Figures
Abstract
The range of an electrically assisted bicycle, which is constrained by the rider’s cycling ability and the battery capacity, is heavily influenced by rolling resistance. Furthermore, the magnitude of rolling resistance affects commuters’ motivation to decide whether to cycle or to choose another way to commute. This paper presents a way to simulate the transient rolling resistance of bicycle tyres as a function of ambient temperature. The significance of the change in driving resistance at different ambient temperatures is demonstrated through the range simulation of an electrically assisted bicycle at varying ambient temperatures. A representative driving cycle for bicycle commuters was created, enabling comparison of dynamic behaviour in a standardised set, to evaluate the effect of ambient temperature on the battery capacity and the increase in driving resistances. To the authors’ knowledge, this kind of model has not previously been created for bicycles. The model calculates tyre temperature based on the heat transfer, considering the heating—i. e., rolling resistance—and cooling effects—i. e., convective and radiative cooling. The decrease in tyre temperature results in an increase in rolling resistance and a decrease in the battery capacity, which was considered in the simulations. The results show significantly increased energy demand at a very low ambient temperature (down to −30°C) compared to + 20°C. The novelty of this article is simulating energy expenditure of bicycle dynamically as a function of ambient temperature. This model includes a temperature-dependent transient bicycle rolling resistance model as well as a battery capacity model. The findings provide researchers with a better comprehension of parameters affecting energy expenditure of bicycles at different ambient or tyre temperatures. The models can be used as a tool during the design process of bicycles to quantify the required battery capacities at different climates. In addition, traffic planners can use the model to assess the effect of changes in infrastructure on motivation to utilise bicycles.
Citation: Hyttinen J, Rothhämel M, Jerrelind J, Drugge L (2024) Simulation of transient rolling resistance of bicycle tyres at various ambient temperatures. PLoS ONE 19(6): e0302821. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302821
Editor: Ashfaque Ahmed Chowdhury, Central Queensland University, AUSTRALIA
Received: September 14, 2023; Accepted: April 14, 2024; Published: June 27, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Hyttinen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.
Funding: The project belongs to the Centre for ECO2 Vehicle Design, which is funded by the Swedish Innovation Agency Vinnova (Grant Number 2016-05195). The authors wish to thank the Centre for ECO2 Vehicle Design, the strategic research area TRENoP and Scania for their financial support. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Cycling is healthy [1] and may contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, congestion, and air pollution [2], but unfortunately, cycling is also physically demanding. Therefore, the trip duration is an essential aspect of utility cycling motivation [3, 4]. Moreover, additional travel time when cycling is considered three times more unpleasant than additional travel time using other forms of commuting, such as walking, driving a car, or using public transport [5]. Perceived driving comfort is connected to driving resistance forces and the efficiency of the bicycle. Typically, aerodynamic, rolling, acceleration, and climbing resistance forces are named to describe the longitudinal dynamics of vehicles as bicycles. Depending on the application, riders attempt to reduce some of these driving resistances in order to reduce driving effort. For example, rolling resistance and aerodynamic forces are reduced in competitive cycling to maintain high acceleration and high speeds on a given track, including ascending slopes [6]. In contrast, utility cyclists try to avoid hills to reduce the cycling effort required [7] and are willing to pedal a longer distance instead.
