Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Characteristics of Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in sewage from a tertiary hospital in Jilin Province, China

  • Mingwei Liu ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Mingwei Liu, Lin Zheng

    Roles Writing – original draft

    Affiliations College of Life Science, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China, Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China

  • Lin Zheng ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Mingwei Liu, Lin Zheng

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations College of Life Science, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China, Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China

  • Lingwei Zhu,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China

  • Gejin Lu,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China

  • Hongru Guo,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliation The Sericultural Research Institute of Jilin Province, Jilin, PR China

  • Jiayao Guan,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China

  • Jie Jing,

    Roles Validation

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China

  • Shiwen Sun,

    Roles Supervision

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China

  • Ying Wang,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China

  • Zixian Wang,

    Roles Validation

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China

  • Yang Sun,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China

  • Xue Ji,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China

  • Bowen Jiang,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China

  • Jun Liu,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China

  • Wenhui Zhang ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision

    wenhui.changchun@163.com (WZ); xuejung2021@163.com (XG)

    Affiliation College of Life Science, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China

  •  [ ... ],
  • Xuejun Guo

    Roles Funding acquisition, Supervision

    wenhui.changchun@163.com (WZ); xuejung2021@163.com (XG)

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changchun, China

  • [ view all ]
  • [ view less ]

Background

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infection is a serious problem in hospitals worldwide. We monitored a tertiary hospital in Changchun, Jilin Province, China, and found that CRKP was the major species among the carbapenem-resistant isolates in sewage. Subsequently, we evaluated the drug susceptibility, resistance genes, virulence genes, outer pore membrane protein-related genes (OmpK35 & OmpK 36), multi-locus sequence typing and replicons, biofilm formation capabilities, and resistance to chlorine-containing disinfectants among KP isolates. Identification of drug sensitivity, multiple resistance profiles were observed including 77 (82.80%) multidrug resistant (MDR), 16 (17.20%) extensive drug resistant (XDR). Some antibiotic resistance genes were detected, the most prevalent carbapenemase gene was blaKPC, and 16 resistance genes were associated with other antibiotics. In addition, 3 (3.23%) CRKP isolates demonstrated loss of OmpK-35 and 2 (2.15%) demonstrated loss of OmpK-36. In the detection of multi-locus sequence typing (MLST), 11 ST11 isolates carried virulence genes. The most common replicon type was IncFII. Biofilm-forming capabilities were demonstrated by 68.8% of the isolates, all of which were resistant to chlorine-containing disinfectants. The results of the study showed that antibiotic-resistant isolates, especially CRKP, could resist disinfectants in hospital wastewater, and improper treatment of hospital wastewater may lead to the spread of drug-resistant bacteria and their genes. Thus, these bacteria must be eliminated before being discharged into the municipal sewage system.

Introduction

Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) is a member of the ESKAPEE (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp, and Escherichia coli) family organisms [1]. Among these organisms, carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) has become the most common carbapenemase-producing species in hospitals [2] and is a major healthcare-associated pathogen worldwide. Research has shown that the incidence of CRKP infections and associated deaths increased 6.16 times from 2007–2015 [3]. KP is intrinsically resistant to multiple antibiotics and can easily acquire antibiotic resistance determinants. Furthermore, KP has the potential to evolve into multidrug resistance phenotypes and hypervirulent KP (HVKP). The ST11 KP strain is associated with a high drug resistance phenotype and high virulence [4].

Carbapenem antibiotics are the most effective against multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria [5] and are used as a last resort to treat critical patients. The most common mechanism by which bacteria develop resistance to carbapenem antibiotics is the production of carbapenemases. KPC-2 and NDM are dominant carbapenemases observed in clinical CRKP cases in China. Pathogens producing KPC-2 are resistant to all β-lactams except ceftazidime–avibactam, greatly limiting treatment options; additionally, NDM is a serious threat to public health worldwide due to the rapid spread of NDM-expressing pathogens [6].

