Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Public’s calorie literacy and perceived effectiveness of restaurant menu calorie labeling in the United Arab Emirates

  • Leila Cheikh Ismail ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    lcheikhismail@sharjah.ac.ae

    Affiliations Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE, Nuffield Department of Women’s & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

  • Hanin Kassem,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

  • Tareq M. Osaili,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE, Department of Nutrition and Food Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan

  • Mona Hashim,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

  • Reyad Obaid,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

  • Hadia Radwan,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

  • Maysm N. Mohamad,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE

  • Sheima T. Saleh,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

  • Zein Al Zomut,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Jordanian Society for Food and Nutrition, Amman, Jordan

  • Salma Abu Qiyas,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

  • Radhiya Al Rajaby,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

  • Rameez Al Daour,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

  • Habiba I. Ali,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE

  • Lily Stojanovska,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE, Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia

  • Ayesha S. Al Dhaheri

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Nutrition and Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE

Abstract

Restaurant menu calorie labeling is regarded as a promising, cost-effective, and innovative method that will have an impact on the food environment, raise awareness among consumers, and aid in global efforts to prevent obesity. This study aimed to assess the public’s calorie literacy, dining practices, and perceived effectiveness of restaurant menu labeling implementation in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). A descriptive, web-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 1279 adults in the UAE. Socio-demographic characteristics, calorie literacy, and perceived effectiveness of restaurant menu labeling among participants were investigated. Chi-square analysis was used to compare indicators across demographic characteristics. More females than males completed the online survey, (56.1% and 43.9%). Most of the participants aged < 30 years old (54.8%), The majority of participants reported eating away from home at least once per week (89.6%). 66.0% of participants were knowledgeable about calorie definition, but only 37.1% knew about average daily energy requirements. Younger participants, with a normal BMI, and higher education levels reported a significantly higher likelihood of eating at a chain restaurant with caloric information on the menu (p <0.05). The majority of participants (76.0%) preferred to see calorie information and other nutrition information on menus. To conclude, menu labeling is a welcomed policy to be implemented in food outlets. Further investigation is necessary to ascertain the most efficacious method of presenting nutrition information to consumers to facilitate informed purchasing decisions considering the potential benefits of mandating calorie declaration in obesity prevention efforts.

Introduction

The trend of consuming food away from home is on the rise globally [1]. This raises a lot of concern among health professionals as available evidence indicates its association with poor diet quality, nutritional status, and overall health [2]. Moreover, available data indicates that consumers often underestimate the energy content in their food, particularly food from fast-food restaurants. The consumption of such food is directly related to energy intake as food at restaurants is often served in larger portions leading to unintentional overconsumption [3, 4].

Global estimates of overweight and obesity are increasing, with more than 1.9 billion adults living with overweight, and over 650 million adults living with obesity in 2016 [5]. In the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in particular, the prevalence of overweight and obesity has at least doubled between 1989 and 2017 [6]. Several systematic reviews have shown that the region has been passing through a phase of nutrition transition, owing to factors such as population growth, urbanization, food globalization, and economic and cultural factors [7, 8]. More specifically, sedentary lifestyles and unfavorable dietary behaviors including increased consumption of energy-dense foods, larger portion sizes of food and beverages at chain restaurants, low intakes of fruits and vegetables, and generally poor food choices, are recognized as major contributors to the alarming surge in obesity rates in the region [9, 10].

Literature shows that people nowadays are consuming more calories than they need by substituting traditional foods with calorie-dense food options and consuming sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) which play a significant role in expanding obesity rates [11, 12]. In this sense, as global and local dietary trends shift towards increased consumption of food away from home, there is a crucial need for urgent innovative approaches at the individual, organizational, and retail levels that prevent obesity and other non-communicable diseases and promote healthy eating for populations.

The UAE provides a success story in establishing and implementing innovative enterprises such as the ‘Healthy Food School Box’ initiative which includes several innovative awareness activities that aim to promote food safety and healthy eating among children in the UAE [13], the ‘Mutabah system’ which screens school children and helps in promptly identifying those living with overweight and obesity [14], and the ‘Ma’kom’ initiative and the ‘Dubai Fitness Challenge’ that encourage people in the country to become more physically active [15, 16]. Moreover, in efforts to address the obesity epidemic, the UAE has levied an excise tax on energy drinks (100%) and carbonated drinks (50%) in 2019 [17]. The UAE along with many countries have also introduced or implemented nutritional labeling policies including front-of-pack labeling and nutrition facts panels among others [18, 19]. One of these is the recent “SEHHI” program to promote healthier food choices across the UAE’s capital city by placing a label on foods to label their healthiness launched by the Abu Dhabi Public Health Centre [20].