Another approach to reducing cycling effort is to utilise the assistance of an electric motor. These types of bicycles are called pedelecs. Currently, the most common pedelecs have assistive torque proportional to the rider’s pedalling torque, and the rider can usually manually choose this gain factor [8], typically by means of an electronic driver interface at the handlebar. The available studies regarding pedelecs focus on the health benefits gained from cycling despite the electric assistance, which reduces the required effort [8–10]. Independent of how much assistance drivers utilise individually or on average when riding their pedelec, Yang and Lee [8] reported range anxiety for riders of pedelecs, which means the fear of not arriving at the destination, before the battery is empty. This kind of human behaviour is also observed in the context of the usage of electric cars [11]. Since the range of electric vehicles depends on many parameters, such as rolling resistance, it is worth investigating the influence of rolling resistance on the driving range of electrically assisted bikes. Specifically during wintertime cycling can be a challenge, and several studies discuss different ways of enabling winter cycling [12, 13]. However, the willingness to cycle has been shown to drop during the winter season, for example, because of increased rolling resistance [14]. Electrical assistance could counteract this decreased willingness by compensating the increase in air and rolling resistance. Even if the need for electric energy increases in this case, both the energy demand and the greenhouse gas emissions are still lower than any other modes of transport that utilise some type of non-human propulsion system [15, 16]. For that reason, the present work focuses on the effect of ambient temperature on steady-state and transient rolling resistance.
Some well-known tyre parameters affecting rolling resistance are vertical load, tyre inflation pressure, and tyre width [17, 18]. In addition, the tube type and speed dependency of rolling resistance has been known for many years. Baldissera et al. [6] confirmed this increase in rolling resistance coefficient with increasing speed in their experiments. Nonetheless, this increase has minimal relevance for utility cyclists since these changes occur at velocities much higher than are typical for utility cyclists. Furthermore, the driving losses affect not only the assisted range of the batteries but also the maximum acceleration of bicycles and pedelecs [19].
In contrast, information regarding the transient rolling resistance of bicycle tyres caused by the tyre temperature changes during driving is practically non-existent. Bicycle tyres are made of filler-reinforced rubber, which is known to have a significant temperature dependency for dissipative properties. Therefore, it is surprising that this factor has not yet been studied in more detail, and the rolling resistance coefficient is often considered only as a constant value. Previously, Hyttinen et al. [20] have shown significant temperature dependency in truck tyres. Rothhämel [21] discovered a similar temperature dependency for bicycle tyres, where decreased ambient temperature caused a significant increase in steady-state rolling resistance measurements. For temperatures below freezing point the influence of temperature was higher than the influence of tyre pressure, which otherwise has been known to be the most important factor for rolling resistance. However, the transient rolling resistance behaviour of bicycle tyres was not investigated in Rothhämel’s study. In addition to tyre temperature, also road type [19], slush, snow, and wet conditions have been shown to affect tyre rolling resistance [22, 23]. Fenre and Klein-Paste [22] noted that increase in rolling resistance correlated well with subjective discomfort experienced by cyclists. Therefore, this article aims to use the results provided by Rothhämel and expand the model to consider transient rolling resistance and the warm-up behaviour of the tyre.
Electrically assisted bicycles should have a sufficient range to incentivise people to use bicycles for short-range commuting instead of using cars. When the assisted range is long enough at all operational conditions, cyclists might perceive cycling more positively, not worrying about too short of a driving range. Another sustainability perspective is that a better understanding of rolling resistance helps to dimension batteries, so pedelecs do not have too large batteries, saving valuable natural resources. Therefore, energy consumption and battery drain for a hypothetical pedelec are studied in this article using the developed simulation model, showing how the driving range decreases at different temperatures for the chosen drive cycle.
To the authors’ knowledge, the driving cycle presented in this work is the first of its kind for bicycles. This driving cycle facilitates a standardised comparison of the longitudinal dynamic behaviour of bicycles. The proposed driving cycle can be employed as it is or adapted for different purposes.
This article is structured as follows: firstly, the driving losses of bicycles are introduced, then the rolling resistance simulation model is presented. The simulation results of transient rolling resistance and the driving range of an electrically assisted bicycle are presented thereafter. Finally, the findings are discussed while conclusions and future work in the last section close the article.
