Figures
Abstract
Introduction
Evaluating the professional competencies of Peruvian doctors is crucial for proposing necessary improvements. However, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the specific characteristics and competencies that are assessed in these studies.
Objective
The objective of this study is to characterize published studies focusing on the assessment of professional competencies among physicians in Peru.
Methods
A comprehensive scoping review was conducted, encompassing scientific journal publications that evaluated the professional competencies of physicians in Peru. The search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and SciELO, with the review period extending until 2022. The identified competencies were classified using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and the Ministry of Health of Peru (MINSA) frameworks. The findings were presented using absolute and relative frequency measures.
Results
A total of forty-nine studies focused on the assessment of professional competencies among physicians were identified, indicating an upward trend over the years. The primary focus of these studies was on evaluating competencies related to medical knowledge (79.6% according to ACGME classification) and the treatment of health problems (57.1% according to MINSA classification). However, there was a noticeable lack of emphasis on assessing behavioral competencies such as ethics, professionalism, and communication. Most of the included studies (65.3%) were exclusively conducted in Lima. Among the studies that disclosed their funding sources, 61% were self-funded.
Conclusion
Most studies primarily concentrated on evaluating knowledge-based competencies, specifically in the areas of diagnosis and treatment. There is a scarcity of studies assessing other important competencies. Additionally, centralization and limited funding appear to be areas that require improvement in the evaluation of professional competencies among Peruvian physicians.
Citation: Rojas-Miliano C, Aperrigue-Lira S, Barriga-Chambi F, Huamani-Merma E, Taype-Rondan A (2024) Assessment of professional competencies of Peruvian physicians: A scoping review of published studies. PLoS ONE 19(5): e0299465. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299465
Editor: Oriana Rivera-Lozada de Bonilla, Norbert Wiener University, PERU
Received: July 13, 2023; Accepted: February 9, 2024; Published: May 23, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Rojas-Miliano et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The medical profession bears significant responsibility for the health attention of the population [1]. To ensure a proficient practice, physicians must acquire the necessary competencies to utilize their knowledge, skills, attitudes, and judgment for effective interventions [2]. Nonetheless, inadequacies have been detected in the medical skills acquisition across numerous countries, Peru included, where shortcomings in areas like knowledge, behavioral aptitudes, research proficiencies, and others have been documented [3–8].
Previous literature reviews have examined the existing research on medical competencies in specific countries. For instance, in the United Kingdom, limited studies have focused on evaluating the interactional and interpersonal aspects, systemic and technological components, and personal training of physicians [9]. Similarly, a systematic review investigated the medical competencies outlined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) for medical residents, revealing that patient care and medical knowledge were the most frequently assessed areas [10]. However, there is currently a dearth of reviews that have evaluated Peruvian studies on medical competencies.
Identifying and describing the published studies on professional competencies among physicians and final-year medical students in Peru is crucial for recognizing knowledge gaps and systematizing the existing information. It will provide guidance for the implementation of national strategies aimed at enhancing doctors’ training with the necessary professional skills. With this objective in mind, the present study aims to conduct a comprehensive scoping review that characterizes the published studies on professional competencies in physicians and final-year medical students in Peru.
Methods
Design and eligibility criteria
A scoping review was carried out to evaluate scientific articles reporting original findings (original studies, editorials, or other article types) published in scientific journals until 2022. The review centered on studies that examined the professional competencies of physicians (including general practitioners, residents, and specialists) from Peru. We also included final-year medical students (interns) which are a few weeks away from finishing medical school, as their competencies were expected to be relatively consistent with those of licensed physicians. Language restrictions did not apply.
Intervention studies lacking a baseline measurement of competencies before implementation were excluded. Further, studies that focused on a broader population (such as any-year-medical students or healthcare professionals in general) that did not present data on competencies assessed separately from the target populations (interns or physicians) were also excluded.
Operational definition of competencies
A study was considered to have assessed professional competencies in the field of medicine if it addressed any of the elements outlined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) [11] or the Ministry of Health of Peru (MINSA, by its acronym in Spanish) [12].
On the one hand, the ACGME [13] provides a practical and comprehensive classification of competencies (including hard and soft skills) that’s a reference for the development of postgraduate medical education programs (medical residency) [14]. This classification was proposed in collaboration with the American Board of Medical Specialties and other organizations interested in postgraduate medical education in the United States [15]. As a result, the ACGME proposes 25 items [16] divided into six core competencies: 1) patient care, 2) medical knowledge, 3) practice-based learning and improvement, 4) system based-learning, 5) professionalism, and 6) communication and interpersonal skills [11].
Similarly, in Peru, MINSA issued a ministerial resolution in 2020 outlining a set of competencies expected of general practitioners to ensure high-quality higher education provision. The competency framework was developed by analyzing the population’s health needs and the healthcare system characteristics, among other related considerations. Subsequently, these competencies were established through a collaborative process involving educational institutions, healthcare providers, and civil society.