Hospitals play an important role in spreading antibiotic-resistant bacteria into the environment through sewage. Hospital sewage contains various antibiotic compounds, microorganisms, metabolized drugs, disinfectants, and patient excreta [7]. Thus, hospital sewage is a key reservoir for MDR microorganisms [8]. Hospital sewage analysis has emerged as a supplement to traditional clinical bacterial resistance monitoring because a single sewage sample contains bacteria from thousands of individuals [9].

In this study, we characterized the CRKP isolates in sewage from a tertiary hospital in Changchun City located in northeast China, confirmed the antibiotic resistance patterns and detection of some drug resistance genes, evaluated biofilm formation ability, and virulence genes, and performed multi-locus sequence typing (MLST).

Materials and methods

Sample collection and bacterial isolation

We selected a comprehensive tertiary hospital with over 5,900 beds and over 9,600 employees. It is one of the top 30 hospitals in China and is located in Changchun in the northeast Jilin province. The hospital has a standard sewage treatment system.

The samples were taken from sewage treatment stations and had not been subjected to digestion treatment. We used a 500-mL stainless steel barrel sampler to collect 200-mL sewage every two months four times from March to September 2021. The sampling procedure was approved by Changchun Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The samples were stored on ice, transported to the laboratory, and processed within 6 h at 4°C. One hundred microliters of each collected sewage sample was spread on MacConkey agar (Haibo Biotech, Qingdao, China) plates containing 4 mg/L imipenem and 2 mg/L vancomycin (to inhibit gram-positive bacteria) and incubated for 20 h at 37°C. The 16S rDNA gene was amplified and sequenced by the Comate Biosciences Co., Ltd. (Changchun, China), and biochemical identificationwas determined using a BD PhoenixTM-100 System.

String testing and virulence gene detection

The hypermucoviscous phenotype was identified by string test. All isolates were inoculated on agar plates containing 5% sheep blood and incubated at 37°C for 20 h. The string test was performed as previously described [10]. Virulence genes rmpA, rmpA2, iucA, and iroB were amplified by PCR as previously described [11].

Multi-locus sequence typing

MLST was performed on all isolates by PCR of seven standard housekeeping genes (gapA, infB, mdh, pgi, phoE, rpoB, and tonB) listed on the PubMLST website (http://www.pasteur.fr/recherche/genopole/PF8/mlst/Kpneumoniae.html). The sequence types (STs) were determined using the MLST database.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The susceptibility of the isolates to amikacin, gentamicin, imipenem, meropenem, cefazolin, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, cefepime, aztreonam, ampicillin, piperacillin, amoxicillin–clavulanate, ampicillin–sulbactam, piperacillin–tazobactam, colistin, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and tetracycline was determined using a BD PhoenixTM-100 System. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of imipenem was determined using the broth microdilution method according to 2020 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as the quality control for the susceptibility test. The isolates found to be resistant to at least three different classes of antimicrobial agents were classified as MDR bacteria, and resistant to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial agents were classified as XDR bacteria [12].

Detection of antimicrobial resistance genes

The presence of several drug resistance-associated genes was assessed by conventional single PCR. The template DNA consisted of boiled lysates prepared from the isolates. Carbapenem resistance genes (blaKPC, blaNDM, blaIMP, blaVIM, and blaOXA–48), β-lactam resistance genes (blaCTX–M, blaSHV, blaTEM), plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) genes (aac(6′)-Ib-cr, qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, and qnrS), tetracycline resistance genes (tet(A), tet(B), tet(C), tet(D), and tet(X)), sulfonamide resistance genes (sul1, sul2, sul3), chloramphenicol resistance genes cmlA, floR, aminoglycoside resistance genes (armA, rmtB, aac(3)-II, aac(6′)-Ib) and integrase genes intI1 (for class 1 integrons), intI2 (for class 2 integrons), and intI3 (for class 3 integrons) were evaluated. Furthermore, a single PCR assay targeting two outer membrane pore protein genes (OmpK-35 and OmpK36) was also performed [13]. The PCR primers and conditions are shown in S1 Table.

