Figures
Abstract
Objectives
The pain associated with osteoarthritis (OA) was thought to be nociceptive; however, neuropathic pain is also observed. We investigated the relationship between hip OA and neuropathic pain using the PainDETECT questionnaire (PDQ).
Methods
A total of 159 hips of 146 consecutive patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a diagnosis of OA were enrolled in this study. The prevalence of each pain phenotype was evaluated preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively using the PDQ. Patient characteristics and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores were compared between a group with possible neuropathic pain (NP group) and a group with nociceptive pain (non-NP group).
Results
Before THA, neuropathic, unclear, and nociceptive pain was observed in 18, 36, and 105 hips, respectively. The prevalence in the NP group was 54 hips, accounting for approximately one-third of all hips, which decreased significantly to seven hips after THA. A significantly higher NRS score was observed in the NP group, both before and after THA.
Citation: Yamabe Y, Hasegawa M, Kobayashi G, Tone S, Naito Y, Sudo A (2024) Neuropathic pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip before and after total hip arthroplasty. PLoS ONE 19(4): e0301352. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301352
Editor: Raffaele Vitiello, Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Roma, ITALY
Received: January 10, 2024; Accepted: March 14, 2024; Published: April 25, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Yamabe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: he authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Persistent pain, a main symptom of osteoarthritis (OA), can cause joint dysfunction. The etiology of pain in OA is complex, and its exact pathophysiology is not completely understood. Pain caused by inflammation is classified as nociceptive, whereas pain caused by nerve stimulation is classified as neuropathic pain. However, not all types of pain can be clearly categorized and many patients experience both types of pain [1]. For many years, pain associated with OA was thought to be nociceptive; however, recent reports indicate that neuropathic pain is involved as well [2]. Neuropathic pain is defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain as “pain arising as a direct consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system” [3]. Typical orthopedic conditions presenting with neuropathic pain include carpal tunnel syndrome and spinal disorders [4]. Neuropathic pain is characterized by tactile sensitivity and hyperalgesia, such as a burning sensation and numbness. Identifying patients with hip OA experiencing neuropathic pain is essential for providing patient education and additional treatment options beyond conventional pain treatment. Although a reliable and valid tool for assessing neuropathic pain symptoms in patients with OA is essential, few studies have explored the relationship between hip OA, neuropathic pain, and pain outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We hypothesized the existence of a neuropathic component in hip OA pain and that the occurrence of neuropathic pain in the hips of patients with OA might decrease after surgery. In this study, we evaluated neuropathic pain in patients with hip osteoarthritis before and after THA using the PainDETECT questionnaire (PDQ).
Materials and methods
Patients
We enrolled 146 consecutive patients with OA of the hip (159 hips; female, n = 126 [137 hips] male, n = 20 [22 hips]; mean age, 67 [28–88] years; mean body mass index (BMI), 25.3 [15.7–37.4] kg/m2) who underwent THA from April 2020 to November 2022 prospectively. The surgical approaches included 95 superior, 35 posterior, 21 anterior, and 8 anterolateral approaches. Patients under 18 years of age, revision cases, those with dementia or psychiatric disorders, and those with missing questionnaire data were excluded. Patients whose preoperative physical and imaging findings suggested that their hip pain was due to spine-related disease were not indicated for THA. For the first two weeks after surgery, all patients took oral NSAIDs or acetaminophen according to our protocol. No patients used analgesics specifically for neuropathic pain.
