Link between the aboveground and belowground biomass allocation with growing of Tamarix sp. seedlings in the hinterland of Taklimakan Desert, China

Flora Erkin; Dai Yue; Anwar Abdureyim; Wanyuan Huang; Mawlida Tayir

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0289670

Abstract

The morphological characteristics and biomass allocation can reflect plant adaptive strategies to the environment. Tamarix sp. is an excellent shrub species used for windbreaks and fixing sand in the desert of northwest China. The successful establishment of Tamarix sp. seedlings and their growth into mature individuals require their adaptation to various environmental conditions, which is the key to naturally regenerating the Tamarix population. To clarify the root morphological characteristics, leaf structural characters, and biomass allocation of Tamarix sp. seedlings in response to drought conditions, we took the Tamarix sp. seedlings at the Daryaboyi oasis in the hinterland of Taklimakan Desert as the object of study, analyzed rooting depth, root dry weight (RDW), specific root length (SRL), root surface area (RA), specific root area (SRA), leaf area (LA), specific leaf area (SLA) and root: shoot ratio (R:S ratio). The gravimetric soil water content varied from 5.80% to 25.84% in this study area. The taproots of Tamarix sp seedlings with small basal stem diameters were shallower and had few lateral root branches and Tamarix sp. seedlings with large basal stem diameters had more obvious taproots and lateral roots. With the growth of Tamarix sp. seedlings, the taproot deepened, and the values ranged from 4.5 cm to 108.0 cm; the SRL, SRA, and SLA decreased, and the ranges of the values were 28.92–478.79 cm·g^-1, 1.07–458.50 cm²·g^-1, and 24.48–50.7 cm²·g^-1; the RDW, RA, and LA increased, the ranges of the values were 0.16–21.34 g, 3.42–328.04 cm², and 2.41–694.45 cm²; the more biomass was allocated to the aboveground parts, and the mean R: S ratio was 0.76. In better soil water conditions, the root growth rate decreased as Tamarix sp. seedlings grew, and more biomass was allocated to the aboveground. This further showed that stable surface water is highly significant to the biomass allocation strategy of Tamarix sp. seedlings.

Citation: Erkin F, Yue D, Abdureyim A, Huang W, Tayir M (2023) Link between the aboveground and belowground biomass allocation with growing of Tamarix sp. seedlings in the hinterland of Taklimakan Desert, China. PLoS ONE 18(8): e0289670. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289670

Editor: Xiao-Dong Yang, Ningbo University, CHINA

Received: May 23, 2023; Accepted: July 24, 2023; Published: August 16, 2023

Copyright: © 2023 Erkin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding: This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China in the form of grants (32160260 & 31800613) awarded to DY. No additional external funding was received for this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

1 Introduction

The Taklamakan Desert is the largest desert in China and the second-largest mobile desert in the world. The ecological environment of the Taklamakan Desert is extremely harsh and the climate is dry ‎[1]. Therefore, some excellent drought-resistant and sand-fixing pioneer plants have become the dominant species here. Tamarix sp. is an excellent shrub in the desert of northwest China ‎[2]. It is often regarded as a pioneer plant for wind and sand control due to its excellent resistance to growth and reproduction in the harsh environment of desert areas and to influence and improve the desert environment through its rapid growth and development ‎[3, 4].

Plant functional traits indicate the ability of plants to grow, reproduce and survive by affecting plant growth, reproduction, and survivability and thus indirectly affecting its morphological and physiological traits [5]. Functional traits that help plants in acquiring limiting nutrients and water are more important for desert plant species ‎[6, 7]. The roots and leaves are important organs for energy and material exchange between plants and the environment. Root morphological characteristics are used as indicators of resource utilization strategies, which can reflect the adaptation and competitive ability of different species or provenances, to survive during the long-term evolutionary process ‎[8]. When plants are exposed to water stress, to maintain the absorption of water and nutrients, the roots of plants must enter the deep soil layer and continue to grow rapidly ‎[9]. Previous studies have found that under drought conditions the specific root length (SRL) decreased, root surface area (RA) and specific root area (SRA) increased ‎[10, 11], can conclude that plants can change their morphology through regulation, adapt to changes in environmental conditions, and increase the survival probability.

Plant leaf functional traits can not only reflect plant growth, metabolism, and reproduction but also represent plant adaptation strategies to different ecological environments ‎[12]. The leaf area (LA) is an important parameter to evaluate many traits of plants like canopy, photosynthesis, and evapotranspiration ‎[13, 14]. The specific leaf area (SLA) is defined as the light-capturing leaf surface area per unit of dry biomass ‎[15], and an essential functional trait and indicator for estimating plant strategies in response to environmental changes ‎[12]. Plant traits are often interdependent, or their values correlate, LA and SLA are informative on resource acquisition and lifespan ‎[16]. Plants adopt low LA and low SLA adaptation strategies to maintain water in an arid environment, whereas contrasting values are implying quick nutrient use and photosynthetic capacity ‎[17, 18]. In summary, LA and SLA are closely related to light availability and habitat resource supply.

The allocation of biomass to plant organs plays an important role in their acquisition of resources and competition to survive ‎[19]. Optimal partitioning theory (OPT) suggests that plants should allocate biomass to the organ that acquires the most limiting resource ‎[20]. Padilla et al. ‎[21] find that roots of all species responded to alterations in water supply by changing biomass allocation patterns (i.e., higher root: shoot ratio (R:S ratio) in droughted plants), and by altering fine roots diameter, measured in terms of SRL. When plants are stressed by water and nutrients, the biomass allocated to the roots increases to obtain more water and nutrients ‎[22]. Past few years studies found that under irrigation conditions, higher water and nutrients enable plants to allocate more biomass to the aboveground (i.e., R: S ratio decreased) ‎[3, 23, 24]. Meanwhile, it shows that the increase of the belowground part can mitigate the conditions when a plant’s supply is lower in nutrients and water ‎[25].

The Daryaboyi Oasis is located at the tail of the Keriya River, which is the second-largest river at the southern edge of the Tarim Basin. The oasis is subject to relatively little interference and thrives under natural conditions, with relatively "primitive" characteristics ‎[26]. Tamarix sp. (bush species) is one of the dominant species in the Daryaboyi oasis. The seedling stage is the most vulnerable stage during plant settlement and the stage at which the plants are most likely to die ‎[27]. The successful settlement and growth of Tamarix sp. seedlings into mature individuals need to adapt to various adverse conditions, which is the key to realizing the natural renewal of the Tamarix population. Recent years studies showed that the Daryaboyi Oasis has inundation from 2000 to 2019, with maximum peaks occurring in February and August; a period of minimal inundation occurred in May ‎[28, 29]. River water is a critical parameter for the germination and growth of Tamarix sp. seedlings in this study area. Currently, studies on root morphological characteristics, leaf structural characters, and biomass allocation have focused on adult Tamarix sp. in plantations ‎[30–32]. While less attention has been paid to these characteristics in Tamarix sp. seedlings grown under natural environmental conditions. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the root morphological characteristics, leaf structural characters, and biomass allocation of Tamarix sp. seedlings during their early growth stages, which is important to help improve the understanding of the mechanisms used by plants to adapt to arid zones. Therefore, two specific hypotheses were tested: In a natural environment with perennial surface water runoff, with the growing of Tamarix sp. seedlings in the hinterland of Taklimakan Desert (1) they decrease SRA and SLA, and (2) allocated more biomass to the aboveground.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study area

