield S.B.; Kemnitz J.W.; Klein S.; Schoeller D.A.; Speakman J.R. Energy Balance and Its Components: Implications for Body Weight Regulation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2012, 95, 989–994, pmid:22434603
  37. 37. Timper K.; Brüning J.C. Hypothalamic Circuits Regulating Appetite and Energy Homeostasis: Pathways to Obesity. Dis. Model. Mech. 2017, 10, 679–689, pmid:28592656
  38. 38. Haddad-Tóvolli R.; Dragano N.R. V; Ramalho A.F.S.; Velloso L.A. Development and Function of the Blood-Brain Barrier in the Context of Metabolic Control. Front. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 224, pmid:28484368
  39. 39. Langlet F. Tanycytes: A Gateway to the Metabolic Hypothalamus. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2014, 26, pmid:25131689
  40. 40. Jais A.; Brüning J.C. Arcuate Nucleus-Dependent Regulation of Metabolism-Pathways to Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus. Endocr. Rev. 2022, 43, 314–328, pmid:34490882
  41. 41. Coll A.P.; Yeo G.S.H. The Hypothalamus and Metabolism: Integrating Signals to Control Energy and Glucose Homeostasis. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2013, 13, 970–976, pmid:24075719
  42. 42. Vohra M.S.; Benchoula K.; Serpell C.J.; Hwa W.E. AgRP/NPY and POMC Neurons in the Arcuate Nucleus and Their Potential Role in Treatment of Obesity. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2022, 915, 174611, pmid:34798121
  43. 43. Dietrich M.O.; Liu Z.-W.; Horvath T.L. Mitochondrial Dynamics Controlled by Mitofusins Regulate Agrp Neuronal Activity and Diet-Induced Obesity. Cell 2013, 155, 188–199. pmid:24074868
  44. 44. Drougard A.; Fournel A.; Valet P.; Knauf C. Impact of Hypothalamic Reactive Oxygen Species in the Regulation of Energy Metabolism and Food Intake. Front. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 56, pmid:25759638
  45. 45. Rochford J.J.; Myers M.G.; Heisler L.K. Setting the Tone: Reactive Oxygen Species and the Control of Appetitive Melanocortin Neurons. Cell Metab. 2011, 14, 573–574, pmid:22055500
  46. 46. Chen J.Q.; Cammarata P.R.; Baines C.P.; Yager J.D. Regulation of Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Biogenesis by Estrogens/Estrogen Receptors and Physiological, Pathological and Pharmacological Implications. Biochim. Biophys. Acta—Mol. Cell Res. 2009, 1793, 1540–1570, pmid:19559056
  47. 47. Irwin R.W.; Yao J.; Hamilton R.T.; Cadenas E.; Brinton R.D.; Nilsen J. Progesterone and Estrogen Regulate Oxidative Metabolism in Brain Mitochondria. Endocrinology 2008, 149, 3167–3175, pmid:18292191
  48. 48. Goglia F.; Silvestri E.; Lanni A. Thyroid Hormones and Mitochondria. Biosci. Rep. 2002, 22, 17–32, pmid:12418548
  49. 49. Wrutniak-Cabello C.; Casas F.; Cabello G. Thyroid Hormone Action in Mitochondria. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2001, 26, 67–77, pmid:11174855
  50. 50. Kowalska K.; Habrowska-Górczyńska D.E.; Piastowska-Ciesielska A.W. Zearalenone as an Endocrine Disruptor in Humans. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016, 48, 141–149, pmid:27771507
  51. 51. Chatterjee A.; Jamal Z.; Das J.; Banerjee A.; Chatterji U. The Imperceptible Contagion: Arsenic as a Neuro-Immune-Endocrine Disruptor. Proc. Zool. Soc. 2021 744 2021, 74, 387–407,
  52. 52. Wong J.K.; Le H.H.; Zsarnovszky A.; Belcher S.M. Estrogens and ICI182,780 (Faslodex) Modulate Mitosis and Cell Death in Immature Cerebellar Neurons via Rapid Activation of P44/P42 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 4984–4995, pmid:12832521
  53. 53. Kiss D.S.; Ioja E.; Toth I.; Barany Z.; Jocsak G.; Bartha T.; et al. Comparative Analysis of Zearalenone Effects on Thyroid Receptor Alpha (TRα) and Beta (TRβ) Expression in Rat Primary Cerebellar Cell Cultures. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, pmid:29751674
  54. 54. Mandal B.K.; Suzuki K.T. Arsenic Round the World: A Review. Talanta 2002, 58, 201–235, pmid:18968746
  55. 55. Chang S.I.; Jin B.; Youn P.; Park C.; Park J.-D.; Ryu D.-Y. Arsenic-Induced Toxicity and the Protective Role of Ascorbic Acid in Mouse Testis. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2007, 218, 196–203, pmid:17188728
  56. 56. Jana K.; Jana S.; Samanta P.K. Effects of Chronic Exposure to Sodium Arsenite on Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Testicular Activities in Adult Rats: Possible an Estrogenic Mode of Action. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2006, 4, 1–13.