This classification is divided into 13 competencies: 1) Carry out the clinical evaluation and establish a work plan, 2) Carry out the comprehensive treatment of low/high-complexity health problems, 3) Carry out actions for the best recovery of the person with sequelae of physical, mental or social damage, 4) Promote changes in individual, collective, and surroundings; 5) Carry out health interventions to reduce exposure, risks, and damages that affect individual health, and public health; 6) Exercise their profession according to the Peruvian health system, 7) Participate in the training of students and the strengthening of capacities of human resources in health, 8) Generate new knowledge, which contributes to the solution of health problems and decision-making, 9) Apply technology and innovation scientifically founded, 10) Demonstrate commitment to well-being and health, 11) Establish professional relationships with the person, family, and community, 12) Influence and motivate people with respect and equity, 13) Establish cooperative relationships, sharing knowledge and resources. Furthermore, MINSA further categorizes these competencies into technical skills (1 to 9) and behavioral skills (10 to 13). The detailed operational definitions for each competency can be found in S1 Table.
Literature search
The search was conducted from February 5 to March 25, 2023, utilizing PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, and Google Scholar. Detailed search strategies are in S2 Table.
Selection of studies
The articles identified through the search strategies were imported into Rayyan Software, where duplicates were eliminated. Subsequently, three authors (FBC, SAL, EHM) independently evaluated the articles based on their titles and abstracts to identify potentially eligible ones. These selected articles were then thoroughly reviewed in full text, and those that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were chosen. Discrepancies were resolved through consultation with a fourth author (CRM).
Data extraction
The data of interest in the included articles were extracted to a Microsoft Excel sheet in duplicate by fourth authors (FBC, SAL, EHM, CRM). Discrepancies were resolved by another author (ATR).
The following variables were extracted from the studies: author, publication year, article type (original, letter to the editor, other), study design (cross-sectional, descriptive or analytical, longitudinal, intervention), location (city of the study conduction), the sample size of the target population, included population (internists, general practitioners, residents, and specialists), study context (university, health center or hospital, virtual survey, events such as courses, congresses, workshops, information from the National Medical Examination (ENAM, by its acronym in Spanish), journal of publication (Peruvian, foreign), journal indexing in Scopus (yes, no), funding (yes, no), the language of publication (Spanish and English), evaluated competence, the method used to assess the competence and the type of competence evaluated according to the ACGME and MINSA classification. The complete database is located in S3 Table.
Results
A total of 913 records were identified, of which 49 studies that met the selection criteria were finally included (Fig 1).
Of the included studies, 26 (53.0%) employed a descriptive cross-sectional design, while 19 (38.8%) utilized an analytical cross-sectional approach. In geographical distribution, 32 studies (65.3%) were conducted exclusively in Lima, the capital city of Peru. Furthermore, the sample sizes varied widely, ranging from 14 to 30,750 participants, with a median of 113.
Concerning the assessment tools employed to evaluate competencies, 22 studies (44.9%) utilized surveys developed by the authors. Among these, ten studies did not specify the source of instrument creation; five articles indicated that surveys were previous-research based; and seven were developed according to specific criteria, such as technical standards or official documents. Additionally, seven studies (14.3%) utilized ENAM data. In 42 studies (85.7%), competencies were assessed directly, while in seven studies, the evaluation focused on self-perception or perception by others regarding competence. Detailed characteristics of each study are in Table 1 includes the corresponding references for each study.
Among the studies included in the analysis, 14 (28.6%) were focused on general practitioners, while 13 (26.5%) were conducted among residents. Furthermore, a significant proportion of the studies, accounting for 26 (53.0%), were published in international journals, indicating a wide dissemination of the findings. Additionally, 35 (71.4%) of the studies were published in journals indexed in Scopus, reflecting their recognition and scholarly impact. It is worth mentioning that financial support was reported in 15 studies (30.6%), indicating external funding sources contributing to the research endeavors (Table 2)
The assessment of medical competencies revealed a range of 0 to 5 competencies evaluated, following the ACGME classification. Among the included studies, a significant proportion (79.6%) focused on competencies associated with "medical knowledge." The remaining competencies were assessed by varying numbers of studies, with each competency being evaluated by between 2 and 9 studies.
Following the MINSA classification, the evaluated studies encompassed a range of 0 to 9 competencies. Notably, 28 studies (57.1%) focused on competencies associated with dimension 1, which involves clinical assessment and a work plan establishment. Similarly, 28 studies (57.1%) addressed competencies related to dimension 2, which entails the comprehensive treatment of low/high-complexity health issues. The remaining were evaluated by varying numbers of studies, ranging from zero to seven.
Technical competencies were evaluated in 41 studies (83.7%), while behavioral competencies were assessed in eight studies (16.3%). Regarding technical competencies, only one study (2.0%) evaluated dimension 8, which pertains to generating new knowledge to address health issues and aid decision-making. Additionally, just one study (2.0%) assessed dimension 9, which involves applying technology and scientifically grounded innovations. However, none of the studies evaluated dimension 12, which encompasses influencing and motivating individuals with respect and equity, by MINSA (Table 3).
