Figures
Abstract
Background
Health insurance has been one of the fundamental approaches of financing healthcare for sustainable Development goals (SDGs). There is a paucity of evidence on the determinants of healthcare insurance coverage among women of reproductive age in Tanzania, therefore this study aimed at assessing factors associated with access to health care insurance among women of reproductive age in Tanzania using national Demographic and health survey dataset.
Methodology
This study was an analytical cross-sectional study that utilized nationally representative secondary data sourced from the Tanzania Demographic and Health Surveys (TDHS) of 2022. A weighted sample of 15,254 women of reproductive age (15–49) was included in the study. A multilevel regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with health care insurance coverage. These results were presented using adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval.
Results
In Tanzania the proportion of health insurance coverage among women of reproductive age was 5.8% whereby majority of women subscribing to employer’s insurance (3.9%). In the fixed effect model, older women (35–49) were more likely to be covered with health insurance compared those aged 15–24 (AOR = 2.75, 95% CI: 2.19, 3.45). Similarly, married women had higher likelihood of health insurance coverage compared to unmarried (AOR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.33, 1.92). Furthermore, educated women were more likely to be covered with health insurance than uneducated women (AOR = 6.96, 95% CI: 4.74, 10.22). Similarly, women who were exposed to mass media were more likely to be covered with health care insurance compared to unexposed (AOR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.78), in the Random effect model Intra-Cluster Correlation (ICC) value in Model III was 0.27
Conclusion
The low health insurance coverage among Tanzanian women of reproductive age reveals significant gaps in healthcare access Socioeconomic factors, along with limited access to reliable health information, highlight the importance of comprehensive and inclusive strategies to increase healthcare coverage. By implementing multifaceted approaches that tackle these root causes, Tanzania can improve the health and well-being of its women, ultimately contributing to a healthier and more resilient society.
Citation: Kessy SA, Tibenderana JR, Gimonge J, Moshi FV (2024) Determinants of healthcare insurance coverage among women of reproductive age in Tanzania: A multilevel mixed effect analysis. PLoS ONE 19(12): e0302806. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302806
Editor: Devaraj Acharya, Tribhuvan University, NEPAL
Received: April 14, 2024; Accepted: December 1, 2024; Published: December 19, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Kessy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The DHS data is freely available for download at https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Abbreviations: AIC, Akaike Information Criteria; BIC, Bayesian Information Criteria CI, Confidence Interval; CHF, community health fund; DHS, Demographic and Health Survey; EA, Enumeration Area; HI, Health Insurance; LMIC, Low and Middle Income Country; NBS, National Bureau of Statistics: NSSF, National Social Security Fund; PR, Prevalence Risk; PSU, Primary Sampling Unit; SDGs, Sustainable development goals; UHC, Universal health coverage; VIF, Variance Inflation Factor; TIKA, Tiba Kwa Kadi; SHIB, Social Health Insurance Benefit; WRA, Women of Reproductive Age; TDHS, Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey
Background
Globally, health insurance has been one of the fundamental approaches of financing healthcare for sustainable Development goals (SDGs) by 2030. About 2 billion individuals are struggling with financial difficulties, with 1 billion encountering severe out of pocket [1]. Additionally, 344 million people globally are being pushed further into the burden of health care costs [1, 2]. Globally the significance of Universal Health Coverage (UHC) has been emphasized by its incorporation into the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) stating that, all individuals should have equal access to health care as right rather than a privilege with its target to be achieved by 2030 [3, 4].
Universal Health Coverage (UHC) means that all individuals and communities receive health services they need without suffering financial hardship. It includes the full spectrum of essential, quality health services, from health promotion to prevention, treatment, rehabilitation, and palliative care [2]. The global trajectory is deviating from the path to achieve substantial advancements in universal health coverage, a goal outlined in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) target 3.8 set for 2030 which aim at protecting the vulnerable population from financial risks associated with severe health-related expenses [5].
UHC is important as it ensures provision of essential health services based on need, equitable access for the entire population, and the presence of financial-risk protection mechanisms to prevent economic hardship from healthcare expenses are key components of universal health coverage [6]. Women face considerable challenges in accessing medical services, primarily stemming from limited opportunities for economic empowerment and addressing their distinct healthcare requirements [5].