The study area is located at the Daryaboyi Oasis in the hinterland of the Taklamakan Desert, Xinjiang, China (Fig 1). It has a geographical location of 38°24’–38°34’N, 81°56’–81°90’E, an altitude of 1,100–1,300 m, and an area of approximately 324 km² ‎[33, 34]. This area is part of a typically arid continental climate, with an average annual precipitation of less than 10 mm; the average relative humidity is 40.2%; the annual potential evaporation is 2,480 mm; the average annual temperature is 12.1°C, and there is a large difference in temperature between day and night ‎[22]. The primary plant species in the oasis are Populus euphratica Olivier, Tamarix spp., Alhagi sparsifolia Shap, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin ex. Steud, and Karelinia caspia Less. The depth of the groundwater table ranges from 1 to 8 m in the oasis from south to north; the winter and spring seasons have shallower groundwater depth than the summer and autumn seasons ‎[26]. The annual river runoff is relatively stable, with a large amount from September to February and a small amount from March to August ‎[35]. The soil is primarily sandy, and the concentrations of soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) are 2.14 g·kg^-1 and 0.08 g·kg^-1 respectively. The pH value of the soil is 9.22.

Download:

Fig 1. Location of the study site.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289670.g001

2.2 Experimental design

We conducted field sampling after obtaining permission from the government of Daryaboyi Township, Yutian County, Hotan Region, Xinjiang, China. The field experiment was conducted in mid-June 2021. There was surface runoff in the sampling area in early June 2021, and the groundwater depth was 2.40 m. Representative areas of Tamarix sp. seedlings were selected that were subject to less human interference and near the established groundwater observation wells in the oasis, and samples of their leaves, roots, and nearby soil were collected. We randomly selected three sample plots (1 × 1 m) near the observation well, and the height, crown width, basal stem diameter, and coverage of Tamarix sp. seedlings in the sample plots were measured, and the average values were 22.8±16.0 cm, 11.6±7.1 cm, 4.9±2.5 mm, and 30.45%, respectively.

2.3 Sampling and measurements

2.3.1 Plant sampling.

Growing well, free of insects and diseases, and had a representative basal stem diameter Tamarix sp. seedlings that ranged from 1 to 11 mm were randomly selected from the sample plots. The whole roots of 12 Tamarix sp. seedlings were excavated in the sample plot, and their morphological information is shown in Table 1, and the list of root and leaf functional traits, their abbreviations, and definition are shown in Table 2. Tools, such as shovels, tweezers, brushes, and thin wooden sticks, were used to carefully strip away the soil around the roots until they were fully exposed. We maintain the integrity of the root system during the excavation. If there were broken roots, the roots were labeled. The position of their growth was recorded, and the roots were photographed for measuring RA and SRA. The roots were separated from the aboveground parts and placed in numbered airtight bags. The aboveground part of the Tamarix sp. seedlings to determine the R: S ratio, and leaves were photographed for measuring LA and SLA

Download:

Table 1. Morphological information of the whole roots excavated from Tamarix sp. seedlings (means ± SD).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289670.t001

Download:

Table 2. List of root and leaf functional traits and their abbreviations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289670.t002

(1)

Where the DW_belowground is the dry weight of belowground biomass, and DW_aboveground is the dry weight of aboveground biomass.

All the leaves and roots on the full-root excavation plant were placed on different white papers with references and photographed. Adobe Photoshop 2020 (Adobe, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for cutout graphics (Fig 3). The calculate leaf and root area software (HP Scan jet 4850) was used to calculate the surface areas of leaves and roots. The leaves and roots were then placed in a 60°C oven for 48 h to determine the constant weight to calculate the SRL, SRA, and SLA. The formulae are as follows ‎[37, 39, 41]: (2) (3) (4)

Where SRL is the specific root length; RL is the total root length (cm), and RDW is the total root dry weight (g). SRA is the specific root area; RA is the total root area (cm²); SLA is the specific leaf area; LA is the single leaf area (cm²), and LW is the leaf dry weight (g).

2.3.2 Soil sampling.

The soil samples were collected at intervals of 20 cm near the plants sampling plants from the topsoil to the groundwater table, and there were three replicates per layer. The soil sample was placed in an aluminum box and brought back to the laboratory to measure the gravimetric soil water content (SWC) by oven drying method. Other soil samples were simultaneously taken from the 0–20 cm layer in the sample plot and placed in sealed bags for numbering, which was used to determine the SOC, TN, TP, and pH value. The SOC was determined by the black dichromate oxidation method; the soil TN was measured by the semi-micro Kjeldahl digestion procedure; the soil TP was determined by spectrophotometry ‎[42]. To determine the soil pH, the electrometric method as described by Adams and Pearson ‎[40] was used.

The formula to calculate the SWC is as follows ‎[43]: (5)

Where SWC is the gravimetric soil water content; FW_soil is the fresh weight of soil, and DW_soil is the dry weight of soil.

2.4 Data analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., China go, IL, USA). The relationships between basal stem diameter and RDW, SRL, RA, SRA, LA, and SLA, and that between Ln root mass and Ln shoot mass, and between R: S and Ln total mass were fitted via linear regression models by Origin 2021. All Graphs were plotted with Origin 2021.

3 Results

3.1 Characteristics of gravimetric soil water content

The SWC in the study area increased with the increase in soil depth (Fig 2). The SWC varied from 5.80% to 25.84%, with an average of 15.12%, and it fluctuated in the 0–120 cm soil depth, with a varied range of 5.80% to 19.49%. Below the 120 cm soil depth, the SWC gradually increased.

Download:

Fig 2. Variation of gravimetric soil water content at different depths at the Daryaboyi Oasis in the hinterland of the Taklimakan Desert, China (means ± SD, n = 3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289670.g002

3.2 Root morphological characteristics and leaf structural characters of the Tamarix sp. seedlings

The root distribution of the Tamarix sp. seedlings varied with the size of the basal stem diameter (Fig 3). The taproots of Tamarix sp. seedlings with small basal stem diameters were obviously shallower and had few lateral root branches (Fig 3A and 3B). The taproots and lateral roots of Tamarix sp. seedlings with large basal stem diameters were more apparent (Fig 3C). The values of basal stem diameters were 1.40 mm, 2.95 mm, and 10.63 mm; the taproot lengths were 35.4 cm, 54.1 cm, and 31.8 cm, respectively, and the root depths were 52 cm, 54.1 cm, and 108 cm, respectively. The depth of Tamarix sp. seedling taproots deepened as the basal stem diameters increased, and the root depth varied from 4.5 cm to 108.0 cm (Fig 4).

