Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Ongoing increasing trends in central precocious puberty incidence among Korean boys and girls from 2008 to 2020

Abstract

Background

Over the last few decades, there has been growing evidence of earlier onset and progression of puberty worldwide. This population-based longitudinal cohort study aimed to analyze the change in the annual incidence rate of central precocious puberty (CPP) among Korean children over the most recent decade, using the national registry data.

Method

The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) and insurance claims for gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) treatment were used to identify CPP patients who were using the Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA) database between 2008 and 2020. Patients who began GnRHa therapy before the age of 9 and 10 for girls and boys, respectively, were included in the study.

Results

A total of 6,906 boys and 126,377 girls were diagnosed with CPP between 2008 and 2020. The annual incidence of CPP increased by 83.3 times in boys (from 1.2 to 100 per 100,000 persons) and by 15.9 times in girls (from 88.9 to 1414.7 per 100,000 persons). The age-specific annual incidence of CPP increased remarkably more in older children than in younger ones; the 2020 CPP incidence among 9-year-old boys and 8-year-old girls reached 705.2 and 7,967.3 per 100,000 persons, respectively. The annual prevalence of CPP in boys and girls increased from 2.7 to 206.5 (76.5 times) and from 141.8 to 3439.9 (24.3 times) per 100,000 persons, respectively.

Conclusion

Based on GnRHa treatment insurance claims, our study suggests that the annual incidence of CPP has substantially increased in Korea during the past 13 years. These findings highlight the importance of meticulous judgment by doctors in determining GnRHa treatment.

Introduction

Precocious puberty is traditionally defined as the appearance of secondary sexual characteristics before the age of 8 in girls and 9 in boys, as well as the onset of menstruation before the age of 9.5 [1]. The onset of puberty can be assessed by breast enlargement in girls and testicular enlargement in boys, as well as the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis, detected by laboratory tests [2]. If early activation of HPG axis causes precocious puberty, the disorder is GnRH-dependent and referred to as central precocious puberty (CPP) [3].

There has been a global trend in which pubertal development has been accelerated since the mid-1900s, although the pubertal timing and tempo varied by race and ethnicity [4]. However, after the early 2000s, epidemiologic studies suggested that the pubertal timing and specific age at menarche in girls stabilized in several European nations [59]. In the US, despite the fact that the age of breast development among girls had decreased significantly over the past half-century, the age at menarche had decreased by only 2.5 to 4 months over a similar period, indicating that the advancement of pubertal onset in the US population is not accompanied by HPG axis activation [6]. On the other hand, a recent large population-based study indicated that the age of menarche has declined by approximately five months over the last 15 years in Korean girls, which is a much more significant change as compared to other Western countries [10]. This trend of accelerated pubertal development in adolescents was also observed in several countries, including Korea, Sweden, and Denmark, not just in girls but also in boys [1114].

Few studies have been conducted to examine the prevalence of precocious puberty worldwide, as compared to several studies on normal pubertal timing and its secular changes among adolescents. Studies in Spain [15], Denmark [16], and Korea have reported an increase in CPP incidence. In prior research, we demonstrated that the incidence of CPP among Korean children aged less than 8 (in girls) or 9 (in boys) rose almost 15-fold between 2004 and 2010 [11]. A follow-up study from another group indicated that the increase in Korean CPP incidence was approximately 5-fold in girls and 9-fold in boys for the pediatric population aged less than 9 (in girls) or 10 years (in boys) between 2008 and 2014 [17]. Identifying the long-term trends in overall CPP cases under GnRHa treatment in the real world is essential to estimate the medical and societal burden of CPP. However, given the accelerating pubertal tempo worldwide, it is particularly crucial to evaluate CPP trends by age group in order to predict future implications on public health and to make medical decisions based on treatment targets.

In this study, we aimed to examine the most up-to-date incidences of CPP in Korea and to determine if there was a difference in CPP trends based on sex and age group.

