https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9663-9460
Figures
Abstract
The recent outbreak of viral zoonotic disease–monkeypox–caused by the monkeypox virus, has infected many people worldwide. This study aims to explore the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) concerning monkeypox among university students in Bangladesh. Data were collected using purposive snowball sampling from 887 university students through an online survey using Google Form. The participants were mostly in their twenties (M = 22.33 [SD 2.01] years), and they spent, on average, 2.59 [SD 1.91] hours/day on electronic and social media. The participants generally showed moderate knowledge (39.5%), low attitude (25.1%), and moderate practice (48.6%) toward monkeypox, with 47.6% having had a moderate KAP score. Findings further showed that personal attributes of university students, i.e., age, sex, year of schooling, residence, living status, geographical distribution, e.g., division, were statistically and significantly associated with knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding monkeypox and overall KAP score. It is also apparent that health status, susceptibility to monkeypox, and exposure to social media were the most common factors significantly associated with knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding monkeypox and overall KAP score. The current study’s findings underscore the need for developing appropriate information, education, and communication (IEC) materials and their dissemination, which could play an important role in reducing the risk of monkeypox and similar other infectious diseases, particularly among students in Bangladesh.
Citation: Islam MA, Sathi NJ, Setu SP, Nahar MT, Khan MNA, Hasan M, et al. (2023) Knowledge, attitude, and practice of university students towards monkeypox in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE 18(10): e0287407. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287407
Editor: Md Mostafizur Rahman, Bangladesh University of Professionals, BANGLADESH
Received: February 2, 2023; Accepted: June 5, 2023; Published: October 12, 2023
Copyright: © 2023 Islam et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are available at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QNWHML.
Funding: No. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is responsible for millions of fatalities worldwide; consequently, it steers panic among people, especially in developing countries like Bangladesh [1–7]. After two years of sustaining the COVID-19 pandemic, the outbreak of another contagious viral disease, monkeypox, has recently reached a worrisome level in several nations [8]. The monkeypox virus causes monkeypox, a severe and rare zoonotic illness belonging to the Orthopoxvirus genus of the Poxviridae family, and it resembles smallpox [9–11]. The addition of lymphadenopathy symptoms distinguishes it apart from smallpox [9]. Monkeypox was detected for the first time in 1958 in a Danish laboratory among monkeys kept for research purposes [12]. In those colonies of monkeys, two outbreaks of a disease similar to a pox-like illness were observed. Although the origin of the disease is unknown, African rodents and non-human primates (e.g., monkeys) may host the virus and transmit it to humans [12]. In 1970, a 9-month-old infant boy was the first human to be diagnosed with the disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo [13], and later, it spread to other African nations, especially in Central and West Africa [11], while the first cases outside of Africa being recorded in the United States in 2003 [11, 14]. Israel and the United Kingdom have reported similar figures of confirmed cases of monkeypox in consecutive years, 2018 and 2019 [14, 15]. In May 2019, in Singapore, a Nigerian man was found to have carried the monkeypox virus, the first verified case on the Asian continent [16].
In 2022, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 1400 monkeypox cases (suspected 1,392 and confirmed 44) were detected in seven African countries [17], relatively higher than the previous two decades [18]. Furthermore, a total of 18,844 cases have been detected in 29 European countries in 2022. In addition, 47 more cases have also been reported from Turkiye and three Western Balkan nations [19]. The WHO reported that the emergence and spread of monkeypox in several non-endemic geographic regions pose a significant threat to public health globally [14, 15]. Recent studies revealed that outbreaks of monkeypox among humans are highly likely, and ‘the public health importance of monkeypox disease should not be underestimated’ [11, 20].
The case-fatality ratio of monkeypox ranges from 0 to 11% in the general population, although it is significantly greater among young children [14]. The death prevalence in recent years has risen due to monkeypox, as reported by the WHO [14]. There are three modes of transmission for monkeypox: (i) animal-to-human; (ii) human-to-human; and (iii) human to substances contained with the monkeypox virus [14, 15, 21]. The virus can spread from infected animals by broken skin (scratches/bites), blood and bodily fluids, or pox lesions [21]. In addition to touching the lesions of an infected person, airborne droplets from coughs and sneezes are also liable for human-to-human transmission [14]. The most prevalent symptoms of monkeypox include fever, headache, muscle aches, backache, swollen lymph nodes, chills, and tiredness with rashes [14]. Recent outbreaks have been characterized by a preponderance of patients with mild clinical manifestations; however, the virus may cause severe disease in young children, pregnant women, and immunosuppressed individuals [14]. In addition, individuals (18 to 50 years of age) are accustomed to suffering uniformly, as public gatherings are relatively common among them [22]. It is essential to pay special attention to university students, as most of this demographic attend educational institutions to acquire knowledge. There is no specific therapy for monkeypox, but antiviral medications and immunizations for smallpox may be helpful, as claimed by some experts [12]. However, the centers and disease control prevention (CDC) prompts several preventative steps to control the spread of monkeypox, particularly in unaffected territories [12]. The most viable preventive measures include isolating infected patients/animals, washing hands after close contact with the infected, and avoiding infected animals and anything contaminated with the virus [12].