Historically, the scarcity of nutrition information in food retail establishments has been considered a factor contributing to the difficulty of making healthy food choices by consumers, suggesting the need for restaurant menu labeling [21]. Research confirms that consumers regardless of their age can make healthier food choices when the information is readily available to them [22]. To address this issue, in 2010, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States required chain restaurants and other similar retail food establishments to declare the energy content of food items on their menus [23]. Promoting the use of nutrition information and enhancing calorie awareness among consumers have been found to have a positive impact on consumer behavior in choosing foods with lower-calorie options [24, 25]. To date, this policy has gained huge interest and support from individuals and health-concerned stakeholders as a potential strategy to combat the spread of obesity and was implemented in several countries globally on a mandatory basis including the United States [23], United Kingdom [26], and South Korea [27]. In the Arab region, restaurant menu labeling has been mandated in Saudi Arabia and implemented voluntarily in the UAE [28, 29].

Restaurant menu calorie labeling is regarded as a promising, cost-effective, and innovative method that will have an impact on the food environment, raise awareness among consumers, and aid in global efforts to prevent obesity [30]. Moreover, restaurant menu labeling supports better food choices among consumers and encourages food service establishments to reformulate their menus and include healthier options [30, 31]. Studies in the United States that investigated restaurant menu labeling effects on consumers’ food choices indicated a reduction of total calories ordered per consumer while using them ranging from 83 to 227 calories [32, 33]. Another study revealed that using these labels was associated with a moderately higher healthy eating index regardless of weight status [34]. Moreover, other studies indicated that consumers favor restaurant menu labeling and are interested in knowing the calorie count of the food they order [22, 35], while others found a minor impact on altering consumer behavior [36, 37]. Nonetheless, the literature suggests that restaurant menu labeling is a cost-effective method to support reducing obesity-related cancer burdens and lower healthcare costs [38, 39].

In line with the National Nutrition Strategy 2030 in the UAE and the alarming rates of obesity and overweight in the country, it is important to look into possible strategies that help mitigate the burden of these diseases [40]. Previous work by Radwan et al. investigated consumers’ attitudes toward the implementation of the calorie declaration policy in the UAE when the legislation draft was proposed [41]. The findings revealed that people in the UAE were in favor of mandating calorie labeling of restaurant menu items [41]. Since then, the first phase of the legislation was passed including the development of guiding specifications and voluntary implementation in many chain restaurants and other retail food outlets. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the public’s calorie literacy, dining practices, and perceived effectiveness of restaurant menu labeling after its voluntary implementation in the UAE.

Methods

Study design and participants

This is a cross-sectional web-based study conducted between July and October 2020 among adults in the UAE. The inclusion criteria were nationals and expatriates who were 18 years and older and living in the UAE. A convenient sample of a total of 1279 participants was drawn from all seven emirates in the UAE (Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Sharjah, and Northern Emirates; Ajman, Um Al Quwain, Ras Al-Khaimah, and Fujairah). A web link connecting to the online survey was shared on different social media platforms, e.g., LinkedIn™, Facebook™, and Instagram™. Participants were also recruited by sending invitation links via emails or WhatsApp™ to the researchers’ contacts. Snowball sampling was also used to ensure a wide range of participation by encouraging consenting participants to share the web link with their contacts. An information sheet explaining the objectives of the study, significance, and protocol was provided on the first page of the study followed by a consent form. An electronic informed consent was obtained from all participants. Only consenting participants were then directed to complete the questionnaire.

Participants were free to exit the survey at any point and data was collected anonymously. This study was conducted according to the guidelines in the Declaration of Helsinki. All procedures involving human subjects/patients were approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the University of Sharjah (Number: REC-20-06-25-04-S). The minimum required sample size was calculated based on the following equation with a confidence interval of 95%:

Where z = 1.96; P = (estimated proportion of the population that presents the characteristic) = 0.5; e (margin of error) = 0.05; N (sample size) = 384 participants, plus 20% (attrition rate) = approximately 461 participants.