  57. 57. Stump D.G.; Holson J.F.; Fleeman T.L.; Nemec M.D.; Farr C.H. Comparative Effects of Single Intraperitoneal or Oral Doses of Sodium Arsenate or Arsenic Trioxide during in Utero Development. Teratology 1999, 60, 283–291. pmid:10525206
  58. 58. Smedley P.L.; Kinniburgh D.G. Arsenic in Groundwater and the Environment. In Essentials of Medical Geology: Revised Edition; Springer, 2012; pp. 279–310.
  59. 59. Shankar S.; Shanker U. Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater: A Review of Sources, Prevalence, Health Risks, and Strategies for Mitigation. Sci. world J. 2014, 2014. pmid:25374935
  60. 60. Zsarnovszky A.; Kiss D.; Jocsak G.; Nemeth G.; Toth I.; Horvath T.L. Thyroid Hormone- and Estrogen Receptor Interactions with Natural Ligands and Endocrine Disruptors in the Cerebellum. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2018, 48, 23–36, pmid:28987779
  61. 61. Sengupta P. The Laboratory Rat: Relating Its Age with Human’s. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2013, 4, 624. pmid:23930179
  62. 62. Sengupta P. Environmental and Occupational Exposure of Metals and Their Role in Male Reproductive Functions. Drug Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 36, 353–368. pmid:22947100
  63. 63. Sengupta T.; Ghosh S.; Gaur T A.; Nayak P. Dissimilar Anxiety-like Behavior in Prepubertal and Young Adult Female Rats on Acute Exposure to Aluminium. Cent. Nerv. Syst. Agents Med. Chem. (Formerly Curr. Med. Chem. Nerv. Syst. Agents) 2021, 21, 187–194. pmid:34970958
  64. 64. Brydges N.M. Pre-Pubertal Stress and Brain Development in Rodents. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2016, 7, 8–14.
  65. 65. Rebuli M.E.; Patisaul H.B. Assessment of Sex Specific Endocrine Disrupting Effects in the Prenatal and Pre-Pubertal Rodent Brain. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016, 160, 148–159. pmid:26307491
  66. 66. Toth I.; Kiss D.S.; Goszleth G.; Bartha T.; Frenyo L. V.; Naftolin F.; et al. Hypothalamic Sidedness in Mitochondrial Metabolism: New Perspectives. Reprod. Sci. 2014, 21, 1492–1498, pmid:24740989
  67. 67. Kiss D.S.; Toth I.; Jocsak G.; Sterczer A.; Bartha T.; Frenyo L. V.; Zsarnovszky A. Preparation of Purified Perikaryal and Synaptosomal Mitochondrial Fractions from Relatively Small Hypothalamic Brain Samples. MethodsX 2016, 3, 417–429, pmid:27284533
  68. 68. Berruien N.N.A.; Murray J.F.; Smith C.L. Pregnancy Influences the Selection of Appropriate Reference Genes in Mouse Tissue: Determination of Appropriate Reference Genes for Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR Studies in Tissues from the Female Mouse Reproductive Axis. Gene 2021, 801, 145855, pmid:34293448
  69. 69. Pfaffl M.W.; Horgan G.W.; Dempfle L. Relative Expression Software Tool (REST) for Group-Wise Comparison and Statistical Analysis of Relative Expression Results in Real-Time PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, pmid:11972351
  70. 70. Kiss D.S.; Zsarnovszky A.; Horvath K.; Gyorffy A.; Bartha T.; Hazai D.; et al. Ecto-Nucleoside Triphosphate Diphosphohydrolase 3 in the Ventral and Lateral Hypothalamic Area of Female Rats: Morphological Characterization and Functional Implications. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2009, 7, 1–12.
