Figures
Abstract
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic has stretched healthcare resources thin and led to significant morbidity and mortality. There have been no studies utilizing national data to investigate the role of cardiac risk factors on outcomes of COVID hospitalizations. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of cardiac multimorbidity on healthcare utilization and outcomes among COVID hospitalizations during the first year of the pandemic.
Methods
Using the national inpatient sample (NIS), we identified all adult hospital admissions with a primary diagnosis of COVID in 2020, using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes (ICD010-CM). Coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, previous stroke, and atrial fibrillation were then identified as cardiac comorbidities using ICD-10-CM codes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of cardiac multimorbidity on mortality and mechanical ventilation.
Results
We identified 1,005,040 primary COVID admissions in 2020. Of these admissions, 216,545 (20.6%) had CAD, 413,195 (39.4%) had DM, 176,780 (16.8%) had HF, 159,700 (15.2%) had AF, 30735 (2.9%) had PVD, and 25,155 (2.4%) had a previous stroke. When stratified by number of comorbidities, 428390 (40.8%) had 0 comorbidities, 354960 (33.8%) had 1, 161225 (15.4%) had 2, and 105465 (10.0%) had 3+ comorbidities. COVID hospitalizations with higher cardiac multimorbidity had higher mortality rates (p<0.001) higher MV rates (p<0.001). In our multivariable regression, these associations remained with increasing odds for mortality with each stepwise increase in cardiac multimorbidity (1: OR 1.48 (1.45–1.50); 2: OR 2.13 (2.09–2.17); 3+: OR 2.43 (2.38–2.48), p<0.001, all).
Conclusions
Our study is the first national examination of the impact of cardiac comorbidities on COVID outcomes. A higher number of cardiac comorbidities was associated with significantly higher rates of MV and in-hospital mortality, independent of age. Future, more granular, and longitudinal studies are needed to further examine these associations.
Citation: Chouairi F, Jaffe E, Minhas AMK, Fudim M (2024) Brief report: Effect of cardiac multi-morbidity on COVID hospitalization outcomes. PLoS ONE 19(4): e0301898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301898
Editor: Rittal Mehta, Children's National Hospital, UNITED STATES
Received: February 22, 2023; Accepted: March 25, 2024; Published: April 24, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Chouairi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: Data cannot be shared because a DUA has to signed and payment made to HCUP to use this data. It is illegal for me to share, but can be acquired by other research teams at https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/databases.jsp.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic has stretched healthcare resources thin and led to significant morbidity and mortality. Among patients admitted for COVID, previous institutional data has suggested that cardiac risk factors play a role in severe disease and even death.[1, 2] Possible mechanisms at play include acute myocardial infarction, lymphopenia mediated atherosclerotic plaque destabilization, and inflammatory heart dysfunction.[3–5] In addition, the impact of multimorbidity, which as been found to increase risk in other populations, is unclear.[6] Despite limited institutional or regional studies, there have been no studies utilizing national data to investigate the role of cardiac risk factors both individually and in the form of multimorbidity on outcomes of COVID hospitalizations. As a result, the aim of this study is to examine the effect of cardiac multimorbidity on healthcare utilization and outcomes among COVID hospitalizations during the first year of the pandemic.
