Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Low genetic heterogeneity of Leishmania major in different geographical regions of Iran

  • Adel Spotin ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft

    Adelespotin@gmail.com, Spotina@tbzmed.ac.ir

    Affiliations Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran, Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

  • Soheila Rouhani,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

  • Ali Haghighi,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

  • Parviz Parvizi

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Molecular Systematics Laboratory, Parasitology Department, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

To examine the genetic diversity of Leishmania major, 100 Giemsa-stained positive slides were collected from endemic foci of Iran (Northeast, Central, and Southwest provinces) over two consecutive years during 2019–2021. The Leishmania ITS-rDNA gene was amplified and Leishmania sp. was recognized by PCR-RFLP and sequencing. In addition, 178 registered ITS-rDNA sequences from other geographical regions of Iran were retrieved from GenBank, including different host species (human, sandfly and rodent). A total of 40 new haplotypes were discovered using the ITS-rDNA sequence analysis. IR29 (20.6%) and IR34 (61%) were the two most common haplotypes, represented by a star-like feature in the overall population. Analysis of the molecular variance test revealed low genetic diversity of L. major in human cases (Haplotype diversity; 0.341), rodent (Hd; 0.387) and sandfly (Hd; 0.390) sequences. The lowest genetic diversity of L. major was observed in Southwest/Southeast Iran (Hd: 0.104–0.286). The statistically Fst value indicated that L. major is not genetically differentiated between geographic regions of Iran, except for the Northeast-Southwest (Fst: 0.29055) and Central-Southwest (Fst: 0.30294) population pairs. The current study as the first investigation discloses new perspectives for further evaluation in the identification local transmission paradigms and initiating effective prevention strategies.

1. Introduction

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is one of the neglected tropical diseases that is mainly spread in Iran by the causative agents of Leishmania major and Leishmania tropica [1, 2]. CL is prevalent in more than half of the Iranian provinces with a prevalence of 1.8% to 37.9% and an annual incidence of 26,630 cases/year [3, 4].

The spectrum of genetic (haplotype) variability in L. major is presented as one of the most controversial issues [1, 2, 5, 6]. The genetic heterogeneity of Leishmania species may result in the emergence of new species/strains/haplotypes and ultimately the creation of drug-resistant mutants [5, 6]. With regard to treatment failure, the identification of heterogeneity traits of Leishmania spp. and the emergence of resistant drug mutations should be addressed by policymakers.

Several mitochondrial and nuclear DNA markers, including microsatellites, ribosomal internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS-rDNA), cytochrome c, 18S-rRNA, HSP-70, the gp63 gene locus, and minicircles of kinetoplast DNA were used to assess the genetic diversity of the Leishmania parasite [1, 712]. The ITS-rDNA is a useful and informative phylogenetic marker as it has sequences with different rates of evolutionary variability [5, 13]. A number of molecular assays have been employed to identify genetic polymorphism between inter-and intra-Leishmania species [14, 15]. These include multilocus microsatellite typing (MLMT), random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE), multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and sequencing.

Several Iranian researchers have performed their molecular experiments on L. major genotyping in different host species (human, sandfly and rodent) and their results have shown that the new haplotypes circulate sympatrically in endemic regions of the country [1619]. However, according to our literature review, there is no comparative study on the genetic diversity of L. major among different endemic foci of Iran.

Knowledge of the genetic characteristics of L. major in adjacent regions may provide the basis for conducting future epidemiological studies to implement control strategies. The aim of this study was to assess the genetic diversity and gene migration of L. major using ITS-rDNA nucleotide sequences derived from human, sandfly and rodent in endemic regions of Iran.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Ethics statement and sample collection

All research involving human participants have been obtained in conformity with informed consent, privacy and confidentiality of patients who were sampled and analyzed anonymously during study. The majorities of the people were in the edge of Iran border and therefore could not able to get written consent one by one. Instead, the oral consent was obtained with the help of central public health authority as both mutual acquaintance and interpreter of the indigenous peoples. All experiments on the humans were performed according to the guidelines of the Ethical Board of Pasteur Institute of Iran.