Driving resistance of a bicycle
This section describes driving losses that a cyclist experiences during cycling. The total driving losses Ftotal, as illustrated by Fig 1, consist of four different contributions: (I) rolling resistance Fr, (II) aerodynamic resistance Faero, (III) climbing resistance Fclimb, and (IV) acceleration resistance Faccel. Eq (1) shows the calculation of the driving losses which will be explained in detail later on:
(1)
Rolling resistance can be explained as an energy loss related to a travelled distance with the relation Fr = ΔE/ΔL, where ΔE is the consumed energy, and ΔL is the travelled distance. This energy loss originates, for the most part, from the hysteretic behaviour of filler-reinforced rubber. Reinforcing fillers are added to rubber to make them more wear-resistant and to increase grip levels [24]. However, these reinforcing fillers increase the viscoelastic behaviour of the rubber, causing increased rolling resistance. This rolling resistance force can be represented as a rolling resistance coefficient crr, and it is defined as shown in Eq (2) as a ratio between the rolling resistance force and the vertical load Fz:
(2)
where mb is the mass of the bicycle, including the mass of the luggage, and mc is the mass of the cyclist. Fig 2 shows how the hysteretic behaviour of rubber creates an unsymmetrical contact pressure, causing most of the rolling resistance force.
The aerodynamic resistance (Eq 3) is related to the air density ρair, which is a function of ambient temperature Ta, air drag coefficient cd, the projected frontal area of bicycle and cyclist A, and vehicle speed v, with the following equation:
(3)
The cross-sectional area for a typical cyclist can be assumed to be A = 0.6 m2, and the air drag coefficient cd = 1.0 [25]. At cold temperatures, the aerodynamic resistance increases because of the increase in the air density, as specified in Eq (4):
(4)
where
is the specific gas constant, and pair is the air pressure.
The inclination angle of the road α causes the climbing resistance (Eq (5)).
(5)
The acceleration resistance is a resistance caused by the linear inertia of the bicycle, as follows:
(6)
Putting Eqs (2) to (6) together results in the following total losses
(7)
The mass of the bicycle, luggage, and rider can be assumed to be 100 kg for a male cyclist, according to Tengattini [26]. Rotational inertia resistances also exist, but these are estimated to be negligibly low because of small rotating masses. Therefore, rotational inertia resistances are not separately calculated.
Rolling resistance model
This section introduces the rolling resistance simulation model. The simulation model makes the following assumptions: the tyre has a uniform temperature, and the rolling resistance force is fully converted into heat. For every time step Δt, a new tyre temperature is calculated from the heat balance. The temperature-dependent rolling resistance model proposed by Rothhämel [21] is used as a basis for the transient tyre model.
The model derivation starts with a heat balance, where the net energy flow into the tyre is equal to the difference between in-
and out-flowing energy
(see Eq (8)):
(8)
The energy flow stored in the tyre (Eq (9)) is described in terms of tyre mass mt, specific heat capacity ct and the temperature gradient of the tyre :
(9)
Mandal et al. [27] previously showed that the specific heat capacity is temperature dependent. This heat capacity is modelled as a linear equation, and the values for and
are extracted from Mandal’s plot for a 5 PHR nano silica-filled natural rubber:
(10)
The rolling resistance force causes the energy flow into the tyre:
(11)
Rothhämel [21] has published Eq (12), which describes the rolling resistance at varying ambient temperatures, having two different regression parameters b1 and b2:
(12)
Eq (11) describes the evolution of the rolling resistance at varying tyre temperatures, and it is used in this article to describe the temperature dependency of rolling resistance. The out-flowing energy is divided into three parts: convective cooling between the wind and the tyre , convective cooling between the road and the tyre
and radiative cooling
. The former is calculated according to Eq (13).
(13)
where At is the outer cooling area of the tyre. The tyre is idealised to be a torus. Thereby, the outer area is calculated according to Eq (14) from the difference between the torus area Atorus and the contact patch area Acp:
(14)
Eq (15) gives the area of a torus:
(15)
where Rt is the distance from the centre of the tube to the wheel rotational axis, and rt is the radius of the tyre tube. The contact patch area can according to Eq (16) be obtained from the inflation pressure of the tyre pt and the vertical wheel load Fz:
(16)
The heat transfer coefficient h can in accordance with Eq (17) be assumed to consist of two different contributions: free hnatural and forced hforced convection, and speed-dependent convection hforced [28, 29]:
(17)
In this case, v is the vehicle speed while the wind speed is assumed to be zero. The natural and forced convection parameters are extracted from Browne and Wickliffe et al. [30]. Eq (18) gives the convective cooling between the road and the tyre:
(18)
This article considers the convection coefficient equal for and
.