  71. 71. Patra M.; Mahata S.K.; Padhan D.K.; Sen M. CCN6 Regulates Mitochondrial Function. J. Cell Sci. 2016, 129, 2841–2851. pmid:27252383
  72. 72. Naghizadeh A.; Esform A.; Rezaei M.; Farkhondeh T.; Samarghandian S. Environmental Arsenic Exposure and Its Toxicological Effect on Thyroid Function: A Systematic Review. Rev. Environ. Health 2022, 37, 281–289, pmid:34090316
  73. 73. Sun H.J.; Xiang P.; Luo J.; Hong H.; Lin H.; Li H.B.; et al. Mechanisms of Arsenic Disruption on Gonadal, Adrenal and Thyroid Endocrine Systems in Humans: A Review. Environ. Int. 2016, 95, 61–68, pmid:27502899
  74. 74. Miller W.H.; Schipper H.M.; Lee J.S.; Singer J.; Waxman S. Mechanisms of Action of Arsenic Trioxide. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 3893–3903. pmid:12124315
  75. 75. Stoica A.; Pentecost E.; Martin M.B. Effects of Arsenite on Estrogen Receptor-α Expression Activity in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells. Endocrinology 2000, 141, 3595–3602, pmid:11014213
  76. 76. Davey J.C.; Nomikos A.P.; Wungjiranirun M.; Sherman J.R.; Ingram L.; Batki C.; et al. Arsenic as an Endocrine Disruptor: Arsenic Disrupts Retinoic Acid Receptor- and Thyroid Hormone Receptor-Mediated Gene Regulation and Thyroid Hormone-Mediated Amphibian Tail Metamorphosis. Environ. Health Perspect. 2008, 116, 165–172, pmid:18288313
  77. 77. Chow S.K.Y.; Chan J.Y.W.; Fung K.P. Suppression of Cell Proliferation and Regulation of Estrogen Receptor α Signaling Pathway by Arsenic Trioxide on Human Breast Cancer MCF-7 Cells. J. Endocrinol. 2004, 182, 325–337, pmid:15283693
  78. 78. Waalkes M.P.; Liu J.; Chen H.; Xie Y.; Achanzar W.E.; Zhou Y.S.; et al. Estrogen Signaling in Livers of Male Mice with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Induced by Exposure to Arsenic in Utero. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2004, 96, 466–474, pmid:15026472
  79. 79. Chatterjee A.; Chatterji U. Arsenic Abrogates the Estrogen-Signaling Pathway in the Rat Uterus. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2010, 8, 1–11, pmid:20598115
  80. 80. Xu Y.; Elmquist J.K.; Fukuda M. Central Nervous Control of Energy and Glucose Balance: Focus on the Central Melanocortin System. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1243, 1–14, pmid:22211889
  81. 81. Rzemieniec J.; Litwa E.; Wnuk A.; Lason W.; Kajta M. Bazedoxifene and Raloxifene Protect Neocortical Neurons Undergoing Hypoxia via Targeting ERα and PPAR-γ. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2018, 461, 64–78, pmid:28859903
  82. 82. Chen G.C.; Guan L.S.; Hu W.L.; Wang Z.Y. Functional Repression of Estrogen Receptor α by Arsenic Trioxide in Human Breast Cancer Cells. Anticancer Res. 2002, 22, 633–638.
