Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The development and the use of gender-affirming online resources and games for gender-independent, intersex, non-binary, and transgender (GIaNT) children and youth: A scoping review protocol

  • Roya Haghiri-Vijeh ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Roya Haghiri-Vijeh, Kat Newman-Seymour

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    rvijeh@yorku.ca

    Affiliation School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada

  • Kat Newman-Seymour ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Roya Haghiri-Vijeh, Kat Newman-Seymour

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Gender, Sexuality, Women’s Studies, Western University, London, ON, Canada

  • Daniel Huizenga ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ DH and AH also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation Social Innovation Research Centre, Centennial College, Scarborough, ON, Canada

  • Aidan Hung

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    ‡ DH and AH also contributed equally to this work.

    Affiliation School of Nursing, Collaborative Toronto Metropolitan University, Centennial and George Brown College Nursing Degree Program, Canada

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this scoping review protocol is to review what has been reported on the development and the use of gender-affirming online resources and games for gender-independent, intersex, non-binary, and transgender (GIaNT) youth (aged 9–26).

Introduction

GIaNT youth and their specialized health care needs are mostly exempt from curriculums. There is limited information on the specific online sources available for GIaNT children and youth.

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria are sources that include GIaNT children and youth and focus on online spaces and games for the identified population.

Methods

The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) method for scoping reviews has guided the development of this protocol. Databases to be searched include CINAHL, Cochrane, Epistemonikos, ERIC, Gender Studies Database, GenderWatch, LGBTQ+ Source, ProQuest, PyscInfo, and Scopus. Unpublished studies and gray literature searches will be undertaken in ProQuest thesis and dissertation and a limited number of relevant websites. No limit on date or region will be applied. Records will be screened and extracted by two independent reviewers. Results will be presented as tables with accompanying narrative summary.

Conclusion

This scoping review protocol will guide the review and mapping of literature on available sources for online spaces and games for GIaNT children and youth.

Introduction

Puberty is the process of physical changes initiated by hormonal signals from the brain to the gonads between the ages of 8 to 14 years old. Sexual health and puberty education is mandated across all provincial and territorial curricula in Canada. However, this information tends to be inadequate or outdated, failing to meet either international standards or the 2019 Canadian Guidelines for Sexuality Education [1]. Few resources provide adequate support for gender-independent, intersex, non-binary, or transgender (GIaNT) children and youth whose gender identity does not directly align with conventional visible markers of physiological sex and its medicalization. Gender identity and gender-affirmation are integral to one’s sense of well-being at all stages of development [2].

When considering puberty health education for GIaNT youth, it is crucial to understand that such youth’s puberty health needs are not the same as their cisgender counterparts [35]. Overwhelmingly, puberty and sexual education programs are not inclusive to gender-diverse youth [4, 5]. GIaNT youth have expressed not only a need for comprehensive and inclusive puberty health education programs but also the desire to explore such pathways in an online setting [4, 5]. Online spaces are generally preferred amongst GIaNT and other 2SLGBTQIA+ (Two Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and “+” stands for orientations and identities not named in the initialism) youth because these are regarded as “safe,” meaning, they can undergo transformative, affirming, and individualized education as they see fit [57] without external limitations like unsupportive caretakers/parents, or homophobic and/or transphobic judgement or bias [5, 7]. Since most youth gain access to puberty health information online [5, 7], digital platforms appear to be a promising method for disseminating such educational programs [79].

One popular form of digital platforms is called role-play games. Role-play games (RPG’s) are a popular genre of video game that allow the player to control a character’s actions within the game. This usually means the player makes autonomous, personalized choices on where to go in the world, decide how to navigate through story options, as well as interact with the game world in other ways, such as with items, places, and other characters. RPG’s are typically user-friendly, do not require intricate hand-eye coordination, and are story/character-based games. RPG’s are widely sought-out by GIaNT youth because they permit exploration of one’s gender identity and expression through fictional characters, which is a crucial component for emotional intimacy, relatability, safeness, and relevance among them [7, 10].