Discussion
The scientific output concerning medical competencies in Peru demonstrates a notable upward trend, indicating a growing interest in the field, and appears to be accompanying a growing research-publishing culture in Peru [66].
The rise in scholarly publications in this field serves as an encouraging indication that there is a growing emphasis on the assessment and enhancement of medical education in Peru. This trend holds promising prospects for enhancing the quality of healthcare services delivered to the populace. The significance of this development is in light of concerning reports revealing a remarkable failure rate among final-year medical students in the ENAM examination [67] and suboptimal levels of public satisfaction with healthcare [68].
Regarding geographical distribution, the majority of studies were predominantly conducted in Lima, the capital city of Peru, while limited representation from other regions was observed. This centralized pattern has been noted in various research domains [69] and could be attributed to resource constraints, and limited research expertise in those regions [70]. It is imperative to research medical competencies in other areas of the country to assess and enhance the quality of medical education, as well as propose interventions aimed at improving healthcare quality.
The competencies that received the highest level of evaluation in the studies included "medical knowledge" based on the ACGME classification, as well as "perform a clinical evaluation and establish a work plan" and "perform comprehensive treatment" based on the MINSA classification. Similar findings have been reported in other literature reviews, demonstrating that medical knowledge competencies are commonly assessed in various settings, such as among UK physicians [9] Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation residents [10], and during international surgery rotations [71].
The heightened attention given to medical knowledge competencies may stem from a concern for the acquisition of knowledge in comparison to other medical competencies. For instance, research conducted in Peru demonstrated that hospital resident physicians placed slightly greater emphasis on acquiring medical knowledge compared to other ACGME competencies [72]. Moreover, the prevalence and ease of access to assessment tools for these competencies may contribute to their prioritization over more complex clinical competencies, such as communication skills, shared decision-making, teaching, and others [73,74].
The competencies that received the least attention were "learning based on practice and improvement" and "systems-based learning" as per the ACGME classification. Similar findings in other reviews have identified "learning based on practice and improvement" as the least frequently assessed ACGME competency in studies [10,71]. It could be attributed to competence complexity and abstract nature, which presents challenges in its evaluation [75].
The competencies with the lowest level of evaluation based on the MINSA classification encompassed the areas related to generating new knowledge, applying technology and innovation, establishing cooperative relationships, and influencing and motivating individuals. The scarcity of research focusing on these proficiencies could be attributed to the belief that they are outlying from the practical aspects of medicine. Nevertheless, the ability to generate new knowledge, apply technology and innovation play a critical role in tackling health challenges in Peru [76]. Similarly, the capacity to establish cooperative relationships is fundamental for effective teamwork and collaborative decision-making within the medical context [77].
Regarding the assessment tools employed to evaluate competencies, most studies utilized surveys or exams. The advantage of these instruments lies in their ease of use, rapid administration, and cost-effectiveness. However, these instruments may not comprehensively assess medical competencies, as they rely on self-reports or specific knowledge [78]. Only four studies employed clinical scenarios like OSCE, Mini-CEX, or clinical simulation, for a competency evaluation. These methods are increasingly being adopted in various medical schools in Peru to assess clinical competencies [79,80]. Future studies should investigate the feasibility and accuracy of alternative instruments that may offer enhanced reliability, such as direct observation, simulated scenarios, or a combination of assessment tools [78]. Furthermore, there is a need to promote further research on the instruments’ development and adaptation to assess non-clinical competencies among Peruvian physicians.
Regarding funding, nearly one-third of the studies mentioned receiving funding from an institution. This finding is consistent with another study conducted at a Peruvian university, where one-sixth of scientific articles on medical education reported having funding [81]. However, medical education research in Peru and other Latin American countries still receives limited funding [82]. It could be attributed to medical education not being a priority within Peru’s biomedical research agenda [83], leading to reduced interest from funding agencies and medical researchers.
Among the 38 funded studies, six mentioned receiving funding from government entities and five from universities. Differently, a study analyzing 1822 articles found that governments and universities were the primary funding sources for medical education research published in high-impact scientific journals [84]. Exploring the role of these actors becomes important in promoting research on medical competencies.
It is recommended that medical education evaluative institutions in Peru, such as ASPEFAM (an institution assessing the theoretical knowledge of medical students in their final year of studies) and CONAREME (an institution conducting the entrance exam for resident physicians), incorporate the medical competencies addressed in this study into their assessments. Additionally, the evaluation of these competencies could be considered within undergraduate and postgraduate academic programs. This approach could enhance interest in this area, as researchers might seek to assess factors associated with the acquisition of such competencies and/or develop new measurement methods. Moreover, scientific output on medical competencies could be increased by employing alternative assessment methods, including those considering the perspective of patients. This could be achieved through the use of simple and reliable instruments such as surveys assessing communicative and interpersonal skills [85].