Materials and methods

Subjects

Study samples.

The vast majority of South Korean citizens (97%) are registered with a National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and are offered insurance coverage for their medical expenses. Korean patients’ diagnoses from hospitals are recorded using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) coding system for health insurance claims. The Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) performs reviews of medical documentation for all NHIS-sponsored medical expenses to monitor the adequacy of diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, HIRA data provides a credible source of information for monitoring the incidence and prevalence of uncommon illnesses in the Korean population [18].

The HIRA allows insurance claims for GnRHa treatment only if a diagnosis of CPP is confirmed in accordance with the Korean clinical guidelines for CPP [19]: 1) an emergence of secondary sexual characteristics before age 8 in girls (Breast Tanner stage 2) and before age 9 in boys (Genitalia Tanner 2 stage), 2) advancement of bone age and acceleration of growth, and 3) a pubertal response (a peak luteinizing hormone level ≥ 5 IU/L) after a GnRH stimulation test. Of note, the HIRA sets an upper age limit at which it allows insurance claims for GnRHa therapy, which is 9 years of age in girls and 10 years in boys, to consider a lag period between the first detection of pubertal signs and diagnosis by a physician. To estimate the incidence of CPP in this study, we included CPP children (girls aged <9, boys aged <10) who registered with an ICD-10 diagnostic code for precocious puberty (E22.9 or E30.1) at the HIRA database as starting GnRHa treatment for the first time between January 1, 2008, and November 30, 2020. Due to the method used in this study to define CPP cases, it is important to note that the number of CPP cases in this study is not the direct number of cases determined from medical records, including medical histories and laboratory data, but a proxy number of CPP cases. Since the NHIS covers GnRHa treatment claims in CPP girls under the age of 12 and in CPP boys under the age of 13, we calculated prevalence by including CPP patients who had received GnRHa therapy within these age limits. Both the incidence and prevalence were determined in terms of units per 100,000 people. Throughout the study period, neither the Korean guidelines for CPP diagnosis nor the HIRA practice for GnRHa insurance coverage changed [19].

The Institutional Review Board at Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital waived their review board’s approval requirement for this study (approval number: SGPAIK2021-07-001), because the HIRA dataset complies with South Korea’s Bioethics and Safety Act by using anonymous identifying codes to protect personal information. No informed consent was necessary.

Incidence and prevalence calculations.

The incidence rate was estimated by taking the number of population at risk in accordance with the census in each calendar year, sex, and age as denominators and the number of CPP patients who first started GnRHa treatment in each calendar year, sex, and age as numerators. The number of at-risk population was collected from the National Institute of Statistics of Korea [20]. The prevalence was also calculated using the number of populations at risk in each calendar year, sex, and age as denominators and the number of CPP patients receiving GnRHa treatment in each calendar year, sex, and age as the numerator. 95% confidence intervals of incidence and prevalence estimates were generated from the asymptotic convergence of incidence estimates to the normal distribution under the assumption that the number of CPP follows the Poisson distribution. A generalized linear model (GLM) with Poisson distribution was used to evaluate the relationship of year, sex, and age with the incidence rate of CPP. All statistical data were analyzed using R 4.0.2 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and a two-tailed test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The incidence of central precocious puberty

A total of 6,906 boys aged 0–9 years and 126,377 girls aged 0–8 years were diagnosed with CPP between 2008 and 2020, and the incidence of CPP was 489.3 per 100,000 girls and 22.4 per 100,000 boys (Table 1). The annual incidence of CPP among Korean children by sex and diagnostic age cutoffs is shown in Fig 1. The annual incidence of CPP among boys grew by 83.3 times (from 1.2 to 100 per 100,000 persons), while the incidence among girls increased by 15.9 times (from 88.9 to 1414.7 per 100,000 persons). When a stricter diagnostic age cutoff (under 8 and 9 years of age for girls and boys, respectively) was implemented, similar but rather gradual trends were observed, with a 49.5-fold rise in the annual incidence of CPP in boys from 0.4 to 19.8 per 100,000 and a 12-fold increase in girls from 15.4 to 187.7 per 100,000.

thumbnail
Fig 1. The annual incidence of central precocious puberty.

