Figures
Abstract
Abundant efforts have been directed to understand the global obesity epidemic and related obesogenic behaviors. However, the relationships of maternal concern and perception about child weight with child eating behaviors in Saudi Arabia have not been investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the associations of maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk with maternal feeding practices and child eating behaviors among mothers and their children in Saudi Arabia. Mothers of 115 children aged 3–5 years old were recruited from eight preschools. Child eating behaviors (enjoyment of food, responsiveness to foods, food fussiness, satiety responsiveness, and slowness in eating) and maternal feeding practices (restriction, monitoring, and using food as a reward), maternal concern about child weight, and maternal perception about child overweight risk were assessed using validated questionnaires. Multiple linear regression models, adjusted for maternal body mass index (BMI) and child’s BMI-z score and sex, were tested to examine the independent associations of maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk with child eating behaviors and maternal feeding practices. Maternal concern about child weight was positively associated with food enjoyment in children (B = 0.14 [95% confidence intervals = 0.02,0.27]) and responsiveness to food (B = 0.16 [0.03,0.29]), whereas a negative association with child food fussiness was observed (B = -0.19 [-0.33, -0.04]). Maternal perception about child overweight risk and child slowness in eating were negatively associated (B = -0.72 [-0.16 to -0.28]). Maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk were not associated with maternal feeding practices. In conclusion, maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk were found to be associated with food approach eating behavior traits but not with maternal feeding practices. Mothers who are concerned about child weight or perceive their children as overweight may need guidance and support to promote healthy eating behaviors among their children. Future cross-cultural studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanisms for the influence of maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk on maternal feeding practices, child eating behaviors, and weight status of children.
Citation: Kutbi HA, Mosli RH (2024) Maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk, maternal feeding practices, and child eating behaviors: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 19(6): e0302557. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302557
Editor: Omar Mohammad Ali Khraisat, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, JORDAN
Received: December 26, 2022; Accepted: April 7, 2024; Published: June 11, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Kutbi, Mosli. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Childhood overweight and obesity is a public health burden affecting 38 million children around the world [1]. Hence, abundant efforts have been directed to understand the global obesity epidemic and related obesogenic behaviors to develop effective interventions [2–5]. The current literature indicates that excess adiposity among children is strongly linked to eating behaviors. For example, children exhibiting high food responsiveness, defined as eating in response to food cues, or low ability to adjust eating in response to satiety or fullness are more vulnerable to overweight or obesity [6]. Increased eating speed has been also proposed to increase children’s risk for overweight or obesity [7]. However, children’s eating behaviors (CEBs) are more likely to be influenced by extrinsic factors, such as the home environment [3].
Parents are often recognized to have a powerful influence in shaping eating behaviors of their children through parenting and feeding practices [5]. However, the existing data suggest that parental use of particular feeding practices might be influenced by CEBs or weight status of children [8]. Feeding practices could be also affected by parental concern and perception about child’s overweight risk [9–13]; Parents concerned about their child being overweight or obese may alter the employed feeding practices in order to mitigate unexpected weight gain [14]. However, and in contrast to their intention, the adopted feeding practices may unintentionally promote obesity traits [15, 16].
The impact of maternal weight perception and concern on child’s feeding practices has been previously investigated in a variety of settings and findings varied across cultures. For instance, Brodribb et al. examined this relationship among mothers and infants residing in Queensland; Maternal infant weight perception and concern were found positively correlated with controlling feeding practices [9]. Similar findings have been reported among children aged 5–8 years [10–13]. On the other hand, a study conducted among low-income Latina mother-child dyads did not detect an association between maternal perception and concern about child weight and maternal feeding practices [17], whereas in Saudi Arabia, maternal concern and perception about child weight and the relationship with maternal feeding practices and CEBs have not been previously explored.
