https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6209-2313
Figures
Abstract
Background
Olfactory dysfunction is a common manifestation in COVID-19 patients and can significantly impact their quality of life. Corticosteroids have been proposed as a potential treatment, but their efficacy remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to comprehensively analyze the efficacy of corticosteroid therapy for treating COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction.
Methods
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases up to March 1, 2023. Randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of corticosteroids on olfactory dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 were included. The primary outcome was the olfactory score at the end of follow-up, and the secondary outcomes were the duration and the rate of recovery from olfactory dysfunction.
Results
Seven randomized controlled trials with 999 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, corticosteroid treatment resulted in a statistically significant improvement in olfactory score with a standardized mean difference of 0.55 (95% CI: 0.15 to 0.95). Topical corticosteroids were found to be effective, but systemic corticosteroids were not. In addition, longer durations and higher dosages of corticosteroids treatment may also be associated with significant improvements in olfactory scores. No significant effect was observed on the duration or recovery rate of olfactory dysfunction.
Citation: Wang J-Y, Pao J-B, Lee C-H, Wang J-Y, Lee M-C, Wu T-T (2023) Corticosteroids for COVID-19-induced olfactory dysfunction: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 18(12): e0289172. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289172
Editor: Giovanni Cammaroto, AUSL della Romagna, ITALY
Received: April 7, 2023; Accepted: July 13, 2023; Published: December 21, 2023
Copyright: © 2023 Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has had a significant impact on global health. As of March 2023, over 750 million confirmed cases and more than 6.8 million deaths have been reported worldwide [1]. One notable manifestation of COVID-19 is olfactory dysfunction, which affects approximately 47.85% of cases [2]. An early study reported that COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction resolves spontaneously within two weeks in 95% of patients, with a mean recovery time of 9 days and 98% of patients recovering within 28 days [3]. However, recent studies suggest that approximately 25 to 33% of people inflicted with the SARS-CoV-2 virus continue to have some degree of measurable smell dysfunction for months after their infection [4–6]. With the large number of people affected by COVID-19, a substantial number of people worldwide will continue to experience olfactory dysfunction, leading to depression, anxiety, nutritional issues, and decreased quality of life.
Given that the mechanisms underlying COVID-19-related anosmia remain unclear, numerous theories have been proposed, including: nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea; mucosal edema in the olfactory cleft; damage to the olfactory epithelium (either directly or through immune-mediated mechanisms); injury to the olfactory bulb; and dysfunction of the central olfactory pathways [7–9]. Various interventions, including olfactory training and using corticosteroids, have been evaluated for the management of olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients [10]. While olfactory training is a recommended intervention for COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction, corticosteroids have been suggested as a potential treatment option due to their anti-inflammatory properties. Interestingly, parallels can be drawn to acute vestibular vertigo, a condition characterized by severe spinning sensation and nausea, caused by inflammation of the vestibular system [11]. Corticosteroids have been known to reduce vestibular inflammation, providing relief when administered within the first 1 to 2 days of symptom onset [11]. The anti-inflammatory properties of corticosteroids hint at their potential for managing COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction, despite the ongoing debate about their efficacy [10, 12]. With nasal symptoms like nasal congestion and rhinorrhea possibly reflecting chronic inflammation in the nose and olfactory system, consideration of addressing nasal comorbidities such as allergic rhinitis or chronic rhinosinusitis may improve quality of life and aid in the recovery of smell function in long COVID patients [13, 14].