Replicon typing

A PBRT kit (DIATHEVA, Italy) was used to identify the 25 different replicons (HI1, HI2, I1, I2, X1, X2, L/M, N, FIA, FIB, FIC, FII, FIIS, FIIK, W, Y, P, A/C, T, K, U, R, B/O, HIB-M, and FIB-M) in eight multiplex PCRs following the manufacturer’s instructions [14]. PCR products were visualized using QuickGel 6100 system (Monad Biotech CO., Ltd.)

Disinfectant resistance test

Method for determining the MIC value in CLSI, the MIC value of the disinfectant NaClO was determined by micro-broth dilution. The concentration gradients were set as 1600 μg/ml, 800 μg/ml, 400 μg/ml, 200 μg/ml, 100 μg/ml, 50 μg/ml, and 25 μg/ml. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as the quality control. Because the effective concentration of NaClO solution reported in the manufacturer’s instructions was 300–500 μg/ml, an isolate with a MIC value greater than or equal to 400 μg/ml was defined as resistant in this research.

Biofilm formation assay

We modified routine methods to determine the biofilm formation capability of the isolates [15]. Briefly, the isolate to be tested was cultured in Mueller-Hinton broth (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) at 37°C for 20 h; then the concentration was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland, the suspension was diluted 100 times, and 200 μL of the resulting suspension was inoculated into a sterile flat-bottomed 96-well polystyrene microplate. After a 20-h incubation at 37°C, the non-adherent cells were removed, and the plate was washed three times with 300 μl of 1% sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) per well. Biofilms were fixed with methanol for 15 min, the remaining methanol was removed, and the well was air-dried. Subsequently, 220 μl 1% crystal violet was added per well and incubated for 10 min. The well was then rinsed with PBS, air dried, and 200 μl 75% ethanol was used to dissolve the dyed biofilm. Finally, the optical density (OD) of the dissolved biofilm was measured with a microplate reader at a wavelength of 460 nm. Three repeat tests were conducted for each strain. Sterile Mueller-Hinton Broth medium (Solarbio, Beijing, China) was used as a negative control. The cut-off for biofilm formation was defined as three standard deviations above the mean of the negative control OD (ODc). The criteria were as follows: OD <ODc, no biofilm forming ability; ODc<OD<2ODc, weak biofilm forming ability; 2ODc<OD<4ODc, moderate biofilm forming ability, and 4ODc< ODc, strong biofilm formation ability.

Statistical analyses

Chi-square test scores were used to assess statistically significant differences in biofilm formation ability and antibiotic resistance. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 26.0. International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk. A probability (p) value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Bacterial Isolation and Identification

A total of 121 carbapenem-resistant isolates were isolated from four hospital sewage samples, including 1 strain of Enterobacter kobei (0.83%), 2 isolates of E. coli (1.65%), 4 isolates of Citrobacter frazier (3.31%), 14 isolates of strain of Raoultella ornithinolytica (11.57%), 2 isolates of Aeromonas spp. (1.65%), 5 isolates of Enterobacter cloacaestrain (4.13%) and 93 isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae (76.86%) (Fig 1). All isolates were confirmed by 16S rDNA gene analysis and the BD PhoenixTM-100 System. Since KP accounted for the majority of the isolates, we subsequently focused on the characteristics of KP isolates. Among the 93 KP isolates, 2 were isolated in March 29 May, 23 in July, and 39 in September.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Distribution of 121 carbapenem-resistant isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285730.g001