The error bars show the 95 percent confidence intervals for the incidence estimates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283510.g001

thumbnail
Table 1. The annual incidence (95% confidence interval) of central precocious puberty per calendar year.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283510.t001

Age-specific incidence of central precocious puberty

Fig 2 and S1 Table show the annual incidence of CPP based on sex and age at diagnosis. The age-specific annual incidence of CPP increased significantly in all age groups, with the exception of boys aged 5 years and girls aged 0–3 years. In 2020, the incidence of CPP was greatest among 9-year-old boys and 8-year-old girls at 705.2 and 7,967.3 per 100,000 individuals, respectively (Fig 2, S1 Table). Table 2 illustrates the estimated annual change in central precocious puberty incidence rates by sex and age group. CPP incidence increased by 135.8% per year in boys and 118.5% per year in girls between 2008 and 2020. The age-specific annual incidence of CPP increased considerably with older age groups, with the highest rise occurring in 8-year-old boys (138.9%) and in 8-year-old girls (118.9%).

thumbnail
Fig 2. The annual incidence of central precocious puberty according to sex and age at diagnosis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283510.g002

thumbnail
Table 2. The estimated change of central precocious puberty incidence rates per year (IRR and 95% CI) between 2008 and 2020 based on sex and age group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283510.t002

Fig 3 depicts the age distribution of CPP cases according to sex and calendar year. Between 2008 and 2013, the proportion of 8-year-old CPP girls increased from 66.9% to 78.4%; however, this proportion remained consistent after 2013. Similarly, the proportion of CPP boys aged 9 years increased from 69.7% to 86.8% between 2008 and 2013, but the proportion of CPP cases based on age remained stable after 2013.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Age distribution of central precocious puberty patients according to sex and calendar year.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283510.g003

The prevalence of CPP

The annual prevalence of CPP based on sex, calendar year, and two diagnostic age limits is shown in Table 3 and Fig 4. Between 2008 and 2020, the overall prevalence of CPP was 6.8 per 100,000 boys and 250.6 per 100,000 girls. Similar to the trend in incidence, the prevalence of CPP had increased annually and reached 28.0 per 100,000 boys and 657.2 per 100,000 girls by 2020. Between 2008 and 2013, the CPP prevalence rose more sharply than between 2013 and 2020. CPP prevalence increased 31.1 times in boys over 13 years, while it grew 20.3 times in girls. It increases more among boys than girls, similar to the incidence rate (Fig 4).

thumbnail
Fig 4. The annual prevalence of central precocious puberty according to sex, calendar year, and two diagnostic age limits.

The error bars show the 95 percent confidence intervals for the prevalence estimates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283510.g004

thumbnail
Table 3. The prevalence (95% confidence interval) of central precocious puberty according to the sex, calendar year, and two diagnostic age limits.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283510.t003

Discussion

In this study, we found that Korean CPP incidence has accelerated in the past 13 years. The annual incidence of CPP increased by 83.3 times in boys (from 1.2 to 100 per 100,000 persons) and by 15.9 times in girls (from 88.9 to 1,144.7 per 100,000 persons), substantially more in older children than in younger children; the incidence of CPP increased most remarkably in boys and girls aged 8 years. Since CPP incidences increased across all age groups, the age distribution of CPP incidence remained constant after 2013. The prevalence of CPP followed a similar pattern to the incidence.