A recent meta-analysis [15], consisting of four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one cohort study revealed that topical corticosteroid treatment significantly improved olfactory scores compared with the control group. Subsequently, several studies have been published, and the results have shown inconsistent results when compared to the previous meta-analysis. Tragoonrungsea et al. indicated that no significant difference between corticosteroid nasal irrigation and saline or no irrigation in restoring the sense of smell in COVID-19-associated olfactory loss [16]. Hosseinpoor et al. concluded that there was no significant difference in olfactory scores, including smell test and visual analog scale (VAS) scores, between the corticosteroid nasal spray and control groups during the follow-up period [17]. However, based on the significant difference in olfactory score changes between the two groups, it appears that nasal corticosteroids may positively affect the recovery process of patients with COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction who received treatment for more than 2 weeks. Additionally, Schepens et al. [18] showed that oral corticosteroid prednisolone did not improve olfactory function after COVID-19. Hence, we aim to conduct an updated meta-analysis with subgroup analysis to comprehensively examine the efficacy of corticosteroid therapy for COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction. This was necessary due to the limited number of high-quality studies included in previous meta-analyses, inconsistent results from recent studies, and the need to identify a more suitable corticosteroid treatment regimen.
The PICOS framework was as follows:
- Population: Patients with COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction.
- Intervention: Corticosteroid therapy.
- Comparison: Placebo or standard care.
- Outcome: Improvement in olfactory score
- Study design: Randomized controlled trials
Methods
Systematic literature review
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [19]. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from their inception to March 1, 2023, without language restrictions. The search terms used were: ("olfactory dysfunction" OR "anosmia") AND ("COVID-19" OR "SARS-CoV-2") AND ("corticosteroids" OR "steroids"). For detailed search strategy, please refer to S1 Table. Two independent reviewers screened all titles and abstracts for eligibility and identified relevant articles, and any discrepancies were resolved through discussion. The review protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023404491).
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
This study only included RCTs that examined the effects of corticosteroids on olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients. The exclusion criteria were studies with non-COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction, studies that did not use corticosteroids as an intervention, and studies that did not report the outcomes of interest.
Data extraction and quality assessment
Data were extracted independently by two reviewers using a standardized data extraction form. Information on study characteristics, participant characteristics, intervention type, and duration of treatment was extracted. The primary outcome of interest was the olfactory scores at the end of follow-up, which ranging from 0 as the worst to 10 as the best, and the secondary outcomes were the duration and recovery rate of olfactory dysfunction. We used risk ratio (RR) to calculate the effect sizes for the rate of recovery, mean difference (MD) to calculate the duration of recovery, and standardized mean difference (SMD) to calculate the olfactory scores due to the use of different measurement scales in different studies. The risk of bias for each RCT was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2.0 (ROB 2.0) by two independent reviewers [20].
Statistical analysis and data synthesis
We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of corticosteroids in the treatment of olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients. The pooled effect sizes were calculated using a random effects model, due to the anticipated heterogeneity in types, administration routes, and duration of use of corticosteroids. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran’s Q test and the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate the effect of treatment duration (≤2 weeks and >2 weeks), as suggested by the findings of Hosseinpoor’s study [17], as well as dose (high dose and normal dose) and route of administration (topical and systemic). We defined high dose corticosteroid nasal spray treatment as a dose that is greater than twice the defined daily dose (DDD) [21]. A sensitivity analysis was performed by omitting individual studies and investigating the effect of this omission on the overall results of the meta-analysis. Egger’s test was employed to evaluate the presence of potential publication bias in this analysis [22, 23]. All statistical analyses were performed using STATA 17.0 software.
Results
Eligible studies and patient characteristics
The PRISMA flowchart of the study selection process was presented in Fig 1. Seven RCTs with a total of 999 participants, all of whom had olfactory dysfunction due to COVID-19 and were treated with corticosteroids [16–18, 24–27]. Of the seven studies included, six used topical corticosteroids [16–17, 24–27] and one study used systemic corticosteroids [18]. The duration of treatment varied across the studies, ranging from 10 days to 1 month. Participant enrollment in each study ranged from 70 to 276 individuals, with mean or median age from 29 to 49 years old. The proportion of male participants in each study ranged from 28.3% to 56.7%. Table 1 provides a summary of the characteristics of the included studies.