Determination of antibiotic susceptibility of the isolated CRKP

The MIC values of imipenem in the 93 CRKP isolates were determined, with 2 (2.15%) at 256 μg/ml, 18 (19.35%) at 128 μg/ml, 21 (22.58%) at 64 μg/ml, 22 (23.66%) at 32 μg/ml, 15 (16.13%) at 16 μg/ml, and 15 (16.13%) at 8 μg/ml (Fig 2). Furthermore, we performed susceptibility testing for 21 antibiotics and all isolates showed reduced susceptibility to at least 10 or more antibiotics. The resistance rates to imipenem and meropenem were 100% and 98.92%, respectively. The resistance rates to cefazolin, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, cefepime, aztreonam, piperacillin–tazobactam were 100%, 81.72%, 63.44%, 98.92%, 98.92%, and 98.92%, respectively. All of the CRKP isolates were resistant to ampicillin, piperacillin, amoxicillin–clavulanate, and ampicillin–sulbactam. The resistance rates to trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and tetracycline were 77.42%, 30.11%, 22.58%, 17.20%, 21.51% and 25.81%, respectively (S2 Table). All CRKP isolates were sensitive to colistin (Fig 3). Among the isolates, 32 different resistance patterns were observed. It was worth noting that 77 (82.80%) were MDR isolates, and 16 (17.20%) were XDR isolates. The most (18.28%, 17/93) common MDR pattern was IMP-MEM-CFZ-CAZ-CTX-FEP-AZT-AMP-PIP-AMC-SAM-TZP-SXT. Among the 13 XDR CRKP isolates, 10 (76.92%) isolates had the same drug resistance pattern (AMK-GEN-IMP-MEM-CFZ-CAZ-CTX-FEP-AZT-AMP-PIP-AMC-SAM-TZP-SXT-CIP-LVX-MXF-TET) and 2 (15.38%) isolates were only sensitive to amikacin, with a resistance pattern (GEN-IMP-MEM-CFZ-CAZ-CTX-FEP-AZT-AMP-PIP-AMC-SAM-TZP-SXT-CIP-LVX-MXF-TET) (Table 1). Only one (7.69%) strain was resistant to all tested antibiotics except colistin.

thumbnail
Fig 2. MIC of 93 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates against imipenem.

Note. Rows represent imipenem concentration gradients, and columns represent percentages of isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285730.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. Resistance rates of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates to 21 antibacterial drugs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285730.g003

thumbnail
Table 1. 32 drug resistance patterns in the 93 Klebsiella Pneumoniae isolates in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285730.t001

Multi-locus sequence typing of the isolated CRKP

Multiple site sequencing was performed on 93 isolates of CRKP, of which 55 isolates detected ST type. Among the isolates, 55 strains were detected with ST type, of which ST 11 type 12.9% (12/93) and ST 197 type 12.9% (12/93) were the main ST types. Other detailed results are shown in the S3 Table.

Antibiotic resistance genes and integrons of the isolated CRKP

Three carbapenemase resistance genes, blaKPC, blaNDM, and blaIMP, were detected. The blaKPC was carried by 85 (91.4%) isolates, blaNDM by 9 (9.68%) isolates, and blaIMP by 4 (4.3%) isolates. No isolates carried blaVIM or blaOXA-48. ESBLs genes were also detected, including 32 (34.4%) carrying blaCTX-M, 30 (32.26%) carrying blaSHV, and 53 (56.99%) carrying blaTEM. The detection rates of the fluoroquinolone resistance genes qnrA, qnrB, qnrS, and aac(6’)-Ib-cr were 3.22% (3/93), 36.56% (34/93), 25.8% (25/93) and 12.9% (12/93), respectively, qnrC and qnrD were not detected. The detection rates of the sulfonamide resistance genes sul1 and sul2 were 60.22% (56/93) and 39.78% (37/93), respectively, sul3 was not detected. The detection rates of the chloramphenicol resistance genes cmlA and floR were 9.68% (9/93) and 3.22% (3/93), respectively. The detection rates of the tetracycline resistance genes tet(A) and tet(B) were 25.8% (24/93) and 3.23% (3/93), respectively. No tet(C), tet(D) and tet(X) genes were detected. The detection rates of the aminoglycoside resistance genes rmtB, aac(3)-II, and aac(6′)-Ib were 13.98% (13/93), 35.48% (33/93), 18.28% (17/93), respectively. ArmA, rmtB and rmtC were not detected (Fig 4). Only class 1 integron was detected in 72 (61.0%) of the 93 CRKP isolates. The outer membrane pore protein genes were analyzed; 3 (3.23%) isolates did not carry OmpK-35, and 2 (2.15%) isolates did not carry OmpK36.

thumbnail
Fig 4. The heat map of drug resistance gene detection in the 93 Klebsiella Pneumoniae isolates in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285730.g004

Detection of virulence genes of the isolated CRKP

Four virulence genes were detected in 11 of the 93 isolates. 6 (6.45%) isolates carried rmpA, and 11 (11.83%) isolates carried rmpA2. The iron uptake system genes iucA, iroB were both carried by 10 isolates, accounting for 10.75% of the isolates. Importantly, 6 isolates carried all four virulence genes, accounting for 6.45% of the isolates. Among these 11 isolates, 1 was an MDR isolates, and the others 10 isolates were MDR isolates (S4 Table). These 11 CRKP isolates carrying virulence genes were all ST11.