In Sub Saharan Countries, the prevalence of universal health coverage of health insurance coverage to be less than 10% [7, 8] The outcomes of Health Insurance (HI) implementation have been varying. Findings from research in Ghana [9]. and Rwanda [10] indicate that HI has contributed to greater equity in access to care for the overall population, alleviating the financial burden of healthcare expenses among the impoverished. Conversely, study findings from Ghana suggests Health Insurance (HI) did not provide uniform protection to all its members. Instead, it favored individuals with higher education, greater wealth, and those living in proximity to health facilities more than others [11].
Furthermore, among Sub-Saharan countries there is a notable correlation between formal sector employment and access to health insurance compared to informal employment sector [2]. Additionally, other factors such as such as income, education, household wealth status, marital status, age, and place of residence, as predictors of health insurance ownership [7, 12].
Despite notable accomplishments, the healthcare sector grapples with substantial hurdles in striving to deliver high-quality care to all individuals, regardless of their financial capacity to afford services. Women encounter more pronounced obstacles in accessing critical healthcare services, including routine antenatal visits and childbirth services [5, 13, 14].
In Tanzania, over 80% of the population continues to rely on out-of-pocket payments for accessing healthcare services, often resulting in significant financial burdens [15]. Tanzania implemented different health insurance policies in the mid-1990s, such as National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) in 1996 mandatory for every public servant and the Community Health Fund (CHF) in 2001the CHF, designed for the informal and rural communities, operates on a voluntary basis, offering coverage for up to six family members through a fixed annual payment, other health insurances such as Social Health Insurance Benefit (SHIB) established as a benefit under the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) and the Community Health Fund (CHF) and Tiba Kwa Kadi (TIKA) [15–17]
The capacity of women in the reproductive age group to attain affordable health coverage and care carries significant societal implications and hinges on the economic well-being of both women and their families, research have indicated that women often face a double burden of experiencing a higher prevalence of health issues while simultaneously being primarily responsible for caring for sick children and family members in African context. Nevertheless, the accessibility of healthcare services for women in the reproductive age group remains limited in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC), primarily due to financial burden [18].
In Tanzania, universal health coverage is in line with government policy of improving maternal health among reproductive age in order to improve maternal morbidities and mortality, more than 90% of men and women do not have any health insurance with only 5% coverage among children aged (0–14) years [19]. Despite several studies that have been done in Tanzania which were small scale, thus there is still a paucity of national wide information regarding health insurance utilizations. Additionally, there is a notable absence of published literature addressing health insurance coverage in the country. Hence to address this gap, the present study aimed to evaluate the health insurance coverage and its associated factors among women in the reproductive age group in Tanzania utilizing data from the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). The findings of this study offer valuable insights for health planners, program developers, and healthcare professionals, providing a foundation for enhancing financial protection and service utilization among women of reproductive age.
Methodology
The data source
The study made use of the 2022 Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey (TDHS) data; a countrywide cross-sectional survey carried out every five years [20]. Tanzania, the largest country in East Africa, spans an area of 940,000 square kilometers, including 60,000 square kilometers of inland water. The study incorporated data from all regions of the United Republic of Tanzania as of 2022, the estimated population of Tanzania stood at 61,741,120, with an annual population growth rate of 3.2% [21, 22]. This study was an analytical cross-sectional study that utilized nationally representative secondary data sourced from the Tanzania Demographic and Health Surveys (TDHS) of 2022. The TDHS, is funded by the U.S Agency for International Development and implementation is carried out by the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar, as well as the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), the Office of the Chief Government Statistician (OCGS), with technical support provided by ICF International [21–24]. Measure Demographic and health survey (DHS) website was accessed to obtain the data (https://dhsprogram.com/)The data collection method of the surveys involves using a standardized questionnaire that is uniform across countries to gather information from women aged 15–49. The questionnaire is often translated into the primary local languages of the participating nations. According to the DHS, these translated questionnaires, along with the original English version, undergo pretesting in both English and the local dialect to ensure their accuracy. Subsequently, during the pretest phase, field workers engage in an interactive discussion of the questions, providing suggestions for improvements across all versions. After the field practice, a debriefing session is conducted with the pretest field personnel, and adjustments are made to the questionnaires based on the insights gained from this process [20]. The survey employed face-to-face questionnaire interviews and utilized a stratified design with multistage cluster sampling to gather information on various aspects such as population health status, neonatal mortality, health behaviors, nutritional status, family planning, and demographics.
