Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Serological detection of Rickettsia spp. and evaluation of blood parameters in pet dogs and cats from Bangkok and neighboring provinces

  • Chanon Fa-ngoen,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations Faculty of Veterinary Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand, Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand

  • Gunn Kaewmongkol,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand

  • Natnaree Inthong,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Faculty of Veterinary Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand

  • Ampai Tanganuchitcharnchai,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

  • Mohammad Yazid Abdad,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom

  • Jarunee Siengsanan-Lamont,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology

    Affiliation Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

  • Stuart D. Blacksell,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom

  • Sarawan Kaewmongkol

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    cvtswt@ku.ac.th

    Affiliation Faculty of Veterinary Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand

Abstract

Rickettsiosis is caused by Orientia spp. and Rickettsia spp., arthropod-borne zoonotic intracellular bacteria. The close relationships between pet dogs, cats and owners increase the risk of rickettsial transmission, with limited studies on the seroprevalence in pets. This study investigated the prevalence of rickettsia exposure among dogs and cats in Bangkok and neighboring provinces. The samples from 367 dogs and 187 cats used in this study were leftover serum samples from routine laboratory testing stored at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital. In-house Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests included IgG against the scrub typhus group (STG), typhus group (TG), and spotted fever group (SFG). The seroprevalence in pet dogs was 30.25% (111/367), including 21.53% for STG, 4.36% for TG, and 1.09% for SFG. Co-seroprevalence consisted of 2.72% for STG and TG, 0.27% for STG and SFG, and 0.27% for pangroup infection. The prevalence in cats was 62.56% (117/187), including 28.34% for STG, 4.28% for TG, and 6.42% for STG. Co-seroprevalence in cats consisted of STG and TG (4.28%), STG and SFG (5.35%), TG and SFG (3.21%), and three-group infection (10.69%). No significant difference in seroprevalence for the three serogroups was observed in any of the 64 districts sampled. The mean hematocrit level significantly decreased in seropositive dogs (P<0.05). Seropositive dogs and cats were detected in significantly greater numbers of anemia cases than nonanemia cases (P<0.05) (odds ratio: 7.93, 0.44, p = 0.00, p = 0.01). A significantly higher number of seropositive cats had decreased hemoglobin levels (P<0.05) (odds ratio: 3.63, p = 0.00). The seropositive samples significantly differed among older cats (P<0.05). These high exposures in pet dogs and cats could constitute important relationship dynamics between companion animals and rickettsial vectors. Significantly decreased hematocrit and hemoglobin levels indicated anemia in the exposed dogs and cats. The study findings will raise awareness of this neglected disease among pet owners and veterinary hospital personnel and aid in future public health preventative planning.

Introduction

Rickettsiosis is a vector-borne zoonotic disease caused by arthropod-borne zoonotic intracellular bacteria. These bacteria reside in blood-sucking arthropods such as fleas, ticks, lice, and mites. Many rodents, dogs, cats, cattle, and wild animals are natural hosts for these blood-sucking arthropods [1]. The most common types of rickettsioses are caused by rickettsial organisms that fall within 3 serogroups: the scrub typhus group (STG), typhus group (TG) and spotted fever group (SFG) [2, 3]. Scrub typhus group organisms are from the genus Orientia, and both typhus and spotted fever group organisms are from the genus Rickettsia. Rickettsiosis is a prominent cause of sickness and mortality in Southeast Asia. Rickettsiosis is the fourth leading cause of fever in Southeast Asian returnees to countries on six continents, after malaria, dengue fever, and mononucleosis. After dengue fever, rickettsiosis is the second most often reported infection for nonmalarial fever in Southeast Asia [48].

