https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6016-8935
Figures
Abstract
Genetic variations are a crucial source of germplasm heterogeneity, as they contribute to the development of new traits for plant breeding by offering an allele resource. Gamma rays have been widely used as a physical agent to produce mutations in plants, and their mutagenic effect has attracted much attention. Nonetheless, few studies have examined the whole mutation spectrum in large-scale phenotypic evaluations. To comprehensively investigate the mutagenic effects of gamma irradiation on lentils, biological consequences on the M1 generation and substantial phenotypic screening on the M2 generation were undertaken. Additionally, the study followed the selected mutants into the M3 generation to evaluate the agronomic traits of interest for crop improvement. Seeds of lentil variety Moitree were irradiated with a range of acute gamma irradiation doses (0, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, and 350 Gy) to induce unique genetic variability. This research focused on determining the GR50 value while considering seedling parameters and examining the status of pollen fertility while comparing the effects of the gamma irradiation dosages. The GR50 value was determined to be 217.2 Gy using the seedling parameters. Pollens from untreated seed-grown plants were approximately 85% fertile, but those treated with the maximum dosage (350 Gy) were approximately 28% fertile. Numerous chlorophyll and morphological mutants were produced in the M2 generation, with the 300 Gy -treated seeds being the most abundant, followed by the 250 Gy -treated seeds. This demonstrated that an appropriate dosage of gamma rays was advantageous when seeking to generate elite germplasm resources for one or multiple traits. Selected mutants in the M3 generation showed improved agronomic traits, including plant height, root length, number of pods per plant, and yield per plant. These investigations will contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the mutagenic effects and actions of gamma rays, providing a basis for the selection and design of suitable mutagens. This will facilitate the development of more controlled mutagenesis protocols for plant breeding and help guide future research directions for crop improvement using radiation-induced mutation breeding techniques.
Citation: Pramanik B, Debnath S, Rahimi M, Helal MMU, Hasan R (2023) Morphometric frequency and spectrum of gamma-ray-induced chlorophyll mutants identified by phenotype and development of novel variants in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). PLoS ONE 18(6): e0286975. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286975
Editor: Adalberto Benavides-Mendoza, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, MEXICO
Received: January 12, 2023; Accepted: May 27, 2023; Published: June 12, 2023
Copyright: © 2023 Pramanik et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) is an important pulse crop in India. It is a member of the Fabaceae family with chromosome number 2n = 2x = 14 [1]. It is an annual edible legume with lens-shaped pods and purse-shaped seeds [2]. This oldest known legume originated in the Near East [3], from whence it spread to Canada, Turkey, and Southeast Asian nations such as India, China, Nepal, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, among others [4]. Lentil seeds are a good source of a variety of proteins, vitamins, and minerals that are required for human nutrition [5]. Additionally, the availability of more tryptophan and lysine makes it a good complement to rice or wheat, which is deficient in that specific amino acid and thus offers balanced nutrition in the human diet. Because the legume "lentil" is a high-protein legume (containing approximately 24.1% protein), crop improvement techniques may have a major impact [6]. Surprisingly, socioeconomic and agroecological constraints are the primary impediments to the development of this food legume across India, despite its great nutritional value. Numerous biotic and abiotic stress conditions significantly reduce the yield potential of lentils, particularly in resource-poor areas worldwide [7]. The indigenous cultivars of lentil in India belonged to a specific ecotype (Pilosae), which appears to lack notable variability for phenological, morphological, yield- and resistance-associated traits, resulting in the failure of lentil improvement programmes for a longer duration [8]. The day length bottleneck hampered the transfer of lentil germplasm into the Indo-Gangetic plain, resulting in decreased yield potential in that particular geographical region [9]. Additionally, the small and delicate blooms hampered the success rate of artificial hybridization by up to 20%–50% due to the difficulties of emasculation and pollination, which resulted in injury during these procedures. As a consequence, cross-pollination has become a time-consuming process in lentils [8]. Additionally, the genus Lens was notable for the development of crossability barriers during interspecific hybridization within and across species [10]. Eventually, these processes collectively resulted in the lentil’s narrow genetic base. Various scholars previously identified this narrow genetic basis as the primary restraint on lentil production [11]. Additionally, adaptive specificity and repeated failures to employ various unproductive foreign germplasms contribute to the failure of lentil genetic progress [12]. Thus, given the parameters outlined above, mutagenesis might be seen as a supplementary and novel breeding