https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1417-1260
Figures
Abstract
Background
Subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) is a biochemical thyroid disorder characterised by elevated levels of Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) together with normal levels of thyroid hormones. Evidence on the benefits of treatment is limited, resulting in persistent controversies relating to its clinical management.
Aim
This study describes the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients identified as having subclinical hypothyroidism in Wales between 2000 and 2021, the annual cumulative incidence during this period and the testing and treatment patterns associated with this disorder.
Methods
We used linked electronic health records from SAIL Databank. Eligible patients were identified using a combination of diagnostic codes and Thyroid Function Test results. Descriptive analyses were then performed.
Results
199,520 individuals (63.8% female) were identified as having SCH, 23.6% (n = 47,104) of whom received levothyroxine for treatment over the study period. The median study follow-up time was 5.75 person-years (IQR 2.65–9.65). Annual cumulative incidence was highest in 2012 at 502 cases per 100,000 people. 92.5% (n = 184,484) of the study population had TSH levels between the upper limit of normal and 10mIU/L on their first test. 61.9% (n = 5,071) of patients identified using Read v2 codes were in the treated group. 41.9% (n = 19,716) of treated patients had a history of a single abnormal test result before their first prescription.
Conclusion
In Wales, the number of incident cases of SCH has risen unevenly between 2000 and 2021. Most of the study population had mild SCH on their index test, but more than a third of the identified patients received levothyroxine after a single abnormal test result. Patients with clinically recorded diagnoses were more likely to be treated. Given the expectation of steadily increasing patient numbers, more evidence is required to support the clinical management of subclinical hypothyroidism.
Citation: Bauer BS, Azcoaga-Lorenzo A, Agrawal U, Fagbamigbe AF, McCowan C (2024) Subclinical hypothyroidism in Wales from 2000 to 2021: A descriptive cohort study based on electronic health records. PLoS ONE 19(5): e0298871. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298871
Editor: Fateen Ata, Hamad Medical Corporation, QATAR
Received: October 6, 2023; Accepted: February 1, 2024; Published: May 21, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Bauer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The data used for this study are third-party data provided by SAIL Databank. Access to the datasets is conditional upon application and review by their Information Governance Review Panel. Interested parties can access the datasets by following the same application process as the authors, as detailed on the SAIL Databank website (https://saildatabank.com/data/apply-to-work-with-the-data/). The authors did not have any special access privileges that other applicants would not have.
Funding: This study was performed as part of a PhD studentship funded by the School of Medicine, University of St Andrews. The University of St Andrews played no role in the design and conduct of the study.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The thyroid gland is a butterfly-shaped endocrine organ in the neck whose function is regulated by Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) from the pituitary gland. It produces the thyroid hormones thyroxine (T4) and triiodothyronine (T3), which primarily regulate bodily metabolic function. Hypothyroidism generally refers to a deficiency of these hormones but can be subdivided into overt and subclinical types. The latter, subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH), is a frequently asymptomatic condition in which the thyroid hormone levels are within normal range, but TSH is elevated [1, 2].
Reference ranges for TSH vary due to patient characteristics, particularly age, sex, race, ethnicity and pregnancy status [3, 4]. There is disagreement over what should be considered as the upper limit of normal [5–9], so these values tend to differ between laboratories, given the lack of universally applicable guidelines. However, a commonly used upper cut-off for TSH is 4.5 mIU/L [10], such that patients with measurements between 4.5 and 9.9 mIU/L are said to have mild SCH. On the other hand, TSH levels ≥10 mIU/L are classified as severe SCH [2].
Among the causes of SCH, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, an autoimmune thyroid disorder, is the most frequent. Women are more likely to develop SCH than men, regardless of age [2, 11]. Previous studies have also reported that the population prevalence of SCH ranges between 4% and 10%, depending on factors such as age and sex distribution patterns [1, 11–13]. The Colorado Thyroid Disease Prevalence Study determined that in their study population of over 25,000 patients, approximately 9% of subjects not on thyroid medication were found to have SCH [11]. The US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) reported SCH prevalence figures of 4.3% in the total population [13].
It has been reported that around 2% to 6% of SCH cases each year experience progression to overt hypothyroidism. This phenomenon occurs more commonly among female patients and those found to test positive for thyroid peroxidase antibodies, for instance, in autoimmune thyroid disease [1, 14]. As reported in some studies, the TSH levels of approximately 60% of patients identified as having mild SCH may later spontaneously revert to normal [2, 15].