Various replicon types of the isolated CRKP

The results of PBRT revealed 12 replicon types. 44 (47.31%) isolates harbored two replicons, and 24 (25.8%) harbored one replicon. Twelve (12.9%) isolates harbored three replicons, 2 (2.15%) harbored four replicons, and 3 (3.23%) harbored five replicons. One isolate harbored six replicons. The most common replicon type was IncFII, which was harbored by 50 (53.76%) isolates, followed by IncR and IncIB, harbored by 35 (37.63%) and 31 (33.33%) isolates, respectively. No replicon types were found in 7 (7.53%) isolates. Among the isolates, the most common type of replicon combination was IncFII and IncR, accounting for 11 (11.83%), followed by the combination of IncFIB and IncFIA, accounting for 10 (10.75%) (S5 Table).

Disinfectant resistance testing and biofilm formation of the isolated CRKP

All isolates were resistant to disinfectant. The NaClO MIC value of 67 (72.04%) isolates was 400 μg/ml, and that of the other isolates was 800 μg/ml. Regarding biofilm formation, 63 (67.74%) isolates exhibited biofilm formation capabilities; among them, 58 (63.4%) isolates were weak film-forming, and 5 (5.4%) were moderate. The other 30 (31.2%) isolates were unable to form biofilms (S6 Table). Among the 63 biofilm producers, 14 (22.22%) were XDR and 49 (77.78%) were MDR. Among the 30 CRKPs that could not form biofilms, 2 (6.67%) were XDR, and 28 (93.33%) were MDR. Regarding drug resistance among CRKP isolates, the biofilm-forming ability of CRKP was significantly different from the resistance of different classes of antibiotics(p = 0.019).

Discussion

The source of hospital sewage is very complex, including medical and domestic sewage. Hospital sewage contains highly resistant microorganisms and is a suitable niche for bacterial horizontal gene transfer. We conducted this study to understand the characteristics of highly resistant bacteria in hospital sewage.

CRKP was the most common species of carbapenem-resistant bacteria isolated from the sewage samples. This finding is probably because the temperature in the Northern Hemisphere begins to increase in May, and July to September are the hottest months of the year; K. pneumoniae survives better at higher temperatures and humidity levels, and the incidence of KP bloodstream infections varies seasonally [16], this is also consistent with our research.

Antibiotic resistance has always been a key and difficult issue of global concern, and hospital sewage is a key reservoir for MDR microorganisms. Except for β lactam antibiotics, CRKP isolates also have different degrees of resistance to other antibiotics, and the antimicrobial spectrum is complex.

In addition, the biofilm formation ability of CRKP isolates not only makes it easier for these isolates to colonize in the sewers [17], but also shows significant differences in antibiotic resistance. And regarding the drug resistance pattern, biofilm-producing isolates were more resistant than non-biofilm-producing isolates, consistent with previous reports [11]. Biofilm-forming CRKP is more dangerous because these isolates can colonize the respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urinary tracts and can lead to invasive infections (especially in immune-deficient patients) [18]. With the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant KP, effective management of infections caused by biofilm-producing microorganisms is essential in healthcare settings.

In addition, all of these CRKP isolates were resistant to chlorine-containing disinfectants, potentially because the sewage contained disinfectants from the operating rooms and wards that had been diluted to sublethal concentration by domestic sewage and other water; bacteria living in this sublethal concentration environment might develop resistance [19]. Furthermore, it has been reported that bacteria with biofilm growth patterns can develop resistance to disinfectants [20]. Further research is required to explain why these KP isolates survive in sewage. Fortunately, when we tested the samples from the outlet, no live bacteria were detected, indicating that the sewage digestion tank eliminated these isolates.

