Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A blend of medium-chain fatty acids, butyrate, organic acids, and a phenolic compound accelerates microbial maturation in newly weaned piglets

Abstract

Inclusion of additive blends is a common dietary strategy to manage post-weaning diarrhea and performance in piglets. However, there is limited mechanistic data on how these additives improve outcomes during this period. To evaluate the effects of Presan FX (MCOA) on the intestinal microbiota and metabolome, diets with or without 0.2% MCOA were compared. Pigs fed MCOA showed improved whole-body metabolism 7 days post-weaning, with decreased (P < 0.05) creatine, creatinine and β-hydroxybutyrate. Alterations in bile-associated metabolites and cholic acid were also observed at the same time-point (P < 0.05), suggesting MCOA increased bile acid production and secretion. Increased cholic acid was accompanied by increased tryptophan metabolites including indole-3-propionic acid (IPA) in systemic circulation (P = 0.004). An accompanying tendency toward increased Lactobacillus sp. in the small intestine was observed (P = 0.05). Many lactobacilli have bile acid tolerance mechanisms and contribute to production of IPA, suggesting increased bile acid production resulted in increased abundance of lactobacilli capable of tryptophan fermentation. Tryptophan metabolism is associated with the mature pig microbiota and many tryptophan metabolites such as IPA are considered beneficial to gut barrier function. In conclusion, MCOA may help maintain tissue metabolism and aid in microbiota re-assembly through bile acid production and secretion.

Introduction

In pig production, weaning is associated with many changes in gastrointestinal tract structure, function, and inflammatory status, which increase the risk of post-weaning diarrhea [1]. These physiological changes include decreased digestive and absorptive function resulting from low feed-intake [2], and are exacerbated by changes in dietary composition and the resulting need for alterations in dietary enzyme secretion [35]. Concurrently, changes in gut-barrier function, elevated cortisol, and immune cell recruitment result in altered inflammatory status [68]. This altered immune and secretory profile alongside alterations in the gastrointestinal microbiota have important implications for pathogen expansion and post-weaning diarrhea [1, 911]. One strategy to improve pig outcomes across the weaning transition is through dietary additives [9, 12]. Additive blends, such as those containing medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs), phenolic compounds, and organic acids, are commonly used during the weaning transition; their effects on the gut microbiota are thought to reduce the risk of gastrointestinal pathogen colonization and adverse outcomes during this vulnerable period in pig production [10, 13].

Medium-chain fatty acids exert antimicrobial effects through disruption of phospholipid membranes [14], and have been shown to suppress gastric and intestinal pathogens, including Escherichia coli and Clostridium perfringens [1416]. Short-chain organic acids are often used following weaning to reduce gut pH and pathogen colonization in the gastrointestinal tract [17, 18]. Phenolic compounds have been found to have multiple benefits including reducing oxidative stress, improving lipid metabolism, controlling pathogen colonization, and improving gut barrier function, while increasing the abundance of many core constituents of the microbiota [13, 19, 20]. Supplemental butyrate provides an energy source for intestinal epithelial cells, conferring benefits to gut barrier function while reducing inflammatory cytokines and diarrhea incidence in weaned pigs [2124].

Synergistic effects of blends of MCFAs and short-chain organic acids have also been demonstrated compared to MCFAs or organic acids fed alone [25]. Previous studies have shown a positive effect of a blend of both MCFAs and organic acids on commensal ileal microbes during pathogen challenge [26], as well as on diarrhea, immune function, and fecal microbiota under non-challenge conditions [27]. Inclusion of these blends in weanling pig diets have also been shown to improve growth, feed efficiency, and nutrient digestibility [28, 29].

While there are many studies demonstrating the synergistic effects of these ingredients in weanling pig diets, the mechanisms by which they affect microbial and host metabolism remain to be examined. Further understanding of how these additives alter microbe-host metabolic networks is critical to their optimal implementation, and to understanding variability in response to these additives under different production conditions. To gain an increased understanding of how a blend of MCFAs, phenolic compounds, butyrate, and organic acids (MCOA) impact microbial and host metabolism, we performed an in-depth characterization of the metabolites in two intestinal sites, portal plasma, and systemic plasma at multiple time points through the weaning transition. These results were combined with microbiota sequencing analysis from the same intestinal sites to explore how modulation of microbiota altered metabolite pools compared to pigs fed a control diet. This approach provided novel insights into the possible mechanisms through which MCOA improve performance outcomes.

Materials and methods

The study was approved by the Dutch Animal Ethics Committee (AVD2040020184665) and carried out at the Swine Research Centre of Trouw Nutrition R&D (Sint Anthonis, the Netherlands).

Animal performance data

At weaning (22–25 days of age with average body weight 7.7 kg ± 0.7), a total of 108 pigs (Hypor Maxter × Hypor Libra) were selected from 20 litters of origin and assigned to one of two treatment groups (Table 1), those receiving the control diet (CON) and those receiving a control diet with the addition of a blend of medium chain fatty acids, organic acids, slow release C12, target release butyrate and a phenolic compound (MCOA) (Presan FX, Trouw Nutrition, Amersfoort, NL) supplemented at 0.2% on top of the control diet. Diets were isoenergetic and isonitrogenous (Table 2). Groups were balanced for body weight, colostrum intake, and sex. Pigs were housed in one of six pens with 18 pigs/pen according to treatment and individual feed and water intake data were collected using electronic feeding and water stations (Schauer Agrotronic, GmbH, Austria). Body weights were collected at 2 days prior to weaning, and on days 0, 2, 4, 6, 13 and 27 post-weaning as well as at time of euthanasia. Growth performance data were compared using the PROC MIXED procedure in SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) with treatment as a fixed effect and pen as a random effect.

Nutrient analysis

Nutrient levels were determined using standard analytical methods. Moisture was determined according to method 930.15 [30], and nitrogen was determined by the combustion method (method 990.03; LECO FP 528 MI, USA) using the LECO Nitrogen analyzer and crude protein calculated as nitrogen × 6.25. The crude fat was determined as an extraction method 920.39 according to AOAC [30]. The ash content of the diets was measured according to method 942.05 [30]. Mineral analyses were completed according to NEN-EN 11510(EN) specifications (2017). This method uses the inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) method to determine minerals in animal feed after dry ashing. Sorbic acid was determined using the method described by Canale et al. [31].