Precocious puberty is conventionally defined as the development of secondary sexual characteristics in girls and boys before the age of 8 and 9 years, respectively, in most countries. This criterion was established based on the old articles on the age of pubertal events from the 1940s [21]. In 1997, in response to the concern that this criterion might be outdated, large-scale national surveys on the pubertal age were conducted in the US [22]. These studies indicated that the mean age of pubertal onset in girls had been advanced as compared to prior studies (9.96 ± 1.82 years in white girls, 8.87 ± 1.93 years in African-American girls). Accordingly, the age of 7 years for white girls and 6 years for African-American girls has been proposed to define precocious puberty [23], assuming no symptoms or signs of a central nervous system disorder or other concurrent illnesses that could also contribute to sexual precocity. However, the conventional diagnostic age limit is still used in the majority of studies on precocious puberty, mainly due to the absence of nationally representative survey data on pubertal development. Furthermore, because of the delay between the initial detection of pubertal development and the clinically verified diagnosis of precocious puberty, several studies and clinicians use the age of under 9 years for girls and under 10 years for boys as a diagnostic age limit for precocious puberty [16,17,2426].

There have been few studies on the national incidence of CPP. In a prior study, we reported a substantial increase in CPP incidence among Korean girls from 3.3 to 50.4 per 100,000 persons between 2004 and 2010 using the HIRA database [11]. A Spanish study conducted between 2000 and 2009 using clinical data from pediatric endocrinology units also showed an increasing trend of CPP among girls, but the overall incidence of Korean CPP between 2004 and 2010 was more than 20 times higher compared with Spanish CPP incidence between 1997 and 2009 (23.3 vs. 1.1 per 100,000 persons) [15]. Among Korean boys, between 2004 and 2010 the increase in CPP incidence was gradual, from 0.3 to 1.2 per 100,000 boys, and the increment was modest among girls aged < 6 years and boys aged < 7 years. In this study, we showed that the increasing secular trend in Korean CPP was accelerated over the last 13 years in both sexes and that the incidence rise was larger in boys than in girls, contrary to our earlier findings. Recently, a Danish study using national patient registry data likewise reported that the CPP incidence increased more rapidly in boys (15-fold) than in girls (6-fold) between 1998 and 2017, although the rates of CPP increase in our study were 5 to 9 times higher than those reported in Denmark in 2017 [16].

No research has previously explored the trend in CPP incidence by age in detail. In this study, we observed that CPP incidence has grown across almost all age groups. This observation and our recent report on a significant decrease in menarche age in Korean girls [10] support the notion that activation of the HPG axis is associated with earlier pubertal onset in Korean girls. The earlier onset of puberty among Korean children differs from that of US children, in whom pubertal onset was accelerated but not accompanied by HPG axis activation [24,27], the age at menarche remained constant, and the tempo of puberty was slowed [28]. We hypothesize that changes in CPP incidences over the last decade could be attributed to a general shift to the left in pubertal onset and tempo rather than an increase in pathological CPP [29], which is supported by the fact that CPP incidences have increased over the majority of age groups, with the incidence among 8-year-old girls reaching 7.96% in 2020.

Another important finding in our study is that GnRH agonist treatment starting at the age of 8 accounts for 75 to 90% of all cases. Despite there being no conclusive evidence that GnRHa treatment beyond the age of 7 years improves females’ adult height [3032], GnRHa treatment has been initiated in many children ≥ 8 years old with CPP in Korea, likely reflecting severe parental concerns regarding premature menarche and children’s psychosocial health [33]. Other possible explanations might be vigorous marketing by GnRHa pharmaceutical companies, high accessibility to the healthcare system, and relatively affordable medical costs in Korea [33,34]. According to the Korean Pediatric Endocrinology society’s clinical guidelines, clinicians are recommended to regularly follow up on patients suspected to have CPP for at least 3–4 months to confirm if their symptoms and signs are rapidly progressing before they start GnRHa treatment [19]. Through this process, it is possible to prevent non-progressive CPP patients who do not need treatment from starting treatment. Additionally, it is necessary to establish the normative data of pubertal onset and tempo in Korean children, which estimated to have been accelerated in the last 20 years among the entire population, and to educate physicians and parents to improve their understanding of the normative data in Korea.