The MIC value of imipenem for most CRKP isolates is 32 μg/mL and 64 μg/mL, and blaKPC is the most common carbapenem resistant gene in this study. In the national surveillance report of Chinese clinical carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) strains isolated from 2012 to 2016, the detection rate of blaKPC was 77.1%, that of blaNDM was 11.3%, and that of blaIMP was 1.8% [21]. However, in north China, the incidence of blaKPC was higher than the average level, reaching 90.32%, a detection rate consistent with our results [22, 23]. Among the 93 isolates, 4 CRKP isolates did not carry any carbapenemase genes. The MIC value was 8 μg/mL for imipenem in two of these isolates and 16 μg/mL in the other two, both representing low carbapenem resistance levels. This finding may be due to other rare carbapenem resistance genes; ESBL and/or AmpC production and changes in the cell membrane may also be responsible [24, 25]. ESBLs and AmpCs can hydrolyze carbapenems at very low levels; when combined with reduced membrane impermeability or increased drug efflux, these strains can demonstrate resistance. Notably, in the present study, four CRKP isolates without deletion of Ompk-35 or Ompk-36 protein were observed. We hypothesize that, in addition to Ompk-35, Ompk-36 outer membrane pore protein deletion, the deletion of other outer membrane pore proteins, or alterations in the exopump system may be involved in conferring increased resistance.

Plasmids play an important role in spreading antibiotic resistance [26]. In our study, IncFIB and IncFII were dominate replicons, and these types of plasmids were also popular vectors for carbapenem resistance genes such as blaNDM, blaKPC, and ESBL genes blaCTX–M, and blaOXA [27, 28]. The wide variety of replicon types increases drug-resistant gene transmission and the genetic evolution of drug-resistant bacteria.

Among highly drug-resistant isolates of CRKP, ST11 was the most common sequence type, which is characterized by high virulence and high drug resistance [29]. ST11 is one of the most important hospital-acquired carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (HA-CRKP) clones [30]. In our study, all 11 ST11 XDR isolates harbored the HVKP -related molecular marker genes iroB, iucA, rmpA, and rmpA2 [11]. Research has shown an association between rmpA and purulent liver abscesses [31]; overproduction of capsule regulator genes (rmpA or rmpA2), salmochelin (iroBCDN) and aerocin (iucABCD) siderophore gene clusters leads to higher virulence, as shown in a neutrophil killing assay (NKA) and in Galleria mellonella infection model infection assays [32]. These virulence genes have been suggested to be present in virulence plasmids [33]. ST11-type CR-HVKP has been reported to cause severe infection in relatively healthy people in China due to the acquisition of the virulence plasmid pLVPK, making infection difficult to treat with antibiotics [32]. Hybrid-binding virulence plasmids have been shown to be transferable by conjugation to other CRKP isolates, transforming ST11 CRKP strains into Hv-CRKP strains [4]. Thus, the ST11 CRKP isolates in this study had high drug resistance and the potential for high virulence and transmission.

Conclusions

In this study, CRKP was the most Carbapenem drug-resistant bacteria isolated from hospital sewage, the resistance of some antibiotics may be related to the ability of biofilm formation. CRKP isolates were all tolerant to chlorine-containing disinfectants, which may be related to disinfectants used in the environment for a long time. In this study, blaKPC was the major Carbapenem gene, and some virulence genes were also detected. The Multilocus sequence typing of CRKP isolates were diverse, and ST11 was closely related to hv-CRKP. Although we examined the replication subtype in CRKP isolates, however, further studies are needed to clarify whether the resistance and virulence characteristics of these isolates are influenced by mobile genetic factors, such as plasmids, and whether they pose a risk of transmission. Improper treatment of hospital sewage may lead to the spread of drug-resistant bacteria and antibiotic-resistant genes, which may become a substantial threat to public health.

