Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Molecular detection and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli in broiler chicken farms in Malaysia

  • Mulu Lemlem ,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    mululemlem86@gmail.com (ML); erkihun@umk.edu.my (EA)

    Affiliations Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Kota Baharu, Malaysia, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, College of Health Science, Mekelle University, Tigray, Ethiopia

  • Erkihun Aklilu ,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    mululemlem86@gmail.com (ML); erkihun@umk.edu.my (EA)

    Affiliation Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Kota Baharu, Malaysia

  • Maizan Mohammed,

    Roles Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Kota Baharu, Malaysia

  • Fadhilah Kamaruzzaman,

    Roles Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Kota Baharu, Malaysia

  • Zunita Zakaria,

    Roles Supervision

    Affiliation Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia

  • Azian Harun,

    Roles Supervision

    Affiliation School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia

  • Susmita Seenu Devan

    Roles Data curation, Investigation

    Affiliation Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Kota Baharu, Malaysia

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is one of the major public health threats globally. This challenge has been aggravated with the overuse and misuse of antibiotics in food animals and humans. The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes in Escherichia coli (E. coli) isolated from broiler chickens in Kelantan, Malaysia. A total of 320 cloacal swabs were collected from farms in different districts of Kelantan and were analyzed using routine bacteriology, antimicrobial susceptibility test, and molecular techniques for further identification and characterization of ESBL encoding genes. Based on PCR detection for the E. coli species-specific Pho gene, 30.3% (97/320) of isolates were confirmed as E. coli, and 84.5% (82/97) of the isolates were positive for at least one ESBL gene. Majority of the isolates, 62.9% (61/97) were harboring blaCTX-M followed by 45.4% (44/97) of blaTEM genes, while 16.5% (16/97) of the isolates were positive for both mcr-1 and ESBL genes. Overall, 93.8% (90/97) of the E. coli were resistant to three or more antimicrobials; indicating that the isolates were multi-drug resistance. 90.7% of multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index value greater than 0.2, would also suggest the isolates were from high-risk sources of contamination. The MLST result shows that the isolates are widely diverse. Our findings provide insight into the alarmingly high distribution of antimicrobial resistant bacteria, mainly ESBL producing E. coli in apparently healthy chickens indicating the role of food animals in the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance, and the potential public health threats it may pose.

Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the most challenging threats globally. Excessive use of antimicrobials in veterinary medicine, food-animal production, and agriculture results in the emergence of antimicrobial resistance [13]. Modern food animal production system requires large amounts of antimicrobials for disease control, prophylaxis, and growth promotion. Resistance among bacterial species causes increment in morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs worldwide [4]. Multi-drug resistant bacterial infections can result in minimum treatment choices, thus threats of AMR have reached an alarming level [5].

One of the mechanisms of bacterial resistance to antibiotics is producing an enzyme that hydrolyze the beta-lactam ring of antibiotics. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases are highly potent new bacterial enzymes that are resistant to β-lactam antibiotics [6]. ESBLs are resistant to the three generations of cephalosporin, whereas they might be inhibited by β-lactamase inhibitors specifically clavulanic acid [7]. ESBLs were reported for the first time in 1980s and are responsible for causing nosocomial and community acquired infections. ESBLs are plasmid-encoded enzymes commonly found in Enterobacteriaceae, mainly in E. coli, Klebsiella and Salmonella [8]. E. coli is usually the harmless facultative anaerobic bacteria, which is mostly found in the gastrointestinal tract of humans and animals. However, it is also a potentially pathogenic bacteria that can cause various diseases and is considered as a main cause of mortality and morbidity in poultry farms [9, 10]. Resistant bacteria in food animals may directly or indirectly be transferred to humans through food, water, and manure. Due to the ubiquitous nature of the commensal bacteria, they are reservoirs of resistance determinants [11]. Fecal carriage of extraintestinal pathogenic E coli (EXPEC) associated genes in chicken is found to cause EXPEC infections in animal model [12]. In addition, recent evidences showed that a part of human food born EXPEC infections originated from food producing animals mainly poultry meat [13]. Therefore, identifying these resistant E. coli isolates from apparently healthy food animals is important to understand the antibiotic resistance characteristics, the emergence and spread of resistance genes, particularly ESBL encoding genes. ESBL is an increasing threat for the public health in developing countries including Malaysia. Chicken meat and its products are the main source of protein in Malaysia [14]. There are several reports on the prevalence of ESBL producing E. coli in health sectors in Malaysia [1517]. In addition, recent evidence has shown that there is a high contamination of chicken meat with ESBL producing E. coli in Malaysia [1820]. Even though there is research done in some parts of the peninsular Malaysia on ESBL producing E. coli from chicken farm, but there is no published data on the prevalence of ESBL producing E. coli and its encoding genes from broiler chicken farm in the study area. Therefore, this study was aimed to investigate the occurrence of ESBL producing E. coli, the resistance genes and antimicrobial resistance patterns of E. coli isolated from apparently healthy broiler chickens in Kelantan.