(19)
where
is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant and ee = 0.96 is the emissivity. Finally, knowing the temperature dependency of rolling resistance and cooling parameters, the temperature gradient is calculated according to:
(20)
The time integration of the tyre temperature is done using Euler integration:
(21)
Rolling resistance simulation
The simulation results are presented in this section. To visualise the transient rolling resistance, four consecutive 9-minute speed steps between and
are simulated, according to Fig 3.
Figs 4 and 5 show the rolling resistance and tyre temperatures at various ambient temperatures and speed levels (Fig 3). The rolling resistance reaches different rolling resistance levels at different speed levels. The temperature increase compared to the ambient temperature becomes more prominent at higher speed levels, causing a decrease in rolling resistance. At warm temperatures, the transient rolling resistance is nearly non-existent, while it is relatively large at cold temperatures. Especially at extremely low ambient temperatures (−30°C), the transient rolling resistance is significant. The change is not nearly as great for bicycle tyres as it is, for example, for truck tyres [20, 31], but the change in rolling resistance is still noticeable at cold temperatures. Moreover, about 9 minutes at constant speed seems enough to reach a steady-state condition.
It has been shown previously that the motivation of cyclists decreases with increasing energy demand. This might cause cyclists to choose to commute by car instead of cycling. In addition, the motivation of cyclists can further be affected by inconvenience because of the colder ambient temperatures.
Electrically assisted bicycles and energy consumption
The market for electrically assisted bicycles—i. e., pedelecs—is growing. For example, at the beginning of 2022 in Germany, 12% of bicycles were pedelecs [32] and 48% of all new bicycles were electrically assisted [33]. For electric motors, low ambient temperatures are usually not problematic. In contrast, batteries are known for their sensitivity to low temperatures. The most usual battery type for pedelecs is lithium-ion batteries because of their high energy density. However, the capacity of lithium-ion batteries also has a considerable temperature dependency [34]. The battery capacity decreases considerably with decreasing temperature. Eq (22) describes the change in battery capacity at different ambient temperatures:
(22)
where αb, β and c are regression constants, and Tb is the battery temperature in Celsius. The parameters for the battery capacity are taken from Zia et al. [34] αb = −0.354, β = 0.0310 and c = 1.157. At very cold temperatures (−20°C), the battery capacity reduces to approximately half of the capacity at + 25°C, as shown in Fig 6. The change in battery capacity is due to changes in molecular movements. Higher temperatures increase molecular movement and enable a higher capacity than that of the nominal capacity at + 25°C, which can lead to values above 100%. All the simulation parameters are listed in Table 1.
100% corresponds to nominal capacity at + 26°C.
For the simulations, it is assumed that the pedelec goes the same driving cycle as a conventional bicycle: however, with an average speed of in accordance with the findings by Twisk et al. [35], which is also in accordance with the experimental approach by Yang [8]. Gain factor (meaning assist level) equal to 3 was used in the simulations, which means that the electric motor assists by three times the torque that the rider is generating. So, the power of the electric motor Pem is equal to three times the rider’s power Prider. The propulsion power is the sum of both of them. The battery capacity Wbat is presumed to be 500 Wh.
From Schantz et al. [36], it is known that bicycle commuters cycle on average for 17 to 24 minutes. In addition, from a preliminary evaluation of measured data, it is known that bicycle commuters need to reduce their speed significantly (below 50% of the average speed) nearly once per minute. Based on this information, a driving cycle was created, as visualised in Fig 7, to study how temperature affects rolling resistance in a driving case close to reality. According to this driving cycle, the mean riding speed is , which is close to the data reported by Twisk et al. [35] for bicycles in the Netherlands over a 22-minute cycling period. This corresponds to a distance of 6.97 km. A cyclist and bike, with a combined mass of 100 kg, frontal cross-sectional area of 0.6 m2, and a drag coefficient of 1, at + 10°C, have 170 kJ energy expenditure.