strategy. It is capable of generating such a variation that does not exist in the organism’s genetic background. As a result, this feature may be used to enhance a plethora of desirable characteristics in a plant species. A wide range of mutation methods have been used, including physical and chemical mutagens such as gamma radiation, X-rays, heavy metal ions, and protons, as well as biotechniques such as genetic modification, transgenic, or gene editing based on CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Many different forms of DNA damage may be caused by photon radiation, including the nucleotide alterations and strand breaks caused by oxidized bases, abasic sites, single-strand breaks, and double-strand breaks that gamma radiation can cause. If this DNA damage is not addressed or is repaired ambiguously, mutations, such as single-base substitutions, deletions, insertions, inversions, or translocations, may arise at the genome scale and eventually lead to alterations in the phenotypic traits of the organisms [13]. Numerous researchers have proposed and implemented mutation breeding as an effective tool for this kind of improvement in a variety of crops [11, 14–22]. Amin, et al. [11] published a report indicating a dose-dependent decrease in the germination of lentil seeds treated with MMS (methyl methanesulfonate). Additionally, they noted that 2% (v/v) DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) inhibited MMS action. Gaur, et al. [17] have observed similar results utilizing gamma rays as a mutagen on pigeon pea. Khursheed, et al. [18] evaluated the combined impact of gamma rays and ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) on the mutagenesis potential of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) seeds by determining the germination percentage and seedling height.
As a result, this research was undertaken to find the optimal dosage of acute gamma-irradiated mutagenesis for the improvement of lentil’s agronomically significant features to achieve a greater mutation frequency [22, 23]. Additionally, the immediate impact of gamma irradiation on seedling and sterility parameters is discussed in this section. Additionally, the influence of determining the GR50 value by the detection of a large number of mutants, both chlorophyll and morphological, was shown in this study. These studies focused on the lentil variety "Moitree." It is a well-known variety among farmers in West Bengal, India, as well as a national check because of its considerably greater production performance than other varieties, even when seeded late. As a result, a group of researchers used this variety extensively in their experiments [24–26]. The creation of numerous chlorophyll and morphological mutants in the subsequent generation would be crucial for the identification of new alleles and might potentially be released as varieties or pre-breeding material in the near term if they are found to be economically sustainable and agronomically useful.
Thus, in this study, particular emphasis has been placed on examining seedling traits of the M1 generation. Analyzing these traits is essential, as it is considered the most reliable method to detect mutants in early generations [27]. By focusing on seedling characters in the M1 generation, researchers can effectively identify and isolate favorable mutants, which can be further evaluated for their agronomic performance and potential use in breeding programs [28]. This early detection of mutants allows for a more streamlined approach to crop improvement, ensuring that only the most promising mutant lines are carried forward for further analysis and development [29]. Consequently, the importance of studying seedling traits in the M1 generation is a crucial aspect of this research, contributing to the overall objective of finding the optimal dosage of acute gamma-irradiated mutagenesis for the improvement of agronomically significant traits in subsequent generations of lentils and achieving a higher mutation frequency.
Materials and methods
Determination of GR50 value
Approximately 35000 homogenous, uniform, dry and healthy seeds of lentil (variety: Moitree) were collected from the Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Palli Siksha Bhavana (Institute of Agriculture), Visva-Bharati, Sriniketan. Among them, every 1/7th of the total seeds, i.e., almost 5000 seeds were exposed to acute gamma irradiation of seven doses including 0, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, and 350 Gy, respectively, at the rate of 7 sec per 10 Gy radiation. The irradiation procedure was executed in the gamma chamber (GC-6000) of RNARC, BCKV, West Bengal, India. Formal safety precautions, i.e., maintaining a safe distance of 10 m, using proper gloves and kits, closing the room during irradiation procedures, etc., were appropriately followed. A few irradiated seeds of each dose along with the untreated one (used as control; denoted by the irradiation dose of 0 Gy above) were germinated following the petri-plate method. Each filter paper (size 9), soaked with double-distilled water, was placed on twenty-one petri plates, properly marked with the dosage. Seeds of each dose were grown on those specifically marked Petri plates and incubated at 25±2°C in the laboratory. Ten seeds of each irradiation dose and control were grown on Petri plates with three replications. For each dose, germination percentage (%), various seedling parameters viz. shoot length (cm), root length (cm), seedling height (cm), seedling vigor index, etc., were recorded for 7 and 14 days, respectively.