  83. 83. Prakash C.; Soni M.; Kumar V. Biochemical and Molecular Alterations Following Arsenic-Induced Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Rat Brain. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2015, 167, 121–129, pmid:25764338
  84. 84. Guan H.; Li S.; Guo Y.; Liu X.; Yang Y.; Guo J.; et al. Subchronic Exposure to Arsenic Represses the TH/TRβ1-CaMK IV Signaling Pathway in Mouse Cerebellum. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 157, pmid:26821021
  85. 85. Molin M.; Ulven S.M.; Dahl L.; Lundebye A.K.; Holck M.; Alexander J.; et al. Arsenic in Seafood Is Associated with Increased Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH) in Healthy Volunteers–A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2017, 44, 1–7, pmid:28965562
  86. 86. Meltzer H.M.; Maage A.; Ydersbond T.A.; Haug E.; Glattre E.; Holm H. Fish Arsenic May Influence Human Blood Arsenic, Selenium, and T4:T3 Ratio. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2002, 90, 83–98, pmid:12666828
  87. 87. Glattre E.; Mravcova A.; Lener J.; Vobecky M.; Egertova E.; Mysliveckova M. Study of Distribution and Interaction of Arsenic and Selenium in Rat Thyroid. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 1995, 49, 177–186, pmid:8562286
  88. 88. Kushwaha R.; Mishra J.; Tripathi S.; Khare P.; Bandyopadhyay S. Arsenic, Cadmium, and Lead Like Troglitazone Trigger PPARγ-Dependent Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Expression and Subsequent Apoptosis in Rat Brain Astrocytes. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 55, 2125–2149, pmid:28283887
  89. 89. Kirkley A.G.; Carmean C.M.; Ruiz D.; Ye H.; Regnier S.M.; Poudel A.; et al. Arsenic Exposure Induces Glucose Intolerance and Alters Global Energy Metabolism. Am. J. Physiol.—Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2018, 314, R294–R303, pmid:29118024
  90. 90. Gao N.; Yao X.; Jiang L.; Yang L.; Qiu T.; Wang Z.; et al. Taurine Improves Low-Level Inorganic Arsenic-Induced Insulin Resistance by Activating PPARγ-MTORC2 Signalling and Inhibiting Hepatic Autophagy. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 5143–5152, pmid:30362509
  91. 91. Ceja-Galicia Z.A.; Daniel A.; Salazar A.M.; Pánico P.; Ostrosky-Wegman P.; Díaz-Villaseñor A. Effects of Arsenic on Adipocyte Metabolism: Is Arsenic an Obesogen? Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2017, 452, 25–32, pmid:28495457
  92. 92. Wauson E.M.; Langan A.S.; Vorce R.L. Sodium Arsenite Inhibits and Reverses Expression of Adipogenic and Fat Cell-Specific Genes during in Vitro Adipogenesis. Toxicol. Sci. 2002, 65, 211–219, pmid:11812925
  93. 93. Wang Z.X.; Jiang C.S.; Liu L.; Wang X.H.; Jin H.J.; Wu Q.; et al. The Role of Akt on Arsenic Trioxide Suppression of 3T3-L1 Preadipocyte Differentiation. Cell Res. 2005, 15, 379–386, pmid:15916724
  94. 94. Srivastava P.; Yadav R.S.; Chandravanshi L.P.; Shukla R.K.; Dhuriya Y.K.; Chauhan L.K.S.; et al. Unraveling the Mechanism of Neuroprotection of Curcumin in Arsenic Induced Cholinergic Dysfunctions in Rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2014, 279, 428–440, pmid:24952339
  95. 95. Ghosh S.; Dungdung S.R.; Chowdhury S.T.; Mandal A.K.; Sarkar S.; Ghosh D.; et al. Encapsulation of the Flavonoid Quercetin with an Arsenic Chelator into Nanocapsules Enables the Simultaneous Delivery of Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Drugs with a Synergistic Effect against Chronic Arsenic Accumulation and Oxidative Stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 51, 1893–1902, pmid:21914470