Although no case has been identified in Bangladesh, however, the country is surrounded by India, where multiple cases have been identified in recent times. India has established particular instructions to prevent the spread of monkeypox in the states and union territories [23]. Bangladesh has not yet been exposed to vulnerable scenarios generated by monkeypox and has not taken any measures to combat the potential threat posed by monkeypox. However, tension and anxiety about the disease are circulating throughout the country. Understanding knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to monkeypox is crucial in societal contexts because it investigates peoples’ norms and behavioral issues regarding the spread of infection. This non-therapeutic approach is an effective way of exploring the thoughts, fears, and perceptions of people regarding a disease [15, 24]. Generally, KAP encompasses many individuals’ beliefs, e.g., its history, knowledge, aggravating factors, symptoms, the availability of therapies, and their effects [20, 25, 26]. These beliefs facilitate the practice of proper prevention-related behavior, which may vary from person to person. Any misperception or incorrect information poses a possible hazard to the nation.
Regarding monkeypox, earlier studies showed that a knowledge gap existed among physicians, health workers, students, and general people [26–30]. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no studies have explored the KAP of monkeypox in the context of Bangladesh. This understanding is important because mass gatherings promoted the spread of monkeypox, especially among students [22]. Additionally, perception of the real risk changes the behavior of individuals, and it is necessary to monitor the KAP of the students continue to see the changing pattern with changes in the spread level of the diseases [20, 31]. Moreover, to create consciousness among students, it is essential to know the KAP of students regarding monkeypox in order to reduce the spread of this disease. This study aimed to examine KAP regarding monkeypox, whether it is high, moderate or low, among university students in Bangladesh.
Materials and methods
Study settings and participants
This cross-sectional study was conducted using Google Form (see S1 File) to assess the Bangladeshi university students’ KAP regarding monkeypox. The students were invited through emails and social media (e.g., Facebook, Messenger, WhatsApp) between 31 May to 22 June, 2022. Inclusion criteria were: (i) a student enrolled in a Bangladeshi university and (ii) having the ability to read the instruction and write the response online using standard English. Considering the aforementioned criteria, the university students were approached, and using the purposive snowball sampling technique each participant was requested to forward the e-questionnaire to friends and others in their peers [11, 20, 32–36]. A total of 887 responses were studied for this study after careful scrutiny.
Ethical considerations
Ethics for this research was approved by the Khulna University Ethical Clearance Committee (Reference No. KUECC-2022/06/13). The e-questionnaire contained a consent form detailing the rights of the participants, including voluntary participation, anonymity and confidentiality of the participants and their responses, and a right to withdraw without justification within a stipulated timeframe.
Procedure
The e-questionnaire was developed after an intensive review of relevant literature [12, 14, 17, 24]. The e-questionnaire was modified and adapted from previously published literature on smallpox and monkeypox disease by the World Health Organization (WHO) [14], and from the CDC [12]. The e-questionnaire consisted of five modules: (i) socio-demographic characteristics; (ii) knowledge-related information; (iii) attitude-related information; (iv) practice-related information; and (v) media exposure. Socio-demographic characteristics included age, sex, religion, years of schooling, marital status, living status, residence (rural, sub-urban and urban), and division, while the KAP modules contained 26 five-point Likert scale items regarding knowledge (10 items), attitude (8 items) and practice (8 items) toward monkeypox. For knowledge and attitude-related items, possible responses ranged from ‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’, whereas, for practice items, responses were ‘never’ to ‘always with an additional response of ‘not applicable’. The fifth module included items on media exposure, such as how frequently the participants received news from the radio, television, Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, and other sources regarding monkeypox.