Increase in M1 generation
Excluding the GR50 value determining experiment, the rest of the seeds irradiated with six doses of gamma rays (100, 150, 200, 250, 300, and 350 Gy) along with the control (untreated seeds) were sown in the field in the year of 2020–21. A few pollens were collected from the floral buds for the following experiment during the pre-flowering stage. From the rest, a large number of M1 populations were developed from those seeds. A large number of pods as well as seeds were collected from individual plants from the population for raising the next generation, i.e., M2 population.
Pollen fertility study
Pollens were collected from the floral buds of irradiated seed-grown in vivo M1 plants along with controls. After collection, the pollens of each dose and control were treated with 1% (w/v) iodide-potassium iodide (IKI) [30] solution for a few seconds, after which they were minutely observed under the 40X objective lens of a compound light microscope (Olympus OIC) in the laboratory, as mentioned earlier. The pollen fertility percentage was calculated by implementing the following formula:
Pollens of all doses and the control were observed under the microscope with three replications each. Pollens from control plants were compared with those of each dose to check whether there was any reduction in pollen fertility percentage.
Identification of candidate mutants in the M2 generation
Seeds obtained from the M1 generation were sown in the next generation for the purpose of growing the M2 population in the aforementioned field using a plant-to-progeny method in 2021–22. Row-to-row and plant-to-plant spacings of 30 cm and 15 cm, respectively, were maintained. 122 individual plants were selected across the field based on their chlorophyll content and numerous morphological characteristics to determine the mutagenic effects of the acute gamma irradiation dosages (0, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, and 350 Gy) administered in the previous generation. After ten days of germination, those candidate mutants were appropriately tagged and recorded. Additionally, a dose-dependent normal plant population was also determined. The observed plant mutants were handled as per the relevant regulations and guidelines of IAEA.
Selection of M3 mutants with improved agronomic characteristics
The 122 candidate mutants selected in the M2 generation were subjected to the plant-to-progeny method again for raising the M3 population in the same field during the following year (2022–23). Row-to-row and plant-to-plant spacings were maintained at 30 cm and 15 cm, respectively, consistent with the previous generation. Six individual mutants were chosen from four of the 122 families in the current population derived from the M2 generation, based on their enhanced agronomic features such as increased plant height, root length, number of pods, and yield per plant. The observed plant mutants were managed in accordance with the relevant regulations and guidelines of the IAEA in this generation as well.
Statistical data analysis
The experiment involving the calculation of the dose of growth reduction was organized in a completely randomized block design with seven levels of gamma irradiation (including control) and three treatments, where the radiation levels were randomly arranged. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for all the parameters studied in the experiments was carried out at a 5% significance level to test whether the observed averages of the treatment levels were significantly different. Probit analysis [31] was executed to determine the GR50 value of all the parameters of interest. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS (version 20.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software package.
Results
GR50 value
In this study, the germination percentage was highest (100%) in the control seeds, whereas retardation in germination efficiency and germination percentage was found with increasing radiation dose (Figs 1 and 2A). Similarly, the control seedlings showed the best outcome concerning all other seedling parameters, i.e., shoot length, root length, total seedling length, seedling vigor index, etc. (Table 1). The seedling vigor index was calculated according to the formula germination percentage × seedling length for each dose, which also provided a similar graph to seedling height in this study (Fig 2B and Table 1). Based on the total seedling length and root length, the GR50 value was measured, which was 217.2 Gy (Fig 3A and 3B).
(a) Growth status of seedlings after 7 days of experiment. (b) Growth status of seedlings after 14 days of experiment.
Graphical representation of effect of different doses of acute gamma irradiation (0, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, and 350 Gy) on (a) gemination percentage at 7 and 14 days after experiment, respectively. (b) seedling vigor index at 7 and 14 days after experiment, respectively.
Dose response curve of (a) seedling length. (b) root length.
Pollen fertility
Similar to the last experiment, the floral buds of the control seedlings were found to carry the maximum number of fertile pollens (almost 85%) (Fig 4A and Table 1). On the other hand, 350 Gy gamma-irradiated pollens showed the lowest fertility (27–29%) among all others (Fig 4G and Table 1). Notably, the pollens also exhibited the fertility percentage in descending order (Fig 4A–4G) when placed with elevating doses of gamma radiation in the graph (Fig 4H).
