Figures
Abstract
Introduction
Stunting is a major public health problem affecting more than one-third of under five year’s old children in Ethiopia. It has short and long (irreversible) consequences, including stunted growth, never reaching physical and cognitive potential, struggles in school, and increased morbidity and mortality due to infections. Though stunting is the leading cause of child mortality in Ethiopia, evidence is scarce on the prevalence and predictors of stunting among under-five years old children in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the prevalence and predictors of stunting severity among under-5 children in Ethiopia.
Materials and methods
This study was based on 2019 Mini-Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) data. A weighted total sample of 4972 under-five years old children was included in the study. Height measurement was collected for each child. Anthropometric indicator, height-for-age was determined for children using World Health Organization growth standards (Z-scores for Height-for-Age (HAZ)) to asses stunting level. Given the ordinal nature of stunting and the hierarchical nature of EDHS data, a multilevel ordinal logistic regression model was applied. Brant test was used to check the proportional odds assumption, which was satisfied (P-value ≥0.05). Moreover, deviance was used for model comparison. For the multivariable analysis, variables with a p-value ≤0.2 in the bivariable analysis were considered. The Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was reported as associated factor to the severity levels of stunting in the multivariable multilevel proportional odds model.
Results
The overall prevalence of stunting among under-5 children in Ethiopia was 35.7% [95% CI: 34.4%, 37.1%]. Of these, 12.1% were severely stunted, and 24.9% were moderately stunted. Being male [AOR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.93], children aged 6–23 months [AOR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.84, 3.07], ≥ 24 months [AOR = 4.15, 95% CI: 3.26, 5.28], children whose maternal age 15–24 years [AOR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.92], children from the poorest, poorer, middle, and richer household wealth were [AOR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.32, 2.57], [AOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.31], [AOR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.29, 2.44], and [AOR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.17], children whose maternal educational status of no formal education and primary education had [AOR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.28, 2.82], [AOR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.22, 2.60], Tigray [AOR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.78, 4.86], Afar [AOR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.11, 3.10], Amhara [AOR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.14, 3.14] and Harari [AOR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.20, 3.25]regions, low community maternal education [AOR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.92] were significantly associated with stunting severity levelling.
Conclusion
Stunting among children under five years of old in Ethiopia remains a major public health issue. Improving access to maternal education is related to appropriate child feeding practices and health, particularly in younger and uneducated mothers. Strengthening the family’s wealth status is also recommended to reduce stunting. In addition, it is better to support strategies of preconception care for mothers during pregnancy to reduce stunting in the long term.
Citation: Asgedom YS, Seifu BL, Mare KU, Asmare ZA, Asebe HA, Kase BF, et al. (2024) Levels of stunting associated factors among under-five children in Ethiopia: A multi-level ordinal logistic regression analysis. PLoS ONE 19(1): e0296451. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296451
Editor: Ayele Mamo Abebe, Debre Berhan University, ETHIOPIA
Received: July 21, 2023; Accepted: December 12, 2023; Published: January 2, 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Asgedom et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: Data is available online and you can access it from http://www.dhsprogram.com.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Abbreviations: AOR, Adjusted Odds Ratio; ANC, Antenatal care; DHS, Demographic and Health Survey; EDHS, Ethiopian Demographic health survey; CI, Confidence Interval; EAs, Enumeration areas; ICC, Intra-cluster Correlation Coefficient; JME, Joint Malnutrition Estimates; HAZ, Z-score for Height-for-Age; KR, Kids Record; LLR, Log likelihood ratio; LR, Likelihood ratio; OR, Odds ratio; SDG, Sustainable Development Goal; SSA, sub-Saharan Africa; SNNPRs, Southern Nation, Nationalities and People Representatives WHO = World Health Organization; WHA, World Health Assembly
Introduction
Stunting is characterized by low height-for-age, which hinders children’s ability to reach their full physical and cognitive potential due to persistent or repeated under nutrition [1]. Stunting is best predicted by length and height, as having a length/height ratio that is more than two standard deviations below the population’s median [2]. The impact of the disease is serious and long-lasting, for children, families, communities, and the country as a whole.