Methodology

Sample collection

A total of 320 cloacal swab samples were randomly collected from 5 different broiler farms namely, Machang, bachok, Tumpat, Pasir Mas and Jeli in Kelantan. Each cloacal swab was placed into Amies transport medium and labeled with sample identification number and date of collection. All collected samples were transported to the laboratory using an ice pack at a temperature of 2–8°C within 6 hours of sample collection.

Isolation and identification of E. coli

Collected cloacal swab samples were enriched in Buffered Peptone Water (Oxoid, Manchester, UK) and incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs. The enriched bacteria were inoculated on MacConkey agar and lactose-fermenting colonies were taken and cultured on Eosin methylene blue (EMB) agar (Oxoid, Manchester, UK) after incubation at 37°C for 24 hrs. Green metallic sheen colonies on EMB were selected for further confirmation by using biochemical characteristics, including triple sugar iron agar (TSI) for glucose fermentation, citrate utilization, urease production, indole fermentation, methyl red test, and motility as mentioned previously [21]. Presumptive E. coli isolates were sub cultured on to nutrient Agar and stored in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (Oxoid, Manchester, UK) containing 50% glycerol at -80°C for further analysis as described in [22]. E. coli ATCC® 25922 was used as a positive control. Isolates were confirmed by PCR, using a set primer specific for E. coli.

Antimicrobial susceptibility test

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of E. coli isolates was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) (Oxoid, Manchester, UK). Bacterial suspension with turbidity equivalent to 0.5 McFarland standard was evenly dispensed on the surface of MHA plates using a sterile cotton swab. Antibiotic discs Aztreonam (ATM30), Cefotaxime (CTX30), Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMC30), Ceftazidime (CAZ30), Ceftriaxone (CRO30), Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT25), Chloramphenicol (C30), Tetracycline (TE30), Tazobactam (TZP110), Ofloxacin (OFX5), Imipenem (IPM10) and meropenem (MEM10) were placed on the surface of MHA agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 16 to 18 hours. The zone of inhibition was measured to the nearest millimetre and interpreted based on the guidelines of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [23]. E. coli ATCC® 25922 were used as a control strain. Bacterial isolates that show resistant to three or more classes of antimicrobial agents were classified as multidrug resistant (MDR) [24, 25]. Multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index was analyzed as stated in [26]. Multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index was calculated by dividing the number of resistant antibiotics which are resistance to an organism to the total number of antibiotics tested.

PCR confirmation and ESBL encoding gene detection in E. coli

Genomic DNA was extracted using bacterial DNA extraction kit (Machery-Nagel, Germany) following the manufacturer’s recommendation. Extracted DNA was amplified using PCR with species-specific Pho and E. coli primer as published previously [18, 19, 27, 28]. The primer sequences used in this study are summarized in Table 1. The PCR reaction for pho primer was carried out with the following protocol: An initial denaturation step of 95°C for 4 min followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, optimized annealing temperature at 56°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 60 s with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The PCR protocol for E coli primer was as follows: Initial denaturation of 95°C for 3 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 sec, annealing at 55°C for 90 sec and extension at 72°C for 15 sec followed by final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Extracted genomic DNA was further amplified using PCR with specific primers (Table 1) to screen for the presence of ESBL (blaCTX-M and blaTEM) and colistin (mcr-1) encoding genes in E. coli. The PCR Protocol used for both CTX and TEM: an initial denaturation 95°C for 4 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C denaturation for 30s, 55°C annealing temperature for 30s and extension 72°C for 60 sec, with the final extension 72°C for 10 min. the Agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products were conducted, and gel images were analysed using GelDoc© Gel Documentation System (Bio-Rad, USA).

thumbnail
Table 1. Primers used for the detection of E. coli species and ESBL genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285743.t001

A correlation heatmap was generated between the antibiotic resistance genes and resistance phenotypes using a Python seaborn library for categorical variables [31]. The phenotype resistance of the antibiotics was determined based antibiotic susceptibility profiles.