Methods
Data source
The NIS (National Inpatient Sample) is a publicly available, nationally representative 20% stratified, all-payer, claims-based inpatient discharge sampling database that is collected and maintained by the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) and represents over 35 million annual hospitalizations in the United States.[7] Since 2012, discharges in this database represent a random sample of 20% of discharges from all nonfederal U.S. hospitals, stratified by hospital, census division, ownership status, urban vs rural location, teaching status, bed size, patient diagnosis-related group, and admission month. We followed the recommendation from the AHRQ for analysis using survey data, using patient-level and hospital-level trend weights provided to obtain national estimates. In accordance with standard practices of utilizing NIS, we also acknowledge that observations are hospitalization events not people, we have not performed state level analysis, we have not limited our data analysis years to pre-2011, we have not performed physician level analysis, and have not used non-specific secondary diagnosis codes. Additionally, we have used survey specific analysis with appropriate weighting and accounted for changes during the major transition periods of the dataset.[8]
Statistical analysis
Using the national inpatient sample (NIS), we identified all adult hospital admissions with a primary diagnosis of COVID in 2020, using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes (U07.1). Coronary artery disease (CAD), diabetes mellitus (DM), heart failure (HF), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), previous stroke, and atrial fibrillation (AF) were then identified as cardiac comorbidities using ICD-10-CM codes within the secondary diagnosis records within the NIS database (COVID-19 was the primary diagnosis code) (S1 Table).[9] Chi-squared tests were used for categorical variable comparisons and Kruskal Wallis tests were utilized for continuous variables given the non-standard distribution of continuous variable data. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of cardiac multimorbidity on mortality and mechanical ventilation (MV). Our multivariable model included age, sex, race, comorbidities, hospital location/teaching status, hospital size, hospital region, primary expected payer, and household income of patient’s ZIP code. In the regression examining individual comorbidities, each comorbidity was individually included as variables, however for the regression examining cardiac multi-morbidity (0, 1, 2, 3+ comorbidities), individual comorbidities were not included in the regression to prevent collinearity. A sensitivity analysis was performed where patients were stratified into groups by age: 18–44 years, 45–64 years, 65–79 years, and 80+ years. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v26 (IBM, Armonk, NY). Given multiple testing within this study, Bonferroni correction was applied to our primary analysis with statistical significance for our descriptive testing set to p<0.001. This study was exempt from IRB approval given its use of public, de-identified data.
Results
We identified 1,005,040 primary COVID admissions in 2020. Of these admissions, 216,545 (20.6%) had CAD, 413,195 (39.4%) had DM, 176,780 (16.8%) had HF, 159,700 (15.2%) had AF, 30735 (2.9%) had PVD, and 25,155 (2.4%) had a previous stroke. When stratified by number of comorbidities, 428390 (40.8%) had 0 comorbidities, 354960 (33.8%) had 1, 161225 (15.4%) had 2, and 105465 (10.0%) had 3+ comorbidities. COVID hospitalizations with higher cardiac multimorbidity had higher mortality rates (0: 6.3%, 1: 10.9%, 2: 17.9%, 3+: 21.4%, p<0.001) (Fig 1) higher MV rates (0: 6.7%, 1: 10.6%, 2: 13.8%, 3+: 14.0%, p<0.001), and lower rates of home discharge among those who survived their hospitalization (0: 77.1%, 1: %, 2: 65.6%, 3+: 59.4%, p<0.001). Those with higher cardiac multimorbidity also had longer length of stay in days (0: 5.0 [3.0–8.0], 1: 5.0 [3.0–9.0], 2: 6.0 [3.0–11.0], 3+: 6.0 [4.0–11.0], p<0.001) and higher hospital costs. (0: 9256 [5392–16669], 1: 10898 [6182–20677], 2: 12043 [6793–23617], 3+: 12873 [7197–24172], p<0.001). Associated data can be found in Table 1.
In our multivariable regression, these associations remained with increasing odds for mortality with each stepwise increase in cardiac multimorbidity (1: OR 1.48 (1.45–1.50); 2: OR 2.13 (2.09–2.17); 3+: OR 2.43 (2.38–2.48), p<0.001, all) and with each individual comorbidity (Prior Stroke: OR 1.15 (1.11–1.19); PVD: OR 1.13 (1.10–1.17); AF: OR 1.67 (1.64–1.70); HF OR 1.39 (1.37–1.42); DM: OR 1.19 (1.17–1.20); CAD: OR 1.16 (1.14–1.18), p<0.001, all) (Fig 2A). Additionally, cardiac multimorbidity was associated with higher odds of MV (1: OR 1.67 (1.64–1.70); 2: OR 2.37 (2.32–2.42); 3+: OR 2.41 (2.36–2.47), p<0.001, all) and individual comorbidities (except for PVD and prior stroke) were independently associated with higher odds of MV (AF: OR 1.86 (1.83–1.90); HF OR 1.31 (1.29–1.33); DM: OR 1.37 (1.35–1.38); CAD: OR 1.10 (1.08–1.11), p<0.001, all).
a) Forest Plot displaying odds of mortality by comorbidities; b) Forest Plot displaying odds of mortality by cardiac multi-morbidity stratified by age group.