An initial search of the literature shows that the majority of games and online resources for GIaNT youth and children focus on mental health [11, 12], which includes accompanying concerns of smoking cessation and/or addiction [8, 13, 14]. The possibility of using online gaming as a mental health intervention is a common concern we have found in our preliminary search on the topic [8, 12]. While mental health is, of course, encompassed in a holistic view of health (especially in the context of gender-diverse youth), it makes up only one form of health, and does not include a broader scope of puberty health needs for GIaNT youth. For example, some of the GIaNT youth participants in research studies have expressed that their only exposure to sexual education curriculums center issues like pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, and only in the context of cisgender youth [13, 15]. Such curriculums are not applicable to the needs and desires that GIaNT youth express towards information on puberty health.

A preliminary search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and JBI Evidence Synthesis was conducted, and we found two current systematic reviews that are similar to our review topic but not focused on identified objective. These systematic reviews are: 1.) Effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of digital health interventions for LGBTIQ+ Young People: Systematic Review by Gilbey et al. [9], and 2.) Sex education in the spotlight: What is working? systematic review by Lameiras-Fernández et al. [16] While similar in subject matter, neither of these systematic reviews specifically focused on GIaNT youth. Particularly the former article focused on mental health interventions, and not necessarily a holistic view of puberty health needs. Lameiras-Fernández et al. explored the limitations and possibilities of casting out sexual education curricula in digital settings to youth but did not focus on GIaNT youth. Therefore, the aim of this scoping review is to address this gap in literature.

For these reasons, the purpose of this scoping review protocol will be to search for what has been reported on the development and the use of gender-affirming online resources and games for GIaNT children and youth. JBI scoping review methodology will be utilized to identify the existing literature for online resources and games for GIaNT youth, as well as investigate existing literature on specialized needs for GIaNT youth puberty health education. This method of inquiry is ideal for mapping and exploring the literature on a topic, as it draws from a broad range of study designs and evidence types to inform the findings.

Review questions

What has been reported on the development and the use of gender-affirming online spaces and games for GIaNT children and youth? What has been reported on online spaces or games for GIaNT youth to address their puberty health needs?

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria for this scoping review are as follows: 1.) Participants/study must include GIaNT people. 2.) Participants/study must target children, youth, or young people within the age group of 9–26. 3.) Studies may include the use, implication, and/or discussion of gaming, online resources, or other digital platforms in relation to the population. Digital platforms may include online websites, apps, and social media. The exclusion criteria include individuals who are under 9 years of age and over 26 years of age, do not identify as GIaNT people, and sources that does not include games, online sources, or other digital platforms.

Population.

Transgender refers to any individual whose gender identity does not align with their assigned-sex-at-birth [17]. It is often referred to as an “umbrella” term because it includes but is not limited to individuals who identify as: transgender women, transgender men, non-binary, gender-fluid, gender queer, and more [18, 19]. Intersex people are sometimes included in this category, but it is commonly anticipated amongst intersex and queer communities that such a label is determined on an individualized basis [20, 21]. In other words, not all intersex people align themselves with the transgender identity [17]. Non-binary refers to individuals who do not align their gender identities within the man/woman gender binary [20, 21]. This can include people who are agender, gender-fluid, or genderqueer. Some, but not all, individuals who are non-binary identify as transgender. Our team uses gender-independent and gender-diverse to refer to anyone who may be questioning their gender, or otherwise view themselves as not cisgender, but have not identified themselves within a specific gender identity.

We define youth as individuals between ages 9–26. This age range was based on an initial review of the literature. Although not explicitly explained, this seemingly older age range may be for three reasons: 1.) The potential use of (or desire to use) puberty blockers within the population; [10, 18] 2.) The possibility of a “second puberty,” which refers to GIaNT individuals who choose to use hormonal therapy, which initiates a “second puberty” process within the body for those who have already undergone puberty; [10, 18] and 3.) Considering the apparent pervasive lack of access to comprehensive puberty health needs, coupled with transgender information and options are not widely made available to youth. Moreover, many of the GIaNT individuals come to an understanding of their gender identities in a variety of timelines [10, 18, 22]. To this end, it is necessary to broaden our age range to include seemingly older individuals as youth.

Concept.

This review will consider studies that examine online spaces or game development and its use for GIaNT youth.

Context.

Sources will have a global context and will not be limited to geographical location or clinical care setting.

Types of studies.

This scoping review will consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods study designs for inclusion. In addition, systematic reviews, text, and opinion papers will be considered for inclusion in the proposed scoping review. The review of grey literature will not be limited to Canada’s professional sites, and it will consider key international websites and resources, such as educational and training resources for healthcare professionals for the purpose of puberty healthcare for GIaNT youth.

