Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Deciphering the immune landscape of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A single-cell transcriptomic analysis of regulatory T cell responses to PD-1 blockade therapy

  • Adib Miraki Feriz ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Adib Miraki Feriz, Fatemeh Bahraini

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Student Research Committee, Birjand University of Medical Sciences (BUMS), Birjand, Iran

    ⨯
  • Fatemeh Bahraini ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Adib Miraki Feriz, Fatemeh Bahraini

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Student Research Committee, Birjand University of Medical Sciences (BUMS), Birjand, Iran

    ⨯
  • Arezou Khosrojerdi,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Infectious Diseases Research Center, BUMS, Birjand, Iran

    ⨯
  • Setareh Azarkar,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Student Research Committee, Birjand University of Medical Sciences (BUMS), Birjand, Iran

    ⨯
  • Seyed Mehdi Sajjadi,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Cellular and Molecular Research Center (CMRC), BUMS, Birjand, Iran

    ⨯
  • Edris HosseiniGol,

    Roles Data curation, Software

    Affiliation Department of Computer Engineering, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

    ⨯
  • Mohammad Amin Honardoost,

    Roles Investigation, Visualization

    Affiliation Laboratory of Systems Biology and Data Analytics, Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore

    ⨯
  • Samira Saghafi,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Cellular and Molecular Research Center (CMRC), BUMS, Birjand, Iran, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, BUMS, Birjand, Iran

    ⨯
  • Nicola Silvestris,

    Roles Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Human Pathology “G. Barresi”, University of Messina, Messina, Italy

    ⨯
  • Patrizia Leone,

    Roles Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy

    ⨯
  • Hossein Safarpour ,

    Roles Project administration, Supervision, Validation

    safarpour701@yahoo.com (HS); vito.racanelli@unitn.it (VR)

    Affiliation Cellular and Molecular Research Center (CMRC), BUMS, Birjand, Iran

    ⨯
  • Vito Racanelli

    Roles Project administration, Supervision

    safarpour701@yahoo.com (HS); vito.racanelli@unitn.it (VR)

    Affiliation Centre for Medical Sciences (CISMed), University of Trento and Internal Medicine Division, Santa Chiara Hospital, Provincial Health Care Agency (APSS), Trento, Italy

    ⨯

Abstract

Immunotherapy is changing the Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) landscape and improving outcomes for patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. A deeper understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME) is required in light of the limitations of patients’ responses to immunotherapy. Here, we aimed to examine how Nivolumab affects infiltrating Tregs in the HNSCC TME. We used single-cell RNA sequencing data from eight tissues isolated from four HNSCC donors before and after Nivolumab treatment. Interestingly, the study found that Treg counts and suppressive activity increased following Nivolumab therapy. We also discovered that changes in the CD44-SSP1 axis, NKG2C/D-HLA-E axis, and KRAS signaling may have contributed to the increase in Treg numbers. Furthermore, our study suggests that decreasing the activity of the KRAS and Notch signaling pathways, and increasing FOXP3, CTLA-4, LAG-3, and GZMA expression, may be mechanisms that enhance the killing and suppressive capacity of Tregs. Additionally, the result of pseudo-temporal analysis of the HNSCC TME indicated that after Nivolumab therapy, the expression of certain inhibitory immune checkpoints including TIGIT, ENTPD1, and CD276 and LY9, were decreased in Tregs, while LAG-3 showed an increased expression level. The study also found that Tregs had a dense communication network with cluster two, and that certain ligand-receptor pairs, including SPP1/CD44, HLA-E/KLRC2, HLA-E/KLRK1, ANXA1/FPR3, and CXCL9/FCGR2A, had notable changes after the therapy. These changes in gene expression and cell interactions may have implications for the role of Tregs in the TME and in response to Nivolumab therapy.

Introduction

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a highly fatal malignancy arising from the mucosal epithelium of the tongue, mouth, nasopharynx, larynx, and throat, with an annual mortality rate of 40–50% [1, 2]. The disease is associated with significant clinical challenges, including a high incidence of distant metastases (10–30%) and tumor recurrence (30%-50%) [3]. HNSCC pathogenesis is driven by various factors such as tobacco exposure, betel nut consumption, alcohol consumption, consumption of spicy food, dental trauma, sunlight exposure, chronic inflammation, Human Papillomavirus infection, somatic genetic mutations, genetic predisposition, and alterations in the microbiome [1, 4].

Despite substantial technological breakthroughs in HNSCC therapy, the mortality rate remains high [5]. HNSCC management has traditionally relied on surgery, radiation, and systemic chemotherapy, either as monotherapy or in combination [6]. Concurrent chemo/radiotherapy, particularly with cisplatin, is a promising therapeutic option, significantly improving survival outcomes for patients with inoperable tumors [7]. However, the genetic complexity of HNSCC plays a crucial role in dictating patient outcomes, with loco-regional failure representing a significant challenge. The use of cisplatin as a radio-sensitizer has been associated with significant systemic toxicity, limiting its applicability in immunocompromised or frail HNSCC patients [5]. Therefore, there is a growing interest in developing innovative therapeutic strategies that maximize disease control while minimizing treatment-related morbidity.

Over the last decade, the field of cancer immunotherapy has rapidly advanced and has been successfully used to treat various malignancies such as melanoma, breast, colorectal, and lung cancer [8]. The use of immunotherapy in the treatment of HNSCC has also revolutionized the field by improving survival rates and decreasing side effects associated with traditional therapies [8]. With the discovery of immunotherapeutic modalities such as oncolytic viruses, monoclonal antibodies, CAR-T cells, and therapeutic vaccines, the HNSCC treatment landscape is rapidly changing and expanding [9]. These innovative approaches hold tremendous potential for improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

Anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have shown great promise in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic HNSCC [10]. Nivolumab, as a PD-1 CPI, is a commonly used FDA-approved treatment for patients with platinum-restricted recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. However, the success rate of this therapy is still modest, with only around 15% of patients responding to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in previous trials [11]. While most studies on CPI resistance have focused on the immune microenvironment and the deactivation and exhaustion of T and B cells [12], less attention has been given to tumor cell-intrinsic mechanisms of immunotherapy resistance in HNSCC. Thus, to identify drivers of response and resistance to CPI, studying the tumor microenvironment (TME) is crucial.

The TME is a complex and dynamic ecosystem that includes various immune cells that migrate to the tumor site. Among these immune cells, T regulatory cells (Tregs) play a crucial role in promoting tumor growth by regulating immune system hyper-activation and maintaining tolerance [13]. Tregs can suppress anti-cancer responses and promote angiogenesis at the tumor site [14]. However, the prognostic effect of Tregs is controversial and varies according to the type of cancer, tumor stage, and treatment [15]. In some cancers, such as melanoma, hepatocellular, cervical, renal, and breast cancer, FOXP3+ Tregs infiltration has been associated with decreased overall and disease-free survival [16]. However, the effect of Tregs on HNSCC is still controversial. Some studies have suggested that increased FOXP3+ Tregs infiltration leads to improved survival [17–19], while others have reported that it causes decreased survival [20–22]. Therefore, further studies are required to elucidate the role of Tregs in HNSCC.