Sample collection

On the day prior to weaning, 10 piglets were selected for sample collection based on individual body weight, colostrum intake, and sex. This group was used as reference group that had not been exposed to weaning stress. On D 3, 5, 7, and 14 post-weaning, a subset of pigs was selected for sample collection based on representative feed intake for their treatment group and balanced for sex (n = 10/group/day). Samples from CON animals only were also collected on D28 (n = 10). Prior to euthanasia, piglets were sedated using a mixture of Zoletil (250 mg zolazepam and 250 mg tiletamine) and 20 mL Sedanum (20 mg xylazine / mL) at 1 ml per 10 kg BW. Thereafter, a blood sample was taken from the jugular vein for metabolomics analysis. Blood was stored on ice immediately upon collection, and plasma was isolated by centrifugation (10 minutes at 2000×G at 4°C) within 2 hours after blood collection. Following blood sampling, pigs were euthanized, by an intra-cardiac injection with 40% barbiturate pentobarbital. The abdominal cavity was opened, and a blood sample was taken from the portal vein. The gastrointestinal tract from duodenum to the rectum was removed and clamps were placed at the end of the ileum and at the cecum to avoid mixing of contents. Contents from the complete length of the small intestine were collected and homogenized, while in the large intestine, contents of the mid-colon were sampled. All samples were snap frozen on dry ice and stored at -80°C until further analysis.

Metabolomics

Plasma and digesta samples were processed by the Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics (Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands) and submitted to untargeted LC-MS/MS with a positive and negative ionization phase. Samples were first homogenized, and protein precipitation performed [32]. Metabolomic analysis was performed using an LC-MS/MS based SWATH method with a Shimadzu Nexera X2 system (Shimadzu, Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands). The MS was a Sciex TripleTOF 6600 (AB Sciex Netherlands B.V., Nieuwerkerk aan den IJssel, NL) operated in positive and negative ESI mode. Peaks were identified using data independent acquisition (SWATH) using the public metabolite (VS12) database to align and identify metabolites [33].

Following peak identification, metabolite differences for each day and location were analyzed using Metaboanalyst 5.0. Metabolite intensities were first normalized using quantile normalization and range scaling. Following processing, metabolome differences were visualized using PCA and ANOSIM analysis on Bray-Curtis distances performed to compare differences in metabolomes. Differences in individual metabolites were assessed using FDR adjusted t-tests where significance was determined as P < 0.05 and trends at P < 0.10. Overrepresentation analysis was performed on jugular metabolite samples using the list of significantly different metabolites to identify metabolic pathway differences between groups at each timepoint.

Microbiota analysis

RNA extraction was performed on lysed cells (MagNA Lyser; Roche, Burges Hill, UK) using as the MO BIO RNA isolation kit (Carlsbad, CA, USA) without the use of β-mercaptoethanol and DNase in steps as previously described (15). Amplicon libraries of the V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA were constructed following the Illumina protocol with modifications to reduce PCR bias [34].

Sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform with a read length of 300bp. Raw sequence data was processed and annotated in Mothur (v 1.39) where reads were merged, filtered for quality, and aligned using the SILVA (NR-123) database [35]. Aligned reads were further filtered to exclude chimeras and clustered into OTUs using VSEARCH with a cut-off of 97% identity [36]. Sequence data was uploaded to the NCBI sequence read archive (Project ID: PRJNA928417). Processed OTU tables and phylogenetic trees were then imported into R where the effects of MCOA on both alpha and beta diversity were analyzed on each day using the phyloseq package [37]. Alpha diversity was examined using both Chao1 and Shannon indices and compared using a Wilcoxon ranked-sum test. Differences in beta diversity were compared using the adonis2 function (PERMANOVA) in the R package vegan on Bray-Curtis and UniFrac matrices. Differentially abundant taxa were examined using LEfSe analysis [38].

Due to the high number of low abundance and low incidence OTUs in the small intestine of pigs sampled on D3, 5 and 7, a successional core was identified from the microbiota of D14 pigs and used for comparisons of core microbiota assembly in the small intestine at earlier timepoints [39, 40]. Due to the disruption of weaning, core microbes were defined as those present in > 60% of D14 individuals with > 5% relative abundance. These OTUs were then compared between groups at D7 using a Wilcoxon ranked-sum test. To further assess the relationship between metabolites and core microbes in the small intestine, regularised Canonical Correlation Analysis (rCCA) was performed using a cross-validation (ridge) method for regularisation in the R package mixOmics [41, 42]. Results were visualised using a relevance network plot with a correlation threshold of 0.6 and a cluster image map showing all correlated relationships between microbes and metabolites identified using rCCA [43].

Results

Pig performance

Average daily gain (ADG) from D0-13 (CON n = 19, MCOA n = 22) was higher for pigs fed MCOA (111 vs 71 g/d with P = 0.04; Fig 1), this growth rate is lower than expected for pigs of this age in this facility; likely due to the increased amount of handling required for this experimental protocol. Feed efficiency was not significantly different between groups.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Comparison of growth performance.

a. Average daily gain (ADG) and b. average daily feed intake (ADFI) for pigs fed a control diet (CON) or a control diet supplemented with blend of medium chain fatty acids and organic acids on top (MCOA) for the first thirteen days post-weaning. ADG was significantly different (P = 0.04) while ADFI was not significantly different (P = 0.19) between groups (n = 19 for CON and 22 for MCOA) for the thirteen-day period.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289214.g001

Metabolome

An overall shift in the global metabolite pool was observed at all time points, with the most noticeable difference at D7. Although feed intake was relatively low at D3 and 5 post-weaning in both diets (S1 Fig), analysis of similarity on Bray-Curtis distances showed a small but significant difference between plasma metabolome on both days (P = 0.004, r2 = 0.29 and P = 0.007, r2 = 0.29 respectively; Fig 2). No significant differences were detected in intestinal metabolites at D3 or 5. A more pronounced separation, with a greater number of significantly different metabolites was observed at D7 and 14 in jugular plasma (P = 0.001, r2 = 0.82 and P = 0.001, r2 = 0.70 respectively, Fig 2). When individual metabolites were compared, key metabolite groups with noted differences between MCOA and CON animals included markers of tissue deposition and fatty acid metabolism (Fig 3), bile acid components (Fig 4), tryptophan metabolites (Fig 5), and B vitamins (S2 Fig). Metabolic pathway results showed two significantly overrepresented pathways in MCOA pigs for tryptophan metabolism and riboflavin metabolism. In CON animals, three significantly overrepresented pathways for purine metabolism, betaine metabolism, and oxidation of branched-chain fatty acids were detected (S3 Fig). A trend for enriched beta oxidation of very long chain fatty acids and pyrimidine metabolism were also identified.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Summary of overall effects of MCOA on weaned pig metabolome.