This study exclusively incorporated articles published in scientific journals, potentially neglecting pertinent unpublished studies. Furthermore, it concentrated on two standards, ACGME and MINSA, which are recognized as relevant to international and national contexts. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, this is the first study to map the scientific production of medical competencies in Peru. It allows the identification of existing gaps in the evaluation of medical competencies in Peru and further directs the strategies implemented to strengthen competency-based medical education, particularly in less evaluated competencies in practice. The use of the ACGME classification for medical competencies can be replicated in studies conducted in other countries. The obtained results reveal a scarcity of studies on certain medical competencies in Peru. This finding may reflect that the country is experiencing a delayed development in medical education compared to other countries, even within South America [86], a situation that might be similar to what occurs in countries with similar contexts.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this scoping review characterized the published studies on professional competencies in physicians and final-year medical students in Peru. The studies primarily evaluated competencies related to medical knowledge (diagnosis, treatment), while behavioral competencies were less frequently assessed (ethics, professionalism, communication). Most studies were self-funded, conducted in Lima, and relied on questionnaires. It may be attributed to a scarcity of interest and resources dedicated to researching this topic. The results obtained reveal a scarcity of studies on specific medical competencies in Peru. This finding may reflect a similar situation in countries with comparable contexts.
Supporting information
S1 Checklist. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299465.s001
(DOCX)
S1 Table. Operational definitions of each competence according to ACGME and MINSA.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299465.s002
(DOCX)
References
- 1. Brett AS. Physicians have a responsibility to meet the health care needs of society. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2012;40(3):526–32. pmid:23061580
- 2. Gómez-Rojas JP. Las competencias profesionales. Rev Mex Anest. 2015;38(1):49–55. Available at: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=55675.
- 3. Díaz Vélez C, Manrique González LM, Galán Rodas E, Apolaya Segura M. Conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas en investigación de los estudiantes de pregrado de facultades de medicina del Perú. Acta Médica Peruana. 2008;25(1):9–15. Available at: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?pid=S1728-59172008000100003&script=sci_abstract.
- 4. DesRoches CM, Rao SR, Fromson JA, Birnbaum RJ, Iezzoni L, Vogeli C, et al. Physicians’ Perceptions, Preparedness for Reporting, and Experiences Related to Impaired and Incompetent Colleagues. JAMA. 2010;304(2):187–93. pmid:20628132
- 5. Brinkman DJ, Tichelaar J, Graaf S, Otten RHJ, Richir MC, van Agtmael MA. Do final‐year medical students have sufficient prescribing competencies? A systematic literature review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(4):615–35. pmid:29315721
- 6. Yagui Moscoso M, Vidal Anzardo M, Rojas Mezarina L, Sanabria Rojas HA. Prevención de infecciones asociadas a la atención de salud:: conocimientos y prácticas en médicos residentes. Anales de la Facultad de Medicina. 2021;82(2):131–9.
- 7. Pedreros DET, Rojas RE. Factors associated with the level of knowledge about palliative care among medical students at a University in lima, Peru. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana [Internet]. 2021 May 10 [cited 2023 Mar 20];21(3).
- 8. Ticse R, Vásquez NE, Cárcamo HA, Ticse R, Vásquez NE, Cárcamo HA. Percepción sobre el profesionalismo médico en estudiantes del último año de medicina en una universidad peruana. Revista de Neuro-Psiquiatría. 2021;84(1):3–10.
- 9. Monrouxe LV, Grundy L, Mann M, John Z, Panagoulas E, Bullock A, et al. How prepared are UK medical graduates for practice? A rapid review of the literature 2009–2014. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(1):e013656. pmid:28087554
- 10. Malmut L, Kline-Quiroz C, Cushman DM. Competency Assessment in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Resident Education: A Systematic Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;101(12):1111–6. pmid:35121682
- 11. Edgar Laura, Sydney McLean Sean O. Hogan, Hamstra Stan, Holmboe Eric S.. The Milestones Guidebook [Internet]. 4th ed. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME); 2020. 41 p. Available at: https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/milestonesguidebook.pdf.
- 12.
Dirección General de Personal de La Salud, Dirección de Planificación de Personal de la Salud. Documento Técnico: Perfil de competencias esenciales que orientan la formación de los profesionales de la salud [Internet]. Ministerio de Salud ‐ Perú; 2021. Available at: http://bvs.minsa.gob.pe/local/MINSA/5497.pdf.
- 13.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Background and Archives [Internet]. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. 2018 [cited 2023 Apr 13]. https://www.acgme.org/what-we-do/accreditation/common-program-requirements/background-and-archives/ (accessed 2023 Apr 13).
- 14.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. What We Do [Internet]. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. 2020 [cited 2023 Apr 13]. https://www.acgme.org/what-we-do/overview/ (accessed 2023 Apr 13).