Rickettsia spp. have been found in diverse animals in Thailand. For example, Orientia tsutsugamushi was found in rodents by PCR detection. O. tsutsugamushi DNA was also found in the mite genera Blankaartia, Ascoschoengastia, Lorillatum, and Gahrliepia [9, 10]. Rickettsia felis was found in cat fleas, Ctenocephalides felis, and Ctenocephalides orientis [11, 12]. In Thailand, R. rickettsii, R. canada, and R. prowazekii were found in dogs [13]. The seroreactivity of the spotted fever group was demonstrated using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent test in cats in northeastern Thailand [14]. Ticks, fleas and chiggers were collected from dogs and rats in southern Thailand, and DNA sequencing indicated that the species were Rickettsia. asembonensis, Rickettsia spp. cf1, 5, and O. tsutsugamushi strain TA763 [15]. Molecular evidence confirmed Rickettsia spp. infection in rats caught from a Bangkok park. The confirmed species were R. typhi and R. felis, and this was the first report of R. felis DNA in rodents in Southeast Asia [16].

Rickettsiosis is classified as a neglected tropical disease (NTD), a group of infectious diseases that cause significant morbidity and mortality but receive little to no focus in public or veterinary health policies and support. However, NTDs continue to impact over a billion people living in underdeveloped or developing tropical countries, including those in Southeast Asia, Africa, and South America [1719]. Therefore, diagnosis, treatment, and vaccine development are limited, and development of treatment is delayed. People in tropical countries are unaware of these diseases that harm their health. People are raising more pets as the social structure, family, and way of life have changed [20, 21]. Dogs and cats are now treated as family members rather than as “pets,” resulting in the “pet humanization” phenomenon. Awareness and comprehension of the importance of zoonoses are critical for society. The closer relationships between pets and owners have potentially increased the risk of disease transmission [2224]. However, there are limited studies on the seroprevalence of rickettsiosis in pet animals in Thailand.

This study investigated the serological prevalence of rickettsiosis in pet dogs and cats in Bangkok and neighboring provinces. This research provides critical information for anyone at risk of these diseases, such as dog and cat owners, veterinary hospital staff, and relevant public health professionals.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The Animals for Scientific Purposes Act (A.D. 2015) of Thailand was followed, and authorization was acquired from the Laboratory Animal Committee of Kasetsart University’s Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (approval ID: ACKU63-VET-038). The author of this study was granted permission to use animals for scientific purposes (approval number U1-00325-2558).

Sample collection

All dog and cat whole blood and serum samples were randomly collected from leftover routine samples at the hematology laboratory, Kasetsart Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University. The serum samples came from 367 dogs and 187 cats with nonspecific diseases. The serum samples were also selected at random. Only pet dogs and cats from Bangkok and adjacent provinces, including Nonthaburi, Samut Prakan, Pathum Thani, Samut Sakhon, and Nakhon Pathom, were collected for testing (Fig 1). Whole blood and serum were kept at -20°C until they were tested (Table 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. A map of the Bangkok metropolitan area where the study participants (cats and dogs) were from (the green color is the area of residence of the dogs and cats used in this study) [25].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297373.g001

thumbnail
Table 1. Summary of samples collected from pet dogs and cats by province.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297373.t001

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

The Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU) developed and produced the scrub typhus, typhus, and spotted fever antigens used in this investigation. The ELISA method used has been published previously [2629].

The protocol, in brief, utilized 96-well plates coated with O. tsutsugamushi antigen (4 strains; Karp, Kato, Gilliam, and TA716), R. typhi antigen, and spotted fever group antigens (2 strains; R. conorii and R. honei). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-dog/cat IgG (Sigma‒Aldrich, Germany) was used as the secondary antibody, and tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) (Thermo Scientific, USA) was used as the substrate. Plates were read at 450 nm (minus a reference value at 620 nm) (Bio-Rad iMark™ Microplate Absorbance Reader, USA). If a sample had an ELISA IgG nett OD greater than or equal to 0.5, it was considered positive for the presence of antibodies.

Statistical analysis

We studied the association between seropositive samples of Rickettsia spp. in dogs and cats by using statistics to categorize the data based on factors that we believed would be linked to positive samples. To classify the data, we used information from the animal database of Kasetsart Veterinary Teaching Hospital. The data were divided into animal habitat, age, sex, breed, and hematology, which we used to segment the data for statistical analysis (S1 File). For the continuous variables (hematology: HCT, RBC, WBC, HGB, MCV, MCHC, MCH, PLT), we obtained descriptive statistics such as the means, medians, standard deviations (SDs), minimums, and maximums. We used the completed classification data for statistical analysis and tested the variables of interest as risk factors using the chi-square test based on the recorded data characteristics. R version 4.2.3 and NCSS 2023 version 23.0.1 were used to statistically analyze the general and hematological data and perform chi-square and odds ratio analyses. We conducted all statistical analyses with 95% confidence intervals, and we considered a p value < 0.05 significant.