Methods

The proposed scoping review will be conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for scoping review as evident in the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [23].

Search strategy

The search strategy will aim to locate both published and unpublished studies. An initial limited search of Web of Science and PubMed (MedLine) was undertaken to identify seed articles on the topic (Table 1).

The text words contained in the titles and abstracts of relevant articles, and the index terms used to describe the articles will be used to develop a full search strategy for CINAHL, Cochrane, Epistemonikos, ERIC, Gender Studies Database, GenderWatch, LGBTQ+ Source, ProQuest, ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Global, PyscInfo, and Scopus. The search strategy, including all identified keywords and index terms, will be adapted for each included information source. To include relevant grey literature, no limits on the type of the sources is applied. The reference lists of all studies selected for critical appraisal will be screened for additional studies. There will be no language restriction since preliminary search results were mostly in English. Study type or publication date will not be restricted. Due to the limited number of sources in the literature, sources published on any date will be included.

Study selection

Following the search, all identified citations will be collated and uploaded into Zotero and Covidence™, an online systematic review organization tool, and duplicates removed. Following a pilot test, titles and abstracts will then be screened by two independent reviewers for assessment against the inclusion criteria for the review. Two independent reviewers will screen, select, and extract eligible studies. In the title and abstract screening phase, Google Translate will be utilized for sources not in English. If a non-English source is moved forward to the full-text review, Google Translate will be utilized to extra data. If unable to extract data from the non-English sources or unable to check the accuracy of translation, these sources will be excluded, and this exclusion will be identified in the Prisma diagram.

Potentially relevant studies will be retrieved in full and Covidence will be utilized for management, assessment, and extraction of data. The full text of selected citations will be assessed in detail against the inclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. Reasons for the exclusion of sources of evidence in full text that do not meet the inclusion criteria will be recorded and reported in the scoping review. Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers at each stage of the selection process will be resolved through discussion, or with an additional reviewer/s. The results of the search and study selection and inclusion process will be reported in full in the final systematic review and presented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram [24].

Data extraction

A draft extraction tool is provided (Table 2). The draft data extraction tool will be modified and revised as necessary during the process of extracting data from each included paper. Modifications will be detailed in the full scoping review. Data will be extracted from studies included in the review by two independent reviewers using the standardized JBI data extraction tool. The data extracted will include specific details about the populations, study methods, interventions, and outcomes of significance to the review questions. Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. Authors of papers will be contacted to request missing or additional data, where required.

Data analysis and presentation

The extracted data will be presented in tubular format (Table 2). In addition to charted results, a narrative summary will describe how the results respond to the review questions.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) 2015 checklist: Recommended items to address in a systematic review protocol*.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294869.s001

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the contributions of the team of researchers and game developers at Centennial College, and the administrative support for the Social Innovation Research Centre at Centennial College. Dr. Purnima Tyagi for leadership, and the team of game developers who participated in discussions informing this literature review: Miriam Verburg, Ronan Daniel, Nathaniel Hachey, Theodore Telega, Vladislav Volodin, and Marko Kuper. We would also like to acknowledge the feedback from Negar Namaei (an undergraduate student), Jennifer Easter (Centennial’s health sciences librarian), and the audience at the International LGBTQ+ Psychology and Related Social Sciences Conference, Preaching to the Choir, in Toronto, June 21 and 22, 2023.