In the initial stage, 629 clusters were identified, from which households were then selected. Among these clusters, 26 households were systematically chosen to be representative from each cluster, resulting in a total of 16,354 households included in the survey. Eligibility for inclusion was based on the presence of all women aged 15–49 years in the selected household on the night prior to the interview. Further details on the sampling procedure and design have been previously documented [20]. A total of 15,254 women who had information on all the variables of interest were included in the study (Table 1). We adhered to the guidelines provided by the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement when writing the manuscript [25]. The DHS data is freely available for download at https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm
Study variables. The outcome variable of this study was health insurance coverage. This was from the question “are you covered by any health insurance?”. Response is coded as 0 = “No” and 1 = “Yes”. The explanatory variables were age of the woman, marital status, education, employment, residence, wealth index, head of household sex, head of household age, media exposure, visited by healthcare worker for past12 months and visited health facility for the past 12 months. Age was recorded as 15–24, 25–34 and 35–49. Marital status was categorized as married and unmarried. Wealth status was categorized as poor, middle, and rich. Education was classified into three categories: no education, primary education, secondary education, or higher education. A new variable of media exposure was generated from household has either tv or radio. Our generated study variables and coding were based on previous literature [7, 26–29].
Statistical analysis
We used Stata software, version 18.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) for all statistical analyses. Initial presentation of health insurance coverage was done using percentages to show the proportion of women covered. Subsequently, through cross-tabulation, we explored the distribution of health insurance coverage among various background characteristics. Before conducting the regression analysis, we assessed potential collinearity among the variables using the variance inflation factor (VIF). Results indicated minimal collinearity, with VIF values ranging from 1.44 to 1.45 and a mean of 1.61, suggesting no significant multicollinearity concerns. To investigate the factors linked with health insurance coverage, we employed multilevel binary logistic analysis. This approach was chosen due to the complex survey design of the DHS, which involved a two-stage cluster sampling. Four models were utilized for analysis: Model 0: An empty model without any explanatory variables, Model I: Including individual-level factors, Model II: Incorporating community level factors and Model III: Considering all explanatory variables together. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were fit for each model. Both fixed and random effects were included in all models. The Intra-Cluster Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to quantify the proportion of variation in health insurance coverage attributable to differences between clusters (Primary Sampling Units, PSUs), measuring the similarity within clusters. Higher ICC values indicate greater within-cluster similarity, underscoring the need to account for clustering effects in the analysis. Fixed effects illustrated the relationship between explanatory variables and the outcome. Model fitness was evaluated using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), allowing us to determine how well each model fit the data, in adjusted analysis we used stepwise regression to identify independent variables associated with health insurance coverage, A significance level of p < 0.05 was used for all statistical tests. Furthermore, we weighed all analyses to account for disproportionate sampling and non-response.
Ethical clearance
Permission to download and utilize the data was obtained from the DHS Program/ICF International via http://www.dhsprogram.com. The data was strictly used for the current study’s objectives. Extensive details regarding the methodology and ethical considerations of the DHS program can be found in the published reports of the Tanzania Demographic and Health survey [20, 24].
Results
Participants background characteristics
Among 15,254 participants of this study, the mean (SD) age was 29.3(9.8). The overall health insurance coverage among women of reproductive age was about 6%. Health insurance coverage was prevalent (7.28%) among women aged 35+ years. Around (6.82%) women who owned health insurance were married. The majority of women (13.0%) of study participants who were covered with health insurance had secondary or higher education. In occupation (6.23%) of participants who were insured were working. Less thana quarter (4.19%) of the study participants who owned health insurance were from rural areas (Table 1).