Download:

Fig 3. Root distribution of Tamarix sp. seedlings with different basal stem diameters.

Note: the basal stem diameters were as follows: (a) 1.40 mm, (b) 2.95 mm, (c) 10.63 mm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289670.g003

Download:

Fig 4. Taproot depths of Tamarix sp. seedlings individual with different basal stem diameters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289670.g004

The linear regression models of the RDW and RA of Tamarix sp. seedlings were y = 1.84x-4.64 and y = 10.27x+16.86 (Fig 5A and 5C), with the slope of RDW and RA vs. basal stem diameter significantly higher than 1.0, this indicates that with the increase in basal stem diameter the RDW and RA increased, the ranges of the values were 0.16–21.34 g and 3.42–328.04 cm², and the mean values were 5.69 g and 76.30 cm². Fig 5B and 5D showed that linear regression models of the SRL and SRA of Tamarix sp. seedlings were y = -21.57x+300.89 and y = -5.39x+66.64, this indicates that with the increase in basal stem diameter, the SRL and SRA decreased, and the ranges of the values were 28.92–478.79 cm·g^-1 and 1.07–458.50 cm²·g^-1, the mean values were 179.42 cm·g^-1 and 67.55 cm²·g^-1, respectively.

Download:

Fig 5. Root morphological characteristics of Tamarix sp. seedlings with different basal stem diameters.

Note: (a) root dry weight, (b) specific root length, (c) root area, (d) and specific root area.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289670.g005

The linear regression of the LA and basal stem diameter was proportional (Fig 6A), and the linear regression model was y = 60.34x-115.86, this indicates that with the increase of basal stem diameter, the LA of Tamarix sp. seedlings increased, and the ranges of the values were 2.41–694.45 cm² and the mean LA values were 223.98 cm². The linear regression of the SLA and basal stem diameter was inversely proportional (Fig 6B), and the linear regression model was y = -0.62x+41.66, this indicates that with the increase of basal stem diameter, the SLA of Tamarix sp. seedlings decreased, and the ranges of the values were 24.48–50.7 cm²·g^-1 and the mean SLA values were 38.19±7.34 cm²·g^-1.

Download:

Fig 6.

Leaf area (a) and leaf specific area (b) of Tamarix sp. seedlings with different basal stem diameters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289670.g006

3.3 Biomass allocation of the Tamarix sp. seedlings

The natural logarithms of root biomass and shoot biomass were tightly and linearly correlated (Fig 7A), the natural logarithms function was y = 0.87x-0.3. Thus, Fig 7A indicates that with the increase in basal stem diameter, both the aboveground and belowground biomass of Tamarix sp. seedlings increased. The linear correlation (y = -0.6x+0.89) between the R: S ratio and total mass shows that the R: S ratio decreases gradually with the increase in basal stem diameter, and the average R: S ratio was 0.76 (Fig 7B).

Download:

Fig 7. Aboveground and belowground biomass allocation of Tamarix sp. seedlings with different basal stem diameters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289670.g007

4 Discussion

In arid and semiarid areas, soil water is a key factor that restricts plant growth and reproduction, affects the development of individual plants, determines the types of plants, and limits the distribution of vegetation ‎[44]. In the Daryaboyi Oasis, the SWC increased as the soil depth deepened, which was consistent with the results of soil water research in the Taklimakan Desert ‎[45]. Wan et al. ‎[46] showed that the shallow soil water in the Daliyabuyi oasis of the Taklimakan Desert was less than 1% without surface water. In our study area, surface water flows through, so the shallow soil has a high content of water (Fig 2), which facilitated the survival and growth of seedlings with shallow roots.

In an arid desert environment, the common ecological mechanism of plant adaptation to drought is a highly developed root system, with a deeper root depth ‎‎[3, 47]. The root morphological characteristics were closely linked to the utilization of water and nutrient resources by the plant ‎[48, 49]. The vertical roots stopped growing when the SWC reached 30% ‎[50]. Our results showed that the lateral root distribution of the Tamarix sp. seedlings with larger basal stem diameters was more apparent (Fig 3). The rooting depth of Tamarix sp. seedlings with different basal stem diameters generally increased as the basal stem diameter increased (Fig 4), indicating that the Tamarix sp. seedlings as the growing developed roots and tended to absorb deeper stable soil water.

The interaction between water status and RDW, RA, and R: S ratio was significant, drought increased R: S ratio but it reduced the RA and RDW ‎[51]. The RDW and RA of Tamarix sp. seedlings increased as the basal stem diameter increased (Fig 5A and 5C), which means good water conditions in our study area. The SRL is the ratio of root length to biomass, which can represent the relationship between root gain and expenditure ‎[37, 52]. The results of previous studies showed that the SRL of the Abies community decreased with tree size and aboveground biomass, and the mean value of SRL was 10.40 ± 0.26 cm·g^-1 ‎[53]. The mean SRL was 18.2 cm·g^-1 of the rainforest vascular epiphyte community ‎[54]. With the growth, the SRL values of Tamarix sp. seedlings decreased, and the mean value of SRL was 179.42 cm·g^-1 (Fig 5B), the SRL of Tamarix sp. seedlings in our study area was higher, indicating that the productivity of Tamarix sp. seedlings was higher. The SRL and RA ranged from 730–940 cm·g^-1 and 6.3–12 cm² of Platycladus orientalis seedlings in a greenhouse ‎[55]. The plants that grow more quickly generally have a larger SRL than the plants that grow more slowly ‎[56]. It is therefore understandable that the Tamarix sp. seedlings were at a rapid growth stage in our study. The RA can reflect the effective absorption area of water and nutrients absorbed by roots as a whole ‎[38]. Drought treatment promoted the elongation growth of the root and increased its SRL and SRA ‎[43]. In sandy soil substrate, the response of seedlings to deeper phreatic water depth is realized by the increase of RA caused by the increase of total root length ‎[38]. In our study, with the growth of Tamarix sp. seedlings, RA increased (Fig 5C), which indicated that the growing Tamarix sp. seedlings by increasing the RA to capture more water. The plant growth theory suggests that fast-growing plants generally have a larger SRA. Plants with a larger SRA are more efficient at absorbing higher amounts of water and nutrients ‎[57]. In this study, with the increase in basal stem diameter, the SRA of Tamarix sp. seedlings decreased (Fig 5D), and the seedlings with the smallest basal stem diameters had the largest SRA. We can conclude that seedlings with small basal stem diameters applied a substantial amount of photosynthetic products into developing root systems to acquire stable water sources, further showing that small seedlings need higher water and nutrients during rapid growth. For instance, the SRL and SRA of Chinese fir plantations decreased with stand age, indicating that the fine root nutrient foraging ability decreased in older stands ‎[58]. From the results of these previous studies, we can confirm that the root growth rate decreased as Tamarix sp. seedlings grew.