The development of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has provided a comprehensive examination of the transcriptome profiles of specific cell populations, which has significantly assisted the study of the TME [23, 24]. This approach has also been utilized to investigate the TME of HNSCC, and the results have given researchers a deeper understanding of how cells interact and change at the tumor site [23, 25]. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of Nivolumab on the function and cellular communication of Tregs using scRNA-seq data analysis. By studying the effect of Nivolumab on Tregs, we hope to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the response and resistance to anti-PD-1 CPI in HNSCC. This study has the potential to contribute to the development of more effective immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of HNSCC.

Materials and methods

The study overall design and flow process are presented in Fig 1.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Schematic visualization of the study.

Figure made by Biorender. Reprinted from [86] under a CC BY license, with permission from Elsevier, original copyright 2023.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295863.g001

Single-cell RNA sequencing data processing

The scRNA-seq data analysis was performed on four donor tumors from a neoadjuvant study of advanced-stage HNSCC patients who were treated with the anti PD-1 therapy, Nivolumab. The samples were taken before and after the patients received treatment. The primary data of GSE195832 by Obradovic et al., was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE195832) [26]. This data was based on Illumina NovaSeq 6000 paltform (Homo sapiens).

In the analysis of scRNA-seq data using Scanpy (version 1.9.1), a rigorous pipeline was meticulously executed. Initially, a quality control step identified and eliminated low-quality cells with less than 200 expressed genes and those with more than 20% mitochondrial content. Additionally, genes expressed in fewer than 20 cells were filtered out. Subsequent data preprocessing involved the normalization of raw gene expression counts using the sc.pp.normalize_total function, with a target total sum of 10,000 counts per cell, and a logarithmic transformation to stabilize variance. To capture the most informative genes, Highly Variable Genes (HVGs) were precisely selected using the sc.pp.highly_variable_genes function, and retaining the top 4000 genes. These HVGs were then subjected to principal component analysis (PCA) [27] to reduce dimensionality. To address batch effects, the ’combat’ algorithm (version 0.3.3) [28] was meticulously applied to harmonize PCA embeddings from eight distinct samples. Utilizing the top 50 principal components, a neighborhood graph was constructed to capture cell-cell similarities (S1 Fig), and the Leiden algorithm was precisely utilized for clustering cells into biologically meaningful groups. Finally, differential expression analysis, leveraging the sc.tl.rank_genes_group function with use_raw = True, was conducted to uncover genes with significant expression differences within each cluster.

The regulatory T cells (Tregs) were annotated with specific markers such as CD3D, FOXP3, TIGIT, and FANK1 which reported in previous studies [29, 30]. After that, we constructed UMAP embeddings with a minimum distance of 0.5 and a spread of 1.0 to display the most closely similar neighbor graph [31].

Differentially expressed genes and cell cycle analysis of Tregs

DEGs were evaluated using the sc.tl.rank_genes_groups function using paired t-test method to discover differences between Tregs in untreated and treated samples. For downstream analysis, genes having an adjusted p-value of < 0.05 and fold change >|1| were chosen. The p-value was adjusted using Benjamini-Hochberg.

In order to predict the cell cycle stage, the S and G2M-specific genes were scored using the Scanpy function (scanpy.tl.score_genes_cell_cycle). The S- and G2M label for each individual cell are determined by the class with the highest score. If neither the S-score nor the G2M-score exceeds 0.5, the cells are said to be in the G1 phase. The reference genes for the cell cycle phase that are utilized for scoring are included in the Kowalczyk et al. study [32].

Enrichment analysis of DEGs of Tregs subpopulation

In our study, we performed gene enrichment analysis using two distinct methods to comprehensively evaluate the biological implications of DEGs within the Tregs subpopulation. First, we employed Over-Representation Analysis (ORA) with Enrichr (https://maayanlab.cloud/Enrichr/), which allowed us to assess whether the DEGs were significantly associated with specific Gene Ontology (GO) terms of biological processes. This approach highlighted over-represented functional categories among the DEGs. Additionally, we utilized Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) with WebGestalt (http://www.webgestalt.org/option.php), a robust tool that assessed whether our DEGs exhibited coordinated and statistically significant expression patterns within predefined gene sets from the MSigDB. This dual approach ensured a comprehensive exploration of the functional relevance of the DEGs, providing valuable insights into the underlying biological processes and pathways within the Tregs subpopulation.

Pseudotemporal ordering of single cells

We conducted pseudotime analysis using scFates v0.8.1 (https://pypi.org/project/scFates/), an analytical tool seamlessly integrated with Scanpy and notable for its GPU-accelerated capabilities, facilitating faster and more scalable inference. Pseudotime analysis involves the estimation of cellular progression along developmental trajectories and examination of gene expression pattern across pseudotime, and scFates is well-suited for this purpose. It allowed us to infer pseudotime values for individual cells, providing insights into their developmental states. By comparing these pseudotime genes with DEGs, we identified Treg-specific genes within the trajectory. This approach helped unravel the temporal dynamics and critical cellular transitions within the biological system under investigation.

Expression pattern of inhibitory ICs in Tregs

To find the expression behavior of ICs in Tregs, we used DEG analysis to compare the expression patterns of a broad panel of inhibitory ICs, including TIGIT, LY9, PDCD1, LAG3, CTLA4, CD276, NT5E, PDCD1LG2, CD274, IDO1, VSIR, HAVCR2, and ENTPD, in untreated and treated samples. The cluster specificity of their expression was then assessed using UMAP, and IC expression was then displayed using pseudo-time. Then, we used the GEPIA database, a user-friendly web-based tool designed for the analysis and visualization of gene expression pattern across multiple cancers from TCGA and the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) projects, to determine if the expression patterns of the pertinent ICs matched those of their counterparts in the TCGA PCa dataset.

Cell-cell communication analysis

Cell-cell interaction was investigated using SquidPy [33], which provides analytical techniques for depositing, modifying, and interactively clarifying single-cell RNA sequencing data. It employs a productive re-implementation of the CellPhoneDB technique [34]. CellPhoneDB is particularly notable for its ability to handle a substantial number of interacting cell pairs, often exceeding 100,000, and it accommodates the analysis of interactions across diverse cluster combinations, frequently numbering over 100 clusters. To ensure the reliability of our findings, we rigorously considered interactions where both ligand and receptor genes were expressed in at least 10% of the cells within our scRNA-seq dataset.

