Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Latinos: A cross-sectional study

  • Deborah G. Smith ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    deborah.smith@lsuhs.edu

    Affiliation Department of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Science Center Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana, United States of America

  • Corey D. Smith,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Science Center Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana, United States of America

  • Jennifer A. DeLeon,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Science Center Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana, United States of America

  • Jillian L. Sandoz,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Science Center Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana, United States of America

  • Carolina O. Ochoa,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Science Center Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana, United States of America

  • Martha P. Pearson,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Nursing, Northwestern State University of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana, United States of America

  • Raimunda H. M. Macena

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Medicine, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil

Abstract

Vaccination against COVID-19 can prevent severe illness and reduce hospitalizations and deaths. Understanding and addressing determinants contributing to vaccine uptake among high-risk groups, such as Latinos, are pivotal in ensuring equitable vaccine distribution, promoting health equity, and fostering community engagement to bridge the gap in vaccine acceptance and ultimately enhance public health. This study aimed to examine factors influencing vaccine uptake among Latinos. We conducted a cross-sectional study using an online platform (n = 242). The survey was administered using a multimodal approach. Strategies for recruitment included community outreach, social media, and targeting community networks serving Latinos. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, and multivariable analysis were performed. Overall, 81.4% of respondents had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, with 77.0% recommending it and 70.6% believing it to be safe, 66.7% believing in its efficacy, 62.3% able to find trustful information in Spanish or Portuguese, and almost 40% who relied on health organizations as their primary resource for COVID-19 vaccine information. Factors significantly associated with vaccine uptake included higher education level (p<0.001), English level (p = 0.023), living in an urban area (p = 0.048), having insurance (p<0.001), and having a healthcare provider (p = 0.007). Furthermore, belief in vaccine safety and efficacy, trust in public health authorities, concerns about COVID-19, the ability to determine true/false vaccine information during the pandemic, and the availability of trustworthy information in Spanish/Portuguese had statistically significant associations (p<0.05) with COVID-19 vaccine uptake. COVID-19 vaccine uptake differed based on sociodemographic and other modifiable factors. Our findings emphasize the importance of implementing targeted interventions and culturally sensitive communication strategies to improve vaccination uptake among the Latino community in the United States.

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified the existing health and social disparities that affect ethnic and racial minority communities and has particularly affected Latino communities in the United States (US). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Hispanic/Latino population had the highest morbidity and mortality rates among all minority groups in the US [1]. Current data show that 24% of COVID-19 cases are among Latinos, 12.7% among African Americans, and 4.4% among Asians in the United States. Mortality rates are also higher among Latinos compared to other minorities: 16.4% Latinos, 13% African Americans, and 3.2% Asians [2]. Vaccination against COVID-19 can prevent severe illness and reduce hospitalizations and deaths [3]. To achieve equitable and sustainable vaccination rates, it is important to identify determinants that contribute to vaccine uptake among high-risk groups, such as Latinos.

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines vaccine hesitancy as the delay in accepting or refusing vaccines despite the availability of vaccination services [4]. When COVID-19 vaccines became available in December 2020, vaccine uptake among African Americans and Latinos remained low partly due to inequities in vaccine distribution across the US [5]. As of March 25, 2023, the CDC reports that 89.1% of Latinos in the United States have received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. This vaccination rate is slightly higher than the 87.0% rate among non-Latino White Americans and similar to the 89.2% rate among African Americans [6]. Asian Americans, meanwhile, have the highest vaccination rate at 98.2% [6]. Barriers and facilitators to vaccination may differ across settings and populations depending on the contextual environment, available resources, and prevalent cultural myths, beliefs, and practices [7]. Identifying factors associated with COVID-19 acceptance among minority groups can assist public health authorities in developing effective strategies to improve vaccination uptake.