Results

The overall prevalence was 30.25% (111/367) in pet dogs. Of 367 pet dogs, 21.53% (79/367) were positive for the scrub typhus group. The typhus group seroprevalence was 4.36% (16/367), and the spotted fever group seroprevalence was 1.09% (4/367). Some dogs tested positive for more than one antigen. The codetection rate of scrub typhus and typhus was 2.72% (10/367). One dog was seropositive for both the scrub typhus and spotted fever groups (0.27%; 1/367). Multiple seropositivity was detected in a dog that tested positive for all three antigen groups, with 0.27% (1/367) (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Seroprevalence results of ELISA for dogs and cats.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297373.t002

In cats, the overall seroprevalence was 62.56% (117/187). A total of 28.34% (53/187) were positive for the scrub typhus group. The typhus group seroprevalence was 4.28% (8/187), and the spotted fever group seroprevalence was 6.42% (12/187). Additionally, some cats tested positive serologically for more than one antigen. Codetection of scrub typhus and typhus groups was 4.28% (8/187). The seroprevalence of the scrub typhus and spotted fever groups was 5.35% (10/187). The seroprevalence of the typhus and spotted fever groups was 3.21% (6/187). We also found that 10.69% of cats (20/187) tested positive serologically for all three groups of antigens (Table 2).

To investigate the correlation between urban and suburban areas, we divided all pet habitats into two categories: pets in Bangkok and pets in surrounding provinces. We performed a chi-square analysis to find the association between serological results and habitats. The results revealed no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of dogs and cats between Bangkok’s urban and suburban areas and its surrounding provinces (p value = 0.75 for the dog samples and p value = 0.84 for the cat samples) (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Statistical analysis of the number of dogs and cats by area using the chi-square test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297373.t003

The analysis used chi-squared independence tests to examine the relationship between each cat and dog age group. Three different age groups were categorized to find the association between age and serological outcome, including dogs and cats younger than one year, between 1 and 7 years, and older than seven years. The analysis results in the dog population showed no significant difference between the ages of dogs and serological results (p value = 0.80). In contrast to the results for dogs, significant differences were found in the cat population between the age groups (chi-square statistic of 19.73 and a p value = 0.00), indicating statistical significance at p < 0.05. The seropositive samples differed significantly among older cats (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 4. Statistical analysis of the number of dogs and cats by age using the chi-square test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297373.t004

The sex-based analysis was conducted using a chi-square test of independence to investigate the association between rickettsia exposure in males and females. Our findings indicated no significant difference between males and females regarding rickettsia exposure in dogs or cats, with p values = 0.80 and 0.81, respectively.

We collected data on the complete blood count (CBC), which measures the quantity and characteristics of three types of blood cells: red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. The data included values for hematocrit (HCT), red blood cell (RBC), white blood cell (WBC), hemoglobin (HGB), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and platelet count (PLT) (Tables 5 and 6). These blood parameters were compared between seropositive and seronegative dogs and cats. The mean hematocrit (HCT) significantly decreased in seropositive dogs (P<0.05).

thumbnail
Table 5. Complete blood count (CBC) values of dog samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297373.t005

thumbnail
Table 6. Complete blood count (CBC) values of cat samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297373.t006

We conducted a chi-squared independence test using all hematological data to investigate the association between complete blood count and exposure to Rickettsia spp. The analysis revealed a significant association between hematocrit and Rickettsia spp. exposure in dogs and cats (p < 0.05) (Table 7). The chi-square statistic of hemoglobin in cats was 14.01 with a p value of 0.00, which was significant at p < 0.05 (Table 8). Therefore, we found that the dog HCT, cat HCT, and cat HGB data showed significant associations between these blood parameters in dogs and cats and Rickettsia spp. exposure.