Score generation (KAP)
The e-questionnaire was divided into five interrelated but distinct modules: module 1 contained the socioeconomic background and health status of the participants (e.g., age, sexual identity, religion, year of schooling, residence, division, marital status, living status, health status, time spent (hour) on media, and ever thought that the participants had Monkeypox cases or ever felt affected by monkeypox); module 2, module 3 and module 4 included questions on knowledge (10 items), attitude (8 items) and practice (8 items), respectively. The knowledge information concerning monkeypox disease had questions about signs, transmission (e.g., Human-to-human transmission occurs only through large respiratory droplets), duration of infection (e.g., The illness typically lasts for 2–4 weeks), people at risk (e.g., Homosexuals, bisexuals, and people with multiple sex partners are more at risk). The attitude module emphasized isolation from infected persons, avoiding clothing or bedding of someone with the rash, and measures against the infection. The practice module had questions mainly on avoiding infected persons or sick animals’ practices maintained by the participants. For analysis, the responses of the 26 items were subsequently recoded as 1 for accurate/correct responses and 0 for inaccurate/incorrect responses (including neutral responses) (see Table 2). Later, the score for each category was re-categorized into three levels, namely low, moderate, and high score. Finally, quartiles were used to classify the total score: up to the 25th quartile was a low score, 26th to 75th quartile was a moderate score and more than the 76th quartile was a high score in every module (knowledge, attitude, and practice) [32].
Statistical analyses
The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics v27. Initially, descriptive statistics, such as frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation (SD), of socio-demographic aspects, were used to elaborate on the basic characteristics of the participants. In order to analyze the association between socio-demographic features and scores on knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding monkeypox, Pearson’s Chi-square test of independence (χ2) was utilized. The dependent variable has three categories, namely low, medium, and high scores. So finally, the generalized ordered logistic regression model [37] was implemented to estimate the score of knowledge, attitude, practice, and total KAP score of monkeypox among university students in Bangladesh. For all statistical analyses, the probability value of α level (significance) was 0.05.
Results
Socio-demographic features
Table 1 shows the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants. There was more male (535) than female (352) participants; a total of 2.6% (self-reported percentage) were found to have ever thought that they had monkeypox cases. The average age of the participants was 22.33, and a total of 571 participants were living in urban areas, mostly with their families (424). The majority of students were from the Khulna division (449), while others (49.4) resided in other divisions in Bangladesh. Again, most of them (807) received up to a Bachelor degree of schooling. About 566 of the study participants spent ≤2 hours/day on electronic and social media. Table 1 summarizes the remaining socio-demographic details of the participants.
Evidence on participants’ knowledge scores, attitude scores, and practice scores regarding monkeypox
Table 2 shows the association of different socio-demographic factors with knowledge, attitudes, and practices score classifications (low, moderate, high) regarding monkeypox. The majority of individuals had a moderate (39.5%) knowledge score, followed by a high score (24.1%). Many participants’ knowledge levels on monkeypox were shown to be significantly related to their age, years of schooling, living status, marital status, health status, and time spent (hour) on media. Suggestively, the higher number of the 21–23 age group were counted in high (13.5%) and moderate (24.0%) knowledge scores classification compared to their equivalent ≤20 age group participants in high (5.5%) and moderate (5.3%), respectively. Honor’s students had a considerably higher knowledge score of monkeypox (22.9%). It is also evident that participants living with families showed relatively higher knowledge (high 12.7% and moderate 18.0% knowledge score). A significant number of participants (38.1%) had a moderate attitude score, followed by high scores (36.8%). Many participants’ attitude levels toward monkeypox were shown to be significantly related to their sexual identity, residence, living status, time spent (hour) on media, and ever felt affected by monkeypox. Suggestively, a higher number of females were counted in high (18.6%) and moderate (12.4%) attitude scores classification compared to their equivalent males in high (18.2%) and moderate (25.7%), respectively. Urban resided students showed significant moderate attitude score (24.9%) towards monkeypox. In the case of living with family, students showed better attitudes towards monkeypox (high 16.2% and moderate 20.1% attitude score). Again, many participating students exhibited low practice scores (26.5%), whereas 48.6% of the participants showed moderate practice scores. Most of the participants’ practice levels on monkeypox were shown to be significantly related to their religion, time spent (hour) on media, and ever felt affected by monkeypox. A substantial practice score was identified among Muslims (high 19.5% and moderate 41.4% practice score). The perceived high (14.7%) practice towards monkeypox was in the participants who spent ≤ 2 hours daily to get information on media.
Table 2 also indicates the KAP score classifications (low, moderate, high) regarding monkeypox. A significant proportion of participants (47.6%) had a moderate KAP score, followed by high scores (24.7%). The majority of the participants’ monkeypox KAP scores were shown to be substantially associated with time spent (hour) on media and ever felt affected by monkeypox. The perceived high (17.0%) KAP towards monkeypox was among people who spent 2 hours or less per day obtaining information from the media regarding monkeypox. It was also observed significantly in the moderate (44.8%) KAP score of the participants who had ever thought they had monkeypox symptoms or had monkeypox-related effects.