The pharmacological treatment for overt and subclinical hypothyroidism is levothyroxine (LT4), a synthetic version of thyroxine. Controversy persists on the clinical management of SCH, specifically around whether to initiate treatment and, in those cases, what level of TSH to use as a threshold. The debate is due to insufficient robust evidence and conflicting study findings on the long-term benefits–and, inversely, potential harms–of treatment for this disorder [1, 10, 16–19]. For example, many studies have investigated the effects of SCH on cardiovascular disease, but while some found that levothyroxine lowered the incidence of myocardial infarctions, atrial fibrillation and cardiovascular mortality [20], others did not [21, 22]. Similarly, Mooijaart et al. reported that in 2 randomised trials of levothyroxine treatment for patients 80 years and above, there was no significant difference in quality of life (QoL) between treatment and control groups [23]; whereas in a cohort study of 78 patients, Winther et al. found marked improvements in health-related QoL within six months of starting treatment [24]. Even so, current NICE guidelines state that treatment should only be commenced after a repeat abnormal TSH result of ≥10 mIU/L three months after the first [25].
The debate extends to screening for SCH, despite the frequency of no reported symptoms, due to the lack of substantiated evidence of benefits for the majority who might be diagnosed through screening programs [2, 26, 27]. Other issues that are pertinent to the management of SCH are the overuse of thyroid function tests, also known as overtesting, which can potentially increase the detection of elevated TSH [28, 29], and the overuse of levothyroxine for SCH [19, 30], with no clarity on how it affects patients in the long-term.
Our study aims were to (i) describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients identified as having SCH in Wales between 2000 and 2021; (ii) estimate the annual cumulative incidence of SCH and the accumulation of patients identified as having SCH during the study period; (iii) characterise thyroid function testing and levothyroxine prescribing over the study period, including the TSH thresholds used to initiate treatment for SCH.
Methods
Study design
This is a retrospective, population-based cohort study using the anonymised, linked electronic health records (EHR) for the population living in Wales between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2021. These were individuals registered with a General Practitioner (GP) practice contributing to the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank.
Data source
The data source was the SAIL Databank, a repository of anonymised patient records for the population of Wales, representing approximately 5 million individuals between January 2000 and December 2021 [31]. Data is collected from approximately 84% of all GP practices in the country. The development, database structure, policies and requisite procedures governing the use of SAIL data have been detailed previously [32–34]. Approval was granted by the Information Governance Review Panel (IGRP) in February 2022 (ref 1371) for a study on SCH and clinical outcomes to be performed using SAIL datasets. The primary care, hospital, outpatient, emergency department, death, demographic and test result datasets (S1 Appendix) were first accessed on 14 March 2022.
Study cohort
Cohort entry was defined by the presence of one or more of: SCH Read v2 codes, SCH International Classification of Diseases version 10 (ICD-10) codes or test results indicative of SCH within the study timespan. For test results, the respective lab reference ranges were used as recorded to identify the upper limit of TSH and normal levels of T4 (S2 Appendix). Subjects could enter the cohort at any point between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2021 (Fig 1). Exit from the study occurred at the earliest of: (i) death, (ii) censoring due to the end of GP registration or emigration from Wales or (iii) the end of the study period.
Eligibility criteria
To be included in the study, patients must have had a recorded SCH diagnostic code or test result indicative of SCH. They must also have been registered with a GP for at least 12 months before the index SCH code or test result.
The following groups were excluded: women with recorded pregnancies within 12 months of the index SCH code or test, patients under 18 years old, those that had ever been identified as having overt hypothyroidism, those given prescriptions for thyroid-altering medications (amiodarone, lithium and antithyroid drugs) or thyroid hormone replacement (more than 30 days before the index code or test) and those with histories of radioiodine and thyroidectomy, such that there were no other indications for the use of levothyroxine.
Study variables
Baseline characteristics were assessed on the index diagnostic code or test date, which was set as the ‘date of identification’. Patients were further classified into two mutually exclusive groups based on whether they received prescriptions for thyroid hormone replacement at any point after the date of identification (‘treated’) or did not receive any treatment (‘untreated’).
Sex was recorded as either male or female. Age was calculated from demographic records as the difference in years between the week of birth date and date of identification. This variable was also categorised into bands spanning ten years each. Deprivation scores were enumerated using the 2019 version of the Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation (WIMD 2019) and assigned based on the recorded home postcode on the date of identification [35, 36]. Length of follow-up was calculated as the difference between the study start date and the exit date or study end date.
Additional SCH-related characteristics such as TSH levels, hypothyroidism codes, and prescribed medications were derived from the primary care or test result datasets. The presence of ≥1 thyroid hormone prescription was used as a proxy indicator for treatment status. The number of TFTs performed before and after initiating levothyroxine was also calculated for treated patients. This was done to gauge the frequency with which the NICE treatment guideline–a repeat abnormal TSH result of ≥10 mIU/L after three months before commencing treatment–was followed.