Developing targeted strategies for COVID-19 vaccine uptake requires understanding social, cultural, and political contexts among different racial/ethnic groups [8]. Ethnic minority groups, including Latinos, often reside in socioeconomically disadvantaged regions, which poses challenges in accessing healthcare [9]. Furthermore, limited education serves as another barrier to healthcare, which is also linked to different vaccination rates across the country among minority groups [10]. Additionally, studies have shown that people from racial and ethnic minority groups have limited access to job opportunities that offer health insurance and paid sick leave [11]. Misinformation, myths, mistrust in the government, political and religious beliefs, and concerns about vaccine safety may also increase public anxiety about vaccines and politicize vaccination policies [12, 13].

The literature has limited information on factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Latinos in Northwest Louisiana. Therefore, this study aims to fill this gap by identifying the factors influencing vaccine uptake among the Latino population in Louisiana and providing recommendations to increase vaccination rates. By understanding the underlying barriers and facilitators, we can develop culturally sensitive and effective interventions to achieve health equity for Latino communities. This research holds significant public health implications for mitigating the impact of COVID-19 and ensuring that everyone, regardless of their cultural or ethnic background, has equal access to vaccines and the opportunity to protect their health and well-being. In addition, this study is unique because specifically targets Latinos in Northwest Louisiana. Geographic variations can play a significant role in health-related behaviors and access to healthcare.

Material and methods

Study design and setting

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Northwest Louisiana from June 1, 2022, to March 13, 2023. According to the 2020 United States Census, 26,838 Hispanics or Latinos live in Northwest Louisiana, accounting for 8% of the total population in this area. Northwest Louisiana comprises 13 parishes: Bienville, Bossier, Caddo, Claiborne, DeSoto, Jackson, Lincoln, Natchitoches, Red River, Sabine, Union, Winn, and Webster [14, 15].

Participants

The target sample size for our study was 200 with a ±5% margin of error and a confidence level of 95%. A total of 242 participants took part in the survey. Eligible criteria included age 18 or older, identifying as Hispanic or Latino in race/ethnicity, and currently residing in Northwest Louisiana.

Data collection

The survey was administered to participants via the Survey Monkey® platform using non-probabilistic snowball sampling and time-location sampling (TLS) methods. The snowball sampling method relies on existing participants to refer others, helping to include individuals who might not be easily accessible or known to the researchers [1618]. For instance, we engaged community leaders within the Latino population by inviting them to participate in the survey and encouraging them to extend the invitation to their peers. Additionally, we utilized the snowball sampling approach, leveraging healthcare organizations and local clinics in Northwest Louisiana to promote awareness about the study. These clinics allowed our research team to present information about the study in their waiting room and invite their patients to answer the survey. In addition, we shared the research flyer with patients so they could distribute the survey link and QR code to their family and friends. This method allowed us to obtain a reasonably representative sample of Latinos living in northwest Louisiana. We used different platforms to disseminate the survey, such as Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. The time-location sampling (TLS) method was utilized to obtain the target sample size. The primary aim of TLS is to sample individuals at frequently visited locations, but to avoid undercoverage bias, it is necessary to identify locations that a significant proportion of the target population visits regularly [19]. Before the survey, we identified such locations by contacting nonprofit organizations and community leaders to map specific locations and times where we could reach out to the target population. We conducted community outreach at church events, local health clinics, and Latino markets, distributing flyers and asking eligible people to answer the study survey. Participants were asked to complete a brief anonymous survey available in three languages to ensure inclusivity: Spanish, Portuguese, and English.

Variables

Data was collected using a structured questionnaire containing the following variables: sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, COVID-19-related experiences, COVID-19 testing, perceived risk of infection, COVID-19 vaccination (at least one dose), and the likelihood of accepting COVID-19 vaccine. Participant characteristics in the survey included geographic region, age, sex, country, educational attainment, marital status, religion, and employment. Sex was classified as female or male. Age was classified into three categories (18–24, 25–49, and higher than or equal to 50). We classified the education level into three groups: less than high school, high school or GED, and more than high school. The poverty level was organized into two categories (below and above the poverty line). This variable was calculated based on household size and the U.S. Federal Poverty Guidelines for 2023 [20].