One hundred positive microscopic slides from wet/dry lesions of confirmed CL patients were collected from endemic geographical regions of Iran (Southwest, Khuzestan Province; n: 40, Northeast, Golestan Province; n: 30 and Central; Isfahan Province; n: 30) from August 2019 to February 2021. In this study, the collected samples from indigenous cases were included and the imported cases from neighboring countries were excluded.

The positive slides were graded to rank leishman bodies’ density from +1 to +6. In addition, in order to compare the analyzed sequences of the present study with five regions of Iran, 178 sequences of ITS-rDNA L. major including Southwest (Khuzestan, Ilam and Fars provinces), Central (Isfahan and Kashan provinces), North (Tehran Province), Southeast (Kerman), North-Central (Semnan), West (Lorestan and Kermanshah provinces) and Northeast (Golestan, Turkmen Sahra), Khorasan (Birjand, Esfarayen, Mashhad, Jajarm and Garmeh) populations were retrieved from the GenBank database for FASTA during 2008–2020.

2.2. DNA extraction, PCR amplification and PCR-RFLP for ITS-rDNA

DNA extraction of parasites was performed from Giemsa-stained positive slides (DNG Plus Kit, Iran) [20]. Single-round PCR was used to detect Leishmania sp. by amplifying ITS-rDNA about 480 bp. The details of PCR protocol and employed primers (ITS1F and ITS2R4) were the same as previously reported [1, 9, 17]. To digest the PCR amplicons in RFLP, the endonuclease reaction of ITS-rDNA was performed in a volume of 30μL containing, 2μL of 10x buffer, 2μL of BsuRI (HaeIII) (cut site GG↓CC), 10μL of amplicon and 16μL of distilled water for 4 h at 37C. The digested fragments were analyzed using electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel containing safe stain and ladder of 100 bp.

2.3. DNA sequencing, data extraction and bioinformatic analysis of ITS-rDNA

Forty PCR products were successfully sequenced using the ITS primers, ITS1F and ITS2R4 (Codon Company, Iran). Sequences were trimmed and edited in consensus positions compared to regional sequences using Sequencher v.5.4.6 software. Furthermore, 178 registered ITS-rDNA nucleotide sequences of L. major from other geographic populations of Iran including different host species (human, sandfly and rodent) were downloaded from GenBank. The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was performed by DnaSP software to determine the genetic diversity indices (number of haplotypes (Hn); nucleotide diversity (Nd); haplotype diversity (Hd), neutrality indices (Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs tests) [21]. The pairwise fixation index (Fst: F-statistics) and number of migration (Nm) were obtained to assess the gene migration of L. major between different geographical regions of Iran. To ascertain the genealogical relationships of intra-species diversity of L. major, a haplotype network was drawn by PopART software determined by the Median-Joining model [22]. To confirm taxonomic status of the L. major, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the program Splits Tree v.4.0 based on the Neighbor Net method and Median-Joining analysis. Distance scale was 0.01 indicating the number of base substitutions per site. Also Trypanosoma brucei (Accession number; JN673390) was considered as an outgroup branch.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Leishmania sp. using PCR-RFLP

The clinical presentations of wet/dry lesions were classified into classic (volcanic form) and non-classic (psoriasiform, herpetiform, hyperkeratotic, eczematoid, zosteriform and erythematous papulonodules signs). The ITS-rDNA gene (480 bp) was amplified from all 100-CL stained slides. Based on the PCR-RFLP assay, all Leishmania PCR products were digested by BsuRI (HaeIII) and then two fragments of 140 bp and 340 bp were definitely assigned to L. major. To confirm the PCR-RFLP findings, 40 L. major amplicons were successfully sequenced, trimmed and edited to construct the phylogenetic tree.