Where available, thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibody measurements were extracted from the test results dataset and compared to normal ranges. All references to TFT results in this text required that TSH and FT4 results share the same specimen collection date. Hence, ‘normal TFT result(s)’ refers to TSH and FT4 having both been within their respective reference ranges, whereas ‘abnormal TFT result(s)’ represents the elevated TSH and normal FT4 characteristic of SCH. Rather than selecting fixed study thresholds for thyroid hormones and antibodies, the reported lab reference ranges were used to align our identification of SCH with the results clinicians would have received.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to summarise baseline demographic data and clinical characteristics. For categorical variables, counts and percentages were used; means and standard deviations were employed for continuous variables.
Estimates of annual cumulative incidence were obtained for each year between 2000 and 2021; this was calculated as the number of newly identified SCH cases between 1 January and 31 December divided by the total number of GP-registered individuals as of 1 July (mid-year population) and multiplied by 100,000. The mid-2011 Welsh population was used to obtain age- and sex-standardised estimates.
The frequencies of normal and abnormal TFT results per patient were classified as prior to or later than the date of identification. We reported the total number of TFTs in the wider GP-registered population to explore if there was a relationship to the number of tests ordered in the same year for the study population. For the former, the study eligibility criteria were applied to all patients who had recorded TFT results between 2000 and 2021 –the number of tests per year was then calculated, irrespective of whether SCH was detected.
The frequency of levothyroxine prescriptions each year and the time between the date of identification and the first prescription were also calculated.
Structured query language (SQL DB2) was used to retrieve and interrogate the SAIL datasets via the SAIL Gateway [37].
Ethical approval
The project was approved in writing by the SAIL Databank IGRP (ref 1371) and by the School of Medicine Ethics Committee, acting on behalf of the University of St Andrews Teaching and Research Ethics Committee (UTREC) (MD16055) in March 2022. As the study data are de-identified, authors had no access to disclosive information and consent from individual patients was not required.
The results are reported using the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected Data (RECORD) guidelines [38].
Results
Between January 2000 and December 2021, over 5.6 million individuals were identified in the demographic register, 304,148 of whom had recorded diagnostic codes or tests indicative of SCH. After applying the eligibility criteria resulting in the exclusion of 104,628 patients, 199,520 individuals were identified as incident SCH cases over the study period (Fig 2). The proportion of untreated patients (n = 152,416; 76.4%) was more than three times that of those who received levothyroxine over the study period (n = 47,104; 23.6%).
Patient characteristics
The baseline characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. There were more female than male patients in the entire cohort (63.8% vs 36.2%). The mean age of study participants was 57.8 years, with a standard deviation of 17.55 years. The highest patient numbers were observed in the 60–69 age band (n = 39,486; 19.8%). There were more untreated than treated patients across all age bands.
The total length of follow-up for the study population was 1,286,883 person-years, with a median duration of 5.75 person-years (IQR 2.65–9.65). 24.6% of the study population died before the end of the study, as opposed to those censored (n = 7,715; 3.9%) because they moved away from Wales or switched to non-SAIL GP practices. Most patients had records running to the end of the study period, 31 December 2021 (n = 142,687; 71.5%).
There was considerable overlap between categories based on the means of identification from the EHR. 99.2% of patients had recorded TFT results on the date of identification; only 149 patients had a combination of all three criteria (Table 1).
Annual cumulative incidence
The annual cumulative incidence of SCH was irregular over the study period. The number of new cases was highest at a single historical point: approximately 502 cases per 100,000 people in 2012, following a marked decline in 2010 (297 cases per 100,000 people). Between 2015 and 2018, the cumulative incidence of SCH was steady but fell again until 2020 (275 cases per 100,000 people) (Fig 3).
When stratified by age and sex, the cumulative incidence charts followed a similar trajectory, though it was noted that the number of female patients was higher for both measures (S3 Appendix).
Testing and treatment patterns
The annual overall number of TFTs ordered for SCH patients in this study was 1,046 in 2000, and because more patients were identified as having SCH over the study period, the totals were highest in 2018 (n = 123,448) (Fig 4). There was a drop in 2020 (n = 88,000) compared to the previous year (n = 121,448), coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. The plotted graph for tests ordered for the wider GP-registered population appears similar to that for study participants but has corresponding peaks and troughs of a larger magnitude (Fig 4).
On the date of identification, 92.5% (n = 184,484) of the study population had TSH values between the upper limit of normal and 10 mIU/L. Of this group, 39,324 (21.3%) received prescriptions for levothyroxine during the study. However, the split between treated and untreated patients was reversed for patients with TSH levels higher than 10 mIU/L (Table 2).
In total, more than half of patients with severe SCH–TSH levels over 10 mIU/L–on the date of identification were in the treated group (n = 6,891; 53%). There were also more patients with elevated TPO antibodies on the recorded date of the first code or test among the treated (n = 5,428; 59.5%) than the untreated group (n = 3,689; 40.5%), as shown in Table 2.