We additionally conducted a sensitivity analysis in which patients were stratified into age groups. Mortality trends remained similar and can be found in Fig 2B.
Discussion
This study demonstrated that cardiac comorbidities and multimorbidity were associated with significantly greater resource utilization and increased risk for mortality and MV. Interestingly, there was a stepwise increase in risk for worse outcomes with increased cardiac multimorbidity. This study also was one of the first to demonstrate the connection between increased cardiac multimorbidity and increased healthcare utilization, specifically direct cost, hospital length of stay and home discharges. In regard to the individual comorbidities, atrial fibrillation had the strongest association with worse outcomes. This echoes previous data from Denmark which demonstrated increased risk of severe COVID-19 with atrial fibrillation and heart failure.[10] It is possible that this is due the prothrombotic nature of COVID which in turn could increase the already elevated likelihood of thrombus formation in patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation.[11] More generally, this study echoes previous data which demonstrated that cardiovascular disease in COVID-19 patients was associated with worsened mortality, however our study adds a nationwide analysis of the United States to this fund of data, in addition to examining resource utilization.[12–18]
In a secondary analysis, we investigated if cardiac multimorbidity was a driver of worse outcomes independent of age. Advanced age has become established risk factor for severe illness and death due to COVID-19 with underlying immunologic mechanisms purposed.[19] In our analysis we determined that cardiac multimorbidity, independent of age has a significant effect on worse outcomes. It appears that comorbidities had a weaker association with mortality as age increased, however the significant association with mortality remained, even when only examining patients over the age of 80. As a result, it is important for physicians to take comorbidities into effect when risk stratifying patients regardless of their age. Additionally, it is important that future studies examine the effects of non-cardiac comorbidities such as end stage renal disease, liver disease, pulmonary diseases, and to examine the interplay between them and age to better understand the mortality and morbidity burden of COVID-19 on the US healthcare system.
Many of the limitations of this study stem from the NIS database itself. Given the nature of the database and ICD codes, there is a chance of misidentification or under-identification of comorbidities due to code sensitivity. Limited testing capabilities in 2020 may also have contributed to an under-identification of COVID-19 infection. The NIS does not allow for evaluation of the severity of the COVID-19 infection and does not allow for the identification of intensive care unit stays. Finally, this study is observational, and the variables acquired from the NIS are not longitudinal, limiting our ability to identify patient outcomes beyond their hospitalization.
Conclusions
Our study is the first national examination of the impact of cardiac comorbidities on COVID outcomes, demonstrating worse outcomes across all age groups. A higher number of cardiac comorbidities was associated with significantly higher rates of MV and in-hospital mortality, independent of age. Future, more granular, and longitudinal studies are needed to further examine these associations.
Supporting information
S1 Table. ICD-10 codes for classification of diagnoses.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301898.s001
(DOCX)
References
- 1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet (London, England). 2020;395(10223):497–506. Epub 2020/01/28. pmid:31986264; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7159299.
- 2. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Jama. 2020;323(13):1239–42. Epub 2020/02/25. pmid:32091533.
- 3. Sawalha K, Abozenah M, Kadado AJ, Battisha A, Al-Akchar M, Salerno C, et al. Systematic Review of COVID-19 Related Myocarditis: Insights on Management and Outcome. Cardiovascular revascularization medicine: including molecular interventions. 2021;23:107–13. Epub 2020/08/28. pmid:32847728; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7434380.