Given the established associations of maternal feeding practices and CEBs with children’s body weight status [18], we aimed to build on existing work by examining the relationships of maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk with maternal feeding practices and child eating behaviors among Saudi preschoolers and their mothers. In Saudi Arabia, mothers are often recognized to have greater role and responsibility in child feeding compared to other cultures, which may make them feel accountable for children’s weight status [19, 20]. Additionally, it has been estimated that approximately one-third of the Saudi children (27.8%) are overweight or obese [21]. Therefore, findings of the present study will inform childhood obesity interventions targeting mothers and CEBs.
Materials and methods
Study sample and procedure
Data of this study were collected between October and December 2019 from eight preschools; two preschools located in each of the Northern, Southern, Eastern, and Western areas of Jeddah city, Saudi Arabia. Permission to collect data from each school was obtained from school principals. All children enrolled in these schools had an envelope placed in their backpacks, which is routinely checked by their mothers on a daily basis. Each envelope contained an invitation letter for the mother describing the study objectives and protocol and a consent form for participation. The inclusion criteria included that the mother is an Arabic speaker, Saudi or a permeant resident in Saudi Arabia, has a healthy child aged 3–5 years without serious health condition or food allergy, and lives primarily with the child.
The minimum sample size needed for the present size was 113 mothers of preschoolers, based on an estimated correlation of 0.30 between maternal concern about child weight and CEBs, alpha (two-sided) = 0.05, and power of 90% [22, 23]. Mothers who met the inclusion criteria and dispatched the signed consent forms with their children (n = 209) were contacted over the phone to complete the study questionnaire. Ninety-four mothers did not respond to the phone calls over a period of one-month (45.0%); therefore, the final analyses included data of 115 mothers and their children (55.0%).
The study questionnaire assessed the sociodemographic characteristics of the sample, CEBs, and maternal feeding practices, wherein the research assistants read each question aloud and recorded mothers’ response. Child anthropometric measurements were objectively assessed at the schools by trained research assistants. This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was granted by the Unit of Biomedical Ethics at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (Reference number HA-02-J-008).
Measures
Sociodemographic variables and anthropometric measures.
Sociodemographic data (children’s date of birth, nationality, household income, maternal education, and employment status) were collected through phone interviews. Mothers were also requested to recall and report their height and weight, and maternal body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Mothers reporting pregnancy at the time of data collection were asked to provide their pre-pregnancy weight and the BMI was calculated accordingly.
Anthropometric measurements of each child (height and weight) were assessed objectively by trained research assistants within one-week of the conducted phone interview. Heavy clothes and shoes were removed, and measurements were taken twice. Each child was requested to stand still to measure his/her height and if the two readings differed by more than 0.5 cm two additional measurements were taken and the average was calculated. A digital scale was used to measure child’s weight; If weight measurement varied by more than 0.1 kg the weight was reassessed two additional times and the average was recorded. The BMI-z scores for children were calculated according to the reference standards of the World Health Organization (WHO) [24] and used as a continuous variable in all models.
Child eating behaviors.
CEBs were assessed using five constructs adapted from the Child’s Eating Behaviors Questionnaire (CEBQ), including enjoyment of food (desire to eat and interest in food):“My child loves food,” “My child is interested in food,” “My child looks forward to mealtimes,” and “My child enjoys eating”; food responsiveness (eating in response to food cues): “My child is always asking for food,” “If allowed to, my child would eat too much,” “Given the choice, my child would eat most of the time,” “Even if my child is full up s/he finds room to eat his/her favorite food,” and “If given the chance, my child would always have food in his/her mouth”; satiety responsiveness (ability to adjust eating in response to satiety or fullness): “My child has a big appetite” (reverse coded), “My child leaves food on his/her plate at the end of a meal,” “My child gets full before his/her meal is finished,” “My child gets full up easily,” and “My child cannot eat a meal if s/he has had a snack just before”; food fussiness (selectivity in accepting a range of foods): “My child refuses new foods at first,” “My child enjoys tasting new foods” (reverse coded), “My child enjoys a wide variety of foods” (reverse coded), “My child is difficult to please with meals,” “My child is interested in tasting food s/he hasn’t tasted before” (reverse coded), and “My child decides that s/he doesn’t like a food, even without tasting it”; and slowness in eating (a slow eating rate): “My child finishes his/her meal quickly” (reverse coded), “My child eats slowly,” “My child takes more than 30 minutes to finish a meal,” and “My child eats more and more slowly during the course of a meal” [25]. Response options for each item ranged from 1 = never to 5 = always. The average score for the items included in each construct was calculated to indicate the average score. These constructs have been widely used and were validated among children in Saudi Arabia [26]. The constructs showed acceptable internal consistency among the sample, wherein Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged between 0.61 to 0.80.
Maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk.
Maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk were assessed using the two constructs of the Child Feeding Questionnaire-Arabic version (CFQ-A), which has been previously validated among preschoolers in Saudi Arabia [20, 27]. Maternal concern about child weight was evaluated using three questions: “How concerned are you about your child eating too much when you are not around her?” “How concerned are you about your child having to diet to maintain a desirable weight?” and “How concerned are you about your child becoming overweight?” Response options of each item ranged between “1 = unconcerned” to “5 = very concerned”. Maternal perception about child overweight risk was evaluated using the perceived child weight construct (four items) that assessed the perception of child weight status history: “Your child during the first year of life,” “Your child as a toddler,” “Your child as a preschooler,” and “Your child kindergarten.” Response options of each item were as follows: “1 = markedly underweight”, “2 = underweight”, “3 = normal”, “4 = overweight”, and “5 = markedly overweight”. The two constructs showed high internal reliability, of which Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were 0.86 and 0.73, respectively.
Maternal feeding practices.
Three maternal feeding practices were assessed using constructs obtained from CFQ-A [20], including maternal restriction (“I have to be sure that my child does not eat too much of her favorite food,” “I intentionally keep some foods out of my child’s reach,” “If I did not guide or regulate my child’s eating, she would eat too many junk foods,” and “If I did not guide or regulate my child’s eating, she would eat too much of her favorite foods,” response options ranged from “1 = disagree” to “5 = agree”, α = 0.66); using food as a reward (“I give my child food to keep him/her quiet when shopping or traveling,” “I give my child food to reward him/her for good behavior,” “I withhold a food my child likes as a consequence for bad behavior,” “My child expects to be given a favorite food as a reward,” “I give my child a special food to celebrate an achievement,” and “I give my child food to persuade him/her to do something he/she does not really want to do,” with response options ranging from “1 = never” to “5 = very often”, α = 0.82); and monitoring (“How much do you keep track of the sweets (candy, ice cream cake, pies, pastries) that your child eats?” “How much do you keep track of the snack food (potato chips, Doritos, cheese puffs) that your child eats?” and “How much do you keep track of the high-fat foods that your child eats?” response options ranged from “1 = never” to “5 = always”, α = 0.83).
Statistical analysis
Data were described as mean ± standard deviation and frequency and percentages. Shapiro-Wilk test of normality was conducted to evaluate normality of continuous data. The results indicated that data were skewed (P < 0.05); therefore non-parametric tests were used. The correlations between the continuous variables were tested using Spearman’s correlation test. Differences in maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk across the groups of categorical variables were assessed using Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Multiple linear regression analyses (adjusted for child’s BMI-z score and sex and maternal BMI) were conducted to examine the independent associations of maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk with maternal feeding practices (restriction, using food as a reward, monitoring) and CEBs (food fussiness, slowness in eating, food enjoyment and responsiveness, and satiety responsiveness). We used two-sided tests for the analyses, and P value < 0.05 was set to indicate significance. All the analyses were performed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0 (Armonk, NY).
Results
Characteristics of the sample and maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk
Table 1 shows the sociodemographic characteristics of the participants. Approximately two-thirds of the children were boys (n = 68, 59.1%). The mean BMI-z score of children was 0.21±1.38, ranging between -3.64 and 4.37. The majority of children in our sample were Saudis (n = 86, 74.8%). Maternal age ranged between 20.1 to 50.1 years old. Approximately half of the mothers were unemployed (n = 62, 53.9%), whereas the majority had completed a college degree or higher (n = 92, 80%). Maternal BMI was found to be positively correlated with the BMI-z score of children (r = 0.26, P = 0.01).