Effect of gamma irradiation on fertility percentage of pollen of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) observed under 40X opjective lens of compound light microscope (Olympus OIC); the irradiation doses are: (a) Control (0 Gy). (b) 100 Gy. (c) 150 Gy. (d) 200 Gy. (e) 250 Gy. (f) 300 Gy. (g) 350 Gy; (h) Graphical representation of the same.
Frequency of candidate mutants in the M2 generation
During the M2 generation, potential mutants (Fig 5) were thoroughly identified using agronomic and morphological parameters. Four distinct kinds of chlorophyll mutants, viz., albina (Fig 6B), xantha (Fig 6C), chlorina (Fig 6D), and xantha-viridis (Fig 6E), were identified (Table 2). Additionally, a few leaf morphological (Fig 6I–6T and 6V and 6W) and plant morphological mutants (Fig 6H–6J) were also detected (Table 2).
(a, g, k) Untreated plant, (b-e) Chlorophyll mutants [(b) Albina, (c) Xantha, (d) Chlorina, (e) Xantha-viridis], (f) Chimera, (h-j) Plant morphological mutants, (i-t) Leaf shape (leaf morphological) mutants, (u) Leaf arrangement in untreated plant, (v-w) Change in leaf arrangement in leaf morphological mutants.
Superiority of candidate M3 mutants over control as well as M2 generation mean
Table 3 presents the data of selected M3 generation mutants derived from this mutation breeding experiment. It compares the plant height, root length, number of pods per plant, and yield per plant of the M3 generation mutants with the M2 mean and control values. The table highlights the increments observed in the selected M3 generation mutants compared to both the M2 mean and control values, emphasizing the positive effects of mutation breeding on lentil plant traits. This information can be useful for breeders to choose the best performing mutants for further crop improvement programs. For instance, VBM3Sel-34 showed an 18.5 cm increase in plant height from the M2 mean and a 26.6 cm increase from the control. This mutant also displayed a 4.7 cm increment in root length from the M2 mean and an 8 cm increment from the control. The number of pods per plant increased by 8 and 14 when compared to the M2 mean and control, respectively. Furthermore, the yield per plant for VBM3Sel-34 increased by 0.55 g from the M2 mean and 1.11 g from the control.
Similar trends can be observed in the other selected M3 generation mutants, such as VBM3Sel-57, VBM3Sel-109, VBM3Sel-178, VBM3Sel-259, and VBM3Sel-357. All these mutants exhibited increments in plant height, root length, number of pods per plant, and yield per plant compared to their respective M2 mean and control values.
This indicates the success of the mutation breeding program in enhancing the agronomic traits of lentil plants, which can ultimately lead to improved crop performance and yield (Fig 7).
Data analysis shows that the selected M3 generation mutants have significantly improved agronomic traits when compared to the M2 mean and control plants. This demonstrates the effectiveness of mutation breeding in enhancing the agronomic traits of lentil plants. The information presented can be valuable for breeders in selecting the best performing mutants for future crop improvement efforts, contributing to increased lentil production and addressing food security challenges.
Discussion
Prior to initiating experiments on colossal scale mutant breeding, LD50 and GR50 dosages are essential [32]. These GR50 and LD50 values are crucial because they result in a greater likelihood of acquiring desirable mutants [22]. According to Álvarez-Holguín, et al. [33], lower doses of gamma irradiation result in minor alterations to the genome, but higher doses result in undesired or deadly mutations, i.e., the higher the doses, the greater the mortality. Therefore, the undesirable mutations obtained remain a way away from the expected conclusion [33]. Moreover, it is already well established in accordance with the norms of IAEA that gamma irradiation up to the dosage of 10 kGy had no deleterious effect on human health [34]. Therefore, seeds treated with gamma rays should be considered safe when used for consumption purposes.
Probit analysis, used in the present study, is extensively utilized in research involving binomial responses. Its primary application is in toxicological investigations, where it converts the sigmoidal dose‒response curve to a straight line that can then be easily evaluated using regression deploying either least squares or maximum likelihood. To simplify the complex percent affected vs. dose‒response relationship into a simple linear relationship of probit vs. dose‒response, 0 is defined as 0.0001, and 10 as 0.9999 and included a table to assist researchers in converting impact-percentage to probit, which is then plotted against the logarithm of dose. Moreover, this existing tool has the capability to evaluate LD50 or GR50 at a 95% confidence interval along with a chi-square test for checking the adequacy of fit [35].