It was also noted that 6,811 (83.1%) of patients identified using Read v2 codes had mild SCH at the time of identification, but almost two-thirds of these patients subsequently received treatment over the study period (n = 4,140; 60.8%).
For the treated group, 19,716 (41.9%) patients received their first levothyroxine prescription after only one test result showing raised TSH and normal T4. (Fig 5).
Most treated patients had between 1 and 5 TFTs performed in the first 12 months (n = 31,840; 67.6%), 24 months (n = 32,801; 69.6%) and 36 months (n = 30,348; 64.4%) after treatment with levothyroxine was initially prescribed (Table 3). The proportion of untreated patients with no recorded follow-up TFTs was larger than that of treated patients over the same three-year period after SCH was identified or treated. Over this duration, more in the treated group (n = 7,399; 15.7%) had more than five monitoring tests compared to the untreated (n = 8,167; 5.4%).
The number of patients on treatment rose gradually, from 52 to 33,337 of the existing SCH cases in 2000 and 2021 respectively (Fig 6). Here, ‘initiating treatment’ refers to the number of patients who received their first prescription for levothyroxine in that year, as opposed to those that had already commenced treatment since the study start date (‘continuing treatment’). Except at the start of the study (2000 to 2002), a smaller proportion of patients were started on treatment throughout (Fig 6 and S4 Appendix).
Under one-fifth of patients in the treated group (n = 7,794; 16.5%) received their first levothyroxine prescription within one month of their index test or code for SCH. In contrast, most treated patients (n = 29,818; 63.3%) got their first prescription more than 12 months after SCH was identified (Table 4).
Discussion
Between 2000 and 2021, 199,520 individuals residing in Wales were identified as having SCH. The annual cumulative incidence of SCH was irregular, with a marked drop in 2010 and a prominent peak in 2012 for crude and both age- and sex-standardised estimates. In keeping with other studies on SCH [11, 39], it was found that more females than males were identified with SCH. Less than one-third of the study population received treatment during the study period. Most patients identified using diagnostic codes, specifically Read v2, received levothyroxine over the study period, though an equally large proportion of these patients also had mild SCH on their first test date.
In contrast, 6.5% of the study population had TSH levels higher than 10 mIU/L on their index test results. Levothyroxine was prescribed for 42% of patients in the treated group after a single abnormal test indicative of SCH. The frequency of TFTs for treated patients after their first prescription was higher than tests performed for untreated patients after identifying SCH.
Annual cumulative incidence
The reason for the peak in annual cumulative incidence in 2012 was not immediately apparent. However, most of the patients in this study were identified using TFT results rather than diagnostic codes. A potential reason for the irregular pattern of annual incident cases, therefore, might be altered clinical decision-making as a result of new guidance; for example, the Royal College of Physicians released a statement on the diagnosis and management of primary hypothyroidism in 2008 [40] and updated the guidance in 2011 [41]. The intervening period corresponds to the marked drop in incident cases of SCH in the study population around 2010, but this conclusion cannot be reached based on a single study.
Notably, when standardised to the mid-2011 population of Wales, estimates of the annual cumulative incidence of SCH were broadly similar across the age and sex categories. However, the line representing patients aged 90 and over was flattened compared to the crude annual cumulative incidence plot, suggesting that the proportion that was 90 years or older in the standard population was smaller than among the study population.
Testing and treatment
Overtesting for thyroid function has been widely reported in the literature [28, 29, 42–44]. In contrast, our findings show that in the years following the identification of SCH, most of the untreated patients had fewer tests, which aligns with current guidance to perform repeat TFTs annually or biennially for untreated SCH, depending on the presence of features of underlying thyroid disease [25]. Treated patients, who would typically require frequent monitoring tests–every three months until TSH levels normalise and then annually–were found to have had more TFTs in comparison. Annual monitoring would possibly explain why 64% of treated patients had between one and five tests in the first three years after treatment was started.
Data on TPO antibodies on the date of identification were available for only a small fraction of patients in the cohort. However, this corresponds to the NICE recommendation to consider antibody testing for elevated TSH levels and avoid repeating these specific tests [25]. TPO antibody assays predating these NICE guidelines would also likely have been infrequent.
The plotted rise in the number of TFTs ordered for study participants can be explained by the increasing number of identified SCH cases over the study period. On the other hand, the marked drop observed around 2020 may be attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic, during which mandatory lockdowns were implemented. It is, however, impossible to completely rule out overtesting in this study because inappropriate TFT ordering accompanied by a higher number of patients receiving tests would, unsurprisingly, present a false picture of a steady average among patients with SCH.