Data analysis

The collected data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences® (SPSS), version 28. We used descriptive statistics to summarize and compare the characteristics of the overall sample. We used chi-square tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables to compare differences in vaccine acceptance by participants’ characteristics and other determinants.

Ethical approval

This study was approved on March 28, 2022, by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Louisiana State University Shreveport (#2021–00029). A written consent was obtained before completing the self-administered questionnaire.

Results

The survey had 242 participants with an average age of 42.2 years (standard deviation of 12.10 years). Most participants were female, accounting for 64.9% of the group; 56.6% were born in Mexico; 37.7% had completed high school education; and 38.4% reported a lack of English proficiency. The majority, 61.3%, were married; 61.2% lived in an urban area; 51.1% were below the poverty level; and 66.1% didn’t have insurance (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of respondents (N = 242).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302332.t001

Overall, 81.4% had received the COVID-19 vaccine, with 77.0% recommending it and 70.6% believing it to be safe; 66.7% believed in its efficacy; 62.3% could find trusted information in Spanish/Portuguese; and almost 40% relied on health organizations as their primary resource for COVID-19 vaccine information (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Willingness, beliefs, and awareness towards COVID-19 vaccine among Latinos.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302332.t002

Factors significantly associated with vaccine uptake included age 50 years or older (p = 0.038), a higher education level (p<0.001), speaking English well (p = 0.027), living in an urban area (p = 0.038), having insurance (p<0.001), and having a healthcare provider (p = 0.009) (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Sociodemographic factors influencing the COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Latinos.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302332.t003

Attitudes and beliefs towards the COVID-19 vaccine also influenced the Latino community in Northwest Louisiana. Several attitudinal factors had statistically significant associations (p<0.05) with COVID-19 vaccine uptake: Having been tested for COVID-19, worried about getting COVID-19, believing in vaccine safety and efficacy, trust in public health authorities, concerns about COVID-19, the ability to determine true/false vaccine information during the pandemic, and the availability of trustworthy information in Spanish or Portuguese (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 4. Attitudes and beliefs influencing COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Latinos.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0302332.t004

Discussion

Before the COVID-19 vaccine became available, several previous studies conducted in the United States showed that one-third of the adult population reported they would not get it [21, 22]. In these studies, vaccine acceptance was lower for certain racial and ethnic groups, such as Blacks and Latinos [2325]. Despite the hesitance predicted by those studies, our findings showed that Latinos in Louisiana had a similar vaccination acceptance rate to the national data, where 89.1% of Latinos reported receiving at least one dose of the vaccine [6]. Mass vaccination campaigns and community outreach in Louisiana provided equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines, potentially closing coverage gaps among Latinos [26]. A recent survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 54% of Hispanic adults and 51% of Black adults say they will get the new COVID-19 vaccine, compared to 42% of White adults [27].

Our results also showed that beliefs in vaccine safety and efficacy were associated with increased vaccine uptake among Latinos. Individuals who believed the vaccine to be safe and effective were more likely to get vaccinated, indicating the importance of communication strategies that address vaccine safety concerns. In addition, trust in public health authorities is essential for fostering confidence in vaccination programs [28]. This also coincides with our results, as survey responses that indicated greater trust in public health officials were associated with higher vaccination acceptance. Furthermore, concerns about COVID-19’s morbidity and mortality were associated with increased vaccination uptake [5, 29]. Individuals more concerned about COVID-19 were more likely to get vaccinated, highlighting the role of risk perception in vaccine decision-making [30]. This aligns with our findings that those who were more concerned with COVID-19 had higher vaccination uptake.