PCAs of metabolites on D3, 7, and 14 in jugular plasma; Group names indicate treatment (CON vs. MCOA) and day of sampling (7 or 14). Group names indicate treatment (CON vs. MCOA) and day of sampling (7 or 14).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289214.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. Whole-body metabolic indicators of tissue deposition.

Differences between pre-weaning, MCOA, and control groups shown on D7 and 14 include a. Creatine; b. Creatinine; c. Acetylcarnitine; d. L-carnitine; e. ß-Hydroxybutyrate; f. Homocysteine. Metabolomics was performed using LC-MS/MS with a SWATH method for peak identification and analyzed in Metaboanalyst 5.0. Compounds shown in Fig 3B, 3D and 3F were not captured in intestinal LC-MS/MS. Group names indicate treatment (CON vs. MCOA) and day of sampling (7 or 14). Pre-weaning samples are denoted as PW. Groups with statistically different means (P < 0.05) are denoted by different letters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289214.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4. Bile acid changes observed on D7 and 14 post-weaning in response to feeding a control diet or a diet containing MCOA.

a. Cholic acid; b. Choline; c. Taurine. Metabolomics was performed using LC-MS/MS with a SWATH method for peak identification and analyzed in Metaboanalyst 5.0. Taurine was not detected intestinal metabolome. Group names indicate treatment (CON vs. MCOA) and day of sampling (7 or 14). Pre-weaning samples are denoted as PW. Groups with statistically different means (P < 0.05) are denoted by different letters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289214.g004

thumbnail
Fig 5. Tryptophan and metabolite alterations in response to a control diet or a diet containing MCOA.

a Tryptophan; b. Indole-3-carboxylic acid; c. N-Acetyltryptophan; d. Indole-3-carboxyaldehyde; e. 3-Indolepropionic acid. Metabolomics analysis was performed using LC-MS/MS and a SWATH peak identification method. Statistical analysis was performed in Metaboanalyst 5.0. Compounds shown in 6b, d and e were not identified in intestinal metabolomics. Group names indicate treatment (CON vs. MCOA) and day of sampling (7 or 14). Pre-weaning samples are denoted as PW. Groups with statistically different means (P < 0.05) are denoted by different letters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289214.g005

Differences in small intestinal metabolome were only detected on D7 post-weaning (P = 0.002, r2 = 0.27). In the colon, small but significant global differences were detected on D3 (P = 0.04, r2 = 0.10), while more pronounced changes were found on D7 and 14 (P = 0.001, r2 = 0.55 and P = 0.001, r2 = 0.30 respectively). The global differences observed in intestinal metabolome were not due to the residual presence of additive components in the digesta at either location. Differences in individual gastrointestinal metabolites, measured through FDR-adjusted t-tests, were only observed at D7.

Intestinal microbiota

Analysis of relative abundance data from the small intestine at all time points revealed numerous low abundance opportunistic taxa in the small intestinal microbiota at D3, 5 and 7, which limited statistical comparisons of important native microbiota constituents at early timepoints. To overcome this interpretation challenge in the early post-weaning period, a successional core of microbes was identified using D14 sequencing results. The abundance of these core taxa was then examined at earlier timepoints to measure microbial succession during this period. At D14, a total of four taxa comprising 83–100% of the small intestinal microbiota were identified as core genera: Clostridium sensu; Escherichia_Shigella, Lactobacillus and Streptococcus. Comparison of these taxa between MCOA and CON fed animals revealed a trend toward increased Lactobacillus relative abundance at D7 post-weaning in MCOA fed pigs (P = 0.05) (Fig 6D). This re-establishment of Lactobacillus is shown in the small intestinal microbiota of MCOA but not CON fed pigs at D7 and coincides with the time point where the most pronounced differences in metabolome in all compartments was observed.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Summary of overall effects of MCOA on weaned pig microbiota and metabolic pathways.

a. Weighted Unifrac distance of colon microbiota on D7 and 14; b. Alpha diversity measures of colon microbiota on D7 and 14; c. Metabolic pathways enriched in the jugular plasma of MCOA pigs on D7 post-weaning; d. Lactobacillus relative abundance D7 in the small intestine. Group names indicate treatment (CON vs. MCOA) and day of sampling (7 or 14). Differences are denoted as * P < 0.10, ** P < 0.05 and *** P < 0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289214.g006

Analysis of colon microbiota showed differences in composition and alpha diversity metrics between treatment groups at D7 post-weaning. The microbiota of MCOA fed pigs at D7 tended to be different than that of CON fed pigs (P = 0.09), and more closely resembled the microbiota of pigs at D14 post-weaning in measures of both overall abundance and composition (Fig 6A and 6B). The variability of individual microbiota composition, measured by homogeneity of dispersion, in CON fed animals at D7 was quite high (Fig 6A) compared to those at D14 (CON07 vs. CON14, P = 0.001), while that of MCOA fed animals was not significantly different from D14 animals (MCOA07 vs. MCOA14, P = 0.13).

Microbiota and metabolome networks

Network analysis using the R package mixOmics [43] revealed a positive correlation between Lactobacillus and abundance of tryptophan (P < 0.05, r2 = 0.61) and tryptophan metabolites (P < 0.05, r2 = 0.40–0.62) found in jugular plasma at D7 post-weaning(Fig 7A and 7B).

thumbnail
Fig 7. Microbe-metabolite relationships.

a. Network analysis of core SI intestinal microbiota and metabolites at D7 with a significant correlation (P < 0.05) threshold r2 of 0.6; b. Microbe-metabolite network analysis results for all significant correlations (P < 0.05) with core small intestine microbial taxa on D7; c. Correlation between Lactobacillus relative abundance and cholic acid in all pigs from the study (P = 0.08, rho = 0.21).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289214.g007

As Lactobacillus species have bile-tolerance mechanisms [44], the relationship between cholic acid and Lactobacillus, both of which are more abundant in MCOA fed pigs at D7, was explored in pigs sampled at all timepoints using Spearman correlation. A trend for a positive correlation was observed (P = 0.08, rho = 0.21; Fig 7C).