References

  1. 1. (2019) Canadian Guidelines for Sexual Health Education. In: Action Can. Sex. Health Rights. https://www.actioncanadashr.org/resources/factsheets-guidelines/2019-06-25-canadian-guidelines-sexual-health-education. Accessed 13 Oct 2023
  2. 2. Glynn TR, Gamarel KE, Kahler CW, Iwamoto M, Operario D, Nemoto T (2016) The role of gender affirmation in psychological well-being among transgender women. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers 3:336–344 pmid:27747257
  3. 3. Bradford J, Reisner SL, Honnold JA, Xavier J (2013) Experiences of transgender-related discrimination and implications for health: results from the Virginia Transgender Health Initiative Study. Am J Public Health 103:1820–1829 pmid:23153142
  4. 4. (2021) Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome with rare findings of inferior crossed-fused renal ectopia and Gartner’s duct cyst: a video case report. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1433
  5. 5. Steinke J, Root-Bowman M, Estabrook S, Levine DS, Kantor LM (2017) Meeting the Needs of Sexual and Gender Minority Youth: Formative Research on Potential Digital Health Interventions. J Adolesc Health Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med 60:541–548 pmid:28108088
  6. 6. Craig SL, McInroy L (2014) You can form a part of yourself online: The Influence of new media on identity development and coming out for LGBTQ youth. J Gay Lesbian Ment Health 18:95–109
  7. 7. McInroy LB, McCloskey RJ, Craig SL, Eaton AD (2019) LGBTQ+ youths’ community engagement and resource seeking online versus offline. J Technol Hum Serv 37:315–333
  8. 8. Egan JE, Corey SL, Henderson ER, et al (2021) Feasibility of a Web-Accessible Game-Based Intervention Aimed at Improving Help Seeking and Coping Among Sexual and Gender Minority Youth: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Adolesc Health Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med 69:604–614 pmid:34140199
  9. 9. Gilbey D, Morgan H, Lin A, Perry Y (2020) Effectiveness, Acceptability, and Feasibility of Digital Health Interventions for LGBTIQ+ Young People: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 22:e20158 pmid:33270039
  10. 10. McKenna JL, Wang Y-C, Williams CR, McGregor K, Boskey ER (2022) “you can’t be deadnamed in a video game”: Transgender and gender diverse adolescents’ use of video game avatar creation for gender-affirmation and exploration. J LGBT Youth No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified
  11. 11. Lucassen M, Samra R, Iacovides I, Fleming T, Shepherd M, Stasiak K, et al (2018) How LGBT+ Young People Use the Internet in Relation to Their Mental Health and Envisage the Use of e-Therapy: Exploratory Study. JMIR Serious Games 6:e11249
  12. 12. Strauss P, Morgan H, Wright Toussaint D, Lin A, Winter S, Perry Y (2019) Trans and gender diverse young people’s attitudes towards game-based digital mental health interventions: A qualitative investigation. Internet Interv 18:100280 pmid:31890628
  13. 13. Ames HM, Glenton C, Lewin S, Tamrat T, Akama E, Leon N (2019) Clients’ perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication accessible via mobile devices for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. pmid:31608981
  14. 14. Carson-Chahhoud KV, Ameer F, Sayehmiri K, Hnin K, Van Agteren JE, Sayehmiri F, et al (2017) Mass media interventions for preventing smoking in young people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001006.pub3
  15. 15. Mustanski B, Greene GJ, Ryan D, Whitton SW (2015) Feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of an online sexual health promotion program for LGBT youth: the Queer Sex Ed intervention. J Sex Res 52:220–230 pmid:24588408
  16. 16. Lameiras-Fernández M, Martínez-Román R, Carrera-Fernández MV, Rodríguez-Castro Y (2021) Sex education in the spotlight: What is working? Systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:2555 pmid:33806507
  17. 17. Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (2021) Promoting 2SLGBTQI+ Health Equity: A Best Practice Guideline. Toronto
  18. 18. Haley SG, Tordoff DM, Kantor AZ, Crouch JM, Ahrens KR (2019) Sex education for transgender and non-Binary youth: Previous experiences and recommended content. J Sex Med 16:1834–1848 pmid:31585806
  19. 19. Morgan H, O’Donovan A, Almeida R, Lin A, Perry Y (2020) The Role of the Avatar in Gaming for Trans and Gender Diverse Young People. Int J Environ Res Public Health. pmid:33233536
  20. 20. Dellar, Nicole M A Guide to Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity Terms. In: https://www.apa.org. https://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/psychology-teacher-network/introductory-psychology/diversity-terms. Accessed 4 Aug 2023
  21. 21. Glossary of Terms. In: Hum. Rights Campaign. https://www.hrc.org/resources/glossary-of-terms. Accessed 4 Aug 2023
  22. 22. Tordoff DM, Sequeira GM, Shook AG, Williams F, Hayden L, Kasenic A, et al (2022) Factors associated with time to receiving gender-affirming hormones and puberty blockers at a pediatric clinic serving transgender and nonbinary youth. Transgender Health trgh.2021.0116
  23. 23. Munn Z, Aromataris E, Tufanaru C, et al (2019) The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI). Int J Evid Based Healthc 17:36–43 pmid:30239357
  24. 24. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ n71