Multi-Locus sequence typing (MLST)

Seven housekeeping genes, adk, fumC, gyrB, icd, mdh, purA, and recA, were amplified and sequenced for each selected isolates following previous protocol [32, 33].The primers used are available online in website [34]. The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min; 30 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 56°C (adk) or 64°C (fumC, and purA) or 68°C (recA, gyrB, icd and mdh) for 1 min and 72°C for 2 min; followed by a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. The amplified PCR products were sent to Apical 1st base Sequencing service (Apical Scientific SDN. BHD.) Malaysia, to perform a sequence analysis. The allele sequences and sequence types were determined from the E. coli database at the MLST website [35].

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Universiti Malaysia Kelantan (Approval code: UMK/FPV/ACUE/PG/2/2019, Approval Date: February 2019). The animal subjects (chicken from commercial poultry farms) were used only for cloacal swabs collection and no invasive or harmful procedures were used in handling the birds.

Result

In this study, out of 320 cloacal swab samples, 121 presumptive E. coli were isolated based on routine bacteriological and biochemical characteristics. Out of these 121 E. coli isolates, from Machang were (n = 35), Bachok (n = 28), Tumpat (n = 20), Pasir Mas (n = 21) and Jeli (n = 17). Out of these E. coli isolates, 30% (97/320) were confirmed as E. coli by PCR using species-specific primer.

Antimicrobial susceptibility profile

Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of the E. coli isolates against 12 antibiotics of different classes were subjected and the results are summarized in Table 2. E. coli isolates had relatively higher resistance to tetracycline (82.5%) and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (78.4%), whereas the lowest resistance (17.5%) was observed to the imipenem as shown in Table 2. In addition, some of the E. coli isolates were resistant to carbapenem antibiotics, meropenem (28.9%) and imipenem (17.5%). Almost all, 93.8% (91/97) of the isolates were resistant to at least three of the tested 12 antibiotic discs belong to different classes. Thus, they could be classified most of the E. coli isolates of this study are multi-drug resistant. 90.7% of the isolates were with MAR index values > 0.2; while 9.3% of them had index values less than or equal to 0.2. The proportions of isolates with the MAR index values from 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9 were 16.5%,16.5%,7.2%, 15.5%,10.3%, 12.4% and 8.3% respectively.

thumbnail
Table 2. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of E. coli isolate from chicken farm in Kelantan, Malaysia, 2021 (n = 97).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285743.t002

ESBL encoding genes in E. coli isolates

The E. coli isolates were screened for the presence of ESBL encoding genes where blaCTX-M and blaTEM genes were detected in 62.9% (61/97) and 45.4% (44/97) of the samples respectively. In addition, 20.6% (20/97) were positive for colistin resistance gene mcr-1. Our study showed that 22.7% (22/97) of the E. coli isolates were harboring both blaCTX-M and blaTEM genes. The majority the ESBL resistance genes found were blaCTX-M gene. Six isolates (6.1%) were found positive for blaCTX-M, blaTEM and mcr-1 genes. Overall, 84.5% (82/97) of those E. coli isolates were positive for ESBL genes. The ESBL and colistin resistance genes distribution are summarized in Table 3.

thumbnail
Table 3. MLST sequence type of E. coli isolates and encoding resistance genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285743.t003

Multi-Locus sequence typing (MLST)

The MLST sequence typing of the isolates shows that the E. coli isolates were widely diverse.

The Identified sequence types are summarized in Table 3.