Many studies have proved that plants in the desert change leaf functional traits to reduce water loss ‎[59, 60]‎. A study on leaf functional traits of Disanthus cercidifolius var. longipes H. T. Chang in the high mountains of southeastern China showed that as the plants developed, the LA increased and SLA decreased ‎[14]. As the same, with the growth of the Tamarix sp. seedlings, the LA increased (Fig 6A) and SLA decreased (Fig 6B). The SLA plays an important role in determining the productivity of plants since the changes in leaf SLA reflect changes to the structure and nutritional content of leaves ‎[41]. Previous studies have shown that plants with a low SLA live in relatively arid and barren environments, while those with a high SLA have a high rate of relative growth and productivity ‎[61]. The mean SLA of adult T. chinensis at the pure stand, mixed forest in the hinterland of the Taklimakan desert was 39.06±6.87 cm²·g^-1 ‎[59]. The mean SLA of Tamarix sp. seedlings was 38.19±7.34 cm²·g^-1 (Fig 6B), the SLA values of adults and seedlings were similar, which indicated that the seedling productivity of Tamarix sp. reached the adult`s level. The value of SLA from the present study was lower than the mean SLA (53±2 cm²·g^-1) of the Mediterranean plant genus growing in northeastern Spain ‎[62], which indicates that plants in habitats with abundant resources typically have higher SLA values than plants in the desert with scarce resources. When the environment was dry and resources were scarce, Haloxylon ammodendron in the Ebinur Lake wetland, in Xinjiang, China reduced its SLA ‎[63]. The combination of soil nutrients and changes in LA and SLA of Tamarix sp. seedlings can be understood that the habitat soil is infertile.

Previous studies have shown that with the increase of drought, plants show strong drought resistance through root growth, SRL, RA, and SRA increasing ‎[43]. Compared with the decreasing trend of SRL and SRA as the growth of Tamarix sp. seedlings, and SLA reflected a low fitting slope, which indicates that the stability of photosynthetic function is maintained. In conclusion, the morphological characteristics of Tamarix sp. seedlings did not show drought-resistant properties, since the study area had good soil water conditions. This indicates that the conclusions were consistent with our hypothesis (1) that in a natural environment with perennial surface water runoff, with the growing of Tamarix sp. seedlings in the hinterland of Taklimakan Desert, they decrease SRA and SLA.

The increase in the R: S ratio enlarges the quantity of water and nutrients that is absorbed and enhances the ability of plants to resist drought and remain fertile ‎[3, 64]‎. When irrigation was timed roughly to coincide with local flooding the biomass of Tamarix sp. seedlings was primarily distributed to the aboveground parts, and the mean R: S ratio was 0.75 ‎[65], which was very close to the R: S ratio change trend of Tamarix sp. seedlings in this study (Fig 7A) and the average value of 0.76 (Fig 7). The response of H. ammodendron seedlings in the hinterland of the Taklamakan Desert in China to irrigation amount showed that the R:S ratio increased with decreasing irrigation amount and the R:S ratio was 0.92 when irrigation was minimal ‎[66]. Compare with the above study the small R: S ratio of Tamarix sp. seedlings indicated that the soil water condition was well in the study area, and more biomass was then allocated to the aboveground parts of the Tamarix sp. seedlings (Fig 7B). This indicates that the conclusions were consistent with our hypothesis (2) that under natural conditions, with the growth of Tamarix sp. seedlings in the hinterland of Taklimakan Desert allocated more biomass to the aboveground.

5 Conclusion

The study area was nourished by surface water from the Keriya River, the groundwater was shallow. The taproots of Tamarix sp. seedlings with small basal stem diameters were shallower and had few lateral root branches and Tamarix sp. seedlings with large basal stem diameters have more obvious taproots and lateral roots. Because the soil water condition is well, with the growth of Tamarix sp. seedlings, the root dry weight and root surface area increased, and the specific root length was higher, which indicated that Tamarix sp. seedlings have higher productivity and were at a rapid growth stage. The seedlings with the small basal stem diameters had the largest specific root area, can understand that small seedlings need higher water and nutrients during rapid growth. From the above results, it is clear that the root growth rate decreased as Tamarix sp. seedlings grew. The root: shoot ratio mean value was 0.76, and more biomass was allocated to aboveground parts with the growth of Tamarix sp. seedlings. This further showed that stable surface water is highly significant to the biomass allocation strategy of Tamarix sp. seedlings.