This study showed that older adults were more likely to be vaccinated than younger adults, which correlates with other research showing generational differences in vaccination beliefs. This may mean that younger people believe they have better immunity and do not need to be vaccinated or that they are more exposed to vaccine-related misinformation [31]. The 2021 Household Pulse Survey data showed that older adults in the United States had an intent or willingness to become vaccinated once the vaccine was shown to be safe [31]. Studies showed higher vaccine willingness and acceptance among Latinos and older adult groups in the United States, possibly due to risk perception and knowledge about COVID-19 outcomes [5, 32, 33].

Access to healthcare services and information provided by healthcare professionals can positively influence vaccine decision-making [34, 35]. In this study, Latinos with health insurance and a healthcare provider (HCP) were more likely to be vaccinated than those without insurance and HCP. We also found that Latinos living in urban areas were more likely to get vaccinated than those living in suburban or rural areas. This may be partly due to urban areas typically having better access to healthcare facilities and vaccination centers, which may contribute to the higher vaccine uptake in these regions [36]. Additionally, urban areas are more likely to have higher infection rates and a greater awareness of the “risk of mortality,” which can increase fear of disease and a willingness for vaccine uptake, as discussed previously [29].

Educational factors have also been shown to influence COVID-19 vaccination uptake among different racial and ethnic groups in the United States [35, 37]. Our study showed that Latinos with higher education levels were more likely to accept the COVID-19 vaccine than those with lower education attainment. This aligns with previous research, which suggests that individuals with higher education tend to be more health-conscious and possess greater vaccine literacy, enabling them to better understand the benefits of vaccination [3840].

Cultural factors also influenced vaccination acceptance. Although treated as a homogenous population, every Latino subgroup represents many nations of origin, each being culturally distinct and containing different cultural beliefs about vaccines. Overall, Hispanic and Latinx people are deeply rooted in language, family, and religion. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the value of protecting family members was emphasized through interventions promoting the importance of testing and vaccination [41]. In this population, COVID-19 vaccination coverage was high, including the number of individuals expressing favor regarding vaccination for their children and confidence in recommending the vaccine to others [42]. This reveals a willingness across behavioral characteristics to accept and receive vaccination. Studies showed relatively high acceptance rates among Latinx individuals in Mexico, Brazil, and Ecuador [28, 43]. Hispanic and Latinx people rely on trusted resources for vaccine-related decision-making. These include community members like bilingual health workers and religious groups, as well as authoritative online sources such as the World Health Organization [44, 45]. These trusted sources have served to address information gaps about vaccines, specifically for COVID-19, and strengthen confidence in vaccine safety and importance.

Although progress in vaccine acceptance is evident, continued efforts are still needed to achieve higher vaccination rates for the Latino population in Northwest Louisiana. Even though many Latino people have accepted the COVID-19 vaccine, vaccine hesitancy persists. Prior studies have identified several factors that contribute to this hesitancy, such as mistrust of medical personnel, mistrust of the health system, and medical racism [46]. Requirements of identification and eligibility, mistrust of the government, and anti-immigration policies also play a role in this hesitancy [47]. These are further complicated by inadequate access to language-appropriate and culturally concordant services and information, cost-related concerns, and misconceptions about vaccine side effects [48, 49]. In addition, cultural traditions, such as mistrust of non-natural medicines, lead to a preference for traditional herbal or home remedies. This can contribute to the belief that vaccination is unnecessary.

Studies have shown that there has been an increased willingness and change in attitude towards the COVID-19 vaccine over time [50]. This trend shows promise for public health campaigns to increase vaccine uptake, and implementing evidence-based practices and programs could help increase vaccine coverage [51, 52]. One study in San Francisco demonstrated increased COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Latino populations through a community-centered (neighborhood) vaccination program that included mobilization, vaccination, and activation that addressed and overcame barriers to COVID-19 vaccination [45]. The program utilized social networks to boost vaccination coverage. Most Latino individuals reported vaccine coverage at the site due to its neighborhood location, convenient scheduling, and recommendation by a trusted community member, friend, or family member [45].