The mean scale scores of maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk and CEBs are illustrated in Table 2. Bivariate analyses were also conducted to investigate whether maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk are linked to the sociodemographic variables. Significantly positive but weak correlation was observed between maternal concern and maternal BMI (r = 0.19, P = 0.04). The mean scale scores of maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk were not found to be significantly different across all the sociodemographic groups (P > 0.05).
The correlation between maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk, maternal feeding practices, and child eating behaviors
Table 3 illustrates the correlation between maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk, maternal feeding practices, and CEBs. No correlation between maternal concern about child weight and maternal use of restriction (r = 0.05), using food as a reward (r = -0.09), or monitoring (r = -0.14) was observed (P > 0.05 for all). Yet, maternal concern about child weight was positively correlated with child enjoyment of food (r = 0.25, P < 0.01) and child responsiveness to food (r = 0.21, P = 0.02).
Maternal perception about child overweight risk was not found to be correlated with maternal feeding practices, including use of restriction (r = 0.12), using food as a reward (r = -0.04), or monitoring (r = 0.10), (P > 0.05 for all). However, maternal perception about child overweight risk was found to be positively correlated with child’s BMI-z score (r = 0.48, P < 0.01), whereas a negative significant correlation was observed with child slowness in eating (r = -0.34, P < 0.01).
Associations of maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk with maternal feeding practices
Multiple regression analyses were conducted to investigate whether maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk predict maternal feeding practices and CEBs, Table 4. Maternal concern was not associated with the use of restriction (B = 0.17 [95% confidence intervals (CI) = -0.05,0.37]), using food as a reward (B = -0.11 [-0.30,0.08]), or monitoring (B = -0.04 [-0.18, 0.10]). Similarly, maternal perception was not found to be associated with maternal use of restriction (B = 0.60 [-0.11, 1.31]), using food as a reward (B = 0.45 [-0.18, 1.09]), or monitoring (B = -0.14 [-0.61, 0.32]).
Associations of maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk with child eating behaviors
Positive associations were observed between maternal concern about child weight and child enjoyment of food (B = 0.14 [0.02,0.27]) and responsiveness to food (B = 0.16 [0.03, 0.29]), whereas a negative association with child’s food fussiness was found (B = -0.19 [-0.33, -0.04]). Maternal perception about child overweight risk was inversely related to child slowness in eating (B = -0.72 [-0.16, -0.28]).
Discussion
The present study was the first to examine the relationships of maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk with maternal feeding practices and CEBs in Saudi Arabia. Contrary to findings of other studies [10, 13], maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk were not found to be associated with maternal feeding practices among our sample. On the other hand, maternal concern about child weight predicted higher levels of child enjoyment and responsiveness to food and lower levels of food fussiness, whereas maternal perception about child overweight risk was negatively associated with child slowness in eating.
Children are born with an innate ability to regulate their food intake. However, as they grow, their eating behaviors are increasingly influenced by extrinsic factors such as parental eating behaviors, foods made available to children, and the utilized feeding styles [28]. The existing evidence indicates that CEBs are strongly related to their weight status. Overweight children tend to be less responsive to satiety clues and more responsive to food compared to normal-weight children, whereas low responsiveness to satiety clues has been linked to child’s weight gain [29]. Hence, efforts to reduce the prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity had focused on understanding CEBs and associated factors that could influence their weight status. Nevertheless, findings of the present study suggest that maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk is an important area to consider when designing childhood obesity interventions.