3.2. Determination of genetic diversity and genetic differentiation between L. major

The edited sequences (n: 40) were compared with sequences obtained (n: 178) from the GenBank database. Ten sequences (including new haplotypes) were submitted to the GenBank database, and accession numbers were presented in S1 Table. A total of 40 new haplotypes were identified based on sequence analysis of the ITS-rDNA gene (S1 Table). According to AMOVA test, low genetic heterogeneity of L. major was found in Southwest (Hd: 0.104, Hn: 5), Southeast (Hd: 0.286, Hn: 2), Central (Hd: 0.419, Hn: 10), in the west (Hd: 0.334, Hn: 4), Northeast (Hd: 0.429, Hn: 17) and North-Central Iran (Hd: 0.400, Hn: 2) (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Diver sity and neutrality indices of L. major using ITS-rDNA sequences in various geographical regions of Iran.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285520.t001

Based on host species, low genetic (haplotype) diversity of L. major was observed in reservoir rodents (Rhombomys opimus and Meriones libycus, Hd; 0.387, Hn: 10) and sandflies (Phlebotomus papatasi/Phlebotomus caucasicus, Hd; 0.390, Hn: 7) compared to human CL cases (Hd; 0.441, Hn: 23) (Table 2). The highest nucleotide diversity was found in Central Iran (Nd: 0.01005) particularly in reservoir rodents (Nd: 0.01164) (Tables 1 and 2). Neutrality indices of ITS-rDNA showed negative values (-2.27541 for Tajima’s D to -9.662 for Fu’s Fs statistic) in Northeast, West and Central populations which indicating a deviation from neutrality (Table 1). Within 480 bp consensus position of ITS-rDNA, 48 point mutations were identified. 24 of these were parsimony-informative sites and 24 of these were singleton variable sites. The statistically Fst value showed that L. major is not genetically differentiated between geographic regions of Iran (Fst: 0.01649 to 0.07820) except Northeast-Southwest (Fst: 0.29055, Nm: 0.61) and Central-Southwest (Fst: 0.30294, Nm: 0.58) population pairs (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 2. Diversity and neutrality indices of L. major in different host species (human, sandfly and rodent) using ITS-rDNA sequences in various geographical regions of Iran.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285520.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. Pairwise fixation index (Fst) for L. major isolates originating from five regions of Iran using nucleotide sequence data of ITS-rDNA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285520.t003

3.3. Phylogenetic tree and haplotype network of ITS-rDNA

Neighbor Net tree generated by ITS-rDNA sequences demonstrated that L. major identified

(Accession nos; OP811334, OP811489, OP811525, OP829807-OP829812) assigned into L. major complex (Fig 1). The identified haplotypes (IR1-1R40) based on their different host species are presented in Fig 2. A total of 7, 10 and 23 haplotypes of L. major were detected in the sandfly, rodent and human, respectively in the different CL foci of Iran (Fig 2 and Table 2). IR29 (20.6%) and IR34 (61%) were the two most common haplotypes in the whole population, represented by a star-like feature in the overall population.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Neighbor-Net graph drawn by Leishmania spp. by using the Splits Tree 4.0 program.

The identified isolates of L. major in this study marked by an asterisk (*). Trypanosoma brucei (Accession no: JN673390) was considered as out-group branch. The distance scale was estimated 0.01.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285520.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. ITS-rDNA haplotype network in L. major from different host species (human, sandfly and rodent) in various geographical foci of Iran.

Submitted sequences (n: 10) in this study were considered as common haplotype L. m1 (OP811334*). The red circles are relative to the frequency of each haplotype. Each line between haplotypes indicate single mutational step.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285520.g002

Occurrence of haplotypes of IR28 (Accession no: KF899848) and IR31 (Accession no: KP773410) between common haplotypes of IR29 and IR34 suggests that human-derived L. major may circulate between geographic regions of Iran (Fig 2).

4. Discussion

Knowledge of L. major genetic diversity of is essential to design epidemiological studies to implement monitoring, surveillance and control programs [5, 6]. This study analyzed the nucleotide sequence data on the heterogeneous population structure of L. major originating from sandfly, rodent and human hosts in Iran where different ecological conditions occur in widely separated regions.