Results

HNSCC TME cell fractions

We reanalyzed a published scRNA-seq dataset from eight HNSCC tissues in order to comprehend the heterogeneity in the patient response to CPI therapy. After removing cells that failed Quality Control (QC), a total of 53,730 cells remained for downstream analysis (pre-Nivolumab therapy: n = 27223, post-Nivolumab therapy: n = 26507) (Fig 2A and 2B). Cells were represented as twelve different clusters using uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) and unsupervised graph-based clustering (Fig 2C).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Characterization of Tregs in HNSCC TME in pre and post Nivolumab therapy.

A) UMAP visualization of cells in two statuses; B) UMAP visualization of cells according to their originated samples; C) UMAP visualization of HNSCC TME clusters based on Leiden clustering; D) UMAP visualization of Tregs markers and related expression pattern of them in TCGA tumor bulk dataset; The box plots display the median mRNA expression levels of Treg markers in HNSCC tumors (orange) compared to normal tissues (red). The values on the axes are presented in Log2 (TPM+1), where TPM (Transcripts Per Million) quantifies gene expression while considering transcript length and sequencing depth. Log2 transformation makes the data more interpretable and robust for visual comparisons. The "+1" avoids issues with zero TPM values, ensuring all values are positive. The * red indicates a p-value less than 0.01, implying statistical significance. The abbreviations T and N denote tumor and normal tissues, respectively. E) Histogram representation of Tregs cell count in pre (blue) and post (orange) Nivolumab therapy; paired t-test with p-value < 0.05, Error bars indicate standard deviation; F) Histogram representation of Tregs cell number in different donors in pre (blue) and post (orange) Nivolumab therapy; G) UMAP visualization of Tregs in two different statues.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295863.g002

Based on the expression of canonical gene markers including: CD3D, FOXP3, TIGIT, and FANK1, cluster four was identified as the Treg population (Fig 2D). Interestingly, examination of the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort indicated that FOXP3 and TIGIT were significantly up-regulated in HNSCC samples compared to healthy (Fig 2E).

We found that tumor cells showed a notable increase in Treg cluster compared to pretreatment tumors (Fig 2F and 2G).

DEG analysis of Tregs

The gene expression level in Tregs before and after treatment with Nivolumab was determined by differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis (Fig 3A). Pseudogenes, mitochondrial encoded genes, and ribosomal genes were eliminated, and 4089 Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (adjusted p-value <0.05), including 284 up-regulated genes and 3805 down-regulated genes, were identified (Fig 3A).

thumbnail
Fig 3. DEGs, enrichment, and cell cycle analysis of Tregs in HNSCC TME.

A) Volcano plot of the Treg’s DEGs after Nivolumab therapy. Genes regulated with a fold change >|1| and Adj. p.value < 0.05 are highlighted in red showing the indicated fold changes derived from t-test statistic; B) GO Biological Processes of Treg’s DEGs using ORA. The figure contains bar charts showing the results of the enrichment analysis of GO developed using Enrichr. For each term, the x-axis indicates the -log10 (p.value); C) GSEA analysis of Tregs DEGs. GSEA analysis using hallmark gene sets from the molecular signature database for the transcriptional difference between pre and post Nivolumab therapy. NES = normalized enrichment score; D) Bar plot of the percentage of Tregs in different phases (G1: Growth 1 phase, S: DNA Synthesis phase, G2M: Checkpoint, Mitosis phase) and statues.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295863.g003

Based on previous studies [35], heterogeneity within Treg cells has been characterized by a bimodal distribution of TNFRSF9, a known marker for Treg activation. To investigate whether this heterogeneity is associated with response to treatment, we further performed DEG analysis of TME cells. Compared to pre-treatment, we observed that tumor cells in TME of post-treatment samples consistently expressed TNFRSF9 at higher level. Also, the result of DEG analysis of Treg cells between two statuses indicated that genes associated with immunosuppressive functions including TNFRSF4, ENTPD1, REL and LAYN were downregulated in post treatment Tregs. Notabely, we discovered numerous immediate early genes among Treg DEGs, including NR4A2, DUSP1, FOSB, FOS, JUN, and JUNB. These genes are quickly activated in response to stimuli, with no or little nascent protein synthesis [36].

Biological Process (BP) analysis of Tregs in post treatment centered around the neutrophil degranulation, neutrophil immunity, neutrophil activation, and the cytokine-mediated signaling pathway (Fig 3B). Furthermore, (Molecular Signatures Database) MSigDB analysis showed the negative regulation of KRAS signaling, Notch signaling, bile acid metabolism, coagulation, and angiogenesis in Tregs after Nivolumab therapy (Fig 3C).

We found no significant increase in the Treg cluster’s S.Score (module score of genes associated with the S phase of the cell cycle) or G2M.Score (module score of genes associated with the G2M phase of the cell cycle) after treatment with Nivolumab, indicating that this unique transcriptional profile was not due to active cell cycling (Fig 3D).

Pseudo-time trajectory analysis of Treg dynamic changes

Given the heterogeneity of the TME, we performed a pseudo-temporal reconstruction using scFates to determine the lineage structures and pseudo-temporal variables of the HNSCC TME. There were eight unique nodes found based on transcriptional alterations in pseudo-time trajectory analysis, which node number five mapped on Treg cluster. The top 10 up-regulated genes associated with this node included DUSP4, TRBC2, CD7, GZMA, CD2, and TRAC. Also, CCL5 as an important chemokine was among these specific genes that indicating stimulation of Treg cells presumably by interferons (Fig 4A). Furthermore, enhanced production of CD3E/D, may reveal epigenetic change in the Treg cells. IL-32 was another gene with strong expression in the Treg cluster. Thanks to mRNA alternative splicing, this cytokine has nine distinct isoforms and is now recognized as a key pro-inflammatory factor.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Pseudo-temporal analysis of HNSCC TME.

A) Top ten up-regulated genes of Tregs during the pseudo-time; UMAP presentation illustrating the dynamics of the HNSCC TME and its transition states as they progress through pseudo-time. The lineage tracking initiates at the 0 branch and concludes at the 1 branch. The heatmap depicts genes that experience upregulation within the Treg branch as pseudo-time advances. The highlighted genes comprise the top ten upregulated genes specific to the Treg branch compared to other branches during pseudo-time analysis. B) Venny plot of the top ten up-regulated genes of Tregs and Tregs DEGs; C) The expression pattern of four similar genes between the top ten up-regulated genes of Tregs and Tregs DEGs along the pseudo-time.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295863.g004

When the list of top 10 up-regulated genes associated to Tregs node were compared with the Treg DEG list between two statuses, we found that four genes including GZMA, CD2, IL-32, and TRAC were also dys-regulated significantly in Tregs before and after treatment (Fig 4B). In this regard, post-treatment Tregs demonstrated a markedly decrease in IL-32, CD2, and TRAC expression while GZMA was up-regulated in response to Nivolumab (Fig 4B).