Fig 8 depicts the evolution of tyre temperature over time, converging to a nearby steady-state influenced by ambient temperature. The plot compares two scenarios where the bicycle has been stored outdoors or in a warm garage: the first where the tyre begins at ambient temperature and another where tyre temperature starts at room temperature (+ 20°C). Additionally, Fig 9 visualises the corresponding rolling resistance due to the increasing tyre temperature. Above an ambient temperature of 0°C, the transient rolling resistance is hardly visible when the bicycle is stored outdoors. In contrast, when the tyres start at room temperature, rolling resistance is considerably smaller below + 10°C ambient temperatures during the first 5–10 minutes of cycling. Fig 10 shows the magnitude of the energy expenditure provided by the electrical assistance (gain factor 3), the cyclist, and the total energy expenditure.
One set of simulations starting at ambient temperature (–) and one starting at + 20°C (- -).
One set of simulations starting at ambient temperature (–) and one starting at + 20°C (- -).
The remaining battery capacity at different ambient temperatures is shown in Fig 11. What stands out is the significant decrease in driving range at decreasing temperatures. The battery is almost empty at a very cold temperature (−30°C). The battery capacity would be even lower if the assist level were to be adjusted so that the cyclist experienced the same effort at all ambient temperatures.
The same driving cycle is repeated until the battery capacity is zero at all temperatures to highlight how different ambient temperatures affect the driving range. Fig 12 shows how the driving range drops significantly at decreasing ambient temperatures. Therefore, the lowest planned ambient temperature should be the dimensioning factor for the battery capacity.
Discussion
Cycling during the winter season is a current topic that is accompanied by corresponding research as shown by the references in the introduction. Accordingly, numerous cities in northern countries have adopted winter cycling strategies in recent years, with primary focus on de-icing and snow ploughing.
The simulation results indicate that the temperature rise of bicycle tyres during operation is small compared to car or truck tyres. However, at low ambient temperatures (below the freezing point), even a small increase in tyre temperature (Fig 8) causes a substantial reduction in rolling resistance (Fig 9). This work extends the temperature-dependent rolling resistance model proposed by Rothhämel [21] to also consider transient effects within the tyre.
The increase in tyre temperature during operation and the related decrease in rolling resistance depend on vehicle speed. The steady-state simulation (Figs 4 and 5) illustrates the transition very distinctly, even though it is not a realistic driving behaviour. A realistic driving cycle (Fig 7) based on statistical data was created to study commuting of cyclists. This kind of driving cycle is similar to those used for exhaust gas emission measurements in motor vehicles. The driving cycle facilitates simulation of the longitudinal dynamic behaviour of bicycles, enabling comparison of rolling resistance changes and its real-life implications. Although the driving cycle’s input data may vary locally, including topographic effects, generating representative cycles is acknowledged as a distinct research field. The driving cycle is exchangeable for future applications of the present model if necessary. The model represents primarily bicycle traffic in built-up areas where most of the commuting takes place. This also includes frequent stops. In rural areas with a higher fraction of highway driving more steady-state cycling can be expected.
The presented transient tyre temperature and rolling resistance model has a physical basis and it is tuned using prior measurements [21]. The model showcases changes in rolling resistance similar to those observed in truck tyres [31]. However, on a bicycle the transient effects take place on a smaller scale. This can be explained by the smaller masses and a lower amount of energy losses in the system. Even if the masses are smaller, the ratio is in a similar order of magnitude: the tyres of a bicycle and truck account for approximately 1–2% of the total mass.