We found that the proportions of 8-year-old CPP girls and 9-year-old CPP boys increased considerably between 2009 and 2013; however, this trend halted after 2013. We previously discovered that the incidence of CPP in Korea increased significantly between 2004 and 2010, but primarily among children over the age of six [11]. We had hypothesized that a rise in parental knowledge of CPP, which led to an increase in treatment, was one of the plausible causes for this trend. If parental knowledge was the key reason for the trends in rising Korean CPP incidence in this study, the proportion of CPP children aged 8–9 years should have continuously increased, whereas CPP incidence among children aged 6 would have shown just a modest increase. In light of our new results on the age-specific incidence and proportions of CPP, parental awareness and CPP screening practices may have contributed to the early rise in CPP incidence prior to 2013, although the impact may have peaked after 2013. A trend toward earlier activation of the HPG axis in the overall Korean population may account for our recent results.

It is unclear why the onset of puberty among Korean children is accelerating. Growing research suggests that the rising prevalence of childhood obesity is a key factor in the secular trend toward earlier puberty. Several population-based longitudinal studies suggested that earlier pubertal maturation might be linked with higher adiposity in both boys and girls from many countries, including Korea [35]. The average age of menarche among Korean girls has been reduced from 13.0 years old to 12.6 years old over the last decade, and this trend was particularly pronounced in girls with overweight. Although the exact mechanisms remain to be elucidated, obesity-related hormonal changes including leptin and insulin resistance are speculated to contribute to early puberty [35]. It has been observed that obesity-related increases in circulating leptin activate hypothalamic Kiss 1 expression, which regulates GnRH pulse production and puberty onset [36]. Obesity-induced hyperinsulinemia was also shown to induce earlier pubertal onset by increasing androgen synthesis from the ovary and adrenal glands and by increasing the bioavailability of sex steroid hormones [35,37,38]. The prevalence of overweight/obesity in Korean children has rapidly increased from 15.2% to 23.7% between 2007 and 2017, and was higher in boys than in girls [39]. More pronounced increasing trends of overweight and obesity prevalence in boys compared with girls might partly explain why CPP incidence in boys has increased more rapidly than girls among Korean children. Although the findings are inconsistent, studies have also shown that low birth weight and preterm birth are associated with a faster pubertal onset or tempo than peers, especially when obesity is accompanied during childhood [40]. This phenomenon can be partly explained by increased insulin resistance in children born with low birth weight and preterm birth [41]. Between 1993 and 2016, the percentage of newborns born in Korea with low birth weight and preterm birth has increased approximately two to three times [42]. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) is another frequently stated explanation for earlier pubertal onset. The relationship between EDC exposure and puberty has been explored for phenols and phthalates or polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), although the findings of those studies have been inconsistent [43]. In Korea, cross-sectional studies reported significant associations between phthalate exposure and earlier menarche / central precocious puberty in girls, as well as between air pollution and earlier menarche; however, further studies are needed to confirm EDC exposure has contributed to the rapid increase in Korean CPP [4446]. Furthermore, there has been a marked increase in psychological distress, a rise in screen time, a decrease in physical activity, and an increase in protein intake over the previous decades among Korean children [47,48], all of which may have influenced the advancement of pubertal tempo. However, since this was a registry-based study, we were unable to investigate the potential factors due to lack of access to individual medical records.

There are several limitations to this study. First, the etiology and epidemiologic risk factors could not be investigated since detailed medical information on variables associated with CPP, such as obesity status, family history of pubertal milestones, and the presence of organic diseases, was not included in the HIRA database. Second, patients who were diagnosed with CPP but did not receive GnRHa treatment may have been excluded in this study, which may have affected the accuracy of our study findings. Third, given that the precise dates of the pubertal onset in CPP cases were not recorded in the HIRA database, there is a possibility of overestimation of the CPP incidence, particularly among girls aged 8 years and boys aged 9 years. Lastly, we were not able to exclude unsustained CPP cases that began unnecessary GnRHa treatment. According to clinical guidelines, GnRHa treatment is not recommended for individuals with unsustained CPP that might not be linked with early menarche and short adult height.