Stunting affected (too short for age) an estimated 149.2 million children under 5 globally in 2020, with variation across different sub-regions of the world based on geographical location [1, 3]. In 2020, more than half (53%) of under-five years old children were affected by stunting lived in Asia, and two out of five or more than 41% lived in Africa [4]. The number of children with stunting has declined in the past two decades (from to 2000–2020) in all regions, except Africa and Asia [4].
Based on the 2019 Mini Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey, the prevalence of stunting in Ethiopia is 37%, indicating that stunting is still a major public health issue in the country [5]. It has devastating consequences that can last for a lifetime and even affect the next generation. Stunted children may never reach their full height potential and their brains may never reach their full cognitive potential [4].These children start their lives at a significant disadvantage: they struggle in school, earn less as adults, and face barriers to community participation [4]. Moreover, stunted children are at a greater risk of infectious morbidity and mortality [6].
Stunting is usually associated with poor socioeconomic conditions, poor maternal health and nutrition, frequent illness, and inappropriate infant and young child feeding and care in early life [1]. Previous research has identified various factors that are associated with stunted growth in children. In particular, several independent predictors of stunting have been identified in Ethiopia, including the child’s sex, age, household wealth status, the interval between births, place of residence, the mother’s educational attainment, maternal height, body mass index (BMI), region, religion, contraceptive use, and mental health status [7–15].
The World Health Organization (WHO) aims to reduce the prevalence of stunting by 40% by 2025 [16]. About 37% of children under five years old in Ethiopia currently affected by stunting [4]. In addition, the Ethiopian government has pledged to end child under nutrition, particularly stunting, by 2030 [17]. In Ethiopia, studies on the prevalence of stunting and its associated factors in children under five years old are being conducted. However, these studies cannot comprehend the ordinal nature of stunting status because the impact of stunting varies depending on the severity level of stunting (mild, moderate, and severe stunting). Consequently, we used multilevel ordinal logistic regression to obtain a reliable estimate while avoiding information loss. Thus, the present study aimed to assess the levels of stunting-associated factors among under-five children in Ethiopia using Mini-EDHS 2019 data.
Materials and methods
Data source and sampling procedure
This study was based on the 2019 mini-DHS of Ethiopia. The EDHS is conducted every five years to generate updated health and health-related indicators. The data were derived from the measure DHS (Demographic and Health Survey) program and detailed information about the surveys can be found in each country’s DHS reports. A multistage stratified sampling technique was employed to select the study subjects. In the first stage, Enumeration Areas (EAs) were randomly selected, whereas in the second stage, households were selected. There are different datasets in DHS, and for this study, we used the Kids Record (KR) file. The dependent and independent variables were extracted from the KR dataset, based on the literature. The final sample size was 4,972.
Study variables and measurements
Dependent variable.
Our outcome variable of interest was levels of stunting among under-five years old children, which we grouped into four ordinal categories; severely stunted if the Z-score < −3 Standard Deviation (SD), moderately stunted (−3.00 ≤ HAZ < 2); and not stunted if Z-score ≥ −2 SD.
Independent variables.
Because of the hierarchical nature of the DHS data, the independent variables considered in the study were obtained from two sources (individual and community-level variables). Child age, child sex, household wealth status, maternal education, maternal age, sex of household head, child twin status, birth order, parity, number of Ante Natal Care (ANC) visits, place of delivery, husband’s education, type of toilet facility, type of water source, birth size, and maternal occupation were level one variables. Residence, region, community poverty, and community maternal education were level-two variables.
These two community-level variables (community maternal education and poverty) were generated by aggregating maternal education and household wealth status at the cluster/enumeration area levels. They were then categorized as having higher community maternal education and poverty based on the national median value of maternal education and poverty since they were not normally distributed.
Data management and analysis
The data were weighted using sampling weight, primary sampling unit, and strata before any statistical analysis to restore the representativeness of the survey and take into account the sampling design when calculating standard errors, to obtain reliable statistical estimates. STATA (StataCorp, USA) version 17 statistical software was used for data management and analysis. The outcome variable for this study was polychotomous and had ordinal nature. Therefore, an ordinal logistic regression model was used to the analyze the predictors of stunting (not stunted, moderately, and severely stunted). The fundamental assumption in an ordinal logistic regression model is proportional odds. If the data satisfies the proportional odds assumption, the proportional odds model can be used; otherwise, a partial proportional model should be used. To choose the appropriate ordinal model for the data, we checked the Proportional Odds (PO) assumptions, which state that the effects of all independent variables are constant across categories of the outcome variable. After fitting the proportional odds model, the proportional odds assumption was tested using the Brant’s test. It tests the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the effects of the independent variables across the stunting levels. The Brant test revealed that the proportional odds assumption was satisfied (p>0.05). Therefore, we used the proportional odds model to assess predictors of stunting levels and independent variables.