References

1. Li CJ, Han H, Ablimiti M, Liu R, Zhang H, Fan JL. Morphological and physiological responses of desert plants to drought stress in a man-made landscape of the Taklimakan desert shelter belt. Ecological Indicators. 2022;109037.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Chen XY. Pollen limitation and breeding system of Tamarix ramosissima (ledeb) in patched habitats. South African Journal of Botany. 2015;99(Null).
- View Article
- Google Scholar
3. Shan LS, Zang XM, Wang YK, Wang H, Yan HN, Wei J, et al. Influence of moisture on the growth and biomass allocation in Haloxylon ammodendron and Tamarix ramosissima seedlings in the shelterbelt along the Tarim Desert Highway, Xinjiang, China. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2008;93:101.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. Meng HH, Gao XY, Huang JF, Zhang ML. Plant phylogeography in arid northwest china: retrospectives and perspectives. J SYST EVOL. 2015;53(1):33–46.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
5. Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, et al. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany. 2013;61,167–234.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. Li SJ, Su PX, Zhang HN, Zhou ZJ, Xie TT. Characteristics and Relationships of Foliar Water and Leaf Functional Traits of Desert Plants. Plant Physiology Journal. 2013;49 (2): 153–160.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Gao XY, Meng HH, Zhang ML. Diversification and vicariance of desert plants: Evidence inferred from chloroplast DNA sequence variation of Lagochilus ilicifolius (Lamiaceae). Biochemical Systematics & Ecology. 2014;55(X):93–100.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Hodge A, Berta G, Doussan C, Merchan F, Crespi M. Plant root growth, architecture, and function. Plant soil. 2009;321(1–2):153–187.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Jabborova D, Annapurna K, Al-Sadi A, Alharbi SA, Datta R, Zuan ATK. Biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mediated enhanced drought tolerance in okra (abelmoschus esculentus) plant growth, root morphological traits and physiological properties. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021;28, 5490–5499.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Abtahi M, Majidi MM, Mirlohi A, Rognli OA. Root characteristic system improves drought tolerance in orchardgrass. Plant Breeding. 2017.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Hamid AS, Reza SA, Mojgan Z. Specific root length, soil water status, and grain yields of irrigated and rainfed winter barley in the raised bed and flat planting systems. Agricultural Water Management. 2018;210, 304–315.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
12. Zhou X, Xin J, Huang X, Li H, Li F, Song W. Linking Leaf Functional Traits with Soil and Climate Factors in Forest Ecosystems in China. Plants. 2022;11, 3545. pmid:36559655
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Ahmad S, Ali H, Rehman AU, Khan R, Hasanuzzaman M. Measuring leaf area of winter cereals by different techniques: a comparison. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences. 2015;13(2):117–125.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Chen FQ, Guan S, Geng M, Lv K, Huang Y. Changes in leaf functional traits of the endangered plant Disanthus cercidifolius var. longipes with plant growth and development. 2020.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
15. Chaturvedi RK, Raghubanshi AS. Leaf size and specific leaf area of tropical deciduous trees increases with elevation in soil moisture content. International Journal of Hydrology. 2018;(4).
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Chelli S, Ottaviani G, Tsakalos JL, Campetella G, Simonetti E, Wellstein C, et al. Intra-and inter-specific leaf trait responses of understorey species to changes in forest maturity. Forest Ecology and Management. 2022;506:119977.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
17. Xin Z, Zuo X, Zhao X, Liu C, Peng L. Plant functional traits and interrelationships of 34 plant species in south central Horqin Sandy Land, China. Journal of Desert Research. 2015;35(6): 1495.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Wright IJ, Westoby M. Cross-species relationships between seedling relative growth rate, nitrogen productivity and root vs leaf function in 28 Australian woody species. Functional Ecology. 2000;14(1), 97–107.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Tilman D. Plant Strategies and the Structure and Dynamics of plant communities. Princeton University Press. 1988;52:97.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Mccarthy MC, Enquist BJ. Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation. Functional Ecology. 2007;21(4):713–720.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
21. Padilla FM, Miranda JD, Jorquera MJ, Pugnaire FI. Variability in amount and frequency of water supply affects roots but not growth of arid shrubs. Plant Ecology. 2009;204(2), 261–270.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Zhang P, Deng X, Long A, Xu H, Ye M, Li J. Change in spatial distribution patterns and regeneration of Populus euphratica under different surface soil salinity conditions. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:9123.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Stevens MHH, Shirk R, Steiner CE. Water and fertilizer have opposite effects on plant species richness in a mesic early successional habitat. Plant Ecology. 2006;183(1), 27–34.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Karkanis A, Bilalis D, Efthimiadou A. Architectural plasticity, photosynthesis and growth responses of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti medicus) plants to water stress in a semi-arid environment. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2011;5(4):369–374.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
25. Sun SC, Chen LZ. A preliminary study on the ecological responses of seedlings to drought and simulated defoliation in Quercus liaotun-gensis. Acta Ecol Sin. 2000;20(5): 893–897.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Shi HB, Shi QD, Zhou XL, Imin B, Li H, Zhang WQ, et al. Effect of the competition mechanism of between co-dominant species on the ecological characteristics of Populus euphratica under a water gradient in a desert oasis. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2021;27:e01611.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Xu GQ, Mcdowell NG, Li Y. A possible link between life and death of a xeric tree in the desert. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2016;35:44.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
28. Wang JH, Zhang F, Luo GM, Guo YC, Zheng JH, Wu SX, et al. Factors Influencing Seasonal Changes in Inundation of the Daliyaboyi Oasis, Lower Keriya River Valley, Central Tarim Basin, China. Remote Sensing. 2022a;14,5050.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Wang J, Zhang F, Luo G, Guo Y, Zheng J, Wu S, et al. Influence of natural and anthropogenic controls on runoff in the Keriya River, central Tarim Basin, China. PLoSONE. 2022b;17(5): e0269132. pmid:35622832
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Yin QL, Tian TT, Han XH, Xu JS, Chai YF, Mo J, et al. The relationships between biomass allocation and plant functional trait. Ecological indicators: Integrating, monitoring, assessment and management. 2019;102.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Bush SE, Guo JS, Dehn D, Grady KC, Hull JB, Johnson E, et al. Adaptive versus non-adaptive responses to drought in a non-native riparian tree / shrub, Tamarix spp. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2021;108342.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Sun J, Zhao XM, Fang Y, Xu WG, Gao FL, Zhao WL, et al. Root growth and architecture of tamarix chinensis in response to the groundwater level in the yellow river delta. Marine pollution bulletin. 2022 (Jun.):179.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
33. Li H, Shi QD, Wan YB, Shi HB, Imin B, Li MS. Influence of surface water on desert vegetation expansion at the landscape scale: a case study of the Daliyabuyi Oasis, Taklamakan desert. Sustainability. 2021a;13:9522.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Li H, Shi QD, Wan YB, Imin B. Using Sentinel-2 Images to Map the Populus euphratica Distribution Based on the Spectral Difference Acquired at the Key Phenological Stage. Forests. 2021b;12(2):147.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
35. Imin B, Dai Y, Shi QD, Guo YC, Hao L, Nijat M. Responses of two dominant desert plant species to the changes in groundwater depth in hinterland natural oasis, Tarim Basin. Ecology and Evolution. 2021;00:1–12.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
36. Puangbut D, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Craig K. Root distribution pattern and their contribution in photosynthesis and biomass in jerusalem artichokeunder drought conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2018;50(3), 879–886.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Characteristics Fitter A. and Functions of Root Systems. Marcel Dekker Inc. 2002.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
38. Wang LJ. Study on the root growth characteristics of Populus euphratica and influencing factors. (Doctoral Dissertation, Xinjiang University, China). 2015.
39. Leuschner C, Gebel S, Rose L. Root trait responses of six temperate grassland species to intensive mowing and NPK fertilisation: a field study in atemperate grassland. Plant Soil. 2013;373, 687–698.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
40. Adams WE, Pearson RW, Jackson WA, McCreery RA. Influence of limestone and nitrogen on soil pH and coastal bermudagrass yield. Agronomy Journal. 1967;59(5).
- View Article
- Google Scholar
41. Gong HD, Gao J. Soil and climatic drivers of plant SLA (specific leaf area). Global Ecology and Conservation. 2019;20:e00696.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Gao XL, Li X G, Zhao L, Kuzyakov Y. Shrubs magnify soil phosphorus depletion in Tibetan meadows: Conclusions from C: N:P stoichiometry and deep soil profiles. Science of the Total Environment. 2021;147320. pmid:33957589
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Dan LS. Studies on morphology and function of root of typical desert plant and its drought-resistant physiology characteristics on northwest China. (Doctoral Dissertation, Gansu Agricultural University, China). 2013.
44. Reynolds JF, Virginia RA, Kemp PR, Soya AGD, Tremmel DC. Impact of drought on desert shrubs: effects of seasonality and degree of resource island development. Ecological Monographs. 1999;69(1):69–106.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Yan HL, Liang SM, Zhang XM, Wang WH, Ma JB, Zhu JT. Photosynthesis responses of endemic shrubs of Taklimakan Desert to adverse temperature, humidity, and radiation. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2008;84:92.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Wan YB, Shi QD, Dai Y, Marhaba N, Peng L, Shi HB. Water Use Characteristics of Populus euphratica Oliv. and Tamarix chinensis Lour. at Different Growth Stages in a Desert Oasis. Forests. 2022;13, 236.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Darrouzet-Nardi A, D’Antonio CM, Dawson TE. Depth of water acquisition by invading shrubs and resident herbs in a Sierra Nevada meadow. Plant and Soil. 2006;285:31–43.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. Berntson GM. The Characterization of topology: a comparison of four topological indices for rooted binary trees. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1995;177:271–281.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Asaeda T, Siong K, Kawashima T, Sakamoto K. Growth of phragmites japonica on a sandbar of the regulated river: morphological adaptation of the plant to low water and nutrient availability in the substrate. River Research and Applications. 2010;25(7):874–891.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Zeng FJ, Song C, Guo HF, Liu B, Luo WC, Gui DW, et al. Responses of root growth of Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. (Fabaceae) to different simulated groundwater depths in the southern fringe of the Taklimakan Desert, China. Journal of Arid Land. 2013;5(002):220–232.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Ruttanaprasert R, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Kesmala T, Kanwar RS, Holbrook CC, et al. Root responses of jerusalem artichoke genotypes to different water regimes. Biomass & Bioenergy. 2015;81(OCT.), 369–377.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Zhu LQ, Sun J, Yao XD, Wang XH, Huang JX, Xiong DC, et al. Fine root nutrient foraging ability in relation to carbon availability along a chronosequence of Chinese fir plantations. Forest Ecology and Management. 2022;507:120003.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. Ugawa S, Miura S, Hashimoto S, Iwamoto K, Fukuda K. Changes in quantity, morphology and nitrogen content of fine roots with stand development in a subalpine fir-wave forest. Journal of Forest Research. 2018;23(6).
- View Article
- Google Scholar
54. Wagner K, Wanek W, Zotz G. Functional traits of a rainforest vascular epiphyte community: trait covariation and indications for host specificity. Diversity. 2021;13(2):97.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
55. Feng Z, Yang X, Liang H, Kong Y, Hui D, Zhao J, et al. Improvements in the root morphology, physiology, and anatomy of platycladus orientalis seedlings from air-root pruning. Hortscience. 2018;53(12):1750–1756.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
56. Comas LH, Eissenstat DM. Linking fine root traits to maximum potential growth rate among 11 mature temperate tree species. Functional Ecology. 2004;18:388–397.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
57. Rewald B, Leuschner C. Does root competition asymmetry increase with water availability? Plant Ecology and Diversity. 2006;2(3):255–264.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
58. Li S, Wang H, Gou W, White J F, Su P. Leaf functional traits of dominant desert plants in the Hexi Corridor, Northwest China: Trade-off relationships and adversity strategies. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2021;4, e01666.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
59. Tayir M, Dai Y, Shi QD, Abdureyim A, Erkin F, Huang WY. Distinct leaf functional traits of Tamarix chinensis at different habitats in the hinterland of the Taklimakan desert. Front. Plant Sci. 2023;13:1094049.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
60. Yang XD, Anwar E, Zhou J, He D, Gao Y C, Lv GH, et al. Higher association and integration among functional traits in small tree than shrub in resisting drought stress in an arid desert. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2022;201,104993.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
61. Guerrero I, Carmona CP, Morales MB, ONate JJ, Peco B. Non-linear responses of functional diversity and redundancy to agricultural intensification at the field scale in Mediterranean arable plant communities. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2014;195:36–43.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
62. Camarero JJ. Linking functional traits and climate-growth relationships in Mediterranean species through wood density. IAWA J. 2019;40 (2):215–240.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
63. Hu D, Lv GH, Qie YD, Wang HF, Yang F, Jiang LM. Response of Morphological Characters and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Haloxylon ammodendron to Water and Salt Stress. Sustainability. 2021;13:388.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
64. Wang J, Du G, Tian J, Zhang Y, Jiang C, Zhang W. Effect of irrigation methods on root growth, root-shoot ratio and yield components of cotton by regulating the growth redundancy of root and shoot. Agricultural Water Management. 2020;234.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
65. Zeng FJ, Guo HF, Liu B, Zeng J, Xing WJ, Zhang XL. Characteristics of biomass allocation and root distribution of Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb. and Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. Seedlings. Arid geography. 2010;33 (01):59–64.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
66. Shan L, Zhang X, Hua Y, Xie T, Yan H, Fan H. Response of root distribution of Haloxylon ammodendron seedlings to irrigation amounts in the hinterlands of the Taklimakan desert, china. Journal of Plant Ecology. 2009;4(1), 60–67.
- View Article
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Li CJ, Han H, Ablimiti M, Liu R, Zhang H, Fan JL. Morphological and physiological responses of desert plants to drought stress in a man-made landscape of the Taklimakan desert shelter belt. Ecological Indicators. 2022;109037.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Chen XY. Pollen limitation and breeding system of Tamarix ramosissima (ledeb) in patched habitats. South African Journal of Botany. 2015;99(Null).
View Article
Google Scholar