- 4. Zhang J, Lu S, Wang X, Jia X, Li J, Lei H, et al. Do underlying cardiovascular diseases have any impact on hospitalised patients with COVID-19? Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2020;106(15):1148–53. Epub 2020/05/27. pmid:32451362; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7253226.
- 5. Long J, Luo Y, Wei Y, Xie C, Yuan J. The effect of cardiovascular disease and acute cardiac injury on fatal COVID-19: a meta-analysis. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2021;48:128–39. Epub 2021/04/26. pmid:33895644; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8056484.
- 6. Miller PE, Thomas A, Breen TJ, Chouairi F, Kunitomo Y, Aslam F, et al. Prevalence of Noncardiac Multimorbidity in Patients Admitted to Two Cardiac Intensive Care Units and Their Association with Mortality. The American journal of medicine. 2021;134(5):653–61.e5. Epub 2020/11/02. pmid:33129785; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8079541.
- 7.
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Overview of National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [December 15, 2019].
- 8. Khera R, Angraal S, Couch T, Welsh JW, Nallamothu BK, Girotra S, et al. Adherence to Methodological Standards in Research Using the National Inpatient Sample. JAMA. 2017;318(20):2011–8. Epub 2017/11/29. pmid:29183077; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5742631.
- 9. Clark KAA, Reinhardt SW, Chouairi F, Miller PE, Kay B, Fuery M, et al. Trends in Heart Failure Hospitalizations in the US from 2008 to 2018. Journal of cardiac failure. 2021. Epub 2021/09/18. pmid:34534665.
- 10. Phelps M, Christensen DM, Gerds T, Fosbøl E, Torp-Pedersen C, Schou M, et al. Cardiovascular comorbidities as predictors for severe COVID-19 infection or death. European heart journal Quality of care & clinical outcomes. 2021;7(2):172–80. Epub 2020/10/28. pmid:33107909; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7665490.
- 11. Wichmann D, Sperhake JP, Lütgehetmann M, Steurer S, Edler C, Heinemann A, et al. Autopsy Findings and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With COVID-19: A Prospective Cohort Study. Annals of internal medicine. 2020;173(4):268–77. Epub 2020/05/07. pmid:32374815; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7240772.
- 12. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet (London, England). 2020;395(10229):1054–62. Epub 2020/03/15. pmid:32171076; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7270627.
- 13. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. The New England journal of medicine. 2020;382(18):1708–20. Epub 2020/02/29. pmid:32109013; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7092819.
- 14. Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, Jiang L, Song J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive care medicine. 2020;46(5):846–8. Epub 2020/03/04. pmid:32125452; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7080116.
- 15. Shi S, Qin M, Yang B. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Cardiac Injury-Reply. JAMA cardiology. 2020;5(10):1199–200. Epub 2020/07/09. pmid:32639516.
- 16. Sabatino J, De Rosa S, Di Salvo G, Indolfi C. Impact of cardiovascular risk profile on COVID-19 outcome. A meta-analysis. PloS one. 2020;15(8):e0237131. pmid:32797054
- 17. Smith ER, Oakley E, Grandner GW, Rukundo G, Farooq F, Ferguson K, et al. Clinical risk factors of adverse outcomes among women with COVID-19 in the pregnancy and postpartum period: a sequential, prospective meta-analysis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2023;228(2):161–77. Epub 2022/08/27. pmid:36027953; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9398561.
- 18. Nishiga M, Wang DW, Han Y, Lewis DB, Wu JC. COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease: from basic mechanisms to clinical perspectives. Nature reviews Cardiology. 2020;17(9):543–58. Epub 2020/07/22. pmid:32690910; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7370876.
- 19. Booth A, Reed AB, Ponzo S, Yassaee A, Aral M, Plans D, et al. Population risk factors for severe disease and mortality in COVID-19: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one. 2021;16(3):e0247461. Epub 2021/03/05. pmid:33661992; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7932512.