Over 90% of the study population had mild SCH–TSH levels between the upper limit of normal and the 10mIU/L threshold–on the date they were identified. This number is higher than that reported from the Colorado Thyroid Disease Prevalence study, 74% [11]. However, the participants in the Colorado study were the attendees of a statewide health fair, representing 25,862 individuals. Unlike this longitudinal study based on SCH cases over 20 years, the fair facilitated a cross-sectional survey. As such, a more extended series of surveys might have approximated our findings more closely.
Patients with a recorded diagnosis were more likely to receive treatment than those identified through test results. Of the latter, less than a third were in the treated group, suggesting that GPs may have been more likely to disregard test results indicative of SCH if, for instance, the TFTs were not directly relevant to their plans for the clinical management of presenting symptoms. In such a scenario, the SCH diagnosis would not be recorded, decreasing the probability of the patient receiving a prescription for levothyroxine. Crucially, the study findings also indicated that the presence of a diagnostic code in the EHR was not an indicator of the severity of SCH–as determined using the 10 mIU/L threshold for TSH. Their index test results showed that most patients with clinically recorded diagnoses had mild SCH in the first instance.
More of the patients who had severe SCH on the index date received treatment during the study, as would be expected. Several treatment guidelines around the world similarly recommend the initiation of levothyroxine for cases with TSH levels above 10mIU/L, including those from the American Thyroid Association [45, 46], European Thyroid Association [47] and Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism [48]. A crucial caveat to this guidance is that patient age must be considered, given the physiological increases in TSH levels with age [20, 23]. It is frequently stated that a higher treatment threshold should be applied for older patients, particularly for mild SCH [18, 49, 50]. Even so, a multinational survey on treatment practices for SCH by Razvi et al. [51] found wide variability in the implementation of such recommendations. Potential reasons for the failure to treat cases of severe SCH, as observed for 3.1% of our study population, include patient age, transient increases in TSH or measurement errors [2], which would be lower on subsequent tests.
Levothyroxine is currently the third most frequently prescribed drug by GPs in Wales [52–54]. Previous studies have also described ‘overtreatment’–the tendency for clinicians to initiate treatment even when it is not necessarily required and would not benefit the patient [30, 55]. The finding that 42% of all the patients in the treated group had levothyroxine initiated based on a single abnormal test result indicative of SCH may be related to overtreatment. This proportion was notably higher than the number of patients with severe SCH and those who tested positive for TPO antibodies–according to current guidelines, these two groups would have been deemed eligible for immediate treatment. Furthermore, the number of patients who had severe SCH on the date of identification was lower than those who received their first prescription within one month of that date. All these findings point to the potential overuse of levothyroxine over the study period.
Strengths and limitations
The strengths of this study included the use of multiple SAIL datasets to identify patients identified as having SCH and to assess their eligibility for this study; the scale and coverage of the data used, which is almost the whole population of Wales spanning at least two decades, as well as the characterisation of different aspects of SCH and SCH patients to provide a comprehensive description of the disorder and how it was managed clinically.
This study is subject to some limitations. Foremost are the inherent challenges of identifying SCH in EHR: missing data, coding errors and inconsistencies in patient records influenced the inclusion of patients in the study. It was observed that the test results dataset, in particular, was plagued by these issues due to the variety of ways in which test names, codes and values were recorded. Even so, this problem was mitigated by including the primary care and inpatient datasets to identify patients who had been clinically diagnosed with the disorder. SAIL Databank is also recognised as a high-quality primary care data source with a high level of coverage in Wales (84%) [56]. Also, it was not possible to identify the ethnicity of eligible patients as this information was not available in the provisioned datasets.
Related to these points, most of the study population was identified in the EHR using their TFT results. However, these are not error-proof; it has been reported previously that due to the use of population reference ranges, an individual may have a physiologically abnormal thyroid function test (TFT) result that matches what is otherwise considered normal range [1, 57].
It is also essential to note that for the evaluation of treatment, only prescribing data–not dispensing data–were available. It was, therefore, impossible to ascertain whether the levothyroxine prescriptions given were filled (adherence) and the medication taken by the patient as instructed (compliance). This affected the interpretation of treatment duration, as it would otherwise have been possible to explore LT4 use by accounting for the amount of medication given and, possibly, to distinguish between treated patients by dosages and drug formulations. However, it can reasonably be expected that most patients who received prescriptions took their medication; hence, we used prescriptions as a proxy for treatment status.
A key challenge in estimating the true prevalence of SCH is the lack of agreement concerning TSH reference ranges [9]. Diagnosis relies entirely on lab results; therefore, variations in the upper limit of normal for TSH directly influence patient numbers. However, separate constraints arise from using EHR only to measure prevalence. Chief among these is the likelihood of underestimating the number of existing cases because of the complex interplay of factors that affect the decision to seek clinical care [58]. This selection bias arises because patients with more severe symptoms are more likely to visit their GP and have a recorded visit in the EHR [59, 60]. Another factor is that the restriction of study start and stop dates can mimic a closed cohort in which the ‘existing patient’ count starts at zero. We did not use the study population for prevalence estimates for these reasons.