In conclusion, our research revealed that the reported increase in CPP incidence in Korea that began in early 2000 has continued through 2020. This phenomenon was ubiquitous across all age groups and both sexes, and was not confined to older children or girls. This suggests that the onset of puberty among the general population in Korea is shifting to the left. Further research is needed to identify the precise causes of accelerated puberty onset and to establish a new pubertal timing reference in Korea.

Supporting information

S1 Table. The annual incidence of central precocious puberty according to the sex and age at diagnosis.

New cases of central precocious puberty were defined as those children (boys aged 0–9 years and girls aged 0–8 years) who claimed gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment for the first time to Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283510.s001

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the Korean Health Insurance Review Agency for allowing us to use the data.

References

  1. 1. Rosenfield RL, Cooke DW, Radovick S. Puberty in the female and its disorders. In: Sperling M. Sperling Pediatric Endocrinology. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2021. p. 528–626.
  2. 2. MD RMK, MD JWSG, MD NJB, Shah Samir S. MD M, Robert C., et al. Disorders of pubertal development. In: Kliegman R, Stanton B, W. SGJ, Schor NF, Behrman RE, Nelson WE. Nelson textbook of pediatrics. e1. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020. pp. 2899–2912.
  3. 3. Melmed Shlomo MBChBM, Auchus Richard J MD P, MD ABG, Koenig Ronald J. MD P, MD CJR. Physiology and disorders of puberty. In: Melmed S, Koenig RJ, Rosen CJ, Auchus RJ, Goldfine AB. Williams Textbook of Endocrinology. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020. p. 1023–1164.
  4. 4. Eckert-Lind C, Busch AS, Petersen JH, Biro FM, Butler G, Bräuner EV, et al. Worldwide secular trends in age at pubertal onset assessed by breast development among girls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174: e195881. pmid:32040143
  5. 5. Tanner JM. Trend towards earlier menarche in London, Olso, Copenhagen, the Netherlands and Hungary. Nature. 1973;243: 95–96. pmid:4706636
  6. 6. Biro FM, Pajak A, Wolff MS, Pinney SM, Windham GC, Galvez MP, et al. age of menarche in a longitudinal US cohort. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018;31: 339–345. pmid:29758276
  7. 7. Talma H, Schönbeck Y, van Dommelen P, Bakker B, van Buuren S, Hirasing RA. Trends in menarcheal age between 1955 and 2009 in the Netherlands. PLOS ONE. 2013;8: e60056. pmid:23579990
  8. 8. Rigon F, Bianchin L, Bernasconi S, Bona G, Bozzola M, Buzi F, et al. Update on age at menarche in Italy: toward the leveling off of the secular trend. J Adolesc Health. 2010;46: 238–244. pmid:20159500
  9. 9. Papadimitriou A, Fytanidis G, Douros K, Bakoula C, Nicolaidou P, Fretzayas A. Age at menarche in contemporary Greek girls: evidence for levelling‐off of the secular trend. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97: 812–815. pmid:18460111
  10. 10. Seo MY, Kim SH, Juul A, Park MJ. Trend of menarcheal age among Korean girls. J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35: e406. pmid:33350182
  11. 11. Kim SH, Huh K, Won S, Lee KW, Park MJ. A significant increase in the incidence of central precocious puberty among Korean girls from 2004 to 2010. PLOS ONE. 2015;10: e0141844. pmid:26539988
  12. 12. Ohlsson C, Bygdell M, Celind J, Sondén A, Tidblad A, Sävendahl L, et al. Secular trends in pubertal growth acceleration in Swedish boys born from 1947 to 1996. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173: 860–865. pmid:31329245
  13. 13. Sørensen K, Aksglaede L, Petersen JH, Juul A. Recent changes in pubertal timing in healthy Danish boys: associations with body mass index. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95: 263–270. pmid:19926714