Table 3 indicates that the generalized ordered logit (GOL) analysis of the KAP level of the students concerning monkeypox with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with a 95% confidence level. A significant GOL regression was found for knowledge levels (LR χ2 = 72.85), attitude levels (LR χ2 = 102.04), practice levels (LR χ2 = 86.28), and overall KAP levels (LR χ2 = 72.01) at 1% level of significance. In this model, age, years of schooling, residence, living status, marital status, health status, and time spent (hour) on media were significantly associated with students’ knowledge levels about monkeypox. When compared to the age group less than or equal to 20 years, the odds for the 21–23 year age group were (aOR: 0.53, 95% CI = .35, .80) less likely of being in the high knowledge group of monkeypox than the low or moderate knowledge group. Again, compared to students from rural residences, there were 1.55 times (aOR: 1.55, 95% CI = .96, 2.49) more likely to be in the moderate and high knowledge group of monkeypox for students from sub-urban residences than the low knowledge group. In the case of comparing the high knowledge group to the low or moderate knowledge group, the ever-married students were 1.97 times (aOR: 1.97, 95% CI = 1.19, 3.26) more likely to be in the high knowledge group of monkeypox than never-married students. Again, comparing the students with poor health status, the observed knowledge for the students with good health was 1.65 times more (aOR: 1.65, 95% CI = .98, 2.80) likely to be in the high knowledge group than in the low or moderate knowledge group.
Again, in this model, age, sex identity, residence, living status, health status, time spent (hour) on media, and ever felt affected by monkeypox were found to be significantly associated with attitude levels among students towards monkeypox. When compared to the low altitude group students, there exist 1.26 times (aOR: 2.21, 95% CI = 1.15, 4.04) more likely moderate or high attitude in the 21–23 age group students about monkeypox than those in the ≤20 age group. Female students were 1.79 times (aOR: 1.32, 95% CI = 1.30, 1.91) more likely to have a low or moderate attitude level than male students who had high attitude levels. Concerning monkeypox, the odds of attitude level for sub-urban students were 1.83 times more likely (aOR: 1.83, 95% CI = 1.08, 3.10) to be in the moderate or high group than the low attitude group for rural students.
It is also apparent in the model that sex identity, religion, living status, division, time spent (hour) on media, and ever felt affected by monkeypox were found to be significantly associated with practice levels among students towards monkeypox. It demonstrates that female students were (aOR: 0.69, 95% CI = .48, .98) less likely to be in the high practice group when compared to those in the low or moderate practice group concerning monkeypox than male students. Other religious students were five times more likely (aOR: 5.00, 95% CI = 1.88, 13.33) to be in the low or moderate group than the high practice group for Islam religious students.
Moreover, age, religion, years of schooling, residence, living status, time spent (hour) on media, and ever felt affected by monkeypox were significantly associated with overall KAP levels among students towards monkeypox. In comparison to the age group less than or equal to 20 years, the odds for the≥24 years age group was (aOR: .61, 95% CI = .36, 1.05) less likely to be in the high knowledge group of monkeypox than low or moderate KAP scores group. In the case of moderate or high KAP scores against low KAP levels, master’s and above level of education were (aOR: 0.56, 95% CI = .32, .99) less likely to be in low KAP level group towards monkeypox compared to Honor’s. It demonstrates that individuals who lived with their families were 1.66 times (aOR: 1.66, 95% CI = 1.05, 2.62) more likely to be in the high KAP level group than those in the low or moderate KAP concerning monkeypox than those who lived alone. The odds of KAP levels for people who spent 3–4 hours per day getting information or getting updated from the media about monkeypox were less (aOR: .66, 95% CI = .44, .97) likely to be in the low than moderate or high KAP level group compared to those who spent ≤ 2 hours per day on media.
Discussion
After recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic, the recent outbreak of monkeypox poses a significant threat to the overall wellbeing of people worldwide. This study, therefore, was designed to measure the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of Bangladeshi university students towards monkeypox and to identify the key factors that determine the levels of KAP among them regarding monkeypox. Evidence suggests that proper knowledge, positive attitude, and better practice among students regarding an outbreak can ensure a healthy and safe life with reduced stress [38].