Most (9.79%) of women of reproductive age who owned health insurance were from rich household. In household (5.45%) of women of reproductive age who were insured were living in household whose head was male. Almost (6.49%) of the women who were insured were living in household whose head was aged 35–49 years of age. The majority (8.09%) of women who were insured had been exposed to media. Almost (9.14%) of the insured women had been visited by field worker in the last 12 months. Around (6.90%) of the study participants who are insured visited a health facility for the past 12 months (Table 1).
Proportional of health insurance coverage
In Tanzania the proportion of health insurance coverage among women of reproductive age is 5.8%. The rest of the group are not covered with any health insurance (Fig 1)
Specific types of health insurance coverage
Fig 2 shows percentage of women with specific types of health insurance. Most of them (5.8%) have any insurance followed by employers’ insurance (3.9%) and the lowest (0.2%) being social security insurance (Fig 2).
Determinants of health insurance coverage among Tanzanian reproductive age women
Fixed effect.
Table 2, Model III presents determinants of health insurance coverage among Tanzanian reproductive age women. Older women (35–49) were more likely to be covered with health insurance compared to those aged 15–24 (AOR = 2.75, 95% CI: 2.19, 3.45). Similarly, married women had higher likelihood of health insurance coverage compared to unmarried (AOR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.33, 1.92). The odds of health insurance coverage were higher among educated women (secondary/higher) compared to uneducated women (AOR = 6.96, 95% CI: 4.74, 10.22). Women who were exposed to media had higher odds of health insurance coverage compared to unexposed (AOR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.78). Women of reproductive age who visited health facility for the past 12 months had higher likelihood of health insurance coverage compared to those who didn’t (AOR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.51). Additionally, participants from rich households were more likely to be covered with health insurance compared to their counterparts (AOR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.99, 3.87). We found that women who are living in households lead by female.
Random effect.
Table 2 presents results for random effect. We observed that the Intra-Cluster Correlation (ICC) value in Model III was 0.27 indicating that approximately 27% of the variability in health insurance coverage is attributed to differences between the clusters. The cluster-level variation, as indicated by the ICC values were 29%, 26%, 24% and 27% for Model 0, Model I, Model II and Model III respectively. We opted to focus on interpreting the results of Model III for discussion, as it had the lowest AIC value (5603.60) among the models, indicating a goodness of fit.
Discussion
This study aimed to analyze the determinants affecting the possession of health insurance among Tanzanian women as a key approach to achieving universal health coverage. It found that insignificant majority of women of about 5.8% own any form of health insurance. The research identified several determinants associated with health insurance coverage, including age, economic status, educational attainment, marital status, and mass media exposure, Visited health facility last 12 months.
Our study revealed that only 5.8% of Tanzanian women possess health insurance, figure is contrary with Ghana having more than half percent accessing health healthcare [30]. These findings are in line with less than one tenth of the women of the reproductive age in Mauritania, Ethiopia and Nigeria [8, 26, 31]. This disparity can be explained that in Ghana there is a difference in health policy agendas, like livelihood empowerment against Poverty Program (LEAP) in Ghana [30] A pro-poor intervention policy, use of Participatory welfare ranking (PWR) and geographic targeting (GT) for poor groups helped in improving efficiency and equity needs under NHIS program in Ghana. It has been mandatory and compulsory for all Ghanaians to join health insurance scheme in Ghana [30].
This study found that compared to being unmarried, being married was associated with having health insurance coverage. Studies have identified that being in a dual income household offers more avenues for health insurance, similar findings have been reported in other studies conducted in East Africa, Zambia and Kenya [7, 29, 32] but inconsistence with the study done in Malawi [4]. Additionally, unmarried women may struggle to afford insurance premiums and deductibles and may perceive their risk of illness as lower [7].
The study suggests that women 35 years of age and older are more likely to subscribe to healthcare insurance, which is in line with findings from several other African nations, such as South Africa, and Nigeria and the one done in sub–Saharan Africa [2, 5, 33]. There are several reasons for this trend. Firstly, people in this age group typically find employment, which makes it possible for them to pay for health insurance. Furthermore, older women may have more children who are more likely to become sick and frequently take on caregiving responsibilities, which may lead them to look into insurance to reduce their out-of-pocket costs.