Finally, the most recently reported SAIL coverage of GP practices in Wales is approximately 84% [56]; therefore, it cannot be assumed that the denominators used to estimate the annual cumulative incidence are directly equal to the respective actual population counts. This challenge was mitigated by performing standardisation of the estimated cumulative incidence, though the plotted graphs were essentially unchanged.
Conclusion
This descriptive study on SCH in Wales shows an uneven rise in the overall number of patients, TFT and levothyroxine use between 2000 and 2021, with the highest annual cumulative incidence in 2012 at 502 cases per 100,000 people.
Compared to patients who only had test results indicative of SCH, those with clinically recorded diagnoses were less likely to meet the 10mIU/L TSH cutoff for severe SCH but were also more likely to be offered treatment. In contrast, patients with mild SCH on their index test were less likely to receive levothyroxine. The clinical management of SCH was inconsistent with the recommendation to consider treatment only if a repeat test reveals TSH levels higher than 10mIU/L, considering that over a third of treated cases had only one prior abnormal test result. However, per the current NICE annual monitoring guidance, TFTs were ordered more frequently for treated than untreated patients.
Our findings show that more robust guidelines are needed to ensure the appropriate clinical management of patients with SCH. Given the potential for a continued rise in patient numbers and conflicting evidence on the impact of SCH on patients’ long-term health, more research is needed to inform strategies to improve the use of TFTs and levothyroxine for managing this thyroid disorder.
Supporting information
S3 Appendix. Age- and sex-stratified annual cumulative incidence according to the mid-2011 Welsh census data.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298871.s003
(DOCX)
S4 Appendix. Levothyroxine use during the study period.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298871.s004
(DOCX)
References
- 1. Biondi B, Cooper DS. The clinical significance of subclinical thyroid dysfunction. Endocrine reviews. 2008;29:76–131. pmid:17991805
- 2. Cooper DS, Biondi B. Subclinical thyroid disease. The Lancet. 2012;379:1142–54. pmid:22273398
- 3.
Biondi B. The normal TSH reference range: what has changed in the last decade?: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 3584–7.
- 4.
Dayan C, Panicker V. Interpretation of thyroid function tests and their relationship to iodine nutrition: changes in TSH, free T4, and free T3 resulting from iodine deficiency and iodine excess. in: Preedy V R, et al(Eds), Comprehensive handbook of iodine: nutritional, biochemical, pathological and therapeutic aspects, Academic Press, Boston, USA. 2009:47–54.
- 5. Kratzsch J, Fiedler GM, Leichtle A, Brügel M, Buchbinder S, Otto L, et al. New reference intervals for thyrotropin and thyroid hormones based on National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry criteria and regular ultrasonography of the thyroid. Clinical chemistry. 2005;51:1480–6. pmid:15961550
- 6. Meyerovitch J, Rotman-Pikielny P, Sherf M, Battat E, Levy Y, Surks MI. Serum thyrotropin measurements in the community: five-year follow-up in a large network of primary care physicians. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2007;167:1533–8. pmid:17646608
- 7. Surks MI. TSH reference limits: new concepts and implications for diagnosis of subclinical hypothyroidism. Endocrine Practice. 2013;19:1066. pmid:24014005
- 8. Okosieme O, Gilbert J, Abraham P, Boelaert K, Dayan C, Gurnell M, et al. Management of primary hypothyroidism: statement by the British Thyroid Association Executive Committee. Clinical endocrinology. 2016;84:799–808. pmid:26010808
- 9. Hennessey J, Espaillat R. Subclinical hypothyroidism: a historical view and shifting prevalence. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2015;69:771–82. pmid:25846327
- 10. Surks MI, Ortiz E, Daniels GH, Sawin CT, Col NF, Cobin RH, et al. Subclinical thyroid disease: scientific review and guidelines for diagnosis and management. Jama. 2004;291:228–38. pmid:14722150
- 11. Canaris GJ, Manowitz NR, Mayor G, Ridgway EC. The Colorado thyroid disease prevalence study. Archives of internal medicine. 2000;160:526–34. pmid:10695693
- 12. Surks MI, Hollowell JG. Age-specific distribution of serum thyrotropin and antithyroid antibodies in the US population: implications for the prevalence of subclinical hypothyroidism. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2007;92:4575–82. pmid:17911171
- 13. Hollowell JG, Staehling NW, Flanders WD, Hannon WH, Gunter EW, Spencer CA, et al. Serum TSH, T4, and thyroid antibodies in the United States population (1988 to 1994): National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2002;87:489–99.