Even though children’s body weight in the present study was not found to be associated with maternal concern about child weight, the higher degree of concern about child weight predicted greater food enjoyment and responsiveness in children and lower levels of food fussiness. Food enjoyment and responsiveness are food approach eating behavior traits that have been linked to increased child weight [30], whereas food fussiness is a food avoidance eating behavior trait that has been linked to decreased child weight [30]. These findings indicate that maternal concern about child weight could unintentionally result in counterproductive effect promoting obesity traits. Several studies have suggested that feeding practices could be the most influential factor in shaping CEBs, and that altered eating behaviors can be due to feeding practices that have overridden the child’s ability to self-regulate food intake [15, 16]. Specifically, the existing data suggest that parents may alter their feeding practices in response to perceptions towards the eating behavior traits exhibited among their children [31, 32] and concerns for children’s weight status [33]. A previous study investigated the association of maternal concern for child’s overweight status with the feeding practices; Mothers with greater concern were less likely to use pressure to eat and more likely to restrict food; However, maternal feeding practices and children’s overweight status were not found to be associated [34]. Nevertheless, prospective studies are needed to elucidate whether maternal concern about child weight would result in higher weight status on the long-term.
A previous study conducted among Australian children and their mothers observed greater use of restriction among mothers with higher levels of concern for their child being overweight, whereas no association was observed with maternal use of food as a reward or monitoring feeding practices [10]. Similar finding has been reported by a study conducted in the Unites States [13]. Contrary to these findings, our data did not indicate an association between maternal concern towards child body weight and maternal feeding practices, including food restriction, monitoring, and using food as a reward. This variation could be attributed to cross-cultural differences in societal norms for the role and responsibility of the Saudi mothers in child feeding along with the accessibility to childcare centers, which may affect the quality time spent between the mother and her child [20, 35].
Slowness in eating has been linked to decreased energy intake [6], whereas increased eating speed was found to be associated with child obesity [7]. In the present study, BMI-z score of children was negatively correlated with slowness in eating. Hence, children may benefit from utilizing a family-based intervention approach targeting to reduce speed of eating. A study conducted by Faith et al. has examined the effectiveness of “Reduced Eating Pace” intervention program that aimed to improve CEBs. Findings indicated that the use of psychoeducational and behavioral techniques resulted in increased slowness in eating and food enjoyment and less weight gain [36].
Our data showed a negative association between maternal perception about the child overweight risk and child slowness in eating, whereas no association between maternal perception and maternal feeding practices was observed. These findings suggest that children of mothers who perceive the child as being overweight or obese are possibly reacting to maternal perception. Perhaps, the child is translating his/her emotions by reacting negatively to maternal concern, increasing rate of eating to rapidly finish the served meal. However, further studies are needed to understand factors that could influence child’s eating speed.
To the best of our knowledge, this study was the first to evaluate the associations between maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk and CEBs. Anthropometric measurements of children were objectively assessed, and the sample was recruited from several preschools located in various regions around Jeddah city, Saudi Arabia. Limitations of our study include its relatively small sample size and the low response rate. Incentivizing research participants in future work might be necessary to encourage participation and to enhance response rates [37]. Furthermore, maternal height and weight were self-reported, which could be susceptible to recall bias. Additionally, due to the high proportion of mothers holding a college degree, findings of this study might not be generalizable to children of mothers with lower educational status.
This study provides evidence that maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk are linked to obesogenic CEBs. Specifically, maternal concern about child weight was found to be associated with higher levels of child enjoyment and responsiveness to food and lower levels of food fussiness, whereas maternal perception about child overweight risk was negatively associated with child slowness in eating. Our findings will inform childhood obesity interventions targeting CEBs to address maternal concern and perception about child weight status and to incorporate mothers into the intervention programs. Mothers who are concerned about their child weight or perceive their children as overweight may need guidance and support to promote healthy CEBs. Furthermore, and in contrast to findings of other studies, we did not detect an association between maternal concern or perception about child overweight risk and maternal feeding practices. This may indicate the variation in the expression or extent of maternal concerns across cultures. Future qualitative cross-cultural studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanisms for the influence of maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk on CEBs and weight status. Additionally, further longitudinal research studies may examine the cause-and-effect relationships between maternal concern and perception about child overweight risk and CEBs.
Acknowledgments
Thanks are due to all participating preschools and mothers. The authors would also like to thank Ms. Raima Alhebshi for her administrative assistance during data collection.
References
- 1. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight 2020 [Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight.