Women’s education level had a substantial impact on whether or not they had health insurance. Individuals with more educational attainment were shown to be more likely than those without formal education to have health insurance. This finding adheres to other studies that show education is a significant factor in predicting one’s ability to obtain health insurance [30, 34–36]. Education may help people obtain information more easily and increase their chances of entering high-paying professions, which are more likely to offer insurance coverage, which explains the positive association.
In comparison to women residing in the poor household, the current study showed that women residing in the rich household had greater odds of having health insurance coverage. The findings of the national survey carried out in Ethiopia were consistent with these results [37], indicating a relationship between income levels and the probability of acquiring health insurance. In contrast, women from wealthier homes had lower probabilities of having health insurance coverage, according to different research conducted in Sudan [38].
The observed phenomenon of women with a history of visiting health facilities in the last 12 months exhibiting higher odds of having insurance coverage compared to their counterparts can be attributed to several factors. It is plausible that frequent visits to health facilities provide these women with increased exposure to healthcare services, thereby fostering a deeper understanding of the importance of insurance coverage and potentially reducing the barrier of out-of-pocket expenses. This finding aligns with existing research conducted in East African countries [7].
Furthermore, compared to women who were not exposed to the media, those who were exposed showed a higher likelihood to use health insurance. This finding is consistent with research from Ethiopia, Kenya, and Sub-Saharan Africa [30, 39, 40]. This can be explained by high coverage of internet and other media channel in the country which can act as an instrument for knowledge dissemination and raises awareness of the importance of health insurance.
Strength and limitation
This study utilized the most current, nationally representative dataset, offering a comprehensive perspective on health insurance ownership among reproductive-age women. The demographic and health surveys (DHS) used are a valuable resource for addressing critical data gaps and supporting evidence-based health planning and interventions. Additionally, the large sample size ensures robust statistical power, enhancing the reliability and generalizability of the findings to the broader female population.
However, the study has notable limitations. As it relied on secondary data, the analysis was restricted to variables available in the DHS dataset, potentially excluding significant factors identified in other studies. The cross-sectional design further limits the ability to infer causality, as associations are observed at a single point in time without accounting for temporal dynamics. The reliance on self-reported data introduces potential biases, such as recall bias and social desirability bias, which may affect the accuracy of the findings. Furthermore, contextual or systemic factors, such as variations in regional health infrastructure or policies, could not be accounted for. Finally, unmeasured confounding variables, such as cultural attitudes toward insurance or the use of informal health services, may also influence the results but were beyond the scope of this study. Addressing these limitations in future research, such as through longitudinal designs or mixed-method approaches, could provide a more nuanced understanding of health insurance ownership among women.
Conclusion
Less than ten percent of Tanzanian women of reproductive age (WRA) are registered in health insurance, representing an unacceptably low coverage rate and underscoring the urgent need to eliminate barriers to healthcare access for this population. Key determinants of health insurance coverage include marital status, wealth, education level, media exposure, and recent visits to medical facilities. These findings highlight the complex interplay between socioeconomic and informational factors in healthcare decision-making among WRA in Tanzania. Multifaceted strategies are required to address these challenges and increase health insurance coverage, contributing to the broader goal of achieving universal health coverage.
Recommendations
To address the low health insurance coverage among WRA, promoting educational attainment, particularly in health and financial literacy, through comprehensive education initiatives and vocational training opportunities, is essential. Empowering widows and single women should also be a priority by ensuring they have access to resources and autonomy in making healthcare decisions. Leveraging mass media platforms to disseminate information about the benefits of health insurance can raise awareness and encourage adoption. Interventions must focus on addressing the root causes of low coverage to ensure equitable access to healthcare services across all population segments. Additionally, researchers should explore health insurance dropout rates through qualitative and quantitative studies to better understand the challenges and identify strategies for improving retention. These steps are crucial for policymakers, stakeholders, and researchers as Tanzania works toward achieving universal health coverage.