Although the results of this study revealed that about 63.6% of students had relatively higher knowledge about monkeypox; previous study results showed that the perception of monkeypox was not satisfactory among most university students [27, 39, 40]. The unprecedented loss of life, particularly the relatives, during COVID-19, might have encouraged university students to know more about a similar contagious outbreak, such as monkeypox, to take protective and preventive measures for themselves and their loved ones. Our study also revealed that age, residence, living status, marital status, and health status had a significant positive association with the knowledge score of students regarding monkeypox. This finding is parallel with the previous studies [33, 41]. The students who are at a younger age are more likely to have higher knowledge compared to the older students. This may be because older students generally think more about their careers than younger students and concentrate less on other subjects [42, 43]. Besides, unlike younger university students, older students were less likely to get information from online sources [44]. The students who lived in sub-urban and urban locations were more likely to have moderate to high knowledge of the risk of monkeypox than those from rural areas [45]. The reason behind this is that during any pandemic outbreak, the local authorities and government take necessary steps and strategies primarily for urban areas where the epidemic frequently spreads quickly. As a result, rural areas become the victim of deprivation of the required information and preventive or protective strategies [46]. The students with relatively good health had higher knowledge of monkeypox than those with poor health conditions. One of the prior studies also suggested that during the pandemic, health consciousness increased [47], and for this reason, the students with good health conditions acquire more knowledge regarding the potential risk factors and behaviors associated with infectious diseases. This study also suggested that the ever-married students had higher knowledge regarding monkeypox than never-married students, which is analogous to an earlier study [48].
The findings also showed that three out of four university students (74.9%) had a higher level of attitude about the risk factors associated with monkeypox. This finding supports the previous studies, where students had a greater positive attitude toward Dengue fever [49] and COVID-19 [38]. This study also disclosed a significant positive association of participants’ age, sex, residence, and living status with the attitude score of students regarding monkeypox. But participants’ health status and time spent on media had a significant negative relation with the attitude score of students regarding the risk of monkeypox. Some earlier studies also identified that age, sex, residence, and living status were significantly associated with the attitude score regarding the pandemic [41, 50–52]. This study suggested that students who lived with their family members had a higher (36.3%) attitude toward the risk of monkeypox. An earlier study suggested that the shared support gained from one’s family member significantly and positively impacted the attitude regarding social distancing [50]. In this study, male participants had a greater attitude (43.9%) regarding monkeypox than their female counterparts (31%), which is similar to the results of another study [53], suggesting a more positive attitude toward COVID-19 among males than females. This result is inconsistent with an earlier study that indicated that female participants had a better attitude than male participants regarding dengue fever [49].
In the case of practice regarding monkeypox, most of the students (73.5%) strictly maintained necessary preventive measures to protect themselves from the risk of possible monkeypox infection (i.e., most of the students practiced higher [high to moderate] preventive measures). The protective measures include avoiding contact with sick or dead animals with symptoms, or anyone who has a rash that includes blisters or pus-filled patches, washing hands frequently with soap and water or using an alcohol-based hand sanitizer, eating thoroughly cooked meat, wearing a face mask, maintain safe sex, avoid sneezing in public spaces, and avoid sharing cigarettes, as such were advocated by health agencies to minimize the risk of monkeypox [54, 55]. In addition, the results of our study indicate that students’ sex, religion, living status, division, and spending time on media exhibited a significant association with the practice score regarding monkeypox. Female students had better practice regarding monkeypox than their male counterparts. Another study also found that female participants practiced better than male participants [53, 56].
In the case of overall KAP scores, students living in the urban area and staying with friends and family significantly improved overall KAP scores (knowledge, attitude, and practices) about monkeypox. Male students had a higher score (13.5%) than female students (11.2%), and the students who lived with their families had a higher KAP score than those who lived alone.
Strengths and limitations
This study has certain limitations. Using the purposive snowball sampling technique, a nonrandom and nonprobability approach to select participants, may not allow the generalization of the findings. The participants who responded to the e-questionnaire were instructed to forward it to their friends and other students in their contacts, so the recruitment bias may also have happened. Most participants were from the Khulna division, so the results may not appropriately be epitomized for the entire population of Bangladesh. Moreover, as this study was conducted among educated participants with access to the Internet, the results may only represent the educated youths of Bangladesh, especially university students. Therefore, the self-reported responses may not be similar to that of the entire populace. Since this study was cross-sectional in nature, the results described represent the situation of a particular period, i.e., the survey period. The KAP among university students is also subject to change with the changing situation of monkeypox. Thus, a longitudinal study with a nationally representative sample is required to examine the time-dependent KAP changes and the associated risk factors, which may give a more extended area of research on this topic. Considering this population’s underprivileged economic and educational profiles, a community-based study may represent precise results.