In this study, the ITS-rDNA marker was used to detect the evolutionary relationship of L. major, as this DNA barcode marker can depict a reliable picture of the various phylogenetic subdivisions within this genus [13].

Based on current findings, micro-heterogeneity of L. major observed in reservoir rodents (R. opimus and M. libycus), sandfly vectors (Ph. papatasi/Ph. caucasicus) and human CL cases. This outcome indicates that rodents, sandflies, and human hosts are unlikely to exert a selective pressure on L. major and emphasizes the geographic/ecologic dependence of the low genetic heterogeneity in Iran. On the other hand, low genetic diversity of L. major in human, rodent and sandfly sequences can be explained by the genomic features of ITS-rDNA. In fact, the GC content of L. major (59.7%) is generally higher than that of L. tropica, so the stability of the triple hydrogen bonds of the GC pair and the stacking interaction are subjected to slippage [23, 24].

In a related study, low genetic heterogeneity of L. major isolates collected from patients and rodents was identified by MLMT technique in emergent foci of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Tunisia [25, 26].

However, Tashakori et al., (2011) have shown three distinct genetic clusters of L. major (n: 26 isolates) using MLMT in Iran and they stated that significant genetic diversity of L. major is related to the existence of different populations of Ph. papatasi and/or differences in the abundance of reservoir hosts in different regions of Iran [27].

Some evidence suggests that the level of genetic diversity in the Leishmania parasite depends on the effective population size and is higher in small populations [5]. Furthermore, environmental alterations and biotic interactions among five regions of Iran can exert strong selective pressures on different life-history aspects and hence influence their degree of genetic diversity in Leishmania parasite [5]. However, other authors have reported a decreasing degrees of genetic diversity among the following Leishmania spp.; L. tropica> L. aethiopica> L. major> L. donovani [28].

In this study, a variety of clinical manifestations (classical and non-classical forms) of L. major were observed in human lesions, however no significant genetic diversity (Hd; 0.541) was found among ITS-rDNA sequences of L. major in Khuzestan, Southwest Iran. These findings attenuate relationship between phenotypic and genotypic traits of CL in L. major patients, possibly demonstrating that genetic heterogeneity may not definitely influence the formation of various clinical manifestations.

The negative neutrality indices for the L. major population indicate evidence of some likely mechanisms including the neutral mutation model, population size equilibrium and purifying selection [29].

The significant Fst values (0.29055 to 0.30294) of ITS-rDNA sequences showed that L. major Northeast-Southwest and Central-Southwest populations were genetically differentiated. It could be postulated that no gene migration of L. major taken place between local isolates of the mentioned regions. This also indicates that the diversity of the L. major population was unlikely to be affected by the bottleneck effect.

Furthermore, the occurrence of distinct genetic structure of L. major between mentioned regions indicates that this protozoan may have been sustained by indigenous human, rodents and sandflies during the era. On the other hand, low values of Fst (0.01649 to 0.07820) showed that L. major West-Central, Central-Northeast, West-Southwest populations were not genetically differentiated, indicating a gene migration of L. major has probably occurred between mentioned population pairs.

The emergence of haplotypes of IR28 (human isolate) and IR31 (human isolate) between common haplotypes of IR29 and IR34 shows that here is dawn of L. major migration as a result of transmission of haplotypes from one population to another population through ecological changes and/or host mobility.

Charyyeva et al., (2021) demonstrated that L. tropica isolated from Syrian and Turkish patients using ITS1 sequences exhibits a complex phylo-geographic pattern, with some haplotypes being widespread across the Turkey and Syria [30].

One of the limitations of the current study was that the L. major sequences obtained from sandflies and rodents were partially small, in order to infer the extensive genetic diversity on a large scale.