References
- 1. WHO. Universal health coverage (UHC). 2023 [cited 9 Nov 2024]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/universal-health-coverage-(uhc)
- 2. Kirigia JM, Sambo LG, Nganda B, Mwabu GM, Chatora R, Mwase T. Determinants of health insurance ownership among South African women. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5. pmid:15733326
- 3. Dieleman JL, Sadat N, Chang AY, Fullman N, Abbafati C, Acharya P, et al. Trends in future health financing and coverage: future health spending and universal health coverage in 188 countries, 2016–40. The Lancet. 2018;391: 1783–1798. pmid:29678341
- 4. Chauluka M, Uzochukwu BSC, Chinkhumba J. Factors Associated With Coverage of Health Insurance Among Women in Malawi. Frontiers in Health Services. 2022;2. pmid:36925801
- 5. Shao L, Wang Y, Wang X, Ji L, Huang R. Factors associated with health insurance ownership among women of reproductive age: A multicountry study in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS One. 2022;17. pmid:35413063
- 6. Saksena P, Hsu J, Evans DB. Financial Risk Protection and Universal Health Coverage: Evidence and Measurement Challenges. PLoS Med. 2014;11. pmid:25244520
- 7. Weldesenbet AB, Kebede SA, Ayele BH, Tusa BS. Health insurance coverage and its associated factors among reproductive-age women in east africa: A multilevel mixed-effects generalized linear model. Clinico Economics and Outcomes Research. 2021;13: 693–701. pmid:34349533
- 8. Okedo-Alex IN, Akamike IC, Ezeanosike OB, Uneke CJ. A review of the incidence and determinants of catastrophic health expenditure in Nigeria: Implications for universal health coverage. International Journal of Health Planning and Management. John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2019. pp. e1387–e1404. pmid:31311065
- 9. Blanchet NJ, Fink G, Osei-Akoto I, Blanchet NJ. THE EFFECT OF GHANA’S NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE SCHEME ON HEALTH CARE UTILISATION. 2012.
- 10. Diop F, Bitran R. The impact of alternative cost recovery schemes on access and equity in Niger. 1995. Available: https://academic.oup.com/heapol/article/10/3/223/746741
- 11. Fiestas Navarrete L, Ghislandi S, Stuckler D, Tediosi F. Inequalities in the benefits of national health insurance on financial protection from out-of-pocket payments and access to health services: Cross-sectional evidence from Ghana. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34: 694–705. pmid:31539034
- 12. Kumi-Kyereme A, Amo-Adjei J. Effects of spatial location and household wealth on health insurance subscription among women in Ghana. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13. pmid:23768255
- 13. Raymond VG, Ndalla MM, Tibenderana JR. Antenatal care access in Tanzania: progress, challenges, and recommendations for a healthier maternal and child well-being. International Journal of Surgery: Global Health. 2023;6.
- 14. De Masi S, Bucagu M, Tunçalp Ö, Peña-Rosas JP, Lawrie T, Oladapo OT, et al. Integrated Person-Centered Health Care for All Women During Pregnancy: Implementing World Health Organization Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience. 2017. Available: www.ghspjournal.org
- 15. Kessy SA, Tibenderana JR. Reimaging of health care: Tanzania’s quest and bold step towards universal health coverage deploying universal health insurance as a catalyst. International Journal of Surgery: Global Health. 2023;6.
- 16. Amani PJ, Hurtig AK, Frumence G, Kiwara AD, Goicolea I, San Sebastiån M. Health insurance and health system (un) responsiveness: a qualitative study with elderly in rural Tanzania. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21. pmid:34686182
- 17. Osei Afriyie D, Loo PS, Kuwawenaruwa A, Kassimu T, Fink G, Tediosi F, et al. Understanding the role of the Tanzania national health insurance fund in improving service coverage and quality of care. Soc Sci Med. 2024;347. pmid:38479141
- 18.
WHO. Addressing the Challenge of Women’s Health in Africa Report of the Commission on Women’s Health in the African Region. 2012.
- 19.
MoH et al. Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey (TDHS-MIS). 2022.
- 20.