Survey questionnaire

The questionnaire was prepared on Google Forms in both English and Arabic languages. A first draft of the survey was developed by researchers in the field of nutrition and dietetics upon review of relevant literature by Bleich et al. [35] and Radwan et al. [41]. The questionnaire was subsequently modified to inquire about the demographics of participants, the perceived usefulness of calorie declaration, and dining practices. The survey was reviewed by a panel composed of three Ph.D. holders in the Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics Department and pilot-tested on 30 participants. The pilot testing data was not included in the results. The final questionnaire was translated from English to Arabic using the Brislin backtranslation method and the English version is provided in the supporting information section (S1 File).

The questionnaire included 21 close-ended questions and consisted of five parts. The first part included sociodemographic information such as sex, nationality, age group, marital status, employment status, household income level and education level. Self-reported weight and height were used to calculate the body mass index (BMI) by dividing the weight in kilograms by the height squared in meters (kg/m2). For categorization, the World Health Organization guideline for BMI classification was used [42]. The second part comprised two items: questions related to energy definition and knowledge of the recommended daily caloric requirement, while the third part included three items that inquired about consumer dining practices (i.e., frequency of eating away from home, preferred food outlets, and the factors that influence their purchasing decision). The fourth part included three items that addressed self-perceived caloric knowledge and views on the influence of calorie posting, and the fifth part covered participants’ perceptions of posting caloric information in chain restaurants. The last part also examined consumer preferences on calorie posting on menus, asking if they would like to see calories and other nutritional information posted on menus. The questionnaire took approximately 10 to 15 minutes to complete.

Statistical analysis

Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) ver. 26.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics for the sociodemographic characteristics were reported as counts and percentages. Mean responses and percentages of responses in each category were computed. Cross tabulations and chi-square tests were used to compare participants’ responses across demographic characteristics (age, educational level, family income). Results were significant for p-value < 0.05.

Results

Study sample characteristics

The sociodemographic characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1. More females than males completed the online survey, (56.1% and 43.9% respectively). Most of the participants were young, aged < 30 years old (54.8%), single (52.9%), had a college degree or above (73.8%), and about a third had a monthly income of less than 10,000 AED (29.8%). Almost half of the participants were employed (47.1%). Most of the participants had normal weight (44.1%), while 34.5% and 16.8% of them were overweight or obese respectively.

thumbnail
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants (n = 1279).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293387.t001

Knowledge of energy definition and recommended energy requirements

Participants’ knowledge of energy definition and daily energy requirements are shown in Table 2. Most of the participants correctly identified the term ‘calories in food’ as the amount of energy the food gives (66.0%), while a lesser proportion of them knew the correct average daily calorie requirement of 2000–2500 kcal (37.1%). Only 28.4% of the participants answered both questions correctly. Knowledge of correct energy definition differed significantly by sex and education level. Moreover, the participants’ estimation of the correct daily energy requirements for adults differed significantly by education level. Females (p = 0.019), and those with a college degree or above (p<0.001), had better knowledge of energy definition within each category, while only those with a higher education level had better knowledge of average daily requirement questions than others (p<0.001). Furthermore, those who had normal weight answered both questions correctly more than their counterparts (p = 0.029). No significant difference was observed in knowledge by age.

thumbnail
Table 2. The association of participants’ knowledge of energy definition and recommended energy requirements with sociodemographic variables and BMI using chi-square (n = 1279).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293387.t002

Dining practices

When asked about the frequency of eating away from home, most of the participants reported eating away from home one to two times per week (56.7%) as shown in Table 3. Moreover, when asked about the factors that influenced their food purchasing decisions, most participants reported mood and cravings followed by calorie content and price (62.2%, 19.4%, and 18.5% respectively). The most preferred food outlet options among participants were dine-in restaurants, followed by fast food outlets, and home-delivered food (76.0%, 67.2%, and 55.4% respectively) as shown in Fig 1.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Participants’ distribution of preferred food outlets (n = 1279).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293387.g001

thumbnail
Table 3. Percentage distribution of the participants’ dining practices (n = 1279).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293387.t003

Self-perceived caloric knowledge and views on the influence of calorie posting in chain restaurants