Conclusion
When the research was started, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, assuming that still, no other studies had examined the KAP among university students in Bangladesh concerning monkeypox. Bangladesh’s rapid economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic necessitates an immediate understanding of monkeypox’s KAP. It is strongly believed that the findings of this study will provide policymakers with crucial insights for formulating and improvising awareness programs and strategies to manage health emergencies, such as COVID-19 or monkeypox, in the future. This study was carried out to uncover the KAP levels regarding monkeypox among university students in Bangladesh and identify the associated risk factors that determine their levels of KAP. It was found that a significant number of students had moderate to high knowledge and the same levels of attitude and practices regarding monkeypox to protect themselves from the potential risks. There was a significant association between participants’ sex, residence, socioeconomic status, media exposure, and contracting monkeypox. This study recommends adopting a more balanced strategy by increasing the overall knowledge with a cautious attitude and protective and preventive practices regarding monkeypox in rural and urban areas to bolster public awareness regarding the risk of human monkeypox.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge students’ voluntary participation in addressing a critical issue during a state of health emergency in Bangladesh and other parts of the world.
References
- 1. Ahammed B, Jahan N, Seddeque A, Hossain MT, Shovo T-EA, Khan B, et al. Exploring the association between mental health and subjective sleep quality during the COVID-19 pandemic among Bangladeshi university students. Heliyon. 2021;7(5):e07082. pmid:34095577
- 2.
Akter R, Akter M, Hossain MT, Ahsan MN. Socio-environmental factors affecting mental health of people during the COVID-19 in coastal urban areas of Bangladesh. In: Ramanathan AL, Sabarathinam C, Jonathan MP, Prasanna MV, Kumar P, Arriola F, editors. Environmental Resilience and Transformation in times of COVID-19: Climate Change Effects on Environmental Functionality. Cambridge: Elsevier Inc; 2021. p. 49–61.
- 3. Halim SFB, Mridha S, Nasrin N, Islam MK, Hossain MT. Socioeconomic crisis and mental health stress among the middle-income group during the covid-19 pandemic. Sociol Spectr. 2022;42(2):119–34.
- 4. Hossain MT, Ahammed B, Chanda SK, Jahan N, Ela MZ, Islam MN. Social and electronic media exposure and generalized anxiety disorder among people during COVID-19 outbreak in Bangladesh: A preliminary observation. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0238974. pmid:32916691
- 5. Islam MA, Barna SD, Raihan H, Khan MNA, Hossain MT. Depression and anxiety among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: A web-based cross-sectional survey. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0238162. pmid:32845928
- 6. Shovo T-E-A, Ahammed B, Khan B, Jahan N, Shohel TA, Hossain MT, et al. Determinants of Generalized Anxiety, Depression, and Subjective Sleep Quality among University Students during COVID-19 Pandemic in Bangladesh. Dr Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Journal. 2021;3(1):27–35.
- 7. Hossain MT, Islam MA, Jahan N, Nahar MT, Sarker MJA, Rahman MM, et al. Mental Health Status of Teachers During the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Web-Based Study in Bangladesh. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13. pmid:35958639
- 8. Chakraborty C, Bhattacharya M, Nandi SS, Mohapatra RK, Dhama K, Agoramoorthy G. Appearance and re-appearance of zoonotic disease during the pandemic period: long-term monitoring and analysis of zoonosis is crucial to confirm the animal origin of SARS-CoV-2 and monkeypox virus. Vet Q. 2022;42(1):119–24. pmid:35658858
- 9. Durski KN, McCollum AM, Nakazawa Y, Petersen BW, Reynolds MG, Briand S, et al. Emergence of Monkeypox—West and Central Africa, 1970–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(10):306–10. Epub 2018/03/16. pmid:29543790.
- 10. Silenou BC, Tom-Aba D, Adeoye O, Arinze CC, Oyiri F, Suleman AK, et al. Use of Surveillance Outbreak Response Management and Analysis System for Human Monkeypox Outbreak, Nigeria, 2017–2019. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(2):345–9. Epub 2020/01/22. pmid:31961314.
- 11. Bunge EM, Hoet B, Chen L, Lienert F, Weidenthaler H, Baer LR, et al. The changing epidemiology of human monkeypox—A potential threat? A systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16(2):e0010141. pmid:35148313
- 12.
CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Monkeypox. 2022 June 28, 2022. Report No.
- 13. Breman JG, Kalisa R, Steniowski MV, Zanotto E, Gromyko AI, Arita I. Human monkeypox, 1970–79. Bull World Health Organ. 1980;58(2):165–82. Epub 1980/01/01. pmid:6249508.
- 14.
WHO. Monkeypox. 2022.
- 15. Harapan H, Setiawan AM, Yufika A, Anwar S, Wahyuni S, Asrizal FW, et al. Confidence in managing human monkeypox cases in Asia: A cross-sectional survey among general practitioners in Indonesia. Acta Trop. 2020;206:105450. pmid:32194068
- 16. Ng OT, Lee V, Marimuthu K, Vasoo S, Chan G, Lin RTP, et al. A case of imported Monkeypox in Singapore. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2019;19(11):1166. pmid:31657773
- 17.