Discussion

Patterns of metabolome differences

The overall pattern of metabolite changes, with the strongest difference between metabolomes observed at D7 post-weaning, is particularly relevant given that it coincides with a time when the risk of E. coli associated post-weaning diarrhea is high and impacts of post-weaning interventions may be important for preventing diarrheal disease [45]. This is also a time where the initial acute stressors of weaning are resolved, and feed intake begins to rebound [45]. Higher feed intake at D7 and 14 would result in higher MCOA intake, contributing to the global differences observed on these days as well as to the potential mechanism underlying the global difference in intestinal metabolome observed at D7.

The fact that differences observed in the intestinal metabolite profiles did not include the additive components themselves is not unexpected as previous studies in weanling pigs have shown most MCFA digestion and absorption occurs prior to the end of the proximal small intestine, and abundance of these compounds, except for slow-release C12, drops sharply in subsequent sections of the GI tract [16, 46]. Consistent with our results, it is expected that these compounds would not be observed in total small intestine or colon contents. However, this result alongside the changes in individual metabolites observed demonstrate the role of MCOA in altering metabolic networks beyond the metabolism of additive residues.

Metabolites reflective of impacts on tissue deposition

Several notable differences in metabolic markers of fatty acid metabolism and tissue deposition were detected in jugular plasma at D7 and 14 post-weaning. The prevailing pattern suggests improved energy balance and muscle metabolism alongside decreased fatty acid catabolism in MCOA fed pigs. Key evidence supporting this is the pattern of decreased creatine, creatinine and β-hydroxybutyrate observed in MCOA fed pigs at these time points (Fig 3A, 3B and 3E). At D7 post-weaning, decreased acetylcarnitine, L-carnitine, and homocysteine also support this finding (Fig 3C, 3D and 3F). Except for homocysteine and creatine, these differences were also observed on D14 indicating ongoing effects of MCOA in increasing tissue metabolism post-weaning. Carnitine abundance is an important indicator of fatty acid metabolism and for overall metabolic status due to its effects on lipid and glucose homeostasis [47, 48]. L-carnitine levels are tightly regulated in response to whole-body nutrient sensing, matching the amount of fatty acid metabolism to what is needed to regulate metabolic status [48]. The lower levels of L-carnitine in MCOA fed pigs may indicate less tissue catabolism at D7 and 14 post-weaning. At the same timepoints, lower circulating creatinine observed in MCOA fed pigs (Fig 3A), also suggests higher muscle metabolism. This is further supported by the higher growth observed from D0-13 of pigs fed MCOA. There was a dramatic increase in creatine post-weaning in CON fed pigs, consistent with reduced feed intake alongside a corresponding reduction in metabolic activity [49], while MCOA fed pigs did not exhibit this increase. Lower levels of creatinine (Fig 3B) are also seen in MCOA fed pigs, while CON fed pigs display elevated creatinine on D7 and 14 further indicating decreased metabolic activity and negative energy balance in CON fed pigs post-weaning [50, 51]. This is further supported by significant overrepresentation of metabolites in pathways for oxidation of fatty acids (S3 Fig). Higher levels of riboflavin observed in plasma at D7 and 14 in MCOA fed pigs (S2 Fig) may also be related to these changes in energy balance. Levels of the B-vitamins niacin, riboflavin, and folate may also reflect creatine synthesis as they provide required methyl groups [52]. During fasting, methyl requirements for the methionine cycle must be met through remethylation of homocysteine, which depends on B-vitamin availability [53]. This results in an inverse relationship between homocysteine, creatinine and B-vitamin metabolism and status [54], as observed here. At D7 post-weaning, riboflavin metabolites were found to be significantly enriched in jugular plasma of MCOA fed pigs (Fig 6C), while nicotinamide and pantothenic acid did not show the same pattern (S2 Fig). β-hydroxybutyrate was also elevated in CON fed pigs at D7 and 14 post-weaning (Fig 3E), indicating ongoing negative energy balance in CON fed pigs [55], despite comparable feed intake between groups (Fig 1B). The differences in these metabolites taken together illustrate decreased body fat mobilization in MCOA fed pigs at D7 and 14 post-weaning, which could in part be due to improved nutrient digestion, absorption, and subsequent alterations in nutrient sensing in the gastrointestinal tract in the presence of MCOA [56].

MCOA supplementation alters bile components

At D7 post-weaning, MCOA fed pigs had increased abundance of cholic acid in the portal plasma, jugular plasma, and colon, suggesting an increase in bile acid production and secretion (Fig 4A). This change was accompanied by a decrease in the abundance of the bile acid precursor taurine in portal and jugular plasma (Fig 4B and 4C). Taurine also has an important role in osmoregulation [57], and may therefore be associated with post-weaning edema. Decreased plasma choline in MCOA pigs may also be due to changes in bile production and secretion, as it is the precursor to phosphatidylcholine, the primary phospholipid in bile as well as an important regulator of cholesterol homeostasis [58, 59]. This alteration in primary bile metabolites persisted at D14 post-weaning, showing an effect of MCOA on bile metabolism throughout the sensitive post-weaning period as shown in Fig 4. Medium-chain fatty acids are known to increase the production of primary bile acids compared to other dietary sources of fat [60]. This could be particularly advantageous in the post-weaning period where bile acid and lipase production are inadequate [5, 61, 62], and decreased feed intake may alter signaling for bile acid production, resulting in decreased nutrient digestibility [63, 64].

MCOA supplementation increases generation of bioactive indoles

Alongside changes in bile metabolites, pigs fed MCOA displayed higher concentrations of tryptophan at D7 post-weaning in the portal and jugular plasma, while a lower concentration was detected in the colon (Fig 5A). At the same time-point, higher levels of five tryptophan metabolites–indole-3-carboxylic acid, 3-methyloxyindole, 2-methyloxyindole, indole-3-carboxaldehyde and 3-indolepropionic acid (IPA) were detected in the plasma of pigs receiving MCOA on D7 (Fig 5B, 5D and 5E; S4 Fig). Overrepresentation analysis further supported a significant increase in the tryptophan metabolism in MCOA-fed pigs on D7 post-weaning (Fig 4C). Increases in IPA, indole-3-carboxylic acid, 3-methyloxyindole, and 2-methyloxyindole were also observed in plasma at D14 (Fig 5B, 5D and 5E; S4 Fig). Indole and its derivatives can be absorbed via passive diffusion through cell membranes and readily move into portal circulation [65], and it is, therefore, not surprising that these metabolites did not differ in the digesta. Further, an increase in n-acetylated tryptophan, a microbial product [66], was detected in the small intestine of MCOA fed pigs (Fig 5C). These changes are indicative of an increase in tryptophan degradation by gastrointestinal microbes in MCOA fed pigs. As tryptophan metabolites are important signaling molecules [67, 68], changes in tryptophan availability and production of bioactive molecules via microbial degradation are of particular interest to animal health outcomes. These tryptophan metabolites are commonly detected in a mature pig microbiota [69], and are therefore of interest for further investigation related to post-weaning microbiota assembly in this study.