The correlation coefficient of the phenotype resistant to ESBL Encoding (blaCTX-M and blaTEM) genes of the isolated E. coli shows near to zero value (Fig 1). However, the a few resistance antibiotics, for instance, CAZ30 and CTX30; CRO30 and CTX30; ATM30 and CAZ30; TZP110 and CAZ30 have shown a strong correlation pattern.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Correlation heatmap for ESBL genes with antibiotic resistant phenotypes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285743.g001

Discussion

Even though E. coli is a commensal bacterium, it is the main opportunistic pathogen in poultry. ESBL producing E. coli pose major threat to poultry production with a potential risk of transfer of these resistant pathogens to humans directly or indirectly. In the present study, ESBL encoding genes of E. coli were detected from cloacal swab samples collected from broiler chickens in Kelantan, Malaysia. The 30% prevalence of E. coli among the samples collected from the broiler chicken farm in the current study is lower than the previous study from Malaysia which reported a prevalence of 82.3% [36] and 72.8% [37]. This difference in E. coli isolation could be due to the difference in the sample size, the types of samples and sampling area used in the research. For instance, the result from [37] includes environmental and cloacal samples and [38] used only 88 chicken cloacal samples in their study.

Antimicrobial resistance in broiler chickens has been reported in many countries in the world. This could be due to the rampant use of antibiotics as growth promoter, disease prevention and treatment of diseases in food animals. Our result revealed that most of the isolates were resistant in different degrees to commonly used antibiotics such as, tetracycline (82.5%), trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (78.4%) and chloramphenicol (61.9%). These results showed that most of the isolated E. coli from broilers in the chicken farms were multidrug-resistant. The excessive uses of these common antimicrobials in the poultry production has been reported to cause multidrug-resistance [39]. High resistance rate of tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, 91.4% and 74.2% respectively, were reported from previous study on broiler chicken farm from Malaysia [37]. In our study, some E. coli isolates show resistant to carbapenem antibiotics, meropenem (28.9%) and imipenem (17.5%). In this study isolates with MAR index values greater than 0.2 were 90.7%, and 9.3% were less than or equal to 0.2. The high percentage of MAR indices with values greater than 0.2 indicates that the isolates originate from high-risk sources of contamination. This might be caused by the excessive usage of antibiotics for prevention, control of diseases, and growth promotion [40]. E. coli isolates were positive for ESBL encoding genes, blaCTX-M and blaTEM. This finding suggests that ESBL producing E. coli is distributed in local broiler farms. Spread of ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from non-symptomatic food animals indicates that commensal E. coli can serve as a resistance gene reservoir and may pose a potential risk of transfer to humans [41, 42]. Previous studies from Malaysia showed high prevalence of ESBL as well as colistin resistant E. coli contamination from chicken meat [1820].

In our study the dominant ESBL encoding gene was blaCTX-M, which was also reported by several studies conducted in broilers globally [36, 38, 4245]. Recently blaCTX-M is reported the leading ESBL gene worldwide. In contrast to this, a study from Germany showed blaSHV was the most prevalent ESBL gene in poultry [46]. We found that out of the 97 isolates of E. coli, blaCTX-M genes were detected in 62.9% of the isolates. This finding is slightly higher than previous prevalence reports from similar work by Khoshbakht R [47] which reported 60.3% prevalence of blaCTX-M producing E. coli in chicken from Iran. Similar patterns of prevalence were recently reported in Malaysia by [36] who reported that 100% (7/7) E. coli were positive for blaCTX-M genes. The presence of blaTEM in the E. coli isolated from chicken of this study was 45.4%, which is higher than a study from Iran (37.7%) [47], but it is slightly lower than Enterobacteriaceae isolated from surface water in Malaysia (47.4%). Similarly, it has been reported that high prevalence of blaCTX-M followed by blaTEM harboring E. coli recovered from human clinical samples [48, 49]. We found that 22.7% of the E. coli isolates were encoding both blaCTX-M and blaTEM ESBL genes, which is slightly lower than previous study from Philippines, 33.3% [42]. Evidences show that ESBL prevalence varies throughout the world where Asian countries were with the highest rates [50]. In addition, we detected the coexistence of mcr-1 gene with blaCTX-M in six of the E coli isolates. Which shows that, the co- resistance of another critical antibiotic, colistin. Similar findings were also reported from studies of chicken origin in Nepal and China [44, 51]. The correlation analysis of resistance antibiotic phenotypes with blaCTX-M and blaTEM genotypes did not show any correlations. Whereas, a strong correction was observed among cephalosporins, cephalosporin versus beta-lactam and beta-lactam inhibitor.