WHO. WHO is supporting African countries to strengthen monkeypox surveillance and response actions. 2022.
- 18. Petersen E, Kantele A, Koopmans M, Asogun D, Yinka-Ogunleye A, Ihekweazu C, et al. Human monkeypox: epidemiologic and clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and prevention. Infectious Disease Clinics. 2019;33(4):1027–43. pmid:30981594
- 19.
ECDC. 2022 [cited 2022]. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/infectious-disease-topics/z-disease-list/monkeypox/epidemiological-data-2022-monkeypox-outbreak.
- 20. Bates BR, Grijalva MJ. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards monkeypox during the 2022 outbreak: An online cross-sectional survey among clinicians in Ohio, USA. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2022;15(12):1459–65. pmid:36403402
- 21. Bothra A, Maheswari A, Singh M, Pawar M, Jodhani K. Cutaneous manifestations of viral outbreaks. Australas J Dermatol. 2021;62(1):27–36. pmid:32895964
- 22.
ECDC. Mpox (formerly named monkeypox) situation update 2022 [updated 20 December 2022]. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/news-events/monkeypox-situation-update.
- 23.
Increased alert in Tamil Nadu and West Bengal due to monkeypox scare. THE DAILY INQILAB. 2022.
- 24. Lulli LG, Baldassarre A, Mucci N, Arcangeli G. Prevention, Risk Exposure, and Knowledge of Monkeypox in Occupational Settings: A Scoping Review. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2022;7(10):276. pmid:36288017
- 25. Szymona-Pałkowska K, Janowski K, Pedrycz A, Mucha D, Ambroży T, Siermontowski P, et al. Knowledge of the disease, perceived social support, and cognitive appraisals in women with urinary incontinence. BioMed research international. 2016;2016. pmid:28097132
- 26. Riccò M, Ferraro P, Camisa V, Satta E, Zaniboni A, Ranzieri S, et al. When a Neglected Tropical Disease Goes Global: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Italian Physicians towards Monkeypox, Preliminary Results. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2022;7(7):135. pmid:35878146
- 27. Kumar N, Ahmed F, Raza MS, Rajpoot PL, Rehman W, Khatri SA, et al. Monkeypox Cross-Sectional Survey of Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, and Willingness to Vaccinate among University Students in Pakistan. Vaccines. 2023;11(1):97. pmid:36679942
- 28. Sallam M, Al-Mahzoum K, Dardas LA, Al-Tammemi AaB, Al-Majali L, Al-Naimat H, et al. Knowledge of Human Monkeypox and Its Relation to Conspiracy Beliefs among Students in Jordanian Health Schools: Filling the Knowledge Gap on Emerging Zoonotic Viruses. Medicina. 2022;58(7):924. pmid:35888642
- 29. Ahmed SK, Abdulqadir SO, Omar RM, Abdullah AJ, Rahman HA, Hussein SH, et al. Knowledge, Attitude and Worry in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq during the Mpox (Monkeypox) Outbreak in 2022: An Online Cross-Sectional Study. Vaccines. 2023;11(3):610. pmid:36992194
- 30. Alsanafi M, Al-Mahzoum K, Sallam M. Monkeypox Knowledge and Confidence in Diagnosis and Management with Evaluation of Emerging Virus Infection Conspiracies among Health Professionals in Kuwait. Pathogens. 2022;11(9):994. pmid:36145426
- 31. Hasan M, Hossain MA, Chowdhury S, Das P, Jahan I, Rahman MF, et al. Human monkeypox and preparedness of Bangladesh: A knowledge and attitude assessment study among medical doctors. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2023;16(1):90–5. pmid:36508945
- 32. Islam MA, Nahar MT, Khan MNA, Butt ZA, Monjur-Al-Hossain A, Barna SD, et al. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices concerning Black Fungus during COVID-19 Pandemic among Students of Bangladesh: An Online-Based Cross-Sectional Survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(15):9146. pmid:35954512
- 33. Kundu S, Al Banna M, Sayeed A, Begum MR, Brazendale K, Hasan MT, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and preventive practices toward the COVID-19 pandemic: an online survey among Bangladeshi residents. Journal of Public Health. 2021:1–15. pmid:34414065
- 34. Hayat K, Rosenthal M, Xu S, Arshed M, Li P, Zhai P, et al. View of Pakistani residents toward coronavirus disease (COVID-19) during a rapid outbreak: a rapid online survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(10):3347. pmid:32408528
- 35. Rugarabamu S, Ibrahim M, Byanaku A. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) towards COVID-19: A quick online cross-sectional survey among Tanzanian residents. MedRxiv. 2020:2020.04. 26.20080820.