Pain phenotype
The PDQ was used to evaluate neuropathic hip pain. This questionnaire is a self-reporting pain-screening tool developed to assess the possibility that a patient’s pain is neuropathic in usual practice, and can differentiate pain with 85% sensitivity and 80% specificity. It was originally developed for patients with chronic lower back pain [5] and has been used to treat various diseases [6]. The PDQ comprises nine questions regarding the intensity and quality of pain, and its scores are classified into pain course pattern, presence of radiating pain (maximum score of 3), and gradation of pain (maximum score of 35). The total score ranges from 0 to 38 points. Scores from 0 to 12 are classified as nociceptive pain, scores from 13 to 18 as unclear pain that includes elements of both nociceptive and neuropathic pain, and scores from 19 to 38 as neuropathic pain. In this study, unclear and neuropathic pain were grouped as possible neuropathic pain and evaluated in two groups: possible neuropathic pain (NP group: total 13–38 points) and nociceptive pain (non-NP group: total 0–12 points). The PDQ was administered preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively in all patients, and the prevalence of neuropathic pain was measured before and after THA by the surgeon. Sex, age, BMI, and numerical rating scale (NRS) scores on rest were compared between groups. The correlation between the preoperative PDQ score and the pre- and postoperative NRS scores and between the preoperative PDQ score and BMI were also investigated. This study was approved by the institutional review board of Mie University Hospital (H2018-083), and all patients received written informed consent to participate. We conducted this study according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Statistical analyses
Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare pre- and postoperative NRS scores, age, and BMI between NP and non-NP groups. Chi-square test was used to compare gender and to compare the prevalence of possible neuropathic and nociceptive pain before and after THA. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlations between pre- and post-THA NRS scores and preoperative PDQ scores, and between BMI and preoperative PDQ scores. Fisher’s test was used to assess the changes in pain type before and after THA. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. We use EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) to analyze data [7].
Results
Before THA, neuropathic, unclear, and nociceptive pain was present in 18 (11%), 36 (23%), and 105 (66%) hips, respectively. After THA, the number of hips with neuropathic and mixed pain decreased to 1 (1%) and 6 (4%), respectively. The number of hips classified into the preoperative NP group was 54 (33%), accounting for approximately one-third of all hips; however, this number decreased significantly to 7 (4%) after THA (p < 0.01) (Table 1). Of the seven hips classified into the postoperative NP group, six were also classified into the NP group preoperatively, while one was classified into the non-NP group preoperatively. A significantly higher percentage was observed in the NP group both pre-and postoperatively (p < 0.01), indicating that patients with preoperative neuropathic pain tended to have prolonged neuropathic pain (Fig 1). NRS score improved from 8.5 preoperatively to 0.7 points postoperatively in the NP group, and from 6.8 preoperatively to 0.3 points postoperatively in the non-NP group. A significantly higher NRS score was observed in the NP group than in the non-NP group both before and after THA (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the mean age was significantly higher in the NP group than in the non-NP group (p < 0.05). No significant differences in sex or BMI were observed between the two groups (Table 2); however, a positive correlation was observed between the preoperative PDQ and NRS scores (r = 0.358, p < 0.001). Similarly, a positive correlation was observed between the preoperative PDQ and postoperative NRS scores (r = 0.375, p < 0.001) (Fig 2). A correlation was not observed between the preoperative PDQ and BMI (r = 0.052, p = 0.51).
Abbreviations: NP group, neuropathic pain group; non-NP group, non-neuropathic pain group.
Discussion
Osteoarthritic pain has traditionally been considered a nociceptive pain; however, recent studies have reported a close relationship between OA and neuropathic pain [6, 7, 16–19]. Neuropathic pain is also known to cause chronic postoperative pain in patients with OA. Maeda et al. reported a positive correlation between preoperative PDQ scores before THA and postoperative pain [8], and Hasegawa et al. reported an association between chronic pain after THA and preoperative neuropathic pain [9]. A deeper understanding of the causes of pain in OA has led to the use of centrally acting drugs [10].