Developing targeted strategies for COVID-19 vaccine uptake requires understanding social, cultural, and political contexts among different racial/ethnic groups. Incorporating these in our interventions can help eradicate misconceptions related to vaccination and other health issues. Promoting vaccine uptake among Latino communities in the US requires culturally sensitive and community-specific strategies. These strategies may include: 1. Culturally Tailored Campaigns: Provide information about vaccines in Spanish and Portuguese using culturally relevant messaging and visuals that resonate with Hispanic/Latino cultural values and traditions. In addition, healthcare providers should receive cultural competency training to understand better the needs and concerns of Hispanic/Latino patients. 2. Community Outreach: Organize vaccination and educational events in accessible locations, such as community centers, churches, and schools. Ensure flexible hours to accommodate work schedules. And engage community leaders, organizations, and influencers to disseminate vaccine information. 3: Health Promoters (Promotores de Salud)—Train and empower community health workers (Promotores de Salud) who are trusted community members to provide information, address concerns, and facilitate access to vaccination. 4. Language Services: Provide interpretation services at vaccination sites for those with Limited English Proficiency (LEP). 5. Data Collection: Collect and analyze demographic data to track vaccine uptake within the Hispanic/Latino community. This helps identify areas of improvement and evaluate the effectiveness of strategies. 6. Long-term Engagement: Continue engagement with the community beyond vaccination efforts to address ongoing healthcare needs and build a lasting relationship.

Limitations

Due to the online nature of our study, we encountered several limitations. First, the survey’s reliance on internet access may have excluded individuals with limited digital literacy, potentially limiting the representation of certain segments within the Latino community in Northwest Louisiana. Additionally, the voluntary nature of the survey could have led to self-selection bias, favoring respondents who were more directly affected by COVID-19 or held stronger opinions, possibly resulting in an overrepresentation of specific subgroups. Moreover, an anonymous Internet survey offered limited control over participant demographics, leading to variations in the study groups’ gender and age distribution, which may not fully represent the entire region’s population. Although logistic regression analysis was not conducted in this study due to the limited sample size, our findings are consistent with previous research on COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Latinos. This strengthens the external validity of our study and provides further support for the importance of addressing vaccine hesitancy and uptake in this population. Another potential limitation of this study was that we did not differentiate between the primary COVID-19 vaccination series and the booster vaccination when collecting responses, both of which were being administered within the study’s timeframe. Factors influencing booster vaccination uptake could have differed from primary vaccination uptake, which may have given additional insight into vaccination uptake challenges. In addition, we did not compare response differences between responses given in 2022 and responses given in 2023, which may have revealed evolving risk factors from one year to the next. Despite these limitations, our study provides valuable insights into the unique perceptions of Latinos towards the COVID-19 vaccine, encouraging future research to explore diverse data collection methods for a more comprehensive understanding.

Conclusion

Tailoring strategies to the specific needs, beliefs, and challenges of Latino communities is crucial for increasing vaccine uptake and improving public health outcomes. A multi-dimensional approach is needed to improve perceptions around vaccinations in general and COVID-19 shots specifically. Collaboration between healthcare providers, community leaders, and organizations is essential for the success of these efforts.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank the MLK Health Center and Pharmacy in Shreveport for allowing us to use their facility to promote this research. We also thank Ms. Marilu Rodriguez, a Latina health advocate at MLK, for helping us to reach out to the Latino community. We also want to thank the NSU Spanish Club Shreveport for helping us with our community outreach and the local radio station, 318 Latino Radio Station, for allowing us to use their Facebook platform to promote this research.