In conclusion, the present study as the first investigation strengthens our knowledge of local transmission paradigms and the genetic data of L. major in different geographical regions of Iran. Moreover low genetic heterogeneity of L. major in human, rodent and sandfly hosts should be highlighted as a treatment target for the emergence of probable drug-resistant mutants, particularly in clinical Leishmania strains. Further research is needed to develop next-generation sequencing of Leishmania sp. through the use of informative markers in larger areas of Iran and surrounding countries to assess the potential evolutionary scenario.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Identified haplotypes of L. major based on ITS-rDNA sequences in various geographical foci of Iran.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285520.s001

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The collections of microscopic slides were made possible by the assistance of the Centre of Health Services Khuzeastan and Golestan. The authors thank Mehdi Baghban for helping with the field work and Elnaz AlaeeNovin for helping in Molecular Systematics Laboratory.

References

  1. 1. Spotin A, Rouhani S, Parvizi P (2014) The associations of Leishmania major and Leishmania tropica aspects by focusing their morphological and molecular features on clinical appearances in Khuzestan province, Iran. BioMed Res Int 2014.
  2. 2. Mirzapour A, Spotin A, Behniafar H, Azizi H, Maleki B, et al. (2019) Intra-species diversity of Leishmania major and L. tropica from clinical isolates of cutaneous leishmaniasis in southwest iran inferred by ITS1-rDNA. Iran J Public Health 48: 893.
  3. 3. Alvar J, Vélez ID, Bern C, Herrero M, Desjeux P, et al. (2012) Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence. PLoS One 7: e35671. pmid:22693548
  4. 4. Badirzadeh A, Asadgol Z, Spotin A, Mokhayeri Y, Shirzadi M, et al. (2015) The burden of leishmaniasis in Iran: findings from the global burden of disease from 1990 to 2010; Asian Pac J Trop Dis 7(9):513–518.
  5. 5. Banuls A-L, Hide M, Prugnolle F (2007) Leishmania and the leishmaniases: a parasite genetic update and advances in taxonomy, epidemiology and pathogenicity in humans. Adv Parasitol 64: 1–458.
  6. 6. Santi AMM, Murta SMF (2022) Impact of Genetic Diversity and Genome Plasticity of Leishmania spp. in Treatment and the Search for Novel Chemotherapeutic Targets. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9.
  7. 7. Yatawara L, Le TH, Wickramasinghe S, Agatsuma T (2008) Maxicircle (mitochondrial) genome sequence (partial) of Leishmania major: gene content, arrangement and composition compared with Leishmania tarentolae. Gene 424: 80–86.
  8. 8. Yurchenko V, Kolesnikov AA, Lukes J (2000) Phylogenetic analysis of Trypanosomatina (Protozoa: Kinetoplastida) based on minicircle conserved regions. Folia Parasitol 47: 1–5. pmid:10833008
  9. 9. Parvizi P, Ready P (2008) Nested PCRs and sequencing of nuclear ITS‐rDNA fragments detect three Leishmania species of gerbils in sandflies from Iranian foci of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis. Trop Med Int Health 13: 1159–1171.
  10. 10. Montalvo A, Fraga J, Monzote L, Montano I, De Doncker S, et al. (2010) Heat-shock protein 70 PCR-RFLP: a universal simple tool for Leishmania species discrimination in the New and Old World. Parasitology 137: 1159–1168.
  11. 11. Bulle B, Millon L, Bart J-M, Gállego M, Gambarelli F, et al. (2002) Practical approach for typing strains of Leishmania infantum by microsatellite analysis. J Clin Microbiol 40: 3391–3397.
  12. 12. Victoir K, Banuls A, Arevalo J, Llanos-Cuentas A, Hamers R, et al. (1998) The gp63 gene locus, a target for genetic characterization of Leishmania belonging to subgenus Viannia. Parasitology 117: 1–13.