Besides, DHS data have a hierarchical nature. Therefore, children and mothers are nested within a cluster, and we assume that study subjects in the same cluster may share similar characteristics with participants in another cluster. This violates the independence observations and equal variance assumptions between the clusters in the ordinal logistic regression model. This implies the need to consider heterogeneity between clusters using an advanced model. Therefore, a multilevel cumulative logit model was used.
As a result, because the Brant test was met, the multilevel proportional odds model gave a single Odds Ratio (OR) for an explanatory variable (severe vs. moderate/not stunted, severe/moderate vs. not stunted).
Four models were constructed for multilevel logistic regression analysis. The first model was a null model without explanatory variables to determine the extent of cluster variation in stunting levels. The second model was adjusted for individual-level variables; the third model was adjusted for community-level variables, and the fourth was fitted with both individual and community-level variables simultaneously. Model comparison was made based on deviance (-2Log-Likelihood Ratio (LLR)) because the models were nested models, and the model with the lowest deviance was the best-fitted model for the data.
Variables with a p-value ≤ 0.2 in the bi-variable multilevel proportional odds model were considered for the multivariable multilevel proportional odds model. In the multivariable multilevel proportional odds model, the Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was reported to indicate the strength of association, and the statistical significance for the final model was set at p<0.05.
Results
Study participant’s descriptive characteristics
A total of 4,972 children under five years old were included (Table 1). Of these, 2967 (59.66%) were children aged ≥24 months and 2530 (50.89%) were male. About 2527 (50.82%) were from parity ≥4, 1702 (34.23%) were from parity 2–3 and 4864 (97.83%) type of birth were single. Nearly half (51.02%) of the mothers gave birth at home, and 1575 (43.66%) attended ≥4 ANC visits. More than half, 2665 (53.60%) mothers did not attain formal education and 1146 (23.05%) were aged≥ 35. Regarding household wealth status, around 1,141 (22.94%) were the poorest and 4329 (87.07%) heads of households were males. About 2708 (54.46%) > 5 household numbers and 4,169 (83.85%) types of toilet facilities did not improve. The majority (64.99%) were available for to an improved water source and 4688 (94.28%) were married.
Regarding the community-level characteristics of the study participants, 3723 (74.88%) were from rural areas, 1979 (39.80%) were from the Oromia region, 1008 (20.27%) were from Southern Nation, Nationalities and People Representatives (SNNPRs), and 14(0.29%) were from Harar. Community maternal education was low in nearly half (51.37%) of the study participants, and the level of poverty was high in 2755 (55.41%) of the community (Table 2).
Prevalence of levels of stunting.
The overall prevalence of stunting among under five years old children was 35.7% [95% CI: 34.4%, 37.1%]. This study showed that 24.9% [95% CI: 23.5%, 25.9%] of under five years old children had moderate stunting, and 12.1% [95% CI: 11.2%, 13.0%] had severe stunting.
Random effect analysis results.
Null model (Model 1). This model is an intercept-only model without predictors. We examined whether the multilevel ordinal logistic regression model was more significant over the single-level ordinal logistic regression model using the Likelihood Ratio (LR). The LR test result was statistically significant (p<0.05), indicating that the multilevel ordinal logistic regression model was best fitted to the single-level ordinal logistic regression analysis. Therefore, the LR-test was suggestive of use of a multilevel ordinal logistic regression model. Four random effect models were fitted and the final model was chosen since it had the lowest deviance value (Table 3).
Proportional odds assumption.
The parallel-lines assumption was checked using the Brant test. The null hypothesis in the proportional odds assumption is that there is no difference in the effects of the independent variables across levels of stunting. The Brant test revealed that the proportional odds assumption was fulfilled (p = 0.21). In addition to the global test, we assessed each variable in the model to identify the variables for which the proportional odds assumption was fulfilled, and all the variables had a p-value>0.05.