The participants’ self-perceived caloric knowledge and the influence of calorie posting are presented in Table 4. About a third of the participants reported knowing enough about energy requirements to make better food choices (34.7%) and almost half of them reported not knowing enough but wanting to know more (46.9%). The chi-square test revealed that younger participants (<30 years), those who are single, who had a higher education level, who were employed and had a normal BMI perceived themselves as knowledgeable about energy requirements more significantly than their counterparts (p<0.001, p<0.001, p = 0.006, p = 0.003 and p<0.001 respectively). On the other hand, while older participants and those who are married answered negatively to this question, they expressed their preference in wanting to know more. Most participants agreed that when calorie count is provided on foods and beverages, it influences their food choices (78.1%). Older participants, those who were single, those who had a college degree, who were employed, and those with a normal BMI reported being more influenced by calorie posting in making their food choices than their counterparts (p<0.001).

thumbnail
Table 4. The association of sociodemographic variables with the public’s self-perceived caloric knowledge and views on the influence of calorie posting in chain restaurants using chi-square (n = 1279).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293387.t004

Table 5 shows the participants’ views on calorie posting in chain restaurants. Around a third of the participants reported that they would more likely eat at chain restaurants with calorie information on menus (34.9%) and half of them trust that the calorie information on menus is correct (50.1%). Participants’ perceptions of calorie posting differed significantly between different sociodemographic characteristics. Younger participants, married, those with a higher education level, and those with a normal BMI reported a significantly higher likelihood than their counterparts of eating at a chain restaurant with caloric information on the menu (p = 0.001, p = 0.002, p<0.001 and p = 0.001 respectively). Moreover, those with a normal BMI were significantly more trusting of the correctness of calorie information on menus (p = 0.014).

thumbnail
Table 5. The association of sociodemographic variables with participants’ perceptions of posting caloric information in chain restaurants using chi-square (n = 1279).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293387.t005

Most of the participants favored menu labeling and reported a preference for viewing caloric information on menus (76.0%) as shown in Fig 2.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Participants distribution of preference to see calorie information on menus (n = 1279).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293387.g002

Over two-thirds of the participants (70.0%) reported a preference for viewing nutritional information on menus besides the calorie content as shown in Fig 3. When asked about which other nutritional information participants would like to see on menus, total sugars, total fat, and protein were the most common choices (>60%). Other information included saturated fats, carbohydrates, allergens, and sodium (Fig 4).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Participants distribution of preference to see other nutrition information on menus (n = 1279).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293387.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4. Other nutritional information participants would like to see on menus (n = 1279).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293387.g004

Discussion

This is the first study in the UAE to evaluate the public’s perceived effectiveness towards the voluntary restaurant menu calorie labeling policy (introduced in 2020) in food establishments around the UAE. This study highlighted several knowledge gaps among the UAE participants concerning energy requirements, dining practices, and beliefs about the influence of posting caloric information on menus in different food outlets.

Overall, most participants were aware of energy definition but lacked knowledge of the average daily energy requirements. The findings of the present study differed from similar studies in the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and the United States, where most participants correctly identified the recommended daily energy requirements [35, 41, 43]. Previous studies in the UAE have highlighted a gap in nutritional knowledge and urged the need for policies to address nutrition literacy in the country among different age groups [44, 45].

In the present study, only a third of participants perceived themselves as knowledgeable about energy requirements enough to make lower-calorie food choices in restaurants (35%) which was lower than the proportion of participants reporting that in the United States (54%) [35]. Although about half of the participants reported not knowing enough about energy requirements to make lower-calorie food choices, they were interested in knowing more. This emphasizes the crucial need for educating the public on the assessment of energy requirements for food and nutrition and choosing healthier food more efficiently and indicates the willingness and potentially the readiness of consumers for such interventions.

Literature indicates that food away from home is generally less healthy and is significantly associated with a higher prevalence of obesity [11, 46]. In the present study, most participants reported eating away from home at least once a week which is similar to findings reported previously in the UAE, the United States, and Vietnam [35, 41, 47]. Moreover, similar to the study among Vietnamese consumers, dine-in and fast-food restaurants were the most frequently visited food outlets by our participants [47]. Such results emphasize the importance of providing calorie information to consumers in chain restaurants and different food outlets so that they are better informed about the energy content and thus make informed choices. Mood and cravings were chosen by most of the participants as factors affecting food choice highlighting the strong link between eating behavior and emotion [48]. A recent meta-analysis revealed an inverse relationship between emotional intelligence and disordered eating [49], suggesting how identifying emotional intelligence can help in identifying people at risk of disordered eating. From another perspective, more emphasis should be put toward educating the public about interoceptive awareness which refers to being aware of bodily signals of hunger and satiety [50, 51]. In the present study, the calorie content of food ranked second in factors that affect purchasing food away from home, followed by price. This was similar to the findings among Vietnamese consumers [47], however, it differed from those in the United States, where participants were evenly distributed between calories and price as influencing factors in food purchasing [35] suggesting the important impact for menu declaration.