thumbnail
Table 7. Statistical analysis of ELISA results for dog samples by complete blood count (CBC) values using the chi-square test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297373.t007

thumbnail
Table 8. Statistical analysis of ELISA results for cat samples by complete blood count (CBC) values using the chi-square test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297373.t008

Anemic dogs with HCT levels below 35% had a 7.93-fold greater chance of being seropositive than those with normal HCT levels (odds ratio: 7.93, p = 0.00). Anemic cats with HCT levels less than 30% had a 0.44-fold greater chance of being seropositive than those with normal HCT levels (odds ratio: 0.44, p = 0.01). For those cats with HGB levels below 9.8 g/dL, there was a 3.63-fold greater chance of being seropositive than those with normal HGB levels (odds ratio: 3.63, p = 0.00).

Discussion

This study investigated the evidence of exposure of domesticated dogs and cats in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region (BMR) to Rickettsia spp. The findings indicated that all three disease groups (scrub typhus, typhus, and spotted fever) resulted in serological positivity using ELISA. This study is of great importance because it provides evidence of a high human exposure risk to Rickettsia spp. from pets. Moreover, this study revealed that many dogs and cats were exposed to Rickettsia spp., possibly due to their exposure to blood-sucking arthropods that may carry the bacteria. Previous reports have indicated detections of Rickettsia spp. in blood-sucking arthropods such as Ctenocephalides felis felis, especially in countries such as Thailand, the United States, and Bangladesh [3133]. Additionally, there have been reports of cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) in northeastern Thailand that have tested positive for R. asembonensis [14], while ticks, fleas, and chiggers in southern Thailand have been found to harbor O. tsutsugamushi [16].

Vector-borne diseases (VBDs) were investigated in pet animals (dogs and cats) in Khukhot city, Pathum Thani Province, Thailand, and demonstrated a notable connection between age and the likelihood of infection among pets. The study specifically disclosed that adult cats are more vulnerable to VBDs than their younger counterparts [34]. In our research, older cats were also more at risk of exposure to Rickettsia spp. The higher prevalence among older cats might be due to their natural behavior of exploring the area surrounding their homes, as evidenced by a study conducted by the Central Tablelands Local Land Services (LLS) in New South Wales, Australia. The LLS used GPS to track the paths of domesticated cats and found that some cats roamed up to 3 kilometers away from their homes, including venturing into forests [35]. Keeping cats outdoors can expose them to various environmental factors, such as other animals, parasites, bacteria, viruses, and environmental hazards. For example, outdoor pets may come into contact with other animals, including strays or wild animals that could carry diseases such as rabies. Additionally, outdoor pets are at a higher risk of encountering parasites such as fleas, ticks, and mosquitoes, and outdoor cats are more likely to be infected with the parasites Toxoplasma gondii [36] and Bartonella henselae [37], which cause toxoplasmosis and cat scratch disease, respectively. Going outdoors is a significant risk factor for parasitic infections in domesticated cats, with outdoor cats being 2.77 times more likely to be infected with parasites than indoor cats [38]. It is important to note that keeping a cat outdoors can also pose a health risk to the owner [36, 37, 3941].

One crucial factor to consider is the potential exposure of pet dogs and cats to Rickettsia spp., a disease that may be transmitted by rodents, particularly the oriental house rat (Rattus tanezumi), which has a widespread and adaptable habitat in all regions [4244]. Rattus rattus is commonly found in public parks throughout Bangkok [16], in both urban and rural areas. Retrospective studies in Thailand have shown that rats, such as Rattus tanezumi in Nakhon Pathom Province, are immune to O. tsutsugamushi, R. typhi, and R. honei [45]. Furthermore, molecular evidence of R. typhi and R. felis has been found in small mammals captured from a park in Bangkok [16]. This information suggests that carrier animals and their vectors are ubiquitous in both urban and rural areas, and there is a possibility that these gnawing animals and their vectors may have close contact with pets, making this a matter of concern. Therefore, taking appropriate measures to protect pets from possible exposure to these vectors is important.