Factors associated with levels of childhood stunting.
Bivariable analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with stunting. Consequently, the sex of the child, child’s age in months, family size, parity, maternal age, marital status, place of delivery, household wealth status, maternal education status, residence, region, community poverty, and community maternal education were considered for multivariable analysis (p<0.2). In the multivariable multilevel proportional odds model; the sex of a child, maternal age, and community maternal education were significantly associated with lower odds of severity levels of stunting. However, child age in months, household wealth status, maternal education, and region were significantly associated with higher odds of stunting severity levels. The odds of having higher levels of stunting among female children were decreased by 17% [AOR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.93] compared to male children. The odds of having higher levels of stunting among children aged 6–23 months and ≥ 24 months were 2.38 times [AOR = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.84, 3.07] and 4.15 times [AOR = 4.15, 95% CI: 3.26, 5.28] higher odds compared to children aged < 6 months. Children whose maternal aged ≥ 35 years their odds of having higher levels of stunting decreased by 27% [AOR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.92] compared to those whose mothers aged 15–24 years. Children from the poorest, poorer, middle, and richer household wealth were 1.84 times [AOR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.32, 2.57], 1.66 times [AOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.31], 1.78 times [AOR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.29, 2.44], and 1.62 times [AOR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.17] higher odds of higher level of stunting compared to children from the richest household wealth, respectively. Children whose maternal educational status of no formal education and primary education had 1.90 times [AOR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.28, 2.82], 1.78 times [AOR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.22, 2.60] higher odds of a higher level of stunting than children whose mother had a higher level of education, respectively.
The odds of being at higher levels of stunting among children in Tigray, Afar, Amhara and Harari regions were 2.95 times [AOR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.78, 4.86], 1.85 times [AOR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.11, 3.10], 1.90 times [AOR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.14, 3.14] and 1.97 times [AOR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.20, 3.25] compared to children in Addis Ababa. The Odds of having higher levels of stunting among children from high community maternal education decreased by 24% [AOR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.92] compared to children from low community maternal education (Table 3).
Discussion
The prevalence of stunting in Ethiopia was 35.77% [95% CI: 34.4%, 37.1%], indicating that childhood stunting remains a major public health problem in Ethiopia. Although the government of Ethiopia is committed to accelerating the reduction of stunting as a key strategy for human capital development and inclusive economic development, stunting remains a serious public health issue in the country. It is higher than the prevalence reported in Northern Brazil (14.8) [18], Pakistan (21%), and China (20%) [19]. The potential reason may be due to differences in socioeconomic status among countries; China and Brazil have a higher socioeconomic status than Ethiopia [20]. It is also possible that countries with a middle or high socioeconomic status have better chance of combating nutritional issues such as stunting by providing appropriate nutritional supply and variety to their populations than low-income countries such as Ethiopia [21]. Moreover, in Ethiopia, there is a widespread belief that young children are unable to chew and digest meat and dairy products and, as a result, are not provided with these foods, thereby missing out on important proteins and micronutrients that favour the occurrence of stunting [22].
Further, in the final model, we found that the sex of the child, maternal age, and community maternal education were significantly associated with lower odds of stunting severity levels, whereas child age in months, household wealth status, maternal education, and region were significantly associated with higher odds of stunting severity level.
Being male was significantly associated with increased odds of childhood stunting compared to being female. This is in line with studies conducted in Tanzania [23], Indonesia [7], and Nigeria [24]. This may because nutrition and health tend to be worse in boys beginning in utero and continuing through childhood [25]. Another reason might be that boys are more likely to be born preterm and have low birth weight, which could also contribute to stunting [25, 26]. Children aged 6–23 months and above had higher odds of higher levels of stunting than children aged less than 6 months. A possible reason might be that the age of 6–23 months is the crucial time to begin complementary feeding, which exposes children to frequent infections, further causing stunting in older children [27].
Children born to mothers aged 15–24 had higher odds of higher levels of stunting than children born to mothers aged 25 years and above. This could be because babies born to younger mothers are more likely to be preterm and have low birth weight, which may predispose the newborn to neonatal infections and malnutrition such as stunting [28]. Moreover, younger mothers are less able to ensure adequate nutritional intake for their children since the mother is still in the growing stage, which affects their children’s growth and development, resulting in malnutrition and other growth impediments [29].