- 2. Emeth Á, Ojala K, Ravens-Sieberer U, Todd J, Woynarowska BN, Janssen I, et al. Comparison of overweight and obesity prevalence in school-aged youth from 34 countries and their relationships with physical activity and dietary patterns. Obesity Reviews. 2005;6(2):123–32. pmid:15836463
- 3. Katzmarzyk PT, Chaput JP, Fogelholm M, Hu G, Maher C, Maia J, et al. International study of childhood obesity, lifestyle and the environment (ISCOLE): Contributions to understanding the global obesity epidemic. Nutrients. 2019;11(4):484. pmid:30991687
- 4. Van Stralen MM, Te Velde SJ, Singh AS, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Martens MK, Van Der Sluis M, et al. European Energy balance Research to prevent excessive weight Gain among Youth (ENERGY) project: Design and methodology of the ENERGY cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):1–20. pmid:21281466
- 5. Vollmer RL, Mobley AR. Parenting styles, feeding styles, and their influence on child obesogenic behaviors and body weight. A review. Appetite. 2017;71:232–41. pmid:24001395
- 6. Andrade AM, Greene GW, Melanson KJ. Eating slowly led to decreases in energy intake within meals in healthy women. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2008;108(7):1186–91. pmid:18589027
- 7. Murakami K, Miyake Y, Sasaki S, Tanaka K, Arakawa M. Self-reported rate of eating and risk of overweight in Japanese children: Ryukyus child health study. Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology. 2012;58(4):247–52. pmid:23132308
- 8. Liszewska N, Scholz U, Radtke T, Horodyska K, Luszczynska A. Bi-directional associations between parental feeding practices and children’s body mass in parent-child dyads. Appetite. 2018;129:192–7. pmid:30017947
- 9. Harrison M, Brodribb W, Davies PS, Hepworth J. Impact of maternal infant weight perception on infant feeding and dietary intake. Maternal and child health journal. 2018;22(8):1135–45. pmid:29497984
- 10. Haines J, Downing KL, Tang L, Campbell KJ, Hesketh KD. Associations between maternal concern about child’s weight and related behaviours and maternal weight-related parenting practices: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2018;15(1):1–9. pmid:30355337
- 11. Swyden K, Sisson SB, Morris AS, Lora K, Weedn AE, Copeland KA, et al. Association between maternal stress, work status, concern about child weight, and restrictive feeding practices in preschool children. Maternal and child health journal. 2017;21(6):1349–57. pmid:28138826
- 12. Spill MK, Callahan EH, Shapiro MJ, Spahn JM, Wong YP, Benjamin-Neelon SE, et al. Caregiver feeding practices and child weight outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;109:990S–1002S. pmid:30982865
- 13. Branch JM, Appugliese DP, Rosenblum KL, Miller AL, Lumeng JC, Bauer KW. Feeding and mealtime correlates of maternal concern about children’s weight. Journal of nutrition education and behavior. 2017;49(6):490–6. e1. pmid:28457715
- 14. Etelson D, Brand DA, Patrick PA, Shirali A. Childhood obesity: Do parents recognize this health risk? Obes Res. 2003;11(11):1362–8. pmid:14627757
- 15. Campbell K, Andrianopoulos N, Hesketh K, Ball K, Crawford D, Brennan L, et al. Parental use of restrictive feeding practices and child BMI z-score. A 3-year prospective cohort study. Appetite. 2010;55(1):84–8. pmid:20420869
- 16. Faith MS, Scanlon KS, Birch LL, Francis LA, Sherry B. Parent-child feeding strategies and their relationships to child eating and weight status. Obes Res. 2004;12(11):1711–22. pmid:15601964
- 17. Hidalgo-Mendez J, Power TG, Fisher JO, O’Connor TM, Hughes SO. Child weight status and accuracy of perceived child weight status as predictors of Latina mothers’ feeding practices and styles. Appetite. 2019;142:104387. pmid:31369764
- 18. Demir D, Bektas M. The effect of childrens’ eating behaviors and parental feeding style on childhood obesity. Eating Behaviors. 2017;26:137–42. pmid:28363115
- 19. Saguy AC, Almeling R. Fat in the fire? Science, the news media, and the "obesity epidemic". Sociological Forum. 2008;23(1):53–83.