[5] View Article

[6] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Shan LS, Zang XM, Wang YK, Wang H, Yan HN, Wei J, et al. Influence of moisture on the growth and biomass allocation in Haloxylon ammodendron and Tamarix ramosissima seedlings in the shelterbelt along the Tarim Desert Highway, Xinjiang, China. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2008;93:101.
View Article
Google Scholar

[8] View Article

[9] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Meng HH, Gao XY, Huang JF, Zhang ML. Plant phylogeography in arid northwest china: retrospectives and perspectives. J SYST EVOL. 2015;53(1):33–46.
View Article
Google Scholar

[11] View Article

[12] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Díaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P, et al. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany. 2013;61,167–234.
View Article
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Li SJ, Su PX, Zhang HN, Zhou ZJ, Xie TT. Characteristics and Relationships of Foliar Water and Leaf Functional Traits of Desert Plants. Plant Physiology Journal. 2013;49 (2): 153–160.
View Article
Google Scholar

[17] View Article

[18] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Gao XY, Meng HH, Zhang ML. Diversification and vicariance of desert plants: Evidence inferred from chloroplast DNA sequence variation of Lagochilus ilicifolius (Lamiaceae). Biochemical Systematics & Ecology. 2014;55(X):93–100.
View Article
Google Scholar

[20] View Article

[21] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Hodge A, Berta G, Doussan C, Merchan F, Crespi M. Plant root growth, architecture, and function. Plant soil. 2009;321(1–2):153–187.
View Article
Google Scholar

[23] View Article

[24] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Jabborova D, Annapurna K, Al-Sadi A, Alharbi SA, Datta R, Zuan ATK. Biochar and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mediated enhanced drought tolerance in okra (abelmoschus esculentus) plant growth, root morphological traits and physiological properties. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021;28, 5490–5499.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Abtahi M, Majidi MM, Mirlohi A, Rognli OA. Root characteristic system improves drought tolerance in orchardgrass. Plant Breeding. 2017.
View Article
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Hamid AS, Reza SA, Mojgan Z. Specific root length, soil water status, and grain yields of irrigated and rainfed winter barley in the raised bed and flat planting systems. Agricultural Water Management. 2018;210, 304–315.
View Article
Google Scholar