Children from families with low household wealth had increased odds of having higher levels of stunting than those children from rich households. This is in line with findings reported from Oromia [30], Indonesia [7], Nigeria [31], the Democratic Republic of Congo [32], and Rwanda [12]. The possible reason might be low household wealth status is associated with food insecurity which will not allow them to be well nourished and more predisposed them to growth failure. Further, the high prevalence of stunting might be because households with low wealth status are less likely to have sufficient nutrient-rich purchases and access to healthcare services during their children illness.
Poor maternal educational status was significantly associated with increased odds of childhood stunting. This is consistent with the findings reported in previous studies [3, 12, 18, 28]. A possible explanation might be that maternal education is a reliable predictor of nutritional outcomes [33, 34]. Maternal education helps to improve the understanding of infant health and nutrition (e.g., exclusive breastfeeding and appropriate complementary feeding), which helps to improve the quality of children’s diets [35]. Moreover, higher maternal education is associated with greater healthcare-seeking behaviour for their children than their counterparts [36].
Children from Tigray, Afar, Amhara, and Harari regions were significantly associated with higher odds of having higher levels of stunting compared to Addis Ababa. This is consistent with the studies reported in [37] and, Nigeria [24]. A possible reason might be the availability and accessibility of education, information on how to care for their children, and health care services.
Children who lived in a community with a high level of maternal education had lower odds of higher levels of stunting compared to children from low community maternal education. This is consistent with another study [38]. This is because low community maternal education (illiteracy) is the principal cause of childhood malnutrition [39]. Further, in contrast to an illiterate society, educated communities are more knowledgeable about possible childcare practices, have better nurturing, use healthcare services, and have more independence in making decisions [40, 41].
Public health and methodological implications have been looked at in this study. In terms of public health, the study was based on a large sample size of Ethiopian children using pooled Mini-EDHS data, increasing the statistical power of the study and allowing the findings to be generalized. In terms of methodology, previous research has employed binary classification of stunting using yes/no categories, but treating mild, moderate, and severe stunting as a yes is not statistically valid as it leads to the loss of crucial information. Additionally, the factors responsible for mild stunting may not be the same as those responsible for severe stunting, highlighting the need for more nuanced analysis.
This study had both strengths and limitations. The study utilized a weighted pooled nationally representative EDHS survey in Ethiopia, and multilevel ordinal logistic regression analysis was conducted to obtain reliable estimates and standard errors. The sample size was sufficient to detect the true effects of the independent variables. However, readers should keep in mind the limitations of the study, as it cannot establish a causal relationship between stunting and predictors due to the use of cross-sectional data. Additionally, the study was not able to explore all variables important to childhood stunting as it relied on secondary data.
Conclusions
Stunting among under five years old children in Ethiopia is a key public health problem. The sex of the child, child age in months, maternal age, household wealth status, maternal educational status, region, and community maternal education were found to be significant predictors of the severity levels of stunting. Improving access to maternal education related to appropriate child-feeding practices and health, particularly in younger and uneducated mothers. Strengthening the wealth status of the family is also recommended to decrease stunting. Besides, it is better to support strategies of preconception care for mothers during pregnancy to reduce stunting in the long term.
References
- 1. WHO: Fact sheets on Malnutrition,2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malnutrition. [cited 10 June,2023].
- 2. Beer SS, Juarez MD, Vega MW, Canada NL. Pediatric malnutrition: putting the new definition and standards into practice. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. 2015;30(5):609–24. pmid:26330113
- 3. Ssentongo P, Ssentongo A, Ba D, Ericson J, Na M, Gao X, et al. Global, regional and national epidemiology and prevalence of child stunting, wasting and underweight in low-and middle-income countries, 2006–2018. Sci Rep. 2021; 11 (1): 5204. 2021. pmid:33664313
- 4.
World Health Organization. Levels and trends in child malnutrition: UNICEF.
- 5. Mini E, Demographic E. Health survey 2019: key indicators report. The DHS Program ICF. 2019.