Supporting information

S2 Table. Antibiotic resistance of CRKP isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285730.s002

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Multiple site sequence typing of CRKP isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285730.s003

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Detailed information of 11 CRKP isolates with virulence genes in this study, including virulence genes, MLST results, MIC values of imipenem, and antibiotic resistance.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285730.s004

(XLSX)

S5 Table. Replicon typing in CRKP isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285730.s005

(XLSX)

S6 Table. Biofilm formation capacity in CRKP isolates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285730.s006

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the members of the sewage treatment stations of hospital, for help with the sampling.

References

  1. 1. Rice LB. Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial pathogens: no ESKAPE. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(8):1079–81. pmid:18419525
  2. 2. Wang M, Earley M, Chen L, Hanson BM, Yu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical outcomes and bacterial characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae complex among patients from different global regions (CRACKLE-2): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(3):401–12. pmid:34767753
  3. 3. Cassini A, Högberg LD, Plachouras D, Quattrocchi A, Hoxha A, Simonsen GS, et al. Attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life-years caused by infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the EU and the European Economic Area in 2015: a population-level modelling analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):56–66. pmid:30409683
  4. 4. Yang X, Dong N, Chan EW, Zhang R, Chen S. Carbapenem Resistance-Encoding and Virulence-Encoding Conjugative Plasmids in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Trends Microbiol. 2021;29(1):65–83. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2020.04.012
  5. 5. Kattan JN, Villegas MV, Quinn JP. New developments in carbapenems. Clin Microbiol Infec. 2008;14(12):1102–11. pmid:19076841
  6. 6. Yu X, Zhang W, Zhao Z, Ye C, Zhou S, Wu S, et al. Molecular characterization of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates with focus on antimicrobial resistance. Bmc Genomics. 2019;20(1):822. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6225-9
  7. 7. Chagas TP, Seki LM, Cury JC, Oliveira JA, Dávila AM, Silva DM, et al. Multiresistance, beta-lactamase-encoding genes and bacterial diversity in hospital wastewater in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Appl Microbiol. 2011;111(3):572–81. pmid:21672095
  8. 8. Mutuku C, Melegh S, Kovacs K, Urban P, Virág E, Heninger R, et al. Characterization of β-Lactamases and Multidrug Resistance Mechanisms in Enterobacterales from Hospital Effluents and Wastewater Treatment Plant. Antibiotics-Basel. 2022;11(6). http://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11060776
  9. 9. Aarestrup FM, Woolhouse M. Using sewage for surveillance of antimicrobial resistance. Science. 2020;367(6478):630–2. pmid:32029617
  10. 10. Zhan L, Wang S, Guo Y, Jin Y, Duan J, Hao Z, et al. Outbreak by Hypermucoviscous Klebsiella pneumoniae ST11 Isolates with Carbapenem Resistance in a Tertiary Hospital in China. Front Cell Infect Mi. 2017;7:182. http://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00182
  11. 11. Russo TA, Olson R, Fang CT, Stoesser N, Miller M, MacDonald U, et al. Identification of Biomarkers for Differentiation of Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae from Classical K. pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(9). http://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00776-18
  12. 12. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infec. 2012;18(3):268–81. pmid:21793988
  13. 13. Shi W, Li K, Ji Y, Jiang Q, Wang Y, Shi M, et al. Carbapenem and cefoxitin resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains associated with porin OmpK36 loss and DHA-1 β-lactamase production. Braz J Microbiol. 2013;44(2):435–42. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822013000200015
  14. 14. Carattoli A. Resistance plasmid families in Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Ch. 2009;53(6):2227–38. pmid:19307361
  15. 15. Shadkam S, Goli HR, Mirzaei B, Gholami M, Ahanjan M. Correlation between antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation capability among Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated from hospitalized patients in Iran. Ann Clin Microb Anti. 2021;20(1):13. pmid:33588850