Accumulating evidence shows that indoles are highly bioactive through aryl-hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) binding and are important regulators of gut barrier function with protective effects in models of irritable bowel disease [7072]. Serum indole and IPA have previously been shown to be decreased in active colitis, while colonic tryptophan was elevated [69]. This supports a positive effect of MCOA on gastrointestinal tract function and inflammation as the opposite pattern is observed at a time where gastrointestinal inflammation is common [1, 73]. Indole-3-carboxylic acid is also capable of binding AhR, though this has been less widely described [74]. Methylindole (skatole) is an intermediate in the production of indole-3-aldehyde from indole-3-acetate and is subsequently metabolized into 3-methyloxyindole in the liver via CYP450 [65]. Though not likely to be related to weaning outcomes, this metabolite may be of further interest for minimizing off-flavours in pork products.

Microbiota assembly differences in response to MCOA

Given the role of Lactobacillus spp. as important members of the porcine microbiota [75], which are long known to be sensitive to host stressors [76], their increased abundance in MCOA-fed pigs is an important indicator of microbiota re-assembly following weaning [77]. The positive correlation between this genus and cholic acid is of further interest, indicating that the inclusion of MCOA and resulting increase in cholic acid production may shape the small intestinal microbiota’s re-assembly of Lactobacillus post-weaning (Fig 7C). Further supporting this is the consistent evidence in the literature of increased lactobacilli counts in a variety of age groups of pigs in response to a blend of dietary MCOA [28, 29, 78, 79], suggesting that a protective effect of MCOA occurs through shaping a gut environment that allows an earlier Lactobacillus expansion post-weaning.

In the early post-weaning period, alterations in tryptophan and indole metabolites between MCOA and CON fed pigs suggests that MCOA may increase the assembly of microbes able to generate indole metabolites [80]. Production of IPA and the correlation with Lactobacillus abundance, may be of particular interest due to its beneficial effects on gut barrier function [70], requires microbial enzymatic machinery, and common commensal gut organisms Lactobacillus, C. sporogenes and Peptostreptococci possess the capability to generate IPA [65, 80, 81]. Encapsulated MCFAs have been shown to increase Lactobacillus spp. abundance in the stomach of pigs [16], supporting the possibility that tryptophan degradation by lactobacilli could begin in the proximal gastrointestinal tract in MCOA fed pigs and result in the observed increase in acetylated tryptophan in the small intestine of MCOA fed pigs.

The tendency of MCOA-fed pigs at D7 to have a colonic microbiota that was different than that of CON pigs, and similar to that of D14 samples, demonstrates that MCOA supports a more expedient assembly of the post-weaning colonic microbiota, resulting in a more uniform microbiota composition with fewer incidental taxa observed. This timely reassembly of the microbiota in both the small intestine and colon at D7 post-weaning is a potential benefit of MCOA, which will allow pigs to move through the vulnerable weaning period. The weaning transition period is a critical time where gut microbiota disruption can facilitate opportunistic pathogen growth resulting in post-weaning diarrhea [1, 15]. There is an opportunity to improve animal health and growth outcomes during this sensitive window by assisting the pig with efficient assembly of a microbiome that is adapted to the post-weaning diet, thereby supporting pathogen exclusion, and promoting optimal immune function [10, 11, 82]. Improved understanding of the mechanisms by which MCOA modulate the gut microbiota can contribute to the successful application of this additive after weaning.

Conclusion

In this paper we describe the effects of a blend of medium chain fatty acids, organic acids, slow release C12, target release butyrate and a phenolic compound on microbes, metabolites, and their interactions. The effect of MCOA on bile acid dynamics offers novel insights into the mechanism by which these additives might confer benefits during the post-weaning period. The correlation between cholic acid and Lactobacillus relative abundance provides a possible mechanism underlying this consistently observed effect. Lastly, the relationship between Lactobacillus in the small intestine and tryptophan metabolism presents a new understanding of the generation of indole species in the porcine gastrointestinal tract. While these metabolites are abundant in the metabolome of pigs, it is not known where microbial tryptophan metabolism begins. Finally, the relationship between MCOA, bile acid production and tissue catabolism provides an interesting area for further exploration in the weaning transition. Bile acid secretion is typically reduced post-weaning, and the effect of MCOA could allow the post-weaning pig to maintain its ability to digest and absorb lipids and, thus, protect against post-weaning catabolism. This is an interesting avenue for further research into the relationship between MCOA, and whole-body metabolism in the weaned pig.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Comparison of daily feed intake of pigs from Day 3–7 post-weaning for pigs fed a control diet (CON) or a control diet supplemented with blend of medium chain fatty acids and organic acids on top (MCOA).

Group names indicate treatment and day of sampling (7 or 14).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289214.s001

(TIFF)

S2 Fig. Differences in b-vitamins in response to a control diet or a diet containing MCOA: a.

riboflavin, b. nicotinamide, c. pantothenic acid. Metabolomics analysis was performed using LC-MS/MS and a SWATH peak identification method. Statistical analysis was performed in Metaboanalyst 5.0. Compounds shown were not identified in intestinal metabolomics. Group names indicate treatment (CON vs. MCOA) and day of sampling (7 or 14). Pre-weaning samples are denoted as PW. Groups with statistically different means (P < 0.05) are denoted by different letters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289214.s002

(TIFF)

S3 Fig. Metabolite pathways enriched in jugular plasma of CON pigs on D7 post-weaning.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289214.s003

(TIFF)

S4 Fig. Additional tryptophan metabolite alterations in response to a control diet or a diet containing MCOA: a.

3-methyloxyindole, b. 2-methyloxyindole. Metabolomics analysis was performed using LC-MS/MS and a SWATH peak identification method. Statistical analysis was performed in Metaboanalyst 5.0. Compounds shown were not identified in intestinal metabolomics. Group names indicate treatment (CON vs. MCOA) and day of sampling (7 or 14). Pre-weaning samples are denoted as PW. Groups with statistically different means (P < 0.05) are denoted by different letters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289214.s004

(TIFF)

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the farm staff of the Swine Research Centre of Trouw Nutrition R&D (Sint Anthonis, the Netherlands) for their contributions in executing the trial. The authors thank M.A. Giera, A. Verhoeven, and R.I.E. Derks of the Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics (Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands) for their contributions.