  96. 96. Dwivedi N.; Mehta A.; Yadav A.; Binukumar B.K.; Gill K.D.; Flora S.J.S. MiADMSA Reverses Impaired Mitochondrial Energy Metabolism and Neuronal Apoptotic Cell Death after Arsenic Exposure in Rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2011, 256, 241–248, pmid:21513725
  97. 97. Hughes M.F. Arsenic Toxicity and Potential Mechanisms of Action. Toxicol. Lett. 2002, 133, 1–16, pmid:12076506
  98. 98. Gopalkrishnan A.; Rao M.V. Amelioration by Vitamin A upon Arsenic Induced Metabolic and Neurotoxic Effects. J. Heal. Sci. 2006, 52, 568–577,
  99. 99. Rocha R.A.; Gimeno-Alcañiz J. V; Martín-Ibañez R.; Canals J.M.; Vélez D.; Devesa V. Arsenic and Fluoride Induce Neural Progenitor Cell Apoptosis. Toxicol. Lett. 2011, 203, 237–244, pmid:21439358
  100. 100. Pachauri V.; Mehta A.; Mishra D.; Flora S.J.S. Arsenic Induced Neuronal Apoptosis in Guinea Pigs Is Ca2+ Dependent and Abrogated by Chelation Therapy: Role of Voltage Gated Calcium Channels. Neurotoxicology 2013, 35, 137–145, pmid:23376091
  101. 101. Lu T.H.; Tseng T.J.; Su C.C.; Tang F.C.; Yen C.C.; Liu Y.Y.; et al. Arsenic Induces Reactive Oxygen Species-Caused Neuronal Cell Apoptosis through JNK/ERK-Mediated Mitochondria-Dependent and GRP 78/CHOP-Regulated Pathways. Toxicol. Lett. 2014, 224, 130–140, pmid:24157283
  102. 102. Rojewski M.T.; Korper S.; Thiel E.; Schrezenmeier H. Arsenic Trioxide-Induced Apoptosis Is Independent of CD95 in Lymphatic Cell Lines. Oncol. Rep. 2004, 11, 509–513, pmid:14719092
  103. 103. Hong Y.; Piao F.; Zhao Y.; Li S.; Wang Y.; Liu P. Subchronic Exposure to Arsenic Decreased Sdha Expression in the Brain of Mice. Neurotoxicology 2009, 30, 538–543, pmid:19422848
  104. 104. Hassani S.; Yaghoubi H.; Khosrokhavar R.; Jafarian I.; Mashayekhi V.; Hosseini M.J.; et al. Mechanistic View for Toxic Effects of Arsenic on Isolated Rat Kidney and Brain Mitochondria. Biol. 2015, 70, 683–689,
  105. 105. Haczynski J.; Tarkowski R.; Jarzabek K.; Wolczynski S.; Magoffin D.A.; Czarnocki K.J.; et al. Differential Effects of Estradiol, Raloxifene and Tamoxifen on Estrogen Receptor Expression in Cultured Human Skin Fibroblasts. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2004, 13, 903–908, pmid:15138633
  106. 106. Razmara A.; Sunday L.; Stirone C.; Xiao B.W.; Krause D.N.; Duckles S.P.; et al. Mitochondrial Effects of Estrogen Are Mediated by Estrogen Receptor α in Brain Endothelial Cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2008, 325, 782–790, pmid:18354059
  107. 107. Gorgogietas V.A.; Tsialtas I.; Sotiriou N.; Laschou V.C.; Karra A.G.; Leonidas D.D.; et al. Potential Interference of Aluminum Chlorohydrate with Estrogen Receptor Signaling in Breast Cancer Cells. J. Mol. Biochem. 2018, 7, 1–13. pmid:30148119
  108. 108. Nasrallah C.M.; Horvath T.L. Mitochondrial Dynamics in the Central Regulation of Metabolism. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2014, 10, 650–658. pmid:25200564
  109. 109. Gomes L.C.; Benedetto G. Di; Scorrano L. During Autophagy Mitochondria Elongate, Are Spared from Degradation and Sustain Cell Viability. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13, 589–598, pmid:21478857