- 15. Holt KD, Miller RS, Nasca TJ. Residency Programs’ Evaluations of the Competencies: Data Provided to the ACGME About Types of Assessments Used by Programs. J Grad Med Educ. 2010;2(4):649–55. pmid:22132294
- 16.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Patient Care ‐ ACGME Competencies [Internet]. University of Maryland-Medical Center. [cited 2023 Apr 13]. https://www.umms.org/ummc/pros/gme/acgme-competencies/patient-care (accessed 2023 Apr 13).
- 17. Aparicio JR, Medrano SGR, Szielasko KG, Ingunza ELG. Un programa de capacitación previo al inicio de la práctica profesional de médicos peruanos mejora sus conocimientos sobre atención de parto y partograma. Rev bras educ med. 2011;35:186–92.
- 18. Arenas FR, Medina CAG, Artezano FR, Espinoza EG, Hurtado GL del CH. Factores asociados a la calificación del Examen Nacional de Medicina 2012 en internos de la UNMSM. Anales de la Facultad de Medicina. 2014;75(1):43–7.
- 19. Cieza Zevallos JA, León Rabanal CP, Huapaya Carrera JA, Miyahira Arakaki JM. Examen nacional de medicina en Perú 2008–2009: análisis y sostenibilidad de los resultados. Acta Médica Peruana. 2010;27(2):99–104. Available in: http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/amp/v27n2/a04v27n2.pdf.
- 20. Flores-Cohaila J, Rivarola-Hidalgo M, Flores-Cohaila J, Rivarola-Hidalgo M. El desempeño académico previo como predictor del examen nacional de medicina: un estudio transversal en Perú. FEM: Revista de la Fundación Educación Médica. 2022;25(6):243–7.
- 21. Huamaní C, Gutiérrez C, Mezones-Holguín E. Correlación y concordancia entre el examen nacional de medicina y el promedio ponderado universitario: análisis de la experiencia peruana en el periodo 2007–2009. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública. 2011;28(1):62–71. Available in: http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/rins/v28n1/a10v28n1.pdf.
- 22. Málaga G, Gayoso D, Vásquez N. Empathy in medical students of a private university in Lima, Peru: A descriptive study. Medwave. 2020;20(04):e7905–e7905. pmid:32469857
- 23. Mendoza-Chuctaya G, Barreto JB, Agramonte-Vilca M, Ruiz-Esquivel J. Examen Nacional de Medicina del Perú: análisis y variación de resultados en una escuela de Medicina. 2008–2015. Educación Médica. 2018;22(S3):168–72.
- 24. Mendoza-Chuctaya G, Mejia CR, Cano-Pucapuca J. Diferencias en la nota del ENAM y el promedio ponderado universitario en postulantes al servicio rural peruano, 2008–2015. EDUMED. 2019(S1);20:104–9.
- 25. Mendoza-Chuctaya G, Calla-Torres M, Ramos KR, Mejia CR, Mendoza-Chuctaya G, Calla-Torres M, et al. Examen Nacional de Medicina (ENAM): Análisis de la última década de evaluaciones teóricas en los futuros médicos del Perú. Acta Médica Peruana. 2021;38(3):169–76.
- 26. Prialé A, Samanez-Obeso A, Runzer-Colmenares F, Olazo-Cárdenas KM. Evaluación de grado estudiantes de medicina del último año mediante simulación clínica multimodal: Experiencia de una universidad peruana. Revista del Cuerpo Médico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo. 2022;15(3):387–91.
- 27. Tarazona-Pedreros D, Espinoza-Rojas R, Tarazona-Pedreros D, Espinoza-Rojas R. Factores asociados al nivel de conocimiento sobre cuidados paliativos en estudiantes de medicina de una Universidad en Lima, Perú. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana. 2021;21(3):571–9.
- 28. Vera-Ponce VJ, Torres-Malca JR, La Cruz-Vargas JAD, Zuzunaga Montoya FE, Chavez PH, Talavera-Ramirez JE, et al. Analysis of Statistical Knowledge of Peruvian Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study Based on a Survey. ijsmr. 2022;11:59–65
- 29. Acuña-Ortiz FE, Capitán de la Cruz VA, León Jiménez FE. Knowledge on fibromyalgia among general practitioners, from Chiclayo-Peru, 2016. Reumatol Clin. 2017;13(6):326–30. pmid:27742549
- 30. Bustamante-García M, Inga-Berrospi F, et al. Factores asociados a la percepción de competencias gerenciales en médicos peruanos recién egresados. Revista del Cuerpo Médico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo. 2021 Dec;14(4):447–51.
- 31. Chiang SS, Cruz AT, Del Castillo H, Contreras C, Becerra MC, Lecca L. Evaluation of health-care providers’ knowledge of childhood tuberculosis in Lima, Peru. Paediatrics and International Child Health. 2015;35(1):29–35. pmid:25161060
- 32. Correa-Carhuachin V, Manayalle-Torres M, León-Jiménez F, Cubas-Benavides F. Validación de un Instrumento para Medir el Nivel de Conocimiento sobre Hígado Graso no Alcohólico en Médicos Generales. Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú. 2011;351–8.