- 6. Mutasa K, Tome J, Rukobo S, Govha M, Mushayanembwa P, Matimba FS, et al. Stunting Status and Exposure to Infection and Inflammation in Early Life Shape Antibacterial Immune Cell Function Among Zimbabwean Children. Frontiers in immunology. 2022;13:899296. pmid:35769481
- 7. Agho KE, Inder KJ, Bowe SJ, Jacobs J, Dibley MJ. Prevalence and risk factors for stunting and severe stunting among under-fives in North Maluku province of Indonesia. BMC Pediatrics. 2009;9(1):1–10. pmid:19818167
- 8. Geberselassie SB, Abebe SM, Melsew YA, Mutuku SM, Wassie MM. Prevalence of stunting and its associated factors among children 6–59 months of age in Libo-Kemekem district, Northwest Ethiopia; A community-based cross-sectional study. PloS one. 2018;13(5):e0195361. pmid:29723280
- 9. Haile D, Azage M, Mola T, Rainey R. Exploring spatial variations and factors associated with childhood stunting in Ethiopia: spatial and multilevel analysis. BMC Pediatrics. 2016;16(1):1–14. pmid:27084512
- 10. Ikeda N, Irie Y, Shibuya K. Determinants of reduced child stunting in Cambodia: analysis of pooled data from three demographic and health surveys. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2013;91:341–9. pmid:23678197
- 11. Mzumara B, Bwembya P, Halwiindi H, Mugode R, Banda J. Factors associated with stunting among children below five years of age in Zambia: evidence from the 2014 Zambia demographic and health survey. BMC nutrition. 2018;4(1):1–8. pmid:32153912
- 12. Nshimyiryo A, Hedt-Gauthier B, Mutaganzwa C, Kirk CM, Beck K, Ndayisaba A, et al. Risk factors for stunting among children under five years: a cross-sectional population-based study in Rwanda using the 2015 Demographic and Health Survey. BMC public health. 2019;19(1):1–10.
- 13. Shine S, Tadesse F, Shiferaw Z, Mideksa L, Seifu W. Prevalence and associated factors of stunting among 6–59 months children in the pastoral community of Korahay Zone, Somali Regional State, Ethiopia 2016. J Nutr Disorders Ther. 2017;7(208):2161.
- 14. Tariku A, Biks GA, Derso T, Wassie MM, Abebe SM. Stunting and its determinant factors among children aged 6–59 months in Ethiopia. Italian Journal of Pediatrics. 2017;43(1):1–9.
- 15. Torlesse H, Cronin AA, Sebayang SK, Nandy R. Determinants of stunting in Indonesian children: evidence from a cross-sectional survey indicate a prominent role for the water, sanitation, and hygiene sector in stunting reduction. BMC public health. 2016;16(1):1–11. pmid:27472935
- 16.
World Health Organization (WHO). Driving commitment for nutrition within the UN decade of action on Nutrition Geneva, Switzerland 2018.
- 17. Health FDRoEMo. Seqota declaration; a commitment to end child undernutrition in Ethiopia by the year 2030. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2016.
- 18. Corrêa EM, Gallo CdO, Antunes JLF, Jaime PC. The tendency of stunting among children under five in the Northern Region of Brazil, according to the Food and Nutrition Surveillance System, 2008–2017. Jornal de Pediatria. 2023;99:120–6. pmid:36055366
- 19. Zhang J, Shi J, Himes JH, Du Y, Yang S, Shi S, et al. Undernutrition status of children under 5 years in Chinese rural areas-data from the National Rural Children Growth Standard Survey, 2006. Asia Pacific Journal of clinical nutrition. 2011;20(4):584–92. pmid:22094844
- 20. Becker GS, Philipson TJ, Soare RR. The Quantity and Quality of Life and the Evolution of World Inequality. 2005; VOL. 95.
- 21. Van Tuijl CJ, Madjdian DS, Bras H, Chalise B. Sociocultural and economic determinants of stunting and thinness among adolescent boys and girls in Nepal. Journal of Biosocial Science. 2021;53(4):531–56. pmid:32638672
- 22. Berhane HY, Jirström M, Abdelmenan S, Berhane Y, Alsanius B, Trenholm J, et al. Social stratification, diet diversity and malnutrition among preschoolers: a survey of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Nutrients. 2020;12(3):712. pmid:32156006
- 23. Chirande L, Charwe D, Mbwana H, Victor R, Kimboka S, Issaka AI, et al. Determinants of stunting and severe stunting among under-fives in Tanzania: evidence from the 2010 cross-sectional household survey. BMC Pediatrics. 2015;15:1–13.