Demographic and Health Surveys. Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey (TDHS-MIS). 2022.
- 21.
NBS Tanzania. National Bureau of Statistics. In: Manufacturing Index. 2023 pp. 4–7.
- 22.
Ministry of Health. Tanzania Ministry of Health. 2023.
- 23.
Ministry of Health Zanzibar. Ministry of Health Zanzibar. 2023 pp. 1–184.
- 24.
Macro International Inc. Measure DHS. The DHS Program—Protecting the Privacy of DHS Survey Respondents. In: DHS. 2021.
- 25. Elm E von, Altman Douglas G, Egger Matthias, Stuart J Pocock PCG& JPV for the SI, Abstract. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Policy and practice. 2014;045120: 126–140.
- 26. Dowou RK, Atanuriba GA, Adzigbli LA, Balame SK, Tahidu I, Aggrey-Korsah J, et al. Determinants of health insurance coverage among women in Mauritania: a multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health. 2024;24: 1–10. pmid:38243212
- 27. Kimani JK, Ettarh R, Warren C, Bellows B. Determinants of health insurance ownership among women in Kenya: evidence from the 2008–09 Kenya demographic and health survey. International Journal for equity in healthquity in health. 2014;13: 1–8. pmid:24678655
- 28. Chauluka M, Uzochukwu BSC, Chinkhumba J. Factors Associated With Coverage of Health Insurance Among Women in. 2022;2: 1–11. pmid:36925801
- 29. Kimani JK, Ettarh R, Warren C, Bellows B. Determinants of health insurance ownership among women in Kenya: Evidence from the 2008–09 Kenya demographic and health survey. International Journal for Equity in Health. BioMed Central Ltd.; 2014. pmid:24678655
- 30. Amu H, Seidu AA, Agbaglo E, Dowou RK, Ameyaw EK, Ahinkorah BO, et al. Mixed effects analysis of factors associated with health insurance coverage among women in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS One. 2021;16. pmid:33739985
- 31. Tusa BS, Weldesenbet AB, Kebede SA. Spatial distribution and associated factors of underweight in Ethiopia: An analysis of Ethiopian demographic and health survey, 2016. PLoS One. 2020;15. pmid:33259562
- 32. Mulenga J, Mulenga MC, Musonda KMC, Phiri C. Examining gender differentials and determinants of private health insurance coverage in Zambia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21. pmid:34753465
- 33. Aregbeshola BS, Khan SM. Predictors of enrolment in the national health insurance scheme among women of reproductive age in nigeria. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7: 1015–1023. pmid:30624875
- 34. Kwarteng A, Akazili J, Welaga P, Dalinjong PA, Asante KP, Sarpong D, et al. The state of enrollment on the National Health Insurance Scheme in rural Ghana after eight years of implementation. Int J Equity Health. 2019;19. pmid:31892331
- 35. Ramos Rosas E, Winkler V, Brenner S, De Allegri M. Identifying the determinants of health insurance coverage among Peruvian women of reproductive age: an assessment based on the national Peruvian demographic survey of 2017. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19. pmid:33143709
- 36. Salari P, Akweongo P, Aikins M, Tediosi F. Determinants of health insurance enrolment in Ghana: Evidence from three national household surveys. Health Policy and Planning. Oxford University Press; 2019. pp. 582–594. pmid:31435674
- 37. Yosef A, Kebede A, Worku N. Respectful maternity care and associated factors among women who attended delivery services in referral hospitals in Northwest Amhara, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13: 1965–1973. pmid:33364778
- 38. Baloul I, Dahlui M. Determinants of health insurance enrolment in Sudan: evidence from Health Utilisation and Expenditure Household Survey 2009. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14.
- 39. Kebede DB, Belachew YB, Selbana DW, Gizaw AB. Maternal Satisfaction with Antenatal Care and Associated Factors among Pregnant Women in Hossana Town. Int J Reprod Med. 2020;2020: 1–8. pmid:32775404
- 40. Kazungu JS, Barasa EW. Examining levels, distribution and correlates of health insurance coverage in Kenya. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2017;22: 1175–1185. pmid:28627085