- 33. Correa-Carhuachin KV, Manayalle-Torres CM, León-Jiménez FE, Díaz-Vélez C, Cubas-Benavides F. Conocimiento sobre hígado graso no alcohólico en médicos generales de dos distritos de Chiclayo, Perú, durante el 2012. Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú. 2014;34(1):29–32. Available in: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1022-51292014000100004.
- 34. Nieto-Gutierrez W, Zafra-Tanaka JH, Pacheco-Barrios K, Taype-Rondan A. Self-perception of competences in clinical practice among recently graduated physicians from Lima, Peru. Heliyon. 2020;6(11):e05424. pmid:33251350
- 35. Taype-Rondán Á, Inga-Berrospi F, Casiano Celestino R, Bastidas F. Percepción de médicos recién egresados sobre las habilidades clínicas adquiridas durante el pregrado en Lima, Perú. Revista médica de Chile. 2015;143(4):540–2.
- 36. Taype-Rondán Á, Tataje Rengifo G, Arizabal A, Alegría Hernández S. Percepción de médicos de una universidad de Lima sobre su capacitación en procedimientos médicos durante el internado. Anales de la Facultad de Medicina. 2016;77(1):31–8.
- 37. Zafra-Tanaka JH, Hurtado-Villanueva ME, Saenz-Naranjo M del P, Taype-Rondan A. Self-perceived competence in early diagnosis of cervical cancer among recently graduated physicians from Lima, Peru. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0203778. pmid:30208095.
- 38. Zafra-Tanaka JH, Pacheco-Barrios K, Inga-Berrospi F, Taype-Rondan A. Self-perceived competencies in the diagnosis and treatment of mental health disorders among general practitioners in Lima, Peru. BMC Med Educ. 2019; 19(1):464. pmid:31842855.
- 39. Zavala Sarrio S, Uetmasu CS, Díaz MC, Vásquez AD. Autonomía del paciente y derecho a rehusar tratamientos: Conocimiento en Médicos Jóvenes Peruanos (encuesta 2010). Acta Médica Peruana. 2012;29(2):70–8. Available in: http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/amp/v29n2/a05v29n2.pdf.
- 40. Agreda-Carrillo ER, Galindo-Morales ML, Larios-Falcón KE, Arévalo-Flores JM, Cruzado L. Conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas sobre depresión mayor en médicos residentes de un hospital de tercer nivel de atención en Lima, Perú. Revista de Neuro-Psiquiatria. 2017;80(2):94–94.
- 41. Mayo GV, Quijano EG, Ponce DA, Ticse R. Utilización de la Escala de Empatia Médica de Jefferson en Residentes que realizan su especialización en un hospital peruano. Revista de Neuro-Psiquiatría. 2019;82(2):131–40.
- 42. Olascoaga AC, Riquelme A. Aplicación longitudinal del Mini Clinical Examination (Mini-CEX) en médicos residentes. Educación Médica. 2019;20:25–8.
- 43. Riveros-Ruiz J, Gutiérrez-Aguado A, Correa-López LE, De la Cruz-Vargas JA. Competencias del médico residente como educador en una universidad privada del Perú. Educación Médica. 2021;22:86–92. Available in:
- 44. Ticse Aguirre RW, Cuba Fuentes MS, Nestares Rojas JA, Aguilera L. Efecto de un entrenamiento corto en habilidades de comunicación con el método CICAA (conectar, identificar, comprender, acordar y ayudar), en médicos residentes de una universidad peruana. Revista Medica Herediana. 2019;30(3):148–56.
- 45. Yagui M, Vidal Anzardo M, Rojas Mezarina L, Sanabria Rojas HA. Prevención de infecciones asociadas a la atención de salud:: conocimientos y prácticas en médicos residentes. Anales de la Facultad de Medicina. 2021;82(2):131–9. Available in:
- 46. Cuba Fuentes MS, Zegarra Zamalloa CO, Reichert S, Gill D. Attitudes, perceptions and awareness concerning quaternary prevention among family doctors working in the Social Security System, Peru: a cross-sectional descriptive study. Medwave. 2016;16(3):e6433. pmid:27144838
- 47. Olascoaga AC, Aphang M, Prevost Y, Loza C, Pizarro M, Riquelme A, et al. Validez y confiabilidad de los resultados del instrumento MEDUC-PG14 para medir el desempeño docente en la residencia médica en Perú. Revista médica de Chile. 2021;149(6):920–7.
- 48. Chérrez Ojeda I, Calderon JC, Mori J, Colombaro D, Braido F, Soria E, et al. Patient-physician relationship in the management of asthma: Multicentric approach in Latin America. Journal of Asthma. 2016;53(7):751–60. pmid:27042878
- 49. Condor-Rojas Y, Gil-Olivares F, Fuentes-Rivera ME, Mendoza-Carrión AM, Terrel-Gutiérrez LJ, Labán-Hijar R, et al. Nivel de conocimientos de higiene de manos en enfermeras y médicos de tres hospitales nacionales del seguro social de salud, 2018. Revista del Cuerpo Médico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo. 2020;13(2):141–5.