References

  1. 1. Shortreed SM, Gray R, Akosile MA, Walker RL, Fuller S, Temposky L, et al. Increased COVID-19 infection risk drives racial and ethnic disparities in severe COVID-19 outcomes. Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities. 2023;10(1):149–59. pmid:35072944
  2. 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID Data Tracker. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2023.
  3. 3. Alarcón-Braga EA, Hernandez-Bustamante EA, Salazar-Valdivia FE, Valdez-Cornejo VA, Mosquera-Rojas MD, Ulloque-Badaracco JR, et al. Acceptance towards COVID-19 vaccination in Latin America and the Caribbean: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel medicine and infectious disease. 2022;49:102369. pmid:35680058
  4. 4. Butler R, MacDonald NE. Diagnosing the determinants of vaccine hesitancy in specific subgroups: The Guide to Tailoring Immunization Programmes (TIP). Vaccine. 2015;33(34):4176–9. pmid:25896376
  5. 5. Delgado-Gallegos JL, Padilla-Rivas GR, Zúñiga-Violante E, Avilés-Rodríguez G, Arellanos-Soto D, Gastelum-Arias LJ, et al. Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cross-Sectional Study on a Mexican Population Using an Online Questionnaire (COV-AHQ). Front Public Health. 2021;9:728690. Epub 20211126. pmid:34900890.
  6. 6. COVID-19 Vaccinations in the United States [Internet]. 2021 [cited August 30, 2021]. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations_vacc-people-fully-percent-total.
  7. 7. Garcini LM, Pham TT, Ambriz AM, Lill S, Tsevat J. COVID‐19 diagnostic testing among underserved Latino communities: Barriers and facilitators. Health & social care in the community. 2022;30(5):e1907–e16. pmid:34719072
  8. 8. Kriss JL, Hung MC, Srivastav A, Black CL, Lindley MC, Lee JT, et al. COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage, by Race and Ethnicity—National Immunization Survey Adult COVID Module, United States, December 2020-November 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(23):757–63. Epub 20220610. pmid:35679179.
  9. 9. Cheng Z, Li Y. Racial and ethnic and income disparities in COVID-19 vaccination among Medicare beneficiaries. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022;70(9):2638–45. Epub 20220607. pmid:35639044.
  10. 10. Bergen N, Kirkby K, Fuertes CV, Schlotheuber A, Menning L, Mac Feely S, et al. Global state of education-related inequality in COVID-19 vaccine coverage, structural barriers, vaccine hesitancy, and vaccine refusal: findings from the Global COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey. The Lancet Global Health. 2023;11(2):e207–e17. pmid:36565702
  11. 11. Shearn C, Krockow EM. Reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in ethnic minority groups: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of initial attitudes in qualitative research. SSM Qual Res Health. 2023;3:100210. Epub 20221222. pmid:36573229.
  12. 12. Brown A, Sperandio M, Turssi C, Leite RMA, Berton V, Succi R, et al. Vaccine confidence and hesitancy in Brazil. Cadernos de saude publica. 2018;34 9:e00011618. pmid:30281705
  13. 13. Sarathchandra D, Navin MC, Largent MA, McCright AM. A survey instrument for measuring vaccine acceptance. Prev Med. 2018;109:1–7. Epub 2018/01/18. pmid:29337069.
  14. 14. State of Louisiana Division of Administration. About Louisiana 2021 [cited 2021 November 12]. https://www.louisiana.gov/about-louisiana/.
  15. 15. Population Estimates, April 1, 2020 [Internet]. 2020. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/shreveportcitylouisiana/POP010220.
  16. 16. Parker C, Scott S, Geddes A. Snowball sampling. SAGE research methods foundations. 2019.
  17. 17. Sharma G. Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International journal of applied research. 2017;3(7):749–52.