  14. 14. Liu YX, Wikland KA, Karlberg J. New reference for the age at childhood onset of growth and secular trend in the timing of puberty in Swedish. Acta Paediatr. 2000;89: 637–643. pmid:10914954
  15. 15. Soriano-Guillén L, Corripio R, Labarta JI, Cañete R, Castro-Feijóo L, Espino R, et al. Central precocious puberty in children living in Spain: incidence, prevalence, and influence of adoption and immigration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95: 4305–4313. pmid:20554707
  16. 16. Bräuner EV, Busch AS, Eckert-Lind C, Koch T, Hickey M, Juul A. Trends in the incidence of central precocious puberty and normal variant puberty Among children in Denmark, 1998 to 2017. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3: e2015665. pmid:33044548
  17. 17. Kim YJ, Kwon A, Jung MK, Kim KE, Suh J, Chae HW, et al. incidence and prevalence of central precocious puberty in Korea: an epidemiologic study based on a national database. J Pediatr. 2019;208: 221–228. pmid:30857777
  18. 18. Kyoung DS, Kim HS. Understanding and utilizing claim data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and Health Insurance Review & Assessment (HIRA) database for research. J Lipid Atheroscler. 2022;11: 103–10.
  19. 19. The Korean Society of Pediatric Endocrinology. The Korean Society of Pediatric Endocrinology’s Clinical Guideline for the Management of Precocious Puberty. The Korean Society of Pediatric Endocrinology; Seoul, Korea: 2022
  20. 20. Korean Statistical Information Service. [Cited 2022 August 5]. Available from: https://kosis.kr/eng/statisticsList/statisticsListIndex.do?menuId=M_01_01&vwcd=MT_ETITLE&parmTabId=M_01_01 Statistics Korea.
  21. 21. Herman‐Giddens ME. Recent data on pubertal milestones in United States children: the secular trend toward earlier development. Int J Androl. 2006;29: 241–6; discussion 286. pmid:16466545
  22. 22. Herman-Giddens ME, Slora EJ, Wasserman RC, Bourdony CJ, Bhapkar MV, Koch GG, et al. Secondary sexual characteristics and menses in young girls seen in office practice: a study from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings network. Pediatrics. 1997;99: 505–512. pmid:9093289
  23. 23. Kaplowitz PB, Oberfield SE. Reexamination of the age limit for defining when puberty is precocious in girls in the United States: implications for evaluation and treatment. Drug and Therapeutics and Executive Committees of the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society. Pediatrics. 1999;104: 936–941. pmid:10506238
  24. 24. Giabicani E, Allali S, Durand A, Sommet J, Couto-Silva AC, Brauner R. Presentation of 493 consecutive girls with idiopathic central precocious puberty: a single-center study. PLOS ONE. 2013;8: e70931. pmid:23936254
  25. 25. Mogensen SS, Aksglaede L, Mouritsen A, Sørensen K, Main KM, Gideon P, et al. Diagnostic work-up of 449 consecutive girls who were referred to be evaluated for precocious puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96: 1393–1401. pmid:21346077
  26. 26. Xhrouet‐Heinrichs D, Lagrou K, Heinrichs C, Craen M, Dooms L, Malvaux P, et al. Longitudinal study of behavioral and affective patterns in girls with central precocious puberty during long-acting triptorelin therapy. Acta Paediatr. 1997;86: 808–815. pmid:9307158
  27. 27. Aksglaede L, Sørensen K, Petersen JH, Skakkebaek NE, Juul A. Recent decline in age at breast development: the Copenhagen Puberty Study. Pediatrics. 2009;123: e932–e939. pmid:19403485
  28. 28. Midyett LK, Moore WV, Jacobson JD. Are pubertal changes in girls before age 8 benign? Pediatrics. 2003;111: 47–51. pmid:12509553
  29. 29. Parent AS, Teilmann G, Juul A, Skakkebaek NE, Toppari J, Bourguignon JP. The timing of normal puberty and the age limits of sexual precocity: variations around the world, secular trends, and changes after migration. Endocr Rev. 2003;24: 668–693. pmid:14570750