References

  1. 1. Gresse R, Chaucheyras-Durand F, Fleury MA, Van de Wiele T, Forano E, Blanquet-Diot S. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Postweaning Piglets: Understanding the Keys to Health. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25: 851–873. pmid:28602521
  2. 2. Kelly D, Smyth JA, Mccracken KJ. Digestive development of the early-weaned pig. British Journal of Nutrition. 1991;65: 181–188. pmid:2043602
  3. 3. Marion J, Ronique Romé V, Rard Savary G, Oise Thomas F, Le Dividich J, Le Huë Rou-Luron I. Nutrient-Gene Interactions Weaning and Feed Intake Alter Pancreatic Enzyme Activities and Corresponding mRNA Levels in 7-d-Old Piglets. 2003. Available: https://academic.oup.com/jn/article/133/2/362/4687897
  4. 4. Kelly D, Smyth JA, McCracken KJ. Digestive development of the early-weaned pig. British Journal of Nutrition. 1991;65: 169–180. pmid:1904270
  5. 5. Jensen MS, Jensen SK, Jakobsen K. Development of Digestive Enzymes in Pigs with Emphasis on Lipolytic Activity in the Stomach and Pancreas. J Anim Sci. 1997;75: 437–445. pmid:9051467
  6. 6. Mccracken BA, Spurlock ME, Roos MA, Zuckermann FA, Gaskins HR. Biochemical and Molecular Action of Nutrients Weaning Anorexia May Contribute to Local Inflammation in the Piglet Small Intestine 1. J Nutr. 1999. Available: https://academic.oup.com/jn/article/129/3/613/4722101
  7. 7. Spreeuwenberg MAM, Verdonk JMAJ, Gaskins HR, Verstegen MWA. Nutrient Metabolism Small Intestine Epithelial Barrier Function Is Compromised in Pigs with Low Feed Intake at Weaning 1,2. 2001.
  8. 8. Moeser AJ, Vander Klok C, Ryan KA, Wooten JG, Little D, Cook VL, et al. Stress signaling pathways activated by weaning mediate intestinal dysfunction in the pig. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;292: 173–181. pmid:16901995
  9. 9. Metzler-Zebeli BU, Metzler-Zebeli BU. Porcine Gut Microbiota and Host Interactions During the Transition from the Suckling to Postweaning Phase. 2022; 147–178.
  10. 10. Zheng L, Duarte ME, Sevarolli Loftus A, Kim SW. Intestinal Health of Pigs Upon Weaning: Challenges and Nutritional Intervention. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8: 91. pmid:33644153
  11. 11. Pluske JR, Turpin DL, Kim J-C. Gastrointestinal tract (gut) health in the young pig. Animal Nutrition. 2018;4: 187–196. pmid:30140758
  12. 12. de Lange CFM, Pluske J, Gong J, Nyachoti CM. Strategic use of feed ingredients and feed additives to stimulate gut health and development in young pigs. Livest Sci. 2010;134: 124–134.
  13. 13. Mahfuz S, Shang Q, Piao X. Phenolic compounds as natural feed additives in poultry and swine diets: a review. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. BioMed Central Ltd; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00565-3 pmid:33823919
  14. 14. Hanczakowska E, Szewczyk A, Okoñ K. Effects of dietary caprylic and capric acids on piglet performance and mucosal epithelium structure of the ileum. J Anim Feed Sci. 2011;20: 556–565.
  15. 15. Jackman JA, Dean Boyd R, Elrod CC. Medium-chain fatty acids and monoglycerides as feed additives for pig production: towards gut health improvement and feed pathogen mitigation. Animal Science and Biotechnology. 2020;11: 44. pmid:32337029
  16. 16. Zentek J, Buchheit-Renko S, Männer K, Pieper R, Vahjen W. Intestinal concentrations of free and encapsulated dietary medium-chain fatty acids and effects on gastric microbial ecology and bacterial metabolic products in the digestive tract of piglets. 2012;66: 14–26. pmid:22397093
  17. 17. Suiryanrayna MVAN, Ramana J v. A review of the effects of dietary organic acids fed to swine. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. BioMed Central Ltd.; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-015-0042-z pmid:26500769
  18. 18. Tugnoli B, Giovagnoni G, Piva A, Grilli E. From acidifiers to intestinal health enhancers: How organic acids can improve growth efficiency of pigs. Animals. MDPI AG; 2020. pmid:31947627
  19. 19. Zhang HJ, Jiang XR, Mantovani G, Lumbreras AEV, Comi M, Alborali G, et al. Modulation of Plasma Antioxidant Activity in Weaned Piglets by Plant Polyphenols. Ital J Anim Sci. 2014;13: 3242.
  20. 20. Xu X, Chen X, Huang Z, Chen D, Yu B, Chen H, et al. Dietary apple polyphenols supplementation enhances antioxidant capacity and improves lipid metabolism in weaned piglets. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2019;103: 1512–1520. pmid:31268198
  21. 21. Grilli E, Tugnoli B, Foerster CJ, Piva A. Butyrate modulates inflammatory cytokines and tight junctions components along the gut of weaned pigs. J Anim Sci. 2016;94: 433–436.
  22. 22. Feng W, Wu Y, Chen G, Fu S, Li B, Huang B, et al. Sodium Butyrate Attenuates Diarrhea in Weaned Piglets and Promotes Tight Junction Protein Expression in Colon in a GPR109A-Dependent Manner. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry. 2018;47: 1617–1629. pmid:29949795
  23. 23. Zeng X, Yang Y, Wang J, Wang Z, Li J, Yin Y, et al. Dietary butyrate, lauric acid and stearic acid improve gut morphology and epithelial cell turnover in weaned piglets. Animal Nutrition. 2022;11: 276–282. pmid:36263412
  24. 24. Huang C, Song P, Fan P, Hou C, Thacker P, Ma X. Dietary Sodium Butyrate Decreases Postweaning Diarrhea by Modulating Intestinal Permeability and Changing the Bacterial Communities in Weaned Piglets1–3. J Nutr. 2015;145: 2774–2780. pmid:26491121
  25. 25. Zentek J, Ferrara F, Pieper R, Tedin L, Meyer W, Vahjen W. Effects of dietary combinations of organic acids and medium chain fatty acids on the gastrointestinal microbial ecology and bacterial metabolites in the digestive tract of weaning piglets 1. J Anim Sci. 2013;91: 3200–3210.