  16. 16. Anderson DJ, Richet H, Chen LF, Spelman DW, Hung YJ, Huang AT, et al. Seasonal variation in Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection on 4 continents. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(5):752–6. http://doi.org/10.1086/527486
  17. 17. Guilhen C, Miquel S, Charbonnel N, Joseph L, Carrier G, Forestier C, et al. Colonization and immune modulation properties of Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm-dispersed cells. Npj Biofilms Microbi. 2019;5(1):25. pmid:31583108
  18. 18. Wang G, Zhao G, Chao X, Xie L, Wang H. The Characteristic of Virulence, Biofilm and Antibiotic Resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2020;17(17). pmid:32872324
  19. 19. Merchel PPB, Wang X, Tagkopoulos I. Biocide-Induced Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:640923. pmid:33717036
  20. 20. Yuan L, Sadiq FA, Wang N, Yang Z, He G. Recent advances in understanding the control of disinfectant-resistant biofilms by hurdle technology in the food industry. Crit Rev Food Sci. 2021;61(22):3876–91. pmid:32838547
  21. 21. Wang Q, Wang X, Wang J, Ouyang P, Jin C, Wang R, et al. Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: Data From a Longitudinal Large-scale CRE Study in China (2012–2016). Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67(suppl_2):S196–205. pmid:30423057
  22. 22. Chen J, Hu C, Wang R, Li F, Sun G, Yang M, et al. Shift in the Dominant Sequence Type of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection from ST11 to ST15 at a Medical Center in Northeast China, 2015–2020. Infect Drug Resist. 2021;14:1855–63. pmid:34054300
  23. 23. Su S, Zhang J, Zhao Y, Yu L, Wang Y, Wang Y, et al. Outbreak of KPC-2 Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae ST76 and Carbapenem-resistant K2 Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae ST375 strains in Northeast China: molecular and virulent characteristics. Bmc Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):472. pmid:32616018
  24. 24. Goodman KE, Simner PJ, Tamma PD, Milstone AM. Infection control implications of heterogeneous resistance mechanisms in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Expert Rev Anti-Infe. 2016;14(1):95–108. pmid:26535959
  25. 25. Han R, Shi Q, Wu S, Yin D, Peng M, Dong D, et al. Dissemination of Carbapenemases (KPC, NDM, OXA-48, IMP, and VIM) Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Isolated From Adult and Children Patients in China. Front Cell Infect Mi. 2020;10:314. pmid:32719751
  26. 26. Wang X, Zhao J, Ji F, Chang H, Qin J, Zhang C, et al. Multiple-Replicon Resistance Plasmids of Klebsiella Mediate Extensive Dissemination of Antimicrobial Genes. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:754931. pmid:34777312
  27. 27. Liu Y, Long D, Xiang TX, Du FL, Wei DD, Wan LG, et al. Whole genome assembly and functional portrait of hypervirulent extensively drug-resistant NDM-1 and KPC-2 co-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae of capsular serotype K2 and ST86. J Antimicrob Chemoth. 2019;74(5):1233–40. pmid:30843067
  28. 28. Musicha P, Msefula CL, Mather AE, Chaguza C, Cain AK, Peno C, et al. Genomic analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from Malawi reveals acquisition of multiple ESBL determinants across diverse lineages. J Antimicrob Chemoth. 2019;74(5):1223–32. pmid:30778540
  29. 29. El-Domany RA, Awadalla OA, Shabana SA, El-Dardir MA, Emara M. Analysis of the Correlation Between Antibiotic Resistance Patterns and Virulence Determinants in Pathogenic Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from Egypt. Microb Drug Resist. 2021;27(6):727–39. http://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2020.0236
  30. 30. Liao W, Liu Y, Zhang W. Virulence evolution, molecular mechanisms of resistance and prevalence of ST11 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in China: A review over the last 10 years. J Glob Antimicrob Re. 2020;23:174–80. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2020.09.004
  31. 31. Yang Q, Jia X, Zhou M, Zhang H, Yang W, Kudinha T, et al. Emergence of ST11-K47 and ST11-K64 hypervirulent carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in bacterial liver abscesses from China: a molecular, biological, and epidemiological study. Emerg Microbes Infec. 2020;9(1):320–31. http://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1721334
  32. 32. Gu D, Dong N, Zheng Z, Lin D, Huang M, Wang L, et al. A fatal outbreak of ST11 carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Chinese hospital: a molecular epidemiological study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2018;18(1):37–46. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30489-9
  33. 33. Wyres KL, Lam M, Holt KE. Population genomics of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18(6):344–59. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0315-1