  30. 30. Bangalore Krishna KB, Fuqua JS, Rogol AD, Klein KO, Popovic J, Houk CP, et al. Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs in children: update by an international consortium. Horm Res Paediatr. 2019;91: 357–372. pmid:31319416
  31. 31. Lazar L, Kauli R, Pertzelan A, Phillip M. Gonadotropin-suppressive therapy in girls with early and fast puberty affects the pace of puberty but not total pubertal growth or final height. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87: 2090–2094. pmid:11994346
  32. 32. Franzini IA, Yamamoto FM, Bolfi F, Antonini SR, Nunes-Nogueira VS. GnRH analog is ineffective in increasing adult height in girls with puberty onset after 7 years of age: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;179: 381–390. pmid:30324797
  33. 33. Eugster EA. Treatment of central precocious puberty. J Endocr Soc. 2019;3: 965–72. pmid:31041427
  34. 34. Park M, Youn HM, Park EC. Position value for relative comparison of healthcare status of Korea in 2019: Comparison with countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Health Policy and Management. 2022;32: 113–121.
  35. 35. Kim SH, Park MJ. Childhood obesity and pubertal development. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2012;15: 151–159.
  36. 36. Shi L, Jiang Z, Zhang L. Childhood obesity and central precocious puberty. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13: 1056871. pmid:36465655
  37. 37. de Ridder CM, Thijssen JH, Bruning PF, Van den Brande JL, Zonderland ML, Erich WB. Body fat mass, body fat distribution, and pubertal development: a longitudinal study of physical and hormonal sexual maturation of girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;75: 442–446. pmid:1639945
  38. 38. Ahmed ML, Ong KK, Dunger DB. Childhood obesity and the timing of puberty. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2009;20: 237–242. pmid:19541497
  39. 39. Kim JH, Moon JS. Secular trends in pediatric overweight and obesity in Korea. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2020;29: 12–17. pmid:32188238
  40. 40. Deng X, Li W, Luo Y, Liu S, Wen Y, Liu Q. Association between small fetuses and puberty timing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14: 1377. pmid:29137163
  41. 41. Roth CL, DiVall S. Consequences of early life programing by genetic and environmental influences: A synthesis Regarding pubertal timing. Endocr Dev. 2016;29: 134–152. pmid:26680576
  42. 42. Kim HE, Song IG, Chung SH, Choi YS, Bae CW. Trends in birth weight and the incidence of low birth weight and advanced maternal age in Korea between 1993 and 2016. J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34: e34. pmid:30686955
  43. 43. Greenspan LC, Lee MM. Endocrine disrupters and pubertal timing. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2018;25: 49–54. pmid:29135489
  44. 44. Park O, Park JT, Chi Y, Kwak K. Association of phthalates and early menarche in Korean adolescent girls from Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KoNEHS) 2015–2017. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2021;33: e4. pmid:34754465
  45. 45. Lee MS, Lee GM, Ko CW, Moon JE. Precocious puberty in Korean girls with and without exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in toy slime: a comparative analysis. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021;21: 190. pmid:34535098
  46. 46. Jung EM, Kim HS, Park H, Ye S, Lee D, Ha EH. Does exposure to PM(10) decrease age at menarche? Environ Int. 2018;117: 16–21. pmid:29704753
  47. 47. Kim M. The subjective well-being of Korean children and its policy implications. Health and welfare policy forum [Internet]. 2015;2015: 14–26.
  48. 48. Chae J, Seo MY, Kim SH, Park MJ. Trends and risk factors of metabolic syndrome among Korean adolescents, 2007 to 2018. Diabetes Metab J. 2021;45: 880–889. pmid:34225415