To determine if these alteration in expression of GZMA, CD2, IL-32, and TRAC is a distinct feature of Treg cells, we further assessed the expression of these four genes in all clusters across the pseudo-time. Although these genes were expressed slightly in certain clusters, the Treg cluster exhibited higher levels of expression than the other clusters (Fig 4C).

IIC expression pattern in Tregs

Considering the importance of IICs in suppressing immune responses, we compared the expression of 14 common IICs in Tregs before and after Nivolumab therapy (Fig 5A). Among the IICs examined, only five were significantly altered between two statuses (Fig 5B). TIGIT, ENTPD1, and CD276 and LY9 levels were significantly lower in Tregs after therapy, while LAG-3 showed an increased expression level (Fig 5C). However, the expression of PDCD1 (PD-1), as the target of Nivolumab, did not significantly dys-regulate before and after the treatment (Fig 5C).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Characterization of expression pattern of IICs.

A) Dot plot of the expression pattern of IICs in Tregs before and after Nivolumab therapy; B) Venny plot of the significant IICs in Tregs; C) The log2FC and Adj P.val of IICs in Tregs between two statuses. D) The expression pattern of significant IICs along the pseudo-time; Yellow branches shows highest expression of the gene across the pseudo-time. E) The expression pattern of significant IICs in TCGA tumor bulk dataset, The box plots display the median mRNA expression levels of Treg markers in HNSCC tumors (represented by the orange plots) and the corresponding normal tissues (represented by the red plot). The values on the axes are represented in units of Log2 (TPM+1). The * red indicates a p-value less than 0.01, implying statistical significance. The abbreviations T and N denote tumor and normal tissues, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295863.g005

UMAP analysis indicated that among the five mentioned IICs, TIGIT and LAG-3 have a higher expression level in Tregs than other clusters (Fig 5D). Nevertheless, according to the UMAP results, LAG-3 expression has increased and TIGIT expression has decreased in Tregs following treatment with Nivolumab. Based on TCGA HNSCC tumor bulk dataset, patients with HNSCC had higher TIGIT, LAG3, and CD276 expression levels than healthy individuals (Fig 5E).

The cell-cell interaction of Tregs

We next identified ligand-receptor pairs between other cells and Tregs before and after Nivolumab treatment using Squidpy algorithm. This python-based tool includes a database of ligand-receptor interactions as well as a statistical model for identifying relationships between two cell types that are enriched from single-cell transcriptomics data. Results of the analysis demonstrated a dense communication network among cluster two and Treg cells both before and after Nivolumab therapy (Fig 6A). The MARCO, CD14, FCGR3A, and CD163 genes, which are unique to tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), were expressed in cluster two (Fig 6B). Among the interactions, five pairs SPP1/CD44, HLA-E/KLRC2, HLA-E/KLRK1, ANXA1/FPR3, and CXCL9/FCGR2A had shown notable changes after the therapy (Fig 6C). We identified hallmark associations for these ligands and receptors using MSigDB, focusing on the top 5 pairs (10 genes). The analysis was conducted using ORA and revealed connections to various cellular pathways, including those related to inflammation response, apoptosis, glycolysis, angiogenesis, and signaling pathways such as IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling, IL2/STAT5 signaling, and TNFα signaling via NF-κB (Fig 6D).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Cell-cell interaction of Tregs in HNSCC TME.

A) Bar plot of the interaction scores of Tregs in Pre and Post treatment. Interaction score: sum of all expression of all ligand and receptors which were involved between Treg and others; B) UMAP visualization of TAMs markers; C) Ligand/Receptors which are significant between Tregs and TAMs. Interaction score: Top highly expressed interactions between Treg and TAMs; D) MSigDB analysis of the ligand/receptors pathways. The figure contains bar charts showing the results of the enrichment analysis of MSigDB developed using Enrichr. For each term, the x-axis indicates the -log10 (p.value).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295863.g006

Discussion

Not all T cells participate in the development of anti-cancer responses. The TME’s development is significantly influenced by a specific subset of T cells that express CD4, CD25, and FOXP3 markers and is known as the "Treg" subset [37]. These cells, which in normal circumstances assist in preventing the development of chronic inflammation and autoimmune diseases, promote the growth and development of tumor cells [38]. Tregs, in addition to inhibiting CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from becoming activated, enhance angiogenesis to improve the delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the tumor site [39]. As a result, numerous studies have indicated that targeting Treg immunosuppressive mechanisms or eliminating these cells is an essential cancer treatment target [40–42].

Tregs infiltrating TME, on the other hand, had inconclusive results in some cancers, such as HNSCC [43]. Some studies have shown the poor prognosis of HNSCC patients with a high FOXP3+ Treg cell infiltration [20, 21]. In contrast, others have highlighted the correlation between the high recruitment of these cells and better overall survival and local control [18, 44].

In this study, we re-analyzed a scRNA-seq data of HNSCC patients treated with Nivolumab to examine the cellular and molecular dynamics of Tregs in the TME.

Previous studies have already established several markers for Treg cells such as CD3D, FOXP3, FANK1, and TIGIT using single cell sequencing [29, 45], which we also employed in our study to accurately validate Treg cell annotation. In addition, we discovered that FOXP3 and TIGIT are expressed at higher levels in HNSCC patients by analyzing the TCGA tumor bulk dataset (Fig 2D). TIGIT+ Tregs are highly immunosuppressive, persistent, and concentrated in cancers, according to Julien et al [46]. Additionally, FOXP3+ Tregs are capable of inhibiting the proliferation of autologous CD4+ CD25- T cells [47].

Our results demonstrate that both collectively and individually, Treg numbers increased following treatment with Nivolumab (Fig 2E and 2F). According to a comparison of the cell cycle of Tregs before and after treatment, evidence showed that Treg proliferation increased dramatically following Nivolumab treatments (Fig 3D). The increase of Tregs after treatment with anti-PD-1 has also been confirmed in the study of Kamada et al [48]. In addition, Xiong et al. showed that Nivolumab treatment increases the number of FOXP3+ CD4+ T-cells in peripheral blood [49].

There are some crumbs of evidence to support the cross-talk between neutrophils and Tregs. According to studies, Tregs facilitate neutrophil migration into the TME by generating CXCL8 [50]. Furthermore, Treg-secreted IL-10 and TGF-β can induce neutrophil polarization and conversion to tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) [51]. Treg also suppress the phagocytosis ability of neutrophils [52]. Following the discovery by Eruslanov et al. that TANs are not immunosuppressive in the early stages of cancer but rather stimulate T cell responses, the significance of neutrophil-Treg cross-talk in TME doubles [53]. Our results showed that the mechanisms of Treg involved in the regulation of neutrophil activity, such as degranulation and mediating immunity, had changed after Nivolumab therapy (Fig 3B).