  26. 26. Han Y, Zhan T, Zhao Q, Tang C, Zhang K, Han Y, et al. Effects of mixed organic acids and medium chain fatty acids as antibiotic alternatives on the performance, serum immunity, and intestinal health of weaned piglets orally challenged with Escherichia coli K88. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2020;269: 114617.
  27. 27. Han YS, Tang CH, Zhao QY, Zhan TF, Zhang K, Han YM, et al. Effects of dietary supplementation with combinations of organic and medium chain fatty acids as replacements for chlortetracycline on growth performance, serum immunity, and fecal microbiota of weaned piglets. Livest Sci. 2018;216: 210–218.
  28. 28. Kuang Y, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Song Y, Zhang X, Lin Y, et al. Effects of dietary combinations of organic acids and medium chain fatty acids as a replacement of zinc oxide on growth, digestibility and immunity of weaned pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2015;208: 145–157.
  29. 29. Upadhaya SD, Lee KY, Serpunja S, Song TH, Kim IH. Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal microbiota and fecal noxious gas emission in weaning pigs fed high and low density diet with and without protected organic acid blends. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2018;239: 1–8.
  30. 30. AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. Gaithersbur: AOAC International; 2007.
  31. 31. Canale A, Valente ME, Ciotti A. Determination of volatile carboxylic acids (C1–C5i) and lactic acid in aqueous acid extracts of silage by high performance liquid chromatography. J Sci Food Agric. 1984;35: 1178–1182.
  32. 32. Kim HK, Kostidis S, Choi YH. NMR analysis of fecal samples. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2018;1730: 317–328. pmid:29363085
  33. 33. Tsugawa H, Cajka T, Kind T, Ma Y, Higgins B, Ikeda K, et al. MS-DIAL: data-independent MS/MS deconvolution for comprehensive metabolome analysis. Nat Methods. 2015;12: 523–526. pmid:25938372
  34. 34. van Hees HMJ, Davids M, Maes D, Millet S, Possemiers S, den Hartog LA, et al. Dietary fibre enrichment of supplemental feed modulates the development of the intestinal tract in suckling piglets. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019;10: 1–11.
  35. 35. Yilmaz P, Parfrey LW, Yarza P, Gerken J, Pruesse E, Quast C, et al. The SILVA and “All-species Living Tree Project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42: D643. pmid:24293649
  36. 36. Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ. 2016;4: e2584. pmid:27781170
  37. 37. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics of Microbiome Census Data. Watson M, editor. PLoS One. 2013;8: e61217. pmid:23630581
  38. 38. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12: R60. pmid:21702898
  39. 39. Neu AT, Allen EE, Roy K. Defining and quantifying the core microbiome: Challenges and prospects. PNAS. 2021. pmid:34862327
  40. 40. Perlman D, Martínez-Álvaro M, Moraïs S, Altshuler I, Hagen LH, Jami E, et al. Concepts and Consequences of a Core Gut Microbiota for Animal Growth and Development. 2022.
  41. 41. González I, Déjean S, Martin PGP, Baccini A. CCA: An R Package to Extend Canonical Correlation Analysis. J Stat Softw. 2008;23: 1–14.
  42. 42. González I, Cao KAL, Davis MJ, Déjean S. Visualising associations between paired “omics” data sets. BioData Min. 2012;5: 1–23.
  43. 43. Rohart F, Gautier B, Singh A, Lê Cao KA. mixOmics: An R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13: e1005752. pmid:29099853
  44. 44. Bustos AY, Saavedra L, de Valdez GF, Raya RR, Taranto MP. Relationship between bile salt hydrolase activity, changes in the internal pH and tolerance to bile acids in lactic acid bacteria. Biotechnol Lett. 2012;34: 1511–1518. pmid:22526425
  45. 45. Eriksen EØ, Kudirkiene E, Christensen AE, Agerlin MV, Weber NR, Nødtvedt A, et al. Post-weaning diarrhea in pigs weaned without medicinal zinc: risk factors, pathogen dynamics, and association to growth rate. Porcine Health Manag. 2021;7: 1–19.
  46. 46. Mattson FH, Nolen GA. Absorbability by Rats of Compounds Containing from One to Eight Ester Groups. J Nutr. 1972;102: 1171–1175. pmid:5057204
  47. 47. Fritz IB. Action of carnitine on long chain fatty acid oxidation by liver. American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content. 1959;197: 297–304. pmid:13825279
  48. 48. Ringseis R, Keller J, Eder K. Basic mechanisms of the regulation of L-carnitine status in monogastrics and efficacy of L-carnitine as a feed additive in pigs and poultry. Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2018;102: 1686–1719. pmid:29992642
  49. 49. Janicki B, Buzala M. The role of creatine in the organism of pigs and its effect on the quality of pork: A review. Annals of Animal Science. 2013;13: 207–215.
  50. 50. Wyss M, Kaddurah-Daouk R. Creatine and creatinine metabolism. Physiol Rev. 2000;80: 1107–213. pmid:10893433
  51. 51. Southey BR, Bolt CR, Rymut HE, Keever MR, Ulanov A v., Li Z, et al. Impact of Weaning and Maternal Immune Activation on the Metabolism of Pigs. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8. pmid:34336923
  52. 52. Brosnan JT, da Silva RP, Brosnan ME. The metabolic burden of creatine synthesis. Amino Acids. 2011;40: 1325–1331. pmid:21387089
  53. 53. Lamers Y. Indicators and methods for folate, vitamin B-12, and vitamin B-6 status assessment in humans. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2011;14: 445–454. pmid:21832901
  54. 54. Ulvik A, Hustad S, McCann A, Midttun Ø, Nygård OK, Ueland PM. Ratios of One-Carbon Metabolites Are Functional Markers of B-Vitamin Status in a Norwegian Coronary Angiography Screening Cohort. J Nutr. 2017;147: 1167–1173. pmid:28381531
  55. 55. Perri AM, O’sullivan TL, Harding JCS, Friendship RM. Article The use of serum beta-hydroxybutyrate to determine whether nursery pigs selected on the basis of clinical signs are anorexic. CVJ. 2016.