The determined GR50 value in this research, through probit analysis, was 217.2 Gy. In general, GR50 is an effective method for quantifying a parameter’s 50% decrease [23]. Because M1 plants are heterozygous at the genotypic level, the change caused by mutation may be seen in any allele located in any random locus, leading to reduced mutation manifestation [36]. A lower likelihood of detecting a recessive mutation at this stage and how a larger segregating mutant population may be used to harvest unique mutations in the future were elaborated in previous studies. Additionally, the GR50 study may be regarded as acceptable since a minimal percentage of deaths occurred compared to the LD50 study.
Pollen fertility research has also examined the tissue-damaging properties of gamma rays. Similar to seedling height, the greater the dosage of gamma radiation, the lower the pollen fertility %. This conclusion was already endorsed by a number of studies [37–42]. Kumar, et al. [38] demonstrated that when dried seeds of pea were irradiated, a 5 kR dosage of gamma rays induced 10.06 percent pollen sterility, while a 40 kR exposure generated 53.12 percent pollen sterility. Additionally, when presoaked seeds were utilized, they observed an increase in pollen sterility. Wani [42] treated lentil seeds from the Pant L-406 and Type-8 varieties with three different chemical mutagens (EMS, sodium azide, and hydrazine hydrate). Additionally, this experiment demonstrated a decrease in pollen fertility and increased dosages of each mutagen. Notably, for each dosage, the M2 generation had a higher fertility % than the M1 generation [42]. Additionally, Priyanka, et al. [39], Eswaramoorthy, et al. [37], and Vikhe and Nehul [41] all found comparable findings with the mutagens they employed in horse grams (Macrotyloma uniflorum), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. ), and mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). On the other hand, Tamilzharasi, et al. [40] showed a reduced pollen fertility % in black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) when combined higher doses of gamma rays and EMS were used rather than only gamma rays.
Albina, chlorina, xantha, and xantha-viridis chlorophyll mutants were obtained in the present investigation. Chlorina was the most prevalent, accounting for 0.091 percent of the total, followed by xantha-viridis (0.05 percent), xantha (0.031 percent), and albina (0.002 percent) (Table 2). Albina was detected only in plots with seeds that had been irradiated with 250 Gy and 300 Gy gamma rays. In the case of other chlorophyll mutants, the frequency increased up to 300 Gy but then decreased abruptly after 350 Gy gamma ray exposure. This might be due to the fatality associated with greater doses of this physical mutagen. Similarly, only plots with 200 Gy, 250 Gy, or 300 Gy showed chimera at frequencies of 0.001%, 0.002%, and 0.004%, respectively (Table 2). The highest frequency was reported when morphological mutants with altered leaf shape were detected (38.75%). Nine distinct leaf forms were identified from this group (Fig 6I–6T). Additionally, two different forms of leaf arrangement mutations (Fig 6V and 6W) and three other types of plant morphological mutants were detected in the field (Fig 6H–6J). Furthermore, the plants treated with 300 Gy had the highest frequency of mutants, followed by the plants treated with 250 Gy.
The frequency of chlorophyll mutation is an excellent indicator of various mutagen dosages [43]. Additionally, chlorophyll abnormalities generated by irradiation may be utilized to locate accessible mutations in the irradiated population. Ionizing radiation has the potential to modify the photosynthetic complex [44] by decreasing the photosystem’s efficiency [45]. A substantial dosage of gamma rays, up to 500 Gy, lowers the chlorophyll content by 80.91% and the grana and stroma thylakoid organization patterns [46]. Apart from those fundamental outcomes, stable mutants with good agronomic performances can directly be used as breeding materials for making novel genotypes [47, 48].
It was observed that the selected M3 generation mutants exhibited significant improvements in agronomic traits compared to their respective M2 mean and control values. This suggests that induced mutations have effectively led to the development of desirable genetic variations, which can be exploited for future crop improvement efforts. These findings align with previous studies on mutation breeding, which have successfully generated mutants with superior agronomic traits in various crop species [27, 28]. So, the present study underscores the potential of gamma-ray-induced mutagenesis in developing lentil mutants with improved agronomic characteristics. The selected M3 generation mutants can serve as valuable genetic resources for breeders to incorporate into lentil breeding programs, ultimately contributing to enhanced crop performance and yield [49]. Further studies involving advanced generations (M4 and beyond) and molecular characterization of the induced mutants are recommended to better understand the genetic basis of the observed phenotypic changes and confirm the traits’ stability across generations.