According to GSEA analysis, KRAS signaling, Notch signaling, and angiogenesis activity were all reduced in Tregs following Nivolumab treatment (Fig 3C). Abundant molecules in the KRAS signaling pathway participate in intracellular signaling and regulate cell differentiation, proliferation, growth, and apoptosis [54]. Uncontrolled proliferation and an elevated risk of malignancy can result from mutations in any of the genes responsible for producing these molecules [55]. Numerous studies have also shown that RAS signaling pathway alterations impact T cell function [56–58]. Mor et al. found that inhibiting Ras increases the level of FOXP3 in pre-existing Tregs and improves the conversion of CD4+ CD25- T cells to CD4+ CD25+ FOXP3+ T cells [59]. Additionally, this work demonstrated that RAS inhibition improves Tregs’ immunosuppressive function in a FOXP3-dependent manner, which allowed RAS-deficient Tregs to prevent the development of diabetes in a mouse model of the disease by up to 70% [59]. Our research showed that Nivolumab therapy reduced KRAS signaling in Tregs, which could cause an increase in the expression of FOXP3 and enhance the immunosuppressive ability of Tregs.

The Notch signaling pathway is one of the most evolutionarily conserved pathways and is activated only by cell-to-cell communication [60]. Rong et al. demonstrated that the suppressive activity of Tregs is adversely affected by the activation of the Notch signaling pathway [61]. Activation of the Notch signaling pathway, in other words, causes Tregs to express less TGF-β, IL-27b (a component of IL-35), and PD-1 [61]. Tregs treated with Notch ligands produced more IFN-γ and were less capable of inhibiting T-effector proliferation and preventing the release of TNF-α and IFN-γ [61]. Our results demonstrated that Nivolumab treatment decreased the Notch signaling pathway in Tregs, which may have increased their immunosuppressive ability.

Accurate study of diverse gene expression in scRNA-seq utilizing pseudotime can aid in better understanding the specificity of any therapy, leading to the identification of novel genes as critical player targets. Accordingly, we found that the expression levels of four genes GZMA, CD2, IL32, and TRAC were altered in Tregs after Nivolumab treatment (Fig 4B). The expression level of GZMA increased while the expression of other genes decreased. It has long been known that tumor and virus-infected cells can be killed by (Natural Killers) NK and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells using the granzyme/perforin mechanism [62]. Today, it is evident that this mechanism is not just restricted to NK and TCD8+, and Tregs also employ this to induce cell cytolysis in TCD8+, NK, and B effector cells in TME [63–65]. According to the study of Grossman et al., CD4+CD25+ natural Tregs express more GZMA and less GZMB, whereas adaptive Tregs express these molecules differently [66]. Additionally, they demonstrated that both Treg subtypes had a strong capacity for killing DC, T cells, and CD14+ monocytes to suppress immune responses [66]. Our results also indicated that GZMA expression levels in Tregs had increased following treatment, which may be a sign of their increased capacity for cell cytolysis of TME cells.

IL-32 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine produced by different immune cells, including NK cells, T cells, and monocytes [67]. This cytokine has been shown to play a role in the induction of other pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2) [67]. The decrease in the expression of IL-32 in Tregs after treatment can be an inhibitory mechanism of this cell to prevent the formation of inflammation in TME.

The importance of immunosuppressive TME and dysfunctional expression of IICs in reducing anti-tumoral immune responses has been underlined by increasing evidence [11]. Based on our findings, five of the IICs had significant expression changes when the IIC panel in Tregs was compared before and after treatment (Fig 5C). According to these findings, PD-1+ Tregs significantly increased LAG-3 expression after Nivolumab treatment, while TIGIT, ENTPD1, CD276, and LY9 expression decreased significantly. LAG-3 is a CD4-dependent molecule [68]. This molecule is produced on the surface of Tregs after activation, binds to MHC-II, and inhibits DCs’ and effector T cells’ functions [68]. In addition, it has been demonstrated that LAG-3+ Tregs can control humoral immune responses [69]. The production of high amounts of IL-10 and TGF-β by LAG-3+ Tregs inhibits the function of Tfh, prevents the formation of the germinal center (GC), and finally suppresses the production of antibodies [70]. The increase of LAG-3 expression in Treg after Nivolumab injection can increase their ability to suppress cellular and humoral immune responses. It should be emphasized that after the treatment, CTLA-4 and PDCD-1 expression levels also increased; however, this increase was not significant.

TIGIT is one of the most important IICs on the surface of Tregs, capable of suppressing effector T cells, decreasing NK cytolysis activity, and inhibiting antibody formation [71]. Preclinical research suggests that blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and TIGIT simultaneously promotes tumor rejection and has promise for patients with solid tumors [71]. Our findings demonstrate that anti-PD-1 (Nivolumab) therapy alone also reduces TIGIT expression in Tregs.

Understanding Tregs immunosuppressive actions is an appealing therapeutic option for promoting anti-tumor immune responses. However, the distinct cell-cell interaction patterns, notify for further investigation. In this case, comparing the cell-cell contact before and after Nivolumab administration showed a reduction in Treg communication with most clusters after treatment (Fig 6A). Additionally, the most significant ligand-receptor pairs between Tregs and TAMs were marked in Fig 5C. After receiving Nivolumab, the interaction of five pairs of receptors and ligands (SPP1/CD44, HLA-E/KLRC2, HLA-E/KLRK1, ANXA1/FPR3, and CXCL9/FCGR2A) significantly decreased (Fig 5C). According to Cheng et al., the CD44-SSP1 axis is a control mechanism that prevents the proliferation of effector T cells in the TME [72]. Additionally, they demonstrated that once Tregs were presented in the TME, the level of CD44 expression in those cells was reduced, increasing the ability of Tregs to proliferate [72]. Additionally, they demonstrated that once Tregs were presented in the TME, the level of CD44 expression in those cells was reduced, and their proliferation ability increased [72]. Our study revealed that Nivolumab therapy reduces CD44-SSP1 interaction, which may have increased Treg proliferation potential.

KLRC2 (NKG2C) and KLRK1 (NKG2D) are activating receptors mainly expressed on the surface of NK cells and T cells [73]. By binding these receptors to their ligands, these cells become more capable of cytotoxicity [73]. Though Protein Atlas has confirmed a small expression of KLRK1 on the surface of non-classical monocytes, we did not identify any studies that specifically addressed these two receptors on the surface of TAMs. Nevertheless, our findings support a decreased NKG2D/C-HLA-E interaction between TAMs and Tregs after treatment. Yang et al. showed that NKG2D+CD4+ T cells kill Tregs following the binding of NKG2D to its ligand [74]. Although NKG2D/C-dependent cytolysis in macrophages has yet to be confirmed, we do know that these cells can directly kill other cells after stimulation by releasing lethal mediators such as TNF-α, reactive nitrogen species, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [75]. The reduction of NKG2D/C-HLA-E interaction after Nivolumab injection could be the mechanism by which Tregs escape death, although this data needs further study. Since the function of FPR3 has not yet been determined [76], more experiments are essential to justify the effect of the reduction of the FPR3-ANXA1 axis on Treg behavior after treatment with Nivolumab.