The results of the present study have also indicated that participants have positive attitudes toward calorie posting on menus, as most of them reported that it influences their food choices and that they trust the information provided. Similar findings were observed among consumers in Saudi Arabia and the United States as most participants favored calorie posting and thought that it was useful [35, 52]. Public positive attitude and support for menu labeling and nutrition labeling in general, are key factors in the successful implementation of such policies. About a third of participants in our study indicated that they were more likely to eat at restaurants that provide calorie posting on menus. These findings were lower than those in Saudi Arabia [43] and higher than those in the United States and the UAE (prior to the voluntary implementation of menu labeling) [35, 41]. These findings suggest the need for more in-depth studies investigating barriers to menu labeling, particularly when reports show that more than 1,000 food outlets in the Emirate of Dubai alone have been displaying menu labeling since 2020 [53] and Abu Dhabi, the UAE’s capital are working on the “SEHHI for Displaying Calories on the Menu” as part of the SEHHI initiative [20].

The present study indicates that there were some differences in knowledge and perceptions of calorie posting between different socio-demographic characteristics. Participants who had a college degree or above, and those with normal BMI had better knowledge scores and generally more positive attitudes toward calorie posting. These findings are similar to those reported by previous studies conducted in the UAE and among Vietnamese consumers [41, 47]. Well-educated people are more likely to have healthy behaviors and pursue health information more regularly [54]. Moreover, participants with normal BMI had more positive perceptions toward calorie posting than their counterparts. A possible explanation would be that normal-weight people could be more aware and interested in seeking healthy options to maintain their weight status and overall health. In addition, females were more knowledgeable about energy definition, similar to other studies, as women generally are more interested in menu labeling to help them choose lower-calorie options and control their calorie intake [35, 41, 47].

Favorably, our analyses indicate that participants were interested in calorie posting and would like to see calorie information on menus and expressed a preference in seeing other nutritional detailed information. This was in line with similar studies indicating that consumers favor menu labeling and would like to have sufficient information to choose healthier food options [22, 35, 41, 47]. Two studies showed the positive impact of calorie posting on consumers’ purchasing decisions, as they recorded a 6% drop in the average calories per transaction at a common coffee shop [55] and a 14% reduction in calorie consumption in people who were provided with calorie labels [22]. Although a limited number of studies measured the positive impact of calorie posting on consumers’ choices, literature shows that some companies may be reformulating their products in line with the menu labeling requirements, by modifying portion sizes or ingredients [56, 57]. This implies that restaurant menu labeling may influence both consumers and food retailers. Furthermore, most participants in our study expressed their preference for viewing more calorie information posted in different food outlets, confirming that individuals are interested in menu labeling and would like to see it in food outlets they visit frequently.

Restaurant menu labeling is a new policy implemented voluntarily and has not been implemented widely in the UAE. As such, the consumers may not be well exposed to this concept yet, which warrants further research to be conducted in exploring its acceptance. It should be noted that this study has several limitations. The use of an online self-administered questionnaire and the nature of the cross-sectional design used may have led to a less representative sample which may have affected the external validity of the results. However, multiple methods of participant recruitment and through different channels were employed to minimize risks of self-selection bias and to capture a larger diversity of participants. Moreover, the methodology used does not give a clear representation of real-life purchasing behavior and does not measure the direct impact of menu labeling on consumer behavior. Despite this, this study has several strengths. It identified gaps in actual knowledge and consumer-perceived knowledge. Also, it highlighted the possible impact of a wider and mandatory menu labeling implementation on consumer practices and gave us a snapshot of consumers’ dining practices in the UAE and their future preferences concerning menu labeling and calorie information.

Conclusions

Our findings propose that menu labeling and providing nutrition information are welcomed policies to be implemented widely in most food outlets since the majority of the participants exhibited positive attitudes and preferences. Given the surge of restaurants and other food outlets in the UAE, and with increasing consumers’ tendency for food away from home, mandating calorie declaration would be a useful policy in supporting obesity prevention strategies and enhancing consumers purchasing decisions. As such it is necessary to introduce more efficient educational interventions to the public on the importance of healthy eating as well as proper reading understanding and interpreting different food labels. More research is required to determine the optimum approach and best presentation to deliver nutrition information to consumers to help them make informed choices. Moreover, future studies are required to fill in knowledge gaps and provide clearer insights into the true impact of menu labeling on consumers and food outlets in the UAE.