- 50. Cordova E, Al-Rousan T, Castillo-Angeles M, Aftab S, Nelson BD. Effect of low-cost interventions on the retention of knowledge and skills following Helping Babies Breathe training. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2018;142(2):248–54. pmid:29687893
- 51. Ochoa-Alencastre M, Arnao-Farfán C, Sanabria-Rojas H. Conocimientos sobre metodología educativa para la capacitación de adultos, del personal de salud del primer nivel de atención, Perú 2005. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública [Internet]. 2009 Mar 31 [cited 2023 Mar 20];
- 52. Pace L, Grossman D, Chávez S, Távara L, Lara D, Guerrero-Vásquez R. Legal abortion in Peru: knowledge, attitudes and practices among a group of physician leaders. Gac Med Mex. 2006;142(S2):91–4. pmid:19031684.
- 53. Paredes P, de la Peña M, Flores-Guerra E, Diaz J, Trostle J. Factors influencing physicians’ prescribing behaviour in the treatment of childhood diarrhoea: Knowledge may not be the clue. Social Science & Medicine. 1996;42(8):1141–53. pmid:8737432
- 54. Romani FRR, Henríquez JR, López FC, Yngas GH. Conocimientos, percepciones y prácticas de personal de salud en la detección de sintomáticos respiratorios en una región de muy alto riesgo de trasmisión de tuberculosis en el Perú. Anales de la Facultad de Medicina. 2016;77(2):123–7.
- 55. Snowden R, Kennedy KI, Leon F, Orense VC, Perera HW, Phillips R, et al. Physicians’ views of periodic abstinence methods: a study in four countries. Stud Fam Plann. 1988;19(4):215–26. pmid:3176094.
- 56. Canelo Aybar CG, Alarcon Santos, Amao Ruiz EJ, Beteta Vejarano VS, Monge Salgado E. Conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas de la medicina basada en evidencias en médicos asistentes y residentes en dos hospitales de Lima-Perú. Revista Médica Herediana. 2007;18(2):76–84. Available in:http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1018-130X2007000200004.
- 57. Castro-Suarez S, Guevara-Silva E, Caparó-Zamalloa C, Osorio-Marcatinco V, Meza-Vega M, Miller B, et al. Knowledge and Attitudes for the Management of Behavioral Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia. Front Neurol. 2022;12:786448. pmid:35087469
- 58. Cherrez Ojeda I, Jeffe DB, Guerrero T, Mantilla R, Santoro I, Gabino G, et al. Attitudes and knowledge about obstructive sleep apnea among Latin American primary care physicians. Sleep Medicine. 2013;14(10):973–7. pmid:23973417
- 59. Custodio N, Becerra-Becerra Y, Cruzado L, Castro-Suárez S, Montesinos R, Bardales Y, et al. Nivel de conocimientos sobre demencia frontotemporal en una muestra de médicos que evalúan regularmente a pacientes con demencia en Lima-Perú. Revista chilena de neuro-psiquiatría. 2018;56(2):77–88.
- 60. Flores A, Burgos S, Abarca-Barriga H. Knowledge level of medical students and physicians about rare diseases in Lima, Peru. Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2022;11(4):180–8. pmid:36457581.
- 61. Quispe RC, Muñoz EM, Cadillo AV, Ticse R. Perception of medical communication skills during the clinical interview in a Peruvian teaching hospital: validation and application of an assessment tool. Medwave. 2019;19(9):e7705. pmid:31665130
- 62. Montes Teves PA, Soria Medina JI, Gamarra Espinoza Z-I, Monge Salgado E. Actitud del médico frente a la infección por Helicobacter pylori en su práctica clínica. Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú. 2002;22(3):221–7. Available in: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?pid=S1022-51292002000300005&script=sci_abstract.
- 63. Tejada-Hidalgo K, Llanos-Tejada F. Cuestionario OSAKA para valorar el conocimiento de la apnea obstructiva del sueño en personal de cirugía de un hospital público. Lima, Perú. Acta Médica Peruana. 2018;35(2):94–9.
- 64. Vásquez-Silva L, Ticse R, Alfaro-Carballido L, Guerra-Castañon F. [Access, use and preferences of Information and Communication Technologies by physicians in a general hospital in Peru]. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2015;32(2):289–93. pmid:26338389.
- 65. Zea-Vera A, Liendo-Caro C, Luna-Carrillo L, Prevost-Ruiz Y, Castañeda-Guarderas A, Málaga G. [Knowledge of epidemiological risk indicators used in clinical trials among medical students in advanced years and medical residents]. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2012;29(2):218–22. pmid:22858768
- 66.
Analysis of production, impact, and collaboration networks in scientific research in Scopus for Peru from 2000 to 2019 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 May 17]. https://www.medwave.cl/revisiones/analisis/8121.html (accessed 2023 May 17).