Furthermore, the reduction in Treg-TAM interaction following Nivolumab therapy has influenced several mechanisms, including the inflammatory response, apoptosis, IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling, IL2/STAT5 signaling, and TNF-α signaling via NF-κB, though our data do not show the nature of these changes.

Our results showed that the increase in the number of Tregs after Nivolumab treatment could be due to the reduction of the CD44-SSP1 axis, KRAS signaling pathway, and NKG2C/D-HLA-E axis, which respectively lead to increased Tregs proliferation, FOXP3 expression, Tregs differentiation, and the prevention of destruction by other cells (Fig 1).

The decrease in KRAS and Notch signaling pathway activity, which increases the expression of FOXP3, PD-1, and IL-35, can also contribute to the increased suppressive capacity of Tregs. These cells exhibit elevated CTLA-4 and LAG-3 expression on their surface in addition to PD-1 and TIGIT expression, which inhibit the activity of T effectors and dendritic cells (DCs), prevent the development of GC, and inhibit the production of antibodies. Cellular and humoral immune systems can be suppressed more effectively by these cells. Tregs produce more anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10, TGF-β, and IL-35 while producing less pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-32. The potential of these cells to destroy other cells has increased along with GZMA synthesis. Finally, different biological processes, including those related to neutrophil degranulation and activation, changed in the Tregs of HNSCC patient’s post-Nivolumab therapy. Although it is unknown from our data what kind of modifications these are (Fig 1).

Although reducing the immunosuppressive mechanisms and restoring the antitumor power of immune cells in the TME are of the IIC therapy goals, our study provided completely different results. Tregs, the most effective cells at inducing TME, are regarded as one of the most important targets of IIC therapy. However, our results did not only not show a decrease in the number and suppressive function of Tregs, but all the evidence indicated an increase in the number and intensification of the suppressive function of Tregs.

Finally, by studying other articles, the probability of hyper progressive disease (HPD) in these four HNSCC patients after being treated with Nivolumab was strengthened. A subset of cancer patients receiving CPI experience enhanced tumor cell proliferation, rapid disease progression, and a poor prognosis [77–84]. This condition known as HPD is seen in 4–29% of cancer patients [85]. Here are still no specific criteria to predict the probability of HPD occurrence in patients. In addition, the mechanisms involved in HPD remain unclear. However, some potential HPD mechanisms have been proposed, including Tregs proliferation, up-regulation of CTLA-4 and LAG-3, an increase in ILC-3, etc. [48]. Further studies of these mechanisms can probably help clarify the limitations of IIC therapy success in HNSCC patients and identify effective therapeutic targets for HPD patients.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study investigated the dynamic changes in the TME of HNSCC patients treated with Nivolumab, with a particular focus on Tregs. DEG analysis of Tregs revealed downregulation of genes associated with immunosuppressive functions, and upregulation of immediate early genes. Biological process and MSigDB analysis showed negative regulation of KRAS signaling, Notch signaling, and angiogenesis in Tregs after Nivolumab therapy. Additionally, the study found altered expression of certain IICs in Tregs before and after treatment. These findings provide new insights into the response to Nivolumab therapy in HNSCC patients, and suggest that targeting Tregs and IICs could potentially enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. PCA and UMAP of cell in both before and after batch effect correction.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295863.s001

(JPG)