In this study the MLST sequence typing of the isolates shows that the E. coli isolates were widely diverse. Among the sequences, medically important groups like ST117, ST69 and ST155 were identified. ST117 and ST155 E. coli isolates were harboring both blaCTX and blaTEM ESBL genes. Both ST117 and ST155 were found in ESBL-producing E. coli from community in Malaysia [52]. ST117 was reported in extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli related virulence genes both in human and food-animal [53]. ST 155 were also reported in broiler chicken origin from previous research from Malaysia [20]. It was also reported with ESBL producing E.coli isolates in chicken meat in Singapore, Spain [54, 55] and from diseased chicken in China [56]. ST69 (ST69 complex) was also found harboring blaTEM gene.

Both ST117 and ST69 were reported from human EXPEC associated infections and food animals and retail meat sources in Europe [57]. In addition, ST69 was found with high virulence gene content in human EXPE in Spain [58].

Conclusion

This study showed that prevalence of ESBL genes in E. coli isolates from broilers chicken farms in Malaysia is high. Our finding shows that blaCTX-M is the most prevalent ESBL gene in broiler farms in Kelantan, Malaysia. Most of the E. coli isolates were multi-drug resistant and are therefore a potential risk as sources of ESBL producing E. coli infection from animals to humans by direct or indirect consumption of the animal products. The findings provide an insight that ESBL producing E. coli is likely spreading among the local chicken farms in Malaysia, particularly Kelantan. The spread of this multidrug resistant E. coli in food animals poses a risk of dissemination of the pathogen to humans through food chain.

Supporting information

S1 File. Contains all the supporting figures.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285743.s002

(DOCX)

S2 File. Contain the correlation matrix.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285743.s003

(IPYNB)