Supporting information

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all those who supported in administering the survey and those who participated in this study.

References

  1. 1. Landais E, Miotto-Plessis M, Bene C, Maitre d’Hotel E, Truong MT, Somé JW, et al. Consumption of food away from home in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review. Nutrition Reviews. 2022;81(6):727–54.
  2. 2. Wellard-Cole L, Davies A, Allman-Farinelli M. Contribution of foods prepared away from home to intakes of energy and nutrients of public health concern in adults: a systematic review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2022;62(20):5511–22. pmid:33596740
  3. 3. Cantu-Jungles TM, McCormack LA, Slaven JE, Slebodnik M, Eicher-Miller HA. A Meta-Analysis to Determine the Impact of Restaurant Menu Labeling on Calories and Nutrients (Ordered or Consumed) in U.S. Adults. Nutrients. 2017;9(10). Epub 2017/10/05. pmid:28973989.
  4. 4. Diliberti N, Bordi PL, Conklin MT, Roe LS, Rolls BJ. Increased portion size leads to increased energy intake in a restaurant meal. Obes Res. 2004;12(3):562–8. pmid:15044675
  5. 5. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight fact sheet 2020 [updated 2020; cited 2022 May 19]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight.
  6. 6. Radwan H, Ballout RA, Hasan H, Lessan N, Karavetian M, Rizk R. The epidemiology and economic burden of obesity and related cardiometabolic disorders in the United Arab Emirates: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. J Obes. 2018;2018:2185942. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6311818. pmid:30652030
  7. 7. Aboul Enein BH, Bernstein J, Neary AC. Dietary transition and obesity in selected Arabic-speaking countries: a review of the current evidence. EMHJ. 2016;22(10):763–70. pmid:28134430
  8. 8. Nasreddine L, Ayoub JJ, Al Jawaldeh A, Mediterranean WHOROftE. Review of the nutrition situation in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. East Mediterr Health J. 2018;24(01):77–91.
  9. 9. Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Hall KD, McPherson K, Finegood DT, Moodie ML, et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):804–14. pmid:21872749
  10. 10. AlAbdulKader AM, Tuwairqi K, Rao G. Obesity and cardiovascular risk in the Arab gulf states. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2020;14(7).
  11. 11. Musaiger AO. Overweight and obesity in eastern mediterranean region: prevalence and possible causes. J Obes. 2011;2011:407237. Epub 2011/09/24. pmid:21941635; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3175401.
  12. 12. Ng SW, Zaghloul S., Ali H, Harrison G., Yeatts K., El Sadig M., et al. Nutrition transition in the United Arab Emirates. European journal of clinical nutrition. 2011;65(12):1328–37. pmid:21772317
  13. 13. WAM. Ministry of Health launches ’School Lunch Box’ programme to promote healthy lifestyles among children 2021 [cited 2023 September 4]. Available from: https://www.wam.ae/en/details/1395302962802.
  14. 14. WAM. UAE’s first online system to collect data about obesity among school students launched 2020 [cited 2023 September 4]. Available from: https://wam.ae/en/details/1395302819727.
  15. 15. MOHAP. Under the slogan “dream small… It adds up” Ministry of Health and prevention launches its media campaign as part of MA’KOM initiative 2019 [cited 2022 August 16]. Available from: https://www.mohap.gov.ae/en/MediaCenter/News/Pages/2044.aspx.
  16. 16. Dubai fitness challenge. What is Dubai fitness challenge? 2023 [cited 2023 September 4]. Available from: https://www.dubaifitnesschallenge.com/about-us/.
  17. 17. Hussain A, Elkelish WW, Al Mahameed M. Impact of excise tax on consumption, brand loyalty and health awareness: Evidence from the United Arab Emirates. Cogent Business & Management. 2023;10(1):2160579.
  18. 18. The National. ’Traffic light’ nutrition labels on packaged food will not be mandatory 2022 [cited 2022 13 September]. Available from: https://www.thenationalnews.com/uae/health/2021/12/12/traffic-light-nutrition-labels-on-packaged-food-no-longer-mandatory/.
  19. 19. Popkin BM, Barquera S, Corvalan C, Hofman KJ, Monteiro C, Ng SW, et al. Towards unified and impactful policies to reduce ultra-processed food consumption and promote healthier eating. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9(7):462–70. pmid:33865500