  13. 13. Hillis DM, Moritz C, Porter CA, Baker RJ (1991) Evidence for biased gene conversion in concerted evolution of ribosomal DNA. Science 251: 308–310. pmid:1987647
  14. 14. Schönian G, Kuhls K, Mauricio I (2011) Molecular approaches for a better understanding of the epidemiology and population genetics of Leishmania. Parasitology 138: 405–425.
  15. 15. Spotin A, Rouhani S, Ghaemmaghami P, Haghighi A, Zolfaghari MR, et al. (2015) Different morphologies of Leishmania major amastigotes with no molecular diversity in a neglected endemic area of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Iran. Iran Biomed J 19: 149.
  16. 16. Oryan A, Shirian S, Tabandeh M-R, Hatam G-R, Randau G, et al. (2013) Genetic diversity of Leishmania major strains isolated from different clinical forms of cutaneous leishmaniasis in southern Iran based on minicircle kDNA. Infect Genet Evol 19: 226–231.
  17. 17. Sharbatkhori M, Spotin A, Taherkhani H, Roshanghalb M, Parvizi P (2014) Molecular variation in Leishmania parasites from sandflies species of a zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in northeast of Iran. J Vector Borne Dis 51: 16–21.
  18. 18. Mirzaei A, Rouhani S, Taherkhani H, Farahmand M, Kazemi B, et al. (2011) Isolation and detection of Leishmania species among naturally infected Rhombomis opimus, a reservoir host of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Turkemen Sahara, North East of Iran. Exp Parasitol 129: 375–380. pmid:21945269
  19. 19. Hajjaran H, Mohebali M, Mamishi S, Vasigheh F, Oshaghi MA, et al. (2013) Molecular identification and polymorphism determination of cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis agents isolated from human and animal hosts in Iran. BioMed Res Int 2013. pmid:24286085
  20. 20. Parsaei M, Raeisi A, Spotin A, Shahbazi A, Mahami-Oskouei M, et al. (2018) Molecular evaluation of pvdhfr and pvmdr-1 mutants in Plasmodium vivax isolates after treatment with sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine and chloroquine in Iran during 2001–2016. Infect Genet Evol 64: 70–75.
  21. 21. Rozas J, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R (2003) DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19: 2496–2497. pmid:14668244
  22. 22. Bandelt H-J, Forster P, Röhl A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16: 37–48. pmid:10331250
  23. 23. Ivens AC, Peacock CS, Worthey EA, Murphy L, Aggarwal G, et al. (2005) The genome of the kinetoplastid parasite, Leishmania major. Science 309: 436–442.
  24. 24. Schönian G, Schnur L, El Fari M, Oskam L, Kolesnikov AA, et al. (2001) Genetic heterogeneity in the species Leishmania tropica revealed by different PCR-based methods. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 95: 217–224.
  25. 25. Attia H, Sghaier RM, Gelanew T, Bali A, Schweynoch C, et al. (2016) Genetic micro-heterogeneity of Leishmania major in emerging foci of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Tunisia. Infect Genet Evol 43: 179–185.
  26. 26. Ghawar W, Attia H, Bettaieb J, Yazidi R, Laouini D, et al. (2014) Genotype profile of Leishmania major strains isolated from tunisian rodent reservoir hosts revealed by multilocus microsatellite typing. PLoS One 9: e107043.
  27. 27. Mahnaz T, Al-Jawabreh A, Kuhls K, Schönian G (2011) Multilocus microsatellite typing shows three different genetic clusters of Leishmania major in Iran. Microbes Infect 13: 937–942.
  28. 28. Schönian G, El Fari M, Lewin S, Schweynoch C, Presber W (2001) Molecular epidemiology and population genetics in Leishmania. Med Microbiol Immunol 190: 61–63.
  29. 29. Huyse T, Poulin R, Theron A (2005) Speciation in parasites: a population genetics approach. Trends Parasitol 21: 469–475. pmid:16112615
  30. 30. Charyyeva A, Çetinkaya Ü, Özkan B, Şahin S, Yaprak N, et al. (2021) Genetic diversity of Leishmania tropica: Unexpectedly complex distribution pattern. Acta Trop 218: 105888.