Effects of corticosteroids on olfactory dysfunction
Regarding the primary outcome, our random-effects model demonstrated a statistically significant SMD of 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15 to 0.95; Fig 2) in the olfactory score between the corticosteroid and control groups, indicating a positive impact of corticosteroid treatment on olfactory score improvement. However, the heterogeneity among the trials was high (I2 = 87.88%). The subgroup analysis showed that topical corticosteroids were more effective than systemic corticosteroids in improving olfactory scores, with an SMD of -0.10 and 0.65, respectively (p = 0.01). Additionally, the analysis revealed a significant difference between high dose and normal dose corticosteroid nasal spray treatment in improving olfactory scores (S1 Fig). Furthermore, treatment for more than two weeks was found to significantly improve olfactory scores compared to treatment for two weeks or less (S2 Fig). Taken together, these findings suggest that topical corticosteroids with longer treatment duration and higher dose may be more effective in improving olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients. No effects on results of all outcomes were obtained for any study after performing a leave-one-out analysis.
For the secondary outcome, analysis from four studies indicated no significant impact of corticosteroids on either the duration (MD: -3.78 days; 95% CI: -8.86 to 1.31; Fig 3) or the recovery rate (Log RR: 0.18; 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.45; Fig 4) of olfactory dysfunction compared to controls. The limited number of studies reporting these outcomes may have reduced the power to detect significant effects.
Regarding safety profile, three out of the seven studies reported on the incidence of adverse effects associated with the use of topical corticosteroids. Hosseinpoor et al. [17] did not report any adverse reactions in either the intervention or control groups. In contrast, Schepens et al. [10] observed adverse effects in 9 out of 58 participants from the intervention group and in 5 out of 57 participants from the control group. However, none of these adverse events were severe enough to warrant discontinuation of the medication. Lastly, Tragoonrungsea et al. [16] identified that corticosteroids might reduce the risk of nasal dryness, based on a comparison of adverse events such as pharyngeal burning, nasal burning, pharyngeal dryness, and nasal dryness. There were no significant differences in the other three events between the groups. Despite the limited number of studies, these findings collectively suggest that topical corticosteroids could potentially have a favorable safety profile in the management of olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients.
Quality assessment
A risk of bias graph was presented in Fig 5, showing that three of the seven studies had a low risk of overall bias, while the remaining four were rated as having some concerns. Among the studies with some concerns, three were flagged for issues related to the domain of random sequence generation or allocation concealment, while two studies had concerns related to the risk of reporting selected outcomes.
For publication bias, an Egger test was conducted to assess the presence of small-study effects and potential publication bias. The results indicated that there was no significant evidence of small-study effects for the duration of olfactory dysfunction (p = 0.16). However, there was significant evidence of small-study effects for the olfactory score and the rate of recovery from olfactory dysfunction (p = 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively).
Discussion
Our study provides important evidence for clinical professionals in making decisions regarding the use of corticosteroid treatment for COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction. COVID-19 has been affecting people worldwide for a significant amount of time, leading to a substantial impact on individuals’ quality of life. Currently, there are limited treatment options available for COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction [28]. The results of our analysis suggest that corticosteroid treatment is effective in improving olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients. Specifically, we found a statistically significant improvement in olfactory scores with corticosteroid treatment, with a SMD of 0.55 (95% CI: 0.15 to 0.95). Although heterogeneity among the studies was high, a sensitivity analysis indicated that our findings are robust and not overly influenced by any single study. In addition, we found that the included studies had a low risk of bias, which further strengthens the reliability of our findings.