  20. 20. Abu Dhabi Public Health Centre. SEHHI program [cited 2023 9 September]. Available from: https://www.adphc.gov.ae/en/Public-Health-Programs/SEHHI-program#:~:text=SEHHI%20for%20Displaying%20Calories%20on%20the%20Menu%3A%20It%20is%20a,and%20better%20available%20food%20choices.
  21. 21. Jeffery RW, & French S. A. Epidemic obesity in the United States: are fast foods and television viewing contributing? Am J Public Health. 1998;88(2):277–80. pmid:9491022
  22. 22. Roberto CA, Larsen PD, Agnew H, Baik J, Brownell KD. Evaluating the impact of menu labeling on food choices and intake. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(2):312–8. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2804627. pmid:20019307
  23. 23. FDA. Food labeling; Nutrition labeling of standard menu items in restaurants and similar retail food establishments. Federal Register2014. p. 71155–259.
  24. 24. Petimar J, Zhang F, Rimm EB, Simon D, Cleveland LP, Gortmaker SL, et al. Changes in the calorie and nutrient content of purchased fast food meals after calorie menu labeling: A natural experiment. PLOS Medicine. 2021;18(7):e1003714. pmid:34252088
  25. 25. Long MW, Tobias DK, Cradock AL, Batchelder H, Gortmaker SL. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Restaurant Menu Calorie Labeling. American Journal of Public Health. 2015;105(5):e11–e24. pmid:25790388
  26. 26. GOV.UK. New calorie labelling rules come into force to improve nation’s health 2022 [cited 2022 September 4]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-calorie-labelling-rules-come-into-force-to-improve-nations-health.
  27. 27. Jo HS, Jung SM. Evaluation of food labeling policy in Korea: analyzing the Community Health Survey 2014–2017. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2019;34(32). pmid:31432651
  28. 28. The National. Saudi Arabia brings in mandatory calorie labels on menus 2019 [cited 2023 September 4]. Available from: https://www.thenationalnews.com/uae/health/saudi-arabia-brings-in-mandatory-calorie-labels-on-menus-1.808556.
  29. 29. Dubai Municipality. Calorie labeling in food service establishments. Guideline. Dubai: Dubai Municipality, 2019 2019. Report No.
  30. 30. Shangguan S, Afshin A, Shulkin M, Ma W, Marsden D, Smith J, et al. A meta-analysis of food labeling effects on consumer diet behaviors and industry practices. Am J Prev Med. 2019;56(2):300–14. pmid:30573335
  31. 31. Grummon AH, Petimar J, Soto MJ, Bleich SN, Simon D, Cleveland LP, et al. Changes in Calorie Content of Menu Items at Large Chain Restaurants After Implementation of Calorie Labels. JAMA Network Open. 2021;4(12):e2141353–e. pmid:34967879
  32. 32. Marty L, Reed SM, Jones AJ, Robinson E. Increasing availability of lower energy meals vs. energy labelling in virtual full-service restaurants: two randomized controlled trials in participants of higher and lower socioeconomic position. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):975. pmid:34034699
  33. 33. Fotouhinia-Yepes M. Menu calorie labelling in a fine dining restaurant: will it make a difference? J Qual Assur Hosp Tour. 2013;14(3):281–93.
  34. 34. Jia J, Van Horn L, Linder JA, Ackermann RT, Kandula NR, O’Brien MJ. Menu Calorie Label Use and Diet Quality: a Cross-Sectional Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2023. pmid:37433378
  35. 35. Bleich SN, Pollack KM. The publics’ understanding of daily caloric recommendations and their perceptions of calorie posting in chain restaurants. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):121. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2847976. pmid:20214811
  36. 36. Petimar J, Ramirez M, Rifas-Shiman SL, Linakis S, Mullen J, Roberto CA, et al. Evaluation of the impact of calorie labeling on McDonald’s restaurant menus: a natural experiment. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2019;16(1):99. pmid:31684961
  37. 37. Sobaih AEE, Abdelaziz AS. The Impact of Nutrition Labelling on Customer Buying Intention and Behaviours in Fast Food Operations: Some Implications for Public Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(12):7122. pmid:35742371
  38. 38. Mengxi D, Christina FG, Frederick C, Heesun E, John BW, Parke W, et al. What is the cost-effectiveness of menu calorie labelling on reducing obesity-associated cancer burdens? An economic evaluation of a federal policy intervention among 235 million adults in the USA. BMJ Open. 2023;13(4):e063614. pmid:37072239