The statistical analysis of the hematologic data of pet dogs and cats found that Rickettsia spp. infections might lower the hematocrit (HCT) levels in dogs and cats, and hemoglobin (HGB) levels in seropositive cats were also significantly lower. Rickettsia infections involve the endothelial cells of the capillary wall, leading to damage and dysfunction of these cells [46, 47]. This damage results in anemia and lower hemoglobin levels in infected individuals. The mechanism by which Rickettsia infection causes anemia and lower hemoglobin levels is complex and not fully understood. However, these bacteria directly invade and damage the endothelial cells of the capillary wall, leading to the leakage of red blood cells and other blood components into the surrounding tissues. This leakage causes a decrease in the number of red blood cells and hemoglobin in the blood, resulting in anemia [4749].

A study found numerous dogs and cats visiting veterinary hospitals testing positive for Rickettsia spp. These findings raise the question of whether veterinary staff are at risk of contracting the disease, especially given that previous reports have shown a significant prevalence among veterinary staff. A previous report from Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico, found a high prevalence of the disease among veterinary staff, with 21% of staff members at 63 veterinary clinics testing positive for R. rickettsii, and many staff reported a history of being bitten by the brown dog tick (Rhipicephalus sanguineus) [50]. The high prevalence of Rickettsia spp. in dogs and cats admitted to veterinary hospitals, combined with the risks to veterinary staff, underscores the importance of raising awareness and taking preventative measures to reduce the spread of the disease. Veterinary hospitals need to implement protocols to reduce the risks of infection, and staff must take precautions to protect themselves from exposure to Rickettsia spp.

The issue regarding cross-reaction is only relevant between Murine typhus and Spotted fever groups. It may be possible to discriminate further using the strength of the antibody response. It is difficult to discriminate between antibodies between the antigenic groups because of shared epitopes, and further work is required to characterize the immune response in animals and the levels of cross-reaction between the antigenic groups.

Conclusion

This study provides serological evidence that pet dogs and cats in Bangkok and surrounding provinces are exposed to the following three diseases: scrub typhus, typhus, and spotted fever. These data imply that pet dogs and cats are frequently exposed to the disease and may constitute important reservoirs of rickettsiosis. Evaluating blood parameters, such as significantly decreased HCT and HGB levels, should be of concern in seropositive dogs and cats with various clinical signs. These blood parameters indicate anemia in exposed dogs and cats. However, these pets often show no specific signs of illness, and thus, it is difficult to monitor disease occurrence, if any. Hematological data derived from this study, such as hematocrit and hemoglobin data, were associated with infection. Therefore, the pathogenesis of rickettsiosis in dogs and cats should be further studied. This information may be helpful to veterinarians for preliminary screening of the causes of anemia in dogs and cats in tropical countries. Age-related exposure was also a major parameter. The study findings can provide basic information for those interested in using them as a guideline to monitor disease outbreaks in humans and pets. This study can also raise awareness of this neglected disease among pet owners and veterinary hospital personnel and aid in future public health preventative planning.

Supporting information

S1 File. Data on dogs and cats, including their age, sex, location, and all blood parameters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297373.s001

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank all staff from the Hematology Laboratory, Kasetsart Veterinary Teaching Hospital, and the Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU) for supporting this study. The Fig 1 was originated and modified from https://data.humdata.org/dataset/geoboundaries-admin-boundaries-for-thailand.