  18. 18. Dusek G, Yurova Y, Ruppel CP. Using social media and targeted snowball sampling to survey a hard-to-reach population: A case study. International Journal of doctoral studies. 2015;10:279.
  19. 19. Siegfried Y, DeMatteis JM, Gollapudi B. Implementation of a sample design for a survey of program participants using time-location sampling. Plos one. 2023;18(5):e0285877. pmid:37195989
  20. 20. Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. HHS Poverty Guidelines for 2023 2023 [cited 2023 Jul 31]. https://aspe.hhs.gov/topics/poverty-economic-mobility/poverty-guidelines.
  21. 21. Daly M, Robinson E. Willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 in the US: representative longitudinal evidence from April to October 2020. American journal of preventive medicine. 2021;60(6):766–73.
  22. 22. Khubchandani J, Macias Y. COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in Hispanics and African-Americans: A review and recommendations for practice. Brain, behavior, & immunity-health. 2021;15:100277. pmid:34036287
  23. 23. Fisher KA, Bloomstone SJ, Walder J, Crawford S, Fouayzi H, Mazor KM. Attitudes toward a potential SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: a survey of US adults. Annals of internal medicine. 2020;173(12):964–73.
  24. 24. Malik AA, McFadden SM, Elharake J, Omer SB. Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the US. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;26. pmid:32838242
  25. 25. Szilagyi PG, Thomas K, Shah MD, Vizueta N, Cui Y, Vangala S, et al. National Trends in the US Public’s Likelihood of Getting a COVID-19 Vaccine—April 1 to December 8, 2020. JAMA. 2021;325(4):396–8. pmid:33372943
  26. 26. Smith DG, Vanchiere JA, Raley M, Yurochko AD, Bhuiyan MAN, Murnane KS, et al. COVID-19 drive-through mass vaccination in Northwest Louisiana. Journal of the Louisiana Public Health Association. 2022;2(2):30. pmid:36129424
  27. 27. KFF. KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor September 2023: Partisanship Remains Key Predictor of Views Of COVID-19, Including Plans To Get Latest COVID-19 Vaccine. 2023 September 27. Report No.
  28. 28. Sallam M. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Worldwide: A Concise Systematic Review of Vaccine Acceptance Rates. Vaccines. 2021;9(2):160. pmid:33669441
  29. 29. Baumgaertner B, Ridenhour BJ, Justwan F, Carlisle JE, Miller CR. Risk of disease and willingness to vaccinate in the United States: A population-based survey. PLOS Medicine. 2020;17(10):e1003354. pmid:33057373
  30. 30. Palamenghi L, Barello S, Boccia S, Graffigna G. Mistrust in biomedical research and vaccine hesitancy: the forefront challenge in the battle against COVID-19 in Italy. European journal of epidemiology. 2020;35:785–8. pmid:32808095
  31. 31. Adams SH, Schaub JP, Nagata JM, Park MJ, Brindis CD, Irwin CE Jr. Young adult perspectives on COVID-19 vaccinations. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2021;69(3):511–4. Epub 20210714. pmid:34274212.
  32. 32. Wang VH, Silver D, Pagán JA. Generational differences in beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines. Prev Med. 2022;157:107005. Epub 20220227. pmid:35235852.
  33. 33. Brandt EJ, Rosenberg J, Waselewski ME, Amaro X, Wasag J, Chang T. National Study of Youth Opinions on Vaccination for COVID-19 in the U.S. J Adolesc Health. 2021;68(5):869–72. Epub 20210403. pmid:33824070.
  34. 34. Reiter PL, Pennell ML, Katz ML. Acceptability of a COVID-19 vaccine among adults in the United States: How many people would get vaccinated? Vaccine. 2020;38(42):6500–7. pmid:32863069
  35. 35. Peña JM, Schwartz MR, Hernandez-Vallant A, Sanchez GR. Social and structural determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among racial and ethnic groups. J Behav Med. 2023;46(1–2):129–39. Epub 20230118. pmid:36652085.