Assessment tools such as LANSS [11], S-LANSS [12], NPQ [13], DN4 [14], ID Pain [15], and PainDETECT are widely used to assess neuropathic pain. In Japan, a Japanese version of the PDQ has been developed and is widely used. Using the PDQ, pain can be differentiated with 85% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Despite limited data directly comparing these tools, Mulvey et al. reported that the accuracy of the PDQ is comparable to that of other self-report questionnaires, and its reliability and validity have been confirmed [16]. Bennett et al. reviewed the strengths and limitations of these questionnaires and reported that PainDETECT did not require clinical examination and showed slightly higher sensitivity and specificity than other tools [17]. However, a challenge with the PDQ is that even a score of 0 is classified as nociceptive pain; thus, even patients without pain are placed into the nociceptive pain group.
In a previous study that evaluated hip OA pain using the PDQ, the prevalence of neuropathic pain with a PDQ score of 13 or higher ranged from 19% to 37% (Table 3) [18–21]. The prevalence of neuropathic pain in the present study was 33%, similar to the frequencies reported in previous studies. However, previous studies have not evaluated preoperative pain outcomes and PDQ scores after THA in patients with neuropathic pain. In this study, we investigated PDQ scores before and after THA and found that THA decreased the prevalence of neuropathic pain. Patients with preoperative neuropathic pain were more likely to experience prolonged postoperative neuropathic pain. Fitzsimmons et al. proposed that in patients with preoperative neuropathic pain, careful preoperative evaluation, including for spinal disease, is necessary to avoid chronic postoperative pain [22]. In this study, all patients underwent an interview and X-ray to detect lumbar spine disease. In addition, a lumbar spine MRI was performed on those patients who seemed to need it. It is difficult to completely rule out the involvement of lumbar spine disease preoperatively and elderly patients with neuropathic pain should be searched more carefully for spinal disease before THA.
A positive correlation between the preoperative PDQ and postoperative NRS scores was observed, suggesting that neuropathic pain may lead to worse outcomes after THA and lower patient satisfaction. Although the causes of neuropathic pain and related factors require further investigation, preoperative evaluation, including PDQ, may be useful in reducing the prevalence of postoperative chronic hip pain.
This study has certain limitations, including the shortage of evaluation of spinal disease in patients with hip OA and a short follow-up period of 6 months. A correlation between age and the incidence of neuropathic pain may have occurred because spinal disease could not be completely ruled out. We have used only PDQ and NRS to verify the association between the presence of preoperative neuropathic pain and the occurrence of chronic postoperative pain. The reliability of PDQ for neuropathic pain in patients with hip OA has not been fully evaluated, and further studies are required to clarify this. Surgical approaches have not been unified, and the effect of different approaches on neuropathic pain has not been studied.
Conclusion
In this study, neuropathic pain was evaluated using the PDQ before and after surgery in patients with hip OA who underwent THA. Possible neuropathic pain was present in 54 of the 159 hips (33%). Patients with preoperative neuropathic pain tended to have higher preoperative and postoperative NRS scores, suggesting that the involvement of neuropathic pain should be considered when treating patients with hip OA. Furthermore, although the prevalence of possible neuropathic pain decreased to 4% after THA, our results indicate an association between the presence of preoperative neuropathic pain and the occurrence of chronic postoperative pain after THA.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the patients who participated in this study, and Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
References
- 1. Siddall PJ, McClelland JM, Rutkowski SB, Cousins MJ. A longitudinal study of the prevalence and characteristics of pain in the first 5 years following spinal cord injury. PAIN. 2003; 103(3): 249–257. pmid:12791431.
- 2. Ohtori S, Orita S, Yamashita M, Ishikawa T, Ito T, Shigemura T, et al. Existence of a neuropathic pain component in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Yonsei Med J. 2012; 53(4): 801–805. pmid:22665349.
- 3. Loeser JD, Treede RD. The Kyoto protocol of IASP Basic Pain Terminology. Pain. 2008; 137(3): 473–477. pmid:18583048.
- 4. Borman P, Kaygisiz F, Yaman A. Neuropathic component of low back pain in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Mod Rheumatol. 2021; 31(2): 462–467. pmid:32271113.