References

  1. 1. Cabello FC. Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: a growing problem for human and animal health and for the environment. Environ Microbiol. 2006;8(7):1137–44. Epub 2006/07/05. pmid:16817922.
  2. 2. Rantala M, Holso K, Lillas A, Huovinen P, Kaartinen L. Survey of condition-based prescribing of antimicrobial drugs for dogs at a veterinary teaching hospital. Vet Rec. 2004;155(9):259–62. Epub 2004/10/06. pmid:15461362.
  3. 3. Schwarz S, Kehrenberg C, Walsh TR. Use of antimicrobial agents in veterinary medicine and food animal production. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001;17(6):431–7. Epub 2001/06/09. pmid:11397611.
  4. 4. Bunner CA, Norby B, Bartlett PC, Erskine RJ, Downes FP, Kaneene JB. Prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007;231(2):275–83. Epub 2007/07/17. pmid:17630898.
  5. 5. Wall B, Mateus A, Marshall L, Pfeiffer D, Lubroth J, Ormel H, et al. Drivers, dynamics and epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in animal production: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2016.
  6. 6. Shaikh S, Fatima J, Shakil S, Rizvi SM, Kamal MA. Antibiotic resistance and extended spectrum beta-lactamases: Types, epidemiology and treatment. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2015;22(1):90–101. Epub 2015/01/07. pmid:25561890; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4281622.
  7. 7. Bush K, Jacoby GA. Updated functional classification of beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(3):969–76. Epub 2009/12/10. pmid:19995920; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2825993.
  8. 8. Bajpai T, Pandey M, Varma M, Bhatambare GS. Prevalence of TEM, SHV, and CTX-M Beta-Lactamase genes in the urinary isolates of a tertiary care hospital. Avicenna J Med. 2017;7(1):12–6. Epub 2017/02/10. pmid:28182026; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5255976.
  9. 9. Friedman ND, Kaye KS, Stout JE, McGarry SA, Trivette SL, Briggs JP, et al. Health care—associated bloodstream infections in adults: a reason to change the accepted definition of community-acquired infections. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(10):791–7. Epub 2002/11/19. pmid:12435215.
  10. 10. Kathayat D, Helmy YA, Deblais L, Rajashekara G. Novel small molecules affecting cell membrane as potential therapeutics for avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):15329. Epub 2018/10/20. pmid:30333507; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6193035.
  11. 11. Schaefer AM, Bossart GD, Mazzoil M, Fair PA, Reif JS. Risk factors for colonization of E. coli in Atlantic Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Indian River Lagoon, Florida. J Environ Public Health. 2011;2011:597073. Epub 2011/10/07. pmid:21977048; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3184408.
  12. 12. Stromberg ZR, Johnson JR, Fairbrother JM, Kilbourne J, Van Goor A, Curtiss RR, et al. Evaluation of Escherichia coli isolates from healthy chickens to determine their potential risk to poultry and human health. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0180599. Epub 2017/07/04. pmid:28671990; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5495491.
  13. 13. Lazarus B, Paterson DL, Mollinger JL, Rogers BA. Do human extraintestinal Escherichia coli infections resistant to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins originate from food-producing animals? A systematic review. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(3):439–52. Epub 2014/10/11. pmid:25301206.
  14. 14. Wahab A, Rittgers C. Broiler Meat Sector, Malaysia. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. 2014.
  15. 15. Lim KT, Yasin R, Yeo CC, Puthucheary S, Thong KL. Characterization of multidrug resistant ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates from hospitals in Malaysia. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2009;2009:165637. Epub 2009/08/13. pmid:19672454; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2721974.
  16. 16. Ngoi ST, Teh CSJ, Chong CW, Abdul Jabar K, Tan SC, Yu LH, et al. In Vitro Efficacy of Flomoxef against Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Associated with Urinary Tract Infections in Malaysia. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(2):181. Epub 2021/03/07. pmid:33670224; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7916913.
  17. 17. Ho WS, Balan G, Puthucheary S, Kong BH, Lim KT, Tan LK, et al. Prevalence and characterization of multidrug-resistant and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli from pediatric wards of a Malaysian hospital. Microb Drug Resist. 2012;18(4):408–16. Epub 2012/03/08. pmid:22394084.
  18. 18. Aklilu E, Raman K. MCR-1 Gene Encoded Colistin-Resistant Escherichia coli in Raw Chicken Meat and Bean Sprouts in Malaysia. Int J Microbiol. 2020;2020:8853582. Epub 2020/08/11. pmid:32774381; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7407033 publication of this paper.
  19. 19. Aliyu AB, Saleha AA, Jalila A, Zunita Z. Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing- Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):699. Epub 2016/08/04. pmid:27484086; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4971674.
  20. 20. Aklilu E, Harun A, Singh KKB. Molecular characterization of blaNDM, blaOXA-48, mcr-1 and blaTEM-52 positive and concurrently carbapenem and colistin resistant and extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli in chicken in Malaysia. BMC Vet Res. 2022;18(1):190. Epub 2022/05/20. pmid:35590358; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9118571.