[32] View Article

[33] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Zhou X, Xin J, Huang X, Li H, Li F, Song W. Linking Leaf Functional Traits with Soil and Climate Factors in Forest Ecosystems in China. Plants. 2022;11, 3545. pmid:36559655
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[35] View Article

[36] PubMed/NCBI

[37] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Ahmad S, Ali H, Rehman AU, Khan R, Hasanuzzaman M. Measuring leaf area of winter cereals by different techniques: a comparison. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences. 2015;13(2):117–125.
View Article
Google Scholar

[39] View Article

[40] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Chen FQ, Guan S, Geng M, Lv K, Huang Y. Changes in leaf functional traits of the endangered plant Disanthus cercidifolius var. longipes with plant growth and development. 2020.
View Article
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Chaturvedi RK, Raghubanshi AS. Leaf size and specific leaf area of tropical deciduous trees increases with elevation in soil moisture content. International Journal of Hydrology. 2018;(4).
View Article
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Chelli S, Ottaviani G, Tsakalos JL, Campetella G, Simonetti E, Wellstein C, et al. Intra-and inter-specific leaf trait responses of understorey species to changes in forest maturity. Forest Ecology and Management. 2022;506:119977.
View Article
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Xin Z, Zuo X, Zhao X, Liu C, Peng L. Plant functional traits and interrelationships of 34 plant species in south central Horqin Sandy Land, China. Journal of Desert Research. 2015;35(6): 1495.
View Article
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Wright IJ, Westoby M. Cross-species relationships between seedling relative growth rate, nitrogen productivity and root vs leaf function in 28 Australian woody species. Functional Ecology. 2000;14(1), 97–107.
View Article
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Tilman D. Plant Strategies and the Structure and Dynamics of plant communities. Princeton University Press. 1988;52:97.
View Article
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Mccarthy MC, Enquist BJ. Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation. Functional Ecology. 2007;21(4):713–720.
View Article
Google Scholar

[60] View Article

[61] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Padilla FM, Miranda JD, Jorquera MJ, Pugnaire FI. Variability in amount and frequency of water supply affects roots but not growth of arid shrubs. Plant Ecology. 2009;204(2), 261–270.
View Article
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Zhang P, Deng X, Long A, Xu H, Ye M, Li J. Change in spatial distribution patterns and regeneration of Populus euphratica under different surface soil salinity conditions. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:9123.
View Article
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Stevens MHH, Shirk R, Steiner CE. Water and fertilizer have opposite effects on plant species richness in a mesic early successional habitat. Plant Ecology. 2006;183(1), 27–34.
View Article
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Karkanis A, Bilalis D, Efthimiadou A. Architectural plasticity, photosynthesis and growth responses of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti medicus) plants to water stress in a semi-arid environment. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2011;5(4):369–374.
View Article
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Sun SC, Chen LZ. A preliminary study on the ecological responses of seedlings to drought and simulated defoliation in Quercus liaotun-gensis. Acta Ecol Sin. 2000;20(5): 893–897.
View Article
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Shi HB, Shi QD, Zhou XL, Imin B, Li H, Zhang WQ, et al. Effect of the competition mechanism of between co-dominant species on the ecological characteristics of Populus euphratica under a water gradient in a desert oasis. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2021;27:e01611.
View Article
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Xu GQ, Mcdowell NG, Li Y. A possible link between life and death of a xeric tree in the desert. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2016;35:44.
View Article
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Wang JH, Zhang F, Luo GM, Guo YC, Zheng JH, Wu SX, et al. Factors Influencing Seasonal Changes in Inundation of the Daliyaboyi Oasis, Lower Keriya River Valley, Central Tarim Basin, China. Remote Sensing. 2022a;14,5050.
View Article
Google Scholar

[84] View Article

[85] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Wang J, Zhang F, Luo G, Guo Y, Zheng J, Wu S, et al. Influence of natural and anthropogenic controls on runoff in the Keriya River, central Tarim Basin, China. PLoSONE. 2022b;17(5): e0269132. pmid:35622832
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[87] View Article

[88] PubMed/NCBI

[89] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Yin QL, Tian TT, Han XH, Xu JS, Chai YF, Mo J, et al. The relationships between biomass allocation and plant functional trait. Ecological indicators: Integrating, monitoring, assessment and management. 2019;102.
View Article
Google Scholar

[91] View Article

[92] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Bush SE, Guo JS, Dehn D, Grady KC, Hull JB, Johnson E, et al. Adaptive versus non-adaptive responses to drought in a non-native riparian tree / shrub, Tamarix spp. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2021;108342.
View Article
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Sun J, Zhao XM, Fang Y, Xu WG, Gao FL, Zhao WL, et al. Root growth and architecture of tamarix chinensis in response to the groundwater level in the yellow river delta. Marine pollution bulletin. 2022 (Jun.):179.
View Article
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Li H, Shi QD, Wan YB, Shi HB, Imin B, Li MS. Influence of surface water on desert vegetation expansion at the landscape scale: a case study of the Daliyabuyi Oasis, Taklamakan desert. Sustainability. 2021a;13:9522.
View Article
Google Scholar

[100] View Article

[101] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Li H, Shi QD, Wan YB, Imin B. Using Sentinel-2 Images to Map the Populus euphratica Distribution Based on the Spectral Difference Acquired at the Key Phenological Stage. Forests. 2021b;12(2):147.
View Article
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Imin B, Dai Y, Shi QD, Guo YC, Hao L, Nijat M. Responses of two dominant desert plant species to the changes in groundwater depth in hinterland natural oasis, Tarim Basin. Ecology and Evolution. 2021;00:1–12.
View Article
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Puangbut D, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Craig K. Root distribution pattern and their contribution in photosynthesis and biomass in jerusalem artichokeunder drought conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2018;50(3), 879–886.
View Article
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Characteristics Fitter A. and Functions of Root Systems. Marcel Dekker Inc. 2002.
View Article
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Wang LJ. Study on the root growth characteristics of Populus euphratica and influencing factors. (Doctoral Dissertation, Xinjiang University, China). 2015.

[ref39] 39. Leuschner C, Gebel S, Rose L. Root trait responses of six temperate grassland species to intensive mowing and NPK fertilisation: a field study in atemperate grassland. Plant Soil. 2013;373, 687–698.
View Article
Google Scholar

[116] View Article

[117] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Adams WE, Pearson RW, Jackson WA, McCreery RA. Influence of limestone and nitrogen on soil pH and coastal bermudagrass yield. Agronomy Journal. 1967;59(5).
View Article
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Gong HD, Gao J. Soil and climatic drivers of plant SLA (specific leaf area). Global Ecology and Conservation. 2019;20:e00696.
View Article
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Gao XL, Li X G, Zhao L, Kuzyakov Y. Shrubs magnify soil phosphorus depletion in Tibetan meadows: Conclusions from C: N:P stoichiometry and deep soil profiles. Science of the Total Environment. 2021;147320. pmid:33957589
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[125] View Article

[126] PubMed/NCBI

[127] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Dan LS. Studies on morphology and function of root of typical desert plant and its drought-resistant physiology characteristics on northwest China. (Doctoral Dissertation, Gansu Agricultural University, China). 2013.