  110. 110. Rambold A.S.; Kostelecky B.; Elia N.; Lippincott-Schwartz J. Tubular Network Formation Protects Mitochondria from Autophagosomal Degradation during Nutrient Starvation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108, 10190–10195, pmid:21646527
  111. 111. Tondera D.; Grandemange S.; Jourdain A.; Karbowski M.; Mattenberger Y.; Herzig S.; et al. SLP‐2 Is Required for Stress‐induced Mitochondrial Hyperfusion. EMBO J. 2009, 28, 1589–1600. pmid:19360003
  112. 112. Ehses S.; Raschke I.; Mancuso G.; Bernacchia A.; Geimer S.; Tondera D.; et al. Regulation of OPA1 Processing and Mitochondrial Fusion by M-AAA Protease Isoenzymes and OMA1. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 187, 1023–1036, pmid:20038678
  113. 113. Head B.; Griparic L.; Amiri M.; Gandre-Babbe S.; van der Bliek A.M. Inducible Proteolytic Inactivation of OPA1 Mediated by the OMA1 Protease in Mammalian Cells. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 187, 959–966, pmid:20038677
  114. 114. Wojtczak L.; Lehninger A.L. Formation and Disappearance of an Endogenous Uncoupling Factor during Swelling and Contraction of Mitochondria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1961, 51, 442–456, pmid:14007889
  115. 115. Lin C.; Chang L.W.; Wei Y.; Wu S.; Yang C.; Chang W.; et al. Electronic Microscopy Evidence for Mitochondria as Targets for Cd/Se/Te‐based Quantum Dot 705 Toxicity in Vivo. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2012, 28, S53–S62. pmid:22871604
  116. 116. Prakash C.; Kumar V. Arsenic-Induced Mitochondrial Oxidative Damage Is Mediated by Decreased PGC-1α Expression and Its Downstream Targets in Rat Brain. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2016, 256, 228–235.
  117. 117. Samad N.; Rao T.; Rehman M.H. ur; Bhatti S.A.; Imran I. Inhibitory Effects of Selenium on Arsenic-Induced Anxiety-/Depression-Like Behavior and Memory Impairment. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022, 200, 689–698, pmid:33745108
  118. 118. Chang C.-Y.; Guo H.-R.; Tsai W.-C.; Yang K.-L.; Lin L.-C.; Cheng T.-J.; et al. Subchronic Arsenic Exposure Induces Anxiety-Like Behaviors in Normal Mice and Enhances Depression-Like Behaviors in the Chemically Induced Mouse Model of Depression. Biomed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 159015, pmid:26114099
  119. 119. Samad N.; Jabeen S.; Imran I.; Zulfiqar I.; Bilal K. Protective Effect of Gallic Acid against Arsenic-Induced Anxiety−/Depression- like Behaviors and Memory Impairment in Male Rats. Metab. Brain Dis. 2019, 34, 1091–1102, pmid:31119507
  120. 120. Chattopadhyay S.; Bhaumik S.; Chaudhury A.N.; Gupta S. Das Arsenic Induced Changes in Growth Development and Apoptosis in Neonatal and Adult Brain Cells in Vivo and in Tissue Culture. Toxicol. Lett. 2002, 128, 73–84.
  121. 121. Chattopadhyay S.; Bhaumik S.; Purkayastha M.; Basu S.; Chaudhuri A.N.; Gupta S. Das Apoptosis and Necrosis in Developing Brain Cells Due to Arsenic Toxicity and Protection with Antioxidants. Toxicol. Lett. 2002, 136, 65–76.
  122. 122. Santra A.; Chowdhury A.; Ghatak S.; Biswas A.; Dhali G.K. Arsenic Induces Apoptosis in Mouse Liver Is Mitochondria Dependent and Is Abrogated by N-Acetylcysteine. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2007, 220, 146–155. pmid:17303202
  123. 123. Shen Z.Y.; Shen J.; Cai W.J.; Hong C.; Zheng M.H. The Alteration of Mitochondria Is an Early Event of Arsenic Trioxide Induced Apoptosis in Esophageal Carcinoma Cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2000, 5, 155–163. pmid:10639594