  56. 56. Burrin D, Stoll B, Moore D. DIGESTIVE PHYSIOLOGY OF THE PIG SYMPOSIUM: Intestinal bile acid sensing is linked to key endocrine and metabolic signaling pathways 1,2. J Anim Sci. 2013;91.
  57. 57. Schaffer S, Takahashi K, Azuma J. Role of osmoregulation in the actions of taurine. Amino Acids. 2000;19: 527–546. pmid:11140357
  58. 58. Bernhard W, Lange R, Graepler-Mainka U, Engel C, Machann J, Hund V, et al. Choline supplementation in cystic fibrosis—The metabolic and clinical impact. Nutrients. 2019;11. pmid:30889905
  59. 59. al Rajabi A, Castro GSF, da Silva RP, Nelson RC, Thiesen A, Vannucchi H, et al. Choline supplementation protects against liver damage by normalizing cholesterol metabolism in Pemt/Ldlr knockout mice fed a high-fat diet. Journal of Nutrition. 2014;144: 252–257. pmid:24368431
  60. 60. Hagerman LM, Schneider DL. Effect of Cholestyramine on Fecal Bile Salt Excretion in Rats Fed Diets Containing Medium-Chain Triglycerides or Corn Oil. Exp Biol Med. 1973;143: 93–96. pmid:4703451
  61. 61. Lewis DS, Oren S, Wang X, Moyer ML, Beitz DC, Knight TJ, et al. Developmental changes in cholesterol 7alpha- and 27-hydroxylases in the piglet. J Anim Sci. 2000;78: 943. pmid:10784184
  62. 62. Qiu Y, Liu S, Hou L, Li K, Wang L, Gao K, et al. Supplemental Choline Modulates Growth Performance and Gut Inflammation by Altering the Gut Microbiota and Lipid Metabolism in Weaned Piglets. Journal of Nutrition. 2021;151: 20–29. pmid:33245135
  63. 63. Lin S, Yang X, Yuan P, Yang J, Wang P, Zhong H, et al. Undernutrition Shapes the Gut Microbiota and Bile Acid Profile in Association with Altered Gut-Liver FXR Signaling in Weaning Pigs. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67: 3691–3701. pmid:30864445
  64. 64. Cao AZ, Lai WQ, Zhang WW, Dong B, Lou QQ, Han MM, et al. Effects of porcine bile acids on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, blood metabolites and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2021;276: 114931.
  65. 65. Li X, Zhang B, Hu Y, Zhao Y. New Insights Into Gut-Bacteria-Derived Indole and Its Derivatives in Intestinal and Liver Diseases. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12. pmid:34966278
  66. 66. Wikoff WR, Anfora AT, Liu J, Schultz PG, Lesley SA, Peters EC, et al. Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106: 3698–3703. pmid:19234110
  67. 67. Gao J, Xu K, Liu H, Liu G, Bai M, Peng C, et al. Impact of the Gut Microbiota on Intestinal Immunity Mediated by Tryptophan Metabolism. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8. pmid:29468141
  68. 68. Diether NE, Willing BP. The Microbiome and Amino Acid Metabolism. Metabolism of Nutrients by Gut Microbiota. The Royal Society of Chemistry; 2022. pp. 48–67.
  69. 69. Yu M, Li Z, Chen W, Rong T, Wang G, Ma X. Microbiome-Metabolomics Analysis Investigating the Impacts of Dietary Starch Types on the Composition and Metabolism of Colonic Microbiota in Finishing Pigs. Front Microbiol. 2019;10: 1143. pmid:31191480
  70. 70. Alexeev EE, Lanis JM, Kao DJ, Campbell EL, Kelly CJ, Battista KD, et al. Microbiota-Derived Indole Metabolites Promote Human and Murine Intestinal Homeostasis through Regulation of Interleukin-10 Receptor. Am J Pathol. 2018;188: 1183–1194. pmid:29454749
  71. 71. Lamas B, Natividad JM, Sokol H. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor and intestinal immunity. Mucosal Immunol. 2018;11: 1024–1038. pmid:29626198
  72. 72. Koper JEB, Loonen LMP, Wells JM, Troise AD, Capuano E, Fogliano V. Polyphenols and Tryptophan Metabolites Activate the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in an in vitro Model of Colonic Fermentation. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2019;63. pmid:30443985
  73. 73. Lallès JP, Bosi P, Smidt H, Stokes CR. Weaning—A challenge to gut physiologists. Livest Sci. 2007;108: 82–93.
  74. 74. Dong F, Hao F, Murray IA, Smith PB, Koo I, Tindall AM, et al. Intestinal microbiota-derived tryptophan metabolites are predictive of Ah receptor activity. Gut Microbes. 2020;12: 1788899. pmid:32783770
  75. 75. Holman DB, Brunelle BW, Trachsel J, Allen HK. Meta-analysis To Define a Core Microbiota in the Swine Gut. mSystems. 2017;2. pmid:28567446
  76. 76. Tannock GW, Savage DC. Influences of Dietary and Environmental Stress on Microbial Populations in the Murine Gastrointestinal Tract. Infect Immun. 1974;9: 591–598. pmid:4593471
  77. 77. Pieper R, Janczyk P, Zeyner A, Smidt H, Guiard V, Souffrant WB. Ecophysiology of the developing total bacterial and Lactobacillus communities in the terminal small intestine of weaning piglets. Microb Ecol. 2008;56: 474–483. pmid:18311472
  78. 78. Nguyen DH, Lee KY, Tran HN, Kim IH. Effect of a protected blend of organic acids and medium-chain fatty acids on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, meat quality, faecal microflora, and faecal gas emission in finishing pigs. Can J Anim Sci. 2019;99: 448–455.
  79. 79. Devi SM, Lee KY, Kim IH. Analysis of the effect of dietary protected organic acid blend on lactating sows and their piglets. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2016;45: 39–47.
  80. 80. Pavlova T, Vidova V, Bienertova-Vasku J, Janku P, Almasi M, Klanova J, et al. Urinary intermediates of tryptophan as indicators of the gut microbial metabolism. Anal Chim Acta. 2017;987: 72–80. pmid:28916042
  81. 81. Hyland NP, Cavanaugh CR, Hornby PJ. Emerging effects of tryptophan pathway metabolites and intestinal microbiota on metabolism and intestinal function. 2022;54: 57–70. pmid:35038025
  82. 82. Xiong X, Tan B, Song M, Ji P, Kim K, Yin Y, et al. Nutritional Intervention for the Intestinal Development and Health of Weaned Pigs. Front Vet Sci. 2019;6: 46. pmid:30847348