- 14. Díez JJ, Iglesias P. Spontaneous Subclinical Hypothyroidism in Patients Older than 55 Years: An Analysis of Natural Course and Risk Factors for the Development of Overt Thyroid Failure. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2004;89:4890–7. pmid:15472181
- 15. Díez JJ, Iglesias P, Burman KD. Spontaneous normalization of thyrotropin concentrations in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2005;90:4124–7. pmid:15811925
- 16. Biondi B. Natural history, diagnosis and management of subclinical thyroid dysfunction. Best practice & research Clinical endocrinology & metabolism. 2012;26:431–46. pmid:22863386
- 17. Calissendorff J, Falhammar H. To treat or not to treat subclinical hypothyroidism, what is the evidence? Medicina. 2020;56:40. pmid:31963883
- 18. Chrysant SG. The current debate over treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism to prevent cardiovascular complications. International journal of clinical practice. 2020;74:e13499. pmid:32159256
- 19. Chu JW, Crapo LM. The treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism is seldom necessary. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2001;86:4591–9. pmid:11600508
- 20. Hennessey JV, Espaillat R. Diagnosis and management of subclinical hypothyroidism in elderly adults: a review of the literature. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2015;63:1663–73. pmid:26200184
- 21. Stott DJ, Rodondi N, Kearney PM, Ford I, Westendorp RG, Mooijaart SP, et al. Thyroid hormone therapy for older adults with subclinical hypothyroidism. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;376:2534–44. pmid:28402245
- 22. Waring AC, Harrison S, Samuels MH, Ensrud KE, LeBlanc ES, Hoffman AR, et al. Thyroid function and mortality in older men: a prospective study. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2012;97:862–70. pmid:22238396
- 23. Mooijaart SP, Du Puy RS, Stott DJ, Kearney PM, Rodondi N, Westendorp RG, et al. Association between levothyroxine treatment and thyroid-related symptoms among adults aged 80 years and older with subclinical hypothyroidism. Jama. 2019;322:1977–86. pmid:31664429
- 24. Winther KH, Cramon P, Watt T, Bjorner JB, Ekholm O, Feldt-Rasmussen U, et al. Disease-specific as well as generic quality of life is widely impacted in autoimmune hypothyroidism and improves during the first six months of levothyroxine therapy. PloS one. 2016;11:e0156925. pmid:27257805
- 25.
UK National Guideline Centre. Thyroid disease: assessment and management 2019 [updated 20 November 2019]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng145.
- 26. Gencer B, Rodondi N. Evidence and controversies regarding the screening for subclinical hypothyroidism in patients with cardiovascular disease. Journal of thoracic disease. 2016;8:E446. pmid:27294253
- 27. Cappola AR, Cooper DS. Screening and treating subclinical thyroid disease: getting past the impasse. Annals of internal medicine. 2015;162:664–5. pmid:25799007
- 28. Vaidya B, Ukoumunne OC, Shuttleworth J, Bromley A, Lewis A, Hyde C, et al. Variability in thyroid function test requests across general practices in south-west England. Qual Prim Care. 2013;21:143–8. pmid:23968263
- 29. Werhun A, Hamilton W. Thyroid function testing in primary care: overused and under-evidenced? A study examining which clinical features correspond to an abnormal thyroid function result. Family practice. 2015;32:187–91. pmid:25782692
- 30. Somwaru LL, Arnold AM, Joshi N, Fried LP, Cappola AR. High frequency of and factors associated with thyroid hormone over-replacement and under-replacement in men and women aged 65 and over. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2009;94:1342–5. pmid:19126628
- 31. Akbari A, Bedston S, Abbasizanjani H, Davies G, Fry R, Lowthian E, et al. Developing a population-scale harmonised ethnicity-spine in Wales. International Journal of Population Data Science. 2022;7.
- 32. Ford DV, Jones KH, Verplancke J-P, Lyons RA, John G, Brown G, et al. The SAIL Databank: building a national architecture for e-health research and evaluation. BMC health services research. 2009;9:1–12.
- 33. Jones KH, Ford DV, Thompson S, Lyons R. A profile of the SAIL databank on the UK secure research platform. International Journal of Population Data Science. 2019;4. pmid:34095541
- 34. Lyons RA, Jones KH, John G, Brooks CJ, Verplancke J-P, Ford DV, et al. The SAIL databank: linking multiple health and social care datasets. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2009;9:1–8.
- 35.
Cyngor Gwynedd. Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation [cited 2023 05 May]. https://www.gwynedd.llyw.cymru/en/Council/Key-statistics-and-data/Welsh-Index-of-Multiple-Deprivation.aspx.
- 36.
Jones H. Where are the most deprived areas in Wales?: Senedd Research, National Assembly for Wales; 2019 [updated 27 May 2021]. https://research.senedd.wales/research-articles/where-are-the-most-deprived-areas-in-wales/.