The subgroup analysis indicated that topical corticosteroids, but not systemic corticosteroids are effective in improving olfactory scores. However, this result contrasted with the findings of a small randomized controlled trial conducted by Cheema et al. [29]. This trial was not included in our analysis because it compared the efficacy of systemic and topical corticosteroids in improving olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients, rather than comparing corticosteroid treatment with a control group. The study reported that olfaction was regained earlier in patients treated with systemic steroids compared with topical steroids (p < 0.001). It is crucial to emphasize that our analysis did not primarily focus on comparing the effectiveness of oral and nasal administration of corticosteroids in improving olfaction. Due to the limited number of studies examining the efficacy of systemic corticosteroids in treating olfactory dysfunction, it is currently premature to draw any conclusions about their effectiveness. However, it is worth noting that if topical corticosteroids are effective, they may be a preferred treatment option due to their lower likelihood of producing systemic side effects. Moreover, our subgroup analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in olfactory scores between high dose and normal dose corticosteroid nasal spray treatment for COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction. This suggests that higher doses of corticosteroid treatment may be more effective in improving olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients. In addition, longer duration of treatment was associated with a significant improvement in olfactory scores compared to shorter treatment duration. Therefore, our analysis suggests that using topical corticosteroids at a higher dose, equal to or greater than 2 times DDD, for a duration longer than two weeks, may lead to greater improvement for COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction. Additionally, as topical corticosteroids have a lower risk of producing systemic side effects, they may be a safer option compared to systemic corticosteroids. Due to safety concerns, several publications have advised against prescribing systemic corticosteroids, particularly in active cases [30–32]. Hence, it is advisable to conduct a thorough evaluation of the patient’s underlying condition, existing comorbidities, imaging findings, and perform a comprehensive risk-benefit assessment before administering oral or topical corticosteroid therapy. Our findings provide evidence to support the use of topical corticosteroids as a therapeutic option for patients with persistent COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction, especially for those distressed by lingering smell loss. Clinicians can consider prescribing a trial of high-dose nasal corticosteroids for 2 to 4 weeks to determine if a patient experiences subjective or objective improvement in smell function.
A recent meta-analysis conducted by Kim et al. included one cohort study and four randomized controlled trials up to September 2021 [15]. Their results showed that topical steroids improved acute-onset olfactory dysfunction caused by COVID-19, but there was no significant difference in the rate of full olfactory recovery between treated and control patients, which is consistent with our findings. However, our study provides additional insights as we searched up until March 2023, including more recent literature, and performed subgroup analysis on the effects of treatment duration and high-dose versus normal-dose corticosteroid nasal spray treatment, as well as analyzing the recovery time. Furthermore, it is important to note that our study focused specifically on the effects demonstrated by randomized controlled trials.
While our study provides valuable insights into the use of corticosteroids for COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction, it is important to acknowledge its limitations. Firstly, the number of RCTs included in our meta-analysis was relatively small, which may limit the generalizability of our findings. Secondly, there was variation in the dosage and duration of corticosteroid treatment among the included studies, which contributes to high heterogeneity and makes it difficult to determine the optimal treatment protocol for this condition. Although sensitivity analysis did not affect our overall results, such heterogeneity introduces uncertainty to our findings and may have biased our overall effect size estimate. Furthermore, differences in patient populations across the included studies, such as age, severity of olfactory dysfunction, time-to-treatment, and severity of COVID-19, might have an influence on the outcomes. Despite the possibility of conducting stratified analyses, the high data heterogeneity and limited number of studies could have led to insignificant or unreliable results. Thus, these factors warrant careful consideration in future studies aiming to deepen our understanding of corticosteroid effectiveness for COVID-19-related olfactory dysfunction. Additionally, we detected publication bias in two of our outcomes, suggesting that selective reporting of studies with positive results could potentially lead to overestimation of the treatment effect. Moreover, some studies included in our analysis did not report results concerning adverse reactions, which limits our understanding of the safety profile associated with corticosteroid treatment in COVID-19 patients, particularly those with underlying comorbidities or who are taking other medications. Considering the potential of corticosteroids to suppress the immune system, especially in high doses or long-term use, further research on their safety profile in this population is crucial. Furthermore, the limited number of studies reporting the time for olfactory dysfunction recovery or the rate of recovery from olfactory dysfunction could have limited our ability to detect a significant effect of corticosteroid treatment on these outcomes. This underscores the need for future research to overcome these limitations, including larger RCTs to validate our findings. Additionally, more investigation into optimal treatment protocols, as well as long-term efficacy and safety of corticosteroid treatment, is crucial. Such rigorous studies will provide further insights into the potential benefits of corticosteroids for olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients.