The input data that were used to tune the model, originates from earlier measurements, covering a temperature range from −30°C to + 25°C. Cyclists might also operate their bicycles at higher ambient temperatures. However, the temperature dependency of rolling resistance diminishes with increasing ambient temperature, while air density decreases, causing a decrease in air drag. It can be assumed that the model is also valid up to a certain limit at higher ambient temperature than that covered by the original data. However, the largest limitation of the model at significantly higher temperatures is due to the absence of a human body efficiency model. Beyond a certain threshold, the human propulsion capacity starts to decrease significantly.
The simulations suggest that commuting durations less than 5–10 minutes will result in significantly lower rolling resistance, particularly at temperatures below + 10°C, if the bicycle has been stored in a warm garage.
Conclusions and future work
This article presented a model that can capture the transient rolling resistance of a bicycle tyre at different ambient temperatures. The impact of ambient and tyre temperatures can be identified for a cyclist using the developed temperature-dependent bicycle rolling resistance model. Furthermore, this model was used to simulate the energy expenditure changes at various ambient temperatures for an electrically assisted bicycle. As a result, the following conclusions can be made:
- The developed rolling resistance model effectively captures the transient rolling resistance of bicycle tyres at various ambient temperatures and drive times. Consistent with prior investigations [31, 37], the general characteristic behaviour of warming-up and subsequent reduction in rolling resistance post-start is successfully reproduced.
- Even small increases in tyre temperature at cold ambient temperatures decrease the rolling resistance considerably. This is exemplified in Fig 5 where a change in riding speed from
to
(e. g. cycling from a slight declination to an up-hill section), leads to a decreased energy dissipation, resulting in a lower tyre temperature and approximately 10% higher rolling resistance. This change is equivalent to altering the inflation pressure from 400 kPa to 300 kPa.
- At warm temperatures, the warm-up behaviour of the tyre has only a minor effect (1–2%) on rolling resistance.
- The ambient and tyre temperatures greatly influence a bicycle’s driving losses—i. e., rolling and aerodynamic resistance. This means that a lowered temperature causes an unfavourable combination of all parameters affecting the required propulsion energy. A drop of ambient temperature by + 10°C results in a 10–15% increase of energy expenditure for a given driving cycle (see Fig 10).
- Electrically assisted bicycles have a considerably shorter driving range during winter at cold temperatures. This is caused by the increased driving losses, specifically rolling and aerodynamic resistance (see above) and the decreased battery capacity (see Eq (22) and Fig 11). The cycling range drops over 20% from + 20°C to 0°C. The decline of cycling range is even more drastic below the freezing point. −10°C is a typical limit for Li-Ion-batteries that is recommended by the manufacturers, where only 60% of the nominal range is available for the simulated pedelec.
- The increased driving losses during cold weather might decrease the cycling motivation of cyclists if gain factors are not adjusted at cold temperatures to compensate for the increased driving losses.
- The lowest operational temperature that the pedelec is planned to be used at, should be a dimensioning factor regarding the battery size and range aspect. For already existing pedelecs clear communication might help to increase customers’ understanding. Even a second battery, as is standard for some electric bicycles, could be an extension of existing bicycles in some circumstances.
In summary, the study provides valuable insights into the dynamics of winter cycling, offering implications for both research methodologies and practical applications, especially in built-up areas where commuting by bicycles takes place most commonly. The presented model’s adaptability to different driving cycles enhances its utility across diverse cycling scenarios.
In the future, the model should be validated using test rig or on-road experiments. In addition, simulations could be expanded to consider the increase of rolling resistance due to road conditions, such as mud and snow, and road roughness or softness. It is recommended to parameterise the model for different types of tyres, as the model is currently parameterised using a dataset of only one type of conventional tyre. However, during winter conditions, studded winter tyres are often used. It would be beneficial to measure studded or unstudded winter tyres for better range estimation of pedelecs during the winter season.
References
- 1. Oja P, Vuori I, Paronen O. Daily walking and cycling to work: their utility as health-enhancing physical activity. Patient education and counseling. 1998;33(1):S87–S94.