- 37. Jones KH, Ford DV, Jones C, Dsilva R, Thompson S, Brooks CJ, et al. A case study of the Secure Anonymous Information Linkage (SAIL) Gateway: a privacy-protecting remote access system for health-related research and evaluation. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2014;50:196–204. pmid:24440148
- 38. Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, Harron K, Moher D, Petersen I, et al. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS medicine. 2015;12:e1001885. pmid:26440803
- 39. Vanderpump MP, Tunbridge WMG. Epidemiology and prevention of clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism. Thyroid. 2002;12:839–47. pmid:12487765
- 40. Allahabadia A, Razvi S, Abraham P, Franklyn J. Diagnosis and treatment of primary hypothyroidism. BMJ: British Medical Journal (Online). 2009;338. pmid:19325179
- 41.
Royal College of Physicians. The diagnosis and management of primary hypothyroidism—Revised 2011. 2011.
- 42. Dalal S, Bhesania S, Silber S, Mehta P. Use of electronic clinical decision support and hard stops to decrease unnecessary thyroid function testing. BMJ Open Quality. 2017;6:u223041. w8346. pmid:28469901
- 43. Karmisholt J, Andersen S, Laurberg P. Variation in thyroid function tests in patients with stable untreated subclinical hypothyroidism. Thyroid. 2008;18:303–8. pmid:18303960
- 44. Karmisholt J, Andersen S, Laurberg P. Variation in thyroid function in subclinical hypothyroidism: importance of clinical follow-up and therapy. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2011;164:317. pmid:21208994
- 45. Jonklaas J, Bianco AC, Bauer AJ, Burman KD, Cappola AR, Celi FS, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of hypothyroidism: prepared by the american thyroid association task force on thyroid hormone replacement. thyroid. 2014;24:1670–751. pmid:25266247
- 46. Garber JR, Cobin RH, Gharib H, Hennessey JV, Klein I, Mechanick JI, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for hypothyroidism in adults: cosponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American Thyroid Association. Thyroid. 2012;22:1200–35. pmid:22954017
- 47. Pearce SH, Brabant G, Duntas LH, Monzani F, Peeters RP, Razvi S, et al. 2013 ETA guideline: management of subclinical hypothyroidism. European thyroid journal. 2013;2:215–28. pmid:24783053
- 48. Sgarbi JA, Teixeira PF, Maciel LM, Mazeto GM, Vaisman M, Montenegro Junior RM, et al. The Brazilian consensus for the clinical approach and treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism in adults: recommendations of the thyroid Department of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism. Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia. 2013;57:166–83. pmid:23681263
- 49. Leng O, Razvi S. Hypothyroidism in the older population. Thyroid research. 2019;12:1–10.
- 50. Biondi B, Cappola AR. Subclinical hypothyroidism in older individuals. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2022;10:129–41. pmid:34953533
- 51. Razvi S, Arnott B, Teare D, Hiu S, O’Brien N, Pearce SH. Multinational survey of treatment practices of clinicians managing subclinical hypothyroidism in older people in 2019. European thyroid journal. 2021;10:330–8. pmid:34395305
- 52.
Statistics for Wales. Prescriptions in Wales: April 2019 to March 2020. 2020 23 September 2020. Report No.
- 53.
Statistics for Wales. Prescriptions in Wales: April 2021 to March 2022. 2022 7 September 2022. Report No.
- 54.
Statistics for Wales. Prescriptions in Wales: April 2020 to March 2021. 2021 8 September 2021. Report No.
- 55. El Kawkgi OM, Brito JP. Screening for thyroid dysfunction: prevention of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. CMAJ. 2019;191:E1260–E1. pmid:31944183
- 56.
SAIL Databank. Welsh Longitudinal General Practice Dataset (WLGP)—Welsh Primary Care: Health Data Research Innovation Gateway; [updated 05 April 2023]. https://web.www.healthdatagateway.org/dataset/33fc3ffd-aa4c-4a16-a32f-0c900aaea3d2.
- 57. Andersen S, Pedersen KM, Bruun NH, Laurberg P. Narrow individual variations in serum T4 and T3 in normal subjects: a clue to the understanding of subclinical thyroid disease. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2002;87:1068–72.
- 58. Bagley SC, Altman RB. Computing disease incidence, prevalence and comorbidity from electronic medical records. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2016;63:108–11. pmid:27498067
- 59. Rusanov A, Weiskopf NG, Wang S, Weng C. Hidden in plain sight: bias towards sick patients when sampling patients with sufficient electronic health record data for research. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2014;14:1–9.
- 60. Edmondson ME, Reimer AP. Challenges frequently encountered in the secondary use of electronic medical record data for research. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2020;38:338–48. pmid:32149742