Conclusion
In summary, topical corticosteroids may be beneficial for improving olfactory dysfunction from COVID-19, especially when used at higher doses and for longer durations. However, larger, high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings, determine optimal treatment regimens, including precise dosage and duration, and evaluate long-term efficacy and safety.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Forest plots of the effects of high dose and normal dose corticosteroid nasal spray treatment on changes in olfactory scores for COVID-19 patients with olfactory dysfunction.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289172.s002
(TIF)
S2 Fig. Forest plots of the effects of different treatment durations on changes in olfactory scores for COVID-19 patients with olfactory dysfunction.
Studies were categorized into those with treatment durations of ≤ 2 weeks and those with treatment durations of > 2 weeks.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289172.s003
(TIF)
References
- 1.
World Health Organization: WHO COVID-19 Dashboard. [cited 2023 03.01]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/.
- 2. Saniasiaya J, Islam MA, Abdullah B. Prevalence of Olfactory Dysfunction in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Meta-analysis of 27,492 Patients. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(4):865–78. Epub 20201205. pmid:33219539; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7753439.
- 3. Klopfenstein T, Kadiane-Oussou NJ, Toko L, Royer PY, Lepiller Q, Gendrin V, et al. Features of anosmia in COVID-19. Med Mal Infect. 2020;50(5):436–9. Epub 20200417. pmid:32305563; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7162775.
- 4. Boscolo-Rizzo P, Guida F, Polesel J, Marcuzzo AV, Antonucci P, Capriotti V, et al. Self-reported smell and taste recovery in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: a one-year prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;279(1):515–20. Epub 2021/05/09. pmid:33963433; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8103884.
- 5. Doty RL. Olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19: pathology and long-term implications for brain health. Trends Mol Med. 2022;28(9):781–94. Epub 2022/07/10. pmid:35810128; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9212891.
- 6. Jafar A, Lasso A, Shorr R, Hutton B, Kilty S. Olfactory recovery following infection with COVID-19: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2021;16(11):e0259321. Epub 2021/11/10. pmid:34752471; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8577770.
- 7. Ziuzia-Januszewska L, Januszewski M. Pathogenesis of Olfactory Disorders in COVID-19. Brain Sci. 2022;12(4). Epub 20220327. pmid:35447981; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9029941.
- 8. Aragão M, Leal MC, Cartaxo Filho OQ, Fonseca TM, Valença MM. Anosmia in COVID-19 Associated with Injury to the Olfactory Bulbs Evident on MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020;41(9):1703–6. Epub 2020/06/27. pmid:32586960; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7583088.
- 9. Meng X, Deng Y, Dai Z, Meng Z. COVID-19 and anosmia: A review based on up-to-date knowledge. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020;41(5):102581. Epub 2020/06/21. pmid:32563019; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7265845.
- 10. Wu TJ, Yu AC, Lee JT. Management of post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction. Curr Treat Options Allergy. 2022;9(1):1–18. Epub 20220104. pmid:35004126; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8723803.
- 11. Di Mauro P, La Mantia I, Cocuzza S, Sciancalepore PI, Rasà D, Maniaci A, et al. Acute Vertigo After COVID-19 Vaccination: Case Series and Literature Review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:790931. Epub 2022/01/25. pmid:35071270; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8770332.
- 12. Wei G, Gu J, Gu Z, Du C, Huang X, Xing H, et al. Olfactory Dysfunction in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Review. Front Neurol. 2021;12:783249. Epub 2022/02/05. pmid:35115994; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8805677.
- 13. Nalbandian A, Sehgal K, Gupta A, Madhavan MV, McGroder C, Stevens JS, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Med. 2021;27(4):601–15. Epub 2021/03/24. pmid:33753937; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8893149.
- 14. Maniaci A, Merlino F, Cocuzza S, Iannella G, Vicini C, Cammaroto G, et al. Endoscopic surgical treatment for rhinogenic contact point headache: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278(6):1743–53. Epub 2021/03/08. pmid:33677741; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7936872.