- 36. Alvira N, Satoto TBT. Public Knowledge, Attitudes And Practices (Kap) Towards COVID-19: A Quick Online Cross-Sectional Survey In Yogyakarta, Indonesia. International Journal Of Public Health Science (Ijphs). 2020.
- 37. Williams R. Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. The Stata Journal. 2006;6(1):58–82.
- 38. Patwary MM, Disha AS, Bardhan M, Haque MZ, Kabir MP, Billah SM, et al. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward Coronavirus and Associated Anxiety Symptoms Among University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study During the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Bangladesh. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2022;13.
- 39. Jairoun AA, Al-Hemyari SS, Abdulla NM, El-Dahiyat F, Shahwan M, Hassan N, et al. Awareness and preparedness of human monkeypox outbreak among university student: Time to worry or one to ignore? Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2022;15(10):1065–71. pmid:36087548
- 40. Ren F, Liu J, Miao J, Xu Y, Zhang R, Fan J, et al. Public awareness, specific knowledge, and worry about mpox (monkeypox): A preliminary community-based study in Shenzhen, China. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023;11. pmid:36866102
- 41. Zhong B-L, Luo W, Li H-M, Zhang Q-Q, Liu X-G, Li W-T, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: a quick online cross-sectional survey. Int J Biol Sci. 2020;16(10):1745. pmid:32226294
- 42. Suhi SS, Jabbar MA, Farjana F, Nasrin N, Hossain MT. Factors Affecting Social Science Students’ Career Choices: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Study in Bangladesh. Education Research International. 2022;2022:2765246.
- 43. Ela MZ, Shohel TA, Shovo T-EA, Khan L, Jahan N, Hossain MT, et al. Prolonged lockdown and academic uncertainties in Bangladesh: A qualitative investigation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon. 2021;7(2):e06263. pmid:33615016
- 44. Biswas PR, Ahammed B, Rahman MS, Nirob BM, Hossain MT. Prevalence and determinants of internet addiction among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: An online cross-sectional study. Heliyon. 2022;8(7). pmid:35873537
- 45. Malaeb D, Sallam M, Salim NA, Dabbous M, Younes S, Nasrallah Y, et al. Knowledge, Attitude and Conspiracy Beliefs of Healthcare Workers in Lebanon towards Monkeypox. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2023;8(2):81. pmid:36828497
- 46. Rudan I. A cascade of causes that led to the COVID-19 tragedy in Italy and in other European Union countries. Journal of global health. 2020;10(1).
- 47. Čvirik M. Health conscious consumer behaviour: The Impact of a pandemic on the case of Slovakia. Central European Business Review. 2020;9(4):45–58.
- 48. Wolf MS, Serper M, Opsasnick L, O’Conor RM, Curtis L, Benavente JY, et al. Awareness, attitudes, and actions related to COVID-19 among adults with chronic conditions at the onset of the US outbreak: a cross-sectional survey. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(2):100–9.
- 49. Rahman MM, Khan SJ, Tanni KN, Roy T, Chisty MA, Islam MR, et al. Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices towards Dengue Fever among University Students of Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(7):4023. pmid:35409706
- 50. Li S, Xu Q. Family support as a protective factor for attitudes toward social distancing and in preserving positive mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Health Psychol. 2022;27(4):858–67. pmid:33153342
- 51. Sultana MS, Khan AH, Islam MR, Hossain S, Hasan MT, Sikder MT. Gender differences in knowledge, attitudes and preparedness to respond to COVID-19 among adults in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study. Population Medicine. 2022;4(January):1–11.
- 52. Aynalem YA, Akalu TY, Gebresellassie Gebregiorgis B, Sharew NT, Assefa HK, Shiferaw WS. Assessment of undergraduate student knowledge, attitude, and practices towards COVID-19 in Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0250444. pmid:34003825
- 53. Adli I, Widyahening IS, Lazarus G, Phowira J, Baihaqi LA, Ariffandi B, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice related to the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduate medical students in Indonesia: A nationwide cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2022;17(1):e0262827. pmid:35061848
- 54. Guarner J, Del Rio C, Malani PN. Monkeypox in 2022—What Clinicians Need to Know. JAMA. 2022;328(2):139–40. pmid:35696257
- 55. León-Figueroa DA, Bonilla-Aldana DK, Pachar M, Romaní L, Saldaña-Cumpa HM, Anchay-Zuloeta C, et al. The never ending global emergence of viral zoonoses after COVID-19? The rising concern of monkeypox in Europe, North America and beyond. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2022;49:102362. pmid:35643256
- 56. ALdowyan N, Abdallah AS, El-Gharabawy R. Knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) study about middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) among population in Saudi Arabia. Int Arch Med. 2017;10.