References

  1. 1. Johnson D.E., et al., Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nature reviews Disease primers, 2020. 6(1): p. 92. pmid:33243986
  2. 2. Bray F., et al., Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2018. 68(6): p. 394–424. pmid:30207593
  3. 3. Ghiani L. and Chiocca S., High Risk-Human Papillomavirus in HNSCC: Present and Future Challenges for Epigenetic Therapies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022. 23(7): p. 3483. pmid:35408843
  4. 4. McDermott J.D. and Bowles D.W., Epidemiology of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas: Impact on Staging and Prevention Strategies. Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2019. 20(5): p. 43. pmid:31011837
  5. 5. Bhat G.R., Hyole R.G., and Li J., Chapter Two—Head and neck cancer: Current challenges and future perspectives, in Advances in Cancer Research, Tew K.D. and Fisher P.B., Editors. 2021, Academic Press. p. 67–102.
  6. 6. Madhukar G. and Subbarao N., Current and Future Therapeutic Targets: A Review on Treating Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Curr Cancer Drug Targets, 2021. 21(5): p. 386–400. pmid:33372876
  7. 7. Schüttrumpf L., et al., Definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with squamous cell cancers of the head and neck—results from an unselected cohort of the clinical cooperation group “Personalized Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer”. Radiation Oncology, 2020. 15(1): p. 7.
  8. 8. Cramer J.D., Burtness B., and Ferris R.L., Immunotherapy for head and neck cancer: Recent advances and future directions. Oral oncology, 2019. 99: p. 104460. pmid:31683169
  9. 9. Cheng G., et al., A review on the advances and challenges of immunotherapy for head and neck cancer. Cancer Cell International, 2021. 21(1): p. 1–18.
  10. 10. Ferris R.L., et al., Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. 2016. 375(19): p. 1856–1867.
  11. 11. Cillo A.R., et al., Immune landscape of viral-and carcinogen-driven head and neck cancer. Immunity, 2020. 52(1): p. 183–199. e9. pmid:31924475
  12. 12. Lin M., et al., Single-cell transcriptomic profiling for inferring tumor origin and mechanisms of therapeutic resistance. npj Precision Oncology, 2022. 6(1): p. 71. pmid:36210388
  13. 13. Rocamora-Reverte L., et al., The complex role of regulatory T cells in immunity and aging. Frontiers in Immunology, 2021. 11: p. 616949. pmid:33584708
  14. 14. Lee M.Y. and Allen C.T., Mechanisms of resistance to T cell‐based immunotherapy in head and neck cancer. Head & Neck, 2020. 42(9): p. 2722–2733.
  15. 15. Jørgensen N., Persson G., and Hviid T.V.F., The tolerogenic function of regulatory T cells in pregnancy and cancer. Frontiers in immunology, 2019. 10: p. 911. pmid:31134056
  16. 16. Seminerio I., et al., Infiltration of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells is a strong and independent prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancers, 2019. 11(2): p. 227. pmid:30781400
  17. 17. Bron L., et al., Prognostic value of arginase‐II expression and regulatory T‐cell infiltration in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. International journal of cancer, 2013. 132(3): p. E85–E93. pmid:22815199
  18. 18. Kindt N., et al., High stromal Foxp3-positive T cell number combined to tumor stage improved prognosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral oncology, 2017. 67: p. 183–191. pmid:28351575
  19. 19. Kim H.R., et al., PD-L1 expression on immune cells, but not on tumor cells, is a favorable prognostic factor for head and neck cancer patients. Scientific reports, 2016. 6(1): p. 1–12.
  20. 20. Liang Y.-j., et al., Foxp3 expressed by tongue squamous cell carcinoma cells correlates with clinicopathologic features and overall survival in tongue squamous cell carcinoma patients. Oral oncology, 2011. 47(7): p. 566–570. pmid:21641272
  21. 21. Al‐Qahtani D., Anil S., and Rajendran R., Tumour infiltrating CD25+ FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) relate to tumour grade and stromal inflammation in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of oral pathology & medicine, 2011. 40(8): p. 636–642. pmid:21352381
  22. 22. Strauss L., et al., The frequency and suppressor function of CD4+ CD25highFoxp3+ T cells in the circulation of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Clinical cancer research, 2007. 13(21): p. 6301–6311. pmid:17975141
  23. 23. Kürten C.H., et al., Investigating immune and non-immune cell interactions in head and neck tumors by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nature communications, 2021. 12(1): p. 1–16.
  24. 24. Derakhshani A., et al., The expression pattern of VISTA in the PBMCs of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: A single-cell RNA sequencing-based study. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2022. 148: p. 112725. pmid:35183994
  25. 25. Cai Z., et al., Mast cell marker gene signature in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. BMC cancer, 2022. 22(1): p. 1–16.
  26. 26. Obradovic A., et al., Immunostimulatory Cancer-Associated Fibroblast Subpopulations Can Predict Immunotherapy Response in Head and Neck Cancer. Clin Cancer Res, 2022. 28(10): p. 2094–2109. pmid:35262677
  27. 27. Wolf F.A., Angerer P., and Theis F.J., SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome biology, 2018. 19(1): p. 1–5.
  28. 28. Zhang Y., Parmigiani G., and Johnson W.E., ComBat-seq: batch effect adjustment for RNA-seq count data. NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2020. 2(3): p. lqaa078. pmid:33015620
  29. 29. Chen K., et al., Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic change in tumor microenvironment during pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma malignant progression. EBioMedicine, 2021. 66: p. 103315. pmid:33819739
  30. 30. Zhao J., et al., Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the heterogeneity of liver-resident immune cells in human. Cell Discovery, 2020. 6(1): p. 22. pmid:32351704
  31. 31. Becht E., et al., Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nature biotechnology, 2019. 37(1): p. 38–44.
  32. 32. Kowalczyk M.S., et al., Single-cell RNA-seq reveals changes in cell cycle and differentiation programs upon aging of hematopoietic stem cells. Genome research, 2015. 25(12): p. 1860–1872. pmid:26430063
  33. 33. Palla G., et al., Squidpy: a scalable framework for spatial omics analysis. Nature methods, 2022. 19(2): p. 171–178. pmid:35102346
  34. 34. Efremova M., et al., CellPhoneDB: inferring cell–cell communication from combined expression of multi-subunit ligand–receptor complexes. Nature protocols, 2020. 15(4): p. 1484–1506. pmid:32103204
  35. 35. Bacher P., et al., Regulatory T cell specificity directs tolerance versus allergy against aeroantigens in humans. 2016. 167(4): p. 1067–1078. e16.
  36. 36. Bahrami S. and Drabløs F.J.A.i.b.r., Gene regulation in the immediate-early response process. 2016. 62: p. 37–49.
  37. 37. Sakaguchi S., et al., Immunologic tolerance maintained by CD25+ CD4+ regulatory T cells: their common role in controlling autoimmunity, tumor immunity, and transplantation tolerance. Immunological reviews, 2001. 182(1): p. 18–32. pmid:11722621
  38. 38. Fontenot J., Gavin M., and Rudensky A., Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells. Nat. Immunol. 2003. 4: 330–336. J Immunol, 2017. 198: p. 986–992.
  39. 39. Facciabene A., Motz G.T., and Coukos G., T-regulatory cells: key players in tumor immune escape and angiogenesis. Cancer research, 2012. 72(9): p. 2162–2171. pmid:22549946
  40. 40. Tanaka A. and Sakaguchi S., Targeting Treg cells in cancer immunotherapy. European journal of immunology, 2019. 49(8): p. 1140–1146. pmid:31257581
  41. 41. Elkord E., et al., T regulatory cells in cancer: recent advances and therapeutic potential. Expert opinion on biological therapy, 2010. 10(11): p. 1573–1586. pmid:20955112
  42. 42. Moreno Ayala M.A., Li Z., and DuPage M., Treg programming and therapeutic reprogramming in cancer. Immunology, 2019. 157(3): p. 198–209. pmid:30866047