- 67. Mendoza-Chuctaya G, Calla-Torres M, Ramos KR, Mejia CR, Mendoza-Chuctaya G, Calla-Torres M, et al. Examen Nacional de Medicina (ENAM): Análisis de la última década de evaluaciones teóricas en los futuros médicos del Perú. Acta Médica Peruana. 2021;38(3):169–76.
- 68. Hernández-Vásquez A, Rojas-Roque C, Prado-Galbarro FJ, Bendezu-Quispe G. Satisfacción del usuario externo con la atención en establecimientos del Ministerio de Salud de Perú y sus factores asociados. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública. 2019;36(4):620–8. pmid:31967253
- 69. Inga-Berrospi F, Arosquipa Rodríguez C. Avances en el desarrollo de los recursos humanos en salud en el Perú y su importancia en la calidad de atención. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública. 2019;36(2):312–8. pmid:31460646
- 70.
Producción científica peruana en medicina y redes de colaboración, análisis del Science Citation Index 2000–2009 [Internet]. [cited 2023 May 17]. http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-46342010000300003 (accessed 2023 May 17).
- 71. Kang D, Siddiqui S, Weiss H, Sifri Z, Krishnaswami S, Nwomeh B, et al. Are we meeting ACGME core competencies? A systematic review of literature on international surgical rotations. Am J Surg. 2018;216(4):782–6. pmid:30093091
- 72. Díaz-Plasencia JA, Díaz-Reyna JA, Valencia-Mariñas H, Yan-Quiroz E, Iglesias-Obando A, Díaz-Villazón M. Importancia de las competencias y utilidad de las actividades de aprendizaje en el desempeño de los residentes de medicina. FEM: Revista de la Fundación Educación Médica. 2016;19(4):193–203. Available at: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2014-98322016000400006.
- 73. Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and Assessing Professional Competence. JAMA. 2002; 9;287(2):226–35. pmid:11779266
- 74. Kriston L, Hahlweg P, Härter M, Scholl I. A skills network approach to physicians’ competence in shared decision making. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy. 2020;23(6):1466. pmid:32869476
- 75. Faraj Pour A, Yazdani S, Farmad SA. A conceptual model for practice-based learning and improvement competency in medicine. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11(6):3230–7. pmid:36119169
- 76. Zárate E. Innovación en la investigación. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública. 2010 Jul;27(3):432–437. Available at: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-46342010000300017.
- 77. Paravic Klijn T, Lagos Garrido ME, Paravic Klijn T, Lagos Garrido ME. TRABAJO EN EQUIPO Y CALIDAD DE LA ATENCIÓN EN SALUD. Ciencia y enfermería [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 May 17];27.
- 78. Sureda-Demeulemeester E, Ramis-Palmer C, Sesé-Abad A. La evaluación de competencias en Medicina. Revista Clínica Española. 2017;217(9):534–42. pmid:28666528
- 79.
Asociación Peruana de Facultades de Medicina-ASPEFAM. Boletín Electrónico de ASPEFAM [Internet]. Boletín Electrónico de ASPEFAM. 2019 [cited 2023 May 17]. https://www.aspefam.org.pe/boletin_elec/Boletin%20199/Boletin%20199.htm (accessed 2023 May 17).
- 80.
Asociación Peruana de Facultades de Medicina-ASPEFAM. Fase piloto del Examen Clínico Objetivo Estructurado (ECOE). Boletín Electrónico. 2019 Jul;5. Available at: https://www.aspefam.org.pe/prensa/02.07.2019%20ECOE.pdf.
- 81. Mendoza-Arana PJ. Investigación en educación médica en la Facultad de Medicina de San Fernando: una perspectiva sistémica. Anales de la Facultad de Medicina. 2012;73(1):55–61. Available at: http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/afm/v73n1/a11v73n1.pdf.
- 82. Morán-Mariños C, Montesinos-Segura R, Taype-Rondan A. Producción científica en educación médica en Latinoamérica en Scopus, 2011–2015. Educación Médica. 2019, 1(20):10–5.
- 83.
Prioridades de Investigación en Salud [Internet]. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SALUD. [cited 2023 Apr 12]. https://web.ins.gob.pe/es/investigacion-en-salud/prioridades-de-investigacion (accessed 2023 Apr 12).
- 84. McKechnie DGJ, Al-Shakarchi N, Tackett SA, Young TM, Rashid MA. Sources of funding for research articles in medical education journals from 1999 to 2019. Med Teach, 2023-24(1);1–6. pmid:36963107
- 85. Holmboe Eric S., et al. “The Role of Assessment in Competency-Based Medical Education.” Medical Teacher, 2010, 32, (8), 676–82. PubMed, pmid:20662580
- 86. Hubley John, “Health Education in Developing Countries—the Need for an Appropriate Technology”, Health Education Research, 1988, 3(4), 387–92, available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/45111186.