References

  1. 1. Low VL, Tan TK, Khoo JJ, Lim FS, AbuBakar S. An overview of rickettsiae in Southeast Asia: Vector-animal-human interface. Acta Trop. 2020 Feb;202:105282. pmid:31778642
  2. 2. Balcells ME, Rabagliati R, García P, Poggi H, Oddó D, Concha M, et al. Endemic scrub typhus-like illness, Chile. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Sep;17(9):1659–63. pmid:21888791
  3. 3. Izzard L, Fuller A, Blacksell SD, Paris DH, Richards AL, Aukkanit N, et al. Isolation of a novel Orientia species (O. chuto sp. nov.) from a patient infected in Dubai. J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Dec;48(12):4404–9. pmid:20926708
  4. 4. Acestor N, Cooksey R, Newton PN, Ménard D, Guerin PJ, Nakagawa J, et al. Mapping the aetiology of non-malarial febrile illness in Southeast Asia through a systematic review—terra incognita impairing treatment policies. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44269. pmid:22970193
  5. 5. Aung AK, Spelman DW, Murray RJ, Graves S. Rickettsial infections in Southeast Asia: implications for local populace and febrile returned travelers. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014 Sep;91(3):451–60. pmid:24957537
  6. 6. Freedman DO, Weld LH, Kozarsky PE, Fisk T, Robins R, von Sonnenburg F, et al. Cetron MS; GeoSentinel Surveillance Network. Spectrum of disease and relation to place of exposure among ill returned travelers. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 12;354(2):119–30. pmid:16407507
  7. 7. Bottieau E, Clerinx J, Schrooten W, Van den Enden E, Wouters R, Van Esbroeck M, et al. Etiology and outcome of fever after a stay in the tropics. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Aug 14–28;166(15):1642–8. pmid:16908798
  8. 8. Wilson ME, Weld LH, Boggild A, Keystone JS, Kain KC, von Sonnenburg F, et al. GeoSentinel Surveillance Network. Fever in returned travelers: results from the GeoSentinel Surveillance Network. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jun 15;44(12):1560–8. pmid:17516399
  9. 9. Rodkvamtook W, Kuttasingkee N, Linsuwanon P, Sudsawat Y, Richards AL, Somsri M, et al. Scrub typhus outbreak in Chonburi Province, central Thailand, 2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018 Feb;24(2):361–365. pmid:29350148
  10. 10. Takhampunya R, Korkusol A, Promsathaporn S, Tippayachai B, Leepitakrat S, Richards AL, et al. Heterogeneity of Orientia tsutsugamushi genotypes in field-collected trombiculid mites from wild-caught small mammals in Thailand. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Jul 16;12(7):e0006632. pmid:30011267
  11. 11. Foongladda S, Inthawong D, Kositanont U, Gaywee J. Rickettsia, Ehrlichia, Anaplasma, and Bartonella in ticks and fleas from dogs and cats in Bangkok. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011 Oct;11(10):1335–41. pmid:21612535
  12. 12. Phoosangwalthong P, Hii SF, Kamyingkird K, Kengradomkij C, Pinyopanuwat N, Chimnoi W, et al. Cats as potential mammalian reservoirs for Rickettsia sp. genotype RF2125 in Bangkok, Thailand. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2018 Aug;13:188–192. pmid:31014872
  13. 13. Suksawat J, Xuejie Y, Hancock SI, Hegarty BC, Nilkumhang P, Breitschwerdt EB. Serologic and molecular evidence of coinfection with multiple vector‐borne pathogens in dogs from Thailand. J Vet Intern Med. 2001 Sep-Oct;15(5):453–62. pmid:11596732
  14. 14. Phomjareet S, Chaveerach P, Suksawat F, Jiang J, Richards AL. Spotted fever group Rickettsia infection of cats and cat fleas in Northeast Thailand. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):566–571. pmid:32744925
  15. 15. Sanprick A, Yooyen T, Rodkvamtook W. Survey of Rickettsia spp. and Orientia tsutsugamushi pathogens found in animal vectors (ticks, fleas, chiggers) in Bangkaew District, Phatthalung Province, Thailand. Korean J Parasitol. 2019 Apr;57(2):167–173. pmid:31104409
  16. 16. Rungrojn A, Chaisiri K, Paladsing Y, Morand S, Junjhon J, Blacksell SD, et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Rickettsia spp. from wild small mammals in public parks and urban areas of Bangkok metropolitan, Thailand. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 11;6(4):199. pmid:34842856