  43. 43. Maggioni D., Pignataro L., and Garavello W., T-helper and T-regulatory cells modulation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncoimmunology, 2017. 6(7): p. e1325066. pmid:28811959
  44. 44. Mandal R., et al., The head and neck cancer immune landscape and its immunotherapeutic implications. JCI insight, 2016. 1(17). pmid:27777979
  45. 45. Zhao J., Shi Y., and Cao G., The Application of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing in the Inflammatory Tumor Microenvironment. 2023. 13(2): p. 344.
  46. 46. Fourcade J., et al., CD226 opposes TIGIT to disrupt Tregs in melanoma. JCI Insight, 2018. 3(14). pmid:30046006
  47. 47. Yuan X.-L., et al., Elevated expression of Foxp3 in tumor-infiltrating Treg cells suppresses T-cell proliferation and contributes to gastric cancer progression in a COX-2-dependent manner. Clinical Immunology, 2010. 134(3): p. 277–288. pmid:19900843
  48. 48. Kamada T., et al., PD-1+ regulatory T cells amplified by PD-1 blockade promote hyperprogression of cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019. 116(20): p. 9999–10008. pmid:31028147
  49. 49. Xiong Y., et al., Immunological effects of nivolumab immunotherapy in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. BMC cancer, 2020. 20(1): p. 1–10. pmid:32183719
  50. 50. Himmel M.E., et al., Human CD4+ FOXP3+ regulatory T cells produce CXCL8 and recruit neutrophils. European journal of immunology, 2011. 41(2): p. 306–312. pmid:21268001
  51. 51. Fridlender Z.G., et al., Polarization of tumor-associated neutrophil phenotype by TGF-β:“N1” versus “N2” TAN. Cancer cell, 2009. 16(3): p. 183–194.
  52. 52. Morris A.C., et al., Role of regulatory T cells in neutrophil function. The Lancet, 2016. 387: p. S30.
  53. 53. Eruslanov E.B., et al., Tumor-associated neutrophils stimulate T cell responses in early-stage human lung cancer. The Journal of clinical investigation, 2014. 124(12): p. 5466–5480. pmid:25384214
  54. 54. Genot E. and Cantrell D.A., Ras regulation and function in lymphocytes. Current opinion in immunology, 2000. 12(3): p. 289–294. pmid:10781411
  55. 55. Mustachio L.M., et al., Targeting KRAS in Cancer: Promising Therapeutic Strategies. Cancers (Basel), 2021. 13(6). pmid:33801965
  56. 56. Karussis D., et al., The Ras-pathway inhibitor, S-trans-trans-farnesylthiosalicylic acid, suppresses experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Journal of neuroimmunology, 2001. 120(1–2): p. 1–9. pmid:11694313
  57. 57. Marks R.E., et al., Farnesyltransferase inhibitors inhibit T-cell cytokine production at the posttranscriptional level. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology, 2007. 110(6): p. 1982–1988. pmid:17545504
  58. 58. Carnevale J., et al., RASA2 ablation in T cells boosts antigen sensitivity and long-term function. Nature, 2022. 609(7925): p. 174–182. pmid:36002574
  59. 59. Mor A., et al., N-Ras or K-Ras inhibition increases the number and enhances the function of Foxp3 regulatory T cells. Eur J Immunol, 2008. 38(6): p. 1493–502. pmid:18461565
  60. 60. Shen W., Huang J., and Wang Y., Biological significance of NOTCH signaling strength. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2021. 9: p. 652273. pmid:33842479
  61. 61. Rong H., et al., Notch signalling suppresses regulatory T‐cell function in murine experimental autoimmune uveitis. Immunology, 2016. 149(4): p. 447–459. pmid:27564686
  62. 62. Lieberman J., The ABCs of granule-mediated cytotoxicity: new weapons in the arsenal. Nature Reviews Immunology, 2003. 3(5): p. 361–370. pmid:12766758
  63. 63. Grover P., Goel P.N., and Greene M.I., Regulatory T cells: regulation of identity and function. Frontiers in Immunology, 2021: p. 4061. pmid:34675933
  64. 64. Cao X., et al., Granzyme B and perforin are important for regulatory T cell-mediated suppression of tumor clearance. Immunity, 2007. 27(4): p. 635–646. pmid:17919943
  65. 65. Zhao D.-M., et al., Activated CD4+ CD25+ T cells selectively kill B lymphocytes. Blood, 2006. 107(10): p. 3925–3932. pmid:16418326
  66. 66. Grossman W.J., et al., Human T regulatory cells can use the perforin pathway to cause autologous target cell death. Immunity, 2004. 21(4): p. 589–601. pmid:15485635
  67. 67. Khawar M.B., Abbasi M.H., and Sheikh N., IL-32: a novel pluripotent inflammatory interleukin, towards gastric inflammation, gastric cancer, and chronic rhino sinusitis. Mediators of inflammation, 2016. 2016. pmid:27143819
  68. 68. Huang C.-T., et al., Role of LAG-3 in regulatory T cells. Immunity, 2004. 21(4): p. 503–513. pmid:15485628
  69. 69. Komai T., et al., Transforming growth factor-β and interleukin-10 synergistically regulate humoral immunity via modulating metabolic signals. Frontiers in immunology, 2018. 9: p. 1364.
  70. 70. Okamura T., et al., TGF-β3-expressing CD4+ CD25− LAG3+ regulatory T cells control humoral immune responses. Nature communications, 2015. 6(1): p. 1–14.
  71. 71. Ge Z., et al., TIGIT, the next step towards successful combination immune checkpoint therapy in cancer. Frontiers in Immunology, 2021. 12. pmid:34367161
  72. 72. Cheng M., et al., Immunosuppressive role of SPP1-CD44 in the tumor microenvironment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma assessed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2022: p. 1–16.
  73. 73. Park K., Park J., and Song Y., Inhibitory NKG2A and activating NKG2D and NKG2C natural killer cell receptor genes: susceptibility for rheumatoid arthritis. Tissue antigens, 2008. 72(4): p. 342–346. pmid:18700876
  74. 74. Yang D., et al., NKG2D+ CD4+ T cells kill regulatory T cells in a NKG2D-NKG2D ligand-dependent manner in systemic lupus erythematosus. Scientific reports, 2017. 7(1): p. 1–13.
  75. 75. Aminin D. and Wang Y.M., Macrophages as a “weapon” in anticancer cellular immunotherapy. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 2021. 37(9): p. 749–758. pmid:34110692
  76. 76. Qi J., et al., Identification of FPR3 as a unique biomarker for targeted therapy in the immune microenvironment of breast cancer. Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. 11: p. 593247. pmid:33679387
  77. 77. Saâda-Bouzid E., et al., Hyperprogression during anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Annals of Oncology, 2017. 28(7): p. 1605–1611. pmid:28419181
  78. 78. Faure M., et al., Hyperprogressive disease in anorectal melanoma treated by PD-1 inhibitors. Frontiers in Immunology, 2018. 9: p. 797. pmid:29725330
  79. 79. Ferrara R., et al., Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) is frequent in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) treated with anti PD1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies (IO). Annals of Oncology, 2017. 28: p. v464–v465.
  80. 80. Matos I., et al., Incidence and clinical implications of a new definition of hyperprogression (HPD) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients treated in phase 1 (Ph1) trials. 2018, American Society of Clinical Oncology.
  81. 81. Ji Z., et al., Hyperprogression after immunotherapy in patients with malignant tumors of digestive system. BMC cancer, 2019. 19(1): p. 1–9.
  82. 82. Kim C., et al., Hyperprogressive disease during PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Annals of Oncology, 2019. 30(7): p. 1104–1113. pmid:30977778
  83. 83. Wong D.J., et al., Hyperprogressive disease in hepatocellular carcinoma with immune checkpoint inhibitor use: a case series. Immunotherapy, 2019. 11(3): p. 167–175. pmid:30730278
  84. 84. Petrioli R., et al., Hyperprogressive disease in advanced cancer patients treated with nivolumab: a case series study. Anti-Cancer Drugs, 2020. 31(2): p. 190–195. pmid:31850916
  85. 85. Shen P., et al., Hyperprogressive disease in cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2021. 12.
  86. 86. Feriz A.M., et al., Single-cell RNA sequencing uncovers heterogeneous transcriptional signatures in tumor-infiltrated dendritic cells in prostate cancer. Heliyon, 2023. 9(5). pmid:37144199