- 2. Neves A, Brand C. Assessing the potential for carbon emissions savings from replacing short car trips with walking and cycling using a mixed GPS-travel diary approach. Transportation research Part A, Policy and practice. 2019;123:130–146.
- 3. Sener I, Eluru N, Bhat C. An analysis of bicycle route choice preferences in Texas, US. Transportation (Dordrecht). 2009;36(5):511–539.
- 4. Heinen E, van Wee B, Maat K. Commuting by Bicycle: An Overview of the Literature. Transport Reviews. 2010;30(1):59–96.
- 5. Wardman M, Tight M, Page M. Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work. Transportation research Part A, Policy and practice. 2007;41(4):339–350.
- 6. Baldissera P, Delprete C, Rossi M, Zahar A. Experimental Comparison of Speed-Dependent Rolling Coefficients in Small Cycling Tires. Tire science & technology. 2021;49(3):224–241.
- 7. Broach J, Dill J, Gliebe J. Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2012;46(10):1730–1740.
- 8. Yang S, Lee Y. Integrated Physiological, Biomechanical, and Subjective Responses for the Selection of Assistive Level in Pedelec Cycling. Frontiers in physiology. 2021;12:740728–740728.
- 9. Sperlich B, Zinner C, Hébert-Losier K, Born D, Holmberg H. Biomechanical, cardiorespiratory, metabolic and perceived responses to electrically assisted cycling. European journal of applied physiology. 2012;112(12):4015–4025.
- 10. de Geus B, de Smet S, Nijs J, Meeusen R. Determining the intensity and energy expenditure during commuter cycling. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41(1):8–12.
- 11. Neubauer J, Wood E. The impact of range anxiety and home, workplace, and public charging infrastructure on simulated battery electric vehicle lifetime utility. Journal of power sources. 2014;257:12–20.
- 12.
Bergström A. Winter Maintenance Standards on Cycleways—Appropriate Road Condition for Increased Cycling During Winter. In: PIARC, 11th International Winter Road Congress, January 2002—Sapporo, Japan; 2022.
- 13.
Tahkola P. 7,000 Ways to Embrace Winter–Cycling for Four Seasons. In: Velo-City, May 2023, Leipzig, Germany; 2023.
- 14. Fenre MD, Klein-Paste A. The effect of rolling resistance on people’s willingness to cycle during wintertime. Journal of infrastructure preservation and resilience. 2021;2(1):1–11.
- 15. Weiss M, Dekker P, Moro A, Scholz H, Patel MK. On the electrification of road transportation—A review of the environmental, economic, and social performance of electric two-wheelers. Transportation research Part D, Transport and environment. 2015;41:348–366.
- 16.
Allekotte M, Bergk F, Biemann K, Deregowski C, Knörr W, Althaus HJ, et al. Ecological assessment of different types of transport (in German: Ökologische Bewertung von Verkehrsarten). Wörlitzer Platz 1, 06844 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany: German Environment Agency (Umweltbundesamt); 2020. 156. Available from: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/479/publikationen/texte_156-2020_oekologische_bewertung_von_verkehrsarten_0.pdf.
- 17. Henchoz Y, Crivelli G, Borrani F, Millet G. A new method to measure rolling resistance in treadmill cycling. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2010;28(10):1043–1046.
- 18. Grappe F, Candau R, Barbier B, Hoffman M, Belli A, Rouillon J. Influence of tyre pressure and vertical load on coefficient of rolling resistance and simulated cycling performance. Ergonomics. 1999;42(10):1361–1371.
- 19. Meyer D, Kloss G, Senner V. What is slowing me down? Estimation of rolling resistances during cycling. Procedia Engineering. 2016;146:526–531.
- 20. Hyttinen J, Ussner M, Österlöf R, Jerrelind J, Drugge L. Effect of Ambient and Tyre Temperature on Truck Tyre Rolling Resistance. International Journal of Automotive Technology. 2022;00(1):1–12.