- 15. Kim DH, Kim SW, Kang M, Hwang SH. Efficacy of topical steroids for the treatment of olfactory disorders caused by COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol. 2022;47(4):509–15. Epub 20220406. pmid:35352483; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9111649.
- 16. Tragoonrungsea J, Tangbumrungtham N, Nitivanichsakul T, Roongpuvapaht B, Tanjararak K. Corticosteroid nasal irrigation as early treatment of olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19: A prospective randomised controlled trial. Clin Otolaryngol. 2023;48(2):182–90. Epub 20221114. pmid:36336851; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9877925.
- 17. Hosseinpoor M, Kabiri M, Rajati Haghi M, Ghadam Soltani T, Rezaei A, Faghfouri A, et al. Intranasal Corticosteroid Treatment on Recovery of Long-Term Olfactory Dysfunction Due to COVID-19. Laryngoscope. 2022;132(11):2209–16. Epub 20220825. pmid:36054369; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9538270.
- 18. Schepens EJA, Blijleven EE, Boek WM, Boesveldt S, Stokroos RJ, Stegeman I, et al. Prednisolone does not improve olfactory function after COVID-19: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Med. 2022;20(1):445. Epub 20221116. pmid:36384737; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9667850.
- 19. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj. 2021;372:n71. Epub 20210329. pmid:33782057; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8005924.
- 20. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj. 2019;366:l4898. Epub 2019/08/30. pmid:31462531.
- 21.
WHO. Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Guidelines for ATC Classification and DDD Assignment. WHO Geneva; 2023.
- 22. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Bmj. 1997;315(7109):629–34. Epub 1997/10/06. pmid:9310563; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2127453.
- 23. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58. Epub 2002/07/12. pmid:12111919.
- 24. Yildiz E, Koca Yildiz S, Kuzu S, Günebakan Ç, Bucak A, Kahveci OK. Comparison of the Healing Effect of Nasal Saline Irrigation with Triamcinolone Acetonide Versus Nasal Saline Irrigation alone in COVID-19 Related Olfactory Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;74(Suppl 2):3022–7. Epub 20210710. pmid:34277384; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8272442.
- 25. Abdelalim AA, Mohamady AA, Elsayed RA, Elawady MA, Ghallab AF. Corticosteroid nasal spray for recovery of smell sensation in COVID-19 patients: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Otolaryngol. 2021;42(2):102884. Epub 20210104. pmid:33429174; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7836546.
- 26. Kasiri H, Rouhani N, Salehifar E, Ghazaeian M, Fallah S. Mometasone furoate nasal spray in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction: A randomized, double blind clinical trial. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;98:107871. Epub 20210612. pmid:34147912; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8196319.
- 27. Rashid RA, Zgair A, Al-Ani RM. Effect of nasal corticosteroid in the treatment of anosmia due to COVID-19: A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study. Am J Otolaryngol. 2021;42(5):103033. Epub 20210407. pmid:33839489; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8024226.
- 28. Karamali K, Elliott M, Hopkins C. COVID-19 related olfactory dysfunction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;30(1):19–25. Epub 2021/12/11. pmid:34889850; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8711304.
- 29. Cheema UN, Zeb S, Irfan L, Sikandar MZ, Ashraf SA, Munir K. Impact of Topical v/s Systemic Steroids on Regaining Olfaction in Post Covid-19 Patients; A Randomized Controlled Trail. Pakistan journal of medical and health sciences. 2022;16(11):185‐7. CN-02510915.
- 30. Patel ZM. Regarding Use of Topical Steroids in Patients With COVID-19-Associated Olfactory Loss. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;147(1):110. Epub 2020/11/20. pmid:33211102.
- 31. Huart C, Philpott CM, Altundag A, Fjaeldstad AW, Frasnelli J, Gane S, et al. Systemic corticosteroids in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related smell dysfunction: an international view. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2021;11(7):1041–6. Epub 2021/03/18. pmid:33728824; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8251281.
- 32. Whitcroft KL, Hummel T. Olfactory Dysfunction in COVID-19: Diagnosis and Management. Jama. 2020;323(24):2512–4. Epub 2020/05/21. pmid:32432682.