Conclusions
In conclusion, this study successfully demonstrated the efficacy of gamma-ray-induced mutagenesis in lentil for the development of novel variants with improved agronomic traits. The optimal dosage of gamma radiation was determined based on the GR50 value and seedling parameters. Distinct types of chlorophyll mutants were identified in the M2 generation, along with several leaf and plant morphological mutants. Furthermore, six promising mutants were selected in the M3 generation, exhibiting superior agronomic traits such as increased plant height, root length, number of pods, and yield per plant. These findings serve as a valuable resource for lentil breeding programs to enhance the crop’s performance and productivity. Future research should focus on conducting multi-environment trials to evaluate the stability and adaptability of these selected mutants across diverse agroecological zones. Additionally, further genetic and molecular characterization of these mutants will help to understand the underlying mechanisms involved in the expression of the improved traits, thereby facilitating the development of molecular markers for marker-assisted selection. Lastly, it would be essential to involve farmers in participatory varietal selection to ensure the acceptability and adoption of these improved lentil varieties at the grassroots level.
Acknowledgments
The research article is a part of Mr. Biswajit Pramanik for his Ph.D. research program, which was supervised by Dr. Sandip Debnath at Visva-Bharati University. Researchers also acknowledge the help received from the YSRA-BRNS project entitled “Physical mutation to improve the P acquisition along with nodulation efficiency in lentil”, (No. 55/14/17/2020-BRNS/10360 Dated 10/12/2020) from the Department of Atomic Energy, BARC, Mumbai, India.
References
- 1. Sharma S., Knox M. and Ellis T.N., "AFLP analysis of the diversity and phylogeny of Lens and its comparison with RAPD analysis," Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 751–758, 1996.
- 2.
Saxena M.C., "Plant morphology, anatomy and growth habit." In The lentil: Botany, production and uses, edited by Erskine W., Muehlbauer F.J., Sarker A. and Sharma B., pp 34–46. Wallingford, UK: CABI Press, 2009.
- 3.
Duke J., Handbook of legumes of world economic importance. USA: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
- 4. Cokkizgin A. and Shtaya M.J., "Lentil: Origin, cultivation techniques, utilization and advances in transformation," Agricultural Science, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2013.
- 5. Bhatty R., "Composition and quality of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik): a review," Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology Journal, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 144–160, 1988.
- 6. Debnath S., Sarkar A., Perveen K., Bukhari N.A., Kesari K.K., Verma A., et al., "Principal component and path analysis for trait selection based on the assessment of diverse lentil populations developed by gamma-irradiated physical mutation," BioMed Research International, vol. 2022, pp. Article ID 9679181, 14 pages, 2022. pmid:35898676
- 7.
Yankova V. and Sovkova-Bobcheva S., "Studying of bean varieties (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) reaction to bean weevil infestation (Acanthoscelides obtectus Say)." In Reports of bean improvement cooperative and national dry bean council research conference, 144–145. Michigan State University, USA, 2009.
- 8.
Laskar R.A., Khan S., Deb C.R., Tomlekova N., Wani M.R., Raina A., et al., "Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) diversity, cytogenetics and breeding." In Advances in plant breeding strategies: legumes, edited by Al-Khayri J., Jain S. and Johnson D., pp 319–369: Springer, Cham, 2019.
- 9.
Materne M. and McNeil D.L., "Breeding methods and achievements." In Lentil: an ancient crop for modern times, edited by Yadav S.S., McNeil D.L. and Stevenson P.C., pp 241–253. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2007.
- 10. Ferguson M.E., Maxted N., Van Slageren M. and Robertson L.D., "A reassessment of the taxonomy of Lens Mill. (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae, Vicieae)," Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 41–59, 2000.
- 11. Amin R., Laskar R.A. and Khan S., "Assessment of genetic response and character association for yield and yield components in Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) population developed through chemical mutagenesis," Cogent Food & Agriculture, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. Article 1000715, 15 pages, 2015.
- 12. Ali J.F., Arain M. and Shaikh N., "Genetic manipulation of lentil through induced mutations," Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 3449–3455, 2010.