  39. 39. Dupuis R, Block JP, Barrett JL, Long MW, Petimar J, Ward ZJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of calorie labeling at large fast-food chains across the U.S. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2023. pmid:37586572
  40. 40. The United Arab Emirates’ Government portal. National Nutrition Strategy 2030 2023 [cited 2023 1 September]. Available from: https://u.ae/en/about-the-uae/strategies-initiatives-and-awards/strategies-plans-and-visions/health/national-nutrition-strategy-2030.
  41. 41. Radwan H, Faroukh EM, Obaid RS. Menu labeling implementation in dine-in restaurants: the Public’s knowledge, attitude and practices. Arch Public Health. 2017;75(1):8. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5327521. pmid:28261476
  42. 42. World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000 2000. Report No.: 9241208945. 0512–3054.
  43. 43. AlShehri NM, AlMarzooqi MA. Consumers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward Calorie Labeling in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Assessment. Front Public Health. 2022;10:893978. Epub 20220714. pmid:35910913; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9330236.
  44. 44. Attlee A, Abu-Qiyas S, Obaid RS. Assessment of Nutrition Knowledge of a University Community in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. Malaysian Journal of Nutrition. 2014;20(3).
  45. 45. Al-Yateem N, Rossiter R. Nutritional knowledge and habits of adolescents aged 9 to 13 years in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates: a cross sectional study. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2017;23(8):551–8. pmid:29105046
  46. 46. Strupat C, Farfán G, Moritz L, Negre M, Vakis R. Obesity and food away from home: What drives the socioeconomic gradient in excess body weight? Econ Hum Biol. 2021;43:101048. pmid:34474398
  47. 47. Nguyen LH, Tran BX, Thi Nguyen HL, Le HT, Do HT, Kim Dang A, et al. Socio-Economic Disparities in Attitude and Preference for Menu Labels among Vietnamese Restaurant Customers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(3). Epub 2018/03/07. pmid:29509723; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5877005.
  48. 48. Godet A, Fortier A, Bannier E, Coquery N, Val-Laillet D. Interactions between emotions and eating behaviors: Main issues, neuroimaging contributions, and innovative preventive or corrective strategies. Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders. 2022;23(4):807–31. pmid:34984602
  49. 49. Zhang J, Wang Y, Wu C, He J. The relationship between emotional intelligence and eating disorders or disordered eating behaviors: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences. 2022;185:111239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111239.
  50. 50. Robinson E, Foote G, Smith J, Higgs S, Jones A. Interoception and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between interoception and BMI. International Journal of Obesity. 2021;45(12):2515–26. pmid:34480102
  51. 51. Simmons WK, DeVille DC. Interoceptive contributions to healthy eating and obesity. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2017;17:106–12. pmid:28950955
  52. 52. Alkhaldy AA, Taha DS, Alsahafi SE, Naaman RK, Alkhalaf MM. Response of the public and restaurant owners to the mandatory menu energy-labelling implementation in restaurants in Saudi Arabia. Public Health Nutrition. 2020;23(18):3435–47. Epub 2020/05/26. pmid:32450940
  53. 53. Dhanusha G. 1,000 eateries in Dubai now display calorie count on their menus UAE: Khaleej Times; 2021 [cited 2022 August 18]. Available from: https://www.khaleejtimes.com/uae/1000-eateries-in-dubai-now-display-calorie-count-on-their-menus.
  54. 54. Cutler DM, Lleras-Muney A. Understanding differences in health behaviors by education. J Health Econ. 2010;29(1):1–28. Epub 2009/12/08. pmid:19963292.
  55. 55. Bollinger B, Leslie P, Sorensen A. Calorie posting in chain restaurants. Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2011;3(1):91–128.
  56. 56. Pulos E, Leng K. Evaluation of a voluntary menu-labeling program in full-service restaurants. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(6):1035–9. Epub 2010/04/17. pmid:20395577.
  57. 57. Bruemmer B, Krieger J, Saelens BE, Chan N. Energy, saturated fat, and sodium were lower in entrees at chain restaurants at 18 months compared with 6 months following the implementation of mandatory menu labeling regulation in King County, Washington. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(8):1169–76. Epub 2012/06/19. pmid:22704898.