- 24. Akombi BJ, Agho KE, Hall JJ, Merom D, Astell-Burt T, Renzaho AM. Stunting and severe stunting among children under-5 years in Nigeria: A multilevel analysis. BMC Pediatrics. 2017;17:1–16.
- 25. Thurstans S, Opondo C, Seal A, Wells J, Khara T, Dolan C, et al. Boys are more likely to be undernourished than girls: a systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in undernutrition. BMJ global health. 2020;5(12):e004030. pmid:33328202
- 26. Costa JC, da Silva ICM, Victora CG. Gender bias in under-five mortality in low/middle-income countries. BMJ global health. 2017;2(2):e000350. pmid:29082002
- 27. Rao S, Swathi P, Unnikrishnan B, Hegde A. Study of complementary feeding practices among mothers of children aged six months to two years-A studies from coastal south India. The Australasian medical journal. 2011;4(5):252.
- 28. Finlay JE, Özaltin E, Canning D. The association of maternal age with infant mortality, child anthropometric failure, diarrhea and anemia for first births: evidence from 55 low-and middle-income countries. BMJ open. 2011;1(2):e000226.
- 29. Habimana S, Biracyaza E. Risk factors of stunting among children under 5 years of age in the eastern and western provinces of Rwanda: analysis of Rwanda demographic and health survey 2014/2015. Pediatric health, medicine, and therapeutics. 2019:115–30. pmid:31695558
- 30. Mengistu K, Alemu K, Destaw B. Prevalence of malnutrition and associated factors among children aged 6–59 months at Hidabu Abote District, North Shewa, Oromia Regional State. J Nutr disorders ther. 2013;1(1):2161–509.
- 31. Uthman OA. A multilevel analysis of individual and community effect on chronic childhood malnutrition in rural Nigeria. Journal of tropical pediatrics. 2009;55(2):109–15. pmid:18845589
- 32. Kismul H, Acharya P, Mapatano MA, Hatløy A. Determinants of childhood stunting in the Democratic Republic of Congo: further analysis of Demographic and Health Survey 2013–14. BMC public health. 2018;18(1):1–14.
- 33. Frost MB, Forste R, Haas DW. Maternal education and child nutritional status in Bolivia: finding the links. Social science & medicine. 2005;60(2):395–407.
- 34. Reed BA, Habicht J-P, Niameogo C. The effects of maternal education on a child’s nutritional status depend on socio-environmental conditions. International journal of epidemiology. 1996;25(3):585–92.
- 35. Gibson EL, Wardle J, Watts CJ. Fruit and vegetable consumption, nutritional knowledge and beliefs in mothers and children. Appetite. 1998;31(2):205–28. pmid:9792733
- 36. Vereecken CA, Keukelier E, Maes L. Influence of mother’s educational level on food parenting practices and food habits of young children. Appetite. 2004;43(1):93–103. pmid:15262022
- 37. Teshome B, Kogi-Makau W, Getahun Z, Taye G. Magnitude and determinants of stunting in children under five years of age in food surplus region of Ethiopia: the case of west gojam zone. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development. 2009;23(2).
- 38. Khattak UK, Iqbal SP, Ghazanfar H, Kulsoom Khattak U. The role of parents’ literacy in malnutrition of children under the age of five years in a semi-urban community of Pakistan: a case-control study. Cureus. 2017;9(6).
- 39. Beal T, Massiot E, Arsenault JE, Smith MR, Hijmans RJ. Global trends in dietary micronutrient supplies and estimated prevalence of inadequate intakes. PloS one. 2017;12(4):e0175554. pmid:28399168
- 40. Kimani-Murage EW, Muthuri SK, Oti SO, Mutua MK, Van De Vijver S, Kyobutungi C. Evidence of a double burden of malnutrition in urban poor settings in Nairobi, Kenya. PloS one. 2015;10(6):e0129943. pmid:26098561
- 41. Mandal G, Bose K. Assessment of overall prevalence of undernutrition using a composite index of anthropometric failure (CIAF) among preschool children of West Bengal, India. 2009.