- 13. Du Y., Feng Z., Wang J., Jin W., Wang Z., Guo T., et al., "Frequency and spectrum of mutations induced by gamma rays revealed by phenotype screening and whole-genome resequencing in Arabidopsis thaliana," International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. Article 654, 2022. pmid:35054839
- 14. Abbas G., Asghar M.J., Rizwan M. and Ahmad F., "Harnessing positive variability in F2 and M2 populations of lentil," Journal of Agriculture and Basic Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 37–45, 2016.
- 15. Akhtar S., Ahsan M., Asghar M.J., Abbas G., Rizwan M. and Ahmad Z., "F1 seed mutagenesis: A novel technique of creating genetic variability in lentil," Journal of Agriculture and Basic Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 45–51, 2017.
- 16. Baghery M.A., Kazemitabar S.K. and Kenari R.E., "Effect of EMS on germination and survival of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.)," Biharean Biologist, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 33–36, 2016.
- 17. Gaur A.K., Singh I., Singh S. and Reddy K., "Studies on effects of gamma ray doses on germination in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh] under laboratory and field conditions," International Journal of Chemical, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1975–1977, 2018.
- 18. Khursheed S., Waheed K., Haq I.U. and Khan S., "Mutagenic damage by gamma rays and ethyl methanesulphonate in two cultivars of Faba bean," International Journal of Botany Studies, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 50–54, 2020.
- 19. Laskar R.A. and Khan S., "Assessment on induced genetic variability and divergence in the mutagenized lentil populations of microsperma and macrosperma cultivars developed using physical and chemical mutagenesis," PloS one, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. e0184598, 2017. pmid:28922405
- 20. Pandit R., Bhusal B., Regmi R., Neupane P., Bhattarai K., Maharjan B., et al., "Mutation breeding for crop improvement: a review," Reviews in Food and Agriculture, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2021.
- 21. Pharmawati M., Defiani M.R., Wrasiati L.P. and Wijaya I.M.A.S., "Morphological changes of Capsicum annuum L. induced by ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) at M2 generation," Current Agriculture Research Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2018.
- 22. Wanga M.A., Shimelis H., Horn L.N. and Sarsu F., "The effect of single and combined use of gamma radiation and ethylmethane sulfonate on early growth parameters in sorghum," Plants, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. Article 827, 2020. pmid:32630116
- 23. Layek S., Pramanik S., Das A., Gupta A.K., Bhunia A. and Pandit M.K., "Effect of gamma radiation on seed germination and seedling growth of snake gourd (Trichosanthes anguina L.)," South African Journal of Botany, vol. 145, pp. 320–322, 2022.
- 24. Kumari V.V., Banerjee P., Vijayan R., Nath R., Sengupta K. and Chandran M., "Effects of micronutrient foliar spray on thermal indices, phenology and yield of lentil in new alluvial zone of West Bengal," Journal of AgriSearch, vol. 7, pp. 202–205, 2020.
- 25. Mookherjee S., Karforma J., Pandit T.K. and Ghimiray T.S., "Yield gap analysis ‘Infarmers’ participatory seed production plot of lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.) at old alluvial zone of West Bengal, India," Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 449–451, 2019.
- 26. Roy S., Rahman F., Pal P. and Basak J., "Enhancing pulse productivity through agro-technologies under clustered frontline demonstration programme." 1–25. Bihar, Jharkhand and West Bengal, 2018.
- 27. Ambavane A. R. “Studies on Mutagenic Effectiveness and Efficiency of Gamma Rays and Its Effect on Quantitative Traits in Finger Millet (Eleusine Coracana L. Gaertn).” Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, Jan. 2015, pp. 120–25,
- 28. Kavera. “Genetic Improvement for Yield through Induced Mutagenesisin Groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea L.).” Legume Research, vol. 40, no. 1, Jan. 2017, pp. 32–35,
- 29. Jambhulkar S.J.. 2007. Mutagenesis: generation and evaluation of induced mutations. Advances in Botanical Research, vol. 45, January 2007, pp.417–434.
- 30. Jayashree V., Muthuswamy A., Jayamani P. and Kumar K., "Interspecific hybridization and crossability studies of cultivated varieties of Vigna mungo L. Hepper with Vignamungo var silvestris," Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, vol. 11, no. 01, pp. 271–275, 2020.
- 31.
Finney D.J., Probit analysis Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1971.