- 20. Mosli RH. Validation of the Child Feeding Questionnaire among Saudi pre-schoolers in Jeddah city. Public Health Nutrition. 2020;23(4):559–608. pmid:31516100
- 21. Al-Hussaini A, Bashir MS, Khormi M, AlTuraiki M, Alkhamis W, Alrajhi M, et al. Overweight and obesity among Saudi children and adolescents: Where do we stand today? Saudi journal of gastroenterology: official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. 2019;25(4):229. pmid:31187784
- 22. Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(2):121–6. pmid:24049221
- 23. Ek A, Sorjonen K, Eli K, Lindberg L, Nyman J, Marcus C, et al. Associations between parental concerns about preschoolers’ weight and eating and parental feeding practices: results from analyses of the child eating behavior questionnaire, the child feeding questionnaire, and the lifestyle behavior checklist. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147257. pmid:26799397
- 24.
WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO child growth standards: length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-forheight and body mass index-for-age: methods and development.: World Health Organization; 2006.
- 25. Wardle J, Guthrie CA, Sanderson S, Rapoport L. Development of the children’s eating behaviour questionnaire. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. 2001;42(7):963–70. pmid:11693591
- 26.
Alhamad AH. Validation of the Children’s Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (CEBQ) in the population of Saudi preschoolers: University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand; 2013.
- 27. Birch LL, Fisher JO, Grimm-Thomas K, Markey CN, Sawyer R, Johnson SL. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Child Feeding Questionnaire: a measure of parental attitudes, beliefs and practices about child feeding and obesity proneness. Appetite. 2001;36(3):201–10. pmid:11358344
- 28. Birch LL, Deysher M. Caloric compensation and sensory specific satiety: evidence for self regulation of food intake by young children. Appetite. 1986;7(4):323–31. pmid:3789709
- 29. Llewellyn CH, Trzaskowski M, Van Jaarsveld CH, Plomin R, Wardle J. Satiety mechanisms in genetic risk of obesity. JAMA Pediatrics. 2014;186(4):338–44. pmid:24535189
- 30. Boswell N, Byrne R, Davies PSW. Eating behavior traits associated with demographic variables and implications for obesity outcomes in early childhood. Appetite. 2018;120:482–90. pmid:29024677
- 31. Tripicchio GL, Keller KL, Johnson C, Pietrobelli A, Heo M, Faith MS. Differential maternal feeding practices, eating self-regulation, and adiposity in young twins. Pediatrics. 2014;134(5):e1399–e404. pmid:25311601
- 32. Harris HA, Fildes A, Mallan KM, Llewellyn CH. Maternal feeding practices and fussy eating in toddlerhood: A discordant twin analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2016;13(1):1–9. pmid:27412445
- 33. Payne LO, Galloway AT, Webb RM. Parental use of differential restrictive feeding practices with siblings. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity. 2011;6:e540–6. pmid:21615232
- 34. May AL, Donohue M, Scanlon KS, Sherry B, Dalenius K, Faulkner P, et al. Child-feeding strategies are associated with maternal concern about children becoming overweight, but not children’s weight status. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2007;107(7):1167–74. pmid:17604746
- 35. Blissett J, Bennett C. Cultural differences in parental feeding practices and children’s eating behaviours and their relationships with child BMI: A comparison of Black Afro-Caribbean, White British and White German samples. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(2):180–4. pmid:23232584
- 36. Faith MS, Diewald LK, Crabbe S, Burgess B, Berkowitz RI. Reduced Eating Pace (RePace) behavioral intervention for children prone to or with obesity: Does the turtle win the race? Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019;27(1):121–9. pmid:30515992
- 37. Smith MG, Witte M, Rocha S, Basner M. Effectiveness of incentives and follow-up on increasing survey response rates and participation in field studies. BMC medical research methodology. 2019;19(1):1–13.