[ref44] 44. Reynolds JF, Virginia RA, Kemp PR, Soya AGD, Tremmel DC. Impact of drought on desert shrubs: effects of seasonality and degree of resource island development. Ecological Monographs. 1999;69(1):69–106.
View Article
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Yan HL, Liang SM, Zhang XM, Wang WH, Ma JB, Zhu JT. Photosynthesis responses of endemic shrubs of Taklimakan Desert to adverse temperature, humidity, and radiation. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2008;84:92.
View Article
Google Scholar

[133] View Article

[134] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Wan YB, Shi QD, Dai Y, Marhaba N, Peng L, Shi HB. Water Use Characteristics of Populus euphratica Oliv. and Tamarix chinensis Lour. at Different Growth Stages in a Desert Oasis. Forests. 2022;13, 236.
View Article
Google Scholar

[136] View Article

[137] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Darrouzet-Nardi A, D’Antonio CM, Dawson TE. Depth of water acquisition by invading shrubs and resident herbs in a Sierra Nevada meadow. Plant and Soil. 2006;285:31–43.
View Article
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Berntson GM. The Characterization of topology: a comparison of four topological indices for rooted binary trees. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1995;177:271–281.
View Article
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Asaeda T, Siong K, Kawashima T, Sakamoto K. Growth of phragmites japonica on a sandbar of the regulated river: morphological adaptation of the plant to low water and nutrient availability in the substrate. River Research and Applications. 2010;25(7):874–891.
View Article
Google Scholar

[145] View Article

[146] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Zeng FJ, Song C, Guo HF, Liu B, Luo WC, Gui DW, et al. Responses of root growth of Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. (Fabaceae) to different simulated groundwater depths in the southern fringe of the Taklimakan Desert, China. Journal of Arid Land. 2013;5(002):220–232.
View Article
Google Scholar

[148] View Article

[149] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Ruttanaprasert R, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Kesmala T, Kanwar RS, Holbrook CC, et al. Root responses of jerusalem artichoke genotypes to different water regimes. Biomass & Bioenergy. 2015;81(OCT.), 369–377.
View Article
Google Scholar

[151] View Article

[152] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Zhu LQ, Sun J, Yao XD, Wang XH, Huang JX, Xiong DC, et al. Fine root nutrient foraging ability in relation to carbon availability along a chronosequence of Chinese fir plantations. Forest Ecology and Management. 2022;507:120003.
View Article
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Ugawa S, Miura S, Hashimoto S, Iwamoto K, Fukuda K. Changes in quantity, morphology and nitrogen content of fine roots with stand development in a subalpine fir-wave forest. Journal of Forest Research. 2018;23(6).
View Article
Google Scholar

[157] View Article

[158] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Wagner K, Wanek W, Zotz G. Functional traits of a rainforest vascular epiphyte community: trait covariation and indications for host specificity. Diversity. 2021;13(2):97.
View Article
Google Scholar

[160] View Article

[161] Google Scholar

[ref55] 55. Feng Z, Yang X, Liang H, Kong Y, Hui D, Zhao J, et al. Improvements in the root morphology, physiology, and anatomy of platycladus orientalis seedlings from air-root pruning. Hortscience. 2018;53(12):1750–1756.
View Article
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] Google Scholar

[ref56] 56. Comas LH, Eissenstat DM. Linking fine root traits to maximum potential growth rate among 11 mature temperate tree species. Functional Ecology. 2004;18:388–397.
View Article
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Rewald B, Leuschner C. Does root competition asymmetry increase with water availability? Plant Ecology and Diversity. 2006;2(3):255–264.
View Article
Google Scholar

[169] View Article

[170] Google Scholar

[ref58] 58. Li S, Wang H, Gou W, White J F, Su P. Leaf functional traits of dominant desert plants in the Hexi Corridor, Northwest China: Trade-off relationships and adversity strategies. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2021;4, e01666.
View Article
Google Scholar

[172] View Article

[173] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Tayir M, Dai Y, Shi QD, Abdureyim A, Erkin F, Huang WY. Distinct leaf functional traits of Tamarix chinensis at different habitats in the hinterland of the Taklimakan desert. Front. Plant Sci. 2023;13:1094049.
View Article
Google Scholar

[175] View Article

[176] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Yang XD, Anwar E, Zhou J, He D, Gao Y C, Lv GH, et al. Higher association and integration among functional traits in small tree than shrub in resisting drought stress in an arid desert. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2022;201,104993.
View Article
Google Scholar

[178] View Article

[179] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Guerrero I, Carmona CP, Morales MB, ONate JJ, Peco B. Non-linear responses of functional diversity and redundancy to agricultural intensification at the field scale in Mediterranean arable plant communities. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2014;195:36–43.
View Article
Google Scholar

[181] View Article

[182] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Camarero JJ. Linking functional traits and climate-growth relationships in Mediterranean species through wood density. IAWA J. 2019;40 (2):215–240.
View Article
Google Scholar

[184] View Article

[185] Google Scholar

[ref63] 63. Hu D, Lv GH, Qie YD, Wang HF, Yang F, Jiang LM. Response of Morphological Characters and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Haloxylon ammodendron to Water and Salt Stress. Sustainability. 2021;13:388.
View Article
Google Scholar

[187] View Article

[188] Google Scholar

[ref64] 64. Wang J, Du G, Tian J, Zhang Y, Jiang C, Zhang W. Effect of irrigation methods on root growth, root-shoot ratio and yield components of cotton by regulating the growth redundancy of root and shoot. Agricultural Water Management. 2020;234.
View Article
Google Scholar

[190] View Article

[191] Google Scholar

[ref65] 65. Zeng FJ, Guo HF, Liu B, Zeng J, Xing WJ, Zhang XL. Characteristics of biomass allocation and root distribution of Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb. and Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. Seedlings. Arid geography. 2010;33 (01):59–64.
View Article
Google Scholar

[193] View Article

[194] Google Scholar

[ref66] 66. Shan L, Zhang X, Hua Y, Xie T, Yan H, Fan H. Response of root distribution of Haloxylon ammodendron seedlings to irrigation amounts in the hinterlands of the Taklimakan desert, china. Journal of Plant Ecology. 2009;4(1), 60–67.
View Article
Google Scholar

[196] View Article

[197] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

1 Introduction

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study area

2.2 Experimental design

2.3 Sampling and measurements

2.3.1 Plant sampling.

2.3.2 Soil sampling.

2.4 Data analysis

3 Results

3.1 Characteristics of gravimetric soil water content

3.2 Root morphological characteristics and leaf structural characters of the Tamarix sp. seedlings

3.3 Biomass allocation of the Tamarix sp. seedlings

4 Discussion

5 Conclusion

References