  17. 17. Paris DH, Shelite TR, Day NP, Walker DH. Unresolved problems related to scrub typhus: a seriously neglected life-threatening disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013 Aug;89(2):301–7. pmid:23926142
  18. 18. Salje J, Weitzel T, Newton PN, Varghese GM, Day N. Rickettsial infections: A blind spot in our view of neglected tropical diseases. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 May 13;15(5):e0009353. pmid:33983936
  19. 19. Hotez PJ, Aksoy S, Brindley PJ, Kamhawi S. What constitutes a neglected tropical disease?. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Jan 30;14(1):e0008001. pmid:31999732
  20. 20. Guo Z, Ren X, Zhao J, Jiao L, Xu Y. Can Pets Replace Children? The Interaction Effect of Pet Attachment and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Fertility Intention. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 15;18(16):8610. pmid:34444359
  21. 21. Irvine L, Cilia L. More‐than‐human families: Pets, people, and practices in multispecies households. Sociology Compass. 2017;11(2):e12455.
  22. 22. Stull JW, Brophy J, Weese JS. Reducing the risk of pet-associated zoonotic infections. CMAJ. 2015 Jul 14;187(10):736–743. pmid:25897046
  23. 23. Joosten P, Van Cleven A, Sarrazin S, Paepe D, De Sutter A, Dewulf J. Dogs and Their Owners Have Frequent and Intensive Contact. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 16;17(12):4300. pmid:32560155
  24. 24. Overgaauw PAM, Vinke CM, Hagen MAEV, Lipman LJA. A One Health Perspective on the Human-Companion Animal Relationship with Emphasis on Zoonotic Aspects. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 27;17(11):3789. pmid:32471058
  25. 25. Runfola D, Anderson A, Baier H, Crittenden M, Dowker E, Fuhrig S, et al. geoBoundaries: A global database of political administrative boundaries. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 24;15(4):e0231866. pmid:32330167; PMCID: PMC7182183.
  26. 26. Elders PN, Dhawan S, Tanganuchitcharnchai A, Phommasone K, Chansamouth V, Day NP, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of an in-house Scrub Typhus enzyme linked immunoassay for the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies in Laos. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Dec 7;14(12):e0008858. pmid:33284807
  27. 27. Phanichkrivalkosil M, Tanganuchitcharnchai A, Jintaworn S, Kantipong P, Laongnualpanich A, Chierakul W, et al. Determination of optimal diagnostic cut-offs for the Naval Medical Research Center scrub typhus IgM ELISA in Chiang Rai, Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 May;100(5):1134–1140. pmid:30860022
  28. 28. Saraswati K, Phanichkrivalkosil M, Day NP, Blacksell SD. The validity of diagnostic cut-offs for commercial and in-house scrub typhus IgM and IgG ELISAs: A review of the evidence. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Feb 4;13(2):e0007158. pmid:30716070
  29. 29. Suwanabun N, Chouriyagune C, Eamsila C, Watcharapichat P, Dasch GA, Howard RS, et al. Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in Thai scrub typhus patients. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997 Jan;56(1):38–43. pmid:9063359
  30. 30. Fielder SE. MSD Veterinary Manual Rahway. New Jersey.USA Merck & Co., Inc. 2022 [updated Sep 2022]. Available from: https://www.msdvetmanual.com/special-subjects/reference-guides/hematology-reference-ranges#.
  31. 31. Ahmed R, Paul SK, Hossain MA, Ahmed S, Mahmud MC, Nasreen SA, et al. Molecular detection of Rickettsia felis in humans, cats, and cat fleas in Bangladesh, 2013–2014. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016 May;16(5):356–8. pmid:26901499
  32. 32. Assarasakorn S, Veir J, Hawley J, Brewer M, Morris A, Hill AE, et al. Prevalence of Bartonella species, hemoplasmas, and Rickettsia felis DNA in blood and fleas of cats in Bangkok, Thailand. Res Vet Sci. 2012 Dec;93(3):1213–6. pmid:22521739