  21. 21. Liu X, Liu H, Li Y, Hao C. Association between virulence profile and fluoroquinolone resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from dogs and cats in China. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. 2017;11(04):306–13. pmid:28459221
  22. 22. Yin W, Li H, Shen Y, Liu Z, Wang S, Shen Z, et al. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-3 in Escherichia coli. MBio. 2017;8(3):e00543–17. pmid:28655818
  23. 23. CSLI. Performance Standard for Antimicrobial Suseceptibility Testing.31st ed. CLSI supliment M100Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2021.
  24. 24. Schwarz S, Silley P, Simjee S, Woodford N, van Duijkeren E, Johnson AP, et al. Editorial: assessing the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria obtained from animals. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(4):601–4. Epub 2010/02/26. pmid:20181573.
  25. 25. Sweeney MT, Lubbers BV, Schwarz S, Watts JL. Applying definitions for multidrug resistance, extensive drug resistance and pandrug resistance to clinically significant livestock and companion animal bacterial pathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(6):1460–3. Epub 2018/02/27. pmid:29481657.
  26. 26. Osundiya O, Oladele R, Oduyebo O. Multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) indices of Pseudomonas and Klebsiella species isolates in Lagos University Teaching Hospital. African Journal of Clinical and Experimental Microbiology. 2013;14(3):164–8.
  27. 27. Thong KXYaKL. Multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection of virulence Genes in Escherichia coli. Malaysian Journal of Science. 2009;28(1):1–14.
  28. 28. Kong RYC, So CL, Law WF, Wu RSS. A Sensitive and Versatile Multiplex PCR System for the Rapid Detection of Enterotoxigenic (ETEC), Enterohaemorrhagic (EHEC) and Enteropathogenic (EPEC) Strains of Escherichia coli. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 1999;38(12):1207–15.
  29. 29. Dierikx C, van Essen-Zandbergen A, Veldman K, Smith H, Mevius D. Increased detection of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli isolates from poultry. Vet Microbiol. 2010;145(3–4):273–8. Epub 2010/04/17. pmid:20395076.
  30. 30. Rebelo AR, Bortolaia V, Kjeldgaard JS, Pedersen SK, Leekitcharoenphon P, Hansen IM, et al. Multiplex PCR for detection of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance determinants, mcr-1, mcr-2, mcr-3, mcr-4 and mcr-5 for surveillance purposes. Euro Surveill. 2018;23(6):29–39. Epub 2018/02/15. pmid:29439754; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5824125.
  31. 31. Waskom M. seaborn: statistical data visualization. Journal of Open Source Software. 2021;6(60)), 3021,.
  32. 32. Seenama C, Thamlikitkul V, Ratthawongjirakul P. Multilocus sequence typing and bla ESBL characterization of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolated from healthy humans and swine in Northern Thailand. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:2201–14. Epub 2019/08/15. pmid:31410039; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6650452.
  33. 33. Tartof SY, Solberg OD, Manges AR, Riley LW. Analysis of a uropathogenic Escherichia coli clonal group by multilocus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(12):5860–4. Epub 2005/12/08. pmid:16333067; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1317175.
  34. 34. Wirth T, Falush D, Lan R, Colles F, Mensa P, Wieler LH, et al. Sex and virulence in Escherichia coli: an evolutionary perspective. Mol Microbiol. 2006;60(5):1136–51. Epub 2006/05/13. pmid:16689791; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1557465.
  35. 35. EnteroBase. Escherichia coli MLST Database. 2018 [cited 2022 20 August]. Available from: https://enterobase.warwick.ac.uk/species/ecoli/allele_st_search.
  36. 36. Suryadevara N, Yong K, Balavinayagamani G, Subramonie S, Ragavan ND, Ramachandiran M, et al. Molecular characterization of Escherichia coli from chickens in poultry farms of Malaysia. Research journal of biotechnology. 2020;15:1–10.
  37. 37. Elmi SA, Simons D, Elton L, Haider N, Abdel Hamid MM, Shuaib YA, et al. Identification of Risk Factors Associated with Resistant Escherichia coli Isolates from Poultry Farms in the East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia: A Cross Sectional Study. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(2). Epub 2021/02/04. pmid:33530462; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7912622.
  38. 38. Nagaraja Suryadevara KBY, Balavinayagamani Ganapathy, Sridevi Subramonie, Nanthiney Devi Ragavan MR, Gnanendra Shanmugam and Ponmurugan P. Extended-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics have widely been used for treatment of serious Gram-negative infections. However, bacterial resistance has emerged due to production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs). Research Journal of Biotechnology. 2020.
  39. 39. McEwen SA, Fedorka-Cray PJ. Antimicrobial use and resistance in animals. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34 Suppl 3(Supplement_3):S93–S106. Epub 2002/05/04. pmid:11988879.
  40. 40. Krumperman PH. Multiple antibiotic resistance indexing of Escherichia coli to identify high-risk sources of fecal contamination of foods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983;46(1):165–70. Epub 1983/07/01. pmid:6351743; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC239283.