- 21. Rothhämel M. On rolling resistance of bicycle tyres with ambient temperature in focus. Int J of Vehicle Systems Modelling and Testing. 2023;17(1):67–80.
- 22. Fenre MD, Klein-Paste A. Bicycle rolling resistance under winter conditions. Cold regions science and technology. 2021;187:103282–.
- 23. Fenre MD, Klein-Paste A. Rolling Resistance Measurements on Cycleways Using an Instrumented Bicycle. Journal of cold regions engineering. 2021;35(2).
- 24.
Nakajima Y. Advanced Tire Mechanics. Singapore: Springer Singapore Pte. Limited; 2019.
- 25.
Gressmann M. Fahrradphysik und Biomechanik: Technik, Formeln, Gesetze. 12th ed. Bielefeld: Delius Klasing; 2017.
- 26. Tengattini S, Bigazzi A. Physical characteristics and resistance parameters of typical urban cyclists. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2018;36(20):2383–2391.
- 27. Mandal A, Pan S, Mukherjee S, Saha AK, Thomas S, Sengupta A. Variations in Specific Heat and Microstructure in Natural Rubber Filled with Different Fillers as Studied by Differential Scanning Calorimetry. Journal of Polymer and Biopolymer Physics Chemistry. 2014;2(1):25–28.
- 28. Qin Y, Hiller J. Ways of formulating wind speed in heat convection significantly influencing pavement temperature prediction. Heat and mass transfer. 2013;49(5):745–752.
- 29. Assaad MC, Kimble B, Huang YM, Burgan R, Fralick GC, Wrbanek JD, et al. Thin-Film Heat Flux Sensor for Measuring the Film Coefficient of Rubber Components of a Rolling Tire. Tire Science and Technology. 2008;36:275–289.
- 30. Browne AL, Wickliffe LE. Parametric Study of Convective Heat Transfer Coefficients at the Tire Surface. Tire Science and Technology. 1980;8:37–67.
- 31. Hyttinen J, Ussner M, Österlöf R, Jerrelind J, Drugge L. Truck tyre transient rolling resistance and temperature at varying vehicle velocities—Measurements and simulations. Polymer testing. 2023;122:108004–.
- 32.
Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). Current budgets, Equipment of private households with selected consumer goods (in German: Laufende Wirtschaftsrechnungen, Ausstattung privater Haushalte mit ausgewählten Gebrauchsgütern). Gustav-Stresemann-Ring 11, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany: Federal Statistical Office of Germany; 2022. 2150200217004. Available from: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Einkommen-Konsum-Lebensbedingungen/Ausstattung-Gebrauchsgueter/Publikationen/Downloads-Ausstattung/ausstattung-privater-haushalte-2150200227004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.
- 33.
ZIV. Associations present figures for bicycle and e-bike market 2022 (in German: “ZIV und VDZ: Verbände stellen Zahlen für Fahrrad- und E-Bike-Markt 2022 vor.”). Reinhardtstraße 7, 10117 Berlin, Germany: ZIV Zweirad-Industrie-Verband e.V.; 2023.
- 34. Zia MF, Elbouchikhi E, Benbouzid M. Optimal operational planning of scalable DC microgrid with demand response, islanding, and battery degradation cost considerations. Applied energy. 2019;237:695–707.
- 35. Twisk D, Stelling A, Van Gent P, De Groot J, Vlakveld W. Speed characteristics of speed pedelecs, pedelecs and conventional bicycles in naturalistic urban and rural traffic conditions. Accident analysis and prevention. 2021;150:105940–105940.
- 36. Schantz P, Wahlgren L, Eriksson JS, Sommar JN, Rosdahl H. Estimating duration-distance relations in cycle commuting in the general population. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(11).
- 37.
Zhu C, Yan J. Experimental Investigation on Rolling Resistance and Temperature of the Heavy-Duty Vehicle Tires. In: SAE Technical Paper Series. SAE International; 2023.