  33. 33. Šlapeta Š, Šlapeta J. Molecular identity of cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) from cats in Georgia, USA carrying Bartonella clarridgeiae, Bartonella henselae and Rickettsia sp. RF2125. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2016 Jun;3–4:36–40. pmid:31014497
  34. 34. Luong NH, Kamyingkird K, Thammasonthijarern N, Phasuk J, Nimsuphan B, Pattanatanang K, et al. Companion Vector-Borne Pathogens and Associated Risk Factors in Apparently Healthy Pet Animals (Dogs and Cats) in Khukhot City Municipality, Pathum Thani Province, Thailand. Pathogens. 2023 Mar 1;12(3):391. pmid:36986313
  35. 35. Pearce M. Cat tracking program makes owners re-think pets’ behaviour and how they manage their moggies Australia. ABC Central West. 2016 [updated 21 May 2016; cited 2023:5]. Available from: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-20/cat-tracking-program-makes-owners-re-think-pet-behaviour/7431248?utm_campaign=abc_news_web&utm_content=link&utm_medium=content_shared&utm_source=abc_news_web.
  36. 36. Hill D, Dubey JP. Toxoplasma gondii: transmission, diagnosis and prevention. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002 Oct;8(10):634–40. pmid:12390281
  37. 37. Chomel BB, Boulouis HJ, Maruyama S, Breitschwerdt EB. Bartonella spp. in pets and effect on human health. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Mar;12(3):389–94. pmid:16704774
  38. 38. Chalkowski K, Wilson AE, Lepczyk CA, Zohdy S. Who let the cats out? A global meta-analysis on risk of parasitic infection in indoor versus outdoor domestic cats (Felis catus). Biol Lett. 2019 Apr 26;15(4):20180840. pmid:30991913
  39. 39. Fisher M. Toxocara cati: an underestimated zoonotic agent. Trends Parasitol. 2003 Apr;19(4):167–70. pmid:12689646
  40. 40. Lepczyk CA, Lohr CA, Duffy DC. A review of cat behavior in relation to disease risk and management options. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2015;173:29–39.
  41. 41. Loyd KA, Hernandez SM, Abernathy KJ, Shock BC, Marshall GJ. Risk behaviours exhibited by free-roaming cats in a suburban US town. Vet Rec. 2013 Sep 28;173(12):295. pmid:23913174
  42. 42. Blasdell K, Bordes F, Chaisiri K, Chaval Y, Claude J, Cosson J-F, et al. Progress on research on rodents and rodent-borne zoonoses in South-east Asia. Wildl. Res. 2015;42(2):98–107.
  43. 43. Kosoy M, Khlyap L, Cosson JF, Morand S. Aboriginal and invasive rats of genus Rattus as hosts of infectious agents. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015 Jan;15(1):3–12. pmid:25629775
  44. 44. Pages M, Bazin E, Galan M, Chaval Y, Claude J, Herbreteau V, et al. Cytonuclear discordance among Southeast Asian black rats (Rattus rattus complex). Mol Ecol. 2013 Feb;22(4):1019–34. pmid:23278980
  45. 45. Prompiram P, Poltep K, Pamonsupornvichit S, Wongwadhunyoo W, Chamsai T, Rodkvamtook W. Rickettsiae exposure related to habitats of the oriental house rat (Rattus tanezumi, Temminck, 1844) in Salaya suburb, Thailand. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2020 Aug 1;13:22–26. pmid:32793413
  46. 46. Valbuena G, Walker DH. Infection of the endothelium by members of the order Rickettsiales. Thromb Haemost. 2009 Dec;102(6):1071–9. pmid:19967137
  47. 47. Walker DH, Ismail N. Emerging and re-emerging rickettsioses: endothelial cell infection and early disease events. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 May;6(5):375–86. pmid:18414502
  48. 48. Gottlieb M, Long B, Koyfman A. The evaluation and management of Rocky Mountain spotted fever in the emergency department: a review of the literature. J Emerg Med. 2018 Jul;55(1):42–50. pmid:29685474
  49. 49. Tsioutis C, Zafeiri M, Avramopoulos A, Prousali E, Miligkos M, Karageorgos SA. Clinical and laboratory characteristics, epidemiology, and outcomes of murine typhus: a systematic review. Acta Trop. 2017;166:16–24. pmid:27983969
  50. 50. Escarcega-Avila ALM, Jiménez-Vega F, Quezada-Casasola A, Mora-Covarrubias A. Serologic evidence of rickettsial diseases associated with tick bites in workers of urban veterinary clinics. J Vector Borne Dis. 2020 Jan-Mar;57(1):40–46. pmid:33818454