  41. 41. Li S, Zhao M, Liu J, Zhou Y, Miao Z. Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance Profiles of Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated from Healthy Broilers in Shandong Province, China. J Food Prot. 2016;79(7):1169–73. Epub 2016/07/01. pmid:27357036.
  42. 42. Gundran RS, Cardenio PA, Villanueva MA, Sison FB, Benigno CC, Kreausukon K, et al. Prevalence and distribution of blaCTX-M, blaSHV, blaTEM genes in extended- spectrum beta- lactamase- producing E. coli isolates from broiler farms in the Philippines. BMC Vet Res. 2019;15(1):227. Epub 2019/07/07. pmid:31277658; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6612079.
  43. 43. Hiroi M, Yamazaki F, Harada T, Takahashi N, Iida N, Noda Y, et al. Prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in food-producing animals. J Vet Med Sci. 2012;74(2):189–95. Epub 2011/10/08. pmid:21979457.
  44. 44. Wu C, Wang Y, Shi X, Wang S, Ren H, Shen Z, et al. Rapid rise of the ESBL and mcr-1 genes in Escherichia coli of chicken origin in China, 2008–2014. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7(1):30. Epub 2018/03/15. pmid:29535301; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5849743.
  45. 45. Horton RA, Randall LP, Snary EL, Cockrem H, Lotz S, Wearing H, et al. Fecal carriage and shedding density of CTX-M extended-spectrum {beta}-lactamase-producing escherichia coli in cattle, chickens, and pigs: implications for environmental contamination and food production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(11):3715–9. Epub 2011/04/12. pmid:21478314; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3127594.
  46. 46. Dahms C, Hubner NO, Kossow A, Mellmann A, Dittmann K, Kramer A. Occurrence of ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli in Livestock and Farm Workers in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0143326. Epub 2015/11/26. pmid:26606146; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4659621.
  47. 47. Khoshbakht R SS, Raeisi M. Antibiotic susceptibility and high prevalence of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli in iranian broilers. Revue Méd Vét. 2016.
  48. 48. Sekawi Z, Yusof R, Shamsudin M. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases-producing Escherichia coli from a tertiary hospital in Malaysia: emergence of CTX-M-type β-lactamases variation. Research Journal of Microbiology. 2008;3:489–93.
  49. 49. Pokhrel RH, Thapa B, Kafle R, Shah PK, Tribuddharat C. Co-existence of beta-lactamases in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli from Kathmandu, Nepal. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7(1):694. Epub 2014/10/08. pmid:25287013; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4197279.
  50. 50. Hawkey PM. Prevalence and clonality of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Asia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14 Suppl 1:159–65. Epub 2007/12/25. pmid:18154540.
  51. 51. Joshi PR, Thummeepak R, Paudel S, Acharya M, Pradhan S, Banjara MR, et al. Molecular Characterization of Colistin-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolated from Chickens: First Report from Nepal. Microb Drug Resist. 2019;25(6):846–54. Epub 2019/03/16. pmid:30874473.
  52. 52. Dwiyanto J, Hor JW, Reidpath D, Su TT, Lee SWH, Ayub Q, et al. Pan-genome and resistome analysis of extended-spectrum ss-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli: A multi-setting epidemiological surveillance study from Malaysia. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0265142. Epub 2022/03/11. pmid:35271656; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8912130.
  53. 53. Manges AR, Harel J, Masson L, Edens TJ, Portt A, Reid-Smith RJ, et al. Multilocus sequence typing and virulence gene profiles associated with Escherichia coli from human and animal sources. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2015;12(4):302–10. Epub 2015/03/17. pmid:25774654.
  54. 54. Guo S, Aung KT, Leekitcharoenphon P, Tay MYF, Seow KLG, Zhong Y, et al. Prevalence and genomic analysis of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in retail raw meats in Singapore. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76(3):601–5. Epub 2020/12/18. pmid:33331642.
  55. 55. Vitas AI, Naik D, Perez-Etayo L, Gonzalez D. Increased exposure to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae through the consumption of chicken and sushi products. Int J Food Microbiol. 2018;269:80–6. Epub 2018/02/09. pmid:29421362.
  56. 56. Ding S, Han X, Li J, Gao W, Chen Z, Feng Y. Discovery of multi-drug resistant, MCR-1 and ESBL-coproducing ST117 Escherichia coli from diseased chickens in northeast China. Science Bulletin. 2018;63(16):1059–66. pmid:36755458
  57. 57. Manges AR. Escherichia coli and urinary tract infections: the role of poultry-meat. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(2):122–9. Epub 2015/12/19. pmid:26679924.
  58. 58. Blanco J, Mora A, Mamani R, Lopez C, Blanco M, Dahbi G, et al. National survey of Escherichia coli causing extraintestinal infections reveals the spread of drug-resistant clonal groups O25b:H4-B2-ST131, O15:H1-D-ST393 and CGA-D-ST69 with high virulence gene content in Spain. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(9):2011–21. Epub 2011/06/15. pmid:21669946.