  36. 36. Solís Arce JS, Warren SS, Meriggi NF, Scacco A, McMurry N, Voors M, et al. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in low-and middle-income countries. Nature medicine. 2021;27(8):1385–94. pmid:34272499
  37. 37. Keselman A, Arnott Smith C, Wilson AJ, Leroy G, Kaufman DR. Cognitive and Cultural Factors That Affect General Vaccination and COVID-19 Vaccination Attitudes. Vaccines. 2023;11(1):94. pmid:36679939
  38. 38. Wang Y, Liu Y. Multilevel determinants of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in the United States: A rapid systematic review. Preventive medicine reports. 2022;25:101673. pmid:34934611
  39. 39. Biasio LR, Zanobini P, Lorini C, Monaci P, Fanfani A, Gallinoro V, et al. COVID-19 vaccine literacy: A scoping review. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023;19(1):2176083. Epub 20230215. pmid:36794338.
  40. 40. Miller JD, Ackerman MS, Laspra B, Polino C, Huffaker JS. Public attitude toward Covid-19 vaccination: The influence of education, partisanship, biological literacy, and coronavirus understanding. Faseb j. 2022;36(7):e22382. pmid:35657606.
  41. 41. Garcini LM, Pham TT, Ambriz AM, Lill S, Tsevat J. COVID-19 diagnostic testing among underserved Latino communities: Barriers and facilitators. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2022;30(5):e1907–e16. pmid:34719072
  42. 42. Ruiz JB, Bell RA. Parental COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the United States. Public Health Reports. 2022;137(6):1162–9. pmid:35915993
  43. 43. Lazarus JV, Ratzan SC, Palayew A, Gostin LO, Larson HJ, Rabin K, et al. A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nature medicine. 2021;27(2):225–8. pmid:33082575
  44. 44. Ortiz AC, Akgün KM, Bazan IS. Embracing the Diversity of Latinx Communities to Promote Vaccinations. Yale J Biol Med. 2022;95(2):257–63. Epub 20220630. pmid:35782479.
  45. 45. Marquez C, Kerkhoff AD, Naso J, Contreras MG, Castellanos Diaz E, Rojas S, et al. A multi-component, community-based strategy to facilitate COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Latinx populations: From theory to practice. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(9):e0257111. pmid:34543291
  46. 46. Nuriddin A, Mooney G, White AIR. Reckoning with histories of medical racism and violence in the USA. Lancet. 2020;396(10256):949–51. pmid:33010829.
  47. 47. Martinez O, Wu E, Sandfort T, Dodge B, Carballo-Dieguez A, Pinto R, et al. Evaluating the Impact of Immigration Policies on Health Status Among Undocumented Immigrants: A Systematic Review. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2015;17(3):947–70. pmid:24375382
  48. 48. Macias Gil R, Marcelin JR, Zuniga-Blanco B, Marquez C, Mathew T, Piggott DA. COVID-19 Pandemic: Disparate Health Impact on the Hispanic/Latinx Population in the United States. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2020;222(10):1592–5. pmid:32729903
  49. 49. Khubchandani J, Sharma S, Price JH, Wiblishauser MJ, Sharma M, Webb FJ. COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy in the United States: A Rapid National Assessment. J Community Health. 2021;46(2):270–7. Epub 20210103. pmid:33389421.
  50. 50. Cordina M, Lauri MA. Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine hesitancy and intention to take the vaccine. Pharmacy Practice (Granada). 2021;19(1). pmid:33828623
  51. 51. Naeim A, Guerin RJ, Baxter-King R, Okun AH, Wenger N, Sepucha K, et al. Strategies to increase the intention to get vaccinated against COVID-19: Findings from a nationally representative survey of US adults, October 2020 to October 2021. Vaccine. 2022;40(52):7571–8. Epub 20220912. pmid:36357290.
  52. 52. Markovic-Denic L, Nikolic V, Pavlovic N, Maric G, Jovanovic A, Nikolic A, et al. Changes in Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccination and Vaccine Uptake during Pandemic. Vaccines (Basel). 2023;11(1). Epub 20230109. pmid:36679992.