- 5. Freynhagen R, Baron R, Gockel U, Tölle TR. painDETECT: a new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006; 22(10): 1911–1920. pmid:17022849.
- 6. Noda K, Tajima M, Oto Y, Saitou M, Yoshiga M, Otani K, et al. How do neuropathic pain-like symptoms affect health-related quality of life among patients with rheumatoid arthritis?: A comparison of multiple pain-related parameters. Mod Rheumatol. 2020; 30(5): 828–834. pmid:31398076.
- 7. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ’EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013; 48(3): 452–458. pmid:23208313.
- 8. Maeda K, Sonohata M, Kitajima M, Kawano S, Mawatari M. Risk Factors of Neuropathic Pain after Total Hip Arthroplasty. Hip Pelvis. 2018; 30(4): 226–232. pmid:30534541.
- 9. Hasegawa M, Tone S, Naito Y, Sudo A. Possible Neuropathic Pain in Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee Before and After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of Pain Research. 2021; 14: 3011–3015. WOS:000700586900001. pmid:34588812
- 10. Dimitroulas T, Duarte RV, Behura A, Kitas GD, Raphael JH. Neuropathic pain in osteoarthritis: a review of pathophysiological mechanisms and implications for treatment. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014; 44(2): 145–154. pmid:24928208.
- 11. Bennett M. The LANSS Pain Scale: the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs. Pain. 2001; 92(1–2): 147–157. pmid:11323136.
- 12. Bennett MI, Smith BH, Torrance N, Potter J. The S-LANSS score for identifying pain of predominantly neuropathic origin: validation for use in clinical and postal research. J Pain. 2005; 6(3): 149–158. pmid:15772908.
- 13. Krause SJ, Backonja MM. Development of a neuropathic pain questionnaire. Clin J Pain. 2003; 19(5): 306–314. pmid:12966256.
- 14. Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, et al. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain. 2005; 114(1–2): 29–36. pmid:15733628.
- 15. Portenoy R. Development and testing of a neuropathic pain screening questionnaire: ID Pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006; 22(8): 1555–1565. pmid:16870080.
- 16. Mulvey MR, Bennett MI, Liwowsky I, Freynhagen R. The role of screening tools in diagnosing neuropathic pain. Pain Manag. 2014; 4(3): 233–243. pmid:24953075.
- 17. Bennett MI, Attal N, Backonja MM, Baron R, Bouhassira D, Freynhagen R, et al. Using screening tools to identify neuropathic pain. Pain. 2007; 127(3): 199–203. pmid:17182186.
- 18. Shigemura T, Ohtori S, Kishida S, Nakamura J, Takeshita M, Takazawa M, et al. Neuropathic pain in patients with osteoarthritis of hip joint. European Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 2011; 2(3): 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-011-0070-x.
- 19. Rienstra W, Blikman T, Mensink FB, van Raay JJAM, Dijkstra B, Bulstra SK, et al. The Modified painDETECT Questionnaire for Patients with Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis: Translation into Dutch, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Reliability Assessment. PLOS ONE. 2016; 10(12): e0146117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146117.
- 20. Blikman T, Rienstra W, van Raay JJAM, Dijkstra B, Bulstra SK, Stevens M, et al. Neuropathic-like symptoms and the association with joint-specific function and quality of life in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis. PLOS ONE. 2018; 13(6): e0199165. pmid:29902245
- 21. Power JD, Perruccio AV, Gandhi R, Veillette C, Davey JR, Syed K, et al. Neuropathic pain in end-stage hip and knee osteoarthritis: differential associations with patient-reported pain at rest and pain on activity. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2018; 26(3): 363–369. pmid:29326061
- 22. Fitzsimmons M, Carr E, Woodhouse L, Bostick GP. Development and Persistence of Suspected Neuropathic Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Individuals With Osteoarthritis. Pm r. 2018; 10(9): 903–909. pmid:29452296.