- 32. Kumar V., Vishwakarma G., Chauhan A., Shitre A., Das B.K., Nair J., et al., "Use of proton beam as a novel tool for mutations in rice," BARC Newsletter, vol. 366, pp. 5–9, 2018.
- 33. Álvarez-Holguín A., Morales-Nieto C.R., Avendaño-Arrazate C.H., Corrales-Lerma R., Villarreal-Guerrero F., Santellano-Estrada E., et al, "Mean lethal dose (LD 50) and growth reduction (GR 50) due to gamma radiation in Wilman lovegrass (Eragrostis superba)," Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 227–238, 2019.
- 34. Dimov K., "Effect of gamma irradiation on the primary and secondary products of lipid oxidation in raw chicken meat, stored under different temperatures and packaging–a meta-analysis," Archiva Zootechnica, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 130–141, 2022.
- 35. Kumar V., Sheoran O., Rani S. and Malik K., "Development of a web-based tool for probit analysis to compute LC50/LD50/GR50 for its use in toxicology studies," Journal of Applied and Natural Science, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 641–646, 2020.
- 36.
Roychowdhury R. and Tah J., "Mutagenesis—A potential approach for crop improvement." In Crop improvement, edited by Hakeem K., Ahmad P. and Ozturk M., pp 149–187. Boston, USA: Springer, 2013.
- 37. Eswaramoorthy V., Kandasamy T., Thiyagarajan K., Vanniarajan C. and Jegadeesan S., "Effectiveness and efficiency of electron beam in comparison with gamma rays and ethyl methane sulfonate mutagens in cowpea," Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 171, pp. Article 109640, 2021. pmid:33639325
- 38. Kumar A., Chaurasia A., Marker S., Shukla P., Rai P.K., Verma P.K., et al, "Effect of gamma radiation of macro mutations, effectiveness and efficiency under M2 generation in Pea (Pisum sativum L.)," Annales of West University of Timisoara. Series of Biology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 71–76, 2016.
- 39. Priyanka S., Sudhagar R., Vanniarajan C., Ganesamurthy K. and Souframanien J., "Gamma rays induced morphological, flowering and palynological modifications in horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum)," Journal of Environmental Biology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1363–1369, 2021.
- 40. Tamilzharasi M., Kumaresan D., Thiruvengadam V., Souframanian J. and Jayamani P., "Assessment of mutagenic sensitivity in blackgram variety CO 6," Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 413–420, 2021.
- 41. Vikhe A.C. and Nehul J.N., "Mutagenic Efficiency and Effectiveness of EMS, SA and GR on Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek," World Journal of Current Scientific Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 76–80, 2021.
- 42. Wani M.R., "Comparative biological sensitivity and mutability of chemo-mutagens in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik)," Legume Research, vol. 44, pp. 26–30, 2019.
- 43. Saha S. and Paul A., "Radiation induced mutagen sensitivity and chlorophyll mutation frequency on sesame seeds," Journal of Environmental Biology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 252–257, 2019.
- 44.
Ali H., Ghori Z., Sheikh S. and Gul A., "Effects of gamma radiation on crop production." In Crop production and global environmental issues, edited by Hakeem K., pp 27–78: Springer, Cham, 2015.
- 45. Angelini G., Ragni P., Esposito D., Giardi P., Pompili M., Moscardelli R., et al., "A device to study the effect of space radiation on photosynthetic organisms," Physica Medica: PM: an International Journal Devoted to the Applications of Physics to Medicine and Biology: Official Journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), vol. 17, pp. 267–268, 2001. pmid:11780616
- 46. Alikamanoglu S. and Sen A., "Stimulation of growth and some biochemical parameters by magnetic field in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) tissue cultures," African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 53, pp. 10957–10963, 2011.
- 47.
Debnath S. and Guha S., "Breeding methods for quality improvement in horticultural crops." In Value addition of horticultural crops: recent trends and future directions, edited by Sharangi A. and Datta S., pp 201–211. New Delhi. India: Springer, 2015.
- 48. Satpathy S., Debnath S. and Mishra A., "Study on character association in Lens culinaris medik," Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 58–65, 2021.
- 49. Weng W., Tang Y., Xiong R., Bai Q., Gao A., Yao X., et al., Specific Gibberellin 2-Oxidase 3 (SbGA2ox3) Mutants Promote Yield and Stress Tolerance in Sorghum bicolor. Agronomy, vol. 13, no. 3, March 2023, pp. 908. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030908